The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997-09-09; City Council; 14341; RESPONSE TO THE GRAND JURY'S 1996-1997 FINAL REPORT1 -I RESPONSE TO THE GRAND JURY’S 1996-97 FINAL REPORT L xpenditures of staff time to research and prepare an appropriate I Q 0 fsh: th !? 2 S 0 .- -w 2 s - .- 0 S 3 c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 io 1 1 12 am suub 252 13 ao8 14 0u$j iUU zo-is acgg 0DU 15 o aazo z -I O- 16 OOQ p; l7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 :;$? FA zum 0 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 97-598 A RESOLUTiON OF THE CIlY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RESPONSE TO THE GRAND JURY’S 1996-97 FINAL REPORT WHEREAS, the Grand Jury issued two Findings and Recommendai in its 1996-97 Final Report concluding that the Redevelopment Agency should au its Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund; and WHEREAS, the Grand Jury also found that the Redevelopment Agf should spend monies from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund only on planning and administrative expenses that are necessary for and not disproportic to the actual amount of money spent to develop affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that these recommendations warranted as shown on its response to the presiding judge, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council approves of the response to the presiding of the San Diego Superior Court (Exhibit A). . Ill Ill Ill Ill /I/ I < * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ’’ 12 13 om $e& an8 owg ;%E zgg E:$ ZZ% YUU so55 l4 OcGn& 9 ‘e- 15 a>m< ZWVJc) uu%n 0 a0-J oZJ - 16 17 GO 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 m 0 PAXED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting d the Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the 9th day of September 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin, NOES: None ABSENT: None .. ATTEST: UTE RANZ, City Clerk KAREN??K%TZ, gistant City Clerk / I + September 9, 1997 The Honorable William J. Howatt, Jr. Presiding Judge Superior Court of the State of California County of San Diego 220 West Broadway P. 0. Box 2724 San Diego, California 921 12-2720 Hon. William J. Howatt: The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has carefully reviewed and considered the Si Diego County Grand Jury 1996-97 Final Report (June 27, 1997) and respectfu submits its response as required by Penal Code section 933(c) and as furth specifically addressed in Penal Code section 933.05. The Final Report makes two “findings and recommendations” with respect to t Redevelopment Agency of the City of Carisbad which require a response. Finding $ 23 concludes basically that there existed an “excess surplus” of funds as of July 1994 and the second, Finding 97-25, finds that the amount of money expended frc the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (hereinafter “LMIHF”) for planning E general administrative activities is disproportionate to the amount actually spent for costs of production, improvement or preservation of that housing. ~ FINDING 97-23: This finding is based on the Grand Jury’s determination that at the end of fiscal y 1993-94, the unexpended and unencumbered balance in the LMIHF was $1,418,5 which exceeds $1,302,719, the aggregate amount deposited during the preceding 1 years, and an Excess Surplus of $1 15,855 existed. RESPONSE: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Carlsbad disagrees with the underlying bl for the Grand Jury’s Finding and Recommendation. At the end of fiscal year 1993 the unexpended and unencumbered balance in the LMIHF was $893,086 (which is than $1,302,719, the aggregate amount deposited during the preceding four yel 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad. CA 92008-1 989 (760) 434-2830 FAX (760) 720- e 0 See Redevelopment Agency’s “Deposits and Expenditures Report” attached hereto i Exhibit A. Therefore, no excess surplus existed and the Board of Directors will nl implement Recommendation 97-23 because it is not warranted or is not reasonable i explained below in accordance with Penal Code section 933.05(4). FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION 97-25: This Finding is based on the Grand Jury’s determination that the amount of mone expended from the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency LMIHF for planning and gener administrative activities is 100% of the amount spent for the costs of housir production. RESPONSE: The Redevelopment Agency disagrees with the underlying basis for the Grand Jur Finding and Recommendation. During the five year period ending June 30, 1996, t amount of money expended from the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency LMIHF planning and general administrative activities was approximately 10% of the to expenditure from this Fund. (See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated reference). The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City Carlsbad believes that the amounts expended for planning and general administrat activities in the range of IO-20% are not “disproportionate” (as allowed by federal I2 and reasonable under the circumstances, and will not implement Recommendation ! 25 because it is not warranted or is not reasonable as further explained below accordance with Penal Code section 933.05. By comparison, the Commur Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) regulations authorize up to 20% for administer costs for CDBG programs. The Redevelopment Agency and the City of Carlsbad h; implemented programs and policies to provide housing for all economic segments oi community. It has expended appropriate amounts from the LMIHF to achieve thr goals and objectives which are set forth in its Housing Element to the General PI Section 4 of the Housing Element of the General Plan, which was approved by the ( Council on September 6, 1994 by Resolution No. 94-246, sets fodh the go objectives, policies and programs of the City and Redevelopment Agency. As state( that report: “Taken together these four components (goals, objectives, policies and programs) comprise a very ambitious, broad-based program for the provision of shelter throughout the City. Via this element the City demonstrates its understanding of the magnitude of the housing problem, as well as its understanding of the need for a substantial commitment of City resources to providing the necessary solutions to this problem. The goals, objectives, policies and programs section of this element contains the actions the City of Carlsbad will .take to 2 e 0 promote housing and shelter opportunities for all segments of the community. ...” (Copy attached as Exhibit 8). The City of Carlsbad together with the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency has mac great strides in its efforts to produce affordable housing. With the use of tt Redevelopment Agency’s LMIHF Carlsbad realized the construction of a $34 millic 344-apartment unit project which has 1, 2, 3 and 4 bedroom units affordable households at 50-60% of the San Diego County median income. The City of Carlsb: was recently recognized by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developme as a city whose program should be a model to others in the development of affordab housing. The Redevelopment Agency has worked together with the City of Carlsbad combine funding sources and develop affordable housing projects of high quality. Tt Redevelopment Agency together with the City of Carlsbad has been able substantially leverage its funds to gain significant outside resources (including t credits and private contributions) for Villa Loma and the MAAC/Laurel Tree Projec The beautiful Villa Loma project would not have been constructed if the LMIHF had n been used. The creativity and perhaps unique funding mechanisms may have causi some existing confusion when studied by the Grand Jury leading to its Finding 97-23. STATE OF CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEP DEPARTMENT HOUSING REPORT AND COMPLAINANTS ALLEGATIONS The Report prepared and distributed by the state Department of Housing a Community Development entitled “Redevelopment Housing Activities in Califorr Fiscal Year 1994-95” does not accurately reflect all of the expenditures, encumbranc or disbursements of the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency. The state Report includ only those dollar figures which were reported as “expenditures” which relate to planni and administrative costs of the Agency. The Carlsbad Redevelopment Agent however, provides its financial assistance through loans to a project (e.g., Villa Lon rather than grants. This results in a skewed accounting which does not accuratc reflect the true expenditures from this fund. As can be seen in Exhibit A, over a fi year period, the amount spent on administration was only approximately 10% of t total expenditures from the LMIHF (including expenditures that were structured loans). Even if one adjusts the Agency’s expenditures over this period by subtract1 its loans, the amount spent on administration would be only approximately 20% of 1 total adjusted expenditures. LOAN RECEIVABLES V. EXPENDITURES Although certain accounting principles do not allow the Redevelopment Agency report its land acquisition loan or project construction loans as “expenditures”, the fur have indeed been disbursed and will not be available for reuse until repaid in the dist future. Attached is a copy of the 1993-94 and 1994-95 Annual Reports presentec the state regarding the use of the LMIHF. Although required by the department, 1 report does not provide a complete picture of the revenue to and from the fund. - history of expenditures from the LMIHF is more accurately portrayed in the previoi submitted exhibit. This exhibit reflects the figures reported in the City accounts, L adjustments to provide additional information on reimbursements from other funds i 3 8 0 a total expenses related to loans disbursed by the Redevelopment Agency. The rep0 again confirms that the Redevelopment Agency had no excess surplus as of June 31 1994. COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF AGENCY LMIHF EXPENDITURES The total deposits (which included interest and other revenue) to the Housing Fund i of June 30, 1994 amount to $3,856,965. The total expenses and encumbrances as that date were $2,963,879. The unencumbered/unexpended balance as of June 31 1994 was $893,086, which is less than the total amount of tax increment deposite ($1,302,719) to the LMIHF in the prior four years. The expenditures/encumbrance included $2 million for the acquisition of the property for the Villa Loma project as 1 November 15, 1993 and a $500,000 financial assistance commitment for another 1: unit apartment project known as the Laurel Tree apartments. Ultimately, the Agency LMlHF expenditure for the acquisition of land for the Villa Loma project was reimburse through the Federal Community Development Block Grant program with a Section IC loan which the City agreed to repay in nine years with CDBG funds which a1 anticipated in future years. As required by law, these funds were re-deposited into tt LMIHF and are available and may be expended for new affordable housing projects. In November 1994 the City of Carlsbad afid the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agenc entered into agreements with the developers of the Villa Loma project, Bridge Housir Corporation, a well known non-profit affordable housing developer, to fur approximately $2.2 million in construction and permanent financing loans for tt project. These agreements clearly indicate that the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agenr together with the City of Carlsbad entered into contracts to finance the construction the Villa Loma affordable housing project with the funds from the Agency's LMlH These agreements record expenditures/loans which are consistent with applicab community redevelopment law. When the apartment project received approvals of i other financing, agreements with the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency and the City Carlsbad were executed. agreements are enclosed for your review. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS The cumulative amount of funds expended for administrative purposes as of June 3 1994 was $291,075. This represents only 9.8% of the expenditures/encumbrancc made as of that date from the LMIHF and only $604 per unit constructed or anticipatc to be constructed within approximately the next year. It is very important to note that extremely time-consuming to develop a successful affordable housing project a1 numerous staff hours are required to negotiate regulatory agreements, agree upon tt design of a project, obtain all the necessary discretionary approvals and implement I construction. Very few affordable housing projects are negotiated, documented ar developed in a one or two year period. Financial resources must be committed by redevelopment agency for staff costs and pre-development expenses an an annu basis even though the project may take three to four years to develop and no units a constructed within a single year. . Copies of the City Council and Redevelopment Agenc 4 m d The Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency believes that its general administrative COS^ . from the LMIHF are reasonable and necessary to produce affordable housing units. I the amount of administrative funds expended ($291,075) from the LMIHF is compare( to the total cost of the Villa Loma project ($34 million), the percentage of administrativt costs for the Agency is reduced to 0.8%. The total amount of administrativt expenditures from the LMIHF including anticipated future expenses is not significan when reviewed against the production of affordable housing units. It is important not that the administrative costs related to the provision of affordable housing both insid and outside the redevelopment area are supported by not only the LMlHF but also th general Redevelopment Agency budget, the CDBG program and the City’s Housin Trust Fund. The Community Redevelopment Law states that it is the intention of the Legislature thi the amount of money expended for planning and general administrative activities sh: not be disproportionate to the amount actually expended for the costs of productioi improvement or preservation of that housing. The Redevelopment Agency does n believe it is inconsistent with this statement of intent to measure administrati1 expenditures against production expenditures on the basis of a multi-year period. fact, the Redevelopment Law itself requires redevelopment agencies to plan thc affordable housing activities in five-year increments. (Cal. Health and Safety Code 33490(a)(2).) While there may be individual years during a five-year or other multi-ye in which administrative expenses exceed expenditures, it is our opinion that su expenditures do not violate the intent of the Legislature so long as the overall amount to the overall amount actually expended on affordable housing production. The Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency believes that the most important point related the noted administrative cost that the City and the Agency have realized a tremendc return on their direct investments of low and moderate income housing funds. This t been accomplished by the significant leveraging by the use of other public and priv monies. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, it is important to reiterate the following points regarding expenditL from the LMIHF: 0 The Redevelopment Agency has made good use of its LMIHF which have resultel LMIHF funds expended for planning and administrative activities is not disproportion? top quality affordable housing. 0 The Redevelopment Agency has used and will continue to use its funds in conjunction with the Federal CDBG funds, tax increment bond proceeds, state an federal tax credits, and private financing to ensure that quality affordable housing projects are constructed in Carlsbad. 5 3 e 0 The Redevelopment Agency’s administrative costs are reasonable in comparison to the number of units actually or anticipated to be produced. The leveraging of the LMIHF has resulted in significant accomplishments i indicated by the award the City of Carlsbad recently received from the United State Department of Housing and Urban Development. (See attached newspaper article Exhibit C). The City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency believe that the Gra Jury relied on reports from the State of California which did not accurately provide representation of the Redevelopment Agency’s LMIHF disbursements and fu balance. Certain accounting principles resulted in confusion as to haw the Agen expended its funds which should not detract from its history of accomplishments. As redevelopmefit law requires, the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency has been usi its LMIHF to produce affordable housing. While the Agency supports efforts to ensure that redevelopment agencies are spend their LMlHFs appropriately, we feel that the Grand Jury’s Findings i Recommendations are not warranted under the circumstances. The Carlst Redevelopment Agency staff will gladly appear before the Grand Jury in person answer any questions or provide further information on this issue. understanding that staff has not been given that opportunity to date. Redevelopment Agency was not aware of the final determination of the Grand Jury i the Report was distributed. If you or the Grand Jury would like additional informa regarding the above, please contact Mr. Raymond Patchett, City Manager, at 434-2t We appreciate the opportunity to submit our comments in response to the Grand Jc Findings and Recommendations and clarify our position on these important issues. It is Very truly yours, CLAUDE A. LEWIS Mayor enclosures c: Grand Jury City Council City Manager City Attorney Financial Management Director Community Development Director Special Redevelopment Counsel Wasserman 6 e .r--rCY e*te69*69e*t9*ew s 2 3 8 2 3. e 69 E $ '3 43 8 > e 0 E 0 m 0. U G e c 0, a w .- E U 4. g a I_ E ui m 3 c. 0 P r .- .4 L a g 3 E q P3 P 8 3% 7 8 2 8% -0- !$$ 6 E B g% P ln i! Cn'i $g tc 30 .E3 $81 u- Ag i3g 242 *gg a* 84 a g $ 2. !- & -$$E !g .3 8 $ .g 0- g s 58 w! 1 -E jj VI l- &N.W e- "2" +b.9 z R glarsO mm-2 s 2 . EL.rg ggmo EO Fig a q.&& ag 5 g S.p42g& $ 7 $8 O+j9'5te_1' igs gpaL ,ggEP$ $e: S*'aq{ I= - b$gzS -I- r gi && '0 9 li 2, -I jZ$bS! &q$$$Zt c?: 0 3 42Bk 'c. -0gx cp 0 %Ei . * c - % i.L oaooooo 0000000 g GX rn*nb+*a***-*n-e* 0 to ea 1111111*1 TL. s $ fi 3 !$-go-- gpm dab'" h m E=g gg gamz%gz E57 iij.>= v) 8% I! so7 6s c &EU.- cl 23 ge c 5 2.2,! =!i gar ~b+4A&**~u9~****aa P 0 ,acSuoc ingmmmm ,mmm% *$bFTv-v- 0000 0000 -1 oEa't3: .Fmmmw 3 gz i Z4d*j+ujGl 1 Ex ( A. FISCAL CAVEAT B. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, PROGRAMS The following section of the Housing Element sets out the city’s long-term housing goals and identifies a menu of shorter-term objectives, policy positions, and action programs which can be utilized to achieve these long-term goals. The Goals, Objectives, Policies and P Section of this Element contains the actions the Carlsbd ~11 take to promote housing and shelte tunities for all segments of the community. e , This section contains averall Goal sta city may take to meet those G&~, and progran e Taken together these four components @oals, Objectives to meet those Goals, Policies on posi are action stateiments. objectives, policies, and programs) comprise a very ambi- throughout the City. Via this element the City demon- strates its understanding of the magnitude of the housing problem, as well as its understanding of the need for a necessary solutions to the problem. I tious, broad-based program for the provision of shelter - There are six Goals stated in this Elemi ~~~l~ are articulatd as a gener$l “end con&tic not contain an action verb as they reflect a final s of what the City will hope to achieve. How the policies and -importantly - action progms. - substantial commitment of city resources to providing the merit", which mte a desired achievement. The ( Having demonstrated this understanding and hav- be achieved is e&blished via the subordbate ot - ing affirmed its commitment towards meeting the City’s housing needs, it is nevertheless incumbent on the City to acknowledge that the housing program is but one of alarge number of programs competing for the finite fiscal re- SOUrCeS Of the city. Because not all Of the following proposals are Precisely defined (requiring further study), somedepend upon the development ofnew fbnding sources which CUITently do not exkt (trust fund, in-lieU fees, etc.), and many will be implemented over a number Of years (years for which budget projections are not available as this element is being drafted), it is not possible to subject this program to strict budgetary scrutiny. In addition, there may be legal requirements affecting future encurn- braces of funds, as well as demands h other areas requirhgthe City to make difficult decisionson budgetary Priorities. sh$’ stated, while the city, in adopting this element, embraces the housing program contained in the fol~owbg section, it may or may not be possible to do frame envisioned by the program. - Under each Goal there are several Ot Objectives are more specific achievements the strive for to obtain the more broad based Go: Objective should address a particular ou&m& ing need that is identified in the previous setia Element. M~~ objectives establish numerical 1 be achieved in action programs, - e - a Each Objective will contain one or IT grams that will describe an action necessary to a Objective. fie Programs are briefly described 4 beimplementedoverthefiveyearperiodofthe Many of the programs are studies fiat wi comprehensive look at a certain aspects of ho may follow through with a more specific progr: the study indicate a plan ofaction should be rqu a close look at the impacts and implications 1 programs may bring about. - - - everything proposed within the program, within the time- Nothing in this observation should be construed to complexities of certain subjects it is importa - - to mean that the City has any diminished commitment or Under many Objectives, but not all, a diminished obligation to responding to Carlsbads hous- Policies. Policies are statements on position the .I ing needs. to implement an objective. Policies contair: - - - 1 - 1T R 'I. @ Housing .Element are important statements as they reflect POLICY 1.1 Conversions to condominiums of existing re1 units which contain households of low and model income may not be approved unlessfindings can be m that; the units will remain aflordable, and the City met its need for aflordable housing stock.for lower the City's official position on a matter. Future develop- ment must be consistent with these policies. Following each program are line items: ~ FUNDING: bdicates the source of funds to be used for each program. Where a finding source indicates General Fund it is to mean that the program uses existing staff or resources and is funded by the General Fund. Some Funding source indicate the use of State, or Federal hds. Where these funds might become unavailable, inpiementation of these programs may not be possible. moderate income groups, PROGRAM 1.1 Develop a program to restrict condominium I version when such conversions would reduce the nun oflow or moderate income housing units available thra out the city. This program may require apartment o who are undertaking the conversion to pay a fee tl City. These fhds would be used to mitigate the im] of the loss of these rental units from the City's hoi stock to low and moderate income households. I LEAD AGENCY: indicates the agency, depart- iment or authority responsible for the program. When imore than one agency is listed it is ajoint or cooperative (effort. The Housing Authority means the City Council authority over any housing program, the administration and actual staffing to be carried out by the Housing and Redevelopment Department. FUNDING: Condominium Conversion LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1992 TARGET YEAR: indicates the time span for most of the programs, usually from 1991 until 1996. the program is scheduled to be implemented or the study will take place. Where only one date is indicated it means the fiscal year OBJECTIVE 1.2 (MOBILE HOME PARKS) Reduce or eliminate net loss of existing n home rental opportunities available to lower and ma income households. C.' GOAL 1 (PRESERVATION) Carlsbad's existing housing stock preserved and rehabilitated with special attention to housing affordable to lower-income households PROGRAM 1.2 OBJECTIVE 1.1 (CONDOMINIUM The City wiii continue to implement the existing Residential Mobile Home Park mnhg ord (Municipal Code 2 1.17) which sets conditions on cl of use or conversions of Mobile Home Parks. CONVERSION) Create a program to monitor conversions to con- dominium of those rental apartments which house prima- rily low and moderate income households and limit those for those income ranges. . FUNDING: CDBG & Redevelopme LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., H and Redevelopment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1992 aside Funds conversions that reduce the supply of affordable housing Page 96 0 0 - c - OBJECTIVE 1.3 (MOBILE HOME PROGRAM 1.5 - w PARKS) -w The Building Department will develop an merit a program to monitor and report to the Houi Redevelopment Dept., information on housing st is substandard and or deteriorating. Identified sir will be reported to the Housing and Redevelopmei for assistance under the City's rehabilitation an tanceprograms. Retain and presewe the affordability of mobile home parks. F 'I PROGRAM 1.3 - The City will assist lower income tenants to research the financial feasibility of purchasing their mo- bile home park so as to retain rents and leases affordable to its tenants. 1 FUNDING: CDBG funds, State and Rehab. Loans, Private rehabilitation and Redevelopment Agency. U LEAD AGENCY: Building Dept., 1 FUNDING: CDBG funds, State Grants and LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. Loans, Private loans. TARGET YEARS: 1 '1 99 1 - 1996 - '* - TARGET YEAR: 1992 OBJECTIVE 1.6 (REHABILITAl SUBSIDIES-RENTAL STOCK) OBJECTIVE 1.4 (RENTAL STOCK .8 - MONITORING) Provide loan subsidies, loan rebates ar assistance to owners of lower income units in units per year W Maintain a data base of information on vacancy repair and rehabilitation. Target: approxima - rates, rental rates and physical condition of the city's existing rental housing stock, and utilize this database to evaluate programs affecting rental stock. 7 - PROGRAM 1.6 PROGRAM 1.4 The City through the Housing and Rec merit Department and in ConJ~ction with the I Department will provide loas, rebates and 0th to Preserve the existing stock oflow and inoderate rental housing. Priority Will be given to housing ic by the Building Department as being substan deteriorating in which houses families of lower and in some cases moderate income. This 1 depends partially on outside funding from St The City shall develop and implement a program in which it will periodically collect information on the factors affecting supply and demand of existing rental stock within the city. This information will be used in analysis of rental housing to be contained in the annual Housing Element Report. - FUNDING: Existing City staff (General) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department, Federal sources. Housing and Redevelopment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1991 - FUNDING: State grants and loans lending institutions, Redevelopment s funds, CDBG funds. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Re( ment Dept., Building Dept. OBJECTIVE 1.5 (REHABILITATION) IdentifL and rehabilitate substandard and deteno- TARGET YEARS: 1991-1995 . rating housing. Pa @ OBJECTIVE 1 .? (ACQUISITION AND planning and building fees, priority processing and j cia1 incentives such as low-interest rehabilitatioi property acquisition loans. FUNDING: Redevelopment set-aside. ( Funds. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Rede ment Dept. REHABILITATION) Acquire deterioraing and substandard rental housing fiom private owers, utilizing various local, state, and federal funding sources. Target: Approxi- mately SO units through 1996. POLICY 1.7 TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 Ofthe rental units acquired by the city for rehabilitationpurposes by ihe City S Housing Authority, approximotely 20% will be set aside*for households in the very low-income range. PROGRAM 1.7 OBJECTIVE 1.9 (REHABILITATN HOMEOWNERS) Provide rehabilitation assistance, loan sut and loan rebates for lower-income,households, pers special needs, and senior homeowners to presen rehabilitate deteriorating homes. Turgei: Approxir 5 units per year, The City through the Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. will implement a program to acquire, using local Redevelopment set-aside finds, CDBG, State, Fed- eral and private sector loans, rental housing that is sub- standard, deteriorating or in danger of being demolished. Twenty percent of the units, once rehabilitated, will be set aside for very-low income households. POLICY 1.9 The Housing Authority provision of reha tion assistance and assistance to homeowners h targeted to low-income, special needs and senior 1 holds in that priority. FUNDING: Redevelopment set-aside, CDBG funds, State and Federal loan programs, pri- vate sector loan programs. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. TARGET YEARS: 199 1 - 1996 PROGRAM 1.9 The City will implement a homeowner reh: tion program targeted to lower-income, special (handicapped, low income large-family, etc. ,) and households that will consist of financia! and proc incentives such as low interest and deferred rep: loans, loan rebates, and priority processing. OBJECTIVE 1.8 (REHABILITATION (NCENTIVES) FUNDING: Redevelopment set-aside, ( State, Federal and private sector loa grants. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Rede ment Dept. . Provide incentives for the rehabilitation and pres- ervation of deteriorating rental units which house lower income residents. PROGRAM 1.8 TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 The City will provide financial and processing incentives for the owners of lower income rental stock in need of rehabilitation and preservation. These incentives will include, but not limited to: the waivingor reduction of Page 98 - @ w - - OBJECTIVE 1.10 (NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM 2.1 IMPROVEMENT) - With the exception of some lower-income vate sector efforts. New development will be achi - Assist in the creation of a Neighborhood Im- provement Program to prorde local resident input and provement programs. special needs housing which may be assisted by the ( new housing development will be achieved through through the auspices of State Planning Law and the C General Plan and Municipal Codel There is no sp program for this overall goal. It is recognizedthat ach ment of this goal will be heavily influenced by pr sector marketing strategies; local, state and national nomic trends; availability of regional infrastructur< services; andother factors beyondthecontrol ofCarl! - participation into neighborhood preservation and in- - PROGRAM 1.10 Assist residents, especially in older neighbor- hood, in the creation of a Neighborhood Improvement Program under which the city staffwould: 1) promote an v organization directed at fostering neighborhood pride and improvement, and 2) provide information on city and - OBJECYIVE 2.2 (DEVELOPMEN1 other funding resources. Activities might include housing rehabilitation and repair, infrastructure maintenance and repair, weed abatement, abatement of code violations, neighborhood pride and awareness activities, charitable activities and information outreach, among others. STANDARDS) Ensure that development and housing cons tion achieved through the use of modified codes standards, that will reduce the cost of housing, will 1 quality design and architecture. FUNDING: CDBG funds, Redevelopment Set aside funds. PROGRAM 2.2 LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. The Planning Department, in its review of TARGET YEARS: 1992-1996 opment for all income categories, may recommend ing or modifying certain development standards or r mending that certain Municipal Cede changes be mented to encourage the development of low and mo income housing. These recommendations will viewed with a goal to reduce costs associated with strictoroutdatedstandards. These cost savings nee .Paranteed to be Passed On to the hmre cost Of * Although Standards may be modified they wi11 akc aesthetic and design criteria acceptable to the Cip FUNDING: CDBG Funds, Redevelc Set-aside funds, General funds for ah tive purposes only. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept.. neering Dept., Building Dept. 0. GOAL 2 (QUANTITY AND DIVERSITY OF HOUSING STOCK) Ne\v housing developed with a diversity OfQpes, prices, tenures, densities and locations and in sufficient quantity to meet the demand of anticipated City and regional growth. OBJECTIVE 2.1 (REGIONAL HOUSING NEED) Allow development of sufficient new housing to meet Carisbad’s share of the total regional housing need, as identified in SANDAG’s Regional Housing Needs Statement, 1991-1 996. Target: Approximately 6273 units. TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 Pa @ 1,,,,,,- OBJECTIVE 2.3 (DEVELOPABLE PROGRAM 2.5 ACREAGE M 0 NIT0 RI N G) Review existing zoning and land use pc remove impediments to mixed use development comm~rcial centers should ~~rpo~te, where a ate, mixed commerciaYresidential uses. Major ir office centers, where not precluded by environm safety considerations, should incorporate nux€ trial/office/residential uses. Ensure sufficient developable acreage in all resi- dential densities to &vide varied housing types for households in all economic ranges. PROGRAM 2.3 The City will monitor the absorption of residen- tial acreage in all densities and, if needed, recommend and encourage the creation of additional residential acreage at densities sufficient to meet the City's housing need for current and future residents. Any such actions shall be undertaken only where consistent with the Growth Man- agement Plan. DEVELOPMENT MONITORING) FUNDING: Existing City staff (Ge LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. TARGET YEAR 1993 08JECTlVE 2.6 (COASTAL FUNDING: Existing City Staff (General) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. TARGET YEARS: 199 1 - 1996 Identif), monitor, and report the numb fordable housing units constructed, converted. o ished in the coastal zone. POLICY 2.6 OBJECTIVE 2.4 (ADAPTIVE REUSE) Provide alternative housing environments by en- couraging adaptive reuse of older commercial or indus- trial buildings. Pursuant to Government Code Sectro and 6mOfrom January I, 1992, the City shall I record, and report data on housing units con. converted, and demolished in the Coastal Zone with informanon regarding whether these u affordable to lower-income households. PROGRAM 2.6 PROGRAM 2.4 The City should encourage adaptive reuse of aging industrial, commercial and some residential build- ings by developing an ordinance that would create afford- able living spaces for combined living/working spaces. The principle targeted area for this type of housing would be m the downtown redevelopment area. As afimction ofthe building process, the monitor and record Coastal Zone housing data u but not limited to, the following: FUNDING: Redevelopment Set aside, CDBG 1) The number of new housing units a hnds. for construction within the coastal z( LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., Housing January 1, 1982. and Redevelopment Dept. 2) The number of housing units for TARGET YEAR: 1992 and families of low or moderate inc defined in Section 50093 of the He Safety Code, required to be providec housing developments within the coa or within three miles of the coastal z( OBJECTIVE 2.5 (MIXED USE) Encourage increased integration of housing with non-residential development. Page 100 0 0 . I . W @! 3) The number of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families or low or moderate income that have been authorized to be demolishedor converted since January 1, 1982 in the coastal zone pursuant to Section 65590 of the Government Code. 4) The number of residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 required for replacement or authorized to be PROGRAM 3.1 w The City shall work with and assist local COI nity groups, social welfare agencies, fadand ov and other interested parties to provide shelter fc identified permanent and migrant farm workers duri five-year housing element perid. These efforts wil: coordination with other regional and local program -m -. D - 1 of the Health and Safety Code, that have been FUNDING: State and Federal grant! LEAD AGENCY: Community Dea 1 graph 3). The location of the replacement ment Department. loans. CDBG funds converted or demolished as identified in para- units, either onsite, elsewhere within the TARGET YEARS: By first Quarter of locality’s jurisdiction within the coastal zone, - Meet with local faders and advocai or within three miles of the coastal zone within the locality’s jurisdiction, shall be designated migrant farm workers, and aggressivel! in the review. sue grant and siting possibilities. COI - W refine the needs assessment of permaner W efforts through 1996. These data will be reported in the City’s annual housing report. OBJECTIVE 3.2 (LARGE FAMIL’r Assure the development of an adequate nu of housing units suitably sized to meet the needs of 11 income larger households POLICY 3.2 I FUNDING: General finds - (Administrative only) LEAD AGENCY: Building Department TARGET YEARS: 1/92 - Begin capturing data 1992-1 996 - Ongoing. s In those developments which are reqitir include 10 or more units affordable to lower-ir households, at least 1 Opercent of the lower income should have 3 or more bedrooms. This poIicy do( pertain to lower-income senior housing projecrs. E. GOAL 3 (GROUPS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, INCLUDING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS) Sufficient new, affordable housing opportunities in all quadrants of the City to meet the needs of groups, with special requirements, and, in particular the needs of share proportion of fbture lower and moderate income households. PROGRAM 3.2 Those housing projects entering into an i current lower and moderate income househol& and a fair merit with the city to provide lower income housing be required to implement Policy 3.2 FUNDING: General Fund (adnunist LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. OBJECTIVE 3.1 (FARM WORKER) only) TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 Provide adequate shelter for both the permanent and migrant farm worker. n.. (ted) OBJECTIVE 3.3 (HOMELESS) Provide transitional shelters and assistance for OB J ECTlVE 3.4 (SENlORlELDE Provide additional senior housing. Tars the homeless. I proximately 20 units PROGRAM 3.3.a PROGRAM 3.4.a Carlsbad will continue to facilitate the acquisi- tion, for lease or sale, of suitable sites for transitional shelters for the homeless population. The City will also continue to assist local non-profits and charitable organi- zations in securing state hnding for the acquisition, construction and management of these shelters. Amend the City's current Senior Citizen ing regulations to conform to the provisions of ( ment Code section 65913.4 and 65915 (density Establish standards for location, parking, safeQ ation facilities, medical care, and other aspects c orientated housing. Consider requiring all senio. projects to be approved under Conditional Use Establish appropriate monitoring and reporting dures to assure compliance with approved projec FUNDING: Redevelopment Set aside funds, CDBG finds LEAD AGENCY: Community Develop- tions. ment Agency TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 PROGRAM 3.3.b TARGET YEAR: 1991 FUNDING: Existing Staff (General LEAD AGENCY: Planning Depart Continue to provide Federal Community Devel- opment Block Grant (CDBG) funds to community, social welfare, not-for-profit and religious groups which provide services within the North County area. FUNDING: CDBG hnds LEAD AGENCY: Housing And Redevelop- ment Dept. TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 PROGRAM 3.3.c PROGRAM 3.4.b Under the Constitution of the State of Ca Article 34, housing projects that have more 1 percent of the total units set aside for low-incomc holds, and are developed by, or utilize hdin Federal, State or local sources are subject to a VOI citizens. In 1980, Carlsbadvoters approved an A referendum to allow 200 units of Senior low housing.*Thls authority has not been exercised. L will study the feasibility of creating a low-incom housing project at an appropriate site(s) within C FUNDING: Redevelopment set-asid Private financing, state public financ LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Rec ment Dept., Planning Dept. TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 Encourage and assist a subrecipient (non-profit organization) of CDBG funds to develop a program which will offer a City Referral Service to refer, on a 24-hour basis, transient homeless individuals and families to local agencies providing services to the homeless. FUNDING: CDBG Funds LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. OBJECTIVE 3.5 (LOWER INCO Provide a range of new housing opportur lower-income households, in all areas of t TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 Page 102 -.. (i Target: Approximately 1400 (1,125 minimum) addi- tional assisted households. POLICY 3.6.b - A minimum ofjpeen percent of all apF units in any residential specific plan or qualified . vision (to be defined) shall be set aside and be affordable to ~owerincome hO~~holds. U'hre it ' demonstrated to the City >satisfaction that it is ecc cally infeasible to build the required units, an contribution consistingoffinds, land, or other cot tions may be made to the City. The City shall as> sure their ultimate and exclusive' use, in providin, ter for lower income households. The in-lieu COI which shall evaluate the cost differential in dew and constructing market-rate vs. lower-income 1 xou& he implaentationofvarious programs, be city will ensure the cration ofthe minimum fair share goal of 1125 lower income housing opportunities. These programs and their associated numerical goals are in&- cated below. * w - FUNDING: General fund and various other LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department, Housing and Redevelopment Dept. . funding sources. fiduciary responsibility for thesh contributions a v TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 tion shall be in an amount to be determined from d 1 able housing. -- ,. OBJECTIVE 3.6 (INCLUSIONARY) Ensure that all master plannedand specific planned PROGRAM3.6.b 1 1 communities and all qualified subdivisions provide a range of housing for a11 economic income ranges. Develop a program to implement Polic within all residential specific plan and qualified s sions. This program will require an agreement t the developer and the City that stipulates these UI remain affordable for aspecific length oftime, and units may be offered for rent, Or with the approv; city, for sale. The program will also identify incenl city may offer. An in-lieu fee, to be determined, 1 to meet the requirement to construct the low^ housing for developments less than 5 units. Approximately 200 units - 7 POLICY 3.6.a -8 A minimum of .#!fieen percent of a11 ~nifs ap- proved .for any master plan community or residential spec$cplan shall be qfordable 10 lower income-house- I1 -. holds. I8 PROGRAM3.6.a The City shall prepare and adopt an Inclusionary Housing Program which shall require that i 5% ofall base FUNDING: Private developer fundi residential units within any Master PldSpecific Plan LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. community or other qualified subdivision shall be re- TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 # stricted and affordable to lower income households. This tial developers subject to this inclusionary requirement and the City which stipulates: the number of required lower income inclusionary units, the designated sites for the locationoftheunits, aphasing schedule for production -- program shall require an agreement between all residen- PROGRAM 3.6.~ (IN-LIEU FEE) 8 The City will conduct a study pursuant t -- 3.6.b to evaluate, as analternative to inclusionaq ments as stipulated in Policy 3.6.b ofthe feasibili fee may be assessed against the market rate unil development and will be basedon the difference produce a market rate rental unit versus a lowe affordable unit. A detailed plan for the priori of the units, and the tenure of affordability for the units. in-lieu contribution forthe inclusionary requirem -- FUNDING: Existing staff (General Fund). LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department. TARGET YEAR: Summer of 1992 4 -- a __ Pa -... -- I' @I . :: these in-lieu fees shall be included in the In-Lieu Fee Study. HOUSING) PROGRAM 3.7.b (ALTERNAI FUNDING: General Fund (Administration Only) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department TARGET YEARS: Begin study in 199 1 - Adopt orhce by July 1992. Consider development standards for alter housing types, such as hotels, managed living homeless shelters, and farm worker housing altem which would assist in meeting the City's share of hc for low and very low income households. Aut alternative housing projects through a Condition, Permit or Special Use Permit. Th& City will also ex the existing Second Dwelling Unit Section of its h, better encouraging and facilitating the developr affordable second units. .. OBJECTIVE 3.7 (LOWER INCOME DEVELOPMENT AND INCENTIVES) pal Code (Section 2 1.42.0 10( 1 l)(A)) to explore mr Provide incentives, housing type alternatives, and city initiated developments and programs for the assistance of lower-income household. POLICY 3.7.b ' ' PROGRAM 3.7.a (DENSITY BONUS) Develop an ordinance that implements Govern- ment Code section 65913.4 and 65915. (Density Bonus) These sections require the City to grant a minimum of a 25 percent bonus over the otherwise allowed density, AND one or more additional economic incentives or conces- sions that may include but are not limited to: fee waivers, reduction or waiver of development standards, in-kind infrastructure improvements, an additional density bonus above the minimum 25 percent, mixed use development, or other financial contributions in return for the developer guaranteeing that the project will reserve aminimum of 50 percent of the units for Senior or other special need households, or 20 percent of the units for low income households or 10 percent of the units for very-low income households. These units must remain affordable for a period of 30 years. Under the City's program each project should enter into an agreement with the City and this agreement will be monitored by the Housing and Redevel- opment Dept. for compliance. Approvads and development of alternativc ing types such as managed living units, trans shelters, and migrantfarm worker housing are ( gent upon meeting the City S requiredlower incoi special housing needs. Alternative housing typ their approvals may be denied should the .fins made that theproject is not needed to meet the spe low-income housing needs of the community. PROGRAM 3.7.c (CITY INITIATE VELOPMENT) The City of Carisbad, through the office Housing Authority and through the Housing and R opment Department, will institute a New kusil duction Program that will create new units of 1 affordable to households of low and very low incon Housing and Redevelopment Dept. will work with for-profit and especially not-for-profit developer program will use local funds from CDBG, redeve] set-aside funds and other city originated funds an age them against State, Federal and private low funds to create these housing opportunities. Targ proximately 200 new units of these new units 1 be affordable to very-low income households. FUNDING: Private Funding, State ar FUNDING: General Fund (administration only). Redevelopment Set-aside funds. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., Housing and Redevelopment Dept. TARGET YEARS: Draft Ordinance 1991 Ordinance adopted by the first quarter of 1992. funding. Page 104 k! LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., Housing ad Redeve!opment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1991 and payable. applicable conditions, thefee. which would othemise 1 imposed by this chapter, shall immediately become d, - PROGWM 3.7.e (FEE WAIVER) POLICY 3.7.c Implement City Council Policy number 17 um ofihe told units devehped under he Housing . which public facility fee would be waived for lov income housing projects. Developments for which Put Facility Fees are waived may be subject to an analysis the fiscal impacts of the project to the City. Authofily New Canslmch'on Programs, 100 units will be affordable to households of very-low income. FUNDING: Local, CDBG, Redevelopment set-aside hnds, State and Federal loan and grant funds. Private funding from various sources . ment Dept.. TARGET YEARS: Approximately 200 new units. Of these new units, 100 units will be affordable to very low income households. PROGRAM 3.7.d (SECTION 8) FUNDING: Redevelopment Set-aside fin LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept, Housi and Redevelopment Dept, Finance Dept LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 PROGRAM3.7.f (PRIORITY PROCE: I NG) Implement priority processing for lower-inco development projects. Thz priority processing would dude an accelerated plan-check process. The prio additional assisted housing opportunities in the Housing need extensive engineering or environmental review. Element Period I99 1 - 1996. Turgct: Approximately 100 additional households. FUNDING: General Fund(administra1 FUNDING: Federal Section 8 finding. LEAD AGENCY: Community Deve LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- ment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1991 Continue the City's Section 8 program to provide processing would be limited to projects which would only) CDBG funds ment Dept. TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 PROGRAM 3.7.g (IN-KIND IMPRO' POLICY 3.7.e MENTS) Public Facilities Fees (PFF) may be waived for lower income housing projects pursuant to City Council Policy 17.5.e., which states in part: The City Council may grant an exception.for a low cost housingproject where [he City Councilfinds such apruject consistent with rhe Housing Element of the General Plan and that such an exception is necessary. In approving an exception .fir low cost housing the City Council may attach conditions. including limitation on rent or income levels of tenants. If the City Council finds a project is not being operated as a low cost housing project in occordance with all The City will implement a program to contd to selected lower-income housing development, in-1 infrastructure improvements that may include but limited to: street improvements, sewer improvemc; other infrastnicfure improvemenu as needed. FUNDING: CDBG funds, Redevelopr tax increment and set-aside finds. Ger hnd. LEAD AGENCY: Community Devt ment Department TARGET YEAR: 1992 Page .@ POLICY 3.7.h. bonus programs and new development pro compatible and consistent with the City’s Grc agement Ordinance. In order to enable the development ofafrordable ., housing, Ihe Citywillaccommoabre General Pian Amend- ments to increase reszdential densities on all PC and LC zoned properties and all other residentially designated properties. Any proposed General Plan Amendment request to increase site densities forpurposes ofprovid- proposal’s compatibility with adjacent land uses and proximify to employment opportunities, urban services or major roads. These General Plan Lund Use designa- tion changes will enable up to 23 huelling itnitsper acre, and in conjunction with a twenpfive percent density bonus, up to 29 dwelling units per acre. POLICY 3.8. Pursuant to Council Policy number 4: hereby modified as indicated): I ing aflora‘abable housing, will be evaluated relative to the Residential development that does no maximum allowable number of Units under t management control Point are considered to ha7 units”. These excess units are allocated to be under the folloWh PfiOfitY. 1. Housing development for low an1 households as defined by CaI. Gc 2. Senior Citizen housing as di 3. In-fill Single Family Subdivisio R- 1, that meet all development stan where lot sizes are equal to or grt adjacent subdivided R-1 properties. 4. Projects within the existing gen density range that provide, without o pensation, for some significant pub1 FUNDING: General Fund (administration not required as part of the developi only) cess. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department 5. Projects proposing a zone change 1 TARGET YEAR: 1992 residential to residential based on th ing findings; PROGRAM 3.7.j a.) The property was zoned for c residential use on July I, 1986. b.) The property is compatible foi tial use without significant mitigatio c.) The density of the project doe ceed the Growth Management Contrc any adjacent developed residential 1 PROGRAM 3.8 PROGRAM 3.7.i Code Section 65915. In order to enable the development of affordable Carlsbad Municipal Code Section ‘1 housing, the City shall adopt a. mechanism to allow discretionary consideration of density increases above the maximum now permitted by the General Plan. This mechanism will include either; a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Site Development Plan (SDP) or Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The City shall implement, through new ordi- nances, Housing Programs 2.2 (Development Standards), 3.6.a (Inclusionary), 3.7.a (Density Bonus) and 3.7.b (Alternative Housing) by the end of 1992. FUNDING: Existing staff (General Fund) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department TARGET YEAR: End of 1992. Formalize the concept of an Excess ’ Unit Bank. The “bank” should be an accountini to keep track of “excess units” anticipated ur city’s Growth Management Plan, but not uti OBJECTIVE 3.8 (GROWTH MANAGEMENT) Ensure that incentive programs. such as density Page 106 6 developers in approved projects. Surplus units would be TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 available for inclusion in other projects using such tools as density transfers, density bonuses and changes to the General Plan land use designations. OBJECTIVE 3.10 (MODERATE INCOME) FUNDING: Existing StaqGeneral) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., Growth Management Division. TARGET YEAR: 199 1 Provide a range of new. housing opporb affordable to moderate-income households in all a the City. Target: Approximate19 1300 units PROGRAMS 3.10.a (MORTGAGE ENUE BOND) OBJECTIVE 3.9 (SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS PRIORITIES) The City will encourage the development. : to market conditions and feasibility, of a minimum new units affordable to first-time home buyers of ~ ate income through a City-hnded mortgage revem program. The program will be limited to first-tim buyers who rent or work in Carlsbad. Ensure that new development constructed by the private sector, and pubIic funds allocated for lower- income and special needs groups, will meet the City’s lower-income housing needs. POLICY 3.9 FUNDING: Mortgage Revenue Bonc LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redr ment Dept., Finance Dept. . PROGRAM 3.10.b’ (LENDING GRAMS) New development and housing that is set aside for low and very low income households will address the by the Housing Authority through the Planning Depart- ment and the Housing and Redevelopment Agency. unmet housing needs of the communify by priorities set TARGET YEARS: 1992-1996 PROGRAM 3.9 The City’s Housing Authority and Hous Redevelopment Dept. will work with focal lenders local development community to secure hndi develop additional lending programs through local and State and Federal housing programs for rr income, and especially first-time home buyers. The City will annually set priorities for its future lower-income and special housing needs. The priorities will be set by the Housing and RedeveIopment Dept. with assistance from the Planning Department and approved by the City Council. Prioritygiven to the housing needs for lower-income subgroups (i.e., handicapped, seniors, large- the guidance of new housing constructed by the private sector and for the use of knd used or allocated by the City . family, very-low income) will be utilized for preference in for construction or assistance to low income projects. will address the City’s most important housing needs. FUNDING: Private Lenders, State 3 era1 agencies. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Re( . ment Dept. TARGET YEARS: 1991-1999 POLICY 3.10.c Setting priorities is necessary to focus the limited amounts - of available financial resources on housing projects that Priorities will be set annually as needs fluctuate according to how well they are accommodated over time. * e A minimum ofjpercent ofall units appr any master and specific planned communim a FUNDING: RedeveIopment set-aside finds. affordable 10 moderafe inCOme~firSf-t?me home - LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- - ment Dept. - . Pa .' @ PROGRAM 3.18.c (MODERATE standard lots, the appropriate floor areas for assoc: INCLUSIONARY) houses; and the applicability of providing density bon so as to achieve reduced development costs. Sma subdivisions will continue to be approved only thr Planned Developments (Municipal Code Section 2 I FUNDING: General Fund (administr LEAD AGENCY: Plkning Dept. TARGET YEARS: !991-1996 To assure the provision of a full range of housing opportunities for all income-groups in master and specific planned communities, the City will develop an inclusionary program to implement Policy 3.10.c Tatget: Approxi- mately 200 units. only) FUNDING: Private Lenders, Mortgage Rev- enue Bonds, State and Federal Funds. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept.,Housing and Redevelopment Dept. OBJECTIVE 3.12 (LAND BANKIN Provide adequate land for low income and TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 erate housing development throughout the city. OBJECTIVE 3.11 (SMALLER, MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING) PROGRAM 3.12 Reduce the size of housing, thereby reducing The City will implement a land banking prc under which it would acquire land suitable for del ment of housing affordable to lower and moderate in households. The proposed Land Bank will accept c butions of land in-lieu of housing production rec under an inclusionary requirement, surplus land City, County, State or Federal governments, and otherwise acquired by the City for its housing prog This land would be used to reduce the land co' producing lower and moderiite income housing devi undertaken by the City or other parties. costs and increasing affordability. POLICY 3.11 Residential'subdivisions may be approved with lots smaller than required in the underlying zone. but only when the size of the structures is reduced so as to yeld less costly houses. The City will consider alterna- tivemeasures, including. but not limited to, height limits. lot coverage limits, andmaximitm.floorarea ratiosas the means to control the size of structicres on these smaller lots. FUNDING: CDBG, Redevelopment Se funds, General Funds (admin only) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept., Hc and Redevelopment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1992 PROGRAM 3.1 1 The Planning Department shall study the rela- tionship between the size ofhouses, lot sizes, density, and construction and development costs. Some single family detached and attached houses should be built on smaller currently provides, so as to reduce development and construction costs. Smaller homes at lower costs would create housing more affordable to moderate income house- holds. The study will present findings together with recommendations on: minimum sizes for permitted sub- OBJECTIVE 3.13 (COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT) lots; and have smaller floor areas than the private sector Monitor the lending practices local lendmi tutions for compliance under the Community Rei ment Act to evaluate lending activities and goals tc meeting the communities credit needs. Page 108 6 - - POLICY 3.13 FUNDING: In-lieu fees, tax increment f real property transfer tau, and CDBG f local, state and federal funds. LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redev ment Dept., Finance Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1992 - The Ciy will annually evaluate its bankrng practices with local and regional lending institutions bused on CRA lending reports. The City will reevaluate its relahonshp wiih Lending institutions that are sub- stantially dejcient in their CR.4 ratings. I .. - PROGRAM 3.13 OBJECTIVE: 3.15 (HOUSING - ELEMENTIANNUAL REPORT) ability and usefulness through annual amenhen1 - The Housing and Redevelopment Dept., in con- junction with the Finance Department and the City Trea- compliance with the C.R.A. Lending institutions which are deficient in meeting C.R.A. lending responsibilities in - affordable housing will be identified. The City will explore means to encourage greater lending activities in Ensure that the Housing Element retains i - surer will monitor and evaluate local lending institution's - view and monitoring. - areas such as multi-family construction and lending for PROGRAM 3.15 I' To retain the Housing Element as a viable I - Carlsbad. document, the Planning Dept. will undertake an a - FUNDING: CDBG fUnd9 RedeveloPnIent program and report to the City Council annually ( of California requirements regarding annual report review of the Housing Element and schedule an a * ment if required. Staff will also develop a monii progress and effectiveness of the housing programs. monitoring program will be in conjunction with new Set-aside hnds LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- . - merit DePt.9 €%mce DePt.9 city Tn~~urer TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 FUNDING: General Fund LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. OBJECTIVE 3.14 (HOUSING TRUST TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 FUND) The City will create a Housing Trust find to F. GOAL 4 (HOUSING, JOBS, facilitate the construction and rehabilitation ofaffordable housing. WORK FORCE BALANCE) Maintenance of a high quality of life and a s local economy through a balance of residential and residential development, in particular, a balance ( skills desired and wages offered by local employer skills and education possessed, and wages earned 1 local work force; and the cost of local housing. PROGRAM 3,14 The City will create a Housing Trust Fund for the fiduciary administration of monies dedicated to the devel- opment, preservation and rehabilitation of housing in Carlsbad. The Trust Fund will be the repository of all collected in-lieu fees, CDBG and tax-increment hnds targeted for proposed housing as well as other, local, state and federal and other collected funds. Page OBJECTIVE 4.1 (HOUSING tMPACT FUNDING: Private funding ment Dept. FEE) LEAD AGENCY: Community Devel Achieve a balance between 1) the numbers of TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 local jobs created relative tt) the availability of housing, and 2) the cost of housing relatjve the wages that are offered. OBJECTIVE 5.2 (WAKR CONSERVATION) I PROGRAM 4.1 Promote resource conservation including H The City will study the impact ofcommercial and industrial development on housing demand, and the ability of local employees to afford local housing. Where adverse impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be consid- but are not limited to, the requirement for commercial and industrial developers md employers to contribute an in- lieu fee towards the production of affordable housing and employer assistance to finance affordable housing for their employees. conservation in new housing development. PROGMM 5.2 ered to reduce the impact. These measures may include, New housing construction developed und wateremergencymay berequiredtodevelop strictcol vation guidelines, inc~uding but not Iimited to, mandz insta11arion Of low flush and low flow bathroom kitchen fixtures, xerophytic landscaping or suspensi' landscaping requirements until the water emergen! lifted, and requiring the use of reclaimed water i construction grading projects. hy such actions shi in accord with policies adopted by the City in respor declared emergencies. FUNDING: CDBG hnds., General Fund (administration only) LEAD AGENCY: Planning Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1992 FUNDING: Private funding LEAD AGENCY: Community Dei ment Dept. TARGET YEAR: 1991 G. GOAL 5 (RESOURCE CONS ERVATl ON) H. GOAL 6 (OPEN AND FAIR New and redeveloped housing which conserves HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES) natural resources, in particular energy and water. OBJECTIVE 5.1 (ENERGY All Carlsbad housing opportunities (own and rental, fair-market and assisted) offered in cor: ance with open housing policies and free of discrimi~ practices. CONSERVATION) Promote energy consernation in new housing development. PROGRAM 5.1 OBJECTIVE 6.1 (FAIR HOUSINC Disseminateandprovidemformationon hi The City will continue to implement energy con- servation measures in new housing development through State Building Code, Title 24 regulations, and solar orientation ofmajor subdivisions through Title 20., Chap- ter 17 of the Municipal Code. ing laws and Practices to the COmmUfi~. Page 110 1 0 e 1 h - W PROGRAM 6.1 I. PRIORITIES, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION, UPDATE AND REVIEW The Housing Authority and Housing and Rede- velopment Dept will makeinformation on “fair housing law and practices” available to all tenants, property Owners and other persons involved in the sale and rental of housing throughout Carlsbad on an ongoing basis. -. 1 -. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The preceding policies md action prop istration finds. identified in the Housing Element. The design LEAD AGENCY: Housing and Redevelop- program is a comprehensive attempt to meet bo& ment Dept. to implement the program, priorities are set which CI trate resources on the most immediate needs, mal the need for additional time, staff or funds. . FUNDING: CDBG &n&, Section 8 &in- designed to meet a broad range of housing goals and range community and Stateguidelines. However, U use of the resources available and, in some cases, ic w - 1 TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 - PROGRAM 6.2 w The Housing Authority will continue its program fair housing issues. These complaints will be monitored as to the status of the complaint and will direct any action, agencies for hrther actions. - of referrals to the appropriate agencies on complaints on if required, to the appropriate Local State or Federal 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The original Housing Element was devi Committee appointed by the City Council. This R Committee met in 12 sessions between May and O( 1979. A final review meeting was held in January followed by Planning Commission and City CI hearings and workshops in the Spring and Sumr 1980. The 1991 revision of the Housing Elemer technical update of that document. The 1990 C Series 6627 Regional Growth Forecasts, and 199 1 Housing Needs Statement were used in the revisior The City has provided several opportuniti all economic segments of the population to particir the revision of the Housing Element. The Hc Element went thrqugh an elaborate cititen particil process when it was first drafted in 1980. 1 - with the guhnce and cooperation ofa Citizens’ R W - FUNDING: Section 8 administration Funds, CDBG finds. LEAD AGENCY: Housing Authority TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 PROGRAM 6.3 (MILITARY, STUDENT REFERRALS) W The City will assure that information on the availability of assisted, or below-market housing is pro- vided to all lower-income and special needs groups. The Housing and Redevelopment Agency will provide infor- mation to local military and student housing offices of the availability of low-income housing in Carlsbad. A series of public workshops for each qu: FUNDING: CDBG Funds, Redevelopment of the community were held in October and Novem Set aside fimds. 1990 to discuss housing concerns and issues. TNO LEAD AGENCY! Housing and Redevelop- shops were held with affordable housing advocatc ment Agency . the building and development community to receive TARGET YEARS: 1991-1996 and discuss the future housing element. A questio was passed out to the participants at these meeti receive citizen input on local housing issues. A cop! 1 questionnaire is contained in the appendices. Pq no c @ ana Prior to adoption of the Housing Element, public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council. DeDartrnent of Commerce, Bureau of Ce The decennial national census was taken I 1990. This information and more current info1 were used as part of this revision. Review of € Element projections and goals should take place that would require amendments/revisions becom 3. MANDATED REVIEW AND UPDATE Environmental Assessment and Review able. A Negative Declaration on the Housing Element has been prepared and filed with all appropriate agencies in accordance with Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the California Environmental Quality Act. I ProPram Evaluation Local evaluation of program effectiven implementation of policies and programs, with mendations for change, should be conducted a over the nest five years with public hearings be Housing and Redevelopment Commission. Interaovemental Coordination Regional data on population and housing fore- casts and fkir share allocation from the San Diego Asso- ciation of Governments (SANDAG) were used. Maior Revision A major evaluation and revision of the 1 Local Review and UDdate Afleradoption by Planning Commissionand City Council, the Element will be updated as necessary. The state requires that the nest revision be accomplished by July 1, 1996. Element should take place in 1995. San Dieeo County A copy shall be filed with San Diego County pursuant to development of fbture Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program applications. Citx Staff Carlsbad's Community Development Block Grant submissions shall be reviewed to assure conformance with Housing Element Goals and Programs. Page 112 *+uc5 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - FdY, JUNE 26, 1997 . ,.. ~ T --.. __ ..... ., ...,. . ... -.-I._." . ,/__.___ .~r *__. . -.._.__.-..- ' - *..-... I ?' . - . .. -.-, ~ i ._._ I ._._._. "._. - _._ _._._ .--. -. _.- -,'-.-....L-.- -.-.-.-.. * - ._.. 1 _I__- .c m\Brl c __l___I_~-_-- ---I- --.- ----- -. - <. .. 4. __ * e 0 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, SUNDAY, JULY 13, 1997 . ., ., . , . . . c r - m/ 0 1 THE CITY COUN aaut-ttg af ji5at-t p NORMAN W HICKEY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 1619) 531 5250 CHIEF AD MINI STRATIVE OFFICE FAX 1619) 557 4060 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA December 4, 1991 Ray Patchett, City Manager City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. P tchett: On October 2, 1991 the San Diego County Board of Supervisors adopl the ordinance which adljusts and redefines the boundaries of i supervisorial districts. The new boundaries became effective November 1, 1991 and will determine which County supervisor citizc will vote for beginning with the June, 1992 primary election. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the Board of Supervisc official action and a copy of the ordinance. Also enclosed is a 1 showing the new boundaries and a statistic sheet with population q ethnic/racial information for each district. Please share this information with your Mayor and City Council. If you have any questions on this material, please feel free contact Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, June Komar at 531-62 Sincerely, IL- 1 1 I ;&/ W. HICKEY Chief Administrative Officer - e t NO. li On October 1, 1991, Bo Supervisors ordered action he1 first item on the Agenda. County Counsel orally outlined in the staff report. During discussion, membe to the final adoption of the redistricting map that the Board has made every attempt to meet quirements of both State and Federal the entire redistricting process, Conce the division of the City of Carlsbad, an of San Diego will now be represented ?by four Supervisors. ON MOTION of Superv Williams, the Board of Sup Series) as follows: AN ORDINANCE A DISTRICTS AND RE DISTRICTS OF THE NO. 6097 (NEW SERIES) Roll call on the for vote : AYES: Supervisors Bilbray, Bailey, Williams NOES: Supervisors Golding and MacDonald ABSENT: Supervisors None --- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) County of San Diego) I, THOMAS J, PASTUS2 the County of San Diego, I have compared the foregoing copy with the orig order adoptec by said Board at a regular meeting thereof he1 tober 2, 199: (11) , by the vote herein file in my office; thatt transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand and this 12th day of November, 1991. THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA 4 - -_ a e --Q ORDINANCE NO. 7983 (NEW SERIES) AN ORDINANCE ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF ALL SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 6097 (NEW SERIES) The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego ordains as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Sections 400 and 400.1 of the Sa Diego County Charter and Sections 35000 and 35001 of the Elections Code, and after giving consideration to the applicable decisions of the courts, the facts enumerated in Elections Code Section 35000 and the provisions of the San Diego County Chartel the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego hereby adjusts and redefines the boundaries of the supenrisorial districts of the County of San Diego as hereinafter set forth i! this ordinance. Section 2. The County of San Diego is divided into fiv supervisorial districts as hereinafter described. supervisorial district shall include all of the territory withi the San Diego County census tracts and portions thereof listed after the name of the supervisorial district. Each supervisor: district bounded by the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean shall include all that territory of the County Of San Diego lying we: of and between said shoreline and the westerly boundary of the State of California. Each -.I J 10/2/91 (11) 9 e < SECTION 3. Supervisorial District No. 1 - SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 1 Consists of the following census tracts: 3204 5899 10007 112 129 3207 62 10008 113 130 35 6299 10009 11399 13101 36 63 10103 114 13102 38 64 10104 11499 13201 3899 7001 10106 115 13203 39 - 2002 10107 116 13204 13301 40 71 10108 117 13302 45 72 10109 118 46 7301 102 119 13303 47 7302 103 120 13304 48 74 104 12 1 13305 13401 49 75 105 12 2 13405 12301 10601 - 5099 9902 10602 12302 13406 51 9999 10603 12401 13407 5199 10001 107 12402 13408 52 10002 108 125 13409, an( 53 10003 109 126 54 10004 110 127 53 10005 111 128 .50 9901 1, ~ll those portions of census tracts 213.01 and 213-02 lying southerly and Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of section 23 township 17 south range 1 west, San Bernardino base and meridian w the most easterly boundary of census tract 134-05, thence easterly along the north line of sections 23 and 24 to the northwest corner section 19 township 17 south range 1 east, thence easterly along tl north line of said section 19 to the northwest corner of the northe quarter of said section 19, thence southerly along the west line of said northeast quarter to the southwest corner there of, thence easterly along the south line of said northeast quarter to the southwest corner of the north half of section 20, thence easterly along the south line of said north half to the west line of section 21, thence southerly along the west line of sections 21 and 28 to t southwest corner of section 28, thence easterly along the south lint of said section 23 to the northeast corner of section 33, thence southerly along the east line of section 33 and theoretical section to the northeast corner of theoretical section 4 township 18 south range 1 east, thence continuing southerly along the east line of theoretical section 4 and east line of sections 4, 9, 16, 21 and 28 the intersection with the most easterly boundary of census tract 100-07, and *. 0 e 8 2. All those portions of census tracts 135.06 and 139-03 lying the 240 foot contour elevation surrounding Sweetwater Reservoir. _- w a -- SECTION 4. Supenrisorial District No- 2, SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 2 Consists of the following census tracts: 2901 15701 20804 21000: 15702 20897 BLK 363 2902 2903 158 20898 BLK 364 9602 159 20902 BLK 365 9604 160 211 BLK 366 9705 16201 21202 BLK 368 9706 16202 14002: BLK 369 13503 163 BIZ 1198 BLK 370 13504 16401 BfiR 120C BLK 371 13305 16402 20901: BIX 372 13603 16502 BLK GRP-4 BLK 374 13604 16602 BIX GRP-5 BLK 375 137 16603 BIX GRP-6 BLK 376 138 16605 BLK GRP-7 BLK 377 13905 16606 BLK 214A BLK 378 14001 16607 BLK 214B BLK 379 144 16608 BIX 214C BLK 380 145 16609 BLK 215 BLK 381 146 16610 BIX 216 BLK 382 147 16611 BIX 217 BLK 383 14801 16701 BLK 218 BLK 384 14803 16702 BLK 221 BLX 385 14804 16802 BLK 287 BLK 386 150 16806 BLK 289 BJX 388 BLK 389 151 16807 BLK 290 152 16808 BIX 291 BLK 390 - 15301 16809 BLK 292 BLK 391 15302 169 21000: BLK 392 15402 17007 BLK GRP-4 BLK 393 15403 17008 BLK 329 BLK 394 15404 17009 BLK 330 BLK 395 15501 17010 BLK 331A BLK 396 15502 17020 BLK 331B BLK 397, and 15601 17021 BLK 332 15602 20801 BLK 350A 9703 161 21201 BLK 367 13601 16501 BLK GRP-3 BIX 373 149 16804 BIZ 288 BLK 387 .? 1. That portion of census tracts 27.03, 30.02, 140-02, 141, 142, and 143 lying within the City of Lemon Grove on January 1, 1990, a e 2. That portion of census tracts 170.06, 170.11, 170.14, 170.23, 170.26, 170.97, and 170.98 lying within the City of Powai on January 1, 1990, 3. unincorporated San Diego County on January 1, 1990, 4- northerly and easterly of the following described line: That portion of census tracts 170.23 and 170.26 lying withii All those portions of census tracts 213.01 and 213.02 lying Beginning at the intersection of the north line of section 23 township 17 south range 1 west, San Bernardino base and meridian with the most easterly boundary of census tract 134.05, thence easterly along the north line of sections 23 and 24 to th northwest corner of section 19 township 17 south range 1 east, thence easterly along the north line of said section 19 to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section 19, thence southerly along the west line of said northeast quarter t the southwest corner there of, thence easterly along the south line of said northeast quarter to the southwest corner of the north half of section 20,. thence easterly along the south line c said north,half to the west line of section 21, thence souther11 along the west line of sections 21 and 28 to the southwest corn€ of section 28, thence easterly along the south line of said section 28 to the northeast corner of section 33, thence southerly along the east line of section 33 and theoretical section 33 to the northeast corner of theoretical section 4 township 18 south range 1 east, thence continuing southerly aloi the east line of theoretical section 4 and east line of section: 4, 9, 16, 21 and 28 to the intersection with the most easterly boundary of census tract 100.07, 5. Santee on April 1, 1991, and 6. All of census tract 135.06, excepting therefrom that porti lying below the 240 foot contour elevation surrounding Sweetwat Resenro i r - That portion of census tract 95.03 lying within the City o - w 0 SECTION 5, Supervisorial District No. 3. SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 3 Consists of the following census tracts: 76 a506 17808 20401: 77 8597 78 8598 20012 BLK 122 17805: BLK 123 9101 BLK GRP-2 BLK 124 9102 BLK 110 BLK 125 94 BLK 111 BLK 126 9501 BLK 112 BLK 127 9502 BLK 113 BLK 128 9504 BLK 114 BLK 129 82 9704 BLK 115 BLK 130 8303 9802 BLK 116 BLK 132 9804 BLK 117 BLK 133 8305 9805 BLK 605 BLK 134 8306 BLK 606 BLK 135 8307 17015 17016 20401: BLK 13 6 8310 BLK 101 BLK 137 8311 17018 BLK 102 BLK 138 8312 17019 BLK 103 BLK 139 8313 17022 BLK 104 BLK 140 8314 17027 8315 17028 BLK 105 BLK 141 17103 BLK 106 BLK 142 8316 8317 17104 BLK 108 BLK 143 8318 17106 BLK 109 BLK 144 172 BLK 110 BLK 145 8319 8320 17302 BLK 111 BLK 146 BLK 112 BLK 147 8321 17303 8322 17304 BLK 113 BLK 148 . 8324 17401 8325 17403 BLK 115 BLK 150 8326 17404 BLK 116 BLK 151 8501 175 BLK 117 BIX 152 8502 17601 BLK 118 BLK 153, and 7901 7902 8001 8002 8101 8102 Si01 9801 20303: BLK 131 BLK 114 BLK 149 8503 17602 BLK 119 8504 177 BLK 120 8505 17807 BLK 121 1. That portion of census tracts 170.06, 170.11, 170.14, 170-23, 170.26, 170-97, and 170.98 lying within the City of San Diego on January 1, 1990, 0 2. Carlsbad on January 1, 1990, 3. the City of San Marcos on January 1, 1990, the City of Santee on April 1, 1991, and 5, southerly of the westerly extension of the center line of Road Survey No, 1534 (Palomar Airport Road) That portion of census tract 200.11 lying within the City o All of census tract 171.05 except that portion lying within 4, ul Of CenSUS tract 95-03 except that portion lying within All that portion of block 103 in census tract 178.05 lying f I \ v -- SECTION 6- Supervisorial District No. 4. SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 4 Consists of the following census tracts: 1 2502 3402 9103 2 26 41 9104 3 2701 42 9105 4 2702 43 9201 5 2704 44 9202 6 2705 55 9301 7 2706 56 9303 8 2801 57 9304 9 2802 59 9603 10 3001 60 13901 .ll 3101 61 13904 12 3102 65 13 3103 66 BLK 104 14 3105 68 BLK 105 15 3107 69 BLK 106 16 3108 8507 BLK 107 17 3109 8509 BLK 108 18 3110 8510 BLK 201 19 3201 8511 BLX 202 2001 3202 86 BLR 203 2002 3203 8701 BLK 204 21 3208 8702 BLK 205 22 3209 88 BLK 207 23 3210 8901 BLK 208, and 24 14002: 33 8902 2501 3401 90 1- That portion of census tracts 27-03, 30.02, 141, 142, and 143 lying within the City of San Diego on January 1, 1990,'and 2- All of census tract 139.03, excepting therefrom that portion lying below the 240 foot contour elevation surrounding Sweetwater Reservoir. * a SECTION 7. Supervisorial District No. 5. SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 5 Consists of the following census tracts: 17801 19901 20303: 20901: 17803 19902 BLK 101 BLK 207 17806 19903 BLK 102 BLK 208A 179 20005 BLK 103 BLK 208B 180 20006 BLK 104 BLK 208C BLK 105 BLK 208D BIX 106 BLK 208E 181 20007 182 20008 183 20009 BLK 107 BLK 208F 184 20010 BLK 108A BLK 2086 18501 20101 BLK 108B BLK 209A 18504 20103 BLK 108C BLK 209B 18507 20104 BLK 108D BLK 209C 18508 20202 BLK 109 BLK 2090 18597 20204 BLK llOA BLK 20932 18598 20205 BLK llOB BLK 209F 18601 20297 BLX 111 BIX 210 18603 20298 BLK 112A BLK 211A 18605 20301 BLK 112B BLK 211B 18606 20302 BLK 112C BLK 212 18607 20402 BLK 112D BLK 213 187 20403 BLK 113 BLK 219 18801 205 BLK 114 BLK 220 18802 20601 BLK 115 BLK 222 18803 20698 BLK 118A BLK 223 18901 20701 BLK 118B BLK 224 18902 20703 BLK 601 BLK 225 190 20705 BLK 602A BIX 226 19101 20706 BLK 602B BLK 227 19103 17805: BLK 603 BLK 228 19104 BLK 101 BLK 604 BLK 229 19105 BLK 102 20401: BLK 230 19202 BLK 104 BLK GRP-2 BLK 231 19203 BLK 105 BLK GRP-3 BLK 232 193 BLK 107 20901: BLK 234 19401 BLK 108 BLK GRP-1 BLK 235A 19402 BLK 109 BLK 201A BLK 235B 195 BLK 116 BIX 201B BLK 236 19601 BLK 117 BLK 20fC BLK 237 19602 20303: BLK 202 BLK 238 19701 BLI< GRP-2 BLK 203 BLX 239 19702 BLK GRP-3 BLK 204 BLK 240 19801 BLK GRP-4 BLK 205 BLK 241 19802 BLK GRP-5 BLX 206 BLK 242 19204 BLK 106 BLK 107 BLK 233 w ____ __. ___ _- e --- 20901: 20901: 21000: 21000: BLK 242 BLK 271 BLK 306 BLK 340 BLK 243 BLK 272 BLX 307 BLK 341 BLK 342 BLK 244 BLK 273 BLK 308 BLK 245 BLK 274A BLK 309 BLK 343 BLK 246 BLK 274B BLK 310 BLK 344 BLK 247 BLK 275 BLK 311 BLK 345 BLK 248 BLK 276 BLK 312 BLK 346 BLK 249 BLK 277 BLK 313 BLK 347 BLK 250 BLK 278 BLK 314 BLK 348 BLK 251 BLK 279 BLK 315 BLK 349 BLK 252 BLK 280 BLK 316 BLK 350B BLK 351 BLK 253 BLK 281 BLK 317 BLK 352 BLK 254 BLK 282 BLK 318 BLK 255 BLK 283 BLK 319 BLK 353 BLK 256 BLK 284 BLK 320 BLK 354 BLK 257 BLK 285 BLK 321 BLK 355 BLK 322 BIX 356 BLK 258 BLK 286 BLK 259 BLK 293 BLK 323 BLK 357 BLK 324 BLK 358 BLK 260 BLK 294 BW 261 BLK 295 BLK 325 BLK 359 BLK 262 BIX 296 BLK 326 BLK 360 BLK 263 BLK 297 BLK 327 BLK 361 BLK 264 21000: BLK 328 BLK 362, and BLK 265 BLK GRP-1 BLK 331C BLK 266 BLK GRP-2 BLX 333 BLK 267 BLK GRP--5 BLK 334 BLK 268 BLX 301 BLK 335 BLX 269 BLK 302 BLK 336 BLK 270A BLK 303 BLK 337 BLK 304 BLK 338 BLK 270B BLK 270C BLX 305 BLK 339 1. of San Marcos on January 1, 1990, 2. the City of Carlsbad on January 1, 1990, and 3. All that portion of block 103 in census tract 178.05 lying northerly of the westerly extension of the center line of Road Survey No. 1534 (Palomar Airport Road). That portion of census tract 171-05 lying within the City All of census tract 200.11 except that portion lying within . 0 a Section 8. The San Diego County census tracts referred to in the foregoing sections of this ordinance are those census tracts established for the federal decennial census in San Diego County, as such tracts and their boundaries are set forth in tha document entitled Iq1990 CENSUS TRACTS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA" attached herewith, which document is hereby approved Whenever in the foregoing sections a portion of a census tract i included within the boundaries of a supervisorial district and i described as that portion within Or outside the boundaries of th incorporated cities within San Diego County, the boundaries Of that supervisorial district within that census tract shall follc the corporate boundaries of those cities as they existed on January 1, 1990, except with respect to the City of Santee whosc corporate boundaries shall be those boundaries as they existed t April 1, 1991. Section 9. Ordinance 6097 (New Series) is repealed. Section 10. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of its passage: and befor the expiration of the fifteen (15) days after its passage, a su shall be published once with the names of the members voting fc and against the same in the San Diego Daily Transcript, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Sar Diego. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 15 JOHN MACDONALD Chairman of the Board of Supervi: of the County of San Diego, Stat California The above ordinance was adopted by the following vote: Supervisor Brian P. Bilbray Voting qlAyel' Supervisor George F. Bailey Voting trAyelt Supervisor Susan Golding Voting rrNoll Supervisor Leon L. Williams Voting clAyeq' Supervisor John MacDonald Voting crNoqr ATTEST my hand and the seal of the Board of Supervisors 12th day of November, 1991. THOMAS J. PASTUSZm Clerk of the Board of Supervisors BY 2- <+jLz+J Esther C. Ryan, Deputy /\ P:; _. * j y: , , A,S j -{ COUN I Y CC'UiG 9% e .- 1990 CENSUs C(5-s FOR SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALrFoRNIA I03 2903 5099 8102 8800 10007 12500 14200 16606 200 3001 51 00 8200 8901 10008 12600 14300 16607 300 3002 5199 8301 8902 10009 12700 * 14400 16608 400 3101 5200 8303 9000 10103 12800 14500 16609 500 3102 5300 8305 9101 10104 12900 14600 16610 600 3103 5400 8306 9102 10106 13000 14700 16611 800 3107 5600 8310 9104. 10108 13102 14803 16702 900 3108 5700 8311 9105 - IO IO^ 13201 14804 16802 1000 3109 5800 8312 9201 10200 13203 14900 16804 1100 3110 5899 8313 9202 10300 13204 15000 16806 1200 3201 5900 8314 9301 10400 13301 15100 16807 1300 - 3202 6000 8315 9303 10500 13302 15200 16808 1400 3203 6100 8316 9304 10601 13303 15301 16809 1500 3204 6200. 8317 9400 . 10602 13304 15302 16900 1600- - 3207, 5299 8318 9501 10603 13305 15402 17006 1700 320s 6300 8319 9502 10700 13401 15403 17007 1800 3209 6400 8320 9503 10800 13405 15404 17008 1900 -3210 6500 8321 9504 10900 13406 15501 17009 2001 3300 6600 8322 9602 11000 33407 - 15502 17010 2002 3401 6800 8324 9603 11100 13408 15601 17011 2100 3402 6900 8325 9604 11200 13409 15602 17014 2300 3600 7002 8501 9704 11399 13504 15702 17016 2400 3800 7100 8502 9705 11400 13505 15800 17018 2501 3899 7200 8503 9706 11499 13506 15900 17019 2502 3900 7301 8504 9801 11500 13601 16000 17020 . 2600 4000 7302 8505 9802 11600 13603 16100 17021 270 1 4100 7400 8506 9804 11700 13604 16201 17022 2702 4200 7500- 8507 9805 11800 13700 16202 17023 2703 4300 7600 8509 9901 11900 13500 16300 17026 2704 4400 7700 8510 9902 12000 13901 16401 17327 2705 4500 7800 851 1 9999 12100 13903 16402 17028 2706 4600 7901 8597 10001 12200 13904 1GSOl 17097 280 1 4700 7902 8598 10002 12301 13905 16502 17098 2802 4 800 8001 8600 10003 12302 14001 16602 17103 2901 4 900 8002 8701 i'Ooo4 12401 14002 16603 17104 2902 SO00 8101 8702 IO005 12402 14100 16604 17105 700 3105 5500 8307 9103 10107 13101 14801 - . 16701 2200 3500 7001 8326 9703 11300 13503 is?oi 17015 PAGE 1 % 1990 CENSUS 0 ma FOR SAN DIEGO COUN 9 CALIFORNLA 17106 18803 20297 17302 18902 20301 17303 19000 20302 17304 19101 20303 17401 19103 20401 17403 19104 20402 17404 19105 20403 17500 19202 20500 17601 19203 20601 17602 19204 20698 17801 19401 20703 17803 19402 20705 - 17805 19500 20706 17806 19601' 20301 17807 19602 20804 17808 19701 20897 17900 19702 20898 18000 19801 20901 18100 19802 20902 18200 19901 21000 18300 19902 21100 18400 19903 21201 18501 20005 21202 18504 20006 21301 . 18507 20007 21302 27200 18901 20298 * 17700 *- 19300 20701 3 18508 20005 18597 20009 18595 20010 13601 20011 18603 20012 18605 20101 18606 20103 18607 20104 'I 18700 20202 18801 20204 13802 20205 PAGE 2 t-@ 25 pH cc,@ 5 0- 0 m0 -0 0" m .74 Q!g z 2s cc,d d 0-0 -0 4 o;\ > $ d 2 32 0 og mg CQg 0, m '0,6 -n M *8 Q!g cc,g r', 0 Q" 0 *- 0 cog mg ** M mg Q!# zz *\q 4 *. mm wg c'! TCI NO -8 c '0, cd 6 "* .Y .z $ 4 b d Sd s? v, 6 ln* QQ 39 Q!m "g s "" 0 *, 0 mg cc, 4 m * oE el p! Zb 0 rlg % \om 2 Q!! rd c'" c.i mn (.s s.2 *% 4 2 r- o N# VIS dc'! c'l, -e *c'! NO : P *ln VI0 4 !? s * $ lg-* 2- * s- l- d w mi \o $$ sg mg mg v)g G$ G: +6 .e * Pq \o -m m * * PJ m l= - v1 m * * *g 2C-J cad -"& -4 b\o\ 0, od *e 2=t" -3- 0" - 0'" I+ 4 0 rl w 5 D g-2 H* gyp- - 3 0 3 m- z *- 3 -- 4 v1 o\ =t" v) w fi N v) v) w cc, lc- 0- -e.. s (0 c3 0 +- c3 0 0 w cu cu 0 Y Q 0 0 Y Y cu -CI Y Y u-4 6s 0 *CI u Y + Y Y E am r.4g *"0 cc, *g *d: 4, r- 08 0-0 m 00 l-4 v)Q m 4 gg 33 .=?? \d d, d# m" w 9. o\ m * d# XI* eo dm d v) 10, z- OI *" - HZ 0 0 c, ru 0 e E a (I 3 z !? a :g z $lA .= .- IBO;:gu,+5% -._ 5 .de- -aW& m';:gj= 0 s Eg E'$ $==;a .~g.%&tup: !$ i$ I 'fzz =eo, .2m& 2 ,mmm irii 3 2 u) G$ m3z .g= 2% 8a $3 8 s 4 .2 g UEJ~;,,~@$ 5 q o~+u~~ba a a 0 O~E eg$f,~m;;tjj<.gt$gSggs ~ma ss3~>3~xam~1~~~$z~zl~~~=0~ -~didw~w~~----,--,,,,,,,,, c: fri m' iui CIj 6 uj 0: 0.G fri m' **-a. &&. 3 CITY MAPS 102 . 129 130 103 131 108 109 132 133 110 134 111 135 114 135-1 114-1 136 115 137 116 119-1 138 1 19-2 1 39 120 139-1 139-2 121 140 122 124-1 141 1 42 128 TOTAL 34 COUNTY MAPS 1143 1319 1169 1346 1196 1347 1197 1348 1223 1349 1224 1350 1226 1351 1227 1352 1228 1378 1 254 1379 1255 1380 1256 1387 1257 1382 1285 1408 1286 1409 1287 1410 1288 1411 1315 1412 1317 1440 1318 1441 1442 1316 1439 .; TOTAL 43 r a Q z- - 0 r -- W'k.aj&0.&4pj+ uj d h' . o(3om10vvv10 10 10 * 044pj+ltj~Kd~O 44 ~+uj NNwNNNwNwNo mm 0(3(3 L .- 04.c\io'+uj&Kdoj 4oi6iddKid----,-,,,, LC* c L7 2 Lr: - 3 CIN MAPS 8 9 10 14 18 79 80 86 93 100 101 107 113 94 TOTAL 14 Effective 1GO2-91 COUNTY MAPS 1245 1342 1403 1461 1519 1584 1653 1807 1272 1343 1404 1462 1520 1585 1654 1808 1273 1344 1405 1463 1521 1586 1655 1827 1274 1345 1406 1464 1522 1587 1664 1828 1275 1346 1407 1465 1523 1589 1665 1829 1276 1347 1408 1466 1524 1590 1666 1836 1277 1348 1424 1467 1525 1591 1667 1837 1282 1365 1425 1468 1526 1592 1668 1950 1980 1283 1366 1367 1427 1484 1528 1606 1368 1428 1485 1529 1607 1674 1996 1284 1303 1304 1369 1430 1486 1530 1608 1675 1997 1305 1370 1431 1487 1543 1609 1676 1998 1306 1371 1432 1488 1544 1613 1683 1999 1307 1372 1433 1489 1545 1614 1684 2007 1310 1373 1434 1490 1546 1615 1685 2008 131 1 1374 1435 1491 1547 1616 1697 2036 1312 1375 1436 1492 1552 1622 1698 2064, 1313 1376 1437 1493 1553 1623 1700 1314 1377 1439 1494 1554 1636 1704 1315 1378 1440 1495 1555 1637 1705 1 706 1740 1316 1394 1441 1496 1334 1395 1442 1497 1335 1396 1454 1498 1558 1640 1741 1336 1397 1455 1499 1559 1643 1742 1337 1398 1456 ' 1514 1574 1644 ln6 1338 1399 1457 1515 1575 1645 1777 1339 1400 1458 1516 1577 1646 1797 I 1340 1401 1459 1517 1578 1647 1798 1341 1402 1460 1518 1583 1652 1806 1951 1669 1670 1426 1469 1x7 1605 1638 1639 1556 1557 TOTAL 228 - 0 h cu 0 .. g 4 In- (u 6 ic f Q- $ Gi 5 & 0 6 4% -5 - B gj do WcES 'E # 35 60 -0cF gg a, urn$ ai? ~O~cn 2 + .cP_~l ZI pi ahal s?m ,.ZC .5 &*?&Ee g: . U~cco0m.- .LOgc&m-, .G=$ gupawo3 0" 2t.~oi?c.am~ZI~r -08 2o~~0-0~0 --sn-oEg& 23s m'~Et6~nI~m'$~~n~m~~~~~.~~8.~r-L"m~~~~,.,al~o i 0 m2 ,Bo S.Emr 8&cnz c= 28 c[rtncug E@P $'I g ,g 0 5 giz% ;~~EEC, a m E=- Ex o ,= c 111 c.c=r ", % ,= cn m -6iillj4rritfj ~~~rrrrr-rr--(ucucucu~cucu(ucucu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c 4iObWhCOt3OT-CUOd - - Cal - - cn C 0 1- L. 2. BE s 0"s ~3 .iaalc >82 u g, 2 tm E C a .12 e - 075 k .u 2 0 roucm al al< ,z3p am~xm~~n~xo>Y3axwam~cn~~cn~n~~z~~~~~x~~~~n~a~1cn m 0 32 0 0 0.- % s?zr o.g$O a LlQ c m m m m m m o.--'C g$&.Ep & szs $: .....*.~1tI! a. -.did a'*'a. k' a. 6. 6' . CU' fi'*.ro' d. F; d' a; 0 . - .+* I\ 3 CITY MAPS 78 79 11 34 12 35 13 36 58 80 81 82 83 14 37 39 17 18 40 62 84 19 41 63 85 20 42 64 86 21 43 65 87 22 44 66 88 23 45 67 89 24 46 68 90 25 47 69 91 26 48 70 92 27 49 71 93 28 50 72 94 29 51 73 95 30 52 74 96 31 53 75 97 32 54 76 102 33 55 77 103 56 57 E; 61 38 16 TOTAL 88 COUNTY MAPS 1241 1242 1131 1132 1070 1071 1084 1133 1243 1085 1155 1245 1156 1 246 1157 1272 1686 1087 1 088 1158 1273 1103 1159 1 274 1104 1181 1282 1105 1182 1303 1106 1183 1307 1107 1184 1310 1108 1210 131 1 1128 1211 1312 1129 1212 1338 1130 1215 1339,1340 TOTAL 49 .dG c\i Fj 0: ui w r-: a. d 0 & cj cri + ui W-K m' 6 0 & c\i (.j p: uj a.r-: m' d 0 & C~~dd~~~O~-r--~--,r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m CITY MAPS 76 101 112 84 102 113 85 1 03 116 90 104 117 118 119 91 105 92 106 93 I07 122 97 1 08 123 9a 109 1 24 99 110 125 100 111 126 TOTAL 33 COUNTY MAPS 1314 1315 * 131 6 1346 TOTAL 4 O&&Fiidd6&dOGC c' oj Pi,: d w (.: (d oi - c - - c c c 7 - - N 01 p 3 i CITY MAPS I 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTAL 15 COUNTY MAPS 1044 1094 1148 1203 1265 1328 1055 1095 1149 1204 1266 1329 1056 1096 1150 1205 1267 1330 1057 1097 1151 1206 1268 1331 1058 1098 1152 1207 1269 1332 1059 lo99 1153 1208 1270 1333 1060 1100 1154 1209 1271 1334 1065 1101 1155 1210 1272 1356 1066 1102 1170 1229 1292 1357 1067 1118 1171 1230 1293 1358 1068 1119 1172 1231 1294 1359 lo69 1120 1173 1232 1295 1360 1070 1121 1174 1233 1296 1361 1072 1122 1175 1234 1297 1362 1073 1123 1176 1235 1298 1363 1074 1124 1177 1236 1299 1364 1079 1125 1178 1237 1300 1386 1080 1126 1179 1238 1301 1387 1081 1127 1180 1239 1302 1388 1389 1392 1082 1128 1181 1240 1144 1199 1261 1324 1393 1083 1084 1091 1145 1200 1262 1325 1394 1092 1146 1201 1263 1326 1416 1303 1323 i 129 I198 1241 TOTAL 172