Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-07-24; City Council; 16298; Lynn Parcel MapCITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL AB# jb,d?g m: MTG. 3 l #+DI LYNN PARCEL MAP ZC 01-03 /LCPA 01-04 /CDP 01-07 DEPT. HD. bV& CITY ATTY. &B- DEPT. PLN # CITY MGR RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. N5-sq r , APPROVING Zone ZC 01-03, and ADOPT Resolution m I- a aq Change, ADOPTING a Negative Declaration and APPROVING, Zone Change, ZC 01-03, Local Coastal Program Amendment, LCPA 01-04, and Coastal Development Permit, CDP 01-07 based upon the findings contained therein. ITEM EXPLANATION: On June 20, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a zone change, local coastal program amendment and coastal development permit on a two acre parcel of land on the west side of Black Rail Road, south of future Poinsettia Lane and north of Aviara Parkway. The applicant is also processing a four lot minor subdivision which is an administrative action acted upon by staff. The project requires a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program amendment to change the Limited Control (L-C) designation of the property to One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot lot size minimum, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7,500 - Q) to implement the Residential Low-Medium (RLM) General Plan designation. The Q-overlay ensures that the future proposed building elevations and floor plans for the project are subject to the review and approval by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL: The Planning Commission has determined that this project could not have a significant effect on the environment. On April 4, 2001, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. FISCAL IMPACT: All required improvements needed to serve this project would be funded by the developer. The Facility Financing Section of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan lists the financing techniques being used to guarantee the public facilities needed to serve development within Zone 20. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Ordinance No. )3s- 59 g 2. City Council Resolution No. -0 J- aaq 3. Location Map 4. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987,4988, 4989 and 4990 5. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated June 20, 2001 6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated June 20, 2001. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. NS-598 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2 1.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 01-03, FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q ON 2.027 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND NORTH OF AVIARA PARKWAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO.: ZC’Ol-03 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 21.05.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being the zoning map, is amended as shown on the maps marked Exhibit “ZC 01-03” attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988, and 4989 constitute the findings of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its adoption. Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill I! I * c r 1 E C J 1c 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 24th day of July ,2001, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of ,2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEW -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2o01-22g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO REZONE A TWO ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD AND SOUTH OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO.: ZC Ol-OYLCPA Ol-04/ CDP 01-07 follows: The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on June 20, 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Negative Declaration, Zone Change 01-03, Local Coastal Program Amendment 01-04, and Coastal Development Permit 01-07 to rezone 2.027 acres of land from Limited Control to residential One-Family, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay (R-1-7,500-Q), and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988, 4989 and 4990 recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 24th day of July , 2001 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Negative Declaration, Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit and; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration, Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit. follows: The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the findings of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988, 4989 and 4990 constitute the findings of the City Council in this matter. 3. That the Negative Declaration is adopted, and the Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit, ZC 01-03, LCPA 01-04, and _ .:- L.’ CDP 01-07 respectively, are approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988, 4989 and 4990 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 24th day of July , 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard, and Hall. NOES: None. ATTEST: &bn- \ / \ LOR-E M. VVqOD, City Clerk (SEAL) -2- b I PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE zc: 01-03 draft 0 final 0 Prniart Name- I VNN PARCFI MAP I ‘V,““. I.U.I.“. b m . . . . I I .I .VLL I.., .I Legal Description(s): 1 Related Case File Nolsl: LCPA 01-04/CDP 01-07 That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof Zone Change Property: From: To: A. 2 15-070-09-00 L-C R-l -7,500-Q B. C. D. Attach additional pages if necessary Approvals Council Approval Date: Ordinance No: Effective Date: Signature: LYNN PARCEL MAP ZC 0%03/LCPA 0%04/CDP 01-07 r I i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4987 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE, FROM L-C TO R-1-7500-4, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT, AND A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND NORTH OF AVIARA PARKWAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO.: ZC 0 l -03/LCPA 0 l -04/CDP 01-07 WHEREAS, William R. Lynn and Candace C. Lynn, “Developer and “Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the offkial plat thereof (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 20th day of June 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ‘18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration according to Exhibit “ND” dated April 4, 2001, and “PII” dated March 28,2001, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: Findiws: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: A. It has reviewed, analyzed and considered Negative Declaration ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04KDP 01-07 the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF the project; and B. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and C. It reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad; and D. Based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PC RESO NO. 4987 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Heineman, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: Commissioners Compas and L’Heureux ABSTAIN: I JEFk&?N. SEGALL, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOBMILWR Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4987 -3- City of Carlsbad NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: 5675 Black Rail Rd. Carlsbad CA 92009. Adjacent and west of Black Rail Road and 330 feet south of future Poinsettia Lane and is identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2 15-070-09-00. Project Description: Proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment and Zone Change to change the land use designation from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential, 7,500 square foot lot size minimum (R-l- 7,500), with a Qualified Overlay Zone (-Q), on a 2.027 acre parcel of land. Also proposed is a ,minor subdivision to create 4 residential lots and a Coastal Development Permit. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on tile in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. DATED: APRIL 4,200l CASE NO: ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04KDP dl-07/MS 01-04 CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP PUBLISH DATE: APRIL 4,200l Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue l Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 l (760) 602-4600 l FAX (760) 602-8559 l www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II CASE NO: ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04/CDP Ol-07/MS 01-04 DATE: March 28,200l BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP 2. APPLICANT: WILLIAM AND CANDACE LYNN 3. ADDRESSES AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5675 Black Rail Rd., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 93 l-2793 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Februarv 22.2001 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Prouosed Local Coastal Pronram Amendment and Zone Chance to change the land use desimation from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential. 7,500 square foot lot size minimum (R-1-7.500), with a Qualified Overlay Zone C-0). on a 2.027 acre parcel of land. Also proDosed is a minor subdivision to create 4 residential lots and a Coastal Development Permit. The m-oiect site is located adiacent and west of Black Rail Road and 330 feet south of future Poinsettia Lane and is identified by Assessors Parcel Number 215-070-09-00. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. El Land Use and Planning Ix] Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services 0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems I7 Geological Problems El Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics cl Water q Hazards 0 Cultural Resources H Air Quality 0 Noise El Recreation El Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/96 lxl cl q cl 0 DETERMINATION. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An Negative declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental Impact Review (MEIR 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review (MEIR 93-01), including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. 5-29-q Date Date / 2 Rev. 03/28/96 13 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but J&I potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR.if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 3 Rev. 03/28/96 l If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. 0 An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 03128196 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) b) cl d) e> Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18, #2) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18, #2) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18, #2) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18, #2) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community) (#l:Pgs 5.6-l - 5.6-18, #2) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: 4 b) c) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6, #2) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6, #2) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-l - 5.5-6, #2) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or 4 b) cl 4 e) f) g) h) i> expose people to potential impacts involving: Fault rupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15 #2) Seismic ground shaking? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (#l :Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1.15, #2) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) Subsidence ofthe land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-I - 5.1-15, #2) Expansive soils? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15, #2) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff! (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2- 11,#2) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-l 1, #2) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-11, #2) Potentially Significant Impact 0 q q q q 0’ q q q q q cl q q 0 q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q cl q q q q q q 0 q q 0 q q q q q q q q Less Than Significant Impact q 0 q 0 q q q q cl q 0 0 q q 0 cl q q q 0 No Impact Ix1 txl lxl lzl lxl lzl El Ix1 E3l lxl El lxl lxl lzl lxl lxl lxl 151 lxl lxl 5 Rev. 03128196 16 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). d) 4 0 id h) i> Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-11, #2) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-11, #2) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-l 1, #2) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-l 1, #2) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-l 1, w Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.2-l - 5.2-l 1, #2) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs 5.3- 1 - 5.3-12) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12, #2) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12, #2) d) Create objectionable odors? (#l:Pgs 5.3-l - 5.3-12, #2) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the a> b) cl 4 e> CJ d proposal result in: Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs 5.7-l - 5.7-22, #2) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (#l :Pgs 5.4- 1 - 5.4-24, #2) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24, #2) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24, #2) Potentially Significant Impact q q q q q q Ia q q q (xl q q q q q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0 q q q q q q a III q El q q q q q q q q q Less Than Significant Impact q q q q q q q El q q q q q q q q q q q q No Impact Ix] lxl lzl El Ix] Ix] q Lxl Ix] I8 q IXJ lxl lxl lxl (XI Ix] lxl lxl lxl 6 Rev. 03128196 /7 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). 4 e) VIII. 4 b) cl Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24, #2) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs 5.4-l - 5.4-24, #2) ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-l - 5.13-9, #2) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-I -5.12.1-5 & 5.13- 1 - 5.13-9, #2) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9, #2) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a> b) c> 4 e> A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5, w Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5, #2) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5, #2) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5, #2) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-l - 5.10.1-5, #2) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-l - 5.9- 15, #2) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9- 1 - 5.9-15, #2) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect 4 b) cl d) e) upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-l - 5.12.5-6, #2) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4, #2) Schools? (#l:Pgs 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5, #2) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.8-7, #2) Other governmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.8-7, #2) XIIUTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: Potentially Significant Impact q -0 cl q q cl q q q a q q q 0 q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q q q q q q q q cl q q q 0 q q q q Less Than Significant Impact q q 0 q q q cl q q El q q q q q q q No Impact lxl Ix] lxl Ix] El El lxl lxl lxl lxl Ix1 lxl Ia lxl IXI lxl txl 7 Rev. 03128196 18 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). 4 b) cl 4 e) f) g) XIII. a> b) c> XIV. a> b) c) d> e) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-l - 5.13-9, #2) Communications systems? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-l - 5.12.8-7, w Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7, #2) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-l - 5.12.3-7, #2) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8, #2) Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-l - 5.12.4-3, #2) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-I - 5.12.3-7, #2) AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#l:Pgs 5.11-l - 5.11-5, #2) Have or demonstrate a negative aesthetic effect? (#l:Pgs 5.1 l-1 - 5.1 l-5, #2) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.11-l - 5.11-5, #2) CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Disturb paleontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8- 10, #2) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8- 10, #2) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10, #2) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10, #2) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-l - 5.8-10, #2) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-l - 5.12.8-7, #2) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.8-l - 5.12.8-7, #2) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact q q q q q q q q q q 0 0 q q q q q q Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated q q q q q q 0 cl q q cl q q q q cl q q Less Than Significant Impact q q q q q q .I7 q q q q q q cl q q q q No Impact lxl Ix] lxl lxl lxl [xl lxl Ix] Ix] Ix] lxl lxl lxl IXI lzl lxl Ix] Ix] 8 Rev. 03128196 19 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than No Significant Impact Impact Incoaorated b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? q 0 q lxl (“Cumulatively considerable” - means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, q cl q either directly or indirectly? lxl Rev. 03128196 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. 4 Mitigation measures. Fqr effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,“ describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 10 Rev. 03128196 2’ DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project consist of amending the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and rezoning a 2.027 acre parcel of land from Limited Control to Residential Single Family - 7,500 square foot lot size minimum -Qualified overlay zone (R-1-7,500-Q). The site is located within the Mello II segment of the LCP and is in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. The proposed zoning will conform to the existing General Plan Residential Low-Medium density land use designation as well as surrounding residential zoned and general plan designated properties. The four lots proposed with the minor subdivision exceed the minimum lot size required and are compatible with the adjacent residential subdivision. The property will be conditioned with the minor subdivision to provide improvements such as underground utilities, curb, sidewalk, and drainage structures to match existing improvements. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence and detached accessory garage structure. The property has been disturbed with non-native plantings and does not contain any significant habitats or endangered, threatened or rare species. This project would not impact wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The site has not been use for commercial agricultural purposes and would not contain any significant residues from agricultural chemicals. The Zone 20 EIR does not identify any archaeological sites on the property. 11 Rev. 03128196 xl II. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS B. Environmental Impact Discussion Air Quality The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air quality impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan’s Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. Transportation/Circulation The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 ml1 and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when 12 Rev. 03128196 23 adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan’s Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. III. EARLIER ANALYSES USED The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008, (760) 602-4600. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Renort for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-Ol), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department. 2. “Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Zone 20 Specific Plan” (EIR 90- 03), dated June 1992, Brian F. Mooney Associates. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES None ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Not applicable 13 Rev. 03128196 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4988 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM L-C TO R-1-7,500-Q ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND NORTH OF AVIARA PARKWAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO: zc 01-03 WHEREAS, William R Lynn and Candace C. Lynn, “Developer,” and “Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on Exhibit “X,“ attached hereto and made part thereof dated June 20, 2001, on file in the Planning Department, LYNN PARCEL MAP - ZC 01-03 as provided by Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 20th day of June 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Zone Change; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: 4 That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 2s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LYNN PARCEL MAP - ZC 01-03 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FindinPs: 1. 2. 3. 4. That the proposed Zone Change from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot lot size minimum, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7,500-4) is consistent with the goals and policies of the various elements of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program in that the proposed zone replaces the L-C Zone which is intended to be an interim zone designation. The proposed R-l- 7,500-Q zone is consistent with the RLM General Plan and Local Coastal Program land use designations and with the Zone 20 Specific Plan which was earlier found to be consistent with the General Plan. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element, in that the zoning designation sholirn on Exhibit “AA” implements the existing General Plan Land Use Designation. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that residential uses allowed by the proposed zone change are compatible with surrounding and future residential and agricultural uses. The Q-Overlay Zone, made part of the proposed zone change, provides the City with discretionary review over the placement of the residential units to assure that they will conform to all applicable regulations. Conditions: 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Negative Declaration and LCPA 01-04 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987 and 4989 for those other approvals. 2. This approval shall be null and void if the project site subject to this approval is not annexed to City of Carlsbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval. The City shall not issue any grading, building, or other permit, until the annexation is completed. The City Manager is authorized to extend the 60 days, for a period not to exceed 120 days, upon a showing of good cause. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section PC RESO NO. 4988 -2- Jb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 20th day of June 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Heineman, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: Commissioners Compas and L’Heureux ABSTAIN: 1 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4988 -3- 617 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Commission Administrative Regulations; and 28 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 20th day of June 2001, hold a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4989 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO BRING THE DESIGNATION ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND NORTH OF AVIARA PARKWAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO: LCPA 0 l-04 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and WHEREAS, William R. Lynn and Candace C. Lynn, “Developer,” and “Owner,” has filed a verified application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program designations regarding property described as That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit “X,” attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 4988, and made a part hereof, dated June 20,2001, LYNN PARCEL MAP, LCPA Ol- 04, as provided in Public Resources Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment. -_ WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on March 22, 2001 and ending on May 3, 2001, staff shall present to the City Council a summary of the comments received. C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LYNN PARCEL MAP - LCPA 01-04 based on the following findings, and subject to the following conditions: FindinPs: 1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by this amendment, in that the project is consistent with applicable policies requiring the project to provide drainage and erosion control measures. 2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring the designation of the City’s General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map (as amended), and Mello II Implementation (the zoning map) into conformance. 3. That the project is conditioned to provide the payment of an agricultural conversion mitigation fee which will mitigate the loss of agricultural resources by preserving or enhancing other important coastal resources. Conditions: 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Negative Declaration, ZC 01-03, and CDP 01-07 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission I Resolution No. 4987,4988 and 4990 for those other approvals. PC BESO NO. 4989 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ‘18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 20th day of June 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Heineman, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: Commissioners Compas and L’Heureux ABSTAIN: JEkIXl?k. SEGALLqhairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. aLZtiLER Planning Director PC RESO NO. 4989 -3- PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE LCPA: 01-04 draft 0 final 0 Proiect Name: LYNN PARCEL MAP .-I--‘ ..-...-. _. ._._ . . ._-- . . . Legal Description(s): 1 Related Case File Nntsk ZC 0143KDP 01-07 . .-.-_-- ---- . ..- ..-\-,. -- -. --.--. -. -. That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof Zone Change Property: From: To: A. 215-070-09-00 L-C R-l -7,500-Q B. C. D. Attach additional pages if necessary Approvals Council Approval Date: Ordinance No: Effective Date: Signature: . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4990 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 01-07 TO SUBDIVIDE 2.027 ACRES INTO FOUR LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BLACK RAIL ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND NORTH OF AVIARA PARKWAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 20. CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP CASE NO.: CDP 01-07 WHEREAS, William R. Lynn and Candace C. Lynn, “Developer,” and “Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding described as That portion of the south half of the dortheast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit as shown on Exhibit “AA” dated June 20, 2001, on file in the Planning Department, LYNN PARCEL MAP - CDP 01-07 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of June 2001, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the CDP. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) FindinPs: That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LYNN PARCEL MAP - CDP 01-07 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the proposed amendment to the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies in that no prime agricultural lands exist on or near the site; no impacts will occur to environmentally sensitive habitats; no coastal access is or will be needed through’ or adjacent to the project site; and no significant public view points are on or near the site. 2. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the site is located over 1 mile from Batiquitos Lagoon and over 2 miles from the Pacific Ocean and no coastal access areas or water-oriented recreational activities exist on or near the project site. 3. The project complies with the requirements of the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone as the project has been conditioned : to pay the agricultural conversion mitigation fee to develop the property with other than agricultural uses. 4. The project also complies with the requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone as erosion will be controlled by grading in conformance with the City’s Standards; grading will be restricted to the summer season; the site contains no wetlands or dual criteria slopes. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final parcel map approval or certificate of compliance. 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of this Coastal Development Permit. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 3. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid PC RESO NO. 4990 -2- 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of ZC 01-03, LCPA 01-04 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 4987,4988 and 4989 for those other approvals. The applicant shall apply for and be issued a Tentative Parcel Map for this project within two (2) years of approval or this coastal development permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210 of the Zoning Ordinance. If a grading permit is required, all grading activities shall be planned in units that can be completed by October 1st. Grading activities shall be limited to the “dry season”, April 1st to October 1st of each year. Grading activities may be extended to November 15th upon written approval of the City Engineer and only if all erosion control measures are in place by October 1st. To offset the conversion of non-prime agricultural land to urban land uses per the requirements of the Mello II Local Coastal program, the applicant shall provide payment of an agricultural mitigation fee, the amount of which shall not be less than $5,000 nor more than $10,000 for each net converted acre of non-prime agricultural land. The amount of the fee as determined by the City Council shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of the final map or issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first and shall be consistent with the provisions of Carlsbad’s LCP. CDP 01-07 shall be effective on the date the California Coastal Commission certifies LCPA 01-04. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafier.collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PC RESO NO. 4990 -3- 34” 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Heineman, Nielsen, and Trigas NOES: ABSENT: Commissioners Compas and L’Heureux ABSTAIN: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: - MICHAEL J. HOLZMtiER Planning Director ’ PC RESO NO. 4990 -4- 33’ The City of Car&bad Planning Department EXHIBIT 5 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. 1 0 P.C. AGENDA OF: June 20,200l SUBJECT: ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04/CDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration, and recommendation of approval of a Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designations from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-l- 7,500 - Q) and Coastal Development Permit for a minor subdivision on a 2.027 acre parcel of property generally located on the west side of Black Rail Road and south of future Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988 4989, and 4990, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration and RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Zone Change (ZC Ol-03), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA Ol-04), and Coastal Development Permit (CDP Ol-07), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit to subdivide and change the zoning and Local Coastal Program land use designation from Limited Control (L-C) to Residential - Single Family - 7,500 square foot lot size minimum - Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7,500-Q) for a 2.027 acre parcel of land located on the west side of Black Rail Road, south of future Poinsettia Lane and north of Aviara Parkway. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel into four lots. The project complies with City standards and all necessary findings can be made for the approvals being requested. The Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment require City Council approval. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The 2.027-acre project site is located within the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Zone 20. It is bordered to the north by a vacant parcel, to the east by Black Rail Road, to the south by a single-family subdivision (Carnation - Encantada by Ryland Homes), and single family/agriculture (Cardoza) to the west. The property is developed with a single-family residence (Lynn) and improved with normative plants and lawn. The property does not have any sensitive vegetation or steep slope constraints; all of the 2.027 site is developable. The proposed Zone Change and Local Coastal Program designations are necessary to change the Limited Control (L-C) designation of the property to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04/CDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP June 20,200l lot size minimum, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7500 - Q) to implement the Residential Low-Medium (RLM) General Plan designation. The project includes a request for a minor subdivision (MS 01-04). The applicant proposes to divide the property into four lots. The minor subdivision is an administrative action to be approved by the Planning Director and Public Works Director after Planning Commission and City Council actions on the Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment and Coastal Development Permit. At this point there are no building plans, elevations, or grading proposed fo.r the subdivision. The Q-Overlay requires the approval of a Site Development Plan, for development of more than a single-family home, by the Planning Commission prior to building permit issuance. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards: A. B. C. D. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use Designation; R-l-7,500, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-l -7,500-Q) Zone Regulation; Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203); Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The General Plan and Local Coastal Program designation for the project site is Residential Low- Medium (RLM). The surrounding properties in Zone 20 are General Plan designated RLM as shown on the attached Exhibit “X.” This designation allows single-family residential development at a range of O-4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The RLM range has a Growth Control Point of 3.2 du/ac. The density of the proposed single-family subdivision is 2.45 du/ac. The project complies with all elements of the General Plan as illustrated in Table A below: ELEMENT Land Use Table A - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE USE, PROPOSED USES & CLASSIFICATION, IMPROVEMENTS GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Site is designated for Four single-family lots Residential Low- I at 2.45 du/ac Medium at 3.2 du/ac. COMPLY? Yes 37 ZC 0 l -03/LCPA 0 l -04KDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP June 20,200l Housing Open Space & Conservation Noise Circulation Provision of In-lieu fees to be paid Yes affordable housing Utilize Best Manage- Project will conform to Yes ment Practices for all NPDES control of storm water requirements and to protect water quality Residential exterior Project site is not Yes noise standard of 60 impacted by potential CNEL and interior noise generating noise standard of 45 sources such as CNEL Poinsettia Ln. or Palomar Airport Require new . Project will provide Yes development to roadway improvements construct roadway consisting of frontage improvements needed improvements for to serve proposed Black Rail Road. development B. R-l-7,500-Q Regulation The project site, part of a County island annexed in 1987, is currently zoned Limited Control (L-C). The L-C zone designation is given to annexed properties and is an interim zone for areas where planning for future land uses has not been completed nor have plans of development been formalized. Proposed is a zone change from L-C to R-1-7,500-Q. This will result in the zoning for the site being consistent with the General Plan Land Use designations of RLM. The proposed zone is also compatible with the existing adjacent residentially zoned properties and probable future residential zones of the adjacent L-C zoned properties. C. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203) The project is within an area subject to the Zone 20 Specific Plan. The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties within Zone 20 to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and community amenities for the future residents of Zone 20. The project complies with the following requirements of the Specific Plan as demonstrated in Table C below. Table C: ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN REOUIREMENTS STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Required Zoning R-l R-1-7,500-Q Local Coastal Plan Grading Grading prohibited between Grading limitation included as Requirements Oct. 1 and April 1 CDP condition LCP Agricultural Conversion Three conversion options Payment of Agricultural oermitted Conversion Mitigation Fee 38 ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04/CDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP June 20,200l Page 4 Dedications Trail System Affordable Housing All required land or easements Street right-of-way and shall be dedicated to the City easement dedications proposed Construct required trails Project does not contain any identified on the citywide plan trail segments Provide affordable housing Payment of an in-lieu fee D. Local Coastal Program The project site is located within Site III of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. Development of the project site is also subject to, and consistent with, the requirements of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. Approval of a Coastal Development Permit is required for the project. One of the primary requirements of the applicable coastal regulations pertains to the conversion of agricultural land to urban use. The project has been conditioned to ensure the payment of an agricultural conversion mitigation fee, which will mitigate the loss of agricultural resources by preserving or enhancing other important coastal resources. The grading restrictions that apply in the coastal zone are proposed as conditions of the Coastal Development Permit. The project site does not have any sensitive coastal resources in the form of slopes over 25% or native vegetation. The Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) is required to implement the proposed zone change from L-C to R-1-7,500-Q. The LCPA will result in the zoning and coastal land use designations for the site to be consistent and provide consistency with the LCP land use designation of Residential Low-Medium (O-4 dwelling units per acre). No comments were received during the required six-week LCPA public notice. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA guidelines and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The General Plan land use designation remains the same. The project falls within the scope of the City’s MEIR for the City of Carlsbad General Plan update (EIR 93-01) certified in September, 1994, in which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for cumulative impacts to air quality and traffic. MEIR’s may not be used to review projects if it was certified more than five years prior to the filing of an application for a later project except under certain circumstances. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was certified more than five years ago, the City’s preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was certified. The only potential changed circumstance, the intersection failure at Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real, is in the process of being mitigated to below a level of significance. Additionally, there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the MEIR was certified. Therefore, the MEIR remains adequate to review later projects. All feasible mitigation measures identified by the MEIR which are appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project. The initial study (EIA-Part II) prepared in conjunction with 39 ZC 0 1-03/LCPA Ol -04/CDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP June 20,200l Page 5 this project determined that there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the property or to this project that are considered direct, significant or adverse impacts. No mitigation measures are required or proposed for the project. The environmental documents for the project were sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation and no comments were received. In consideration of the foregoing, on April 4, 2001, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4987 (Neg. Dec.) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4988 (ZC) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4989 (LCPA) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4990 (CDP) Location Map Background Data Sheet Exhibit “AA” Disclosure Statement VL:cs BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: ZC Ol-03/LCPA 01-04/CDP 01-07 CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: William R. Lvnn and Candace C. Lynn REQUEST AND LOCATION: Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment and Coastal development permit to rezone a parcel from L-C to R-1-7.500-0 located on the west side of Black Rail Rd, south of Poinsettia Lane. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Dieno. State of California, according to the official plat thereof. APN: 215-070-09 Acres: 2.027 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 4 Lots/ 1 existing; unit GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM Density Allowed: 3.2 Density Proposed: 2.45 Existing Zone: Limited Control (L-C) Proposed Zone: R-1-7,500 - Q Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Site L-C North L-C Zoning General Plan RLM RLM Current Land Use SFD VACANT South R- 1-7,500-Q RLM SFD East L-C RLM SFD West L-C RLM SFD/WATER TANKS PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT w Negative Declaration, issued April 4.2001 cl Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated - l-l Other, 41 h. -. -I, ~~., ‘- ’ \. ,r - __ e.- . -. ; 5. - ---; . . ., : ,-‘.. ) ‘~--~~‘- __ ; 4 - .. -- L-.., . ,.. . . ,’ .L -. .- ‘\ ,i 2ity of Cwlsbad I DISCLOSURE STATEMEST Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applicattons Lvhlch ~111 require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Commlttee. The followmg information MIST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be revwved until this tnformatlon 1s completed. Please prmt. Sate: Person is defined as “Any individual. firm, co-parmership, joint venture, association, social club. fraternal organization, corporation, estate, Dust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county. city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as 3 unit.” Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Xot the applicant’s agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addres’ses of & persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or DartnershiD, include the names, titie, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) person William R. Lynn Carp/Part N/A Title Owner Title Address 6575 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Address 2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent) Provide ihe COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of && persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i-e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a cornoration or Dartnershiq include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned comboration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Candace L. Lynn Carp/Part Title Owner Title N/A Address 6575 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Address 1635 Faraday.Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92006-7314 - (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-6669 43 5. SOY-PROFIT c XSIZATIOIU OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (I ) or (2) above is a nomrofir omnmtmn or 3 trust. list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an offker or director of the non-profit organitation or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non ProfitTrust N/A Non Profiflrust N/A Title Address Title Address 4. Have you had more than St50 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees an&or Council withm the past welve ( 11) months? cl Yes cl x No tf yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I cenify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of o&r!datC ,.J-JJ -c;! / Signature okpplicantidate Candace C. Lynn Print or type name of owner Candace C. Lynn Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent H:ADM~N\COUNTER\OISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5198 Page 2 of 2 44 Planning Commission Minutes June 20,ZOOl DRAFTEx!::z6 PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairperson Segall opened the public hearing and asked Assistant Planning Director, Gary Wayne to introduce the first item. Mr. Wayne announced that the Sign Ordinance would be heard after 6:00 p.m. 1. CUP 00-36 - AT&T WIRELESS - 7512 CADENCIA STREET - Request for approval to install a new 240 square foot radio base station (RBS) within a new 400 square foot garage and install a total of six antennas within two expanded chimney structures and one new faux chimney on residential property located at 7512 Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 6. (Approval of documents denying this application.) 2. CUP 94-Ol(A)xl - SHELL OIL - Request for an extension of CUP 94-01(A) to allow the continued operation of a combination self-service car wash/service station and convenience market at the southwest corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and Pio Pica Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. 3. CT 97-23xl1SDP 97-26x1 - MAGNOLIA SUBDIVISION - PHASE II EXTENSION - Request for a two-year extension of time for a Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan for Phase II of the Magnolia Subdivision located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Magnolia Avenue and Adams Street. 7. CUP 90-12x2 - ALL CATS HOSPITAL - Request for an extension of CUP 90-12 to allow the continued operation of an all-cats veterinary hospital at 7040 Avenida Encinas in Local Facilities Management Zone 9. 8. CUP 96-08x1 - CONTRACT SERVICES/RANCH0 DEL OR0 TOWING - Request for an extension of CUP 96-08 to allow the continued operation of a vehicle towing service at 6050 Avendia Encinas in Local Facilities Management Zone 3. 9. CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of a single-family residence within the City’s Coastal Zone located at 2335 Pio Pica Drive between Yourell Avenue and Forest Avenue within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. 11. ZC Ol-O3/LCPA 01-OUCDP 01-07 - LYNN PARCEL MAP - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a negative Declaration, and recommendation of approval of a Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designations from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Coastal Development Permit for a minor subdivision on a 2.027 acre parcel of property generally located on the west side of Black Rail Road and south of future Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 20 13. PP 24(J) - PLAZA CAMINO REAL BUS TRANSFER FACILITY RELOCATION - Request for a Precise Plan Amendment to allow the relocation of the existing NCTD bus transfer facility from the southern portion of the mall parking area to the western portion of the mall parking area, on property generally located at the northeast corner of Marron Road and Monroe Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Mr. Wayne stated that, except for Item No. 1, all the items are normally heard in a public hearing context. He said they are all routine in nature with no outstanding issues and staff is recommending the Commission take those items as a group, open and close the public hearing and act on them as a group. He said the actions are final with the Planning Commission unless appealed, with the exceptions of Items No. 11 and 13, where the Planning Commission’s actions are advisory. Planning Commission Minutes June20,2001 Page3 Chairperson Segall suggested to make Item No. 2 a separate motion for clarification, since the applicant has asked for a continuance. Chairperson Segall opened public testimony and seeing no one wishing to speak, closed public testimony. Commissioner Nielsen asked if Item 13 had been previously approved. He was also concerned regarding Item No. 8, if there were certain findings that were illegal, and why Item No. 2 would be open for business when asking for a CUP. Mr. Wayne explained that Item No. 13 had a different location from the previous approval; staff monitors Item No. 8 on a yearly basis and they are ok; and there is an amendment needed for Item No. 2 so they are applying for an extension to include some color changes. DISCUSSION None. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Trigas and duly seconded, to adopt the following items: Item No. I, Planning Commission Resolution No. 5006 Denying Conditional Use Permit CUP 00-36 based on the findings contained therein. Item No. 3, Planning Commission Resolution No. 4975 adopting a Negative Declaration and Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4934 and 4976 approving CT 97-23x1 and SDP 97-26x1 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Item No. 7, Planning Commission Resolution No. 4984 approving a five year extension of CUP 90-12 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Item No. 8, Planning Commission Resolution No. 5002 approving a five year extension of CUP 96-08 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Item No. 9, Planning Commission Resolution No. 5001 approving Coastal Development Permit CDP 00-62 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Item No. II, Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4987, 4988, 4989 and 4990, recommending adoption of a Negative Declaration and recommend approval of a Zone Change (ZC 01-03), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 01-04) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 01-07) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Item No. 13, Planning Commission Resolution No. 5003, recommending approval of Precise Plan Amendment PP 24(J) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: AYES: 5-o-o Chairperson Segall, Commissioners, Heineman, Baker, Nielsen, Trigas NOES: ABSTAIN: None None each regular and -entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 11, 2001 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at 11th San Marcoe , California this July, 2001 - day NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising ’ This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have Proof of Publication of been adjudged newspapers of general Notice of Public: Hearing circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach -- - and San Diego County; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been oublished in MscRtPnON: -- -- ------ - rr ..AI.AC CtTY OF CARl.SBAu mu I aeic OF PUBLlC RdEARtNGP Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration, and ,commendation of approval of a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment change the land use designations from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family RBSidentiaf. 500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Dvarlay Zone (R-1-7.500 - 0) Id Coastal Development Permit for a minor subdivision on a 2.027 acre parcel Of PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 8l2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times DCATIONZ nis project is within the City of Cadsbad’s Coastal Zone located on the west side of Blaok ail Road and south of future Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. A SSESSOR’S PARCL NUMBER: 215-070-09 A PPUCAM: H fillii and Candace Lynn 6! 575 Black Rail Road c arlsbad. CA 92009 A in a P : a public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Cartsbad City Council / the CourMl Chambers, 1200 Car&ad Village Drive, Carlsbad. California, on July 24, 301 at 6~00 p.m. ersons are cardiially invited to attend the public hearing and pruvide the decision makers ‘ith any oral or written comments they may have regarding the projsct.The project will be escrfbed and a staff recommendatiin given, folfowed by pubfii testimony, qu+ions and decision. Copies ot Ihe staft report will be available on or after Jub 20, 200b _ If I t < you have any questions, or would like IO be notified of the decision, please contaof Van .ynch at the Cii of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 730 am o 5% p.m., Friday 8:OO a.m. to 5:OO p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carfsbad. CaMomk 32006, (X0)602-4613. APPEALS f you challenge the Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendmant, and Coasta &elopment Permit in court, you may be liiiled to raising only those issues you o someone e1s.e raised at the public hearing described in this noti@. or in writtel :orrespondenca delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the publii hearing. , 1. Appeals to the Cii Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Councf Sweals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by MI I %nning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: i E 3 This site is located wfihin the Coastal Zone Appealabk? Area. a This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. I Where the decision is appealable to the CoaStal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a I Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal * Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103. San Diego, , California 921094402. CASE FILE: ZC al-WLCPA 01-04KDP 01-07 CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP L&l 70518. July 11,200l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIPTION: Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration, and recommendation of approval of a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designations from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7,500 - Q) and Coastal Development Permit for a minor subdivision on a 2.027 acre parcel of property. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone located on the west side of Black Rail Road and south of future Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 2 15-070-09 APPLICANT: William and Candace Lynn 6575 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Carlsbad City Council in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on July 24, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after July 20,200l. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602-4613. 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive - Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989 - (760) 434-2808 a9 APPEALS If you challenge the Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FILE: ZC Ol -03/LCPA 01-04/CDP 01-07 CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP PUBLISH: WEDNESDAY, JULY II,2001 LYNN PARCEL MAP ZC 01=03/LCPA 0%04/CDP 01-07 ME COPY . City of Carlsbad NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: June 20,200l DESCRIPTION: Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration, and recommendation of approval of a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the land use designations from Limited Control (L-C) to One-family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (R-1-7500 - Cl) and Coastal Development Permit for a minor subdivision on a 2.027 acre parcel of property. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone located on the west side of Black Rail Road and south of future Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 20. ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 215-070-09 APPLICANT: William and Candace Lynn 6575 Black Rail Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on June 20, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after June 14, 2001. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602- 4613. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1635 Faraday Avenue l Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 l (760) 6024600 l FAX (760) 602-8559 l www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ‘c v ;.-; :^’ f .? &“.. : c I, z:,;*. * . . APPEALS If you challenge the Zone Change, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: III This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. . lxl This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 921084402. CASE FILE: ZC Ol-03/LCPA Ol-04KDP 01-07 CASE NAME: LYNN PARCEL MAP PUBLISH: JUNE 7,200l (Form A) TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice ZC 01-03/LCPA Ol-04/CDP 01-07 - Lynn Parcel Map for a public hearing before the City Council. Please notice the item for the council meeting of First Available Hearing Thank you. TlmP 29, 2001 Oate Smooth Feed SheetsTM CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 801 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NO COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER VAN LYNCH 6/29/2001 Address Labels CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT Use template for 5160c CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 WILLIAM & CANDACE LYNN 6575 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Laser 5160@ CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 BILL FIGGE MAIL ST 50 P 0 BOX 85406 SAN DIEGO CA 92186-5406 REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD STACEY BACZKOWSKI STE B 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92124-1331 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN WESTERN REG BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8 RONALD M JAEGER PO BOX 92007 2800 COTTAGE WAY LOS ANGELES CA 90009 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING STE 103 STE 2450 7575 METROPOLITAN DR 980 NINTH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK SUPERINTENDENT 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN BUENAVENTURA CA 93001 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAIRMAN 722 JACKSON PL NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 COASTAL CONSERVANCY STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE GARY RESOURCE CONSER STE 102 2121-C SECOND ST DAVIS CA 95616 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENGINEER PO BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES CA 90053 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLAZA DR ARLINGTON TX 7601 I-4005 DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV P 0 BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD P 0 BOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE . DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RM 700 IIOWESTAST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 DEPARTMENTOFDEFENSE COMMANDANT, 1 ITH NAVAL DIST, DIST CIVIL ENGR PO BOX 452130 SAN DIEGO CA 92145-2130 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR STE 350 901 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES RM 100 1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN 450 GOLDEN GATE AV SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RM 5504 1120N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMM CHUCK NAJARIAN 1516 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR 350 GOLDEN SHORE LONG BEACH CA 90802 OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS PO BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 93044 NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN OCRM,55MC4 N/ORM - 3 1305 EAST-WEST HWY SILVER SPRING MD 20910 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION & DEVMT COMMISSION BILL TRAVIS STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 9411 I-4704 STATE LANDS COMMISSION DWIGHT SANDERS STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REG PO BOX 427 BOULDER CITY NV 80306- SO REGION TECHNICAL SERVICES JOHN WALSTROM STE 270 8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108 U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM WI834 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MID-PACIFIC REGION 2800 COlTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE STE W-2605 2800 COlTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825-l 888 USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 “G” ST DAVIS CA 95616 CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES STE 1311 1416 9TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LILY ALYEA STE 702 333 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197 WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD PO BOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS JACK KOERPER STE 800 401 “B” STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE JAN SOBEL 5620 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD CA 92008 STACEY BACZKOWSKI SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR KENNETH E SULZER STE 800 1 ST INT’L PLAZA 401 “B” ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 GUY MOORE JR 6503 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANTHONY & DICKY BONS 25709 HILLCREST AV ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE JOHN MARTIN 2730 LOKER AV WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 TABATA FARMS PO BOX 1338 CARLSBAD CA 92018-I 338 SIERRA CLUB S D CHAPTER CRAIG ADAMS 3820 RAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 LESLIE ESPbSlTO 1893 AMELFI DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYRIL/MARY GIBSON 12142 ARGYLE DR LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702 LANIKAI LANE PARK SHARP SPACE 3 6550 PONTO DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 SPIERS ENTERPRISES DWIGHT SPIERS STE 139 23 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 STATE LANDS COMMISSION MARY GRIGGS STE 100 S 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202 PERRY A LAMB 890 MERE POINT RD BRUNSWICK ME 04011 LAKESHORE GARDENS BILL MCLEAN 7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN LAMB 1446 DEVLIN DR LOS ANGELES CA 90069 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC KIM SEIBLY P 0 BOX 1831 SAN DIEGO CA 92112 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN ART DANELL RM 335 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT JAON VOKAC STE B-5 5201 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CRA PRESIDENT LEE ANDERSON 5200 EL CAM IN0 REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 FLOYD ASHBY 416 LA COSTA AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 COASTAL CONSERVANCY RICHARD RETECKI STE 1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER 7163 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 Smooth Feed SheetsrM Use template for 5160@ JOSEPH A RUDVALIS 6517 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFOR 15373 INNOVATION DR 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92128-3426 MICHAEL J CARDOSA 6579 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 GEORGE R BOLTON 6519 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 WILLIAM & DONNA BAKER 18552 ERWIN ST RESEDA CA 91335-6820 STANLEY THOMAS 1574 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 ROBERT T & KAREN HUNG 1586 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 ALAN FRITZ 1598 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 JEANNETTE M CROBARGER 1591 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 JAMES M CONSOLE 1579 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 THOMAS A HOLINGER 6498 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 RICHARD E & ESTHER KIM 6491 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 Address Labels GEORGE R BOLTON 6583 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 AVELINA HIDALGO 6591 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 JOSEPH M NILAND 1578 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 MICHAEL A & KYM TEDESCO 1590 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 TROY D & ANN BUSS 1599 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 MARK & DEBBIE RODRIGUEZ 1587 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 J D & LIBBY RAUCH 1575 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 DAVID J MCGEE 6499 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 NORMAN G GALLAGHER 1252 PALMA VISTA CT ESCONDIDO CA 92025-7570 TIMOTHY C BALDWIN 1570 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 SCOTT D & STACIE WILSON 1582 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 THANHHLE 1594 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 ALBERT & AGNES VARRIN 1595 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 LOUIS R & GLORIA RASPA 1583 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 RUSH 6494 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 BRYAN B BURRIS 6495 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 GUY S MOORE 6602 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2603 Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed SheetP Use template for 5160@ NOBORU & EVELYN TABATA THERESA K SPENCER PO BOX 943 6355 CORTE DEL ABET0 10 CARLSBAD CA 92018-0943 CARLSBAD CA 92009-1443 A D J HOLDINGS L L C AVIARA MASTER ASSN 622 E MISSION RD 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069-1902 CARLSBAD CA 92009-1432 MICHAEL D PROMOTICO LEOPOLD0 RODRIGUEZ 1385 NIGHTSHADE RD 1389 NIGHTSHADE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-3502 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3502 *** 38 Printed *** Address Labels Laser 5160@ Smmth Feed Sheet9 Use template for 5160@ *** 5 Printed *** Address Labels Laser Sn. 30th Feed SheetsfM Use template for 5160@ OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 6513 EL CAMINO REAL 6579 BLACK RAIL RD 6525 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 OCCUPANT 6602 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2603 *** 4 Printed *** Address Labels Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use templa;fe>oT $i=iii@ JOSEPH A RUDVALIS 6517 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 GEORGE R BOLTON 6519 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 WILLIAM & DONNA BAKER 18552 ERWIN ST RESEDA CA 91335-6820 STANLEY THOMAS 1574 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 ROBERT T & KAREN HUNG 1586 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA '92009-4032 ALAN FRITZ 1598 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 JEANNETTE M CROBARGER 1591 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 JAMES M CONSOLE 1579 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 THOMAS A HOLINGER 6498 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 RICHARD E & ESTHER KIM 6491 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 Address Labels RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFOR 15373 INNOVATION DR 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92128-3426 GEORGE R BOLTON 6583 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 AVELINA HIDALGO 6591 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 JOSEPH M NILAND 1578 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 MICHAEL A & KYM TEDESCO 1590 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 TROY D & ANN BUSS 1599 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 MARK & DEBBIE RODRIGUEZ 1587 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 J D & LIBBY RAUCH 1575 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 DAVID J MCGEE 6499 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 RYLAND HOMES OF CALIFOR 15373 INNOVATION DR 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92128-3426 MICHAEL J CARDOSA 6579 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 NORMAN G GALLAGHER 1252 PALMA VISTA CT ESCONDIDO CA 92025-7570 TIMOTHY C BALDWIN 1570 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 SCOTT D & STACIE WILSON 1582 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 THANHHLE 1594 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4032 ALBERT & AGNES VARRIN 1595 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 LOUIS R & GLORIA RASPA 1583 MARITIME DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-4033 RUSH 6494 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 BRYAN B BURRIS 6495 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBAD CA 92009-4028 GUY S MOORE 6602 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2603 Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160$ NOBORU & EVELYN TABATA THERESA K SPENCER GUY S MOORE PO BOX 943 6355 CORTE DEL ABET0 10 CARLSBAD CA 92018-0943 CARLSBAD CA 92009-1443 A D J HOLDINGS L L C AVIARA MASTER ASSN 622 E MISSION RD 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069-1902 CARLSBAD CA 92009-1432 MICHAEL D PROMOTICO LEOPOLD0 RODRIGUEZ 1385 NIGHTSHADE RD 1389 NIGHTSHADE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-3502 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3502 *** 38 Printed *** Address Labels Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed SheetsTM OCCUPANT '6513 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 Use template for 5160’? OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 6579 BLACK RAIL RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-2602 6525 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009-2804 OCCUPANT *** 4 Printed *** A notice has been mailed to all property ownersloccugants Address Labels Laser 5160@