HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11-16; City Council; 15498; Roesch Property Subdivision ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB# 15,498 DEPT. HD. TITLE:
MTG. 11/16/99 ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
DEPT. PLN & ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09
I CITY Am. @ I CITY MGR s-2
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. NS-519 , APPROVING ZC 98-12 and ADOPT
Resolution No. 99-501 , APPROVING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program and LCPA 98-09.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On October 6, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the Roesch
Property Subdivision located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail
Road in the Zone 20 Specific Plan area and Local Facilities Management Zone. The Planning Commission approved (6-0) CT 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21, and CDP 98-86 for 21 standard
single family lots and residences, one open space lot, and the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing
credits in Villa Loma, and recommended approval of ZC 98-12, LCPA 98-09, and the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for a Zone Change and
One Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q)
Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the zone classification from Limited Control (L-C) to
on 5.83 acres and Open Space (0-S) on 21.87 acres.
The project site is a 27.7 acre previously cultivated vacant parcel designated by the General Plan
and Local Coastal Program Land Use Map for Residential Low Medium (RLM) density development
and Open Space (OS). The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires that the site be rezoned from L-C to R-I
concurrent with a development proposal. The 21.87 acre open space lot, which is partially
constrained by steep slopes and sensitive vegetation, is identified in the City's Draft HMP as a
to R-1-7500-Q for the disturbed area and 0-S for the preserved area are therefore consistent with
hardline conservation area, The proposed Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment
the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zone 20 Specific Plan, and the Draft HMP.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the project. The project is within the scope of the
City's Master Environmental Impact Report which is utilized to address the project's cumulative air
quality and circulation impacts. The project was also evaluated in the Zone 20 Program
Environmental Impact Report. The project's direct significant effects include impacts to biological
resources, hazards associated with potential agricultural soil contamination, and paleontological
resources. Environmental mitigation measures are proposed for all of the direct significant
environmental impacts to reduce them to below a level of significance. In addition, the project has
been conditioned to pay its fair share of the Palomar Airport RoadlEl Camino Real intersection
"short-term improvements".
FISCAL IMPACT:
All public facilities required to serve the additional dwelling units will be constructed prior to or concurrent with development as required by the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. Since these :mprovements will be constructed by the developer, no negative fiscal impacts will be incurred by the Xty. As noted above, the applicant will also be responsible for a pro rata share of the cost for short term
jingle family subdivision will increase land values thus creating a positive fiscal impact in the form of
mprovements to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Development of the
ncreased property tax revenues.
1
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 15,498
GROWTH MANAGMENT STATUS:
Facilities Zone
*The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
CFD No. 1 Special Facilities
1.34 dulac Net Density*
3.2 Growth Control Point
20
EXHIBITS:
2. City Council Resolution No. 99-501
1. Ordinance No. NS-519
3. Location Map
4. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626, 4627, and 4628
5. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 6. 1999
6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 6, 1999.
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
2i
21
ORDINANCE NO. NS-519
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030
OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN
AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND
BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
CASE NO.: ZC 98-12
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Section 21.050.30 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being tb
CHANGE, ZC 98-12 FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q AND 0-S ON
zoning map, is amended as shown on the maps marked Exhibits “ZC 98-12” and “LCPA 98-09”
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set
forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4627 and 4628 constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council held on the day of , 1999, and thereafter
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
1
1
'
t - i
E
5
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
day of 1999, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-
PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE
City of Carlsbad according to the official plat thereof, as
Range 4 west, San Bernardino Base and'Meridian, tn the
described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March
1 1, 1997 as file no. 1997-01 06633 of offtcial records.
Property: From:
Zone Change Approvals
A. 215-070-27 L-c
Council Approval Date:
R-1-7.500-QBOS Ordinance No:
Effective Date:
Signature:
To:
4
Attach additional pages if necessary 1
3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 99-501
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND LOCAL COASTAL
PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE
21.87 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED TO THE
NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY
AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN THE ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN
AREA AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE.
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
CASE NO.: ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
SITE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q ON 5.83 ACRES AND 0-S ON
follows:
WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment,
Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal
Development Permit to grade and subdivide 27.7 acres into 22 lots. The Planning Commission
adopted Resolutions 4626,4627, and 4628 recommending to the City Council that the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, and
Local Coastal Program Amendment be approved and adopted Resolutions 4629, 4630, 4631,
and 4632 approving a Tentative Tract Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal
Development Permit ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on 16th day of
,vpmhPr , 1999, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all
persons interested in or opposed to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council after considering all of the testimony added
conditions requiring the project to post signs and disclosures that the trails are open to the
public.
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone
Change 98-12, and Local Coastal Program Amendment 98-09 is approved and that the findings
and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No
4626, 4627, and 4628 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the
findings and conditions of the City Council.
3. That the City Council adds the following conditions with respect to signage
and disclosure of the public trails:
a. Signs will be posted at appropriate locations to indicate the public
nature of the trail to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.
b. That such signs will be posted until all the houses are sold.
c. The fact that the trail is open to the public shall be prominently
displayed in all relevant disclosure documents.
d. The developer shall include a notice on the maps and models in the
sales office in a prominent location indicating the fact that the trail is open to the
public.
4. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial
Review" shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
"The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6. which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be
filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the
date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after
the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings
accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the
estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such
petition may be filed in court is extended to not latter than the thirtieth day
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed
with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad. California 92008."
....
....
....
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1C
11
1I
IS
2c
21
2'
2
2
2
2
2
2
-
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 16th day of November 1999. by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Lewis, Hall, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
I
1 ATTEST:
1
I
(SEAL)
I
I
I
)
I
L
3
4
5
6
7
8 -3-
EXHIBIT 3
ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
ZC 98-1 2/LCPA 98-09
1
‘
L
C -
t
L I
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2s
26
27
28
c
EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4626
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-
Q AND 0-S AND TO SUBDIVIDE 27.7 ACRES INTO 21
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT WITH
21 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN
AVIARA PARKWAY AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: ZC 98-12iLCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-
CASE NO.: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”,
described as
05/HDP 98-21KDP 98-86
That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as
described in Certificate of Compliance record March 11, 1997 as
File No. 1997-0106633 official
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program was prepared in conjunction with said project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program.
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
la
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED’ by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations ?e true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program according to
Exhibit “ND” dated July 29, 1999, and “PII” dated February 21, 1999, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findines:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the environmental impacts
therein identified for this project and any comments, thereon prior to
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and
b. the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines
and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad: and
d. based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Conditions:
1. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of the Roesch Property
Subdivision Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
...
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 4626 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen,
Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4626 -3-
__ City of Carlsbad
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Addresskocation: North of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail
Road in the southwest quadrant within the Zone 20 Specific Plan
area.
Project Description: A Local Coastal Program Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative
Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit
and Coastal Development Permit to change the zoning from
Limited Control (L-C) to One Family ResidentiaUQualified
Ovday Zone/Open Space (R-1-7,5OO-Q/OS) and to subdivide the
27.7 acre parcel into 21 standard single family 7,500+ square foot
lots and one open space lot. Single family homes are also
proposed on each lot.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the
initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1)
revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the
proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment
would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City
that the project “as revised” may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30
days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Anne Hysong in the Planning
Department at (760) 438-1161, extension 4477.
DATED: JULY 29,1999
CASENO: . ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19kIDP 98-21/CDP 98-86/SDP 99-05
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
PUBLISH DATE: JULY 29, 1999
Planning Director
2075 La Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1 161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: ZC 98-12lLCPA 98-09lCT 98-19/HDP 98-21iCDP 98-86lSDP 99-05
DATE: Februarv 2 I. 1999
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Roesch Prouettv
2. APPLICANT: Standard Pacific Homes
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 9335 Chesaueake Drive. San Dieeo,
CA 92123
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED:
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A urouosed Local Coastal F’roeram Amendment and Zone Chanee
to chanee the land use desienation for the site from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family
Residential. 7.500 sauare foot minimum lot size. Oualified Develoument Overlav Zone (R-I-
7.500 -0) and &en Suace (0s) on a 27.7 acre uarcel. Also urouosed is a Tentative Tract Mau to
create 21 residential lots and 1 ouen mace lot. a Site Develoument Plan. Hillside Develoument
Permit. and Coastal Develoument Permit. The uroiect site is located in the southwest auadrant
north of Poinsettia Lane between Black Rail Road and Aviara Parkwav within the boundaries of
the Zone 20 Suecific Plan..
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project.
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Land Use and Planning [XI TransportatiodCirculation
0 Population and Housing [XI Biological Resources
Geological Problems Energy & Mineral Resources
0 Water [XI Hazards
[XI Air Quality 0 Noise
0 Public Services
[XI Cultural Resources
Recreation
u Mandatory Findings of Significance
1 J3 Rev. 03/28/96
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
0
0
0
IXI
17
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation .
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I .find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Mitigated
Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental
Impact Review (MEIR 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review (MEIR 93-01),
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature Date
2 Rev. 03/28/96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
0 A brief explanation is required for all answers except ‘“No Impact” answers that’ are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
0 “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
e “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
0 “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant,
0 Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
k effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
0 When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
0 A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
‘3
/5
Rev. 03/28/96
e If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has ~
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier Em, (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
4 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2: Pgs III-74 - I11 - 87)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 ~ 5.6-18; #2 Pgs 111-74 - In -87)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts
(#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 Pgs I11 -74 - I11 -87)
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 Pgs 111-74 - I11 -
87)
Potentially Significant Impact
0
0
0
0
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2 I11 -
74 - I11 -87)
-, 0
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
populationprojections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 -
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
5.5-6)
housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-112 -
111-1 18; #4)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ((#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2:
Pgs 111-112 - 111-118; #4)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
((#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1.15; #2: Pgs 111-112 - 111-118; #6)
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 -
5.1-15;#2:PgsII1-112-111-118;#4)
e) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2:
Pgs 111-1 12 - 111-1 18; #4)
f, Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#l:Pgs
g) Subsidence ofthe land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs
h) Expansive soils?(#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2: Pgs 111-112
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 -
5.1-1 - 5.i-15; #2: pgs 111-112 - 111 -118; M)
111-1 12 - 111-1 18; #4)
-111-118;#4)
5.1-15;#2Pgs111-112-111-118: #4)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Significant Potentially
Unless Mitigatlon Incorporated
0
0
0
Significant Impact
Less Than No
lmpact
n[XI
0 [XI-
0. [XI
0 om
0 om
0 om
0 o[XI
0 o[XI
0 o[XI
0 om
0 om
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
5 Rev. 03/28/96
"
Issues (and Suppotting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact
Potentially S~gnificant
Unless Mitigation
Incorporated 0
Slgnificant lmpacr
Less Than ho
Impact
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patlems, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? (#l:Pes 5.2-1 - 5.2- 0 om - I I; #5)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
such as flooding? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 I; #5)
oxygenorturbidity)? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 52-11; #5)
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1; #5)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1; #5) 0 Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
capability? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #5)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5. 2-
((#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #5)
11; #5)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies? ((#l:Pgs
5.2-1 - 5.2-1 1)
0
0
0
0
om om
0
0
0
0 om om
OB
0
0
0
0
I7
0 om om om 0
0
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs 5.3-
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1
1 - 5.3-12)
- 5.3-12) 0
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any change in climate? ((#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
d) Create objectionable odors? ((#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
0
0
0 no
0 OB om om 0
VI. TRANSPORTAhONICIRCULATION. Would the
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#l:Pgs
proposal result in:
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69, #7)
curves or daneerous intersections) or incomvatible uses 0
0
0
00 om
I (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 517-1 - 5.7.i2; #2: Pgs
111-58 - 111-69) 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
om om om om
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
(#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22: #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
(#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69)
D Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative (#]:PES 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69)
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
(#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69)
g) Rail, waterhome or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -
5.7.22; #2: Pgs 111-58 - 111-69) 0 0 om
/8
Rev. 03/28/96 6
-
Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Slgnificant Significant S~gnificant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. . Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
animals, and birds? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs III- (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
37 - 111-57; #3)
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
(#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3)
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3)
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2:
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
(#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-58; #3)
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2: Pgs 111-37 - 111-57; #3, #8)
.~
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
(#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 8; 5.13-
1 - 5.13-9)
Result in the loss of availabi!ity of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5
8: 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
0 [XI no
[XI on
o 0 om
0 [XI 00
0
0
0
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals orradiation)? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 -
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
5.10.1-5)
hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.1O:l-1 - 5.10.1-5; #2: Pgs 111-97 -
111-105)
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5; #2: Pgs 0
111-97 - 111-105)
Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 ~ 5.10.1-5)
0
0
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-1 - 5.9-
15: #2: Pes 111-88 - 111-96: #6) 0
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9- .I
1 - 5.9-15; #2: Pgs 111-88 - 111-96; #5) 0
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) 0
om
0 OIXI
0 om
0 om
on
[XI on
n[XI nm
7 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). Potentially
Significant Impact
Potentially Stgiftcant
Mitigation Unless S~gnificant
Less Than
Impact
Impact
NO
I Incorporated 0 0 o
b) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4)
c) Schools? (#l:Pgs 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#l,
e) Other governmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -
0 0 0
0 pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7)
5.12.8-7)
0 0 0
[XI [XI [XI
0 [XI-
XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 &
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
5.13-1 - 5.13-9) o
b) Communications systems? (#l; pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7)
c) -Local or regional water treatment or distribution
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3-7)
e) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8)
f~ Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3) n
0 0
0 0
facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7)
o cl [XI
0 0 [XI
[XI
0 o 0 CI
0 0 0 -
g) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 -
5.12.3-7)
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#I:Pgs
b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (#l:Pgs
c) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2: Pgs
5.11-1-5.11-5;#2:PgsIII-119-III-151) 0
5.11-1-5.11-5;#2:PgsIII-119-III-151)
111-119 - 111-151) CI
0 [XI
[XI
[XI
0
CI
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-
10; #2: Pgs 111-106 - 111-107)
c) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10;#2:
10; #2: Pgs 111-70 - 111-73)
Pgs 111-70 ~ 111-73)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2: Pgs 111-70 - 111-73)
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#l:Pgs
e) Resuict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2: Pgs
111-70 - 111-73)
0
0
0
[XI 0
0
0
0
o
[XI
IXI
[XI
0
cl 0 IXI
XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1 -
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#l:Pgs
5.12.8-7)
5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7) U'
0
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
8
20
Rev. 03/28/96
h
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or resmct the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
prehstory?
examples of the major periods of Califotnia history or
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
9
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Spificanr Significant Slgnificant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mit~eation I Incorporated 0 [XI no
[XI’ 0 on
0 0’ 0 [XI
d/
Rev. 03128196
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analysis of this proposed single family residential project has been completed through
the General Plan Update (GPA 94-01) and related Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR
93-01) , The MEIR is cited as source #1 in the preceding checklist. This proposal is consistent
with the applicable portions of the General Plan and is considered a project that was described
in MER 93-01 as within its scope. All feasible mifigation measures identified in MEIR 93-01
which are appropriate to the project have been incorporated into this project.
The project site is located in an area which is subject to the requirements of the Zone 20
Specific Plan approved by the City Council in 1994. A program EIR was certified for the Zone
20 Specific Plan. The Zone 20 Program EIR identified, analyzed, and recommended mitigation
to reduce potentially significant impacts to insignificant levels. The Zone 20 Program EIR
(PEIR) analyzed potential impacts to agriculture, air quality, biology, circulation, land use,
noise, pesticide residue, paleontology, public facilities financing, soils/geology, and visual
aesthetics that could result from the development of the Specific Plan area. The Program EIR
is intended to be used in the review of subsequent projects within Zone 20. The project
incorporates the required Zone 20 Program EIR mitigation measures, and through the analysis
of the required additional biological, geotechnical, hydrology, and noise analysis a
determination has been made that no additional significant impacts beyond those identified and
mitigated by the Program EIR will result from this project. The following environmental
evaluation briefly explains the basis for this determination along with identifying the source
documents which support the environmental determination. The Zone 20 Program EIR and
additional technical studies are cited as source documents for this environmental evaluation.
10 Rev. 03/28/96
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is approximately 27.7 acres in size and is located at the north of Poinsettia Lane
between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road . The project consists of 21 residential lots with a
minimum lot area of 7,500 square feet and one 21.87 acre open space lot. The site contains
coastal sage scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grasslands, southern willow scrub,
California gnatcatchers, sensitive plant species, and areas which have been used for agriculture.
A total of 27.7 acres of the site are designated as Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM 0-4
DU/AC). The project site is zoned Limited Control (L-C). A zone change and local coastal
program amendment are proposed to designate the site as One-Family Residential, 7,500 square
foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-Q) and Open Space (OS) to
correspond to the existing generai plan land use designations. An irrevocable offer of dedication
will be required over the open space lot. A portion of the residential density from these parcels is
being transferred to the area of the site which is proposed to be developed.
In addition to approval of the tentative map application a hillside development permit and coastal
development permit approval are being requested.
11 Rev. 03/28/96
d3
11. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
B. Environmental Impact Discussion
V. a) Air Quality
The implementation of projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. -
These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic
gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major
contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San
Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considered
cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the
updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures
to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand
Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass
transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is
located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked
“Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City
Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air
quality impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all projects within
the scope of the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further
environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the
Planning Department.
VI. a) TransportatiodCirculation
The implementation of projects that fall within the scope of and are included in the updated 1994
General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to
accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely
impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These
generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad
Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections
are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous
mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures
to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop
alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian
linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when 2
12 Rev. 03/28/96
adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic fiom a failing Interstate or State Highway
onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The
applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been
incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. The
project will be conditioned to.dedicate a segment of the future citywide trail within the western
portion of the site (SDG&E access road), and to pay its fair share of the cost of the Poinsettia
Lane road segment through Zone 20.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the
failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore,
the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required became the
recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a “Statement Of Ovemding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of
Ovemding Considerations” applies to all projects that fall within the scope of the General Plan’s
Master EIR, including this project.
The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report
has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service’’ (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport
Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This
potentially creates a changed circumstance negating reliance on previous environmental
documentation. Pursuant to $15162 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a
“Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded
intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However, case law has
interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the preparation of a “Subsequent
EIR’ if mitigation measures are adopted which reduce the identified impacts to a level of
insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS
into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right turn
lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been
conditioned to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements,” thereby
guaranteeing mitigation to a level of insignificance.
VII. a, c. & d) Biological Resources
The Zone 20 Program EIR identified the mitigation requirement that future site specific
biological survey studies that focus on the impacts created by individual subsequent development
projects be prepared. The additional biological studies are required to consider the baseline data
and biological open space recommendations of the Zone 20 Program EIR and provide more
detailed and current resource surveys. The site specific biological survey is required to identify
mitigation for any project specific impacts.
A report entitled, “Biological Resources Assessment of the Rosech Site Located in the City of
Carlsbad, San Diego County, California,” dated December 8, 1998 by Natural Resource
Consultants has been prepared for the project. In addition, a separate sensitive plant survey on a
portion of the Roesch property has been conducted to analyze the biological impacts associated
with the proposed project grading and fire suppression zones.
13 Rev. 03/28/96
The biology report for the Roesch property determined that implementation of the project would
result in the direct loss of 6.61 acres or approximately 24% of the site including impacts to the
following habitat types and sensitive plant and animal species :
W 5.02 acres of agricultural - less than significant
W 0.0 acre of coastal sage scrub - less than significant
1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral - significant
W 4.98 acre of annual non-native grassland - less than significant
W .28 acres of ruderal - less than significant
W .01 acres of eucalyptus woodlands - less than significant
W approximately 296 white coast ceanothus
W 20 Nuttall's scrub oak
W 1591 square feet of western dichondra
W 484 square feet of ashy spike moss
Based on cumulative data pertaining to the site, it is assumed the site supports two gnatcatcher
pairs within the coastal sage scrub and chaparral areas. The California gnatcatcher observed
onsite were located on the north and south sides of the site within chaparral and coastal sage
scrub vegetation. There will be no impact to its preferred habitat, coastal sage scrub. Indirect
impacts may result in the reduction of the carrying capacity of the native habitats, however, the
patch of habitat onsite is connected to additional habitat offsite.
The proposed plan results in the preservation of approximately 21 acres (76 percent), 14.5 acres
of which are native habitats, in natural open space, including 100% of native grasslands, coastal
sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, and southern willow scrub, and 67% of southern
maritime chaparral. The following onsite impacts associated with implementation of the
proposed development plan are considered significant:
a) Loss of 1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral.
The Roesch property is identified as a standards area within Linkage Area F of the Carlsbad
Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Standards areas require a minimum preservation of 67
percent of coastal sage scrub and 75 percent of gnatcatchers as well as 100% conservation of
narrow endemic species. Additionally, within Zone 20, a goal is established for no net loss of
wetland habitats, southern maritime chaparral, maritime succulent scrub and.coastal sage scrub.
The proposed project meets the standards area conservation requirements outlined by the Draft '
Carlsbad HMP: the project ensures the functioning of preserve linkages due to the preserve
design and native habitats that are contiguous with open space on adjacent parcels is preserved.
Although the project results in the loss of 1.37 acre of southern maritime chaparral, it does not
contain narrow endemic plants and is located to the east of the linkage comdor proposed by the
Roesch project. The project contributes to the preservation of resources and the ultimate
development of the subregional preserve system by contributing open space, a total of 21 acres of
predominately native habitats, in a continuous configuration through Linkage Area F. On an
overall project-level basis, the property is proposed to preserve 76 percent of the site, with the
sensitive native habitats onsite proposed to receive approximately 100 percent preservation
except for southern maritime chaparral. The potential indirect impact to the 2 pair of gnatcatchers
observed onsite resulting from grading activities would be mitigated through direct surveys to
locate active gnatcatcher nests. If nests are present, no grading or removal of habitat may take
place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during the nestinghreeding season (mid-February
through mid-July).
14
46
Rev. 03/28/96
Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the Draft Carlsbad HMP.
Mitigation Measures
The project design mitigates direct impacts to southern maritime chaparral and the sensitive plant
species that occur within this habitat. Included in the project design is the granting of an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad or an acceptable entity for an open
spacekonservation easement over Lot 22 of the tentative map. This covers over 67 percent
(2.79 acres) of the southern maritime chaparral on the Roesch property. This satisfies the 2:l .
mitigation ratio that is typically required by the resource agencies for the impact of southern
maritime chaparral. The open space easement also includes the preservation of 100% of native .
grasslands, coastal sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, southern willow scrub as well as
the majority of wart-stemmed ceanothus, Nuttall's scrub oak, western dichondra, ashy spike
moss, and California gnatcatcher occurring onsite. In addition, the following mitigation
measures will be implemented:
To mitigate potential disturbances to the California gnatcatcher resulting from grading activities,
prior to the commencement of grading activities, direct surveys to locate active gnatcatcher nests
shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If nests are present, no grading or removal of habitat
may take place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during the nestingbreeding season (mid-
February through mid-July).
The Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Developer shall
provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been
approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the
CC&Rs shall contain the following provision:
a. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying maintenance responsibility for
Open Space Lot 22. The CC&Rs shall stipulate that within the boundaries of the
HOA open space easement, structures or any other thing not shown on the
approved tentative map or landscape plans shall be prohibited.
The Developer shall dedicate to the Homeowner's Association on the final map,
an open space maintenance easement over Lot 22 identified on the tentative
map to enable maintenance activities within the easem'ent area including but
not limited to, landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved
tentative map and landscape plans, removal of debris and trash, minimal fire
suppression thinning, and erosion prevention and remediation. A note to
this effect shall be placed on the non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
Removal of native vegetation and development of Open Space Lot(s) 22,
including but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas,
stairways and landscaping, other than that approved as part of the grading plan,
improvement plans, landscape plan, etc. as shown on the project exhibits, is
specifically prohibited, except upon written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department
for fire prevention purposes, or upon written approval of the Planning Director,
based upon a request from the Homeowners Association accompanied by a report
from a qualified arboristhotankt indicating the need to remove specified trees
and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to adjacent habitable 47 15 Rev. 03/28/96
dwelling units. For areas containing native vegetation the report required to
accompany the request shall be prepared by a qualified biologist.
IX. c) and d) Hazards
Agricultural chemicals have previously been used on the site according to the Zone 20 Program
EIR. Because of this prior use there is the potential for soil contamination resulting from the
varying degrees of degradation, prevalence in the environment, and toxicity of the agricultural
chemicals which may have been used. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented .
to lessen this potential impact to a level of less than significant as required by the Zone 20
Program EIR:
1) Prior to approval of the final map or grading plan a detailed soils testing and analysis
report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City Planning
and Engineering Departments as well as the County Department of Environmental Health
for review and approval. Ths report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination
on-site due to historic use, handling, or storage of restricted agricultural chemicals. The
report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any
potentially significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at high
concentrations in the soil. Such mitigation measures shall include, at a minimum:
a. Remove any contaminated soils and haul to a State-certified landfill.
b. Cap the area of soil contamination with materials appropriate for the containment
of the specific type of chemical, taking into account its rate of absorption and
toxicity level.
c. Place the area of soil contamination in an open space easement, with restrictions
on future construction of permanent buildings and human uses. Fencing and
warning signs shall also be installed, where appropriate, prohibiting potential use
of the site.
2) The applicant shall notify, in a manner satisfactory to the City Attorney, all tenantshers
of new development that these areas are subject to dust, pesticides, and odors associated
with adjacent agricultural operations, and that the tenantshsers occupy these areas at their
own risk.
X. b) Noise
A noise study was prepared for the project as required by a mitigation measure identified in the
Zone 20 program EIR. All projects located within 500 feet of existing/future Poinsettia Lane are
required to analyze the projected traffic noise impacts. The acoustical evaluation prepared by
Investigative Science and Engineering concluded that the all noise levels at receptor points
would be below the 670 dBA CNEL threshold established by the City; therefore no mitigation is
required.
In accordance with mitigation required by the Zone 20 EIR, the following condition shall be
applied to the project:
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property 28 16 Rev. 03/28/96
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
XIV. a) Cultural Resources - Paleontology
According to the Zone 20 Program EIR the geologic formations present within the Zone 20
Specific Plan Area have the potential to contain significant fossils. There is a high potential for
the discovery of fossils during future grading and construction activities. The following .
mitigation measures shall be implemented during future grading of the site to reduce potentially
significant impacts on the region’s paleontological resources to an acceptable level:
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to issuance
of a grading permit;
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the
site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils
present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for
laboratory processing through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make
periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process;
c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an
exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts;
d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum;
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of
the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
111. EARLIER ANALYSES USED
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of
Carlsbad Planning Department located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92009,
(760) 438-1 161, extension 4446.
1. “Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan
Update”, (MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department.
2. “Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Zone 20 Specific Plan” (EIR 90-
03), dated June 1992, Brian F. Mooney Associates.
3. “Biological Resources Assessment of the Roesch Site Located in the City of Carlsbad,
San Diego County, California”, dated December 8, 1998, Natural Resource Consultants.
4. “Geotechnical Investigation - Roesch Property” (Job No. 06074-12-02), dated May 4,
1998, Geocon, Inc.
29
17 Rev. 03/28/96
5. “Hydrology Study for Roesch Property in the City of Carlsbad” (W.O. 2240-Os), dated
June 24, 1998, Hunsaker & Associates, Inc.
6. “Standard Pacific Roesch Property Acoustical Study (SE Report #98-035)” dated
December 2, 1998, Investigative Science and Engineering.
7. “1998 Traffic Monitoring Report” for the City of Carlsbad, Valley Research and Planning
Associates.
8. “Draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad” dated
April, 1999.
18
30
Rev. 03/28/96
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
1. The project design mitigates direct impacts to southern maritime chaparral and the
sensitive plant species that occur within this habitat. Included in the project design is the
granting of an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad or an acceptable
entity for an open space/conservation easement over Lot 22 of the tentative map. This
covers over 67 percent (2.79 acres) of the southern maritime chaparral on the Roesch
property. This satisfies the 2:l mitigation ratio that is typically required by the resource
agencies for the impact of southern maritime chaparral. The open space easement also
includes the preservation of 100% of the of native grasslands, coastal sage scrub,
disturbed coastal sage scrub, southern willow scrub, and 2 pair of California gnatcatchers
occurring onsite, and the majority of white coast ceanothus, Nuttall’s scrub oak, western
dichondra, ashy spike moss.
2. To mitigate potential disturbances to the California gnatcatcher resulting from grading
activities, prior to the commencement of grading activities, direct surveys to locate active
gnatcatcher nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If nests are present, no
grading or removal of habitat may take place within 200 feet of active nesting sites during
the nestinghreeding season (mid-February through mid-July).
3. The Developer shall establish a homeowner‘s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provision:
a. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying maintenance responsibility for
Open Space Lot 22. The CC&Rs shall stipulate that within the boundaries of the
HOA open space easement, structures or any other thing not shown on the
approved tentative map or landscape plans shall be prohibited.
4. The Developer shall dedicate to the Homeowner’s Association on the final map, an
open space maintenance easement over Lot 22 identified on the tentative map to
enable maintenance activities within the easement area including but not limited to,
landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved tentative map and
landscape plans, removal of debris and trash, minimal fire suppression thinning,
and erosion prevention and remediation. A note to this effect shall be placed on the
non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
5. Removal of native vegetation and development of Open Space Lot(s) 22, including but
not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways and
landscaping, other than that approved as part of the grading plan, improvement plans,
landscape plan, etc. as shown on the project exhibits, is specifically prohibited, except
upon written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department for fire prevention purposes, or upon
written approval of the Planning Director, based upon a request from the Homeowners
Association accompanied by a report from a qualified arboristmotanist indicating the
need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to
adjacent habitable dwelling units. For areas containing native vegetation the report
required to accompany the request shall be prepared by a qualified biologist.
19
31
Rev. 03/28/96
6. Prior to approval of the final map or grading plan a detailed soils testing and analysis
report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City Planning
and Engineering Departments as well as the County Department of Environmental Health
for review and approval. This report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination
on-site due to historic use, handling, or storage of restricted agricultural chemicals. The
report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any
potentially significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at high
concentrations in the soil. Such mitigation measures shall include, at a minimum:
a. Remove any contaminated soils and haul to a State-certified landfill.
b. . Cap the aka of soil contamination with materials appropriate for the containment
of the specific type of chemical, taking into account its rate of absorption and
toxicity level.
c. Place the area of soil contamination in an open space easement, with restrictions
on future construction of permanent buildings and human uses. Fencing and
waming signs shall also be installed, where appropriate, prohibiting potential use
of the site.
7. The applicant shall notify, in a manner satisfactory to the City Attorney, all tenantsiusers
of new development that these areas are subject to dust, pesticides, and odors associated
with adjacent agricultural operations, and that the tenants/users occupy these areas at their
own risk.
8. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy of the
paleontologist’s report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to issuance
of a grading permit;
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perfom periodic inspections of the
site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils
present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for
laboratory processing through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make
periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process;
c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an
exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts;
d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a
research interest in the materials, such as the SA Diego Natural History Museum;
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist Ad the grading activities of
the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. 34
20 Rev. 03/28/96
c
21
.~
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
33
Rev. 03/28/96
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND
CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
22
39
Rev. 03/28/96
ENVIRONMENTAL MI,. SATION MONITORING CHECKLIL . PAGE 1 OF 5
u I-
C <
- : ? 0 C C <
ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 ..JATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 2 OF 5
m ri
ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 .aATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 3 OF 5
~ -
ENVIRONMENTAL MI1 .-,ATION MONITORING CHECKLIS.. PAGE 4 OF 5
-
if
m C
._ F C C m h
ENVIRONMENTAL MI'). JATION MONITORING CHECKLIS. I PAGE 5 OF 5
.~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
..
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4627
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-
Q AND 0-s ON PROPERTY’GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH
OF POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY
AND BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
CASE NO: ZC 98-12
WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”,
described as
That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to official
plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance record
March 11,1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on
Exhibit “XX” dated October 6, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof, ROESCH
PROPERTY SUBDIVISION, ZC 98-12, provided by Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. $0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the proposed Zone Change from L-C to R-1-7,5OO-Q/O-S is consistent with the
goals and policies of the various elements of the General Plan, in that the proposed
zones replace the L-C Zone which is intended to be an interim zone and are
consistent with the designations required for the property by the Zone 20 Specific
Plan which was found to be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed open
space designation implements various goals and policies of the Open Space and
Conservation Element concerning protection of environmental resources.
That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as
mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use
Element, in that the One Family Residential (R-1-7,500) Zone implements .the
property’s RLM General Plan designation and the Open Space (0-S) Zone is
consistent with the portion of the property designated by the General Plan as OS
and the remainder of the property to be preserved as Open Space by a publicly
dedicated open space easement.
That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general
welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the zone change would
implement the applicable policies of the General Plan.
The Q-Overlay Zone, made a part of the proposed zone change, provides the City’
with discretionary review over the placement of the residential units to assure that
they conform to all applicable regulations.
Conditions:
1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, LCPA 98-09, CT 98-19, SDP
99-05, HDP 98-21, and CDP 98-86. ZC 98-12 is subject to all conditions contained in
Resolutions 4626,4628,4629,4630,4631, and 4632.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feeskxactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
PC RES0 NO. 4627 -2- 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feeskxactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES : Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux,. Nielsen,
Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman
ABSTAIN:
lhiA L
WILLIAM COMPAS, Vice Chaifbmon
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4627 -3-
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LCPA: 98-09
Project Name: Roesch Property Subdivision I Related Case File No(s):
PropertylLegal Description@): ZC 98-12, CT 98-19, HDP 98-21, CDP 98-86, SDP 99.
Being that portion of Section 22. Township 12 south, 05
Range 4 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the
City of Carlsbad according to the official plat thereof, as
described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March 11,
1997 as file no. 1997-01 06633 of official records.
I I Signature:
Attach ddditional pages if necessary
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4628
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE
DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM,
GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO
CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND
BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
CASE NO: LCPA 98-09
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program,
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and
WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a verified
application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property
owned by Ronald L. Roesch, “Owner”, described as
That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to official
plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance record
March 11,1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal
Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit(s) “LCPA 98-09” attached to Planning
Commission Resolution 4627 as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article
15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations of
the California Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of October, 1999, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period for
any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on August 26,
1999 and ending on October 6, 1999, staff shall present to the City Council a
summary of the comments received.
That a note be placed on the LCP zoning map: This property shall not be
subdivided to create more than 4 dwelling unitslacre of net developable land.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION,
LCPA 98-09 based on the following findings, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is
in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies
of the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by
this amendment, in that the project is consistent with applicable policies requiring the
preservation of steep slopes containing coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats
and the reduction of storm water runoff to existing levels.
2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello I1 segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal
Program is required to bring the designations of the City’s General Plan Land Use
Map, Zoning Map (as amended), and Mello I1 Land Use Plan into conformance.
Conditions:
1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and ZC 98-12. LCPA 98-09 is
4621.
subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626 and
PC RES0 NO. 4628 -2-
1
t
,
E
s
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
c 18
19
2a
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 6th day of October, 1999, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES : Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux, Nielsen,
Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
NOES:
ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
46
PC RES0 NO. 4628 -3-
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 5
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIO~
Item No. @
Application complete date: June 21, 1999
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 6,1999 Project Planner: Anne Hysong
Project Engineer: Mike Shirey
SUBJECT: ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-211CDP 98-86 -
ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION - Request for: a) a recommendation of
approval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to
change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential, 7,500
square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open
Space (0-S); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan,
Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single
family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to
the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within
the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management
Plan and the Coastal Zone.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626,4627, and
4628 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12 and LCPA 98-09, and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolutions 4629, 4630, 4631 and 4632 APPROVING CT 98-19, SDP 99-05,
HDP 98-21 and CDP 98-86 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project consists of a Zone Change arid Local Coastal Program Amendment to
rezone the property to' R-I-7500-Q (Qualified Overlay Zone) and 0-S (open space) and various
permits to enable the subdivision and grading of the 27.7 acre vacant parcel into 21 standard
single family lots and one open space lot. The project site is located north of Poinsettia Lane
between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road in the southwest quadrant. The proposed single
family lots occupy approximately 6.5 acres in the southeastern portion of the parcel and the
remaining 21+ acres would be preserved in open space. In accordance with the Hillside
Development and Coastal Development Ordinances, architectural elevations and floor plans are
provided for the single family homes. The applicant proposes to satisfy the project’s
inclusionary housing requirement through the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in the
Villa Loma Affordable Housing Apartment project. As designed and conditioned, the project is
consistent with the General Plan, Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), Mello I1 LCP, Subdivision
Ordinance and relevant Zoning Chapters of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the City’s Draft
Habitat Management Plan.
ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
Paee 2
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project site consists of 27.7 acres of vacant, partially cultivated land which is bounded on the
north and east by the Mariano and Ocean Bluff subdivisions and to the west by the Samhi
subdivision. The southeastern comer of the site is approximately 500 feet north of the newly
completed segment of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road. The
parcel falls in elevation from east to west from approximately 316’ to 180’ along the northern
boundary and from 290’ to 230’ along the southern boundary. The site drains to the north
through a north-south natural drainage course created by steep slopes that form a canyon within
the western portion of the site. A major 150’ wide north-south power line easement is also
within the canyon. The site contains native habitats including native grasslands and southern
willow scrub, as well as coastal sage scrub and southern maritime chaparral on steep slope areas.
Two California gnatcatcher pairs occupy the site. All of the native habitats would he preserved
by the proposed development except for 1.37 of the 4.16 acres of southern maritime chaparral.
The property is designated by the General Plan for RLM (Residential Low-Medium) density
development and OS (Open Space) and zoned Limited Control (L-C). The parcel is regulated by
the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Mello I1 LCP which require the site to he rezoned to One Family
ResidentialiQualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) to implement the RLM General Plan
designation. Therefore, the portion of the site proposed for development would he rezoned to R-
1-7,500-4 and the remainder of the site is proposed to he rezoned to OS.
The proposed project would disturb approximately 6.5 of the 27.7 acres to enable the
development of 21 standard single family lots ranging in size from 7,534 square feet to 16,274
square feet and one 21.87 acre open space lot. The site consists of 18.4 net developable acres,
and the proposed project density including the 3.7 dwelling unit affordable housing requirement
for a total of 24.7 units is 1.34 dwelling unitdacre. In accordance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan
and the Zone 20 EIR prefemed biological mitigation, the proposed development would preserve
the northern and western portions of the site in open space due to biological constraints and the
need for open space connectivity through the Zone 20 Specific Plan area. The site is also
designated as a standards area by the City’s Draft Habitat Management Plan which requires that
67% of the site he preserved to enable the connection of habitat preserve areas to the east and
north. The open space includes a 150’ wide SDG&E easement in which an existing access road
would also function as a public trail through the property.
The proposed single family lots are located in the southeastern portion of the property where they
would receive vehicular access from Brigantine Drive, a local street that intersects Poinsettia
Lane and also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff Subdivision (Cantamar). As shown on
Exhibit “B”, the subdivision design consists of a dual cul-de-sac at the terminus of Regatta Road.
Lots along the eastern property line abut single family lots in the Ocean Bluff project, and the
remaining lots abut open space to the north, south, and west. Drainage from the development
would flow through storm drains to the southern boundary of the site where a riprap energy
dissipator would reduce the rate of flow to existing levels.
Four single family two-story floor plans are proposed, each with three different facade treatments
and a maximum height of 30 feet. Units range in size from 2,720 square feet to 3,353 square 48
ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT %-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
Page 3
feet. Plan 1 is proposed with a two car garage, Plan 2 with a three car garage, and Plans 3 and 4
with a two car garage plus an optional one car tandem garage.
The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans, ordinances and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use
Designations;
Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP203);
Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20 (Subdivision Ordinance)
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) including:
1. Chapter 2 1.10 - One Family Residential Zone
2. Chapter 21.06 - Qualified Overlay Zone
3. Chapter 21.33 - Open Space
4. Chapter 21.85 - Inclusionary Housing
5. Chapter 21.95 - Hillside Development Regulations;
6. Chapters 21.201, 21.202 - Coastal Development Permit Procedures and Coastal
Resource Protection Overlay Zone
Growth Management - Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan.
IV. ANALYSIS
The'recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with <he applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of the regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables.
A. General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The table
below indicates how the project complies with the elements of the General Plan which are
particularly relevant to this proposal.
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Land Use Proposed residential density of 1.34 dwelling unitshet acre in the RLM
designation is within the allowed density range of 0 - 4 ddacre and
consistent with the growth control point of 3.2 ddacre. Project density is
based on 24.7 total units (affordable and market rate)/18.4 net developable
ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6. 1999
Page 4
shown on the tentative map or included as conditions of approval.
B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203)
The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties
within its boundaries to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and
community amenities for future residents. The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires project
compliance with all applicable land use plans, policies, and ordinances, except as modified by
the Specific Plan. The following discussion describes the proposed project’s conformance with
the relevant Specific Plan regulations which include Affordable Housing, Land Use (General
Plan, Zoning, Development Standards, and the Mello I1 LCP), and Open Space preservation.
Affordable Housing
The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires compliance with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
(Chapter 21.85) requiring that 15% of the total number of proposed units are made affordable to
low income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for the proposed 21 lot
‘subdivision is 3.7 dwelling units. When feasible, the affordable units are required to be
constructed onsite, however, the purchase of housing credits in an offsite combined inclusionary
project within the same quadrant may be approved by the City Council. Since it would not be
feasible to construct inclusionary units onsite due to the limited number of lots proposed, the
project is proposing to purchase 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable
Apartment project located in the southwest quadrant.
CirculationlODen SDace/Traik/Land Use
The project is located within Area C of the Specific Plan. Projects within Area C are required to
receive.vehicular access from local streets intersecting with Poinsettia Lane, a recently completed
two lane roadway, at specified locations. In conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan, the
proposed project would receive access from Poinsettia Lane via Brigantine Drive, an approved
intersecting street, which also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff project. The Zone 20
Specific Plan requires the project to preserve the constrained lands, including the SDG&E 3-0
- -
ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
Paee 5
easement and 25% - 40% slopes, in open space. The proposed project exceeds this requirement
through preservation of 76% of the site in open space.
The Specific Plan requires that the site be rezoned from L-C to R-1-7,500 allowing single family
development at the density permitted by the RLM General Plan designation (0 - 4 dwelling
unitdacre). Since 21.87 acres of the site are proposed for open space, the proposed zoning also
includes the 0-S Zone. The Q (Qualified Overlay) zone is proposed to be added to the R-l-
7,500 zoning consistent with previous Zone 20 approvals. The Q zone requires approval of a site
development plan which includes architectural elevations, floor plans, and building footprints.
The proposed zoning, preservation of open space including a trail segment, structures and
architecture is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan architectural guidelines as specified in
the following table:
Open Space 1. Preserve areas constrained
by steep slopes and SDG&E
easement
2. Trail segment through
SDG&E easement
Variety of
1. Roof, wall and accent
materials and colors
2. Roof heights and masses
3. Window and Door
enhancement
4. Garage designs, facades, and
orientations
5. Articulated building forms
PROPOSED
5.83 Acres - R-1-7,500-C
21.87 Acres - 0-S
1. Preserve 2 1.87 acres
including all constrained
lands, i.e. steep slopes,
SDG&E easement,
sensitive habitats and
HMP wildlife corridor
2. Dedication of public
Trail Segment 3 1.
1 .Nine exterior color
schemes for wall, trim an(
accent
2.Multiple roof linedone
and two story elements
3. Recessed entries, doors
windows
4. Two and three car
garages, single and dual
door designs
5. Multiple building
planes, multi-level roofs,
one and two story
elements, balcony decks
C. Mello I1 Local Coastal Program (LCP)
The project is located within and subject to the Mello I1 LCP segment and is designated for
residential low medium (RLM) density land use and Limited Control (L-C) zoning. Although
the Mello I1 Land Use Plan is consistent with the subject parcel’s RLM General Plan A-/
ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09iCT 98-19/SDP 99-05bIDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
Page 6
designation, the implementing zone (L-C) specified by the Mello I1 LCP is not consistent with
the proposed zone change to R-1-7,500-Q and Open Space. Since the California Coastal Act
specifies that all rezonings related to land use regulation or administration within the coastal
zone, which occur after the certification of a local government’s local coastal program, require a
LCP amendment in order to be effective, the project includes a Local Coastal Program
Amendment to change the implementing zone from L-C to R-1-7,500-Q for the proposed
developed area and Open Space (0-S) for the preserve area.
The project is consistent with Mello I1 LCP policies limiting grading to the summer season
(April - October) and preservation of steep slopes (25%+) possessing coastal sage scrub and
chaparral plant communities (dual criteria). The project is conditioned to restrict grading of the
site to the summer season, and proposed grading avoids all of the coastal sage scrub habitat and
encroaches into 6.6% of the chaparral habitat existing on dual criteria slopes. The Mello I1 LCP
permits an encroachment of up to 10% to enable reasonable use of a property. Of the total 27.87
acres, the project proposes to disturb only 6.5 acres although there are other developable areas
existing on the site. Approximately 16 acres contain sensitive habitat (coastal sage scrub,
southern maritime chaparral, native grassland, and wetland) and the project proposes to disturb
only 1.37 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The proposed density is 34 units below the
density permitted by the General Plan and total avoidance of dual criteria slopes would result in
the loss of 6 of the proposed 21 lots. An alternate design utilizing the developable acreage to the
north would result in equal or greater impacts to sensitive vegetation than is proposed and disrupt
the habitat corridor. Therefore, the proposed encroachment would enable reasonable
development of the property with 21 single family lots on approximately 6 acres, while
preserving 76% of the site (21.87 acres) containing the majority of steep slopes and sensitive
habit existing on the site. This preserved area will be part of a habitat corridor that provides a
linkage to open space through and adjacent to the Zone 20 Specific Plan area in accordance with
the City’s draft HMP.
Mello I1 hydrology standards require the drainage system to be designed to ensure that runoff
resulting from a 10 year frequency storm of 6, hours and 24 hours duration under developed
conditions, are less than or equal to the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration
under existing conditions. The project has been designed so that the minimal additional runoff
from the project beyond existing conditions is considered insignificant.
D. Subdivision Ordinance
The proposed tentative map complies with the requirements of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance,
Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The subdivision will not conflict with any easements
for access through or use of the property. The project is designed to take advantage of natural
heating and cooling opportunities in that lots and structures are primarily oriented in an east-west
alignment maximizing southern exposure and benefit of prevailing breezes. Primary access to
the property would be provided by Brigantine Drive via Poinsettia Lane, a circulation arterial
roadway. The proposed cul-de-sac conforms to the City’s cul-de-sac policy thereby negating a
secondary access requirement. The proposed local public streets have adequate public right-of-
way and would be constructed by the developer to full public street width standards with curb,
gutters, sidewalks, fire hydrants, and underground utilities in accordance with City standards.
h.
ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05mDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
The proposed street system is therefore adequate to handle the project’s pedestrian and vehicular
traffic and accommodate emergency vehicles.
To reduce drainage impacts from the project site, the developer is required to provide adequate
drainage and erosion control. The drainage requirements of Specific Plan 203, City ordinances,
and Mello I1 have been considered and appropriate drainage facilities have been designed and
secured. In addition to City standards and compliance with the City’s Master Drainage Plan,
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to prevent
any discharge violations.
E11213. Chapter 21.10 - R-1 (One Family Residential 2one)lChapter 21.06 -
Q (Qualified Overlay Zone)/Chapter 21.33 - 0-S (Open Space)
As shown on the following table, the project meets or exceeds the R-1 zone standards with
regard to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, and building height. Although the proposed project
is a standard single family subdivision which would not require Planning Commission approval
of the actual single family units, the Q zone requires the approval of a site development plan
including building footprints and architectural elevations to ensure that the proposed units are
consistent with the R-1 zone standards. This enables the Planning Commission to make the
necessary findings that the project will not adversely impact the site or surrounding uses and that
the site is adequate to accommodate the proposed use.
Front: Minimum 20’
Side: 10% of Lot Width - 10’ Minimum
Lot 22 of the proposed project consists of 21.87 acres to be dedicated as an open space easement
that will be incorporated into the HMP, upon its adoption, as part of the City’s habitat preserve
areas. The rezoning of this portion of Lot 22 to 0-S is consistent with the Open Space Zone
(Chapter 21.33). The 0-S zone is consistent with the portion of the site already designated as
General Plan Open Space and the future re-designation of the remainder of the open space lot to
General Plan Open Space.
E4. Chapter 21 35 - Inclusionary Housing
See discussion under B. Zone 20 Specific Plan - Affordable Housing above.
3-3
ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09iCT 98-19iSDP 99-05/HDP 98-2liCDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
Page 8
E5/6. Chapter 21.95 - Hillside Development Regulationsichapter 21.203 - Coastal Resource
Protection Overlay Zone
The proposed project is consistent with the applicable Hillside Development Ordinance
restrictions for development of steep slopes, slope height, grading volumes, slope screening and
slope setbacks. The development is planned for areas of the site that are predominately 0 -15 %
slopes. The project will disturb small areas of natural slopes exceeding 40%, however, the area
of disturbance does not meet all the criteria necessary to prohibit development by the Hillside
Ordinance. Proposed grading volumes of 7,620 cubic yardsiacre are within the acceptable range
and manufactured slope heights are well below the 40’ maximum allowed. Manufactured slopes
will be screened by a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover and structures will be
setback a minimum of 15’ from the top of slopes.
As discussed under Section C above, slopes exceeding 25% in the coastal zone possessing
coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats (dual criteria) are also protected from disturbance. The
proposed disturbance consists of 6.6% of the .southem maritime chaparral habitat existing on
steep slopes. Disturbance of up to 10% is permitted to enable reasonable use of the property.
The proposed development, which is limited to the southeast comer of the parcel, is reasonable
since it utilizes the most developable and accessible area of the property preservation of 76% of
the site including the majority of steep slopes and sensitive habitat existing on the site, would
result from the proposed subdivision design.
F. Growth Management
he proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 20 in the southwest
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance
with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table E below.
Table E: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
* The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09iCT Y8-l9/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21KDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The initial study (EIA-Part 11) prepared in conjunction with this project determined that some of
the environmental effects which are peculiar to the property or to this project are considered
significant and adverse impacts. The developer has agreed to add mitigation measures to fhe
project to reduce those adverse effects to below a level of significance in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project’s direct
significant effects include impacts to biological resources, paleontological resources, and traffic
impacts. The project site possesses several sensitive habitats. The wildlife agencies have
reviewed the project and concur with proposed biological mitigation measures. The
environmental documents for the project were sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation in
addition to being sent directly to the area offices of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
California Department of Fish and Game. The comments from the wildlife agencies have been
incorporated into the required mitigation measures. Mitigation measures are also proposed for
the other significant adverse effects and are also listed in the EIA-Part 11. The project is within
the scope of the City’s Master Environmental Impact Report which is utilized to address the
project’s cumulative air quality and circulation impacts. The City has received its annual Growth
Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection
“level of service” (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR)
during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance
negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to 915162 of the CEQA
Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent” environmental documentation if
substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded intersection failure) determines that a changed
circumstance exists. However, case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to
not require the preparation of a “Subsequent EIR” if mitigation measures are adopted which
reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance.
A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS
into’the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right tum
lanes-northbound’to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been conditioned
to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements” thereby, guaranteeing
mitigation to a level of insignificance.
In consideration of the foregoing, on July 29, 1999 the Planning Director issued a Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the proposed project.
ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09KT ~8-19iSDP 99-0S/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-80 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION
October 6, 1999
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4626 (Mit. Neg. Dec.)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4627 (ZC)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4728 (LCPA)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4729 (CT)
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4730 (SDP)
6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4731 (HDP)
7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4732 (CDP)
8. Location Map
9. Background Data Sheet
10. Disclosure Statement
11. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
12. Reduced Exhibits
13. Full Size Exhibits “A” - “AA” dated October 6, 1999
AHChmh
-
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: ZC 98-12iLCPA 98-09iCT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21iCDP 98-86
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
APPLICANT: STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Zone Chanee and Local Coastal Promam Amendment to
change zoning from Limited Control IL-C) to One-Family Residential. 7.500 sauare foot minimum lot
size, Oualified Overlav Zone (R-1-7500-01 and Open Space (OS): and a Tentative Tract Mau. Hillside
Develoument Permit, and Coastal Develoument Permit to subdivide 21 sinele familv lots and one ouen
suace lot on a 27.7 acre uarcel located in the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parhav and Black
Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Manaeement Pian and
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Section 22. Township 12 South. Ranee 4 West. San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Dieeo, State of California,
according to official plat thereof. as described in Certificate of Comuliance record March 11. 1997 as
File No. 1997-0106633 official.
APN 215-070-27 Acres: 27.7 ProposedNo. of LotsiUnits: 22 Lotsi21 Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLWOS
Density Allowed: 0 - 4 DdAcre - 3.2 DdAcre GCP Density Proposed: 3.2 DdAcre
Existing Zone: L-C Proposed Zone: R-1-7.500-0/0-S
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
a General Plan Current Land Use
Site L-c RLM Vacant
North R-1-7500 RLM Vacant
South L-c RLM VacandAgric
East R-1-7,500-Q RLM Single Family
West R-1-10-Q RLM Vacant
Residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 21
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: Seutember 30. 1998
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued Julv 29. 1999
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
0 Other,
3-7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Appl~cant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require;
discretionary action on the part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee. 1
The following informarion MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project can1101
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defmed as "Any individual. fm, co-parmersbip, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal
organization. corporation, estate, mst, receiver, syndicate. in this and any other county, city and county. cit)
municipality, disnict or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
provided below.
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propem owner must be
I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or uannershia. include the
names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE VIA) 1X THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation. include the
names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page ma!' he attached if
necessary.)
Person Standard Pacific Corp CorplPan N/lb
Title npv-1 nn~r a Delaware Corporation Title
Address 9335 Chesapeake Drive Address San Diego, CA 92123
_I -. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addiesses of persons having any ownership
interest in the propeny involved. Also. provide the nature of the legal ownership (ix.
partnership. tenants in common. non-profit. corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or PartnershiD. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES.
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Ronald L. Roesch Corp/Pan N/A
Title .:. CLCJScPfilLf;' P,rr,7:--nrl~ Owner. bZRR"L.i-ed man Title
Address- N-i 1-8 Address
Santa Monica CA 90405
*. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cir\ staff.
Boards. Commissions. COmmiKeeS and/or Council within the past twelve (11) months?
Yes No Ifyes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessav,
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
Signature of ownerldate
Ronald L. Roesch Gregg Linhoff
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicanr
For: Standard Pacific Corp.
A Delaware Corporation
rlapplicant's agent if applicable/d&
n h Associates for
Prm or type name of owner/applicant's agenr
Standard Pacific Corp.
5-9
H 4DMIN'.COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
-~ -
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: RLMiOS
ZONING: R-1-7500-0
DEVELOPER’S NAME: STANDARD PACIFIC CORP.
ADDRESS: 9335 CHESAPEAKE DRIVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
PHONE NO.: [619) 292-2200 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 215-070-27
QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 27.7 ACRES/:!] DU’S
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: UNKNOWN
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 73 sa. ft
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 38.94 sa. ft.
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 2 1 EDU
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .15 acres
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 54.88 CFS
Identify Drainage Basin = Basin C
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 210ADT
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 5
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 21.87 Acres
I. Schools: CUSD
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 21 EDU
Identify Sub Basin = NIA
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD = 4.620 GPD
L. The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
60
..-. ,., ..
........
i ~: ,. , .
.
. .. .... . ~. . ,
i ' 1'"
' , ... '
' , i.
.. .. .
,. ..
-. . ." .. .. .. ~.
- .. ... .~
.. . "-" "
c
Fa
,'
.
."_
? ;-
;
-
z < -1 P
.-
"-
" "
.
!
.i! " c e Y -1
1"
0 PI
a
a
.2 w 70
0
tl
i==
m < Lu m
0 d
73
b L:
p
t
0 d
75
/-.
-r-
-7 "-
c
c
n < 0 v
0 d
77
+ t
"
. . . .. c
0 d
-
PLANNING COMMISSION
~-
DRAFT EXHIBIT 6 October 6, 1999 Page 11
6. ZC 98-121LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-051HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY
SUBDIVISION - Reauest for: a) a recommendation of aDDroval for a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change ani Local Coastal
Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential,
7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit,
and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single family lots and residences and one open space lot
on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black
Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management
Plan and the Coastal Zone.
Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne, stated that item #6 contains a number of requests, both
legislative and quasi-judicial, to allow the subdivision of the Roesch Property, which is located in Zone 20.
Mr. Wayne stated that there were several permits in this item. All of the quasi-judicial permits are final
here and are conditioned upon the legislative action. The Planning Commission's action on the Zone
Change and LCP Amendment is a recommendation to the City Council for final action on the remaining
items. Mr. Wayne announced that Associate Planner, Anne Hysong. would make the presentation.
Associate Planner, Anne Hysong explained that the Roesch Project is a residential single family lot
subdivision, proposed on a 27.7 acre parcel located within the Zone 20 Specific Plan area in the
southwest quadrant. The property is designated by the General Plan for residential low medium (RLM)
density development and open space. The project site is located north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara
Parkway and Black Rail Road. The site is currently vacant and previously cultivated. It is a Hillside
parcel, which falls in elevation from east to west approximately 136 feet along the property's northern
boundary and 60 feet along the property's southern boundary. The northern and western portions of the
site contain steep slopes, a natural drainage course, a SDG&E easement, and sensitive plant and animal species and habitats, including coastal sage scrub, maritime chaparral and native grass land.
species) existing on site will be preserved, except for 1.37 of the 4.16 acres of chaparral existing on the
Ms. Hysong continued, stating that all of the sensitive and threatened habitats, (plant species and animal.
consists of one 21.87-acre open space lot. 21 single-family homes are proposed with four floor plans, site. The project consists of 21 standard single family lots, which all exceed 7,534 square feet. It also
each with three different faqade treatments. The units range in size from 2,720 square feet to 3,353
square feet.
Ms Hysong stated that the proposed project preserves 76% of the site in open space. The open space
has been designated by the HMP as a hardline open space area. The project also consists of a SDG&E
easement, which will have a trail segment through it from north to south. The applicant is requesting the
Planning Commission's approval for the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma
project to satisfy its inclusionary housing requirement.
The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a zone change, local
coastal program amendment and a mitigated negative declaration and approve a tentative tract map, site
development plan, hillside development permit and coastal development permit. The project is subject to
and consistent with the following city polices and plans: the General Plan, the Zone 20 Specific Plan
requirements for land use, open space preservation. public safety and aesthetics, the Mello II LCP policies
and implementing ordinances and the lnclusionary Housing ordinance, Hillside Development, Growth Management and Subdivision ordinances, as well as the drafl HMP.
residential subdivision is consistent with the property's residential low-medium density (RLM) general plan Ms. Hysong explained that the proposed density of 1.34 dwelling units per acre for the single-family
designation. The proposed 21.87 acre open space lot is consistent with the underlying open space
designation occurring on a portion of the open space lot. The proposed rezoning of the property from LC
designations.
limited control to R-1-7500 Q and 0-S is consistent with the RLM and Open Space General Plan
79
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 12
Continuing Ms Hysong, noted that the project is consistent with all of the Zone 20 Specific Plan requirements, including the proposed R-1-7500 zoning, the architectural guidelines, access from
Poinsettia Lane via Brigantine Drive, the preservation of steep slopes and sensitive habitat in open space
and the dedication of the trail segment. The project is also consistent with the Mello II LCP policies and
implementing ordinances. The project will preserve the majority of dual criteria slopes, called for in the
Mello II LCP, as well as provide adequate drainage system to avoid increased run off. The project is
consistent with the Hillside Development regulations since manufactured slope heights are less than 40
feet, the dual criteria slopes are preserved, and the grading volume is within the acceptable range.
Ms. Hysong stated that, the environmental assessment performed for the Roesch project revealed those
20 EIR and the Cityk MEIR, would require mitigation. These include a requirement for direct gnatcatchers
additional potentially significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed and mitigated by the Zone
surveys prior to grading, the granting of an open space conservation and HOA maintenance easement
over the open space (Lot 22), soils testing and analysis and the payment of the fees for the short term
improvements to Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real intersection.
In summary, Ms. Hysong affirmed that Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Carlsbad
Tract CT 98-19, Site Development Plan 99-05, Hillside Development Permit 98-21 and Coastal
Development Permit 98-86. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of Zone Change 98-12, Local Coastal Program Amendment 98-09 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Ms. Hysong mentioned the Errata sheet that indicated corrections. to the Staff Report and Resolutions,
which includes a revision to condition #21.
Commissioner Segall wanted to know if the applicant agrees with the Errata sheet that was presented
Ms. Hysong stated that the applicant wanted to discuss condition #21
Commissioner Segall referred to page 6 of the Staff report: That the project was designed to take
advantage of the natural heating and cooling opportunities in the lots and structures which are primarily
orientated east and west. He requested a clarification of the aforementioned.
Ms. Hysong stated that the majority of the lots were oriented in an east and west direction. In addition to
that because of the low density of the project and the distances between structures that requirement is
satisfied. EasVwest means through the project side to side and in some cases front to rear. In general
this statement is made in single family subdivisions.
Commissioner Segall informed Ms. Hysong that the exhibits in the Staff Report were difficult to see and
wanted to know about the rear and side elevations. He wanted to know if these areas are enhanced
Ms. Hysong stated that there was a great deal of enhanced window treatment.
Vice-Chairperson Compas requested the applicant to speak.
Representing the applicant was Jack Henthorn, 5375 Avenida Encinas - Suite D, Carlsbad. Mr. Henthorn
work through the process painlessly. He thanked the Staff and revealed that they had provided valuable
stated that they have been working with the wildlife agencies and believed they have discovered a way to
input in to the design efforts on the site. Mr. Henthorn explained that he has reviewed the staff report and recommendations including the errata sheet and the modification to condition #21. He requested that the
the modifications to condition #21 of Resolution 4629 represented a departure from the conditions
Planning Commission take action as recommended by Staff. He requested that the minutes reflect that
previously approved on developments of a similar type within the Zone.
Commissioner Segall asked how the condition deviated from previous similar projects.
that the intent was never to saddle the private developer with the liability for public utilization of a trail. A Mr. Henthorn explained that in reviewing Zone 20 specific plan and the evolution of the plan, it was clear
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6, 1999 Page 13
trail in other development projects was built, constructed, maintained and it was available to the residents
of that development until such time that the City enacted their trails program and thereby accepted
maintenance and liability responsibility for the public utilization of that trail while it was on private property.
This condition appears to eliminate that. Every other project that the Planning Commission has
recommended for approval has a condition that does not require the developer to accept liability for the
general public use of the trail system.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Jane Zappen, 1485 Turquoise Drive, Carlsbad, expressed that the maps did not show where everything is
going to happen. She wanted to see a map that indicates where the affordable housing would be located.
Sam Zappen, 1485 Turquoise Drive, Carlsbad, stated that he felt the presentation photograph showing
that area was old and did not actually show how the area looked today. The photograph did not show the
many homes that had been built in the area. Mr. Zappen expressed that he thought the photograph was
at best 10 years old.
Vice-Chairperson Compas stated that a current map was available and that the Commission was very
aware of the homes that had been built in the area.
Mr. Zappen, went on to say that a number of expensive homes had been built in the area and he wanted
to make sure that the Planning Commission did things in the area with the interest of the existing home owners and the value of their property in mind. The politically correct format might be affordable property,
but he felt it was a minor portion of the area and did not want property values decreased.
Jack Henthorn explained that the affordable housing proposal did not include low income housing within
the project. The grading on the photograph represents an in-construction photograph that is one and a
half years old. It is anticipated that the beginning prices on the homes will be in access of Cantamar or
Mar Brisa.
Vice-chairman Compas closed public testimony.
Ms. Hysong stated that the project is compatible with the surrounding single family development. It is a standard single family subdivision with ample open space that buffers it from most of the other
developments.
Commissioner Trigas stated that it appeared to be a quality project and was impressed with the
architectural design. She feels that the development will do wonders for the area.
Commissioner Segall concurred with Commissioner Trigas’ comments regarding the high quality of the
clarification on the revision to condition #21, how it would impact the applicant and who would bear the
project. He noted that only a small portion of the plot area would be developed. He did however want
liability.
Mr. Wayne explained that the City adopted a Trails Plan requiring the dedication of trails. There was no
the trails to be bonded for. Relying on experiences of the past it was ascertained there were a great deal mechanism in place to pay for the construction and maintenance of the trails. The first step was to allow
of problems related to putting in trails later. Putting the matter before the City Council, the City Council
agreed, and wanted a standard condition put into place, that required the construction of the trail
the City accepted dedication. When this was put before the California Coastal Commission, the CCC said
immediately with the final map. Then the trail could be maintained as a private trail, until as such time as
this was not acceptable in the coastal zone. There are public access requirements in the Coastal Act and
therefore, they started adding modifications to LCP Amendments with respect to the requirement for trails
and for those trails to be accessible by the public. Mr. Henthorn is correct in stating that we have been
inconsistent, but the inconsistency is an evolutionary one. It is our interpretation that the Zone 20 plan,
which coordinates public access or trail systems through the specific plan area states that the trails are
not just for the use by residents of a particular subdivision. We are now trying to consistently add the
condition that requires these that are in the coastal zone to be public trails from the beginning. Mr. Wayne
81
PLANNING COMMISSION October 6,1999 Page 14
stated that he had firsthand knowledge, because he lived in an area that had public access trails. It was
easy to get insurance and there was small impact on the homeowners' fee. We are now consistently adding this condition to coastal zone public trails.
Commissioner Segall wanted to know if the issue of liability could be covered by an insurance policy.
Mr. Wayne explained that ultimately the Citywide trail system will be covered under some type of lighting
and landscape district or other similar mechanism. It therefore might have another management entity.
The wording was negotiated with the California Coastal Commission. It first appeared in the Poinsettia
Property Specific Plan.
Assistant City Attorney asserted that it was required by the California Coastal Commission and the City of
Carlsbad. had no choice.
Commission Trigas asked if the wording would be in future projects in the coastal zone.
Mr. Wayne acknowledged that this wording would be in all projects related to the coastal zone
Commissioner Welshons complimented Ms. Hysong on an excellent presentation
Vice-Chairperson Compas concurred with Ms. Welshons in regards to Ms. Hysong presentation
MOTION: Motion by Commission Welshons, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626, 4627 and 4628
Recommending Approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12 and LCPA 98-09 and adopt
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4629, 4630, 4631, and 4632 approving CT
to the conditions contained therein, plus the memorandum provided dated
98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21 and CDP 98-86 based on the findings and subject
October 6, 1999.
VOTE: 6-0
AYES; NOES:
Compas, L'Heureux, Segall, Trigas, Welshons. Nielsen
ABSTAIN:
None
None
Public hearing closed by Vice-Chairperson Compas
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of
eighteen years and not a party to or interested in
the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have
been adjudged newspapers of general
circulation by the Superior Court of the County of
San Diego, State of California, for the cities of
Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach
and San Diego County; that the notice of which
the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not
smaller than nonpareil), has been published in
each regular and entire issue of said newspaper
and not in any supplement thereof on the
following dates, to-wit:
November 5, 1999
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at san MARCOS , California
this
of
5th
Nw. 1999
day
~ Signature'
This space is ror the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Notice of Public HEarinq
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION ZC98-1 ULCPA 96-09 -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you. because your interest may affected. that me City Council d the City of Carlsbad will hold a wblic hearin0 at me Ci Council Chambers. 1204 Carisbad Village Drive. ~~~ ~ ~~ :arbbad, Cahrnia. at 6:OO p.m.. on Tuesdiy, November 16, 18&. lo conslder appmvai of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mmgation Monitoring and ~swnino Pmoram. Zone Chanoe and Local Ccfslal Prwram Amendment to :h&gi &initr& Limited Coiml (L-C) to One Family ResMenaal7,SOO square faat minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-0) and Open Smce 10-51. for 21 Sinole fsmilv Id8 and residences and one open space lot
3" a 27.7 &re prcel lhed @.me north of Poinsenla Lane bmeen Amara Parkway and Black Rail Road within boundaries of the Zone 20 Spsok Plan and Local Facilities Manaaement Plan and me Coastal Zone and more
particularly described as:
That pomon of Sedan 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West. San Bernardino
Bas and Meridian. in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sen Dlego. state d Cdilomia, anording to oflicial plat thereol. as described In CenWe d Compliance recorded March 11, 1897. as File No. 1887-0106633 ofliciai.
Those persons wishirg to speak on this proposal are cardially invited to anend lhe public hearing. Copies of me stan repon will be available on or aner November 12,1953. n you have any quesnons regarding this maner. pleas contact Anne Hysang in the Clty 01 Carisbad Planning Depament at (760) 438-1161, extenskn4477.
If you challenge me Mnlgated Negative Declaration. Mitlgatlon Monitoring
you may be limited to raking only mOse ishues you or someMe else raIM and Reponing Program, Zone Change. and/or LDcal Coastal Program in mu*.
at the public hearing described In this notice or In wrinen correspondence delivered to the Cl of Carlsbad Mnce d the City Clerk et, or Mor to. the public hearing.
~r~ ~.~
CITY OF CARSBAD CITY COUNCIL APPLICAW. STANDARD PACIFIC CORP
-% @
Led 64686 November 5. 1953
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising '
...
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
M
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m., on Tuesday, November 16, 1999, to
consider approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited
Control (L-C) to One Family Residential 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay
Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S), for 21 single family lots and residences and one open
space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway
and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities
Management Plan and the Coastal Zone and more particularly described as:
That portion of Section 22, Township I2 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, as
described in Certificate of Compliance recorded March 11, 1997,
as File No. 1997-0106633 official.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after November 12, 1999. If you have
any questions regarding this matter, please contact Anne Hysong in the City of Carlsbad
Planning Department at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4477.
If you challenge the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Zone Change, and/or Local Coastal Program in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad Office of the City Clerk at, or prior to,
the public hearing.
APPLICANT: STANDARD PACIFIC COW.
PUBLISH: NOVEMBER 5,1999
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
" @
.
ROESCH PROPERTY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
. ZC 98-1 2ILCPA 98-09
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached arc the materlals necessary for you to notice
zc 98-12/LCPA 98-09 - Roesch Property Subdivision
for a publlc hearing before the Clty Council.
Please notice the iten for the Council meeting of First Available Hearing
Thank you.
Assistant Clty Man- . October 22, 1999
Date
- - FILE COP!
City of Carlsbad
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMPLETE DATE: June 21.1999
DESCRIPTION:
Request for: a) a recommendation of approval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal
Program Amendment to change zoning fkom Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family
Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q)
and Open Space (04); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan,
Hillside Development Pmit, and Coastal Development Permit for 21 single family lots
and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel.
LOCATION:
This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located to the north of
Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of
the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
215-070-27
APPLICANT:
Standard Pacific Corp.
9335 Chesapeake Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the
Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on October 6, 1999 at
6:OO p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with
any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described
and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision.
Copies of the staff report will be available on or after September 30, 1999.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Anne
Hysong at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m., Friday 8:OO a.m. to 5:OO p.m. at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009,
(760) 438-1161, extension 4477.
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 (760) 438-1 161 FAX (760) 438-0694 @
APPEALS
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program
Amendment, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If
you challenge the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing.
1. Ameals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council,
appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the
Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: 0 Ths site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the
Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a
Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the
Coastal Commission is located at 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, California
92108-1725.
CASE FILE: ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-211CDP 98-86
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY
PUBLISH: SEPTEMBER 23,1999
tl;: - ~...."4* .-A !A ."p L ".
e*; Kc" & RD
SITE -~ - , : - "
".T" '4
.- " .. @
ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
ZC .98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-1 9/
SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86
STANDARD PACIFIC COR
9335 CHESAPEAKE DR
SANDIEGOCA92123-1010
JOAN ETTINGER
1493 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTIN 8; STEFANIE COLOMBAITO JOHN LIEDTKY
1484 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1497 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID DESSECKER
1489 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MATTHEW 8; MELANIE ODONNELL
I454 TURQUOISE DR
TIMOTHY 8; KARI RISE
1458 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID 8; KAREN MOORE
1466 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY B: DIANE WILLIAMS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1478 TURQUOISE DR
LAURENCE & SUSAN
1481 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REISNER
DAVID FRENCH
1469 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THE LANG FAMILY
6438 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARKUS 8; DENISE MARITZ
6450 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
1VILLIAM SCHECK
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6443 RUBY WAY
MARK RABY
CARLSBAD CA 92009 1470 TURQUOISE DR
SIPRA DASGWTA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1489 TURQUOISE DR
REY B: ARLm' FERNANDEZ
I485 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEVIh' 8; LISA HARDY
1462 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH 8; PATRICIA SWIDERSKI
24800 CHRISANTA DR 200 MISSIONVIEJO CA 92691-4819
JOHN ZAPPIA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1485 TURQUOISE DR
FRED 8; JUDITH KISIEL WENDY KHENTlGAN
1477 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1473 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD B: JOANNE BODNAR BRYAN 8: JENNIFER GRABER
1465 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
1461 TIRQOUISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT M NSJT HUMBERS HUMBERST STEVEN 8; RHONDA SWAIN
6442 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6446 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
EDWARD 8; RUTH APFFEL
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
RICHARD GAYNOR
6439 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
EUGENE &.KARIN GOORCHENKO
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
MARK SNAZA
1451 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009- 1244
MICHAEL 8: KATHLEEN NAYLOR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1493 TURQUISE DR \ GREYSTONE HOMES INC
COftaNA CA 91719-1301
E RINCON ST 115
\~
', GREYSTONE HOMES IKC
495 E RINCON ST 1 IS
COXONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RMCON ST 115 ' ~.~,,
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301 *.
DEhWIS 8: DORIS HAMMAESTEN
1488 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
JAMES 8: ANDREA GORMAN
1504 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
MAHESH 8: PADMA KODUKULA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
15 12 SAPPHIRE DR THE MARTIN FAMILY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
15 16 SAPPHIRE DR LALJRIE MACRI
1520 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
".
495 E FilNCON ST 1 15
-STONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
1 K&zV-IQ 8: DENISE MCQUEEN
CARLSBAD ChQ09
15 13 TURQUOISE DR
..
KELVIN B: DENISE MCQUEEK
15 13 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDWIN B: SANDRA MELLICK
1509 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
>SEW WIZA
1505 TU"E DR
CARLSBAD CA !bW. ..__ '. ...
\
G~EYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
JOSEPH WIZA
1505 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
..
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST I15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
-1'75 E RINCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
NANCY WIEWIORA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6443 OPAL WAY
BEXNETT MANX
6-139 OPAL WAY SOHAIL B: RAHEELA BOKHARI
6435 OPAL WAY
GRANT 8: VICTORIA ALBRIGHT
6430 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCWT 115 CORONA CA 917TB-UO1
G-ONE HOMES INC
495 E RIhbb.ST 115
CORONA CA 91'h94301
GEYSTONE HOMES Ih'C
495 E RINGON ST 115
CORONA CA 9nl%l30l
PAUL & KAREN RUTLEDGE JOHN & CLETA FREDERICKSEN
6446OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CAROLE MUROYA 1514 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 15 18 TURQUOISE DR
G bE YSTONE HOMES MC
CORONAKA91719-1301
-.
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORON CA 91719-1301 CORONA CA 91719-1301
. 495 EMCON ST 115 495e RINCON ST 11 5 GREYSTONE HOMES MC
495 E WON ST 115
\
495 E RINCON ST 115 ,,
GREYSTONE HOMES'INC GREYSTONE HOMIXINC
495 E RINCON ST 115 x,~
CORONA CA 91719-1301 ', CORONACA91719-1301 '\ CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACKIE SCHWAB
1501 SAPPHIRE DR
\
\.,
JUSTIN 8; LAURA WILLIAMS 1505 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
KEITH & KIM MCFARLANE
1508 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK
1509 TLRQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
,.CORONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-I301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
VIN & DENISE MCQUEEN
UOISE DR
SWSTONE HOMES INC
495 E NNCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
DONALD & MARY IRVINE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1501 TURQUOISE DR
MAREK & MARTINA LIYANAGE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6434 OPAL WAY
JAMES & PASCALE REYNOLDS
6438 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH & SUSAN TARMAS
6442 OPAL WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009
\ GREYSTONE HOMES INC
iCORONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES IKC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE'HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES 1NC
495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
C6RONA.CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RlNCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
495 ERINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTOXE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301,
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RlNCON ST I15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES 1NC
495 E RlNCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 11 5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST I15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST I 15 .
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RlNCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
\ GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RIKCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
\ \
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1361
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
492 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 1 I5
CORONA CA 91719-1301
495 E RINCON ST 115
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 1 15
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC 495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONACA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301 .
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495’E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115 CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
SEA~DEJESTATES L L
.
15707 ROCffWLLE BLVD 255
IRVINE CA
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
195 E RINCON ST 1 IS
CORONA CA 91719-1301
SEASIDE ESTATES L L
15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255
IRVME CA 92618
SEASIDE ESTATES L L
15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255
IRVINE CA 92618
BASIL gL DOROTHY LOMBARD0
1304 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARIA GUGLELMELLI
1322 STATICE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
C.ARLSBAD LLC RIELLY
SELX’PORT BEACH CA 92660
23 CORPORATE PLAZA DR THE FAMILY
3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400
SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750
TREE PLUM
SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750
3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400
LENNAR HOMES CA MC MARTIN & CYNTHIA FLETCHER ROBERT & ROSEMARIE GATES
27432 CALLE ARROYO
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675-274 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
6742 LEMON LEAF DR 6748 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
VINCENT CHAO
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
6754 LEMON LEAF DR
CHRISTOPHER BIANCHI
6714 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
KATIA FLOWS
1320 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLE LAVER
1337 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUIS HAYWARD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1321 VERBENA CT
NORMA LANGHAM
1309 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAURA SOETEN
13 18 STATICE CT C.4RLSBAD CA 92009
GREGG 8: DENISE PERALTA
I338 STARLING CT ~ ~~
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~ ~~
N.4DINE BAURIN
1323 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BUN KIM
6734 LEMON LEAF DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
CARY Bt JENNIFER IKEMOTO
6722 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
ASOKNATH & KAJAL CHATTERJEE MARTIN BOGAN
67 11 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARLSBAD CA 92009
1316 VERBENA CT
BRENDA WELCH
1324 VEBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LACEY WARHOL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1333 VERBENA CT
BEHROKH GOLSHAN
1 3 17 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAUN & TIFFANY STORM
1302 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GENEANE LINZEY
1326 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID BRAUN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1339 STATICE CT
ROBERT & LYNN PIERCE
13 I9 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICK GUIMOND
1328 VERBENA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
DEBRA SANDOVAL
1325 VERDIN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CRAIG HARVEY
1313 VERDIN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICK & RATIH LEHRMANN
1306 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICIA CISNEROS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1334 STARLING CT
DIANNA PRANSKUS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1327 STATICE CT
JIM & KIM BRUNNER
1316PHLOXCT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ~ ~~~
3
SHERRI PESTRITTO
13 11 PHLOX CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
* LUZ RODRIGUEZ
1312 PHLOX CT CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUISE WYLIE
1308 PHLOX CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
\ooooo
CARLSBAD RIELLY
GOO00
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
.
* CARLSBAD RIELLY
BOO00
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
VICTORIA FERNANDEZ
PO BOX 395 CARDIFF CA 92007-0395
'\ CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
AVELINA 8: ERNEST HIDALGO
65 1 1 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804
Kristin Brice 1304 Phlox Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009
Cherry Tree Walk, LLC 3020 Old Ranch Rd #250 Susan Dean
Seal Beach,CA 90740 1315 Phlox Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009
Bridgette Wisdom 1329 Verbena Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy #400
Plum Tree Walk
c/o Olsen Comp
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Lee E. Catherine Portilla 1310 Statice Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009
Mario Guglielmelli
1322 Statice Ct
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Ronald Roesch
Santa Monica,CA 90405
2800 Neilson Way #708
Catellus Residental 5 Park Plaza #400
Irvine, CA 92614
CARLSBAD RIELLY
ouooo
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELLY
00000
WILLIAM 8: DONNA BAKER
18552 ERWIN ST
RESEDA CA 91335-6820
Jack Henthorn Jack Henthorn E. Assoc 5375 Avenida Encinas #D
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Gregg Linhoff Standard Pacific Corp 9335 Chesapeake Dr.
San Diego,CA 92123
Signature Date%
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY OF SAN MARCOS
801 PINE AVE 505 S VULCAN AVE 1 CIVIC CENTER DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SANDAG
STE 50 STE B STE 800
330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 401 B STREET
LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LAFCO AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
1600 PACIFIC HWY 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92101 SAN DIEGO CA 92123
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
2730 LOKER AVE WEST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY
SERVICES
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 200
3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NO
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
DEPT
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
ANNE HYSONG
-I....- I.... . ... ,...,,IC
STANDARD PACIFIC COR
9335 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1010
MARTIN & STEFANIE COLOMBATTO JOHN LIEDTKY
1484 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
.I
1497 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOAN ETTINGER
1493 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID DESSECKER
1489 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~.
MATTHEW & MELANIE ODONNELL
1454 TURQUOISE DR
TIMOTHY & KARI RISE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1458 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
- ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ - . . . ~ .
DAVID & KAREN MOORE MARK RABY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1466 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1470 TURQUOISE DR.
JEFFREY & DIANE WILLIAMS SIPRA DASGUF'TA
1478 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1489 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REY & ARLYN FERNANDEZ
1485 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEVIN & LISA HARDY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1462 TURQUOISE DR
JOSEPH &PATRICIA SWIDERSKI
MISSIONVIEJO CA 92691-4819
24800 CHRISANTA DR 200
JOHN ZAPPIA
1485 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAURENCE & SUSAN REISNER FRED & JUDITH KISIEL
148 1 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WENDY KHENTIGAN
1473 TURQUOISE DR . CARLSBAD CA 92009
1477 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID FRENCH
1469 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THE LANG FAMILY
6438 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARKUS & DENISE MARITZ
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6450 RUBY WAY
.~
WILLIAM SCHECK
6443 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
RICHARD & JOANNE BODNAR BRYAN & JENNIFER GRABER
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
1465 TURQUOISE DR 1461 TIRQOUISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT M NSJT HUMBERS HUMBERST STEVEN & RHONDA SWAIN
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6442 RUBY WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6446 RUBY WAY
EDWARD & RUTH APFFEL
495ERINCONST115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
RICHARD GAYNOR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1249
6439 RUBY WAY
EUGENE & KARIN GOORCHENKO
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
MARK SNAZA
145 1 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-1244
._ GREYSTO~M
495 E RiiW
MICHAEL & KATHLEEN NAYLOR
1493 TURQUISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS & DORIS HAMMAESTEN
1488 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
495 E RINCON ST 115
CORONA CA 91719-1301
JAMES & ANDREA GORMAN
1 504 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ONA CA 91719-1301
~~ ~ ~~ ~~~
LAURIE MACRI
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1520 SAPPHIRE DR
~ ~~~~
MAHESH & PADMA KODUKULA
15 12 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009
THE MARTIN FAMILY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
15 16 SAPPHIRE DR '
-,... .-.
KELVIN & DENISE MCQUEEN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1513 TURQUOISE DR
EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK
1509 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
'x: ~~ , GREYSTONE HOMES WC
495 EhNCON ST 115
CORONA CA.91719-1301
... . ~..
~~~~ ... ~. .
.. . -. . .
NANCY WIEWIORA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6443 OPAL WAY
JOSEPH WIZA
1505 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH WIZA
~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
BENNETT MANN
6439 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SOHAIL & RAHEELA BOKHARl
6435 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GRANT & VICTORIA ALBRIGHT
6430 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREYSTONE H
"" ~.~. "
PAUL & KAREN RUTLEDGE
6446 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
.~. .
JUSTIN & LAURA WILLIAMS
1505 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~
GREYSTONE H
KEITH & KIM MCFARLANE
1508 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
.
EDWIN & SANDRA MELLICK
1509 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN & CLETA FREDERICKSEN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
15 14 TURQUOISE DR * ;c
C 0 ACA91719-1301
GREYST
C ONA 91719-1301
ONST115
GREYSTONE
't. \
!
CAROLE MUROYA
15 18 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACKIE SWAB
1501 SAPPHIREDR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
"~ ~
1, \ \
KELVIN & DE
-
.. ,
~ ~~ ~ ~~
JAMES & PASCALE REYNOLDS
6438 OPAL WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~~
\
\
GREYSTONE
i \ \
DONALD & MARY IRVINE
1501 TURQUOISE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH & SUSAN TARMAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6442 OPAL WAY
\ \
*
GREYSTbNE HO
\ 1~ .
\
~ ~ ~~~ '\
~~~ ~~
GREYSTONE HO
CA 91719-1301
MAREK & MARTINA LIYANA~E
CARLSBAD CA 92009
6434 OPAL WAY
>, .i ..
GREYSTONE HOMES
495 E RINCON S
\
495 E RINCON ST
GREYSTONE HOMES
23 CORPORATE PLAZA DR
CARLSBAD LLC RIELLY
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
',,$,,Y
'/ CORON A 91719-1301
.
GREYSTONE HOME
:+
CORO A 91719-1301
91719-1301
.~
19-1301
SEASIDE ESTATES L L
15707 ROCKVILLE BLVD 255
IRVINE CA 9261 8
, /'
BASIL & DOROTHY LOMBARD0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1304 VERBENA CT
THE FAMILY
3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400
SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750
GREYSTONE'HO
'.
~ ~ ~~~
TREE PLUM
3010 OLD RANCH PKY 400
SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2750
MARIA GUGLELMELLI
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1322 STATICE ST
LENNAR HOMES CA INC MARTIN & CYNTHIA FLETCHER ROBERT & ROSEMARIE GATES
27432 CALLE ARROYO
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675-274 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
6742 LEMON LEAF DR 6748 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
VINCENT CHAO
6754 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3424
CHRISTOPHER BIANCHI
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
6714 LEMON LEAF DR
KATIA FLORES
1320 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAROLE LAVER
1337 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOUIS HAYWARD
1321 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORMA LANGHAM
1309 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAURA SOETEN
1 3 18 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREGG & DENISE PERALTA
1338 STARLING CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NADINE BAURIN
1323 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRIANKIM
6734 LEMON LEAF DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
CARY & JENNIFER IKEMOTO
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423
6722 LEMON LEAF DR
ASOKNATH & KAJAL CHATERJEE
671 1 LEMON LEAF DR MARTIN BOGAN
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3423 CARLSBAD CA 92009
13 16 VERBENA CT
BRENDA WELCH
1324 VEBENA CT '
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LACEY WARHOL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1333 VERBENA CT
BEHROKH GOLSHAN
1317 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAUN &TIFFANY STORM
1302 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GENEANE LINZEY
1326 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID BRAUN
1339 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT & LYNN PIERCE
13 1 9 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICK GUIMOND
1328 VERBENA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DEBRA SANDOVAL
1325 VERDIN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CRAIG HARVEY
1313 VERDINCT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICK & RATIH LEHRMANN
1306 STATlCE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICIA CISNEROS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1334 STARLING CT
DIANNA PRANSKUS
1327 STATICE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JIM & KIM BRUNNER
1316 PHLOX CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LUZ RODRIGUEZ
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1312 PHLOX CT
00000
00000
00000
00000 '.
~ ~~
\, \
00000
00000
CARLSBAD L RIEL
LOUISE WYLIE
1308 PHLOX CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
\ Y C RLSBADL
00000 '
,.
CARLSBA~ L RIELLY
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
SHEW PESTRlTTO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1311 PHLOXCT
..
17 CARLSBAD L RI
i i
00000
, 00000
CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
00000
00000
\ i
-
CARLSBAD L NELLY
00000
00000
CARLSBAD L RIELL CARLSBAD RIELLY
00000
AVELINA & ERNEST HIDALGO WILLIAM & DONNA BAKER
651 1 EL CAMINO REAL 18552 ERWIN ST CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 RESEDA CA 91335-6820
~~.
VICTORIA FERNANDEZ Kristin Brice
PO BOX 395 1304 Phlox Ct CARDIFF CA 92007-0395
Jack Henthorn Jack Henthron h Assoc Carlsbad, CA 92009 5375 Avenida Encinas #D
* Carlsbad, CA 92008
'Cherry Tree Walk, LLC 3020 Old Ranch Rd #250 Seal Beach,CA 90740 I
~ ~ ~ ~
Bridgette Wisdom
Carlsbad, CA 92009 1329 Verbena Ct
Susan Dean Greqq Linhoff
Carlsbad, CA 92009 1315 Phlox Ct
Plum Tree Walk c/o Olsen Comp. 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy#400
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Stanaard Pacific Corp 9335 Chesapeake Dr
San Diego, CA 92123
Lee h Catherine Portilla
1310 Statice Ct Carlsbad, CA 92009
Ronald Roesch 2800 Neilson Way #708
SANTA MONICA CA 90405
Mario Guglielmelli
Carlsbad, CA 92009
1322 Statice Ct Catellus Residential
5 Park Plaza #400
Irvine, CA 92614
Smooth Feed SheetsTM
H:WMIN\LABELS\LCP
INTERESTED PARTIES
UPDATED 3-99
OLIVENHAIN M.W.D.
1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CRAIG ADAMS
SIERRA CLUB
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER
3820 RAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LESLIE ESPOSITO
1893 AMELFI DRIVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
LANlKAl LANE PARK
SHARP; SPACE 3.
6350 PONTO DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KIM SEIBLY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
PO BOX 1831
SAN DIEGO CA 92112
.~ . ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~
PERRY A LAM0
890 MERE POINT ROAD
BRUNSWICK MAINE 0401 1
- ~~ ~~
RICHARD RETECKI
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
SUITE 1100
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER
7163 ARGONAURA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~~ ~ ~~~~
COPIES TO
t CITYCLERK
t MAIN LIBRARY
f BRANCH LIBRARY
4 WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
COM DEV DEPARTMENT
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
REGIONAL WATER QUAL. BD
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SUITE B
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92124
GUY MOORE JR
6503 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON
12142 ARGYLE DRIVE
LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702
JOHN LAMB
LOSANGELES CA 90069
1446 DEVLIN DRIVE
MARY GRIGGS
STATE LANDS COMMISSSION
SUITE 100 SOUTH
100 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT
5201 RUFFIN ROAD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
ANTHONY BONS
25709 HILLCREST AVE
ESCONDIDO CA 92026
JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5
MWMRS MICHAEL CARDOSA
6491 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICES
2730 LOKER AVE WEST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Use template for 5160@
TABATA FARMS ..
PO BOX 1338
CARLSBAD CA 92018
KENNETH E SULZER
1ST INT’L PLAZA, SUITE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
JAN SOBEL
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PO BOX 1605
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SANDAG - EXEC DIRECTOR
BILL McLEAN
7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS
do LAKESHORE GARDENS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SPIERS ENTERPRISES
DWIGHT SPIERS
SUITE 139
23 CORPORATE PLAZA
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
SUPERVISOR BILL HORN
ATTN: ART DANELL
COUNTY OF SD, ROOM 335
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
LEE ANDERSON
CRA PRESIDENT
5200 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FLOYD ASHBY
416 LA COSTA AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Laser 5160@ -aAVERV@ Address Labels
I.
LABELS - 5163 SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY)
WELLS FARGO PLAZA LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCES) SUITE 800
APPENDIX A (LIST IS REQUIRED BY COASTAL
COMMISSION)
401 B STREET
1 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 I
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROOM 700
110 WEST A STREET
SANDIEGO CA 92101
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
350 McALLISTER STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
PO BOX 3044
SACRAMENTO CA 95812-3044
~ DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
1 STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
~ ROOM 100
1220 N STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
~ BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
' WILLIAM G. BRENNAN ROOM 5504
DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPECIAL COUNCIL 1120 N STREET
SUITE 2450 SACRAMENTO CA 95814
980 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS
BILL FIGGE, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
MAIL STATION 65
2829 SAN JUAN ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
RESOURCES AGENCY
RM 1311
1416 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95812
-
~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~
U. S. FISH AND WILDLLFE SERVICE
SUITE 130
33 10 EL CAMINO AVENUE
SACRAMENTO CA 95821
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
SUITE 1100
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CHUCK NAJARIAN
15 16 NINTH STREET
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR
350 GOLDEN SHORE
LONGBEACH CA 90802
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
GAIL PRESLEY, CHIEF
~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
i RM1341
141.6 NINTH STREET
S,ACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIROMENTAL COORD
~ RM 1516-2
~ 1416 NINTH STREET
I SACMENTO CA 95814
SOUTHERN REGION
JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE
SAND DIEGO CA 92108
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS
SUITE 1005
100 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
BILL TRAVIS
30 VAN NESS AVENLTE
SANFRANCISCO CA 95814
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
PO BOX 100
SACWENTO CA 95801
~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SUITE B
9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD
SANDIEGO CA 92124-1331
~ ..~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ .~ ~~~
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ATTN: GARY
RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST
SUITE 102
DAVIS CA 95616
2121-C SECOND STREET
~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ." ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~
PACIFIC REGIONAL MANAGER
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC
ADMIN - OCRM, 55MC4
NJORM - 3
1305 EAST-WEST HIGHWAY
SILVER SPRING MD 20910
~ .. ~ ~ ~~ . ~~~~~~~
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LILY ALYEA - SUITE 702
333 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197
I
BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
PO BOX 92007
WESTERN REGION
1 LOS ANGELES CA 90009
~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~..
USDA - RURAL DEVLOPMENT
~ 430 ST DEPT 4169
~ DAVIS CA 95616
!
!
caul
1 CHAIRMAN
WIL -_ EP WIRONMENTA
~
,L QUP
! 722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST I WASHINGTON DC 2006
~~ ~~~ ~
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER
PO BOX 271 1
LOS ANGELES CA 90053
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
61 1 RYAN PLAZA DR STE 400
ARLINGTON TX 7601 1-4005
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL DISTRICT
DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER
SANDIEGO CA 92132
U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
2135 BUTANO DRIVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
LOWER COLORADO REGION
PO BOX 427
BOULDER CITY CO 89005
SUPERINTENDENT
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
190 1 SPINNAKER DRIVE
SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001
*,
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
SUITE 350
901 MARKET STREET
SANFRANCISCO CA 94103
~ CLIFFORD EMMERCING, DIRECTOR
' DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVE I DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONAL ADMIN
~ 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
, SANFRANCISCO CA 94102
U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
MID-PACIFIC REGION
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENDENT
RONALD M. JAEGER RED WOOD NATIONAL PARK
SACRAMENTO CA 95825 11 11 2ND STREET
~ 2800 COTTAGE WAY DRAWER N
CRESCENT CITY CA 95531
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
~ 3 1 1 1 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH