HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-15; City Council; 16192; Faraday Avenue Extension Agreement Amendmentwo 8 2 %
. . p 2 9 P 9 5 % 2
. . g 2 d Y $
CITY OF CARLS
AB# Id! !q&
MTG. 5/I 5101
, DEPT. ENG
SAHTID AND 164NCH POTABLE AND 84NCH RECYCLED
WATER PIPELINE AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council of the City of Carlsbad: Adopt Resolution No. &? /- / 4Froving Amendment
No. 1 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with Kim ey-Horn & Associates
for Environmental Impact Report preparation and preliminary and final engineering design
for Faraday Avenue Road extension from Orion Way to Melrose Drive (Project No. 3622) and
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer Reaches SAHTl A, SAHTI B, SAHTIC, and SAHTID; and
appropriation of funds.
Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District: Adopt Resolution No. It23
approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn
& Associates for Environmental Impact Report preparation and preliminary and final engineering
design for Faraday Avenue 164nch potable and 8-Inch recycled water pipeline.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District entered into an agreement with
Kimley-Horn & Associates which includes the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report and
preliminary engineering for the extension of Faraday Avenue from Orion Way to the easterly city
limits, the upper reaches of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer and the Carlsbad Oaks
North development. The current appropriations for this project do not provide sufficient funding for
project tasks not included in the original project scope of work.
The original scope of services included funding for an estimated amount of archaeological and
biological surveys as needed to prepare the Environmental Impact Report. After completing their
field review, the consultant has confirmed the need to study eleven sites. The cost to review the
eleven sites exceeds the estimated cost as included in the original scope. Staff recommends that
the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates,
to provide additional archaeological services.
In conjunction with the approval of Amendment No. 1, which requires an appropriation of $35,610,
staff is recommending that the City Council appropriate an additional $100,000 for this project. The
additional $100,000 appropriation will facilitate the efficient processing and funding of future project
tasks and additional project costs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Relative to CEQA, the work associated with this action is defined as Class 6, Information
Collection, and is categorically exempt. Prior to beginning the final design, the Environmental
Impact Report will be brought to the City Council for certification.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As currently programmed, there are insufficient appropriations to cover the subject amendment.
In addition to the appropriation of $35,610 as needed to fund the subject amendment, staff is
requesting an additional appropriation of $100,000 for additional project costs. The $135,610 will be
I
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. VP j Iv-
appropriated from the Gas Tax Fund, to be repaid with fees collected in conjunction with Bridge
and Thoroughfare District No. 5. Previously $120,000 has been appropriated from the Gas Tax
Fund.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council of the City of Carlsbad: Resolution No. m/ -/ approving
Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates
for Environmental Impact Report preparation and preliminary and final engineering
design for the Faraday Avenue extension from Orion Way to Melrose Drive and the
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor Sewer reaches SAHTIA, SAHTIB, SAHTIC and
SAHTI D and appropriation of funds.
2. Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District: Resolution
No. lla3 approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Kimley-Horn & Associates for Environmental Impact Report preparation and preliminary
and final engineering design for the Faraday Avenue 16-inch potable and 8-inch recycled
water pipeline.
3. Amendment No. 1 the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates.
1
2
3
4
5
6
"7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,.w.*
t:,+q,?. fi
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
KIMLEY-HORN 8, ASSOCIATES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION AND PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR FARADAY AVENUE ROAD
EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO MELROSE DRIVE
AND SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR SEWER
REACHES SAHTIA, SAHTIB, SAHTIC, AND SAHTID, AND
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California considers it necessary and
n the public interest to approve and accept Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
4greement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, in the amount of $35,610, for additional
archaeological resource testing; and
WHEREAS, the contractor, Kimley-Horn & Associates possesses the necessary skills and
qualifications to provide the needed services; and
WHEREAS, an amendment to the consultant agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates
ras been prepared and submitted hereto; and
WHEREAS, to fund the subject amendment, and to provide $100,000 for additional project
:osts requires additional appropriations in the amount of $135,610 from the Gas Tax Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
Zalifornia, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the City of Carlsbad and
Qmley-Horn & Associates is hereby approved in the amount of $35,610 and the Mayor is
ruthorized and directed to execute said amendment.
v
‘/
‘I
r/
‘/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
16
18
23
24
25
26
27
26
(SEAL)
That the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate additional funds in the
amount of $135,610 from the Gas Tax Fund, to be transferred to the Gas Tax project fund.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council
day Of May I 2001 by the following vote, to wit:
Counicl Members Nygaard and Hall.
Page 2 of Resolution No. 2001-147
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/ \‘A:, .; IL-. .I. , p ^I ‘4’
RESOLUTION NO. 1123
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (CMWD) APPROVING AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT PREPARATION AND PRELIMINARY AND FINAL
ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR FARADAY AVENUE 16-INCH POTABLE
AND 8-INCH RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District of the City of
Zarlsbad considers it necessary and in the public interest to approve and accept Amendment
Jo. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, in the amount of
535,610, for additional archaeological resource testing; and
WHEREAS, the contractor, Kimley-Horn & Associates possesses the necessary skills and
qualifications to provide the needed services; and
WHEREAS, an amendment to the consultant agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates
ras been prepared and submitted hereto; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of Carlsbad Municipal
water District (CMWD) of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the Carlsbad Municipal Water
District and Kimley-Horn & Associates is hereby approved in the amount of $35,610 and the
‘resident is authorized and directed to execute said amendment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Carlsbad Municipal
hater District held on the 15th day of May , 2001 by the
ollowing vote, to wit:
AYES: Board Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard and Hall.
er Kulchin.
rTTEST:
(SEAL)
5
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
FARADAY AVENUE ROAD EXTENSION FROM ORION WAY TO
MELROSE DRIVE SURVEY, MAPPING AND DESIGN SERVICES
This Amendment is entered into and effective as of the 21st day of
May I 2001 amending the agreement dated May 8, 2000, by and
between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, (“City”), the Carlsbad Municipal Water
District, a Public Agency organized under the Municipal Water Act of 1911, and a Subsidiary
District of the City of Carlsbad, (“District”), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, a North Carolina
corporation, (“Contractor”) to provide environmental and civil engineering services for
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and preliminary and final engineering.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the initial agreement, dated May 8, 2000, identified a scope of work which
included the testing of cultural resource sites up to a $10,000 dollar task budget; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this aforementioned agreement desire to alter the scope of
work as follows: Add additional testing of cultural resource sites in support of the preparation of
the Environmental Impact Report, as detailed on attached Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, a supplemental scope of work and fee schedule have been negotiated and
agreed to between the parties hereto, and shown on Exhibit “A” Scope of Services and Fee;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the City, the District and Contractor agree as follows:
1. Contractor shall provide services as outlined on the attached Exhibit “A”.
2. City/District shall pay Contractor for all work associated with Paragraph 1
above, on a time and materials basis not-to-exceed $35,610. Contractor shall provide
City/District on a monthly basis, copies of invoices sufficiently detailed to include hours
performed, hourly rates, and related activities and costs for approval by City/District.
7/25/00
3. Contractor shall complete all work outlined on the attached Exhibit “A” by
November 52001, or by the expiration of the agreement amended hereby.
4. All other provisions of the aforementioned agreement entered into on
May 8, 2000, by and between City, District and Contractor shall remain in full force and effect.
5. All requisite insurance policies to be maintained by the Contractor shall
include coverage for the amended assignment and scope of work.
Acknowledged and Accepted:
CONTRACTOR:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., A Nort&Carol$n@ corporation
By: -(sign hereJ
b&,,;d 50 &cm /iic.c?t-es&~ t
&Lme/&) ” /t?&%.&X JLL
WIG cd. CHRISIIMEN
Cammksbn H 1277134
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
/4-d&
(Proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by must be attached.)
(President or vice-president and secretary or assistant secretary must sign for corporations. If only one officer signs, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering that officer to bind the corporation.)
(If signed by an individual partner, the partnership must attach a statement of partnership authorizing the partner to execute this instrument.)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
7/25/00
February 1,200l
Marshall Plantz
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Contract Amendment No. 1; Faraday Avenue Projects 095272000
Dear Mr. Plantz:
Cotton Bridges Associates informed us that the archaeologist, Brian Smith and
Associates would need additional compensation for additional testing, laboratory
analysis and report preparation for eleven different cultural resource sites. Please see
the attached letter detailing the request. Our fee for providing these services will be
$35,610. The following table lists the cost for each site needing further testing.
Temp 1
Temn 7
SITES WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY COST
$5,690
3-850
.”
J I -O&+0 2,600
ent boundary 5 o!ul Site partially within developml
SDl-5231
Total Cost for Site Testing
Less $lOk Previously Allocated for testing of site outside
development boundary
SUB-TOTAL
‘1’“”
$34,695
(10,000)
524.695
Brian Smith 8 Associates
Cotton Bridges Ass
Kimley-Horn and AC n-,-4 :-^L:--
ociates
-. .xociates
LAJUIUII I~UUII Effort n..L----..,r--r ..-A...- ,lr.nr,
! $24,695 1
4,950
3,000 n rb-.r CYUCJCOllSUll.t3~K MXKUP ( I U-m) I L,Y03
TOTAL .Wi.610
n
suite 301
517 Fourth Avenue
San Diego, Caliiia
92101
n
TEL 619 234 9411
FAX 619 234 9433
Mr. Marshall Plan& February 1 , 2001, Page 2
Please have authorized persons execute both copies of this letter in the spaces
provided below, retain one copy and return the other to me. This letter when signed
by both parties constitutes an amendment and supplement to the Contract. Please
notify me in writing immediately if this letter is not in accordance with your
instructions.
Very truly yours,
mDzT777.
Dennis J. Landaal, P.E.
Project Manager
-*I* ‘.LI.LVVI e.LLI II “Y I I VI I, Y,,&YULd. I ,dd”L. I,“. ALI I-.C,3
COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATES, I NC.
URBAN PLANNIWC AN0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
January 25,200l
tc!!
Dennis Landaal, P.E. Kimlay-Horn and Associates, Inc. 517 Fourth Avenue Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92101
Subject:
Dear Dennis:
Faraday Avenue Cultural Resources Scope Adjustment
Pursuant to discussions with you and City M, Brian P. Smith and Associates (BSA) has conducted ali~~reviewandsurveyworkfortheFaradayAvsnue,AguaHedionaSewerandTchang Specific Plan project, Thmugh this initial work effbrt, BSA has identified 17 cultural resource silos witbin the areaofpotontialeffect(APE) ofthe projeotthatwillrequire additionaltesting, laboratory nnalysis, and report preparation.
Our original scope of work and budget allocated a limited amount ($10,000) fbr cultural resources testing. Ourscoperecognizedthatthelevelof~~assooiatedpvithany~gcauldnotbed~ined uutll the Phase I work was completed (the rec13rds sea& and survey) at which time the number and extentofsitewouldbekaowu. Th4original$lO,oQOalIocatedfbrte~willpartiallycaver~etesting needed; however, additional funds will he needed to complete the testing in aooordance with City of Carlsbad Cultural Resonmes Guidelines and the CEQA Cuideliaes. BSA has prepared a Testing Cost Pmposal fixeach ofthe 17cultural sites(attached). Wehavoreviewedthelocationsofthesitesandwill beabletoeliminateapproximately6ofthesitesastheywiIlnotbeimpactedbytheproject. Test&will be required for the remaiuing 11 sites. The attached table indicates the sites and the costassociatedwith each site.
At this time au amendment of $24,695 for BSA and $4,950 fix CBA is requested M address the additional oultural resources sites (total amount of S 29,645). ‘Ihis amount is in addition to the $10,000 previously allocated for testing. Please also note, as stated within BSA’s Testing Cost Proposal, any additional work necessary resulting from a discovery of human remains would be an additional cost.
Please give me a CalI if you have any questions regarding the proposed scope and budgcr amendment.
Senior Assbciate
#1165.00
747 FAST GREEN STREET, SUITE 300 ’ PASADEN (X91101-2119 (626) 3WOlOZ l FAX (626) 304-0402 l E-MAILcba@pacbell.net
6336 GREENWICH DRIVE, SUmE F l SAN DIECO, C% 92122-5922 @5B) 6254056 l FM (Ese) 625-0545 9 E-MA1 cbasd@pacbell.net
720 SUNRISE AVENUE, SUITE 202-C . ROSMLLE, CA 956614509 (916) 7804390 l FAX (9161760-9308 . EMAIL chasa@Jps.net
-... -.-.._
4#11,. L4.LUU.A J*LLl-II L” , I “I v U,\I”OLJ~ “=a”&. 1-w. 111
Summary of Impacted Sites Required to be Tested for Signifkance
t.a/3 .
All of the sites identified in the table below will be impacted by the proposed projti Culti
sites within the study area, but net impacted by the project are not listed in the table.
c
-, ,
1>
*
Site Temp 1
Site Temp 2
Site Temp 3
“Site Temp 4
Site Temp 7
SDI-2714
SDI-2722
WI-2776
SDI~5229
SDI-5230
SDI-523 1
:
TOTAL’COST for SITE TESTING
Less $10,000 previously allocated tir testing
TOTU
$5,690
$3,850
$2700
$3200
$1,525
$150
a575
$735
$150
$2,600
$5,930
$34,695
(~10,000)
$24,695
B~ANF. STAND Assam ARcHAEQLoGcm RIcuPALE0NToLoGIcAI CONSULIING 14671 mx cnvm sue hrm, orooryu 92129 l2s28 roaAn emu, slma 3, FOWAY, ciumo=a 02064 Pmm l8SQ 484-OSlS: Fur @SE) 4664523
November 14,2000.
Tim Gnibus Cotton/Beland Associates ii$ yich Drive
San Diego, California 92122
RE: Faraday Avenue / Agua Hedionda Sewer Revised Testing Cost Proposal
Dear Tim:
As authorized by Cotton/Beland Associates, we initiated the testing of fOUr prehistoric sites located along the Faraday Avenue/Agua Hedionda Sewer Project in October. Three of thcst Sites have+ been found to be much larger and contain more extensive artifact collections than anticipated, based on the’infonnation provided in the site record forms. A primary consideration to the ttsting conducted was the dense ground cover that has prevented accurate visual appraisal of the potential of the sites based on surface evidence, Given the existing condition of the dense vegetation graund cover in areas where important sites are resent, I have revisited the recordtd sites to reassess the scope of work needed to accurately test x e sites and conduct the impact analysis.
The four sites tested include Temp 1, SDI-2722, SDI-2776, and SD1523 1. In general, we have encountered dense vegetation which has masked much of the sites, and upon clearing and close inspection, the size and complexity of the cultural resources has been found to be much greater than related on the site registration forms, In particular, Site SDI-5231 was previously tested in the mid 197Os, but our field testing has determined that the previous testing missed much of the eastern half of the archaeological site, and faiIed to actually delineate the boundaries of the deposit or locate the areas with the greatest research potential. Our initial work proposed updating the testing program with 20 shovel tests and IWO test units; however, to actually complete the delineation work, 36 sbovel tests were needed, and 41 surface collections were mapped.
At Site SDI-2776, the site form suggested that the site had been destroyed by grading and only a few shell fragments remain; however, upon initiation of derailed work, we encountered a very dense shell and artifact scatter with an extensive subsurface deposit hidden in the dense coastal sage scrub growth that lies north of creek area. The level of effort needed to adequately mt SDI- 2776 was much greater than anticipated or budgeted.
At Site Temp 1, our initial survey identified the site; however the unexpected aspect of this site was that the disturbance related to past agricultural use masked and buried portions of this site. Testing revealed a much larger surface and subsurface component to the site requiring 3 1 shovel tests (15 were estimated in our scope of work) and resulting in 71 surface recovery locations.
AS a result of this survey, seven archaeological sites and six archaeological isolates were identified, eight previously recorded archaeological sites were relocated or attempted to be relocated, and hue ,. historic structures were relocated. Of the newly identified sites, six am prehistoric and one is historic. All the isolates identified are prehistoric. Brief descriptions of the 15 archaeological sites, two historic structures, and six isolates are provided below. In order to complete the impact
November lt, 2000 - Brian F. Smith ud Asmddes - Pqi? 2
analysis of the proposed road and sewer line construction, as well as analyze the Tchang.Property, additional archaeological investigations will be required to determine site significance and evaluate potential impacts. The scope of work for the-site testing program is provided in the following section and is summarized in Table 1.
site Descritbtions J& Be Testine Prom
This site is identified as a large, sparse to moderately dense prehistoric lithic scatter consisting of at least 200 flakes, several ceramic potsherds, and marine shell. The site is located partially within the sewer alignment and partially within the road and development area for the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface anifacrs, and the excavation of 3 1 shovel tests and three test units co delineate and evaluate the subsurface deposit identified. This site has a medium likelihood of a subsurface deposir.
This site is identified as a large, sparse prehistoric hthic scaner cotbisting of at least one mano and 40 flakes, with a small quantity of marine shell also present. The site is located within the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 25 shovel tests and one rest unit to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a moderate subsutface potential.
This site is identified as a sparse lithic scatter consisting of at least 25 flakes and some marine shell. The site is located within the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 15 shovel tests and one rest unit to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified, This site has a low likelihood of a subsurface deposit-
This site is identified as a sparse prehistoric lithic scatter consisting of at least six hammerstones, one mano, and 40 flakes. The site is situated in the central area of the Tchang property. Testing of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 25 shovel tests and two test units to delineate and evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a moderate sub&face potential.
Site Temu 5
This site is identified as a sparse lithic scatter consisting of less than ten flakes, oqe scraper, and matine shell. The site is located along the sewer alignment west of the Tchang prom. Testmg of this site would require the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts, and the excavation of 20 shovel tests and one test unit to delineate aad evaluate any subsurface deposit identified. This site has a low likelihood for the presence of a subsurface deposit.
Site Tern0 6H
This site is identified as a possibly historic rock and concrete dam on a tributary of Agua Hedionda Creek with a pipe built into the dam creating a small cascade, The site is located in the northwest comer of the Tchang property. Likelihood of an adjacent historic deposit appears very low and therefore photographing and recording the feature will suffice to document the dam.
NomnbrId,2000- BrimF. SmithmdAs~ocintcs-Page3
This site is identified as a possible prehistoric feature consisting of a mano and m&ate found together partially buried. The artifacts are located on the Tchang properly. Although no other artifacts were found associated with the mano and metate, because they appear to be a feature testing is recommended. Testing should consist of collection of the two artifacts and the excavation of three to five shovel tests and a test unit if a subsurface deposit is identified. Due to the location of the site and the partially buried nature of the artifacts, likelihood of a subsurface deposit is low to modem.
sire SDt-2714
This site is identified in records as a bedrock milling station and lithic scatter. The site is located within 50 feet of the sewer alignment in the southern area of the project. The site was posthole tested in the 1970’s and at that time no subsurface deposit was identified. During this survey, the milling was not relocated and only two flakes were observed in the site vicinity. Because of the negative results of the previous testing and the inability to locate the milling, no testing is recommended for this site.
Site SDI-2 722
This site is identified in records as a lithic and ceramic scatter with a possible rock shelter, The rock shelter was not relocated and a cluster of large boulders in the site vicinity appears to have been pushed there, possibly as a result of agricultural activities in the past. The site is located within the alignment of Faraday Avenue. Five flakes were found in the site vicinity and although the records do not explicitly state that the site has been previously tested, it may be speculated that this sire was previously tested because this site was recorded by Car&o in 1973 and the other sites recorded during that survey were tested. Due to the paucity of artifacts, the ciisturbed nature of the site, and the likelihood that the site was previously tested, only a limited testing effort is necessary to confirm the status of the site. The testing effort should include five shovel tests, one test unit, and the collection of surface artifacts.
This site is not identified in the records obtained other than locational data. The landform mapped was relocated, and the site was found to contain a significant quantity of artifacts, including pottery, flakes, stone tools, and hundreds of marine shell fragments. This site is located on the south side of the Tchang development area within the alignment for Faraday Avenue and the sewer line. The site is much larger then mapped in the site record forms, encompassing an area of approximately 650 feet (northcast to southwest) and 400 feet from northwest to southeast, and sits on a long, sloping terrace adjacent to the creek. Testing of the site will be necessary to evaluate the site, and should include 40 shovel tests and 4 test units. All surface artifacts discovered should be mapped and collected.
This site is identified in records as consisting of two large milling slicks located on granite outcrops 75 feet apart, with a single Ethic tool found in disturbed soil between the outcrops. The site was purported to be on the boundary of the project area. This site was not relocated and appears to have been destroyed during the construction of a parking lot located between the Carlsbad Skate Park and a police station. No testing is recommended.
This site is identified in records as consisting of a single bedrock milling slick located on a large granite outcrop near the boundary of the project area. Although many bedrock oufcrops were observed, the grinding slick was not relocated. The site may be located outside the project area and
_-- _-,_-_ ----, . .
Nmmmbn 14,200O - Brian F. Smith rnd Assodntee - Pa@ 4
there is evidence that some bedrock outcrops have been pushed into a drainage. Because the site
appears to be outside the project area and/or destroyed, no testing is recommended.
Sire m-5229 This site is identified in records by Charles Bull in 1977 as a lithic scatter with ‘ho evidence of a subsurface component.” This site was not relocated during our study, and there is a possibility that the site has been previously tested and surface collected. No additional work is recommended at the site, although further research will be conducted to search for any prior testing information.
- 5230 This site is identified in records as a large sparse lithic scatter with marine shell present. The site is located in the southwest area of the Tchang property. The site was posthole tested in .I973 and determined to have a subsurface deposit present to as deep as 36” in one area. A testing program is needed at this site to determine the dimensions of the subsurface deposit and evaluate the potential of the contents of the site. The testing program should include 25 shovel tests and two test units, and all surface artifacts will be mapped and collected.
Site SDI--1 14.063 2
This site has been independently ident8ie.d by different researchers and given two site numbers. Both numbers share locational data and site characteristics and will be tnzated as one site in this letter. The site is located in the western alignment of Faraday Avenue and also is within the alignment of the sewer. The site is identified as a habitation site which has been previously tested including a surface collection and the excavation of two trenches and three test units. The site is reported to have a depth of 40 cendmeters. Portions of Site SDI-5231&D&14,063 were tested in the 1970s; however the scope and results of that testing have not yet been obtained Because of the record information which suggests that this site may be important, an updated testing effort is recommended to delineate any subsurface deposits and evaluate the significance of the site. Testing of this site would be accomplished through the excavation of 36 shovel tests and two test units, plus the mapping and collection of all surface artifacts.
This historic structure was relocated and is still standing. The ~mmurc has been adequately recorded by previous researchers. No additional work is necessary.
This historic structure was relocated and is still standing. The structu~ has been adequately recorded by previous researchers. No additional work is necemary.
The isolates need no additional work but descriptions are presented to provide additional information about the nature of artifacts in the project m
A heavily-used two-sided granite mano.
isolate A retouched metavolcanic flake.
c3
A granite mano and a metavolcanic flake. &Q&&
A granite mano.
November Z4,2000 - Btian F. Smith and Asaociotrs - Page 5
A multiply-retouched metavolcanic flake.
A cobble scraper and a marine shell fragment.
Site SDISZ 17
The scope of work will be accomplished by implementing the following methodology. The methodology to be used will conform to the City of Carlsbad archaeological guidelines. The resting program will include the following specific tests:
(1) All surface artifacts or other features will be mapped. Surface artifacts will be collected by provenience location and returned to our laboratory for caraloging.
(2) A series of shovel tests will be used to defme the boundaries and depths of the prehistoric ckposits. Each shovel test will measure 30 centimerers in diameter and will be excavated in IO-centimeter levels until a non-cultural level is encountered. All soil from each shovel test will be sifted through 1/8th-inch screen to recover artifacts. The quantity of shovel tests at each site is dependent upon the size and potential of the site.
(3) For each of the sites that will require shovel tests, test unit excavations may also be required. These test units each measure one meter square, and will also be excavated in IO-centimeter levels until a non-cultural level is encountered. All soil from each test unit will be sifted through l/Bth-inch screen to recover artifacts.
(4) All collected mattrials must be washed, identified, cataloged, and properly stored. Some materials may require special analysis, such as bone (faunal) material, which would be analyzed by our faunal expert to identify the types of animals that were being used for food sources at the siks. Eventually, the artifacts must be submitted for permanent curation at the San Diego Mchaeological Cater.
The archaeological kst of the prehistoric archaeological sites will identify the boundaries as well as the artifact content of each site. The testing effort is intended to locate, sample, and record any deposits of artifacts and/or features relakd to the prehistoric use of the sites. All collected materials must be caraloged and subjected to laboratory analysis. The field and laboratoq information will provide the foundation for the significance evaluation of each archacolopcal site. Finally, the appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) fotms must be completed for each resource in order to formally record or update the siks at the South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University. A report of findings must be prepared according to city Guidelines which will detail all the forgoing work and discuss the significance evaluation of cultural resources on the property. The report will include +ciic technical conknt, and appropriate graphics and maps. In the event that archaeologrcal resources existing on the property are found to be significant, potential impacts associakd with the project would need to be addressed and measures to mitigak impacts identified.
Thai proposal will provide a revised fee for the archaeological excavation, laboratory analysis ~oiogical m+ials, and a report cf findings. This st@y will encompass the types of of
infonrmion normally required for such projects and cultural resources present on the pmperty- The fees for the individual sites correspond to the level of effort listed in Table 1, The costs to complek the necessary level of effort at each site are provided in Table 2. The fee to conduct the surface collection and mapping, as well as the recording of any features, is an estimate based-on man hours needed to accomplish the tasks, which varies greatly between the different sites.
Based on the initial testing of the first four sites and a closer inspection of previously recorded sites, the following revised cost proposal should more accurately define the perimeters of the testing program. Another major problem that has been encountered is access to the siks with testing equipment Many sites, especially in the Tchang portion and the nonhweskm segments of the sewer alignment, are a long distance from the nearest road or access point. and all equipment will need to the carried to the sites. equipment KO the sites. In the case of some sites, an hour hike is needed to get Having a key to the gate on the east side of the property would helD to
reduce the time to access the srks.
The fees for subsurface ksting are based generally on unit costs for shovel kst ($70.00 to $120.00
per kst) and test units ($400.00 to $700.00 per unit). The fee for laboratory analysis is again an estimate based upon our inference from the field survey of the quantity of materials that may be present in the subsurface testing. In the event that the kst units produce a much larger quantity of cultural makrials than expected, the laboratory costs would be increased.
Any meetings or public hearings which require my anendance will be billed on an hourly basis,.at a rate of NO.00 per hour, in addition to the testing fee listed above. The testing program can can be completed within four to five weeks following authorization to proceed. Should any resources be tested prove to need efforts that are beyond our estimate, I will notify you immediately.’ Also, I have not included any special studies in our fee estimate, because we do not know if, in fact, much
Nmcmbn 14,2&W - Brian F. Smith and Amociote~ - Page 7
in the way of s$ecial analyses will be required. I will inform you of any special analysis fees
following the field work phase of work. All copy charges are reimbursable, and mileage is billed at $0.35 per mile.
The estimated budget for this testing program is based upon our best estimate of the level of effort that will be required. However, we will make every effort to reduce the amount of work needed cx hopefully complete our tasks in less time than anticipated.
SlJ?oO.oO.
f%o.oo
S400.00 .,... .,. . .
5800 00 . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . .
5450 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
so:oo..
. . ..c.c)9
S6,325.00
sss0.w %+??.w ., . . S5,(;19x>,~
w!JY w!?.w . !.?,s50-~
.,. .?w*ofJ . . . . W!K-?!?. . . . . Yf2!T?%~o
=!NN. ,. ..5tK:.F. . ..!3,300:~~..
5450 00 . . . . . . . . ‘.. . 540000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..w??~!!R
w!!? . .,. .S3~:00 ,.,.., ,.. x%!?.oo.
. ..s!so.w ww?. ,.. . . . S.!.#?,oO.
.,. ..s!?:%! ,..,. .wo~oo . ..S!SO.oo
s150 00 . . . ..!. s35om . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W75.00 . . . . . . . . .
!?%?:!?!2 . . . . . . . . ..s5(Jo-o(J $7 225 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...? . . . . . ...! ..,....,
w.00 ,.. ..,.... %W-~ . . . . . . sl.N!w
. . W.M . st.%!:oo . . . .%.?so!?!!.
$0.00 SISO 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . s150.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S~qO.00 sem-~ ., . Stt6w.00 .I. . ._....,._,...
5700.00 s450 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5~.w,oo
$0.00 5150.00 3250 00 . . ..I..... ,.....,.. . . . . . . . . . . ,..t... :,. . . . . . . .
$0.00 5150.00 S2SO.00
s5,300.00 S5,650.00 538.670.00
The potential does exist that, given the size and intensity of the prehistoric use of the property, human remains may be discovered during our work. Any additional work necessary resulting from such a discovery would be in addition to our budget estimate. in the event that the City requests various revisions to the report or additional field work, this request would be the source for a contract addendum.
- ---
At the completion of our field work, I will plan to meet with the project engineer and yourself or other representatives, to discuss our findings and make recommendations regarding the proposed projects and any significant sites. Our report will provide mitigation measures to resolve any problems between the planned uses and significant archaeological sites.
We can begin this project at any time. If you have any questions,.please contact me.
Sincerely,
BFS:ks
State of (-J ‘P- \r 6 c\-
County of \
On AQp\\ 21 I don \
Da0 Name and Title of Officer (e.g., “Jane Doe, Notary Public”) .
personally appeared a ---)&,;a Kp .ti+ &.,r+hr?YO.i‘\
Name(s) of Signer(s)
0 personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon
executed the instrument.
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudu/ent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name:
q Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Cl Partner- 0 Limited q General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
q Trustee
q Guardian or Conservator
q Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
•i Partner - q Limited 0 General
q Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
Cl Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
0 1995 National Notary Association * 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164. Canoga Park, CA 91309-7164 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-600-676-6627
State of kA~o+in;~~
County of SC>- ; QC\ c-,
u
On fiQr\I\ n, a
Date (
OO! ‘-\ before me, k\c! C u .’ l.fU&=i$-;CWS- I Name and Title of Officer (e.g., “Jane Doe, Notary Public”)
personally appeared czh.N-\QS 6Qcr 53’ \clc I Name(s) of Signer(s)
q personally known to me - OR - q proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document,
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Cl Partner - 0 Limited Cl General
Cl Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
q Guardian or Conservator
q Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Signer’s Name:
Cl Individual
0 Corporate Officer
Title(s):
0 Partner - Cl Limited q General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
0 1995 National Notary Association - 6236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7164 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7164 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-676-6627