HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-10; City Council; 14550; SANDAG Board and Transportation Subcommitteerc . I -.
* CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL q-d w
!*B#
MTG. +&h~
DEPT. Council
TITLE- ADOPTING RESOLUTION URGING SANDAG
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO DESIGNATE ONE MEMBER
DEPT. HD.
OF EACH OF THE TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARDS CITY A-IN.
TO SIT ON SANDAG BOARD AND ITS
TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMll-l-EE AS EX-OFFICIO CITY MGR.
MEMBERS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If your concur your action is to adopt Resolution No. %-J# expressing the need
for and urging consideration by the SANDAG Board of Directors of designating one member
of each of the transit development board to sit on its Board and its Transportation
Subcommittee as ex-officio members.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Council Member Nygaard, Carlsbad’s NCTD representative, is urging support of this
resolution so that these two ex-officio members of the SANDAG Board of Directors and the
Transportation Subcommittee may participate in the regional capital programming process.
Further, adoption of this resolution is consistent with NSDCTDB’s staff recommendations
that:
1. The Board adopt a joint resolution with MTDB requesting a designated Board member
from each Transit Board to sit on both the SANDAG Board of Directors and the
Transportation Subcommittee as Ex-Officio members;
2. Authorize submission of joint letter signed by MTDB and NSDCTDB requesting that the
three major transit projects (Mission Valley East LRT, Mid-Coast LRT, and Oceanside-
Escondido Rail) be specifically included in the 1998 SANDAG legislative program;
3. Endorse the proposed transit program in the amount of $84 million for inclusion in the
SANDAG Regional FY 99-04 STIP project list; and
4. Authorize the submission of the three parking projects in Encinitas, Oceanside and
Solana Beach for proposed funding in the FY 99 STIP.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If funding is approved for the three projects, additional revenue for $2,257,000 would be
included in the FY 99 Budget. This does not represent a direct expense from Carlsbad.
EXHIBITS:
Resolution No. y/-#
n
. .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 98-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING THE NEED FOR AND
URGING CONSIDERATION BY THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION
OF GOVERNMENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
DESIGNATING ONE MEMBER OF EACH OF THE TRANSIT
DEVELOPMENT BOARDS TO SIT ON THE SANDAG BOARD OF
DIRECTORS AND ITS TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE AS
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) has
been designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Regional
Transportation Planning Agency for San Diego County; and
WHEREAS, as the MPO, SANDAG is responsible for the long range
planning of integrated regional transportation systems for San Diego County including
public transportation systems; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG has primary responsibility for programming flexible
federal, state, and regional transportation funds, upon which the Transit Development
Boards depend; and
WHEREAS, public transportation systems are a critical portion of an
integrated regional transportation system; and
WHEREAS, the inclusion of public transit services in an integrated
regional transportation system provides positive environmental benefits and enhances
the quality of life in the San Diego Region as defined in the Regional Growth
Management Strategy; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transit Development Board and the North
San Diego County Transit Development Board are responsible for planning,
developing, and operating public transportation services and facilities within their
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
respective jurisdictions and, as such, collectively represent the region’s public transit
needs and concerns; and
WHEREAS, neither the Metropolitan Transit Development Board nor the
North San Diego County Transit Development Board is represented on the SANDAG
Board of Directors or its Transportation Subcommittee,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad expresses the critical need for,
and urges consideration by the SANDAG Board of Directors of designating one
member of each of the Metropolitan Transit Development Board and the North San
Diego County Transit Development Board to sit on the SANDAG Board and its
Transportation Subcommittee, as ex-officio members.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the day of , 1998 by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
May 26, 1998
San Diego
ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101-4231
(619) 595-5300 l Fax (619) 595-5305
http://www.sandag.cog.ca.us
TO: All City Clerks and the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
At their meeting of May 22, 1998 the Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of
Governments adopted their FY’99 Final Program Budget. The Board further directed that a copy
of that document be filed with the Clerk of each member agency.
Enclosed, for your files, is a copy of the SANDAG “FY’99 Final Program Budget.” Your
SANDAG Board Representative and Alternate(s), and your City Manager/CA0 received a copy
of this document in their May 22, 1998 SANDAG Board Agenda package.
Sincerely, C
WAYNE T. SINK
Director of Finance and Administration
WTSicd
Enclosure
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad. Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos. San&e, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, S.D. Unified Port District, S.D. County Water Authority, and Tijuana/Baja California.
Agenda Report No. 21
FYI99
FINAL
PROGRAM BUDGET
MAY 22,1998
San Diego
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
401 B Street l Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 595-5300
The Overall Work Program is designed to meet the comprehensive planning requirements of the
United States Department of Transportation and the California Department of Transportation.
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad. Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.
ADVlSORYRlAlSON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority. and TijuanaBaja California/Mexico.
Board of Directors
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is a public agency formed voluntarily by
local governments to assure overall areawide planning and coordination for the San Diego region. Voting members include the incorporated Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon,
Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside,
Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and the County of San Diego.
Advisory and Liaison members include Caltrans, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego
Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, and TijuanalBaja California/Mexico.
CHAIRMAN: Hon. D. Elliot Parks
VICE CHAIRMAN: Hon. Art Madrid
SECRETARY-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Kenneth E. Sulzer
CITY OF CARLSBAD Hon. Ramona Finnila. Mavor Pro Tern (A) Hon. Bud Lewis, Mayor (A) Hon. Matt Hall, Councilmember
CITY OF CHULA VtSTA Hon. Shirley Horton, Mayor (A) Hon. Jerry Rindone, Councilmember
CITY OF CORONADO Hon. Thomas Smisek, Mayor (A) Hon. David Blumenthal, Councilmember
CITY OF DEL MAR Hon. D. Elliot Parks, Councilmember (A) Hon. Richard L. Earnest, Deputy Mayor
CITY OF EL CAJON Hon. Richard Ramos, Councilmember (A) Hon. Mark Lewis, Councilmember
CITY OF ENCINITAS Hon. Chuck DuVivier, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. James Bond, Councilmember
CITY OF ESCONDIDO Hon. Keith Beier, Councilmember (A) Jerry Harmon, Councilmember
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH Hon. Mike Btxler, Mayor (A) Hon. Gail Benda, Councilmember (A) Hon. Mayda Wrnter, Councilmember
CITY OF LA MESA Hon. Art Madrid, Mayor (A) Hon. Barry Jantz, Councilmember (A) Hon. Jay La Suer, Councilmember
CITY OF LEMON GROVE Hon. Mary Sessom, Mayor (A) Hon. Jeffrey Jandura, Councilmember
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Hon. Rosalie Zarate, Councilmember (A) Hon. George H. Waters, Mayor
CITY OF OCEANSIDE Hon. Terry Johnson, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. Carol McCauley, Councilmamber
CITY OF POWAY Hon. Don Higginson, Mayor (A) Hon. Bob Emery, Councilmember (A) Hon. Mickey Cafagna. Councilmember
CITY OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Christine Kehoe, Councilmember (A) Hon. Barbara Warden, Councilmember (A) Hon. Valerie Stallings, Councilmember
CITY OF SAN MARCOS Hon. Vince Andrade, Councilmember (A) Hon. Hal Martin, Councilmember
CITY OF SANTEE Hon. Jack Date, Mayor (A) Hon. Hal Ryan, Councilmember (A) Hon. Jim Bartell, Councilmember
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH Hon. Marion Dodson, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. Tere Renteria, Councilmember (A) Hon. Joe Kellejian, Councilmember
CITY OF VISTA Hon. Gloria E. McClellan, Mayor (A) Hon. Ed Estes, Jr., Mayor Pro Tern
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Pam Slater, vice Chairman (A) Hon. Greg Cox, Chairman
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (Advisory Member) James van Loben Sels, Director (A) Gary Gallegos, District 11 Director
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Liaison Member) CAPT Tom M. Boothe, USN, CEC Commander, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (Advisory Member) Jess Van Deventer, Commissioner
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (Advisory Member) Frank Chenelle (A) John Fowler
TIJUANAIBAJA CALIFORNIAIMEXICO (Advisory Member) Hon. Luis Herrera-Lasso M. Consul General of Mexico
Revised March 12,1998
ii
C.
m-.-
7-q
-.
I
I
T‘
c-
r-
-.
--
r
-
7‘
c-
y--
T--
c-
.r-‘
May 22,1998
San Diego Association of Governments
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA REPORT No.: 98-5 21
Action Requested: ADOPT
FY’99 FINAL PROGRAM BUDGET
Authoritv
In accordance with the requirements of Section 12A of the SANDAG Joint Powers Agreement, the
Budget Review Committee hereby submits for your consideration, and recommends adoption of,
the SANDAG FY’99 Final Program Budget. Section 12A requires the Board to adopt a Final
Program Budget prior to June 1st.
Budget Review Committee Recommendation
The SANDAG Budget Review Committee has reviewed this proposed Final Program Budget and it
is their
RECOMMENDATION
that the Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments adopt this FY’99 Final
Program Budget as the expenditure plan to carry forward the regional planning program for Fiscal
Year 1999, and that the Executive Director be authorized to finalize the grant applications and
revenue claims necessary to fund the approved FY’99 Overall Work Program.
Background
This Final Budget is based upon SANDAG’s FY’99 Overall Work Program (OWP). The Board
approved the FY’99 OWP on April 24, 1998 following review by the SANDAG Budget Review
Committee, various federal and state agencies, and by the staff of SANDAG Member Agencies.
The Overall Work Program describes SANDAG’s most important responsibilities, and the work elements described in the OWP respond to various initiatives and mandates of local, state and
federal governments. They vary in their purpose, scope and specificity, but all require approval by
SANDAG.
A brief description of the proposed work program is included in the Executive Summary of this
Final Program Budget.
. . . 111
For the first time, this Final Budget now incorporates the budget of SANDAG serving as the San
Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (TransNet). In previous years, only the
administrative budget of TransNet was included in the SANDAG budget. The TransNet program
budget was presented to the Board as a separate document.
Budget Overview
The FY’99 Final Program Budget projects available revenues, including reserves and TransNet
program sales tax revenues and bond proceeds, to be $227,660,098. This projected funding level
represents a 14% decrease from the current actual FY’98 SANDAG and TransNet Program
Budgets. This decrease is due primarily to the lower amount of TransNet revenue bond proceeds
available for the coming year.
Of the $228 million, $210 million, or 92%, are funds that will be passed through to other local
agencies or will be contracted out for transportation demand management and other transportation
demonstration projects such as the I-15 Value Pricing Demonstration Project and the Intelligent
Transportation System Showcase Program. These programs also include the Coronado Bridge Toll
Program, the Freeway Service Patrol, and the TransNet-funded programs.
A summary of the projected funding, including carryover, by major revenue source is as follows:
Revenue Summa~
Actual % of
FY’98 m
Final
Iv’99
% of
u
Federal Grants
State Grants & Subventions
TransNet Transportation Sales Tax
TransNet Revenue Bonds
Member Agency Assessments
Other Local Funds
Services to Other Agencies
Interest & Reserves
$23,191,216 9%
15224,841 6%
143,800,OOO 54%
73,263,711 28%
508,725 0%
3.086534 1%
516,358 0%
4.992.698 -2%
$20,036,723 9%
7,867,480 3%
154,200,OOO 68%
36,000,OOO 16%
508,725 0%
3,205,063 1%
382,874 0%
5.459.232 2%
Total Estimated Revenues $265.284.082 JJ2cL% 227.660.098 Jiil!.E
Member Assessments
The Budget Review Committee proposes that the Member Agencies’ assessment be held to the
FY’98 level of $508,725. From this total, approximately $360,638 will be used for program
funding, and $148,087 will be used for local (Board of Directors) expenses.
iv
-.
P
c-
“--.
F-
--
C.
*-
e
--
--
-.
San Diego Countv Regional Transportation Commission BudPet
The TransNet budget incorporated in this document is based upon the San Diego Transportation
Improvement Program - Ordinance and Expenditure Plan and Section 11 of the Ordinance which
established the guidelines applicable to administrative expenses of the Commission.
The Ordinance established the rules for the allocation of all Commission revenues. Commission
funds are allocated according to the following priority:
1. No more than one percent of the annual revenues shall be allocated for administrative
expenses.
2. Annually, $1 ,OOO,OOO shall be allocated for bicycle facilities.
3. The remaining funds shall be allocated equally among highway improvements, public transit
improvements, and local street and road improvements.
The Ordinance limited administrative expenses to no more than one percent of the estimated
revenues. For FY’99, this maximum would be $1,542,000. Unused administrative allocations, the
difference between the 1% allowable and the actual costs incurred, are retained in a Board
established “Administrative Reserve” for future administrative or emergency use. In the final year
of the program, accumulated reserves will be distributed to the three program areas and/or used to
help retire outstanding bonded debt.
SANDAG provides all administrative services to the Commission. Administrative expenses include
all expenses of the Board acting as the Commission, as well as all direct staff expenses for the
overall planning, programming, financial forecasting and accounting, and the indirect costs
allocated for general administrative support such as general management, legal, word processing,
office services, materials, supplies, office rent, equipment use, insurance, etc. These costs are
allocated to the Commission based upon SANDAG’s federally approved indirect cost allocation
plan. SANDAG charges all programs for their share of general administrative expenses in
accordance with this plan.
A total of approximately $154,200,000 new sales tax funds are estimated to be available for
allocation in FY’99. This amount is net of the costs of the State Board of Equalization to collect
and distribute local sales taxes. After the deduction for Administrative costs, the Ordinance
requires $1 ,OOO,OOO to be allocated annually for bicycle facilities, leaving $15 1,658,OOO to be
allocated equally among the three major program areas. Therefore, $50,552,667 will be allocated to
each category for highway improvements, local street/road improvements, and public transit
improvements.
The local street and road portion is allocated to each city and the county according to a formula
which includes a base of $50,000 to each jurisdiction and an additional allocation based upon
population and number of miles of local streets.
V
The public transit improvement portion requires one percent ($505,527) to be set aside for services
for seniors and disabled. The balance is then allocated to MTDB ($36,262,829) and NCTD
($13,784,3 11) based on population within their jurisdictions.
These allocations for FY’99 do not include an estimated $3,855,000 of interest earnings by the fund
or approximately $36 million of TransNet revenue bond proceeds. Interest earned is apportioned to
each agency during the course of the fiscal year. However, because earnings of each agency are
based upon actual project cash expenditures, the earnings for each agency cannot be determined in
advance. Therefore, this budget does not attempt to apportion interest to each participant. Bond
proceeds are allocated to eligible projects based upon the needs of the responsible jurisdiction. The
in the TransNet highway program.
FOR: Mayor Art Madrid, City of La Mesa, Chairman, Budget Review Committee
Deputy Mayor Marion Dodson, City of Solana Beach
Councilmember Christine Kehoe, City of San Diego
Mayor Mary Teresa Sessom, City of Lemon Grove
Supervisor Pam Slater, County of San Diego
Tom Wilson, City Manager, City of Oceanside and Chair of the Cities/County
Managers Association
Scott Bamett, Executive Director, San Diego Taxpayers Association
vi
C.
c-l
v
l-
-r
-
.P--
*-
*--
7.
c-
--
*-
Ic‘
c-
*-‘
C.
c.
-.
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Ix.
San Diego Association of Governments
FY ‘99
FINAL PROGRAM BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. ............................
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
Comparative Revenue and Expenditure Summary ............................................
Estimated Funding Summary .............................................................................
Estimated Budget Summary.. .............................................................................
TRANSNET PROGRAM BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROGRAM BUDGET BY OVERALL WORK PROGRAM NUMBER
Program Revenues ..............................................................................................
Program Expenditures ........................................................................................
Staff Allocation Report ......................................................................................
LOCAL EXPENSE BUDGET
Local Expense Budget Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Local Expense Budget Detail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ADMINISTRATION BUDGET
Administration Budget Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administration Expense Budget Detail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MEMBER AGENCY ASSESSMENTS
Member Agency Assessment History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed Member Agency Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PERSONNEL COST SUMMARY
SANDAG Organization Chart ...........................................................................
Estimated Personnel Cost Summary ..................................................................
Position History and Classification Schedule ....................................................
Position Classification and Salary Range Table ................................................
BUDGET AUTHORIZATION RESOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
vii
3
21
22
23
26
30
32
35
47
48
51
52
56
57
60
61
62
63
San Diego Association of Governments
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-.
c-
-
C.
.l--
c.
F
-.
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROGRAM
101 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
101.01 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.
This element provides the overall management, coordination and direction for car-
rying out the Overall Work Program (OWP) and ensures that planned activities are completed effectively and efficiently and coordinated with other agencies. (Federal,
State, and Local)
101.02 REGIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW. The objectives of this work
element are to: (1) provide an opportunity for member agencies to influence federal,
state, and local decisions on proposed projects that may affect local jurisdictions’ plans,
policies and programs; (2) provide technical assistance for improving proposed pro-
jects; (3) maintain a continuous consultation process between the Department of the
Navy and SANDAG’s member agencies; and (4) if necessary, analyze the impacts of
offshore oil drilling on the region and its local jurisdictions. (Federal, State, and Local)
101.03 BINATIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION. The objectives of this work element are to: (1) assist the Committee on Binational Regional Opportuni-
ties (COBRO) in its work to develop a policy framework for SANDAG regarding bi-
national activities; (2) assist in the coordination of binational planning activities; (3)
continue to provide information and technical assistance to member agencies, other or-
ganizations, and the public; (4) promote binational environmental sustainability; and (5)
assist government agencies to identify opportunities arising from the region’s proximity
to the international border and to expand working relationships with appropriate Mexi-
can government agencies. (Federal and State)
101.06 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP). The purpose of the PIP is to inform
and involve citizens in SANDAG’s various programs and work activities. This in-
cludes but is not limited to lower income households, minorities and persons with
disabilities, and representatives from community and service organizations, and pub-
lic agencies. Citizen participation objectives include involvement of interested
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
3
citizens, stakeholders and representatives of community organizations in agency
work programs through timely workshops on topical issues, fully noticed public
hearings, and ongoing broad citizen/organization involvement in the planning and
decision process through the agency’s committee structure. Public information ob-
jectives include: easy access to all agency reports, including increased use of Inter-
’ net’s World Wide Web; publication of information materials highlighting agency
activities; concise verbal and visual presentations; and consistent media coverage of
SANDAG issues. (Federal, State and Local)
101.07 PROGRAM GRAPHICS AND PRINTING SUPPORT. This element provides a full
range of graphics and printing support services for the agency’s plans, programs and
projects. The services include all in-house graphics production of maps, figures, re-
ports, brochures, and other printed as well as audio/visual materials. This work ele-
ment helps meet federal, state and local funding requirements. (Federal, State and
Local)
102 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT
.02.01 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE. The objective of this work element
is to provide computer hardware, system software, network, and information system
support for the overall work program and administrative functions. As computer and
communication technologies evolve, systems are upgraded where changes will save
time, save money, and increase productivity. Emphasis in FY’99 is to (1) expand the
services and information provided on SANDAG’s World Wide Web site, including
interactive access to the Regional Information System; (2) convert the Regional
Council Management System (our accounting and project management software
and databases) to a 32-bit windows operating system; and (3) implement func-
tional specific servers to increase productivity. (Federal and State)
102.02 DEVELOPMENT MONITORING AND ANALYSIS. The objective of this job is to
annually monitor various aspects of development and to maintain the Regional Infor-
mation System databases containing current estimates of population and housing, em-
ployment and development activities. This work element includes analysis of local,
state, and national changes in demographic characteristics and how they relate to plan-
ning and policy issues such as travel behavior, social services and health care. This job
includes tasks previously conducted under work element 102.08, Demographic
Characteristics. Emphasis in FY’99 is to (1) complete small-area estimates of em-
ployment by occupation types and for industrial clusters; and (2) prepare parcel-
level database of existing and vacant employment-related land in the San Diego
region. (Federal and State)
102.03 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES AND CAPABILITIES.
This job develops and maintains geographic information system (GIS) databases and
applications for spatial analysis of various geographic areas required to support the
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
C
-.
c
-.
-
*-
.e--
Overall Work Program. Included in this work program is the publication of high-
quality maps. This work provides the GIS databases used in the Regional Transporta-
tion Plan, the Regional Growth Management Strategy, and other mandated jobs. Em-
phasis in FY’99 is to (1) prepare value-added products from the USGS 1996/97 Color I&a-red digital imagery through a local agency partnership; (2) expand
regional GIS layers to include watersheds affecting the San Diego region (in adjoining
counties and Mexico); (3) promote regional standards for development of GIS layers
through the Local GIS Coordinators Group; and (4) develop GIS applications for non-
GIS professionals. (Federal and State)
102.04 REGIONAL MODEL MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT. The purpose of
this job is to develop, refine and maintain procedures and standards for agency model-
ing and database configuration management. This includes maintaining, updating and
documenting transportation, air quality, land use, demographic and economic models,
and associated databases. These models are used to develop and monitor the Regional
Growth Forecast, Regional Transportation Plan, Major Investment Studies, the
Regional Housing Plan, the Regional Growth Management Strategy, and other man-
dated jobs in the work program. Emphasis in IT’99 is to: (1) complete the sub-
regional demographic characteristic forecast module used to produce forecasts of
age, sex and ethnicity; (2) refine mapping routines in our subregional forecast and
estimate models; and (3) refine and document our 2020 Forecast regional trans-
portation modeling process. (Federal and State)
102.05 CENSUS. The objective of this job is to provide the necessary coordination with the
Bureau of the Census, the State Census Data Center, other Regional Census Data Cen-
ters and local jurisdictions. Tasks include: (1) incorporating census databases into the
Regional Information System for use on other work elements and the Local Technical
Assistance (LTA) program; (2) disseminating census data and materials; and (3) pre-
paring and coordinating local input for Census 2000 planning programs and activities
(review Census Bureau address lists, staif the Statistical Areas Committee and
form and staff the Complete Count Committee). Continued emphasis will be to de-
velop a coordinated regional approach to the Census Bureau’s geographic and partner-
ship programs for Census 2000 so that regionally consistent information is provided to
the Census Bureau efficiently and with minimal effort on the part of local agency staffs.
(Federal and State)
102.06 MICROCOMPUTER ‘APPLICATIONS AND SUPPORT. The objectives of this
work element are to: (1) improve work products and productivity by incorporating
microcomputer hardware and software into SANDAG work program and administra-
tion activities; (2) assist member agencies, Caltrans and the transit operators in utilizing
microcomputers in their planning and operation functions; and (3) provide in-house
training of SANDAG, member agency and transit operator staff. (Federal and State)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
5
102.07 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST. There are four primary objectives for this work
element: (1) produce a regional and county/cities forecast of population, housing,
employment and land use; (2) analyze alternative land-use policies as part of the
Regional Growth Management Strategy; (3) monitor the consistency between the
Regional Growth Forecast and current estimates for each jurisdiction; and (4) dissemi-
’ nate the Regional Growth Forecast through presentations and publications. This work
element prod%es the basic forecast data used in most of the other work elements de-
scribed in this OWP, including the Regional Transportation Plan, major investment
studies and subarea transportation projects. In FY’99, the final 2020 forecast will be
completed and disseminated for use in local and regional planning projects. The
final forecast will include county/cities forecasts of population by age, gender and
ethnicity and household income. (Federal, State, and Local)
102.09 SENSITIVE LANDS ANALYSIS. The primary objectives of this work element are
to: (1) establish, maintain, analyze and distribute sensitive land databases for use on
regional and local projects; (2) assess how current planning policies protect or impact
sensitive resources; (3) monitor impacts to sensitive lands and proposed habitat pre-
serves; and (4) assist local agencies in preparing habitat tracking and monitoring
procedures, reports and tools. These databases and analyses help support the Open
Space Component of the Regional Growth Management Strategy and habitat conserva-
tion programs in the San Diego region. (Federal; State, and Local)
103 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
103.01 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP). The objectives of this job are to
prepare and maintain the Regional Transportation Plan. An updated RTP and asso-
ciated supplemental EIR were approved in 1996. FY’99 activities include the update
of the RTP iinancial element, ongoing public information activities, the prepara-
tion of RTP amendments, as required, and the preparation of the 1999-2020 RTP
for adoption during the summer of 1999. This work element is a state and federal
requirement and is prepared in accordance with state and federal guidelines. (Federal
and State)
103.02 HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. The objectives of this work element are to:
(1) address major highway issues and coordinate with federal, state and local agencies
to refine and update the freeway, expressway and regional arterial plans; (2) periodi-
cally maintain and update ongoing corridor and subarea planning activities; (3) imple-
ment any highway-related transportation management systems that may be required by
the ISTEA; and (4) help the cities and County update their circulation elements using
the latest regional growth forecasts and regional transportation model system. (Federal
and State)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
6
C.
103.05 NONMOTORIZED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. This job includes the mainte-
nance of the bicycle facilities plan and the programming of the TDA and TransZVet
funds for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. (Federal, State, and Local)
103.06 FREIGHT/INTERMODAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. The objectives of
this job are to: (1) continue to help resolve freight/intermodal issues through the use of
a freight advisory committee; (2) coordinate with freight/intermodal planning efforts,
including the Lindbergh Field Master Plan and border area freight planning; and (3)
continue to assist in the planning and implementation of freight/intermodal facilities
identified in previous studies related to the San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway.
(Federal, State, and Local)
103.07 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. The
objectives of this work element are to: (1) assist transit and paratransit operators in im- plementing the Americans With Disabilities Act and in providing transportation to
disabled persons who are transportation disadvantaged, (2) provide technical assistance
to the region’s Coordinated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA), and (3) work with
state and other agencies implementing federal and state transportation programs for
persons with disabilities. (Federal and State)
103.10 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MONITORING. The purpose of this job is to
prepare the average daily traffic flow map, traffic generator reports, and do other trans-
portation data collection and monitoring activities as required. During FY’99, work
initiated in FY’98 will be completed, including updates to unique traffic generator
counts (regional shopping centers, schools, military installations, etc.) and surveys of
users of these major traffic generators to determine their trip-making characteristics.
These data collection activities directly support the region’s transportation modeling
and planning efforts. (Federal, State, and Local)
103.12 COMMUTER RAIL/INTERClTY RAIL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. The
objective of this job is to provide primary staff support for the eight-agency Southern
California Intercity Rail Group Interim Joint Powers Board, as well as the three-agency
Los Angeles-San Diego Rail Corridor Agency (LOSSAN). In addition, support will
continue with efforts to enhance and improve commuter rail operations and capital im-
provements on the COASTER. Monitoring and evaluation of High Speed Rail activi-
ties will also be accomplished under this task. (State and Local)
103.13 ASSISTANCE TO TRANSIT OPERATORS. The objective of this work element is
to provide the region’s transit operators with current and forecast information and tech-
nical services regarding the characteristics of their service areas, riders, and system per-
formance. This information is used by local transit agencies for planning, marketing,
and other decision-making purposes. (Federal)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
7
103.19
103.24
103.28
103.32
103.35
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. The purpose of this work element is
to prepare and maintain a Congestion Management Program (CMP), as required by
state law, in cooperation with the cities and County of San Diego, Caltrans, transit
agencies, and the Air Pollution Control District. The CMP also meets any ISTEA Con-
gestion Management System (CMS) requirements. (Federal and State)
AIR QUALITY PLANNING/CONFORMITY. The objectives of this job are to: (1)
coordinate with local, state and federal transportation and air quality agencies in accor-
dance with adopted Conformity Criteria and Procedures and other statewide efforts; and
(2) conduct transportation and emissions analyses for determining conformity between
the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the Regional Transportation Improvement
Program (RTIP), and the Regional Air Quality Plan. (Federal and State)
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY PLANNING. The purpose of
this work element is to coordinate Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), to continue
oversight and development of the regional ITS strategic plan and high-level systems de-
sign, to manage and coordinate the deployment of regional ITS projects and technolo-
gies, and to represent the region’s interests in the preparation of a strategic plan and
showcase project for the federally-designated Southern California ITS Priority Corridor
(San Diego to Los Angeles). (Federal and State)
MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDIES. The purpose of this activity is to conduct long-
range, multi-modal transportation studies in corridors identified in the Regional Trans-
portation Plan and to assist other transportation agencies in conducting such studies.
(Federal and State)
SAN DIEGO REGION/BAJA CALIFORNIA CROSS-BORDER TRANSPOR-
TATION STUDY. The objective of this project is to develop, jointly with Cal-
trans, a systemwide approach for evaluating and forecasting vehicular and
transit travel across the San Diego Region/Baja California border. The study
will have as a major consideration the possible interaction among existing and
proposed ports of entry. (State and Local)
104 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
104.01 TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION. The objective of this job is to assist in the
coordination of regional transportation through the coordination of transportation pro-
gram activities, the transportation committee structure and staff liaison with Caltrans,
the California Transportation Commission, transit operators, and member agencies.
(Federal, State, and Local)
104.02 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ADMINISTRATION. The
primary objectives of this work element are to administer the Local Transportation
Fund (LTF), and the State Transit Assistance Fund (STAF), and to ensure that require-
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
8
C
-.
-.
104.03
104.04
104.05
104.06
104.07
ments of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) are met. These requirements in-
clude completion of triennial performance audits for each operator receiving TDA
funds, and the development of recommended productivity improvements for transit
systems. The intent of these requirements is to improve the effectiveness, efficiency,
and economy of local transit systems receiving support from TDA funds. As the
Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), SANDAG is responsible for this
program in accordance with state law. This work element is necessary under provisions
of the Transportation Development Act, and in response to a Memorandum of Under-
standing with MTDB and the State of California. (State)
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. The objective
of this job is to manage and administer the local sales tax funds in order to efficiently
implement the expenditure plan. Activities include revenue forecasting, cash flow
analysis, bonding evaluation, fund investment, disbursements, program and fiscal
accounting, auditing, reporting and legal services. (Local)
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX/PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT. The objective
of this job is to prepare and maintain the program of projects for the local sales tax ex-
penditure plan. Activities include the preparation and maintenance of compliance
guidelines, project scheduling and priority setting, and project programming and moni-
toring. (Local)
TransNet PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM. The objective of the TransNet
(transportation network) public information element is to provide an accurate, timely
and consistent flow of easily-understood information on the progress of the local
transportation sales tax program. The element is designed to heighten awareness
among various targeted audiences and stakeholders about how their half-cent sales
tax dollars are being spent to improve this region’s highways, transit, local roads,
and bicycle facilities. (Local)
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. The objective of
the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is the biennial preparation
and adoption of a seven-year program of major surface transportation projects. The
RTIP program includes projects from short-range plans, the Regional Transportation
Plan, the air quality plan, and the TransNet program. The RTIP is required by state and
federal regulations. During FY’99, the project priority setting process for the
federal transportation cycle (ISTEA reauthorization) will be completed and
adopted as part of the RTIP. (Federal and State).
HIGHWAY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. This job will provide ongoing liaison with
Caltrans and affected member agencies to help ensure that the TramNet highway pro-
gram is within schedule and budget. Activities include the development of project
agreements, the review of environmental documents, the review of Caltrans cost esti-
mates and schedules, and the monitoring of highway project design and construction activities. The design contracts initiated in FY’96 will continue, along with contracts
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
9
begun in FY’97 and FY’98, in the areas of construction testing and inspection, and
right-of-way acquisition. Additional contracts are expected in FY’99. (Local)
104.08 SAN DIEGO-CORONADO BRIDGE TOLL ADMINISTRATION. The objective of
this job is to undertake necessary activities pursuant to Section 30796.7 of the Streets
’ and Highways Code, including updating a multi-year financial plan for the use of tolls
to: (1) support the operation, maintenance and improvement of the bridge and its
approaches, (2) support transportation services and facilities which increase the capa-
city of the bridge or reduce the demand for travel in the bridge corridor, (3) support
alternative forms of transportation within the bridge corridor that reduce congestion and
air pollution; and (4) work with Toll Revenue Advisory Committee to develop recom- mendations regarding toll bridge legislation and earthquake retrofit financing. (State)
104.09 STIP/RIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. This new job will provide ongoing
coordination with sponsors of projects funded in the Regional Improvement
Program (RIP) portion of the approved State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill 45: General
oversight will be exercised to ensure that the projects stay on schedule and
within budget, as well as that all federal and state requirements are met. (State)
104.10 I-15 VALUE PRICING PILOT PROJECT. The purpose of the I-15 Express Lanes
Value Pricing Pilot Project is to test market-based roadway pricing concepts to better
manage traffic congestion and air quality. The Pilot Program will provide the
opportunity for single-occupant vehicle (SOV) users to pay a toll to use the excess
capacity on the I-15 Express Lanes. Revenue will be used for the enhancement of
transit services and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) facilities in an effort to improve the
overall efficiency of the transportation corridor. The Pilot Program will be conducted
in cooperation with the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB),
Caltrans, California Highway Patrol (CHP), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
Federal Transit Administration @TA), and the I-15 corridor cities. During FY’99, the
I-15 Express lanes will be operated as a transponder-based, pay-per-trip facility.
mw
104.11 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT. The objectives of this job are
to provide ridematching and transportation information services to the region in co-
operation with Caltrans, the Air Pollution Control District (APCD), transit providers,
Transportation Management Associations (TMAs), the cities and the County.
(Federal, State, and Local)
104.13 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL. The Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) Program is an
ongoing effort operated by SANDAG in conjunction with Caltrans and the California
Highway Patrol. The FSP Program is a roving tow service that assists or removes
stranded or disabled vehicles on designated urban freeways during peak commute hours. (State and Local)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
10
-
c-
--
104.14 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
(ITS) PRIORITY CORRIDOR SHOWCASE PROGRAM. The purpose of this work
element is to administer, on behalf of Caltrans, FHWA and other Southern California
transportation agencies which make up the federally-designated ITS Priority Corridor
&A. to San Diego), the scoping and design of advanced transportation management
and information systems for the Priority Corridor and implementation of the national
Showcase demonstration project. (Federal and State)
105 REGIONAL GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING
105.01 ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT. The objectives of this
work element are to: (1) coordinate binational, land use, and environmental work ele-
ments with SANDAG transportation and research-related items; and (2) integrate new elements of the RGMS. (Local)
105.02 REGIONAL HOUSING PLAN. The objectives of this work element are to: (1) assist
the local jurisdictions in meeting their affordable housing needs and addressing com-
munity concerns; (2) provide coordination and assistance to member jurisdictions and
housing authorities in implementing their housing elements and consolidated plans; (3)
prepare a revised Regional Housing Needs Assessment to include the regional
share allocation and other information needed by local jurisdictions to update
their housing elements in 1999; (4) provide assistance to local jurisdictions who
choose to self-certify their housing elements as permitted by AB 1715; (5) co-
ordinate transportation/transit plans with regional housing needs, especially high- density affordable housing in transit corridors; and (6) continue support of the San
Diego Regional Partners in Homeownership. This work element is part of the Regional
Growth Management Strategy. (Federal and State)
105.03 REGIONAL ENERGY PLAN AND PROGRAM. The objectives of this work
element are to: (1) identify action items and assist local governments, SDG&E/
ENOVA, the energy industry and state agencies in implementing the recommendations
of the Regional Energy Plan and energy actions contained in the Regional Transporta-
tion/Transit Plan; and (2) take appropriate actions to support the Regional Energy
Resource Office in providing technical and program assistance to governments and
businesses in the implementation of these plans. This work element is part of the
Regional Growth Management Strategy. (Local)
105.04 REGIONAL OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCE PLANNING. The
eventual goal of this element is to prepare an Open Space element for integration
into the Regional Growth Management Strategy. This requires the following objec-
tives: (1) update the regional open space inventory, based upon the Draft Series 9
Regional Growth Forecast inputs, the habitat conservation planning processes, and
the Shoreline Preservation Strategy; (2) revise the Open Space financing strategy; (3) build consensus and resolve conflicts for transportation and other public facilities
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
11
with open space preservation and management; (4) assist local agencies, as
requested, on related open space and natural resource planning activities; (5) pro-
vide habitat conservation planning coordination services for the region at the
federal, state, and local levels; (6) assist the Ecotourism Action Committee as it
. identifies a strategy for development of an ecotourism enterprise in the region;
and (7) coordinate a regional non-motorized trails strategy. (Local)
105.05 REGIONAL WATERSHED ELEMENT. The objectives of this work element are to:
(1) enable jurisdictions to analyze the impacts of various activities upon the watersheds
in the region; (2) in conjunction with Sensitive Lands Analysis, Work Element 102.09,
identify data needs for effective watershed planning; (3) integrate watershed manage-
ment with local and regional plans and programs (for example, land use and transporta-
tion, habitat management, water quality, and water storage), and (4) participate in the
statewide watershed project inventory in cooperation with the University of California,
Davis. (Federal, State and Local)
105.06 ELECTRIC UTlLlTY RESTRUCTURING. The objectives of this work element are
to assist local governments and other public agencies in evaluating the potential benefits
and risks associated with direct purchase of electricity from power generators, and
pooling electric purchases to leverage improved electric rates and services. The poten-
tial for new electricity purchasing arrangements is being created through the restruc-
turing of the state’s electric industry by state legislation. The intent of this work
element is to provide the opportunity for direct power purchases and pooled power ac-
quisition among interested public agencies in the region in 1998 if evaluation indicates
significant cost savings may be available. (State and Local)
105.07 REGIONAL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM. The
objectives of this work element are to: (1) continue to develop and carry out beach re-
plenishment programs and funding initiatives to restore and preserve the region’s
beaches; and (2) assist local governments in carrying out beach management activities described in the Shoreline Preservation Strategy. This work element is part of the
Regional Open Space Element and the Regional Growth Management Strategy.
w=a
105.08 AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS. The purpose of this job is to
support SANDAG’s responsibility as the region’s Airport Land Use Commission
(ALUC). The overall objective of the ALUC responsibility is to assure the continued utility of the region’s aviation facilities by preventing encroachment of incompatible
land uses and development within airport influence areas. The ALUC’s principal
means for achieving this objective is through preparation of comprehensive land use plans for the region’s airports. This work element is required by the state Public Utili-
ties Commission and by the Board of Directors serving as the ALUC. (State)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
12
c
*
c
105.12 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND
IMPLEMENTATION. The objectives of this work element are to: (1) assist the
region’s local governments in planning for solid and hazardous waste management
as required by state law (AB 939) by staffing the Integrated Waste Management
Local Task Force (SANDAG Board of Directors) and its advisory committees; and
(2) assist the jurisdictions in implementing their solid and hazardous waste manage-
ment plans. This element is part of the Regional Growth Management Strategy.
(Local)
105.14 LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT (LUDE). With approval of the regional
policy in 1995, SANDAG is assisting local agencies to implement the Land Use
Distribution Element. (1) This assistance will support neighborhood revitalization
efforts, as requested by member agencies, through design workshops, public out-
reach efforts, and other implementation activities. (2) In addition, SANDAG will re-
search and provide information to help resolve issues related to energy efficiency
and higher density development, including the impact of this type of development on
public facilities, crime, and property value. (Local)
105.15 REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. The objectives of this work
element are to: (1) identify how the region should accommodate its forecasted
growth; (2) prepare a monitoring/status report on the region’s progress in imple-
menting the Regional Growth Management Strategy, focusing on the region’s
quality of life; (3) continue work on the regional initiative elements of the Strategy, in-
cluding the Regional Open Space Element and Growth Forecasts; (4) update elements
and the self-certification checklist to reflect changes in state and federal laws, changed
conditions and the results of the self-certification process and monitoring report; (5)
assist the local jurisdictions as they implement the Strategy’s elements and self-
certification process; and (6) initiate integration of GIS applications into the Strategy.
u--o
105.18 NORTH COUNTY MULTIPLE HABITAT CONSERVATION PROGRAM
(MHCP). The objective of this work element is to assist the north county cities as
they complete the final phase of the program. The activities of the cities and SAN-
DAG staff during this fiscal year include: (1) preparing the MHCP plan for
public distribution and the public hearing process; (2) preparing the environ-
mental report for public distribution and the public hearing process; (3) pre-
paring implementing agreements for the cities and the state and federal wildlife
agencies; and (4) meeting other requirements as necessary to obtain take
authorization permits from the California Department of Fish and Game and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Federal, State and Local)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
13
106 REGIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLEARINGHOUSE
106.01 REGIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLEARINGHOUSE. This continuing project
serves as the primary source for historical and current information about crime pat-
terns and theresponse by the criminal justice agencies. Data analyses are used to
support criminal justice planning and policy making. The program provides assis-
tance to member agencies in these areas: quality control studies of crime-related
data, impact assessments of crime-reduction strategies, long-term evaluations of
critical issues, and grant writing assistance for agencies seeking state and federal
funding. To this end, the program convenes a monthly grants coalition meeting
attended by representatives from justice, health, and other service providers. In
addition, this program provides agencies with an evaluation component often
required by state- and federally-funded local programs. The Clearinghouse program
also monitors the jail population and suggests options for relieving jail crowding.
(Locally-funded by SANDAG member agencies)
106.02 ARJIS ASSESSMENT. The Automated Regional Justice Information System
(ARJIS) is a law enforcement computer system designed to integrate crime informa-
tion to allow justice agencies to respond more effectively to crime. This continuing
assessment will monitor the planning and implementation of ARJIS as it transitions
to a new technology. SANDAG tasks are determined by the ARJIS Management
Committee. (ARJIS Member Agencies)
106.05 ARRESTEE DRUG ABUSE MONITORING (ADAM) PROGRAM (formerly
called Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program). This program provides local policy-
makers and criminal justice practitioners with an objective indicator of drug use
trends among the offender population. Results are used to identify potential drug
epidemics, determine drug treatment needs, and as a means to measure drug preven-
tion and control efforts. (National Institute of Justice)
106.24 REFLECTIONS. This third year of a three-year project will complete the assess- ment of a state-funded program to provide an array of services to high-risk juveniles
and their families. In an effort to retain juveniles in the community rather than ex-
pending significant funds for out-of-county placements, this program will provide resources to 200 youth and families. The evaluation will examine the process and
the extent to which the program reduced involvement with the justice and social
service systems. (San Diego County Probation Department)
106.25 METHAMPHETAMINE RESEARCH IN FIVE JURISDICTIONS. Several regions
in the west are experiencing a surge in methamphetamine use among the offender
population. Both law enforcement and drug treatment systems are devoting signifi-
cant resources to the prevention, reduction, and control of this drug. This project
augments the current Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program by criti-
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
14
tally examining the dynamics of methamphetamine use and trafficking in San Diego,
Los Angeles, San Jose, Portland, and Phoenix. The final report will be completed
this year. (National Institute of Justice)
106.26 SHELTER PROJECT. There is minimal information about the needs of battered
women who seek protection at shelters. The problem of domestic violence con- tributes significantly to overall crime and other social costs. Children who witness
violence in the home are twice as likely to become violent abusers in adulthood. The
effectiveness of the criminal justice system, as well as other systems such as shelter
provision, in preventing domestic violence is unclear. This research study, supported
by state legislation (Alpert - AB 2448), in collaboration with local battered women’s
shelters, compiles information on the clients, abusers, incidence of violence, and
service needs of battered women. An additional component of the study is a case
tracking of 3,000 domestic violence incidents reported to law enforcement. Analysis
will include a description of victims, suspects, and incidents, as well as responses by
the justice system (e.g., arrests, charges filed, jail custody, and disposition). Analysis
of these two data sets will enhance the knowledge base so that resources can be allo-
cated for effective service delivery systems to battered women. (State)
106.28 SHELTER PROJECT AUGMENTATION. This study will be completed this fiscal
year. This project augmented the on-going shelter project by expanding the data
collection period to 24 months, interviewing shelter staff, and conducting a pilot
study to determine the feasibility of contacting clients subsequent to shelter stays.
(National Institute of Justice)
106.29 THE 8% PROJECT TO REDUCE JUVENILE VIOLENCE. Recent research
confirms that about 8% of the juveniles in the justice system are responsible for over
one-half of the crimes committed by youth. There is a critical need to target this
group early in their delinquent careers to reduce further criminality. The State of
California has funded seven counties, including San Diego, to participate in the “8%
Project,” which will identify up to 100 juveniles and provide intensive supervision
and rehabilitation services through a collaborative involving the County Probation
Department, Drug and Alcohol Services, and the Department of Social Services.
SANDAG is conducting a process and impact assessment of the three-year program,
utilizing a matched control group, to determine the effectiveness of the project in re-
ducing recidivism, increasing school attendance, and improving educational levels.
(San Diego County Probation Department)
106.30 BREAKING CYCLES (SB 1760). The California 1996 legislature enacted SB 1760 to provide counties funding support to address juveniles at risk for delinquency, as
well as those juveniles with serious delinquency problems. The legislation requires a
comprehensive, collaborative system of agencies that work together to make juve-
niles accountable for their behavior and improve the juvenile justice and community
response to juvenile offenders through a system of graduated sanction. The San
Diego County Probation Department sought and received $4.9 million from the State
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
15
to implement the program. To meet the legislative requirements for a rigorous
evaluation, the Probation Department has requested SANDAG services to conduct an
impact assessment of the three-year program. (San Diego County Probation
Department)
106.31 ’ EVALUATION OF SHERIFF’S CENTRALIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
PROGRAM; This project will monitor the progress of a specialized approach
to domestic violence cases with respect to increased arrests and convictions, and
enhanced safety for victims. (San Diego Sheriff via Department of Justice)
106.32 CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT BURGLARY REDUCTION
PROJECT. The Chula Vista Police Department received funds from the Com-
munity Oriented Policing Services (COPS) office to address residential burglary
in a systematic manner. This one-year project reflects a partnership with the
Chula Vista Board of Realtors. SANDAG will conduct the evaluation of the
project. (Chula Vista Police Department via the COPS Office)
106.33 COURT’ MONITORING OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENDERS
EVALUATION. This program is a partnership between SAIC, the El Cajon
Municipal Court, and SANDAG. The .domestic violence court will test technol-
ogy intended to ensure offender accountability yet also enhance safety of
victims. The Criminal Justice Division will provide the process and impact
assessment of this pilot project. (SAIC via National Institute of Justice)
106.34 AT-RISK YOUTH EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM. Senate Bill 1050
(Alpert) appropriated $2 million to the County of San Diego to support a one-
year pilot program to serve families who have recurring behavior problems that
place youth at risk of becoming wards of the juvenile court. The purpose is to
provide a swift and local service response to problems to avoid future
involvement with the justice system. SANDAG will assess the pilot project.
(San Diego County Probation Department)
106.35 CITY OF SANTEE MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT PREVENTION PROJECT.
The City of Santee received funds from the federal Community Oriented
Policing Services (COPS) for the Santee Sheriff’s Station to implement a motor
vehicle theft prevention project in specific targeted areas. The project is for one
year and provides $100,000 to support the program. SANDAG will conduct an
evaluation of the project. (City of Santee via the COPS Ofiice)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
16
rt
c-
.I-
+
l-
_
3-
107 REGIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE
107.01 LOCAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO MEMBER AGENCIES. The purpose of
this work element is to provide information and technical services to member agencies
to assist them in areas of planning and facility management. As studies are completed,
technical capabilities and refined databases are developed, allowing for increased utili-
zation of these services and information. The objective is to assist member agencies in
the application of existing data and technical analytical capabilities for solving specific
local problems. This work element will respond to member agencies’ requests for
assistance. (Board Initiated)
108 SPECIAL SERVICES
108.01 SANDAG SERVICES TO SOURCEPOINT. The purpose of SourcePoint is to assist
SANDAG with providing regional information services and technical assistance to
public and private organizations and individuals, including the provision of demo-
graphic and economic data and professional services. SourcePoint policy requires that
charges for information and services provided be based upon competitive market rates,
subject to full-cost reimbursement to SANDAG. This program shall account for all
SANDAG services to SourcePoint, including management, marketing, systems mainte-
nance, and any work on specific contracts or projects. (Board Initiated)
109 REGIONAL ECONOMIC PLANNING AND RESEARCH
109.01 REGIONAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY STRATEGY. The purpose of this work
element is to assist local jurisdictions and economic development agencies through-
out the region. The strategy will help these agencies understand the strengths and
weaknesses of the local economy, and its relationship with state, national and inter-
national economic activity. The regional economic prosperity strategy will be con-
sistent with the proposed Regional Growth Management Strategy. Attention will be
on maintaining our quality of life, in part, by identifying and retaining the most im-
portant economic and fiscal contributors. This work element will provide economic
information on these contributors, as well as information that may be used to help
encourage retention, expansion, and the generation of additional employment
opportunities by local firms and businesses. Two additional objectives of this work
element are: .(l) to analyze the effect of, and the relationship between, pro-
posed/planned major capital facility improvements, constructed to help maintain the
region’s quality of life, and (2) to report on the economic impacts of implementing
selected elements of the Overall Work Program. This economic impact analysis of
selected OWP elements will be performed as the programs are undertaken. (Local)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
17
109.02 FISCAL ABILITIES AND RESPONSIBILlTIES. The purposes of this work element
are to evaluate the region’s public financing system, to provide solutions to fiscal prob-
lems related to SANDAG’s Regional Growth Forecasts, and to formulate alternatives
for state/local fiscal reform. Long-term solutions to the challenging problem of how to
pay for needed infrastructure will be proposed, including financing alternatives for new
’ investment i&established communities. Forecasts will be prepared of the cost impacts of alternative distributions of the region’s projected growth, and the most cost-efficient
land use patterns in the region will be identified. Additional recommendations will be
made to reform the statewide system of local government finance, including measures
to achieve greater local fiscal stability, flexibility, and control of resources. This
element is part of the Regional Growth Management Strategy. (Local)
140 TrunsNet PROGRAM
141.00
142.00
143.00
144.00
TransNet BICYCLE FACILITIES. Under the local transportation sales tax
ordinance, $l,OOO,OOO per year is allocated for bicycle facilities. These funds are
used by local agencies to design and construct bicycle transportation facilities,
to install bicycle parking, and to undertake bicycle safety and encouragement
programs. The purpose of the program is to encourage bicycle transportation
by improving the places where people cycle, and by promoting cycling as a
transportation option. (Local)
TransNet HIGHWAY PROGRAM. One-third of the annual TransNet revenues
is allocated to major highway projects. The TramNet Highway Program is ad-
ministered and implemented in jobs 104.03, Transportation Sales Tax/Financial
Management, and 104.07, Highway Project Development. The amount allo-
cated from year to year will vary, depending upon revenues, bonding, and cash
flow requirements. (Local)
TransNet TRANSIT PROGRAM. One-third of the TransNet sales tax revenues
is allocated by formula to the North San Diego County Transit Development
Board (NSDCTDB) and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB)
for specified rail projects and other transit purposes. These funds are adminis-
tered in job 104.03, Transportation Sales Tax/Financial Management. The
amount allocated depends upon revenues, bonding and cash flow requirements.
(Local)
TransNet LOCAL STREETS PROGRAM. One-third of the TrunsNet revenues
is allocated to cities and the County on a formula basis for street and road pur-
poses. Projects may include new construction, reconstruction, or maintenance
of existing right of way. Through the expenditure of these funds, local traffic
circulation is enhanced. (Local)
Bold indicates emphasis area, new programs, projects, or tasks.
18
San Diego Association of Governments
PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY
*
f-
c
d-
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FISCAL YEARS 1998 AND 1999 COMPARATIVE REVENUE 8 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
AMENDED %OF PRELIMINARY %OF FINAL %OF
REVENUE SUMMARY FT98 TOTAL FY99 TOTAL FT99 TOTAL
FEDERAL GRANTS
STATE GRANTS 8 SUBVENTIONS
TRANSNET SALES Tm
TRANSNET REVENUE BONDS
MEMBER AGENCY ASSESSMENTS
OTHER LOCAL FUNDS
SERVICES TO OTHER AGENCIES
INTEREST&RESERVES
5 23.191.218 9% s 20,125,507
15,224,841 8% w=,=
143,800,000 84% 152,5OQOOO
73.263.711 If% 39,ooo,ow
508,725 0% 508,725
3,088,534 1% 3,091,345
518.358 0% 401,343
4.992.897 2% 5877.892
9% 5 20,036,723 9%
4% 7,887,480 3%
66% 154,200,006 66%
17% 36,6OO,OU6 16%
0% 508,725 0%
1% 3,205,083 1%
0% 382.874 0%
3% 5.459.232 2%
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES 5 294.584.082
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
PERSONNEL SALARIES & BENEFITS $
DATA PROCESSING
OUTSIDE GRAPHICS 8 REPORTS
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PASS-THROUGH & IN-KIND SERVICES
TRANSNET BICYCLE FACILITIES
TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM
TRANSNET TRANSIT PROGRAM
TRANSNET LOCAL STREETS PROGRAM
INDIRECT COST - NON PERSONNEL
LOCAL EXPENSE
5,704,095 2%
350,ooa 0%
198,000 0%
129,000 0%
928,000 0%
20.897.200 8%
11,278,850 4%
~#l.ooo,~ 0%
75,120,666 26%
47.124667 18%
53,120,667 20%
1,778,500 1%
324.300 0%
100% 5 231,388,197 - 100% s 227,880,098
5 5,988,094 3% s 8.029,037 3%
350,ooo 0% 350,oocl 0%
187,700 0% 189,700 0%
139,200 0% 139,200 0%
842,ooo 0% 8wooo 0%
19,947,700 9% 20,047,700 9%
8,545.OOO 3% 4,443,450 2%
WJQ~ 0% uw~ 0%
78.039.352 34% 77,597,961 34%
56991,667 22% sO,552,667 22%
57,991,667 25% 56,552,667 28%
I,~,= 1% 1,801 ,ooo 1%
324.300 0% 312.050 0%
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 217,947,745 82% 225,153,180 97% 221,823,432 97%
RESERVES 1,584,323 1% 1,554,323 1% 1,554,323 1%
CARRYOVER 45.052.014 17% 48680,694 2% 4,282,343 2%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES & RESERVES $ 284,584,082 100% s 231388.197 100% $ 227,660,098 100%
Bold type indicates TransNet Program revenues and expenditures not previously reflected in the SANDAG Program Budget
21
$6
CNG
-14%
-48%
7%
-51%
0%
4%
-28%
9%
-14%
6%
0%
-4%
8%
-13%
-4%
-81%
0%
3%
7%
10%
1%
-4%
2%
-2%
-90%
-14%
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOMRNMENTS
I?-96 ESTIMATED FUNDING SUMMARY
ESTIMATED REVENUES
ADOPTED
Iv98
AMENDED PRELIMINARY FINAL
Iv!38 Fr99 FT99
FEDERAL:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION:
FTA MP0 PLANNING (Section 5303)
FTA TRANSIT PLANNING (Section 5307)
FTA DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
FHWA l/2% PL PLANNING
FHWA TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT
FHWA CONGESTION MITIGATION b AIR QUALITY
FHWA STPPLNG RIDESHARE FUNDS
FHWA PRIORITY CORRIDOR PROGRAM (ITMIS)
FHWA ADVANCED TRANSP TECHNOLOGY (lVHS)
FHWA l-l 5 PRICING DEMONSTRATION
U.S. FISH 8 WILDLIFE SERVICE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
f 619.611 t 619,611 $ 674,007 S 651,170
1,170.103 1273,499 2,016,OOl 2m4.352
111,834 13,095 0 0
2,514.013 2,514.013 2,623,179 z73&998
780,ooo 973,046 600.~ ~.~
126.714 96,104 0 0
125,000 353.320 0 0
6,585,031 9,425.651 7.670,472 7.687.744
360.895 =*698 458,249 441.821
7.524,578 7$x3.391 5.203.633 5.209.180
505,119 =a864 SW= 561.003
238,493 141.922 117.580 112.657
TOTAL FEDERAL 22,661,395 23,191,216 20,125.507 20.036.723
STATE:
TRANSPORTATION DEMLOPMENT ACT:
PLANNING
ADMINISTRATION
CALTRANS:
STATE NEW TECHNOLOGY
STATE PLANNING 8 RESEARCH
STIP PLANNING
STIP TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MGMT
SD/CORONADO BRIDGE TOLLS
FREEWAY SERVlCE PATROL
CAL BOATING SAND REPLENISHMENT (SB654)
OTHER
1,582,801 2,043.829 1,750,706 lJ-,Q=
350,ooo 35aooo 275.000 275.000
450,ooo 0 470,ooo 470,ooo
0 0 0 160.000
0 0 193.155 194,035
0 0 wao@J 606,315
4,129,078 5,931,246 4,151,556 Z~,~
2,023.438 2.088.727 2.400,~ 2.400,~
1,794,344 4C15.586 0 0
61.651 17,456 42,974 28.040
TOTAL STATE 10,391,512 15,224,841 9,883,385 7,867,480
LOCAL:
MEMBER ASSESSMENTS
TRANSNET PROGRAM
TRANSNET REVENUE BONDS
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLEARINGHOUSE
sbvd DIEGO c0t.w.m PROBATION DEPT
OTHER LOCAL
l-15 DEMO USER FEES
IN-KIND SERVICES/LOCAL MATCH
508,725 508,725
139.520.000 143.800.ooo
75,ooo.ooo 73.263,711
250,000 250,ooo
85.000 =.ooo
636,875 10.476
94,154 408,150
~,~ 700,ooo
1.902,500 1.632.905
506,725
152,500,OOO
39,ooo,ooo
0
@iooo
536.608
134,737
700,ow
1,635,ow
508.725
154.2oo.ooo
~,~*~
0
85ooo
567,125
277,936
7w.ooo
1,635.ooo
TOTAL LOCAL 218.497.254 220,658.970 195,1w.o70 193,913,786
SERVICES TO OTHER AGENCIES:
LOCAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SERVICES TO SOURCEPOINT
179,693 201,597 239.136 227,653
173,688 314.761 162.207 155,221
TOTAL OTHER 353.581 516.358 461.343 382.874 0% -26%
TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING 251,903,742 259$91,385 225,510.305 222.200,866 98%
INTEREST 8 RESERVES:
TRANSNET INTEREST
RESTRICTED (HOV Lane Fines)
UNRESTRICTED
TOTAL.INTEREST 6 RESERVES
3,910,ooo 3,#6,374 4,273,660 3,855,ooo
0 164,323 204.232 204,232
l,~.~ 1.4w.ooo 1.400.~ l.~,~
5.31 o.ooo 4.992.897 5.877.892 5.459.232
TOTAL REVENUES 8 RESERVES
Percent Change
t 257.213.742 t 264564.062 $ 231,386,197 S 227,660,098
3% -13% -14%
%OF
TOTAL
9%
3%
65%
2%
100%
-14%
-48%
-12%
-14%
9%
-14%
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY99 ESTIMATED BUDGET SUMMARY
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
ADOPTED AMENDED PRELIMINARY FINAL %OF %
pT98 FT98 FY99 IT?36 TOTAL CNG
PERSONNEL:
PROGRAM SALARIES 8 BENEFITS 5 4,709,240 $ 4,709.240 5 4968,706 5 5.003.277 2% 6%
NON-PERSONNEL:
MISCELLANEOUS NON-PERSONNEL:
DATA PROCESSING 350,Wo 350,600 350,Wcl 350,Wo
OUTSIDE MATERIALS. GRAPHICS 8 REPORTS 2w.Wo 196.000 187.700 189,700
OTHER DIRECT COSTS 127,100 129,000 139,200 139,200
TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 953,Wo 928,000 842,Wo 8omoo
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS NON-PERSONNEL: 1,630,lW l.~.~ 1.518.9W 1,486,9W 1% -7%
CONTRACT SERVICES:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS 8 PGRM MGMT woo0 5aooo woo0 6aooo
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT 101,7w 95,700 218,200 213,200
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1,025,OOO 1,045.Wo 1,160,Wo 13w~
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT & ADMIN 19,675,WO 18,934,WO 17,688,WO 17,836,Wo
REGL GROWTH 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MAMT PLNG 695,000 748,Wo 795,000 810,900
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLEARINGHOUSE 4.WcJ 2.@33 4,Wg 4,900
REGIONAL INFORMATION SVCS & ASSISTANCE 22.500 22.500 22.500 22.500
TOTAL CONTRACT SERVICES: 21.573.200 20.897.2W 19,947,7w 20.047,700
PASS-THROUGH & IN-KIND SERVICES:
MTDB, TDA ADMIN/TRANSIT GUIDE
MTDBlCORONADO BRIDGE TOLL PROJECTS
DOD, SAND REPLENISHMENT
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, HABITAT PLNG
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRANSNET BICYCLE FACILITIES
TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM
TRANSNET TRANSIT PROGRAM
TRANSNET LOCAL STREETS PROGRAM
IN-KIND SERVICES
w@Jo WocJo 60,~ Woo0
4,Wwog 3,676,OW 4,6m~ 1.898.450
1,650,ooo 4,816,WO 0 0
116,650 391,650 150,000 lW,ooo
50,Wo 0 0 0
1 .ow~ 1Dw~ 1 ,ow~ l.OW@JO
73,708,268 75,120,866 78,039,352 77,597,961
45,708,267 47,120,667 51,991,667 50.552.667
51.708.267 53,120,667 57.991.667 58.552.667
2.402.500 2.333.WO 2335.000 2.335.WO
TOTAL PASS-THROUGH 81 IN-KIND SERVICES: lW,403,950 187,638,650 195.567.686 192,146,745
INDIRECT CHARGES 2,773,355 2,773,355 2,825.685 2,826,7W
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 206360,605 212,914,205 219.860.171 216508,105
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET 211,089,845 217,623,445 224.828.880 221.511,382
LOCAL/BOARD EXPENSE BUDGET SUMMARY 324,300 324.300 324,300 312,050
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 211,414,145 217.947.745 225,153,lW 221,823,432
RESERVES ’ 1,4w,Wo 1,584,323 1,554,323 1,554,323
CARRYOVER 44.399.597 45.052.014 4.880.694 4.282343
TOTALRESERVES&CARRYOVER 45,799.597 46.636.337 6,235,017 5.838.666
TOTAL EXPENDITURES & RESERVES S 257,213,742 S 264,584,082 6 231,388.197 3 227.660.098
Percent Change 3% -13% -14% 31
9%
84%
1%
3%
100%
-4%
2%
2%
2%
2%
-4%
2%
-87%
-14%
San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission
TRANSNET PROGRAM BUDGET
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FT99 TRANSNET PROGRAM BUDGET
TRANSNET PROGRAM REVENUES
ESTIMATED SALES TAX RECEIPTS
LESS: BOARD OF EQUALlZATlON FEES
Iv98 FT96 Fr99 FT96
ADOPTED AMENDED PRELIMINARY FNAL
5 141997,666 s 147.977,666 5 155.692.5Gl $ 156,821,4W
(2.477sw (2.4~.ooo) (2.592.500) (2.621 Aw
NET SALES TAX RECEIPTS 139,520.txlcr 145.5W.Wtl 152,599.9W 154,2w,ooo
TRANSNET REVENUE BONDS 75.ooo,cKt6 73266.711 39,ooo.ooo 3wJoa~
INTEREST INCOME 3,910,9m 3,4u6,374 4.273,66!7 3.855.ooo
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES s 218.43tIooO f 222.177.085 8 195,773,66cl, s 194.055.wcl
TRANSNET PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE ALLOCATIONS: ‘
COMMISSION/BOARD EXPENSES s 142.588 6 167,588 s 167,588 6 163,963
ADMINISTRATIVUCONTRACTURAL SERVICES 1,057.291 1.057,291 1 .WCJ,287 1 .cKQw2
ADMINISTRATIVE RESERVE 195,321 236,121 357,125 377,435
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE ALLOCATIONS
PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS:
1,395.200 1,455,ooo 1,525.ooO 1,542,6otl
BICYCLE FACILITIES 2 1 ,ow~ l,~.~ l,~,ooO l.~.~
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ’ 45.768.266 47,681,666 49,991,666 56552.666 ’
PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT ’ 45.768,267 47,681,887 49,991,667 50552,667 ’
LOCAL STREET 6. ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ’ 45,768.267 47,681,667 49.991.667 50552.667 ’
TOTAL PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS 138,124.799 144,645.ooo 156,975,crocl 152,658,ooO 6.0%
TRANSNET REVENUE BOND ALLOCATIONS 75.ooo.oocr 73,266.711 39,ooo.ooo ~,~,~
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS 214.519.999 218,768.711 l9l,5ocJ,ooo 190,200.cfw
INTEREST TO BE ALLOCATED 3,910.001 3468.374 4.273666 3,855,60’3
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS AND INTEREST 5 218,430.606 S 222,1T1,685 $ 195773,666 S 194.955,9W
NOTES:
The TransNet Ordinance established the rulea for the allocation of all Commission revenues. Commission funds are allocated according to
the following priority:
’ No more than one percent of the annual revenues shall be allocated for administrative expenses.
’ Annually, $1 ,ooO,OW shall be allocated for bicycle facilities.
’ The remaining funds shall be allocated equally among highway improvements, public transit improvements, and local street and road
improvements.
’ Funds allocated to these program areas include annual debt service for TransNet revenue bonds and short-term commercial paper notes.
FT99 total is 684 million funded by highways ($45 million), transit ($31 million), and local streets and roads ($8 million).
96
CNG
6.0%
-56.9%
-12.7%
-2.2%
-5.4%
64.0%
6.0%
-56.9%
-13.1%
-12.7%
26
?- I
r-
F
;.
)
7-s
?-
I
Ir
.?--
C
.i
7
c
*
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FYg9 TRANSNET PROGRAM BUDGET
ESTIMATED PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS’
FT98 Iv98 Iv99 pT99 %
ADOPTED AMENDED PRELIMINARY FNAL CNG
BICYCLE FACILITIES
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS
5 l,~,~ 5 l,Ow~ s l,~.ooo s 1 sOWJo 0.0%
5 45.708,266 S 47681,666 s 49,991,666 s 56552,666 6.0%
PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS:’
1% FOR SERVICES FOR SENIORS
AND DISABLED S 457.083 $ 476.817 t 499,917 s 505,527
MTDB PROJECTS 6 SERVICES (72%):
80% FOR RAIL CAPITAL PROJECTS
PASS PROGRAMS 6 SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS
26,236,245 27362,705 26688,326 29,010,263
6,557,561 6&l&676 7,172,682 7,252,566
TOTAL MTDB 32.767,806 34.203381 35,860,466 36,262.829
NCTD PROJECTS 8 SERVICES (28%)
80% FOR RAIL CAPITAL PROJECTS
PASS PROGRAMS 8 SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS
9.970.702 10,401,175 10905,074 11.027449
2.492.676 2,6W,294 2,726,268 2,756,862
TOTAL NCTD 12463.378 13,001,469 13,631,342 13.784,311
TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS 5 45,708,267 S 47881,667 $ 49991.687 $ 50,552,667 6.0%
LOCAL STREET & ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: ’
CARLSBAD
CHULA VISTA
CORONADO
DEL MAR
EL CAJON
ENCINITAS
ESCONDIDO
IMPERIAL BEACH
LA MESA
LEMON GROVE
NATIONAL CITY
OCEANSIDE
POWAY
SAN DIEGO
SAN MARCOS
SANTEE
SOLANA BEACH
VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
s 1,295.484 5 1,351,415 6 1.416886 $ 1.432,786
20496,274 2,510,162 2,631,770 2,661,363
459,622 479,468 502,694 508,335
153,311 159,936 167,678 169,560
1,450,336 1,512.953 1586,249 1,-W=
1.005,597 l.a49,012 1.099,833 1,112,175
1,955.Wl 2.039.406 2,138,207 2,162,202
446,030 465,287 487,626 493,303
984,327 1,026,824 1,076,570 1.088,651
456,803 476,525 499,611 565,217
881,215 919,260 963,795 974,611
2.474,970 2,581,824 2,766,9&l 2,737.280
869,326 sow= 950,792 961,462
18,781,369 19,592,232 20541,403 20771.916
682,052 899,270 942,836 953,417
692,489 931,021 976,126 987,080
289,918 302,435 317.987 320,645
1,300.068 1,356,197 1,421,9W 1,437,856
8,744,075 9,121,5W 9563,497 9,870,818
TOTAL LOCAL STREET & ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 5 45,708,267 $ 47681.667 5 49991,667 6 W.662,667 6.0%
TOTAL PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS s 138.124,799 6 144,045,6Gl 5 150,975,ooO 5 152,856,6@J 6.0%
NOTES:
’ This table does not include interest earnings which are allocated to each agency based upon actual cash flow or revenue bond proceeds allocated
for specific projects.
’ Transit allocations are 1% for services to seniors and disabled with the balance allocated by population to MTDB (72%) and NCTD (28%).
’ Local program funds are allocated as 550,ooO to each jurisdiction and the balance allocated by a formula based on 2/3rds population
and lnrds miles of local streeds and roads.
27
San Diego Association of Governments
PROGRAM BUDGET BY
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM NUMBER
= ct
0000000000 00 Q
9
C=
00000 i” $
00000000
o1Tooooow ? 6 3 it
0000000000000 0000000000000 “fsz$$y %- * N
.ooooooo
C t E
00r0000000000
S r!
g”g~~ogoooo~o * *** * e 5?z 8 m--r R F!
00000000
oooooooooo~o~ d 6 G E ooooooo~u&of~o
e 6i s N
0000000 00000000 00000
rNNrONrV) Nw000t0000000 i?E ni g I; s N
c b 0000000 i$ g
G? e f?Q Ii? tb b
0000000000r00
8
000000000~~0~
xi 5 vi h‘
0000000 a, 00000
5!2
35
n
C;88Ei’RW88 9 \” o? “. s cq u? “. -w--t-chlmww WWNWC)VIOCY F-F
lg00~0000
s 9
8 w
mOOOOhOOOOOOO * ” cl- 8
%
%5*p!2x~ $- h’ w g m- ; c&J- c
0000000
I *
noo~~oggooo~o
5 ? T: 7 9 v? x GFi 8M 8 ln
8 0000~0000 00
vi c=
8
3 $
~0000~0000000 9 00 N w
~o~oogooq~o
(B -. 0 “. m 3”
w In z ww g
ppp2~;
g- p F- c&j- v- ; g-
r-
C.
7
*
*1-
*-
3 _-
-.
;. -
-.
;iu oooog
E!? 9
i& 5
a(3 o&$j$jo
32 (Dr-r-
Lii cd vi 6-i P(Du)
P 8
2 ~00000 cz a an. 82
5 a2 ‘rn
i t= l-
;;;oom~tno $2 eizz
izi?
hi h-d r-r4
us
00000000000000
00000000000000
E 00000~00000000 9 Fi
00000000000000
E E E 00~0~0~0000000 g -3 Lo 8 rc- ui
00000000000000
00000000000000
00000000000000
67 8
fi 3-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
!!2
!i
6
L
s
z
;
2
s
5
6
z 31
tz g
“E”8
g iii a d
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0
s
%
83
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
x
ii
E
3
a
8
s
%
8
Q
r
n f
is- a@ y
FGX~ d F 2 %(3c)zE$)w’ OZZOZUU >Q v+oio vzznzOw zwnLcwd+ ..st;$;3g t5a za:I~~G ELZ>ok-,z 03aaaaEZ @$gppi$ 93LlLuL5Z
5 Ahhh
WUUUUUU rNm-aG7zzE
IL YYVYYYY
ms gg e
e”$9”““j z
035 G WYY sse5
ooooo,,,oo,,, * _ $Mi ij-gg
ooooooo;oo;oo
:: 9
PC? & & o~~oo*o~o~~~~
a$ ti si @zig vi 8-- 6 h’
o;
c= 8 a oooooqo~oo;
% Pi2 Fi ; ;
3 Gcnoo 00 6C 8
$2 iii-
8:
a 000 Q 000
5
*
00000000
~“~ooo~o t-i g 6
Gi=c=iT = YVVY Y
ip~“““”
ooooo~o~ooooo
%-
t
0000 zoo; 00000
2
0000 8 8. 0000000
ti sz
oooooooooQ~oo iR
@ 0000000000 go0 s?-
0000 gooo8o8oo z u-i - a QQ “““gg” m- d F- ej
8~z428%85~~8~~ (9 k ‘9 k ‘-. 9 ‘I ‘-i N. 7 “! 9 “! ~gcg4~wco+wc~- NrrrN,.N cd co- G d G d m- rc’ vi r-’ d 6 d C,WPWNbrWWOrV-,
‘;8 8 RR898 bC-,.-,,WrWO--ONO
‘? k “! 9 a? ‘T a? o? -WhN.-.-NOm,.NNC, -. ‘v. u? ‘4 a! c? ‘9 7 N. v? 0, k ‘?
; “-,- W- W- C,- .-- hi d
k~k%~N-w rC,N NN r-w W-N
68888$68 NNNNNNNN 00000000 -3--l-l-rvs- 000~000000000 K~~“R~X:~5~3# ~pmwm~~~~ ggg~~~ 00000000 Tcrt--v-cFv-Pv- rrrrrrrrrFrrr
32
nz’oN8 3 8 6 --v-l-- 000000 ---l-y
2 %E i? 5 !z g 4 E&l? $ g O 3 sj. g. 00000~00000000 g H 00 0000 0 9 g
P hi r-mu7 a T-N g ow 0” 8
;F w
H
f B ~poooooo 00000000000000 0 0 00 (3zw $DZO g&s2
$sS$ O 2
_ is. 2-j iI. T I t-:: ‘I288 _ 8
22 H
$g”,o,o g”~~o~~~goggog O Q 9% Oooo O Q 6 d
In r; &i 3-- u-i ; d 8 vz -0
WI --N $! 8$! P
I-W EC =‘
~~~o~~~oo oo~ooooooooooo i 0 00
E
0000
Q
OEO ni
_
:
%
n
Nr,.rC,“-,W-NOrWWO s; ; 0000 0 NNCOWmmWWbO-Wmt W ” t-2 W N h .- We We -t - “- We W N- .-- OS O- %-I- VBN =I W w- d I
3 ~zsesc;: cO~WII-IWOOP~V-~NWW
z p E co 9 v? 9 m W&Y-J~b-~Om-TNmtOm~ 00 ‘“. N. k u? 9 rU ‘Y
f 6 0000 0
z w 8 5; $j 6 3 $ ri ‘,i oi d ; N M 8 “-8 .- s g W g g g k
N
w m
z $
w,wwa--gP
s Sw+On>F
F dl-w
ggZzzS?a$ (-W-lo+'=)=
wzs 66 >'OF$<+
OWW i=zu
r$qr$y zww- --JZ(J- &On 8 I*
$SgSgg+W
ul~omaoow~~~“~~
&GMLX~wz -dz&$gr
,aDotxww ,“y,~~&pgI
553ut-wwowacc z=g Zzrzwwxrwa>302a oaocc5mmucawmZzm
~NmOmWmmO~Nm OOONNNNNC?C9V-D0 3 $3 wwwwwwww 00000000 $ 88888 Fc---%--Fv-FvYv-Y
r-
F.
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
OWP NO.
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
10103 BINATIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
DIR. OF LAND USE
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
ASST. REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10106 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM
JOB TOTAL
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4202
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4503
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4506
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4601
SPECIAL SVCS DIR. 5021
COMMUNICATIONS DIR. 6020
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
10101 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF LAND USE
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
COMMUNICATIONS DIR.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
JOB TOTAL
10102 REGL INTERGOVERMENTAL REVIEW
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIR.
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10107 PROGRAM GRAPHICS & PRINTING SUPORT
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST
JOB TOTAL
10201 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
DIR. OF RESEARCH
CHIEF INFO. SYS. DEVEL.
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10202 URBAN DEVELOPMENT MONTORING & ANALYSIS
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOC. REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
ASSOC. RESEARCH ANALY.
35
1010
2020
3020
4020
5021
6020
7020
960
200
160
350
200
142
180
2,192
2130
2202
2301
340
300
160
800
2020
2202
2401
3202
3301
3303
3801
4402
5021
5202
260
940
600
40
150
40
40
40
80
160
2,350
80
160
120
40
80
469
800
1,749
6401
6501
6502
1,358
1,053
990
3,401
4020
4201
4605
4606
160
1,760
1,700
1,700
5,320
3203 40
4020 80
4203 340
4205 200
4206 200
4207 350
4301 800
4402 760
4501 1 .ooo
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
OWP NO.
PROJECT
NAME
JOB TOTAL
POSITION
CLASSIFICATION
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
a SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
EMPLOYEE
NUMBER
4505
4506
5021
5202
WORK
HOURS
200
850
80
80
4,980
10203 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10204 REGIONAL MODEL MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGldNAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
JOB TOTAL
10205 CENSUS
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10206 MICROCOMPUTER APPLICATIONS
JOB TOTAL
10207 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECASTS
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER 3302
DIR. OF RESEARCH 4020
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4205
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY 4403
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4503
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4506
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4601
JOB TOTAL
SENIOR REGL PLANNER 2203
DIR. OF RESEARCH 4020
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4203
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4207
ASSOC. REGIONAL PLANNER 4301
ASSOC. RESEARCH ANALY. 4501
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4506
SPECIAL SVCS DIR. 5021
10209 SENSITIVE LANDS ANALYSIS
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
10301 REGL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
4020
4206
4401
4402
4505
4601
3202
3203
3601
4020
4203
4207
4506
5021
4020
4202
4206
4020
4206
4401
4402
4505
310
1,040
200
800
960
120
3,430
100
1,200
700
40
320
1,180
200
80
3,820
40
720
120
880
40
40
880
100
500
60
90
1,710
200
140
860
270
900
720
530
240
3,860
140
160
400
100
320
1,120
36
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL ,WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
OWP NO. NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
MGR. OF TRANSP. FINANCING 3101 1,040
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10302 HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MGR. OF TRANSP. PROGRAMMING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10305 NONMOTORIZED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10306 FRElGHTllNTERMODAL PLANNNING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10307 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR ELDERLY & DISABLED
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10310 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MONITORING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
10312 COMMUTER/INTERURBAN RAIL PLAN
JOB TOTAL
10313 ASSISTANCE TO TRANSIT OPERATORS
JOB TOTAL
10319 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
JOB TOTAL
10324 AIR QUALITY PLANNING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3205
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3203
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER 3302
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER 3303
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 3801
DIR. OF RESEARCH 4020
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4204
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4205
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY 4403
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4502
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4601
ASSOC RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4607
MGR. OF TRANSP. PROGRAMMING 3102
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 3601
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION 3020 80
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3203 80
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3206 40
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 3601 500
37
3201
3205
4204
3102
3202
3301
3303
3601
3801
3207
3202
3301
3801
2202
4206
4503
800
900
80
2,820
630
895
490
820
300
245
3,380
345
345
280
120
100
500
400
400
120
200
320
900
900
40
60
40
40
160
1,520
240
1,460
1,800
40
960
6.360
370
100
470
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
OWP NO. NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
JOB TOTAL 700
10328 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY PLANNING
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
COMMUNICATIONS DIR.
JOB TOTAL
10332 MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDIES
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
-SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOC RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10335 SD/BAJA CROSS-BORDER TRASNPORTATION STUDY
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10401 TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
JOB TOTAL
7 0402 TDA ADMINISTRATION
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
MGR. OF TRANSP. FINANCING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10403 TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL SERVICES MGR
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
MGR. OF TRANSP. FINANCING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
SENIOR ECONOMIC ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
10404 TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
MGR. OF TRANSP. PROGRAMMING
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
10405 TRANSNET PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
COMMUNICATIONS DIR.
38
1010
3020
3206
6020’
80
100
600
80
860
3020
3201
3202
3301
3303
3801
4204
4607
50
800
170
550
220
415
200
800
3,205
2202
3203
3301
3801
160
240
240
300
940
3020 220
220
3020
3101
3207
3302
3401
4205
40
210
518
300
600
40
1,708
1100
3020
3101
3207
3302
5021
5201
1,440
80
550
936
200
120
120
3,446
1010
3020
3102
3202
3303
3401
160
100
500
140
40
400
1,340
1010 80
6020 829
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
“+- FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
c-- OWP NO.
PROJECT
NAME
POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR 6401 207
10411 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
* SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
DIR. OF RESEARCH
CHIEF INFO. SYS. DEVEL.
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
C SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN - SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6501
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6502
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
10406 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
MGR. OF TRANSP. PROGRAMMING
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
3020
3102
3302
3401
3601
10407 HIGHWAY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING DIRECTOR
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR ENGINEER
JOB TOTAL
1010
3020
3103
3401
3501
10408 SAN DIEGO-CORONADO BRIDGE TOLL ADMINISTRATION
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
3020
3302
10409 STIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOB TOTAL
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION 3020
ENGINEERING DIRECTOR 3103
SENIOR ENGINEER 3501
COMMUNICATIONS DIR. 6020
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR 6401
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6501
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6502
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
10410 l-l 5 PRICING DEMONSTRATION
JOB TOTAL
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 1010
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION 3020
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3206
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3209
COMMUNICATIONS DIR. 6020
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR 6401
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6501
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6502
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
3020 150
3208 1,800
3209 710
4020 40
4201 40
4205 160
4403 240
4503 100
4601 300
4605 100
4606 100
39
207
270
500
2,094
120
300
500
200
100
1,220
80
140
1,400
600
80
2,300
120
700
820
140
400
1,720
40
20
150
150
60
2,680
120
200
80
1,090
160
40
180
180
180
2,230
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
OWP NO.
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
10414 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PROGRAM
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF TRANSPORTATION
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
COMMUNICATIONS DIR.
JOB TOTAL
10501 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DIR. OF LAND USE
JOB TOTAL
10502 REGIONAL HOUSING PLAN
DIR. OF LAND USE
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIR.
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
JOB TOTAL
ASSOC RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4607
COMMUNICATIONS QIR. 6020
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR 6401
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6501
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6502
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
10413 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
3206
1010
3020
3206
6020
2020
2020
2130
2203
4202
4503
10503 REGIONAL ENERGY PLAN & PROGRAM
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
2201
10504 REGIONAL OPEN SPACE & NATURAL RESOURCE PLNG
DIR. OF LAND USE
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
2020
2204
2301
10505 REGIONAL WATERSHED ELEMENT
ASSOCIATE REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
2301
10506 ELECTRIC UTILITY RESTRUCTURING
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
2201
10507 REGL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
2201
10508 AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIR.
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
2130
4020
4206
4601
10512 SOLID & HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING
SPEClAL PROJECTS DIR.
40
2130
40
40
140
30
* 30
20
4,040
360
360
80
100
720
40
940
780
780
40
200
750
120
120
1,230
160
160
40
900
700
1,640
240
240
400
400
1,240
1,240
520
40
160
300
1,020
740
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
N’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
OWP NO.
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
10515 REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIR. OF LAND USE
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
ASST. REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOC. REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10518 NORTH COUNTY MHCP
SENIOR REGL PLANNER
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
JOB TOTAL
10601 CRIMINAL JUSTICE CH
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10602 CJ ARJIS ASSESSMENT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
ASST. REGIONAL PLANNER 2401
JOB TOTAL
10514 LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
ASSOCIATE REGL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
10605 CJ ARRESTEE DRUG ABUSE MONITORING
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10624 CJ REFLECTIONS
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10625 CJ METHAMPHETAMINE RESEARCH
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
41
600
1,340
2301
3201
3203
700
200
100
1,000
1010
2020
2203
2401
3203
4020
4203
4301
120
480
550
100
100
60
200
100
1,710
2204
4020
4401
4505
820
60
1,200
320
2.400
4203
4205
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
40
80
185
180
100
200
200
985
7020
7401
7501
7602
20
30
15
15
80
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
100
50
100
10
300
560
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
20
150
75
10
15
270
7020 20
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
PROJECT POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
OWP NO. NAME CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY. 7401
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
7501
7602
7603
20
20
20
40
120
10629 CJ THE 8% PROJECT TO REDUCE JUVENILE VIOLENCE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10630 CJ BREAKING CYCLES (SB 1760)
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10633 CJ MONITORING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENDERS EVALUATION
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10634 CJ HI-RISK YOUTH EVALUATION
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
42
10626 CJ SHELTER PROJECT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10628 CJ SHELTER PROJECT AUGMENTATION
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10631 CJ EVALUATION OF SHERRIFF’S CENTRALIZED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE UNIT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
10632 CJ CHULA VISTA PD BURGLARY REDUCTION PROJECT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR.
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY.
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
JOB TOTAL
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
80
50
50
50
50
280
7020
7401
7501
7602
10
20
30
20
80
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
200
100
100
50
50
500
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
525
575
725
575
575
2,975
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
40
30
30
30
10
140
7020
7401
7501
7602
10
10
10
10
40
7020
7401
7501
7602
7603
250
250
300
250
250
1,300
7020 80
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
OWP NO.
PROJECT
NAME
POSITION EMPLOYEE WORK
CLASSIFICATION NUMBER HOURS
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY. 7401 215
JOB TOTAL
10635 CJ SANTEE VEHICLE THEFT PROJECT
JOB TOTAL
10701 LOCAL TECH ASST TO MA’S
JOB TOTAL
10801 SERVICES TO SOURCEPOINT
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
DIR. OF RESEARCH
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
SENIOR ECONOMIC ANALYST
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST
JOB TOTAL
10901 REGIONAL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY STRATEGY
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
SPECIAL SVCS DIR.
SENIOR ECONOMIC ANALYST
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
JOB TOTAL
r
r
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR. 7020
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY. 7401
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR 7501
SENIOR REGL PLANNER 2203
SENIOR REGL PLANNER 2204
ASST. REGIONAL PLANNER 2401
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 3202
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER 3301
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER 3303
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 3601
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 3801
DIR. OF RESEARCH 4020
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4202
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 4203
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY. 4402
ASSOC. RESEARCH ANALY. 4501
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4503
ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST 4506
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 4601
SENIOR ECONOMIC ANALYST 5201
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR 6401
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6501
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST 6502
PUBLIC INFO. SPECIALIST 6601
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIR. 7020
SENIOR RESEARCH ANALY. 7401
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR 7501
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 7602
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 7603
SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR 7501
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 7602
SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN 7603
1010
3202
3301
3303
3601
3801
4020
4601
5021
5201
5202
6601
4205
5021
5201
5202
105
460
270
1,130
40
20
100
160
300
80
500
100
100
400
50
260
100
880
40
100
80
720
40
710
80
35
180
180
120
40
100
40
100
40
5,335
40
75
150
240
50
400
40
200
160
300
480
120
2,255
200
600
400
800
2,000
43
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM
STAFF ALLOCATION BY OWP NUMBER
PROJECT
OWP NO. NAME
10902 FISCAL ABILITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
POSITION EMPLOYEE
CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
WORK
HOURS
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 1010 80
SPECIAL SVCS DIR. 5021 160
SENIOR ECONOMIC ANALYST 5201 900
SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER 5202 280
JOB TOTAL 1,420
cc
--
-
San Diego Association of Governments
LOCAL EXPENSE BUDGET
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FT99 LOCAL EXPENSE BUDGET SUMMARY
C
F
ADOPTED AMENDED PRELIMINARY FINAL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXPENSE FY96 FY96 FY99 FY99
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES b in,wo $ 123,ooo $ 1n,wo $ 123,CNXI
TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCE 18,560 18,509 18,500 21,5otJ
SCHEDULED TRAVEL 35,ooo WJofJ 35,ooC woo0
UNSCHEDULED TRAVEL 5,09g 5,9fxJ 5.999 cl
MEETING 6 MISC. EXPENSE 26,259 26,250 26,250 21,oocl
BOARD COMPENSATION =,= w= 66,559 w=
TOTAL BOARD EXPENSE 274,3W 274,36cl 274,300 $ 262,oxJ
EQUIPMENT OUTLAY woo0 woo0 199,990 3 100,000
TOTAL LOCAL EXPENSE 324,399 324,300 374,3w =zo50
LESS: CAPITAL OUTLAY RESERVE 0 0 @w-w www
NET TOTAL LOCAL EXPENSE $ 324,300 f 324,399 S 324,390 $ 312,959
SOURCE OF FUNDING LOCAL EXPENSE
%
CNG
0%
16%
-14%
-109%
-20%
0%
4%
199%
MEMBER AGENCY ASSESSMENTS s 156,712 $ 156,712 b 156,712 $ 146,087 -6%
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX ADMIN. 167,568 167,588 167,588 163,963 -2%
TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 15 324,390 f 324,390 t 324,300 $ 312,950 -4%
Local expenses are those costs which, In accordance with federal guidelines cannot be charged
directly or indirectly to grant programs and, therefore, are funded by local funds.
The initial cost of equipment outlay, although not charged to grant programs is recaptured
in future years by charging depreciation to the grant programs resulting in an eventual reimbursement
of local funds. These funds are placed in a capital reserve for future needs.
47
3
P iii I?! H
5:
i! k! P
f ‘;
!z vi
Q
8-
Q
8
$
8
ij
.s 5 PI 1 r E ‘- W
$
Ei
cn;
0
8 UJ-
48
San Diego Association of Governments
ADMINISTRATION BUDGET
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FT99 ADMINISTRATION BUDGET SUMMARY
ADOPTED AMENDED PRELIMINARY FINAL
PERSONNEL FY98 FY98 FT99 FY99
TOTAL SALARIES 8 BENEFITS s 994,855 $ 994,855 $ 1,019,385 $ I ,025,760
NON-PERSONNEL
OFFICE AND GRAPHICS SUPPLIES
POSTAGE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCE
SCHEDULED TRAVEL
UNSCHEDULED TRAVEL
MEETING 8 MISC. EXPENSE
MEMBERSHIPS
RENT, FACILITIES
RENT, VEHICLES
LEASE, DUPLICATING EQUIP.
LEASE/PURCHASE, OFFICE EQUIP
INSURANCE
GASOLINE
TELEPHONE
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT PROG
TRAINING INCENTIVE PROGRAM
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL
103,oocI
87,OW
142,OOCl
2zooo
woo0
70,ooo
5,69g
woo0
39,oocl
615,000
2wJo
76,006
138,000
~,~
5,ooo
110600
32,500
20,oorI
103,oorl
87,OQO
142,ooO
2zooo
Moo0
70,ow
5,ooo
6w)@J
39,wo
615,000
20,ooo
76,096
138,000
=,ooo
5,rJgg
110,oocl
32,5OCl
w$Jo
108,OW
8%~
132,OW
~,~
woo0
70,oocl
5,ooo
60,ooO
42,ooO
636,ooO
z@Jo
73,ooo
138,000
52,OW
5,ooo
lW,OOO
35,000
2wJo
106,WO
WJQo
132,000
25,000
91 ,ow
70,wa
5,@3g
@A~
42,000
636,000
PO00
73,000
138,000
52,OW
5W3
100,ooO
35,oorJ
20,ooll
100,006 100,000 112,500 lW,ooo
$ 1.778.500 t 1.778500 S 1.866500 t I .801.000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $ 2773,355 t 2773,355 $ 2,625,885 $ 2,626,760
The administration budget is a line item summary of those costs shown in the “Indirect Cost
column in the Program Budget Summary.
These costs are not above and beyond the Program Budget, but are overhead costs allocated to
all projects in accordance with established federal guidelines and grant administration procedures.
%
CNG
3%
5%
-2%
-7%
14%
6%
0%
0%
0%
8%
4%
10%
-4%
0%
4%
0%
-9%
8%
0%
0%
1%
2%
51
Q k
8
E 2! .E
E C t I b -c
Q ti
Q 0 0
rc’
Q Q Q
b e UJ-
Q 8 Q $ ,$ UJ-
0
Q 8
. . Y
r r- I
r
r r 1 ?- - ~ l- / l- ?-
f I b .E
B iii E .-
3
s
E hi
g
8
Q
iii-
% E 5 P
San Diego Association of Governments
MEMBER AGENCY ASSESSMENTS
c r
r
I I I I
:..I{ ., :. :.:. : .;. :..:.. ., ., . . . . . :..j: L66 1
I I I I ,, :. ..:. 966
I I I I . . . . . : : ,: ., S66
I I I I ..:. . . j::. :... : . . . . . . .: I..: . . . . .: .::. : .,,;, : j : ,,.: ,,. ..:.:, .‘.:j j;:.. :.. P66
I I I I -r
6661
I I I I
,I 266 L
I
I I I I
686 1
L / I 1 886
I I I P86L
I 086L
8L6
I I I I J, 1 9L6
I I I +
I 1 PLGL I I I I + CL6 1 1 I I I I I E z : : zi El 8 0
(sP’J=‘oU) SWllOCl JO SClNVSflOHl NI .lN;OW
56
% l- s I
i 82
* %
0
I,
z k 8 In
*
E .
D *
” e
San Diego Association of Governments
PERSONNEL COST SUMMARY
VI E
i al+ >c*
SI +tUaD ozg
@
:a- *; I- s mar ‘3 E m OZI
j$
ObO 2 P c
2
60
OF GOVERNMENTS
‘:EL COST SUMMARY
-TED 75 76
I INS.)
^E s.,
:
-;L TAX
FT98 FT99
APPROVED %OF AMOUNT PROJECTED %OF
ANNUAL SALARIES CHANGE ANNUAL SALARIES
f 4563,046 $ 267,005 $ 4,830,051
587,461 12.87% 37,463
394,272 8.64% 6,096
36,466 0.80% 3,720
43,- 0.95% 7,850
45630 1 .oo% 2,671
28,291 0.62% 1,655
5,328 0.12% (1,528)
370 0.01% 10
624,864 12.94%
4w= 8.29%
40,128 0.83%
51,199 1.06%
48,361 1 .oo%
29,946 0.62%
3,800 0.08%
380 0.01%
?FITS 1,141,w
$ 5,704,095
‘7GET:
2 STAFF) $ 994,855
3 STAFF) 4,709,24!l 294,037 5,003,277
..FF) 5 5,704,095
25.01% 57,937 1,198,986
$ 324,942 $ 6,029,037
f 30,905 $ 1,025,760
5 324,642 $ 6,029,037
24.82%
61
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY’99 POSlTlON HISTORY AND CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
POSITION CLASSIFICATION
OFFICE SERVICES SPECIALIST
WORD PROCESSING SPECIALIST
PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST
ADMIN
STAFF
2
3
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST
ASSISTANT REGIONAL PLANNER
OFFICE SERVICES SUPERVISOR 1
SENIOR/ASSOCIATE RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR
SENIOR/ASSOCIATE ACCOUNTANT
SENIOR/ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER
FINANCIAL SERVICES MANAGER
SENIOR ENGINEER
SENIOR/ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE EVALUATOR 1 1
CHIEF, INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER 2 2
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIRECTOR
ENGINEERING DIRECTOR
DIVISION DIRECTORS
GENERAL COUNSEL
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TOTAL POSITIONS
STAFFING HISTORY
NO. OF
STAFF
Authorized FYI75 64
Authorized N’76 61
Authorized FY’77 61
Authorizsd N’79 61
Authorized FY’79 61
Authorized FY’80 58
Authorized FY’8 1 58
Authorized FY’82 50
Authorized FY’83 48
Authorized FY’84 48
Authorized FY’85 51
Authorized FYI88 51
Authorized FY’87 51
1
1
1
1
14
PROGRAM TOTAL
STAFF CHANGE STAFF
5
1
12
0
25
1
1 1
25
1 1
1 1
6 7
1
61 1 76
STAFFING HISTORY
-- 3
3
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
2
12
1
Authorized FY’88 53
Authorized FY’89 63
Authorized FY’90 67
Authorized FY’9 1 67
Authorized FY’92 68
Authorized FY’93 69
Authorized FY’94 69
Authorized M’95 74
Authorized FY’96 74
Authorized FY’97 74
Authorized FY’98 75
Proposed FY’99 76
NO. OF
STAFF
62
C
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Fy’99 POSITION CLASSIFICATION/SALARY RANGE TABLE MONTHLY SALARY RANGES
RANGE
NUMBERS CLASS SALARY RANGES MIN MID MAX
13 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
OFFICE SERVICES SPECIALIST
14 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASSOCIATE ACCOUNTANT
PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST
WORD PROCESSING SPECIALIST
15 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) ASSOCIATE RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
GRAPHICS SPECIALIST
17 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASSISTANT REGIONAL PLANNER
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
OFFICE SERVICES SUPERVISOR
18
19
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) SENIOR RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GRAPHICS SUPERVISOR
21
22
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) ASSOCIATE RESEARCH ANALYST
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASSOCIATE REGIONAL PLANNER
SENIOR ACCOUNTANT
25
29
30
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER
FINANCIAL SERVICES MANAGER
(2) SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) CHIEF, INFO. SYSTEMS DEVL
(1) SENIOR CJ EVALUATOR
SENIOR ENGINEER (NEW POSITION)
(1) SENIOR REGIONAL PLANNER
CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROGRAM MANAGER
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIRECTOR
33 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ENGINEERING DIRECTOR
34 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DIVISION DIRECTORS
36 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GENERAL COUNSEL
37 CLASS SALARY RANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37A DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
N/A EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOTES: Changes from FY’98 to FY’99:
(1) Positions moved up one classification range.
(2) Positions moved up two classification ranges. 63
1,971 2,463 2,956
2.069 2,586 3,104
2,173 2,716 3,259
2,395 2,994 3,593
2,515 3,143 3,773
2,641 3,301 3,962
2.905 3,631 4,358
3,057 3,821 4,586
3,539 4,424 5,309
4,302 5,378 6,453
4,517 5,646 6,776
5,229 6,536 7,844
5,492 6,865 8,237
6,040 7,550 9,061
8,343 7,929 9,514
SET BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
San Diego Association of Governments
BUDGET AUTHORIZATION RESOLUTION
-
C
C
San Diego
ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101
(619) 595-5300 l Fax (619) 595-5305
http://www.sandag.cog.ca.us
REt~OLUTION No.
98-39
ADOPTION OF FY’99 FINAL BUDGET AND
PROVIDING FOR ALL AUTHORIZATIONS
NECESSARY AND PERTINENT THERETO
WHEREAS, the SANDAG Joint Powers Agreement stipulates that the Board of
Directors shall adopt a Final Budget no later than June 1st of each year; and
WHEREAS, Article 3, Section 132103 (a) of the enabling legislation (SB361) creating
the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission requires the adoption of an annual
budget; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 1999 Final Overall Work Program was reviewed and
approved by the Board as the basis, through this budget, for carrying forward the Overall Work
Program for FY’99; and
WHEREAS, the FY’99 Final Program Budget anticipates reliance on federal, State of
California, and other funds which require certification of non-federal matching funds; and
WHEREAS, such required match is identified as being available from Transportation
Development Act funds, member agency assessments, local assistance, and other local funds and
in-kind services; and
WHEREAS, the Executive Director must be authorized to execute or continue
agreements to lease or purchase materials, supplies, services and equipment for the fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the Executive Director to reimburse the San
Diego Association of Governments for necessary administrative expenditures made on behalf of the
Commission including Board of Directors’ expenses, SANDAG staff services, and contractual
services necessary to carry out the legal, administrative, auditing, and investment management
responsibilities of the Commission; NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of
Governments of the San Diego Region and the Board of Directors serving as the San Diego County
Regional Transportation Commission that:
a. The FY’99 Final Program Budget, hereby incorporated by reference, is adopted in an amount
estimated to be $227,660,098 and that the SANDAG Auditor/Comptroller be and is hereby
authorized to finalize the FY’99 appropriations based on actual grant agreements/funding contracts
67
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, De1 Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, Le Mesa, Lemon Grove,
National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marco% Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego. ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, S.D. Unified Port District,
SD. County Water Authority, and TijuanaIBaja California.
executed, actual sales tax revenues, sales tax revenue bond proceeds, and interest earnings received
pursuant to this budgetary authority, and the actual end-of-year carryover funds status as determined
by him; and
b. Each member agency is hereby assessed its share of the amount shown on the enclosed
member assessment schedule which totals $508,725; and
C. The SANDAG Auditor and Comptroller is authorized to make such personnel
reclassifications, Position Classification and Salary Range Table, and employee benefit package
adjustments shown herein pending further amendments by the Board of Directors; and
d. The Productivity Incentive Bonus Program will continue as an ongoing program which
applies to all staff members to recognize superior performance, based on merit, of identified
performance goals and objectives as outlined in the Performance Evaluation form; and
e. The SANDAG Executive Director be and is hereby authorized to submit grant applications or
revenue claims in the amounts indicated below subject to the final agreement of the grant agencies:
Federal Funds:
Federal Transit Administration:
MP0 Planning
Transit Planning
Federal Highway Administration: Planning
Transportation Demand Management Priority Corridor Program
Advanced Transportation Technology I-15 Pricing Demonstration
U.S. Fish &Wildlife National Institute of Justice
Non-Federal Funds:
TDA-Planning
TDA-Administration caltrans:
New Technology
Partnership Planning & Research STIP Planning/Transportation Systems Mgmt
Coronado Bridge Tolls Freeway Service Patrol
California State L.egislature Transportation Sales Tax/Revenue Bonds In-Rind Services/Local Match
Member Assessments CriminaI Justice Clearinghouse
ARJIS San Diego County Probation Dept.
Other Local and In-Rind Services Local Technical Assistance
Services to SourcePoint
Approximate
Amount
$651,000 2,034,OOO
2,739,ooo
600,ooo 7.688,OOO 442,000
s,209,000 561,000
113,000
1,734,OOO
275,000
470,000
160,ooo .
800,000
2,ooo,ooo 2,400,ooo 28,000
190,200.ooo
1.635.000 508,725
85,ooo ooo
507,000 2.563.000
228,000 155,000
68
-
c
f. The SANDAG Executive Director be and is hereby authorized to execute grant agreements
and all necessary documents and covenants required by granting agency laws, rules, and
administrative regulations, and the SANDAG Board of Directors hereby certifies the required non-
federal match to the above listed agencies and in the amounts necessary subject to SANDAG
Auditor certification of funds availability; and
g. The SANDAG Executive Director be and is hereby authorized to enter into and/or continue
agreements to purchase or lease materials, supplies, services (including legal, investment
management, financial advisor, and independent auditing services), and facilities and equipment for
the fiscal year per Attachment A, subject to Auditor and Comptroller certification of funds
availability and approval by SANDAG General Counsel; and
h. The Executive Director of SANDAG is hereby authorized to enter into and/or continue
agreements to provide support services to the highway improvements program and to reimburse
SANDAG for all costs incurred in providing said support services in the amounts estimated as
follows:
Right-of-Way Appraisals .............................................................. $7oo,ooo
Right-of-Way Engineering .............................................................. $10,ooo
Design Engineering Services ..................................................... $3,ooo,ooo
Construction Support Services ................................................... $4,5oo,ooo
Program/Contract Management Support ........................................ $75,ooo
And, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution and Final Program
Budget be filed with the Clerk of each member agency.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1998.
CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: SECRETARY
69
FYI99 PROGRAM BUDGET
Budget Resolution Attachment A
PURPOSE VENDOR/CONTRACTOR/SUPPLJER
ESTIMATED
AMOUNT
Administrative Services:
Annual FinHncial/Grant Complbqce
Audit & Related Services
Accounting Services/Systems Maintenance
Temporary Technical/Clerical Svcs.
LeasJMaintenance Office Space
LeaseIMaintenancc Vehicles
Least/Purchase/Maintenance, Word
Processing, Office. & Graphics
Equipment
Parking & Validation Stamps
Telephone System
Postage
Memberships
Meeting Expenses
Office/Graphics Supplies
Legislative Representation
Board & Staff Travel
Transportation Demand Mgmt/Training Jncentives
Liability Insurance
Coopers & LybramUCaJderon. Jaham & Osbom. CPAs
THE, Inc./Selected Vendors
Selected Vendors
First Interstate Plaza
Selected Vendors
30,ooo
49,500
52,500
638.000
22,ooo
Kodak, & Selected Vendors
First Interstate Plaza
Pacific Telephone, & AT&T
U.S. PostaJ Service & Selected Carriers
NARC. CALCOG & Others
Selected Vendors
Selected Vendors
Selected Representatives
Selected Vendors/Hotels/Carriers
Selected Vendors/Staff
Standard Insurance CoJSelected Vendors
236,000
84,100
100,000
85.000
42.000
60.000
108,ooo
123,000
105,000
55,ooo
62.000
Program Services:
LeaselPurchase!Maintenance Computer
Equipment, Software and Related
EDP Services
Program Materials, Graphics & Reports
Program Other Direct Costs
Temporary Technical/Clerical Svcs. .
Selected Vendors/Consultants
Selected Vendors
Selected Vendors
Selected Vendors
350,ooo
190,ooa
139,000
808.000
Contractual Services:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Mgmt
Information Systems Support
Transportation Planning
Transportation Development
Environmental Management
Criminal Justice & Regional Services
Regional Services & Assistance
Selected Consultants
Selected Consultants/Computer Systems Support
Selected Consultantflraffic Engineering
Contractors /Auditors/Legal & RnanciaJ Advisors
Selected Consuhants/XxhnicaJ Assistance
Selected Consuhantflraftic Engineering
Selected Consultants/Technical Assistance
60,000
213,200
I ,300,ooo
17,638,OOO
810.000
4,ooo
22,5ocl
Pass-Through Contracts:
MTDB. TDA Admin/Transit Guide
MTDB/Coronado Bridge Toll Projects
City Of San Diego. Habitat Planning
TransNet Bicycle Facilities
TransNet Highway Program
TransNet Transit Program
TransNet Local Streets Program
In-Kind Services
MTDB
City of CoronadoIMTDBlSelected Agencieflendors
City of San Diego
Member Agencies
Cahrans/Appraisals/Engineering/Contract SupportIMgmt
MTDBMCTD
Member Agencies
Local Agencies
6aooo
I ,898,OOO
15o.ooo
1,~.~
77.598.000
50,553,ooo
58,553,OOO
2,335.OOO
Employee Benefits & Insurance:
Retirement
Cafeteria Plan & Health Insurance
Dental/Vision Insurance
Life. Accident & Long Term
Public Employees Retirement System
StafflPERSIOthers
Amex-has Ins. Co./Selected Vendors
625.000
400,ooo
40,ooo
Disability Insurance Selected Carriers 55.200
Social Security Hospital Tax Federal Government 30,ooo
Workers Compensation State Compensation Insurance Fund 48.000
70
COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
AND
SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,1999
NOVEMBER 25,1999
San Diego QGJ
ASSOCmmON OF GOVERNMENTS
In the State of California
401 B Street l Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101
(619) 595-5300
Prepared by
Wayne T. Sink
Director of Finance and Administration
Andrk Douzdjian
Financial Services Manager
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Bncinitas, Fscondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, San&, Solana Beach, Vita, and County of San Diego.
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, and Tijuana/Baja California.
Board of Directors
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum
for regional decision-making. The Association builds consensus, makes
strategic plans obtains and allocates resources, and provides information on a
broad range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life.
CHAIRMAN: Hon. Art Madrid
VICE CHAIR: Hon. Ramona Finnila
SECRETARY-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Kenneth E. Sulzer
CR-Y OF CARLSBAD Hon. Ramona Finnila, Councilmember (A) Hon. Bud Lewis, Mayor (A) Hon. Matt Hall, Mayor Pro Tern
CITY OF CHULA VISTA Hon. Shirley Horton, Mayor (A) Hon. Mary Salas, Mayor Pro Tern
CR-Y OF CORONADO Hon. Thomas Smisek, Mayor (A) Hon. Chuck Marks, Councilmember
CfTY OF DEL MAR Hon. Richard Earnest, Mayor (A) Hon. Crystal Crawford, Councilmember
CITY OF EL CAJON Hon. Richard Ramos, Councilmember (A) Hon. Mark Lewis, Mayor
CITY OF ENCINITAS Hon. Dennis Holz, Councilmember (A) Hon. Sheila Cameron, Councilmember
CITY OF ESCONDIDO Hon. Keith Beier, Mayor Pro Tern (A) Hon. June Rady, Councilmember
ClTY OF IMPERIAL BEACH Hon. Diane Rose, Mayor (A) Hon. Mayda Winter, Mayor Pro Tern (A) Hon. Patricia McCoy, Councilmember
CfTY OF LA MESA Hon. Art Madrid, Mayor (A) Hon. Barry Jantz, Councilmember (A) Hon. Jay La Suer, Councilmember
CRY OF LEMON GROVE Hon. Mary Sessom, Mayor (A) Hon. Jill Greer, Councilmember
CR-Y OF NATlONAL CR-Y Hon. Ron Morrison, Vice Mayor (A) Hon. George H. Waters, Mayor
ClTY OF OCEANSIDE Hon. Carol McCauley, Councilmember (A) Hon. Colleen O’Harra, Deputy Mayor
ClTY OF POWAY Hon. Don Higginson, Councilmember (A) Hon. Mickey Cafagna, Mayor (A) Hon. Robert Emery, Deputy Mayor
CR-Y OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Barbara Warden, Councilmember (A) Hon. Juan Vargas, Councilmember (A) Hon. Byron Wear, Deputy Mayor
CITY OF SAN MARCOS Hon. Hal Martin, Councilmember (A) Hon. Pia Harris-Ebert, Vice Mayor
CITY OF SANTEE Hon. Jack Dale, Mayor (A) Hon. Hal Ryan, Councilmember (A) Hon. Jim Bar-tell, Vice Mayor
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH Hon. Marion Dodson, Mayor (A) Hon. Joe Kellejian, Deputy Mayor (A) Hon. Marcia Smerican, Councilmember
CITY OF VISTA Hon. Gloria E. McClellan, Mayor (A) Hon. Judy Ritter, Councilmember
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Hon. Pam Slater, Chairwoman (A) Hon. Greg Cox, Supervisor
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (Advisory Member)
J&e Medina, Director (A) Gary Gallegos, District 11 Director
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Liaison Member) CAPT Robert L. Phillips, CEC, USN Commander, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command (A) CAPT Robert Schenk, CEC, USN
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (Advisory Member) Jess Van Deventer, Commissioner
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (Advisory Member) Frank Chenelle (A) John Fowler
TlJUANAlBAJA CALIFORNIAIMEXICO (Advisory Member) Hon. Gabriela Torres Ramirez Consul General of Mexico
Revised November 16,1999
ii
C
?-- SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
coMl?REHENsIvE
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,1999
r TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
c
-
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
I. Letter of Transmittal .........................................................................................................................
II. Organization Chart ...........................................................................................................................
III. Executive Staff ...................................................................................................................................
21
25
26
28
30
32
33
34
FINANCIAL SECTION
I. Report of Independent Accountants.. ............................................................................................
II. General Purpose Financial Statements
General Purpose Financial Statements Description ..........................................................
Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups ..................................
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes
in Fund Balances - AlI Governmental Fund Types.. ..............................................
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes
in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - General and Special
Revenue Fund Types.. ................................................................................................
SourcePoint Enterprise Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenses,
and Changes in Retained Earnings ..........................................................................
SourcePoint Enterprise Fund - Statement of Cash Flows ................................................
Notes to General Purpose Financial Statements.. ..............................................................
III. Required Supplemental Information
Year 2000 Compliance ...........................................................................................................
IV. Combining, Individual Fund and Individual Account Group Financial
Statements and Schedules
A. General Fund
General Fund Desaip tion ..........................................................................................
Balance Sheet ................................................................................................................
Schedule of Changes in Undesignated Fund Balance ...........................................
Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual ............................................................
Schedule of Appropriations and Expenditures ......................................................
B. Special Revenue Funds Combining Statements
Combining Balance Sheet.. .........................................................................................
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balances ...................................................................................
53
57
58
58
59
60
62
63
3
17
18
. . . Ill
C. Special Revenue Funds - Federal, State and Other Grants
Special Revenue Funds Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Combining Balance Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Combining Statement of Revenues - Budget and Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Combining Statement of Appropriations and Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
D. San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Combined Statements, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds
San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Combined Balance Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Special
Revenue Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
E. Special Revenue Funds, San Diego County Regional
Transportation Commission, Combining Statements
Combining Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Combining Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
F. Debt Service Funds, San Diego County Regional Transportation
Commission, Combining Statements
Combining Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
Combining Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
G. General Fixed Assets
General Fixed Assets Account Group Desaiption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Statement of Changes in Fixed Assets by Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
H. Annual Debt Service Requirements
San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission,
Statistical Data, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited
Tax Bonds), 1992,1993,1994 and 1996 Series A,
Debt Service Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
V. Consolidated Planning Grant Funds
Report of Independent Accountants on Supplementary
Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Consolidated Planning Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
VI. Indirect Cost Worksheet
Indirect Cost Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
VII. Single Audit Reports
Report of Independent Accountants on Compliance and on IntemaI
Control Over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of
Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with
Government Auditing Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
Schedule of Federal Financial Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
iv
c-
m-.
C
Report of Independent Accountants on Compliance with
Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and
Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with
OMB Circular A-133 ................................................................................................... 139
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ..................................................................... 141
STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited)
Member Assessments, Last Ten Fiscal Years ................................................................................ 146
General Fund Revenues - By Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years ...................................................... 148
General Fund Expenditures - By Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years ........................................... 150
Special Revenue Funds - By Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years ....................................................... 152
Special Revenue Expenditures - By Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years.. ..................................... 154
Statistical Data, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Revenue Bond Coverage ...................................... 157
Schedule of Insurance in Force.. ...................................................................................................... 158
Salaries of Principal Employees, Pay Ranges and Classifications ............................................. 160
Development Guidelines Adopted as of June 30,1999, Last Ten
Fiscal Years .............................................................................................................................. 161
Miscellaneous Statistical Data
Population by Jurisdiction .................................................................................................... 170
Major Employers, by Major Statistical Area ....................................................................... 171
Acute Care Hospitals in San Diego Region.. ...................................................................... 172
Major Statistical Areas Map .................................................................................................. 173
Educational Facilities in San Diego Region ........................................................................ 174
Employment by Industry by Jurisdiction.. ......................................................................... 175
Comparison of Inflation Rates ............................................................................................. 179
Gross Regional Product - San Diego Region ...................................................................... 180
Tourism - San Diego County.. .............................................................................................. 181
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
C
December 20,1999
Honorable Chauman and Members
of the Board of Directors
San Diego Association of Governments
San Diego
ASSOCLATION OF GOVERNMENTS
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101-4231
(619) 595-5300 l Fax (619) 595-5305
http://www.sandag.cog.ca.us
We are pleased to present this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (“CAFR”) which
covers the combined financial activities of the San Diego Association of Governments
(“SANDAG”), the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (the
“Commission”), and SourcePoint for the fiscal year ended June 30,1999.
Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the
presentation, including all disclosures, rests with SANDAG. To the best of our knowledge and
belief, the enclosed data is accurate, in all material respects, and is reported in a manner designed to
present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds and account
groups of SANDAG. Also included herein are statistical tables and other supplementary
information. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of SANDAG’s
financial activities have been included.
The CAFR is presented in three sections: Introductory, Financial and Statistical. The Introductory
section includes this letter of transmittal, SANDAG’s organizational chart, and a list of the executive
staff. The Financial section consists of the general purpose tinancial statements and the combining
and individual fund and account group financial statements, as well as other supplementary
information, and the single audit reports. The Financial section also includes the independent
auditors’ report. The Statistical section includes selected historical financial data and demographic
information for the San Diego region, generally presented on a multi-year basis.
Reporting Entity
The San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) is the region’s council of governments
(“COG”). Local elected officials throughout the United States have joined together to form similar
COGS to deal cooperatively with issues which go beyond jurisdictional boundaries, such as
transportation, growth management, environmental quality, and public facility needs. SANDAG is
a voluntary association of each of the 18 cities in the San Diego region and the County of San Diego
(the “County”). The policy-making body known as the Board of Directors is composed of a mayor
or councilmember from each city and a county supervisor. The California Department of
Transportation (“Caltrans”), the Department of Defense, the San Diego Unified Port District, San
Diego County Water Authority, and Tijuana/Baja Califomia Norte are non-voting members of
SANDAG.
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove,
National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.
ADVlSORYlLtAlSON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, S.D. Unified Port District,
S.D. County Water Authority, and Tijuana/Baja California.
SANDAG traces its origins to the 1960s as local planners and decision-makers saw the need for
coordinated efforts to solve a growing list of regional issues. In 1972, a Joint Powers Agreement was
formal&d among local governments, creating a council of governments, then known as the
Comprehensive Planning Organization (“CPO”), with independent staffing and cooperative
financing from the local members and project grants from state and federal agencies. In 1980, the
name was changed fromthe Comprehensive Planning Organhtion to the San Diego Association of
Governments to better reflect the agency’s purpose.
SNAG established SourcePoint, a non-profit corporation, on April 15,1982, for the purpose of
providing certain regional planning information services and technical assistance to local
govemment entities and to the public.
SANDAG’s Board of Directors also serves as the San Diego County Regional Transportation
Commission (the “Commission”). ‘he Commission is responsible for the implementation and
administration of transportation improvement programs funded by the San Diego countywide l/2
percent sales tax. This tax became effective on April 1,1988, as a result of the passage of Proposition
A.- The San Diego County Transportation Improvement Program. The sales tax funds are allocated
equally between highway, public transit, and local streets and road improvements. Over $2 billion
in 1986 dollars, or $4.8 billion in future dollars, are expeckd to be generated in sales tax revenues
over the 20-year period. This program is now known as TransNet.
The l/2 percent sales tax is funding for the following three transportation uses after an initial one
percent is alloded to administr a ti ve purposes and $1 million per annum is designated for bicycle
facility improvements: (i) l/3 to regional highway improvements; (ii) l/3 to local street and road
improvements, to be divided between nineteen jurisdictions; and (iii) l/3 to public transit
improvements, to be divided between the North County Transit District (“NCTD”) and the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board C’MTDJ3”).
Proposition A authorizes the Commissi on to issue limited tax bonds payable from the sales tax
receipts, the proceeds of which can be used to finanaz approved highway, transit, and local street
and road projects.
The Commission oversees the transportation activities within the County of San Diego. The region
is the southemmost major metropolitan area in the State of California. The region encompasses
4,255 square miles, exknding 70 miles along the Pacific Coast from the Mexican border to Orange
County, and inland 75 miles to Imperial County. Riverside and Grange Counties form the northern
boundary. The region is approximately the size of the State of Connecticut.
The topography of the region varies from broad coastal plains to fertile inland valleys and mountain
ranges to the east, rising to an elevation of 6,500 feet Pastern slopes of these mountains form the
rim of the Anza-Borrego JDesert and the Imperial Valley. The Cleveland National Forest occupies
much of the interior portion of the region. The climate is equable in the coastal and valley regions
where most of the population and resources are located. Average annual rainfall in the coastal areas
is approximately ten inches.
4
c
*-
*-
P
*-
The region possesses a diverse economic base consisting of a significant manufacturing presence in
the fields of electronics, computer software and peripherals, aerospace, scientific instruments,
shipbuilding, a growing research and development sector in biotechnology and telecommunica-
tions, a large tourist industry supported by international events and a favorable climate, and a
considerable federal government presence.
Tourismremains strong in the region The facilities constructed for the Americas’ Cup in 1992 and
1995 will help make San Diego an attractive location for similar activities in the future. San Diego
hosted the 1996 Republican Convention, the 1988 and 1998 Super Bowls, and the 1998 World Series.
In addition, the San Diego Convention Center, containing 354,000 square feet of exhibit space, a
40,000 square foot ballroom, and over 100,000 square feet of meeting/banquet space, enables San
Diego to compete with Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Atlanta in attracting the largest conventions
and trade shows. The success of the Convention Center, opened in 1989, has led to a planned major
expansion, which was approved by the voters in June 1998. Completion of the expansion is
scheduled for 2000.
The region has opened the Olympic Training Center, which is the first multi-sport, warm-weather
training center built in the United States. The site occupies 150 acres and is expected to host 1,008
athletes each year. In addition to the many sport facilities, the site includes a conference center,
medical/science complex, and visitor center - all of which are expected to attract one-half million
visitors each year. The region also opened Legoland, a 128acre theme park based upon the popular
Lego building bricks that snap together. The park is located in Carlsbad and is the only one of its
kind to be built in the United States. Coors Amphitheatre, a 20,OOOseat outdoor concert venue
opened in Chula Vista. Other tourist attractions continue to draw thousands of visitors annually,
including the San Diego Zoo, Balboa Park, beaches from Imperial Beach north to Oceanside,
Mission Trails Park and other recreation activities in the east county, and special events that are held
in cities and communities throughout the region.
In November 1998, voters approved a public-private financing agreement, between the City of
San Diego and the San Diego Padres, for the construction of a new downtown ballpark. The
project includes not only the baseball-oriented stadium and parking but also ancillary
development, including hotels, retail and office space. The project is being developed near the
downtown San Diego Convention Center and is expected to have a major beneficial impact on
downtown revitalization.
The San Diego region also is growing as a major center for culture and education. Over 30
recognized art organizations are located in the region, including the San Diego Opera, the Old Globe
Theatre, the La Jolla Chamber Orchestra, as well as museums and art galleries. Higher education is
provided through five two-year colleges and six four-year colleges and universities. The University
of California, San Diego (“UCSD”) is internationally recognized for excellence in research and
education. UCSD ranks sixth among all U.S. colleges and universities in attracting research grants.
San Diego State University (“SDSTJ”) has the largest enrollment of all California State University
institutions. The University of San Diego (“USD”), a private institution, has one of the finest law
schools in the state.
5
‘Economic Condition and Outlook
Historically, the San Diego region has enjoyed strong economic expansion, outpacing both the state
and the national economies. The region’s strength is evidenced by high levels of commercial and
industrial development shared by virtually all sectors of the local economy. The Gross Regional
Product (GRP), an estimate of the total value of goods and services produced in the region, has
more than doubled since 1984, rising to $87.1 billion during 1998. The GRl? for 2000 is forecast at
$96.6 billion, or 5.5 percentzbove the estimate of $91.6 billion in 1999.
In the early 199Os, the shrinkage of the local defense and aerospace industries resulted in the loss of
approximately 18,000 high-paying jobs. With the departure of companies such as General
Dynamics, which had been filling defense orders for aircraft since 1935, the region also lost an
historically-important component of its economic base. The attendant reduction in local purchasing
power had multiplier effects, causing job losses in other industries, such as retail trade and services.
Like elsewhere in the state, the San Diego region’s economy went into a recession.
The San Diego region’s economy has now recovered, having fully regained all of the job losses
experienced during the recession. In 1998, wage and salary employment reached 1,289,500, or more
than 127,500 jobs more than existed in 1990. In addition, the process of restructuring to a more
civilian-based economy has seen the emergence of new local industries, based upon the application
of new technology. These industries include biotechnology, telecommunications, software
development, electrical equipment, consumer electronics, and especially the manufacture of
televisions. IZxpanding tourism and international trade also are adding to the region’s economic
resurgence. Another boost is Corning from the growth of the maquiladora industry in the San
Diego/Tijuana border region. Foreign investment in maquiladora manufacturing plants in Tijuana,
Mexico, is generating more business for San Diego suppliers and service firms. As a result of this
diversification, the local economy is expected to match or surpass U.S. growth rates in the coming
years.
Economic Recovery: The reduction in economic growth experienced during the first half of the
1990s at the national and state levels affected the San Diego region’s economy. During the height of
the recession period, 1990 through 1993, the region lost approximately 20,000 wage and salary jobs.
The recession’s effects on the local labor force, however, have recently been reversed. Since 1993, the
region has added 141,400 wage and salary jobs, platig the total number of wage and salary jobs
well above the pm-recession level. In the near future, Department of Defense expenditures for
wages and salaries are expected to rise with the increase in the number of uniformed military
personnel stationed here. The tourism industry is expected to continue to benefit from special
events held here; the expansion of our convention center, the completion of the latest amusement
park, Lego Land, as well as the region’s close proximity to Los Angeles and Mexico.
Real Estu te: According to the California Association of Realtors, the median price for a detached
home in San Diego was $233,600 in July 1999, up 8.3% from July 1998.
6
P
-
Defense Cufbacks: Defense expenditures, though not as vital to the local economy as they once
were, accounted for $9.3 billion, or 10.7 percent, of San Diego gross regional product in 1998.
This represents a 1.1 percent decrease from 1997, compared to 6.8 percent decrease in state-
wide defense-based revenues. Close to 10,000 high-paying, defense-related jobs in the
aerospace industry were lost in San Diego during the period 1990-1994, but diversification of
the economic base over the past decade has reduced the impacts of such cutbacks. The
decrease of the local navy population, due to shifts such as the closure of the Naval Training
Center and the changeover at Miramar, has been partially offset by the location of both the
Space and Naval Warfare Systems’ command headquarters and systems center, and the USS
JOHN C. STENNIS in San Diego. Defense contracting, once dominated by aerospace
production, has moved into high-tech research and military system development. Accounting
for secondary expenditures such as civilian employees, contractors and indirect jobs, the
federal defense impact on the local economy totaled $16 billion in 1998.
Wafer Supply: Heavy rain and snow beginning in 1993 officially ended California’s five-year
drought. Since 1993, the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA), working in cooperation
with other municipal agencies, has taken action to minimize the impact of a future drought,
and the region has purchased future water transfer rights to be used in the event of drought.
For the long run, San Diego is pursuing other alternatives, such as additional water storage
capacity, reclamation, and additional conservation tactics that will act to mitigate the impact of
any future droughts. The CWA and Imperial Irrigation District reached an agreement to
transfer surplus water to urban uses in San Diego County from agricultural uses in Imperial
County; and the CWA was granted $3 million dollars for the feasibility study of a new
aqueduct for this transport as part of a statewide water bond issue in 1999.
Infemafional Trade: San Diego’s international exports totaled $7.8 billion in 1997 and accounted
for approximately one-tenth of San Diego’s Gross Regional Product. Export sales in the region
have increased significantly in recent years. For example, merchandise exports from San Diego
have increased from $4.4 billion in 1993 to $5.9 billion in 1995 to $7.8 billion in 1997.
San Diego’s largest export destination is Mexico, with approximately $3.4 billion in sales
recorded during 1997. Mexico’s share of San Diego’s total exports increased from 34 percent in
1987 to 43 percent in 1997. Expanding trade under the North American Free Trade Agreement
(“NAFTA”) and a rapidly growing maquiladora industry in the San Diego/Tijuana border
region largely account for the San Diego region’s success in international trade. These trends
also have served to offset the effects of the peso devaluation in December 1994. It is anticipated
that the upward trend in local exports to Mexico, established between 1987 and 1997, will
continue.
By providing for a freer exchange of goods with Mexico, NAFTA has had significant beneficial
impacts on the local economy. Mexico is San Diego’s principal trading partner, and the
ongoing implementation of NAFTA’s provisions over the next several years is expected to
further enhance trade between the two regions.
7
Financial Information
Internal Controls
The Director of Finance and Administration is responsible for establishing and maintaining an
internal control structure designed to ensure that assets are protected from loss, theft or misuse and
to ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled to allow for the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal control
structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are
met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of the control should not
exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates
and judgments by management. In our opinion, SANDAG employs sound accounting policies that
fulfill these responsibilities.
Single Audit
As a recipient of federal, state and local financial assistance, SANDAG is required to undergo an
annual single audit in conformity with the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1984, and the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) Circular A-133 “Audits of States, Tocal Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations.” OMB Circular A-133 was amended June 24,1997 and rescinded
OMB Circular A-128, “Audits of State and local Governments.” The required Auditors’ reports on
compliance and internal controls are presented in .the Financial section. SANDAG is also
responsible for ensuring that an adequate internal control structure is in place to ensure compliance
with applicable laws and regulations related to those programs. This internal control structure is
subject to periodic evaluation by management.
As a part of SANDAG’s single audit, certain tests are made to evaluate the effectiveness of the
internal control structure, including that portion related to federal financial assistance programs, as
well as to determine that SANDAG has complied with applicable laws and regulations. The results
of SANDAG’s single audit for the fiscal year ended June 30,1999 disclosed no instances of material
weaknesses in the internal control structure or significant violations of applicable laws and
regulations.
Budgeting Controls
SANDAG maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance with the annual budget approved by
SNAG’s Board of Directors, with the budgetary provisions of each of the various financial
assistance agreements, and with the requirements of Proposition A - The San Diego Regional
Transportation Improvement Program which is known as the TransNet Program. SANDAG’s
Annual Program Budget, the level at which expenditures cannot exceed the author&d amount, is
organ&d, for financial statement purposes, into a general fund budget, a combined budget for all
special revenue funds, including TransNet program funds, and a total budget (memorandum only).
Each budget is further organized by special revenue fund and funding source.
General Fund Operations
General fund revenues and other financing sources, net of allocations to special revenue funds,
totaled $692,881 in 1999, a net increase of $341,119 from 1998. Allocations to special revenue funds
are for Member Assessments and Transportation Development Act (TDA) planning funds used to
match federal and state grants or to fund activities not fundable by federal or state grants.
The amount of revenue from various sources and the increase or decrease from fiscal year 1998 are
shown in the following tabulation:
Revenue Source
Member Assessments
TDA Planning Funds
Transportation Sales Tax
Miscellaneous Revenues
Subtotal
Less: Allocations to/from
Special Revenue
Funds
Total
1999
Amount
$ 508,724
1,417/I-47
176,183
165,625
2,267,979
Percent
of Total
22%
62%
8%
7%
100%
(1575,098)
$ 692,881
Increase Percent
(Decrease) Increase
from 1998 (Decrease)
$ (2) 0%
173,111 14%
27,073 18%
92,930 128%
293,112 15%
-3%
97% -
The only major change from fiscal 1998 revenue sources was an increase in the miscellaneous
revenue. The increase was mostly due to a check in the amount of $124,545 for an insurance
premium rebate.
The agency’s general and administrative support costs and local expenditures that are not directly
related to any grant program are recorded in the General Fund. General and administrative
expenditures are the basis for indirect cost pools which are intended to be recovered from the special
revenue funds. After netting indirect cost recoveries, inter-fund eliminations and operating
transfers, the total net under recovery of the General Fund was $623,085, representing a change of
$771,478 or 520% from fiscal year 1998.
9
The net expenditures of the General Fund for each major object class category and the increase or
decrease from fiscal year 1998 are shown in the following tabulation:
Expenditures
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Materials and Supplies
Rent/Maintenance Facilities
and Equipment
Travel, Transportation and
Meeting Expenditures
Contractual Services
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total
Less: Reimbursements from
Special Revenue Funds
Net Administrative
Expenditures
Add: Local Expenditures
Total
1999
Amount
$ 1,003,556
267,785
756,240
248,602
249,377
241,921
2‘767,481
(5144,396) 386,442
623,085
280,064
$ 903,149
Percent
of Total
36.3%
9.7%
27.3%
9.0%
9.0%
8.7%
100%
31%
Increase
!!izzz
$ 60,039
94,126
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
6%
54%
31313 4%
39,711 19%
102,943 70%
56,714 31%
385,046 16%
-15%
(771,478)
(6,060)
!§ 765,428
-520%
2%
556%
The one major change from fiscal year 1998 expenditures was an increase in materials and
supplies. This was due mostly to an increase in the costs of, and increased needs for, materials
and supplies. The other major increase was in contractual services for professional attorney
services used for legal matters.
Special Revenue Fund Operations
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for all federal and state grant programs, locally funded
programs, other than proprietary funds, and the Commission’s TransNet program. because grants
operate primarily on a reimbursement basis, revenues, expenditures, and operating transfers
provided by the General Fund elim‘inate a fund balance.
Special Revenue Funds revenues, net of interfund eliminations, totaled $187409,700 in fiscal year
1999, representing a decrease of $2,494,912 or 1% from fiscal year 1998.
10
C
The amount of revenues by source is summarked below:
Revenue Source
Federal Grants
State Grants/
Reimbursements
Other Grants and
Contracts
Transportation Sales Tax
Transportation Development
Act
Member Agency
Assessments
Interest on Investments
Miscellaneous and In-Kind
Services
Total
1999
Amount
$ 10,718,108
03L836)
Percent
of Total
5.7%
0.0%
5620,230
x3,219,713
1.4%
87.1%
2,080,501 1.1%
403,718 0.2%
6,755,006 3.6%
1,694,260
$187,409,700
0.9%
100% ~
Increase
!tzzz
$ 903,785
W-WW
w4,w 6,470,081
632,369
24,949
(349,816)
(l&+51,289)
$(2,494,912)
Percent
Increase
QImease)
9%
-101%
-9%
4%
44%
7%
-5%
-52%
-1%
The major decrease in the State Grants/Reimbursements is due to the Navy returning a check for
approximately $4,000,000 of State funds which were expensed in the prior year. SANDAG treated
the check in the current year as an expenditure refund.
11
Special Revenue Funds expenditures, net of interfund eliminations, totaled $100,559,287,
representing a decrease of $39,068,425, or 28% from the previous year. Expenditures are
summarized in the following tabulation:
Expenditures
Intergovernmental Relations
and Program Management
Information Systems
Development
Regional Transportation
Planning
Transportation Programming
and Planning Assistance
Development Strategy and
Environmental Management
Regional Criminal Justice
Clearinghouse
Regional Information
Services and Assistance
Regional Economic Planning
and Research
Services Provided by Other
Agencies
TransNet Projects
Bicycle Facilities
Highway Improvements
Public Transit Improvements
Local Street and Road
Improvements
General and Administrative
Expenditures
Debt Fiscal Expenditures
Interest Expenditures
Arbitrage Rebate
Expenditure
Total
1999 Percent
AmoLult of Total
Increase
!kzz
percent
Increase
(Decrease)
$ 884,491 0.9% -4%
1,864,451 1.9% 58,833 3%
2,150,996 2.1% 449,702 26%
11803,634 11.7% 214,474 2%
w772~2) -1.8% (fW%W -128%
873,858 0.9% 289,373 50%
536,812 0.5% W3W -6%
353,226 0.4% W,W 100%
0 0.0% (2,700) -100%
4555501 4.5% (4,261,462) 43%
460,847 0.5% (164,939) -26%
21,689,396 21.6% (24,159/564) -53%
13,308,274 13.2”/0 7646,404 135%
40,887,920
1,181,679
338,992
L4Qw2
40.7%
1.2%
0.3%
1.4%
0.0%
100%
(10,121,924) -20%
(17,745) -2%
(121,780) -26%
(279,498) -16%
$100559.287
(734,051) 100%
!Kw%@) -28%
The largest dollar differences were all related to TransNet expenditures, which include
expenditures on bicycle facilities, highway improvements, public transit improvements, local
street and road improvements, and the principal retirement of commercial paper. The large
dollar changes within the programs are due to the projects that are currently being worked on.
12
Enterprise Fund Operations
c
Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations: (a) that are financed and operated in a
manner similar to private business enterprises - where the intent of the governing body is that
the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed
or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that
periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is
appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or
other purposes.
The SourcePoint Enterprise Fund is the only enterprise fund maintained by SANDAG. SourcePoint
accounts for the customized provision of SANDAG’s data and expert staff resources to decision
makers in the business community and local governments. All activities necessary to provide such
services are accounted for in this fund.
SourcePoint revenues, expenses, and the inclrease or decrease from 1998, are shown in the following
tabulation:
1999 Percent
Amount of Total
Increase Percent
(Decrease) Increase
from 1998 (Decrease)
Gross Revenues
Interest Income
Total
Cost of Sales
Operating Expenses
Transfers to SANDAG
Total
$185,368 88% $(35X28) -16%
24,553 12% 3,841 19%
$209,921 100% $(31,287) -12% c
1999 Percent
Amount of Total
Increase
(Decrease)
from 1998
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
$142,938 79% $6,146 4%
5,742 3% (1,491) -21%
33,371 18% 33,371 100%
$182,051 100% $38,026 26%
The major change from 1998 was the decreased amount of gross revenues due to a number of large
contracts obtained in the prior year over the current year. SourcePoint also transferred $33,371 to
SANDAG in the current year to pay for an interactive kiosk which has been placed in SANDAG’s
lobby for use by the public.
13
Pension Activities
Through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), SANDAG maintains an agent
multipleemployer, defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees. Total assets
in excess of pension benefit obligation applicable to SANDAG’s employees were $4,701,486 at June
30, 1998. Net assets available for benefits as a percentage of the pension benefit obligation were
133.6% as of June 30,1998. Information regarding June 30,1999 balances is not yet available from
PERS.
General Fixed Assets Account Group
The general fixed assets of SANDAG primarily include computer equipment and office furniture,
equipment, and fixtures used in the performance of the agencies’ general functions. Expenditures
for fixed assets are recorded in the general fund and special revenue funds in the period incurred.
These assets are capitalized in the general fixed asset account group and are valued at original cost.
Fixed assets are purchased in accordance with SANDAG’s established procurement policy. Federal
grants are not used to purchase fixed assets unless specifically authorized as part of the grant
contract.
Risk Manapement
SANDAG purchases insurance coverage that is considered adequate to minimize SANDAG’s risk
of loss. A schedule of the insurance coverage in place is included in the Statistical section.
Investments
SANDAG’s investment policy and state statutes authorize SANDAG to invest in obligations of the
U.S. Treasury, its agencies and instrumentalities, certificates of deposit with national and state-
licensed or chartered banks or federal or state savings and loan associations, and money market and
mutual funds whose portfolios consist of one or more of the foregoing investments. Funds may
also be invested in the State Treasury’s Local Agency Investment Fund and the San Diego County
Investment Pool.
SANDAG’s investments (other than the pension trust fund) are made with a number of financial
institutions and money managers. During 1999, SANDAG earned an average yield on investments
of 5.21% in its investment portfolio.
Debt Administration
At June 30, 1999, SANDAG had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues included
!§581,975,000 in revenue bonds and !$47,500,000 in commercial paper. SANDAG has maintained its
A+ rating from Standard & Poor’s Corporation and an Al from Moody’s Investor Service on these
issues. Certain issues that were insured received AAA ratings.
SANDAG issued the 1996 Series A bonds in the sum of $185,000,000. The 1996 Series A bonds were
issued for the purposes of financing various state highway, local street and road and public transit
projects in the County also identified in the Ordinance, to retire certain commercial paper notes
issued by the Commission to finance such projects, to fund a reserve account, and to pay costs of
14
issuance related to the 1996 Series A bonds. As of June 30,1999, there was $18,700,000 in 1996 Series
A bonds available for projects.
Major Proiects/Summation
SourcePoint
SourcePoint marked another strong net income year with approximately $37,000 in
operating income recorded. Since its creation twelve years ago, SourcePoint has
provided over $1,400,000 in reimbursements to SANDAG for staff services and computer
resources expended to provide valuable data to the public and private sector. Even with
a moderate marketing program, SourcePoint is expected to continue to provide about a
quarter of a m.iUion dollars per year in financial support to SANDAG.
Transportation Cornmission
Transportation sales tax revenues increased by 7.7% over last year. Through the use of timely
and prudent debt financing, the Commission has been able to provide the financial resources
necessary to fund every project; accumuIate a sales tax fund reserve of almost $113,700,000;
and generate interest earnings of over $4600,000 in the special revenue and debt service funds
during fiscal year 1999.
This past year alone, the Commission funded approximately $400,000 in bicycle facilities,
$21,700,000 in highway improvements, $13,300,000 in public transit projects, and $40,800,000
in local street and road improvements. Over $76,300,000 in public transportation
infrastructure improvements were funded this past year.
SANDAG
Over the past twenty years, federal and state governments have provided reasonably
adequate levels of funding for both short and long range regional transportation planning.
However, SANDAG has never had adequate funding to properly address issues important to
the region such as open space, land use, growth management, solid waste management,
environmental management, and economic development planning.
This year, the SANDAG Board continues to make progress on projects and programs of
regional significance. A new 2020 Cities/County Forecast estimating the region’s population
was released. A Regional Growth Management Strategy (REGION2020) was developed. The
I-15 FasTrakTM project was recognized by the Association of Metropolitan Planning
Organizations. And, SANDAG drafted the $29 billion, 20-year Regional Transportation Plan
that allocates funding for highways, major streets, buses, the trolley, rail transportation,
bicycles, and airport service.
The Board of Directors are encouraged to continue their record of committing a modest level
of local funding toward the regional planning process. However, they are further encouraged
to increase their focus toward obtaining a federal, state, or regional source of funding to
address the land use, environmental, and economic concerns of the region.
15
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA)
awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to SANDAG for its
comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. The Certificate
of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest
standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports.
In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily
readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents
conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting
principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. SANDAG has received a
Certificate of Achievement for the years in which the report was submitted for review. We believe
our current report conforms to the Certificate of Achievement program requirements.
Acknowledgements
The’preparation of this report was accomplished with the cooperation of SANDAG’s management,
financial, and administrative staff and SANDAG’s independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and Calderon, Jaham and Osbom. We express our appreciation to the staff members and the
auditors who contributed to the preparation of this report.
Respectfully submitted,
5 kzz
Executive Director Director of Finance and Administration
16
i
2 .s s 3
II
‘E z
$ .I$
0”
0
I
l- I
.L c‘ cgf g .o, 0 9
J G ; ii=00 Ozrn $ E 9 .o, g3:50 5 m’ #ffJ s n $mm
-
LI ,,o .E 8
1
c?g 2 -s z-0 (I)‘ 8 m
as
.a z
g
‘E 0
$3
17
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Executive Staff
June 30,1999
Executive Director -
Deputy Executive Director
General Counsel
Director of Finance and Administration
Director of Land Use and Public Facilities Planning
Director of Research and Information Systems
Director of Transportation
Communications Director
Criminal Justice Research Director
Special Services Director/SourcePoint
Kenneth E. Sulzer
Bob Parrot?
Debra A. Greenfield
Wayne T. Sink
Michael McLaughlin
Jeff Tayman
Lee F. Hultgren
Gany Bonelli
Susan Pennell
Marney Cox
18
FINANCIAL SECTION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
*-
C
r‘-
f-
I--
T-
c-
.F-
I-
-
C
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
CALDERON, JAHAM & OSBORN
A JOINT VENTURE
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Report of Independent Accountants
The Board of Directors
San Diego Association of Governments
In our opinion, the accompanying general-purpose financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) at June 30,
1999 and the results of its operations and its changes in fund balance and equity and cash flows of its
proprietary fund for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
These financial statements are the responsibility of SANDAG’s management; our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these general-purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit of these general-purpose financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the general-purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general-purpose
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall general-purpose financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
The year 2000 supplementary information on page 53 is not a required part of the general-purpose
financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board, and we did not audit and do not express an opinion on such information. Further, we
were unable to apply to the information certain procedures prescribed by professional standards
because the disclosure criteria specified by TB 98-1, as amended, are not sufficiently specific and,
therefore, preclude the prescribed procedures from providing meaningful results. In addition, we do not
provide assurance that SANDAG is or will become year 2000 compliant, that SANDAG’s year 2000 remediation efforts will be successful in whole or in part, or that parties with which SANDAG does business are or will become year 2000 compliant.
In accordance with Governmenf Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated
December 20, 1999 on our consideration of SANDAG’s internal control over financial reporting and our
tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial
statements taken as a whole. The combining statements and statistical data listed in the accompanying table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a
required part of the general-purpose financial statements of SANDAG. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for pruposes of additional analysis as required by the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-l 33, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the general purpose financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the combined
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the
combined financial statements taken as a whole.
San Diego, California
December 20, 1999
21
I
FINANCIAL SECTION
GENERAL PURPOSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In addition to the general purpose statements, the Financial section includes separate subsections
presenting general, combining statements for special revenue and debt service funds.
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMEW DESCRIPTION
YEARENDEDJUNE30,1999
The general purpose financial statements are presented to provide a broad perspective of the
financial position of the San Diego Association of Governments at June 30,1999, and the results
of its operations and cash flows of its proprietary fund for the year then ended. These general
purpose financial statements include all of the financial activity of the San Diego Association of
Governments, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and SourcePoint,
SANDAG’s chartered non-profit corporation. Although each fund is a separate entity, a
memorandum combined total for all funds is included in these statements and is presented for
information only.
25
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS
JUNE 30.1999
GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES’
ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS
GENERAL
SPECIAL
REVENUE
DEBT
SERVICE
Cash and Investments (Note 2). .................................................... $
Cash With Fiscal AgentlCustodian (Note 2):. ......................................
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal ............................................................................................
State ..................................................................................................
Loans Receivable.. ............................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................
Due from Other Funds (Note 3) .........................................................
Fixed Assets, net.. ..............................................................................
Amount Available in Debt Service Funds.. ..........................................
5357,270 S 101,836,534 $ 0
25,501,393 19,622,322 34,108,228
0 4,077,071
0 12,981,295
0 1 o,ooo,ooo
0 48,350,564
7‘149,013 32,790,740
0 0
0 0
Amount to be Provided for Retirement of General Long-Term Debt.... 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36,007,676 $ 229,658,526 $ 34,108,228
LIABILITIES, FUND EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS
Liabilities:
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.359,267 $ 0 s 0
Contracts Payable ............................................................................. 7,921 0 0
Arbitrage Rebate Payable .................................................................. 0 0 76 1,853
Compensated Absences (Note 5) ....................................................... 431,850 0 0
Due to Other Funds (Note 3). .............................................................. 32,790,740 7,117,430 0
Deferred Revenue.. ............................................................................. 0 31,731,677 0
Commercial Paper Payable (Note 7). .................................................. 0 47,500,000 0
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Payable (Note 6). ..................................... 0 0 0
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,589.778 86,349,107 761,853
Fund Equity and Other Credits:
Investment in General Fixed Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained Earnings - Unreserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fund Balance (Note 8):
Reserved for Debt Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserved for Loan Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserved for Future Projects . . . . . . . . . . . .._...............................................
Unreserved:
Designated for Equipment Replacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
0
0
0
0
500.000
917,898
Total Fund Equity and Other Credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.................................. 1,417,898 143,309,419 33346,375
0
0
0 33,346,375
1 o,ooo.ooo 0
133,309,419 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL LIABILITIES, FUND EQUITY
AND OTHER CREDITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 38,007,676 S 229,658,526 S 34,108,228
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
26
F
I
P
T-
T‘
T-
I
,
PROPRIETARY
FUND TYPE
ENTERPRISE
ACCOUNT GROUPS
GENERAL GENERAL
FIXED LONG-TERM
ASSETS DEBT
TOTAL
(Memorandum
Only)
S 483,987 $ 0 s 0 s 107,677,791
0 0 0 79,231,943
0 0
0 0
0 0
50,097 0
0 0
0 3,753,812
0 0
0 0
0 4,077,071
0 12,981,295
0 10,000,000
0 48,400,661
0 39,939,753
0 3,753,812
33,346,375 33,346,375
549,038,774 549.038.774
S 534,084 s 3,753,812 s 582,385,149 s 888,447,475
s 0 s 0 s 0 s 3,359,267
0
0
0
31,583
0
0
0
0
410,149
0
0
0
7,921
761,853
841,999
39,939,753
31,731,677
47,500,000
581,975,OOO
31,583 582,385,149 706,117,470
0 3,753,812 0 3,753,ai2
502,501 0 0 502,501
0 0 33,346,375
0 0 10,000,000
0 0 133,309,419
0
0
0
cl
500,000
917,898
502,501 3,753,812 0 1 a2,330,005
581,975,OOO
S 534,084 $ 3,753,812 s 582,385,149 s 888,447,475
27
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
JUNE 30,1999
REVENUES:
Federal Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
SPECIAL DEBT
GENERAL REVENUE SERVICE
0 $ 10,718,108 $ 0 .‘; State Grants/Reimbursements, Net of Interfund Allocations (Note 9) ..... 0 (81,836) 0
Other Grants and Contracts.. .................................................................. 0 2,620,230 0
Transportation Sales Tax.. ................................................... . .................. 176,183 163,219,713 0
Transportation Development Act, Net of Inter-fund Allocations.. .............. 0 2,080,501 0
Member Agency Assessments, Net of Intmund Allocations.. ................. 106.304 403,71a 0
Interest on Investments ........................................................................... 31,798 6,755,006 2,466,936
Miscellaneous and Interfund Transfers ................................................... 378,596 1,694,260 0
TOTAL REVENUES.. ...............................................................................
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations and Program Management.. ......................
Information Systems Development.. ........................................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. .........................................................
Transportation Programming and Planning Assistance.. .........................
Development Strategy and Environmental Management (Note 9) ...........
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ..............................................
Regional Information Services and Assistance.. .....................................
Services Provided by Other Agencies.. ...................................................
TransNet Projects ...................................................................................
Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................
Highway Improvements.. .........................................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. .................................................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ...................................................
General and Administrative, Net of Interfund Allocations.. ......................
Board of Directors.. .................................................................................
Equipment Purchases.. ...........................................................................
692,881
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
623,085
217,433
62,631
i a7,409,700
884,491
1,864,451
2,150,996
11,803,634
(1,777,212)
873,858
536,812
353,226
4,555,501
460,847
21,689,396
13,308,274
40,887,920
1,181,679
0
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES . ...__.__......___.....................,..
DEBT SERVICE:
963,149 98,773,873 0
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ......................................................................
Principal Retirement.. ..............................................................................
Interest.. ..................................................................................................
0 338,992 0
0 0 50,500,000
0 1,446,422 32,654,644
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES.. ............................................ 0 1,785,414 83,154,644
TOTAL EXPENDITURES, NET.. .............................................................. 903,149 ioo,559,287 83,154,644
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES........
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Operating Transfers In.. ...........................................................................
Operating Transfers Out.. .........................................................................
.(210,268) 86,850,413
0 4,762,956
0 (83,985.lll)
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 (79,222,155)
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES
OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. ...................................... (210,268) 7,628,258
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1998.. ....................................................... 1,628,166 135‘681,161
2,466,936
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(ao,sa7,7oa)
82,218,594
(2.996,439)
79,222,155
(1,465,553)
34,811,928
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
i,417,898 s 143,309,419 s 339346,375
28
TOTAL
(Memorandum
Only)
S 10,718,108
(81.836)
2,620,230
163,395,896
2,080,5oi
510,022
9,253,740
2,072,856
190,569,517
P
884,491
1,864,451
2,150,996
11,803,634
(1,777,212)
873,858
536,812
353,226
4,555,501
460,847
21,689,396
13,308,274
40,887,920
1,804,764
217,433
62.631
C
T-
99,677,022
338,992
50,500,000
34,101,066
84,940,058
184,617,OaO
5,952,437
86,981,550
(86,981,550)
0
5,952,437
172.121.255
S 178,073,692
29
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND
GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TYPES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
JUNE 30.1999 Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable)
REVENUES:
Federal Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 s 0
State Grants/Aeimbursements, Net of Interfund Allocations (Note 9) .......
Other Grants and Contracts.. ....................................................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ........................................................................
Transportation Development Act, Net of Interfund Allocations.. ................
Member Agency Assessments, Net of Interfund Allocations.. ..................
Interest on Investments.. ..........................................................................
Miscellaneous and Interfund Transfers .....................................................
0 0 0
0 0 0
176,183 176,183 0
0 0 0
106,304 106,304 0
0 31,796 31,798
0 378,596 378,596
TOTAL REVENUES.. ................................................................................ 282,467 692,881 410,394
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations and Program Management.. ........................
Information Systems Development.. .........................................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...........................................................
Transportation Programming and Planning Assistance.. ..........................
Development Strategy and Environmental Management (Note 9) ............
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ...............................................
Regional Information Services and Assistance.. .......................................
Services Provided by Other Agencies.. .....................................................
TransNet Projects.. ...................................................................................
Bicycle Facilities.. .....................................................................................
Highway Improvements ............................................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. ..................................................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ....................................................
General and Administrative, Net of Interfund Allocations ..........................
Board of Directors.. ..................................................................................
Equipment Purchases.. ............................................................................
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 623,085 (623,085)
265,550 217,433 48,117
100.000 62,631 37,369
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . .._.......................................... 365,550 903,149
DEBT SERVICE:
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ........................................................................ 0 0 0
Bond / Commercial Paper Interest.. .......................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE.. .......................................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ............................................. . .......................... 365,550 903,149 (537,599)
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES .........
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Operating Transfers In.. .............................................................................
Operating Transfers Out ............................................................................
(83,063) (210,268)
0 0
0 0
(127,205)
0
0
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES). .................................... 0 0
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES
OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. ....................................... (83,063) (210,268)
0
(127,205)
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,576,OOO 1,628,166 52,166
(537,599)
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1,492,937 3 1,417,898 S (75,039)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
30
TOTALS
SPECIALREVENUEFUNDS (MEMORANDUMONLY)
BUDGET ACTUAL
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis
VARIANCE
favorable
(unfavorable)
BUDGET ACTUAL
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis
VARIANCE
favorable
(unfavorable)
$ 24,181,557 $ 10,718,108 $ (13,463,449) $ 24,181,557 $ 10,718,108 $ (13,463,449)
12,901,912
8,030,llO
158,698,998
1,619,442
462,744
3,910,000
0
(81,836)
2,620,230
163,219,713
2,080,501
403,718
6,755,006
1.694.260
(12,983,748) 12,901,912 (81,836) (12,983,748)
(5,409,880) 8,030,110 2,620,230 (5,409,880)
4,520,715 158,875,181 163,395,896 4,520,715
461,059 1,619,442 2,080,501 461,059
(59,026) 569,048 510,022 (59,026)
2,845,006 3,910,000 6,786,804 2,876,804
1,694,260 0 2,072,856 2,072,856
209,804,763 187.409.700 (22,395,063) 210,087,250 188,102,581 (21,984,669)
884,491
1,864,451
2,150,996
11,803,634
(1,777,212)
873,858
536,812
353,226
4,555,501
1,000,000
95,708,266
45,708,267
60,708,267
1,395,200
0
0
884,491
1,864,451
2,150,996
11,803,634
(1,777,212)
873,858
536,812
353,226
4,555,501
460,847
21,689,396
13,308,274
40,887,920
1,181,679
0
0 884,491 884,491 0
0 1,864,451 1,864,451 0
0 2,150,996 2,150,996 0
0 11,803,634 11,803,634 0
0 (1,777,212) (1,777,212) 0
0 873,858 873,858 0
0 536,612 536,812 0
0 353,226 353,226 0
0 4,555,501 4,555,501 0
539,153 1,000,000 460,847 539,153
74,018,870 95,708,266 21,689,396 74,018,870
32,399,993 45,708,267 13,308,274 32,399,993
19,820,347 60,708,267 40,887,920 19.820,347
213,521 1,395,200 1,804,764 (409,564)
0 265,550 217,433 48,117
0 100,000 62.631 37,369
225,765,757 98.773.873 126,991,884 226,131,307 99.677.022 126.454.285
338,992 338,992 0 338,992 338,992 0
1,446,422 1.446.422 0 1,446,422 1.446.422 0
1,785,414 1,785,414 0 1,785,414 1,785,414 l-l
227,551,171 100,559,287 126,991,884 227,916,721 101,462,436 126,454,285
(17,746,408) 86,850,413 104,596,821 (17,829,471) 86,640,145 104,469,616
4,762,956 4,762,956 0 4,762,956 4,762,956 0
0 (83,985,111) (83,985,111) 0 (83,985,111) (83,985,111)
4,762,956 (79,222,155) (83,985,lll) 4,762,956 (83,985,111)
(12,983,452) 7,628,258 20,611,710 (13,066,515)
(79,222,155)
7,417,990 20,484,505
135681,161 135.681.161 0 137,257,161 137.309.327 52,166
$ 122,697,709 $ 143,309,419 $ 20,611,710 $ 124,190.646 $ 1443727,317 $ 20,536,671
31
SourcePoint
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SOURCEPOINT ENTERPRISE FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30,1999
GROSS REVENUES FROM SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Less: Cost of Services Provided . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (142,938)
GROSS MARGIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,430
OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and Administrative Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,545)
Marketing Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,197)
Total Operating Expenses.. ...................................................... ;. ................ (5,742)
OPERATING INCOME.. .................................................................................... 36,688
Transfers to SANDAG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (33,371)
Interest Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,553
NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,870
RETAINED EARNINGS, JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474,631
RETAINED EARNINGS, JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 502,501
See accompanying report of independent accountants and accompanying footnote disclosures.
32
C
c-
l-
SourcePoint
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SOURCEPOINT ENTERPRISE FUND
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30,1999
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36,688
Adjustment to reconcile net operating income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Transfers to SANDAG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (33,371)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in Due From Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K4053)
Increase in Accounts Payable to SANDAG.. ................................................ 17,006
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:. .......................... 11,270
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Interest on Investments .................................................................................... 24,553
NET INCREASE IN CASH ................................................................................. 35,823
CASH AND INVESTMENTS, JUNE 30,1998 ................................................... 448,164
CASH AND INVESTMENTS, JUNE 30,1999 ............................................... $ 483,987
See accompanying report of independent accountants and accompanying footnote disclosures.
l-
33
1.
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
NOTES TO GENE&IL l?URl’OSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30,1999
Summary of Signific%nt AccountinP Policies:
The financial statements of the San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) have
been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as
applied to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(“GASB”) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting
and financial reporting principles. The more significant of SANDAG’s accounting
policies are described below.
(a) Reporting; Entitv
SANDAG was formed as the Comprehensive Planning Organization under a Joint
Powers Agreement dated September 10, 1972. The Joint Powers Agreement was
amended on November 5, 1980 to change the agency’s name to San Diego
Association of Governments. The member agencies include 18 incorporated cities
from the San Diego region and the County of San Diego. The purpose of SANDAG
is to engage in regional cooperative comprehensive planning, to assist the member
agencies, and to provide a regional reviewing organization for certain federal and
state grant projects.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these financial statements
present SANDAG and its component units, entities for which SANDAG is considered
to be financially accountable. Blended component units, although legally separate
entities, are, in substance, part of SANDAG’s operations and so data from these units
are combined with data of SANDAG. DiscreteIy presented component units, on the
other hand, are reported in a separate column in the combined financial statements to
emphasize they are legally separate from SANDAG. The reporting entity of SANDAG
does not include any discretely presented component units. Each blended component
unit has a June 30 year end.
Included within the reporting entity as blended component units:
SourcePoint: On April 15, 1982, SANDAG formed a public non-profit corporation,
SourcePoint, for the purpose of providing certain services and technical assistance to
users of regional planning information. Certain technical and administrative services
and equipment are provided by SANDAG to SourcePoint at cost. During the year
ended June 30, 1999, $148,680 was charged by SANDAG for such services. The
SourcePoint Board is comprised of three SANDAG Board Members and two public
members, and SourcePoint exclusively benefits SANDAG.
34
-
j-
I---
l-
r
r
t-
San Diego Countv Regional Transportation Commission (the “Commission”): On
April 1, 1988, SANDAG assumed direct oversight responsibility for the Commission.
The Commission is responsible for the implementation and administration of trans-
portation improvement programs funded by the San Diego countywide l/2% sales tax,
as a result of the passage of Proposition A - The San Diego County Transportation Im-
provement Program. Administrative services amounting to $1,181,679 were provided
by SANDAG to the Commission at cost for the year ended June 30,1999. The Commis-
sion Governing Board is the same as the SANDAG Governing Board. The Commission
exclusively benefits the SANDAG member agencies.
Complete financial statements for each individual component unit may be obtained
from SANDAG.
(b) Basis of Presentation
SNAG accounts for its financial position and results of its operations in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental units.
Accordingly, SANDAG uses several funds and account groups as described below.
Fund tvoes and account groups - A fund or account group is an accounting entity with
a self-balancing set of accounts established to record a specific governmental activity.
SANDAG maintains the following fund types and account groups:
Governmental fund types, which include the general fund, special revenue
funds, and debt service funds, are used to account for the general operations
of SANDAG and the Commission;
Proprietary fund tvne, includes the SourcePoint Enterprise Fund, which is used
to account for activities (a) conducted on a fee-for-service basis in a manner
similar to commercial enterprises; or (b) where the governing body has decided
that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net
income is appropriate for management control, accountability, or other purposes.
General fixed assets and general long-term debt account gzroups, which are used
to account for fixed assets and long-term debt of governmental funds.
(c) Measurement Focus and Basis for Accounting
Governmental fund types are accounted for on a “spending” measurement focus.
Accordingly, only current assets and current liabilities are included on their balance
sheets, and the reported fund balance provides an indication of available,
expendable resources. Operating statements for governmental fund types report
increases (revenues) and decreases (expenditures) in available, expendable
resources.
35
The proprietary fund type is accounted for on an “income determination” or “cost of
services provided” measurement focus. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities are
included on the balance sheet, and the reported fund equity provides an indication of
the historical net worth of the fund. Operating statements for proprietary fund types
report increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total historical net worth.
Fiduciary fund types are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve
measurement gf results of operations.
Governmental and Fiduciary fund types use the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Under the mod&d accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when
susceptible to accrual; i.e., both measurable and available. Available means collectible
within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the
current period. In applying the susceptibIe to acaual concept to intergovernmental
revenues, the legal and contractual requirements of the individual programs are used
as guidance. Revenues which are accrued include federal and state grants, contracts,
sales taxes collected by the state on behalf of the Commission prior to yearend, and
interest. Expenditures, other than principal and interest on long-term debt, which are
recorded when paid, are recorded when the liability is incurred.
Proprietary funds are accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement
focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are
recorded when earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred.
The government applies all applicable FASB pronouncements in accounting and
reporting for its proprietary operations.
Total coIumns - The combined financial statements include total columns which
aggregate the financial statements of the various fund types and account groups. The
columns are designated “memorandum only” because the totals are not comparable to
a consolidation in that interfund transactions are not eliminated.
(d) Fixed Assets
General fixed assets represent equipment purchased by the governmental funds. This
equipment is recorded at cost in the general fixed asset account group and no allowance
for depreciation is recorded.
The cost of equipment is recoverable by including depreciation as a reimbursable
overhead expense. Accordingly, equipment depreciation amounting to approximately
!§51,700 was recorded as an kl.i.rect charge in the special revenue grant funds and as a
reimbursement from other agencies and an addition to fund balance designated for
equipment replacement in the general fund. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-
line basis using a three-year useful life for the reimbursement calculations. Equipment
is deleted from the general fixed asset account group when discarded or no longer
used.
36
P
r- /
r
i-
r
r
A summary of the general fixed assets account group is as follows:
Furniture and Fixtures
Computer Equipment
FasTrak Computer and
Monitoring Equipment
Totals
Balance
6/30/98
$ 404514
l&%3,632
603,664
$2,871,810
Additions Deletions
$ 54,491 $ 0
771,251 23,740
80,000 0
$905,742 $23,740
Balance
6/30/W
$ 459,005
2,611,143
@W@
$3,753,812
(e) Budgets and Budge&v Accounting
Formal budget integration is employed as a management control device for the General
and Special Revenue Funds. Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles (GA&?). The General and Special Revenue Funds have
legally adopted annual program budgets.
After the annual program budget is adopted, the Board of Directors can legally amend
the budget at any time during the fiscal year to incorporate new grants or contracts
which may become available during the year. Management can legally amend or
transfer appropriations between programs or projects within the adopted, or amended,
budget, once the budget has been approved. However, management may not exceed
the authorization of any individual fund. The fund level is the legal level of control (the
expenditure level on which expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations) for
each budget for which data are presented in the annual financial report.
During the fiscal year, numerous supplemental appropriations were authorized by the
Board to incorporate additional grants and contracts which became available during the
year. The budget information presented includes the supplemental appropriations.
At the end of the fiscal year, all unexpended funds are treated as continuing
appropriations which do not lapse and are r-e-appropriated and carry over into the
subsequent fiscal year. Encumbrances are used throughout the year as a management
tool. However, since unexpended funds automatically carry over into the subsequent
year, encumbrances are not reflected for financial statement purposes at fiscal year end.
(f) Inter-fund Transactions .
I
r-
-
In the course of normal operations, transactions occur between the General Fund, the
Special Revenue Funds and the SourcePoint Enterprise Fund. The General Fund
executes all cash transactions related to the Special Revenue Funds. This is accounted
for by recording an inter-fund receivable/payable in each fund.
37
(Ed
09
2.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue relates to various grant funds received which are considered earned
when spent for the designated purposes. Funds which have been received but not
earned are recorded as deferred revenue.
Indirect Cost Allocation
The costs of employee vacation, sick leave and compensatory time-off, as welI as other
employee benefits, are paid by the General Fund and allocated to the special revenue
Grant Funds at an estimated rate. Allowable general and administrative costs are simi-
larly charged to the special revenue Grant Funds using a predetermined fixed rate.
These rates are adjusted annually to reflect estimated costs. At June 30, 1999, the
amounts paid by the General Fund were approximately $623,085 more than the
amounts allocated as expenditures to the special revenue Grant Funds.
Cash and Investments
SANDAG has adopted Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) 31 relating
to recording the entity’s investments at their fair value. However, due to the liquidity of
the entity’s investments and that the fair value of those investments is not significantly
affected by the impairment of the credit standing of the issuer, SANDAG has elected to
report its investments at amortized cost.
SANDAG’s investment policy and state statutes authorize SANDAG to invest in obligations
of the U.S. Treasury, its agencies and instrumentalities, certificates of deposit with national
and statelicensed or chartered banks or federal or state savings and loan associations, and
money market and mutual funds whose portfolios consist of one or more of the foregoing
investments. Funds may also be invested in the State Treasury’s Local Agency Investment
Fund and the County Treasurer’s Investment Pool.
State statutes require that all deposits be insured or collateralized. Depositories holding
public funds on deposit are required to maintain collateral in the form of a pool of securities
with the agent of the depository having a market value of at least 10 to 50% in excess of the
total amount of all public funds on deposit.
A summary of cash and investments at June 30,1999, is as follows:
Deposits - cash $ 56,052
Investments 186853,682
Total $186.909.734
38
Deoosits:
r
r
,
r
r
r
-
The following summary presents the amount of SANDAG’s deposits which are fully insured
or collateralized with securities held by SANDAG or its agent in SANDAG’s name (Category
One), those deposits which are collateralized with securities held by the pledging financial
institution’s trust department or agent in SANDAG’s name (Category Two), and those
deposits which are not collateralized or are collateral&d with securities held by the pledging
financial institution or its trust department or agent but not in SANDAG’s name (Category
Three) at June 30,1999.
Cash
Category
one
$56,052
Category
Two
$ -
Category
Three
,$ - a
Total Bank
Balance
$56,052
carrying Amount
$56,052
Investments:
SANDAG categorizes investments according to the level of risk assumed by SANDAG.
Category One includes investments that are insured, registered or held by SANDAG’s agent
in SANDAG’s name. Category Two includes uninsured and unregistered investments held
by the counter-party’s trust department or agent in SANDAG’s name. Category Three
includes uninsured and unregistered investments held by the counter-party, its trust
department or its agent, but not in SANDAG’s name. Certain investments have not been
categorized because securities are not used as evidence of the investment. These
uncategotied investments include ownership interests in pooled investment funds. The
summary below identifies the level of risk assumed by SANDAG and the total carrying
amount and market value of SANDAG’s investments at June 30,1999.
Category Total
b Uncateporized Investments One m
U.S. Trust $39,111,169 $ -
US. Government
Agency 52,563,713 -
Scudder Kemper -
Local Agency
Investment Fund -
Fidelity Funds
Nations Fund
Investment Pool -
CAMP Money
Market Pool
First American
Funds
$- $- $ 39,111,169 $ 39,111,169
52,563,713 52,352,793
24,741,988 24,741,988 24,741,988
26,216,788 26,216,788 26,182,645
18,213,105 18,213,105 18,213,105
23,067,757 23,067,757 23,067,757
1,254,766 1,254,766 1,254,766
1,684,396 1,684,396 1,687,116
Fair
Value
Total $91,674,882 - - $95,178,800 $186,853,682 $186,611,339 i-w
39
3. Interfund Transactions
The following is a summary of due from and due to other funds:
General Fund:
Special Revenue Fund (SANDAG)
Special Revenue Fund (Commission)
Enterprise Fund (SourcePoint)
Total General Funds
Special Revenue Funds:
Gened Fund (SANDAG)
Special Revenue Fund (SANDAG)
Total Special Revenue Funds
Enterprise Fund:
General Fund (SANDAG)
Total All Funds
Due From To Due
$ 7,117,430
0
31583
7,149,013
31,731,677 0
1,059,063 7,117,430
32,790,740 7,117,430
0 31.583
!$31,731,677
1,059,063
0
32,790,740
!$39,939,753 $39,939,753
4. Retirement Plan
Plan Description - SANDAG contributes to the California Public Employees Retirement
System (“PER!?), an agent multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan that acts as a
common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the
State of California. For the year ended June 30,1999, SANDAG’s payroll for employees
covered by PERS and total payroll was $4,321,194 and $4,537,597, respectively.
All SANDAG employees are eligible to participate in PERS upon employment. Retirement
benefits vest after five years of service and PERS also provides death and disability benefits.
Retirement benefits are based on average salary and years of credited service.
SANDAG is required to contribute the remaining amounts necessary to fund the benefits for
its employees, using the actuarial basis recommended by the PERS actuaries and actuarial
consultants and adopted by PERS board of Administration. The employee contributions
(7%) are made by SANDAG on behalf of the employees.
Schedule of Funding Progress - The following Schedule of Funding Progress shows the
recent history of the actuarial value of assets, actuarial accrued liability, their relationship, and
the relationship of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability to payroll.
40
r
r
r
r
r
r
I-
r
r
r
fitry Age Unfunded
Normal Actuarial Liability AnnUd UAALAsa
Valuation Accrued Value of (Excess Funded Covered % of
Date Liability Assets Assets) Status Payroll Payroll
(4 04 W(b) @V(a) (4 KaWl/k)
6/30/96 12,161,158 12,613,947 (452,789) 103.7% 4,057,632 (11.159%)
6/30/97 12,693,971 15,147,564 (2453,593) 119.3% 4,069,121 (60.298%)
6/30/98 13,980,401 18,681,887 (4,701,486) 133.6% 4,308,905 (109.111%)
Contributions Required and Contributions Made - PERS uses the Entry Age Normal
Actuarial Cost Method which is a projected benefit cost method. That is, it takes into
account those benefits that are expected to be earned in the future as well as those
already accrued. According to this cost method, the normal cost for an employee is the
level amount which would fund the projected benefit if it were paid annually from date
of employment until retirement. PERS uses a modification of the Entry Age Normal
Actuarial Cost Method in which the employer’s total normal cost is expressed as a level
percentage of payroll. PERS also uses the level percentage of payroll method to amortize
any unfunded actuarial liabilities. There currently is no unfunded actuarial liability
associated with SANDAG’s employees and there were no actuarially determined
employer contributions during the year. The significant actuarial assumptions used to
compute the actuarially determined contribution requirement are the same as those used
to compute the pension benefit obligation, as previously described.
Annual Pension Costs - An employer reports an annual pension cost (APC) equal to the
annual required contribution (ARC) plus an adjustment for the cumulative difference
between the AK and the employer’s actual plan contributions for the year. The cumulative
difference is called the net pension obligation (NPO).
r
r r
r - 41
A summary of principle assumptions and methods used to determine the ARC is shown
below.
Valuation Date
Actuarial Cost Method
Amortization Method
Average Remaining Period
Assett Valuation Method
Actuarial Assumptions
Investment Rate of Return
Projected Salary Increases
Inflation
Payroll Growth
Individual Salary Growth
s June 30,199s
Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method I
Level Percent of Payroll
45 Years as of the Valuation Date
3 Year Smoothed Market
8.25% (net of administrative expenses)
3.75% to 14.20% depending on Age,
Service, and type of employment
3.50%
3.75%
A merit scale varying by duration of
employment coupled with an
assumed annual inflation component
of 3.50% and an annual production
growth of 0.25%.
Initial unfunded liabilities are amortized over a closed period that depends on the plan’s
date of entry into CalPERS. Subsequent plan amendments are amortized as a level
percent of pay over a closed 20-year period. Gains and losses that occur in the operation
of the plan are amortized over a rolling period, which results in an amortization of 10% of
unamortized gains and losses each year. If the plan’s accrued liability exceeds the
actuarial value of plan assets, then the amortization payment on the total unfunded
liability may not be lower than the payment calculated over a 30-year amortization
period.
Separate audited financial statements of PERS can be obtained by contacting PERS at P.O.
Box 942709, Sacramento, CA 94229-2709.
5. Compensated Absences
SANDAG’s personnel may accumulate earned but unused vacation, sick leave or
compensatory time-off for overtime. Accrued vacation and compensatory time-off, if not
taken, are payable upon termination. Unused sick leave is payable to employees in the event
of termination after five years of service at the rate of 25% of the employee’s accrued amount.
The liability for compensated absences which normally would be liquidated with expendable
available financial resources is accrued in the General Fund. The remaining liability,
consisting of sick leave payable in the event of termination, is recorded in the General Long-
Term Debt Account Group.
42
r-
-
r
At June 30, 1999, the amount of accrued employee benefits for vacation and compensatory
time-off was approximately W2,OOO. Compensated absences are paid by the Special
Revenue Grant Fund to the General Fund as part of the indirect cost allocation and as such
the liability is maintained in the General Fund.
The liability at June 30, 1999 for ~.&sed sick leave payable in the event of termination,
recorded in the General LongiYerm sett hzr;unt Group, amounted to approximately
$410,ooo.
6. Long-Term Debt
General long-term debt at June 30,1999 consists of: (1) compensated absences (see Note 5);
and (2) Sales Tax Revenue Bonds payable consisting of the $185,000,000 1996 Series A,
$246,500,000 1994 Series A, $174,595,000 1993 Series A Refunding, and $141,600,000 1992
Series A (Limited Tax Bonds) issued on September 1,1996; May 17,1995; April 7,1993; and
October 14,1992, respectively.
The following is a summary of the changes in the general long-term debt account group for
the year ended June 30,1999:
Compensated
Absences
Sales Tax Revenue
Bonds Payable
Total
Principal
Balance
July 1,199s
$ 417,149
632,475,OOO
$632,892,149
Obligation/
Principal
$ 7,000
50~00,000
!$50,507,000
Principal
Balance
June 30,1999
$ 410,149
581,975,OOO
$582,385,149
Principal payments for compensated absences and certificates of participation are included as
general and administrative expenses in the general fund.
43
The 1996 Series A Bonds
On September 1,1996, the Commission issued $185,000,000 Second series Sales Tax Reserve
Bonds (L.imited Tax Bonds), 1996 Series A. The 1996 Series A Bonds are limited obligations of
the Commission collateralized by the provisions of the Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1992,
as amended and supplemented, between the Commission and the Trustee, and are payable
from and collateralized, as are the 1989,1992,1993 and 1994 Series A Bonds, by the reserves
from a l/2 percent sales tax imposed within the County of San Diego.
The principal requirements to maturity for the 1996 Series A Bonds are as follows:
Maturity Principal Interest
[April 1) Amount u
2000 $13,880,000 4.40
2001 14,495,ooo 4.50
2002 15,145,ooo 5.25
2003 15,940,000 4.70
2004 11,690,OOO 4.75
2004 5,000,000 6.00
2005 12,545,OOO 6.00
2005 5,000,000 4.875
2006 18,540,OOO 6.00
2007 12,655,OOO 6.00
2007 7,000,000 5.00
2008 20,760,OOO 5.00
$152.650,000
44
The 1994 Series A Bonds
On April 7,1994, the Commission issued $261,700,000 Second Series Sales Tax Revenue
Bonds, 1994 Series A, through a variable-rate mode and executed a swap fixing the
Commission’s interest rate for the first three years. On May 17, 1995, the Commission
executed a fixed rate conversion of the 1994 Series A Bonds in the amount of
$246,500,000. The Commission decided to pursue the option of locking in current low
rates by reversing the three-year swap and converting all the outstanding bonds from the
weekly mode to a fixed rate. The bond issue resulted in present value interest savings of
$18300,000, or 9.1 percent of refunded par.
The principal requirements to maturity for the 1994 Series A Bonds are as follows:
Maturity Principal Interest
(April 1) Amount &&
2000 $ 18,300,000 4.70
2001 19,300,000 4.80
2002 20,200,000 6.25
2003 21,300,OOO 6.25
2004 22,400,000 6.00
2005 3,700,000 5.10
2006 3800,000 5.20
2007 26800,000 5.00
2008 28,200,OOO 4.75
The 1993 Series A Refundinn Bonds
-
On April 7, 1993, the 1993 Series A Refunding Bonds were issued for $174,595,000 to
refund a portion of the First Senior Bonds to achieve debt service savings. A total of
$154,795,000 of outstanding bonds were refunded ($41,235,000 of the 1991 Series A Bonds
and $113,560,000 of the 1989 Series A Bonds). The net present value savings of refunding
was approximately $5,270,000.
Pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement dated as of March 1, 1993 between the
Commission and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as escrow agent,
the refunding of the Refunded Bonds will be effected by depositing a portion of proceeds of
the 1993 Series A Bonds to the Escrow Fund created and established pursuant to the Escrow
Agreement. Such proceeds were used to purchase certain government obligations, the
principal of and interest on which will be sufficient to pay when due the principal of,
redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Bonds on the redemption dates.
45
The refunding of the Refunded Bonds discharged the pledge and assignment of Revenues
collaterahzing the Refunded Bonds under the First Senior Indenture, except for the rights of
the holders of the Refunded Bonds to receive payments from the Escrow Fund. As a result,
the 1989 and 1991 Series A bond refunded amounts are considered to be defeased and the
liability for those Bond amounts has been removed from the General Long-Term Debt
Account Group.
The principal requirements to maturity for the 1993 Series A Refunding Bonds are as follows:
Years Ending Principal Interest
April 1 Repayment &3&
2000 $ 11g80,000 4.60
2001 11,900,000 4.75
2002 12,470,OOO 4.90
2003 13,080,OOO 5.00
2004 13,730,000 5.10
2005 34,355,ooo 5.20
2006 36,140,OOO 5.25
2007 15,305,000 5.25
2008 16,105,OOO 5.25
$164.465.000
The 1992 Series A Bonds
The Commission had entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of October
1, 1992, with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. In general, the Swap Agreement
provided that on a same-day net-payment basis determined by reference to a notional
amount equal to the principal amount of the 1992 Series A Bonds outstanding, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc. would pay to the Commission a floating amount and the
Commission would pay to Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. a fixed amount. On
December 29,1995, the Commission executed a fixed rate conversion of the 1992 Series A
Bonds in the amount of $134,300,000. The Commission decided to pursue the option of
locking in current low rates by reversing the long dated swap and converting aII the
outstanding bonds from the weekly mode to a fixed rate. The bond issue resulted in
present value savings of approximately $200,000.
46
The principal requirements to maturity for the 1992 Series A Bonds are as follows:
Years Ending Principal Interest
April 1 Repavment w
2000 $ 9,285,ooo 4.30
2001 9,705,ooo 4.40
2002 10,125,000 5.25
2003 10,625,OOO 4.60
2004 11,055,ooo 5.50
2005 11575,000 5.50
2006 12,200,000 5.50
2007 12,830,OOO 5.50
2008 13,460,OOO 5.50
!§ 100,860,000
Defeased Bonds
In past years, the Commission defeased certain revenue bonds by placing the proceeds of
new bonds in an irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service payments on the
1991 Series A Bonds and the 1989 Series A Bonds. The net present value savings of the
defeasance was approximately $2,550,000.
Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased bonds are not included
in the Commission’s financial statements.
At June 30,1999, $286,218,006 of bonds outstanding are considered defeased.
1996,1994,1993, and 1992 Series A Bond Reserve Requirements
In order to provide for the payment of the 1996, 1994, 1993, and 1992 Series A Bonds, the
following separate accounts are to be maintained in the Debt Service Fund:
Sales Tax Revenue Account - The Trustee deposits all tax revenues into this account
before they are deposited into one of the other accounts.
Interest Account - On a monthly basis, funds are set aside to equal one-sixth of the
aggregate half-yearly amount of interest becoming due and payable.
Principal Account - On a monthly basis, funds are set aside to equal one-twelfth of the
aggregate yearly amount of bond obligations becoming due and payable on the
outstanding Serial Bonds and Mandatory Sinking Account.
47
Bond Reserve Account -The balance in the Bond Reserve Account should at least equal
the Bond Reserve Requirement. Upon the occurrence of any deficiency in the Bond
Reserve Account, onesixth of the aggregate deficiency wiu be deposited on a monthly
basis to the Bond Reserve Account until the Bond Reserve Account is equal to the Bond
Reserve Requirement.
Rebate Account - On a yearly basis, an arbitrage calculation is performed. Any
arbitrage earnings are maintained separately in the rebate account.
Redemption Account - All money deposited by the Commission with the Trustee for
the purpose of optionally redeeming bonds of any series shall be deposited in the
Redemption Account.
The aforementioned reserve requirement cash balances are held by various fiscal agents
until such time as all debt service payments are made. At June 30,1999, the balances in
cash with fiscal agents accounts are as follows:
Interest Account
Principal Account
Bond Reserve Account
Rebate Account
$ 7,612,799
13,282,071
15451505
761,853
$34.108.228
Total debt-service requirements to maturity for all of the outstanding sales tax revenues
general long-term debt are as follows:
1996 Series A
$ 21,798,712
21,802,992
21,800,718
21,aoo,604
43,602574
sS,~,ooO
196,205,600
L.as amounls
representing interest
Total general
long-tern debt
1994 Series A 1993 Series A 1992 Series A w
$ 27,09O,Q50 $ 19,766,826 $ 14,493,188 $ 83,148,776
27,229,950 19,763#?46 14$13,932 83yo,220
27,203m 19,768,096 14,506,912 f&279,276
27,041,050 19,767,066 14,475350 83,084,070
33575,600 59,450,9!32 28,745,176 l&5,374,252
65,6%,100 73#.590,914 42,793t200 247,480,214
207,036,3OQ 212,107,150 129,527,758 745,676,808
7. Commercial Paper
$152,65O,OCO $164,ooo,ooo $164,465,cQ0 $100,860,ooo
(47,642?150) m3,667,75a (163,701~~
$581,975,cxl0
On August 1,199l the Commission issued tax-exempt Commercial Paper Notes (Limited
Tax Bonds), Series A (the Notes). The maximum aggregate principal amount that can be
outstanding at any time is $135,000,000. During the fiscal year, the maximum
outstanding balance was $47,500,000. As of June 30, 1999, there was !§47,500,000
outstanding. The Notes are payable from and collateralized by a subordinate and second
48
P
lien basis to the 1991 and 1989 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (limited tax bonds) and
a pledge of the Sales Tax Revenues. Interest rates during the current year have varied
from 2.05 percent to 3.50 percent with maturities from 1 day to 153 days. Interest rates
on outstanding amounts at June 30,1999 range from 2.70 percent to 3.15 percent.
8. Fund Balances
Reserves for loan receivable and prepaid assets are established to show that certain assets are
already committed for other purposes and are not available for discretionary expenditures.
Reserves for debt service represent resources legally restricted to the payment of long-term
debt principal and interest maturing in future years.
Reserves for future projects represent resources that are legally restricted for the completion of
projects.
9. Expenditure Refund
In the current year, SANDAG received a refund from the Navy for approximately
$4,000,000 for the beach sand replenishment project. SANDAG treated this refund of
prior year expenditure as an expenditure credit in the current year.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
SANDAG leases its office space and automobiles under various operating leases. Total rent
expense for fiscal year 1999 was approximately $665,000. Minimum annual lease payments
under non-cancelable operating leases with terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Fiscal Year 2000 $ 728,385
Fiscal Year 2001 758,131
Fiscal Year 2002 781,823
Fiscal Year 2003 805,514
Fiscal Year 2004 and Thereafter 1,036,508
Total $4,110,361
Federal and state grants to SANDAG are subject to audit by grantor agencies. Such audits
could lead to requests for reimbursement to the grantor agency for expenditures disallowed
under terms of the grant. In the opinion of management, no material adjustments or refunds
will be required.
The Department of Transportation has determined that in order to provide maximum safety
for the traveling public and to ensure continuous and unimpeded operation of the state’s
transportation network, six state-owned toll bridges are in need of a seismic safety retrofit.
The San Diego-Coronado Bridge has been identified by the department as one of the bridges
that needs seismic retrofit. The San Diego-Coronado Bridge retrofit is ninety-five million
dollars. SANDAG shall deposit thirty-three million dollars in the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit
Account in the State Transportation Fund, on or before July 1, 2000. SANDAG is currently
working on a financial plan for the transfer of monies to this fund.
49
11. Risk ManaEement
SANDAG is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and
destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters for which SANDAG carries
commercial insurance. SANDAG has no real property to insure and does not cany out any
capital projects. AU expenditures for premiums are recorded in the general fund. As of
June 30,1999, no claims liabilities were necessary.
A schedule of the in&axe coverage in place is included in the Statistical Section.
50
FINANCIAL SECTION
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Year 2000 Compliance
C
-
The year 2000 issue affects SANDAG to the extent that:
l Internal: SANDAG uses computers for any date-related functions
l External: Organizations dealing with SANDAG use computers for any date-related
functions affecting SANDAG.
SANDAG’s approach to dealing with exposure to Year 2000 issues is to:
1. Identify vulnerabilities.
2. Change those things which can be changed.
3. Prepare for those things which cannot be changed.
SANDAG recognizes that the bulk of the effort will address those things which can be
changed, and SANDAG will develop remedial strategies to deal with those things which
cannot be changed. SANDAG also recognizes that Year 2000 vulnerability will extend beyond
January 1, 2000; perhaps for as long as 2 to 3 years. (Software and hardware acquired after
January 1, 2000, restored older programs, databases, and spreadsheets will need to be
evaluated for Year 2000 implications.)
Conducting SANDAG’s primary business does not include the online transactional operations
which make banking and reservation scheduling especially susceptible to Year 2000 issues, so
the impacts of Year 2000 are expected to be less profound. SANJDAG is more likely to be
affected by externals (Year 2000 affects on banks and building).
c
Internally, SANDAG has performed the validation testing and the results showed no
abnormalities. However, the validation testing is not a guarantee that the system and
equipment will be Year 2000 compliant.
53
-
FINANCIAL SECTION
COMBINING, INDMDUAL FUND AND
INDMDUAL ACCOUNT GROUP FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
GENERAL FUND
C SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERALF’UNDDESCRB’TION
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999 r
The General Fund is the general operating fund of SANDAG. It is used to account for all
financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
l- Two major expenditure categories are recorded in the General Fund
-
Administrative and General Expenditures are those which benefit all programs and
projects and are intended to be fully allocated to all Special Revenue Funds via an
indirect cost allocation plan based upon direct labor charged to each project, grant, or
reimbursable contract. For the year ended June 30,1999, $623,085 of administrative and
general expenses were under-allocated and, in accordance with SANDAG’s indirect cost
allocation plan, will be “rolled forward” in the subsequent fiscal year.
Local Expense includes expenses of the Board of Directors which cannot be charged directly,
or indirectly, to grant projects and the cost of equipment purchased by the General Fund.
l-
l-
57
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIA-I 10N OF GOVERNMENTS
BALANCE SHEET
GENERAL FUND
JUNE 30,1999
ASSETS
Cash and Investments .......................................................................................... $
Cash With Fiscal Agent/Custodian ...........................................................................
Due from Other Funds.. ............................................................................................
5,357,270
25,501,393
7,149,013
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 38,007,676
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
LIABILITIES:
Accounts Payable.. ...................................................................................................
Contracts Payable ....................................................................................................
Compensated Absences.. ........................................................................................
Due to Other Funds.. ................................................................................................
3,359,267
7,921
431,850
32,790,740
. TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,589,778
FUND BALANCE:
Unreserved :
Designated for Equipment Replacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
500,000
917,898
TOTAL FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i ,417,898
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 38,007,676
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE, JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I..... $ 1 ,174,336
ADD:
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures:
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 692,881
Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903,149
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures.. ................................................................ (210,268)
Decrease in Amount Reserved for Prepaid Assets.. ............................................. 5,528
DEDUCT:
Increase in Amount Designated for Equipment Replacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (51,698)
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE, JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I $ 917,898
58
“I,k. YlL”” C\~“““,A, 1”)” v, “V ‘I LI \I.1”1LI. I ”
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
GENERAL FUND
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999 REVENUE
BUDGET ACTUAL OVER (UNDER)
ESTIMATE REVENUES ESTIMATE
MEMBER ASSESSMENTS
City of Carlsbad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,413 $ 13,413 $ 0
City of Chula Vista.. .........................................................
City of Coronado .............................................................
City of Del Mar.. ..............................................................
City of El Cajon.. .............................................................
City of Encinitas.. ............................................................
City of Escondido.. ..........................................................
City of Imperial Beach.. ...................................................
City of La Mesa.. .............................................................
City of Lemon Grove.. .....................................................
City of National City.. .......................................................
City of Oceanside. ...........................................................
City of Poway.. ................................................................
City of San Diego.. ..........................................................
City of San Marcos ..........................................................
City of Santee.. ................................................................
City of Solana Beach.. .....................................................
City of Vista.. ...................................................................
County of San Diego.. .....................................................
TOTAL MEMBER ASSESSMENTS.. ..............................
29,497
4,874
957
17,200
10,724
22,416
5,198
10,553
4,608
9,902
28,008
8,573
222,955
9,252
10,291
2,538
15,090
82,675
508,724
OTHER REVENUES:
Transportation Sales Tax.. .............................................. 176,183
TDA Planning Funds.. ..................................................... 1,417,447
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES.. ........................................ 1,593,630
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES:
Interest on Investments.. .................................................
Sale of Publications.. .......................................................
Insurance Premium Rebate.. ..........................................
0
0
0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES.. ...................... 0
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES.. ........................ 2,102,354
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
Local Revenue Allocations to Special Revenue Funds . (402,420)
TDA Revenue Allocations to Special Revenue Funds ... (1,417,447)
HOV Lane Fines Transfered from HOV Fund.. ............. 0
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS.. .............................. (1,819,867)
29,497 0
4,874 0
957 0
17,200 0
10,724 0
22,416 0
5,198 0
10,553 0
4,608 0
9,902 0
28,008 0
8,573 0
222,955 0
9,252 0
10,291 0
2,538 0
15,090 0
82.675 0
508,724 0
176,183 0
I,41 7,447 0
1.593.630 0
31,798 31,798
9,282 9,282
124,545 124,545
165,625 165.625
2.267.979 165.625
(402,420) 0
(1,417,447) 0
244,769 244,769
(I .575.098) 244,769
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 282,487 S 692,881 $ 410,394
59
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
VARIANCE
favorable
APPROPRIATIONS EXPENDITURES (unfavorable)
ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL EXPENSE:
Salaries and Fringe Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,025,760 $ 1,003,556 $ 22,204
Materials and Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270,000 267,785 2,215
Rent/Maintenance Facilities and Equipment.. ....................
Travel, Training, Transportation and Meeting Expense .....
Contractual Services.. ........................................................
Miscellaneous .....................................................................
Contingency.. ..................................................
765,000 756,240 8,760
250,000 248,602 1,398
250,000 249,377 623
250,000 241,921 8,079
16,000 0 16,000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE: 2,826,760 2,767,481 59,279
Less: Reimbursements from Special Revenue Funds...... (2,826,760) (2,396,904) (429,856)
Accrued Grant Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 252,508 (252,508)
NET ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE.. ................................ 0 623,085 (623,085)
LOCAL EXPENSE:
Board of Directors Expense.. ............................................. 265,550 217,433 48,117
Equipment Purchases.. ...................................................... 100,000 62,631 37,369
TOTAL LOCAL EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365,550 280,064 85,486
TOTAL GENERAL FUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 365,550 $ 903,149 $ (537,599)
,
60
P
FINANCIAL SECTION
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENTS
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999 FEDERAL, REGIONAL
STATE, AND TRANSPORTATION TOTAL
ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS
OTHER GRANT
FUNDS
COMMISSION
FUNDS
SPECIAL
REVENUE
Cash and Investments (Note 2). ......................................................... $
Cash With Fiscal Agent/Custodian (Note 2). ...........................................
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal.. ..................................................................................................
State.. ......................................................................................................
Loans Receivable.. ..................................................................................
Other .......................................................................................................
Due from Other Funds (Note 3) ..............................................................
0 $ 101,836,534 $ 101,836,534
0 19,622,322 19,622,322
4,077,071 0 4,077,071
2,ia9,795 10,791,500 i2,9ai,295
0 10,000.000 1 o,ooo,ooo
850,564 47,500,000 48,350,564
31,731,677 1,059,063 32,790,740
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS.. ........................................... $ 3a,a49,107 S f90,809,419 S 229,658,526
LIABILITIES, FUND EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS
Liabilities:
Due to Other Funds (Note 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Deferred Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial Paper Payable (Note 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,117,430 5 OS 7,117,430
31,731,677 0 31,731,677
0 47,500,000 47,500,000
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3a,a49,107 47,500,000 86.349.107
m Fund Equity and Other Credits:
Reserved for Loan Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserved for Future Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 10,000,000 10,000,000
0 133309,419 133,309,419
Total Fund Equity and Other Credits . . . . . . .._............................................... 0 143,309,419 143.309,419
TOTAL LIABILITIES, FUND EQUITY
AND OTHER CREDITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 38,849,107 s i90,809,419 s 229,658,526
62
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TYPES FEDERAL, REGIONAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED STATE, AND TRANSPORTATION TOTAL
JUNE 30,1999 OTHER GRANT COMMISSION SPECIAL
FUNDS FUNDS REVENUE
REVENUES:
Federal Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,7ia,ioa $ 0 $ io,7ia,ioa
State Grants/Reimbursements, Net of Interfund Allocations (Note 9) ...........
Other Grants and Contracts.. ......................................................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. .............................................................................
Transportation Development Act, Net of Interfund Allocations.. .....................
Member Agency Assessments, Net of Interfund Allocations.. .......................
Interest on Investments.. ................................................................................
Miscellaneous and Interfund Transfers.. ........................................................
TOTAL REVENUES.. ..................................................................................... 21,245,757 166,163,943 ia7,409,700
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations and Program Management.. .............................
Information Systems Development.. ...............................................................
Regional Transportation Planning ..................................................................
Transportation Programming and Planning Assistance.. ...............................
Development Strategy and Environmental Management (Note 9). ................
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................................
Regional Information Services and Assistance.. ............................................
Services Provided by Other Agencies ............................................................
TransNet Projects.. ........................................................................................
Bicycle Facilities.. ...........................................................................................
Highway Improvements.. ................................................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. .......................................................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ..........................................................
General and Administrative, Net of Interfund Allocations.. .............................
DEBT SERVICE:
Debt Fiscal Expenditures ...............................................................................
Interest.. .........................................................................................................
TOTAL EXPENDITURES, NET.. ................................................................... 21,245,757
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES ............
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Operating Transfers In.. ...............................................................................
Operating Transfers Out .................................................................................
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES). ....................................... 0
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES
OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. .......................................... 0
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1998.. ............................................................. 0
FUND BALANCES, JUNE 30, 1999 ,....___.......,..._..................,,,................ .$ 0 S 143,309,419 S 143,309,419
(ai ,836) 0 (ai ,838)
2,620,230 0 2,620,230
5,505,036 157,714,677 163,219,713
2,080,5oi 0 2,080,5oi
403,718 0 403,718
0 6,755,006 6,755,006
0 1,694,260 1,694,260
884,491 0 884,491
1,864,451 0 1,884,451
2,150,996 0 2,150,996
11,803,634 0 11,803,634
(1,777,212) 0 (1,777,212)
873,858 0 873,858
536,812 0 536,812
353,226 0 353,226
4,555,501 0 4,555,501
0 460,847 460,847
0 21,689,396 21,689,396
0 13,308,274 13,308,274
0 40,887,920 40,887,920
0 1,181,679 1,181,679
0 338,992 338,992
0 1,446,422 1,446,422
63
79,313,530
86,850,413
4,762,956
(83,985,111)
(79,222,155)
7,628,258
135,681,161
100,559,287
86,850,413
4,762,956
(83,985,111)
(79,222,155)
7,628,258
135,681,161
FINANCIAL SECTION
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
FEDERAL, STATE, AND
OTHER GRANTS
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS DESCRIPTION
FEDERAL, STATE AND OTHER GRANT FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
These funds account for revenues and expenditures of grants and contracts awarded to the San
Diego Association of Governments. Each major grant award is identified and accounted for as
a separate Special Revenue Fund.
Program revenues (Special Revenue Funds) are grouped by major sources as follows:
l Federal Transit Administration - provides funding for FTA Section 8 and Section 9 regional
transit planning as well as discretionary planning grants for Transportation Management
Authorities.
l Federal Highway Administration - supports highway planning and programming at the
regional level and the development of the State mandated regional transportation improvement
piograms.
l Department of the Interior via the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - assists in the development of
an endangered species habitat conservation plan for the region.
l Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and the Department of Health and Human
Services - supports the SANDAG Criminal Justice Research Division’s studies which range from
gang problems to drug use testing among inmates at County jails.
0 State of California - provides funding to support regional transportation planning. The
California Energy Commission has assisted in the development of a regional energy
conservation plan.
l California Transportation Development Act - funds SANDAG’s responsibilities as the regional
TDA administrator and transportation planning agency.
l Other Special Revenues - include reimbursable administrative and support work performed by
SANDAG for SourcePoint and the Regional Transportation Commission as well as Local
Technical Assistance provided to the SANDAG member agencies.
Program expenditures are classified by major program category as follows:
l Intergovernmental Relations and Program Management - records SANDAG’s basic
function: ensuring adequate coordination among local, state and federal agencies and units
of government in Mexico as well. It also accounts for public involvement in SANDAG’s
activities and management of the Overall Work Program.
l Information Systems Development - describes the jobs that provide the databases for all
SANDAG projects and many local agency plans and programs.
66
l--
?-
P
l Regional Transportation Planning - handles the Regional Transportation Plan and aU of its long-
range planning components.
l Transportation Progra mming and Planning Assistance - includes all of the near-term
transportation financing projects such as the TransNet and Transportation Improvement
Programs.
l Development Strategy and Environmental Management - is the Program Element for projects
such as housing, open space, water resources, public facilities, recycling, shoreline management,
and endangered species habitat management.
l Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse - provides ongoing reporting and evaluation of the
criminal justice system and its many components.
l Regional Information Services and Assistance - contains the Local Technical Assistance Program
to assist member agencies in the solution of local problems and the work performed for
SourcePoint, SANDAG’s nonprofit corporation, which provides data and professional services to
the private and public sector.
l Services Provided by Other Agencies - include pass-through funds to other regional agencies
such as the North County Transportation Management Authority and the Regional Car-pool
Program.
l TransNet Projects - accounts for projects funded by the one-half percent local sales tax revenues
that are passed through to other governmental agencies for state highway improvements, transit
system construction and services, local street improvements and maintenance, and the
construction of bicycle facilities. This program is administered by SANDAG, serving as the San
Diego County Regional Transportation Commission.
C
C
67
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS CA-81 -x001 CA-go-X837 990WPSNDG
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
1997-98 1997-98 1998-99
FTA FTA FTA
SECTION 5303 SECTION 5307 SP&R
FUND 9801 FUND 9802 FUND 9911
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ O$ O$ 57,257
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS ..,...................................................................... $ 0s O$ 57,257
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 57,257
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Deferred Revenues:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._............... 0 0 57,257
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ O$ 57,257
68
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
990WPSNDG CA-go-X882 11-117394 11-4221 1 l-6066 11-8178
1998-99 1998-99 TRANSPORTATION ITMIS STPPLNG IVHS
FTA FTA DEMAND SHOWCASE RIDESHARE STRATEGIC
- SECTION 5303 SECTION 5307 MGMTKMAQ PROJECT FUNDS PLAN
FUND 9901 FUND9902 FUND 9506 FUND 9507 FUND 9508 FUND 9509
-$ 249,739 $ 419,576 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0s 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
P 0 0 0 526,416 0 144,172
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 C
i $ 249,739 $ 419,576 $ 0s 526,416 $ 0s 144,172
l-
' $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 s 0 $ 0
r 249,739 419,576 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 ?-
0 0 0 526,416 0 144,172
0 0 0 0 0 0
I- O 0 0 0 0 0 !
I 249,739 419,576 0 526,416 0 144,172
r
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0
!-- $ 249,739 $ 419,576 $ 0 $ 526,416 $ 0 $ 144,172
r Continued
r 69
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS 11-6056 CA-81 -x001
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
CONGESTION CONGESTION 1997-98
PRICING PRICING FHWA
DEMONSTRATION PERMIT FEES l/2% PL
FUND 9510 FUND 9511 FUND 9803
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,535,734 $ 0 $ 0
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 306,494 0
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,535,734 $ 306,494 $ 0
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable .,........................................................................ $ 0 $ 0 s 0
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,535,734 0 0
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Deferred Revenues:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . ..-......... ~~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 306,494 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.............._.............................. 1535,734 306,494 0
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,535,734 $ 306,494 $ 0
70
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE
97-6066 990WPSNDG l l -6066/000600 990WPSNDG 990WPSNDG N6871199RP09X14
1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 U.S. NAVY
TRANSPORTATION FHWA STP/STIP FHWA FHWA SD. REGIONAL
- DEMAND MGMT 112% PL TDM PTRSHIP PLNG SP&R BEACH SAND PROJ.
FUND 9804 FUND 9903 FUND 9904 FUND 9913/14 FUND 9915 FUND 9906
-$ O$ 984,787 $ 359,647 $ 133,472 $ 57,173 $ 113,365
0 0 400,000 0 0 0
0 0 0 18,000 0 0
.F- 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
$ 0s 984,787 $ 759,647 151,472 57,173 $ 113,365
C
r-
I $ 0 $ O$ 0 0 0s 0
?- 0 984,787 759,647 151,472 57,173 113,365
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
r
r
r
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 984,787 759,647 151,472 57,173 113,365
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
r $ 0 $ 984,787 !§ 759,647 151,472 57,173 !§ 113,365
, Continued
71
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
(VIA CA FISH 14481143097J190 FG8056HP
& GAME) HABITAT HABITAT PLNG
HABITAT PLANNING (VIA CA FISH
CHALENGE GRANT PROGRAM & GAME)
FUND 9435 FUND 9805 FUND 9805
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,540
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,010 0 0
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 68,193 0
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,010 $ 68,193 $ 20,540
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund.. ............................................................................
Special Revenue Fund.. .............................................................
Enterprise Fund.. ........................................................................
Deferred Revenues:
Federal Agencies.. .....................................................................
State Agencies.. .........................................................................
Other’Agencies.. .........................................................................
10,010
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL LIABILITIES.. ..................................................................... 10,010
0 20,540
0 0
0 0
68,193 0
0 0
0 0
68,193 20,540
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated.. ......................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL FUND BALANCE.. ............................................................. 0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE.. ................................ $ 10,010 $ 68,193 $ 20,540
72
DEPT OF
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HEALTH &
HUMAN SVCS
NIJ DRUG USE NATL. INST. FEDERAL METH
TESTING & OF JUSTICE UBRAN MATRIX
FORCASTING RESEARCH INSTITUTE RESEARCH C PROJECTS PROJECTS PROJECT PROJECT
FUND 93468 FUND 9956 FUND 9958 FUND 9957
l-
3 29,400 !§ 4,362 $ 19,805 $ 92,214
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
C 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 -
$ 29,400 $ 4,362 $ 19,805 $ 92,214
l-
r / $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
29,400 4,362 19,805 92,214
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
r I 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I-- 0 0 0 0
29,400 4,362 19,805 92,214 r
f 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0
P $ 29,400 $ 4,362 $ 19,805 $ 92,214 /
Continued
73
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1996-97 1998-99 CORONADO
STATE STIP BRIDGE TOLL
PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP REVENUE
PLANNING PLANNING PROGRAMS
FUND 9726 FUND 9921 FUND 9467
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 $ 0 $ 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,090 53,552 24,781,813
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,090 $ 53,552 $ 24,781,813
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred Revenues:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._............
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 $ 0 $ 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 24,781,813
1,090 53,552 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,090 53,552 24,781,813
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I............ $ 1,090 $ 53,552 !§ 24,781,813
74
CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOATING & COASTAL DEPT OF STATE
- CO-OP AGRMT
WATERWAYS COMMISSION JUSTICE CONTROLLER
l l -6066(009) 96-300-037
FREEWAY FREEWAY
SERVICE SERVICE
PATROL PATROL
FUND 9462 FUND 9908
BEACH BEACH CRIMINAL REGIONAL
SAND SAND JUSTICE HOUSING
REPLENSIHMENT MITIGATION RESEARCH NEEDS
FUND 9734 FUND 9790 FUND 9731 FUND 9922
3 O$ 0s 0 $ 0 $ 0s 0
0 1,510,285 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
C 668,521 0 4,920,641 96,308 5,487 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
668,521 $ 1,510,285 $ 4,920,641 $ 96,308 $ 5,487 $ 0
r- ’ $ 0 $ 0 $ 0s 0 $ 0 $ 0
r 0 0 1,510,285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
r 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 4,920,641 96,308 5,487 0
I!-- 668,521 0 0 0 0 0
I 668,521 1,510,285 4,920,641 96,308 5,487 0
C
r 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
r I $ 668,521 $ 1,510,285 $ 4,920,641 $ 96,308 $ 5,487 $ 0
Continued
75
CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
DEVELOPMENT ACT
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CRIMINAL
JUNE 30,1999 TDA TDA JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION PLANNING CLEARINGHOUSE
FUND 9422 FUND 9421 FUND 9632
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0s 0s 0
0 279,510 0
0 0 17,818
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 279,510 $ 17,818
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._......._....................... $
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred Revenues:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 $ 0s 0
0 279,510 17,818
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 279,510 17,818
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0s 279,510 $ 17,818
76
OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
S.D. COUNTY CRIMINAL A.P.C.B
ARJIS PROBATION JUSTICE VANPOOL
EVALUATION DEPT RESEARCH INCENTIVE SOURCEPOINT C SERVICES CJ PROJECTS PROJECTS PROGRAM SERVICES
FUND 9444 FUND 9879 FUNDS 9881 et al FUND 9880 FUND 9442
m-s 0s O$ 0 $ O$ 0
0 0 0 0 0
801 0 54,786 0 0
c 0 9,309 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,583 C
$ 801 $ 9,309 $ 54,786 $ 0 $ 31,583
1--
/ $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
801 0
0 0
0 0
r 0 0
0 0
r 0 9,309
801 9,309 r
r
0 0
0 0
r-
54,786
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 31,583
0 0
0 0
0 0
54.786 0 31,583
0
0
0 0
i $
r-
I
.D--.
I
801 $ 9,309 $
,
54,786 $
77
0s 31,583
Continued
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL TOTAL
COMMISSION PROJECTS & FEDERAL,
ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL STATE,
& PROJECTS ASSISTANCE & OTHER
FUND 9443 FUND 9631 et al FUNDS
ASSETS
Due From Other Agencies:
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0s 0 $ 4,077,071 ,
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 2,189,795
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 749,149 850,564
Due From Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,059,063 149,681 32,790,740
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._..... 0 0 0
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 31,583
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,059,063 $ 898,830 $ 39,939,753
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0s 0
Due To Other Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 749,149 7,117,430
Special Revenue Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,059,063 .O 1,059,063
Enterprise Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 31,583
Deferred Revenues: 0
Federal Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 738,781
State Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 29,804,249
Other Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 149,681 1,188,647
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,059,063 898,830 39,939,753
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved - Undesignated.. ........................................................
TOTAL FUND BALANCE.. .............................................................
0 0 O ,
0 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE.. ................................ $ 1,059,063 $ 898,830 $ 39,939,753
78
f
r
I
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
CA-81 -x001 CA-go-X837 990WPSNDG
1997-98 1997-98 1998-99
FTA FTA FTA
SECTION 5303 SECTION 5307 SP&R
FUND 9801 FUND 9802 FUND 9911
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................. $ O$ 16,646 $ 68,768
State Grants (Note 9) .................................................................... 0 0 0
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. .............................................. 0 0 0
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................ 0 0 0
Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 0 4,161 17,192
Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 20,807 85,960
REVENUESEARNED
Federal Grants.. .............................................................................
State Grants (Note 9). ...................................................................
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. ..............................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................................................
Member Agency Assessments .....................................................
0 16,646 61,476
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 4,161 15,369
0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 20,807 76,845
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ (9,115)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Program Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0s 20,807 $ 0
0 0 0
0 0 85,960
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET.. ......................................................
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects.. ..... . ..................................................................
0 20.807 85.960
0 0
0 0
20,807 76,845
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Program Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 20,807 76,845
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES.......... $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,115
80
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
990WPSNDG CA-go-X882 11-117394 1 l-4221 1 l-6066 11-8178
1998-99 1998-99 TRANSPORTATION ITMIS STPPLNG IVHS
FTA FTA DEMAND SHOWCASE RIDESHARE STRATEGIC
SECTION 5303 SECTION 5307 MGMTXMAQ PROJECT FUNDS PLAN
FUND 9901 FUND 9902 FUND 9506 FUND 9507 FUND 9508 FUND 9509
$ 651,170 $ 1,700,000 $ 0 $ 10,856,170 $ 0s 392,939
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 567,500 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
162,792 425,000 0 0 0 9,292
0 0 0 0 0 0
813,962 2,125,OOO 0 11,423,670 0 402,231 C
651,170 1,404,576 0 1,955,829 0 72,317
* 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
+- 162,792 351,144 0 0 0 9,292
0 0 0 0 0 0
813,962 1,755,720 0 1,955,829 0 81,609 -.
$ O$ (369,280) $ O$ (9,467,841) $ 0 $ (320,622)
-$ 0 $ 0s O$ 8,749,888 $ 0s 402,231
0 0 0 2,673,782 0 0
813,962 2,125,OOO 0 0 0 0 1, -
813,962 2,125,OOO 0 11,423,670 0 402,231
108,395 186,734
268,919 251,455
132,254 783,110
13,566 534,421
201,470 0
0 0
35,403 0
53,955 0
0
0
0
1,955,829
0
0
0
0
0
0
81,609
0
0
0
0
0
$
813,962 1,755,720 0 1,955,829 0 81,609
0 $ 369,280 $ 0 $ 9,467,841 $ 0s 320,622
Continued
81
C
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
1 l-6056 CA-81 -x001
CONGESTION CONGESTION 1997-98
PRICING PRICING FHWA
DEMONSTRATION PERMIT FEES 112% PL
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FUND 9510 FUND 9511 FUND 9803
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................ $ 4,660,901 $ 0 $ 0
State Grants (Note 9). ................................................................... 0 0 0
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. .............................................. 1,164,783 2,025,OOO 0
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................ 0 0 0
Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 0 0 0
Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE.. ....................................................... 5,825,684 2,025,OOO 0
REVENUESEARNED
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................
State Grants (Note 9). ...................................................................
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. ..............................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................................................
Member Agency Assessments .....................................................
2,272,563 0 0
0 0 0
564,322 900,000 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
.O 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,836,885 900,000 0
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES s.................. $ (2,988,799) $ (1,125,OOO) $ 0
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,825,684 $ 2,025,OOO S 430,026
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 -(430,026)
New Program Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET ........................................................
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects.. ........................................................................
5,825,684 2,025,OOO
0 0
0 0
0 0
2,836,885 900,000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Program Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,836,885 900,000 0
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES.......... $ 2,988,799 $ 1 ,125,OOO $ 0
82
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE
97-6066 990WPSNDG l l -6066/000600 990WPSNDG 990WPSNDG N6871199RP09X14
1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 U.S. NAVY
TRANSPORTATION FHWA STP/STI P FHWA FHWA S.D. REGIONAL
DEMAND MGMJ 112% PL JDM PTRSHIP PLNG SP&R BEACH SAND PROJ.
FUND 9804 FUND 9903 FUND 9904 FUND 9913/l 4 FUND 9915 FUND 9906
$ 153,961 $ 2,738,998 !§ 800,000 $ 232,000 $ 100,000 $ 9,630,OOO
0 0 400,000 0 0 0
0 0 0 18,000 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 354,866 0 40,000 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
153,961 3,093,864 1,200,000 290,000 100,000 9,630,OOO
153,961 2,524,122 359,647 136,669 57,173 666,205
r 0 0 400,000 0 0 0
0 0 0 18,000 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4-- 0 327,027 0 16,168 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
153.961 2.851 .149 759.647 170.837 57.173 666.205
c-
$ 0 $ (242,715) $ (440,353)
-$ 153,961 $ 0 $ 0
/ 0 0 0
0 3,093,865 1,200,000 v--
153,961 3,093,865 1,200,000
0 399,710 0 I 0 858,762 0
0 611,081 0
- 153,961 47,949 759,647
0 664,426 0
0 0 0
0 35,403 0
T- 0 233,818 0
0 0 0
t 153,961 2,851 ,149 759,647
(119,163) (42,827) $ (8,963,795)
0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 290,000 100,000 9,630,OOO
290,000 100,000 9,630,OOO
0 0 0
0 0 0
170,837 57,173 0
0 0 0
0 0 666,205
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
170,837 57,173 666,205
$
5- I /
0 $ 242,716 $ ' 440,353 $ 119,163 $ 42,827 $ 8,963,795
Continued
83
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
BUDGET AND ACTUAL (VIA CA FISH 14481143097J190 FG8056HP
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS & GAME) HABITAT HABITAT PLNG
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS HABITAT PLANNING (VIA CA FISH
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30‘1999 CHALENGE GRANT PROGRAM & GAME)
FUND 9435 FUND 9805 FUND 9805
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Federal Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ O$ 733,326 $ 49,540
State Grants (Note 9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229,640 0 0
Transportation Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Transportation Development Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Member Agency Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229,640 733,326 49,540
REVENUESEARNED
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................
State Grants (Note 9). ...................................................................
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. ..............................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................................................
Member Agency Assessments .....................................................
0 68,391 49;540
0 0 0
125,963 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,963 68,391 49,540
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (103,677) $ (664,935) $ 0
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Program Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
169,160 $ 579,685 $ 0
60,480 153,641 0
0 0 49,540
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET.. ......................................................
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects ..........................................................................
229,640 733.326
0 0 0 0
125,963
0
0
0
0
0
8,605
0
0
59,786
0
0
0
49,540
0
49,540
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Program Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES.......... $ 8
125,963 68,391 49,540
103,677 $ 664,935 $ 0
84
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
NIJ DRUG USE NATL. INST.
TESTING & OF JUSTICE
FORCASTING RESEARCH
PROJECTS PROJECTS
FUND 93468 FUND 9956
FEDERAL
UBRAN
INSTITUTE
PROJECT
FUND 9958
DEPT OF
HEALTH &
HUMAN SVCS
METH
MATRIX
RESEARCH
PROJECT
FUND 9957
0 108,574 272,920 707,311
0 10,162 27,585 230,077
I- 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 /
0 10,162 27,585 230,077
r- j $ 0s (98,412) $ (245,335) $ (477,234)
r
p $ 0 $ 0s 0 $ 0
0
0
0 108.574
0
108,574
0
272,920
272.920
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
10,162 27,585 230,077
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
10.162 27,585 230,077
0
707,311
707,311
$ 0s 98,412 $ 245,335 $ 477,234
85 Continued
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1996-97 1998-99 CORONADO
STATE STIP BRIDGE TOLL
PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP REVENUE
PLANNING PLANNING PROGRAMS
FUND 9726 FUND 9921 FUND 9467
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Federal Grants ............................................................................... $ 0 $ 0s 0
State Grants (Note 9). ................................................................... 0 193,000 5,319,618 Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. .............................................. 0 0 0
Transportation Sales Tax .............................................................. 0 0 0
Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 0 0 0
Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE ......................................................... 0 193,000 5,319,618
REVENUES EARNED
Federal Grants.. .............................................................................
State Grants (Note 9). ...................................................................
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. ..............................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................................................
Member Agency Assessments .....................................................
0 0 0
0 139,448 2,021,946
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED.. ..................................................... 0 139,448 2,021,946
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES.. ................. $ 0s (53,552) $ (3,297,672)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves.. .................................................................. $ 0 $ 0 !§ 3,319,618
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease). ................................ 0 0 2,000,000
New Program Authorization.. ......................................................... 0 193,000 0
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 193,000 5,319,618
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects.. ................................... . .................................... 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
139,448 2,021,946
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total Program Expenditures ..,.......................,. ~ . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 139,448 2,021,946
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES.......... $ 0 $ 53,552 $ 3,297,672
86
CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOATING & COASTAL DEPT OF STATE
WATERWAYS COMMISSION JUSTICE CONTROLLER
- CO-OP AGRMT l l-SOSS(OO9) 96-300-037
FREEWAY FREEWAY BEACH BEACH CRIMINAL REGIONAL
SERVICE SERVICE SAND SAND JUSTICE HOUSING
PATROL PATROL REPLENSIHMENT MITIGATION RESEARCH NEEDS FUND 9462 FUND 9908 FUND 9734 FUND 9790 FUND 9731 FUND 9922
$ 0s 0s 0s O$ 0s 0
“- 444,709 1,581,500 700,000 101,555 16,941 52,191
0 0 173,542 1,478 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
m- 444,709 1,581,500 873,542 103,033 16,941 52,191
0 0 0 0
* (223,88:) 1,510,285 (4,000,0000) 6,725 11,455 52,191
0 0 (55,496) 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7- 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 (223,886) 1,510,285 (4,055,496) 6,725 11,455 52,191
$ (668,595) $ (71,215) $ (4,929,038) $ (96,308) $ (5,486) $ 0
C
-$ 808,709 $ 0 $ 700,000 $ 78,141 !§ 16,941 $ 0
(364,000) 0 173,542 24,892 0 0
0 1,581,500 0 0 0 52,191 - - ~
444,709 1,581,500 873,542 103,033 16,941 52,191
c-
0
0
(223.88:)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,510,285
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(4,055,49i)
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
G 0 0
6,725 0 52,191
0 11,455 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
(223,886) 1,510,285 (4,055,496) 6,725 11,455 52,191
$ 668,595 $ 71,215 $ 4,929,038 $ 96,308 $ 5,486 $ 0
Continued
87
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT
CRIMINAL
TDA TDA JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION PLANNING CLEARINGHOUSE
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FUND 9422 FUND 9421 FUND 9632
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................. $ 0 $ O$ 0
State Grants (Note 9). ................................................................... 0 0 0 Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. .............................................. 0 0 85,000
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................ 0 0 0 Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 383,544 811,003 0
Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 0 0
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE.. ....................................................... 383,544 811,003 85,000
REVENUES EARNED
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................
State Grants (Note 9). ...................................................................
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. ..............................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................................................
Member Agency Assessments .....................................................
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 85,000
0 0 0
383,544 811,003 0
0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED .,..................................................... 383,544 811,003 85,000
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Program Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
108,544 $ 0s 0
275,000 811,003 . 85,000
0 0 0
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET ........................................................
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects.. ......................................................... !. .............
383,544 811,003 85,000
0 31,508
23,241 333,106
0 203,469
360,303 0
0 200,815
0 0
0 0
0 42,105
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
85,000
0
0
Total Program Expenditures .......................................................... 383,544 811,003 85,000
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES .......... $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
88
OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
S.D. COUNTY CRIMINAL A.P.C.B
ARJIS PROBATION JUSTICE VANPOOL
EVALUATION DEPT RESEARCH INCENTIVE SOURCEPOINT I SERVICES CJ PROJECTS PROJECTS PROGRAM SERVICES
FUND 9444 FUND 9879 3 9881+/9882/2080/20E FUND 9880 FUND 9442
$ 0s O$ 0s 0s 0
c 0 0 0 0 0
0 483,471 300,046 0 285,755
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0
0 483,471 300,046 0 285,755
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
801 174,232 109,189 0 182,006
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
801 174,232 109,189 0 182,006 *
$ 801 $ (309,239) $ (190,857) $ 0 $ (103,749)
‘$ 0 $ 483,541 $ 173,232 $ 8,150 $ 161,334
0 (70) 0 (8,150) 0
0 0 126,814 0 124,421
0 483,471 300,046 0 285,755
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .v- 0 0
801 174,232
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
109,189
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
182,006
0
801 174,232 109,189 0 182,006
$ (801) $ 309,239 $ ’ 190,857 $ 0 $ 103,749
Continued
89
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
FEDERAL, STATE, AND OTHER GRANTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL TOTAL
COMMISSION PROJECTS & FEDERAL, ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL STATE,
& PROJECTS ASSISTANCE & OTHER
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FUND 9443 FUND 9631 et al FUNDS
Federal Grants.. ............................................................................. $ 0 $ 0s 33,873,224
State Grants (Note 9) .................................................................... 0 0 8,809,514
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest ................................................ 0 829,765 6,163,980 Transportation Sales Tax.. ............................................................ 14,105,197 0 14,105,197
Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 0 0 2,207,850 Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 403,718 403,718
TOTAL BUDGET EST l%lATE ...................................................... 14,105,197 1,233,483 65,563,484
REVENUES EARNEt:
Federal Grants.. ........ ................................................................... 0 0 lo,71 8,108
State Grants (Note 9). ................................................................... 0 0 (81,836)
Other Grants, Contracts & Interest.. .............................................. 0 516,213 2,620,230
Transportation Sales Tax.. ....................................... .._ .................. 5,505,036 0 5,505,036
Transportation Development Act.. ................................................. 0 0 2,080,501
Member Agency Assessments ..................................................... 0 403,718 403,718
TOTAL REVENUES EARNED.. ..................................................... 5,505,036 919,931 21,245,757
EXCESS OF BUDGET (OVER) UNDER REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8600,161) $=~ (313,552) $ (44,317,726)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
PROGRAM BUDGET
Prior Year’s Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Program Authorization Increase (Decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
New Program Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,322,522 $ 267,089 !§ 33,804,263
4,782,675 943,733 11,181,502
0 22,661 20,577,719
TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET.. ......................................................
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Intergovernmental Relations & Program Management.. ...............
Information Systems Development.. .............................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. ...............................................
Transportation Programming & Planning Assistance.. ..................
Development Strategy & Environmental Management (Note 9) ...
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ....................................
Regional Information Services & Assistance.. ...............................
Regional Economic Planning and Research.. ...............................
TransNet Projects.. ........................................................................
14,105,197 1,233,483 65,563,484
158,144
0
13,811
777,580
0
0
0
0
4,555,501
0
70,823
0
15,700
300,703
225,357
_ 284,000
23,348
884,491
1,864,451
2,150,996
11,803,634
(1,777,212)
873,858
536,812
353,226
4,555,501
Total Program Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,505,036 919,931 21,245,757
EXCESS OF BUDGET OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES.......... $ 8,600,161 $ 313,552 $ 44,317,726 1
90
FINANCIAL SECTION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENTS
SPECIAL REVENUE AND
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
I
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COIvlMISSION DESCRIPTION
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
SANDAG’s Board of Directors serves as the San Diego County Regional Transportation
Commission (Commission). The Commission is responsible for the implementation and
administration of transportation improvement programs funded by the San Diego countywide
l/Z% sales tax effective April 1, 1988, as a result of the passage of Proposition A - The San
Diego County Transportation Improvement Program.
After allocating no more than one percent of the sales tax revenue for administration and $1 million
annually for bicycle facilities, the remaining annual sales tax and receipts are divided, one-third
each, for highway improvements, public transit facilities, and local street and road improvement.
Revenue bond and commercial paper proceeds are primarily used for highway and public transit
improvements.
C
T-
c
93
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 1999
ASSETS:
GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
SPECIAL DEBT
REVENUE SERVICE
FUNDS FUNDS
ACCOUNT
GROUP
GENERAL
LONG-TERM
DEBT TOTALS
Cash and Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 101,836,534 $ 0 $ 0 $ 101,836,534
Cash with Fiscal Agent.. ...................................
Due from State Agencies.. ...............................
Due from Other Agencies.. ...............................
Due from Other Funds.. ...................................
Loans Receivable.. ...........................................
Accrued Interest Receivable.. ..........................
Agency Receivable.. ........................................
Amounts Available for Debt Service.. ...............
Amount to be Provided for Long Term Debt .....
19,622,322 34,108,228 0 53,730,550
10,791,500 0 0 10.791,500
47500,000 0 0 47,500,000
0 0 0 0
1 o,ooo,ooo 0 0 1 o,ooo,ooo
0 0 0 0
1,059,063 0 0 I,059063
0 0 33,346,375 33,346,375
0 0 548,628,625 548,628,625
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 190,809,419 $ 34,108,228 $ 581,975,OOO $ 806,892,647
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
LIABILITIES:
Agency Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 s 0 $ 0
Arbitrage Rebate Payable.. .............................. 0 761,853
Due to Other Funds.. ........................................ 0 0
Deferred Revenue.. .......................................... 0 0
Commercial Paper Payable.. ........................... 47,500,000 0
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Payable ................. 0 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES.. ........................................ 47,500,000 761,853
FUND BALANCE:
Reserved for Arbitrage Earnings.. .................... 0 0
Reserved for Debt Service.. ............................. 0 33,346,375
Reserved for Loan Receivable.. ....................... 10,000,000 0
Reserved for Future Projects ........................... 133,309,419 0
TOTAL FUND BALANCE.. ................................ 143,309,419 33346.375
TOTAL LIABILITIES
AND FUND BALANCE.. ............................... $ 190,809,419 $ 34,108,228
94
0 761,853
0 0
0 0
0 47,500,000
581,975,OOO 581,975,OOO
581,975,OOO 630,236,853
0 0
0 33,346,375
0 10,000,000
0 133,309,419
0 176,655,794
$ 581,975.OOO $ 806,892,647
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
f-
REVENUES:
e‘-
Transportation Sales Tax .,............_........................................ $
SPECIAL
REVENUE
FUNDS
157,714,677 $
DEBT
SERVICE
FUNDS TOTALS
0 $ 157,714,677
Interest on Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,755,006 2,466,936 9,221,942
l- Other Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,694,260 0 1,694,260
TOTAL REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166,163,943 2,466,936 168,630,879
I-
(I CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
T-
Bicycle Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460,847 0 460,847
Highway Improvements . .._.........._............................................... 21,689,396 0 21.689.396
*- Public Transit Improvements.. .................................................... 13,308,274 0 13,308,274
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ...................................... 40,887.920 0 40.887.920
- General and Administrative Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,181,679 0 1,181,679
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
Debt Fiscal Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f- Arbitrage Rebate Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
’ Principal Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
Interest Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL EXPENDITURES .,,..__.....,,,._......,.........,,..........,..........,...
l- EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
; OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
338,992 0 338,992
0 0 0
0 50,500,000 50,500,000
1,446,422 32,654,644 34,101,066
79,313,530 83,154,644 162x468,174
86,850,413 (80,687,708) 6,162,705
~ Bond I Commercial Paper Proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
y Payment to Escrow Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interfund Operating Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._....................................
- Operating Transfers In . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Transfers Out .___......,.._........,.........,,.........................
c TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
*- AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES ..,....,....,..........,................
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L- FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 ..,..,.......,....,....,.....,......... $
0 0 0
0 0 0
4,762,956 82,218,594 86,981,550
(83,985,111) (2,996,439) (86,981,550)
(79,222,155) 79.222,155 0
7,628,258 (1,465,553) 6,162,705
135,681,161 34,811,928 170,493,089
143,309,419 $ 33,346,375 $ 176,655,794
95
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
BUDGET
Budgetary Basis
TOTALS
ACTUAL
GAAP Basis
VARIANCE
favorable
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999 (unfavorable)
REVENUES:
Transportation Sales Tax .......................................... $
Interest on Investments.. ...............................................
Other Revenues.. ..........................................................
TOTAL REVENUES .......................................................
154,200,OOO $ 157,714,677 $ 3514,677
5,970,838 6,755,006 784,168
0 1,694,260 1,694,260
160,170,838 166,163,943 5,993,105
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Bicycle Facilities ............................................................
Highway Improvements.. ...............................................
Public Transit Improvements.. ......................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ........................
General and Administrative Expenditures.. ...................
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
1 ,ooo,ooo 460,847 539,153
70,552,666 21,689,396 48,863,270
50,552,667 13,308,274 37,244,393
50,552,667 40,887,920 9,664,747
1,542,OOO 1,181,679 360,321
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ............................................ 338,992 338,992 0
Arbitrage Rebate Expenditures.. ................................... 0 0 0
Bond / Commercial Paper Principal Payments.. ........... 0 0 0
Bond I Commercial Paper Interest Expenditures ......... 1,446,422 1,446,422 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ............................................ 175,985,414 79,313,530 96,671,884
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (15,814,576) 86,850,413 102,664,989
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Bond I Commercial Paper Proceeds.. ...........................
Inter-fund Operating Transfer.. .......................................
Operating Transfers In .................................................
0 0 0
0 0 0
4,762,956 4,762,956 0
Operating Transfers Out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 (83,985,11 I) 83,985,111
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES) ,..................,.................................... 4,762,956 (79,222,155) 83,985,111
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (11,051,620) 7,628,258 18,679,878
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . .._....................... 135681,161 135,681,161 0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 124,629,541 $ 143,309,419 $ 18,679,878
96
FINANCIAL SECTION
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMBINING STATEMENTS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINING BALANCE SHEETS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
JUNE 30,1999
SALES TAX
PROJECTS
FUND
PROJECT FUNDS
REVENUE BONDS
1989 1992
SERIES A SERIES A
ASSETS:
Cash and Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 101,836,534 $ 0 $ 0
Cash with Fiscal Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
Due from State Agencies.. ..................... 10,791,500 0 0
Due from Other Agencies.. .................... 0 0 0
Loan Receivable, net.. ........................... 1 o,ooo,ooo 0 0
Accrued Interest Receivable.. ................ 0 0 0
Agency Receivable ,............................... 1,059,063 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS u................................. $ 123,687,097 $ 0 $ 0
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
LIABILITIES :
‘Due to Other Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Deferred Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 $ 0 $ 0
0 0 0
Commercial Paper Payable . . . . .._............ 0 d 0
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0
FUND BALANCE:
Reserved for Arbitrage Earnings . . . . . . . .._. 0 0 0
Reserved for Loan Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 o,ooo,ooo 0 0
Reserved for Future Projects.. ...............
TOTAL FUND BALANCE.. .....................
TOTAL LIABILITIES
AND FUND BALANCE.. $ ......................
113,687,097 - 0 0
123,687,097 . 0 0
123,687,097 $ 0 $ 0
98
1993
SERIES A
PROJECT FUNDS
REVENUE BONDS
1994 1996
SERIES A SERIES A
COMMERCIAL PAPER
1991
ISSUE A
TOTAL
SPECIAL
REVENUE
FUNDS
$ 0 $ 0s O$ 0 $ 101,836,534
0 0 18,699,784 922,538 19,622,322
- 0 0 0 0 10,791,500
0 0 0 47,500,000 47,500,000
I- O 0 0 0 10,000,000
0 0 0 0 0 *
0 0 0 0 1,059,063
- $ 0 $ 0s 18,699,784 $ 48,422,538 $ 190,809,419
- $ 0 $ 0s O$ 0 $ 0
0 -
0
0 0
0 0
rC 0 0 0
T-
0
*- 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 18,699,784
0 18.699.784
0 0
47,500,000 47,500,000
47.500.000 47.500.000
0 0
0 10,000,000
922.538 133.309.419
922,538 143,309,419
$ 0 $ O$ 18,699,784 $ 48,422,538 $ 190,809,419
k.-
99
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINING STATEMENTS OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
REVENUES:
SALES TAX
PROJECTS
FUND
PROJECT FUNDS
REVENUE BONDS
1989 1992
SERIES A SERIES A
Transportation Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 157,714,677 $ 0s 0
Interest on Investments ...............................................
Other Revenues.. ........................................................
TOTAL REVENUES.. ...................................................
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
4,639,168 0
1,694,260 0
164,048,105 0
Bicycle Facilities.. ........................................................ 460,847
Highway Improvements.. ............................................. 4,450,817
Public Transit Improvements.. ..................................... 13,308,274
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ....................... 40,887,920
General and Administrative Expenses.. ...................... 1,181,679
Total Program Expenditures.. ...................................... 60,289,537
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. .......................................... 0
Arbitrage Rebate Expenditure.. ................................... 0
Principal Payments.. ................................................... 0
Interest Expenditures.. ............................................... 0
Total Debt Service Expenditures.. ............................... 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ........................................... 60,289,537
7,650
0
0
0
7.650
7,650
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES.. ............................................ 103,758,568
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
(7,650) (12,068)
Bond I Commercial Paper Proceeds.. .........................
Payments to Escrow Agent.. .......................................
Interfund Operating Transfer.. .....................................
Operating Transfers In.. .............................................
Operating Transfers Out.. ..........................................
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES). .....................................................
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. ......................
FUND BALANCES-JUNE 30, 1998.. ..........................
0
0
0
2,996,439
(83,985,111)
(80,988,672)
22,769,896
100,917,201
0 0
0 0
0 0
7,650 12,068
0 0
7,650 12,068
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,068
0
0
0
12,068
12,068
0
0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 123,687,097 $ 0s 0
100
I- I
r
‘-
r
r
r
r I
r
I ‘-
PROJECT FUNDS
REVENUE BONDS COMMERCIAL PAPER TOTAL
SPECIAL
1993 1994 1996 1991 REVENUE
SERIES A SERIES A SERIES A ISSUE A FUNDS
$ 0s 0s 0s 0 $ 157,714,677
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
2,000
2,000
(2,000)
0
0
0
2,000
2,000 23,728 52,316 1,668,755 (79,222,155)
0
0 2,075,573 40,265 6,755,006
0 0 0 1,694,260
0 2,075,573 40,265 166,163,943
0 0 0 460,847
0 17,238,579 0 21,689,396
0 0 0 13,308,274
0 0 0 40,887,920
0 0 0 1,181,679
0 17,238,579 0 77,528,116
23,728 52,316 241,230 338,992
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1,446,422 1,446,422
23,728 52,316 1,687,652 1,785,414
23,728 17,290,895 1,687,652 79,313,530
(23,728) (15,215,322) (1,647,387) 86,850,413
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
23,728 52,316 1,668,755 4,762,956
0 0 0 (83,985,111)
0 (15,163,006) 21,368 7,628,258
0 33,862,790 901,170 135,681,161
$ 0s 0s 18,699,784 $ 922,538 !§ 143,309,419
101
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
REVENUES:
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
SALES TAX FUNDS
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable)
Transportation Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 154,200,OOO $ 157,714,677 $ 3,514,677
Interest on Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,855,OOO 4,639,168 784,168
Other Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1,694,260 1,694,260
TOTAL REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._......._....................... 158,055,OOO 164,048,105 5,993,105
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Bicycle Facilities.. ..........................................................
Highway Improvements .................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. ......................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ........................
General and Administrative Expenditures.. ...................
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
1 ,ooo,ooo 460,847 539,153
50,552,666 4,450,817 46,101,849
50,552,667 13,308,274 37,244,393
50,552,667 40,887,920 9,664,747
1,542,OOO 1,181,679 360,321
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ............................................ 0 . 0 0
Arbitrage Rebate Expenditures.. ................................... 0 0 0
Bond / Commercial Paper Principal Payments.. ........... 0 0 0
Bond/Commercial Paper Interest Expenditures ......... 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ............................................ 154,200,OOO 60,289,537 93,910,463
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,855,OOO 103,758,568 99,903,568
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Bond / Commercial Paper Proceeds . . . . . . .._....................
Interfund Operating Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Transfers In . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Transfers Out ..,,.,......,.....,........,....,.,.....,.....
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES) . . . . . .._................................................
EXCESS (DEFiCIENCY) OF REVENUES
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 0 0
0 0 0
2,996,439 2,996,439 0
0 (83,985,111) 83,985,lll
2,996,439 (80,988,672) 83,985,lll
6,851,439 22,769,896 15,918,457
100,917,201 100,917,201 0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ti 107,768,640 $ 1233687,097 $ 15,918,457
102
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1989 SERIES A PROJECT FUND 1992 SERIES A PROJECT FUND
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE i- Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable I (unfavorable) (unfavorable)
r $ 0s O$ 0s 0s 0 $ 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7,650 7,650 0 12,068 12,068 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7,650 7,650 0 12,068 12,068 0
(7,650) (7,650) 0 (12,068) (12,068) 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
7,650 7,650 0 12,068 12,068 0
7,650 7,650 0 12,068 12,068 0
$
0
0
0s
0
0
0s
0
0
O$
103
0
0
OS
0 0
0 0
O$ 0
Continued
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
REVENUES:
1993 SERIES A PROJECT FUND
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable)
Transportation Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0s 0
Interest on Investments.. ..............................................
Other Revenues.. .........................................................
TOTAL REVENUES.. ....................................................
0 0
0 0
0 0
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
Bicycle Facilities.. .........................................................
Highway Improvements.. ..............................................
Public Transit Improvements.. ......................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ........................
General and Administrative Expenditures.. ..................
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ............................................
Arbitrage Rebate Expenditures.. ..................................
Bond I Commercial Paper Principal Payments.. ..........
Bond / Commercial Paper Interest Expenditures ........
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ............................................
2,000 2,000
0 0
0 0
0 0
2,000 2,000
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES.. ............................................. (2,000) Gmw
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Bond / Commercial Paper Proceeds.. ..........................
Interfund Operating Transfer.. ......................................
Operating Transfers In ................................................
Operating Transfers Out.. ............................................
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES). .......................................................
0 0
0 0
2,000 2,000
0 0,
2,000 2,000
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. ........................ 0 0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1998.. ............................ 0 0
3
0
0
0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . . .._...................... $ 0s O$ 0
104
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1994 SERIES A PROJECT FUND 1996 SERIES A PROJECT FUND
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable) (unfavorable)
$ O$ 0s 0s 0 $ 0 $ 0
0 0 0 2,075,573
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
20,000,000
0
0
0
23,728
0
0
0
23,728
23,728
0
0
0
23,728 0
52,316
0
0
0
20,052,316
(23,728) (23,728) 0 (17,976,743)
0 0
0 0
23,728 23,728
0
0
52,316
23.728 23,728 0 52.316
0 0 0 (17,924,427) (15,163,006) 2,761,421
0 0 0 33,862,790 33,862,790 0
2,075,573
2,075,573 0
0 0
2,075,573 0
0 0
17,238,579 2,761,421
0 0
0 0
0 0
52,316 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
17,290,895 2,761,421
(15,215,322) 2,761,421
0 0
0 0
52,316 0
0 0
52,316 0
$ 0s 0 $I 0 $ 15,938,363 $ 18,699,784 $ 2,761,421
Continued 105
SAN DIEGO COUNN
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
REVENUES:
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1991 ISSUE A PROJECT FUND
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable)
Transportation Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0s 0
Interest on Investments.. ..............................................
Other Revenues.. .........................................................
TOTAL REVENUES.. ....................................................
CURRENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES:
40,265 40,265
0 0
40,265 40,265
0
Bicycle Facilities.. .........................................................
Highway Improvements.. ..............................................
Public Transit Improvements.. ......................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. ........................
General and Administrative Expenditures.. ..................
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Debt Fiscal Expenditures.. ............................................
Arbitrage Rebate Expenditures.. ..................................
Bond I Commercial Paper Principal Payments.. ...........
Bond / Commercial Paper Interest Expenditures ........
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ............................................
241,230 241,230
0 0
0 0
1,446,422 1,446,422
1,687,652 1,687,652
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES.. ............................................. (1,647,387) (1,647,387)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Bond / Commercial Paper Proceeds.. ..........................
Interfund Operating Transfer.. ......................................
Operating Transfers In.. ...............................................
Operating Transfers Out.. ............................................
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES). .......................................................
0 0
0 0
1,668,755 1,668,755
0 0
1,668,755 1,668,755
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE.S
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES.. ........................ 21,368 21,368
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1998.. ............................ 901,170 901,170
0
0
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . 0 . . . . . .._.................. $ 922,538 $ 922,538 $
106
r
/- TOTALS
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE -
1
Budgetary Basis GAAP Basis favorable
(unfavorable)
r
r
r
r
r
r
1 T-
I- r
I-
i- I-- T-
$ 154,200,OOO $ 157,714,677 $ 3,514,677
5,970,838 6,755,006 784,168
0 1,694,260 1,694,260
160,170,838 166,163,943 5,993,105
1 ,ooo,ooo 460,847 539,153
70,552,666 21,689,396 48,863,270
50,552,667 13,308,274 37,244,393
50,552,667 40,887,920 9,664,747
1,542,OOO 1,181,679 360,321
338,992 338,992 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,446,422 1,446,422 0
175,985,414 79,313,530 96,671,884
(15,814,576) 86,850,413 102,664,989
0 0 0
0 0 0
4,762,956 4,762,956 0
0 (83.985.111 j 83.985.111
4,762,956 (79,222,155) 83,985,I 11
(11,051,620) 7,628,258 18,679,878
135,681,161 135,681,161 0
$ 124,629,541 $ 143,309,419 $ 18,679,878
107
FINANCIAL SECTION
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMBINING STATEMENTS
3nbv U~LUV UWUIN 1 4
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 1992 SALES TAX 1993 SALES TAX
COMMISSION
COMBINING BALANCE SHEETS
REVENUE BONDS REVENUE BONDS
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL
JUNE 30,1999 FUND FUND FUND FUND
ASSETS:
Cash with Fiscal Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,308,381 $ 2,333,785 ji 2,106,931 9 2,861,353
Due from Other Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,308,381 2,333,785 2,106,931 2,861,353
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
LIABILITIES:
Arbitrage Rebate Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FUND BALANCE:
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Reserved for Debt Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,308,381 2,333,785 2,106,931 2,861,353
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE........ $ 1,308,381 $ 2,333,785 $ 2,106,931 $ 2,861,353
COMBINING STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, 1992 SALES TAX 1993 SALES TAX
EXPENDITURES REVENUE BONDS REVENUE BONDS
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999 FUND FUND FUND FUND
REVENUES:
Interest on Investments . .._..............._................... $ 69,034 $ 233,522 $ 105,248 $ 63,572
TOTAL REVENUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.. 69,034 233,522 105,248 63,572
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES:
Principal Payments.. ............................................... 0 8,960,OOO 0 I ,925,ooo
Interest Expense.. .................................................. 5,593,468 0 8,471,526 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ...................................... 5,593,468 8,960,OOO 8,471,526 I ,925,ooo
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,524,434) (8,726,478) (8,366,278) (1,861,428)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Interfund Transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._........... 0 0 0 0
Operating Transfers In . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Transfers Out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,......
FUND BALANCES-JUNE 30, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FUND BALANCES--JUNE 30, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
5,497,148 9,041,250 8,450,350 4,288,750
(67,131) (228,047) (101,738) (48,742)
5,430,017 8,813,203 8,348,612 4,240,‘008
(94,417) 86,725 (17,666) 2,378,580
1,402,798 2,247,060 2,124,597 482,773
1,308,381 $ 2,333,785 !§ 2,106,931 $ 2,861,353
110
1994 SALES TAX IYYO 3fiLC3 IMA
REVENUE BONDS REVENUE BONDS TOTAL
ARBITRAGE DEBT
INTEREST PRINCIPAL RESERVE INTEREST PRINCIPAL REBATE SERVICE
- FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUNDS
I-$ 2,208,174 $ 4,598,449 $ 12,451,505 $ 1,989,313 $ 3,488,484 $ 761,853 $ 34‘108,228
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2,208,174 4,598,449 12,451,505 1,989,313 3,488,484 761,853 34,108,228
Y--
0 0 0 0 0 761,853 761,853
0 0 0 0 0 761,853 761,853
I
c-
,
-
r-
- ~
*
II
-
2,208,174 4,598,449 12,451,505 1,989,313 3,488,484 0 33,346,375
$ 2,208,174 $ 4,598,449 $ 12,451,505 $ 1,989,313 $ 3,488,484 $ 761,853 $ 34,108,228
1994 SALES TAX 1996 SALES TAX
REVENUE BONDS REVENUE BONDS TOTAL
ARBITRAGE DEBT
INTEREST PRINCIPAL RESERVE INTEREST PRINCIPAL REBATE SERVICE
FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUNDS
$ 119,373 $ 676,942 $ 710,911 $ 103,044 $ 385,290 $ 0 $ 2,466,936
119,373 676,942 710,911 103,044 385,290 0 2,466,936
0 26,300,OOO 0 0 13,315,ooo 0 50,500,000
10,105,050 0 0 8,484,600 0 0 32,654,644
10,105,050 26,300,OOO 0 8,484,600 13,315,ooo 0 83,154,644
(9,985,677) (25,623,058) 710,911 (8,381,556) (12,929,710) 0 (80,687,708)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9,776,300 24,300,OOO 0 8,343,129 12,521,667 0 82,218,594
(116,705) (674,217) (872,892) (100,130) (786,837) 0 (2,996,439)
9,659,595 23,625,783 (872,892) 8,242,999 11,734,830 0 79,222,155
(326,082) (I ,997,275) (161,981) (138,557) (1,194,880) 0 (1,465,553)
2,534,256 6,595,724 12,613,486 2,127,870 4,683,364 0 34,811,928 ,
$ 2,208,174 $ 4,598,449 $ 12,451,505 $ 1,989,313 $ 3,488,484 $ 0 $ 33,346,375
111
FINANCIAL SECTION
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP DESCRI-M’ION
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
This account group is used to account for all fixed assets of the San Diego Association of
Governments which were originally acquired with general and special revenue funds.
114
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIXED ASSETS BY TYPE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
BALANCE BALANCE
06/30/l 998 ADDITIONS DELETIONS 06/30/l 999
Furniture and Fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I $ 404,514 $ 54,491 $ O$ 459,005
Computer Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,863,632 771,251 23,740 2,611,143
FasTrak Computer and Monitoring Equipment........ 603,664 80,000 0 683,664
“.-
Totals ,...,........,...................,.,...,......,......, $ 2,871,810 $ 905,742 $ 23,740 $ 3,753,812
115
*
t
FINANCIAL SECTION
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
SANDIEGOCOUNTY
REGIONALTRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
STATISTICAL DATA
SALESTAXREVENUEBONDS
(LIMITEDTAXBONDS), 1992,1993,1994AND1996SERlESA
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
JUNE30,1999
DATE
OI-act-99 0
Ol-Apr-00 9,285,OOO
01 -act-00 0
Ol-Apr-01 9,705,ooo
Ol-act-01 0
Ol-Apr-02 10,125,OOO
Ol-act-02 0
01-Apr-03 10,625,OOO
Ol-act-03 0
01-Apr-04 11,055,000
Ol-act-04 0
Ol-Apr-05 11,575,ooo
Ol-act-05 0
Ol-Apr-06 12,200,000
Ol-Ott-06 0
01-Apr-07 12,830,OOO
01 -act-07 0
OI-Apr-08 13,460,OOO
1992SERlESA 1993SERlESA(REFUNDING)
PRINCIPAL
REPAYMENT
INTEREST
PAYMENT
2,604,094 2,604,094 0 4,193,413 4,193,413
2,604,094 1 I ,889,094 11,380,OOO 4,193,413 15,573,413
2,404,466 2,404,466 0 3,931,673 3,931,673
2,404,466 12,109,466 11,900,000 3,931,673 15,831,673
2,190,956 2,190,956 0 3,649,048 3,649,048
2,190,956 12,315,956 12,470,OOO 3,649,048 16,119,048
1,925,175 1,925,175 0 3,343,533 3,343,533
1,925,175 12,550,175 13,080,OOO 3,343,533 16,423,533
1,680,800 1,680,800 0 3,016,533 3,016,533
1,680,800 12,735,800 13,730,000 3,016,533 16,746,533
1,376,788 1,376,788 0 2,666,418 2,666,418
1,376,788 12,951,788 34,355,ooo 2,666,418 37,021,418
1,058,475 1,058,475 0 1,773,188 1,773,188
1,058,475 13,258,475 36,140,OOO 1,773,188 37,913,188
722,975 722,975 0 824,513 824,513
722,975 13,552,975 15,305,000 824,513 16,129,513
370,150 370,150 0 422,756 422,756
370,150 13,830,150 16,105,OOO 422.756 16.527.756
PERIOD PRINCIPAL
TOTAL REPAYMENT
INTEREST
PAYMENT
PERIOD
TOTAL
$ 100,860,000 $ 28,667,758 $ 129,527,758 S 164,465,OOO $ 47,642,150 $ 212,107,150
118
r-
1’
F 1994 SERIES A 1996 SERIES A
FISCAL YEAR
PRINCIPAL INTEREST PERIOD PRINCIPAL INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL
T- REPAYMENT PAYMENT TOTAL REPAYMENT PAYMENT TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
0
C 18,300,OOO I 0
19,300,000
l- 0
20,200,000
0
21,300,000
0
22,400,OOO
0
3,700,000
0
3,800,OOO
0
26,800,OOO
0
28,200,OOO
4,395,025 4,395,025
4,395,025 22,695,025
3,964,975 3,964,975
3,964,975 23,264,975
3,501,775 3,501,775
3,501,775 23,701,775
2,870,525 2,870,525
2,870,525 24,170,525
2,204,900 2,204,900
2,204,900 24,604,900
1,532,900 1,532,900
1,532,900 5,232,900
1,438,550 1,438,550
1,438,550 5,238,550
1,339,750 1,339,750
1,339,750 28,139,750
669,750 669,750
669,750 28,869,750
0
13,880,OOO
0
14,495,ooo
0
15,145,ooo
0
15,940,000
0
16,690,OOO
n U
17,545,ooo
0
18,540,OOO
0
19,655,OOO
0
20,760,OOO
3,959,356 3,959,356 0
3,959,356 17,839,356 83,148,776
3,653,996 3,653,996 0
3,653,996 18,148,996 83,310,220
3,327,859 3,327,859 0
3,327,859 18,472,859 83,279,276
2,930,302 2,930,302 0
2,930,302 18,870,302 83,084,070
2,555,712 2,555,712 0
2,555,712 19,245,712 82,790,890
2,128,075 2,128,075 0
2,128,075 19,673,075 82,583,362
1,629,850 1,629,850 0
1,629,850 20,I 69,850 82,480,126
1,073,650 1,073,650 0
1,073,650 20,728,650 82,511,776
519,000 519,000 0
519,000 21.279.000 82.488.312
$ 164,000,OOO $ 43,836,300 $ 207,836,300 $ 152,650,OOO $ 43,555,600 $ 196,205,600 $ 745,676,808
119
C
C
FINANCIAL SECTION
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT
1
l-
P
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
CALDERON, JAHAM & OSBORN
A JOINT VENTURE
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Report of Independent Accountants
on Supplementary Information
To the Board of Directors of
San Diego Association of Governments
r- We have audited and reported separately herein on the general-purpose financial statements of the
San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 1999.
r
r
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general-purpose financial statements
of SANDAG taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in the accompanying State
Subventions, Federal %% PL and Other Funds, State Subventions Planning and Research Funds and
Indirect Cost Worksheet are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part
of the general-purpose financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general-purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly
stated in all material respects in relation to the general-purpose financial statements taken as a whole.
San Diego, California December 20, 1999 r
r
r
r
123
li-
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FT99 CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT NO. 990WPSNDG
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
OWl
Work
Program PROJECT TITLE
TOTAL
BUDGET
PER OWP
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
BUDGET EXPENDITURES
ACTUAL ALL FUNDS
0 6/30/99 06/30/99
10101 INTERGOV RELAT 8 PGM MGT $ 268,765
10102 REGL INTERGOV REVIEW 67,173
10103 BINATIONAL COORDINATION 243,952
10106 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM 132,848
10107 PGM GRAPHIC/PRINTING SUPT 167,690
10201 INFO SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE 371,844
10202 URBAN DEVEL MONT & ANAL 355.043
10203 GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEM 275,609
10204 REGL MODEL MAINT 8 DEVEL ’ 326,451
10205 CENSUS 73,374
10206 MICROCOMPUTER APPLICATNS 121,176
10207 REGL GROWTH FORECASTS 312,956
10209 SENSITIVE LANDS ANALYSIS 244,955
10301 REGL TRANSPORTATION PLN 262,146
10302 HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PLN 242,366
10305 NONMOTORIZED PIAN 25,621
10306 FREIGHThNTERMODAL FACILITIES PIAN 36,967
10307 TRANSP PLNG FOR ELDERLY 8 DISABLED 32,648
10310 REGLTRANSP MONITORING 156,626
10312 COMMUTEfUlNTERURBAN RAIL PLN 106,459
10313 ASST TO TRANSIT OPERATORS 653,662
10319 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT 41,349
10324 AIR QUALITY PLANNING/CONFORMITY 46,712
10328 ADVANCED TRANSP TECH PLNG (IVHS) 941,621
10332 MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDIES 355,547
10335 SD\BAJ TRANSP STUDY 201,364
10336 TRANSIT TRIP PLNG VIA WWW 0
10337 TRANSIT DATA COLLECTION 0
10338 JACUMBAlJACUME CROSSING STUDY 0
10339 SD AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS 0
10340 SD PORT GROUND ACCESS 0
10341 SORRENTO VLY CIRCULATION 0
10401 TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION 25,250
10402 TDA ADMINISTRATION 227,766
10403 TRANSNET FINANCIAL MGMT 513,458
10404 TRANSNET PROGRAM DEVEL 116,550
10405 TRANSNET PUBLIC INFO PROG 168,890
10406 TRANSPORTATION IMPR PROG 110,407
10407 TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROJECT DEV 212,133
10406 BRIDGE TOLL ADMINISTRATION 2,000,000
10409 STIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 194,035
10410 l-15 CONGESTION PRICING PROGRAM 7,109,180
10411 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT IMPL 1,906,315
lo413 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL 3,195,606
10414 INTELLIGENT TRANSP SYSTEM (ITMIS) 8,092,744
10501 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 104,095
10502 REGL HOUSING PLAN 124,137
10503 REGL ENERGY PIAN 15,482
$ 262,416 $ 262,416
53,232 53,232
190,077 196,077
143,388 143,388
235,371 235,371
333,014 333,014
209,015 209,015
306,325 306,325
326,834 326,834
111,039 111,039
125,662 125,662
309,840 309,840
142,719 142.719
145,503 145,503
191,247 191,247
34,432 34,432
126,552 126,552
22,006 woo6
186,478 186,478
86,049 86,049
936,583 580,321
w406 34,406
34,668 34,668
456,830 136,209
345,022 345,022
201,364 80,837
50,960 41,845
42,347 42,347
15,110 15,110
30,000 30,000.
30,792 30,792
30,ooo 30,oocI
22,485 22,485
360,303 360,303
362,140 362,140
98,282 98,282
151,010 151,010
79,174 79,174
210,665 210,665
2,021,946 2,021,946
193,000 139,448
7,950,684 3,736,885
1,8-40,461 1,430.627
2,613,679 1,230,439
8,749,888 1,955,829
93,846 93,846
149,423 149,423
19,061 19,061
124
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT FUNDS
FHWA FTA (5303) FTA (5313) FHWA SP&R ALL
PLANNING MP0 PLNG PLANNING SP&R DISCRETIONARY TOTAL OTHER
P GRANT 9903 GRANT 9901 GRANT 9911 GRT 9913/14 GRT 9915 99CWPSNDG FUNDS
$
T
/-
r
/
I-
/-
r
r
r
r
1
r
r
r I
,- I
,
98,016 $ 29,670 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 127,686 $ 134,730
43,156 10,076 0 0 0 53,232 0
121,977 36,593 0 0 0 158,570 31,507
73,882 13,286 0 0 0 87,168 56,220
62,679 18,770 0 0 0 61,449 153,922
204,514 55,778 0 0 0 260,292 72,722
155,758 53,256 0 0 0 209,014 0
137,805 27,561 0 0 0 165,366 140,959
65,290 0 0 0 0 65,290 261,544
36,687 18,344 0 0 0 55,031 56,008
60,588 30,294 0 0 0 90,882 34,780
156,478 46,943 0 0 0 203,421 106,419
41,642 36,743 0 0 0 78,385 64,334
117,966 26,215 0 0 0 144,181 1,322
191,247 0 0 0 0 191,247 0
6,405 6,405 0 0 0 12,810 21,622
7,397 0 0 90,000 0 97,397 29,155
0 0 0 0 0 0 22,006
126,903 31,726 0 0 0 158,629 27,849
0 0 0 0 0 0 66,049
0 0 0 0 0 0 580,321
13,731 20,675 0 0 0 34,406 0
22,990 11,678 0 0 0 34,668 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 136,209
124,442 35,555 0 0 0 159,997 185,025
0 0 0 80,837 0 80,837 0
0 0 41,845 0 0 41,845 0
0 0 35,000 0 0 35,000 7,347
0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 110
0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 0
0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 5,792
0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 0
3,787 2,525 0 0 0 6,312 16,173
0 0 0 0 0 0 360,303
0 0 0 0 0 0 362,140
0 0 0 0 0 0 98,282
0 0 0 0 0 0 151,010
44,162 11,041 0 0 0 55,203 23,971
0 0 0 0 0 0 210,665
0 0 0 0 0 0 2,021,946
0 0 0 0 0 0 139,448
0 0 0 0 0 0 3,736,885
0 0 0 0 0 0 l/X30,827
0 0 0 0 0 0 1,230,439
0 0 0 0 0 0 1,955,829
52,048 26,024 0 0 0 78,072 15,774
78,612 18,620 0 0 0 97,232 52,191
10,063 2,323 0 0 0 12,386 6,675
125
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
FY99 CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT NO. 990WPSNDG
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES
iOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
OWP PROJECT TITLE
TOTAL
BUDGET
PER OWP
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
BUDGET EXPENDITURES
ACTUAL ALL FUNDS
o6l3ol99 m/30/99
10504 REGL OPEN SPACE PLAN
10505 REGL WATERSHED ELEMENT
10506 ELECTRIC UTILITY RESTRUCTURING
10507 REGL SHORELINE MGMT PROG
10508 AIRPORT COMP LAND USE PLNG (ALUC)
10512 SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTE MGMT PLNG
10514 LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
10515 REGL GROWTH MGMT STRATEGY
10518 NORTH COUNTY MHCP
10519 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
10601 CJ CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLEARINGHOUSE
10701 LOCAL TECH ASST TO MA’S
10801 SERVICES TO SOURCEPOINT
10901 REGL ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
10902 FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES
TOTALS
451,342 200,414 200,414
15,793 6,045 6,045
66,655 85,427 85,427
244,232 14,657,305 903,928
94,464 43,160 43,160
105,657 67,475 87,475
148,576 107,981 107,981
308,243 291,536 291,536
421,003 759,324 303,309
0 100,000 0
859,895 1.869,552 862,948
354,026 404.819 345,809
155,221 184,865 148,679
231,274 240,872 240,872
128,447 112,134 112,134
$ 33,808,084 $ 49,796,237 $ 20,744,236
PERCENT OF TOTAL
CONSOLIDATED GRANT:
TOTAL COSTS INCURRED
LESS: LOCAL MATCH REQUIRED
NET GRANT FUNDS EXPENDED
1ST QTR - 07iOll98 - 09/30/98
2ND QTR - 10/01/98 - 12-31/98
3RD QTR - Ol/Oll99 - 03/31/99
4TH QTR - 04/01/99 - 06/30/99
TOTAL AUTHORIZED
BALANCE AVAILABLE
126
r
FHWA FTA (5303)
PLANNING MP0 PLNG
GRANT 9903 GRANT 9901
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING GRANT FUNDS
FTA (5313) FHWA SP&R ALL
PLANNING SP&R DISCRETIONARY TOTAL OTHER
GRANT 9911 GRT 9913l14 GRT 9915 99CWPSNDG FUNDS
125,671 45,134 0 0 0 170,805 29,609
3,948 1,579 0 0 0 5,527 518
2,166 2,166 0 0 0 4,332 81,095
81,088 36,635 0 0 0 117,723 786,205
0 0 0 0 0 0 43,160
51,596 15,879 0 0 0 67,475 0
74,288 22,286 0 0 0 96,574 11,407
184,946 30,824 0 0 0 215,770 75,766
0 0 0 0 0 0 303,309
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 882,948
35,403 35,403 0 0 0 70,806 275,003
0 0 0 0 0 0 148,679
150,328 34,691 0 0 0 185,019 55,853
83,490 19,264 0 0 0 102,754 9,380
$ 2,851,149 $ 813,962 $ 76,845 $ 170,837 $ 100,000 $ 4,012,793 $ 16,731,442
r r
r
r
14% 4% 0% 1% 0% 19% 81% r
100,000
0
$ 2,851,149 $ 813,962 $ 76,845 $ 170,837 $
(327,027) (162,792) . (15,369) (34,170) -
$ 4,012,793
(539,358) r
$ 2,524,122 $ 651,170 $ 61,476 $ 136,667 $ 100,000 $ 3,473,435 r 793,276 217,020 3,181 229 0 1,013,706
746,059 184,411 1,038 2,969 0 934,476
548,839 129,762 9,565 24,625 3,069 715,862
435,948 119,977 47,692 108,844 96.931 809,391
$ 2,738,998 $ 651,170 $ 68,768 $ 232,000 $ 100,000 $ 3,790,936
$ 214,876 $ 0 $ 7,292 $ 95,333 $ 0 $ 317,501
l-
l--
l--
127
FINANCIAL SECTION
INDIRECT COST WORKSHEET
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
INDIRECT COST WORKSHEET
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1999
GENERAL FUND
Budget Item
Indirect
Administrative
Expenditure
Non-eligible
Expenditures
Board of
Directors
Salaries and Benefits.. .................................................. $
Materials and Supplies .........................................................
Report Printing & Graphics.. ................................................
Rent/Maintenance Facilities and Equipment.. .................................................................
Travel, Transportation and
Meeting Expenditure ..........................................................
Contractual Services.. ..........................................................
Miscellaneous.. ....................................................................
Memberships ........................................................................
Insurance.. ...........................................................................
Transportation Demand Management.. ...............................
Training Incentive Program.. ................................................
Data Processing.. .................................................................
Telephone ............................................................................
Capital Outlay .......................................................................
Board of Directors Expenditure.. ..........................................
Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................
Highway Improvements ........................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. .............................................
Local Street Improvements ..................................................
Commission Administration.. ...............................................
Fiscal Debt Expenditure .......................................................
Principal Retirement .............................................................
Interest Expenditure .............................................................
1,003,556 $ 0
83,412 0
184,373 0
756,240 0
248,602 0
249,377 0
18,466 0
37,006 0
36,353 0
29,050 0
14,237 0
0 0
106,809 0
0 62,631
0 217,433
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 .
0 0
0 0
Sub-Totals 2,767,481 280,064
Reimbursements from Special Revenue Funds:
Indirect Applied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued Grant Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2,396,904) 0
252,508 0
Total Additions (Deductions). 0 ............................................... (2,144,396)
Totals per Single Audit .................................................. $ 623,085 $ 280,064
130
r C
r r 1
r
r
r 1
j- r
7
r
T-
C
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Direct
Planning Transportation
Program Commission
Expenditures Projects
$ 4,523,313 $ 0
118,378 0
169,367 0
!I 0 $ 5,526,869
0 201,790
0 353,740
0 0 0 756,240
121,436
12,862,244
35,066
8,348
0
0
341,334
11,140
658,227
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
460,847
21,689,396
13,308,274
40,887,920
1 ,181,679
338,992
1,446,422
0 370,038
0 13,111,621
0 53,532
0 45,354
0 36,353
0 29,050
0 14,237
0 341,334
0 117,949
0 720,858
0 217,433
0 460,847
0 21,689,396
0 13,308,274
0 40,887,920
0 1 ,181,679
0 338,992
50,500,000 50,500,000
32,654,644 34,101,066
18.848.853 79.313.530 83,154,644 184.364.572
2,396,904 0 0 0 0 0
2,396,904 0
$ 21,245,757 $ 79,313,530 $ 83,154,644 $ 184.617.080
DEBT
SERVICE TOTALS
Debt Actual From
Service Sinale Audit
0
0
252,508
252,508
131
FINANCIAL SECTION
SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
CALDERON, JAHAM & OSBORN
A JOINT VENTURE
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON COMPLIANCE
AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAUDITING STANDARDS
r
T
t
c--
-c
The Board of Directors
San Diego Association of Governments
We have audited the general-purpose financial statements of the San Diego Association of
Governments (“SANDAG”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated December 20, 1999. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Comdiance
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether SANDAG’s general-purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct
and material effect on the determination of general-purpose financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and,
accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Governmenf Auditing Standards.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit, we considered SANDAG’s internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general-
purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control
components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would
be material in relation to the general-purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses.
This report is intended for the information of SANDAG’s Board of Directors, management and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities. However, this report is a matter of public record and its
distribution is not limited.
San Diego, California
December 20, 1999
135
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30.1999
FEDERAL GRANTOWPASS THROUGH
GRANTOR/PROGRAM TITLE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION:
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
FY’98 l=fA SECTION 5303 l
FY’98 FTA SECTION 5307 l
Fy’99 l=TA SECTION 5303 l
FY’99 FT-A SECTION 5307 l
Fy’99 FTA SECTION 5313*
SUB-TOTAL
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
FHWA/ TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT (CMAQ)
FHWA / ITMIS SHOWCASE
FHWA / STPPLNG RIDESHARE FUNDS
FHWA / IVHS (ITS) STRATEGIC PLAN
FHWA / CONGESTION PRICING DEMO
FYI98 FHWA l/2 %PL
FYI98 FHWA / TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT
FYI99 FHWA l/2 %PL
FYI99 FHWA/ TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MGMT
FYI99 FHWA / PARTNERSHIP PLANNING
FY’99 FHWA / SP&R Discretionary
SUB-TOTAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR:
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (VIA CAL FISH & GAME)
SUB-TOTAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE:
BEACH SAND REPLENISHMENT*
SUB-TOTAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE (Drug Use Forecasting)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE (Asmt of Domestic Violence)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE via Federal Urgan lnistitute
SUB-TOTAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES:
HEALTH & HUMAN SVCS (Meth Matrix)
SUB-TOTAL
TOTALS
Notes: l Indicates major federal financial assistance programs.
GRANT
CFDA CONTRACT
NUMBER NUMBER
20.507 CA-81 -x001 9801
20.507 CA-go-X837 9802
20.507 990WPSNDG 9901
20.507 CA-go-X88 9902
20.507 990WPSNDG 9911
20.205 11-117394 9506
20.205 11-4221 9507
20.205 11-6066 9508
20.205 11-8178 9509
20.205 11-6056 9510
20.205 CA-81 -x001 9803
20.205 98-6066 9804
20.205 990WPSNDG 9903
20.205 1 l-6066 9904
20.205 990WPSNDG 9913114
20.205 990WPSNDG 9915
FUND
NUMBER
15.612 14-48-l 1430-97-J190 9805
15.612 FG8056HP 9805
N/A N6871199RP09X14 9906
16.560 Purchase Orders 9346B
16.560 98-WT-‘IX-K014 9956
16.560 98-VF-GX-0016 9958
93.660 C-VIT1141 OA 9957
l * Indicates federal pass-through grants from non-federal agencies.
See accompanying notes to schedule of-federal financial assistance.
-
136
r
T
I
r-
l-
?-
?-- I
/
I-
-f-
l-
r-
c-
-
?-
C
rc
CASH
(DUEFROM)
GRANT BALANCE
AWARD JUNE30,1998
CASH CASH CASH DUEFROM
RECEIVED DISBURSED BALANCE BALANCE
Fy'99 Fy'99 JUNE30,1999 JUNE30,1999
$ 283,117 $ -
700,000 16,646
401,431 651,170
985,000 1,404,576
$ - $ 619,611 ** $ (283,117)
900,000 (683,354)
651,170 l * -
1,700,000 -
68,768 l *
3,939,549 (966,471)
786,717 l * (65,589)
13,078,590 ** 996,245
625,000 ** (245,156)
1,025,OOO ** (34,061)
7,960,OOO ** (2,240,805)
2,514,013 ** (801,414)
870,000 ** (83,882)
2,738,998 **
800,000 l *
232,000 l *
100,000 ** -
30,730,318 (2,474,662)
910,291 (20,315)
49,540 **
959.831 (20.3151
$ -
(249,73i)
(419,576)
(57,257)
(726,571)
4,219 61,476
2,373,767 2,133,868
65,589
1,486,OOO
245,156
250,500
2,977,634
801,414
237,843
1,539,335
1,955,829 526,416
72,317
2,272,563
153,961
2,524,122
359,647
136,669
-
(1,535,734)
-
-
(984,787)
(359,647)
(133,472)
(57,173)
(3,070,813)
3,197
57,173 -
7,606,668 7,532,281 670,538
156,899 68,391
29,000 49,540
185.899 117.931
68,193
68.193
(20,540)
(20.5401
(113,365)
(113,365)
9,630,OOO 552,840 666,205
9.630.000 552,840 666,205
(29,401)
(4,362)
(19,805)
(53.5681
130,845
62,526
272,920
466.291
5,800 10,162
7,780 27,585
13.580 37.747
(92,214)
f92.214)
350,999
350.999
137,863 230,077
137,863 230,077
$ 46,076,988 $ (3,490,849) $ 10,870,617 $ 10,718,109 $ 738,731 $ (4,077,071)
C
137
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Year ended June 30,1999
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) includes the
activity of all federal financial assistance programs of the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG). SANDAG’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to
SANDAG’s general purpose financial statements. The information in this Schedule is
presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.
(2) Basis of Accounting
The accompanying Schedule is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting,
which is described in Note 2 to SANDAG’s general purpose financial statements.
(3) Relationship to SANDAG’s General Purpose Financial Statements
Amounts reported in the accompanying Schedule as cash disbursed are reported in
SANDAG’s general purpose financial statements as Federal Grants Revenue.
(4) Dollar Threshold Used to Distinguish Between Tvpe A and Tvpe B
Type A programs are defined as Federal programs with Federal expenditures during the
audit period exceeding the larger of $300,000 or 3% of total Federal expenditures; $321,543 at
June 30,1999. Type B programs are all others that do not meet the Type A criteria.
138
r
I- ,
Compliance
r--
--
r
f--
I
7-
7-
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
CALDERON, JAHAM & OSBORN
A JOINT VENTURE
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Report of Independent Accountants on Compliance
with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program
and Internal Control Over Compliance
in Accordance with OMB Circular A-l 33
To the Board of Directors of
San Diego Association of Governments
We have audited the compliance of the San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) with the
types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budgef (OMB)
Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for
the year ended June 30, 1999. SANDAG’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of
auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance
with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to each of its major federal
programs is the responsibility of SANDAG’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on SANDAG’s compliance based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the
standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-l 33, Audits of States, Local
Governments and Nonprofit Organizafions. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 required that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the
types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a
major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about
SANDAG’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on SANDAG’s compliance with those
requirements.
In our opinion, SANDAG complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that
are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 1999. However, the
results of our auditing procedures disclosed instances of noncompliance with those requirements that
are required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and which are described in the
accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as items 99-l through 99-Z.
Internal Control Over Compliance
The management of SANDAG is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal
program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular
A-l 33.
139
Our consideration of the internal control over compliance would not necessarily disclose all matters in
the internal control that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the
design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that noncompliance with applicable requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and
grants that would be material in relation to a major federal program being audited may occur and not
be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over compliance and its operations that
we consider to be material weaknesses.
This report is intended for the information of SANDAG’s Board of Directors, management and federal
awarding agencies and pass-through entities. However, this report is a matter of public record and its
distribution is not limited.
San Diego, California
December 20, 1999
140
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year ended June 30,1999
Section I - Summarv of Auditor’s Results
1. The independent accountant’s report on the financial statements expressed an
unqualified opinion.
2. Reportable conditions in internal control over financial reporting were identified, none of
which are considered to be material weaknesses.
3. No instances of noncompliance considered material to the financial statements were
disclosed by the audit.
4. Reportable conditions in internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to
major federal awards programs were identified, none of which are considered to be a material
weakness.
5. The independent accountant’s report on compliance with requirements applicable to major
federal award programs expressed an unqualified opinion.
6.
7.
The audit disclosed findings required to be reported by OMB Circular A-133.
8.
SANDAG’s major programs were:
CFDANumber Name of Federal Proeram or Cluster
20.507 U.S. Department of Transportation (ETA)
N/A U.S. Department of Defense
A threshold of $321,543 was used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs as
those terms are defined in OMB Circular A-133.
9. SANDAG did qualify as a low-risk auditee as that term is defined in OMB Circular A-133.
Section II - Financial Statement Findings Section
No matters are reportable.
Section III - Federal Award Findings and Ouestioned Cost Section
Finding No. 99-l Utilize Agreed-Upon Indirect Cost Rate Charged for Federal Transit
Administration (CFDA No. 20.507) Grant Awards
Allowable Costs/Cost Principles of the A-133 Compliance Supplement state that the
indirect cost rates are to be “applied in accordance with approved rate agreements.”
141
SANDAG prepared an Indirect Cost Plan in May 1998 prior to the beginning of the
current fiscal year, which proposed an indirect cost rate of 55.19%. Staff in the Audit
and Investigations department of Caltrans approved the Plan with a 55.19% rate in
January 1999. However, it was noted that the indirect cost rate applied to grants during
the year was 52.99%. Management had decided to decrease the rate although there was
no documentation related to the reasons for the decrease. Although the actual rate is
lower than the approved rate, this violates the compliance requirement as stated.
We recommend that management obtain written approval of any subsequent changes
to its agreed-upon indirect cost rate.
Management’s Response
Because the rate applied was less than the rate approved, it was our judgement that
a written modification to the Plan was not necessary. In fact, according to Caltrans
Division of Audits, once an indirect cost allocation plan has been approved for the
fiscal year, the plan cannot be modified. Any over/under recovery of indirect costs
will result in an increase/decrease in the rate in a subsequent year. The application
of a lower-than-plan rate in the previous year was permitted by Caltrans Division
of Audits.
Finding No. 99-2 Document the Entity’s Policy for Fixed Assets Acquired with Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) Funds (CFDA No. 20.507)
A-102 Common Rule states that the agency should have a fixed asset policy which
addresses the use, retention, maintenance, and disposition of equipment obtained with
federal funds with costs in excess of $5,000 and a useful life in excess of one year.
During the current year, SANDAG had acquired fixed assets in excess of this threshold.
SANDAG acquired various equipment related to the FHWA Project in the amount of
$900,000.
We recommend that SANDAG document its fixed asset policy that addresses the use,
retention, maintenance, and disposition of equipment obtained with federal funds with
costs in excess of $5,000 and a useful life in excess of one year.
Manavement’s Response
SANDAG has a general fixed asset policy. Although the policy may not state it is
specifically for federal funds, it addresses the use, retention, maintenance, and
disposition of equipment obtained with all funding sources. SANDAG will add a
paragraph to our General Fixed Asset Policy that is specific to federally-funded assets.
142
C
*
*I
C
C’
?-
l-
1
-
SAN DIEGO ASSGCJATION OF GO-
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings
Year ended June 30,1999
Finding No. 98-l Ensure Interest Earned from Advances of Federal Highway
Administration (CFDA No. 20.205) Grant Awards are Remitted to the Federal Agency
SANDAG concurs that an interest rebate is warranted. However, SANDAG and
Caltrans audits are still in the process of determining an appropriate amount.
Finding No. 98-2 Utilize Agreed-Upon Indirect Cost Rate Charged for Federal Highway
Administration (CFDA No. 20.205) Grant Awards
See current year finding and management’s response.
Finding 98-3 Record Fixed Assets Acquired with Federal Highway Administration (CFDA
No. 20.205) in the Company’s General Fixed Asset Account Group
We have resolved the coding problems identified in the previous year. Procedures
have been put in place to monitor and prevent a future occurrence.
143
STATISTICAL SECTION
(NOT COVERED BY REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS)
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
MEMBER ASSESSMENTS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
MEMBER ASSESSMENTS 1999 1998 1997
City of Carlsbad ...................................................... $
City of Chula Vista ......................................................
City of Coronado.. .......................................................
City of Del Mar.. ..........................................................
City of El Cajon.. .........................................................
City of Encinitas.. ........................................................
City of Escondido.. ......................................................
City of Imperial Beach.. ..............................................
City of La Mesa.. .........................................................
City of Lemon Grove.. .................................................
City of National City.. ..................................................
City of Oceanside.. .....................................................
City of Poway.;. ...........................................................
City of San Diego ........................................................
City of San Marcos .....................................................
City of Santee.. ...........................................................
City of Solana Beach.. ................................................
City of Vista .................................................................
13,413 $
29,497
4,874
13,089 $ 12,901
29,157 28,963
5,458 5,396
957 961 967
17,200 17,298 17,414
10,724 10,751 10,801
22,416 22,392 22,366
5,198 5,230 5,270
10,553 lo,61 6 10,699
4,608 4,624 4,670
9,902 10,533 10,340
28,008 27,863 27,833
8,573 8,591 8,595
222,955 223,526 223,724
9,252 9,146 9,093
10,291 10,327 10,285
2,538 2,554 2,571
15,090 15,127 15,135
County of San Diego . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,675 - 81,483 81,702
TOTAL MEMBER ASSESSMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 508,724 $ 508,726 $ 508,725
Source: SANDAG Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
146
T--
C I
I-
-
f'
P
I-
f-
I--
l I
P
l-
C
Ip
c-
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
$ 12,726 $ 12,855 $ 12,902 $ 13,512 $ 13,510 $ 15,730 $ 12,436
28,681 28,265 28,121
5,475 4,980 4,486
974 960 971
17,456
10,841
22,443
5,299
10,744
4,707
10,273
27,806
8,625
223,928
8,980
10,155
2,587
15,176
17,461
10,979
22,132
5,300
10,706
4,748
10,528
27,519
8,836
224,236
8,704
10,408
2,543
15,048
82,517
17,523
11,065
22,154
5,335
10,727
4,790
10,873
27,257
8,898
225,035
8,557
10,496
2,573
15,001
29,176 29,143
5,491 5,589
1,025 1,025
18,570 18,763
11,633 11,766
23,223 23,281
5,585 5,600
11,121 11,199
5,075 5,106
12,066 11,703
28,495 28,092
9,340 9,340
236,569 237,428
8,803 8,457
11,082 11,178
2,714 2,731
15,594 15,590
32,626
6,677
1,293
21,443
13,640
25,836
6,588
13,382
5,796
14,044
31,193
10,999
277,238
9,178
13,322
3,659
16,817
102,782
25,673
4,934
1,028
17,329
10,650
19,857
5,205
10,630
4,563
11,332
23,587
8,645
217,942
6,789
10,510
2,948
12,375
81,849 81,961 86,427 85,999 78,564
$ 508,725 $ 508,725 $ 508,725 $ 535,501 $ 535,500 $ 622,243 $ 484,997
147
.
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND REVENUES - BY SOURCE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
REVENUES
Member Assessments.. ............................................. $
IDA Planning Funds.. ...................................................
State Assistance Funds.. ..............................................
1999 1998 1997
508,724 $ 508,726 $ 508,725
1,417,447 1,244,336 1,189,985
0 0 0
Transportation Sales Tax.. ....................................... .: ...
Miscellaneous Revenues.. ............................................
TOTAL REVENUES.. ....................................................
Less : Allocations to Special Revenue Funds.. ...........
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE.. ...................... $
176,183 149,110 127,485
165,625 73,621 86,659
2,267,979 1,975,793 1,912,854
(1,575,098) (1,623,105) (1,991,523)
692,881 $ 352,688 $ (78,669)
Source: SANDAG Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
148
-
-
!-
I
r
T--
*-
I
T
*-
(
C
l-
,
,
I
7
I
C
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
$ 508,725 $ 508,725 $ 508,725 $ 535,501 $ 535,500 $ 622,243 $ 484,997
1,131,944 1,060,465 1,031,060 993,138 1,369,542 1,261,603 1,056,482
0 250,700 301,200 254,900 259,366 440,057 322,067
131,280 102,550 94,250 89,825 88,075 77,500 70,000
57,741 66,109 329,243 61,154 90,632 86,040 56,665
1,829,690 1,988,549 2,264,478 1,934,518 2,343,115 2,487,443 1,990,211
(1,494,301) (1,574,125) (1,991,366) (1,599,475) (2,242,569) (1,875,166) (1,698,240)
$ 335,389 $ 414,424 $ 273,112 $ 335,043 $ 100,546 $ 612,277 $ 291,971
149
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES - BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL EXPENSE 1999 1998 1997
Salaries and Fringe Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,003,556 $ 943,517 $ 954,248
Materials and Supplies.. ..................................................
Rent/Maintenance Facilities and Equipment.. .................
Travel, Transportation and Meeting Expense .................
Contractual Services .......................................................
Miscellaneous.. ................................................................
267,785 173,659 179,559
756,240 724,727 673,441
248,602 208,891 229,196
249,377 146,434 103,262
241,921 185,217 211,450
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE.. .........................
Less: Reimbursements from Special Revenue Funds ...
NET ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE.. .............................
LOCAL EXPENSE
2,767,481 2,382,445
(2,144,396) (2,530,838)
623,085 (148,393)
2,351,156
(2,244,996)
106.160
Board of Directors Expense.. .......................................... 217,433 233,852
Equipment Purchases ..................................................... 62,631 52,272
TOTAL LOCAL EXPENSE. ............................................ 280,064 286,124
173,619
57,998
231,617
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 903,149 $ 137,731 $ 337,777
Source: SANDAG Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
150
I--
r 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
$ 679,354 $ 904,787 $ 867,734 $ 863,877 $ 840,057 $ 792,847 $ 738,958
184,550 142,420 148,642 143,266 206,744 210,800 246,539
T- 676,435 564,821 601,760 567,487 566,995 553,188 486,777
I 214,904 200,337 162,672 157,288 122,390 144,346 126,674
I- 166,933 136,797 94,437 111,900 90,325 112,157 87,188
r-
198,029 159,408 180,625 184,252 101,801 53,240 78,174
2,320,205 2,108,570 2,055,870 2,028,070 1,928,312 1,866,578 1,764,310
(2,281,864) (2,404,239) (2,168,665) (2,286,749) (1,889,907) (1,768,637) (1,642,923)
38,341 (295,669) (112,795) (258,679) 38,405 97,941 121,387
213,894 132,212 138,038 136,286 115,959 124,242 86,473
16,160 80,189 20,949 20,866 68,030 180,569 186,635
230,054 212,401 158,987 157,152 183,989 304,811 273,108
$ 268,395 $ (83,268) $ 46,192 $ (101,527)$ 222,394 $ 402,752 $ 394,495
C
151
C
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - BY SOURCE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
REVENUES 1999 1998 1997
Federal Grants.. .............................................................................. $
State Grants/Reimbursements, Net of Interfund Allocations.. ............
Other Grants and Contracts.. ..............................................................
Transportation Sales Tax.. ..................................................................
Transportation Development Act.. .................. .I ..................................
Member Agency Assessments.. .........................................................
Interest on Investments.. .....................................................................
Miscellaneous.. ...................................................................................
10,718,108 $ 9,814,323 $ 7,686,410
(81,836) 7,978,503 5,789,113
2,620,275 2,884,882 1 ,126,038
163,219,713 156,749,632 141,727,681
2,080,501 1,448,132 1,819,619
403,718 378,769 341,333
6,755,006 7,104,822 6,168,538
1,694,260 3,545,549 1,082,128
$ 187,409,745 $ 189,904,612 $ 165,740,860
Source: SANDAG Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
152
I- 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
r $ 6,834,749 $ 6,791,679 $ 5,589,999 $ 3,670,884 $ 2,769,067 $ 2,647,550 $ 2,111,897
5,992,073 4,306,845 2,355,652 2,206,985 1,972,957 1,299,374 937,584
r- 1,233,706 656,099 779,662 903,582 858,744 1,030,643 893,964
r
128,491,760 117,888,966 113,206,404 113,634,244 106,815,609 110,949,703 116,488,730
/ 1,475,375 1,058,333 1,355,558 1,200,137 1,770,888 1,454,691 1,325,889
- ~ 260,846 251,319 603,438 315,640 445,833 347,013 321,372
6,589,579 11,443,713 16,530,182 30,238,719 32,877,337 25,815,009 17,202,928
t-
I 4,712,745 1,920,864 1,832,lOO 1,066,242 124,944 2,531,874 0
r- I $ 155,590,833 $ 144,317,818 $ 142,252,995 $ 153,236,433 $ 147,635,379 $ 146,075,857 $ 139,282,364
C
I
153
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SPECIAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES - BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1999 1998 1997
Intergovernmental Relations and Program Managment .......... $
Regional Growth Management.. ..................................................
Information Systems Development.. ...........................................
Regional Transportation Planning.. .............................................
Transportation Programming and Planning Assistance.. ............
Development Strategy and Environmental Managment.. ............
Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse.. ..................................
Regional Information Services and Assistance.. .........................
Services Provided by Other Agencies.. .......................................
Special Projects.. .........................................................................
Transnet Projects.. ......................................................................
Bicycle Facilities.. ........................................................................
Highway Improvements.. .............................................................
Public Transit Improvements.. .....................................................
Local Street and Road Improvements.. .......................................
General and Administrative, Net of Interfund Allocations ............
884,491 $ 924,324 $ 960,369
0 0 0
1,864,451 1,805,618
2,150,996 1,701,294
11,803,634 11,589,160
(1,777,212) 6,367,121
873,858 584,485
536,812 569,420
353,226 2,700
0 0
2,052,328
1,766,920
10,921,429
1,713,057
470,316
330,651
75
0
4,555,501 8,816,963 8,257,453
460,847 625,786 1,039,817
21,689,396 45,848,960 100,173,931
13,308,274 5,661,870 58,316,042
40,887,920 51,009,844 67,020,734
1 ,181,679 1,199,424 1,233,378
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98,773,873 $ 136,706,969 $ 254,256,500
Source: SANDAG Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.
154
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
r $ 734,395 $ 749,749 $ 720,721 $ 753,379 $ 680,628 $ 630,183 $ 572,147
0 0 0
1,773,827
3,245,468
8,328,573
1,683,434
700,030
329,504
604
0
1,528,380 1,392,956 1,296,568
2,217,727 1,977,027 1,511,444
6,584,547 3,021,839 2,578,461
1,142,688 1,460,824 1,110,382
514,605 636,070 618,614
491,998 706,569 431,467
870,009 1,817,181 1,673,631
0 0 0
3,187,405 2,453,951 815,434
629,271 1,657,257 1,278,708
79,462,401 80,065,681 83,426,742
48,711,388 35,813,268 99,997,248
51,496,093 49,161,803 46,291,513
1,023,503 1,139,230 1,080,899
0 235,381 41,579
1,436,589 1,271,797
i ,493,849 1,582,794
1,471,140 1,353,205
680,231 632,798
549,820 383,292
647,652 524,492
1,709,450 1,406,605
0 0
0 0
658,843 1,039,009 280,156
75,176,834 70,277,120 36,263,606
121,987,598 130,904,639 43,144,117
34,850,017 52,131,846 33,807,344
1,112,605 1,064,098 637,500
0
1,009,613
1,476,813
974,021
629,727
386,226
1,275,343
1,121,603
0
0
254,700
22,142,208
34,915,206
24,561,222
573,766
r $ 2oi,305,896 $ 184,390,893 $ 244,623,731 $ 243,759,843 $ 264,321,452 $ 121,959,468 $ 89,892,595
f
r
C
155
i-
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
STATISTICAL DATA
SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS
REVENUE BOND COVERAGE
FISCAL YEARS 1989 THROUGH 1999
r FISCAL
YEAR
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994 1995
1996
1997
1998
r- 1999
(1) NETREVENUE
AVAILABLE FOR
DEBT SERVICE
$100,616,091 $24,220,000 $1,301,459 $25,521,459 3.94
130,962,172 i 8,305,ooo 6,574,153 24,879,153 5.26
139,711,203 5,240,OOO 12,120,119 17,360,119 8.05
141,009,130 5,570,ooo 26,490,706 32,060,706 4.40
145,999,369 16,850,OOO 30,395,987 47,245,987 3.09
133,119,426 7,945,ooo 25,871,669 33,816,669 3.94
130,384,318 30,583,139 29,161,608 59,744,747 2.18
137,587,060 31,645,OOO 25,959,514 57,604,514 2.39
141,923,569 32,105,OOO 32,881,173 64,986,173 2.18
160,190,533 48,140,OOO 34,999,933 83, i 39,933 1.93
$168,630,879 $50,500,000 $32,654,644 $83,154,644 2.03
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
PRINICIPAL INTEREST TOTAL COVERAGE
(1) Gross Revenues are net of administrative fees charged by the Board of Equalization and include interest earned on
the sales tax funds. Receipts differ from amounts reported in the financial statements due to the accrual of revenues
r
earned but not received.
I--
r
F-
I-- 157
r I
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE IN FORCE
JUNE 30,1999
Type of Coverage/
Name of Comoany
Long-Term Disability/
Standard
Policy
Number
339146
Group Hospital and
MedicaI/PERS Health Benefits Program
0917
Group Dental/ Ameritas Life Insurance 14630
Group Vision/
Ameritas Life Insurance
14630
Group Life/AD&D
Standard Insurance
339146
‘Supplemental Life/
Standard Insurance
339146
Dependent Life/ Standard Insurance 339146
Workers’ Compensation 484-98
Policy Period
&&I
3-l-99
IQ
2-28-2002
1-1-99
3-l-99
3-l-99
8-l-96 2-28-2002
8-l-96 2-28-2002
8-l-96
7-l-98
Travel Accident/
Cigna
ABL650679 l-l-99
12-31-99
2-29-2000
2-29-2000
2-28-2002
6-30-99
12-31-2001
Details of Coveraee
On the 31st day of being
disabled, the employee is
eligible to receive 66-2/3% of
his/her pm-disability monthly
income up to $10,000 per
month.
Employees and Families select
from ten available plans to
include indemnity, PPO and HMO plans.
Employees and Families
comprehensive dental plan for
preventive, basic and major
services.
Employees and Families vision
care plan for exams, lenses,
frames and contact lenses.
A flat $25,000 Life and $25,000
AD&D per employee - effective
upon date of hire.
Employee selects amount equal
to any multiple of $10,000 from
S30,OOO to a maximum of
5300,000. Any increase in the
amount becomes effective on
the date Standard approves the
Evidence of Insurability and the employee meets the active at
work requirements.
Available to any spouse, child
(unmarried child O-21 years of age) or step-child, unmarried
student under 25 years of age or
handicapped child/student.
Employee’s medical expenses
related to on the job injuries.
Temporary disability benefits to weekly maximum of $490.
Permanent disabiIity benefits.
Maximum death benefit $160,000. 8
Employees and Board of
Directors traveling on agency
business.
Liabilitv Limits
$10,000 maximum benefit per
month.
Varies by plan,
Type I - lOO%, Type II - 80%,
Type III - 50%
$1,500 Calendar Year Maxi-
mum. A 550 deductible applies
to all types of service except
Type I.
510 annual deductible. All
benefits paid at 100% when
services received from vision
panel doctor. Cosmetic contact
lenses limit is $105 per pair. For
non-panel doctors, a schedule of
payments is used.
$25,000 Life and $25,000 AD&D maximum. Both Life and
AD&D reduce at age 70-74 to
$16,250, at age 75 or over to
$12500.
$300,000 maximum. Amount
reduced age 70 and over.
Up to S5,OOO benefit.
Part II Employers Liability
$1,000,000.
Coverage/benefits: $250,000
Aggregate limit: Sl,OOO,OOO
158
1
I-
,
I-- l
I /
I-
I
r
i
I-
r
r
c
Type of Coverage/ Name of Company
Business Automobile/ Fireman’s Fund/ l’he
American Insurance
Company
Commercial Crime/
Kemper/ Lumbermens
Mutual Casualty Company
Commercial Package/
Fireman’s Fund/ The
American Insurance Company
Umbrella/Crum For&r
Pollution Legal Liability/
Reliance National
Indemnity Company
Policy
Number
MXX80679094
3F68629009
MXX80679094
552008312
NTB1632635
1 Source: SANDAG insurance Policies
Policy Period
b
7-l-98
7-l-98
7-l-98
7-l-98
9-15-97
To
6-30-99
6-30-99
6-30-99
6-30-99
9-15-01
Details of Coverage
Liability - Combined Single Limit: Bodily Injury and
Property Damage
Medical Payments
Uninsured Motorists
Physical Damage: Compre- hensive
Collision
3 Vehicles
Public Employee Dishonesty
Blanket Business Personal
Property
Extra Expense
Valuable Papers Transit
EDP-Equipment
Software
Extra Expense General Liability Aggregate
Products/Completed
Operations Aggregate
Personal/Advertising Injury
Each Occurrence
Fire Legal Liability
Medical Expense
Fine Arts
Excess Liability Aggregate
Each Loss Aggregate
Retention, each loss
Extending Reporting.
Liabihtv Limits
$l,OOO,OOO each Accident $5,000 each Person
$l,OOO,OOO each Accident
ACV Less $500 Ded.
ACV Less $500 Ded
$1,000,000/$2,500 Deductible
$1,260,000/$1,000 Ded./90%
Coinsurance
!§650,000/40-80-100
Coinsurance
$300,000/$1,000 Ded. $15,000/$1,000 Ded.
$l,lOO,OOO/$I,OOO Ded.
$500,000 $100,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$50,000
$5,000
$30,300
$5,000,000
$2,000,000 $4,000,000
$100,000
12 months at 200% of premium
P
159
SAN DIEGO ASSOCLATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SALARIES OF PR.INCIPAL EMPLOYEES,
PAY RANGES AND CIkXFICATIONS
Monthly Pay Range
Class Title
Office Services Specialist
Word Processing Specialist
Associate Accountant
Public Information Specialist
Graphics Specialist
Associate Research Technician
Assistant Regional Planner
Office Services Supervisor
Executive Secretary
Senior Research Technician
Graphics Supervisor
Associate Research Analyst
Associate Regional Planner
Senior Accountant
Senior Research Analyst
Administrative Services Manager
Financial Services Manager
Senior Engineer
Senior Regional Planner
Senior CJ Evaluator
Chief, Information Systems Development
Program Manager
Special Projects Director
Engineering Director
Division Directors
General Counsel
Deputy Executive Director
Executive Director
Minimum Maximum
2,069 3,104
2,172 3,259
2,172 3,259
2,172 3,259
2,281 3,422
2,395 3,593
2,515 3,773
2,515 3,773
2,515 3,773
2,641 3,962
2,641 3,962
3,057 4,586
3,057 4,586
3,057 4,586
3,716 5,574
4,097 6,146
4,097 6,146
4,301 6,453
4,301 6,453
4,301 6,453.
4,301 6,453
4,516 6,776
4,516 6,776
5,490 8,236
6,052 9,080
7,006 10,511
7,006 10,511
Set by Board of Directors
160
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ADOPTED AS OF JUNE 30,1999
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
r - 1990
c
I
r
t
SANDAG designated as the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board.
SANDAG designated as the Integrated Waste Management Task Force.
San Diego-Oceanside Commuter Rail Study.
San Diego Air Carrier Site Selection Study.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for NAS Miramar.
1990-1995 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
1991-1996 Regional Housing Needs Statement.
Regional Transportation Demand Management Program.
I-
1990 Regional Transportation Plan.
‘1991
T- Regionally Significant Open Space - Definition.
-
South Bay Rail Transit Extension Study.
Draft Regional Growth Management Strategy accepted for distribution.
r
T-
Transportation Control Measures Plan.
Comprehensive Land Use Plans for Jacumba, Agua Caliente Springs and Ocotillo Wells
Airstrips.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Fallbrook Community Airpark.
r Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Brown Field.
Draft Shoreline Preservation Strategy accepted for distribution.
1992-1997 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
P 1991 Congestion Management Program.
Draft Shoreline Preservation Strategy.
161
Preliminary Series 8 Regionwide Forecast. Updated population forecasts to the year 2015.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Lindbergh Field.
The BRIDGE - Baja Regional Industrial Development Guide.
Local/Regional Consistency Checklist for the Regional Growth Management Strategy.
Natural Communities Conservation Program (NCCP) Planning Committee as part of the state’s
NCCP pilot effort focusing on coastal sage scrub in southern California.
An Open Space Citizens Advisory Committee formed to assist in the planning and
implementation of the Regional Open Space Element of the Regional Growth Management
Strategy.
Toll Revenue Advisory Committee established.
Revised Series 8 Regionwide Forecast accepted for distribution. Updated population estimates
to the year 2015.
Defense Base Closure and ReaIignment Advisory Committee established.
Regional Growth Management Strategy approved. Strategy contains the actions each city, the
county and other public agencies will take to help preserve and improve the region’s quality of
life.
1992-99 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
Transportation Control Measures for the Air Quality Plan.
SANDAG enters into a planning agreement on behalf of the North County Multiple Habitat
Conservation Program with the California Resources Agency, the State Department of Fish and
Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Mid-County Transportation Study accepted for distribution.
Final Shoreline Preservation Strategy.
The Multiple Habitat Conservation Programs (MHCP) database and maps accepted for initial
planning purposes.
Series 8 Regionwide Economic Prosperity Forecast accepted for distribution and for use in
forecasting population, employment and housing growth among the region’s 18 cities and the
county unincorporated area.
162
r-
Draft Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy accepted for distribution. The Strategy identifies
key public policy issues for local government to help maintain and improve the regional
economy and, subsequently, the standard of living during the next 25 years.
Freeway Service Patrol established in conjunction with Caltrans and the California Highway
Patrol.
7 I SANDAG assumes management of the program formerly known as Commuter Computer.
The regional Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program was renamed RideLink.
l- 1994 Regional Transportation Plan. The Plan’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified.
1994 TransNet Plan of Finance.
Grant accepted to study the Pacific Trade Corridor of North America from Alaska to western
Mexico. The study’s purpose is to help determine transportation capital investment strategies C
I
for the corridor and the changes needed to take advantage of the international trade
opportunities.
l- Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Lindbergh Field amended.
l-
Scope of work and proposed budget approved for the study of air transportation market
demand and opportunities in the San Diego region.
FY95 Toll Bridge Program of Projects.
C Military Family Housing Site Evaluation Report for the San Diego Naval Complex sent to the
United States Navy.
r- Serving as the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board, the status report on
T self-certification was accepted for distribution.
-
I Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy.
I-
Economic feasibility study of the potential benefits of re-opening the San Diego and Arizona
Eastern Railroad.
-
Agreement with the federal Bureau of Land Management to include approximately 180,000
acres of BLM land in the region’s habitat conservation planning efforts.
/ 1994-2001 TransNet Program of Projects.
Land Use Distribution Element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy accepted for
distribution.
1994-2001 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
ir
163
Draft Regional Energy Plan accepted for distribution.
Agreement approved transferring management of the Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) Program from Caltrans to SANDAG.
Federal and state funding requested for replenishing the region’s eroding beaches.
Draft Ramona Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLIP) accepted for distribution.
Draft Wireless Communications Facilities issues Paper.
Appointment of a Policy Advisory Committee for the Otay River Transportation Study.
Memorandum of Understanding authorized with SDSU Foundation and SDG&E in order to
secure funding for a Regional Energy Resource Office.
Directors appoint the County Water Authority (CWA) as a non-voting advisory representative
to the SANDAG Board.
Air quality conformity determination of the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and
the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) approved.
Market Demand and Opportunities Study for Air Transportation in the San Diego region.
1994-2001 TransNet Program of Projects amended.
California Trade and Goods Movement Study steering committee appointed.
SANDAG’s Public Involvement Program approved. With the passage and implementation of
the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), new federal regulations require
Metropolitan Planning Organizations such as SANDAG to conduct a separate approval process
for a Public Involvement Program (PIP).
Transportation and Air Quality Conformity Criteria and Procedures approved. SANDAG
authorized to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Air Pollution Control District
(APCD), Caltrans, the state Air Resources Board, and other affected federal agencies to carry
out the procedures.
Regional Energy Plan.
1995-1996 State Transportation Funding Allocation Plan project list approved.
Land Use Distribution Element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy.
Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Brown Field accepted for distribution.
I-15 Congestion Pricing & Transit Development Pilot Program.
164
San Diego-Coronado Bridge Toll Rates & Program of Projects.
Demonstration grant from the California Energy Commission accepted to show how different
land uses and transportation alternatives impact energy, transportation and air quality.
Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast accepted for planning purposes.
M96 Final Program Budget.
Feasibility Analysis for a Toll Road Extension to the International Border; San Diego & Arizona
Eastern Railway Economic Feasibility Study; and Review of Cross-Border Transportation
Planning Processes accepted for distribution.
r
1)
Resolution agreeing to SANDAG’s participation in the AB 715 self-certification process for local
housing elements approved.
Clean Cities Program Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Diego Regional
Al tema tive Fuel Vehicle Coalition approved.
Memorandum of Agreement between SANDAG and the California Coastal Commission
approved. Establishes a process for the administration of a beach sand mitigation fund.
1990-1995 Housing Needs Performance Report accepted for distribution.
Serving as the Integrated Waste Management Task Force, Directors accepted the Final Draft
Countywide Summary Plan and Countywide Siting Element for distribution.
Market Demand and Opportunities Study for Air Transportation in the San Diego region.
Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) program projects added to the 1994-2001
Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The TEA program is designed to fund non-
traditional projects such as pedestrian walkways and historic preservation improvements.
FY97-03 Toll Bridge Financial Plan.
Joint Letter of Intent signed agreeing to cooperative transportation planning efforts in the
binational region between SANDAG, Caltrans, SAHOPE (the transportation planning agency
in Baja California), and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
Draft 1996-2003 TransNet Program of Projects accepted for distribution.
Virginia Avenue Border Crossing Feasibility Study accepted for distribution.
Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities established.
c .
165
1996-2003 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
1996-2003 TransNet Program of Projects.
California Trade and Goods Movement Study.
1996 TransNet Plan of Finance.
High Speed Rail Authority established between SANDAG and eight other southern California
agencies. The Rail Authority’s objective is to determine the net benefit or cost of transferring
the state’s intercity rail responsibility to a Iocal JPA.
State Route 125 Community Trees 2000 Program.
Clean Cities designation for the San Diego region.
I-15 ExpressPass program underway.
Montgomery Field Comprehensive Land Use Plan amended.
I-15 Corridor Major Investment Study Phase 1 Report.
SANDAG stakeholder survey.
1996-2020 Regional Transportation Plan.
Regional Energy Resource Office established. A primary mission of the office is to strengthen
the local economy and improve the environment through coordinated energy actions.
Draft public policies of the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program accepted for distribution.
Regional sand replenishment program.
SANDAG core values (integrity, service, quality, respect, innovation, and consensus) approved
to help reaffirm the way SANDAG conducts its day-to-day work and to complement its
mission and vision statements.
San Diego Regional Partners in Homeownership.
Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategic Plan accepted for inclusion in
SANDAG’s 1998 Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Transportation Improvement
Program. The strategic plan contains a list of the technology -needs of the region’s
transportation system users and service providers, and recommendations for advanced
transportation systems and technologies to serve those needs.
FY98 Transportation Development Act (TDA) allocations, totaling $66.9 million, approved.
166
Electric Utility Restructuring Committee formed.
r”
i-
Revised toll payment schedule for the San Diego-Coronado Bridge approved.
Recommendations developed at the Binational Water Challenges & Opportunities Conference
held in July 1997 approved.
Preliminary biological analysis for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP)
accepted for distribution and comment. The preliminary biological analysis describes the
relative effectiveness of conserving the habitats of 27 priority wildlife species in the Cities of
Carlsbad, Encinitas, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, and Vista.
2020 Regionwide Forecast accepted for use as the basis to analyze the most likely distribution
of new growth among the San Diego region’s 18 cities and county’s unincorporated
communities. r
Water Quality Element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy adopted.
Draft Housing Element Self-Certification Report accepted for distribution.
1998 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) local candidate projects approved for
submittal to the California Transportation Commission.
1996-2003 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) amended to include $37.9
million in federal assistance for transit projects.
Preliminary costs and financing analysis for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program
(MHCP) accepted for distribution and comment. Total program costs are estimated at $108.5
million.
FY99 Transportation Development Act (TDA) allocations, totaling $74.5 million, approved.
Household Hazardous Waste Reciprocity Model Agreement accepted for distribution to
member agencies.
San Diego Regional Power Pool formed to purchase electric power and related services on
behalf of over 53 interested public agencies at reduced costs.
Serving as the Airport Land Use Commission, SANDAG determined that the proposal to
expand the Lodge at Torrey Pines is incompatible with the Miramar Air Station
Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLIP).
Study to identify the traffic impacts of ending the toll on the San Diego-Coronado Bridge
requested by the Board of Directors.
167
Both a policy and technical committee for the State Route 94 corridor Major Investment Study
(MIS) appointed. SANDAG will serve as the lead agency for the MIS, which will evaluate
current and future travel needs along the Route 94 corridor and recommend cost-effective
transportation improvements.
Draft San Diego Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy report accepted for distribution and
comment.
Comments on the draft analysis of the San Diegan Intercity Rail Corridor Study approved.
FY99 Bridge Toll Revenue Program of Projects approved.
Draft 1998-2004 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) accepted for
distribution and comment.
Pilot housing self-certification program for the San Diego region approved.
Recommended criteria for prioritizing transit oriented development (TOD) planning projects
reviewed. $600,000 in funds were allocated during the next six years for TOD planning
activities.
Project list totaling nearly $84 million approved to be included in the overall State
Transportation Improvement Program.
19982004 Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) for the San Diego region adopted
and then amended to include $72.5 million in federal assistance for transit projects.
FY 2000 Transportation Development Act. allocations supporting public transit, bicycle and
pedestrian projects, approved.
San Diego-Coronado Bridge toll removal Impact Study completed and used in the preparation
of an initial environmental impact study.
2020 Cities/County Forecast estimates the region’s population will be 3.8 million by the year
2020, with civilian jobs expanding to nearly 1.63 million.
Directors presented the Regional Growth Management Strategy at the General Assembly,
kicking off the Public Outreach Program to raise public awareness about regional growth.
FasTrak awarded the “Innovated Tools/Special Projects” Award by the Association of
Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
SANDAG Census 2000 Complete Count Committee and,Binational Committee for Education
and Culture (COBEC) formed.
San Diego Regional Power Pool purchased non-polluting, “green power” at a reduced cost.
168
I
c--
;-
Employment Land Inventory database and information report pinpoint the location of more
than 14,000 acres of employment land ready for business development in the region.
Navy and local funding provided $14.3 million for the San Diego Regional Beach Sand Project.
$78.6 million in Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds paid for traffic
construction improvements.
Regional Housing Needs Statement proposed three alternatives to meet the region’s housing
needs during 1999-2004.
Route 56 from Black Mountain Road to Carmel Country Road approved, completing the east-
west highway between I-5 and I-15.
Updated Market Study for the SD&AE Railway, funded by the Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB) and Caltrans, showed changes in the goods movement market for
re-opening the Desert Line.
Source: SANDAG, Public Information Specialist, September 1999
169
MISCELLANEOUS STATISI’ICAL DATA
POPULATION BYJURISDICI’ION, 1960-1999
Jurisdiclion
Carlsbad
Chula Vista
Coronado
De1 Mar
El Cajon
Encinitas
Escondido
Imperial Beach
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
Poway
San Diego
San Marcos
Santee
Solana Beach
Vista
Unincorporated
SAN DIEGO
REGION
Source: SANDAG
1960 1970 _1980
9,253 14,944 35,490
42,034 67,901 83,927
18,039 20,910 18,790
3,124 3,956 5,017
37,618 52,273 73,892
16,377 36,792
17,773 20,244
30,441 39,178
32,771 43,184
24,971 40,494
573,224 696,769
3,896
64,355
22,689
50,308
20,780
48,772
76,698
33,1781
875,538
17,479
40,1821
227,386
24,688 35,834
292.625 358,917
1990 1999
63,126 77,550
135,163 166,945
26,540 28,715
4,860 5,328
88,693 95,546
55,386 60,426
108,635 125,597
26,512 28,882
52,931 58,655
23,984 25,683
54,249 54,961
128,398 157,869
43,516 48,393
1,x0,549 1,254,281
38,974 52,074
52,902 57,389
12,962 14,152
71,872 84,361
398,764 456,451
1,033,Oll 1,357,854 1,861,846 2,498,016 2,853,258
*Santee and Poway were not incorporated at the time of the 7980 Census. 798Ofigures for those two cities are
estimates.
170
MISCELLANEOUS ST’ATIST’ICAL DATA (Continued)
1999 MAJOR EMPLOYERS, by Major Statistical Area
MSA Central
North
City
Fii Name Alvarado Hospital Medical Center
Cox Cable San Diego, Inc.
Golden Eagle Insurance
Hotel De1 Coronado
Hyatt Regency
Kelco Company
Marriott Hotel and Marina
Mercy Hospital & Medical Center
National Steel & Shipbuilding Company Paradise Valley Hospital
Raytheon Systems
San Diego Zoo
Sempra Energy Corporation
Sheraton San Diego Hotel
Solar Turbines Inc.-Lindbergh Field
Southwest Marine, Inc.
Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical
MSA Total
Total Firms = 17
Number of
Emdovees
1,130
700
1,243
1,120
750
549
1,539
1,967
3,759 1,087
550
900
800 1,100
1,574
1,300
510
20,578
Agouron Pharmaceuticals 860
Alaris Medical Systems 750
Anacomp, Inc. 650
Childrens Hospital & Health Care 1,937
Cohu Electronics 751
Cubic Corporation 888
Cymer, Inc. 630
Geico and Affiliates 984
General A tomics 934
General Instruments 650
Green Hospital at Scripps Clinic 654
Herco Technology 576
Hewlett Packard Company 2,135
Kaiser Permanente Medical Care 2,520
Kyocera America Inc. 949
Marconi Integrated Systems 1,340
Maxwell Technologies 600
NCR Corporation 1,283
Nordstrom 500
Pacific Bell 1,115
Pilkington Barnes-Hind, Inc. 613
Pomerado Hospital 563
Qualcomm 9,000
Ranch0 Bernard0 Inn 510
Remet, Inc. 931
Salk Institute 754
Science Applications International Corp. 2,279
Scripps Memorial Hospital-La Jolla 1,579
Sea World 1,700
Sempra Energy Corporation 892
Sharp Memorial Hospital 1,875
‘Employers with 500 or more employees UI one site.
Source: SANDAG Activity Cenrers Inventory
MSA North
City
(cont.)
south
Suburban
East
Suburban
North
County
West
North
County
East
171
Firm Name
Solar Turbines Inc.-Keamy Mesa
Sony Technology Center
Sundstrand Power Systems
The Scripps Research Institute
Titan Corporation
Town and Country Hotel
TRW-Military Electronics Division
Union-Tribune Publishing Company
United Parcel Service
University of San Diego
Number of
Emulovees
1,267
4,000
600
1,580
650
500
550
1,658
507
1,100
MSA To ta1
Total Firms = 41
53,814
BF Goodrich Aerospace Division 2,344
Deli-Mex 550
Scripps Memorial Hospital-Chula Vista 659
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center 717
MSA Total
Total Firms = 4
4,270
Barona Casino 870
Chemtronics, Inc. 895
Grossmont District Hospital 1,578
Sycuan Gaming Center 1,300
Viejas Casino & Turf Club 1,600
MSA Total
Total Firms = 5
6,243
Callaway Golf 2,200
Cobra Golf 859
La Costa Resort Hotel and Spa 921
Southern California Edison 2,200
Taylor Made Golf Company 650
Tri-City Medical Center 1,951
MSA Total
Total Firms = 6
8,781
Hunter Industries 720
Palomar Medical Center 1,723
San Diego Wild Animal Park 720
Signet Armorlite 590
Watkins Manufacturing Company 525
MSA Total
Total Firms = 5
4,278
1999 Regional Total
TotaI Firms = 70
97,964
MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA (Continued)
1999 ACUTE CARE HOSPITALS IN SAN DIEGO REGION: (by Major Statistical Area)
Hospital
Alvarado Hospital Medical Center
Coronado Hospital
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center
Naval Hospital Balboa Park
Paradise Valley Hospital
Sharp Cabrillo Hospital
UCSD Medical Center
Vencor Hospital
Villaview Community Hospital
MSA Total
North
City
Children’s Hospital and Health Care 292
Green Hospital at Scripps Clinic 173
Kaiser Permanente Medical Care 341
Mary Birch Women’s Hospital 108
Mesa Vista Hospital 150
Mission Bay Hospital 128
Pomerado Hospital 109
Scripps Memorial Hospital-La Jolla 321
Sharp Memorial Hospital 391
Thornton-Perlman Hospital 100
Veterans Administration Hospital 417
MSA Total 2,530
south
Suburban
Scripps Memorial HospitaKhula Vista 159
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center 306
MSA Total 465
East
Suburban
Grossmont District Hospital 450
Scripps Hospital East County 106
MSA To ta1 556
North Scripps Memorial Hospital-Encinitas
county Tri-City Medical Center
West MSA Total
North Fallbrook Hospital District
county Palomar Medical Center
East MSA Total
109
397
506
47
300
347
7,100 Regional Total
231
204
470
760
238
192
431
70
100
2,696
SOURCE: SANDAG Activity Ceders Invenfory
172
I-
; r-
r
i_
[
I--
. I
r r
r
7
MISCELLANEOUS SI’ATI!ZICAL DATA (Continued)
JXXJCATIONAL FAClLlTES IN SAN DIEGO REGION:
Junior Colleges, Colleges and Universities
California State University San Marcos
Cuyamaca College
Grossmont College
Miracosta College
National University
Palomar College
Point Loma Nazarene College
San Diego City College
San Diego Mesa College
San Diego Miramar College
San Diego State University (SDSU)
Southwestern College
United States International University (US11
University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
University of San Diego (USD)
Hiph School Districts
Escondido Union High Julian Union High
Fallbrook Union High San Dieguito Union
Grossmont Union High Sweetwater Union
Unified School Districts
Borrego Springs
Carlsbad
Coronado
Mountain Empire
Oceanside
Poway
Elementary School Districts
Alpine Union
Bonsall Union
Cajon Valley Union
Cardiff
Chula Vista
Dehesa
De1 Mar Union
Encinitas Union
Escondido Union
Fallbrook Union
Jamul-Dulzura Union
Julian Union
Lakeside Union
Ramona
San Diego
San Marcos
Vista
Warner
La Mesa-Spring Valley
Lemon Grove
National
Pauma
Ranch0 Santa Fe
San Pasqual Union
Santee
San Ysidro
Solana Beach
South Bay Union
Spencer Valley -
Vallecitos
Valley Center
J)
Source: SANDAG, August 1999; San Diego County Office of Education, September 1999
174
C
T r
[ Jurisdiction
Carlsbad
r- Chula Vista
Coronado
De1 Mar
r
El Cajon
Encinitas*
Escondido
/- Imperial Beach
* La Mesa
l-
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
1’ Poway
~ San Diego
San Marcos
T Santee
( Solana Beach*
Vista T-
MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA (Continued)
EMPLOYMENTBY INDUSTRY BY JURISDICITON
1980,1990, and 1995
Agriculture, Forestry
Fishing and Mining
1,645
89
40
12
209
--
573
23
92
79
23
2,241
186
2,996
658
55
--
257
966 2,102 1,146 2,141 1,920
175 108 723 1,662 1,213
0 41 130 260 141
0 0 40 187 108
103 54 2,269 5,739 3,423
2,308 2,966 -- 1,977 982
762 794 2,462 6,762 4,367
0 0 41 119 84
171 66 1,240 2,217 1,252
38 24 461 918 744
0 24 805 1,156 1,048
508 1,285 1,608 1,869 1,296
104 46 625 1,070 1,020
3,731 1,808 19,744 26,057 21,200
684 535 832 4,039 3,203
73 25 1,349 3,574 2,518
75 139 -- 720 487
661 547 1,106 1,744 1,842
Construction Manufacturing
3,373
8,780
31
45
6,422
--
2,988
29
423
446
1,931
3,226
110
72,758
4,204
937
--
588
7,229 9,819
10,344 5,806
99 180
120 91
6,253 4,912
792 741
4,134 4,100
80 66
525 588
678 413
1,700 2,274
4,893 3,223
667 1,781
87,933 73,273
6,610 4,707
2,337 1,879
531 385
3,002 3,363
Unincorporated 7,539 8,656 6,556 7,580 15,111 8,794 4,171 5,191 3,544 I
REGION 16,717 19,015 17,120 42,161 77,322 55,642 110,462 143,118 121,145 T-
7’
~ *Encinitas and Solana Beach were not incorporated in 2980.
r Source: 1980,1990,1995 Employment Inventories (SANDAG)
175
Iurisdiction p3J 1990 m p8J p9JJ 1995 p3J p9J 1995
Carlsbad 731
Chula Vista 572
Coronado 97
De1 Mar 14
El Cajon 1,256
Encinitas* --
Bscondido 613
Imperial Beach 72
La Mesa 600
Lemon Grove 170
National City 644
Oceanside 1,123
Poway 70
San Diego 22,048
San Marcos 285
Santee 189
Solana Beach* -_
Vista 104
1,463 1,120 315 1,295 2,092
1,715 1,860 619 2,341 2,435
124 152 21 99 92
120 69 15 54 43
816 845 1,489 1,979 1,619
420 329 -- 891 1,234
1,613 1,308 1,131 1,986 1,879
77 34 15 50 47
423 378 336 628 556
298 594 232 344 265
451 625 1,411 1,414 1,323
811 953 872 1,163 1,634
292 357 52 375 613
25,278 25,161 17,726 27,165 23,221
933 815 405 1,982 2,015
285 341 169 1,109 944
118 179 __ 336 312
366 701 302 733 1,650
5,414 4,202 2,136 3,790 4,713
3,878
7,193
1,199
294
9,576
--
6,709
830
6,405
1,430
4,773
4,367
1,707
73,710
1,322
1,512
__
2,828
11,923
7,624
12,250
1,830
1,250
11,024
7,091
13,133
946
7,478
1,676
7,666
8,490
3,076
100,633
3,826
2,895
2,108
4,324
7,821
11,205
1,832
914
10,364
4,895
12,749
802
6,183
1,870
6,953
8.599
3,764
95,560
4,379
3,340
2,143
5,007
16,005 12,436
MISCELLANEOUS ST’ATIST’ICAL DATA (Continued)
EMPLOYMENT.BY INDUSTRY BY JURISDICI’ION
1980,1990, and 199s
(continued)
Transportation
Communication, Utilities
Unincorporated 1,403
Wholesale Trade Retail Trade -
REGION 29,991 41,017 40,023 27,246 47,734 46,687 139,656 213,325 200,316
‘Encinitas and Solana Beach were not incorporated in 1980.
Source: 2980,.2990,1995 Employment Inventories (SANDAG)
176
C
1 Jurisdiction 1980 1990 1995 psJ 1990 1995 pg p9J 1995
r Carlsbad
~ Chula Vista
Coronado
r
De1 Mar
El Cajon
Encinitas*
_ Escondido
Imperial Beach
?- La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
- Oceanside
~ Poway
San Diego
[
San Marcos
Santee
Solana Beach*
r Vista
MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA (Continued)
EMPLOYMENTBY INDUSTRY BY JURIsDICTION
1980,1990, and 1995
(continued)
Finance
Insurance, Real Estate
808
1,420
231
161
2,230
--
1,793
194
1,517
356
313
1,472
552
27,306
312
269
--
825
’ Unincorporated 3,187
3,017 3,023
2,410 2,851
652 572
506 348
1,919 2,255
1,469 1,229
2,672 2,540
208 204
2,661 2,386
295 298
1,736 1,174
1,596 1,794
519 575
50,733 38,763
911 841
572 529
1,023 949
1,293 1,640
4,309 4,368
Services Government, Military
3,246
6,135
1,859
1,367
6,592
-_
6,511
1,074
4,660
1,554
4,496
3,945
1,496
113,517
969
1,206
__
2,719
10,523
9,484 11,346
12,363 12,928
2,960 3,881
1,208 798
10,126 10,415
6,847 8,502
10,731 14,266
932 1,000
7,586 10,379
2,531 2,015
6,756 6,367
7,718 10,791
3,198 4,966
196,972 208,694
3,640 4,669
2,920 3,055
2,740 3,510
5,723 7,523
21,833 26,470
1,047
4,634
12,590
1,156
5,028
--
3,884
1,353
3,262
655
10,484
4,087
1,846
150,596
1,259
1,806
--
2,202
53,470
1,985 2,043
7,240 7,658
30,882 28,086
1,423 418
5,161 5,996
1,940 1,877
5,658 4,012
1,462 1,385
4,921 1,541
1,142 813
10,920 6,663
5,889 5,191
2,702 1,875
155,220 156,523
2,382 3,028
2,571 2,111
579 596
3,001 3,512
42,733 54,662
j-- REGION 42,946 78,501 66,339 171,869 316,268 351,575 259,359 287,811 287,990
%--
I ~ *Encinitas and Solana Beach were not incorporated in 1980.
T-
Source: 1980,2990,1995 Employment Inventories (SANDAG)
177
MISCELLANEOUS ST’ATIST’ICAL DATA (Continued)
EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY BY JURISDICTION
1980,1990, and 1995
(continued)
Jurisdiction 1980
Carlsbad
Chula Vista
Coronado
De1 Mar
El Cajon
Encinita?
Escondido
Imperial Beach
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Oceanside
Poway
San Diego
San Marcos
Santee
Solana Beach*
Vista
Unincorporated
16,189
30,165
16,198
3,104
35,071
--
26,664
3,631
18,535
5,383
24,880
22,941
6,644
500,401
10,246
7,492
--
10,931
101,932
Total Employment
35,204 41,286
50,500 46,064
36,906 34,977
4,868 2,789
43,120 39,883
23,735 22,755
47,451 46,015
3,874 3,622
26,610 23,329
7,920 7,036
31,799 26,451
32,937 34,766
12,003 14,497
673,722 644,203
25,007 24,192
16,336 14,742
8,230 8,700
20,847 25,785
123,042 125,745
Average Annual
Percent Change
1980-90 1990-95
8.1%
5.3%
8.6%
4.6%
2.1%
--
5.9%
0.6%
3.7%
3.9%
2.5%
3.7%
6.1%
3.0%
9.3%
_-
6.7%
1.9%
17.3%
-8.8%
-5.2%
-42.7%
-7.5%
-4.1%
-3.0%
-6.5%
-12.3%
-11.2%
-16.8%
5.6%
20.8%
-4.4%
-3.3%
-9.8%.
5.7%
23.7%
2.2%
REGION 840,407 1224,111 1,186,837 3.8% -3.0%
*Encinitas and Solana Beach zuere not incorporated in 1980.
Percentages are rounded.
Source: 1980,1990,1995 Employment Inventories-(SANDAG) I
178
*
-
I--
‘:,.
I-
T I
I-
7’
r
T- I
-
r
v ,
T-
I-
T- ,
rj
MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA (Continued)
COMI’ARISON OF INFLATION RATES:
Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers
Year
San Diego (a> United States
Index Change Index Change
Cilifornia (b)
Index Change
1986 113.5 2.8%
1987 117.5 3.5%
1988 123.4 5.0%
1989 130.6 5.8%
1990 138.4 6.0%
1991 143.4 3.6%
1992 147.4 2.8%
1993 150.6 2.2%
1994 154.5 2.6%
1995 156.8 1.5%
1996 160.9 2.6%
1997 163.7 1.7%
1998 167.8 2.5%
109.6 1.9%
113.6 3.6%
118.3 4.1%
124.0 4.8%
130.7 5.4%
136.2 4.2%
140.3 3.0%
144.5 3.0%
148.2 2.6%
152.4 2.8%
156.9 3.0%
160.5 2.3%
163.9 1.6%
112.0 3.1%
116.6 4.1%
121.8 4.5%
128.0 5.0%
135.0 5.5%
140.6 4.1%
145.6 3.6%
149.4 2.6%
151.5 1.4%
154.0 1.7%
157.1 2.0%
160.5 2.2%
163.7 2.0%
(a) Sun Diego County
(b) Computed by the California Department of Industrial Relations bused upon Los Angeles-Long
Beach, Sun Francisco-Oukland, and San Diego Indexes.
Source: U.S. Depurfment of Lubor, Bureau of Lubor Statistics; Economic Research Bureau of the
Greater Sun Diego Chamber of Commerce.
179
MISCELLANEOUS SI’ATIST’ICAL DATA (Continued)
GROSSREGIONAL PRODUCT- SAN DIEGO REGION:
Year
Gross Regional
Product (EWions)
Annual Percent Change
Current Dollars Real Change’
San Diego U.S. San Diego U.S.
1988 $53.7
1989 $59.4
1990 $63.1
1991 $65.3
1992 $66.3
1993 $67.9
1994 $70.6
1995 $73.3
1996 $77.4
1997 $82.6
1998 (estimate) $87.1
1999 (forecast) 91.6
*Adjusted for inflation.
10.5%
10.5%
6.3%
3.5%
1.5%
2.4%
4.0%
3.9%
5.6%
6.6%
5.5%
5.2%
7.6%
7.7%
5.6%
3.0%
5.5%
5.0%
5.9%
4.6%
5.1%
5.9%
4.9%
4.3%
7.1%
6.3%
1.5%
-.3%
-1.1%
-.5%
2.1%
2.0%
3.1%
4.7%
4.5%
3.7%
3.8%
3.3%
1.2%
-0.9%
2.7%
2.3%
3.5%
2.3%
3.4%
3.9%
3.8%
2.6%
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bunk of America,
Economics Policy - Research; Economic Research Bureau, Greufer Sun Diego Chamber of
Commerce.
180
l- MISCELLANEOUS STATIZXICAL DATA (Continued)
TOURISM- SAN DIEGO COUNTY:
(inthousands)
i" I year
I- . .\I. 1986
1987
I_ 1988 1989 1990
r 1991 1992 1993
r 1994 1995
1996
r 1997 1998
Total
Visitors
30,442
32,014
33,852
35,027
(1) 12,500 (1) 12,800
(1) 13,000 (1) 12,900
(1) 13,400
(1) 13,692 (1) 13,982
(1) 14,400
(1) 14,600
Visitor
Revenue
$2,431,000
$2,643,000 $2,947,000
$3,121,000
$3,362,000
$3,505,000
$3,665,000
$3,451,000 $3,636,000
$3,797,000
$4,048,000
!$4,400,000 $4,700,000
t
P
I.-
*- (1) The figures now available are those for overnight visifors, as opposed to overnight plus day
visitors.
c-- Source: San Dkgo Convention b Visitors Bureau; Economic Research Bureau, Greater San Diqo
Chamber of Commerce, 1998
C
181