HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-03-03; City Council; 14571; Rancho Carrillo Village A, B, C, & DF -
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGEN& BILL 44
AB# 14,571 ,-* TITLE- DEPT. HD. -$%@
MTG. 3/3/98 Ranch0 Carrillo Village A,B,C,and D CITY ATTY. e
CT 97-02/PUD 97-02 DEPT. PLN d CITY MGRW
1 RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT City Council Resolution No. 98-52 APPROVING CT 97-02 and PUD
97-02 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
~ ITEM EXPLANATION:
On February 4, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the Ranch0
Carrillo Villages A, B, C, and D residential subdivision/planned development project located in the
southeast quadrant within the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan and the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval (7-O) to subdivide 83.55 acres into
210 lots to include 4 multi-family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single family lots and 5 open space lots
and a planned development which included design guidelines for the construction of those units
within Villages C and D. The project is subject to and in compliance with the General Plan, the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and certified EIR, all applicable zoning ordinances and the Subdivision
Ordinance (Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code), and the Draft Habitat Management
Plan. See the attached staff report to the Planning Commission, dated February 4, 1998, for a
complete analysis of the project’s compliance with the subject policies, plans, and ordinances.
The Housing Commission reviewed the proposed affordable housing project associated with the
Master Plan (Village B) on January 14, 1998 and recommended approval of the affordable housing
~ project in Village B.
1 There were no comments from the public on this project.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan were analyzed by the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) 91-04. The project qualifies as being within the scope of both the City’s Master
Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and Final EIR 91-04 in accordance with Section
21083.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, the Planning Director issued a Notice
of Prior Environmental Compliance on January 29, 1998. With regard to air quality and circulation
impacts, the City’s MEIR found that the cumulative impacts of the implementation of projects
consistent with the General Plan are significant and adverse due to regional factors, therefore, the
City Council adopted a statement of overriding consideration. The project is consistent with the
General Plan as to these effects; therefore, no additional document is required.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18. The Growth Control Point is 6
dwelling units per acre for the RM General Plan Land Use designation. The project is consistent
with this because it is proposing 5.9 and 4.6 dwelling units per acre respectively for Villages C and
D. The project is located within CFD No. 1 and as part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is
proposing an assessment district for the construction of Melrose Drive, and has entered into an
agreement with the San Marcos Unified School District which proposes a Mello-Roos financing
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 14,571
vehicle estimated to be in the amount of $12 million for school facilities funding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact will result from the project since it is consistent with the Zone 18 Local Facilities
Management Plan. All necessary major capital facilities will be provided concurrent with
development and funded by the developer of the project. A financing plan that comprehensively
addresses the provision of public facilities within the facility zone has been approved by the City
Council and this project has been conditioned to participate in the identified financing mechanisms.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 98-52
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 4241 and 4242
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated February 4, 1998
5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated February 4, 1998
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 98-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE
MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO 210.LOTS TO INCLUDE
4 MULTI FAMILY LOTS, 114 DUPLEX LOTS, 87 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS AND 5 OPEN SPACE LOTS ALL ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND MELROSE
DRIVE, NORTH OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE, AND EAST
OF BRESSI RANCH.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C,
ANDD
CASE NO.: CT 97-02/PUD 97-02
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on February 4, 1998, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider a Tentative Tract Map and Planned
Development Permit (Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A, B, C, and D, CT 97-02 and PUD 9’7-02) ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 3rd day of
March , 1998, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Development Permit and at that time received the recommendations,
objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT 97-02 and PUD 97-
02; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council ADOPTS Resolution No.’ 98-52 and
determines that the findings and conditions as set forth in Planning Commission Resolutions No.
424 1, and 4242 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings
and conditions of the City Council.
3. That the applications for a Tentative Map and Planned Development
Permit to allow the subdivision of property into 2 10 lots all on property located on the southeast
corner of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive, in LFMP Zone 18, is approved as shown in
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4241 and 4242, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference. .
3
1
4. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. 2 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the C&bad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
3 Review” shall apply:
4 “NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 II Carlsbad on the 3rd day of March 1998, by the following vote, to wit:
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the
City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking
review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes
final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or
preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended
to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally
delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the
preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad,
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.”
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
14 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin and Hall
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Finnila
18
19
20
21
22 I
23 h ATTEST: ,
24
25
26
Ad
ALETHA L. RWTENKRANZ, City Clerk?
(SEW
EXHIBIT 2
1 SITE
o\ M
gq((, Q s R N
RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGES “A, B, C, D”
CT 97-02/PUD 67-02
.- _
1 I
j >
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4241
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT NUMBER CT 97-02 TO
SUBDIVIDE 83.55 ACRES INTO 210 LOTS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND EAST OF MELROSE DRIVE IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C & D
CASE NO.: CT 97-02
WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified application with
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc., “Owner”, described
as
That portion of Section 13, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian, and all that Portion of Section 18 and 19 of
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibit(s) “A”-“ N” dated February 4, 1998, on. file in the Planning
Department - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B C & D - CT 97-02, as provided by
Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 4th day of February, 1998,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
c:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map RANCH0
CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C & D - CT 97-02, based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
project is proposing densities within the Growth Management Control Point; prior
to the recordation of any final map the deeding of an acceptable school site to the
San Marcos Unified School District and a financing plan approved by the San
Marcos School District guaranteeing the construction of the necessary school
facilities must occur; the mitigation of onsite surface runoff so as not to affect on
and offsite downstream properties is required; major offsite sewer line construction
is required; prior to recordation of the final map an affordable housing agreement
must be entered into which provides for and deed restricts at least 15% of the
dwelling units as affordable to lower income households for the useful life of the
dwelling units; over 35% of the net developable acreage of the Master Plan has been
left as open space; the construction of Melrose Drive and access to this subdivision
from it is required; prior to occupancy the construction of noise walls to meet the
standards contained within the General Plan is required; a parks agreement
between the City of Carlsbad and the property owners has been completed; and all
densities, setbacks, parking, recreational space, streets and storage meet the
minimum standards of the Planned Development Ordinance.
2. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the residential development complies with all city policies and
standards, including zoning.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that the project has been designed and conditioned such that there are no conflicts
with any established easements.
5. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
PC PESO NO. 4241 2 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the lots allow for a
variety of building placement alternatives, including the adequate placement and
separation of the homes, in combination with the future variety of floor plans and
the dominant sea breeze/solar radiation patterns, will allow utilization of natural
heating and cooling opportunities.
7. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified
within the certified Final EIR 91-04 and MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this
project have been incorporated into the project and no significant impacts to fish,
wildlife, or their respective habitats will occur.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the drainage
requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and City of Carlsbad ordinances
have been considered and appropriate drainage facilities have been designed and
secured. In addition to City Engineering Standards and compliance with the City’s
Master Drainage Plan, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
standards will be satisfied to prevent any discharge violations.
10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for CT 97-02
(Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A B, C & D), is in conformance with the Elements of the
City’s General Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use - The General Plan Land Use designation for this site is RM and
RH which allows a density range of 4-8 dwelling units per net developable
acre with a Growth Management Control Point of 6 dwelling units per net
developable acre and 15-23 dwelling units per acre which allows a Growth
Management Control Point of 19 dwelling units per acre. Typically the RM
land use designation is appropriate for single family or multi family dwelling
units and the RH land use designation is appropriate for multi family
dwelling units. In conformance with this finding, Ranch0 Carrillo Villages
A, B, C & D are proposing single family and multi family dwelling units.
Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A and B will be developed via Site Development
Plan and Planned Development Permit in the future. Village C is proposing
5.9 dwelling units per net developable acre which is within the allowable
dwelling unit range and less than the Growth Management Control Point.
Village D is proposing 4.6 dwelling units per net developable acre which also
meets the above criteria.
PC RESO NO. 4241 3 B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Circulation - The public street system serving this subdivision includes
Melrose Drive (a Circulation Element Arterial) and the project has been
conditioned to provide the necessary improvements to this arterial. The
Circulation Element of the General Plan does not address private streets, nor
provide direction for minimum street design standards for these
improvements.
C. Noise - Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a
detailed noise study addressing conformance with the Noise Element of the
General Plan.
d. Housing - Prior to the approval of the final map the developer must have
entered into an Affordable Housing Agreement which meets the
requirements set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
e. Open Space and Conservation - Over 35% of the net developable acreage of
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan has been left as open space which exceeds
the 15% Growth Management requirement.
f. Public Safety - The project is conditioned to pay Public Facilities Fees. The
proposed project is required to provide streets, sidewalks, street lights, and
fire hydrants, as conditions of approval.
Parks and Recreation - The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan has entered into a
Parks Agreement with the City of Carlsbad which required the dedication of
land.
11. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project.
In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note shall be placed on the final
map that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the District
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the District
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
b. The project is conditioned that prior to the recordation of a final map the
deeding of an acceptable school site to the San Marcos Unified School
District and a financing plan approved by the San Marcos Unified School
District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school
facilities pursuant to that dedication is required.
C. The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan has entered into a Parks Agreement with
the City of Carlsbad.
PC RESO NO. 4241 4 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
14. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council
Resolution No. 90-384.
15. The Planning Commission finds that the Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidelines
15 168(c)(2) and (e), and 15 183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01)
and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR 91-04;
C. there were EIRs certified in connection with the prior 1994 General Plan
Update and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Amendment;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as
significant in the prior EIRs;
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR under
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
16. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts cause by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
17. The minimum area for any two lots proposing a duplex is 7500 square feet.
d. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
e. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map document(s), as necessary, to make them
PC RESO NO. 4241 5 la
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
Note:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the
approval of this proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to approval of a final
map.
The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and
hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(b) Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy of the
Tentative Map as approved by the final decision making body. The Tentative Map
shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be submitted to
the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement
plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, a
reduced legible version of the approving resolutions on a 24” x 36” blueline drawing.
The final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such
approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application
for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. A note
to this effect shall be placed on the final map.
The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28,
1987, (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time, and any development
fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2 1.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code or other ordinance adopted to implement’ a growth management system or Facilities
and Improvement Plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public
facilities fee dated January 10, 1997, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and
is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
PC RESO NO. 4241 6 //
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9. Prior to approval of a final map or the issuance/approval of a building permit, which ever
occurs first, the Developer shall submit evidence to the Planning Director that impacts to
school facilities have been mitigated in conformance with the City’s Growth
Management Plan to the extent permitted by applicable state law. If the mitigation
involves a financing scheme such as a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District which
is inconsistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan, including City Council Policy
Statement No. 38, the Developer shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the
maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax and that the school district is the taxing
agency responsible for the financing district.
10. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
General Conditions
11.
12.
13.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this residential
housing project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this
approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the
condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of CT 97-02 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 97-02. CT 97-02 is
subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 4242 for the Planned Unit
Development.
The Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
a. General Enforcement bv the Citv. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
b. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the
event that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to
perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such
maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy
thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the
maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be
carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the giving
of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
PC RESO NO. 4241 7 /a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1‘2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements within
the period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such
work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto
from the Owners as provided herein.
C. Special Assessments Levied bv the Citv. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association’s Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to
each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to
pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection
against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full
within the period specified, payment shall be. deemed delinquent and shall be
subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of
the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by
means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available
to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot
in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing
lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in
the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal
actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment.
14. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice
of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the
City of Carlsbad has issued a(n) Tentative Map by Resolution No. 4241 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest.
15. This approval shall be null and void if the project site subject to this approval is not
annexed to City of Carlsbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval. The City shall
not issue any grading, building, or other permit, until the annexation is completed. The
City Manager is authorized to extend the 60 days, for a period not to exceed a date
certain, upon a showing of good cause.
PC RESO NO. 4241 8 /3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
Landscape
16.
17.
18.
19.
Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct the community
theme/noise attenuation walls shown on the Landscape Concept Plan Exhibit, dated
February 4,1998 in conformance with the required noise study.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for this project and after the delayed
architectural review process, the developer is required to complete a noise study
which*will indicate the extent of the construction of a combination of community
theme walls and landscaped berms to attenuate noise to mitigate exterior noise to
the 65 dBA CNEL level and to mitigate interior noise levels of the future homes to
45 dBA CNEL.
The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with
the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s Landscape Manual. The plans
shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director prior to the
approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The
Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and
maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and
debris.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings
so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or
addresses shall contrast to their background color.
Miscellaneous PlanninP Conditions
20. The Developer shall provide bus stops to service this development at locations and with
reasonable facilities to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District and the
Planning Director. Said facilities, if required, shall at a minimum include a bench, free
from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench and pole shall be designed
to enhance or consistent with basic architectural theme of the project.
2 The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
22. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be
limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks and streets.
Environmental
23. The Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all applicable
mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR 91-04 and MEIR 93-01, including but
not limited to demonstration that means of solid waste disposal are available,
acoustical studies are performed, attenuation barriers are constructed as necessary,
and the monitoring of traffic is provided to conform to City standards.
PC RESO NO. 4241 9 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
. . .
The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Project Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, including but not limited to demonstration that means of solid
waste disposal are available, acoustical studies are performed, attenuation barriers
are constructed as necessary, and the monitoring of traffic is provided to conform to
City standards.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or. existing Transportation Corridor, in
a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form
#l on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
The Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
The Developer shall dedicate on the final map, an open space easement for those portions
of lots 209 and 210 which are (in slopes, wetlands, coastal sage scrub or other
constrained land plus all other lands set aside as part of the Citywide Open Space System)
in their entirety to prohibit any encroachment or development, including but not limited
to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways and landscaping other
than that approved as part of (the grading plan, improvement plans, biological
revegetation program, landscape plan, etc.) .
Removal of native vegetation and/or construction of structures on Open Space Lot 209.
and 210, including but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas,
stairways and landscaping, other than that approved as part of (the grading plan,
improvement plans, biological revegetation program, landscape plan, etc.) as shown on
Exhibit “A’‘-“N”, is specifically prohibited, except upon written order of the Carlsbad
Fire Department for fire prevention purposes, or upon written approval of the Planning
Director, and (California Coastal Commission if in Coastal Zone), based upon a request
from the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report from a qualified
arborist/botanist indicating the need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of
disease or impending danger to adjacent habitable dwelling units. For areas containing
native vegetation the report required to accompany the request shall be prepared by a
qualified biologist.
PC RESO NO. 424 1 10 /3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Housing
30.
31.
Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map is not
being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units, the
Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and
deed restrict dwelling units as affordable to lower-income households for the useful life
of the dwelling units, in accordance with the requirements and process set forth in
Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The recorded Affordable Housing
Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.
The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent with the
project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and
the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule
for development.
Ewineerine Conditions
General
32.
33.
34.
35.
36:
37.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the
requirements of the City’s anti-graf?iti program for wall treatments if and when such a
program is formerly established by the City.
This project is approved for up to three final subdivision maps for the purposes of
recordation.
If the developer chooses to record a final subdivision map out of the phase shown on the
tentative map, the new phasing must be reviewed and approved or conditionally approved
by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation,
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements
within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain
facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the
subdivision. Adequate ‘provision for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&Rs
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s association (if on
commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility
PC RESO NO. 4241 11 /L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be placed in the CC&Rs (if maintained by the Association) and on the Final Map.
38. The developer shall defend, indemnity and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers,
and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents,
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the
Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within
the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act.
39. The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors in accordance with Engineering
Standards and the conforming mylar tentative map; and, shall record the following
statements on the conforming mylar tentative map and preliminary landscape plan:
a. Mature vegetation within the site line area of all intersections shall be no
greater than 30” in height or have a canopy no less than 8’ in height.
b. No structure, fence, wall, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street
level shall be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight
distance corridor in accordance with City Standards and the conforming mylar
tentative map. The underlying property owner, or homeowner’s association
shall maintain this condition.
Fees/APreements
40. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with City
Council Resolution No. 91-39.
41. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
42. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless
regarding drainage across the adjacent property.
43. The subject property is within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 96-l (Melrose
Drive). Upon the subdivision of land within the district boundaries, the owner may pass
through assessments to subsequent owners o& if the owner has executed a Special
Assessment District Pass-through Authorization Agreement. Said Agreement contains
provision regarding notice to potential buyers of the amount of the assessment and other
provisions and requires the owner to have each buyer receive and execute a Notice of
Assessment and an Option Agreement. In the event that the owner does not execute the
Authorization Agreement, the assessment on the subject property must be paid off in full
bv the owner nrior to final man annroval.
44. As required by state law, the subdivider shall submit to the City an application for
segregation of assessments along with the appropriate fee. A segregation is not required
if the developer pays off the assessment on the subject property prior to the recordation of
the final map. In the event a segregation of assessments is not recorded and property is
PC RESO NO. 4241 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
subdivided, the full amount of assessment will appear on the tax bills of & new lot.
45. The owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic failure.
46. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give
written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the
subdivision plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
Grading
47.
48.
49.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. The developer must submit
and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards prior
to issuance of a grading permit for the project.
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an “as-graded” geologic plan
is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed
by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed and
must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post site grading. This
plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan
shall be prepared on a 24” x 36” mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a
permanent record.
No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision
unless a grading or slope easement or agreement is obtained from the owners of the
affected properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope
easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer must
either amend the tentative map or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the
project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Dedications/Imnrovements
50. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or
installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be required by
the City Engineer.
51. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer shall be
made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be
granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the
City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
52. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shal
overhead utilities along and within the subdivision.
.l underground all existing
PC PESO NO. 4241 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P
53. Direct access rights for Village’s A & B abutting Melrose Drive shall be waived on the
final map. Potential temporary emergency access to Melrose Drive for Village B
may be approved in accordance with the Village B site development plan, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
54. The developer shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide best
management practices as referenced in the “California Storm Water Best Management
Practices Handbook” to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge
to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer.
Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of
the following:
a. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as
prescribed in their respective containers.
c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants
when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
55. Plans, specifications,. and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City Standards, the
developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided
by law, improvements shown on the tentative map, and the following improvements:
PHASE I
a. Installation of a 4-way fully actuated traffic signal at the “A-A”
StreetMelrose Drive intersection.
b. Installation of a 3-way fully actuated traffic signal at the “A-B”
Street/Palomar Airport Road intersection, in accordance with
correspondence from the City Traffic Engineer to Continental Homes
V.P., David Lother, dated November 12,1997.
C. Melrose Drive - Full remaining prime arterial frontage improvements,
from Palomar Airport Road to the southerly project boundary, with any
required transitions to existing grading/improvements. 19 PC RESO NO. 4241 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
d.
*
Full improvements to the following streets:
l “A-A” Street (68’ right-of-way/48’ curb-to-curb);
0 “A-B” Street (68’ right-of-way/48’ curb-to-curb);
l “A-C” Street (60’ right-of-way/40’ curb-to-curb) *;
l “C-A” Street (56’ right-of-way/36’ curb-to-curb);
a “C-B” Street (56’ right-of-way/36’ curb-to-curb);
l “D-A” Street (60’ right-of-way/40’ curb-to-curb).
“A-C” Street shall transition from a 60’ right of way/40’ curb to curb
section to a 100’ right of way/76’ curb to curb section from the “A-C”
Street/“C-A” Street BC (begin curb return) to the terminus of the “A-
C?’ Street cul-de-sac.
e. Full improvements to Palomar Airport Road from Melrose Drive to
“A-B” Street, with any appropriate transitions, in accordance with
the following **:
**
l Number 3 frontage lane;
l bicycle lane;
l concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk;
l street light standards;
l raised median including landscaping ***.
These improvements are not reimbursable, in accordance with
Principal Civil Engineer, Richard Allen’s correspondence to
Continental Homes V.P., David Lother, dated September 29,1997.
*** Raised median improvements are in accordance with an
agreement reached between Continental Homes V.P., David Lother
and the City Engineer/Public Works Director, in a correspondence
dated September 30,1997.
PC RESO NO. 4241
PHASE II
a. Full improvements to the following streets:
l “D-A” Street (60’ right-of-way/40’ curb-to-curb);
l “D-B” Street (60’ right-of-way/40’ curb-to-curb);
l “D-C” Street (56’ right-of-way/36’ curb-to-curb);
a “D-D” Street (60’ right-of-Way/40 curb-to-curb);
1590 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A list of the above improvements shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final
map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured improvement agreement
or such other time as provided in said agreement.
56. The design of all Village “B” private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by
the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of
Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall
be inspected by the City. The standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall
be paid for this project.
Final Man Notes
57. Notes to the following effect shall be placed on the final map as non-mapping data:
a. All improvements for Village “B” are private and are to be privately maintained
with the exception of the following:
l Water Lines
b.
l Sewer Lines as an exception
This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be
issued for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the
provisions of Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Geo-technical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in
interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from
any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage
or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to,
this subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
d. No structure, fence, wall, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street
level shall be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards and the
conforming mylar tentative map. The underlying property owner, or
homeowner’s association shall maintain this condition.
e. Mature vegetation within the site line area of all intersections shall be no
greater than 30” in height or have a canopy no less than 8’ in height.
f. Swimming pools located within 7’ of fill slopes that are greater than 30’
in height, additional soils analysis must be conducted by a qualified soils
engineer for specific design recommendations.
PC RESO NO. 4241 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Map Corrections/Additions
58. A typical plan view retaining wall detail shall be added to the “Typical Lot
Drainage” detail on sheet 2 of 8 of the tentative map indicating that a 5’ minimum
width shall be held from the face of any structure to the face of any retaining wall,
and, a 3 ft. minimum width shall be held from the face of any structure to the flow
line, regardless of the height of the proposed wall. This shall be shown on the
conforming mylar tentative map.
59. A drainage cross-section detail shall be added to sheet 2 of 8 of the tentative map,
indicating that a 5’ minimum width shall be held from the face of any structure to
the face of any retaining wall, and, a 3’ minimum width shall be held from the face
of any structure to the flow line, regardless of the height of the proposed wall. This
shall be shown on the conforming mylar tentative map.
60. The following shall be added to “General Design” note #ll, on sheet 1 of 8 of the
conforming mylar tentative map: “Retaining walls which are added shall be located
a minimum of 5’ away from any structure. This 5’ distance shall be measured from
the face of the retaining wall to the face of any structure. A minimum of 3’ shall be
held from the face of any structure to the flow line. These requirements shall apply
regardless of the height of any proposed retaining wall and shall be approved by the
City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance.”
61. On sheet 1 of 8 of the conforming mylar tentative map, the designation “Remainder
Parcel” shall be added to the “Key Map” for all of the property located outside of
the Village “A-D” subdivision boundary.
62. The ,330’ corner sight distance sight line towards “A-C” Street, from the “A-A”
Street/“D-B” Street intersection, shall be increased to a minimum of 385’. This
revision shall be shown on the conforming mylar tentative map.
63. Prior to building permit issuance. for Lots 180, 181 & 182, specific grading analysis
shall be conducted, with mitigation measures identified, for constructing units along
an existing intraformational fault line, as identified in the project’s preliminary geo-
technical report.
A widened cul-de-sac design, with appropriate transitions, shall be shown at the
terminus of “A-C” Street, in accordance with the Village B site development plan
design requirements.
64.
65.
PC RESO NO. 4241
The top of slope along the Palomar Airport Road (PAR) frontage for Village “B”
shall be located a minimum of 5’ away from the PAR right of way line to facilitate
the installation of the proposed sound wall and the required standard street trees.
Street trees shall be installed between the proposed sound wall for Village “B” and
the PAR right of way (i.e., on the outside of and thereby screening the sound wall).
If the top of slope cannot be relocated, then another method to accomplish placing
17
aa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the street trees on the outside of the Village “B” sound wall shall be determined at
final design and indicated on the project’s final grading and landscape plans, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
66. The following improvements as required in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP)
and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These improvements shall be substantially
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first
dwelling unit within Ranch0 Carrillo:
a. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundarv
l Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major arterial
standards.
l Construction of full major arterial standards from the intersection
with Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village J and the school
site. ,
b. El Fuerte Street - Throuph Zone 18
l Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width.
l Construction of one lane in each direction from the southerly
boundary of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village T.
C. Sewer Facilities, including:
l 12” main in, or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
0 12” main in Melrose Drive
l Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
l Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
l North La Costa Lift Station
d. Water Facilities, including:
l The portion of the proposed ‘potable 24-inch main in the proposed
alignment of Melrose Drive.
l The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast corner of
Zone 18.
a3
PC RESO NO. 4241 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the proposed
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
0 The portion of the proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in the proposed
alignment of Melrose Drive.
l The proposed reclaimed 384nch main in the proposed alignment
of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
0 The proposed potable 12” main from Melrose to El Fuerte
through service Area E.
67. Prior to approval of any building permit, the developer shall reimburse the City of
Carlsbad for frontage improvements for Palomar Airport Road, in accordance with
the “Zone 18 Cost Distribution for Palomar Airport Road East, Project No. 3166.”
Fire Conditions
68. Additional onsite public water mains and fire hydrants are required.
69. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing public water mains and fire hydrants. The
plan should include offsite fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
70. Applicant shall submit a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways and
traffic circulation for Fire Department approval.
71. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, automatic fire sprinkler
systems and other fire protection systems shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval prior to construction.
Water Conditions:
72. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system, and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be
met.
73. The developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
meter installation.
74. Sequentially, the Developer’s Engineer shall do the following:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements.
Also obtain . demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appropriate parties.
PC RESO NO. 4241
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department for processing and approval.
C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water, and reclaimed water improvement plans,
a meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the prelimmary system layouts and usages (i.e.-GPM-EDU).
75. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not be
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at
the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be
available until time of occupancy.
General Conditions:
76. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following code requirements:
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The following note shall be placed on the Final Map: “Prior to issuance of a building
permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the Developer shall pay a one-time
special development tax in accordance with the City Council Resolution No. 91-39.”
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest residential disabled access requirements pursuant
to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
The Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
PC RESO NO. 4241 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
h
All landscape and irrigation plans shah be prepared to conform with the Landscape
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent off-site siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall be
provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the
access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may,
in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease until the
condition is corrected.
All required water mains, fire hydrants, and appurtenances shall be operational before
combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
Prior to final inspections, all security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be
equipped with a “Knox” key operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact
the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approval prior to installation.
Prior to building occupancy, private roads and driveways which serve as required access
for emergency service vehicles shall be posted as fire lanes in accordance with the
requirements of Section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in buildings having an
aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet.
PC RESO NO. 4241 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- h
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of February, 1998, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compaq Heineman, Monroy,
Nielsen, Salvary, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT: :.
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HaZMKLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4241 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 4242
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD 97-02
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF MELROSE
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18
‘CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES C & D
CASE NO.: PUD 97-02
WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc.,
“Owner”, described as
That portion of Section 13, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Meridian, and all that Portion of Section 18
and 19 of Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California,
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development as shown on Exhibit(s) “A”-“ N” dated February 4, 1998 ,on file in the Planning
Department, RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES C & D - PUD 97-02 as provided by Chapter
21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 4th day of February, 1998,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
a8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES C &
D - PUD 97-02 and the Villages C & D Design Guidelines, attached hereto
and made a part hereof, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
Findinps:
1. All findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4241 shall apply as
findings of this permit and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and
all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the project is
proposing densities within the Growth Management Control Point; prior to the
recordation of any final map the deeding of an acceptable school site to the San
Marcos Unified School District and a financing plan approved by the San Marcos
School District guaranteeing the construction of the necessary school facilities must
occur; the mitigation of onsite surface runoff so as not to affect on and offsite
downstream properties is required; major offsite sewer line construction is required
and so conditioned; prior to recordation of the final map an affordable housing
agreement must be entered into which provides for and deed restricts dwelling units
as affordable to lower income households for the useful life of the dwelling units;
over 35% of the net developable acreage has been left as open space; the
construction of Melrose Drive and access to this subdivision from it is required;
prior to occupancy the construction of noise walls to meet the standards contained
within the General Plan is required; a parks agreement between the City of
Carlsbad and the property owners has been completed; and all densities, setbacks,
parking, recreational space, streets, and storage meet the minimum standards of the
Planned Development Ordinance.
3. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and community as noted in Finding Number 1.
4. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, in that a) all necessary mitigation of adverse environmental impacts are
incorporated into the project’s design or are conditions of approval; b) the project is
conditioned to construct all necessary public improvements; and c) the project is
consistent with all applicable City design and development standards.
PC RESO NO. 4242 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
h
That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.080,
and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design
Guidelines manual, in that 1) the project is consistent with the Planned Development
standards for building height, private recreational open space, recreational vehicle
parking and guest parking; 2) the design is compatible with surrounding land uses
and circulation patterns through its opportunity for connection with potential
adjacent single family development and provides for adequate usable open space
that is readily accessible to residents; and 3) the Master Plan allows for delayed
architectural review.
That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the
site, in that the grading design preserves the major ridgelines and is consistent with
the natural topography by allowing the canyons and hillsides to remain in open
space, considering the necessity of arterial circulation development.
That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that due to the timing of construction, lot
size and product type location (in the northwest corner of the project adjacent to
two arterial roadways) the project will set the precedent for surrounding
development type within the Master Plan and the adjacent existing neighborhood.
That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project, in that the private streets allow for less
pavement width and modified sidewalk provision thereby decreasing the paved
surface, while the public streets are designed to provide maximum access through
double loading.
That the required visitor parking is located on the adjacent “Village C, & D” local
street system.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modific$ions to the Planned Unit Development document(s), as necessary, to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of PUD 97-02 is granted subject to the approval of CT 97-02. PUD 97-02 is
subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 4241 for CT 97-02.
PC RESO NO. 4242 -3- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts shall be submitted in compliance with the
standards contained within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and shall comply with the
Village C and D Design Guidelines.
4. All accessory structures shall comply with the development standards contained within
Section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
5. All dwelling units shall have a permanent foundation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of February, 1998, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compaq Heineman, Monroy,
Nielsen, Salvary, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE!: Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
V MICHAEL J. H&ZMILLER
Planning Director
1 PC RESO NO. 4242 -4-
h r-4
~ne City of CARLSBAD Planning Departmnt EXHIBIT 4
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 0 8
Application complete date: November 28, 1997
P.C. AGENDA OF: February 4,1998 Project Planner: Brian Hunter
Project Engineer: Michael Shirey
su ‘BJECT: CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C & D -
Request for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit
(Villages C & D) to subdivide an 83.55 acre site into 210 lots to include 4 multi-
family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single family lots and 5 open space lots on
property generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, south of
Palomar Airport Road and north of Poinsettia Lane, between the future Melrose
Drive and the eastern city boundary in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities
Management Zone 18.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4241 and 4242,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 97-02 and PUD 97-02 based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Map and a Planned Unit Development Permit
to subdivide and develop the 83.55 acre site into 4 multi-family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single
family lots and 5 open space lots for a total of 210 lots. As designed and conditioned, the project
is in conformance with the General Plan, Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139 and its
amendments), Ranch0 Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04), Ranch0 Carrillo
Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17), and the relevant Zoning Chapters of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code, including the Subdivision Ordinance and the Planned Development Ordinance.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The proposed subdivision, which is located in the P-C Zone and within the boundaries of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, is designated by the General Plan in Villages .A and B for
Residential High Density (15-23 du/ac) development and Open Space and in Villages C and D
for Residential Medium Density (4-8 du/ac) development and Open Space.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139F) was approved by City Council on October 2 1,
1997. The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the Ranch0
Carrillo site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. Grading for the entire
Master Plan area was approved under Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-l 7. For planning
- -
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - h-uKHO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, L & D
February 4,1998
Page 2
purposes, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is divided into 19 planning areas. The Master Plan
identifies the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides general
development and design standards, requirements, and the method by which the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan will be implemented.
The 83.55 acre parcel for this application is identified by the Master Plan as Villages A, B, C and
D. The site sits south of and adjacent to Palomar Airport Road and east of future Melrose Drive.
The site has already been rough graded in conformance with HDP 91-17.
Village A consists of 1 multi-family lot, Village B consists of 3 multi-family lots, Village C
consists of 114 duplex lots and 2 open space lots, and Village D consists of 87 single family lots
and 3 open space lots. The lot sizes for Village C range from 3,670 to 14,830 square feet. Lot
sizes for Village D range from 4,530 to 23,030 square feet. The development of 114 units in
Village C will be 1 unit less than the amount allocated by the approved Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan which allows for the development of up to 115 units. The development of 87 units in
Village D will be 27 units less than the amount allocated by the approved Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan which allows for the development of up to 114 units.
Per the approved Master Plan, Tentative Maps and Planned Development Permits for small lot
single family detached units and duplexes may be processed through Planning Commission and
City Council without floor plans and elevations. Design guidelines for the project have been
submitted for review and approval. Before obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall
submit floor plans and architecture for staff review to ensure compliance with these guidelines.
Similar to a minor planned development permit amendment the floor plans and elevations shall
then be presented to the Planning Commission per Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 2 1.45.160.
Pursuant to the City’s adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, a minimum of 15% of the base
dwelling units must be provided for lower income households. The majority of the inclusionary
requirement for these villages as weli as the entire master plan will be provided in Village B. All
of the required three bedroom inclusionary units will be provided in Village B. A smaller
portion of the inclusionary requirement for this tentative map may be provided as second units
integrated into the single family development within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. The
production of these units will be governed by an affordable housing agreement and a site
development plan. The Affordable Housing Agreement has been recommended for approval by
the Housing Commission on January 14, 1998.
.
The project is subject to the following land use plans, policies, programs and zoning regulations:
A. General Plan;
B. Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP-139F);
C. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance);
D. Inclusionaty Housing (Chapters 2 1.85 and 2 1.53 of the Zoning Ordinance);
E. Growth Management Ordinance; and
F. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code).
33
-
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - ,-JCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, b, L & D
February 4,1998
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plai
Villages A, B, C and D are consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General
Plan. Particularly relevant to the proposed single family community abutting a prime circulation
arterial roadway are the Land Use, Housing, Circulation, and Noise Elements of the General
Plan.
ELEMENT
Land Use
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL,
OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM
Site is designated for high and
medium density residential uses of
15-23 dulac and 4-8 dulac).
Encourage the provision of low
income dwelling units to meet the
objectives of the Housing Element.
Ensure that all hillside development
is designed to preserve the visual
quality of the pre-existing
topography.
Permit the approval of discretionary
actions and the development of land
only after adequate provision has
been made for public facilities and
services in accordance with the
Growth Management public facility
standards.
PROPOSED USE AND
IMPROVEMENTS
Project involves multi-
family and single family
residential communities
at a density of 4.6 to 19
dulac.
Project provides its fair
share of affordable units
in Village B of the
Master Plan.
The grading design is
consistent with the
approved HDP for the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan.
Project is conditioned to
construct/install all
necessary public
facilities Citywide and
quadrant wide public
facilities are adequate to
satisfy the additional
demand; therefore the
project is consistent with
the Zone 18 LFMP.
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - ,-KHO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, b, L & D
February 4,1998
Page 4
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE (cont.)
USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, PROPOSED USE AND ELEMENT OBJ-ECTIVE OR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE
Housing
Circulation
Ensure that master planned The project is subject to
communities and all qualified an affordable housing
subdivisions provide a range of , agreement. The
housing for all economic income project’s fair share of Yes ranges. A minimum of 15% of all affordable units will be
units approved in master plan provided in Village B of
communities shall be affordable to the Ranch0 Carrillo
lower income households. Master Plan.
Require new development to The project is
construct all roadways necessary to conditioned to complete
development prior to or concurrent all necessary street Yes
with need. improvements prior to
occupancy of any unit in
each phase.
Noise 65 dBA CNEL is the exterior noise The project is
level and 45 dBA CNEL is the conditioned to comply
interior noise level to which all with the 45 dBA interior Yes
residential units should be mitigated. noise standard and the
65 dBA CNEL exterior
noise standard.
B. Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
As described below, Villages A, B, C and D comply with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
General Community Development Standards and the Villages A, B, C and D requirements
including: 1) product type and density; 2) approved Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-l 7; 3)
design criteria; and 4) Master Plan infrastructure requirements.
1) Village A
The Master Plan designates Village A for multi-family development with a density range
of 15-23 dwelling units/acre which would allow 195 dwelling units. The proposed project
currently consists of 1 multi-family lot (CT 98-03, CP 98-01) with 169 dwelling units.
As it was received January 24, 1998 by the Planning Department, the completeness of the
application is being determined at this time.
Village B
The Master Plan designates Village B for multi-family development with a density range
of 15-23 dwelling units/acre which would allow 258 dwelling units.. The proposed
35
-
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - I, dCH0 CAFWLLO VILLAGES A, b, c, & D
February 4,1998
Page 5
project currently consists of 3 multi-family lots (Lots 206, 207, and 208 of the tentative
map) on 13.6 unconstrained acres. Similar to Village A, future discretionary permits will
be required for the development of Village B. Presently SDP 97-15 is being processed to
consider an 116 unit affordable apartment on Lot 207 of the site. Whether developed
with apartments or ownership units, a Site Development Plan will be required. since
Village B has been designated as the primary affordable housing site. If developed with
ownership units a Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit will be -required in
addition to the Site Development Plan.
Village C
The Master Plan designates Village C for multi-family development with a density range
of 4-8 dwelling units/acre. The proposed project consists of 114 duplex units on 19.2
unconstrained acres for a density of 5.9 du/net acre which is consistent with the Master
Plan. Village C is proposed to be developed as an RM multi-family (duplex) subdivision
with lot sizes ranging between 3,740 and 14,080 square feet.
As noted previously, the Master Plan allows delayed architectural review with the
adoption of design guidelines at the tentative map stage. Table 2 below contains a
synopsis of the proposed design guidelines for Village C.
TABLE 2 - VILLAGE C DESIGN GUIDELINE SYNOPSIS
Street A-A - 20’ minimum
Front - 20’ minimum
Rear - 15’ minimum
Garages Minimum 20’ x 20’
into walls a minimum 0
minimum of 20’ between face
/-4 h
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - ,&WHO CARRJLLO VILLAGES A, b, c & D
February 4,1998
TABLE 2 - VILLAGE C DESIGN GUIDELINE SYNOPSIS
Walls and Fences
Lot Drains
Minor Modifications
Per Village C landscape exhibit
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on
Allows a change to five or less of these provisions
per Planning Director approval if determined to be in
Village D
The Master Plan designates Village D for single family development with a density range
of 4-8 dwelling units/acre. The proposed project consists of 87 single family units on 19.0
unconstrained acres for a density of 4.6 du/net acre which is consistent with the Master
Plan. Village D is proposed to be developed as an RM single family subdivision with lot
sizes ranging between 4,700 and 21,950 square feet. As noted previously, the Master
Plan allows delayed architectural review with the adoption of design guidelines at the
tentative map stage. Table 3 below contains a synopsis of the proposed design guidelines
for Village D.
TABLE 3 - VILLAGE D DESIGN GUIDELINES SYNOPSIS
ISSUE
Unit Mix
Plotting of Units
Setbacks
COMMENT
A minimum of 3 floor plans with a minimum of 3
front building elevations.
No floor plan shall be plotted for more than 60% of
the total units on a street; no two units with same
facades closer than 100’ on the same side of the
street; and units shall be plotted within the prescribed
building envelope. 50% lot coverage.
Melrose Drive .- 50’ minimum
Front- In accordance with Section 2 1.45.090
(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
Rear - 15’ minimum
Side - 5’ minimum; 10’ minimum for comer lots 37
- -
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - ,d&CHO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, b, L & D
February 4,1998
Page 7
TABLE 3 - VILLAGE D DESIGN GUIDELINES SYNOPSIS
193, which shall maintain 10’
minimum side yard from Street A-A ROW.
Building Separation - Per Section 21.45.090(5) of
the Carlsbad Municipal
s minimum, varied
Garages Minimum 20’ x 20’ interior dimension with doors set into walls a minimum of 3”. Garages facing the
street shall provide a minimum of 20’ between face
ese provrsrons
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved Hillside Development Permit
(HDP 91-l 7) in that the subdivision grading design is consistent with the approved mass
grading design. Project specific grading is still required to facilitate site development.
Standard engineering grading conditions of approval shall be placed on the project.
3) A 50’ landscape setback is required along Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive to
screen the units from the roadway and to buffer residential units from traffic noise. The
proposed landscaping within this setback area is consistent with the Master Plan
landscape guidelines. Streetscape landscaping, community theme walls and fences, 38
A h
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - brXH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, c: & D
February 4,1998
villages fences, as well as village entry monumentation into the project are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan.
4) The project is conditioned to require that all public facilities necessary to serve the project
are provided prior to, or concurrent with, development in accordance with the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan. Two major items with regard to circulation are
associated with this and future Ranch0 Carrillo projects. Major roadway infrastructure
must be constructed to gain site access to ,the Master Plan area. This will include full
width construction of Melrose Drive. An assessment district has been formed to help
finance this improvement.
The circulation systems for Villages A, B, C and D have been laid out in accordance with
the requirements of the approved Ranch0 Car1310 Master Plan. These streets have been
designed to City Standards and will consist of curb, gutter, and sidewalk contained within
the right-of-way widths specified in the Master Plan. The tentative map shows how
Villages A and B will gain access from a public street. Future discretionary permits will
determine the design of the streets within Villages A and B and whether they will be
public or private streets.
Sewer service to this project will be provided by public sewer lines that will tie into a 12”
sewer main to be installed to serve the entire Ranch0 Carrillo development. The sewer
lines for this project will drain by gravity flow along Melrose Drive and then along
Poinsettia Lane. This sewer main will then connect with an offsite pump station, which
will pump sewage to the existing Buena/San Marcos Interceptor system presently located
on El Camino Real. As sewer improvements have yet to be installed for the entire Master
Plan area, a condition of this project will specify that sewer line improvements be
guaranteed prior to approval of any final map.
‘. Domestic water will be provided to the project from trunk lines of the 12” water main
beneath Melrose Drive. The 12” water main will be installed concurrently with the
construction of Melrose Drive. An 8” reclaimed water line will be installed in Melrose
Drive and will be tapped for irrigation of the slope areas. As water improvements have
yet to be installed for the entire Master Plan area, a condition of the project will specify
that water line improvements be guaranteed prior to approval of the final map.
.
Surface drainage will be conveyed by standard curb and gutter to drain to an underground
storm drain system, with various approved outlet areas. A broader drainage issue
associated with the entire Ranch0 Carrillo development is to provide drainage
improvements to mitigate onsite runoff upstream of this project to prevent adverse effects
to downstream onsite and offsite properties. A condition of this project will specify that
construction of drainage mitigation improvements be guaranteed prior to approval of any
final map. Runoff attenuation measures have been installed, concurrent with the Ranch0
Carrillo mass grading operation, to mitigate surface runoff impacts.
- -
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - r&NCHO CARFZILLO VILLAGES A, B, C 8r D
February 4,1998
Page 9
C. Planned Development Ordinance
The proposed subdivision consists of 2 multi-family lots, 114 duplex lots. 87 single family lots
and 5 open space lots for a total of 208 lots on 83.55 acres. Village A consists of one lot and
Village B consists of 3 lots. Villages A and B propose multi-family developments. Village C
consists of 114 duplex lots and 2 open space lots. Village D consists of 87 single family lots and
3 open space lots. ,
The projects design is consistent with design criteria specified by the Planned Development
Ordinance in that it is consistent with the General Plan and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan multi-
family land use designations for Villages A, B and C and single family residential land use
designation for Village D and will provide the required Circulation Element/Master Plan
roadways. The proposed internal circulation pattern, which includes 36’ to 48’ wide public
streets and sidewalks, is designed to provide direct access to individual units in Villages C and
D. The street system will provide on-street guest parking in Villages C and D. The architecture
will be consistent with approved and/or proposed development in the surrounding Ranch0
Can-ill0 villages.
Tables 4 and 5 below summarize compliance with the Planned Development Ordinance
development standards for Villages C and D:
TABLE 4 - VILLAGE C - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED
Lot Size (min.) I 3,500 square feet minimum I 3,670 - 14,830 square feet
Front Yard Setback
Building Separation
20 feet minimum
10’ minimum
20 feet minimum
Minimum 10 feet
Building Height I 35 feet maximum I 35 feet maximum
Public Street Width 36 feet (parking both sides) Public streets with a minimum 36’
curb to curb face width
Parking: Resident 2 per unit = 228 spaces 2 car garage/unit min. = 228 spaces
Guest I 3 1 spaces On-street parking (3 1 spaces min)
RV Storagk 20 sq. ft. per unit
114 units x 20 = 2,280 sq. ft.
Reservation of 2,280 square feet of
RV storage in the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan Recreational Vehicle
Storage Lot.
Storage Space I 392 cu. Ft. I Provided in 2 car garage
Recreation Space: 200 sq. ft./unit x 114 units = 37,050 sq. ft. (private rear yards -
22,800 sq. ft. (half of which may 25,650 sq. ft.; common rec. areas -
be provided as private yards) 11,400 sq. ft.)
‘4
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - LK’HO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, i dk D
February 4,1998
Page 10
TABLE 5 - VILLAGE D PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD
Lot Size (min.)
REQUIRED
3,500 square feet
PROPOSED
4,530 - 23,030 square feet
Front Yard Setback 20 feet, however, setbacks may
be varied to a fifteen-foot
average with a ten-foot
mininium
Same as required
Building Separation I 10’ minimum Minimum 10 feet
Building Height I 30 feet I 30 feet maximum
Private Street Width 36 f&et (parking both sides) Private streets with a minimum 36’
curb to curb face width
Parking: Resident
Guest
2 per unit = 174 spaces
25 spaces
2 car garage/unit min = 174 spaces
On-street parking (25 spaces min)
RV Storage 20 sq. ft. per unit
87 units x 20 = 1,740 sq. ft.
Reservation of 1,740 square feet of
RV storage in the Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan Recreational Vehicle
Storage Lot.
Storage Space 392 cu. Ft. Provided in 2 car garage
Recreation Space: 200 sq. ft./unit x 87 units = 28,275 sq. ft. (private rear yards -
17,400 sq. ft. (half of which may 19,575 sq. ft.; common rec. areas -
be provided as private yards) 8,700 sq. ft.)
D. Inclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 and 21.53 of the Zoning Ordinance)
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan requires project compliance with the City’s Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance; therefore, at least a minimum of 15% of the total number of proposed units
must be affordable to low income households. Additionally, at least 10% of the required
affordable units must be three bedroom units. The required findings include consistency with
General Plan goals and policies, adequacy of the site and street system, and a determination that
the affordable units are compatible with surrounding uses, and will not adversely impact the site
or surrounding areas including traffic circulation.
As mentioned previously most of these units, including the three bedroom unit, will be provided
in Village B. A portion of the Inclusionary requirement may be provided onsite as second units.
The exact details of the number of second units permitted in Village D to meet the Inclusionary
requirement will be determined as a part of the Affordable Housing Agreement. This number
will not exceed 20% of the total units approved within the village.
As stated in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, the majority of the affordable Housing for Ranch0 L/ /
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - hJCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, L & D
February 4,1998
Car1310 will be located in Village B as multi-family condominiums or apartments. Village B is
located adjacent to the intersection of Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road. This location
puts it in proximity to jobs along the industrial corridor of Palomar Airport Road and bus stops
on Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road.
E. Growth Management Ordinance - Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18 in the City’s southwest
quadrant and is subject to the conditions of the Zone 18 LFMP. The 201 units proposed for
Villages C and D are 28 units below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance of 229
units (115 units for Village C and 114 units for Village D). The impacts on public facilities
created by this project (i.e., Villages C and D) and compliance with the adopted performance
standards are summarized in Table 6 below:
TABLE 6 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration 699 square feet Yes
Library 373 square feet Yes
Waste Water Treatment 201 EDU Yes
Parks 1.4 acres Yes
Drainage Drainage Basin D Yes
Circulation 2,010 ADT Yes
Fire Stations 2, 5, and 6 Yes
Open Space 189.9 acres (Master Plan OS Yes
Performance Standard)
Schools San Marcos USD Yes
Sewer Collection System 201 EDU Yes
Water
F. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)
The Carlsbad Municipal Code requires a subdivision map to be filed in accordance with Title 20
for any subdivision project. As conditioned, the proposed tentative map is in compliance with
the City’s Subdivision Ordinance in that the lots are in accordance with the provisions of Title 21
(Planned Development Ordinance) and all of the necessary infrastructure improvements will be
provided. The findings required by Title 20 can be made for this project and are contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4241, dated February 4, 1998.
- -
CT 97-02 / PUD 97-02 - LKHO CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, L’ g: D
February 4,1998
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is located within the boundaries of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP-139(F))
which regulates the entire 680 acre site. The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental
impact from the future development have been analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR 91-04) certified by the City Council on July 27, 1993. Additional project level
studies have been conducted including a supplemental noise analysis and soils contamination
assessment. These studies provide more focused and detailed project level analysis and indicate
that additional environmental impacts beyond what was analyzed in Final EIR 91-04 would not
result from implementation of the project. This project qualifies within the scope of both the
Ranch0 Carrillo EIR and the City’s MEIR as identified in Section 21083.3 of the California
Environmental Quality Act; therefore, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Prior
Environment Compliance on January 29, 1998. The applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR
91-04 and MEIR 94-01 are included as conditions of approval for this project. With regard to air
quality and circulation impacts, the City’s MEIR found the cumulative impacts of the
implementation of projects consistent with the General Plan are significant and adverse due to
regional factors, therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding considerations.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those effects, no additional
environmental documentation is required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 424 1
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4242
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance, dated January 29, 1998
Local Facilities Impact Assessment
Disclosure Form
Reduced exhibits dated February 4,199s
Exhibits “A” - “N”, dated February 4, 1998
BH:nm:mh
- -
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 97-02/PUD 97-02
CASE NAME: Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A. B. C and D
APPLICANT: Continental Ranch, Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 210 Lot residential subdivision (114 duplex. 87 single
familv, 4 future multi-family and 5 onen suace lots) on pronertv generallv located within the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, south of Palomar Airuort Road and north of Poinsettia Lane.
between the future Melrose Drive and the eastern citv boundary in the PC Zone and Local
Facilities Management Zone 18.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A nortion of Section 24. Townshiu 12 South. Range 4 West. San
Bernardino meridian & a uortion of Sections 18 & 19, Township 12 South. Range 3 West.
APN: 221-012-12. -13 Acres: 83.55 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 210 lots
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RH. RM and OS
Density Allowed: RH (15-23 du/ac)RM (4-8 du/ac) Density Proposed: RH(19.0)RM (5.26 du/ac)
Existing Zone: P-C - Planned Communitv Proposed Zone: N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site P-C Vacant
North PM Vacant
South P-C Vacant
East P-C Vacant
West LC Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 20 1
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: Januarv 10. 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Cl Negative Declaration, issued
El Other, Notice of Prior Comnliance. issued Januarv 29, 1998
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Please Take Notice:
The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the
project described below have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional
environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed.
Project Title: Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A, B, C, and D
Project Location: Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan - Southeast corner of Melrose
Drive and Palomar Airport Road
Project Description: Subdivision and Planned Unit Development Permit to
subdivide an 83.55 acre site into 210 lots to include 4 future
multi family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single family lots, and
5 open space lots.
Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las
Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited.
Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of
date of publication.
DATED: January 29, 1998
CASE NO: CT 97-02/PUD 97-02
CASE NAME: Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A,B,C, and D
PUBLISH DATE: January 29, 1998
Planning Director
2075 Las Patmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-I 576 - (760) 438-11610 If&X (760) 438-0894
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
- -4
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Ranch0 Carrillo Villages A.B.C. and D CT 97-02/PUD 97-02
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 18 GENERAL PLAN: RHRM. and OS
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Continental Ranch, Inc.
ADDRESS: 12636 High Bluff Drive Drive, Suite 300. San Diego. CA 92130
PHONE NO.: (619) 793-2580 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 212-012-12 & 13
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 210 lots
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: unknown
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 699
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 373
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 201 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = 1.4
Drainage: Demand in CFS = na
Identify Drainage Basin = D
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 2,010
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = #2.5, and 6
Open Space: Acreage Provided = per Master Plan
Schools: San Marcos Unified
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU 201
Identify Sub Basin = Buena/San Marcos
Intercentor
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 201 EDU
The project is 28 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance for
Villages C and D.
~IPPLIC.~~~SST~~~~E~OFDISCLOSUREOR~T~~~~~IPI~~ONALL~~PLIC~~OIU .VHICH WILL REQUIRE DfSCRETXOSARY ACIION ON =E PART OF THE CFf COUNCIL OR A.Y VPOINTED BOARD. COMMISSION OR COMMlm
‘lease Pnnr) . .
he following infknation must be discioscd:
Lisr the names and addresses of all, p:rsons having 2 Continental Ranch, Inc. znanciai inreresr in the appiication.
12636 High Bluff Drive, Ste, 300
San Dieqo, CA 92130
. 3.
4.
Owner
List the names and addressees of aI person havinE =nv ownership interest in the propeT invol\
Continental Ranch. Tnr - .
12636 Hioh Bluff Drive, Ste. 300
.
Ifanypcnonidcntifiedpursuanrro(11 or(t) above is acorporarionorparmership,lisrthe na and addresses of all individuais owning more than :()cz of rhc shares in the corporation or ok
any parmership inxresx in the-parmctihip.
If any person identified pursuant fo (.l) or (2.) abox- + is a non-Trofir organization or a fIusf. lis names and addresses or’ any person sen-ing as o&e:
as trustee or beneficiary of the trcrst. 3r ciirerzor of thi non-profit orggniz=ic
DISCLOS.FK,$I 296 f 7 PAG 1 of 2
20-F=, -3s. pa1mas Orlve - CarlsDac. Cal~r=t?,~ g2oos-1~76 - I61 g; 238--16i ..-
-
. (Ove Disclosure Statement Page
5. Have you had more than 3250.00 worth of business transacted with any member of City sta:
Boards. Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s)
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm. copartnership, joint venture, aY@ation. social club. fraternal organizatlon
corporation, estate. trust. rccciver, syndicate. this and any other county, city and coimty, city municipality, district or othc
political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
(NOTE: Attach additional. pages as necessary)
Signature of Owner/date
J&V/P 4 c-
Print or type name of Owner
l
. ’ .
I Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of applicant
D!SCLOS.FRM 48 PAGE 1 of 2
VILLAGE C
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village C consists of 114 duplex units in the northern portion of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan. The lots range in size from 3,740 to 14,080 square feet. Lot 13 is a 14,000 square foot
recreation lot.
‘2. UNITMIX
This project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Number of floor plans
Number of front elevation
treatments per building
Minimum Maximum
2 6
2 3
3. PLOTTING
All buildings shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
Architectural Exhibit approved as a part of the Tentative Map for Village C. Plotting shall
alternate floor plans building plan so that no individual floor plan building plan is plotted for
more than 60% of the total units buildings on any individual street. Units Buildings may be
plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the
requirements of the Village C Design Guidelines. Future homeowners shall have the ability
to construct a room addition within the building envelope, as long as the overall building
coverage does not exceed 60% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory structures that
are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned Development
Permit for this project.
Village C Design Guidelines 1 January 1998
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these guidelines shall be attached to the plot plan for each
building phase of this Tentative Map. This matrix shall show how each phase and the overall
project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3 (Plotting), 5 C, D, E, & F
(Architecture) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these guidelines. The matrix may be modified subject
to approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and elevations for this Tentative
Map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
Palomar Airport
Road All units buildings shall maintain a 50’ minimum setback from the
Palomar Airport Road
Street A-A
Front
Rear
All units buildings shall maintain a 20’ setback from Street A-A ROW
20’ minimum
All units buildings shall have a minimum 15’ deep, flat usable rear
yard.
Side 5’ minimum
10’ minimum for comer lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance)
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the
following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival
California Mission
Monterey
Spanish Eclectic
Craftsman
Bungalow
Prairie
California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village C, it should be compatible
with the surrounding Villages. Architectural styles are described in the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan, General Community Development Standards pages 3 1-35.
Village C Design Guidelines 2 January 1998
A*
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J. ’
K.
When three or more 2 story units buildings are in a row situated less than 15 feet
apart, at least one of the three units buildings shall have a single story building edge
with a depth of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units buildings. The
roof covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the rooffor the
2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs
falling to a single story element).
Thirty-three per cent of all units buildings shall have a single story edge for 40% of
the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge
shah be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units buildings qualifying under the 33% shall
be distributed throughout the project.
At least 40% of the units buildings in this project shall have at least three separate
building planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18
inches and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The
minimum depth between the faces ofthe forward-most plane and the rear plane on the
front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive
credit -under this section.
Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph D for front
elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the rear
elevation shall be 3 feet.
At least 50% of the units buildings in this project shall have one side elevation where
there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a
minimum of 7 feet.
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed
or projected a minimum of 2” and shall be with wood or colored aluminum window
frames (no mill finishes).
The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to one
another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
The design of the units buildings shall be varied to create variety and interest within
the village.
A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any one residence.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the units
buildings within this village.
Village C Design Guidelines 3 January 1998
51
-
L. Windows shall be placed to maximize privacy. Windows shall be located so that they
are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible landscaping or
opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
M. At least 3 different roof colors shall be used in this project.
N. A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations of these
units buildings to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer, wood trim,
stucco and stone.
6. GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20’ between the face
of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3 inches rather than
being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.12.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Accessory structures constructed in conformance with this
standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit for this project.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village C Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All
signage will be developed in accordance with the Village C Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 2 1.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village C Design Guidelines 4 Janumy 1998
s-2
10. LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks from
tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be limited as follows:
Street Maximum % of Lots
<2.5% 50%
12.5 - 5% 75%
<5 - 7.5% 90%
57.5 - 12% 100%
12. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A change to five or less of these provisions may be deemed a minor modification and may be
approved by the Planning Director. However, each change must be determined to be in
substantial conformance with the approved project.
Village C Design Guidelines 5 January 1998
a
0
3 = *- > I 3 c *- 3 .- s El ‘I $ c .= 3 i! s .- E E 8 b L
X ‘C
2
/
b
.
>
3
E ‘C $ P .- 2 ‘5 0
2 %
:. .j:. :::. ::.: ‘:.: :;:: :.:: P :.-: .- m
ji 3 ::. .:j n
,:i 3
j;, I! . . . . (I :jjj Q : : jj 3 i.:: m
‘: r :.:: ..ij 1
.:;: CI
Em
i?g UJE :i 6s au) c c
2s
,z
.EB
P$
253
0 al
P = .- > I
5
5 z
E
,5
P .-
g K
i
X
‘t
2
$ 5 6 !z et
~
?P p z 5 ,
f
VILLAGE D
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village D consists of 87 single family residential and 2 recreation lots in the northwest
portion of the Pancho Carrillo Master Plan. The lots range in size from 4,700 to 21,950
square feet.
2. UNITMIX& SIZE
The project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
. Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation
treatments per floor plan 3 6
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sq. ft. (including the area of a second
dwelling unit)
Two Story Units - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq. ft. (including the area of a second
dwelling unit)
Village D Design Guidelines 1 January I998
&5=
3. PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
architectural data exhibit approved as a part of the Tentative Map for Village D. Plotting
shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more than 60% of
the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front facades shall be
plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street Units may be plotted in
phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with the requirements of
the Village D Design Guidelines. Future homeowners shall have the ability to construct a
room addition within the building envelope, as long as the overall building coverage does
not exceed 50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory structures that are within
the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit
for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these conditions shall be attached to the plot plan for
each building phase of this Tentative Map. This matrix shall show how each phase and the
overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3 (Plotting), 5 D, E, F
& G (Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these guidelines. This matrix
may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning Director when the floor plans and
elevations for this Tentative Map are approved.
4. SETBACKS
Melrose
Front
Rear
Side
Street A-A
Building
Separation
All units shall maintain a 50’ minimum setback from Melrose ROW.
In accordance with Section 21.45.090(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
All units shall have a minimum 15’ deep, flat usable rear yard.
5’ minimum
10’ minimum for. comer lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance).
All units except lots 116 & 193 shall maintain a 20’ rearyard setback from
Street A-A ROW. Lots 116 dz 193 shall maintain a minimum 10’ sideyard
setback from Street A-A ROW.
All units in Village D shall comply with the building separation
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance, Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 2 1.45.090(5).
Village D Design Guidelines 2 January 1998
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the
following styles that have been approved as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan:
a Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village D, it should be
compatible with the surrounding Villages. Architectural styles are described in the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan General Community Development Standards pages
31-35.
B. When three or more 2 story units are in a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at
least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of
not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to
a single story element). The height of the structure along the single story edge
may be a maximum of 16’-0” for 50% of its length in order to accommodate
stairs and clerestory spaces along that edge.
C. When three 2 story units in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least one of
the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less than
5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single story units
shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this in
not intended to preclude long shed type roofs falling to a single story element).
D. Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline, the single story edge
shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33% shall be
distributed throughout the project.
Village D Design Guidelines 3 January 1998
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
At least 50% of the units in this project shall have at least four separate building
planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches
and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The
minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane on
the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30 square feet
to receive credit under this section.
Rear streetside elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph E
for front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes
on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
At least 50% of the units in this project shall have one side elevation where there
are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a minimum
of 7 feet.
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be
recessed or projected a minimum of 2” and shall be with wood or colored
ahnninum window frames (no mill finished).
The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to one
another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
village.
A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any on residence.
At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the units
within this village.
Windows shall be phased to maximum privacy. Windows shall be located so that
they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible
landscaping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
At least three different roof colors shall be used on this project.
A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations of
these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer, wood trim,
stucco and stone.
Village D Design Guidelines 4 January 1998
6. GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20’ by 20’.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20’ between the
face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 50% of the units in this village shall have three door garages. Units
with three car garages shall be distributed throughout the project. Three car
garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage doors all on
the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car garage door
combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12”. Driveways serving
three car garages shall have a maximum width of 24’ at the back of the sidewalk
and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at the entrance to the
garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3” rather than
being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 2 1 . lO.OSO( l)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone). Accessory structures constructed in conformance
with this standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned Development Permit for
this project unless the lot coverage as provided for in these guidelines would be exceeded.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village D Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All
Signage will be developed in accordance with the Village D Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit. Signage
shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 2 1.4 1 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village D Design Guidelines 5 January 1998
10. LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks
from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be limited
as follows:
Street Maximum % of Lots
<2.5% 50%
52.5 - 5% 75%
55 - 7.5% 90%
17.5 - 12% 100%
11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
All development in Village D shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 21.45
(Planned Development Ordinance) of the Carlsbad Municipal code, except as may be
modified for the approved affordable housing incentives package for the combined
affordable housing site.
12. SECOND UNITS
Up to 20% of the lots in Village D may be developed with second dwelling units. All
second units shall be developed pursuant to Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code and processed in conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit
Ordinance, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and the Village D Design Guidelines. The
developer of Village D has the option to develop the second units concurrently with the
primary units . The units may be approved as part of the Minor Planned Development
Permit that approves the floor plans and architecture for Village D as long as they are
processed consistent with Section 2 1.10,015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
13. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is considered a
minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each
change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project.
Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the requirements of Section
2 1.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village D Design Guidelines 6 January 1998
a
2 i E b ; ? , J , !, z I . J$ iz i -g
10) j .E :o I ‘5 in ?g i’s
F ,
I 1 I
: I J j 1 ;uj J=
g
! aJ Lb ig ig
2 JS to.
-
! R
i
5 F i
5 2
:.
D :
!
! L
% ;
3 iis! La VP
59
2
5 1)
I 1 1 1. L
lj < i I ! 7 i z i-1 ! CT 1 ‘, 0 :1 < LLI o\ I. :I > ci ! 5
-
, ‘D;
,: ‘; g]
-.r 4‘: 1: .Y ! O? : i
J d *CL2 ,sL( ; ! y.-qy J, ,
qj
? a!! _ ye- ,A ii 1 i 6; :: I.> j “1
I
.
1
‘P
. 9
: : 13
FI iz 4;
; i. ;- 4; ,r” - ,a i SE’$ i,..
;;’ z, . ;! I-
; :. g?
3 i :: z I
f
: %
.C 0
:
;*+j
P
i
-&I&
0 0 Zd 1 0 d uw r; cc . a (:
Z
,ct
0 I 0, -0 z >
< Id:
ti a
f
- :- I /-
I e / (-‘I.
I
.I ,gi
5 ’ 4 i
/
gg *
A
. ~ I :,‘I $ :d .”
c i i “* : . \ * c
‘\ -/ . ‘\~ ?
! f
1’
/ >>’ ,i/ ’ ,
i,’ / II ,’
\ -
\ ‘\ 1’ gi, ““. n \ i i jj \ % ---i--- ,L,\\ ‘< ‘\ \ ‘1 I‘\.- \ I,\ i’
-+ I ‘, i . 1’ 1
i’ i
.z I
/ i
b
- ’ : ,I- >- &a ’ J <- ni COI
I
0 0 i .‘I ; a
cc 1 u- -
Z
cc
d < ,(’
e
&z rl
t l.33ws 33s ‘. S.EiDHS 338
.
d
I I! , 8 Mi 7
S l33HS 33s
.
I
70
:
i
. . . . . . . . . j:....;.: . . . . ..i ::::;:(: :;:y.f: ..:.:.:, . ..‘.
1~
. . . . . . . . ,J$< 1s;; :;,i;$; B j+:. ,.:::j, _ .:.:.:
5 #;
.:.:.z.
i
:.:.:.: i . . . i..... <.:.:. 1::::: :.:.:.: I.... . . . . . . .:.:.:. ..:.:.: ::: j: . . . . . . :::: j: :.:.:. .:.:.: .l... :;:::: .:...:
Bl
;G ..i.. . . . . . . g: c.: g:>: ..:.:. .:.:.:
, : :: ; j ::
;. I . 1' : i .:
? ,: .' i .!, ..> ,:. j.;, ,j ,! 'St
: , .i, , ;.:,:
.:' : ,gj: r -." ~~~~~.~
~,.--.- - -- . C.
,...
.__.... - -r-w---.,,
:....i .,. . . _ . . . . . . . .
’ y/i., )
‘X
/ j+y+, ::. ::y ,f /y.y..*$. . . . . . ;q ,. ,...’
..?” k
* w
/ .. ,. .A.\;; . . . . ., . . ,; ;’ j .&&; $(; .k ,$ .,( ./“$;,
WI
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
/
/
I
-e----a
.- -- .-
- I- ““1
L- - -III--- I.. ‘m
.- I -- .* - ‘no
E muan2 .- --
- . -- II -- IrL - - - .- ‘L- - =-
;= - 2 b
w-m----
.- c-
.- a
c
H- --- ml.1
m=u.m .-
--- WS
- - ~-e-m -- - --. ZIL
.--w - .-
- w
--
.LI - --
- -
_-
-11 -(uI
- ZZ!L -
a2
*- ax- ‘L-
Z- -,”
-- Ib8Si
m , IZ -c m---n ‘-8 .
ml
- , J -..n-.-..z ’ ztczzzz:-z Z===-
.- u . z=- - Z- - 1 -- S - -- - EL -NE I - - s-.. -G!CZ - Zi!i!f= --m’w’w cizz - =- Y z -PI UC - AWZ
-
.- ,- - S- -2Z *II - - rrz -111 , - ..‘ -
ZL ~~ -- NOTE!3 manL
!EB- -
----“-.I
--m--m
.- - w- l9~‘rrll-A~l.l. l--II- ruI-II-ti---- -“ti--.-.! *.-m-m ,-III” F--II 1”--I-.m-“z ---“9.---I -L--ILLS-Q .--“---mm C.--II-..-
=-~--“--
L~~~zzzzi.. mymm-m-01
-LIL-.m-III-U --*a.---
-
.- c- z llLL - -- - L.--H.- me. ‘LI
--I-II I.A ‘LI
“W c
I--- CII
- -
4 - L -
4
.- -
M -
-c - --
Wk
-- -
.-
.-
% --J-l
b - - -
.- - - , - --
. .-
LI -
-rr -7
I RANCH0
Landscape Plant Palette
- .
.
. . :- .-.
i-
C-N- =:= “-
SW-- .--- z- -- W-m
RANCH0
Landscape Concept Details
I
EXHIBIT 5
PUBLIC HEARING:
8. CT 97-02/PUD 97-02 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A,B,C, AND D - Request for a
Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit to subdivide an 83.55 acre site into
210 lots to include 4 multi-family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single family lots and 5 open space lots
on property generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, south of Palomar Airport
Road and north of Poinsettia Lane, between the future Melrose Drive and the eastern city
boundary in the P-C Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne, introduced the item and announced that the Commission’s
action on this item is not final and will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration.
Project Planner, Brian Hunter, presented the staff repot-t and described the project as follows: This is a
request for a Tentative Map and Planned Unit Development Permit to subdivide and develop the 83.55
acre site into four villages. Village A will consist of 1 multi-family lot, Village B - 3 milti-family lots, Village C
- 114 duplex lots and two open space lots, and Village D - 87 single family lots and three open space lots.
The item is in conformance with the General Plan, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and its amendments,
the Rancho Carrijlo Final Environmental Impact Report the Rancho Carrillo Hillside Development Permit,
and the relevant Zoning Chapters of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, including the Subdivision Ordinance
and the Planned Development Ordinance. TWO conditions have been added through the errata sheet and
staff is recommending approval of this Project.
Chairperson Noble opened Public Testimony and offered the invitatiOn to speak.
Chris Chambers, 12636 High Bluff Drive, Ban Diego, representing Continental Homes, concurred with the
staff report and asked the Commission ffr a recommendation, to the city COUnCil, that this item be placed
on the City Council Agenda for the meeting of Feb,ruary I79 1998. Mr. Chambers stated that he hopes the
applicant will be in a position, very soon, to again appear before the Planning Commission with a Bite
Development Plan for the affordable housing Portion of the overall Project.
Commissioner Welshons asked Mr. Chambers if the recreation areas, in Villages C and D, are envisioned
MINUTES 76
PLANNING COMMISSION February 4,1998 Page 13
to have active or passive recreation, and, how is the applicant providing for parking for those areas.
Mr. Chambers replied that each village will have two recreations areas; one will be active and one will be
passive. As for the parking, Mr. Chambers stated that there are no parking spaces specifically for the
recreation areas but that there should be available on-street parking.
Seeing no one else wishing to testify, Chairperson Noble closed Public Testimony.
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Motion by Commissioner Heineman, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 4241 and 4242, recommending approval of CT g7-
02 and PUD 97-02, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein, and to include the errata sheet as presented by staff.
7-o
Noble, Heineman, Savary, Monroy, Welshons, Compaq and Nielsen
None
None
77
March 3,199s
J
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008-l 989
RE: Ranch0 Carrillo Elementary School . ,
-Dear Sirs,
We are very excited about the scheduled construction of the Ranch0 Carrillo Elementary
School. The school district’s,counsel provided a tentative Calendar of Events for
formation of the Community Facilities District (CFD) showing closing of bond sale and
delivery of proceeds August 27, 1998. The Ranch0 Carrillo’Elementary School
construction schedule from NTD Architects shows completion of the buildings by July,
1999, in time to start the school year. Both the CFD schedule and the construction
schedule are enclosed for your review.
In the unlikely event that the bond sale does not occur in a timeframe consistent with
construction of the school, Continental Homes is nonetheless obligated to provide
construction funds to the school district under various provisions of the School Facilities
Funding and Mitigation Agreement (the “Agreement”). The negotiation and execution of
the Agreement was a condition of the many Tentative Maps which already have been
approved for Ranch0 Carrillo. The condition was satisfied on January 8, 1998, the record
date of mutual execution of the Agreement.
lf you have further questions about the timing of school construction, please contact
Lettie Boggs at the school district’at (760) 736-2200.
D
Sincerely,
Continental Homes
David Lother
Vice President, Development
I cc: Ron Ball
Lettie Boggs
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
All. RE&fV’E
CfTYwuNClL
I TE DA Cm&WAGER
AGENDAmM# W+n-
l
T: (619) 793-2580 F: (619) 793-257:
A Continental Homes Community
.J$ /2. 1998 12:5lYM .BAKWG ('/14)ijb/ 0208 . ' i4 NO. zszu.,~~.:P, ,! ,, ,: ,, :, . ,. .",' . .;. '..'. . . .;.,: ! '.,* . . . '. .- . . . ',.: . . . . '_
. SAN wCOS UNIFIi’D SCZXOOL DISmCT~ ‘. ..:. .’ . . :.,““,
THE SAN MARCOS WIED SCHOOL DISTRICT .
‘,,‘.” .’ : ‘. A::: ;;-‘;;.,:;;;.; ;,:. : .; : ::
(MEADOWL34RK+ANCHOCARILLO)
: . . .‘.. :‘;’ ;, ..: ., ,;,. :
” ‘.
+
‘, :. ;. *, ‘.‘,‘... _
Board of Truskes Meetings GeneralIy Held 2nd and 4th Monday of E&h I&&. ’ .‘: ‘! ‘,:c. .; .;, ..: e,..’ ,.l y.,. .’ .s. .’ ‘. . .’ : ,;. ” .‘:. : . . ., ., ” . .:. , ,. ., , . .,’ * ,. ,, . : . . . . . . :.: : ;: ;. ‘,. :,-. ‘.
Acti&@ . ;;, .: ,~,-.:‘.;-‘.‘.“,:.- ,,, ‘,
., :_ . . .
'ByJanuary30,1998 Maps and parcel descriptiks of Cl%@ep&ed~~‘&gidcci. ,; /I::’ ‘;. .,’ ‘. : ,..- : .. ‘. * :‘..: _. ‘. ..’ .‘.., :.’ ,
February 9,1998 Board of Trustees’ d6pts Resol$ioti Wify@g 0;’ r+$i~ . . , ‘,1. .;:’ :.:‘:: !. .’ ‘. .:{
Commwiity Facilities DisQici Financing’ policy, & .rt+q~~;:; :,.‘O,:. .’ . : : :
by Mello-Roos brct (Section 53.312.7)‘. ’ : : .. .. “:’ ,. ;‘, y,.,.’ ‘. ” . ,‘.
Board of Trustees adopts Resolutions of Intent&n to Fo*
CFD No. 4 and No. 5, &wets preparation of engin+&s. ,, :.
reports; calls public hearings.on formation of CED,,?h 4 a~$. ”
: ,,
.’ No. 5 (Section 53321). .:, : .,, ‘. :;:;. .’ :: :
‘. .’ ,’ . ..:‘.. : i I, ‘:’ .,, .I. , .‘I . : ,‘, :: .:., . ‘. ‘.
CAtENDARCiF EVENTSFOR’
FORMATI6N OF COMMUNklY FACILITIES . DISTRICT UNDER MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 (&hout.valida$on action) : . . . . ‘. .’ .’ . I,.:. .,: .:.:a . _’ i .f . . _., .’ :- :. Z’, ~
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTkKT NO. 4 ,tiD NO. 5 OF: . ;,; :,‘a.
.
: . .
. . ., ”
(TENTATWE) ‘. _’ : ,, . .
Board of Trust& adopts Resolutions .Declming Interition &
.’ ‘. +
In&r Bonded Indebtedness (Section.53345). :, I’ : ;;, : . . . . . . ‘, .;. + . . . .’ . , (,,’ :. ,: :
Board of ‘Ihstees adopts R~soluti~os’ Appiaving’CFD Mai: *. ; ‘, .. :
. for Cn> No. 4 kd No. S(Secfion 53321(a) tid Stiketi $nd. * ,. : . .
.. :
Hi&vaysCodeiSection3110&~. ” .“, ;’ ..,,_, ,,,_‘;.
,,
. ,.. ‘. . ,. :,
. . :.,
. ‘,‘. .
..:... ., .: .”
1 ~11 section references are to (he Csl~fornis Government Code unless oth~r~i~c nattd. This cnlenck’js based: .:_,L :. :).
IU only school district facilities being fmarnced through Cm No.4 and No. 5. I.’ ,. : .‘.. .’ . ;’ :’ . ,: ; ‘. . “,I .’ ., : :
- 1 - .’ ,” :
DAKW&GIREiuderl44Sl6
. . ‘. y i. . .
: . .
-... i
.,. :. :’ ‘. .,
.‘., . : . ‘. :
: : .’ . :;;
(. ,’ . . . . ..-..‘I ‘:
. .,.,’ :.
- .!AY.s22. 1998 12:51PM BMWG &14)851 0208 : . .
. .
_’ ‘,
,‘. . . :
.;- : ,L ‘. ‘. : ” .. ,, Sak Diego C@mty Regi&rar of voter+ is requested ti rev&* :.,
. . .,
‘. ,.:.. 1.::’ .: 1 ‘... 1.:
the rmrnber of re8istered vpters (if any) in the tetiitury bf:. 1.: ‘I ;: 1, : .. 1’
CFD No. 4 and No. 5. . . : . ;. ” .‘;. ; ..’ J . . : _’ ‘, : ‘I .;
.A copy of the Resolutions of Intention to’ form.CFD No. 4’ ‘, . :
and No. 5 is filed with the. S’an Diego County Clerk (Section ‘, .
533 15.6).
\ “.. : .; . . . . .: - . ~. ., .: : ‘.. ‘. .I .;. ,. .: ;. .
Post notices of public hearings. ,. .: ” ‘) * I : Y... .; . . .,
.. ,: ,, “~’ ‘.
File Notices of Exemptiod (CEGA) tith County Clerk.; ” ; .;. ‘.*
Statute of limitations for CEQA challenges’ expires ,35, &$s:: ,; ., ::. j.: ., - “,,. ‘, . .
after filing’(Pub~ic Resources Code8cction 21167j.: ‘. :., ,i ‘: : : ‘.” : ‘~ . . ‘. .’ ,: 1’. I).. .
ClerkendorsesandfilesmapofproposedCFDNo~4andNo. y. ‘. ” .’ 1 ,’ . . ,’
‘5 with County Recorder (Streets and I-I@ways Code S&tions ’ .:
3111 and 3112). : .’ . ‘. . .: ‘. Notice of public hearings is mailed to each lando~er’voter . _.. ,, : ;: ;!. ” ’
ii proposecj CFD No. 4 a$ No. 5 (Section 53322.4) .,. I.,’ :: ,“-‘.‘L : -: ‘, 1.. . ,(. , ., .‘: :.: ..<, . .., ., ;
Publication of notices of public hearing on fo&ation of CFD ‘.;:. ,” .: ._ ‘,.‘,’ : . :.
No. 4 and No. 5 in a newspaper of gene@ tiirculatiori in the ,’ ..‘. . ‘.
District (Section 53322) :
February 10,199s
On or before February 16,1998 . .
. On or before February 161’998
On & before February 16,1998
s On or before March 81998
Gn.or before March 8, 1998
On or before March’ 161998
On or before March 20,1998
. ~Marih 23,1998
BAKW&GfXEAidcsl44516
- NO. 2520 P; .3 ,y
Deadline for Registrar of Voters to confirm the number of : .’ :‘“I,. ;. : ‘.: ‘:.’ ‘.
registered voters (if any) within the territory of CFD:r\io;.‘4.. ,1, ” . . :’ ‘:” ~ : ‘. : , .“. and No. & Election Gficial concurs to holding el&ions Ion ” A” .‘y, ;.‘: ;
a shortened time iiame (Government Cede Section 53326(d)j. ] . : . :.
Deadline to complete and file CFD EepOits I&. School ;.; ‘1, : .j,.‘. “,.. ” - ,.’ . .
District (Section 53321.5). .‘- . . ‘. .;., ,:: .,‘: ., I 1 ., .I.. : . . ‘,,, . . . . .
Public hearingsheld (Section 53325). If more than, $I% of . .’ 1
the registered vtiters tile writteq protests, no ‘further ’ ”
proceedings may occur. If no majority protest’ the B&id
.takes the following actions: ‘, :.. ,, ;,: : : ,_‘. I. . ‘..‘. ._ ,a. ,.
Board of. Trustees’ adopts Resolutions of F&ir~at@::‘to I’. ‘, :.‘. .! 1: :‘:’ “. ’ :
establish 6FD No. 4 and&. 5 and levy specialtaxes (S&ioti.: ‘1 .‘: . ., : :
53325. I); calls’ elections’ for submitting to’ the regist&d’.;.,. ” ‘;. ,’ “.: ‘, :. .’ .( . -2- ‘.
. . .
‘. ., . . . .
; .’ . . . ‘.I ,;”
.,,’ . P.
. :
,.. ., ;. ’
‘, ‘.I
. ;
.“.. . . .,
---- : . JAN; 22. 1998 12:~52YM fUKWG ('1141851 0208 ; .
.: : ,. ‘. ‘. ,. . . ._.. I’ . . :. :.’ ,, :.
. ., _’ ^ ;‘,, ,, . .
. ._, .”
.’ ‘. . . .. ,‘,... ;:’ ,.
:. _,...’
. .
i . . Mar&h 24, 1998
’ .’
. . April’lO, 1998
,.’ April.13, 1998
April 15,1998
. . ,On or before April 17,1998
On or before Iby 4,1998
., Miy 11,1998
. May 11,1998
- NO.2520 P,..4 .,.;
_‘.. voteis,of CFD No. 4 and No. 5 the question of WI&~&%” ‘-1I,_.. ‘.“* ‘. ,’ .,..‘..
levy any special taxes2. . The Special Elective ~$1 be ” ‘. ,’ ,s’ ‘1’. . .. i
., “.
:
conducted on April 10, 19983 and is anticipat$rd to be. by. :
.mailcd ballot (Sectiori 5332X5), ., :, . . ; ‘. .’ :.:.r ‘, i. ,.
Bo& ofTme= &pu &&~io~ ~~~~~~:&$&~~~ ‘:’ .‘I :,. a’: .: ::‘; .‘f. i: ’ ,[
to incur Bonded Indebtedhess and calling m, k&@j@::‘:;.‘,)~’ .‘:“-‘::i’ . ’ ”
(Section 53352). ..‘.. ‘. ,. . : .._ . . ‘.
a&ballo&,(S&$on :: ‘. ., Election Offkial maiIs ballot packages
53326, 533.27 and 53327.5).
: ;“.‘, : .: ,I - .I. :I . . ,’ ., :
;;-. j .‘i,:, :..‘.‘,; ;‘::,;:j,,:~; ,,:j,,, :,.. ::;:; : ; . . . . s.: ..;, , : . . ‘..’ .’ .: ‘.. ELECTION DAY (Deadline for receipt of ballots), . . “:.’ ,;‘: .‘,’ .,“;.- * ‘:’ : i .’ * ..,
Boa;rd adopts Resolutions Canvassing Election Results i. “, ..
(Section VW. ,,;.:,: ;T’: ,~ ,, :,, :. . . . . . . . . , ..,, First Reading of Ordinan~s Authorking I,+vy ‘hf’S&cisl’, ; “’ ‘,.. .; :: ; ‘,
Tax&(Sectio~53316axid36900EtS(;g.). : .,. : :, .‘I’: ., .,,, ;:; ‘; :; .: ‘,,,
.‘. . .:. .,.,, ~ .,; : f, .I ,_... ‘... . . :
Post co~‘ofproposed Ordinances’in admi&ratj&,oflli&‘~f. ; .’ ,.’ ‘1’. ;i : ‘,. ‘.:, ,’
District. . . .:. . ,’ ,, .;. .i ” File Notices of Special Tax Lien with County; I+c&$r’: :: :“: ‘: : ‘:.. ,‘,; L.,
(Sectiqn 53328.3 and Streets and High~eys ~tids~~~&Ij&‘~ .. -:.,,t’: ,.:;:,. ;, .: ; ,., ‘. 3 114.5(b)). : I. .“.‘,,,, f.,(...‘;, .,I ..‘.‘.~ ..,.(,.. .” .., ‘. -‘.I . ‘.
Publish and post sumnuuy of pro$osed Ofiinanceti. : 1. 1. ; : ., . , * ,: ‘,
S&--ond r&in8 of O~~&s Au$hdti&g Levy’:‘if;&@\. !:,:. I::: ‘:t ““: .‘. ,, ’ ; .Special Tax and-adoption pf Or$nmce. “.’ ‘..’ 1, :.. .,;: ,‘I : 1” ‘I ! ‘.r, : .,’ . ;: ,. . ‘.. .”
Select and retain Underwriter for Bond SaW. Author& i * ‘. . : .’
appraisals ofproperty within CFD NO. 4 and No. 5. : : ” _’ : I . .“.. . ;.’ ,.:-, *. . ._..
2 The election questions will be combined into a single batlo; me-e. . ‘, .,: . . .‘. .:. . . . ..’ ,,‘. :,: ..:. ,; . ,:._ ‘; ;: .‘. ‘. :,, . . : ‘.. :’ . .’
’
.(‘;,: “, ::.
Ihis election date presumea that there are Iess than 12 registered voteis with the CFD and that ‘tie j&iuIoknk(s):‘~~ ,’ ,’ -:,: : ._ ., 1
within the CFD consent to waiving the El&ion Code requirements. : . ,, .,’ : . ...‘. (, .,a, . ‘.
’ This calendar presumes the sale of special tax bonds of the CFD by.way of a negotiated salt: filtcrnatkel~; . ‘, ‘,
the bond sale mighr he by competitive bid, which would affect this calendar. . . ” : . . . ..<I” i. . ., :. ::. : :,..
BAKW&G/REAldtll44526
. 3AJh.22. 1998' 12:52PM BAKWG . I' 1. '. . . .
June I!!,1998 : . .; 5.
:
. . June !1,19;jS
June15,1998
/ .
:’ itme 22, 1998’ . ..‘.
. July3;1998 .
: ;, .: +$27,1998 . . .‘. ., I..
. .
Ch or before Juli 27,1998
July 31,1998
.
‘August 4, ! 998
. . August 10.1998
August 26,1998
: August 27,1998
. :..
(714) 85l Ij208 ., ., e
.Distr&ution of Dn& CFD No, 4 and NO. 5 bond docynents. .:’ ‘. ‘,, : ‘. I by Bond Counsel. ” .’ ‘, . ,..:.. ,: .,. ‘. :.‘. ,, ” .,,, ‘...‘. ./ : _ . t ,’ : : ,$, y ~
;... . ,‘. .?‘. . .\ :,. -.. L:,:i ; ; :‘, .’
SpecialTax Ordinances be&me effective. .’ ‘, . : : ., ,.’ ” 1.” :(::j: ;.‘,.z,: j;c;:l.,:, : . I. .:; .. :, ., ,.“. . .
Appraisalscotipldtedandfjl,ed’. .,, y,. ‘1 ,:i’ ,:‘, ..,’ : ..* ,. :. . , ..‘.’ ‘. ‘.. . : ,. _
‘Board adopjs CFD Budget&xolutiotis for 1998-9~~,~~~.-,,:.:..-‘;1:‘,:‘~,’- I._ .,-. * .,.1 ,;: ,” ‘. :. .. . I .)‘:,‘,‘ .: ‘; ,’ ‘1 ..:,, ;, .*i ., ‘,, , ‘..I ; ,, :, .‘:; ,.‘. “:“‘. ,I::“; ‘. : &~t.d&of()ff~&j St&&en& , ’ .
. . ‘, ( . . ‘, . (‘:.,:.,
‘Board adopts resolutions approving .Bond sale. n$e&on&f : ‘. ‘. : ,:
Fiscal Agent and apjnwing f&-r@ of do&mcnts tid @fikiiil ::‘,:;j: .’ : ,:
;
.:., ,.‘, ,’ .,: ‘. &atement. .’ ” . ,;. . . :. : ,. ; -. :. .,..,’ .’ ; ‘. :’ . .;.. ‘: :‘. ..,-. . ’ ,’ . File preligdQ CDIAC n#ice. .’ . :. . . ‘. : 1’ :: ,‘i .“., :.,., :, .:-:: ‘..y:\.i:‘,:,:: 1. : ._:
Deadhk to sub&t CFD Spcciril Tax listings ;o.-County .tttid .: , : . . ‘.<.‘I ‘,:
Resolutions’ \o County printing. and. distiihti$~~~, of, : “,.:
‘PreliminaryOff~cialStatemenls. ;. .,. . ..” .;‘.: ,,
i . ; . . : :.,". : ', . ., &.
Printing and distrihtion of Preliminary Officials ~@?k@~~~. : I,‘:, :I. .:!i:: &i .y. i. :,. i. . . ; . . . ‘. ..‘. ,‘>. ,: .,_ .,;‘, . . ..I . . : ,,,:. q-;C.,.‘.f .,. ’
P&bg &J&s, Bond h&we Agr&m& ~“sigh&?i’~’ .’ “f .:. .:. ,’ : .
. . : . . .’ , Predking. ‘, ‘. ; ” , Y’.” ‘. .;. .+,, . : ‘.: .;. .,. . :, : ,. - , ,,: ::.; .., .‘.’ .‘.. .,: ; a,
Closing oiBop&, delivety $pm&. ’ : ‘::. . :. ‘.:’ ,( ; ‘; . ,:
., ..’ .‘T. *‘.. .:: : 1 ‘y > ;’ ..,: : :‘, . . ‘... ,‘. ,. , : _’ ,. . . ,’ ” . .: : .,. , :. :+,;. ‘. . : ‘I . ., : ,:; .’ .: .; :;: ,. .. ,:. . : ,. ‘. ,‘,: ., ,: ;,.. .: : .. .: ,. . ” . ‘. : .. :. .,. ;: .‘. :. ‘., _., .‘. .‘. ; ; . :: :. ,, -: ..,” . y,_ .2” .:. :.. . ,. . . : .’ .# , ,,.: :. ,. ‘. . : ;‘. ,,..... . i : .‘.‘.‘.%. : .i. ,. ,’ :‘.’ I,,. ‘,,.’ ,i ;., . . . .;. : ., : . . : ‘,*
: . . . ..;.
..
(.’ ‘.’ : ‘.
’ ‘JIG calcdw prmnn~ thnt the resulting lien:~alue ratio” will be at’ &t 1:X ,’ ‘.. .’ ,.,,* :.‘, . . . . . . : : /’ _. i.‘. : .: . . . :,. . :‘. : I . ‘. ,;’ .I., ,. ,:,.,
6 T& bond tic& and &&g schedule could be d&twl by mmktt,&sms tid pkeS wh~&~,&h~ Ri$CG. I’! ; ,. i:;t;:- :: :, f
. : : : :- .; ,, ., different dates necess9j or desirable. ,.’ ., ,’ ::, . . . . ,‘.\ : ; : ,..., .: .. :: .), . . ; . . . .’ 4- - ,, : . _’ ‘. ., ;;: ; eAKWMlREiVdul44S26 . . . ,’ .::.. ,‘. + 1. ” :
‘_,. ‘. . . : : ..,, ._’ .. : . : . . . ,, _’ I, .,. .‘,I . . ,;. I,.!. .: ‘. ., , ,. ‘., , ,. .: ,. * . 1 :*:.. . .‘., .’ .: . . :, .’ ::.. :. . . .,( ,“.... :
:. ‘. “: ,,. ,” ‘. ‘, ;. ., ,. ,‘, I...
. .......... . . . . . . .... . . . ..... . . ... . . . ........... . . . ....... . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . ............ ............ . . .......... ... ......... ............ . . . . . . . . ..a. ..... I
. MAR. 3:1998 4:47Pld BAKW& (714) 851 0208 NO. 3677 P. 213
DANE&l. PAYNB
Bmm, hINESON, ‘WILES & t%Alwv?NE
APARWEWWI --noNs M7omEYsAr~W
DI?#zlurRGcwdRI(O aNANw.#wm
3O7RMAVl@W&fuITll101 17001.2 mmNo,cAumxNlh9s2?
d3$%98
Mr. Ronald R Ball, City Athxmy
CiqyofCarMad 12ooCarlsbadviiDrivt #uIsbad, CA 92008
Re San ll&mD!? unified school Dmict RGhi3e of condition of Aqpnwal No. 20
Prior to Appmval ofFinal Mapet fr#Rm&o Cdlo plloject
Recogni~~tolJgM’s~~bythr:Citycouw;ilof~Cityof~~Lto~~
and~vethaVillageBSiteDevelopmesoltPianandVillaeesA,B,C,lDaedHT~~~nrlaps
for the Ran& Cadlo project (“project?), th San Marcos Unified School District (“Distzitit”)
does not wish to oppose tonight’s action by the City Council but tishes to infi#m the Cii
Council that Continenti Homes, k, (%eve@?c”) has not yet met Condition of Approvat ND.
20 (c’condlti0n 20”) for final map appn3wil. codldition 20 states:
YPriortora4atiwofanyflllilf~,- ofgradingor
&ildingpcm&Wbi&werocCUa3first,tbsfblxbwing~bemet:
(1OThcdocdingof9naoceptableschooIaite~~SanMarcos
Utied SCbool diskict if it is deter&& that a school site is
wurante4 and, (2) A financ@ plan agqwwd by San Mtucos UdifiedschoolDistrictgusranteeingthe~nofllK;essary elemmtary s&w1 kilities in Zone 18. As provided fctr in the
3!&%18LlPMP,if;zraylX?im~ and/or school %G CrGcIib are
to be given, the school agreem~cing plan shali provide a mechanism to do 56.”
. MAR. 3: 1998 4: 48PM BAKE (714) 851 0208 NO. 3677 P. 313 -
IXWIE, JiRNESQN, WXLES & GI.ANNQNE
Mr. Ronald R Ball, City Attorney
hkih3,1998
pagc2
Thf3IX&ictandthcDcv~ha~~intodreoordtdamaigZatmagreeillent
(YJditigatim Agrwmat’), howeveq the parties have not coMeted the escrow pxwess for the
doe&g of an aweptable school site. The parties anticipate this process to be compkte within
the next several days,
Please mtcr this let&s into tonight9 rcmxd.
By: lhiel a. 53ttmmon
lxmpam
cc Kin Cladc, A?aiamt se
sanM;ucosutied&hoolDistrict
Lettie Boggs, Director of IkiIitia
San Marcos unifkd !!ichool Ixaict
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 97-02/PUD 97-02 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C, AND D
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you because your interests may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, March 3, 1998, to
consider an application for a Tentative Map and a Planned Unit
Development to subdivide 83.55 acres of property into a 210 lot
subdivision with 4 multi-family lots, 114 duplex lots, 87 single
family lots, and 5 open space lots, and design guidelines for
construction of units located in Villages C and D, on property
generally located on the southeast corner of Melrose Drive and
Palomar Airport Road, and more particularly described as:
Portion of Section 13, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Meridian, and all that portion of Sections
18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Brian
Hunter, in the Planning Department, at (760) 438-1161, ext. 4457.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Unit
Development in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
raised by you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this tentative
subdivision map, if approved, is established by state law and/or city
ordinance, and is very short.
APPLICANT: Continental Ranch, Inc.
PUBLISH: February 21, 1998
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES “A, 8, C, 0”
CT 970OZPUD 97-02
A
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
801 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST
701 ENCINITAS BLVD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
I CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
SUITE 50
330 GOLDENSHORE
LONG BEACH CA 90802
LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
1600 PACIFIC HWY 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
2730 LOKER AVE WEST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPT
PROJECT PLANNER
BRIAN HUNTER
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
I CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LEUCADIA WATER DIST
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SD COUNTY PLANNING
SUITE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DIST
101 SO SANTA FE RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST
1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG
SUITE B SUITE 800
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 400 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-l 331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY SERVICES
{ABOVE ADDRESS - For City Council
Notices Only)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
CT 97-q k&l 9772& /
SUN CONTRACTION CORP
P 0 BOX 80036
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
CONTINENTAL RANCH INC
12636 HIGH BLUFF DR
SUITE 300
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
GENTRY WIMPY INC
9171 TOWNE CENTRE DR
SUITE 355
SAN DIEGO CA 92122
BRESSI LENNAR RANCH VENTURE LL
23333 AVENIDA LA CAZA
COT0 DE CAZA CA 92679
GENTRY WIMPY INC
9754 WHITHORN DR
HOUSTON TX 77095
CARRILLO RANCH0 PARTNERSHIP
591 CAMINO DE LA REINA
SUITE 616
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, ‘Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, February 4, 1998, to consider a tentative tract map and Planned Unit
Development on property generally located at the southeast corner of Melrose Drive
and Palomar Airport Road and more particularly described as:
All that portion of Section 13, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Meridian, and all that Portion of Section 18 and 19
of Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the
public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 29,
1998. If you have any questions, please call Brian Hunter in the Planning Department
at (760) 438-l 161, extension 4457.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this tentative tract map and Planned
Unit Development, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is
very short. If you challenge the tentative tract map and Planned Unit Development in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City
of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 97-02/PUD 97-02
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGES A, B, C, AND D
PUBLISH: JANUARY 24, 1998
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 l (760) 438-11610 FAX (760) 438-0894 @
.--. -
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT .-
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
CT 97-OZ/PUD 97-02 - Ranch0 Carrillo Village A, B, C, & D
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the ftem ,for the council meeting of
.
Thank you,
,
Assistant City Man--
February 12, 1998 .
Date