HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-09-16; City Council; 14348; REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO DESTROY RECORDS KEPT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE..
CITY OF CAR mi AD -AGENDA BILL 0 I AB# 14; ~YK I TITLE:
MTG . 9/16/97
DEPT. CA
REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO DESTROY RECORDS
KEPT BY THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
I DEPT, HD.
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR.
P
0
eB L%
9
2
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 44403 authorizing the destruction of certain files.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This agenda bill is part of a continuing Record Management Program for City de
Adoption of the Resolution will complete the destruction of obsolete and unnecessar
City Attorney’s office.
Government Code section 34090 provides authority for destruction of documents th
than two years old and are no longer required. Authorization of the City Council is re
to the destruction of any documents.
The documents listed in Exhibit “A have been reviewed in accordance with the p
section 34090 of the Government Code, and meet those requirements, and the C
has consented to their destruction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
EXHIBITS:
Resolution No. 9 7 -603
Exhibit “A list of records to be destroyed
1 S 0 .- - 2
s
- .- 0 S 3
1
"
1
2
3
4
0 a
RESOLUTION NO. 97-603
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS KEPT BY THE
CITY ATTORNEY.
5 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad resolves:
6
8
Attorney is authorized to destroy records over two years old as shown on Exhibit ' 7
1. That pursuant to Section 34090 of the Government Code,
11
10 the City Attorney deems is necessary for the ongoing or current activity of the offic
9
2. This resolution shall not authorize the destruction of any reco
City Attorney.
II slug
%E$!
%;e
si0 p.4
czs
I??
jU, OLu8
so4s
Ed:
f? I <-
zwag
a83
<>ma
u
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of
l Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 16th day of SeDtember 1997, by the 1
I
1 vote, to wit:
I
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin, 1
NOES: None
ABSENT: None /7
22 ll 23
24 ATTEST:
25
26
27 /I (S54L)
28
_, .’, (m
EXHIBIT A
ALVAREZ V. CITY, 120927 (Request for Dismissal 9/11/92)
BLAIR AND ZAHN V. CITY, N35786 (Release 5/28/91)
CITY V. MURPHY, N48064 (Final Order of Condemnation 3/13/92)
CAMPILLO V. EPPEL, CITY, 89 1642 B (M) (Stipulation re: Dismissal of Action
HALL V. CITY, 124379 (Release and Settlement 7/17/92)
HAYASHI V. PRUDENTIAL, ET AL., N55737 (Request for Dismissal 6/12/92)
KELLY V. CITY, N5431 I (Request for Dismissal 5/11/92)
KEL-CAL v. CITY, N49825 (Settlement and Release 12/30/91)
O’BRIEN V. CITY, N58341 (Request for Dismissal 4/21/94)
PACIFIC CONTRACTING GROUP, N57262 (Stipulation Dismissing City 10/28/92)
RlTCHlE V. CITY, N64561 (City’s M/SJ granted 2/15/97)
SADDLEBACK WHOLESALE ELECTRIC V. JULIAN, 113715 (Request for Dismissal
SAK PHOTOGRAPHY V. AETNA (Inactive and closed 2/27/86)
SAN DlEGO PIPELINE V. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, C502532 AND C688463 (In
SAWYER V. SETMIRE, 126785 (Request for Dismissal 6/18/92)
SIMON’S LOAN AND JEWELRY V. CITY, 626330 (Request for Dismissal 2/23/91)
VILLASENOR V. CITY, 112730 (Request for Dismissal 12/18/91)
WERNER V. CITY, N59038 (Request for Dismissal 314194)
ZACHARY V. TREJO, N55508 (Release and Settlement 9/13/93)
and Order 1011 0/91)
closed 4/3/90)
OKAY TO DESTROY
- fz. b
RONALD R. BALL q23(s 3.
City Attorney