Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-11-18; City Council; 14430; Soil & Drainage study along Park Dr.- - LI TY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA'BILL AB# 3 0 m: APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENT yi AND THE AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR MTG. I 111 8/97 THE STUDY OF SOIL AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ALONG CITY A EPT. PW PARK DRIVE, PROJECT NO. 3478 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 3- 6% I authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate additional funds and approving a consultant agreement with Kleinfelder, Incorporated, for a geotechnical study including testing and recommendations for the soil sloughing and drainage problems along the northeast side of Park Drive. ITEM EXPLANATION: The purpose of the study by a soils engineer is to develop and evaluate various alternatives that will solve a drainage and soil sloughing problem that is occurring at the north east side of Park Drive from Bayshore Drive to approximately 500 feet north of Marina Drive (project site). During the widening of Park Drive in 1987, the bluff at the project site was cut back for the construction. Water continuously percolates through the bluff causing soil erosion and a water hazard on Park sidewalk being covered with water, green algae growth and soil. Due to the high density residential Drive and the adjacent sidewalk. Pedestrians are often forced to walk in the street due to the neighborhood, the east side of the street is often used for parking which makes it difficult for which is recommended by this study, staff will return to Council for approval of funding and pedestrians to walk if they must step off the sidewalk. Prior to proceeding with any type of project environmental clearance. The soils engineering firm of Kleinfelder, Incorporated is recommended by staff for this study. The firm was the best qualified of the two (2) firms that were requested to submit a proposal for the study in July 1997. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached consultant agreement with Kleinfelder, Exhibit 3. Incorporated for the geotechnical study as described in the attached consultant agreement, ENVIRONMENTAL: this study is a class 6 categorically exempt activity. In accordance with Section 15300 et. seq. of the California Administrative Code, CEQA Guidelines, FISCAL IMPACT: The fee for the attached contract with Kleinfelder, Incorporated is $16,999. Purchase order Staff costs plus possible change orders are estimated at $8,201. The total cost is, therefore, PI03457 has previously been issued for project management services in the amount of $7,800. $33,000. The current budget of $17,000 was set before the scope of the project was determined. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $16,000 from the General Capital Construction Fund in order to complete the study. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map. 2. Resolution No. 43 - 68 I authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $16,000 and approving a consultant agreement with Kleinfelder, Incorporated for the geotechnical study. 3. Consultant agreement for Kleinfelder, Incorporated. \ NOT TO SCALE SI PROJECT NAME PROJECT EXHIBIT DARK DRIVE SLOPE/DRAINAGE STUDY FOR REPAIR 3478 NUMBER 1 MV BY' X011 tVANS CARLSbAD tNG,NEERING ULVI. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 97-681 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AGREEMENT WITH KLEINFELDER, INCORPORATED TO STUDY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSULTANT THE SOIL AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ALONG PARK DRIVE, PROJECT NO. 3478 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has previously appropriated funds for he study of the soil and drainage problems along Park Drive; and WHEREAS, proposals have been solicited for the study of the project from qualified leotechnical engineering firms; and WHEREAS, Kleinfelder, Incorporated was selected as the best qualified firm to prepare he study for Project No. 3478 for a fee of $16,999 bringing the total cost estimate for the project o $33,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, :alifomia. as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate an additional $16,000 from he General Capital Construction Fund. 3. That a consultant agreement with Kleinfelder, Incorporated for the study of Project rlo. 3478 as described in the attached contract is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. Yl Yl Yl Yl Yl Yl VI 111 VI VI Exhibit 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1: Id l! It li 11 15 2( 21 21 2: 24 25 26 27 28 4. Following the Mayor's signature of the agreement, the City Clerk is further luthorized and directed to fonvard copies of said agreement to Kleinfelder. Incorporated and the Ingineering Department design division for their files. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council leld on the 18th day of November , 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin, apP Hall NOES: None ABSENT: None ;TTEST: (SEAL) AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PROJECT NO. 34781 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the e7 day of OCbh , 19x, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and KLEINFELDER. INCORPORATED, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." RECITALS City requires the services of a professional engineering Contractor to provide the necessary engineering services for a study of the soil and drainage problems along Park Drive; and Contractor possesses the necessary skills and qualifications to provide the services required by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTORS OBLIGATIONS The scope of services to be provided are described in Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D", as follows: one Exhibit "A" - Your proposal of July 17, 1997 consisting of 10,pages and e Exhibit "B" - Fax of August 1, 1997, Revised Fee Proposal consisting of huQattachmentvncluding Table 1 (Fee Itemization),-. three sheets. rev. 8/26/96 1 Exhibit 3 0 Exhibit "C" - Memorandum of August 19, 1997, Confirmation of Fees, consisting of one sheet. 0 Exhibit 'D" - Memorandum of August 19, 1997, Description of Work for Soil Borings at Top of Slope for Park Drive SlopelDrainage Study, consisting of one sheet. 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS The City shall provide: A. Copies of all existing City reference data as researched and requested by Contractor. B. Review of the study, plans, specifications and cost estimate for the purpose of determining the general conformity to City Standards and Project Scope. C. Permission to enter onto private property for purposes of soil borings. 3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION The work under this contract will begin within ten (10) days after receipt of notification to proceed by the City and be completed in accordance with Exhibit "A". Extensions of time may be granted if requested by the Contractor and agreed to in writing by the Project Manager. The Project Manager will give allowance for documented and substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a rev. 8/26/96 2 lack of foresight on the part of the Contractor, or delays caused by City 'lnactlon or other agencies' lack of timely action. 4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR The total fee payable for the services to be performed shall be In accordance with Exhibit 'C". No other compensation for services will be allowed except those items covered by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 8. "Changes in Work." The City reserves the right to withhold a ten percent (10%) retention until the project has been accepted by the City. Incremental payments. if applicable, should be made as outlmed in attached Exhibit "A," 5. DURATION OF CONTRACT This agreement shall extend for a period of time as shown on Exhibit "A". The contract may be extended by the City Manager for one (1) additional one (1) year periods or parts thereof, based upon a review of satisfactory performance and the City's needs. The parties shall prepare extensions in writing indicating effective date and length of the extended contract. 6. PAYMENT OF FEES Payment of approved items on the invoice shall be mailed to the Contractor within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. 7. FINAL SUBMISSIONS Within five (5) days of completion and approval of the study, plans, rev. 8/26/96 3 specifications and cost estimate, the Contractor shall deliver to the City the following items: A. All items as described in Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D". B. Two (2) copies of all other reports, test results and calculations generated by the Contractor in the completion and execution of the provisions of thls contract. 8. CHANGES IN WORK If, in the course of the contract, changes seem merited by the Contractor or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change in the conditions of the contract is warranted, the Contractor or the City may iequest a change in contract. Such changes shall be processed by the City in the following manner: A letter outlining the required changes shall be forwarded to the City by Contractor to inform them of the proposed changes along with a statement of estimated changes in charges or time schedule. A Standard Amendment to Agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved by the City according to the procedures described in Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.28.172. Such Amendment to Agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of the agreement. 9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The Contractor warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, 4 rev. 8l26196 percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contmgent upon. or resulting from, the award or making of this agreement. For breach or vlolation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration. or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gtft, or contingent fee. IO. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE The Contractor shall comply with the state and federal laws regarding nondiscrimination. 11. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT In the event of the Contractor's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the work as provided for in this contract, the City Manager may termmate this contract for nonperformance by notifying the Contractor by certified mail of the termination of the Contractor. The Contractor, thereupon, has five (5) working days to deliver said documents owned by the City and all work in progress to the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall make a determination of fact based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentage of work which the Contractor has performed which is usable and of worth to the City in having the contract completed. Based upon that finding as reported to the City Manager, the Manager shall determine the final payment of the contract. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) 5 rev. 8/26/96 days written notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or termination, upon request of the City. the Contractor shall assemble the work product and put same in order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to City. In the event of termination, the Contractor shall be paid for work performed to the termination date; however, the total shall not exceed the lump sum fee payable under paragraph 4. The City Manager shall make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the compensation to be made. 12. DISPUTES If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work-under this agreement, the following procedure shall be used to resolve any question of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they become identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating under the provisions of this contract, shall be reduced to writing by the principal of the Contractor or the City Engineer. A copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both parties involved along with recommended methods of resolution which would be of benefit to both parties. The City .Engineer or principal receiving the letter shall reply to the letter along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) days. If the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the dispute shall be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the Office of the City Manager. The City Council may then opt to consider the directed solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City Council shall be binding upon the parties 6 rev. 8/26/96 involved, although nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to them at law. 13. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS The Contractor agrees that any contract claim submitted to the City must be asserted as part of the contract process as set forth in this agreement and not in anticipation of litigation or in conjunction with litigation. The Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to the City, it may be considered fraud and the Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. The Contractor acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 etsea., the Fake Claims Act, provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public entity. These provisions include false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of information. If the City of Carlsbad seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation' costs, including attorney's fees. The Contractor acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may subject the Contractor to an administrative debarment proceeding wherein the Contractor may be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work or improvement for a period of up to five years. The Contractor acknowledges debarment by another jurisdiction is grounds for the City of Carlsbad to disqualify the Contractor from the selection process. &(Initial) The provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code sections 3.32.025, 3.32.026, rev. 8/26/96 7 I 3.32.02 and 3.32.028 pertaining to false claims are incorporated herein by reference I+ 5 t1 ~tf- - (Initial) 14. STATUS OF THE CONTRACTOR The Contractor shall perform the services provided for herein in Contractor's own way as an independent Contractor and in pursuit of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of the City. Contractor shall be under control of the City only as to the result to be accomplished, but shall consult with the City as provided for in the request for proposal. The persons used by the Contractor to provide services under this agreement shall not be considered employees of-the City for any purposes whatsoever. The Contractor is an independent Contractor of the City. The payment made to the Contractor pursuant to the contract shall be the full and complete compensation to which the Contractor is entitled. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of the Contractor or hislher employees or subcontractors. The City shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance or unemployment .contributions on behalf of the Contractor or hislher employees or subcontractors. The Contractor agrees to indemnify the City within 30 days for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtlme payment, unemployment payment or workers' compensation payment which the City may be required to make on behalf of the Contractor or any employee or subcontractor of the Contractor for work done under this agreement or such indemnification amount may be deducted by the City from any a I' balance owing to the contractor. The Contractor shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and shall comply with those requirements. includmg, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and Consultants that are included in this agreement. 15. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to all applicable requirements of law: federal, state and local. Contractor shall provide all necessary supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approval is necessary. The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any other agencies. 16. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and specifications as herein required are the property of the City, whether the work for which they are made be executed or not. In the event this contract is terminated. all documents, plans, specifications, drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. Contractor shall have the right to make one (1) copy of the plans for hislher records, 17. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS The Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this contract shall be vested in City and hereby agrees to relinquish all claims to such copyrights in favor of City. rev. 8/26/96 9 18. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and agarnst all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorney fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein caused in whole or in part by any willful misconduct or neghgent act or omission of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City of Carlsbad. Contractor shall at its own expense, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Contractors indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Contractor. 19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT The Contractor shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies due thereunder without the prior written consent of the City. 20. SUBCONTRACTING If the Contractor shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under this contract by the Contractor, Contractor shall be fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of Contractor's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of rev. 8/26/96 10 persons directly employed by Contractor. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Contractor and the City. The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable to Contractor's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by the City. 21. PROHIBITED INTEREST No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving of this agreement, shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. No officer or employee of the City who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the City to exercise any executive, supervisory, or similar functions in connection with the performance of this contract shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part thereof. 22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of the City, either before, during or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained nor entitle the Contractor to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this contract. 23. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold Harmless Agreement," all rev. 8/26/96 11 terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall brnd eacn of the parttles hereto, and each of their respective heirs, executors, admlnistrators, successors, and assigns. 24. EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first written above. 25. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The City has determined, using the guidelines of the Political Reform Act and the City's conflict of interest code, that the Contractor will not be required to file a conflict of interest statement as a requirement of this agreement. However, Contractor hereby acknowledges that Contractor has the legal responsibility for complying with the Political Reform Act and nothing in this agreement releases Contractor from this responsibility. 26. INSURANCE The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of the contract and any and all amendments insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise out of or in connection with performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors, Said insurance shall be obtained from an insurance carrier admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California. The insurance carrier is required to have a current Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:V' and shall meet the City's policy for rev. 8/26/96 12 insurance as stated in Resolution No. 91403. A: Coveraaes and Limits. Contractor shall maintain the types of coverages and mmimum limits indicated herein, unless a lower amount is approved by the City Attorney or City Manager: 1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. $1,000,000 combined single-limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the submitted policies contain aggregate limits, general aggregate limits shall apply separately to the work under this contract or the general aggregate shall be twice the required per occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability (if the use of an automobile is involved for Contractor's work for the City): $1,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury. 4. Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to the contractor's profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Coverage shall be maintained for a period of five years following the date of completion of the work. rev. 8/26/96 13 B. Additional Provisions. Contractor shall ensure that the policies of insurance required under this agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provlsions. 1. The City shall be named as an additional insured on all policles excluding Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. 2. The Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance to the City before commencement of work. 3. The Contractor shall obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional Liability which shall be written as claims-made cgverage. 4. This insurance shall be in force during the life of the agreement and any extension thereof and shall not be canceled without 30 days prior written notice to the City sent by certified mail. 5. If the Contractor fails to maintain any of the insurance coverages required herein, then the City will have the option to declare the Contractor in breach, or may purchase replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order that the required coverages may be maintained. The Contractor is responsible for any payments made by the City to obtain or maintain such insurance and the City may collect the same from the Contractor or deduct the amount paid from any sums due the Contractor under this agreement. rev. 8/26/96 14 27. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES The name of the persons who are authorized to give wrltten notices or to receive written notlce on behalf of the City and on behalf of the Contractor in connection with the foregoing are as follows: For City: For Contractor: R.C.E. License Number. lMxExhkse" Title Name Address -2p~5 Las pa Citv Ensineer Lloyd Hubbs Carlsbad, CA 92009-4895 lmas Drive Title Senior Engineer Name Rick E. LarSOn Address 9555 Chesapeake Dr. Suite 101 San Dieao, CA 92123-6300 RCE 39226 28. BUSINESS LICENSE Contractor shall obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License for the duration of the contract. 29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this agreement nor any provision .. 15 rev. 8/26/96 hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. Executed by Contractor this 21 day of &f-r,kl.W ,1942. CONTRACTOR: KLEINFELDER INCORPORATED ATTEST: AJLXL. 642- ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ City Clerk (Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by Contractor must be attached.) (President or vice-president and secretary or assistant Secretary must sign for corporations. If Only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant Secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer to bind the corporation.) APPROVED AS TO FORM: RONALD R. BALL City Attorney 16 rev. 8/26/96 IA ALL-PUh- OSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of On , NmmdTRkotOmrIW Nur*(ll ot SignNsl &personally known to me 0 proved to me on the basis of Satisfactory evidence to be the person@) whose name@) idare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity0es). and that by hidherkheir signature@) on the instrument the person@), or the entity upon behalf of which the person@) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official Seal. WONAL Though the information below is not required by law, il may prove valuable io penons relyifq on iho document and W!d prevent frauduleni removal and reanachment of this form io anomer document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) 0 Corporate Officer 0 Individual Title@): 0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General 0 Attorney-in-Fact 0 Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator . Signer Is Representing: Pmd. NO. 5907 2( 0 Individual 0 Corporate Officer 0 Partner - 0 Limited 0 General Title@): 0 Attorney-in-Fact 0 Trustee- 0 Guardian or Conservator 0 Other: I I Signer Is Representing: ll I I ................... July 17, 1997 Proposal No. 51-YP7-147 Mr. Galen N. Peterson, Consulting Project Manager City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4589 Subject: Geotechnical Proposal for Park Drive SloughinglDrainage Study Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Peterson: Kleinfelder is pleased to present this proposal for performing a geotechnical study to provide recommendations for the soil sloughing and drainage problems along Park Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California. This proposal is based on our review of your letter of July 9. 1997 which requested this proposal and described the general problems, problem area. and anticipated contents of the proposal. The following sections describe our understanding of the proposed project, scope of Kleinfelder services, our approach to the project plan, personnel to be assigned the project, schedule, our current workload, and fees. We have also included our current Standard Form 254. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Based on our preliminary site visit of July 15,1997, it is obvious that about 500 feet of the east side of Park Drive just north of Marina Drive is experiencing some drainage and soil sloughing problems. Water reportedly continuously percolates through the lower portion of the slope. and we observed draining and ponded water during our recent site visit. Cattails and bamboo tend to confirm that the areas are probably continuously wet. The drainage for the existing retaining walls is primarily through open joints in the face of the wall which allow drainage and soil to accumulate on the sidewalk area. The existing pipe drain collections system appears inadequate and simply conducts the water through the sidewalk area where it tends to collect on the street. owing to the flat grade of Park Drive in the study area. It also appears obvious that the lower 25 to 40 feet of the west facing sandstone bluff is experiencing typical bluff erosion similar to sea cliffs adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. Accumulations of erosion material at the base of the bluff are apparently washing further down the lower section of the bluff, over the existing rctaining walls, and are being deposited on the 5l-Yr7-l4n517rGl5l,Dc€ Copyright 1991 Klcinfeldcr, Inc, Page I 01'10 July 17. 1997 sidewalk and street. Based on our preliminary site visit, we did not note any conditions which could indicate that the gross stability of the bluff was being impacted other than the continuous erosion and occasional surface related sloughing as portions of the bluff are undermined by erosion. Two pipelines are visible along the slope above the sidewalk area which are being uncovered by erosion and could potentially be impacted in the near future. KLEINFELDER APPROACH TO THE PROBLEMS Based on our site visit and the request for proposal of July 9, 1997, we consider that two primary problems are present, namely: A. Drainage of the lower slope, and B. Evaluating the erosion of the bluff. Also included in the erosion problem are the subset problems of how to mitigate the erosion and how to reduce the. eroded sediment transportation to the sidewalk and street areas. The most likely approach to the drainage is to add additional drainage and low retaining walls. The walls may also reduce the amount of sediment reaching the street during storm periods. Portions of the existing walls may need to be replaced to provide a better drainage system. We anticipate that all drainage will be collected at the upper subsurface with a drainage collection trench and carried to a suitable underground sewer. For the erosion and sediment, we anticipate that we will need to complete a geologic reconnaissance of the bluff to evaluate the effects of erosion and to provide recommendations for potential measures. At this time we anticipate that some type of aesthetically acceptable storage method will be required that will accommodate temporary storage and periodic removal of accumulated sediment. We do not foresee that increasing the height of existing retaining walls or alteration of the bluff face will be either practical, economical, or acceptable to the City Parks and Recreation Commission. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of Kleinfelder’s service will be to complete a geologic evaluation of the bluff and a limited geotechnical study at the bluff toe to evaluate foundations design parameters for new retaining walls and a subdrain system. The specific tasks to be completed include: 51-YP7-14N17PG151.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder. Inc. Page t of 10 July 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 933.; Chesapeake Drive. Suite 1U1. San Dirgo, CA ~1?12:4-6300 16191 5.11-1145 16191 541-16.15 ia\ 2’ Task 1: Initial Meeting with City Engineering The purpose of this meeting will be to go over Kleinfelder’s proposal and work plan. Our senior engineer will attend this meeting with the Consulting Project Manager and any pertinent staff from the Engineering Department. Someone from the Maintenance Department who is aware of the frequency of sediment clean-up and a representative from the Parks and Recreation Commission should also be present. We have budgeted for a two hour meeting to discuss the project, Kleinfelder’s scope, and to transfer additional knowledge and information the City may have. Task 2: Geologic Slope Reconnaissance Our senior engineer and engineering geologist will visit the site to map the local geology of the affected bluff face area. We will then prepare a report which will consider, describe. and analyze the following: 1) cliff geometry and site topography, extending the reconnaissaice work beyond the site as 2) current and foreseeable cliff erosion; 3) geologic conditions, including soil, sediment and rock types and characteristics in addition to 4) evidence of past or potential landslide conditions; 5) impact of construction activity for the addition of retaining walls and drainage trenchs on the 6) ground and surface water conditions and variations; 7) potential erodibility of site and potential measures to be used to mitigate erosion; 8) preliminary evaluation of factor of safety against deep seated circular failure using estimates for soil strength parameters and other geologic conditions. We will also compute a pseudo- static slope stability factor of safety using a seismic component of 0.ljg to evaluate the earthquake effects on the slope stability. needed to depict unusual geomorphic conditions that might affect the site; structural features, such as bedding, joints, and faults; stability of the study area; At the geologic slope reconnaissance level, the conclusions will not be long and detailed. The observed conditions will be stated, and a general overview of the site geology as it correlates to the stability of the existing bluff will be presented. An assessment of the degree of slope stability and erosion hazards present, based on exiting information. will be given. If there are suspected geologic problems that cannot be evaluated except through in-depth investigations. then this will be clearly stated in the report. Since the evaluation of the factor of safety of the slope will be based on assumed parameters, this evaluation should only be considered preliminary in nature. Please note that if the geological reconnaissance report recommends further investigation. the recommended investigation is not a part of this current scope. Five copies of the draft report and fifteen copies of the final report will be provided. 51-YP7-14AS17PG151.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfcldcr, Inc Page 3 of IO July 17. 1997 25 Task 3: Geotechnical Investigation of the Bluff Toe The purpose of our geotechnical investigation will be to explore the immediate foundation areas in the vicinity of the proposed retaining walls to provide recommendations for the design of the retaining walls, surface and subsurface drainage, and potential methods for sediment retention. We proposed to explore the subsurface conditions by completing four small diameter test borings in the street area to maximum depths of IO to 15 feet below street level. or auger refusal. whichever is shallower, and completing two dynamic cone penetrometer soundings to five feet. The cone penetrometer soundings will be completed using light, portable equipment and will be used behind the sidewalk area to estimate the depth of loose material. Samples of the subsurface soils will be taken at nominal five-foot increments in the borings by conventional standard penetration tests. The cone soundings will consist of driving a 1.5 inch diameter cone into the soil with a free falling, 35 pound driving apparatus. The actual blow counts will be recorded in 4-inch (100 millimeter) increments and will be converted to dynamic cone resistance and equivalent SPT-blow counts by a computer program. A Kleinfelder staff member will maintain a log of the soils encountered in the borings and obtain samples for visual classification and laboratory testing. We anticipate that laboratory program will consist of the following tests: Three Sieve Analyses 0 One Plasticity Index One Direct Shear Test Eight Unit WeightMoisture Contents Based upon the results of our field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses, we will provide the following: Discussion of the surface and subsurface conditions; Total stress and unit weight properties of the retained and foundation soils for retaining wall designs; Recommendations for ranges of total stress and unit weight properties of typical soil types for retaining wall drainage fill and the reinforced (infill) soil zone; Bearing capacity of the retaining wall foundation soils, including recommendations for a foundation leveling pad, minimum foundation embedment, and anticipated foundation settlement; Recommendations for retaining wall drainage and toe-of-slope; Discussion of methods to anchor existing pipelines or relocate them. if required; Guidelines for earthwork construction, including recommendations for site preparation. fill placement, and compaction. 51-YP7-14A517PG151.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinkldcr. Inc, Page 4 of 10 July 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Driw, Suite 101. Sa" Diego, CA 92123-6300 I6191 541-1145 lh191.54l-lh45 ld'l 211 The above information will be summarized in a written report (five preliminary. fifteen final) that will include boring logs, cone sounding data, and laboratory test results. Task 4: Second Meeting with City Engineering The purpose of this second meeting is to review Kleinfelder's preliminary reports. As a minimum, the same individuals attending the initial meeting (Task 1) should attend this second meeting. We have budgeted for a two hour meeting, but have not budgeted for a formal presentation to be made. We will submit five copies of the preliminary reports. Task 5: Revise Preliminary Report We will incorporate the City's review comments from our preliminary report and issue a final report. Fifteen copies of the final report will be provided. . KLEINFELDER CURRENT WORK LOAD With OUI current work load and a local staff of over 50 employees, we do not anticipate that we will have any problem meeting the project schedule. Our project manager, Rick Larson. will be on vacation from July 24' through August 8h . However, if the project needs to start within this period, other members of the Kleinfelder staff can attend the initial meeting. SCHEDULE We anticipate that we can begin work on this project within five working days following our notice to proceed. We have formulated the following work plan and schedule for your review. The work plan and schedule are flexible and subject to your needs. Schedule a Receive notice to proceed (NTP) No activity required 1 Working day (WD) after NTP Schedule first meeting (Task 1) Within 5 WD after NTP Task 1 Within 3 WD after Task 1 Submit revised scope/work plan 3 WD after acceptance of Task 1 or Begin geologic slope review (Task 7) 'revised Task 1 51-~~7-147\517~~151.~0~ Copyright 1997 Kleinfcldcr, Inc. Page 5 0110 July 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive. Suite 101. San Diego. CA 91123-6300 16191 541.1145 16191 S4l-1645 I.1x 5 WD after acceptance of Task 1 or Begin geotechnical study (Task 3) revised Task 1 4 weeks after beginning of Task 3 Submit preliminary reports for Task 2 and Task 3 5 weeks after beginning of Task 3 Schedule Second Meeting (Task 4) Within 2 weeks after Task 4 Submit final reports (Task 5) FEES Our lump sum fees to provide each task are as follows: Task 1 Initial Meeting with City Engineering $430.00 Task 2 Geologic Slope Reconnaissance $4.065.00 Task 3 Geotechnical Investigation $7.446.00 Task 4 Second Meeting with City Engineering $430.00 Task 5 Revise Preliminary Reports to Final $1.240.00 Total Fee S13,611.00 A breakdown of our fees is shown on Table 1 attached. As a matter of clarification, Kleinfelder will be providing only those services listed above which have been accepted in final negotiations with the City of Carlsbad. Attendance at meetings, review of plans and specifications, or the preparation of supplemental reports and letters not specifically detailed in this proposal are not included in our scope for work. If our investigation indicates that unanticipated conditions are present which would require additional work, we will discuss the situation with you and revise our scope. schedule. and fees accordingly. An invoice for OUT services will be submitted upon completion of our report or on an end-of-the-month basis, whichever occurs first. This proposal is valid for a period of 60 days from the date of the proposal. We reserve the right to review our scope and costs if any agreement to provide our services has not been reached with the 60-day period. QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL We have selected key personnel with a great deal of local experience along with knowledge of slope stability and drainage type of projects. si-YP7-l4n5i7ffii5l.~ Copyright 1997 Klcinfcldcr. Inc, Page 6 of IO luly 17. 1997 RLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive. Suitc 101. 5.m Diepo, CA 9212?-6300 161'11 ,541-113.5 (6191 53l-IlAi iax Mr. Rick Larson, P.E., G.E., Senior Engineer: Mr. Larson will provide management and geotechnical engineer for this project. Mr. Larson has over 22 years of experience in consulting. Mr. Larson holds both Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in civil engineering from the University of Missouri, Rolla. He is a registered civil engineer and geotechnical engineer in the State of California. Mr. Larson has an extensive amount of experience with the construction of public works projects. Mr. Larson also brings to the project a great deal of esperience is a design civil engineer. He has personally prepared design plans and specifications for a variety of municipal and site development projects. His combined experience brings to this prqject an overall insight to the proposed improvements many consultants do not have. Mr. Stephen Korbay, R.G., C.E.G.. Senior Engineering Geologist: Mr. Korbay will provide the engineering geology for this project. He has over 25 years experience in both engineering geology and geotechnical disciplines and has developed a broad knowledge of subsurface investigations and analysis for sea cliff erosion and drainage. He has a Bachelors degree in geology, and is an R.G. as well as a C.E.G. He had developed strong technical and project management skills in working with both public and private sector clients and has worked extensively as client liaison with various public works departments and regulatory agencies. Resumes of Messrs. Korbay and Larson and other staff who may work on this project are attached for your further review. SIMILAR PROJECTS Kleinfelder’s San Diego ofice has recently worked on various other projects in the area with similar elements observed in the Park Drive slope seepage and erosion project. Following is a list of those projects with a very brief description of these projects. 0 he Church -ust. 1994; Kleinfelder evaluated the cause of seepage near the base of an artificial fill slope at the church. Water was seeping over the sidewalk and into the street. We provided recornmendations to mitigate seepage and repair damage caused by erosion. 0 .. and 46. Balboa Naval Kleinfelder evaluated the surfkial stability of an existing 40 foot high slope behind the existing building. We provided recommendation for constructing segmented retaining walls, placing additional fill, and mitigating erosion to buttress the existing slope for the purpose of protecting the existing building foundation from being undermined by slope erosion. Water S-e at CATS Buws Na val San Dwn October 1996: Kleinfelder evaluated the causes of damage caused by water seeping through building slabs- on-grade and stem walls. We evaluated groundwater and surface water characteristics and provided recommendations for mitigating the flow of water into the buildings. .. 51-YP7-147\517PG151.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder. Inc. Page 7 0110 July 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 9555 Chesapeake Drive. Suite 101. San Diego. CA 92123-6300 16191 54l-ll45 thlql 54l-liJ5 I,I~ 0 .. e at BW 41. B&ga Naval w. March 1996: Kleinfelder performed a field exploration and surficial stability analysis to evaluate steep slopes composed of formational sandstones near the building. We provided recommendations for constructing cantilever retaining walls at the base of the slope and mitigating erosion of the slope. 0 New G- .. ' e Vallev Citv. Califomia.ch 1996; Kleinfelder performed a geologic hazards study. geotechnical investigation. and slope stability analysis for construction of a new backup generator building for the hospital. The building was located at the base of a slope composed of formational sandstone. The slope was cut back to provide space for the building and buttressed with retaining wall. Kleinfelder provided recommendations for construction of the building, the retaining wall. control of water draining over the slope, and mitigating slope erosion. 0 Studv. El Caion.. June 1997; Kleinfelder is currently performing a rockfall hazards study to %valuate the potential of rock falling and spalling from the face of a 700-foot long by 25-foot tall vertical slope. The slope parallels a driveway behind the building. We have already provided preliminary providing recommendations for mitigating rockfall hazards. Recommendations were provided for mitigating the rockfall hazard to protect pedestrian and vehicle traffic in the affected area. Our final report will be completed within the month of July. 0 ct. MCON P025- 1994; Kleinfelder performed a geotechnical investigation for the construction of a lined drainage channel in the vicinity of the Camp Pendleton Air Station. We performed a geotechnical investigation and provided recommendations for construction of the channel that included stabilizing the channel bottom during construction and dewatering during construction. AUTHORIZATION Enclosed with this proposal are two copies of our firm's standard form of agreement. Please note that Provision 13 of the agreement limits our professional liability. The fee estimate presented herein is based upon acceptance of the standard provisions of the agreement without modification. Revisions to the standard provisions may require changes in the fee estimate. Please sign and return both copies of the attached agreement to our attention if this proposal meets with your approval. Upon receipt, we will execute the agreement and return one copy to your attention. All terms and conditions contained in this proposal and the attached agreement will be in effect through completion of the project should we receive verbal authorization to proceed. If there is a need for any changes in the scope of service or schedule described in this proposal, please call us immediately. 51-YP7-147\Sl7PGISl.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder. Inc. Page 8 of IO July 17. 15'97 KLEINFELDER 9333 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 101. Sm Diego, CA 921.23-6300 16141 jll-ll4i I6191 S4l-Ihl5 1.l~ .. 7c LIMITATIONS C. . .. . pL 7 .. .. .. p\u\S -. If weather, access, or site conditions restrict our field operations. we may need to revise our fee estimate. We understand that accurate data on locations of property lines, existing structures. underground utilities, and services will be provided. Kleinfelder will not assume responsibility for disruption of utilities not accurately located. Time spent for difficult site access will be charged on a time-and-expense basis, and the repair of damaged utilities will be billed at cost. The proposed investigation specially excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics. particularly those involving hazardous waste materials. If a known contamination exists. site environmental assessment may be appropriate prior to development. Kleinfelder would be pleased to outline a scope of service for such an assessment in a separate proposal. In the event that obviously suspicious subsurface materials are encountered visually or by odor in our geotechnical exploration, we will stop OUT investigation and notify your office. All added costs incurred as a result of suspected hazardous substances would be charged on a time-and- expense basis over and above the estimated fees for the site investigation. Items of work and analysis which a& specifically excluded from our scope of services include: Actual design of the retaining walls or their drainage systems; Field surveying of exploration locations; Any cost estimates associated with the proposed construction; Studies for availability of construction materials and evaluation of borrow sites; Soil profile sheets; Environmental characteristics of the site, particularly those involving hazardous waste; Review of design concepts, plans or specifications. and coordination with a design team. and A basic assumption we have made in the preparation of his proposal is that the following datdservices will be hrnished to Kleinfelder by the City of Carlsbad: Any available as-graded geotechnical reports of the immediate study areas and the subdivision above the slope. As-built drawings of existing utilities and improvements in the study area; 51-YP7-147517PG151.DOC Copyright 1997 Klcinfcldcr. Inc. PageYofIO July 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 955.5 Chesapeake Drive. Suite 101. San DieCo. CA 92123-6300 16191,541-1145 Ihl')i541-lh4.5 tax Reproducible base map of the study area for inclusion in Kleinfelder's reports showing proposed improvements; Staked field locations and vertical elevations of proposed exploration points if survey accuracy is required; and Assistance in the clearance of Kleinfelder and Kleinfelder drilling subcontractors onto the study area. The services accepted by final negotiation with the City of Carlsbad will be provided in accordance with the generally accepted practice by other consultants at the time the service are provided. No warranty is made. We thank you for the opportunity of presenting this scope of services and fees for your consideration. If you have any questions or require additional information. please contact us. Respectfully, KLEINFELDER, INC. Rick E. Larson. G.E. 2027 Senior Associate REL:mkb Attachments: S- do./ f/s c d Table 1 (Fee Itemization) 51-YP7-14N17PG151.DOC Copyright 1991 Klcinfelder. Inc. Page lOof 10 luly 17. 1997 KLEINFELDER 9ijj Chesapeake Drive. Suile 101. San Diego. CA 92123-6.300 lhl'll i4l-ll4i 161qI 54l-Ib4; lax I - kq KLEINFELDER TABLE 1 ESTIMATED FEES FOR PARK DRIVE STUDY Pro osal No. 51-YP7-147 July 17, 1997 TABLE 1 TABLE 1 (CONT’D) ESTIMATED FEES FOR PARK DRIVE STUDY Proposal No. 51-YP7-147 July 17, 1997 Expenses Task 2 and 3.3 PrintinglCopying, Is. $ IOO.00 Task 1.2.3 Mileage, 400 mi. @ .50/mi. $200.00 Task 3.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Tests Plasticity Index, 1 @, 117.00/ea. $117.00 Gradation, 3 @ 99.OOiea. $297.00 Direct Shear Tests, 1 @, S255.00Iea. $255.00 Moisture ContentiUniTWeight 8 @ S28.00/ea. Exnense Total I S1.193.00 $224.00 KLEIKFELDER, INC. 95SS Chesapeake Drive.Suite 101 Sm Dkgo, CrJilmia 92123 Fax Cover Sheet DATE Awust 1. 1997 TINE 1 i :23 AM TO: Mr. Galen Petenon PHONE: (61 9) 487-7000 City of Carlsbbrd FAX: (619) 487-7011 FROM George Binger PHONE (619) 541-1i45 F*x: (619) 541-1645 RE: REVISED FEE PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL BORMGS AT PARK DRIVE PROJECT NO: 51-YP7.MT Number of pager including cover shee1: 3 Dear Mr. Peterson: Enclosed are Ihe revised foes for the work assoiciated with drilling four additional boring ax the top Io he slop dong Park Drive. This is based on drilling four brings to depths of 50 feet or effective auger refusal. whichcver is nhallowcr, using conventional small dinmerer drilling equipment. Two borings would bc in the parir area, one in thc desilting basin. and one slightly down the hill southwest ofthe desilting basion on that lcdge. Also, for you Sonnation, I have cstimatcd our cosu for drilling only Ihm borings since that wos the option you initially proposcd to me ycstcr-day. The order of drilling assumed in this cost estimate is the two in thc park area will be first, the terrace below the desilting bnsin third, and inside the desilTing basin f0EKh. Please call me if you have my questions. Respectfully, George Bingcr riffi-el-1337 11 : 35 ILEINFELMP - TABLE 1A - ESTIMATD FEES FOR PARK DRIVE STUDY ADDITIONAL BOIUNGS AT TOP (four borings) Drilling (includes mob/dcmob) for 200 addirionnl lineal feet 6 2,170.00 TABLE 1A - ESTIMATED FEES FOR PARK DRlVE STUDY ADDITIONM, BORINGS AT TOP (four brings) 51-YP7-1Si Copyright Kleinfclder. Inc. 8/1/97 35 TABLE 1B - ESTIMATED FEES FOR PARK DRIVE STUDY ADDITIONAL BORINGS AT TOP (tbree Lorings) , ,. , , ,. .. ... , .. .. . , . . . . , . . I Drilling (includes mub/demob) for 200 ndditional lineal feu 6 1.535.00 TABLE 1B - ESTIMATED FEES FOR PARK DRWE STUDY ADDITIONAL BORINGS AT TOP (three horings) 51-yp7-:47 Copyriglit Klcinfcldcr, Ice. Page 1 Memorandum TO: Galen N. Peterson. Consulting Project Manager ' City of Carlsbad Engineering Department :-', - , 1 : -. ... " . . FROM: - .. "_ Kleinfelder, Inc. Rick E. Larson, Senior Engineer C!" ' r ,.n -c ! 3 I;..,? DATE: August 19, 1997 SUBJECT: CONFIRMATION OF FEES PARY DM\% SLOUGRI?~C/DRAINACE STUDY KLEINFELDER PROPOSAL NO. 51-YP7-147 The purpose of this memorandum is to confirm our conversation of this morning regarding our lump sum fee to provide the Park Drive SloughingDrainage Study. We understand that due to budget constraints the City has set a cap on ow work for this project at about $1 7,000.00. As we discussed, Kleinfelder agrees to complete this work for a lump sum fee of $16.999 with the following understanding: I. The scope of work as described in our July 17, 1997 letter will be completed. However. if Kleinfelder finds fairly similar conditions in three of the lower slope borings and the two cone penetration tests, we have the right to drop the fourth boring. We do not intend to delete the fourth boring if we feel that any significant information may be lost. Furthermore. the boring deleted would not be one of the borings we had intended to provide in the area of obvious seepage. 2. The scope of work as described in our fax of August I. 1997 will also be completed for three borings at the top of the slope. The order of drilling would be for the desilting basin first. the terrace below the desilting basin second, and the park area third. Please note that for the original subcontractor services for Task 1 of Table 1 B, our costs were based on three borings up to depths of 50 feet for a maximum total of 150 lineal feet. The reference to 200 lineal feet for that table was a typographical carry-over from Table 1 A. 3. Kleinfelder understands that a separate contract will net be executed for this project. The work for this project will be completed as a task order under our existing contract with the City of Carlsbad. However, the limitations contained in our letter of July 17Ih and the submitted ASFE guidelines will still apply to our work. 51-YP7-147/517MG109.DOC Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc.. August 19, 1997 Memorandum TO: Galen Peterson City of C~lsbad FROM KLElNFBLDER, INC. George Bin&% KLEINFELDER PROJECT NUMBER s1-YP7-147 DATE: AU~USI 19. 1997 SUBJECZ DESClUPTION OF WORK FOR SOIL BONNGS AT TOP OF SLOP0 FOR PARK DRIVE SLOPE/DMAGE STUDY The pqmx ofthis memorandum is to provide you with information nzgarding drilling three soil borings at the top of the slope running along Park drive in Carlsbad. Thc purposc of thc soil borings arc KO evaluate the potential of perched water tabies~existing within the slop. We anticipate drilling thc borings over a period of thee &ys using n C.M.E. truck mounted drill rig. Moles will be drilled with a nominal Cinch to 8-inch diameter auger. 'Iherc will also be a Ford Ranger pickup truck at the site to support OUT engineer/geologisl in the field for logging the soils encountered. We plm to operate the rig between the hours of 730 a.m. und 430 p.m. on weekdays. Thc noise level during operation of thc rig will the similar to the noise created by operating u 60kW, diesel powered generator. Tic rig will ramin at lhe site overnight to reduce the potential of damnping thc site by driving back forth over the site several times. We would like to close the sidewalk for the entire time the rig is ut the site for the safety ofthe residenu. We plan to keep disturbance of landscaping to vcry low levels. In order to reduce the potential or runing soils in the gmssy park area, irrigation should bc s~oppcd one week before we perform our soil borings. If the soil is wet. ruu may be up to 24 inches deep. Wc also plan to my on the sidewalk area M much as possible to reduce the potential of rutting. We will cut thc sod. rcmovc it, and preserve the removed piece in the actual arca we will be drilling. Sheets of plastic or plywood will be laid down around the auger IO collcct soil cunhgs so M no: to kill tlae pars in the area dour boring. To access the boring out on the remace, wc will have to remove a section of thc wood fence. Affn completion of OUT work at the site, boreholes will be backfilled with the soil cuttings. Excess soil cunings will be removcd from the park urea and spread out in thc areas cor~taining nsrural vegetation outside thr: wooden fence or within the dcsilting basin. Thc sod that WJS removed will be put back into place and rails removed from the fence will be nailed back into place. We will notify you when our field work is com?lctcd so that you may contxt the homc ownem association and &cy can then resume irrigation at their conveniencc. c.\mydamtc\p?l47men.doc Cop!fighl 1997 Kkmliilder, Inc.. SI-YI'7.147 TOT% P. 82 3%