Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-02-13; City Council; 16058; Sign Ordinance Amendments Zone C-M, M, and P-MCITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL & as AB# MTG. DEPT. SP-180(E) - CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER SP 181 (C) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE SP 199(A) I LCPA 00-11 - COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK SP 200(A) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER CITY MGR RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinances No. I\ss -5 70 N s -571 AK-s 7& and F3.5,573 APPROVING SP 180(E), Carlsbad Resea;ch Center; SP 181 (C), Carlsbad Airport Centre; SP 199(A), Park; and SP 200(A), Carlsbad Airport Business Center and ADOPT APPROVING a Negative Declaration, and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 00-l 1 based upon the findings contained therein. ITEM EXPLANATION: This action is to amend the specific plan documents within the C-M, M, and P-M zones to be consistent with the new sign ordinance and the City’s previously amended parking ordinance (Chapter 21.44). The City is processing a zone code amendment (ZCA 99-09) that will change the sign standards within the city’s office/industrial zones. The new standards will conflict with the existing development standards contained within the above-mentioned specific plans. Since state law precludes the adoption of a zoning ordinance that would be in conflict with an existing specific plan, the specific plans must be amended. The amendment will delete the sign and graphic standards contained within the specific plans and will insert a reference to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for the applicable signage development standards. This will allow the zoning ordinance to be amended and be in compliance with the specific plans. The amendments to the specific plans will also adopt the City’s parking ordinance (Chapter 21.44) as the parking standards for these specific plans. ENVIRONMENTAL: The Planning Director has determined that these specific plan amendments, (SP 180(E), SP 181(C), SP 199(A), and SP 200(A)) and Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 00-l 1) will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore issued a Negative Declaration on November 8, 2000. FISCAL IMPACT: None EXHIBITS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Ordinance No. hsS -.!!I 7’ SP 180(E) Ordinance No. Ns -5 7 / : SP 181 (C ) Ordinance No. tQS-S;, 2 SP 199(A) Ordinance No. j&j-.!! 7 ‘;3 : SP 200(A) City Council Resolution No. do01 - qcf Location Map Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4884,4885, 4886, 4887,4888, 4889 Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 3, 2001. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated January 3, 2001. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. NS-570 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN 180(B) TO SUPERCEDE THE PARKING AND SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS WITH CHAPTER 21.44 AND 21.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER CASE NO. : SP 180(E) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan Amendment to revise the parking and sign and graphic requirements; and WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law, the City of Carlsbad has determined that the public interest indicates that said specific plan amendment be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER Specific PIan Amendment, SP 180(E) dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated by reference herein, is approved. The Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the zoning for this property and all development of the property shall conform to the plan. The amendment to the specific plan is the deletion of the parking requirements which reads as follows: “The following standards exceed the regular City standards and shall be used to determine parking requirements. Uses not covered below shall comply with regular City standards as required by Chapter 2 1.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 1. Manufacture, Research, and Assembly. One space for each 500 square feet of floor area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 . 28 , 2. Warehouse. One space for each 1,000 square feet of floor area for the first 20,000 square feet; one space for each 2,000 square feet of floor area for the second 20,000 square feet; one space for each 4,000 square feet of floor area for areas in excess of the initial 40,OOC square feet of floor area of the building. 3. Deleted. 4. Commercial. a. Retail and Service Commercial. One space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. b. Restaurants. One space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. c. Hotels/Motels. One space for each guest room. d. Multiple Use. Where two or more uses occupy a single structure, the parking requirement shall be determined by calculating the requirement for each use individually based on its proportional share of the total floor area. No change to a use requiring more parking will be allowed unless the additional parking for the new use is provided. If additional parking is not added as required, the City shah deny any license or permit applications required for such uses by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The Planning Director may approve the reduction in size of up to 25% of the total required parking spaces to accommodate compact cars provided that: (a) Compact car spaces are located in separate parking aisles from standard- sized spaces; (b) Aisles and spaces for compact car spaces are clearly marked with permanent material denoting ‘Compact Car Only’; (c) Compact car spaces shall be located in close proximity to the facility which they serve so as to encourage their maximum usages; (d) Compact car spaces must be a minimum width of 7-l/2 feet and a minimum length of 15 feet.” -2- 3 1 SECTION 2: That the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan be amended by 2 the addition of text to the parking section to read as follows: 3 4 “The parking requirements for all uses shall comply with Chapter 21.44 of the 5 Carlsbad Municipal Code.” SECTION 3: That the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan be amended by the deletion of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “ 1. General Standards a. Only one single or double-face permanent sign will be allowed per street frontage 11 12 13 14 15 16 per tenant (except as otherwise indicated). b. Signs will be restricted to advertising only the person, firm, company, or corporation operation the use conducted on the site or the products sold therein. c. The area of a wall sign will be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or pictorial symbol. d. All signs attached to the building will be surface mounted. 17 e. Signs visible from the exterior of any building may be lighted, but no signs or any 18 other contrivance will be devised or constructed so as to rotate, gyrate, blink, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 move, or appear to move in any fashion. f. Public service devices such as clocks and temperature indicators will be devoid of advertising. 2. Wall Signs a. No wall sign will exceed an area equal to l-1/2 square feet of sign area for each foot of lineal frontage of the building or store. Total signage shall not exceed 200 square feet in area of comprise more than 10% of the area of the elevation upon which the sign is located, whichever is less. -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. In multi-tenant industrial or office buildings, each individual business may have a wall sign over the entrance to identify the tenant. Said sign will give only the name of the company and will be limited to letters six inches high. Said signs will be oriented toward the parking or pedestrian area for the building and shall not exceed a maximum area of five square feet. c. In multi-tenant commercial buildings, each ground-floor business may have one wall sign per building frontage. Said signs shall not’ be located above the ground- floor facia. Each sign shall be limited to an area equal to 10% of the business face upon which it is located, or a maximum of 35 square feet. 3. Ground (or Free-Standing) Signs a. Ground signs shall not exceed four feet above grade in height or more than l-1/2 square feet in area for each foot of lineal frontage of the building or store. However, no sign shall exceed 200 square feet in area (100 square feet per face, two-face maximum). b. Every lot may have at least one ground sign. Additional ground signs may be added for every 200 square feet of street frontage in excess of the first 100 feet of street frontage. c. No ground sign shall be located within 100 feet of another ground sign. d. No ground sign to be visible along El Camino Real (See amendments). 4. Miscellaneous Signs a. Temporary Identification Signs 1) Sale or lease sign. One sign not to exceed 15 square feet in area advertising the sale, lease, or hire of the site will be allowed. 2) Construction sign. One sign not to exceed 20 square feet in area denoting the architects, engineers, contractor, and other related subjects will be allowed at commencement of construction. Said sign will be removed at the time the building is fit for occupancy. -4- 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3) Temporary future tenant sign. One sign allowing the identification of future tenants and other persons will be allowed. Such signs shall not exceed 20 square feet in area. b. Special-Purpose and Directional Sims. Directional and special-purpose signs (such as those identifying mini-parks) shall be allowed, subject to approval of the Planning Director.” SECTION 4: That the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan be amended by the addition of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “All signs within the Specific Plan shall comply with Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.” SECTION 5: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4885 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the City’s Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.) //I //I //I /I/ /II /II /II -5- . INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City ’ Council on the 13th day of ebruaryOO 1, and thereafter. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day of 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEA-Q -6 ORDINANCE NO. NS-571 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN 181(B) TO SUPERCEDE THE PARKING AND SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS WITH CHAPTER 21.44 AND 21.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE CASE NO.: SP181(C) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan Amendment to revise the parking and sign and graphic requirements; and WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law, the City of Carlsbad has determined that the public interest indicates that said specific plan amendment be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan Amendment, SP SPl81 (C) dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated by reference herein, is approved. The Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the zoning for this property and all development of the property shall conform to the plan. The amendment to the specific plan is the deletion of the parking requirements which reads as follows: “Parking shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of 21.44 of the zoning ordinance. Where two or more uses occupy a single structure, the parking requirement shall be determined by calculating the requirement for each use individually based on its proportional share of total floor area. No change to a use requiring more parking will be allowed unless the additional parking for the new use is provided. If additional parking is not provided, 28 the City shall deny the appropriate permit or license for the new use.” B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2: That the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan be amended by the addition of text to parking section which reads as follows: “The parking requirements for all uses shall comply with Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Cqde.” SECTION 3: That the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan be amended by the deletion of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “1. General Standards: a. Only one single-or double-faced permanent sign will be allowed per street frontage per tenant (except as otherwise indicated). b. Signs will be restricted to identifying only the person, firm, company, or corporation operating the use conducted on the site or the products sold therein. c. The area of a wall sign will be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. d. All signs attached to the building will be surface-mounted. e. Signs visible from the exterior of any building may be lighted, but no sign or any other contrivance will be devised or constructed so as to rotate, gyrate, blink, move, or appear to move in any fashion. f. Public service devices such as clocks and temperature indicators will be devoid of advertising. g. Each project shall have a sign program approved by the Planning Director. No sign which is not consistent with said program shall be allowed. Each sign must receive a sign permit. 2. Wall Signs a. No wall sign will exceed an area equal to one and one-half square feet of sign area for each foot of lineal frontage of the building or store. Total wall signage shall not exceed 200 square feet in area per lot or comprise more than 10% of the area of the elevation upon which the sign is located, whichever is less. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. In multi-tenant industrial or office buildings, each individual business may have a wall sign over the entrance to identify the tenant. Said sign will give only the name of the company and will be limited to letters 6 inches high. Said signs will be oriented toward the parking or pedestrian area for that building and shall not exceed a maximum area of five square feet. c. In multi-tenant commercial buildings, each ground floor business may have one wall sign per building frontage. Said signs shall not be located above the ground floor facia. Each sign shall be limited to an area equal to 10% of the business face upon which it is located or a maximum of 35 square feet. 3. Ground (or Free-Standing) Signs a. Ground signs shall not exceed four feet above grade in height nor more than one and one-half square feet in area for each one foot of lineal frontage of the building or store. However, no sign shall exceed 200 square feet in area (both faces). b. Every lot may have at least one ground sign. Additional ground signs may be added for every 200 feet of street frontage in excess of the first 100 feet of street frontage. c. No ground sign shall be located within 100 feet of another ground sign. 4. Fronting Palomar Airport Road It is the intent of this section to ensure that all signs fronting Palomar Airport Road are aesthetically pleasing in design and appearance and do not adversely impact the appearance of the potential Palomar Airport Road Scenic Corridor. The signs subject to these standards are all signs fronting Palomar Airport Road within Lots 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 28 and 29. For purposes of this section, fronting Palomar Airport Road means “visible from the portion of Palomar Airport Road directly adjacent to the lot in which the sign is located. a. Special care shall be taken in the design of all signs fronting Palomar Airport Road. All wall and monument signs shall be subdued in tone and integrated into -3- /o the architecture of the building. The intent of this section is not to specifically prohibit recognizable logos. b. All signs fronting Palomar Airport Road shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. c. If a Scenic Corridor Overlay is placed on the Palomar Airport Road corridor, then all new signs fronting Palomar Airport Road shall comply with the requirements of the scenic corridor overlay zone (Chapter 21.40). Signs existing on the effective date of the scenic corridor which are not in compliance shall be allowed to remain for the time limits specified (Chapter 2 1.41) unless they are modified or changed in any way except for routine maintenance and/or repair. d. Wall signs fronting Palomar Airport Road shall not exceed a combined total area of one hundred (100) square feet per building (excluding monument signs). An additional 40 square feet of signage may be allowed under unusual circumstances, such as an unusually long name and/or a sign which would not normally be visible unless extra square footage were available. A maximum of 4 signs per building fronting Palomar Airport Road shall be allowed. Of these 4, a maximum of 2 signs per elevation shall be allowed. A curvilinear elevation with distinctly separated sections of substantial length may be counted as more than one elevation. Signs permitted in Section F2b and F2c are exempt from these regulations. The overall area of each wall sign fronting Palomar Airport Road should be in tasteful proportion to the overall area of the elevation on which it is located and to the elements of the elevation, and the letters or symbols employed should ordinarily be no larger than reasonably necessary to enable them to be read or recognized quickly and easily by vehicular passers-by. As a guideline the total area of such sign(s) on each elevation should not exceed a ratio of % sq. ft. sign area per 1 linear foot of building elevation fronting Palomar Airport Road (and in -4- 1/ ) . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 no case shall the combined total area of such signage per building exceed one hundred (100) sq. ft.) except under special circumstances noted above. e. Monument signs are allowed in addition to wall signs, limited to one (1) monument sign fronting Palomar Airport Road per lot, not to exceed thirty-five (35) square feet per face. f. Should Lots 28 and/or 29 develop entirely with commercial uses, sign programs for those lots shall be subject to Planning Commission review with any accompanying discretionary application. 5. Miscellaneous Signs a. Temporarv Identification Signs 1) 2) 3) 4) Sales or Lease Sign. One sign not to exceed 15 square feet in area advertising the sale, lease, or hire of the site will be allowed. Construction Sign. One sign not to exceed 20 feet in area denoting the architects, engineers, contractor, and other related subjects will be allowed at the commencement of construction. Temporary Future Tenant Sign. One sign allowing the identification of the future tenants and other persons. Such signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. None of the above signs (l-3) will be allowed along Palomar Airport Road. One temporary project sign, advertising lot sales or lease, may be placed along Palomar Airport Road, not to exceed 40 square feet per phase. b. Special-Purpose and Directional Signs. Directional and special purpose signs shall be allowed, subject to approval of the Planning Director.” SECTION 4: That the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan be amended by the addition of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: -5- la 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I . “All signs within the Carlsbad Airport Centre Specific Plan shall comply with Chapter 2 1.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.” SECTION 5: That the findings and conditions of the Planning commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4886 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certifjr to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the City’s Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.) Ill Ill Ill /ll /II Ill l/l I/! Ill Ill !/I lil l/l l/l -6- i3 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 13th day of Februar.OOl, and thereafter. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the of day 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk -7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i ORDINANCE NO. NS-572 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN 199 TO SUPERCEDE THE PARKING AND SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS WITH CHAPTER 21.44 AND 21.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NAME: COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK CASE NO.: SP 199(A) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan Amendment to revise the parking and sign and graphic requirements; and WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law, the City of Carlsbad has determined that the public interest indicates that said specific plan amendment be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the College Business Park Specific Plan Amendment, SP 199(A) dated January 3,2001, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated by reference herein, is approved. The College Business Park Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the zoning for this property and all development of the property shall conform to the plan. The amendment to the specific plan is the deletion of the parking requirements which reads as follows: “(See Table 1 for specific parking requirements per use.) Where two or more uses occupy a single ~structure, the parking requirement shall be determined by calculating the requirement for each use individually based on its proportional share of total floor area. No change to a use requiring more parking will be allowed unless the additional parking for the new use is provided. If additional parking is not provided, the City shall deny the appropriate permit or license for the new use” and delete Table 1 on page 19. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2: That the College Business Park Specific Plan be amended by the deletion of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “General Standards: a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. With the exception of community-identity (monument) signs no other freestanding sign shall be allowed along Palomar Airport Road or College Boulevard. The total area of all signs on any one lot shall not exceed 1.5 square feet per lineal foot of building frontage located on the lot. No sign shall be higher than the height of the building upon which it is located. Signs will be restricted to identifying only the person, firm, company or corporation operating the use conducted on the site. The area of a wall sign will be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. All signs attached to the building will be surface mounted. Interiorly illuminated signs visible from the exterior of any building may be allowed, but no signs or any other contrivance will be derived or constructed so as to rotate, gyrate, blink, move or appear to move in any fashion. Public service devices such as clocks and temperature indicators will be devoid of advertising. 2. Wall Sims a. No wall sign will exceed an area equal to one and one-half square feet of sign area for each foot of lineal frontage of the wall on which it is located. Total wall signage shall not exceed 200 square feet in area per lot or comprise more than 10% of the area of the elevation upon which the sign is located, whichever is less. b. In multi-tenant industrial or office buildings, each individual business may have a wall sign over the entrance to identify the tenant. Said sign will give only the name of the company and will be limited to letters 6 inches high. Said signs will 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be oriented toward the parking or pedestrian area for that building and shall no1 exceed a maximum area of five square feet. c. In multi-tenant buildings having commercial uses, each ground-floor business may have one wall sign per building frontage. Said signs shall not be located above the ground-floor facia. Each sign shall be limited to an area equal to 10% of the business face upon which it is located or a maximum of 35 square feet. 3. Ground Sims a. Every lot may have one ground sign not to exceed four feet in height and 40 square feet per face. b. No ground sign shall be located within 100 feet of another ground sign. c. See entryway requirements. 4. Miscellaneous Signs a. Temporary Identification Sims 1) Sale or Lease Sign One sign, not to exceed 15 square feet in area, advertising the sale, lease or hire of the site will be allowed. 2) Construction Sinn One sign, not to exceed 20 feet in area, denoting the architects, engineers, contractor and other related subjects will be allowed at the commencement of construction. Said sign will be removed at the time the building is fit for occupancy. 3) Temporary Future-Tenant Sim One sign allowing the identification of the future tenants and other persons will be allowed. Such signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. 4) None of the above signs (l-3) will be allowed along Palomar Airport Road or College Boulevard. One temporary project sign, advertising lot sales or lease, may be placed along Palomar Airport Road, not to exceed 40 square feet per face. -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. Community-IdentitvlEntryway Signs 1) Sign program that provides for entrance, exit, directional and project- identity signs, shall be allowed in addition to all other signs permitted by this Specific Plan. The aggregated sign area of all community- identification signs within the Specific Plan shall not exceed a total of 432 square feet. 2) Directional and necessary special-purpose signs shall be allowed, subject to approval of the Planning Director. One permanent ground sign identifying the project, not to exceed 10 feet in length and 4 feet in height, will be allowed at each of the three following locations: The intersection of College Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road, the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Palomar Airport Road and the intersection of College Boulevard and A Street.” SECTION 3: That the College Business Park Specific Plan be amended by the addition of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “All signs within the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan shall comply with Section 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.” SECTION 4: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4888 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the City’s Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.) -4- i /y I . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 13thdayof February 2001, and thereafter. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day of 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEW -5- /q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. NS-573 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN 200 TO SUPERCEDE THE PARKING AND SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS WITH CHAPTER 21.44 AND 2 1.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER CASE NO.: SP 200(A) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan Amendment to revise the parking and sign and graphic requirements; and WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of law, the City of Carlsbad has determined that the public interest indicates that said specific plan amendment be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan Amendment, SP 200(A) dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Planning Department, and incorporated by reference herein, is approved. The Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the zoning for this property and all development of the property shall conform to the plan. The amendment to the specific plan is the deletion of the parking requirements which reads as follows: “Where two or more uses occupy a single structure, the parking requirement shall be determined by calculating the requirement for each use individually based on its proportional share of total floor area. No change to a use requiring more parking will be allowed unless the additional parking is provided, the City shall deny the appropriate permit or license for the new use. No parking shall be allowed in the required f?ont yard and street side yard setbacks.” 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2: That the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan be amended by the deletion of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “All signs within the Carlsbad Airport Business Center shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2 1.41 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. General Standards: a. b. C. d. e. f. With the exception of community-identity (monument) signs no other freestanding sign shall be allowed along Palomar Airport Road or El Fuerte Street. The total area of all signs on any one lot shall not exceed 1.5 square feet per lineal foot of building frontage located on the lot. No sign shall be higher than the height of the building upon which it is located. Signs will be restricted to identifying only the person, firm, company or corporation operating the use conducted on the site. Interiorly-illuminiated signs visible from the exterior of any building may be allowed, but no signs or any other contrivance will be derived or constructed so as to rotate, gyrate, blink, move or appear to move in any fashion. Public service devices such as clocks and temperature indicators will be devoid of advertising. 2. Wall Signs a. No wall sign will exceed an area equal to one and one-half square feet of sign area for each foot of lineal frontage of the wall on which it is located. Total wall signage shall not exceed 200 square feet in area per lot or comprise more than 10 percent of the area of the elevation upon which the sign is located, whichever is less. b. The area of a wall sign will be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. c. All signs attached to the building wil 1 be surface mounted. -L- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 d. In multi-tenant industrial or office buildings, each individual business may have a wall sign over the entrance to identify the tenant. Said sign will give only the name of the company and will be limited to letters 6 inches high. Said signs will be oriented toward the parking or pedestrian area for that building and shall not exceed a maximum area of five square feet. e. In multi-tenant buildings having commercial uses, each ground-floor business may have one wall sign per building frontage. Said signs shall not be located above the ground-floor facia. Each sign shall be limited to an area equal to 10 percent of the business face upon which it is located or a maximum of 35 square feet. 3. Ground Signs a. Every lot may have one ground sign not to exceed four feet in height and 40 square feet per face. b. No ground sign shall be located within c. See entryway requirements. 4. Miscellaneous Signs 100 feet of another ground sign. a. Temporary Identification Signs 1) Sale or Lease Sign 2) One sign, not to exceed 15 square feet in area, advertising the sale, lease or hire of the site will be allowed. Construction Sign One sign, not to exceed 20 feet in area, denoting the architects, engineers, contractor and other related subjects will be allowed at the commencement of construction. Said sign will be removed at the time the building is fit for occupancy. -3- 2a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3) Temporary Future-Tenant Sipn One sign allowing the identification of the future tenants and other persons will be allowed. Such signs shall not exceed 20 square feet. 4) None of the above signs (l-3) will be allowed along Palomar Airport Road or El Fuerte. One Temporary project sign, advertising lot sales or lease, may be placed along Palomar Airport Road, not to exceed 40 square feet per face. b. Communitv-IdentitvlEntrvway Signs 1) Sign program that provides for entrance, exit, directional and project-identity signs, shall be allowed in addition to all other signs permitted by this Specific Plan. One permanent ground sign, not to exceed 10 feet in length and 4 feet in height, identifying the project will be allowed at each of the three following locations: The intersection of El Fuerte and Palomar Airport Road, and the intersections east and west of Loker Avenue and Palomar Airport Road.” SECTION 3: That the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan be amended by the addition of text to the sign and graphic section which reads as follows: “All signs within the Carlsbad Airport Business Center Specific Plan shall comply with Chapter 2 1.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.” SECTION 4: That the findings and conditions of the Planning commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4889 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the City’s Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.) INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the Februar 13th day of Y ,OO 1, and thereafter. -4- 23 I . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City c Carlsbad on the day of 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEW -5- 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, FOUR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS, AND A LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO SUPERSEDE THE PARKING, SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS OF THOSE SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONES WITHIN CHAPTERS 21.44 AND 21.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER, CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK, AND CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE CASE NO.: SP 180(E)/SP 181 (C)/SP199(A)/ LCPA 00-l I/ SP 200(A) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as WHEREAS, on January 3, 2001, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Negative Declaration, four separate Specific Plan amendments and a Local Coastal Program Amendment to supersede the sign and graphic and parking requirement sections of the Specific Plans, and adopted Resolutions 4884, 4885, 4886, 4887, 4888, and 4889 recommending to the City Council that the Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendments and Local Coastal Program Amendment be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on 13th dayof February , 2001, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all persons interested in or opposed to SP 180(E), SP 181 (C), SP 199(A), LCPA 00-l 1, and SP 200(A); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared for the project and it was determined that a Negative Declaration could be issued for the project, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of a Negative Declaration, Specific Plan Amendments SP 180(E), SP 181 (C), SP 199(A), and SP 200(A), and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 00-l 1 is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4884, 4885, 4886, 4887, 4888, and 4889, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1 .I6 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply: “NOTICE TO APPLICANT” “The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not latter than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.” PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 13th day of February 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard and Hall. NOES: None ABSENT: None -2- EXHIBIT 6 PARKING & SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS SP 180(E)/SP 181 (C)/SP 199(A)/ LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ ExtmlT7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4884 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION -TO SUPERCEDE THE PARKING AND SIGN AND GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONES WITH CHAPTER 21.44 AND 21.41, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER, CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR, AND CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE CASE NO.: SP 180(E)/SP 18 1 (C)BP 199(A)/ LCPA 00- 1 1/ SP 200(A) WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 180(B), SP 181(B), SP 199(A) and SP 200(A)), regarding property described as Lots l-43 of Carlsbad Tract 81-10, Units 1 and 2a, and Lots 44- 110 of Carlsbad Tract 85-24, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the offke of the county recorder of San Diego County, Lots 1-85 of Carlsbad Tract 81-46, Units 1 through 3, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County, Lots l-26 of Carlsbad Tract 85-17, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County, and Lots l-38 of Carlsbad Tract 74-21, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, tiled in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of January, 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit “ND” dated November 8, 2000, and “PII” dated October 31,2000, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: Findings: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: A. B. C. D. It has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration and the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and It reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad; and Based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PC PESO NO. 4884 -2- 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: G COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4884 -3- City of NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: City of Carlsbad - Industrial zoned properties - various locations. Project Description: Text amendment to supersede the parking and sign requirements of various Specific Plans with Chapters 2 1.44 and 2 1.4 1 respectively of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This is a follow-up action of a previous sign ordinance amendment (ZCA 99-09) to the C-M, M, and P-M zoned properties within the City of Carlsbad. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. DATED: NOVEMBER 8,200O CASE NO: SP 18O(E)/SP 18 1 (C)&P 199(A)/ LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER, CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR, AND CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE. PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 8,200O Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue l Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 l (760) 602-4600 l FAX (760) 602-8559 l www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II CASE NO: SP 180(El/SP 18 1 (C)/SP 199(A)/ LCPA 00- 1 l&P 200(A) DATE: 1 O/3 l/O0 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad Airport Business Center, College Business Park. and Carlsbad Airport Centre 2. APPLICANT: Citv of Carlsbad 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1635 Faraday Av, Carlsbad CA 92008, 760 602-46 13 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: N/A 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Text amendment to suuersede the parking and sign requirements of various Specific Plans with Chapters 21.44 and 21.41 resnectively of the Carlsbad Municiual Code. This is a follow-up action of a previous sign ordinance amendment (ZCA 99-091 to the C- M, M, and P-M zoned properties within the Citv of Carlsbad. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Land Use and Planning lxl Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services q Population and Housing I.3 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems 0 Geological Problems El Energy & Mineral Resources cl Aesthetics 0 Water 0 Hazards 0 Cultural Resources q Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 32 DETERMINATION. El 0 0 cl 0 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental Impact Review (MEIR 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review (MEIR 93-01) including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. //J-m Date Planning Direct2s Si& ure Date 2 Rev. 03/28/96 33 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but &I potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 3 Rev. 03/28/96 34 a If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. l An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a.“Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 03/28/96 35 I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a> b) c) 4 d Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community) (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18) Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or - - 4 b) cl 4 e) f) g> h) 9 expose people to potential impacts involving: Fault rupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Seismic ground shaking? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1.15) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#l:Pgs 5.1-I - 5.1-15) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or till? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Subsidence of the land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-I - 5.1-15) Expansive soils? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1-l - 5.1-15) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2- 11) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2-11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2-11) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No impact El [XI [XI IXI lxl Ix] lxl [XI IXI lxl lzl lxl lxl El El lxl txl Ix1 lxl Ix1 Rev. 03128196 36 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). g) h) 9 Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..211) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5,.2-l 1) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2-11) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2-11) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2- 11) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5..2-11) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: 4 b) 4 d) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs 5.3- 1 - 5.3-12) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12) Create objectionable odors? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the 4 b) 4 4 4 f-l g) proposal result in: Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7.22) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24) Potentially Significant Impact 0. q q q q q lxl q q q IXI q q q q q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q q 0 q q El q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Less Than Significant Impact q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q I7 No Impact El lxl lxl lxl El txl q IXI ixI lxl q IXI lxl lxl lxl Ix1 El lxl Ix1 lxl 6 Rev. 03128196 37 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). 4 4 VIII. 4 b) c) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24) ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 & 5.13- 1 - 5.13-9) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-I - 5.10.1-5) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-l - 5.9 15) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9- 1 - 5.9-15) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect 4 b) c> 4 e) upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4) Schools? (#l:Pgs 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7) Other governmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7) XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) Potentially Significant Impact q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Less Than Significanl Impact q q q q q q q 0 q q q q q q q q q q No Impact [XI lxl txl [XI Ix] Ix] Ix] lxl IXI lxl lxl Ix1 txl Ix1 Ix1 Ix1 lzl Ix] 7 Rev. 03128196 38 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). b) cl 4 4 fl 8) XIII. a) b) c> XIV. a> b) c> 4 d Communications systems? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3-7) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8) Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5, #2) Have or demonstrate a negative aesthetic effect? (#l:PgsS.ll-1 -5.11-5,#2) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.1 l-l - 5.11-5, #2) CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Disturb paleontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8- 10) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8- 10) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Less Than Significant Impact q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q NO Impact lxl Ix] lzl lxl la IXI Ix1 lxl El lxl Ix] IXI Ix1 lxl lxl El IXI 8 * Rev. 03/28/96 39 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? q q q Ix] (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when - . viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, q q q •l either directly or indirectly? 9 Rev. 03/28/96 40 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: 4 Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. 4 Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,“ describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 41 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The proposed project consists of revising four different specific plans within the City of Carlsbad’s industrial area. The plans contain parking and sign standards that are no longer current. The Carlsbad municipal code has been revised and new standards established since the approval of the specific plans. The specific plans will be revised to specify that the parking and sign and graphic requirements be superseded by the Carlsbad municipal code. 11 Rev. 03128196 II. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The project falls within the scope of the City’s MEIR for the City of Carlsbad General Plan update (EIR 93-01) certified in September, 1994, in which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for cumulative impacts to air quality and traffic. An MEIR may not be used to review projects if it was certified more than five years prior to the filing of an application for a later project except under certain circumstances. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was certified more than five years ago, the City’s preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was certified. The only potential changed circumstance, the intersection failure at Palomar Airport Rd. and El Camino Real, is in the process of being mitigated to below a level of significance. Additionally, there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the MEIR was certified. Therefore, the MEIR remains adequate to review later projects. All feasible mitigation measures identified by the MEIR which are appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project. B. Environmental Impact Discussion Air Quality The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air quality impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. 12 Rev. 03128196 43 Transportation/Circulation The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan’s Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. III. EARLIER ANALYSES USED The following documents were used in the analysis .of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008, (760) 602-4613. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-Ol), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department. 2. Sia Ordinance Amendment Negative Declaration for ZCA 99-09, dated march 20,2000, City of Carlsbad Planning Department. 13 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES None ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM None APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESq MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature 14 Rev. 03/28/96 Y 3” 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4885 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 180(E) TO REVISE THE PARKING AND SIGN REGULATIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTERS 2 1.44 AND 2 1.4 1 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL AND NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER CASE NO.: SP 180(E) WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 180(B), regarding property described as Lots l-43 of Carlsbad Tract 81-10, Units 1 and 2a, and Lots 44- 110 of Carlsbad Tract 85-24, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County. (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said request for a Specific Plan amendment as shown on Exhibit “W” dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department, CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER - SP 180(E) as provided by Government Code Section 65.453; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of January 1,2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Specific Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 1982, the City Council approved SPlSO(B), as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2019 and City Council Ordinance No. 9646. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CAFUSBAD RESEARCH CENTER - SP 180(E) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FindinPs: 1. The proposed development as described by the Specific Plan (SP18O(E)) is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. 3. The proposed revised parking and signage development standards will ensure compliance with the updated parking and signage standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Specific Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different fi-om this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given PC RESO NO. 4885 -2- 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously othenvise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: i CARLSBAD PLANN!ING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4885 -3- 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4886 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 181(C) TO REVISE THE PARKING AND SIGN REGULATIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTERS 2 1.44 AND 2 1.4 1 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND TO THE SOUTH AND WEST OF PALOMAR AIRPORT IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE CASE NO.: SP 181(C) WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 181(B), regarding property described as Lots l-85 of Carlsbad Tract 81-46, Units 1 through 3, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said request for a Specific Plan amendment as shown on Exhibits “X” dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department, CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE - SP 181(C) as provided by Government Code Section 65.453; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of January 2001,. hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Specific Plan amendment; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 1998, the City Council approved SPlSl(B), as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4374 and City Council Ordinance No. NS-458. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning ~ Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE - SP 181(C) based on the following findings [and subject to the following conditions]: Findinps: 1. The proposed development as described by the Specific Plan (SP181(C)) is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. 3. The proposed revised parking and signage development standards will ensure compliance with the updated parking and signage standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Specific Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given PC RESO NO. 4886 -2- 5u 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 1 CARLSBAD PLAN&NG COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4886 -3- 5/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4887 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 199(A) TO REVISE THE PARKING AND SIGN REGULATIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTERS 21.44 AND 21.41 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST AND WEST OF COLLEGE BLVD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR CASE NO.: SP 199(A) WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 199, regarding property described as Lots 1-26 of Carlsbad Tract 85-17, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said request for a Specific Plan amendment as shown on Exhibit “Y” dated January 3, 2001, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department, COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK - SP 199(A) as provided by Government Code Section 65.453; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of January 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Specific Plan amendment; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 1986, the City Council approved SP199, as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2577 and City Council Resolution Ordinance No. 9821. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of COLLEGE BUSINESS PARE - SP 199(A) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed development as described by the Specific Plan (SP199(A)) is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. 3. The proposed revised parking and signage development standards will ensure compliance with the updated parking and signage standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Specific Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 2. This approval is granted subject to the approval of LCPA 00-11 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4888 for the other approval. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, PC RESO NO. 4887 -2- 5-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ATTEST: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: QQ CARLSBdD PLANkN:::;ISSION Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4887 -3- 3-4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4888 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO AMEND THE PARKING AND SIGN REQUIREMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST AND WEST OF COLLEGE BLVD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR CASE NO: LCPA 00-l 1 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 199, regarding property described as Lots l-26 of Carlsbad Tract 85-17, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibits “Y,” attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 4887 dated January 3,200l as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day-of January 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: 4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. w At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on November 9,2000, and ending on December 21,2000, staff shall present to the City Council a summary of the comments received. Cl That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR - LCPA 00-l 1 based on the following findings: Findinps: 1. 2. 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by this amendment, in that the College Business Park Specific Plan (SP 199) was adopted as partial implementation for the area it covers and the parking and sign and graphic requirements of Specific Plan 199 will be superseded with Chapters 21.44 and 21.41, respectively, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code which implements the Local Coastal Program. That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to keep the College Business Park Specific Plan consistent with the Mello II segment. This approval is granted subject to the approval of SP 199(A) and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4887 for those other approvals. PC RESO NO. 4888 -2- 5-6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: C&SBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4888 -3- 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4889 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 200(A) TO REVISE THE PARKING AND SIGN REGULATIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTERS 2 1.44 AND 2 1.4 1 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST AND WEST OF EL FUERTE STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER CASE NO.: SP 200(A) ~ WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad is amending Specific Plan 200, regarding ~ property described as Lots l-38 of Carlsbad Tract 74-21, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County (“the Property”); and I WHEREAS, said request for a Specific Plan amendment as shown on Exhibit “Z” dated January 3, 2000, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department, CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER - SP 200(A) as provided by Government Code Section 65.453; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of January 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Specific Plan amendment; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 1986, the City Council approved SP200, as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2609 and City Council Ordinance No. 9819. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER - SP 200(A) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findinps: 1. The proposed development as described by the Specific Plan (SP200(A)) is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. 3. The proposed revised parking and signage development standards will ensure compliance with the updated parking and signage standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Specific Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different fkom this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a PC RESO NO. 4889 -2- 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously othenvise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Compas, Heineman, L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 7 CARLSBAD PLAl&ING C:;ISSION ATTEST: Planning Director 1 PC RESO NO. 4889 -3- EXHIBIT 8 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. 1 0 Application complete date: 1 o-30-00 P.C. AGENDA OF: January 3,200l Project Planner: Van Lynch Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: SP-180(E) - CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER SP 181(C) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE SP 199(A) / LCPA 00-l 1 - COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK SP 200(A) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER - An amendment to various Specific Plans within the industrial zone to specify that the Carlsbad Municipal Code supersedes the parking and sign requirements of those specific plans. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4884 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4885, 4886, 4887, 4888 and 4889 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of SP 180(E), SP 18 1 (C), SP 199(A), LCPA 00-l 1, and SP 200(A) based on the findings contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION In July, 1999, the Carlsbad City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention directing staff to initiate a zone code amendment to amend the City’s Sign Ordinance (Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) to incorporate clear and comprehensive sign standards for the City’s office/industrial zones (i.e., C-M, M and P-M zones). Planning and zoning law states that no zoning ordinance may be adopted or amended in an area covered by a specific plan unless it is consistent with the adopted specific plan. This action is to amend the specific plan documents within the C-M, M, and P-M zones to be consistent with the new sign ordinance and to the City’s previously amended parking ordinance (Chapter 2 1.44). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This project consists of amending the Carlsbad Research Center, Carlsbad Airport Business Center, College Business Park, and Carlsbad Airport Centre specific plans to specify that the sign and graphic and parking requirements for development within these plans is subject to the signage standards (Chapters 21.41) and parking standards (Chapter 21.44) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The City is processing a zone code amendment (ZCA 99-09) that will change the sign standards within the city’s office/industrial zones. The new standards will conflict with the existing development standards contained within the above-mentioned specific plans. Since State law SP 180(E), SP 181(C), SP 199(A), SP 200(A) January 3,200l Pane 2 precludes the adoption of a zoning ordinance that would be in conflict with an existing specific plan, the specific plans must be amended. The amendment will delete the sign and graphic standards contained within the specific plans and will insert a reference to Chapter 2 1.4 1 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for the applicable signage development standards. This will allow the zoning ordinance to be amended and be in compliance with the specific plans. The amendments to the specific plans will also adopt the City’s parking ordinance (Chapter 21.44) as the parking standards for these specific plans. The City’s parking ordinance has been previously amended to revise the parking standard for the manufacturing, office, and warehouse uses. The revised parking standards are equal to or more restrictive than the specific plan parking standard. Specific Plan 199 and 200 already reference Chapter 21.41 of the Municipal Code, but have some additional text that is redundant to the zoning ordinance, which is proposed to be removed for clarity. Specific Plan 181 makes reference to conformance to Chapter 21.44 of the zoning ordinance. Staff recommends referencing the Carlsbad Municipal Code rather than the zoning ordinance, which is correct and consistent with the other specific plans. Specific Plan 180 will have the entire parking standards deleted and will reference the Parking Ordinance. Carlsbad Research Center (SP 180) is located north of Palomar Airport and west of El Camino Real. It is bisected by Faraday Avenue and College Boulevard. Carlsbad Airport Centre (SP 181) is located north of Palomar Airport Road and south and west of Palomar Airport. The College Business Park (SP 199), the undeveloped industrial park north of Palomar Airport Road and west of College Blvd., is located within the coastal zone and requires a Local Coastal Program amendment. Carlsbad Airport Business Center (SP 200) is located north of Palomar Airport Road, east of El Camino Real, and on the east and west side of El Fuerte Street. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendations for approval of these specific plan amendments and Local Coastal Program Amendment was developed by analyzing their compliance/consistency with the Carlsbad General Plan and applicable Local Coastal Program policies. General Plan The proposed specific plan amendments are consistent with the General Plan in that the specific plans implement the General Plan by regulating the intensity of land uses by establishing development parameters such as sign and parking regulations. Zoning The amendments to the various specific plans will eliminate the discrepancies between the zoning ordinance and the specific plans. As mentioned above, the zoning ordinance cannot amend the various affected specific plans without processing a specific plan amendment. These SP 180(E), SP 18 1 (C), SP 199(A), SP 200(A) January 3,200l Pane 3 amendments will supersede the sign and parking requirements of the specific plans with the sign and parking ordinances. Local Coastal Program Specific Plan 199, College Business Park, is located within the Coastal Zone. Currently, the City’s Sign Ordinance and Parking Ordinance constitutes the implementing signage and parking regulations for the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program (LCP). Specifically, Subsection 21.41.070(11) of the existing Sign Ordinance includes specific sign restrictions for properties within the coastal zone. By referencing the sign ordinance and parking ordinance within the specific plans, the documents will be consistent with the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that these specific plan amendments and Local Coastal Program Amendment (SP 180(E)/ SP 18 l(C)/ SP 199(A)/ LCPA 00-l 1 /SP 200(A)) will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore issued a Negative Declaration on November 8,200O. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4884 (Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4885 (SP 180(E)) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4886 (SP 18 1 (C)) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4887 (SP 199(A)) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4888 (LCPA 00-l 1) 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4889 (SP 200(A)) 7. Location Map VL:cs PLANNING COMMISSION January 3,200l EXHIBIT 9 Page 2 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne stated that agenda items #I, #6, #7, #8, #9, #IO, #I 1 and #12 are normally heard in a public hearing context, with the exception of item #l . All items are minor and routine in nature. There are no outstanding issues and staff is recommending approval of all eight (8) items. Staff recommended that the items be taken as a group, the public hearing be opened and closed, and all items be voted upon as a group. In addition, Mr. Wayne stated that if either the public or any one of the Commissioners desired to discuss one of the projects, the Item could be pulled and Staff would respond to questions. Mr. Wayne advised the Commission that their action on these agenda items will be final unless they are appealed to the City Council , except item #I 1 which will automatically go to council. Chairperson Segall asked if anyone wished to pull any item. Commissioner Nielsen requested that items # 7 and # 9 be pulled for discussion. MOTION: ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Trigas, and duly seconded, that items #l , #6, #8, #I 0, 1. 6. 8. 10. 11. 12. #I 1, and #12 be approved as recommended by Staff. PCD/GPC 00-06 - FARADAY BUILDING PURCHASE - Request for approval of a Planning Commission Determination of General Plan Consistency for the City acquisition of property. CDP 00-29 - TRAUTMAN RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of a single-family residence within the City’s Coastal Zone located near the end of a cul-de-sac bulb along the west side of Holly Brae Lane within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. CDP 00-34 - VALLONE RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of a single-family residence within the City’s Coastal Zone located along the east side of Franciscan Road south of Island Way, within the La Costa Downs subdivision (SP 201) within Local Facilities Management Zone 22, including the Errata sheet dated January 3,200l. CUP 225x3 - WESTBLUFF ASSOCIATES, LTD. - Request for an extension of CUP 225x2 to allow the continued, on-premises, sale of alcoholic beverages at the Peking Garden Restaurant located at 6986 El Camino Real, Suite K/l (Westbluff Plaza) in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. SP-180(E) - CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER SP-181 (C) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE SP199(A)/LCPA 00-l 1 - COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK SP 200(A) - CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER - An amendment to various Specific Plans within the industrial zone to specify that the Carlsbad Municipal Code supersedes the parking and sign requirements of those specific plans. CUP 00-29 - TECHBUILT WAREHOUSE SD-377-04 - Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of an unmanned telecommunications facility on an existing building at 2875 Loker Avenue East in the PM Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. PLANNING COMMISSION January 3,200l Page 3 VOTE: 7-o-o AYES: Segall, Trigas, Nielsen, Baker, Heineman, L’Heureux, Compas NOES: None ABSTAIN: None 3 E .I I- , I I I i I ( i i 4 ; City of Carlsbad Records Management Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 13, 2001, to consider an amendment to various Specific Plans within the industrial zone to specify that the Carlsbad Municipal Code supersedes the parking and sign requirements of those specific plans. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after Friday, February 9, 2001. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. If you challenge the amendment to various Specific Plans in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SP 180(E)/SP 18 l(C)/SP 199(A)/LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) CASE NAME: CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE COLLEGE BUSINESS PARR CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 1,200l CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive * Carlsbad, CA 92008-l 989 - (760) 434-2808 49 PARKING & SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS SP 180(E)/SP 181(C)/SP 199(A)/ LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) (form A) TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice 8P lgO(E)/sp lgl(c)/sp igg(A)/sP 200(A)/LCPA 00-11 - Carl&ad Research Ctr Carlsbad Airport Business Ctr ~~F1SBa~U~~P8rtheC~Z;~nc~1~~e~~iZehscS E”;t”; CoUncil. Please notice the itim for the council meeting of First Available Hearing Thank you. Assistant City Man l/8 Page Ad January 18, 2001 Oate p g F F= ?* r: *^ r t ;,,- ‘-’ 1: - City of Carlsbad NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 3,2001, to consider an amendment to various Specific Plans within the industrial zone to specify that the Carlsbad Municipal Code supersedes the parking and sign requirements of those specific plans. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 28, 2000. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. If you challenge the amendment to various Specific Plans in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SP 180(E)/SP 181 (C)/SP 199(A)/LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) CASE NAME: CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER PUBLISH: DECEMBER 21,200O CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue l Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 l (780) 602-4600 l FAX (760) 602-8559 l www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ F p F r‘ ;y +c -- h ‘, 1 r.2 : h i ;.- ..i . - -. City of Carlsbad NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 3,2001, to consider an amendment to various Specific Plans within the industrial zone to specify that the Carisbad Municipal Code supersedes the parking and sign requirements of those specific plans. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 28, 2000. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. If you challenge the amendment to various Specific Plans in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SP 180(E)/SP 181 (C)/SP 199(A)/LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) CASE NAME: CARLSBADRESEARCHCENTER CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK CARLSBAD AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER PUBLISH: DECEMBER 21,200O CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue l Carlsbad. CA 92006-7314 l (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-8559 l www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us PARKING & SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS SP 180(E)/SP 181 (C)/SP 199(A)/ LCPA 00-l l/SP 200(A) @09E nse1 Slap? ssaigr?; ‘xv-:. . A-z; . . ERIC JOHNSTON ’ PLANNING SYSTEMS SUITE 100 1530 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CRIVELLO COMMERCIAL DEV SUITE 110 2260 RUTHERFORD RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARK MCLAREN PALOMAR CREST LLC SUITE 655 4370 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92122 LELAND AYERS CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 2006 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92008 A notice has been mailed to all property owners/occupants listed herein. / / Date: A /j4yh sb”at”Ad yGLt$ I,:. SFGl~c: DaaJ UlOOlUS Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use templste fcr :r:: . City Clerk 1 .Ibl CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST CITY OF ENCINITAS 801 PINE AVE 505 S VULCAN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST SANDAG 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR STE 800 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 2730 LOKER AVE WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SD COUNTY PLANNING STE 50 STE B STE B 330 GOLDENSHORE 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD 5201 RUFFIN RD LONG BEACH CA 90802 SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER VAN LYNCH l/18/2001 73 ,\ A-WED’@ Address Labels CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed S heetsTM L,se temp;& fc- - _ ” ERIC JOHNSTON PLANNING SYSTEMS SUITE 100 1530 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CRIVELLO COMMERCIAL DEV SUITE 110 2260 RUTHERFORD RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARK MCLAREN PALOMAR CREST LLC SUITE 655 4370 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92122 LELAND AYERS CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 2006 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 cl &, AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160@ LABELS - 5163 LCPA MAILING LIST (GOVERNMENT AGENCIES) SANDAG (SAN DIEGO COUNTY) WELLS FARGO PLAZA SUITE 800 APPENDIX A (LIST IS REQUIRED BY COASTAL 401 B ST COMMISSION) SANDIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ROOM 700 1lOWESTAST SANDIEGO CA 92101 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 95812-3044 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES ROOM 100 1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR HOUSING SUITE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 958 14 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROOM 5504 1120NST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DISTRICT 11 CALTRANS RESOURCES AGENCY BILL FIGGE, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RM 1311 MAIL STATION 65 1416 NINTH ST 2829 JUAN ST SACRAMENTO CA 95812 SAN DIEGO CA 92110 U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SUITE W-2605 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-l 888 ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CHUCK NAJARIAN 1516 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 COASTAL CONSERVANCY SUITE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION P 0 BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIROMENTAL COORD 350 GOLDEN SHORE P 0 BOX 944246 LONG BEACH CA 90802 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 SOUTHERN REGION JOHN WALSTROM, TECHNICAL SERVICES 8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DR SAND DIEGO CA 92108 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS SUITE 1005 100 HOWE AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS SUITE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 9411 l-4704 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD PO BOX 100 SACARAMENTO CA 95801 ’ REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 SUITE B FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD WESTERN REGION SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 PO BOX 92007 LOS ANGELES CA 90009 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ATTN: GARY RESOURCE CONSERVATIONIST SUITE 102 2121-C SECOND ST DAVIS CA 95616 PACIFIC REGIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN - OCRM, 55MC4 NIORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HIGHWAY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA - SUITE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2 197 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 611 RYAN PLAZA DR STE 400 ARLINGTON TX 760 1 l-4005 USDA - RURAL DEVLOPMENT 430 ST DEPT 4169 DAVIS CA 95616 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PLACE NORTH WEST WASHINGTON DC 2006 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ENGINEER POBOX2711 LOS ANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMANDANT, ELEVENTH NAVAL DISTRICT DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER SAN DIEGO CA 92132 U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SUITE RM W1834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REGION PO BOX 427 BOULDER CITY CO 89005 SUPERINTENDENT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK 190 1 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS RONALD M. JAEGER 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIRECTOR SUITE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94 103 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REGIONAL ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 ’ DOUGLAS WARNOCK, SUPERINTENDENT REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK DRAWER N 11112ND ST CRESCENT CITY CA 95531 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUITE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 Smooth Feed SheetsTM H:iADMIN’iLABELS\LCP INTERESTED PARTIES OLIVENHAIN M.W.D. 1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD ENCINITAS CA 92024 REGIONAL WATER QUAL. BD EXECUTIVE OFFICER SUITE B 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92124 CRAIG ADAMS SIERRA CLUB SAN DIEGO CHAPTER 3820 RAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 GUY MOORE JR 6503 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 LESLIE ESPOSITO CYRIL AND MARY GIBSON 1893 AMELFI DRIVE 12142 ARGYLE DRIVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP; SPACE 3 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DRIVE LOS ANGELES CA 90069 ‘KIM SEIBLY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC PO BOX 1831 SAN DIEGO CA 92112 MARY GRIGGS STATE LANDS COMMISSSION SUITE 100 SOUTH 100 HOWE AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT ROAD BRUNSWICK MAINE 0401 I SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JOAN VOKAC - SUITE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 RICHARD RETECKI COASTAL CONSERVANCY SUITE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 ANTHONY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AVE ESCONDIDO CA 92026 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAURA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 COPIES TO: + CITY CLERK + MAIN LIBRARY + BRANCH LIBRARY + WATER DISTRICT U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICES 2730 LOKER AVE WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF ENCINITAS COM DEV DEPARTMENT 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018 KENNETH E SULZER SANDAG - EXEC DIRECTOR IST INT’L PLAZA, SUITE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 JAN SOBEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO BOX 1605 CARLSBAD CA 92008 BILL MCLEAN c/o LAKESHORE GARDENS 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 SPIERS ENTERPRISES DWIGHT SPIERS SUITE 139 23 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 SUPERVISOR BILL HORN A-ITN: ART DANELL COUNTY OF SD, ROOM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LEE ANDERSON CRA PRESIDENT 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 FLOYD ASHBY 416 LA COSTA AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 GEORGE BOLTON 6583 BLACKRAIL ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009 I?!! &, AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160@