Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-26; City Council; 15025; KELLY RANCH FINANCING PLAN FOR ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN8 $ o= & < 2 0 F 2 1 0 z = 0 0 - 0 0 77 CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGEhdA BILL i DEPT.HD. 1 AB# 15025 TITLE: MTG. 1/26/99 FINANCING PLAN FOR ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN h DEPT. PLN ai' - CITY MGRy RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. qq -2 0 APPROVING a Negative DI and the amended Financing Plan for Local Facilities Management Zone 8 based on tht therein. ITEM EXP LAN AT1 0 N : The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8 was originally adopted in 1984 and I become outdated. The applicant's request is to update the Circulation, Water, Parks, a collection sections to reflect current facilities needs (Exhibit 6) and to include a Finance Pla KELLY RANCH - LFMP 87-08(A) CITY ATTY.( .i 7). Each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones is required to have a financing pl identifies the sources of funding for all Zone Plan required improvements prior to developm the zone. In anticipation of development within Zone 8 a Finance Plan has been prepared. The finance plan is in conformance with the Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.1 Carlsbad Municipal Code) and related policies, standards, and guidelines. The Fina provides acceptable financial guarantees for all required public facilities, assuring that tht will be in place at time of need. The financing provisions for the various facilities are outlined below. City Administrative and Library Facilities Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 was formed by the City in 1991 to finance a r facilities for citywide benefit, including City Administrative and Library. All properties withi are currently within CFD No. 1. Wastewater Treatment Capacity The Encina Water Pollution Control Facility has adequate capacity to serve the City for at years into the future. Payment of normal sewer connection fees by all development within the only financing mechanism required. Parks The developers within Zone 8 will be required to pay park-in-lieu fees, Circulation Cannon Road will be financed through the Cannon Road West Assessment District. The I will be responsible for construction and is eligible for reimbursement. Faraday Avenue funded through the Capital Improvements Program. Open Space No special financing mechanism is required for open space. Schools The developer has entered into an agreement with the Carlsbad School District for school f PAGE 2 OF AGEND 9 BILL NO. 15in t S 0 Drainaqe, Water and Sewer The developer will be required to construct drainage, water, and sewer facilities to serve 1 development pursuant to an improvement agreement with the City, and/or to pay the requirc ENVIRONMENTAL: No environmental impacts have been identified and a Negative Declaration was issue Planning Director and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the staff recommendation will provide guaranteed financing for public facilities to serve new development within Zone 8. The proposed financing mechanisms are fully c with all Growth Management requirements and related City policies. In the absence of an ( financing plan, funding for these facilitates could not be assured. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 9 9 - 3 2- 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4443 and 4444 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 16, 1998 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 16, 1998 6. Amended Local Facilities Management Plan Sections, dated December 3, 1998 7. Financing Plan for Local Facilities Management Zone 8, dated September 24, 1998. El 0 0 @ KELLY RANCH LFMP 87=08(A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e EX) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4443 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 8 TO UPDATE FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE A FINANCE PLAN ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL AND EAST OF VERTERAN’S MEMORIAL PARK. CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH CASE NO.: LFMP 87-08(A) WHEREAS, KELLY LAND COMPANY has filed a verified applica the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Local Management Plan Amendment for Zone 8 (dated September 24, 1998, on file in the Department) and incorporated by this reference (collectively referred to as the “Local Management Plan Amendments”), as provided in Section 21.90.125 of the Carlsbad 1 Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of Decem1 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of AN AMENDMI Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 8, based on the findings and subject to the following conditions: That the above recitations are true and correct. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 Findings: 1. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8 is consistent with the I Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements contained in C General Plan, in that the assumed development within the Zone is consist Growth Management Policies C.l, C.2 and C.3 of the Land Use Elemei General Plan: A. adequate arrangements have been made for the provision of public concurrent with need; all public facilities performance standards will be complied with, and funding for all necessary public facilities and services will be gu prior to any development approvals, grading or building permits. B. C. 2. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8 is consistent with Section the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), as amended by Ordinance Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adopted 1986 Citywide Facilities and Imprl Plan, in that this Facility Plan has been amended consistent with Section 2 and all facility and service impacts (demands) associated with the propo uses have been analyzed and adequate facilities and services will be inco into future projects. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8 and the conditions 1 therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensuring that public faci be provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards and will be prior to development occurring, in that all public facilities and services reqi future development will be provided through conditions of approval plact future tentative maps or site development plans for the site. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8will control the timing and loc growth by typing the pace of development to the provision of public faci improvements, in that the Zone 8 LFMP contains a facility financing plan 1 the coordination of development with the provision of necessary public faci services. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone Swill ensure public facilities anc are available in conformance with the adopted performance standards development occumng, in that it links the rate of development to the pra necessary public facilities and services. 3. 4. 5. PC RES0 NO. 4443 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 (5 7 8 9 10 11 12 l3 l4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for an amendment to Local Facilities Management Plan -, contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 8, dated SI 24,1998, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated herein by referen PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Comr the City of Carlsbad on the 16th day of December 1998, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compas, Heineman, J Nielsen, and Savary ABSENT: Commissioner Welshons ABSTAIN: /!$QhpPee BAILEY NOB , Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 4443 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4444 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO AMEND THE ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN. CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH CASE NO.: LFMP 87-08 (A) WHEREAS, Kelly Land Company, “Developer”, has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by the Kelly Land Company, City of Carlsbad, and Kirgis 1996 Trust, “Owner”, and WHEREAS, the project is an amendment to the Zone 8 Local Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the amendment constitutes updated facilities requirements i of the approval Kelly Ranch Village “E”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 16th day of Decemb hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all 1 and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered s relating to the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Commission as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative D according to Exhibit “ND” dated November 20, 1998, and “PII” dated I+ 16,1998, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 l6 l7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Findincs: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and c the Negative Declaration, the environmental impacts therein identified for this p any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the proje on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, the Planning Commission finds th; no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the enviror thereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of December 19 following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compas, Heineman, Nielsen, and Savary NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Welshons ABSTAIN: /df+xe BAILEY NOB , Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOUILLM Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 4444 -2- NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project AddresdLocation: Project Description: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described projc pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act a the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on t environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in t Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planni Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public i invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of di of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Departmc at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4448. DATED: NOVEMBER 20,1998 Local Facilities Management Zone 8 Update of the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan CASE NO: LFMP 87-08(A) CASE NAME: PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 20,1998 ZONE 8 AMENDMENT “A” AND FINANCE PLAN Planning Director 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-11 61 FAX (760) 438-08 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: LFMP 87-081 DATE: November 16.19 BACKGROUND 1. 2. APPLICANT: Kelly Land Companv 3. CASE NAME: Zone 8 Amendment “A” and Finance Plan ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road Suite 2 Carlsbad California 92009 DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: October 20.1998 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment of the Zone 8 Local Facilities Manapement Plan reduce buildout assumptions and to modifiv facilities impacts accordinFly. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this proje involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Imp Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 4. 5. 0 Land Use and Planning IXI TransportatiodCirculation 0 Public Services 0 Population and Housing 0 Geological Problems Energy & Mineral Resources Aesthetics [7 Water 0 Hazards 0 Cultural Resources Air Quality 0 Noise [7 Recreation 0 Biological Resources W Utilities & Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/94 0 0 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) [XI I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on t environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on t environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigatic measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIL DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earl' document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigati measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An EIR required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on 1 environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentia significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier El including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed proje Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. 0 \h \I /I7 146 Plamier Signature Date I I I I np% Planning Directox Signddre Date 2 Rev. 03/28/96 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELMS, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the Ci conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significa effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the followii pages in the form of a checklist. Ths checklist identifies any physical, biological and hum, factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negati Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. e A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that a adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following ea question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced informati sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that t potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopt general standards and policies. “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporati of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” tc “Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and t City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce t effect to a less than significant level. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that effect is significant. Based on an “EIA-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially signific effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyi adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applica standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitiga Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed uy the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the pr environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additio environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily requi to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier I pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence 1 the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 0 0 e e 0 e 3 Rev. 03/28/96 0 0 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing i EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, ar those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In th case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporate( may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and includir but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect hi not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, ar the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less th: significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact h: not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not redu the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is r possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significs effect to below a level of significance. 0 A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end oft form under DISCUSS ION 0 F ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attenti1 should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determin significant. 4 Rev. 03128196 0 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Sipnifi~ant INN Impact Unless impact Mitigation Incorporated I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) 0 0 0 151 o 0 0 151 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 €a 0 0 E Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from Declaration issued April 29,1988) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) incompatible land uses? (EIR 83-04Megative e) 11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 o E o 0 0 €3 0 0 0 €3 c) 111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Seismic ground shaking? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (EIR 83- 04Begative Declaration issued April 29,1988) e) Landslides or mudflows? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (EIR g) Subsidence of the land? (EIR 83-04megative 0 0 o E CI 0 o E 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 E 0 0 o E o 0 o E 0 0 0 E 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Declaration issued April 29,1988) 5 Rev. 03/28/96 e Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant lmpac e Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 ISI h) i) Expansive soils? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Unique geologic or physical features? (EIR 83- 04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) 0 0 0 KI Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (EIR 83- 04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 DEI b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (EIR 83-04lNegative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (EIR 83- 04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 0 El 0 cl €x! 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 Lx c) e) f) 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 IXI 0 V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) 0 0 o E o 0 0 E 0 0 CIE 0 0 0 €3 Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (EIR 83- 04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Create objectionable odors? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) c) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: 6 Rev. 03/28/96 0 Potentially Potentially Less Than NO Significant Significant Significant lmpac e Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 IXI o 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 Ixl DM 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 IXI a) b) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,198 8) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (EIR 83- 04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their result in impacts to: 0 OB o 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 €K 0 0 0 Ix 0 0 Ix habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,19 8 8) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (EIR 83- 04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) c) d) e) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (EIR 83-04hTegative Declaration issued April 29,19 88) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (EIR 83- 04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) proposal? a) 0 nIx o 0 0 lz 0 0 0 E 7 Rev. 03/28/96 a Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant lmpac 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (EIR 83- 04/Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 [xi 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 El cl 0 cl [XI to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (EIR b) e) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (EIR 83- b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 0 El 0 0 0 w 04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Police protection? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Schools? (EIR 83-04hlegative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) e) Other governmental services? (EIR 83- 0 0 w o 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 E 0 0 [x 0 CI 0 E3 04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Communications systems? (EIR 83-04hlegative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) 0 0 0 E 0 o E 0 0 o E 0 0 o E 8 Rev. 03128196 0 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Irnpac 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 IXI 0 0 0 IXI 17 17 cl w e) Storm water drainage? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) f) Solid waste disposal? (EIR 83-04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) g) Local or regional water supplies? (EIR 83- 04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: 0 0 0 o 0 0 (XI 0 0 0 (XI a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Create light or glare? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal: 0 0 0 €8 0 0 0 (XI 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 w a) Disturb paleontological resources? (EIR 83- 04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (EIR 83- 04Negative Declaration issued April 29,1988) c) Affect historical resources? (EIR 83-04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) e) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: 0 0 OB 0 0 IXI a> Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (EIR 83- 04Megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (EIR 83-04megative Declaration issued April 29,1988) b) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. 0 0 0 !XI a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 9 Rev. 03128196 0 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impac 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Impact Unless Impact Mitigation incorporated o 0 0 IXI b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 0 0 0 lxl c) XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEC process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negati declaration. In this case a discussion should identify t following on attached sheets: a) Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are availat for review. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above check1 were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursua to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed 1 mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with MitigatL Incorporated,“ describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address si1 specific conditions for the project. b) c) 10 Rev. 03128196 0 0 DISCUSS ION 0 F ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updatc 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle mill traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reacti7 organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are tl San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considerc cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in tl updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a varie of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisio for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measur to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Dema Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including ma transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable ai appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into tl design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is mark( “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, tl preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by Ci Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for i quality impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations’’ applies to all subseque projects covered by the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, 1 further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at tl Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updat 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequ; impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. The generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsb Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersectio are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numero mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewall pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulatil strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate rni+j9r $onifiriP~to~i 19 fik p!M.Pr! ir! the Vity irs well $9 In the San Piegv Air Basin, Since tl to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severe 11 Rev. 03128196 e e State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City t control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have eitht been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of tl- failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefor the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Sipficant Impact”. consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because tk recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, includc a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for circulation impacts. Ths “Statement C Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulatic impacts is required. This project 12 Rev. 03/28/96 0 IF APPLICABLE) LIST OF MITIGATlNG MEASURES ( 0 ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 13 Rev. 03/28/96 0 APPLICANT CONCURRE NCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AN CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature 14 Rev. 03/28/96 e EXH 9 he City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING CO MMISSION ItemNo. @ Application complete date: October 9, 1998 Project Planner: Christer Westman : Project Engineer: Steve Jantz LFMP 87-08(A) - KELLY RANCH - Request for an amendment to the Zone Local Facilities Management Plan to update buildout numbers for the par1 water, circulation and sewer sections, to revise improvement requiremer associated with those sections, and to include a finance plan. P.C. AGENDA OF: December 16, 1998 SUBJECT: I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 44. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Planni Commission Resolution No. 4443 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of LFMP 87-08(, updating certain sections and adopting a Finance Plan for the Local Facilities Management P1 for Zone 8 based on the findings contained therein. 11. INTRODUCTION Zone 8 includes all of the 433 acre Kelly Ranch, the 22 acre Kirgis parcel, and 277 acres unc ownership of the City of Carlsbad within Veteran’s Memorial Park. amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan to update buildout numbers for t parks, water, circulation and sewer sections, to revise improvement requirements associated w those sections, and to include a finance plan. 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan was originally adopted in February 1989. Sir “E”. The amendment will revise the assumptions of the four identified sections (parks, wat circulation, and sewer) of the plan in accordance with the changes incurred by the approval Village “E”. The remaining sections are unaffected. The amendment will also include a finance plan for the zone which identifies funding guarantt for the improvements required as mitigation. The request is for L that time little activity had occurred in Zone 8 until recent approvals for Kelly Ranch Villa 4: 9 e LFMP 87-08(A) - KELL RANCH December 16, 1998 Page 2 IV. ANALYSIS Facilities Plan Amendment The proposed Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) amendment is to reflect reduction in land use density. Specifically, the 1989 LFMP projected 1,224 dwelling uni within Zone 8 at buildout. This amendment projects 1,153 dwelling units (du) which is reduction of 71 du. The reduction in units is as a result of approving 144 du in Village “I versus the 215 du projected in the LFMP. The amended zone plan is based on an estimation 1 potential development capacity per existing ordinances and constraints. The impacts of tl assumed development and financing to assure compliance with the adopted perfomant standards are summarized below: CFD= Community Facilities District PIL= Park In-lieu Fee * Assumptions are based on 1,153 buildout du. PFF= Public Facilities Fees EDU= Equivalent Dwelling Unit ADT= Average Daily Traffic GPD= Gallons per Day The table above provides a summary of the Zone 8 requirements and sources of fundi Following is a brief analysis of each of the three sections of the LFMP which have bi modified. Parks There currently exists a demand for 77.3 acres of park within Park District 1 (Northv Quadrant) and there is an existing supply of 81.9 acres. The existing surplus is 4.6 acres. r buildout demand is projected at 108.2 acres and buildout supply projected at 160.4 which will 0 LFMP 87-08(A) - KELL RANCH December 16, 1998 Pase 3 a 52.2 acre surplus. Park facilities will be satisfied through the payment of park-in-lieu fees an public facilities fees. Water The Carlsbad Municipal Water District master plan updated in 1997 identifies sources ar capacity for water supplies throughout Zone 8. The updated master plan has determined that tl Evans Point water tank is no longer necessary because water supply and storage is availab elsewhere. The requirement to dedicate land for the tank has been eliminated. Circulation The primary reason for amending this section is to update the existing circulation inventory a: zone plan performance criteria. The original LFMP assumed development timing based on t Kelly Ranch Master Plan approved in 1983. No development occurred and subsequeni performance dates passed without circulation improvements being completed. The revis Special Conditions are the best estimate of when circulation facilities must be completed bas on the current assumptions. Circulation facilities will be satisfied through the concurrent improvement of a portion Cannon Road with the development of Kelly Ranch Village “E”; construction of Cannon Ro between El Camino Real and Paseo Del Norte prior to 2000 or coincident with development Kelly Ranch south of Cannon Road andor the Kirgis property; and the construction of Farad Avenue prior to 2005 or concurrent with the development of Veteran’s Memorial Park. (TI portion of Faraday is currently in the design and permitting process.) Sewer Similar to circulation facilities, the Zone Plan has been updated to include current Zone development assumptions, and the Special Conditions have been modified to reflect thc assumptions. Sewer facilities will be temporarily satisfied by available capacity in the No Agua Hedionda Interceptor and ultimately through the construction of the South Agua Hedior Interceptor. Finance Plan The financing provisions for the various facilities are outlined below. Citv Administrative and Librarv Facilities I Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 was formed by the City in 1991 to finance a num of facilities for citywide benefit, including City Administrative and Library facilities. properties within Zone 8 are currently within CFD No. 1. ? 0 LFMP 87-08(A) - KELL RANCH December 16,1998 Page 4 Wastewater Treatment Capacity The Encina Water Pollution Control Facility has adequate capacity to serve the City for at lea five years into the future. Payment of normal sewer connection fees by all development with Zone 8 is the only financing mechanism required. Parks The developers within Zone 8 will be required to pay park-in-lieu fees and PFF. Circulation Cannon Road will be financed through the Cannon Road West Assessment District. developer will be responsible for construction and is eligible for some reimbursement accordance with that district. Improvements Program. QDen %ace No special financing mechanism is required for open space. Schools The developer has entered into an agreement with the Carlsbad School District for schc financing. This agreement is binding on all parties and has not been superceded by rea legislation. Drainape Water and Sewer The developer will be required to construct drainage, water, and sewer facilities to ser proposed development pursuant to an imprqvement agreement with the City, and/or to pay t required fees. T Faraday Avenue is being funded through the City’s Capi x V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is a planning document and amending the plan to reduce buildout assumptions N not have an adverse effect on the environment. All development within LFMP Zone 8 will evaluated on an individual basis and require environmental analysis. A Negative Declarati was issued for the project by the Planning Director. d 0 LFMP 87-08(A) - KELL RANCH December 16, 1998 Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4444 peg. Dec.) 3. Location Map 4. Exhibit A dated December 16, 1998 (Zone Plan Amendment) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4443 (LFMP) CW:eh:mh i EXHIBI1 0 0 3. LFMP 87-08lA) - KELLY RANCH - Request for an amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilitic Management Plan to update buildout numbers for the parks, water, circulation and sew finance plan. Sections, to revise improvement requirements associated with those sections, and to include Commissioner Welshons asked to be excused from hearing this item, citing a possible conflict of interc in that her employer may have a connection with this project. Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne, introduced this item and stated that Associate Planner, Christ Westman would present the staff report. Project Planner Christer Westman presented the staff report and described the project as follows: Tt applicant, Kelly Land Company, has requested an amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan fi Zone 8. The reason for the request is that there was a recent approval for a project, within what is know as the Kelly Ranch, that altered the number of total dwelling units within Zone 8. Because a change in th number of dwelling units changes the number of required public facilities and fees, the applicant requesting an amendment to the Zone Plan. It includes updates to certain facilities regarding circulatior sewer, water, and parks. In addition, the amendment includes a financing plan as the document whic identifies how all of the facilities will be paid for. Paul Klukas, Planning Systems, representing Kelly Land Company, stated that the LFMP and financin plan was a joint effort between Kelly Land Co. and staff. Chairperson Noble opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak. Seeing no one wishinl to testify, Chairperson Noble closed Public Testimony. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Planninl Commission Resolution No. 4444, recommending approval of a Negativl Declaration and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 4443, recomrnendin approval of LFMP 87-08(A) updating certain sections and adopting a Financ Plan for the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8, based upon tht findings contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES : NOES: None ABSTAIN : None Noble, Heineman, Savary, Monroy, Compas, and Nielsen Chairperson Noble announced that the Commission’s action on this item is not final and will be forwardea to the City Council for its consideration. EXm CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN KELLY RANCH AREA "E" AMENDMENT \ Proposed Amendment to: PARKS FACILITIES CIRCULATION FACILITIES SEWER COLLECTION FACILITIES WATER FACILITIES I KELLY LAND COMPANY 2011 Palomar Airport Rd. #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 PLANNING SYSTEMS 1530 Faraday Ave. #lo0 Carlsbad, CA 92008 6th Submittal December 3,1998 I e 0 ZONE 8 LFMP AREA "E" AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Facility Page Parks Facilities ....................... 1 Circulation Facilities ................. 8 Sewer Collection System ............. 20 Water Facilities ...................... 29 L Approved 1988 Zone 8 Plan Zone 8 with Area "E" Reduction BALANCE: Buildout D/U Buildout Pop. 1,224 3027 1153 2851 -71 -176 Park Existing District 1 Population 3/97 Zone 8 4 Northwest 25,335 Quadrant Kelly 1 Ranch Area E Existing Buildout B uil dout Demand Population Demand (acres) (acres) I ,012 2851 6,02 76.24 35,625 106.87 0.03 356 1.06 Park District 1 Zone 8 Northwest Quadrant Buildout Demand (acres) 1998 LFMP Amendment 8.02 108.20 Community Park (Comm.) Holiday Park Magee Hosp Grove Laguna Riviera Total Existing =we Ownership Acres Comm. City 27.55 Comm. City 4.05 Comm. 39.58 Comm. City *- 5.88 Comm. City 2.10 Special Use Area (SUA) Buena Vista School Cannon Car Country Carlsbad High School Chase Field Duck Feed Area Comm. Center Harding Street TYPe Ownership Acres SUA SD 2.30 SUA Lease 1.70 SUA SD 1.10 SUA City 2.30 SUA Leased .66 SUA City .88 SUA City 1.00 Swim Complex Hosp Park Valley Jr. High Total Existing SUA City 1.80 SUA City 5.54 SUA SD 7.50 SUA L 42.32 Park Facility Type Acres Community Park 39.58 Special Use Area Park 42.32 Supply 81.90 Total Existing Park L Future Community Park (Comm.) Veterans Mem. (25. ac. credit each quad.) Parkland Acquisition Hosp Grove/Buena Vista Lagoon Plan Total Future Comm. Parks When Type Ownership Budgeted Acres Comm. City 2003+ 25.00 Comm. Part of Pine 2003+ 5.20 Comm. Statelcity/ 2009+ 41.43 71.63 Acquisition Lease Future (Comm.) Community Park Type Ownership Cannon Lake SUA City Total Future SUA SUA Parks When Budgeted Acres 2009+’ 6.87 6.87 Park Type Community Special Use Area Total Future Park Supply Acres 71.63 6.87 78.50 1997 Park Demand & Supply Acres Park Dist. 1 Demand 76.24 Park Dist. 1 Supply 81.90 Existing Surplus 5.90 Kelly Ranch Area E 1.06 Demand Total Demand including 77.30 Area E Existing Surplus including Area E 4.60 , Buildout Park Demand t!k Supply Demand Supply Buildout Surplus Acres 108.20 160.40 52.20 0 0 4-v - .. C. - d. PAT c- 2. All non-residential uses within Zone 8 shall pay Public Facilities Fees for which the City allocates a portion toward improvement of City Parks. I 7 AREA “E” ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 B. CIRCULATION FACILITIES 1. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facility Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis determines whether or not the circulation system within Zone 8 continues to conform in this updated LFMF to the adopted performance standard. The analysis also addresses all Circulation Element roads and intersections outside of Zone 8 impacted by 20 percent or more of the traffic generated in Zone8 to ensure conformance with the standard. 2. f A Existing Inventorv - 1997 El Camino Real to the north east edge of Zone 8, is a partially improved six lane primary arterial with only four lanes existing between Tamarack Avenue and College Blvd. to the south. Cannon Road presently stubs to the west-central boundary of the Zone, just westerly of Macario Canyon. This roadway is planned to be constructed through the Zone as a four lane major arterial from its current terminus, easterly to El Camino Real and beyond. Kelly Drive extends southwest from El Camino Real and forms the northerly boundary of the Zone. It is designated as a collector street, striped with two lanes, to Park Drive. It is built ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 8 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT e 0 to four lane collector street width, but does not currently have sufficient traffic volume to justify striping with four lanes. Park Drive is a two lane collector street that extends northerly of the Zone, and intersects Tamarack Avenue to the north, well beyond the Zone boundary. Tamarack Avenue, not within Zone 8 and to the north, varies in width as a collector street from four lanes between 1-5 and Adams Street, two lanes between Adams and High Ridge Avenue, then four lanes again between High Ridge and El Camino Real. Table I-L and Exhibit A demonstrate the existing average traffic volumes and levels of service for the street segments surrounding the Zone. Performance Standard 20% Impacted Street Seements - Zone 8 The Street Segments which have been projected to be impacted by 20% or more of Zone 8 vehicular traffic are demonstrated on Table I-L. These and the Intersections that are impacted by 20% or greater are shown graphically on Exhibit A. Table I-L Zone 8 - 20% or Greater Impact Existing Street Segment Levels of Service (1997) STREET SEGMENT 6PA = 6 Lane Prime Arterial CLASS. = Roadway classification 4PA = 4 Lane Prime Arterial VPHPL = Vehicles / Hour Per Lane 4SA = 4 Lane Secondary Arterial CPL = Capacity Per Lane 4-C = 4 Lane Collector LOS = Level of Service ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 9 AREA "E" MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT I 1 - SOURCE: URBAN SYSTEMS ZONE 8 - 20% OR GREATER IMPACT STREET SEGMENTS/INTERSECTIONS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES AREA “E’ AMENDMENT ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 10 MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 The existing intersections of Cannon Road with Car Country Drive and the 1-5 ramps are currently controlled by stop signs, but are presently being upgraded. Traffic signals exist at Paseo Del Norte and Lego Drive. Table I-M demonstrates the existing levels of service of intersections in the Zone 8 area. Table I-M: Zone 8 - 20% or Greater Impact Existing Intersection Levels of Service (1997) LOS ICU LOS ICU A 0.00-0.60 D 0.81-0.90 B 0.61 -0.70 E 0.91-1 .OO C 0.71-0.80 F 1.00-Up = B. Development phasing of ADT from Zone 8 is demonstrated in Table I-N. Trips generated from this conceptual phasing scenario were distributed and assigned to the street network system to project future traffic distribution and impacts. Phase I (1998-99) Areas A, C and E AREA “E” AMENDMENT ZONE 8 LOCAL FAClLiTiES 11 MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 0 Buildout Grand Total: 10,962 These assigned trips were then added to available existing traffic volumes factored upward to account for area-wide growth. The combined traffic volumes (i.e., Existing and Area Growth and Zone 8) were then used to determine the future short-term (called Phase I in this study) and long term (Buildout) impact and mitigation. The traffic circulation network and the projected impacts, resulting from traffic generated from Zone 8 were analyzed by utilizing data from the Transportation Analysis for Zone 8 and Kellv Ranch prepared by Urban Systems Associates, Inc., dated September 23,1997. Exhibit A demonstrates the directional distribution percentages of Zone 8 traffic at buildout of the zone. As mentioned, development within the first two years of phasing (1998-99) is anticipated to occur within Planning Areas A, C and E (Phase I). During this period, Cannon Road will be constructed only from the Planning Area E access road (Frost Street) to El Camino Real. Exhibit B demonstrates the roadway configurations planned and traffic volumes projected with this first two years of development. An examination of street segment average daily traffic volumes with these initial planning areas traffic added leads to the conclusion that street segments would continue to operate within the performance standard (Tables 1-0). The only improvements recommended for this phase would be the construction of Cannon Road along the Planning Area E frontage between El Camino Real and Frost Street. . ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 12 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT e e Table 1-0: Phase I 1998-99 (Areas A, C and E) Street Segment Levels of Service for 20% Minimum Segments 6PA = 6 Lane Prime Arterial CLASS. = Roadway classification 4PA = 4 Lane Prime Arterial VPHTL = Vehicles / Hour Per Lane 4SA = 4 Lane Secondary Arterial CPL = Capacity Per Lane 4C = 4 Lane Collector LOS = Level of Service * ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 13 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT LEGEND SOURCE: URBAN SYSTE X,.\:!-.\- - ADT PHASE I PM PEAK HOUR AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES . ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 14 AREA “E’ MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMEM 0 0 Table I-P: Phase I i99&99 (Areas A, C and E) Intersection Levels of Service for 20% Minimum Intersections LOS ICU LOS ICU A 0.00-0.60 D 0.81-0.90 B 0.61-0.70 E 0.91-1.00 C 0.71-0.80 F 1.00-Up C. Buildout Table I-Q demonstrates buildout street segment levels of service on adjacent streets. As shown, all segments are projected to meet the City’s circulation facility performance standard. Table I-Q: Buildout Street Segment Levels of Service for 20% Minimum r STREET SEGMENT 6PA = 6 Lane Prime Arterial CLASS. = Roadway classification 4PA = 4 Lane Prime Arterial VPHPL = Vehicles / Hour Per Lane 4SA = 4 Lane Secondary Arterial CPL = Capacity Per Lane 4C = 4 Lane Collector LOS = Level of Service ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 15 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 Table I-R demonstrates A.M. and P.M. peak hour levels of service at adjacent intersections. With improvements to Cannon Road and the 1-5 interchange as currently designed, evaluated intersections are projected to meet the City‘s circulation facilities performance standard with no other design improvements other than those already identified in the Zone 13/Lego traffic analysis. Table I-R: Buildout Intersection Levels of Service for 20% Minimum Intersections LOS ICU LOS ICU A 0,OO-0.60 D 0.81-0.90 B 0.61-0.70 E 0.91-1.00 C 0.71-0.80 F 1.00-Up s The extension of Cannon Road through Zone 8 to El Camino Real and the Cannon Road/I-5 interchange improvements planned have been designed to accommodate City buildout traffic projections including Zone 8. The Cannon Road and 1-5 interchange improvements are scheduled for completion by the City in the years 2000 through 2001, coinciding with the anticipated development of the final three years of development phasing of Zone 8. ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 16 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT e e 5. MITEATION: The original Zone 8 LFMP analysis assumed a certain level of development intensity and phasing. The purpose of this updated analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 8, and assess whether the impacted road segments and intersections. Zone 8 will continue to meet the adopted performance standard when the revised development scenario and phasing of the Zone is added to the equation. The Zone 8 LFMP land use assumptions associated with this amendment are less intense than those assumed in the 1988 Zone 8 LFMP. The currently designed improvements for Cannon Road between 1-5 and El Camino Real, including 1-5 interchange improvement designs, have taken into account anticipated Zone 8 traffic. Therefore, no changes to the currently designed Cannon Road improvements are recommended in conjunction with this LFMP amendment. Year 2000 and beyond development within Kelly Ranch is planned to coincide with the construction of Cannon Road through the zone. Traffic signals are recommended at the Faraday Avenue and Frost Street intersections on Cannon Road during this period. 4. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Modified) The proposed mitigation for Zone 8 circulation is based upon the phasing of development and anticipated impacts afier Zone 8 buildout. The mitigation measures presented below will ensure that the adopted performance standard will be maintained through buildout of Zone 8. It should be understood that all cost estimates presented in this LWP Amendment are preliminary in nature and will need further refinement as the actual scope of work, utility needs, and right-of-way requirements are determined. 1. An on-going monitoring program shall be established to evaluate the aspects of improvement, development, and demand on circulation facilities. The required timing of improvements is based upon the projected demand of development in the zone and the surrounding region. This timing may be modified without amendment to this plan, however, any deletions or additions to the improvements will require amending this local plan. ZONE 8 LOCAL. FACILITIES 11 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 a 3 n.- ..nc L. 3. Prior to the approval of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing the construction of the following circulation improvements must be adopted: A. Improvements Needed Now None B. Improvements Neededby1998 concurrent with Area E (1998-99) 1. 4%4IwMg z a. Pr b. -r- t. 42. Ld e? c:: tPB ‘yl I en. 10 ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 18 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 TK- southbound I Pr8rC. 1. Install a fully actuated traffic signal at the intersection of Cannon Road and Frost Street. Install a fully actuated traffic signal at the intersection of Cannon Road and El Camino Real (Eligible for Reimbursement Agreement credit upon adoption of Reimbursement Agreement by City Council) Install full major arterial improvements to Cannon Road, including the landscaped raised median and all utilities and the improvements to El Camino Real in accordance with improvement drawing 333- 2G, from El Camino Real to Frost Street. 2 3. C. Improvements Needed bv 1995-2000 Construction of Cannon Road to full width Major Arterial between Paseo Del Norte and El Camino Real, to coincide with the developmest of any Kelly Ranch or Kirgis development except for Areas A, C and E. Estimated Cost: $1,728,000 Completion Date: 49% 2000 D. Improvements needed by2888 bv 2005 (Macario Park) Neae Installation of full width controlled collector improvements to Faraday Avenue from its existing westerly terminus, to Cannon Road. Improvements needed bv Buildout - None E. 19 AREA “E” ZONE 8 LOCAL. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 C. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM I, PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Trunk-line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate sewer district must be provided concurrent with development. 2. ADEQUACY ANALYSIS: CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED LFMP: In accordance with the Approved 1988 Zone 8 LFMP, the ultimate plan for the Zone 8 region of Carlsbad involves the construction of a master plan sewer project, called the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor (SAHI) Sewer, which will incorporate a pump station and force main to carry the wastewater from the western-flow gravity sewer at the edge of the Zone 8 Agua Hedionda wetlands parallel to future Cannon Road. a The SAHI sewer is a regional facility which is planned to serve a large area of the City of Carlsbad, the vast majority of which lies upstream from Zone 8. For this reason, the line is planned to be a 24" trunk line, greatly in excess of that required for Zone 8 development. The Approved Zone 8 LFMP dictates that all development within the Zone, with the exception of Areas "A and "C (which are located on the north shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon), will access a fully-installed SAHI Trunk line for sewer connection to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Table I-S demonstrates anticipated sewage generation for Zone 8 phasing. ZONE 8 LOCAL. FACILITIES 20 AREA "E" MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Sewer Plan Phase I I1 TI1 Total - SAHTI Line Total - Zone 8 Year Planning Land Use EDU Area 1998-99 E SFD 144 A,C3 MFD, SFD 119 2000-2001 D,G,H(1)(2) MFD 495 I SFD 73 J(” SFD 87 N SFD 11 L MFD 26 K MFD 7 2001-2005 M Park 800* 1643 1762 0 0 Although sufficient capacity in the NAHI Line exists to accommodate projected Area A, C and E development, it is unknown at the time of this report whether capacity will be available to accommodate the full Kelly Ranch project at buildout. Other future EDU’s committed to the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer are estimated by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District as development occurs: Table I-T Short-Term Future Sewer Candidates - NAHI Peak Flow Rate: 2 x 0.45 mgd = 0.9 mgd In 1997, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District evaluated the theoretical flow rate currently tributary to the existing North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer and compared that estimate to the capacity of the sewer pigeline and the Foxes Lift Station. Foxes Lift Station pumps all sewage tributary to the NAHI Sewer. From the analysis, it was concluded that approximately 0.5 mgd of additional capacity remains. This flow rate equates to an additional 1100 EDU’s, approximately, that can be accommodated above the existing number of connections. Based on the resulting projected flow rate of 0.9 mgd, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District cannot guarantee that adequate capacity exists in the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer for all phases of Kelly Ranch (beyond Area E) and Kirgis development, and additional development will need to be evaluated by the District on a case-by-case basis. ZONE 8 LOCAL. FACILITIES 22 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT . 0 0 This LFMP Amendment anticipates (graphically in Exhibits C through F)the opportunity for much of Zone 8 development to temporarily utilize the NAHI Line. The District Engineer must find that adequate capacity exists within the NAHI, or Zone 8 development must utilize the future SAHI. This could cause a delay in development buildout of Zone 8. Special Conditions have been written to provide that the x ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 23 AREA “E” AMENDMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN x 5: .&; 4- Gu r%c .LL - 2:; a 0 5 &; sa E.?:: zt .s; wwg:az=~E i;m ;t <; -. -n^ c6 2 c I, - ,:e ~~~$~wrn w g'm m s a: a% 3tlcPP" .c z ._ ?* 5 0 0 E a a 2 sl ,,am wmuc %3 oEZrns$ $4 XI: * c c13 0 0 -I ga LL w- - n: 2" _I X e 3 /.x $$ ._ C f is; -0% - z E2c LL:? gg &$; .- ZP .&; :: 3;- ;E: 6 3 mrn 5 z g 5 z % .E g 2 ; <eo F,I 3: j3amc2mmu 0 ,a,ccE i$ $: g; a, m E m g .- C .G 1- 22 ;: g2562 $ V) o.2 6 B o a n. 5 s; VI ycnIBIT * P P m c - - - * 52 w 2, -. - c a?$$mm ZS m 0 LL v- I C m -1 _I Q; - 9 WIBIT E 2: 36$ f u. 4- &. .- 01 5; tss .%: v) 9; 0 - 5 DQJC - ow0 NO .c e : 2 ._ map! ,war* EE a% "6 3- klkl zggsgi:m i;: xzamc ggsSaz:<< mm ti: ;g h a 0 0 -I= 2 03 g ; .E .c 33,=gzz,, CC CC v- g $ $.U N 6 0) h h 0 e 3. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Modified): A. The existing Special Conditions for Sewer Collection System Facilities within Zone 8 shall be modified as jozzows: 1. No special conditions are required for Planning Areas "A and "C in the Kelly Ranch portion of Zone 8. Special Conditions (except for Planning Areas "A and "C") are as follows: 2. + b. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for new development in Zone 8 the District Engineer shall make a finding that adequate capacity exists within the NAHI Trunk Line and the appropriate facilities have been installed (including pump station) to direct sewage into the NAHI Line, consistent with this LFMP Amendment, to accommodate such building permits. ,In the event that this finding cannot be made, the City Engineer will not allow issuance of the building permits unless the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will be in place and operational to serve the -subject iwSe&kl development within Zone 8. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permits or building permits, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the necessary sewer collection system consistent with this LFMP Amendment, to serve the proposed development c. must be approved by the City, ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 28 AREA "E" MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 D. WATER FACILITIES 1. PERFORMANCE STANDARD: Line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided concurrent with development. A minimum ten day average storage capacity must be provided prior to development. 2. ADEQUACY ANALYSIS: The adopted Zone 8 LFMP indicates that, with the mitigation identified, Water Facilities would meet the adopted performance standard through buildout of Zone 8. Existing facilities include: e e L 12" water line along Park Drive. 10" water line along the future alignment of Cannon Road. 16" water line at the southwest boundary of Zone 8. e ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 29 AREA "E" MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 3. MITIGATION: The construction of regional water facilities will be funded by CMWD, Contribution to these facilities is made through deveoper payment of Water Fees. Local facilities will be funded by developers in conjunction with development. The Approved Zone 8 LFMP referred to the then-proposed Evans Point Reservoir as a needed regional facility, located within Zone 8. Since the time of the original LFMP approval, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District has determined that the Evans Point Reservoir is no longer necessary, and thus, the requirement to dedicate land for the tank is recommended for elimination. 3. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Modified): 1. prr 2. District. 3. Prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following water facilities shall be approved: All development within Zone 8 shall pay the appropriate connection fee as required by the Costa Real Municipal Water ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 30 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT e e Facility Location Facility Lenpth Area E 14” Water Main 2,400 Area F 14” Water Main 800 10” Water Main 400 Area H 14” Water Main 700 10” Water Main 500 Area I 14” Water Main 550 Area J 10” Water Main 850 Area K 10” Water Main 500 Area L 10” Water Main 500 Area M 10” Water Main 300 Area N 10” Water Main 400 Area 0 10 Water Main 800 Area P 10” Water Main 250 Area Q 10” Water Main 400 Area R 10” Water Main 350 Macario Canyon 12” Water Main (feet) Area G 14” Water Main 1,200 f ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES 31 AREA “E” MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT EXk CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN KELLY RANCH AREA “E” AMENDMENT FINANCING PLAN L Kelly Land Company 2011 Palomar Airport Rd. #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Ave. #lo0 Carlsbad, CA 92008 3rd Submittal 9/24/98 - PLANNING 0 0 ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 FACILITY FINANCING PLAN A. INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose of Document This Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared in conjunction with the LC Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8, in satisfaction of the requirements I the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program (Municipal Code Sectii 21.90.010 et seq.). This Plan provides financing information based on the facilities projected t the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP), and its Amendment No. 1, and based on the Carlsbad Growth Management Program performa standards. Sources of funds and methods of guaranteeing funding are fou in this plan. Also found are Special Conditions as provided in the Zone 8 LFMP, as Amended. 2. Sources of Information In addition to the Zone 8 LFMP document and Zone 8 LFMP Amendment No. 1, sources used in this plan are the Carlsbad Capital Improvement Document (1998-99), various public facilities master plans, and direct conversations with city staff. 3. Ownership Circumstances in LFMP Zone 8 The ownership of property within Zone 8 consists of three landholdings; tl 432.8 acre Kelly Land Company property, the 21.9 acre Kirgis property, an 276.5 acres owned by the City of Carlsbad, known as Macario Canyon. ZONE 8 LOCAL FAClLlTIES FINANCING P MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 0 0 4. Finance Method Section 21.90.080 of the Municipal Code requires a "financing guarantee" fc sources and as such the use of these funds to implement provision of publi facilities constitutes that guarantee. Developer Funding Under this method, the developer will fund and construct certain required facilities prior to or concurrent with development of his particular propert Facilities to be funded in this way are those which normally would be imposed as conditions of approval (or in the case of Area E, has been imposed) of a tentative map under the City's development review process The financing guarantee required by the growth Management Ordinance 1 funds will be available for construction of the required facility shall be provided through delivery to the city of an acceptable security instrument such as a surety bond, or through execution of an improvement agreemen prior to the recordation of the final map. The improvement agreement rnL be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Sectic 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The agreement must also be accompanied by a security instrument as described in Section 20.16.070 of Carlsbad Municipal Code, i.e., a security bond, cash deposit, or an instrun or letter of credit. Citv of Carlsbad Communitv Facilities District No. 1 A Mello-Roos community facilities district has been formea by the City of Carlsbad and approved on May 7,1991 by an affirmative vote of land owr to fund construction of certain Citywide facilities, including a number of facilities which are required by the Zone 8 LFMP. The financing guarantee required by the growth Management Ordinance any of the facilities to be funded by Carlsbad CFD No. 1 is satisfied by annexation to and participation in the district. Development Impact Fees Capital Improvement Program of the City of Carlsbad and special district contain plans to construct certain facilities including a number of facilities which are required by the Zone 8 LFMP. Sources of funds for these facilit are development impact fees which are collected at issuance of building permit. the provision of necessary public facilities. This plan identifies fundlng ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES FINANCING MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 0 0 Facilities which are proposed to be funded directly from development fees include wastewater treatment facilities and certain circulation and sewage collection facilities. For facilities which are proposed to be funded from development fees, payment of such fees will satisfy the priva te developer's financial obligation for these facilities, as long as the applicable Growth Management Program Performance standards are satisfied. Reimbursement from City of Carlsbad Development Fee Fund If a developer constructs a facility which is included in a fee program, he rr be reimbursed from the applicable fee fund, subject to City Council appro1 and the following conditions: That sufficient, unobligated funds are available; That the reimbursement is consistent with the priority of project funding within the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program; and That the reimbursement shall not exceed the maximum amount budgeted in the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program. B. TIMING OF DEMAND Demand for various facilities is based on the type of development, its locatior within the zone and when new development will be "on line". This analysis u the Phasing projection identified on Exhibit A of this Financing Plan for projections regarding type, location and timing of new development. The LR and its Amendment No. I, which modifies the analysis for Parks, Circulation Sewer Collection Facilities, analyzes the impact of new development on the eleven identified public facilities categories and shows specific public facilitie requirements over time. The financing plan demonstrates how the projected facilities requirements will be funded over time. C. FINANCING Public facilities funding sources and funding responsibilities, based on Zone development projections identified through the Zone 8 LFMP, are described this section. Special Conditions which deal with facilities and funding are provided as found in the LFMP. The following are sections which deal with of the identified public facilities categories. ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILlTlES FINA NClNG MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 -------I1 - 0 e Kelly Land Company -PLANNING PROJECTIONS LFMP Zone 8 Phasing 4 FINANC ZONE 8 LOCAL FAClLITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Funding City Administrative Estimated Options Facilities cost Timing 1st 2nd 3rd 1. Public Service Center - Construction !§4,668,000 1998-99 CFD #1 Sewer 2. New City Hall $26,019,000 2003-08 CFD #1 Notes (1)(2) 12) Funding Library Estimated Options Facilities cost Timing 1st 2nd 3rd 1. Library Remodel $1,874,000 1999-00 PFF 2. Library - Cole/North $13,165,000 2009+ PFF/CFD #1 Carlsbad Library Expansion 3. Library - South Carlsbad 1997-99 PFF/CFD #1 Construction $20,992,000 Shelving 650,000 Collection 400,000 Note (1) (1)(2) (1)(2) S Wastewater Estimated Facilities cost Timing 1. Encina Outfall Upgrade $10,545,000 2002-08- 2. Encina Phase V $10,736,000 2003-2008 Expansion Funding Options Is t 2nd 3rd Notes Sewer Fees (1) Sewer Fees (1) 1 Bonds Park Facilities 1. Veterans Memorial Park 2. Park acquisition 3. Cannon Lake Park Funding Estimated Options cost Timing 1st 2nd 3rd Notes $15,769,000 2004+ CFD (1 1 $2,300,000 2003-2008 PIL-NW $947,000 2009-2020 PFF 0 e 2. All non-residential uses within Zone 8 shall pay Public Facilities Fees foi which the City allocates a portion toward improvement of City Parks. Source Of Funds The source of funds for the above-referenced future park facilities will be from several different sources, including CFD No. 1, Park-In-Lieu fees, and Public Facilities Fees. Financing; - Guar an tee Payment of Park-In-Lieu Fees and Public Facilities Fees, and fees associated w CFD No. 1, satisfies the financing guarantee for construction of the necessary parks within the Park District No. 1, X ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES FINANCING 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 9 0 0 5. DRAINAGE FACILITIES Drainage Financing Matrix Zone 8 (1) City Drainage Area Fee funds in conjunction with Faraday Ave. construction Source Of Funds L Prior to approval of any Development Permit within Zone 8, the Developer sk pay the current drainage area fee established at the time of issuance of a Development Permit. FinancinP Guarantee Prior to the recordation of a final map, these facilities must be constructed, or acceptable security instrument, such as performance bonding shall be providt to the City, or an improvement agreement shall be executed. ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITES FINANCING 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 A. Cannon Road Cannon Road West; ECR to Existing Estimated Cost: $20 million terminus at Lego Drive Carlsbad CFD No. l/Transnet/BTD 1 Developers fund frontage improvemc Participation in CFD No. 1 and BTD I Developer bonding for frontage improvements Reimbursement to developer of quali improvements constructed by them. ' Source Of Funds: Finance Guarantee: Reimbursement: . B. Intersect ion Improvements Cannon Road / El Camino Real Intersection Estimated Cost: $1.16 million Source Of Funds: Traffic Impact Fee fund Finance Guarantee: Developer of Area E to bond and Reimbursement: Reimbursement to developer of qua improvements constructed by them. construct. Reimbursement through C. Traffic Signal Estimated Cost: Source Of Funds: Finance Guarantee: Reimbursement: Cannon Road / Frost St. Intersectio $180,000 Developer funded (PFF) Developer of Area E to bond and Reimbursement to developer of qua: improvements constructed by them. construct e D. Faraday Avenue Estimated Cost: Source Of Funds: Reimbursement: Finance Guarantee: Faraday Ave. extension from existi westerly terminus to Cannon Road $3.5 million CFD No. 1 NA CFD No. I E. ParkDrive Park Drive widening along Zone 8 frontage Estimated Cost: $250,000 Finance Guarantee: Reimbursement: Source Of Funds; Developer I Bonding in conjunction with approvz Area A development - ’ F. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal; Cannon Road / Fara Avenue Estimated Cost: $1 10,000 Source Of Funds: Public Facilities Fees Finance Guarantee: Reimbursement: Reimbursement of qualifying City funding through Public Facilitit funds. In 1998-99 CIP. expenditures to developers if constn by them. - 0 0 7. FIRE FACILITIES Facility None is required. There are no Special Conditions contained in the Zone 8 LFMP. Source Of Funds None is required Financing Guarantee None is required. r ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FINANCING PI 17 0 0 8. OPEN SPACE FACILITIES Facility None is required, There are no Special Conditions contained in the Zone 8 LFMP. According to the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan, Zone 8 i: dentified as already in compliance with the adopted performance standard. Therefore, no further analysis is required pertaining to open space. Source Of Funds None is required. FinancinP - Guarantee None is required. L ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITlES FlNANClNG P MANAGEMENT PLAN 18 0 0 9. SCHOOL FACILITIES Facility The following Special Conditions are contained in the Zone 8 LFMP: Prior to the recordation of any residential final map, issuance of grading pern or building permit, whichever occurs first, in Zone 8, an agreement shall be entered into between Carlsbad Unified School District and the affected prope owner(s> that shall provide for the following: 1. The deeding of an acceptable school site to the Carlsbad Unified Schoc District if it is determined by the District a school within Zone 8 is warranted. 2. A financing plan approved by the City and Carlsbad Unified school District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 8 pursuant to condition #l. If any reimbursements and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall provide a mechanism to do so. School Agreement - A Carlsbad Unified School District School Facilities Mitigation Agreement between the Kelly Ranch developer and the Carlsbad Unified School District executed on November 20,1997, which provides that a school site will not be necessary within Zone 8, and that annexation of the property into Carlsbad Unified CFD No. 3 will satisfy the funding of school facilities, This agreemen in compliance with the LFMP condition which requires deeding of a school sj warranted. Source of Funds School facilities will be funded through the collection of funds through schoo facilities CFD No, 3. Financing - Guarantee The Kelly Ranch property has annexed into CFD No. 3, and as a result, financ of school facilities is guaranteed. ZONE 8 LOCAL FAClLlTlES FINANCING 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 19 0 0 10. SEWER FACILITIES Sewer Facilities Financing Matrix Zone 8 (I) City Sewer Fee funds. (2) City Sewer Fee funds in conjunction with Faraday Ave. construction. Facility L The proposed Zone 8 LFMP Amendment contains the following special conditions relative to sewer facilities: Special Conditions (Except for Planning Areas "A" and "C") are as follows: w b. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for new development in Zone 8 the City Engineer shall make a finding that adequate capacity exisi within the NAHI Trunk Line and the appropriate facilities have been installed (including pump station) to direct sewage into the NAHI Line, consistent with this LFMP Amendment, to accommodate such building permits. In the event that this finding cannot be made, the City Enginee ZONE 8 LOCAL. FACIUTIES FINANCING P MANAGEMENT PLAN 20 0 0 will not allow issuance of the building permits unless the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will be in place and operational to serve the REW subject iwi&&id * development within Zone 8. c. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permits or building permits, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the necessary sewer collection system consistent with this LFMP Amendment, to serve the proposed developme must be approved by the City. Source Of Funds All Zone 8 development shall privately fund sewer facilities. In addition, prior approval of any development permit within Zone 8, the Developer shall pay tk required sewer fees to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. Financing - Guarantee The primary regional facilitiy within Zone 8 is the South Agua Hedionda Sew( Trunk Line. The developers shall pay Sewer Fees and bond for development improvements. f ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES FINANCING I MANAGEMENTPLAN 21 Water Facilities On-site 8”-14” water mains, valves, reducing stations 12” water distribution line in Faraday Ave. Total Water Facility costs Funding Est. Options 2nd 3rd Amount Cost Timing 1st 25000LF $8oO,OOO Concurrent Developer w /Development 3200 LF $11O,OOO Concurrent City w/Development $91O,OOo (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the dates of June 30, 1989 Proof of Publication of Public Hearing ____--_-__________-___ ...................... 0 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LFMP 87-08(A) - KELLY RANCH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, to consider approval of a Negativc Declaration, and to consider a request for an amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilitie$ Management Plan to update buildout numbers for the parks, water, circulation, and sewe sections, to revise improvement requirements associated with those sections, and tc include a Financing Plan. Zone 8 is generally located west of El Camino Real at it! intersection with future Cannon Road. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 22, 1999. If you have an! questions regarding this matter, please call Christer Westman, in the Plannini Department, at (760) 438-1 161 , extension 4448. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Financing Plan ir court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else a the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to tht City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior, to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Kelly Land Company PUBLISH: January 16,1999 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 7d/* 8 5% 0' +&3 @. /. '/* 0 0 @ KELLY RANCH LFMP 87=08(A) 0 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LFMP 87-08lA) - KELLY RANCH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, to consider approval of a Negative Declaration, and to consider a request for an amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan to update buildout numbers for the parks, water, circulation, and sewer sections, to revise improvement requirements associated with those sections, and to include a Financing Plan. Zone 8 is generally located west of El Carnino Real at its intersection with future Cannon Road. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 22, 1999. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Christer Westman, in the Planning Department, at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4448. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment and Financing Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised by you or someone else a1 the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's Office at, or prior, to the public hearing. APPLICANT: Kelly Land Company PUBLISH: January 16,1999 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 0 0 1 Carlsbad Village Drive ad, California 92008-1 989 DAVID J. KOLDA 4833 FLYING CLOUD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 ) Carlsbad Village Drive ad, California 92008-1 989 TRISH GAPIK 4831 FLYING CLOUD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 ~- - 10 Carlsbad Village Drive Dad, California 92008-1 989 MARJORIE ROSENFELD 4793 FLYING CLOUD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF ENCINITAS 0 SD COUNTY PLANNING CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 801 PINE AVE STE B 505 S VULCAN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 5201 RUFFIN RD ENCINITAS CA 920 0 . -, SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CITY OF SAN MARCOS CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA 1 CIVIC CENTER DR 300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988 SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG STE 50 STE B STE 800 330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 401 B STREET LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 SAN DIEGO CA 921 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC I URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UP SAN DIEGO CA 921 LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 1600 PACIFIC HWY 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD 2730 LOKER AVE WEST PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS/COMMI CARLSBAD CA 92008 DE PT S ERVI CE S CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CHRISTER WESTMAM BILL DAUGHERTY KlRGlS 1996 TRUST HELGE WElSSlG 4452 HOCKADAY DR PO BOX 230754 620 CONCORD PL DALLAS TX 75229 ENClNlTAS CA 92023-0754 SANMARCOS CA 9201 0 0 KELLY LAND COMPANY LISA & JOE MURPHY DEE KAULBACH STE 206 4666 PANNONIA RD STE 2 201 1 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 4519 COVE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92008 TRlSH GAPIK PAM WH ITCO M B FRED LORENTSEN 4831 FLYING CLOUD WY STE 206 4866 PARK DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 201 1 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92009 MIKE HOWES, HOFMAN PLANNING MARILYN WINSLOW JENNIFER DAVl DSON STE 150 4896 ALONDRA WY 1807 VALENCIA AVE 5900 PASTEUR CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 PAUL KLUKAS PLANNING SYSTEMS 1530 FARADAY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ST€ 100 0 0 (Form A) - TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: RE: PueLxc HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary tor you to notice LFMP 87-08(A) - Kelly Ranch for a public hearing before the City Councll. Please notice the item for the council meeting of First Avaifkble . > I.' . Thank you. January 5, 1999 - Assistant City Man-' Date - * 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad \ hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbi California, at 6;OO p,m, on Wednesday, DeGember 16, 1998, to consider a request an amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan to update build( numbers for the parks, water, circulation and sewer sections, to revise improvemf requirements associated with those sections, and to include a finance plan. Zone 8 generally located west of El Camino Real at its intersection with future Cannon Road. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend tl public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 1 1998. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Plannir Department at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4448. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior the public hearing. ’ CASE FILE: LFMP 87-08(A) CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH PUBLISH: DECEMBER 3,1998 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNI NG DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-11 61 - FAX (760) 438-089 * e 0 I @ KE L LY RAN C H LFMP 87-08(A) I( 0 0 HELGE WElSSlG KlRGlS 1996 TRUST 4452 HOCKADAY DR P 0 BOX 230754 j DALLAS TX 75229 ENClNlTAS CA 92023-0754 KELLY LAND COMPANY SUITE 206 4666 PANNONIA RD 201 1 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD CA 92009 TRISH GAPIK PAM WHITCOMB #206 4831 FLYING CLOUD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 LISA & JOE MURPHY CARLSBAD CA 92008 201 1 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 BILL DAUGHERTY DEE KAULBACH 620 CONCORD PL SUITE 2 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 4519 COVE DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 FRED LORENTSEN MIKE HOWES 4866 PARK DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HOFMAN PLANNING SYSTEMS CARLSBAD CA 92008 2386 FARADAY SUITE 120 MAR1 LY N W I NSLOW PAUL KLUKAS 4896 ALONDRA WAY PLANNING SYSTEMS #lo0 CARLSBAD CA 92008 1530 FARADAY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JENNIFER DAVIDSON 1807 VALENCIA AV CARLSBAD CA 92008 A notice h=js been mailed to all pv I '' Il ners/occupants listed Date Signatu re /a-/Vf -*-+zz--- - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 l9 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e RESOLUTION NO. 99-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONE 8 WHICH INCLUDES A FINANCE PLAN. CASE NAME: KELLY RANCH CASE NO.: LFMP 87-08(A) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby r6 follows: WHEREAS, on December 21, 1988, the City Council approved ti Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Negative Declar: Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment on December 16, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Rc No. 4444 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration and Planning Con Resolution No. 4443 recommending that the City Council approve LFMP 87-08(A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Carlsbad as follows: 1. 2. That the above recitations are true and correct. That the Negative Declaration and amendment to LFMP Zone 8 is approved as described in ZONE 8 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN KELLY I AREA “E” AMENDMENT: Proposed Amendment to Parks Facilities, Circulation F: Sewer Collection Facilities, Water Facilities dated December 3, 1998 and ZONE 8 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN KELLY RANCH AREA “E AMENDMENT: Financir dated September 24, 1998. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of th Carlsbad on the 26th day of January 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, and Finnila NOES: None ABSENT: Council Members Nygaard and Kulchin ATTEST: ALg~AuiiNKim 7 (SEAL) -2-