Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11-16; City Council; 15498; Roesch Property Subdivision ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# 15,498 DEPT. HD. TITLE: MTG. 11/16/99 ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION DEPT. PLN & ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09 I CITY Am. @ I CITY MGR s-2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. NS-519 , APPROVING ZC 98-12 and ADOPT Resolution No. 99-501 , APPROVING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and LCPA 98-09. ITEM EXPLANATION: On October 6, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the Roesch Property Subdivision located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road in the Zone 20 Specific Plan area and Local Facilities Management Zone. The Planning Commission approved (6-0) CT 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21, and CDP 98-86 for 21 standard single family lots and residences, one open space lot, and the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in Villa Loma, and recommended approval of ZC 98-12, LCPA 98-09, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for a Zone Change and One Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the zone classification from Limited Control (L-C) to on 5.83 acres and Open Space (0-S) on 21.87 acres. The project site is a 27.7 acre previously cultivated vacant parcel designated by the General Plan and Local Coastal Program Land Use Map for Residential Low Medium (RLM) density development and Open Space (OS). The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires that the site be rezoned from L-C to R-I concurrent with a development proposal. The 21.87 acre open space lot, which is partially constrained by steep slopes and sensitive vegetation, is identified in the City's Draft HMP as a to R-1-7500-Q for the disturbed area and 0-S for the preserved area are therefore consistent with hardline conservation area, The proposed Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zone 20 Specific Plan, and the Draft HMP. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the project. The project is within the scope of the City's Master Environmental Impact Report which is utilized to address the project's cumulative air quality and circulation impacts. The project was also evaluated in the Zone 20 Program Environmental Impact Report. The project's direct significant effects include impacts to biological resources, hazards associated with potential agricultural soil contamination, and paleontological resources. Environmental mitigation measures are proposed for all of the direct significant environmental impacts to reduce them to below a level of significance. In addition, the project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the Palomar Airport RoadlEl Camino Real intersection "short-term improvements". FISCAL IMPACT: All public facilities required to serve the additional dwelling units will be constructed prior to or concurrent with development as required by the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. Since these :mprovements will be constructed by the developer, no negative fiscal impacts will be incurred by the Xty. As noted above, the applicant will also be responsible for a pro rata share of the cost for short term jingle family subdivision will increase land values thus creating a positive fiscal impact in the form of mprovements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Development of the ncreased property tax revenues. 1 PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 15,498 GROWTH MANAGMENT STATUS: Facilities Zone *The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. CFD No. 1 Special Facilities 1.34 dulac Net Density* 3.2 Growth Control Point 20 EXHIBITS: 2. City Council Resolution No. 99-501 1. Ordinance No. NS-519 3. Location Map 4. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626, 4627, and 4628 5. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 6. 1999 6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 6, 1999. d 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1s 16 17 18 1s 2c 21 22 23 24 25 26 2i 21 ORDINANCE NO. NS-519 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION CASE NO.: ZC 98-12 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 21.050.30 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being tb CHANGE, ZC 98-12 FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q AND 0-S ON zoning map, is amended as shown on the maps marked Exhibits “ZC 98-12” and “LCPA 98-09” attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4627 and 4628 constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its adoption. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the day of , 1999, and thereafter Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill 1 1 ' t - i E 5 1c 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk (SEAL) -2- PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE City of Carlsbad according to the official plat thereof, as Range 4 west, San Bernardino Base and'Meridian, tn the described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March 1 1, 1997 as file no. 1997-01 06633 of offtcial records. Property: From: Zone Change Approvals A. 215-070-27 L-c Council Approval Date: R-1-7.500-QBOS Ordinance No: Effective Date: Signature: To: 4 Attach additional pages if necessary 1 3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 99-501 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE 21.87 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN THE ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE. CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION CASE NO.: ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as SITE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q ON 5.83 ACRES AND 0-S ON follows: WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit to grade and subdivide 27.7 acres into 22 lots. The Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 4626,4627, and 4628 recommending to the City Council that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment be approved and adopted Resolutions 4629, 4630, 4631, and 4632 approving a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit ; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on 16th day of ,vpmhPr , 1999, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all persons interested in or opposed to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council after considering all of the testimony added conditions requiring the project to post signs and disclosures that the trails are open to the public. 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change 98-12, and Local Coastal Program Amendment 98-09 is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No 4626, 4627, and 4628 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 3. That the City Council adds the following conditions with respect to signage and disclosure of the public trails: a. Signs will be posted at appropriate locations to indicate the public nature of the trail to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. b. That such signs will be posted until all the houses are sold. c. The fact that the trail is open to the public shall be prominently displayed in all relevant disclosure documents. d. The developer shall include a notice on the maps and models in the sales office in a prominent location indicating the fact that the trail is open to the public. 4. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" "The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6. which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not latter than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad. California 92008." .... .... .... -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1C 11 1I IS 2c 21 2' 2 2 2 2 2 2 - PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 16th day of November 1999. by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Lewis, Hall, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I 1 ATTEST: 1 I (SEAL) I I I ) I L 3 4 5 6 7 8 -3- EXHIBIT 3 ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ZC 98-1 2/LCPA 98-09 1 ‘ L C - t L I E s 1c 11 12 13 14 1s 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 28 c EXHIBIT 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4626 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500- Q AND 0-S AND TO SUBDIVIDE 27.7 ACRES INTO 21 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT WITH 21 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: ZC 98-12iLCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99- CASE NO.: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”, described as 05/HDP 98-21KDP 98-86 That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance record March 11, 1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 la 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED’ by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations ?e true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program according to Exhibit “ND” dated July 29, 1999, and “PII” dated February 21, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: Findines: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments, thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and b. the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad: and d. based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Conditions: 1. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of the Roesch Property Subdivision Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. ... ... ... ... PC RES0 NO. 4626 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman ABSTAIN: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 4626 -3- __ City of Carlsbad MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Addresskocation: North of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road in the southwest quadrant within the Zone 20 Specific Plan area. Project Description: A Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit to change the zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One Family ResidentiaUQualified Ovday Zone/Open Space (R-1-7,5OO-Q/OS) and to subdivide the 27.7 acre parcel into 21 standard single family 7,500+ square foot lots and one open space lot. Single family homes are also proposed on each lot. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project “as revised” may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4477. DATED: JULY 29,1999 CASENO: . ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19kIDP 98-21/CDP 98-86/SDP 99-05 CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION PUBLISH DATE: JULY 29, 1999 Planning Director 2075 La Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1 161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: ZC 98-12lLCPA 98-09lCT 98-19/HDP 98-21iCDP 98-86lSDP 99-05 DATE: Februarv 2 I. 1999 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Roesch Prouettv 2. APPLICANT: Standard Pacific Homes 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 9335 Chesaueake Drive. San Dieeo, CA 92123 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A urouosed Local Coastal F’roeram Amendment and Zone Chanee to chanee the land use desienation for the site from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential. 7.500 sauare foot minimum lot size. Oualified Develoument Overlav Zone (R-I- 7.500 -0) and &en Suace (0s) on a 27.7 acre uarcel. Also urouosed is a Tentative Tract Mau to create 21 residential lots and 1 ouen mace lot. a Site Develoument Plan. Hillside Develoument Permit. and Coastal Develoument Permit. The uroiect site is located in the southwest auadrant north of Poinsettia Lane between Black Rail Road and Aviara Parkwav within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Suecific Plan.. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Land Use and Planning [XI TransportatiodCirculation 0 Population and Housing [XI Biological Resources Geological Problems Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Water [XI Hazards [XI Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Public Services [XI Cultural Resources Recreation u Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 J3 Rev. 03/28/96 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) 0 0 0 IXI 17 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation . measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I .find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental Impact Review (MEIR 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review (MEIR 93-01), including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Planner Signature Date 2 Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. 0 A brief explanation is required for all answers except ‘“No Impact” answers that’ are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 0 “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. e “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 0 “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant, 0 Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant k effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). 0 When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. 0 A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. ‘3 /5 Rev. 03/28/96 e If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has ~ not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier Em, (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2: Pgs III-74 - I11 - 87) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 ~ 5.6-18; #2 Pgs 111-74 - In -87) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 Pgs I11 -74 - I11 -87) to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 Pgs 111-74 - I11 - 87) Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 I11 - 74 - I11 -87) -, 0 11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or populationprojections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 5.5-6) housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) 111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-112 - 111-1 18; #4) b) Seismic ground shaking? ((#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-112 - 111-118; #4) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ((#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1.15; #2: Pgs 111-112 - 111-118; #6) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15;#2:PgsII1-112-111-118;#4) e) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-1 12 - 111-1 18; #4) f, Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#l:Pgs g) Subsidence ofthe land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs h) Expansive soils?(#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-112 i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-1 - 5.i-15; #2: pgs 111-112 - 111 -118; M) 111-1 12 - 111-1 18; #4) -111-118;#4) 5.1-15;#2Pgs111-112-111-118: #4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Significant Potentially Unless Mitigatlon Incorporated 0 0 0 Significant Impact Less Than No lmpact n[XI 0 [XI- 0. [XI 0 om 0 om 0 om 0 o[XI 0 o[XI 0 o[XI 0 om 0 om IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: 5 Rev. 03/28/96 " Issues (and Suppotting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact Potentially S~gnificant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0 Slgnificant lmpacr Less Than ho Impact a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patlems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#l:Pes 5.2-1 - 5.2- 0 om - I I; #5) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of such as flooding? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 I; #5) oxygenorturbidity)? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 52-11; #5) surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1; #5) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1; #5) 0 Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? capability? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #5) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5. 2- ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #5) 11; #5) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1) 0 0 0 0 om om 0 0 0 0 om om OB 0 0 0 0 I7 0 om om om 0 0 V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs 5.3- b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 1 - 5.3-12) - 5.3-12) 0 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ((#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12) d) Create objectionable odors? ((#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12) 0 0 0 no 0 OB om om 0 VI. TRANSPORTAhONICIRCULATION. Would the a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#l:Pgs proposal result in: b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69, #7) curves or daneerous intersections) or incomvatible uses 0 0 0 00 om I (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 517-1 - 5.7.i2; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 om om om om c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22: #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) D Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative (#]:PES 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) g) Rail, waterhome or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) 0 0 om /8 Rev. 03/28/96 6 - Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Slgnificant Significant S~gnificant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. . Would the proposal result in impacts to: Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats animals, and birds? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs III- (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, 37 - 111-57; #3) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3) forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-58; #3) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3, #8) .~ ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 8; 5.13- 1 - 5.13-9) Result in the loss of availabi!ity of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 8: 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: 0 [XI no [XI on o 0 om 0 [XI 00 0 0 0 A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals orradiation)? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - The creation of any health hazard or potential health 5.10.1-5) hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.1O:l-1 - 5.10.1-5; #2: Pgs 111-97 - 111-105) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5; #2: Pgs 0 111-97 - 111-105) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 ~ 5.10.1-5) 0 0 X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-1 - 5.9- 15: #2: Pes 111-88 - 111-96: #6) 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9- .I 1 - 5.9-15; #2: Pgs 111-88 - 111-96; #5) 0 XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) 0 om 0 OIXI 0 om 0 om on [XI on n[XI nm 7 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Stgiftcant Mitigation Unless S~gnificant Less Than Impact Impact NO I Incorporated 0 0 o b) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4) c) Schools? (#l:Pgs 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#l, e) Other governmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 0 0 0 0 pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7) 5.12.8-7) 0 0 0 [XI [XI [XI 0 [XI- XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) o b) Communications systems? (#l; pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7) c) -Local or regional water treatment or distribution d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3-7) e) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8) f~ Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3) n 0 0 0 0 facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) o cl [XI 0 0 [XI [XI 0 o 0 CI 0 0 0 - g) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#I:Pgs b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (#l:Pgs c) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2: Pgs 5.11-1-5.11-5;#2:PgsIII-119-III-151) 0 5.11-1-5.11-5;#2:PgsIII-119-III-151) 111-119 - 111-151) CI 0 [XI [XI [XI 0 CI XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8- b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8- 10; #2: Pgs 111-106 - 111-107) c) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10;#2: 10; #2: Pgs 111-70 - 111-73) Pgs 111-70 ~ 111-73) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2: Pgs 111-70 - 111-73) would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#l:Pgs e) Resuict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2: Pgs 111-70 - 111-73) 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 0 o [XI IXI [XI 0 cl 0 IXI XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1 - b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-7) 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7) U' 0 XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. 8 20 Rev. 03/28/96 h Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resmct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important prehstory? examples of the major periods of Califotnia history or Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 9 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Spificanr Significant Slgnificant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mit~eation I Incorporated 0 [XI no [XI’ 0 on 0 0’ 0 [XI d/ Rev. 03128196 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analysis of this proposed single family residential project has been completed through the General Plan Update (GPA 94-01) and related Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR 93-01) , The MEIR is cited as source #1 in the preceding checklist. This proposal is consistent with the applicable portions of the General Plan and is considered a project that was described in MER 93-01 as within its scope. All feasible mifigation measures identified in MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to the project have been incorporated into this project. The project site is located in an area which is subject to the requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan approved by the City Council in 1994. A program EIR was certified for the Zone 20 Specific Plan. The Zone 20 Program EIR identified, analyzed, and recommended mitigation to reduce potentially significant impacts to insignificant levels. The Zone 20 Program EIR (PEIR) analyzed potential impacts to agriculture, air quality, biology, circulation, land use, noise, pesticide residue, paleontology, public facilities financing, soils/geology, and visual aesthetics that could result from the development of the Specific Plan area. The Program EIR is intended to be used in the review of subsequent projects within Zone 20. The project incorporates the required Zone 20 Program EIR mitigation measures, and through the analysis of the required additional biological, geotechnical, hydrology, and noise analysis a determination has been made that no additional significant impacts beyond those identified and mitigated by the Program EIR will result from this project. The following environmental evaluation briefly explains the basis for this determination along with identifying the source documents which support the environmental determination. The Zone 20 Program EIR and additional technical studies are cited as source documents for this environmental evaluation. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site is approximately 27.7 acres in size and is located at the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road . The project consists of 21 residential lots with a minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and one 21.87 acre open space lot. The site contains coastal sage scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grasslands, southern willow scrub, California gnatcatchers, sensitive plant species, and areas which have been used for agriculture. A total of 27.7 acres of the site are designated as Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM 0-4 DU/AC). The project site is zoned Limited Control (L-C). A zone change and local coastal program amendment are proposed to designate the site as One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-Q) and Open Space (OS) to correspond to the existing generai plan land use designations. An irrevocable offer of dedication will be required over the open space lot. A portion of the residential density from these parcels is being transferred to the area of the site which is proposed to be developed. In addition to approval of the tentative map application a hillside development permit and coastal development permit approval are being requested. 11 Rev. 03/28/96 d3 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS B. Environmental Impact Discussion V. a) Air Quality The implementation of projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. - These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air quality impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all projects within the scope of the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. VI. a) TransportatiodCirculation The implementation of projects that fall within the scope of and are included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when 2 12 Rev. 03/28/96 adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic fiom a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. The project will be conditioned to.dedicate a segment of the future citywide trail within the western portion of the site (SDG&E access road), and to pay its fair share of the cost of the Poinsettia Lane road segment through Zone 20. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required became the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Ovemding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of Ovemding Considerations” applies to all projects that fall within the scope of the General Plan’s Master EIR, including this project. The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service’’ (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to $15162 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However, case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the preparation of a “Subsequent EIR’ if mitigation measures are adopted which reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance. A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right turn lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements,” thereby guaranteeing mitigation to a level of insignificance. VII. a, c. & d) Biological Resources The Zone 20 Program EIR identified the mitigation requirement that future site specific biological survey studies that focus on the impacts created by individual subsequent development projects be prepared. The additional biological studies are required to consider the baseline data and biological open space recommendations of the Zone 20 Program EIR and provide more detailed and current resource surveys. The site specific biological survey is required to identify mitigation for any project specific impacts. A report entitled, “Biological Resources Assessment of the Rosech Site Located in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California,” dated December 8, 1998 by Natural Resource Consultants has been prepared for the project. In addition, a separate sensitive plant survey on a portion of the Roesch property has been conducted to analyze the biological impacts associated with the proposed project grading and fire suppression zones. 13 Rev. 03/28/96 The biology report for the Roesch property determined that implementation of the project would result in the direct loss of 6.61 acres or approximately 24% of the site including impacts to the following habitat types and sensitive plant and animal species : W 5.02 acres of agricultural - less than significant W 0.0 acre of coastal sage scrub - less than significant 1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral - significant W 4.98 acre of annual non-native grassland - less than significant W .28 acres of ruderal - less than significant W .01 acres of eucalyptus woodlands - less than significant W approximately 296 white coast ceanothus W 20 Nuttall's scrub oak W 1591 square feet of western dichondra W 484 square feet of ashy spike moss Based on cumulative data pertaining to the site, it is assumed the site supports two gnatcatcher pairs within the coastal sage scrub and chaparral areas. The California gnatcatcher observed onsite were located on the north and south sides of the site within chaparral and coastal sage scrub vegetation. There will be no impact to its preferred habitat, coastal sage scrub. Indirect impacts may result in the reduction of the carrying capacity of the native habitats, however, the patch of habitat onsite is connected to additional habitat offsite. The proposed plan results in the preservation of approximately 21 acres (76 percent), 14.5 acres of which are native habitats, in natural open space, including 100% of native grasslands, coastal sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, and southern willow scrub, and 67% of southern maritime chaparral. The following onsite impacts associated with implementation of the proposed development plan are considered significant: a) Loss of 1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral. The Roesch property is identified as a standards area within Linkage Area F of the Carlsbad Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Standards areas require a minimum preservation of 67 percent of coastal sage scrub and 75 percent of gnatcatchers as well as 100% conservation of narrow endemic species. Additionally, within Zone 20, a goal is established for no net loss of wetland habitats, southern maritime chaparral, maritime succulent scrub and.coastal sage scrub. The proposed project meets the standards area conservation requirements outlined by the Draft ' Carlsbad HMP: the project ensures the functioning of preserve linkages due to the preserve design and native habitats that are contiguous with open space on adjacent parcels is preserved. Although the project results in the loss of 1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral, it does not contain narrow endemic plants and is located to the east of the linkage comdor proposed by the Roesch project. The project contributes to the preservation of resources and the ultimate development of the subregional preserve system by contributing open space, a total of 21 acres of predominately native habitats, in a continuous configuration through Linkage Area F. On an overall project-level basis, the property is proposed to preserve 76 percent of the site, with the sensitive native habitats onsite proposed to receive approximately 100 percent preservation except for southern maritime chaparral. The potential indirect impact to the 2 pair of gnatcatchers observed onsite resulting from grading activities would be mitigated through direct surveys to locate active gnatcatcher nests. If nests are present, no grading or removal of habitat may take place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during the nestinghreeding season (mid-February through mid-July). 14 46 Rev. 03/28/96 Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the Draft Carlsbad HMP. Mitigation Measures The project design mitigates direct impacts to southern maritime chaparral and the sensitive plant species that occur within this habitat. Included in the project design is the granting of an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad or an acceptable entity for an open spacekonservation easement over Lot 22 of the tentative map. This covers over 67 percent (2.79 acres) of the southern maritime chaparral on the Roesch property. This satisfies the 2:l . mitigation ratio that is typically required by the resource agencies for the impact of southern maritime chaparral. The open space easement also includes the preservation of 100% of native . grasslands, coastal sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, southern willow scrub as well as the majority of wart-stemmed ceanothus, Nuttall's scrub oak, western dichondra, ashy spike moss, and California gnatcatcher occurring onsite. In addition, the following mitigation measures will be implemented: To mitigate potential disturbances to the California gnatcatcher resulting from grading activities, prior to the commencement of grading activities, direct surveys to locate active gnatcatcher nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If nests are present, no grading or removal of habitat may take place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during the nestingbreeding season (mid- February through mid-July). The Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provision: a. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying maintenance responsibility for Open Space Lot 22. The CC&Rs shall stipulate that within the boundaries of the HOA open space easement, structures or any other thing not shown on the approved tentative map or landscape plans shall be prohibited. The Developer shall dedicate to the Homeowner's Association on the final map, an open space maintenance easement over Lot 22 identified on the tentative map to enable maintenance activities within the easem'ent area including but not limited to, landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved tentative map and landscape plans, removal of debris and trash, minimal fire suppression thinning, and erosion prevention and remediation. A note to this effect shall be placed on the non-mapping data sheet of the final map. Removal of native vegetation and development of Open Space Lot(s) 22, including but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways and landscaping, other than that approved as part of the grading plan, improvement plans, landscape plan, etc. as shown on the project exhibits, is specifically prohibited, except upon written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department for fire prevention purposes, or upon written approval of the Planning Director, based upon a request from the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report from a qualified arboristhotankt indicating the need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to adjacent habitable 47 15 Rev. 03/28/96 dwelling units. For areas containing native vegetation the report required to accompany the request shall be prepared by a qualified biologist. IX. c) and d) Hazards Agricultural chemicals have previously been used on the site according to the Zone 20 Program EIR. Because of this prior use there is the potential for soil contamination resulting from the varying degrees of degradation, prevalence in the environment, and toxicity of the agricultural chemicals which may have been used. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented . to lessen this potential impact to a level of less than significant as required by the Zone 20 Program EIR: 1) Prior to approval of the final map or grading plan a detailed soils testing and analysis report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City Planning and Engineering Departments as well as the County Department of Environmental Health for review and approval. Ths report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination on-site due to historic use, handling, or storage of restricted agricultural chemicals. The report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any potentially significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at high concentrations in the soil. Such mitigation measures shall include, at a minimum: a. Remove any contaminated soils and haul to a State-certified landfill. b. Cap the area of soil contamination with materials appropriate for the containment of the specific type of chemical, taking into account its rate of absorption and toxicity level. c. Place the area of soil contamination in an open space easement, with restrictions on future construction of permanent buildings and human uses. Fencing and warning signs shall also be installed, where appropriate, prohibiting potential use of the site. 2) The applicant shall notify, in a manner satisfactory to the City Attorney, all tenantshers of new development that these areas are subject to dust, pesticides, and odors associated with adjacent agricultural operations, and that the tenantshsers occupy these areas at their own risk. X. b) Noise A noise study was prepared for the project as required by a mitigation measure identified in the Zone 20 program EIR. All projects located within 500 feet of existing/future Poinsettia Lane are required to analyze the projected traffic noise impacts. The acoustical evaluation prepared by Investigative Science and Engineering concluded that the all noise levels at receptor points would be below the 670 dBA CNEL threshold established by the City; therefore no mitigation is required. In accordance with mitigation required by the Zone 20 EIR, the following condition shall be applied to the project: Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property 28 16 Rev. 03/28/96 is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). XIV. a) Cultural Resources - Paleontology According to the Zone 20 Program EIR the geologic formations present within the Zone 20 Specific Plan Area have the potential to contain significant fossils. There is a high potential for the discovery of fossils during future grading and construction activities. The following . mitigation measures shall be implemented during future grading of the site to reduce potentially significant impacts on the region’s paleontological resources to an acceptable level: a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to issuance of a grading permit; b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process; c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts; d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum; e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. 111. EARLIER ANALYSES USED The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92009, (760) 438-1 161, extension 4446. 1. “Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update”, (MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department. 2. “Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Zone 20 Specific Plan” (EIR 90- 03), dated June 1992, Brian F. Mooney Associates. 3. “Biological Resources Assessment of the Roesch Site Located in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California”, dated December 8, 1998, Natural Resource Consultants. 4. “Geotechnical Investigation - Roesch Property” (Job No. 06074-12-02), dated May 4, 1998, Geocon, Inc. 29 17 Rev. 03/28/96 5. “Hydrology Study for Roesch Property in the City of Carlsbad” (W.O. 2240-Os), dated June 24, 1998, Hunsaker & Associates, Inc. 6. “Standard Pacific Roesch Property Acoustical Study (SE Report #98-035)” dated December 2, 1998, Investigative Science and Engineering. 7. “1998 Traffic Monitoring Report” for the City of Carlsbad, Valley Research and Planning Associates. 8. “Draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad” dated April, 1999. 18 30 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) 1. The project design mitigates direct impacts to southern maritime chaparral and the sensitive plant species that occur within this habitat. Included in the project design is the granting of an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad or an acceptable entity for an open space/conservation easement over Lot 22 of the tentative map. This covers over 67 percent (2.79 acres) of the southern maritime chaparral on the Roesch property. This satisfies the 2:l mitigation ratio that is typically required by the resource agencies for the impact of southern maritime chaparral. The open space easement also includes the preservation of 100% of the of native grasslands, coastal sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, southern willow scrub, and 2 pair of California gnatcatchers occurring onsite, and the majority of white coast ceanothus, Nuttall’s scrub oak, western dichondra, ashy spike moss. 2. To mitigate potential disturbances to the California gnatcatcher resulting from grading activities, prior to the commencement of grading activities, direct surveys to locate active gnatcatcher nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If nests are present, no grading or removal of habitat may take place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during the nestinghreeding season (mid-February through mid-July). 3. The Developer shall establish a homeowner‘s association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provision: a. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying maintenance responsibility for Open Space Lot 22. The CC&Rs shall stipulate that within the boundaries of the HOA open space easement, structures or any other thing not shown on the approved tentative map or landscape plans shall be prohibited. 4. The Developer shall dedicate to the Homeowner’s Association on the final map, an open space maintenance easement over Lot 22 identified on the tentative map to enable maintenance activities within the easement area including but not limited to, landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved tentative map and landscape plans, removal of debris and trash, minimal fire suppression thinning, and erosion prevention and remediation. A note to this effect shall be placed on the non-mapping data sheet of the final map. 5. Removal of native vegetation and development of Open Space Lot(s) 22, including but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways and landscaping, other than that approved as part of the grading plan, improvement plans, landscape plan, etc. as shown on the project exhibits, is specifically prohibited, except upon written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department for fire prevention purposes, or upon written approval of the Planning Director, based upon a request from the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report from a qualified arboristmotanist indicating the need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to adjacent habitable dwelling units. For areas containing native vegetation the report required to accompany the request shall be prepared by a qualified biologist. 19 31 Rev. 03/28/96 6. Prior to approval of the final map or grading plan a detailed soils testing and analysis report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City Planning and Engineering Departments as well as the County Department of Environmental Health for review and approval. This report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination on-site due to historic use, handling, or storage of restricted agricultural chemicals. The report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any potentially significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at high concentrations in the soil. Such mitigation measures shall include, at a minimum: a. Remove any contaminated soils and haul to a State-certified landfill. b. . Cap the aka of soil contamination with materials appropriate for the containment of the specific type of chemical, taking into account its rate of absorption and toxicity level. c. Place the area of soil contamination in an open space easement, with restrictions on future construction of permanent buildings and human uses. Fencing and waming signs shall also be installed, where appropriate, prohibiting potential use of the site. 7. The applicant shall notify, in a manner satisfactory to the City Attorney, all tenantsiusers of new development that these areas are subject to dust, pesticides, and odors associated with adjacent agricultural operations, and that the tenants/users occupy these areas at their own risk. 8. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to issuance of a grading permit; b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perfom periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process; c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts; d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the SA Diego Natural History Museum; e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist Ad the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. 34 20 Rev. 03/28/96 c 21 .~ ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 33 Rev. 03/28/96 APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. 22 39 Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL MI,. SATION MONITORING CHECKLIL . PAGE 1 OF 5 u I- C < - : ? 0 C C < ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 ..JATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 2 OF 5 m ri ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 .aATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 3 OF 5 ~ - ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 .-,ATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 4 OF 5 - if m C ._ F C C m h ENVIRONMENTAL MI'). JATION MONITORING CHECKLIS. I PAGE 5 OF 5 .~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4627 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500- Q AND 0-s ON PROPERTY’GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION CASE NO: ZC 98-12 WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”, described as That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance record March 11,1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on Exhibit “XX” dated October 6, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof, ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION, ZC 98-12, provided by Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. 2. 3. 4. That the proposed Zone Change from L-C to R-1-7,5OO-Q/O-S is consistent with the goals and policies of the various elements of the General Plan, in that the proposed zones replace the L-C Zone which is intended to be an interim zone and are consistent with the designations required for the property by the Zone 20 Specific Plan which was found to be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed open space designation implements various goals and policies of the Open Space and Conservation Element concerning protection of environmental resources. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element, in that the One Family Residential (R-1-7,500) Zone implements .the property’s RLM General Plan designation and the Open Space (0-S) Zone is consistent with the portion of the property designated by the General Plan as OS and the remainder of the property to be preserved as Open Space by a publicly dedicated open space easement. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the zone change would implement the applicable policies of the General Plan. The Q-Overlay Zone, made a part of the proposed zone change, provides the City’ with discretionary review over the placement of the residential units to assure that they conform to all applicable regulations. Conditions: 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, LCPA 98-09, CT 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21, and CDP 98-86. ZC 98-12 is subject to all conditions contained in Resolutions 4626,4628,4629,4630,4631, and 4632. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feeskxactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely PC RES0 NO. 4627 -2- 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feeskxactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux,. Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman ABSTAIN: lhiA L WILLIAM COMPAS, Vice Chaifbmon CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 4627 -3- LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 98-09 Project Name: Roesch Property Subdivision I Related Case File No(s): PropertylLegal Description@): ZC 98-12, CT 98-19, HDP 98-21, CDP 98-86, SDP 99. Being that portion of Section 22. Township 12 south, 05 Range 4 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad according to the official plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March 11, 1997 as file no. 1997-01 06633 of official records. I I Signature: Attach ddditional pages if necessary 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4628 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION CASE NO: LCPA 98-09 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”, described as That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance record March 11,1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit(s) “LCPA 98-09” attached to Planning Commission Resolution 4627 as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment. WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on August 26, 1999 and ending on October 6, 1999, staff shall present to the City Council a summary of the comments received. That a note be placed on the LCP zoning map: This property shall not be subdivided to create more than 4 dwelling unitslacre of net developable land. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION, LCPA 98-09 based on the following findings, and subject to the following conditions: 1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by this amendment, in that the project is consistent with applicable policies requiring the preservation of steep slopes containing coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats and the reduction of storm water runoff to existing levels. 2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring the designations of the City’s General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map (as amended), and Mello I1 Land Use Plan into conformance. Conditions: 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and ZC 98-12. LCPA 98-09 is 4621. subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626 and PC RES0 NO. 4628 -2- 1 t , E s 1C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 c 18 19 2a 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman ABSTAIN: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director 46 PC RES0 NO. 4628 -3- The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 5 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIO~ Item No. @ Application complete date: June 21, 1999 P.C. AGENDA OF: October 6,1999 Project Planner: Anne Hysong Project Engineer: Mike Shirey SUBJECT: ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-211CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION - Request for: a) a recommendation of approval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626,4627, and 4628 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12 and LCPA 98-09, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions 4629, 4630, 4631 and 4632 APPROVING CT 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21 and CDP 98-86 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. INTRODUCTION The proposed project consists of a Zone Change arid Local Coastal Program Amendment to rezone the property to' R-I-7500-Q (Qualified Overlay Zone) and 0-S (open space) and various permits to enable the subdivision and grading of the 27.7 acre vacant parcel into 21 standard single family lots and one open space lot. The project site is located north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road in the southwest quadrant. The proposed single family lots occupy approximately 6.5 acres in the southeastern portion of the parcel and the remaining 21+ acres would be preserved in open space. In accordance with the Hillside Development and Coastal Development Ordinances, architectural elevations and floor plans are provided for the single family homes. The applicant proposes to satisfy the project’s inclusionary housing requirement through the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable Housing Apartment project. As designed and conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan, Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), Mello I1 LCP, Subdivision Ordinance and relevant Zoning Chapters of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the City’s Draft Habitat Management Plan. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Paee 2 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The project site consists of 27.7 acres of vacant, partially cultivated land which is bounded on the north and east by the Mariano and Ocean Bluff subdivisions and to the west by the Samhi subdivision. The southeastern comer of the site is approximately 500 feet north of the newly completed segment of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road. The parcel falls in elevation from east to west from approximately 316’ to 180’ along the northern boundary and from 290’ to 230’ along the southern boundary. The site drains to the north through a north-south natural drainage course created by steep slopes that form a canyon within the western portion of the site. A major 150’ wide north-south power line easement is also within the canyon. The site contains native habitats including native grasslands and southern willow scrub, as well as coastal sage scrub and southern maritime chaparral on steep slope areas. Two California gnatcatcher pairs occupy the site. All of the native habitats would he preserved by the proposed development except for 1.37 of the 4.16 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The property is designated by the General Plan for RLM (Residential Low-Medium) density development and OS (Open Space) and zoned Limited Control (L-C). The parcel is regulated by the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Mello I1 LCP which require the site to he rezoned to One Family ResidentialiQualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) to implement the RLM General Plan designation. Therefore, the portion of the site proposed for development would he rezoned to R- 1-7,500-4 and the remainder of the site is proposed to he rezoned to OS. The proposed project would disturb approximately 6.5 of the 27.7 acres to enable the development of 21 standard single family lots ranging in size from 7,534 square feet to 16,274 square feet and one 21.87 acre open space lot. The site consists of 18.4 net developable acres, and the proposed project density including the 3.7 dwelling unit affordable housing requirement for a total of 24.7 units is 1.34 dwelling unitdacre. In accordance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan and the Zone 20 EIR prefemed biological mitigation, the proposed development would preserve the northern and western portions of the site in open space due to biological constraints and the need for open space connectivity through the Zone 20 Specific Plan area. The site is also designated as a standards area by the City’s Draft Habitat Management Plan which requires that 67% of the site he preserved to enable the connection of habitat preserve areas to the east and north. The open space includes a 150’ wide SDG&E easement in which an existing access road would also function as a public trail through the property. The proposed single family lots are located in the southeastern portion of the property where they would receive vehicular access from Brigantine Drive, a local street that intersects Poinsettia Lane and also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff Subdivision (Cantamar). As shown on Exhibit “B”, the subdivision design consists of a dual cul-de-sac at the terminus of Regatta Road. Lots along the eastern property line abut single family lots in the Ocean Bluff project, and the remaining lots abut open space to the north, south, and west. Drainage from the development would flow through storm drains to the southern boundary of the site where a riprap energy dissipator would reduce the rate of flow to existing levels. Four single family two-story floor plans are proposed, each with three different facade treatments and a maximum height of 30 feet. Units range in size from 2,720 square feet to 3,353 square 48 ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT %-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Page 3 feet. Plan 1 is proposed with a two car garage, Plan 2 with a three car garage, and Plans 3 and 4 with a two car garage plus an optional one car tandem garage. The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans, ordinances and standards: A. B. C. D. E. F. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use Designations; Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP203); Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20 (Subdivision Ordinance) Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) including: 1. Chapter 2 1.10 - One Family Residential Zone 2. Chapter 21.06 - Qualified Overlay Zone 3. Chapter 21.33 - Open Space 4. Chapter 21.85 - Inclusionary Housing 5. Chapter 21.95 - Hillside Development Regulations; 6. Chapters 21.201, 21.202 - Coastal Development Permit Procedures and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone Growth Management - Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. IV. ANALYSIS The'recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with <he applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of the regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The table below indicates how the project complies with the elements of the General Plan which are particularly relevant to this proposal. GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Land Use Proposed residential density of 1.34 dwelling unitshet acre in the RLM designation is within the allowed density range of 0 - 4 ddacre and consistent with the growth control point of 3.2 ddacre. Project density is based on 24.7 total units (affordable and market rate)/18.4 net developable ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6. 1999 Page 4 shown on the tentative map or included as conditions of approval. B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203) The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties within its boundaries to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and community amenities for future residents. The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires project compliance with all applicable land use plans, policies, and ordinances, except as modified by the Specific Plan. The following discussion describes the proposed project’s conformance with the relevant Specific Plan regulations which include Affordable Housing, Land Use (General Plan, Zoning, Development Standards, and the Mello I1 LCP), and Open Space preservation. Affordable Housing The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires compliance with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85) requiring that 15% of the total number of proposed units are made affordable to low income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for the proposed 21 lot ‘subdivision is 3.7 dwelling units. When feasible, the affordable units are required to be constructed onsite, however, the purchase of housing credits in an offsite combined inclusionary project within the same quadrant may be approved by the City Council. Since it would not be feasible to construct inclusionary units onsite due to the limited number of lots proposed, the project is proposing to purchase 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable Apartment project located in the southwest quadrant. CirculationlODen SDace/Traik/Land Use The project is located within Area C of the Specific Plan. Projects within Area C are required to receive.vehicular access from local streets intersecting with Poinsettia Lane, a recently completed two lane roadway, at specified locations. In conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan, the proposed project would receive access from Poinsettia Lane via Brigantine Drive, an approved intersecting street, which also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff project. The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires the project to preserve the constrained lands, including the SDG&E 3-0 - - ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Paee 5 easement and 25% - 40% slopes, in open space. The proposed project exceeds this requirement through preservation of 76% of the site in open space. The Specific Plan requires that the site be rezoned from L-C to R-1-7,500 allowing single family development at the density permitted by the RLM General Plan designation (0 - 4 dwelling unitdacre). Since 21.87 acres of the site are proposed for open space, the proposed zoning also includes the 0-S Zone. The Q (Qualified Overlay) zone is proposed to be added to the R-l- 7,500 zoning consistent with previous Zone 20 approvals. The Q zone requires approval of a site development plan which includes architectural elevations, floor plans, and building footprints. The proposed zoning, preservation of open space including a trail segment, structures and architecture is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan architectural guidelines as specified in the following table: Open Space 1. Preserve areas constrained by steep slopes and SDG&E easement 2. Trail segment through SDG&E easement Variety of 1. Roof, wall and accent materials and colors 2. Roof heights and masses 3. Window and Door enhancement 4. Garage designs, facades, and orientations 5. Articulated building forms PROPOSED 5.83 Acres - R-1-7,500-C 21.87 Acres - 0-S 1. Preserve 2 1.87 acres including all constrained lands, i.e. steep slopes, SDG&E easement, sensitive habitats and HMP wildlife corridor 2. Dedication of public Trail Segment 3 1. 1 .Nine exterior color schemes for wall, trim an( accent 2.Multiple roof linedone and two story elements 3. Recessed entries, doors windows 4. Two and three car garages, single and dual door designs 5. Multiple building planes, multi-level roofs, one and two story elements, balcony decks C. Mello I1 Local Coastal Program (LCP) The project is located within and subject to the Mello I1 LCP segment and is designated for residential low medium (RLM) density land use and Limited Control (L-C) zoning. Although the Mello I1 Land Use Plan is consistent with the subject parcel’s RLM General Plan A-/ ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09iCT 98-19/SDP 99-05bIDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Page 6 designation, the implementing zone (L-C) specified by the Mello I1 LCP is not consistent with the proposed zone change to R-1-7,500-Q and Open Space. Since the California Coastal Act specifies that all rezonings related to land use regulation or administration within the coastal zone, which occur after the certification of a local government’s local coastal program, require a LCP amendment in order to be effective, the project includes a Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the implementing zone from L-C to R-1-7,500-Q for the proposed developed area and Open Space (0-S) for the preserve area. The project is consistent with Mello I1 LCP policies limiting grading to the summer season (April - October) and preservation of steep slopes (25%+) possessing coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities (dual criteria). The project is conditioned to restrict grading of the site to the summer season, and proposed grading avoids all of the coastal sage scrub habitat and encroaches into 6.6% of the chaparral habitat existing on dual criteria slopes. The Mello I1 LCP permits an encroachment of up to 10% to enable reasonable use of a property. Of the total 27.87 acres, the project proposes to disturb only 6.5 acres although there are other developable areas existing on the site. Approximately 16 acres contain sensitive habitat (coastal sage scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grassland, and wetland) and the project proposes to disturb only 1.37 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The proposed density is 34 units below the density permitted by the General Plan and total avoidance of dual criteria slopes would result in the loss of 6 of the proposed 21 lots. An alternate design utilizing the developable acreage to the north would result in equal or greater impacts to sensitive vegetation than is proposed and disrupt the habitat corridor. Therefore, the proposed encroachment would enable reasonable development of the property with 21 single family lots on approximately 6 acres, while preserving 76% of the site (21.87 acres) containing the majority of steep slopes and sensitive habit existing on the site. This preserved area will be part of a habitat corridor that provides a linkage to open space through and adjacent to the Zone 20 Specific Plan area in accordance with the City’s draft HMP. Mello I1 hydrology standards require the drainage system to be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 10 year frequency storm of 6, hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are less than or equal to the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. The project has been designed so that the minimal additional runoff from the project beyond existing conditions is considered insignificant. D. Subdivision Ordinance The proposed tentative map complies with the requirements of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The subdivision will not conflict with any easements for access through or use of the property. The project is designed to take advantage of natural heating and cooling opportunities in that lots and structures are primarily oriented in an east-west alignment maximizing southern exposure and benefit of prevailing breezes. Primary access to the property would be provided by Brigantine Drive via Poinsettia Lane, a circulation arterial roadway. The proposed cul-de-sac conforms to the City’s cul-de-sac policy thereby negating a secondary access requirement. The proposed local public streets have adequate public right-of- way and would be constructed by the developer to full public street width standards with curb, gutters, sidewalks, fire hydrants, and underground utilities in accordance with City standards. h. ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05mDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 The proposed street system is therefore adequate to handle the project’s pedestrian and vehicular traffic and accommodate emergency vehicles. To reduce drainage impacts from the project site, the developer is required to provide adequate drainage and erosion control. The drainage requirements of Specific Plan 203, City ordinances, and Mello I1 have been considered and appropriate drainage facilities have been designed and secured. In addition to City standards and compliance with the City’s Master Drainage Plan, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to prevent any discharge violations. E11213. Chapter 21.10 - R-1 (One Family Residential 2one)lChapter 21.06 - Q (Qualified Overlay Zone)/Chapter 21.33 - 0-S (Open Space) As shown on the following table, the project meets or exceeds the R-1 zone standards with regard to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, and building height. Although the proposed project is a standard single family subdivision which would not require Planning Commission approval of the actual single family units, the Q zone requires the approval of a site development plan including building footprints and architectural elevations to ensure that the proposed units are consistent with the R-1 zone standards. This enables the Planning Commission to make the necessary findings that the project will not adversely impact the site or surrounding uses and that the site is adequate to accommodate the proposed use. Front: Minimum 20’ Side: 10% of Lot Width - 10’ Minimum Lot 22 of the proposed project consists of 21.87 acres to be dedicated as an open space easement that will be incorporated into the HMP, upon its adoption, as part of the City’s habitat preserve areas. The rezoning of this portion of Lot 22 to 0-S is consistent with the Open Space Zone (Chapter 21.33). The 0-S zone is consistent with the portion of the site already designated as General Plan Open Space and the future re-designation of the remainder of the open space lot to General Plan Open Space. E4. Chapter 21 35 - Inclusionary Housing See discussion under B. Zone 20 Specific Plan - Affordable Housing above. 3-3 ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09iCT 98-19iSDP 99-05/HDP 98-2liCDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Page 8 E5/6. Chapter 21.95 - Hillside Development Regulationsichapter 21.203 - Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The proposed project is consistent with the applicable Hillside Development Ordinance restrictions for development of steep slopes, slope height, grading volumes, slope screening and slope setbacks. The development is planned for areas of the site that are predominately 0 -15 % slopes. The project will disturb small areas of natural slopes exceeding 40%, however, the area of disturbance does not meet all the criteria necessary to prohibit development by the Hillside Ordinance. Proposed grading volumes of 7,620 cubic yardsiacre are within the acceptable range and manufactured slope heights are well below the 40’ maximum allowed. Manufactured slopes will be screened by a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover and structures will be setback a minimum of 15’ from the top of slopes. As discussed under Section C above, slopes exceeding 25% in the coastal zone possessing coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats (dual criteria) are also protected from disturbance. The proposed disturbance consists of 6.6% of the .southem maritime chaparral habitat existing on steep slopes. Disturbance of up to 10% is permitted to enable reasonable use of the property. The proposed development, which is limited to the southeast comer of the parcel, is reasonable since it utilizes the most developable and accessible area of the property preservation of 76% of the site including the majority of steep slopes and sensitive habitat existing on the site, would result from the proposed subdivision design. F. Growth Management he proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 20 in the southwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table E below. Table E: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE * The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09iCT Y8-l9/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21KDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The initial study (EIA-Part 11) prepared in conjunction with this project determined that some of the environmental effects which are peculiar to the property or to this project are considered significant and adverse impacts. The developer has agreed to add mitigation measures to fhe project to reduce those adverse effects to below a level of significance in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project’s direct significant effects include impacts to biological resources, paleontological resources, and traffic impacts. The project site possesses several sensitive habitats. The wildlife agencies have reviewed the project and concur with proposed biological mitigation measures. The environmental documents for the project were sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation in addition to being sent directly to the area offices of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game. The comments from the wildlife agencies have been incorporated into the required mitigation measures. Mitigation measures are also proposed for the other significant adverse effects and are also listed in the EIA-Part 11. The project is within the scope of the City’s Master Environmental Impact Report which is utilized to address the project’s cumulative air quality and circulation impacts. The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service” (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to 915162 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However, case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the preparation of a “Subsequent EIR” if mitigation measures are adopted which reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance. A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS into’the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right tum lanes-northbound’to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements” thereby, guaranteeing mitigation to a level of insignificance. In consideration of the foregoing, on July 29, 1999 the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09KT ~8-19iSDP 99-0S/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-80 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4626 (Mit. Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4627 (ZC) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4728 (LCPA) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4729 (CT) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4730 (SDP) 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4731 (HDP) 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4732 (CDP) 8. Location Map 9. Background Data Sheet 10. Disclosure Statement 11. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 12. Reduced Exhibits 13. Full Size Exhibits “A” - “AA” dated October 6, 1999 AHChmh - BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: ZC 98-12iLCPA 98-09iCT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21iCDP 98-86 CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Zone Chanee and Local Coastal Promam Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control IL-C) to One-Family Residential. 7.500 sauare foot minimum lot size, Oualified Overlav Zone (R-1-7500-01 and Open Space (OS): and a Tentative Tract Mau. Hillside Develoument Permit, and Coastal Develoument Permit to subdivide 21 sinele familv lots and one ouen suace lot on a 27.7 acre uarcel located in the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parhav and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Manaeement Pian and LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Section 22. Township 12 South. Ranee 4 West. San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Dieeo, State of California, according to official plat thereof. as described in Certificate of Comuliance record March 11. 1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official. APN 215-070-27 Acres: 27.7 ProposedNo. of LotsiUnits: 22 Lotsi21 Units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLWOS Density Allowed: 0 - 4 DdAcre - 3.2 DdAcre GCP Density Proposed: 3.2 DdAcre Existing Zone: L-C Proposed Zone: R-1-7.500-0/0-S Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: a General Plan Current Land Use Site L-c RLM Vacant North R-1-7500 RLM Vacant South L-c RLM VacandAgric East R-1-7,500-Q RLM Single Family West R-1-10-Q RLM Vacant Residential PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 21 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: Seutember 30. 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued Julv 29. 1999 0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated 0 Other, 3-7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Appl~cant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require; discretionary action on the part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee. 1 The following informarion MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project can1101 be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defmed as "Any individual. fm, co-parmersbip, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal organization. corporation, estate, mst, receiver, syndicate. in this and any other county, city and county. cit) municipality, disnict or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." provided below. Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propem owner must be I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or uannershia. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE VIA) 1X THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page ma!' he attached if necessary.) Person Standard Pacific Corp CorplPan N/lb Title npv-1 nn~r a Delaware Corporation Title Address 9335 Chesapeake Drive Address San Diego, CA 92123 _I -. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addiesses of persons having any ownership interest in the propeny involved. Also. provide the nature of the legal ownership (ix. partnership. tenants in common. non-profit. corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or PartnershiD. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Ronald L. Roesch Corp/Pan N/A Title .:. CLCJScPfilLf;' P,rr,7:--nrl~ Owner. bZRR"L.i-ed man Title Address- N-i 1-8 Address Santa Monica CA 90405 *. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cir\ staff. Boards. Commissions. COmmiKeeS and/or Council within the past twelve (11) months? Yes No Ifyes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessav, I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge Signature of ownerldate Ronald L. Roesch Gregg Linhoff Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicanr For: Standard Pacific Corp. A Delaware Corporation rlapplicant's agent if applicable/d& n h Associates for Prm or type name of owner/applicant's agenr Standard Pacific Corp. 5-9 H 4DMIN'.COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 -~ - CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: RLMiOS ZONING: R-1-7500-0 DEVELOPER’S NAME: STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. ADDRESS: 9335 CHESAPEAKE DRIVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 PHONE NO.: [619) 292-2200 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 215-070-27 QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 27.7 ACRES/:!] DU’S ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: UNKNOWN A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 73 sa. ft B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 38.94 sa. ft. C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 2 1 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .15 acres E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 54.88 CFS Identify Drainage Basin = Basin C (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 210ADT (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 5 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 21.87 Acres I. Schools: CUSD (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 21 EDU Identify Sub Basin = NIA (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD = 4.620 GPD L. The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. 60 ..-. ,., .. ........ i ~: ,. , . . . .. .... . ~. . , i ' 1'" ' , ... ' ' , i. .. .. . ,. .. -. . ." .. .. .. ~. - .. ... .~ .. . "-" " c Fa ,' . ."_ ? ;- ; - z < -1 P .- "- " " . ! .i! " c e Y -1 1" 0 PI a a .2 w 70 0 tl i== m < Lu m 0 d 73 b L: p t 0 d 75 /-. -r- -7 "- c c n < 0 v 0 d 77 + t " . . . .. c 0 d - PLANNING COMMISSION ~- DRAFT EXHIBIT 6 October 6, 1999 Page 11 6. ZC 98-121LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-051HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION - Reauest for: a) a recommendation of aDDroval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change ani Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone. Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne, stated that item #6 contains a number of requests, both legislative and quasi-judicial, to allow the subdivision of the Roesch Property, which is located in Zone 20. Mr. Wayne stated that there were several permits in this item. All of the quasi-judicial permits are final here and are conditioned upon the legislative action. The Planning Commission's action on the Zone Change and LCP Amendment is a recommendation to the City Council for final action on the remaining items. Mr. Wayne announced that Associate Planner, Anne Hysong. would make the presentation. Associate Planner, Anne Hysong explained that the Roesch Project is a residential single family lot subdivision, proposed on a 27.7 acre parcel located within the Zone 20 Specific Plan area in the southwest quadrant. The property is designated by the General Plan for residential low medium (RLM) density development and open space. The project site is located north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road. The site is currently vacant and previously cultivated. It is a Hillside parcel, which falls in elevation from east to west approximately 136 feet along the property's northern boundary and 60 feet along the property's southern boundary. The northern and western portions of the site contain steep slopes, a natural drainage course, a SDG&E easement, and sensitive plant and animal species and habitats, including coastal sage scrub, maritime chaparral and native grass land. species) existing on site will be preserved, except for 1.37 of the 4.16 acres of chaparral existing on the Ms. Hysong continued, stating that all of the sensitive and threatened habitats, (plant species and animal. consists of one 21.87-acre open space lot. 21 single-family homes are proposed with four floor plans, site. The project consists of 21 standard single family lots, which all exceed 7,534 square feet. It also each with three different faqade treatments. The units range in size from 2,720 square feet to 3,353 square feet. Ms Hysong stated that the proposed project preserves 76% of the site in open space. The open space has been designated by the HMP as a hardline open space area. The project also consists of a SDG&E easement, which will have a trail segment through it from north to south. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission's approval for the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma project to satisfy its inclusionary housing requirement. The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a zone change, local coastal program amendment and a mitigated negative declaration and approve a tentative tract map, site development plan, hillside development permit and coastal development permit. The project is subject to and consistent with the following city polices and plans: the General Plan, the Zone 20 Specific Plan requirements for land use, open space preservation. public safety and aesthetics, the Mello II LCP policies and implementing ordinances and the lnclusionary Housing ordinance, Hillside Development, Growth Management and Subdivision ordinances, as well as the drafl HMP. residential subdivision is consistent with the property's residential low-medium density (RLM) general plan Ms. Hysong explained that the proposed density of 1.34 dwelling units per acre for the single-family designation. The proposed 21.87 acre open space lot is consistent with the underlying open space designation occurring on a portion of the open space lot. The proposed rezoning of the property from LC designations. limited control to R-1-7500 Q and 0-S is consistent with the RLM and Open Space General Plan 79 PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 12 Continuing Ms Hysong, noted that the project is consistent with all of the Zone 20 Specific Plan requirements, including the proposed R-1-7500 zoning, the architectural guidelines, access from Poinsettia Lane via Brigantine Drive, the preservation of steep slopes and sensitive habitat in open space and the dedication of the trail segment. The project is also consistent with the Mello II LCP policies and implementing ordinances. The project will preserve the majority of dual criteria slopes, called for in the Mello II LCP, as well as provide adequate drainage system to avoid increased run off. The project is consistent with the Hillside Development regulations since manufactured slope heights are less than 40 feet, the dual criteria slopes are preserved, and the grading volume is within the acceptable range. Ms. Hysong stated that, the environmental assessment performed for the Roesch project revealed those 20 EIR and the Cityk MEIR, would require mitigation. These include a requirement for direct gnatcatchers additional potentially significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed and mitigated by the Zone surveys prior to grading, the granting of an open space conservation and HOA maintenance easement over the open space (Lot 22), soils testing and analysis and the payment of the fees for the short term improvements to Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real intersection. In summary, Ms. Hysong affirmed that Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Carlsbad Tract CT 98-19, Site Development Plan 99-05, Hillside Development Permit 98-21 and Coastal Development Permit 98-86. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Zone Change 98-12, Local Coastal Program Amendment 98-09 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Ms. Hysong mentioned the Errata sheet that indicated corrections. to the Staff Report and Resolutions, which includes a revision to condition #21. Commissioner Segall wanted to know if the applicant agrees with the Errata sheet that was presented Ms. Hysong stated that the applicant wanted to discuss condition #21 Commissioner Segall referred to page 6 of the Staff report: That the project was designed to take advantage of the natural heating and cooling opportunities in the lots and structures which are primarily orientated east and west. He requested a clarification of the aforementioned. Ms. Hysong stated that the majority of the lots were oriented in an east and west direction. In addition to that because of the low density of the project and the distances between structures that requirement is satisfied. EasVwest means through the project side to side and in some cases front to rear. In general this statement is made in single family subdivisions. Commissioner Segall informed Ms. Hysong that the exhibits in the Staff Report were difficult to see and wanted to know about the rear and side elevations. He wanted to know if these areas are enhanced Ms. Hysong stated that there was a great deal of enhanced window treatment. Vice-Chairperson Compas requested the applicant to speak. Representing the applicant was Jack Henthorn, 5375 Avenida Encinas - Suite D, Carlsbad. Mr. Henthorn work through the process painlessly. He thanked the Staff and revealed that they had provided valuable stated that they have been working with the wildlife agencies and believed they have discovered a way to input in to the design efforts on the site. Mr. Henthorn explained that he has reviewed the staff report and recommendations including the errata sheet and the modification to condition #21. He requested that the the modifications to condition #21 of Resolution 4629 represented a departure from the conditions Planning Commission take action as recommended by Staff. He requested that the minutes reflect that previously approved on developments of a similar type within the Zone. Commissioner Segall asked how the condition deviated from previous similar projects. that the intent was never to saddle the private developer with the liability for public utilization of a trail. A Mr. Henthorn explained that in reviewing Zone 20 specific plan and the evolution of the plan, it was clear PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 13 trail in other development projects was built, constructed, maintained and it was available to the residents of that development until such time that the City enacted their trails program and thereby accepted maintenance and liability responsibility for the public utilization of that trail while it was on private property. This condition appears to eliminate that. Every other project that the Planning Commission has recommended for approval has a condition that does not require the developer to accept liability for the general public use of the trail system. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Jane Zappen, 1485 Turquoise Drive, Carlsbad, expressed that the maps did not show where everything is going to happen. She wanted to see a map that indicates where the affordable housing would be located. Sam Zappen, 1485 Turquoise Drive, Carlsbad, stated that he felt the presentation photograph showing that area was old and did not actually show how the area looked today. The photograph did not show the many homes that had been built in the area. Mr. Zappen expressed that he thought the photograph was at best 10 years old. Vice-Chairperson Compas stated that a current map was available and that the Commission was very aware of the homes that had been built in the area. Mr. Zappen, went on to say that a number of expensive homes had been built in the area and he wanted to make sure that the Planning Commission did things in the area with the interest of the existing home owners and the value of their property in mind. The politically correct format might be affordable property, but he felt it was a minor portion of the area and did not want property values decreased. Jack Henthorn explained that the affordable housing proposal did not include low income housing within the project. The grading on the photograph represents an in-construction photograph that is one and a half years old. It is anticipated that the beginning prices on the homes will be in access of Cantamar or Mar Brisa. Vice-chairman Compas closed public testimony. Ms. Hysong stated that the project is compatible with the surrounding single family development. It is a standard single family subdivision with ample open space that buffers it from most of the other developments. Commissioner Trigas stated that it appeared to be a quality project and was impressed with the architectural design. She feels that the development will do wonders for the area. Commissioner Segall concurred with Commissioner Trigas’ comments regarding the high quality of the clarification on the revision to condition #21, how it would impact the applicant and who would bear the project. He noted that only a small portion of the plot area would be developed. He did however want liability. Mr. Wayne explained that the City adopted a Trails Plan requiring the dedication of trails. There was no the trails to be bonded for. Relying on experiences of the past it was ascertained there were a great deal mechanism in place to pay for the construction and maintenance of the trails. The first step was to allow of problems related to putting in trails later. Putting the matter before the City Council, the City Council agreed, and wanted a standard condition put into place, that required the construction of the trail the City accepted dedication. When this was put before the California Coastal Commission, the CCC said immediately with the final map. Then the trail could be maintained as a private trail, until as such time as this was not acceptable in the coastal zone. There are public access requirements in the Coastal Act and therefore, they started adding modifications to LCP Amendments with respect to the requirement for trails and for those trails to be accessible by the public. Mr. Henthorn is correct in stating that we have been inconsistent, but the inconsistency is an evolutionary one. It is our interpretation that the Zone 20 plan, which coordinates public access or trail systems through the specific plan area states that the trails are not just for the use by residents of a particular subdivision. We are now trying to consistently add the condition that requires these that are in the coastal zone to be public trails from the beginning. Mr. Wayne 81 PLANNING COMMISSION October 6,1999 Page 14 stated that he had firsthand knowledge, because he lived in an area that had public access trails. It was easy to get insurance and there was small impact on the homeowners' fee. We are now consistently adding this condition to coastal zone public trails. Commissioner Segall wanted to know if the issue of liability could be covered by an insurance policy. Mr. Wayne explained that ultimately the Citywide trail system will be covered under some type of lighting and landscape district or other similar mechanism. It therefore might have another management entity. The wording was negotiated with the California Coastal Commission. It first appeared in the Poinsettia Property Specific Plan. Assistant City Attorney asserted that it was required by the California Coastal Commission and the City of Carlsbad. had no choice. Commission Trigas asked if the wording would be in future projects in the coastal zone. Mr. Wayne acknowledged that this wording would be in all projects related to the coastal zone Commissioner Welshons complimented Ms. Hysong on an excellent presentation Vice-Chairperson Compas concurred with Ms. Welshons in regards to Ms. Hysong presentation MOTION: Motion by Commission Welshons, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626, 4627 and 4628 Recommending Approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12 and LCPA 98-09 and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4629, 4630, 4631, and 4632 approving CT to the conditions contained therein, plus the memorandum provided dated 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21 and CDP 98-86 based on the findings and subject October 6, 1999. VOTE: 6-0 AYES; NOES: Compas, L'Heureux, Segall, Trigas, Welshons. Nielsen ABSTAIN: None None Public hearing closed by Vice-Chairperson Compas PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and San Diego County; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: November 5, 1999 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at san MARCOS , California this of 5th Nw. 1999 day ~ Signature' This space is ror the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Notice of Public HEarinq NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION ZC98-1 ULCPA 96-09 - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you. because your interest may affected. that me City Council d the City of Carlsbad will hold a wblic hearin0 at me Ci Council Chambers. 1204 Carisbad Village Drive. ~~~ ~ ~~ :arbbad, Cahrnia. at 6:OO p.m.. on Tuesdiy, November 16, 18&. lo conslder appmvai of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mmgation Monitoring and ~swnino Pmoram. Zone Chanoe and Local Ccfslal Prwram Amendment to :h&gi &initr& Limited Coiml (L-C) to One Family ResMenaal7,SOO square faat minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-0) and Open Smce 10-51. for 21 Sinole fsmilv Id8 and residences and one open space lot 3" a 27.7 &re prcel lhed @.me north of Poinsenla Lane bmeen Amara Parkway and Black Rail Road within boundaries of the Zone 20 Spsok Plan and Local Facilities Manaaement Plan and me Coastal Zone and more particularly described as: That pomon of Sedan 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West. San Bernardino Bas and Meridian. in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sen Dlego. state d Cdilomia, anording to oflicial plat thereol. as described In CenWe d Compliance recorded March 11, 1897. as File No. 1887-0106633 ofliciai. Those persons wishirg to speak on this proposal are cardially invited to anend lhe public hearing. Copies of me stan repon will be available on or aner November 12,1953. n you have any quesnons regarding this maner. pleas contact Anne Hysang in the Clty 01 Carisbad Planning Depament at (760) 438-1161, extenskn4477. If you challenge me Mnlgated Negative Declaration. Mitlgatlon Monitoring you may be limited to raking only mOse ishues you or someMe else raIM and Reponing Program, Zone Change. and/or LDcal Coastal Program in mu*. at the public hearing described In this notice or In wrinen correspondence delivered to the Cl of Carlsbad Mnce d the City Clerk et, or Mor to. the public hearing. ~r~ ~.~ CITY OF CARSBAD CITY COUNCIL APPLICAW. STANDARD PACIFIC CORP -% @ Led 64686 November 5. 1953 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising ' ... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING M NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, November 16, 1999, to consider approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One Family Residential 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S), for 21 single family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone and more particularly described as: That portion of Section 22, Township I2 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March 11, 1997, as File No. 1997-0106633 official. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after November 12, 1999. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Anne Hysong in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4477. If you challenge the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, and/or Local Coastal Program in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad Office of the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. APPLICANT: STANDARD PACIFIC COW. PUBLISH: NOVEMBER 5,1999 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL " @ . ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION . ZC 98-1 2ILCPA 98-09 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached arc the materlals necessary for you to notice zc 98-12/LCPA 98-09 - Roesch Property Subdivision for a publlc hearing before the Clty Council. Please notice the iten for the Council meeting of First Available Hearing Thank you. Assistant Clty Man- . October 22, 1999 Date - - FILE COP! City of Carlsbad NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: June 21.1999 DESCRIPTION: Request for: a) a recommendation of approval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning fkom Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (04); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Pmit, and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 215-070-27 APPLICANT: Standard Pacific Corp. 9335 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on October 6, 1999 at 6:OO p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after September 30, 1999. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Anne Hysong at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:OO a.m. to 5:OO p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, (760) 438-1161, extension 4477. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 (760) 438-1 161 FAX (760) 438-0694 @ APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge this Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Ameals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: 0 Ths site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92108-1725. CASE FILE: ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-211CDP 98-86 CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY PUBLISH: SEPTEMBER 23,1999 tl;: - ~...."4* .-A !A ."p L ". e*; Kc" & RD SITE -~ - , : - " ".T" '4 .- " .. @ ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ZC .98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-1 9/ SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 STANDARD PACIFIC COR 9335 CHESAPEAKE DR SANDIEGOCA92123-1010 JOAN ETTINGER 1493 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARTIN 8; STEFANIE COLOMBAITO JOHN LIEDTKY 1484 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1497 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID DESSECKER 1489 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MATTHEW 8; MELANIE ODONNELL I454 TURQUOISE DR TIMOTHY 8; KARI RISE 1458 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID 8; KAREN MOORE 1466 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JEFFREY B: DIANE WILLIAMS CARLSBAD CA 92009 1478 TURQUOISE DR LAURENCE & SUSAN 1481 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 REISNER DAVID FRENCH 1469 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 THE LANG FAMILY 6438 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARKUS 8; DENISE MARITZ 6450 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 1VILLIAM SCHECK CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6443 RUBY WAY MARK RABY CARLSBAD CA 92009 1470 TURQUOISE DR SIPRA DASGWTA CARLSBAD CA 92009 1489 TURQUOISE DR REY B: ARLm' FERNANDEZ I485 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIh' 8; LISA HARDY 1462 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH 8; PATRICIA SWIDERSKI 24800 CHRISANTA DR 200 MISSIONVIEJO CA 92691-4819 JOHN ZAPPIA CARLSBAD CA 92009 1485 TURQUOISE DR FRED 8; JUDITH KISIEL WENDY KHENTlGAN 1477 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1473 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD B: JOANNE BODNAR BRYAN 8: JENNIFER GRABER 1465 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 1461 TIRQOUISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT M NSJT HUMBERS HUMBERST STEVEN 8; RHONDA SWAIN 6442 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6446 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 EDWARD 8; RUTH APFFEL 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 RICHARD GAYNOR 6439 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 EUGENE &.KARIN GOORCHENKO 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 MARK SNAZA 1451 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009- 1244 MICHAEL 8: KATHLEEN NAYLOR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1493 TURQUISE DR \ GREYSTONE HOMES INC COftaNA CA 91719-1301 E RINCON ST 115 \~ ', GREYSTONE HOMES IKC 495 E RINCON ST 1 IS COXONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RMCON ST 115 ' ~.~,, GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 *. DEhWIS 8: DORIS HAMMAESTEN 1488 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 JAMES 8: ANDREA GORMAN 1504 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 MAHESH 8: PADMA KODUKULA CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 12 SAPPHIRE DR THE MARTIN FAMILY CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 16 SAPPHIRE DR LALJRIE MACRI 1520 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 ". 495 E FilNCON ST 1 15 -STONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 1 K&zV-IQ 8: DENISE MCQUEEN CARLSBAD ChQ09 15 13 TURQUOISE DR .. KELVIN B: DENISE MCQUEEK 15 13 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 EDWIN B: SANDRA MELLICK 1509 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 >SEW WIZA 1505 TU"E DR CARLSBAD CA !bW. ..__ '. ... \ G~EYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 JOSEPH WIZA 1505 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 .. GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST I15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC -1'75 E RINCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 NANCY WIEWIORA CARLSBAD CA 92009 6443 OPAL WAY BEXNETT MANX 6-139 OPAL WAY SOHAIL B: RAHEELA BOKHARI 6435 OPAL WAY GRANT 8: VICTORIA ALBRIGHT 6430 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCWT 115 CORONA CA 917TB-UO1 G-ONE HOMES INC 495 E RIhbb.ST 115 CORONA CA 91'h94301 GEYSTONE HOMES Ih'C 495 E RINGON ST 115 CORONA CA 9nl%l30l PAUL & KAREN RUTLEDGE JOHN & CLETA FREDERICKSEN 6446OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CAROLE MUROYA 1514 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 18 TURQUOISE DR G bE YSTONE HOMES MC CORONAKA91719-1301 -. GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORON CA 91719-1301 CORONA CA 91719-1301 . 495 EMCON ST 115 495e RINCON ST 11 5 GREYSTONE HOMES MC 495 E WON ST 115 \ 495 E RINCON ST 115 ,, GREYSTONE HOMES'INC GREYSTONE HOMIXINC 495 E RINCON ST 115 x,~ CORONA CA 91719-1301 ', CORONACA91719-1301 '\ CARLSBAD CA 92009 JACKIE SCHWAB 1501 SAPPHIRE DR \ \., JUSTIN 8; LAURA WILLIAMS 1505 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 KEITH & KIM MCFARLANE 1508 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK 1509 TLRQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC ,.CORONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-I301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 VIN & DENISE MCQUEEN UOISE DR SWSTONE HOMES INC 495 E NNCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 DONALD & MARY IRVINE CARLSBAD CA 92009 1501 TURQUOISE DR MAREK & MARTINA LIYANAGE CARLSBAD CA 92009 6434 OPAL WAY JAMES & PASCALE REYNOLDS 6438 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH & SUSAN TARMAS 6442 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 \ GREYSTONE HOMES INC iCORONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES IKC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE'HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES 1NC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 C6RONA.CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RlNCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 495 ERINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTOXE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301, GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RlNCON ST I15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES 1NC 495 E RlNCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 11 5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST I15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST I 15 . CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RlNCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 \ GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RIKCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 \ \ GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1361 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 492 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5 CORONA CA 91719-1301 495 E RINCON ST 115 GREYSTONE HOMES INC CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 15 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONACA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 . GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495’E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 SEA~DEJESTATES L L . 15707 ROCffWLLE BLVD 255 IRVINE CA GREYSTONE HOMES INC 195 E RINCON ST 1 IS CORONA CA 91719-1301 SEASIDE ESTATES L L 15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255 IRVME CA 92618 SEASIDE ESTATES L L 15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255 IRVINE CA 92618 BASIL gL DOROTHY LOMBARD0 1304 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARIA GUGLELMELLI 1322 STATICE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 C.ARLSBAD LLC RIELLY SELX’PORT BEACH CA 92660 23 CORPORATE PLAZA DR THE FAMILY 3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400 SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750 TREE PLUM SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750 3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400 LENNAR HOMES CA MC MARTIN & CYNTHIA FLETCHER ROBERT & ROSEMARIE GATES 27432 CALLE ARROYO SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675-274 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 6742 LEMON LEAF DR 6748 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 VINCENT CHAO CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 6754 LEMON LEAF DR CHRISTOPHER BIANCHI 6714 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 KATIA FLOWS 1320 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAROLE LAVER 1337 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOUIS HAYWARD CARLSBAD CA 92009 1321 VERBENA CT NORMA LANGHAM 1309 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAURA SOETEN 13 18 STATICE CT C.4RLSBAD CA 92009 GREGG 8: DENISE PERALTA I338 STARLING CT ~ ~~ CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~ ~~ N.4DINE BAURIN 1323 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 BUN KIM 6734 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARY Bt JENNIFER IKEMOTO 6722 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 ASOKNATH & KAJAL CHATTERJEE MARTIN BOGAN 67 11 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARLSBAD CA 92009 1316 VERBENA CT BRENDA WELCH 1324 VEBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LACEY WARHOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 1333 VERBENA CT BEHROKH GOLSHAN 1 3 17 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAUN & TIFFANY STORM 1302 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 GENEANE LINZEY 1326 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID BRAUN CARLSBAD CA 92009 1339 STATICE CT ROBERT & LYNN PIERCE 13 I9 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICK GUIMOND 1328 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEBRA SANDOVAL 1325 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CRAIG HARVEY 1313 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICK & RATIH LEHRMANN 1306 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICIA CISNEROS CARLSBAD CA 92009 1334 STARLING CT DIANNA PRANSKUS CARLSBAD CA 92009 1327 STATICE CT JIM & KIM BRUNNER 1316PHLOXCT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~ ~~~ 3 SHERRI PESTRITTO 13 11 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 * LUZ RODRIGUEZ 1312 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOUISE WYLIE 1308 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 OARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY \ooooo CARLSBAD RIELLY GOO00 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 . * CARLSBAD RIELLY BOO00 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 VICTORIA FERNANDEZ PO BOX 395 CARDIFF CA 92007-0395 '\ CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 AVELINA 8: ERNEST HIDALGO 65 1 1 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 Kristin Brice 1304 Phlox Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 Cherry Tree Walk, LLC 3020 Old Ranch Rd #250 Susan Dean Seal Beach,CA 90740 1315 Phlox Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 Bridgette Wisdom 1329 Verbena Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy #400 Plum Tree Walk c/o Olsen Comp Seal Beach, CA 90740 Lee E. Catherine Portilla 1310 Statice Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 Mario Guglielmelli 1322 Statice Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 Ronald Roesch Santa Monica,CA 90405 2800 Neilson Way #708 Catellus Residental 5 Park Plaza #400 Irvine, CA 92614 CARLSBAD RIELLY ouooo CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELLY 00000 WILLIAM 8: DONNA BAKER 18552 ERWIN ST RESEDA CA 91335-6820 Jack Henthorn Jack Henthorn E. Assoc 5375 Avenida Encinas #D Carlsbad, CA 92008 Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Corp 9335 Chesapeake Dr. San Diego,CA 92123 Signature Date% CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY OF SAN MARCOS 801 PINE AVE 505 S VULCAN AVE 1 CIVIC CENTER DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA 300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988 OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG STE 50 STE B STE 800 330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 401 B STREET LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND 1600 PACIFIC HWY 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 2730 LOKER AVE WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 200 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NO SAN DIEGO CA 92108 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER ANNE HYSONG -I....- I.... . ... ,...,,IC STANDARD PACIFIC COR 9335 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1010 MARTIN & STEFANIE COLOMBATTO JOHN LIEDTKY 1484 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 .I 1497 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOAN ETTINGER 1493 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID DESSECKER 1489 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~. MATTHEW & MELANIE ODONNELL 1454 TURQUOISE DR TIMOTHY & KARI RISE CARLSBAD CA 92009 1458 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 - ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ - . . . ~ . DAVID & KAREN MOORE MARK RABY CARLSBAD CA 92009 1466 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1470 TURQUOISE DR. JEFFREY & DIANE WILLIAMS SIPRA DASGUF'TA 1478 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 1489 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 REY & ARLYN FERNANDEZ 1485 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIN & LISA HARDY CARLSBAD CA 92009 1462 TURQUOISE DR JOSEPH &PATRICIA SWIDERSKI MISSIONVIEJO CA 92691-4819 24800 CHRISANTA DR 200 JOHN ZAPPIA 1485 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAURENCE & SUSAN REISNER FRED & JUDITH KISIEL 148 1 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 WENDY KHENTIGAN 1473 TURQUOISE DR . CARLSBAD CA 92009 1477 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID FRENCH 1469 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 THE LANG FAMILY 6438 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARKUS & DENISE MARITZ CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6450 RUBY WAY .~ WILLIAM SCHECK 6443 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 RICHARD & JOANNE BODNAR BRYAN & JENNIFER GRABER CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 1465 TURQUOISE DR 1461 TIRQOUISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT M NSJT HUMBERS HUMBERST STEVEN & RHONDA SWAIN CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6442 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6446 RUBY WAY EDWARD & RUTH APFFEL 495ERINCONST115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 RICHARD GAYNOR CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249 6439 RUBY WAY EUGENE & KARIN GOORCHENKO 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 MARK SNAZA 145 1 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-1244 ._ GREYSTO~M 495 E RiiW MICHAEL & KATHLEEN NAYLOR 1493 TURQUISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DENNIS & DORIS HAMMAESTEN 1488 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301 JAMES & ANDREA GORMAN 1 504 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 ONA CA 91719-1301 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ LAURIE MACRI CARLSBAD CA 92009 1520 SAPPHIRE DR ~ ~~~~ MAHESH & PADMA KODUKULA 15 12 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 THE MARTIN FAMILY CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 16 SAPPHIRE DR ' -,... .-. KELVIN & DENISE MCQUEEN CARLSBAD CA 92009 1513 TURQUOISE DR EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK 1509 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 'x: ~~ , GREYSTONE HOMES WC 495 EhNCON ST 115 CORONA CA.91719-1301 ... . ~.. ~~~~ ... ~. . .. . -. . . NANCY WIEWIORA CARLSBAD CA 92009 6443 OPAL WAY JOSEPH WIZA 1505 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH WIZA ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ BENNETT MANN 6439 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 SOHAIL & RAHEELA BOKHARl 6435 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 GRANT & VICTORIA ALBRIGHT 6430 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREYSTONE H "" ~.~. " PAUL & KAREN RUTLEDGE 6446 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 .~. . JUSTIN & LAURA WILLIAMS 1505 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~ GREYSTONE H KEITH & KIM MCFARLANE 1508 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 . EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK 1509 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN & CLETA FREDERICKSEN CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 14 TURQUOISE DR * ;c C 0 ACA91719-1301 GREYST C ONA 91719-1301 ONST115 GREYSTONE 't. \ ! CAROLE MUROYA 15 18 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JACKIE SWAB 1501 SAPPHIREDR CARLSBAD CA 92009 "~ ~ 1, \ \ KELVIN & DE - .. , ~ ~~ ~ ~~ JAMES & PASCALE REYNOLDS 6438 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~~ \ \ GREYSTONE i \ \ DONALD & MARY IRVINE 1501 TURQUOISE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH & SUSAN TARMAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 6442 OPAL WAY \ \ * GREYSTbNE HO \ 1~ . \ ~ ~ ~~~ '\ ~~~ ~~ GREYSTONE HO CA 91719-1301 MAREK & MARTINA LIYANA~E CARLSBAD CA 92009 6434 OPAL WAY >, .i .. GREYSTONE HOMES 495 E RINCON S \ 495 E RINCON ST GREYSTONE HOMES 23 CORPORATE PLAZA DR CARLSBAD LLC RIELLY NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 ',,$,,Y '/ CORON A 91719-1301 . GREYSTONE HOME :+ CORO A 91719-1301 91719-1301 .~ 19-1301 SEASIDE ESTATES L L 15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255 IRVINE CA 9261 8 , /' BASIL & DOROTHY LOMBARD0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 1304 VERBENA CT THE FAMILY 3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400 SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750 GREYSTONE'HO '. ~ ~ ~~~ TREE PLUM 3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400 SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750 MARIA GUGLELMELLI CARLSBAD CA 92009 1322 STATICE ST LENNAR HOMES CA INC MARTIN & CYNTHIA FLETCHER ROBERT & ROSEMARIE GATES 27432 CALLE ARROYO SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675-274 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 6742 LEMON LEAF DR 6748 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 VINCENT CHAO 6754 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424 CHRISTOPHER BIANCHI CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 6714 LEMON LEAF DR KATIA FLORES 1320 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAROLE LAVER 1337 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOUIS HAYWARD 1321 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 NORMA LANGHAM 1309 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAURA SOETEN 1 3 18 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREGG & DENISE PERALTA 1338 STARLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 NADINE BAURIN 1323 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRIANKIM 6734 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARY & JENNIFER IKEMOTO CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 6722 LEMON LEAF DR ASOKNATH & KAJAL CHATERJEE 671 1 LEMON LEAF DR MARTIN BOGAN CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARLSBAD CA 92009 13 16 VERBENA CT BRENDA WELCH 1324 VEBENA CT ' CARLSBAD CA 92009 LACEY WARHOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 1333 VERBENA CT BEHROKH GOLSHAN 1317 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAUN &TIFFANY STORM 1302 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 GENEANE LINZEY 1326 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID BRAUN 1339 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT & LYNN PIERCE 13 1 9 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICK GUIMOND 1328 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEBRA SANDOVAL 1325 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CRAIG HARVEY 1313 VERDINCT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICK & RATIH LEHRMANN 1306 STATlCE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICIA CISNEROS CARLSBAD CA 92009 1334 STARLING CT DIANNA PRANSKUS 1327 STATICE CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 JIM & KIM BRUNNER 1316 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LUZ RODRIGUEZ CARLSBAD CA 92009 1312 PHLOX CT 00000 00000 00000 00000 '. ~ ~~ \, \ 00000 00000 CARLSBAD L RIEL LOUISE WYLIE 1308 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 \ Y C RLSBADL 00000 ' ,. CARLSBA~ L RIELLY 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 SHEW PESTRlTTO CARLSBAD CA 92009 1311 PHLOXCT .. 17 CARLSBAD L RI i i 00000 , 00000 CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 00000 00000 \ i - CARLSBAD L NELLY 00000 00000 CARLSBAD L RIELL CARLSBAD RIELLY 00000 AVELINA & ERNEST HIDALGO WILLIAM & DONNA BAKER 651 1 EL CAMINO REAL 18552 ERWIN ST CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 RESEDA CA 91335-6820 ~~. VICTORIA FERNANDEZ Kristin Brice PO BOX 395 1304 Phlox Ct CARDIFF CA 92007-0395 Jack Henthorn Jack Henthron h Assoc Carlsbad, CA 92009 5375 Avenida Encinas #D * Carlsbad, CA 92008 'Cherry Tree Walk, LLC 3020 Old Ranch Rd #250 Seal Beach,CA 90740 I ~ ~ ~ ~ Bridgette Wisdom Carlsbad, CA 92009 1329 Verbena Ct Susan Dean Greqq Linhoff Carlsbad, CA 92009 1315 Phlox Ct Plum Tree Walk c/o Olsen Comp. 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy#400 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Stanaard Pacific Corp 9335 Chesapeake Dr San Diego, CA 92123 Lee h Catherine Portilla 1310 Statice Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 Ronald Roesch 2800 Neilson Way #708 SANTA MONICA CA 90405 Mario Guglielmelli Carlsbad, CA 92009 1322 Statice Ct Catellus Residential 5 Park Plaza #400 Irvine, CA 92614 Smooth Feed SheetsTM H:WMIN\LABELS\LCP INTERESTED PARTIES UPDATED 3-99 OLIVENHAIN M.W.D. 1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD ENClNlTAS CA 92024 CRAIG ADAMS SIERRA CLUB SAN DIEGO CHAPTER 3820 RAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPOSITO 1893 AMELFI DRIVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024 LANlKAl LANE PARK SHARP; SPACE 3. 6350 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 KIM SEIBLY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC PO BOX 1831 SAN DIEGO CA 92112 .~ . ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ PERRY A LAM0 890 MERE POINT ROAD BRUNSWICK MAINE 0401 1 - ~~ ~~ RICHARD RETECKI COASTAL CONSERVANCY SUITE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAURA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~~ ~ ~~~~ COPIES TO t CITYCLERK t MAIN LIBRARY f BRANCH LIBRARY 4 WATER DISTRICT CITY OF ENClNlTAS COM DEV DEPARTMENT 505 S VULCAN AVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024 REGIONAL WATER QUAL. BD EXECUTIVE OFFICER SUITE B 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92124 GUY MOORE JR 6503 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DRIVE LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 JOHN LAMB LOSANGELES CA 90069 1446 DEVLIN DRIVE MARY GRIGGS STATE LANDS COMMISSSION SUITE 100 SOUTH 100 HOWE AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 ANTHONY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AVE ESCONDIDO CA 92026 JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5 MWMRS MICHAEL CARDOSA 6491 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICES 2730 LOKER AVE WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 Use template for 5160@ TABATA FARMS .. PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018 KENNETH E SULZER 1ST INT’L PLAZA, SUITE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 JAN SOBEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO BOX 1605 CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANDAG - EXEC DIRECTOR BILL McLEAN 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS do LAKESHORE GARDENS CARLSBAD CA 92009 SPIERS ENTERPRISES DWIGHT SPIERS SUITE 139 23 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ATTN: ART DANELL COUNTY OF SD, ROOM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LEE ANDERSON CRA PRESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 FLOYD ASHBY 416 LA COSTA AVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009 Laser 5160@ -aAVERV@ Address Labels I. LABELS - 5163 SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY) WELLS FARGO PLAZA LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCES) SUITE 800 APPENDIX A (LIST IS REQUIRED BY COASTAL COMMISSION) 401 B STREET 1 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 I DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ROOM 700 110 WEST A STREET SANDIEGO CA 92101 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 350 McALLISTER STREET SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 95812-3044 ~ DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE 1 STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES ~ ROOM 100 1220 N STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814 ~ BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' WILLIAM G. BRENNAN ROOM 5504 DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPECIAL COUNCIL 1120 N STREET SUITE 2450 SACRAMENTO CA 95814 980 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS BILL FIGGE, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MAIL STATION 65 2829 SAN JUAN ST SAN DIEGO CA 92138 RESOURCES AGENCY RM 1311 1416 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95812 - ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ U. S. FISH AND WILDLLFE SERVICE SUITE 130 33 10 EL CAMINO AVENUE SACRAMENTO CA 95821 COASTAL CONSERVANCY SUITE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CHUCK NAJARIAN 15 16 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR 350 GOLDEN SHORE LONGBEACH CA 90802 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GAIL PRESLEY, CHIEF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION i RM1341 141.6 NINTH STREET S,ACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIROMENTAL COORD ~ RM 1516-2 ~ 1416 NINTH STREET I SACMENTO CA 95814 SOUTHERN REGION JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES 8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE SAND DIEGO CA 92108 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS SUITE 1005 100 HOWE AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS 30 VAN NESS AVENLTE SANFRANCISCO CA 95814 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD PO BOX 100 SACWENTO CA 95801 ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SUITE B 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD SANDIEGO CA 92124-1331 ~ ..~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ .~ ~~~ DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ATTN: GARY RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST SUITE 102 DAVIS CA 95616 2121-C SECOND STREET ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ." ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ PACIFIC REGIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN - OCRM, 55MC4 NJORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HIGHWAY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 ~ .. ~ ~ ~~ . ~~~~~~~ U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA - SUITE 702 333 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 I BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PO BOX 92007 WESTERN REGION 1 LOS ANGELES CA 90009 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.. USDA - RURAL DEVLOPMENT ~ 430 ST DEPT 4169 ~ DAVIS CA 95616 ! ! caul 1 CHAIRMAN WIL -_ EP WIRONMENTA ~ ,L QUP ! 722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST I WASHINGTON DC 2006 ~~ ~~~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER PO BOX 271 1 LOS ANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 61 1 RYAN PLAZA DR STE 400 ARLINGTON TX 7601 1-4005 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL DISTRICT DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER SANDIEGO CA 92132 U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 2135 BUTANO DRIVE SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REGION PO BOX 427 BOULDER CITY CO 89005 SUPERINTENDENT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK 190 1 SPINNAKER DRIVE SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 *, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUITE 350 901 MARKET STREET SANFRANCISCO CA 94103 ~ CLIFFORD EMMERCING, DIRECTOR ' DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVE I DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONAL ADMIN ~ 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE , SANFRANCISCO CA 94102 U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 MID-PACIFIC REGION BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENDENT RONALD M. JAEGER RED WOOD NATIONAL PARK SACRAMENTO CA 95825 11 11 2ND STREET ~ 2800 COTTAGE WAY DRAWER N CRESCENT CITY CA 95531 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CA 92108 ~ 3 1 1 1 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH