HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-05-18; City Council; 15208; Rancho Carrillo Village B- e
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGEhOA BILL
AB# /<Ad? -1
MTG. 5118199 RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II
CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP 98-17
DEPT. PLN d CITY MGR %b
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. ci9 - 13 6 , APPROVING CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and
SDP 98-17 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The proposal involves a Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, and Site Development Plan, which will allow for the development of 124 multi-family attached condominium units. Eighty two of the
units will be for-sale affordable units, which fulfills Ranch0 Carrillo’s Master Plan affordable housing
requirement. The project is subject to and in compliance with the General Plan and the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan certified EIR. The applicant is requesting a reduction of standards to the private
street width from 30 feet to 24 feet and reduced setback for five units from 20 feet to 5 feet.
Otherwise the project is in compliance with all applicable zoning ordinances, and the Subdivision
ordinance. Please see the attached staff report to the Planning Commission, dated April 7, 1999, for
a complete analysis of the project’s compliance with the subject policies, plans, and ordinances.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 7, 1999, and voted 4-O (L’Heureux,
Nielsen and Welshons absent), to recommend approval of the project without revisions. No one
spoke in opposition to the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An environmental analysis of the proposed project was conducted and no significant impacts were
identified. Specifically, the addition of underlying zoning for the residential villages, the modification
of design standards for Village B, and the approval of discretionary permits for 124 dwelling units
was adequately analyzed in a previous Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04) for the Ranch0
Carrillo project and the Master Environmental Impact Report for the 1994 General Plan update. In
consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Prior Compliance on
December 16, 1998.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18. The Growth Control Point is 19
dwelling units per acre for the RH General Plan Land Use designation, while the project is proposing
17 dwelling units per acre. The project is located within CFD No. 1 and as a part of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is proposing an assessment district for the construction of Melrose Drive and
has entered into an agreement with the San Marcos Unified School District which proposes a Mello-
Roos financing vehicle estimated to be in the amount of $12 million for school facilities funding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The applicant has made application to the Housing Department for financial assistance for the
affordable housing component of the project. Housing will bring the request before the City Council as a separate hearing item.
-
PAGE 2 OF AGENbi BILL NO. 15,209
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3. 4.
5.
City Council Resolution No. q?- / 76
Location Map
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4467,4468, and 4469 Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 7, 1999
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated April 7, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. 99-176
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
ALLOW A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION INTO 124 MULTI-FAMILY
Al-l-ACHED DWELLING UNITS ALL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND EAST OF MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II
CASE NO.: CT 98-l XP 98-08/SDP 98-l 7
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, on April 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing to consider a Tentative Map (CT 98-15) Condominium Permit (CP 98-08) and
Site Development Plan (SDP 98-17) and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4467,
4468, 4469, respectively, recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the day of 18 th
May , 1999, held a public hearing to consider the recommendations and heard all
persons interested in or opposed to CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and SDP 98-17.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
the Tentative Map (CT 98-15) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission Resolution No. 4467, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by
reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
4. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
the Condominium Permit (CP 98-08) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein
by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
5. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
the Site Development Plan (SDP 98-17) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4469, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein
by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
3
1 6. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1 .I6 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
2 Review” shall apply:
3
II
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.” 11
12 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
13 Carlsbad on the 18 &lay of Mav 1999, by the fallowing vote, to wit:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Nygaard, Finnila, Hall & Kulchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
-2- f!
EXHIBIT 2
SITE
RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGE B PHASE II
CT 98-1 XP 98908ISDP 98-17
1
/I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4467
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT NUMBER CT 98-15 TO
CREATE 124 AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND MELROSE
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II
SE NO.: CT 98-15
8 WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified
9 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc.,
10
II “Owner”, described as
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Ranch0 Carrillo
Village “A-D”, In the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, According to the map thereof No. 13582, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 10,
15
16
(“the Property”); and
17
18
19
20
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibits “A” - “R” dated March 3,1999, on file in the Planning Department
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II, CT 98-15, as provided by Title 20 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
21
22
23
24
25
26
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of March, 1999 and
on the 7th day of April, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
27 I( relating to the Tentative Tract Map. I
28
/I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
of RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II, CT 98-15, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that it is a
residential subdivision designed in accordance with the Subdivision and Planned
Development Ordinances, as well as the approved Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
(and its subsequent amendments), is in compliance with the recommendations of the
required technical studies for soils and drainage, and provides all public
improvements necessary to serve the demand generated by the development.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General Plan
and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. The Palomar Airport Road right-of-way
separates this site from non-residential uses to the north.
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the project is consistent with residential development designated for
Village B by the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and the mass grading plan approved
by Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-17.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that the project has been designed and structured such that there are no conflicts
with any established easements.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the area’s dominant
western wind pattern/solar radiation patterns will allow utilization of natural
7 PC RESO NO. 4467 -2- /
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
heating and cooling opportunities.
7. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that all applicable biological mitigation measures required by Final EIR
91-04 and MEIR 93-01 have been incorporated into the project and/or added to the
project as conditions of approval.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the sewer and
drainage requirements of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan and EIR 91-04 have
been considered and appropriate sewer and drainage facilities have been designed
to accommodate the project. In addition to City Engineering Standards and
compliance with the City’s Master Sewer and Drainage Plans, National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to prevent any
discharge violations.
10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for RANCH0
CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II, CT 98-15, is in conformance with the Elements
of the City’s General Plan, based on the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Land Use - The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan Residential
High (RH) land use designation since the proposed density of 17 du/acre is
within the density range of 15-23 du/acre specified for the site as indicated on
the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Circulation - The project is conditioned to complete all necessary onsite and
offsite roadway improvements prior to occupancy of any unit in each phase.
Additionally, all roadway improvements to serve this portion of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan must be guaranteed and substantially completed prior
to occupancy of units in Village B - Phase II.
The project has been conditioned to ensure conformance with the Noise
Element of the General Plan.
Housing - That the project is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the Housing
Element of the General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as
Village B is providing the balance of the inclusionary requirements for the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan.
Open Space and Conservation - The project is consistent with the Ranch0
PC RESO NO. 4467 -3- 8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 LFMP in that 189.9 acres of performance
standard open space will be provided throughout the Master Plan. This is
over 35% of the net developable acreage of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
which exceeds the 15% Growth Management requirement.
F. Public Safety - In accordance with the Ranch0 Carrillo mass grading plan
(HDP 91-17) and the Village B - Phase II grading plan and final soils report,
all unacceptable soil conditions will be mitigated to facilitate construction.
Standard engineering grading conditions will be required for all requisite
grading.
11. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will not be approved
unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project.
In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note shall be placed on the final
map that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the District
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the District
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the San Marcos School
District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General PIan.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan has entered into a Parks Agreement with
the City of Carlsbad.
12. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
13. The Planning Commission finds that:
A. The project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidelines 15168
(c)(2) and (e), and 15 183;
B. The project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) and
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04);
PC RESO NO. 4467 -4- 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
C. There were EIRs certified in connection with the prior 1994 General Plan
Update and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan;
D. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as
significant in the prior EIRs;
E. None of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist.
That all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01
and EIR 91-04 which are appropriate to this subsequent project have been incorporated
into this subsequent project.
That MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significant and
adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding considerations.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those effects, no additional
environmental document is required.
That the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant shall
record a notice concerning aircraft noise.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, pursuant to Section
14.28.020, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 90-384.
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused the project.
The project, as designed, implements certain objectives and mitigation measures
established by the General Plan Master EIR to reduce cumulative air quality and
circulation impacts as applicable to a residential project of this scale. These include:
providing links to public sidewalk systems that connect with transportation
corridors, future schools, parks, and trail systems; providing for safe pedestrian and
bicycle movements within the project and designing the project to accommodate
pedestrian spaces as well as proposed parking areas and building locations.
The Planning Director has found that, based on the EIA Part II, this subsequent
project was described in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 as within its scope; AND
there will be no additional significant effect, not analyzed therein; AND that no new
or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required; AND that therefore
this subsequent project is within the scope of the prior EIR, and no new
environmental document nor Public Resources Code 21081 findings are required.
PC RESO NO. 4467 -5- /O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21. That this project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffic
impact on the Palomar Airport Road/ El Camino Real intersection. However, this
project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the “short-term improvements”
thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure that reduces the
potential impact to a level of insignificance.
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the
approval of this proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to approval of a final
map.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map document(s) necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and
hold harmless the City of Carlsbad and Council members, officers, employees, agents,
and representatives from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands,
claims, and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising,
directly or indirectly from (a) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action,
whether discretionary or non discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated
herein, and (b) Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted
hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by
the facility of electromagnetic fields or. other energy waves or emissions.
The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24-inch by 36-inch mylar copy
of the Tentative Map as approved by the final decision making body. The Tentative
Map shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, a
reduced legible version of the approving resolutions on a 24” by 36” blueline drawing.
The final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such
approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28,
1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended f?om time to time, and any development
PC RESO NO. 4467
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
C
fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or Facilities
and Improvement Plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to pay the public facilities
fee dated January 10, 1997, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this residential
housing project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this
approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the
condition complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of CT 98-15 is granted subject to the approval of Condominium Permit CP 98-
08 and Site Development Plan 98-17. CT 98-15 is subject to all conditions contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468 for the Condominium Permit CP 98-08 and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4449 for the Site Development Plan, SDP 98-17.
The Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
A. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
B. . . Failure of -non to Mainta in Common Area Lots and Easements. In the
event that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements”, the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to
perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such
maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy
thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the
maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be
carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the giving
of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements within
the period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such
PC RESO NO. 4467 -7- /of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C.
D.
E.
F.
work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto
f?om the Owners as provided herein.
J,evied bv the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association’s Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to
each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to
pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection
against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full
within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be
subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of
the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by
means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available
to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot
in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing
lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in
the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal
actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment.
Prior to the occupancy of any dwelling units in Village B - Phase II, this same
Village B - Phase II shall be annexed into the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Homeowner’s Association.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private
easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street
lights and storm drain facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within
the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included with
the CC&Rs subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors in accordance with
Engineering Standards and the conforming mylar tentative map; and shall record
the following statements on the conforming mylar tentative map and preliminary
landscape plan:
1) Mature vegetation within the site line area of all intersections shall be no
greater than 30” in height or have a canopy no less than 8’ in height.
PC RESO NO. 4467 -8-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
2) No structure, fence, wall, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the
street level shall be placed or permitted to encroach within the area
identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards
and the conforming mylar tentative map. The underlying property owner,
or homeowner’s association shall maintain this condition.
The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
The developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that
discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project.
Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, the Developer shall provide to the
Planning Director a copy of the Department of Real Estate-approved Condominium
Plan vvhich is in conformance with the City-approved plans and exhibits.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice
of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the
City of Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Map by Resolution No. 4467 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide
school facilities.
17. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with
the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s Landscape Manual. The plans
shall be submitted to and approval obtained fi-om the Planning Director prior to the
approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first. The
Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plans, and
maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free fi-om weeds, trash, and
debris.
18. The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accompanied by the
project’s improvement and grading plans.
19. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct the community
theme/noise attenuation walls shown on the Landscape Concept Plan Exhibit.
PC RESO NO. 4467 -9- )1/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that the
following mitigation has been provided: (1) the interior noise levels shall be
mitigated to 45 dBA CNEL when openings to the exterior of the residence are
closed; and (2) if openings are required to be closed to meet the City standard,
mechanical ventilation shall be provided.
. . and Identrflcation
21. Prior to occupancy of any units, the Developer shall construct a directory sign at the
entrance to the project. The design of this sign shall be approved by the Planning
Director.
22. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings
so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or
addresses shall contrast to their background color.
II . . . Miscellaneous ConditiogS
23. This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential homeownership
purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for
such rental shall be not less than 26 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this
requirement.
24. The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office at all
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
25. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be
limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
II Environmental
26. The Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all mitigation
measures identified in the Final EIR 91-04 and MEIR 93-01 that are found by this
resolution to be feasible and applicable to this project.
27. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of applicable portions of,
the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan Final EIR Project Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
28. The Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the project site with the
project as described in the Final EIR 91-04, except as modified by this resolution.
29. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
II PC RESO NO. 4467
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30.
31.
32.
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridors
(Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive), in a form meeting the approval of the
Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #l on file in the Planning
Department).
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
The Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
The Developer shall pay their fair share for the “short-term improvements” to the El
Camino Real/ Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to approval of the final map or the
issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. The amount shall be determined by
the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but not limited to, an increase
in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increased or new Zone 18 LFMP fee; the creation
of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation into a Mello-Roos taxing district.
Housing
33.
34.
35.
36.
Prior to the approval of the final map, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable
Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict 82 dwelling units as
affordable to lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units, in
accordance with the requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code. The recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding on all
future owners and successors in interest.
Prior to final map, a copy of the recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall be
submitted to the Planning Department.
The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent with the
project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and
the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule
for development.
All units within buildings 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,13,17,18,19,20,22,23,24, and 25
on Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract 97-02 are designated as affordable units.
Ten percent of the buildings containing affordable units may be relocated within
Village B - Phase II.
PC RESO NO. 4467 IL -ll-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
37.
38.
39.
40.
There shall be one final subdivision map recorded for this project.
The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements
within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights and storm drain
facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable
manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. Adequate provision
for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&Rs subject to the approval of the
City Engineer.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors in accordance with Engineering
Standards and the conforming mylar tentative map; and, shall record the following
statements on the conformin? mylar tentative mar, and nreliminarv landscape plan:
A. Mature vegetation within the site line area of all intersections shall be no
greater than 30” in height or have a canopy no less than 8’ in height.
B. No structure, fence, wall, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street
level shall be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards and the
conforming mylar tentative map. The underlying property owner, or
homeowner’s association shall maintain this condition.
Gradine
41. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. The developer must submit
and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City Codes and Standards prior
to issuance of a building permit for the project. The grading plans shall reflect the
drainage requirement for City Standard GS-14 along the project’s southerly . property line. The drainage requirement for City Standard GS -14 shall be shown in
plan and section views on the tentative map conforming mylar.
. Dedicatiorasllmurovements
42. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Melrose Drive shall be waived on the final map.
(Reference the intersection of Private Drive “B” with Private Drive “G” on the
tentative map for the specific location.)
PC RESO NO. 4467 -12- /7
1 43.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 44.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 45’
The developer shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide best
management practices as referenced in the “California Storm Water Best Management
Practices Handbook” to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge
to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer.
Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of
the following:
A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides,
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as
prescribed in their respective containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface
improvements.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City Standards, the
developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided
by law, improvements shown on the tentative map, and the following improvements:
A. Installation of a 4-way fully actuated traffk signal at the “A-A”
Street/Melrose Drive intersection.
B. Full improvements to the following streets:
l Village “A* (CT 98-03), “A-A” Street to Village “A,” “A-C”
Street;
l Village “A” (CT 98-03), “A-C” Street to Village “B,‘) Phase
II, Paseo Acampo;
l Village “B,” Paseo Acampo.
A list of the above improvements shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final
map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured improvement agreement
or such other time as provided in said agreement.
The design of all Village “B,” Phase II private streets and drainage systems shall be
approved by the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform
28
/I PC PESO NO. 4467 -13- /B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage
systems shall be inspected by the City. The standard improvement plan check and
inspection fees shall be paid for this project.
Final MaD Notes . .
46. Notes to the following effect shall be placed on the final map as non-mapping data:
A. All improvements for Village “B” are private and are to be privately
maintained with the exception of sewer and water lines which are located
within street and utility easements that are offered for public dedication.
B. No structure, fence, wall, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street
level shall be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standards and the
conforming mylar tentative map. The underlying property owner, or
homeowner’s association shall maintain this condition.
C. Mature vegetation within the site line area of all intersections shall be no
greater than 30” in height or have a canopy no less than 8’ in height.
. . . Correctrons/Addltrons . .
47. The property owner shall execute a covenant for a reciprocal access easement and
maintenance agreement for Ranch0 Carrillo Village “B,” Phases I and II, prior to
issuance of any building permit.
48. The developer shall record an adjustment plat along the project’s southerly
property line as indicated on the tentative map, prior to issuance of any building
permit.
Water
49. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for
any meter installation.
50. The Developer shall provide detailed information to the District Engineer regarding water
demand, irrigation demand, fire flow demand in gallons per minute, and projected sewer
flow in million gallons per day.
51. The entire potable water system, recycled water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail by Developer and District Engineer to ensure that adequate capacity,
pressure and flow demands can be met.
PC RESO NO. 4467 -14-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
52. All District pipelines, pump stations, pressure reducing stations and appurtenances
required for this project by the District shall be within public right-of way or within
easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad.
53. Sequentially, the Developer’s Engineer shall do the following:
A.
B.
Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements.
Prepare and submit a colored recycled water use area map and submit this map to
the Planning Department for processing and approval by the District Engineer.
C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and recycled water improvement plans,
the Developer shall submit preliminary system layouts to the District Engineer for
review, comment and approval.
54. The following note shall be placed on the final map. “This project is approved upon the
expressed condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless the district serving the development has adequate water and sewer
capacity available at the time of development is to occur, and that such water and sewer
capacity will continue to be available until time of occupancy.”
55.
56.
All potable water and recycled water meters shall be placed within public right-of-way.
No more than nineteen (19) homes shall be served on a single potable water distribution
pipeline. For those locations with more than nineteen (19) homes, a looped potable water
pipeline system shall be designed.
57. A public fire flow system shall be required for this residential development, and it shall
be constructed as a looped pipeline system.
58.
m
59.
All potable water and recycled water meters shall be placed within public right of way.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate building plans
for conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of the state and local
Fire Codes.
60. Provide additional public fire hydrants at intervals of 500 feet along public streets and/or
private driveways. Hydrants should be located at street intersections when possible, but
should be positioned no closer than 100 feet from terminus of a street or driveway.
61. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed, and existing public water mains and fire hydrants. The
plan should include off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
PC BESO NO. 4467
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
Applicant shall submit a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways, and
traffic circulation for Fire Department approval.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall be
provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the
access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may,
in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease until the
condition is corrected.
All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational before
combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
Prior to final inspection, all security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be
equipped with a “Knox”, key operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact
the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation.
Prior to building occupancy, private roads and driveways which serve as required access
for emergency service vehicles shall be posted as fire lanes in accordance with the
requirements of Section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following requirements:
A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements and at least two
existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict street centerlines,
hydrant locations and street names.
A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street
indicating the addresses of the buildings on the site.
General
69. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time; if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Tentative Map.
. Code Reumders
70. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of
building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
PC RESO NO. 4467 21 -16-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
71.
72.
73.
74.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in
substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Planning and Building.
The Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name policy
and subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
All garages shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers.
This approval shall become null and void if a final map is not approved for this project
within 24 months from the date of project approval.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
PC RESO NO. 4467 -17- ds!
t
i
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of, April, 1999 by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, Savary, and
Segall
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Welshons
v - I COURTNEY E. HE!NEMAN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HGLZMtiER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4467 -18- d3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4468
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM PERMIT CP 98-08 FOR 124
AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS WITHIN VILLAGE B -
PHASE II IN THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND MELROSE
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II
CA= NO.: CP 98-08
WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc.,
“Owner”, described as
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Ranch0 Carrillo
Village “A-D”, In the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, According to the map thereof No. 13582,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, June 10,1998.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Permit as shown on Exhibit(s) “A” - “R” dated March 3, 1999 ,on file in the
Planning Department, RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II, CP 98-08 as
provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of March, 1999 and
on the 7th day of April, 1999 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Condominium Permit.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
COMMENDS APPROVAI, of RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II, CP 98-08, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
Findiags:
1. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 2 of the General Plan, the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and all
adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the residential
development standards and design criteria specified by the Planned Development
Ordinance are generally adhered to within the Master Plan. Where modifications
have occurred as allowed by the Master Plan process, it is in keeping with the
overall intent and purpose of the Master Plan to provide a variety of housing types
within this residential community.
2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community, in that the multi-family development will contribute
to the balance of housing types in the City.
3. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity in that the project is conditioned to comply with the Zone 18 Local Facilities
Management Plan ensuring that the necessary public facilities and infrastructure
will be provided concurrent with demand and that grading will be in accordance
with the provisions of the Grading Ordinance and the recommendations of the
geotechnical analysis, and that adequate access to the site will be provided from
Melrose Drive.
4. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090 (except as modified pursuant to 21.53 for the
reduction of some private street widths and building setbacks), the design criteria set
forth in Section 21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts
contained in the Design Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides the necessary
private street widths, conveniently located private recreation areas, adequate
resident and guest parking, setbacks and landscaping.
5. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
PC RESO NO. 4468 -2- 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the
site, in that the project grading is consistent with the approved Ranch0 Carrillo
Master Plan Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17, and units will provide
variation in architecture and roof colors as well as landscaping and uniform fencing
on HOA maintained slopes to screen structures from surrounding roadways.
6. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the project is consistent with the
development type and intensity approved for Village B - Phase II by the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan. Village B - Phase II abuts Melrose Drive and is surrounded
by other villages designated for multi-family development.
7. That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and .well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project, in that the internal circulation is
designed to provide automobile access to each of the units garage and to the guest
parking spaces via a private street system and a pedestrian walkway system that
provides access to each unit and across the project.
8. The Planning Commission finds that:
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidelines
15168(c)(2) and(e), and 15183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) and
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 9 l-04).
C. there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior 1994 General Plan and
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIRs; and
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR under
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist.
9. That all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01
and EIR 91-04 which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project have been incorporated
into this Subsequent Project.
10. That MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significant and
adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding
considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those
effects, no additional environmental document is required.
PC RESO NO. 4468 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant shall
record a notice concerning aircraft noise.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council
Resolution No. 90-384.
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
. . Condlttou . .
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Condominium Permit document(s), necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of CP 98-08 is granted subject to approval of CT 98-15 and SDP 98-17. CP
98-08 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No.
4467 for the tentative tract map and 4469 for the site development plan.
3. The exterior patio spaces (ground floor patio and second floor balcony space) shall
not be enlarged or modified as to create an enclosed condition (i.e. solarium, screen
room, or conditioned airspace).
4. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Condominium Permit.
. . .
PC RESO NO. 4468 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of April, 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, Savary, and
Segall
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Welshons
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
w- - MICHAEL J. HOLZMILMR
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4468
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PJANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4469
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SDP 98-17 FOR
124 AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN VILLAGE B -
PHASE II OF THE RANCH0 CARRILLO MASTER PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND MELROSE
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II
CASE NO.. . SDP 98-17
WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc.,
“Owner”, described as
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Ranch0
Carrillo Village “A-D”, In the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, According to the map thereof
No. 13582, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, June 10,1998.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development
Plan as shown on Exhibits “A” - “R” dated March 3, 1999, on tile in the Planning Department,
RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II, CT 98-15, as provided by Chapter
2 1.06Section 2 1.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of March, 1999 and
on the 7th day of April, 1999 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Site Development Plan. a9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGE B - PHASE II, CT 98-15, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or
traffic circulation, in that the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan
and Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan; the multi-family units are compatible in design
and materials to the adjacent proposed multi-family units; and the project would
generate approximately 992 ADT which can be adequately handled by the new
public and private streets designed in the project as well as the existing circulation
system consisting of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Avenue.
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in
that the 7.3 acre site is a flat, rough graded pad, with no physical or environmental
constraints, graded in compliance with HDP 91-17.
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be
provided and maintained, in that the buildings are set back fifty feet from Palomar
Airport Road and Melrose Drive; the site includes a portion of the master plan
perimeter masonry noise attenuation walls and also provides village separation
fences constructed of wood; landscaped common areas and courtyards located
between the buildings are provided; and that topographic changes separate and
buffer the site from the adjacent multi-family and transportation land uses.
4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that the project, as designed, has good on-site
circulation; and the proposed private and public streets will be sized to meet the
land use demand.
5. That the project is in conformity with the general plan and its adopted policies and
goals of the city and that the reduction of the development standard (pursuant to
section 21.53.120 of the CMC) in private street widths from thirty feet to twenty-
four feet would not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety and welfare
in that the private streets are cul-de-sac streets which do not permit through traffic.
The twenty-four foot private drive width allows adequate safe and efficient traffic
PC PESO NO. 4469 -2- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
circulation as the reduced width is adequate for vehicles backing out of garages and I provides adequate separation for two way traffic.
6. That the project is in conformity with the general plan and its adopted policies and
goals of the city and that the reduction of the development standard (pursuant to
Section 2153.120 of the CMC) of the front yard setback from twenty feet, for
private streets with over twelve units, to five feet, would not have a detrimental
effect on the public health, safety and welfare in that the units are located on private
streets that do not have through public traffic and that the garages are equipped
with automatic garage door openers.
. . Condittm . .
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Site Development Plan document(s) necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of SDP 98-17 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Tract map 98-15
and Condominium Permit CP 98-08. SDP 98-17 is subject to all conditions contained
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4467 for Tentative Tract map 98-15 and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RESO NO. 4469 -3- 3/
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of April 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, Savary, and
Segall
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Welshons
ABSTAIN:
COURTNEY E. HEINEMAN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: . 1m
MICHAEL-J. H~%IIk-kR
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4469 -4- 3a
EXHIBIT 4 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 1 0
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 7, 1999
Project Engineer: Mike Shirey
Sl B JECT: CT 98-15KP 98-08/SDP 98-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit
and Site Development Plan to construct 124 condominium units on property
generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan near the southeast
comer of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive in Local Facilities
Management Zone 18.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4467, 4468,
4469, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and SDP 98-15, based upon
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the errata dated April 7,
1999.
II. INTRODUCTION
This item was originally scheduled to be heard on March 3, 1999 and was continued to April 7,
1999.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Errata sheet dated April 7,1999
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4467 (CT)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468 (CP) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4469 (SDP)
5. Staff Report dated March 3, 1999, with attachments
33
April 7,1999
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 98-15KP 98-08/SDP 98-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II
Please replace Exhibit “A” and architectural exhibits (exhibits “G’‘-“R”) with the attached new
plans. The revision is a result of floor plan number two being a three bedroom unit rather than a
two bedroom unit as correctly stated in the staff report. On Table 1 and Table 2 on page two of
the staff report, the three bedroom living square footage of 1,003 square feet should read as 1,034
square feet. The plan elevations have been modified to address the larger patio/deck area and
window placement. Staff supports the revision.
Please delete the last sentence on page 9 and add the following language to the “Environmental
Section” of the staff report;
The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report.
The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service” (LOS)
failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both
the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance
negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to 4 15 162
of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent”
environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded
intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However,
case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the
preparation of a “Subsequent EIR” if mitigation measures are adopted which
reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the
peak hours LOS into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves
construction of two dual right turn lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound
to northbound. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the
intersection “short-term improvements” thereby, guaranteeing mitigation to a
level of insignificance. The applicant is in agreement with the proposed
condition.
Please modify Resolution No. 4467 by the followinudditions;
New Finding 2 1.
That this project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffic
impact on the Palomar Airport Road/ El Camino Real intersection. However, this
project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the “short-term
improvements” thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure
that reduces the potential impact to a level of insignificance.
New Condition 3 1 and then renumber.
The Developer shall pay their fair share for the “short-term improvements” to the
El Camino Real/ Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to approval of the final
map or the issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. The amount shall
be determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but
not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increased or new
Zone 18 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation
into a Mello-Roos taxing district.
- -
The City of Carlsbad Planning Departme&
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 0 5
Application complete date: October 8, 1998
P.C. AGENDA OF: March 3,1999 Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: Mike Shirey
Sl BJECT: CT 98 15/CP 98-08lSDP 98 17 - - - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B -
PHASE II - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit
and Site Development Plan to construct 124 condominium units on property
generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan near the southeast
comer of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive in Local Facilities
Management Zone 18.
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4467, 4468,
4469, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and SDP 98-15, based upon
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The applications propose the development of the 7.3 acre, Village B - Phase II site of the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan with 27 four- and five-plex buildings for a total of 124 units. Eighty-two of
the units will be sold as inclusionary units and the remaining 42 units will be sold as market rate
units. Since this project has more than fifty units, the Planning Commission will be making a
recommendation to the City Council. As designed and conditioned, the project is in
conformance with the General Plan, Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan, and Ranch0 Carrillo Final
Environmental Impact Report. The project is in compliance with all City standards, with the
exception of a reduced standard for private street widths pursuant to incentives allowed for
inclusionary housing projects. All issues have been resolved.
III. PROJECT DESCRZPTION AND BACKGROUND
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan was approved by City Council on October 21, 1997. The
purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of Ranch0 Carrillo, while
preserving the environmental resources of the area. Grading for the entire Master Plan area was
approved under Hillside Development Permit HDP 9 l-l 7. For planning purposes, the Ranch0
Can-i110 Master Plan is divided into 19 villages. The Master Plan identifies the allowable type
and intensity of land uses in each village and provides general development and design
standards, requirements, and the method by which the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan will be
implemented.
CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGB B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
Village B consists of 3 multi-family lots: Lots 206, 207, and 208. The development of 116
apartment units has already been approved for Lot 207 (Phase I). This application is for the
development of 124 units on 7.3 acres consisting of Lots 206 and 208 (as Phase II) for a total of
240 units in Village B. This is 18 units less than the 258 units allowed by growth management.
The proposed development, while located within the Planned Community (P-C) zone, has an
underlying zoning designation of Residential Density-Multiple @D-M) and has a General Plan
designation of Residential High Density (15-23 du/ac) with a 19 du/ac growth control point. The
project density is 17 dwelling units per acre. The site sits adjacent to Palomar Airport Road and
Melrose Drive and has already been rough-graded.
Pursuant to the City’s adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the base dwelling units
in the Master Plan must be provided for lower income households. The proposed project
complies with this requirement by designating 82 of the 124 proposed condominium units to be
sold as inclusionary units.
The proposed 124 unit condominium project consists of 27 residential buildings (16 five-plexes
and 11 four-plexes), a common pool recreation facility, fitness and turf area, and tot lots. Table 1
below shows the size and types of affordable units proposed.
TABLE 1 - AFFORDABLE UNITS
Number of Bedrooms Size of Unit Number of Units
Two 901 SQ. FT. 10
Three 1,003 SQ. FT. 36
1 ~ 1,139 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 82
The remaining 42 units will be sold at market rates. Table 2 below shows the size and type of
market rate units proposed.
TABLE 2 - MARKET RATE UNITS 1
I Number of Bedrooms I Size of Unit I Number of Units I
Two 901 SQ. FT. 6
Three 1,034 SQ. FT. 18
Two or Three* 1,139 SQ. FT. 18
TOTAL 42
*The proposed number of 1,139 sq. ft. market rate units that will be built as two vs. three
bedrooms will be determined at a later date. These units do not change in size, only in interior
floor plan. 37
C
CT 98-l YCP 98-08/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGd B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
3
The project is served by a thirty-two foot wide private street with parking on one side of the
street. Private driveways radiate off this street to provide access to each unit’s garage.
Pedestrian walkways provide cross-development circulation, access to Melrose Avenue, access
to the passive and active recreation areas, and to front entries. In seven cases, a courtyard effect
is created between two parallel buildings. Each courtyard area is complemented with turf area,
landscaping, enhanced paving, and two benches for seating. The project’s common recreation
facilities include a pool, spa, pool building with restroom and pool equipment, three separate tot
lots, and a fitness area. Fifty-one guest parking spaces are provided by street side parking and
guest parking bays disbursed throughout the site. Each unit in the project is provided with an
enclosed two car garage with automatic door opener, ground floor patio area, second story deck,
and laundry space within the unit.
The architectural style is California Mediterranean, which is characterized by the barrel tile roof,
recessed openings, and a sense of mass and solidity. The main roofline is accented with hips at
the ends and various gables. The exterior materials consist of a light-colored, textured plaster
finish with a contrasting colored wainscot and other vertical elements. Windows will be trimmed
with a six-inch wide plaster projection of contrasting color. The patios and balconies will be
enclosed with a low wood railing. Accent features include wood shutters, wood knee braces,
plaster eve corbels, and decorative accent tiles.
The project is subject to the following land use plans, policies, programs and zoning regulations:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
General Plan;
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP- 139 and its amendments);
Planned Development and Residential Density-Multiple Zone Ordinance
Standards;
Subdivision Ordinance;
Affordable Housing Requirement for Site Development Plan (Chapters 21.53 and
21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
Inclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code)
and the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
IV. ANALysIs
The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies in tables and project specific
discussions.
A. General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. Table 3
below indicates how the project complies with the Elements of the General Plan which are
particularly relevant to this proposal. 38
CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CAFtRILLO VILLAW B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
r
ELEMENT
Land Use
Housing
Circulation
Noise
TABLE 3 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
USE CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR
PROGRAM
Site is designated for Residential-
High Density uses which allows
15-23 dwelling units per acre.
Encourage the provision of low
income dwelling units to meet the
special housing needs identified in
the Housing Element.
Ensure that all hillside
development is designed to
preserve the visual quality of the
pre-existing topography.
Permit the approval of
discretionary actions and the
development of land only after
adequate provision has been made
for public facilities and services in
accordance with the Growth
Management public facility
standards.
Ensure that master planned
communities and all qualified
subdivisions provide a range of
housing for all economic income
ranges. A minimum of 15% of all
units approved in master planned
communities shall be affordable to
lower income households.
Require new development to
construct all roadways necessary to
development prior to or concurrent
with need.
65 dEIA CNEL is the exterior noise
level and 45 dRA CNEL is the
interior noise level to which all
residential units should be
mitigated.
PROPOSED USE AND
IMPROVEMENTS
The project consists of multi-
family residential units at a
density of 17 du/ac
82 of the 124 units proposed
will be sold as affordable to
lower income households. The
remaining 42 condominium
units will be sold at market
rate.
Grading is consistent with the
approved HDP for the Ranch0
Carrillo Master Plan.
The project is conditioned to
construct/install all public
facilities necessary to serve the
development. Citywide and
quadrant wide public facilities
are adequate to satisfy the
additional demand, therefore,
the project is consistent with
the Zone 18 LFMP.
The project provides 82
affordable units to fulfil1 the
balance of the affordable
housing requirement for the
Master Plan. The remaining
42 condominium units will be
sold at’market rates.
The project is conditioned to
complete all necessary street
improvement prior to
occupancy of any unit.
The project is conditioned to
comply with the 45 dI3A
CNEL interior noise standard
and the 65 dHA CNEL
exterior noise level standard.
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1
39
h
CT 98- 15KP 98-08/SDP rd- 17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGti B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
B. Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
As described below, the proposed project complies with the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan General
Community Development Standards and applicable requirements including: 1) product type and
density; 2) Approved Hillside Development Permit HDP 91-17; 3) design criteria; 4) Master
Plan infrastructure requirements; and 5) affordable housing.
1. The Master Plan designates Village B for multi-family development with a density range
of 15-23 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project consists of 124 multi-family units
on 7.3 acres for a density of 17 dwelling units per acre.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the approved Hillside Development Permit
(HDP 91-17) in that the rough-grading that has been done on the site is consistent with
the approved mass grading design for the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan area.
3. The project is consistent with the location criteria for higher density affordable projects in
that it is located at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive. This
location puts it in proximity to jobs along the industrial corridor of Palomar Airport Road
and bus stops on Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive.
The project will not adversely impact the overall cohesiveness and appearance of the
Master Plan area. The architectural style and materials of the project are similar to other
single family and multi-family developments in the neighborhood. The project will
provide onsite parking and recreational facilities to adequately serve the project and is
designed with landscaped slopes and setbacks to buffer and screen the project from
surrounding multi-family and duplex lots.
A 50’ building setback is required, and provided, along Palomar Airport Road and
Melrose Drive to screen the units from the roadway and to buffer residential units from
traffic noise. The proposed landscaping within this setback area is consistent with the
Master Plan landscape guidelines. Streetscape landscaping, community theme walls and
fences, and villages fences, as well as village entry monuments into the project are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan.
4. The project is conditioned to require that all public facilities necessary to serve the project
are provided prior to, or concurrent with, development in accordance with the Zone 18
Local Facilities Management Plan.
The circulation system providing access to Village B has been laid out in accordance with
the requirements of the approved Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. These streets have been
designed to city standards and will consist of curb, gutter, and sidewalk to the right-of-
way widths specified in the Master Plan.
Sewer service to this project will be provided by public sewer lines that will tie into a 12”
sewer main serving the entire Ranch0 Carrillo development. The sewer lines for this 40
CT 98-15KP 98-OS/SDP 98-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
6
project will drain by gravity flow along Mehose Drive and then along Poinsettia Lane.
This sewer main connects with an off-site pump station, which will pump sewage to the
existing Buena/San Marcos Interceptor system located on El Camino Real.
Domestic water will be provided to the project from trunk lines of the 12” water main
beneath Melrose Drive. An 8” reclaimed water line along Melrose Drive and will be
tapped for irrigation of the slope areas.
5. The Ranch0 Can-i110 Master Plan states that the affordable housing for Ranch0 Carrillo
may be located in Village B as multi-family condominiums or apartments. The project is
consistent with the Ranch0 Cart-i110 Master Plan and an amendment is proposed to the
Ranch0 Carrillo Affordable Housing Agreement to include the 82 for sale inclusionary
units.
C. Development Standards (Master Plan, Planned Development Ordinance, and
Residential Density-Multiple Zone)
In the Ranch0 Can-i110 Master Plan, Village B, most of the development standards of the
Residential Density-Multiple @D-M) zone are replaced by the same or more restrictive
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance. Table 4 below summarizes the project’s
compliance with the development standards of the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan (MP), Planned
Development Ordinance (PD), and Residential Density-Multiple (RD-M) zone:
TABLE 4 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARD REQUIRED
Dwelling Unit Setback from
Palomar Airport Road and
Melrose Drive (MP)
50 feet minimum
Setback from private drive
P)
5 feet minimum
Building Separation (PD) 10 feet minimum
Recreation space: Private
PD)
Common
active
Common
Passive
10’ minimum dimension
patio
Active common facilities
Passive common facilities
30MPLIANCE
~ PROPOSED
50 feet minimum
5 and 20 foot setbacks
10 feet minimum between
porches
12 feet minimum between
buildings
10’ minimum dimension
patio and second story deck
Swimming pool w/ pool
building, fitness area
Benches, walks, children’s
play areas, grassy play areas
CT 98-15/CP 98-OS/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAW B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
Recreational vehicle storage Required to provide Provided in Village T per
@‘D) Master Plan
The applicant is requesting the following modification to the development standards of the
Planned Development Ordinance:
1) Section 21.45.090(h)(l) - To allow some of the private driveways serving this
project to be 24 feet wide rather than the required 30 foot width for multifamily
projects.
Pursuant to Section 21.53.120, the applicant is required to process a Site Development Plan, ,
because the proposal is for a multi-family residential development. In addition, the applicant is
requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a standard modification
pursuant to Section 21.53.120(c) and 21.06 (Qualified Overlay) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
This section allows a Site Development Plan for an affordable housing project to have less
restrictive development standards than specified in the underlying zone, or elsewhere, provided
the project is in conformance with the General Plan and would not have a detrimental effect on
public health, safety and welfare. Staff supports the proposed standard modification for the
reasons discussed below:
A. This project is consistent with the General Plan and the Ranch0 Carrillo Master
Plan as described in Sections A and B of this report. The project would not have
a significant impact on the environment as described in Section V of this report.
B. The project would provide adequate onsite parking and circulation to serve the
needs of the residents and their guests, and would not impact the availability of
off-site street parking.
C. The existing Planned Development Ordinance requires, at a minimum, 30 foot
wide private streets/driveways; however, the proposed 24 foot wide private streets
would be adequate to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turn
movements and emergency access. The 24 foot wide driveway is wide enough to
accommodate emergency vehicles. The project has been reviewed and approved
by the Fire Department.
D. The City’s Parking Ordinance requires a minimum standard width of 24 feet for a
two-way traffic aisle containing 90 degree parking on both sides. A 24-foot wide
driveway aisle provides adequate separation and distance for vehicles backing out
of garages and adequate separation for two way traffic. The reduced private
driveway widths are proposed on cul-de-sacs (which typically do not carry large
amounts of traffic), rather than on the through spine road. Based on prior
residential developments, the 24-foot wide driveways have proved functional and
historically have not resulted in traffic circulation or public safety problems.
E. The reduced drive width allows the units of the development to be large enough to
accommodate two and three bedroom dwelling units which will be a more livable 44
CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGti B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
ge 8
unit and help to fulfil1 the inclusionary requirement of three bedroom units.
D. Subdivision Ordinance
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed tentative map and has concluded that the
subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance. As noted in Section A above, all infrastructure improvements will be
installed concurrent with development. Access to the site will be provided off Paseo Acampo, a
public street, via Ranch0 Bravado which is off Meh-ose Avenue. The proposed building setbacks
and structure separation will allow for adequate air circulation and the opportunity for passive
heating and cooling. An adjustment plat will be processed to relocate the southerly property line
to the top of the slope to eliminate any cross-lot drainage.
E. Inclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance)
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan project is in compliance with the City’s Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance, which requires that 15% of the total number of units within the Master Plan must be
affordable to low income households. The required findings include consistency with General
Plan goals and policies, adequacy of the site and street system, and a determination that the
affordable units are compatible with surrounding uses, and will not adversely impact the site or
surrounding areas including traffic circulation.
Eighty-two of the 142 units proposed for Village B - Phase II will be sold as inclusionary units.
These units are tentatively located in Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22,
23, 24, and 25, for a total of 72 three bedroom and 10 two bedroom affordable units. Of these
units, the applicant is requesting that up to 50 percent of the units be allowed to be moved to a
different building within Phase II. Given that over half of the units are affordable, there will be
affordable units spread across the project site. The units in the remaining buildings will be sold
at market rates.
This project will require an amendment to the Ranch0 Carrillo Affordable Housing Agreement to
add the 82 affordable units. The affordable housing agreement is conditioned to be completed
prior to approval of the final map. The agreement will be submitted by the applicant to the
Housing office for staffs review and recommendation to the Housing Commission and then to
the Community Development Director and/or City Council.
This development will complete Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan’s affordable housing requirement.
The developer proposes a total of 1,658 dwelling units within the Master Plan. The requirement
that 15 percent of the units be provided as affordable units would require a total of 248 affordable
housing units. Planning Commission has already approved 116 affordable apartments in Village
B-Phase I and 50 Second Dwelling Units. The approval of this project with 82 for sale
affordable units will total 248 total affordable dwelling units provided by the Master Plan.
F. Growth Management Ordinance - Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18 in the City’s southwest 43
CT 98-15/CP 98-08/SDP ~8-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGti B - PHASE II
March 3,1999
fze 9
quadrant and is subject to the conditions of the Zone 18 LFMP. The 124 units proposed are 14
units below the Growth Management control point allowance of 138 units for the 7.3 acre site.
The Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan has mitigated all impacts created by this subdivision.
V. FNVIRONM&NTAI, REVIEW
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan were previously analyzed by the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04). The project also qualifies as being within the scope
of both the City’s Master Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and Final EIR 91-04
in accordance with Section 21083.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, the
Planning Director issued a Notice of Prior Compliance on December 16, 1998. With regard to
air quality and circulation impacts, the City’s MEIR found that the cumulative impacts of
projects consistent with the General Plan are significant and adverse due to regional factors,
therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding considerations.
The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The
Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service” (LOS) failure at
Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m.
peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance negating reliance on
previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to $15 162 of the CEQA Guidelines a
lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial
evidence (i.e., the recorded intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance
exists. However, case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not
require the preparation of a “Subsequent EIR” if mitigation measures are adopted which
reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak
hours LOS into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of
two dual right turn lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This
project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term
improvements” thereby, guaranteeing mitigation to a level of insignificance. The
applicant is in agreement with the proposed condition.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4467 (CT)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468 (CP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4469 (SDP)
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Summary
Disclosure Statement
Villages Plan
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A” - “R”, dated March, 3, 1999. 44
BACKGROUND DATtYHEET
CASE NO: CT 98- 15 I CP 98-08 I SDP 98- 15
CASE NAME: RA-JLAGE B - PHASE II
APPLICANT: Cow. Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 124 condominium units. of which 82 are affordable for sale
units. located cenerallv on the southeast comer of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L ots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No 97-02. Ranch0 Carrill~
VillaE“A-D”. In the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. State of California. According to
the map thereof No. 13582. filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
APN: 221-830-02 & 04 Acres: 23 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 124 units
GENE-AN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Residential Hieh
Density Allowed: 19 units per acre Density Proposed: 17 units uer acre
Existing Zone: Planned Communitv Proposed Zone: Planned Community
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning; General Plan Land use
Site PC. Residential High Vacant
North P.C. Residential High Vacant
South P.C. Residential High Vacant
East P.C. Residential Medium Duplex development
West P.C. Open Space Vacant
PUBLIC FACITJTIES
. . School District: &u~ Marcos IJnified Water District: Carlsbad Mumcmal Sewer District:
. . Carlsbad Mumclpd
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 124 EDU
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: wary 10. 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
cl Negative Declaration, issued
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
txl Other, Notice of Prior Cornp&mce
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
. -
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Ranch0 Can-i110 Village B - Phase II - CT 98-15 / CP 98-08 /SDP 98-l 7
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1_8 GENERAL PLAN: Residential High (RH)
ZONING: Planned Community (PC)
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Continental Ranch Inc.
ADDRESS: 12230 El Camino Real. Suite 300. San Dieyo CA 92130
PHONE NO.: (760) 793-2580 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 221-830-02-00 and 04-00
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 7.3 acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: aown
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 43 1
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 230
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 124 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = 2
Drainage:
Circulation:
Fire:
Qpen Space:
Schools:
Sewer:
Water:
Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
Demand in ADT =
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided =
Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin =
(Sewer Watershed)
Demand in GPD =
N/A
D
992
2.5.6
3.3.
SMUSD
124
R
27.280
The project is 14 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance and 18
units below the units allowed per the Master Plan.
c
J
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on ail applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, fum, co-partnership, joint venture, association. social club, fraternal
organisation, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county. city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of && persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or uartnershio, include the
names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corooration. include the
names. titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person carp/part Continental Ranch, Inc.
Title
Address
Title
Address 12636 High Bluff Dr., Ste.‘300
San Dlego, CA YLIJU
9 -. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also. provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e.
partnership. tenants in common. non-profit. corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a
coruoration or uartnershiu, include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE @J/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned comoration. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Carp/Part Continental Ranch, Inc.
Title
Address
. Title
Address 12636 High Bluff Dr., Ste. 300
San Dlego, CA 92130
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-17610 FAX (760) 438-0894
.-
3. NON-PROFIT OT- JIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identitled pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonnrottt oreanization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit?, staff.
Boards. Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve ( 12) months?
cl Yes El No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
David A. Lother David A. Lother
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5198 Page 2 of 2 44
. I
.
.
.
CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIOW OF CONTmBNT~ RANCH, INC.
_.
I, Susan H. Gaupel', Assistant Secretary of CONTINENTAL RANCH, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Corporation"), do hereby certify that I am a duly elected, qualified and acting officer -of the Corporation and, as such;' I am familiar with the books, minutes and records of the Corporation; that no provision of the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation requires that any action or signature of the Corporation be attested by a corporate officer; that there is no provision in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation limiting the power of the Board of Directors to adopt the hereinafter stated resolutions; that the following is a true and accurat'e copy of resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, on October 20, 1997 either at a duly held meeting of the Board of Directors or by unanimous written consent of all members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation; and that said resolutions have not been modified, rescinded or revoked and are now in full force and effect:
RESOLVED, that one signature from the President or any of the Vice Presidents of the Corporation listed below is required for any and all documents related to planning, engineering, maPPin@, development or construction associated with property owned by Continental Ranch, Inc.; including but not limited to maps, easements, agreements, peruits, dedications, etc.; and
RESOLVED, the following persons are the duly elected President and Vice Presidents of the Corporation:
Chris chambers President .. W. Thomas Hickcox Vice President Donald W. MacKay Vice President c David Lother Vice President Greg Hastings Vice President
RESOLVED FURTHER, that one signature from the President or any of the above-designated Vice Presidents is sufficient by itself to bind the Corporation.in furtherance of these Resolutions.
WITNESS my hand on this 20th day of October, 1997. . 'CONTINENTAL RANCH,' INC., a Delaware corporation
BY I
Assistant Secretary
,’ >
ill,!. !
49
- Attachment 8
-%Q VILI.AGE I3
I I . . ., .-- . \ - 1 LOT 207
116 APTS.
I \\ . LOT 205 I 169 UNITS /
RANCH0 CARRILLO
VILLAGE B PHASE II
CT 98-l 5/CP 98908lSDP 98-17
2 *rii*i *i i !zzr 5 iii
!i i i
II!
i! ‘-r I! Q) 2
E ,ir -”
c I I
: t
B 8
s-3
I
I
I l
I
! !
- r ‘P g! L-----i
E
f
1
H5?
h,u v’
I I
I \ /I I
5-7
7
//I
5-B
%=I--: : I; g; 4L+$--, ’ * II 5
5-9
1
I II I
-- +----e---- Lt 4
t ag
b -- 1 _I ,[f=7& I j-----, /; 3 e-1 L-r 8
r-----l
63
DRAFT
EXHIBIT 5
1. CT 98-15KP 98-08/SDP 98-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Site Development Plan to construct
124 condominium units on property generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan near
the southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive in Local Facilities Management
Zone 18.
Chairperson Heineman asked the applicant if he had any objection to having this item heard by less than
a full Commission. The applicant’s representative, Mike Howes, stated that he had no objections.
Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne introduced the item and announced that the Commission’s
action on this item is not final and will be forward to the City Council for it’s consideration.
Commissioner L’Heureux excused herself from hearing this item, citing a perceived conflict of interest in
that her husband is the attorney for Hofman Planning Associates.
Mr. Wayne introduced Assistant Planner, Van Lynch who described the project and presented the staff
report as follows: This project is a 124 unit airspace condominium project, located in Village B of the
Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan. The project is near the corner of Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road.
Village B is being developed in two phases. Phase I consists of 116 units apartment project and Phase II
consists of 82 affordable units which will make up the remainder of the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan
affordable housing requirement. The project, as proposed, has a density of 17 units per acre which is
below the Growth Management Control point of 19 units per acre and 14 units below the Master Plan
allowance for the project site. There are 27 buildings each of which are 2-story and will contain 4 or 5
units. The architecture is similar to other projects in the area with stucco walls and tile roofs. Sizes range
from 901 square feet (2 bedrooms) to 1,139 square feet (2-3 bedrooms). Per the errata sheet, it can be
noted that Plan No. 2 will be a 3-bedroom unit with 1,034 square feet rather than 1,003 square feet. Each
unit will have a 2-car garage with an automatic garage door opener, laundry space, patio and deck areas.
Between each of the units are landscaped courtyards and pathways which provide access to the front
doors. The project provides various recreational amenities such as a community swimming pool and spa,
a fitness area, and three tot-lots dispersed throughout the development. All of those amenities are
accessed by pedestrian pathways. Guest parking is provided in bays and along the spine road which are
dispersed throughout the project. The project meets or exceed the applicable development standards
except for the reduction of the private street widths. The main spine road is 32 feet wide with 8 foot
parking bays on each side. This spine will also serve as access to the apartments, aforementioned, from
both directions through the project site. The driveways accessing the garages are 24 feet wide with the
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 1999 Page 4
units set back 5 feet from the driveways. Affordable housing projects may be allowed less restrictive
development standards providing the project is in compliance with the General Plan and has no
detrimental effects to the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the General
Plan and the Carrillo Master Plan and adequate onsite circulation is provided with the 24 foot driveways.
The reduction of 24 foot drives also allows the increase in landscape areas between 2 banks of buildings
which is a benefit to the project site. A memorandum has been provided and includes the Growth
Management Findings and Conditions related to the Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real
intersection. Because the project must be heard by the City Council, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of CT 98-l 5, CP 98-8, and SDP 98-l 7.
Commissioner Savary, referring to Finding No. 1, Resolution No. 4469, Line No. 13, ‘I. . . 992 ADT which
can be adequately handled by the new public and private streets in the project as well as the existing
circulation system consisting of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Avenue.“, asked why there is no
mention of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real.
Mr. Lynch replied that the finding that addresses the latter intersection is in the Errata for Resolution No.
4467, and is now referred to as New Finding No. 21.
Commissioner Compas asked if there are any variances that are being requested.
Mr. Lynch replied that the reduction that is being asked for is not a variance (in the strict sense) but is a
reduction of standards that is allowed by the Site Development Plan process.
Mike Howes, Hofman Planning Associates, 5900 Pasteur Court, Suite 100, Carlsbad, concurred with
staffs recommendation of approval and added the following comments. The affordable 2 and 3 bedroom
ownership units in this project represent the last phase of Ranch0 Carrillo’s Affordable Housing program.
Continental Homes has previously received approval for 116 affordable apartment units in Phase II of
Village B. That project is currently under construction. Approval has also been received for 50 second
dwelling units which are located in Villages G, H, M, Q, & R. Some of the units have already been
constructed while others are under construction or will be under construction in the very near future. One
of the goals of Carlsbad’s Housing Element in the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan is to provide a wide variety
of housing types and the approvals that have so far been granted in Ranch0 Carrillo, have complied with
that goal. A variety of affordable housing types is also being provided, from second dwelling units to 3
bedroom ownership units. The reduction in some driveway widths, from 30 feet to 24 feet, allows for
additional landscaping between the units (rather than additional concrete) and is a much better use of the
property. Other than the reduction of those width reductions, this project meets or exceeds all applicable
city ordinances and policies. The errata sheets have been reviewed and the applicant conceptually
concurs with the condition for the payment of the fees for the improvements to the intersection of Palomar
Airport Road and El Camino Real. However, there are some concerns for what the actual costs will be
and one or more representatives from Hofman Planning Associates will be present when this subject is
discussed at City Council.
Commissioner Segall asked how the developer will determine the proper prices for each type of housing
in this project.
Mr. Howes replied that the affordable units must meet the City’s requirements for affordability. However,
the market-rate units will be sold for whatever the market will bear.
Commissioner Segall asked how that can be effectively done if a market-rate unit has an adjacent
affordable housing unit.
Mr. Howes replied that market-rate units will be in buildings separate from the affordable units buildings
and those buildings will be scattered throughout the project.
Commissioner Segall pointed out that one of the provisions indicates that the developer will have the
opportunity to relocate up to 50% of the units and asked if he is correct in the assumption that if the
Commission recommends approval of this project, the ultimate location of the relocated units will not be
known.
MINUTES ,&-
PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 1999 Page 5
Mr. Howes replied that the Commissioner’s assumption is correct but 82 of the 114 units must be
affordable and dispersed throughout the project.
Commissioner Segall suggested that with the ability to relocate that many units, all of the affordable units
could be placed in one area and the market-rate units in another, which is contrary to the goals of the
inclusionary housing ordinance.
David Lother, representing Continental Homes, 2237 Faraday Avenue, #lOO, Carlsbad, replied that they
have attempted to scatter the affordable units throughout the project as best they could. He added that by
having the opportunity to relocate up to 50% of those units, they will have some needed flexibility to
ensure the ultimate proper placement of all units. Mr. Lother assured the Commission that it is not the
intention to create pods of a single housing type, as was suggested. He indicated, on the exhibit, the
preliminary scattering of the affordable units.
Commissioner Segall, after seeing the exhibit, suggested that the percentage be reduced to 10% and
asked if the applicant could accept that figure.
Mr. Lother replied that they could accept a reduction to 10% and that their primary goal is to have some
flexibility with some unit relocation.
Commissioner Segall asked if the reduction of the road width from 30 feet to 24 feet will affect parking as
well as ingress and egress to the housing units and what plans the developer has to prevent the problems
arising from parking in the street.
Mr. Howes responded by pointing out that there are several projects, throughout the City, that have a
similar situation and which are governed by the Homeowners Associations. He added that that is one of
the responsibilities of the associations (erect NO PARKING signs, enforcement of the regulations, etc.) to
ensure the success of the project. He also stated that most people are sophisticated enough to realize
that they cannot park in narrow alleys and streets, particularly if they are posted.
Commissioner Segall inquired as to a provision for visitor parking.
Mr. Howes replied that there are 51 visitor parking spaces (exceeds the requirement) provided in the
project and are spread throughout the project.
Commissioner Segall inquired as to the number of school age children that will be generated by this
project and how those numbers will be mitigated with regard to the availability of schools.
Mr. Howes replied that this project is in the San Marcos School District and that the elementary school in
Ranch0 Carrillo will be open before occupancy of this project. However, Mr. Howes continued, he does
not know the exact number of children that will come out of this project.
Mr. Lynch interjected by stating that the San Marcos School District has projected that the generation rate
will be a total of 57 students; 33 elementary students, 12 middle school students, and 12 high school
students.
Mr. Lother stated that they are in agreement with the 10% relocation of units, as suggested by
Commissioner Segall.
Commissioner Segall stated that if 24 foot street widths are practical, he can accept the width reductions
from 30 feet to 24 feet.
Commissioner Compas asked if this project will be built in phases and if they intend to build the affordable
units first.
Mr. Howes replied that it will be done in at least 2 phases. Regarding the affordable units, he stated that it
would be extremely difficult (and not cost effective) to build them first since they will be scattered
throughout the project and therefore, will be built at the same time as the market-rate units.
MINUTES (ob
PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 1999 Page 6
Commissioner Compas asked Mr. Howes to explain, in concept, how the phasing will work.
Mr. Lother interjected and stated that they have not gotten to the level of that detail and are unsure of
exactly how the phasing will work.
Chairperson Heineman asked if they might build in both areas at the same time.
Mr. Lother replied that that is quite likely since there is one very small area that would not be very cost
effective if it were to be built by itself.
Commissioner Compas asked when they expect to begin construction on this project.
Mr. Lother briefly outlined the process and stated that they expect to break ground in approximately one
year.
Chairperson Heineman opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak. Seeing no one
wishing to testify, Chairperson Heineman closed Public Testimony.
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Compas, and duly seconded, to adopt Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 4467, 4468, and 4469, recommending approval of
CT 98-15, CP 98-08, and SDP 98-15, based upon the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein, including the errata dated April 7, 1999, and
including the applicant’s agreement to move only 10% of the affordable housing
as opposed to 50%.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
4-o
Heineman, Compas, Savary, Segall
None
None
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
4
CT 98-15/CP 98-OS/SDP 98-17 - RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at
the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday
May 18, 1999, to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and
Site Development Plan on property generally located at the southeast comer of Palomar Airport Road
and Melrose Drive in Local Facilities Management Zone 18 and more particularly described as:
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Ranch0 Carrillo Village “A-D”, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to the map thereof, No. 13582,
tiled in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
June 10,1998.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing.
Copies of the staff report will be available on or after May 14, 1999. If you have any questions regarding
this matter, please contact Van Lynch in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department at (760) 438-l 161,
extension 4447.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map, if approved, is established
by state law and/or city ordinance is very short. If you challenge this Tentative Tract Map,
Condominium Permit and/or Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad Office of the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
APPLICANT: CONTINENTAZ, RANCH, INC.
PUBLISH: MAY 7,1999
SITE
@
RANCH0 CARRILLO
ILLAGE B PHASE II
18-l !YCP 98908ISDP 98-17
V
CT9
(F0r.n A)
TO: C1T.Y CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notlde
CT 98-15/CP 98-OS/SDP 98-17 - Ranch0 Carrillo Village "B" - Phase II
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the ftem for the council meeting of First Available Hearing
.
Thank you.
Assistant Clty Man-- .
April 20, 1999
Date
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, March 3, 1999, to consider a request for approval of a Tentative Tract
Map, Condominium Permit and Site Development Plan to construct 124 condominium
units on property generally located within the Ranch0 Carrillo Master Plan on property
generally located at southeast corner of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Drive in
Local Facilities Management Zone 18 and more particularly described as:
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Ranch0 Carrillo
Village “A-D”, In the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, According to the ,map thereof No. 13582,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
June 10, 1998.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the
public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after February 25,
1999. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at
(760) 438-l 161, extension 4447.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map,
Condominium Permit and Site Development Plan, if approved, is established by state
law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map,
Condominium Permit and Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 98-l 5/CP 98-08/SDP 98-l 7
CASE NAME: RANCH0 CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE II
PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 18,1999
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2075 La Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 l (760) 436-l 161 l FAX (760) 438-0894 49
4
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
lc CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME STE 50
330 GOLDENSHORE LONG BEACH CA 90802
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY
SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER
VAN LYNCH
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
788 SAN MARCOS BLVD
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
! CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
I STE B
1 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
: 2730 LOKER AVE WEST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ^
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1 PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
I DEPT
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
SANDAG
STE 800 401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMiN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
.Jndustrial Development Bressi Lennar Ranch Ven Carrillo Ranch0 Partner 18101 Von Karman Ave 12 23333 Avenida La Caza 591 Camino De La Reina Irvine CA 92612-1010 Coto De Caza 92679-3949 San Diego CA 92108-3108
Shea Homes Lp Shea Homes Partnership 10721 Treena St 200 10721 Treena St San Diego CA 92131-1039 San Diego CA 92131
*** 5 Printed ***
-