HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-06-01; City Council; 15240; NAMM Museum Of Making MusicCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGEWA BILL
NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
MTG. 6/l/99 SP 207(D)/LCPA 9%IO/SDP 9509(A)/CDP 98-88
DEPT. PLN $#f CITYMGR %-
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. -Ns -‘/88 , APPROVING SP 207(D) and
ADOPT Resolution No. 9942~2 , APPROVING a Negative Declaration, SP 207(D), LCPA 98-
10, SDP 95-09(A), and CDP 98-88.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On April 21, 1999 and May 5, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings and
recommended approval of opening to the general public the National Association of Music
Merchants (NAMM) Museum of Making Music by a vote of 7-O. The project site is located at 5790
Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
The proposed project is to allow the existing NAMM Museum of Making Music to be open to the
general public. The museum was previously constructed and encompasses an area of 6,500 square feet within the 34,000 square foot NAMM Headquarters building. The NAMM building is
located within Planning Area 2 (office/research and development) of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan. Because the specific plan did not allow for museums open to the general public the Site
Development Plan approved for the site limited the use of the museum to members, clients, patrons,
or associates of NAMM. The two primary concerns with opening the museum to the public are the
potential traffic increase and the potential need for additional parking. A traffic generation study has
been prepared for the museum which concluded that the museum will generate three trips per
thousand square feet as compared to the ten trips per thousand square feet which is the corporate office rate applied to the original construction. As a result no traffic or parking impacts are
anticipated. If the project is approved, the parking lot will be altered to include a bus parking space
should groups visit the museum.
The project was continued to the May 5, 1999 Planning Commission Hearing because of concerns
raised regarding the applicant’s desire to have limited retail sales related to the museum. The
issues related to retail sales in support of the museum concerned the following: (1) The type of retail
sales desired are not currently permitted in Planning Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan,
and (2) the Planning Commission indicated a desire to permit some retail sales in support of the
museum but wanted to limit the retail use. To address these two items the proposed amendments
were revised to permit incidental retail sales related to the museum. The area of retail sales is proposed to be limited to 325 square feet which is 5 percent of the floor area of the 6,500 square
foot museum.
The applicant has requested that the condition regarding the mitigation of traffic impacts at the El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road intersection be deleted. The Assistant City Attorney has
determined that the conditions should be retained. All the necessary findings can be made for the
approvals being requested. More detailed information is included in the attached staff report to the
Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Negative Declaration is proposed for the project. The environmental review relied in part on
Program Environmental Impact Report 94-01 certified for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applications on January 9, 1996 by the City Council. No significant traffic
impacts will occur to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte. The traffic
PAGE 2 OF AGEND~BILL NO. /&%h’
generated for the project is within the scope of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Program EIR
which analyzed this intersection. In addition, the project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of
the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection “short-term improvements.”
FISCAL IMPACT:
All required improvements needed to serve this project will be funded by the developer. The Facility Financing Section of the Zone 13 Local Facilities Management Plan lists the financing techniques
being used to guarantee the public facilities needed to serve development within Zone 13.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
Facilities Zone 13
Local Facilities Management Plan 13
Growth Control Point N/A
Net Density N/A
Soecial Facilitv Fee N/A
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Ordinance No. uj-z’f g
2. City Council Resolution No. 99&?;L
3. Location Map 4. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4537, 4538, 4539, 4540, and 4541
5. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 21 1999 and May 5, 1999
6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated April 21, 1999 and May 5, 1999.
r
-
ORDINANCE NO.NS-488
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CARLSBAD
RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN BY THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION
III. C. 1. A. (1) PERMITTING A MUSEUM OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
WITH INCIDENTIAL RETAIL SALES RELATED TO THE
MUSEUM ON LOT 11 OF PLANNING AREA 2
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: SP 207(D)
7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed and
8 considered a Specific Plan Amendment to add to the list of permitted uses for Lot 11 of
9 Planning Area 2; and
‘10
11
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law, the
City Council has determined that the public interest indicates that said specific plan amendment
,~ 12, .,
_; be approved. .,
.13’ ., NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City. of Carlsbad .does ordain ‘as
1’4 follows: :
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION I: That the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment, SP 207(D)
dated April 21, 1999, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated by reference herein,
is approved. The Carisbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the zoning for this
property and all development of the property shall conform to the plan. The amendment to the
specific plan is to add to the list of permitted used in Section III, C. 1. A. the following:
“A museum open to the general public, including incidental retail sales related to
the museum not to exceed a total floor area of 325 square feet on only Lot 11 (Shown on
Figure 32; Lot 8 of Final Map 13357).”
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in
Planning Commission Resolution No. shall also constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
/I published at least once in a publication of general circulation the City of Carlsbad within fifteen . 3
,.’ ’
:,,,/:
- :
1 days after its adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective
within the City’s Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.)
I INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at the regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council on the day of 1999, and thereafter.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council, held on the
day of
AYES:
1999, by the following vote, to wit:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAl N:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY . . .>. ..’
RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-
t
;
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
RESOLUTION NO. 99-202
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT, SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AMENDMENT, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
TO PERMIT THE EXISTING 6,500 SQUARE FOOT NAMM
MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC,
WITH INCIDENTAL RETAIL SALES RELATED TO THE
MUSEUM ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5790 ARMADA DRIVE IN THE COASTAL ZONE AND LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-l O/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, on April 21, 1999 and May 5, 1999, the Carlsbad Planning
Commission held duly noticed public hearings to consider a proposed Negative Declaration,
Specific Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Site Development Plan
Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit to permit an existing 6,500 square foot museum
to be open to the general public with incidental retail sales related to the museum, and adopted
Resolutions No. 4537, 4538, 4539, 4540, and 4541 recommending to the City Council that the
Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Site
Development Plan Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on 1st day of
June , 1999, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and
heard all persons interested in or opposed to the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan
Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Site Development Plan Amendment, and
Coastal Development Permit; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendment SP 207(D), Local Coastal Program
a-
4
4 I
c
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Amendment 98-10, Site Development Plan Amendment SDP 95-09(A), and Coastal
Development Permit 98-88 is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning
Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4537, 4538, 4539, 4540, and
4541 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1 .I6 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must
be filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following
the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten
days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of
proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount
sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not
latter than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is
either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of
record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 1st day of June 1999, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin
NOES: None -
A-I-I-EST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2- 6
EXHIBIT 3
NAMM - MUSEUM OF
MAKING MUSIC
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98401
SDP 95=09(A)/CDP 98-88
C
EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4537
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO PERMIT A
MUSEUM TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 5790 ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98- 1 O/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP
98-88
8
9
WHEREAS, NAMM, “Developer” and “Owner”, has filed a verified application
10
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
11 Lot 8 of Carlsbad Tract No. 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
12 /I
(“the Property”); and
13
14 project; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
15
16
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 21st day of April 1999 and on
the 5th day of May 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative according
to Exhibit “ND” dated January 26, 1999, and “PII” dated January 21, 1999,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
FindingS:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and
considered the Negative Declaration, the environmental impacts therein identified for this
project and any comments thereon prior to 1 of the
project. Based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, the Planning Commission
finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the
environment and thereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration.
2. The Planning Commission finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of May 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux,
Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COURTNEY E. HEwhairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4537 -2- 9
City 0
Project Address/Location: 5790 Armada Drive/East side of Armada Drive north of Palomar
Airport Road
Project Description: An amendment to the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan with a
corresponding Local Coastal Program Amendment to allow a
museum open to the public on only Lot 11 shown on Figure 32 of
the specific plan. Also proposed is an amendment to the existing
Site Development Plan for the property as well as a Coastal
Development Permit to permit the existing 6,500 square foot
museum to be open to the general public.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date
of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning Department at (760)
438-l 161, extension 4446.
DATED: JANUARY 26,1999
CASE NO: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-l O/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88
CASE NAME: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUSIC MERCHANTS MUSEUM OF
MAKING MUSIC
PUBLISH DATE: JANUARY 26,1999
MICHAEL JmLZ&?‘LLER
Planning Director
2075 La Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-I 576 l (760) 438-l 161 - FAX (760) 438-0894
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: SP 207(D)/ LCPA 9%lo/SDP 95-09tAYCDP 98-88
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: National Association of Music Merchants Museum of Making Music
2. APPLICANT: The Harrison Companv
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 4401 Manchester Avenue. #205,
Encinitas. CA 92024: (760) 753-2824
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMTITED:
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An amendment to the Carlsbad Ranch Suecific Plan with a
corresponding Local Coastal Program Amendment to allow a museum open to the public on onlv Lot 11 shown on Figure 32 of the suecific plan. Also pronosed is an amendment to the existing
Site Development Plan for the uropertv as well as a Coastal Develoument Permit to permit the
existing 6.500 sauare foot museum to be open to the general public. The proiect site is at 5790
Armada Drive within PlanninP Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch Snecific Plan.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
q Land Use and Planning El Transportation/Circulation lxl Public Services
q Population and Housing q Biological Resources (XI Utilities & Service Systems
q Geological Problems q Energy & Mineral Resources q Aesthetics
lxl Water q Hazards q Cultural Resources
q Air Quality q Noise q Recreation
q Mandatory Findings of Significance
Rev. 03/28/96
DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
q
q
q
lzl
q
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative
declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier environmental impact
report (EIR) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature Date
Date
2 Rev. 03128196
C
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
l A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
l “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
l “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
l “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
l Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but & potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
l When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
0 A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
3 Rev. 03/28/96
h
l If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
l An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not
reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Rev. 03/28/96
. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I
4
b)
c)
4
e)
II.
4
b)
cl
III.
4
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
0
IV.
4
b)
cl
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (1; pg. 5.7-l through 5.7-18)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? (1; pg.5.4-5 through 5.4-13, 5.7-I through 5.7-
18, and 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(1; pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
landuses? (1; pg. 5.1-1 through 5.1-16)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (1; 5.7-l through 5.7-18)
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( 1; pg. 7- 1 through 7-4)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)? (1; pg. 7-8 and 7-
9) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (1; pg. 7-8 and 7-9)
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving:
Fault rupture? (1; Appendix A)
Seismic ground shaking? (1; Appendix A)
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (1;
Appendix A)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (1; Appendix A)
Landslides or mudflows? (1; Appendix A)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (1;
Appendix A and pg. 5.12-6 and 5.12-7)
Subsidence of the land? (1; Appendix A)
Expansive soils? ( 1; Appendix A)
Unique geologic or physical features? (1; Appendix A)
WATER. Would the proposal result in:
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (1; pg. 5.12- 1
through 5.12-7)
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding? (1; Appendix A)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
5
Potentially Significant
Impact
q
q
q
q
0
q
q
q
q q q
q q q
q q q
q
q
q
Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q q q
q q q
q q q
q
q
q
Less Than
Significan t Impact
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q q q
q 0, q
q 0 q
q
q
q
No Impact
lxl
IXI
El
IXI
lxl
lxl
El
ISI
lxl
lxl
El
lxl
IXI
lxl
Ix1
lxl
lzl
Ix1
Ix]
lxl
Rev. 03128196
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
4
e>
f)
g)
h)
i>
V.
4
b)
cl
4
VI.
4
b)
c>
d)
e)
0
!a
VII.
4
b)
cl
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (1; pg. 5.9-13 through 5.9-22 and 5.12-1
through 5.12-7)
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (1;
pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Impacts to groundwater quality? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through
5.12-7)
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? (1; pg.
5.9-13 through 5.9-22)
AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (1; pg. 5.2-l
through 5.2-8)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (1; pg. 5.2-1,
5.2-4, 5.2-6, and 5.2-7)
Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? (1; Appendix A)
Create objectionable odors? (1; Appendix A)
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (1; pg.
5.5-l through 5.5-29; 2)
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)? (1; pg. 5.5-l through 5.5-29)
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
(1; pg. 5.5-l through 5.5-29 and 5.9-l through 5.9-4)
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (1; pg.
5.5-25 and 5.5-26)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (1;
Appendix A)
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (1; pg.
5.7-16)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (1; pg. 5.7-l
through 5.7-18)
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds? (1; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (1; pg.
5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (1; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-
6
Potentially
Signifcanl
Impact
Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
cl
cl
0
Less Than
Significan
t impact
No
Impact
Ia
Ix]
lxl
Ix)
Ix]
IXI
0
Ix]
Ix1
El
Cl
lxl
Ix1
lxl
lxl
lxl
El
lxl
•l
El
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
d)
d
VIII.
4
b)
cl
IX.
a)
b)
c>
4
4
X.
a>
b)
XI.
4
b)
c)
4
e)
XII.
a)
b)
c>
13) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
(1; pg. 5.4-l through 5.4-13)
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (1; pg. 5.4-l
through 5.4-13)
Potentially
Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
cl
cl
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (1;
Appendix A)
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (1; Appendix A)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (1; Appendix A)
HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)? ( 1; pg. 5.6-1 through 5.6-7)
Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? ( 1; 5.9- 1 through 5.9-4)
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards? (1; pg. 5.6-l through 5.6-7)
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (1; pg. 5.6-l through 5.6-7)
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (1; pg. 5.7-8 and 5.7-9)
NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
Increases in existing noise levels? (1; pg. 5.8-l through
5.8-7)
Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (1; pg. 5.8-l
through 5.8-7)
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
Fire protection? (1; pg. 5.9-l and 5.9-2)
Police protection? (1; pg. 5.9-2 through 5.9-4)
Schools? (1; pg. 5.9-7 through 5.9-13)
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (1;
pg. 5.7-2, 5.7-3, and 5.7-16)
Other governmental services? (1; pg. 5.7-2 and 5.7-16)
UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
Power or natural gas? ( 1; Appendix A)
Communications systems? (1; Appendix A)
Local or regional water treatment or distribution
Ix1
lxl
lxl
lxl
lxl
lxl
IXI
El
IXI
lxl
lxl
lxl
lxl
III
lxl
lxl
lxl
IXI
ISI
lzl
7 Rev. 03/28/96 17
Potentially Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significan
t Impact
No
Impact
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
4
e)
f)
g)
facilities? (1; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
Sewer or septic tanks? (1; pg. 5.9-4 through 5.9-7)
Storm water drainage? (1; pg. 5.12-1 through 5.12-7)
Solid waste disposal? (1; pg. 5. IO- 1 through 5.1 O-5)
Local or regional water supplies? (1; pg. 5.9-13 and
5.9-22)
XIII.
4
b)
cl
AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (1; pg. 5.11-l
through 5.1 l-7)
Have a demonstratable negative aesthetic effect? (1;
pg. 5.1 l-l through 5.1 l-7)
Create light or glare? (1; Appendix A)
XIV.
a>
b)
c>
4
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
Disturb paleontological resources? (1; pg. 5.3- 1
through 5.3-8)
Disturb archaeological resources? (1; pg. 5.3-l through
5.3-8)
Affect historical resources? (1; pg. 5.3-l through 5.3-8)
e)
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (1; pg. 5.3-
1 through 5.3-8)
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (1; pg. 5.3-l through 5.3-8)
xv.
4
RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
b)
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (1; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)
Affect existing recreational opportunities? (1; pg. 5.7-2
through 5.7-3 and 5.7-16)
XVI.
4
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
b)
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
cl Does the project have environmental effects which will
Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
lxl
lxl
lxl Is] 0 III
lzl
lxl
lxl
lzl
lxl
lxl
q
Ix]
0
0
0
0
lxl
8 Rev. 03128196 /8
Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significan Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the
following on attached sheets:
a> Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available
for review.
W Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
d Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated,“ describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-
specific conditions for the project.
Rev. 03/28/96
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The opening of the National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM) Museum of Making
Music to the public is proposed at the existing facility located at 5790 Armada Drive within
Planning Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. An existing 6,500 square foot museum
within the NAMM Headquarters is presently only available to NAMM members, associates and
their guests. This is the result of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan not listing museums which
are open to the general public as a permitted use within the planning area. The proposed specific
plan amendment and local coastal program amendment would allow the proposed museum use
on the NAMM lot within Planning Area 2. The site development plan and coastal development
permit would specifically provide for the existing 6,500 square foot museum to be open to the
general public. Should NAMM wish in the future to construct additional building area in excess
of 1,000 square feet a site development plan amendment and coastal development permit
amendment would be required to be approved. The only physical change to the site with this
amendment is to provide bus parking to accommodate groups particularly school field trips.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The existing NAMM facility was evaluated in the “Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment
Final Program Environmental Impact Report, dated November 1995 (EIR 94-Ol).” EIR 94-01
evaluates the environmental effects of the development and operation of: The Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan; improvements to the I-S/Cannon Road Interchange; and the development of a
24.2 acre parcel immediately adjacent to the northern boundary of the- specific plan site. The
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan is a planning document which will guide the development of a
447.40 acre area through the provision of a comprehensive set of guidelines, regulations, and
implementation programs. The proposed land uses for the Specific Plan include office, research
and development, related light manufacturing, commercial, hotel, destination resort, golf course,
agriculture, a vocational school campus, and LEGOLAND Carlsbad. The 24.2 acre parcel
adjacent to the northern boundary is proposed as a continuation of the Specific Plan golf course.
EIR 94-01 analyzed the following environmental issue areas: Agricultural Resources, Air
Quality, Archaeological and Paleontological Resources, Biological Resources,
Traffic/Circulation, Hazardous Waste/Pesticide Residue, Land Use Compatibility; Noise, Public
Services and Utilities, Solid Waste, Visual Aesthetics/Grading, and Water Quality. The Initial
Study prepared for the Specific Plan Amendment is contained in Appendix A of EIR 94-01 and
analyzed additional issues which were determined not to have a significant environmental
impact. EIR 94-01 was certified by the Carlsbad City Council on January 9, 1996. At that time
Candidate Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation and
Monitoring Program were approved. All mitigation measures applicable to the NAMM facility
have been incorporated into the project design or were implemented as conditions of approval for
the project. The requested approvals to allow a museum open to the public does not create any
new environmental impacts. Additional traffic analysis has been completed to determine if the
proposal would generate additional average daily trips. The analysis determined that the
museum use generates less traffic than the same area which was previously evaluated as office
space for traffic generation purposes.
References to the applicable section of EIR 94-01 are provided next to each item on this
environmental impact assessment form. Reference is also made to the recent analysis by Urban
Systems Associates for the museum trip generation. A brief explanation is provided in the
10 Rev. 03/28/96 40
following section for each item checked as having a “potentially significant impact” or
. “potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated”:
V. AIR QUALITY
a) Air Quality
No significant impacts as a result of construction activity are anticipated for the entire
Carlsbad Ranch Project. Implementation of the air quality mitigation measures will
lessen long-term operation air quality impacts to a level less than significant. It was
concluded in the analysis for EIR 94-01 that the development anticipated under the
proposed specific plan amendment together with the development of other related
projects will have a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact on the region’s air
quality. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted for this cumulative
impact.
As detailed further in the analysis section for transportation the museum use will generate
fewer vehicle trips thereby having less of an impact than was projected in the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan Program EIR.
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
4 Increased Vehicle Trips
A series of circulation system improvements are required as part of the development of
the Carlsbad Ranch property. With the implementation of the improvements identified in
EIR 94-01 all of the analyzed intersections and street segments are projected to operate at
acceptable levels of service. It was determined that the Carlsbad Ranch project in
conjunction with cumulative build-out forecasts, will result in a significant cumulative
impact to the I-5 freeway and SR-78. A statement of overriding considerations was
adopted for this cumulative impact.
The Museum of Making Music Trip Generation analysis prepared by Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. dated December 3, 1998 determined that were the museum open to the
public it would have a trip generation rate of 3 trips per thousand square feet of building
area. This is compared to the generation rate of 10 trips per thousand square feet which is
the corporate office rate previously applied to the project. The result is that dedication of
building area to museum use lowers the expected trip generation from the project
therefore not creating traffic impacts in excess of those evaluated in the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan Program EIR.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES
b) Police protection
The EIR analysis concluded that the conversion of an agricultural area to an urban area
which will attract visitors will require additional law enforcement and crime prevention
services. The potential increase in demand on police services is a significant impact.
This demand for police protection was reduced through implementation of a mitigation
11 Rev. 03/28/96 a
- -
XII.
measure requiring security measures to be incorporated into the proposed development.
No further impact will be created by the lower traffic generating public museum use.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
9 Solid waste disposal
The generation of additional solid waste by the entire Carlsbad Ranch project was a
potentially significant impact. The mitigation measure identified in EIR 94-01 reduces
this impact to a level of less than significant. The mitigation measure required the
submittal of a solid waste management plan to address the project’s needs for recycling
facilities and diversion programs/measures which can be implemented. The proposed
museum use will have less of an impact than office uses thereby not creating an
additional impact not analyzed in EIR 94-01.
g) Local or regional water supplies
The Carlsbad Ranch project requires the construction of onsite water lines. The impacts
of buildout of the Carlsbad Ranch project to water supplies are potentially significant.
Implementation of the mitigation measures contained in EIR 94-01 reduces impacts to a
level of less than significant. The mitigation includes utilizing reclaimed water for
landscaping on the project site which has already been accomplished on the site. No
further impact is created by the museum use being opened to the public.
12 Rev. 03/28/96 2x2
-
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE’1
Rev. 03128196 23
-
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND
CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
SOURCE DOCUMENTS - (NOTE: All source documents are on tile in the Planning Department
located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, Phone (619) 438-l 161)
1. “Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment Final Program Environmental Impact Report, City of
Carlsbad, November 1995 .”
2. “Museum of Making Music Trip Generation, Urban Systems Associates, Inc., December 3, 1998.”
14 Rev. 03/28/96 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4538
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SP
207(D) TO PERMIT A MUSEUM OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
WITH INCIDENTIAL RETAIL SALES RELATED TO THE
MUSEUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5790
ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: SP 207(D)
WHEREAS, NAMM, “Developer” and “Owner”, has tiled a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lot 8 of Carlsbad Tract No. 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Specific Plan
amendment as shown on draft City Council Ordinance Exhibit “E” dated April 21, 1999,
attached hereto, NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC, SP 207(D) as provided by SP
207 (A) and Government Code Section 65453; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Cornrnission did, on the 21st day of April 1999 and on
the 5th day of May 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Specific Plan amendment; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 1996, the City Council approved SP207(A), as
described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3848 and City Council
Ordinance No. NS-344.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
W
Finding:
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC,
SP 207(D), based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The proposed development as described by the Specific Plan (SP207(D)) is consistent
with the provisions of the General Plan.
The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
All necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequate
provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the capital improvement
program applicable to the subject property.
The proposed public museum.use will be appropriate in area, location and overall design
to the purpose intended. The design and development standards are such as to create an
environment of sustained desirability and stability. Such development will meet
performance standards established by this title.
The existing streets and thoroughfares are suitable and adequate to carry the anticipated
traffic thereon.
The area surrounding the development is planned and zoned in coordination and
substantial compatibility with the development.
Appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse environmental impact as
noted in the adopted environmental impact report or negative declaration for the project.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Specific Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally
consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur
substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different
from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of SP 207(D) is granted subject to the approval of LCPA 98-10, SDP 95-09(A)
and CDP 98-88, as conditioned in Resolutions No. 4539,454O and 4541.
PC RESO NO. 4538 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h
NOTICE
-
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions.
If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of May 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux,
Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4538
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4539
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO PERMIT A MUSEUM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITH INCIDENTAL RETAIL SALES
RELATED TO THE MUSEUM ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT
5790 ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO: LCPA 98- 10
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program,
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and
WHEREAS, NAMM, “Developer” and “Owner”, has filed a verified application
for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program specifically adding to the list of permitted uses
for Planning Areas 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan regarding property described as
Lot 8 of Carlsbad Tract No. 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal
Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit “F” dated April 21, 1999 as provided in Public
Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Administrative
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 21st day of April 1999 and on
the 5th day of May 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period for
any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
4
W
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on January 28,
1999, and ending on March 11, 1999, staff shall present to the City Council a
summary of the comments received.
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC,
LCPA 98-10 based on the following findings, and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment is consistent with all applicable
policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program, in that the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(A)) was adopted as partial implementation
for the area it covers and the addition of a public museum as a permitted use for one
of the developed lots in the specific plan has been determined to have no impacts on
coastal resources and is in compliance with all existing policies.
Approval of LCPA 98-10 is granted subject to the approval of SP 207(D), SDP 95-09(A),
and CDP 98-88. LCPA 98-10 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 4537,4538, 4540 and 4541 for the Negative Declaration,
Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Plan Amendment, and Coastal
Development Permit.
That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal
Program is required to keep the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan consistent with the
Mello II segment.
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
PC RESO NO. 4539 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
-
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of City Council approval to protest imposition of these
fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in
Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with
the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030.
Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 5th day of May 1999, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux,
Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
COURTNEY E. Hw, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
I MICHAEL J. HO&MIL&R
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4539 -3- 30
EXHIBIT “F”
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT 98-10
Dated APRIL 2 1, 1999 -
Add the following to the list of permitted uses in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207)
Section III. C. 1. A.:
“A museum open to the general public, including incidental retail sales related to the museum
not to exceed a total floor area of 325 square feet on only Lot 11 (Shown on Figure 32; Lot 8 of
Final Map 13357).”
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4540
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
SDP 95-09(A) TO PERMIT A MUSEUM TO BE OPEN TO THE
PUBLIC WITH INCIDENTAL RETAIL SALES RELATED TO
THE MUSEUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT
5790 ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 13
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: SDP 95-09(A)
WHEREAS, NAMM, “Developer” and “Owner”, has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lot 8 of Carlsbad Tract no 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development
Plan Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” through “D” dated April 21, 1999, on file in the
Planning Department, NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC, SDP 95-09(A) as provided
by Chapter 2 l.O6/Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of April, 1999 and on
the 5th day of May, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Site Development Plan Amendment.
WHEREAS, on March 6, 1996, the Planning Commission approved, SDP 95
09, as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3905.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C -
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the NAMM MUSEUM OF
MAKING MUSIC, SDP 95-09(A) based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or
traffic circulation, in that the project design complies with the requirements of the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan and all required building and landscape setbacks
exist.
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in
that all applicable code requirements have been met including the parking
requirement for museums.
That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be
provided and maintained, in that modifications to the parking area are proposed to
provide a bus parking space and adequate vehicle circulation has been provided to
accommodate bus turning movements.
That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that the proposed museum will generate less traffic
than an office use and is below the average daily traffic analyzed in the circulation
analysis prepared for Program EIR 94-01 for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the
applicable local facilities management plan and all City public facility policies and
ordinances since:
A. The project has been conditioned to ensure the building permits will not be issued
for the project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is
available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of
the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they
apply to sewer service for this project.
B. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required as
conditions of approval.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 13.
PC RESO NO. 4540 -2- 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McCellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994. The project is compatible with the
projected noise levels of the CLUP; and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix
of the CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that the project site
is within the 60 CNEL noise contour and the proposed land use is a compatible use
at this noise level.
8. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by City Council
Resolution No. 90-384.
9. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
10. That this project could have a potentially significant negative cumulative traffhz
impact on the Palomar Airport Road/ El Camino Real intersection. However, this
project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the “short-term improvements”
thereby, guaranteeing implementation of a mitigation measure that reduces the
potential impact to a level of insignificance.
ConditiQgS:
1. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the approved Site Development Plan, SDP 95-09, as contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3905 except for condition number 1 which is completely
replaced by the following: Staff is authorized and directed to make or require the
Developer to make all corrections and modifications to the Site Development Plan
Documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and conform to
Planning Commission’s final action on the project. Any proposed development
substantially different from this approval, or a future proposal for an expansion or
additional phase of development, shall require an amendment to this approval. The
model retail use area as shown on the first floor plans is not intended, or permitted,
to be a retail sales use but rather a model or demonstration display area for
incorporation into the design and arrangement of stores or retail areas operated by
members, clients, patrons or associate of NAMM at their respective offsite locations.
Incidental retail sales related to the museum are permitted as provided for in the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207(D)).
2. Approval of SDP 95-09(A) is granted subject to the approval of SP 207(D), LCPA 98-
10, and CDP 98-88. SDP 95-09(A) is subject to all conditions contained in the
Planning Commission Resolutions for SP 207(D), LCPA 98-10, and CDP 98-88.
3. The Developer shall pay his fair share for the %hort-term improvements” to the El
Camino Real/ Palomar Airport Road intersection prior to approval of the final map
or the issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. The amount shall be
determined by the methodology ultimately selected by Council, including but not
PC RESO NO. 4540 -3- 3y!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- -
limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact fee; an increased or new Zone
13 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment district; or incorporation into a
Mello-Roos taxing district.
4. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
General:
5. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Site Development Plan.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from the date of City Council approval to protest imposition of these
fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in
Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with
the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030.
Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul their imposition
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RESO NO. 4540 -4- 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
, Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of May 1999, by the
~ following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux,
Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COURTNEY EMMAN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. Hbl!,ZMlkltER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4540 -5- 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4541
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NUMBER CDP 98-88 TO PERMIT A MUSEUM TO BE OPEN
TO THE PUBLIC WITH INCIDENTAL RETAIL SALES
REALTED TO THE MUSEUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 5790 ARMADA DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
CASE NO.: CDP 98-88
WHEREAS, NAMM, “Developer” and “Owner”, has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lot 8 of Carlsbad Tract No. 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” through “D” dated April 21,1999, on file in the
Planning Department, NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC, CDP 98-88, as provided by
Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of April 1999 and on
the 5th day of May 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the CDP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
W
Findinps:
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
COMMENDED APPROVAL of the NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING
MUSIC, CDP 98-88, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal
Program and all applicable policies in that the project is in compliance with the
relevant policies of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, The
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan which serves as partial implementation for the Mello
II Segment for the project site, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
The project site contains no coastal resources and is currently developed pursuant
to a prior Coastal Development Permit.
2. The project complies with the requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone as the project site has been previously developed pursuant to an
earlier coastal development permit. No sensitive vegetation exists on the project site.
Drainage facilities to remove pollutants from site runoff are also provided.
3. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in
conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as
shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this
approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of CDP 98-88 is granted subject to the approval of SP 207(D), LCPA 98-10,
and SDP 95-09(A). CDP 98-88 is granted subject to all conditions contained in the
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4538,4539 and 4540 for SP 207(D), LCPA 98-
10, and SDP 95-09(A).
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
PC RESO NO. 4541 -2- 3s’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of May 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux,
Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Y COURTNEY E.w, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. H&ZMKLER
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 4541 -3- 39
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
IBIT 5 m
. A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 5 0
Application complete date: January 8, 1999
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 2 1,1999 Project Planner: Don Neu
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-lo/SDP 95-09tAYCDP 98-88- NAMM MUSEUM OF
MAKING MUSIC - Request for a recommendation of approval for a Negative
Declaration, an amendment to the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal
Program Amendment, an amendment to the existing Site Development Plan and a
Coastal Development Permit, to permit the existing 6,500 square foot museum to
be open to the general public at 5790 Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone and
Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4537, 4538,
4539, 4540, and 4541 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration, Specific
Plan Amendment (SP 207(D), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 98-lo), Site
Development Plan Amendment (SDP 95-09(A)), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 98-88),
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project is to allow the existing National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM)
Museum of Making Music to be open to the general public. The museum was previously
constructed and encompasses an area of 6,500 square feet of the 34,000 square foot NAMM
Headquarters building. The NAMM building is located within Planning Area 2 (office/research
and development) of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. Because the specific plan did not allow
for museums open to the public the Site Development Plan approved for the NAMM building
limited the use of the museum to members, clients, patrons, or associates of NAMM. The two
primary concerns with opening the museum to the public are the potential traffic increase and the
potential need for additional parking. A traffic generation study has been prepared for the
museum which concluded that the museum will generate three trips per thousand square feet as
compared to the ten trips per thousand square feet which is the corporate office generation rate
applied to the original construction. As a result no traffic or parking impacts are anticipated.
The parking lot has been altered to include a bus parking space should groups visit the museum.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project site is located at 5790 Armada Drive within Planning Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan. The 6,500 square foot Museum of Making Music currently exists on the first floor
of the NAMM Headquarters building. The approval being sought is the ability to open the
museum to the public. No physical improvements to the building are proposed. Improvements
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-1 O/WP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
April 21,1999
to the parking lot are proposed to accommodate a bus parking space. An amendment to the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan is proposed to allow a museum open to the public on only the
NAMM property. Because the project site is in the coastal zone and the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan serves as partial implementation for the Local Coastal Plan in this area an amendment to the
Local Coastal Program is also required. The existing site development plan for the project is
proposed to be amended to modify condition number one which prevents the museum from
being used by the general public. In addition, a coastal development permit is proposed to allow
the change in use to a museum open to the general public.
A study titled, “Museum of Making Music Trip Generation”, by Urban Systems Associates
established a trip generation rate of three trips per thousand square feet. This rate is less than the
ten trips per thousand square feet which a corporate office generates. The end result is that no
additional traffic impacts beyond those previously evaluated for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific
Plan are expected. Actually fewer vehicle trips will be generated by the museum as compared to
the same area being devoted to a corporate office use.
IV. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Office/Planned Industrial (O/PI) General Plan Land Use Designation;
Office/Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (O-Q/P-M-Q);
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (SP 207 as amended)
Site Development Plan findings required by the Qualified Development Overlay Zone -
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 2 1.06, Section 2 1.06.020;
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport;
Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and the Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.203; and
Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 13).
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of
the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. & B. General Plan
The proposed public museum is compatible with the General Plan designation for the project site
of Office/Planned Industrial (O/PI). The zoning designation for the site is Office/Planned
Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (O-Q/P-M-Q). The proposed public museum
use is compatible with professional office uses. The Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan implements
objectives of the General Plan by including required circulation improvements and provisions for
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-lO/WP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88 - NAMM MUstiUM OF MAKING MUSIC
April 21,1999
alternative modes of transportation such as bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Q-Overlay
Zone requires the approval of a Site Development Plan for proposed developed.
C. Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
The project site is located within Planning Area 2 which is designated for office, research and
development uses. A museum open to the general public is a compatible use with the permitted
uses of the planning area. The proposed specific plan amendment will allow a museum open to
the general public on only the NAMM property within Planning Area 2. The NAMM use is
unique in that it includes as part of its mission a focus on exposing people to the history of the
music products industry as well as the benefits of music education. Besides the issue of land use
compatibility the other area focused on was the potential circulation and parking impacts. The
specific plan and the program environmental impact report prepared for the specific plan contain
limits on the traffic which can be generated from the Carlsbad Ranch. The traffic study prepared
for the museum concluded that fewer vehicle trips will be generated by the museum as compared
to an office use. The specific plan already contains a museum parking rate of 1 space per 500
gross square feet which is from the Municipal Code. This compares to the office parking rate of
1 space per 250 gross square feet. As a result there is no increased demand for parking with a
museum use when compared to the corporate office use.
D. Site Development Plan Findings Required By The Q-Overlay Zone
The Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q-Overlay) which is a part of the zoning designation
for the property requires that a site development plan be approved. Four findings are required by
the Q-Overlay Zone. A site development plan was approved for the existing improvements on
the property. An arrendment to the site development plan is proposed to modify the condition
limiting the use of the museum and to modify the parking area to include a bus parking space to
accommodate school groups and other tour groups. The required findings with justification for
each are contained in the Planning Commission Resolution for the site development plan. The
following section summarizes the necessary findings and support for each.
The requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental setting as the
project design complies with the requirements of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. All required
building and landscape setbacks exist. The site is also adequate in shape to accommodate the use
as all other applicable code requirements have been met including the parking requirement for
museums.
All features necessary to adjust the use to existing and permitted future uses will be provided.
Modifications to the parking area are proposed to include a bus parking space. Adequate vehicle
circulation exists to accommodate bus turning movements. There are two access points to the
site. The planned street system is adequate to handle all traffic generated by the use. The
proposed museum will generate less traffic than an office use and is below the total average daily
traffic analyzed in the circulation analysis prepared for Program EIR 94-01 for the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan.
-
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98- 1 O/SL)P 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSJXJM OF MAKING MUSIC
April 21,1999
E. Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan - Palomar Airport
The project site is located within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan - Palomar Airport.
The site is inside the 60 CNEL noise contour for Palomar Airport. The property is
approximately 7,500 feet west of the airport. The airport land use plan identifies the use as being
compatible with the noise levels for the site.
F. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program
The proposed specific plan amendment also requires the approval of a Local Coastal Program
Amendment to the Mello II Segment. This is necessary as the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan
serves as partial implementation of the Mello II Segment. A six week public notice was
completed for the proposed amendment and no comments were received. No coastal issues have
been identified relative to this developed site. As stated previously, traffic generation and
parking demand have been analyzed and no adverse impact is anticipated.
The project is consistent with the relevant policies of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay
Zone (Zoning Ordinance Section 21.203). The project site is presently developed and contains
no steep’slopes or native vegetation. Drainage facilities are in place which filter pollutants from
runoff before it leaves the site.
G. Growth Management Ordinance (LFMP - Zone 13)
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 13 in the northwest
quadrant. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the
adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY
City Administration
Librarv
IMPACTS
N/A
N/A
COMPLIANCE WITH
STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Wastewater Treatment
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An initial study was completed for the proposed use (Environmental Impact Assessment Form -
Part II). The environmental review relied in part on Program Environmental Impact Report 94-
01 certified for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applications on
443
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-lo/SDP 9509(A)lCDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
April 21,1999
PAGE 5
January 9, 1996, by the City Council. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted
for cumulative impacts to air quality, agriculture, and traffic.
No significant traffic impacts will occur to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo
De1 Norte. The traffic generated for the project is within the scope of the Carlsbad Ranch
Specific Plan Program EIR which analyzed this intersection. All required improvements exist.
The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report
has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service” (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport
Road (PAR ) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This
potentially creates a changed circumstances negating reliance on previous environmental
documentation. Pursuant to 3 15 162 of the. CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a
“Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded
intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstances exists. However, case law has
interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the preparation of a “Subsequent
EIR” if mitigation measures are adopted which reduce the identified impacts to a level of
insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS
into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right turn
lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been conditioned
to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements” thereby, guaranteeing
mitigation to a level of insignificance.
No additional significant adverse impacts were identified in the initial study for the project,
therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared. The Negative Declaration was published in the
newspaper. A Notice of Determination will be tiled upon the final action being taken on the
project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4537 (Negative Declaration)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4538 (SP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4539 (LCPA)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4540 (SDP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4541 (CDP)
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Disclosure Form
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A” - “D”, dated April 2 1,1999
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SP 207(D)/LCPA 9%lo/SDP 95-09(A)lCDP 98-88
CASE NAME: NAMM Museum of Making Music
APPLICANT: NAM34
REQUEST AND LOCATION: m museum to the public at 5790 Armada Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: J,ot 8 of Carlsbad Tract No, 94-09 in Carlsbad Ranch Unit 1
APN: 2 1 l-022-20 Acres: 4.03 Proposed No. of Lots/Units:
GENERAJ, PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: O/PI (Office/Planned Indutial)
Density Allowed:. N/A Density Proposed: N/A
Existing Zone: Q-O/P-M-Q Proposed Zone: N/A
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning
Site O-Q/P-M-Q
North O-Q/P-M-Q
South O-Q/P-M-Q
East O-Q/P-M-Q
West OS
General Plan
O/PI
O/PI
O/PI
O/PI
OS
Current Land Use
NAMM Headquarters
Office/R&D
Vacant lot
Office
Armada Drive & Flower
Fields
PUBJ JC FACIJdTIES
School District: !&&bad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 3.6
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: N/A
mVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
LIzI Negative Declaration, issued Jarmary 76. 1999
cl Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
cl Other,
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: NAMM Museum of Making Music - SP 207(D)/ICPA 98-lo/SDP 95
09(A)/CDP 98-88
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: u GENERAL PLAN: O/PI
ZONING: O-Q/P-M-Q
DEVELOPER’S NAME: NAMM
ADDRESS: 5790 Armada Drive. Carlsbad. CA 92008
PHONE NO.: 438-8001 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 2 1 l-022-20
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 6.500 sq. ft. museum
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = N/A
Library: Demand in Square Footage = N/A
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 3.6 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = Paid $.40/sa. ft.
Drainage: Demand in CFS = NIA
Identify Drainage Basin = C
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 20
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 4
Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A
Schools: N/A
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU 3.6
Identify Sub Basin = F
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 792
The project is not proposing any dwelling units thereby not impacting the Growth
Management Dwelling unit allowance.
RECEIVED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications &&i&h &i@ &,# re
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Cow- Qq 1 .
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county. city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propeity owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of u persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a coruoration or uartnership. include the
names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation. include the
names, titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
Carp/Part d ,/A
Title
Address 440 1 M~WWW kc.*2&ddress
~l~ltles, cd& qza2-4
3 -. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of && persons having any ownership
interest in lhe property involved. Also, pro;‘rdr: the 11ri:Crc of the kgal e)wtrercl)lp [i.~,
partnership. tenants in common. non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership. include the names, title. addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned cornoration, include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate offtcers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person /a I Carp/Part ti ,/k
Title Title .
Address Address
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Cartsbad, CA 92009-l 576 - (760) 438-11610 FAX (760) 438-0894
f
NON-PROFIT 0” NIZATION OR TRUST
If an!’ person ident.-xd pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonurollt oreanization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trust,ge or beneficiary of tht;:
Non Profit/Trust n Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards. Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
cl Yes d No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct
Print or type name of owner
5 Ied &QJQ.~0 d
Print or type name of applicant
Signature of ownekapplicant’s agent if applicable/date
Print or type name df owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 48
Larry R. Linkin, President I CEO
Warner Paige, Chairman
Get-son Rosenbloom, Vice-Chajrman
Paul Murphy, Treasurer
Steve West, Secretary
National Association of Music Merchants
5790 Armada Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
49
I / ! I
I
1
:II
/: Ti L
~1 , 1 I
‘1 / j’j (
I iI I / Ii j /:j ! / , /
,
IN y/ I,i gi
;I/ $1 j/ 5’
j; E/
I 1 ,‘I ;
,I /
/ j
‘;I
‘1 . . * ‘y: p
+G&
11 I1 1 . i , 6 : ,~ormrr--l’.““,” m.0 I/ & 1 IY i
g;g rErci &,;n
4, ,‘A--;
5/
P’ i-t- -
,‘(’ I / I ‘: 8;: 1,1, r ,I a.!!,
-! \,
J \‘\ i \
:\
I I
i ‘i /
‘\ --.._/- /”
-i i
bt
1 -1 j/ / s i 7. :--.-----i-- ] :I jt, . . . . . . . . . .._ “F /I
“,
-- f=rY ’
j / I, Ii W
--------__-_
L-3
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. 1 0
Application complete date: January 8, 1999
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 5, 1999 Project Planner: Don Neu
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: SP 207(Dj/LCPA 98-lo/SDP 95-09[AWDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSEUM OF
MAKING MUSIC - Request for a recommendation of approval for a Negative
Declaration, an amendment to the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal
Program Amendment, an amendment to the existing Site Development Plan and a
Coastal Development Permit, to permit the existing 6,500 square foot museum to
be open to the general public with incidental retail sales related to the museum at
5790 Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone
13.
I. COMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4537, 4538,
4539,4540, and 4541 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Negative Declaration, Specific
Plan Amendment (SP 207(D)), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 98-lo), Site
Development Plan Amendment (SDP 95-09(A)), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 98-88),
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. BACKGROUND
The National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM) Museum of Making Music project was
considered by the Planning Commission at the April 21, 1999 hearing. The project was
continued to the May 5, 1999 hearing because of concerns raised regarding the applicant’s desire
to have limited retail sales related to the museum. The issues related to limited retail sales in
support of the museum concerned the following: (1) The type of retail sales desired are not
currently permitted in Planning Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, and (2) the Planning
Commission indicated a desire to permit some retail sales in support of the museum but wanted
to limit the retail use.
To address the two items listed above staff has revised the resolutions and ordinance. The
revisions include permitting incidental retail sales related to the museum. The area of retail sales
is proposed to be limited to 325 square feet which is 5 percent of the floor area of the 6,500
square foot museum. The museum presently includes a Model Store. The Model Store is one of
six display areas in the museum. It features musical instruments and other related products
manufactured by today’s music products industry. According to the applicant the objectives of
the Model Store are as follows:
-
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-l O/SDP 9509(A)/CDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
MAY $1999
1. To show museum visitors current musical instruments and music store display techniques
as compared to those from earlier time periods as represented in the museum.
2. To educate NAMM retail members on the most up-to-date merchandising techniques and
products. The Model Store is used for training sessions.
3. Musical instruments and accessories in the Model Store are not for sale. The museum
does not want to be in competition with local music retailers.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4537 (Negative Declaration)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4538 (SP)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4539 (LCPA)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4540 (SDP)
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4541 (CDP)
6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 2 1, 199 with attachments
7. Planning Commission Resolution 3905
DN:mh
-
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1999
EXHIBIT 6
Page 6
5. SP 207!D)/LCPA 98-IO/SDP 95-09!A!/CDP 98-88 - NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC -
Request for a recommendation of approval for a Negative Declaration, an amendment to the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, an amendment to the
existing Site Development Plan, and a Coastal Development Permit, to permit the existing 6,500
square foot museum to be open to the general public at 5790 Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone,
and in Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne introduced the item and stated that the Commission’s action on
this item is not final and will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration.
Mr. Wayne introduced Senior Planner, Don Neu, who presented a brief slide presentation and staff report
as follows: The site is located on Armada Drive in Planning Area 2 of the Carlsbad Ranch. The existing
building is approximately 34,000 square feet. On the first floor there is an area that is used and improved,
as a museum, approximately 6,500 square feet in size. At this time there is a condition on the Site
Development Plan, as well as limitations in the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, that prevent this museum
from being open to the general public. The area within Planning Area 2 was designated as an
Office/Research & Development area for the Carlsbad Ranch. This amendment would allow the museum
to be opened to the public on only the NAMM property. In evaluating adjacent permitted uses, it has been
determined that the museum would be compatible with surrounding development. One of staffs concerns
was that the museum might generate a large number of vehicles trips (ADT) as compared to office and
R&D uses. A traffic study has been done that shows that the traffic generation rate, for the museum, is
actually much lower than the rate for corporate ofices. The related question was “what will the demand
be for parking at a museum?” The municipal code includes a parking rate of 1 space for every 500 square
feet that was incorporated into the Carlsbad Ranch plan when it was originally approved. It is recognized
that a museum generates fewer trips than other uses. The Site Development Plan Amendment is solely to
modify the first condition which limits the use of the museum and also to revise the parking area to include
a bus parking space. The reason for the bus parking space is that the museum is intending to target
school and other groups that might be expected to arrive in a bus. With those changes, staff is
recommending that findings can be made for the Site Plan Amendment. Because there is a Specific Plan
Amendment, it also requires a Local Coastal Program Amendment. The Coastal Commission did approve
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan and basically included it as part of the implementation for the Mello II
Segment. After this project is heard by this Commission and City Council, assuming it gets a positive
recommendation, it will need Coastal Commission action. The Coastal permit is required because of the
change in the use, for which findings can be made. The site is within Zone 13 and the only physical
change will be made to the parking area improvement is mentioned above. Staff determined that there
are no additional facilities impacts that require other measures or conditions and all of the required
performance standards of the Zone 13 Plan are being complied with. The environmental review proposes
a Negative Declaration which relies on the EIR that was done for the Specific Plan. A condition regarding
the project requirement to participate in the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection
improvement has been added. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed
resolutions that would recommend approval of the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendment,
Coastal Plan Amendment, Site Plan Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit to the City Council.
Commissioner Welshons stated that there appears to be some new walkways for the museum area and
pointed out that one of the 1996 conditions in Resolution No. 3905 requires them to have a bike rack and
showers and asked if the sidewalks affect the location and/or placement of the bike rack, or will it be
removed completely.
Mr. Neu replied that the bike racks will remain. The sidewalk portion on the drawing referred to, is the plan
that was used to get the improvements for the museum through the Building Department. The sidewalks
have been constructed and the bike rack is in place and does not appear to be affected by the sidewalk.
Commissioner Welshons pointed out that there is a notation on the drawings for a future site development
modification and asked Mr. Neu to explain that notation.
MINUTFS z&
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1999 Page 7
Mr. Neu replied that the original site plan had anticipated adding a rounded wing element to the north end
of the building. However, it was not shown as an improvement on the site plans so if it ever becomes a
proposed improvement there will need to be a Site Plan Amendment approved.
Commissioner Welshons asked if such improvements would be more than just an architectural feature.
Mr. Neu replied that it was intended for potential additional square footage.
Commissioner Welshons asked what type of signage they are proposing to use on Armada Drive, to direct
people to the museum.
Mr. Neu replied that he has discussed signage with the applicant. Initially when the original sign proposal
was done, there was a monument sign being contemplated. Over the course of the construction of the
sign for the project, they ultimately put wall signs on the front and back of the building. It appears that the
wall signs precluded them from having a monument sign. Now that Fleet Street has been completed and
the NAMM building has frontage on two streets, they will pick up some additional sign allowance.
Although no calculations have been made, to date, it is likely that there is some surplus to allow a
monument sign for the museum.
Commissioner Welshons asked if the applicant has indicated what the hours of operation will be.
Mr. Neu deferred the Commissioner’s question to the applicant.
Because of the zoning, Commissioner Welshons stated that when this project was originally approved,
staff was adamant that this museum should not be open to the public because it is not in the
Tourist/Commercial Zone. Now that the City is being asked to allow the museum to be open to the public,
Commissioner Welshons asked if staff has taken a position on the hours of operation and should those
hours be in conjunction with the typical work hours of that zone. She also questioned whether or not
museum traffic would conflict with LEGOLAND traffic.
Mr. Neu replied that, given the adjacent uses, staff feels that the surrounding uses will probably not be
affected by hours of operation that might run past 5:00 p.m., or begins at an earlier hour in the morning.
Shari West, Executive Director of the Museum of Making Music, 5790 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, provided
background information and data and the expectations of the museum (should it be allowed to be open to
the public), as follows: As stated by staff, the museum is located within the NAMM building at 5790
Armada Dr., Carlsbad, which was opened to honor the rich NAMM membership on April 26, 1996. NAMM
is an international music product association with over 7,000 members, worldwide. It is one of the oldest
trade associations in the country and will celebrate its 100th birthday in the year 2001. The members of
this association are musical instrument manufacturers, distributors, and music retailers. Although it is
located in the NAMM headquarters, the museum is a separate non-profit cultural institution. The
museum’s mission is to expand the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of music and music
making. It is a one of a kind museum with exhibits that celebrate 100 years of music in America, starting
in 1890. This museum will provide visitors with a glimpse of American life. They will experience popular
music spanning the entire 100 years, a small music store environment with the most popular instruments
of each period in its history. There are over 450 musical instruments and dozens of historic photographs
that bring the exhibits to life. Reaction to the museum, by NAMM members and guests, has been most
favorable. Recent research show that music education can greatly improve children’s math and reading
scores, build self esteem, and help children to adjust socially. The museum has hired an educational
consultant to pinpoint the need for such music related programming and is currently working with the
Carlsbad Unified School District and local youths groups and some senior citizen groups to address that
need. Reactions by those groups has all been very positive. It is because of the museum’s strong
education mission, that the museum is applying for an amendment to the existing Site Development Plan,
in order to open the museum to the general public. Traffic generation studies, done by Urban Systems,
indicates that if the Museum of Making Music is open to the public, it will generate 3 trips per 1,000 square
feet as compared to 10 trips per 1,000 square feet generated by corporate offices. As a result, no traffic
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1999 Page 6
or parking impacts are anticipated. The parking lot has been altered to include a bus parking space. The
Fire Department allows up to 130 people in the museum, at one time. Currently the number of NAMM
members and guests who visit each day is from 6 to 10 people, with an occasional group of 20 to 30
people. All groups will be prescheduled. Five scheduled tours, per week, is anticipated and will consist
of school groups, senior citizen groups, etc. The number of casual visitors, during the weekdays, is
expected to be very low (approximately 25) including NAMM visitors and guests. 150 to 200 visitors, per
day, are expected on weekends., The hours of operation are expected to be between the hours of 1O:OO
a.m. and 5:00 p.m., seven days a week, with the museum being closed on all major holidays. To support
the museum’s public programming, a small fee will be charged for admission. The goal of the museum is
to bring the joy of positive benefits of music and music making to the residents of Carlsbad. The museum
is dedicated to music related education programs for the City’s young people and to adding to the quality
of life for the entire community.
Commissioner Compas asked if the museum’s goal will include citizens from other cities as well as the
citizens of Carlsbad.
Ms. West responded by stating that they want to develop the music education programs as much as
possible. Once the pilot program is operational to the citizens of Carlsbad, they will probably make the
facility available to those in surrounding communities.
Commissioner Welshons asked if the library, across the hall from the museum, will also be opened to the
public.
Ms. West replied that the library is only a resource (research) library and will not be a lending library. It
will be on-line and they expect that most of the use will come via the Internet. She added that it is an
industry based library whose objective is to collect the history of the music products industry. She also
stated that they are getting calls from Carlsbad students who are doing research projects, wanting to know
about the history of a variety of musical instruments.
Commissioner Welshons referred to an exhibit of .a retail music store and asked what the objective of the
model store is.
Ms. West replied that the model store represents today’s product, as opposed to the other exhibits
focused on history. In addition, the plans are to make that exhibit more interactive to support the
education programs as well as to give the retail members ideas about current marketing concepts.
Commissioner Welshons stated that she thought there were items for sale in that model store.
Ms. West stated that they do not yet have retails sales but hope to eventually be in a position to have a
very small portion of the model store available for retail sales. The retail items will probably include things
like logo items, books, and other educational items.
Regarding school groups as visitors, Commissioner Welshons asked how they intended to have Carlsbad
students transported to the museum since Carlsbad does not have school busses.
Ms. West replied that they are aware that there are no school buses in Carlsbad. However, they are
thinking along the lines of having a large van that will take instruments and other materials out to schools
in the community so that children can have “hands-on” experiences with musical instruments. They also
want to develop programs that can be taken into the classroom. Another concept is to get outside funding
so that they can pay for busses to transport the students to the museum.
Commissioner Welshons asked what their experience, in terms of volume, has been since the NAMM
museum opened on April 26, 1996.
Ms. West replied that they get from 6 to 10 visitors per day. She added that NAMM’s members are spread
all over the world so many are not from this area. They have, however, had some industry related
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1999 Page 9
meetings in the building which have drawn from 20 to 30 people at any one time.
Commissioner L’Heureux stated that if some parents volunteer to transport an individual school class,
there could be as many as 8 or 10 cars. If that were the case, would there be adequate parking for those
cars?
Ms. West replied that there is more than adequate parking and added that they have more parking spaces
than those required for the building’s construction.
Chairperson Heineman opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak.
Steve Harrison, 4401 Manchester Avenue, Encinitas, stated that he has been working with NAMM for the
past 2 or 3 years getting the original project approved and now is assisting Ms. West in the process of
getting the museum open to the public. For the record, Mr. Harrison stated that the applicant has already
paid their fair share of fees for improvements and wish to be made exempt from any further fees
assessment for the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real intersection improvements.
Seeing no one else wishing to testify, Chairperson Heineman closed Public Testimony.
Mr. Neu, regarding the proposed retail store, stated that the Specific Plan has an allowance for limited
commercial uses located within the same building as the principal permitted use, such as delicatessen,
mini-convenience store, or other similar uses limited to the sales of goods and services intended to satisfy
the needs of the occupants of the Research and Development Parks. Technically, the sale of
merchandise related to the museum would not ordinarily be construed as something an occupant of the
business park would need. The use of a retail facility within the museum does create a technical problem.
Commissioner Heineman asked if there is a solution that would allow such retail sales.
Mr. Neu replied that the way it appears, it is not an allowed activity unless the Specific Plan can be
interpreted differently. Mr. Neu suggested that the Commission might wish to amend the language to
allow such a facility or they may wish to continue to prohibit such a use. He added that he does not
envision someone going to that store to purchase items unless they have just toured the museum and
therefore the use would not generate any additional traffic or impacts.
Mr. Wayne stated that, in his opinion, what has been described by Ms. West is sales incidental to the
museum and if that is something this Commission wishes to recommend to the City Council as part of this
approval, that is in the purview of this Commission.
Commissioner Segall asked if other industrial complexes sell items that are not food related, that could be
considered sales incidental to their businesses.
Mr. Wayne replied that there are none. Those that have company stores are for employees only and not
for sales to the general public.
Commissioner Compas asked if NAMM could come back for a retail sales approval if they definitely
decide to have a retail sales facility.
Mr. Wayne replied that the problem is that on the surface, the problem seems rather small. However, it is
a very large process and very costly.
Chairperson Heineman re-opened Public Testimony.
Ms. West stated that they were not aware that this proposed small retail area would be an issue. The
museum is a separate non-profit entity from NAMM and the items that would be sold would be related to
the mission of the museum, as is true for most museum shops. They are hoping for some sales as they
need funds so they can be self supporting. She added that the museum store would not be a very large
PLANNING COMMISSION April 21, 1999 Page 10
piece of their support but is certainly an important piece. She urged staff and the Commission to find a
way to allow this museum store.
Commissioner Welshons pointed out that in Resolution No. 3905, Condition No. 1, very specifically says
that retail sales is prohibited and quoted directly from that resolution and condition. She then stated that
this is the resolution that was approved in 1996 and referenced in all of the current conditions. She added
that everything remains the same except the change that is being proposed to amend the use of the
museum to allow public use. Commissioner Welshons continued by stating that if the pleasure of this
Commission is to allow retail sales associated with the museum use, she would propose that this item be
continued to the next meeting so that staff will have time to draft language that would be specific to the
museum.
Chairperson Heineman closed Public Testimony.
Commissioner Welshons stated that her choice would be to allow retail sales, related to the museum. She
further stated that Condition No. 1 needs to be further amended in addition to what is currently being
proposed.
Commissioner Compas asked if the applicant is in agreement with continuing this hearing to May 5, 1999.
Chairperson Heineman re-opened Public Testimony.
The applicant, Ms. West, stated they would be happy to wait and agreed to a continuance to May 5, 1999.
Chairperson Heineman closed Public Testimony.
Commissioner Welshons then asked staff if two weeks is enough time to draft new language,
Mr. Neu replied that two weeks would be ample time.
Commissioner Welshons stated that the intent is that the Commission not open up a precedent for other
business by being so general as simply allowing retail sales. She further stated that she would like to see
staff take the two weeks and draft language that is very specific to the non-profit use of this museum.
Mr. Wayne agreed with Commissioner Welshons that additional time because staff will also probably want
to limit the amount of square footage available to this retail space.
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Welshons, and duly seconded, to continue this item to
May 5, 1999, to allow staff time to draft language that would allow retail sales,
specific to the museum’s non-profit use.
VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
6-O
Heineman, Compas, L’Heureux, Segall, Welshons, Nielsen
None
None
MAY-26-99 WED 11:OO CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO, 4380894 4-h P, 02
COWlJYW$ PURl l!Zm
1. PA 98 l()lsDp 954~~Dp 98.88 Nj$MM OF MAKING MIm s s
Request for a recaknendation of approval for a Negative Declaration, an amendment to the
MAY-26-99 WED 11:OO CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO, 4380894 .-
PLANNING COMMISSION May $1999 Page 2
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, an amendment to the
existing Site Development Plan. and a Coastal Development Permit, to permit the existing 6,500
square foot museum to be open to the general. public at 5790 Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone
and Locai Facilities Management Zone 13.
Senior Management Analyst, Bobbie Hoder introduced the item and stated that the Commission’s action
on this item is not final and will be forwarded to me City Council for its consideration.
Ms. Hoder introduced Senior Planner, Don Neu, who presented me staff repon as follows: This item was
continued from the last hearing because me applicant has indicated the desire to have limited retail sales
associated with the museum use. At the time of the last hearing, staff was directed to return with
appropriate language to allow such a retail use, since the Commission seemed to be in favar of Such a
use. staff is proposing to amend the proposed language for the Specific Ptan Amendment and the Local
Coastal Plan Amendment as well as a condition of the Site Development Plan. Essentially, the amendments will allow a maximum of 325 square feet of the museum floor area to be used for what is now
being referred to as incidental retail sales related to the museum. Staff feels that there is not a citywide
policy issue, in that this project is within a specific Plan that has a unique set of regulations that apply to
just this area. It is not, therefore, an issue in terms of expanding uses in a Planned Industrial Zone.
Mr. Neu submitted an errata sheet indicating minor adjustments to the Specific Plan and Coastal Plan Language as well as the deletion of a number of conditions in the Site Development Plan.
Commissioner Welshons asked Mr. Neu to COmfflent on the suggestion (at the last hearing) that the
museum’s ADTs should be changed and whether or not the museum’s fait share of the circulation fees should be changed.
Mr. Neu replied that staff has been applying a condition relating to the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino
Real intersection failure to all projects asking for discretionary action and at the time when the NAMM
project was approved, the City Council had not yet acted upon the proposals, for ways to finance future
improvements to that intersection. Since Council has acted and has now taken action, this particular facilities zone is noi being requested to be included in the fee program and therefore it is appropriate to
delete that condition.
’ ‘Assistant City Attorney, Rich Rudolf interjected and stated that the action that the Council took was to
approve the’ Urgency Ordinance which goes into affect for 45 days and the ordinance declared a
moratorium within specified Local Facilities Management zones in which this zone is apparently not
included. This allowed an escape from me moratorium if they signed an agreement promising to pay. It is
still not known what the cost methodology is going to be for the fee and it might be that it will be an
amendment to the citywide Transportation Impact Fee which would affect others than those in that zone.
Until that is resolved (which might be within th6 45 days) the condition in question will still be imposed
(across the board) just to be safe and so the City will have the authority to collect the fees if necessary.
Commissioner Wekhons asked if that is based on a fair share and how is it determined how much a
property is going to have to pay.
Principal Engineer, Bob Wojcik stated that (in this case) because they have already paid their Traffic Impact Fees for the entire building and Krause the museum will not increase Me ADTs, there will be no
further charge for this new fee.
Commissioner Welshbns asked Mr. Rudolf to comment on Mr. Wojcik’s statement.
Mr. Rudolf stated that it appears that Mr. Wojcik’s statement is true but the conditions should remain, in
case of necessity. .I
Commissioner Welshons pointed out that with the reallotment of floor space, the building.is no longer all
offices. Based on that, they should not have to pay on an office rate versus a museum rate.
MAY-26-99 WED 11:Ol CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX IjO, 4380894 -.
PLANNING COMMlSSlON May !$I999
P, 04
Page 3
Mr. Rudolf agreed with Ms. Welshons.
Commissioner Welshons asked if NAhdM were to be forced to pay fees (right now) would they have to pay
fees based on 30.000 square feet of office space.
Mr. Rudolf replied that they have already paid for that and that any additional fees would be based on the
change affected by this approval and it seems that staff is saymg that there will be zero additional fees.
Commissioner Welshons asked if the Gemological InstiMe of America (GlA) has a retail facility jn their
building.
Mr. Neu replied that they have a bookstore that is allowed as part of the uses for that planning area which
is primarily for me students in attendance at the instiiute.
Referring to No. 3 of the errata sheet, Condition No 3 (new Condition No. l), Resolution NO, 4540. Commissioner Welshons asked if Condition No. 1, Resolution No. 4541, should also be deleted as it is
identical to the deleted Condition No. 1 in Resolution No. 4540.
Mr. Rudolf replied that it is not necessary as Condition No. 2. Resolution No. 4541 picks up all of the
conditions of the prior approval. He added that if there Is anything technical missing from Condition No. 1, Resolution No. 4541, it is picked up by No. 2, by cross-referencing the other.
Referring to the same Condition No. 9. (new Condition No. 1) asked if the reference to the model sales
facility and the reference to the permitted 325 square foot retail space contradict each Other.
Mr. Neu replied that they really do not contradict each other. He pointed out that the display area is
separate from the retail sales area.
Mr. Rudolf substantiated Mr. Neu’s comment and stated that the mOdeI retail facility is a display in the museum ana the retail sales facility is an entirely separate 325 square feet of space also within the
museum.
Commissioner !&gall asked if the term ‘incidental” is clear in terms of the actual meaning or should it be further defined.
Mr. Neu replied that the term ‘incidentat’ is clear, in that by adding language limiting a maximum of 325 square feet for retail sales, it is obvious that the retail area is meant to be secondary to me museum.
Chairperson Heineman opened Public Testimony and offered the invitation to speak. Seeing no one
wishing to testify, Chairperson Heineman closed Public Testimony.
Commissioner Welshons asked if the NAMM library is open to the public.
Mr. Neu replied that the applicant has described the library as more of a resource use as opposed to a
place where the public is likely to visit. He added that the proposed amendment is not specifically
addressing the library and it is not something that staff is overly concerned about.
’
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Compas, and duly seconded. to adopt Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 4537,4538,4539,4540. and 4541 recommending
approval of the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendment (SP 207(D))
Local Coastal Program Amendment (EPA 93-10). Site Development Plan
Amendment (SDP 9509(A)), and Coastal Development Perrnlt (GDP SESS), based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. including
the errata sheet dated April 30, 1999.
MAY-26-99 WED 11:02 CITY OF CARLSBAD COMM DE FAX NO. 4380894 '- L- P, 05
PLANNING COMMJSSION May 5,1999 Page 4
Commissioner Welshons congratulated the NAMM officials for creating this museum and opening it to the
public. She also stated that she wished it possible U&X NAMM CaJki acquire a passenger bus that would
enable them to go to various schools and organizations. in the City of Carlsbad, and pick up the students
and participants and transport them to the museum at NAMM
VOTE: 7-o
AYES: Heineman, Compas, L’Heureux, Segdl, Trigas, Welshons, Nielsen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
DESCRIPTION:
COMPLETE DATE: January 8,1999
Request for approval for a Negative Declaration, an amendment to the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal Program
Amendment, an amendment to the existing Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit, to permit the existing
6,500 square foot museum to be open to the general public.
LOCATION:
This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone located at 5790 Armada Drive in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities
Management Zone 13.
ASSESOR’S PARCEL NUMBER:
21 l-022-20
APPLICANT: Harrison Co. 4401 Manchester Ave., Ste. 205
Encinitas, CA 92024
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Carlsbad City Council in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on June 1, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and
a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after May 28, 1999.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Don Neu at the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 530 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 2075 Las Pahnas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, (760) 438-l 161, extension 4446.
APPEALS
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Site Development Plan Amendment, and/or Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk’s Office at, or prior to, the public hearing.
1. Anneals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten
(10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
UI’his site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
BI’his site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the
Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 3 111 Camino De1 Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92 108- 1725.
CASE FILE: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-lo/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
PUBLISH: MAY 21,1999
i \ \ I \
@
NAMM - MUSEUM 0;
MAKING MUSIC
SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-l O/
SDP 9509(A)/CDP 98-88
(Form A)
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notide
Sp 207(D) /I-CPA g8-lo/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88 - NAMM Museum of Making Music
for a public heating before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council mestIng of ASAP to include Coastal
Commission Submittal .
Thank you.
May 10, 1999
Date
-
City of
JVOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMPLETE DATE: January 8,1999
DESCRIPTION:
Request for a recommendation of approval for a Negative Declaration, an amendment to
the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, an amendment to
the existing Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit, to permit the
existing 6,500 square foot museum to be open to the general public.
LOCATION:
This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone located at 5790 Armada Drive
in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 13.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER:
21 l-022-20
APPLICANT:
Harrison Co.
4401 Manchester Ave., Ste. 205
Encinitas, CA 92024
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the
Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on April 21, 1999 at 6:00
p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with
any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described
and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision.
Copies of the staff report will be available on or after April 15, 1999.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Don Neu at
the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, (760) 438-
1 16 1, extension 4446.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
2075 La Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-l 576 l (760) 438-l 161 l FAX (760) 438-0894 @
. . .
APPEALS
If you challenge the Specific Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Site
Development Plan Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing.
1. eals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council,
appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the
Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
0 This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. q This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the
Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a
Notice of Final Action fi-om the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the
Coastal Commission is located at 3 111 Camino De1 Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California
92108-1725.
CASE FILE: SP 207(D)/LCPA 98-lo/SDP 95-09(A)/CDP 98-88
CASE NAME: NAMM MUSEUM OF MAKING MUSIC
PUBLISH: APRIL 8,1999
CA COASTAL COMMISSION SD COUNTY PLANNING CA DEPT OF FISH & GAME
STE 200 STE 6 ’ STE 50
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NO 5201 RUFFIN RD 330 GOLDENSHORE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-i 725 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LONG BEACH CA 90802
I I
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY BRD ’ SANDAG ’ LAFCO
STE B STE 800 1600 PACIFIC HWY
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 401 BST SAN DIEGO CA 92101
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
/
j CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST ’ US FISH 81 WILDLIFE SERVICES
801 PINE ST i 2730 LOKER AVE WEST
! CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD .
WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF CARLSBAD ’ CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT ENGINEERING DEPT ! PROJECT PLANNER
DON NEU
C B RANCH ENTERPRISES
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 10
‘CARLSBAD CA 92008-4452
KILROY REALTY L P PO BOX 188251
CARLSBAD CA 92009-0805
PALOMAR CANNON PARTNERS 5522 LOCKHAVEN DR BUENA PARK CA 90621-1540
CARLSBAD RANCH MAINTENA
5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 13
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4455
*** 11 Printed ***
CARLSBAD PACIFIC RESORT
5050 AVENIDA ENCINAS 20
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4381
KILROY REALTY LP
4365 EXECUTIVE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
CARLSBAD RANCH CO 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 10 CARLSBAD CA 92008-4452
L P KREG-OC 4275 EXECUTIVE SQ 240
LA JOLLA CA 92037-9146
15 CARLSBAD RANCH LLC 619 S WLCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024-3634
-- _
SPIEKER PROPERTIES L P
19600 FAIRCHILD 285
IRVINE CA 92612-2510
LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA INC
1 LEGOLAND DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
-
LABELS - 5163
LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCIES) .
APPENDIX A (LIST IS REQUIRED BY COASTAL
COMMISSION)
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROOM 700
110 WEST A STREET
SANDIEGO CA 92101
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
350 MCALLISTER STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
- -___-..
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY
WILLIAM G. BRENNAN
DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPECIAL COUNCIL
SUITE 2450
980 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS
TIM VASQUEZ, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
2829 SAN JUAN ST
SANDIEGO CA 92138
SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY)
WELLS FARGO PLAZA
SUITE 800
401 B STREET
SANDIEGO CA 92101
--- -.
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFAIRS
1400 TENTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
.-.-. --~~ ..~
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
ROOM 100
1220 N STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROOM 5504
1120 N STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
RESOURCES AGENCY
RM 1311
1416 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
SUITE 130
3310 EL CAMINO AVENUE
SACRAMENTO CA 95821
~-- -. -.. - .---.. - _. ~~ __..
ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CHUCK NAJARIAN
11516 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
‘_ ..- --.-__- - - __
MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR
350 GOLDEN SHORE
LONGBEACH CA 90802
: COASTAL CONSERVANCY
SUITE 1100
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
,... -. -
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
; GAJL PRESLEY, CHIEF
, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
, RM 1341
I 1416 NINTH STREET
; SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
1 DOUG WICIUZER, ENVIROMENTAL COORD
/ RM 1516-2
1416 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
~. --__--- -~--- .~.~
SOUTHERN REGION SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION
JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE BILL TRAVIS
SAND DIEGO CA 92108 30 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 958 14
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS
SUITE 1005
100 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
PO BOX 100
SACAR4MENTO CA 95801
-.
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SUITE B
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331
.--.- ~-~---. .-. ._. ._.__.. ~~. _---- -.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ATTN: GARY
RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST
SUITE 102
2121-C SECOND STREET
DAVIS CA 95616
> --.. ~--.--- ______ ~.__ --.~ --~- .~ -_
PACIFIC REGIONAL MANAGER
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC
ADMIN - OCRM, 55MC4
N/ORM - 3
1305 EAST-WEST HIGHWAY
SILVER SPRING MD 20910
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LILY ALYEA - SUITE 702
333 MARKET STREET
SANFRANCISCO CA 94105-2197
---____----.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
611 RYAN PLAZA DR STE 400
ARLINGTON TX 7601 l-4005
-
BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
WESTERN REGION
PO BOX 92007
LOS ANGELES CA 90009
USDA - RURAL DEVLOPMENT
430 ST DEPT 4169
DAVIS CA 956 16
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CHAIRMAN
722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST
WASHINGTON DC 2006
- .-.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER
PO BOX 2711
LOS ANGELES CA 90053
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL DISTRICT
DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER
SAN DIEGO CA 92132
C. I
--__-. --__- --.. -... .~ I
I
‘U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
2135 BUTANO DRIVE
*SACRAMENTO CA 95825 I
--._ ..__ ___.-. -__ _.. ~_ . ____.-_
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
LOWER COLORADO REGION
PO BOX 427
BOULDERCITY CO 89005
I
‘_ .+ ..~..___.._ ___-- I
SUPERINTENDENT
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
1901 SPINNAKER DRIVE
SAN BUENAVENTUK4 CA 93001
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
RONALD M. JAEGER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIRECTOR
SUITE 350
901 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
.-.--- - ~. ..__ . ~_
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVE
DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONAL ADMIN
450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SANFRANCISCO CA 94102
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
MID-PACIFIC REGION
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENDENT
REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK
DRAWERN
1111 2m STREET
CRESCENT CITY CA 95531
-. .
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SUITE 200
3 111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
H:\ADMINiLAilELSWP
XNTERESTED PARTIES
tJ-PDATED 3-99
OLIVENHAIN M.W.D.
1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CRAIG ADAMS
SIERRA CLUB
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER
3820 RAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101 .
LESLIE ESPOSITO
1893 AMELFI DRIVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
>
LAN~KAI LANE PARK
SHARP; SPACE 3
6550 PO:NTO DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KIM SEIBLY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
PO BOX 1831
SAN DIEGO CA 92112
PERRY A LAMB
890 MERE POINT ROAD
BRUNSWICK MAINE 04011
RICHARD RETECKI
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
SUITE 1100
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612 j_
DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER
7163 ARGONAURA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
-.
1
-
I
I
!
<
!
I
I
CITY OF ENCINITAS
COM DEV DEPARTMENT
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
REGIONAL WATER &AL. BD
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SUITE B
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124
GUY MOORE JR
6503 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON
12142 ARGYLE DRIVE
LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702
JOHN LAMB
1446 DEVLIN DRIVE
LOS ANGELES; CA .90069 .
MARY GRIGGS
STATE LANDS COMMISSSION
SUITE 100 SOUTH
100 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
SAN DlEGOCOUNl?
PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT
JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5
5201 RUFFIN ROAD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
ANTHONY BONS
25709 HILLCREST AVE
ESCONDIDO CA 92026
MR/MRS MICHAEL CARDOSA
6491 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES
2730 LOKER AVE WEST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 I
TABATA FARMS
PO BOX 1338
CARLSBAD CA 92018
KENNETH E SULZER
SANDAG - EXEC DIRECTOR
1 ST INT’L PLAZA, SUITE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
JAN SOBEL
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PO BOX 1605
CARLSBAD CA 92008
.
BILL MCLEAN
c/o LAKESHORE GARDENS
7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SPIERS ENTERPRISES
DWIGHT SPIERS
SUITE 139 :
23 CORPORATE PLAZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
SUPERVlSOR.BlLL HORN
ATTN: ART DANELL
COUNTY OF SD, ROOM 335
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LEE ANDERSON
CRA PRESIDENT
5200 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FLOYD ASHBY
416 LA COSTA AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
GEORGE BOLTON
6583 BLACKRAIL ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 8 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE ,OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad.
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
May 21, 1999
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
.sa!! Marcos Dated at California, this 21st day
of May 1999 ----- -&&+ ------
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Notice of Public Heraing -----------------------w-m
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARlNG COMPLETE DATE. hUW8.1~
+,CRIPTtON “, m he cadstad hnch SIR plan. a ka coastal Pragram $ml b aFm-r a warn c!dmm. an mm” and B masta, De”ebpmenf pmu,, 10 perml, tile BXlAlng 6 5cm ,&mm, a” me”dme”f lb me e*lsll”g sde -pmenl
pare ,m, m”ss”m to be open 10 Ihe geoeral PONK
da ;;;‘;, d wmo wcih/at camtmiscoasar ml& *ma Am= one ,n the coastal Zmw and Local Fames
lanagemnl zone 13
,x3SoR’S PARCEL NUMBER 211.022-20
VPLICANI %rnrn co 440, ~ancimm(lva Ste 205. Enmvm CArno
A pu~,c heanng 0” me we P”POS~~ pm@ fl w m b me cawad cny awna, ,n me c0ur.c~ cnambera f2M) Cmbad
V,llage Onve, C&&d. cabfan% 0” June 1.M L* dX-3 P m
I, yw chalengeme Negatw odamm specrrcm n B m, &,,.$A pmgram Amndmenl. ?.I’? O~Veh’~~ ma”
r-44 mdl”r cc&a, kwsbpmellt Pemrt h own VW Ray M ,mm.! 10 ra6mg onv tose lSSws V” M %mwm e’= -_ _A- tinrere, ,. ,k c,,y of Cadsbad CQ Cled% Mhea.