HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-11-19; City Council; 16983; Calavera Hills Village K CT 01-02/PUD 01-05Y CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL
AB# 16,983 DEPT. HD. L m: v
MTG. 11-19-02 CITY ATTY. CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
DEPT. PLN s6y CT 01-021PUD 01-05
CITY MGR
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2002 - 340 , ADOPTING the Negative
Declaration, and APPROVING the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for the
Calavera Hills Village K single-family development.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On October 16, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development for the Calavera Hills Village K single-family project, with a 7-0 vote. The proposed
project is for 84 single-family units on a 16.95 net acres site. The Village K site has a gross acreage
of 51 acres of which approximately 34 acres will be preserved as permanent open space. This open
space corridor was mandated as part of the Certified EIR for the Calavera Hills Master Plan (EIR 98-
02 and MP 150-H).
The currently vacant site would be graded in accordance with the Master Tentative Map for Calavera
Hills Phase II, approved by the City Council on January 15, 2002 (along with EIR 98-02 and MP 150-
H). The site is located northwest of the Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard intersection.
The proposed units would be developed in accordance with Citywide and Master Plan architectural
criteria. Required numbers of single story and reduced second story units are being provided with
versions of Mission, Early California, Monterey, Craftsman and Spanish Colonial architectural styles.
Access would be off of Tamarack Avenue and two recreation areas are proposed with the project,
containing a swimming pool, cabana, turf areas and picnic facilities.
Public comments centered on securing the open space/wildlife corridor per EIR 98-02, and the
provision of sidewalks on existing Harwich and Glasgow drives (already required by the master
tentative map approved in January: one side of that street system will have a sidewalk, the other
side a trail segment). Planning Commission review resulted in a new condition that will provide
incrementally more architectural enhancements to the rear elevations of units highly visible from
adjacent public streets (Lots 16-30),
The proposed development is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Calavera Hills Master Plan,
Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Growth Management Program and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, the single-family project of Village K is
recommended for approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The potential environmental impacts associated with the creation and grading of the Village K site
were reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master
Tentative Map (EIR 98-02), certified on January 15, 2002. Therefore the project-specific
environmental review dealt only with those facets of the project not included in the Phase II Master
Tentative Map proposal.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village K multifamily condominium project, as designed and
conditioned, would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, the
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 16,983
Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 24, 2002, in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection
Procedures of the City of Carlsbad. No comments were received during the 20-day public review
period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible since all development fees will be collected at the time of
grading and building permit issuance. All public facilities necessary to serve the development will be
in place prior to, or concurrent with, development.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2002-340
2. Location MaD
3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5256, 5257, and 5258
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 16, 2002
5. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 16, 2002.
a
1
1
t
8
5
1C
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-340
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CALAVERA
NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLEGE
BOULEVARD AND CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE, IN THE
NORTHEAST QUADRANT.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CASE NO.: CT 01 -0ZPUD 01 -05
HILLS VILLAGE K SINGLE-FAMILY PROJECT, LOCATED
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on October 16, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by Ian
to consider a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 19th day 01
NOVEMBER , 2002, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Negative
Declaration and Site Development Plan, and at the time received recommendations, objections,
protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT Ol-OZ/PUD 01-05; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council adopts Resolution No. 2002-340 and
that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 5289, 5290, and 5291, on file with the City Clerk and made a part
hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
3. That the applications for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development for an 84 unit single-family development on property generally located northwest
of the intersection of College Boulevard and south of Carlsbad Village Drive, are approved as
shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5289, 5290, and 5291.
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
-2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 19th day of NOVEMBER , 2002, by
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard, Hall
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 2002-340
Page 2 of 2 -2-
the
4
EXHIBIT 2
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CT 01-02/PUD 01-05
5
1
2
2 -
4
<
t
5
E
5
IC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5289
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW
THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN 84 UNIT
VILLAGE K OF THE CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE AND COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CASE NO.: CT 01-02PUD 01-05
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, “Developer”/“Owner,” has filed a verified
SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the San Diego
County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of
Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 16th day of October, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit “ND” dated June 24, 2002, and “PII” dated June 18,2002,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinps:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
A.
B.
C.
D.
It has reviewed, analyzed and considered Negative Declaration and the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments
thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. of the project; and
The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
It reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
Based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of October, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, Trigas, White, and Whitton
NOES:
ABSENT:
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson -
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOYZMIUER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5289 -2- 7
0 0
City of Carlsbad
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project AddressLocation:
Project Description:
Village K within the Calavera Hills Master Plan, generally located
northwest of the College BoulevardCarIsbad Village Drive
intersection
84 single-family detached homes consistent with the Calavera Hills
Master Plan.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above-described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments fiom the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date
of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at
(760) 602-4608.
DATED: JUNE 24,2002
CASE NO: CT 01-02PUD 01-05
CASE NAME: VILLAGE WCALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN
PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 24,2002
Planning Director
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 6024600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: CT 01-02PUD 01-05
DATE: June 18.2002
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village K
2. APPLICANT: McMillin Homes
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT’: 2727 Hoover Ave. National
Citv, CA 92950 (619) 336-3138
4. DATE EL4 FORM PART I SUBMITTED: May 17.2001
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Mau and Planned Unit Develoument for the
construction of 84 single family dwelling units, on a 51.5 acre site (with 17 acres of net
area) within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. located northwest of the
intersection of College Boulevard and Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 7.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
0 Land Use and Planning (x] TransportatiodCiation 0 Public Services
0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems
0 Geological Problems 0 Energy & Mineral 0 Aesthetics
0 Water 0 Cultural Resources
Resources
0 Hazards
Noise
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Air Quality 0 Recreation
1 Rev. 03/28/96
7
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
0
0
ISI
0
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect@ on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative
Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier, including
revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore,
a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature Date
2 Rev. 03/28/96 /o
ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR),
Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A ‘Yo Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
‘To Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect fiom “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
Based on an “EM-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but 4 potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and @) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a
supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required
by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no
additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence
that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
3 Rev. 03/28/96 /f
e If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
e An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not
reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact impact Unless Impact
Incorporated
Mitigation
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 0 IXI
(Source kys): (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 [XI
policies adoptedby agencies with jurisdiction over -
the project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
Be incompatible with existing land use in the 0 0 OIXI
vicinity? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0 IXI
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible landuses? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 0 [XI
established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly 0 0 0 IXI
proposal:
population projections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) 0 [XI
or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 IXI housing? (#l:PgS 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
4 Rev. 03/28/96 /a
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially
Significant Significant
Mitigation Unless
Incorporated
Significant Impact
LessThan No
Impact
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expoie people to potential impacts involving:
a) Faultrupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
b) Seismic groundshaking? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1
e) Landslides ormudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
(#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1.15)
- 5.1-15)
g) Subsidence of the land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
h) Expansive soils? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1-
(#l:PgS 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
1 - 5.1-15)
W. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#l:Pgs
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any oxygen or turbidity)? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
water body? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
e) Changes in cw&ts, or the course or direction of
watermovements? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
5..2-11)
(#l:PgS 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
5..2-11)
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
.o 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
El 0
0 0
0 [XI 0 [XI 0
om
0 El 0
om 0 0
om
om
om
0 IXI
om
OEl
0 [XI
om o[XI
on
om
5 Rev. 03/28/96 /3
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
c) ~~ter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0
cause any change in climate? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-
12)
12)
d) Create objectionable odors? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 0 0 0 [XI
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CION. Would the
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -
5.7.22)
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycleracks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs
(#l:PgS 5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
24)
pool)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal? Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 &
(#l:PgS 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
[XI 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
6 Rev. 03/28/96 /f
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially LessThan No
Significant Significant Si&kant Impact lmpact Unless Impact
Mitigation
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known Incop 0 [XI
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs
5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
E. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 UIXI hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil. uesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#l:Pgs ~~ 5.1o.i-i - 5.10.1-5)
Possible interference with an emergency response 0 0 IXI ulan or emereencv evacuation ulan? (#l:Pgs
i.10.1-1- 5.1o.i-5)- -
The creation of any health hazard or potential 17 0 IXI healthhazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
E~~OSUR ofpeople to existing sources ofpotential a 0 IXI
healthhazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
Increase fm hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 IXI
brush, grass, ortrees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
- -
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-1 - 0 0' IXI
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs
5.9-15) 0 0 IXI 5.9-1 - 5.9-15)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6)
b) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -
C) Schools? (#l:PgS 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5)
5.12.8-7)
Xn. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the following
0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5
utilities: 0
' & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
b) Communications systems? 0 0 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3-7) 0 0 e) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8) 0 o r> Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3)
' g) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 0
facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7)
- 5.12.3-7)
,I
0 [XI OB 0 [XI ow
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially LessThan No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation
Incorporated
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the urouosal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? 0
b) Have a demonsbted negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 [XI
c) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5) 0 0 0 [XI
~~ 0 0 [XI (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5)
(#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5)
XIV. CIJL.TURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Dishub paleontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 -
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 -
c) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
5.8-10)
5.8-10)
10)
(#l:PgS 5.8-1 - 5.8-10)
the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10)
XV. RECREATIONAL.. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7)
5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7)
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
periods of California history or prehistory?
or eliminate important examples of the major
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
0 0 0 a
0 0 0 IXI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 0 IXI
0 0 0 [XI
0 0 o[XI
8 Rev. 03/28/96 /6
0 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
The following site-specific technical studies were used in the analysis and design of this project
and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, 92008. (760) 602-4600.
1. Update of Geotechnical Re~ort. Calavera Hills Village K. Citv of Carlsbad. California
dated October 20, 1999, Geosoils, Inc.
2. Interim Reuort of Geotechnical Investigation, Calavera Heirrhts Village K. Carlsbad.
California, dated March 20, 1990, Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.
3. Noise Technical Reuort for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase 11 Village K, Citv of
Carlsbad, California, dated February 18,2002.
9 Rev. 03/28/96 17
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The project involves the construction and occupation of 84 detached single-family units, within
Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 51.5-acre site will be created through the
recordation of the Master Tentative Map for Calavera Hills Phase 11 (CT 00-02) and will be
graded in accordance with that map. As part of the master plan approval and EIR process,
Village K is primarily being set aside as a wildlife comdor leaving a net acreage of 17 acres to
be developed with the single-family units.
The potential environmental impacts associated with the grading of the Village K site were
reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master
Tentative Map (EIR 98-02, SCH No. 99111082), certified January 15,2002. The Environmental
Impact Report also reviewed the impacts associated with the development of Village K with up
to 88 single-family units, 4 units more than is proposed. EIR 98-02, as certified, also reviewed
the potential environmental impacts associated with the major public improvements required for
the buildout of the master plan including Village K.
Since the development of Village K cannot proceed until the Master Tentative Map has been
recorded, and the site has been graded in accordance with that map, the following environmental
analysis deals only with the development of Village K and the project differences compared to
the EIR. The differences center on a revised noise study (which does not result in more or higher
walls than those analyzed in the Em) and a reduced unit amount (84 instead of 88 units).
The Village K site is bound by College Boulevard to the east, Carlsbad Village Drive to the
south, Harwich Drive to the west and existing single-family residential development (Village Q),
and future single-family units in Village L-2, to the north. The proposed single-family
residential use is compatible with all of the existing and future uses in the area.
The residential designation of the Village K site is designated Residential Medium (RM) in the
City’s General Plan, allowing up to 6 dwelling units per developable acre. The proposed density
is 5.2 dwelling units per acre. The project site is zoned P-C (Planned Community) and,
according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be developed in
accordance with the R-1 - Single Family Residential Zone, except as modified in the Master
Plan. The proposed development would consist of 84 single-family residential units and two
common, active recreation areas. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and
meets all development standards and design criteria of the Master Plan and the R-1 zoning
district.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 31,000 cubic yards of balanced
grading subsequent to the mass grading that creates Village K associated the above referenced
master tentative map (CT 00-02). All grading operations would be required to conform to the
recommendations of the site-specific geotechnical report, as well as the City of Carlsbad Grading
Ordinance. In addition, an all-weather access road would be provided throughout construction
and Fire Marshal approval would be required prior to the storage of any hazardous materials on
site.
The residential project would take access off of existing Tamarack Drive and would generate
840 average daily traffic trips, which can be accommodated by existing and required road
segments in the area.
10 Rev. 03/28/96 I8
The project will be required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best Management Practices, thus
reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain system. All facilities needed to
serve the 84 single family units would be provided prior to occupancy, in association with the
Phase II Master Tentative Map grading and improvement plans. In addition, the Carlsbad
Unified School District has stated that there are adequate school facilities to serve the proposed
apartment project.
Noise wall locations and heights are not greater than those covered in the earlier analysis (EIR
98-02) and the proposed unit yield of 84 units is less than the 88 allowed by the master plan.
These two elements represent the variation in the project as reviewed by the master plan’s
certified environmental review (EIR 98-02) and now proposed. Given the above analysis, the
previous environmental documentation and the site-specific technical reports, the proposed
Calavera Hills Village K project would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts
as designed and conditioned.
AIR OUALITY
In 1994 the City prepared and certified an EIR which analyzed the impacts which will result
from the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concludes that
continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will have
cumulative significant impacts in the form of increased gas and electric power consumption and
vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon
monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates.
These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego
Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a %on-attainment basin”, any additional air
emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to build-out
as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air
quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan build-out, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2)
measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation
Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including
mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is
located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked
“Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by
City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Ovemdmg Considerations” for
air quality impacts. This “Statement Of Ovemdmg Considerations” applies to all projects
covered by the General Plan’s Final Master ER. This project is within the scope of that MER
11 Rev. 03/28/96 l9
CIRCULATION
In 1994 the City prepared and certified a Master EIR which analyzed the impacts which would
result fiom the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concluded
that continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will result in
increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate build-out
traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional
through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all
fieeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the
implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the
City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at build-out.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan build-out,
numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include:
1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to
develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks,
pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation
strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic fiom a failing Interstate or
State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to
control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either
been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the
failure of intersections at build-out of the General Plan due to regional through-mc, therefore,
the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the
recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of
Overriding Considerations” applies to all projects covered by the General Plan’s Master EIR.
This project is within the scope of that MER This document is available at the Planning
Department.
A MER may not be used to review projects if it was certified more than five years prior to the
filing of an application for a later project. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to
determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was
certified more than five years ago, the City’s preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no
substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was
certified. The only potential changed circumstance, the intersection failure at Palomar Airport
Rd. and El Camino Real, is in the process of being mitigated to below a level of significance.
Additionally, there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have
been known at the time the MER was certified. Therefore, the MER remains adequate to
review later projects.
EARLIER ANALYSES USED
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of
Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Imuact Re~ort for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update
(MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department.
12 Rev. 03/28/96 a0
e e
2. Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II. Bridge and Thoroughfare District No. 4 & Detention
Basins Final Environmental Imuact Re~ort EIR 98-02), dated November 2001, RECON.
3. Noise Technical Re~ort for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II. Village K, dated
February 18,2002, RECON.
13 Rev. 03/28/94 511
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2$
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5290
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 01-02 TO
SUBDIVIDE 16.95 ACRES INTO 84 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS
WITHIN CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
CARSLBAD VILLAGE DRIVE AND COLLEGE BOULEVARD
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CASE NO.: CT 01-02
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, “Developer”/“Owner,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as:
Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Oflice of the San Diego
County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of
Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown’on Exhibits “A“ - “UU” dated October 16, 2002, on file in the Planning
Department CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - CT 01-02 provided by Chapter 20.12 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of October, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
614
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1c
11
12
I?
14
15
16
1;
18
IS
2c
21
22
22
2L
2:
2t
2;
2t
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - CT
01-02 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposed single family development conforms to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance
and has been designed to comply with other applicable regulations including the
Planned Development Ordinance and the Calavera Hills Master Plan.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single-family residential, multi-family
residential, and park development on the General Plan, in that the project is an in-fill
development and already bounded by earlier phases of master plan development
and/or major arterial roadways (Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard).
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the project site can accommodate the proposed residential
development while complying with all development standards and public facilities
requirements.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large,, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that concurrent with the recordation of the final map the developer shall vacate and
adjust any easements that conflict with the proposed development.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures are oriented
in various directions, adequate separations will be provided to allow for breezes to
cool the areas, and landscaping will be installed to provide shade and reduce the
temperature of developed areas.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
12.
habitat, in that the proposed residential density is within the limits analyzed by the
Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan
Amendment (EIR 98-02/MP 150(H)), and noise attenuation walls are being provided
along the project frontages with Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard. In
addition, the development of this site implements a 35-acre wildlife corridor
required by the resource agencies and outlined in EIR 98-02.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project bas
been designed in accordance with Best Management Practices for water quality
protection in accordance with the City’s sewer and drainage standards, and the
project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the facts set forth in
the staff report dated October 16,2002 including, but not limited to the following:
The proposed density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the existing
RM General Plan designation;
The project minimizes the number of access points to major and prime arterials by
using Tamarack Avenue frontage for access, rather than taking access off of
Carlsbad Village Drive or College Boulevard;
The project includes a noise study with recommendations to reduce the traffic noise
impacts from Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard to 60 dBA CNEL;
The project provides a mixture of architectural styles, contributing to the diversity
of housing within the master plan and City; and
The project will provide emergency water systems and all-weather access roads
throughout construction.
That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 identifies the maximum residential yield on
the Village K site as 88 units (84 proposed) and all facilities within the zone are
planned to accommodate this maximum amount of dwelling units.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
Specifically,
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2E
13.
14.
15.
16.
A.
B.
C.
The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified
School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and
will be collected prior to issuance of building permit unless already credited by
park dedication.
The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be
collected prior to the issuance of building permit.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading permit
or final map for this projecthap, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -4- 275
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, (b)
City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein.
Developer shall submit to Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36,” mylar copy
of the Tentative Map and Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final
decision making body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. A note to this effect
shall be placed on the Final Map.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of PUD 01-05 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5291 for that other
approval.
The Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape
and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan
and the City’s Landscape Manual. The Developer shall construct and install all
landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the
project’s building, improvement, and grading plans.
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. The Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants;
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
A.
B.
C.
D.
General Enforcement bv the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to
the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have
the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be
transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record.
Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the
event that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” as provided in Article , Section
the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary
maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give
written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project,
setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required
and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty
(30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to
carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements within the period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be
entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to
reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein.
Special Assessments Levied bv the Citv. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association’s Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to
each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to
pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection
against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full
within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be
subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of
the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by
means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available
to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot
in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing
lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -6- 27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
la
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
14.
1s.
16.
17.
18.
the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal
actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
hisher respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
E. Landscaoe Maintenance ResDonsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit
owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibits “N”
- “S”, dated October 16,2002.
F. Balconies. trellis and decks. The individual lot or unit owner allowances and
prohibitions regarding balconies, trellis and decks shall be as set forth in Exhibit
“K” -“M”, dated October 16,2002.
The Developer shall provide bus stops to service this development at locations and with
reasonable facilities to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District and the
Planning Director. Said facilities, if required, shall be free from advertising and shall
include at a minimum include a bench and a pole for the bus stop sign. The facilities
shall be designed to enhance or be consistent with basic architectural theme of the
project.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 7, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxedfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and
recreational facilities, unless a construction phasing plan is submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map or grading permit, whichever
occurs first.
The Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any
address change from that which is shown on the permit application.
Prior to the issuance of the grading permit or final map, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the
County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifymg all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n)
Tentative Tract Map and PUD Permit by Resolutions No. 5290 and 5291 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest;
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
IC
11
12
13
14
15
16
li
18
15
2c
21
22
23
24
25
2f
2;
2E
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative,
suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are
distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future
and existing schools, parks and streets.
The developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses
which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall
remain posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in
a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form
#I on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
Open Space Lots 91 and 92, which constitute the 34-acre wildlife corridor through
Village K in compliance with the Calavera Hills Master Plan and Certified EIR 98-
02, shall be dedicated to a third party environmental manager with a conservation
easement dedicated to the City of Carlsbad concurrent with final map approval, to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
The rear elevations for the units on Lots 16-30, shall receive additional architectural
enhancements as part of building permit issuance, to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
Engineering:
General
26. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -8- 619
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is
formally established by the City.
Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&h and/or other
recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all
the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, and storm drain facilities
located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner
among the owners of the properties within the subdivision.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install rain gutters to convey roof drainage to an
approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The final map for the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02 shall be recorded prior to the
recordation of the Final Map for this Tentative Map.
There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project.
Developer shall install sight distance comdors at all street intersections in accordance
with Engineering Standards. A statement shall be included in the Final Map (see Final
Map Notes) and in the CC&Rs.
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement,
grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development.
Building permits for this project will not be issued beyond the cumulative trafic
generation of 2500 ADT by building permits issued for all Calavera Hills Phase I1
projects if the roadway improvements connecting College Boulevard from Carlsbad
Village Drive southerly to El Camino Real have not been completed. Additional
permits may be allowed subject to approval of the City Engineer based on
substantial completion of the required roadway improvements. A note to this effect
shall be included in the Final Map.
FeedAereements
34. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation, the City’s standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement.
35. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
36. Developer shall cause property owner to execute, record and submit a recorded copy to
the City Engineer, a deed restriction on the property which relates to the proposed cross
lot drainage as shown on the tentative map. The deed restriction document shall be in a
form acceptable to the City Engineer aid shall:
A. Clearly delineate the limits of the drainage course;
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -9- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
37.
B. State that the drainage course is to be maintained in perpetuity by the underlying
property owner; and
C. State that all future use of the property along the drainage course will not restrict,
impede, divert or otherwise alter drainage flows in a manner that will result in
damage to the underlying and adjacent properties or the creation of a public
nuisance.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall
cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area
shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street
Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Grading
38.
39.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and
obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for
the project.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. 38. This
project requires off site grading. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside
the limits of this approval unless Developer obtains, records and submits a recorded copy
to the City Engineer a grading or slope easement or agreement from the owners of the
affected properties. If Developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, or
agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case Developer must either apply for
and obtain an amendment of this approval or modify the plans so grading will not occw
outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial conformance from
both the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Dedications/Imurovements
40. Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City
and/or other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the
tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so
offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost.
Streets that already public are not required to be rededicated.
41. Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or
install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent
with any grading or building permit.
42. Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement
to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements
shown on the tentative map and the following improvements including, but not limited to
paving, base, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, medians, signing and striping, traffic
control, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer,
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -10- 31
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water), to City Standards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Streets ‘LA99 6bBW UCV 9 9 , and “D”.
A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the
provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Developer shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights on the final map for all lots
abutting Tamarack Avenue.
Developer shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit, latest version.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Management Plan
(SWMP).” The SWMP shall be in compliance with the NPDES permit requirements
and provisions as established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board and the City of Carlsbad. The SWMP shall address
measures to reduce to the maximum extent possible storm water pollutant runoff at
both construction and post-construction stages of the project. The SWMP shall:
1. Identify construction activity and post-development on-site pollutants of
concern.
2. Recommend structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to remove said pollutants.
3. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee and resident education on
the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
4. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construction BMPs in perpetuity.
5. Incorporate measures to ensure-development runoff rates and velocities from
the site are not increased as a result of the project.
Additionally, concurrent with the SWMP, the applicant shall submit for City
approval a “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).” The SWPPP shall
be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the
California Water Resources Control Board.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install street lights along all public and private street
frontages abutting andor within the subdivision boundary in conformance with City of
Carlsbad Standards.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install sidewalks along all public streets abutting the
subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install wheelchair ramps at the public street comers
abutting the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -11- 32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
25
28
Utilitv Conditions
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire
Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations,
building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants shall be considered
public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way or
within minimum 20-feet wide easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad.
At the discretion of the District Engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate
maintenance, access andor joint utility purposes.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges
for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Dieao Countv Water
Authoritv cauacitv charae(s) prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The Developer shall prepare a colored recycled water use map and submit this map to the
Planning Department for processing and approval by the Deputy City Engineer -
Utilities.
The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a
source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
The Developer shall install potable water and recycled water services and meters at
locations approved by the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be
reflected on public improvement plans.
The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the
District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the District
Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
Prior to issuance of building permits the entire potable water, recycled water, and sewer
system shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity, pressure, and flow
demands can be met to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
Final Map Notes
57. Developer shall show on Final Map the net developable acres for each parcel.
58. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data:
A. All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with the
exception of Streets “A”, “B’’, “C”, and “D”.
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -12- 33
1
2
3
4
5
c
7
E
5
1c
11
12
13
14
15
It
1;
1E
1s
2(
21
22
22
2f
25
2f
2;
21
B.
C.
D.
E.
Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available.
Geotechnical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest
has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action
that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land
subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this
subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above
the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the-area identified
as sight distance conidor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design
Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this
condition.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or
permitted to encroach within the area identified as the Caltrans intersection
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-
Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owuer shall maintain
this condition.
Fire Department:
59. All building permit applications for units adjacent to native open space/preserve
areas shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.
60. The Developer shall submit for Fire Marshal review and approval a 400 scale mylar
showing the location of all proposed fire hydrants.
Code Reminders:
61. The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
62. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
63. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 18.04.320.
64. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
65. The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map
approval becomes final.
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -13- 3LJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
la
11
12
13
14
1s
16
15
18
1s
2c
21
22
22
24
25
2f
27
28
66.
67.
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Some improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations
to acquire such property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate
negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City
Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the requirements of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the City to successfully
acquire said property by condemnation.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feeskxactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -14- 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of October, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
Trigas, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5290 -15- 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5291
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
05, TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION
OF A 84 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN VILLAGE K OF THE CALAVERA
HILLS MASTER PLAN LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE AND COLLEGE
BOULEVARD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CASE NO.: PUD 0 1-05
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, “Developer”/”Owner,” has filed a verified
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD 01-
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as:
Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the San Diego
County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of
Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planning Unit
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A“ - “UU” dated October 16,2002, on file in the
Planning Department, CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - PUD 01-05 as provided by
Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of October, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the PUD Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
l
a
5
la
11
12
13
14
15
16
15
18
1s
2c
21
22
22
24
25
2t
2;
2E
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - PUD
01-05, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
-:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the
Municipal Code, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all
adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the project is
consistent with the Residential Medium density (RM) General Plan designation as it
has a density of 5.0 dwelling per acre; the project complies with the development
standards and design criteria of the Calavera Hills Master Plan for detached single
family homes.
That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community, in that the project site is designated for single-
family units in the Calavera Hills Master Plan and provides for the diversity of
housing types within the City.
That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, in that the project design conforms to all design and development standards
applicable to the property and public improvements will be provided prior to, or
concurrent with, the development of the project to meet all City standards.
That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.080,
and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design
Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides private and common recreation areas;
guest parking is adequately distributed throughout the project, traffic calming and
livable street features are proposed, and the internal street system has a minimum
width of 34 feet.
That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the
site, in that the proposed development in Village K establishes an approximately 35-
acre significant wildlife corridor consistent with the Calavera Hills Master Plan and
certified environmental impact report (EIR 98-02).
That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the proposed single family residential
product type and density are consistent with the master plan’s single family
residential, multifamily residential, and community park land uses that surround it.
That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project.
PC RES0 NO. 5291 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
la
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s
1s
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to gradin
permit or final map, whichever occurs first.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Planned Unit Development.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the PUD documents, as necessary to make them internally
consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall
occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this PUD, (b) City’s approval or
issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in
connection with the use contemplated herein.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 01-02 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5290 for that other
approval, incorporated herein by reference.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
PC RES0 NO. 5291 -3- 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
la
11
12
13
14
15
16
15
18
15
2c
21
22
22
24
25
2t
2;
21
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of October, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
Trigas, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
See, %&
SEENA TFUGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOBMIIYER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5291 -4-
EXHIBIT 4 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. @
Application complete date: August 26, 2002
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 16,2002 Project Planner: Eric Munoz
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
SUBJECT: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - Request for a
Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development
Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family
development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property
generally located at the northwest comer of Carlsbad Village Drive and College
Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5289,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director
and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5290 and 5291 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 01-02 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01-
05, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves the subdivision and construction of an 84-unit single-family project within
Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. Village K will be mass graded in accordance with
the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Tentative Map (CT 00-02). A Tentative Tract Map is required
for the subdivision of property and final grading. A PUD Permit is also being requested. The
project meets all applicable regulations and staff recommends approval.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development
Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84-unit single-family project within
Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 5 I-acre site of Village K was previously the
master plan’s affordable housing site with a maximum of 420 multifamily units allowed. As part
of the recently approved master plan amendment (MP 150(H) approved by City Council in
January 2002), Village K was modified to accommodate a regionally significant wildlife corridor
as part of the EIR process that accompanied the master plan amendment (EIR 98-02).
MP 150(H) now allows up to 88 detached single-family homes on 16.95 net acres. This project
proposes 84 units and complies with all necessary city policies, standards, and master plan
criteria.
Village K is bounded by College Boulevard to the east, Carlsbad Village Drive to the south,
Village L-l and Glasgow Drive to the west, and Tamarack Avenue to the north. Village K is
designated Residential Medium (RM) in the City’s General Plan, allowing up to 8 dwelling units
CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 2
per developable acre with a Growth Management Control Point of 6 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed density is 5.0 dwelling units per acre and is within the allowable General Plan range.
The project site is zoned Planned Community (P-C) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master
Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be developed in accordance with the Planned Development
Ordinance, the Village K standards, and provisions of the Master Plan.
The proposed development would consist of 84 single-family homes that comply with the master
plan’s single-family development criteria for architectural variety and articulation. These criteria
include: minimum lot size, a mix of single-storyhduced second story homes and two story
homes, architectural variety, plan variety, setbacks, garage placement, front porches, front entry
features and recreation areas. The Village K proposal complies with or exceeds all of above
noted master plan criteria for single-family development within Calavera Hills. Four versions of
the following architectural styles will be represented in Village K Mission, Monterey, Craftsman
and Early California.
The single-story units will be under 17 feet in height with approximately 2,050 square feet
(includes garage). The reduced second story units will be approximately 21 feet in height with
the second story being no more than 25% of the first floor area. Total square footage of the
reduced second story units (including garage area) is approximately 2,575 sq. ft. The proposed
two-story units area will be under 25 feet in height with total square footage range of
approximately 3,090 to 3,300. A 34-foot internal street system will serve the project and sewer
and water services will be available. Recreational amenities include active and passive areas. A
swimming pool with a pool house and a tot lot with picnic facilities are proposed as common
recreation areas. Every unit will also have the required amount of private rear yard recreation
space. The project’s fair share of affordable housing is being provided at the Master Plan level in
Village Y (SDP 01-05), therefore none is included in this project.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 31,000 cubic yards of cut and fill,
after the mass grading of CT 00-02. The development would also include retaining walls, with a
maximum height of six feet. The project site would take access off of existing Tamarack Avenue
to the north and would generate 840 average daily traffic trips, which can be accommodated by
the collector street and the adjoining major arterial roadways of Carlsbad Village Drive and
College Boulevard. The project is required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best
Management Practices, thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain
system.
Due to the project’s proximity to College Boulevard, the master plan required that a site-specific
noise study be conducted. That noise study indicates that noise attenuation walls are needed
along some of the project’s perimeter units facing southeast towards College Boulevard. These
walls would range in height from 3 to 6 feet and are incorporated into the project design.
The project is depicted on Exhibits “A”-“UU” dated October 16, 2002. The Calavera Hills
Village K project is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan;
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H));
CT 01-021TUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 3
C. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
D. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance);
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The Calavera Hills Village K project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of
the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the residential development are the Land Use,
Circulation, Noise, Housing, and Public Safety elements. Table 1 below indicates how the
project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan.
Land Use
Circulation
Noise
Housing
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
Site is designated for medium
density (RM) residential
development.
Minimize the number of
access points to major and
prime arterials to enhance the
functioning of these streets
and thoroughfares.
Require that a noise study be
submitted with all residential
projects over five units. Enforce
the City policy that 60 dBA CNEL is the maximum exterior
noise level for residential units.
New housing developed with
a diversity of types, prices,
tenures, densities, and
locations to meet the demand
of anticipated City growth.
Proposed Use and
Improvements
Proposed residential density of
5.0 dwelling units per acre is
below the 6.0 dwellings per
acre maximum allowed in the
RM designation.
The project design takes access
off of Tamarack Avenue, in
accordance with Engineering
standards and traffic calming
measures designed internal to
the site.
The project includes a noise
study with recommendations to
reduce traffic noise from
College Boulevard to 60 dBA
CNEL.
The project provides a mixture
of architectural styles; and the
single-family product type in
this master plan contributes to
the diversity of housing within
the City.
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 01-02PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 4
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Compliance Proposed Use and
Improvements
All necessary water mains, fire
hydrants, and appurtenances
must be installed prior to
occupancy of any unit and all-
weather access roads will be
maintained throughout
construction.
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
Provision of emergency water
systems and all-weather
access roads.
Element
Public
Safety Yes
I single-family project is consistent with the City's 1 Given the above, the Calavera Hills Village E
General Plan.
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan
The proposed 84-unit project is within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan area and,
therefore, subject to the provisions of that master plan (MP 150(H)). Table 2 below summarizes
the project's conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan.
r IERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE v TABLE 2 - CALAF
Standard Proposed Conformance
Allowed Uses:
Maximum of 88 detached
single-family residential units.
Proposed project is 84 detached
single-family residential units
Yes
Setbacks: Per PD Ordinance
(no arterial setbacks involved) Compliance Yes
Yes Architectural Criteria Compliance with elements of
architectural criteria; includes
architectural styles of: Mission,
Early California, Craftsman and
Monterey
Single-Story: 10 units Reduced 2-Story: 15 units
Two-Story: Total: 84 units
Building Height:
Maximum of 30 feet to the
peak of the roof.
Yes Proposed highest structures
measure 25 feet in height, to the
roof peak.
I
Recreation Area:
Minimum of 100 sauare feet The two proposed recreation areas Yes
CT 01-02PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 5
TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
Standard Conformance Proposed
per unit of common recreation
required).
of 8,400 square feet is
feet of common recreation area. area (for 84 units, a minimum
contain a total of 14,093 square
Design Criteria:
Access via Tamarack Avenue.
development within Village K. space preserve. space area to south of
intrusions or accesses via the open access permitted through open
Tamarack Avenue and no No pedestrian or vehicular
The project proposes access off of
A fence/trellis Plan be
the condominium permit. Exhibits “K’-“M. approved in conjunction with A fencekrellis plan is provided on
Yes
Yes
The inclusionary affordable housing requirement for this village is being satisfied by the
development of Village Y and the Calavera Hills Affordable Housing Agreement.
Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the provisions of the
Calavera Hills Master Plan.
C. Subdivision Ordinance
Since the Calavera Hills Village K project involves a subdivision into 92 lots (84 of which are
residential lots), the proposal is subject to the regulations of Title 20, the Subdivision Ordinance.
Chapter 20.16 of the Subdivision Ordinance addresses the requirements for a major subdivision,
that being a subdivision that creates more than four parcels. These requirements deal mostly
with providing the drainage, sewerage, and circulation dedications and improvements needed to
serve the subdivision. There are also requirements concerning consistency with Title 21, the
Zoning Ordinance, which is addressed in the other sections of this staff report.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village K residential subdivision would provide all necessary
facilities prior to, or concurrent with, construction. The hydrology report, submitted by the
applicant, indicates that all runoff can be controlled on-site and conveyed into existing storm
drain facilities. The on-site sewer system would be connected with the existing system in
Carlsbad Village Drive. Water distribution would involve looped service from the existing lines
in Tamarack Avenue. No standards variances are needed to approve the project. Given the
above, the subdivision provides all necessary facilities and improvements consistent with the
Subdivision Ordinance.
CT 01-02PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 6
D. Planned Development Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Master Plan states that Village K shall develop in accordance to the Planned
Development Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.45 of the Zoning Ordinance), except as modified within the
Master Plan. As indicated above, the Master Plan contains regulations governing building
setbacks, building separation, building height, and recreation areas. The Calavera Master Plan
area already has a recreational vehicle storage area (Village I - RV Storage) that serves the entire
master plan. Therefore, the proposed project is subject to the Planned Development Ordinance
standards regarding visitor parking, private streets and driveway, and storage space. Table 3
below details the project’s conformance with these remaining development standards of the
Planned Development Ordinance.
TABLE 3 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
Standard
Visitor Parking:
For projects over 10 units, 5 spaces
for the first 10 units and 1 space per
every 4 units above 10 (for 84 units,
a minimum of 24 spaces is
required).
Private Streets:
Minimum of 34 feet wide streets
from curb-to-curb with minimum
5.5 foot wide parkways.
Storage Space:
All units must contain a minimum
of 480 cubic yards of storage space.
Proposed Conformance
The project provides 64 guest
parking spaces distributed
throughout the project site.
Yes
The proposed street measures
34 feet curb-to-curb and are
Yes
parkways.
adjacent to 4.5 foot wide
Each unit has a minimum of
480 cubic yards of storage
space via 2-car garages per unit Yes
Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the applicable portions of
the Planned Development Ordinance.
E. Growth Management Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Village K project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management
Program, as contained in Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. As discussed above, the
proposed project density of 5.0 dwelling units per net developable acre is within the Growth
Management Control Point of 6.0 dwelling per acre for the Residential Medium density (RM)
General Plan designation. Table 4 below outlines the project’s conformance with the
requirements of the Growth Management Program.
CT 01-02/pUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Standard Compliance Impacts/Standards
City Administration Yes 31 1 sq. ft.
Library 166 sq. A.
Yes 27.1 CFS Drainage
Yes .59 AC Parks
Yes 84 EDU Wastewater Treatment
Yes
Circulation I 840 ADT I Yes I
Fire Station #3
Yes 84 EDU Sewer Collection System
Yes Carlsbad Unified Schools
Yes Satisfied through MP 150(H) Open Space
Yes
~~~
Water I 18,480 GPD I Yes I
The project is below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7
The project site lies within LFMP Zone 7. There are no special conditions or requirements
within the Zone 7 LFMP that apply to this residential project. The project is conditioned to pay
the appropriate public facilities fee, water and sewer connection fees, and traffic impact fees.
The project site is located within a Mello Roos District that covers their proportionate obligation
for school fees. All facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in
place prior to, or concurrent with, development. The Zone 7 LFMP requires the completion of a
connection between College Boulevard and El Camino Real prior to building permit issuance
beyond 2,500 ADT. Therefore, the Calavera Hills Village K residential development is
consistent with the LFMP Zone 7.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The potential environmental impacts associated with the construction of Village K were
reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan
Amendment (EIR 98-02, certified January 15, 2002). Village K was analyzed with up to 88
single-family units. Mitigation affecting this village centers on monitoring during the Master
Plan’s mass grading (approved via CT 00-02). In addition, a revised noise study for Village K
was required to determine the heights and locations of noise walls.
~~
The proposed Calavera Hills Village K project, as designed and conditioned, would not create
any significant adverse environmental impact than previously identified and addressed in EIR
98-02. The project is consistent with the applicable regulations; will be graded in accordance
with the City’s Grading Ordinance and City Standards; will comply with the City’s National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit; will provide all facilities necessary to serve the
Ad7
CT 01-02PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
October 16,2002
Page 8
development prior to, or concurrent with, construction; and will provide noise attenuation walls
along the College Boulevard; and is consistent with EIR 98-02.
Given this environmental analysis, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June
24,2002. No public comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
EM:mh
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5289 (Neg Dec)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5290 (CT)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5291 (PUD)
Location Map
Disclosure Statement
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Background Data Sheet
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A” - UU”, dated October 16,2002.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownerslup interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until ths information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defmed as “Any individual, firm, cc-parb~mhip, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having a financial
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cornoration or uartnershiu, include the
APPLICABLE W/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned cornoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person cOrp,part Calavera Hills II L.L.C.
Title Title
Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
CA 91950
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (is,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
comoration or uartnershie include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned cornoratiot~ include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person CorpPart Calavera Hills I1 L.L.C.
Title Title
Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City
CA 91950
1635 Faraday Avenue * Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 * (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-8559 .@ 4Y
3. NON-PROFIT @GANLZATION OR TRUST e
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonurotit organization or a tmst, list the
names and addresses of ANy person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as bustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profinrust Non Profinrust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes NO If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessaxy
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:AOMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 50
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: CT 01-02PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K -
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: I GENERAL PLAN: RM
ZONING: PC - Calavera Hills Master Plan
DEVELOPER'S NAME: Calavera Hills I1 L.L.C.
ADDRESS: 2727 Hoover Avenue, National Citv, CA
PHONE NO.: (619) 336-3138 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 167-101-28. 168-041-03/06/07~10
QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU):
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 2004
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 31 1
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 166
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 84 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = .58
Drainage: Demand in CFS = 27.1
Identify Drainage Basin = Buena Vista
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 840
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 3
Open Space: Acreage Provided = Per MP 150(A)
Schools: Carlsbad Unified
Elementary: 2 1.9
Middle: 6
High: 11.4
Sewer: Demands in EDU 84
Identify Sub Basin = SAH
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 18,480
The project is 1.0 units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 01-02PUD 01-05
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS - VILLAGE K
APPLICANT: MCMILLIN COMPANIES
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 84 single-family homes in Village K
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lots “D and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
City of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego. State of California. according to Map 823, filed in the
Office of the San Diego County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad
Tract No. 00-02
APN: 167-101-28. 168-041-03/06/07/10 Acres: 16.95 net ProposedNo. ofLots/Units: 84 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Rh4
Density Allowed: 4-8 Density Proposed: 5.0
Existing Zone: PC Proposed Zone: PC
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoninn
Site PC
North PC
South PC
East PC
West PC
General Plan Current Land Use
Rh4 Vacant
Collector Street Tamarack Avenue
Major Arterial Carlsbad Village Blvd.
Major Arterial College Blvd.
RM Village C-1
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 84
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued June 24,2002
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
0 Other,
.. . ..
i
15 f 'ct i
a 8 a P
L
57
1
I
I
i
i
3
\
I E
L3
64
r
Y
\ \
\
\
/'
CA 4 4 0
c.l ._
4
4 0
m
1
H x
v, 0 I
I
73
v, j 9 & 0
PC
c\1
...
9 & io
u b
73
m 0
0. 3 I
CI 3 e, ... N 4 d 0
lr) 9
3 0 9 a
0 fl
0
.C.
I
3
ry) 0 I
N .L
4
3 0
77
m 4
& 0
m 9 d 0
N ..,
4 d 0
b u
80
rg 4 d 0
"
I
.hit
vr 0
d 0 9
pi
c.l ...
4 d 0
/j , Ir
II
CA ? 3 0
i L
, d 0 b u
L-
I
I
i
i i
i
i
!
! I
I
!
i
i
I
i
i i
83
.* N s 3 0
b V
0 E
E
I I
I I I
-
.I .. .. .. ._...e .....- I: :: r-"- I I
I I I I 1 I I I L""-""""""""" L! a" I
.n
c\l s
Io H
86
87
v) 0 I
c
Pi ...
9
3 0 's
a?
0 rg
0
I &
f! i 1
0
.n I 2[ I
k u K I i"I-1 f.
r-
i
j j
I I
I
."
I
93
m 0
0
I d
.n N 9
M 0 1
1
a 3 .
m 0
0 d I
!3 PI
hl ...
9
d 0
b u h
4 3 Q
c
97
99
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 DRAFT Page
FJHIBIT 5
6. CT 01-OZIPUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - Request for a Negative Declaration,
Tentative Tract Map (CT), and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and
construction of an 84-unit single-family development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master
Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7.
Plan, on property generally located at the northwest corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and College
Jimeno. He stated that the Commission's action is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council.
Mr. Wayne introduced item #6 and stated that Eric Munoz would make the presentation assisted by Frank
Chairperson Trigas opened the public hearing on Item #6.
Mr. Munoz pointed out that Village K is located in the central portion of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, It
was the subject of a major change in the Master Plan Amendment approved by the City Council earlier
this year, which was to establish a 34-acre wildlife corridor through Village K. Village K had also been
previously designated for 420 multi-family homes and the affordable housing site. The affordable housing
site was relocated to Village Y and Village K was re-designated from multi-family to single-family with a
maximum of 88 single-family homes. This project proposes 84 homes and complies with all architectural
and master plan guidelines for development standards as well as architectural criteria. He showed
exhibits and pointed out the open space area going through the central and southern portion of Village K.
Mr. Munoz stated that the Errata Sheet clarifies the fact that the open space area in Village K is comprised
the map, but they wanted to make it clear to the Commission and the community that the 34-acre wildlife
of two lots. He said it clarifies what was going to happen anyway as a standard matter of practice in filing
corridor comprised of those two lots will be dedicated to an environmental manager of conservation
easement with open space zoning in the master plan.
Commissioner Segall asked how the people that move into Village K will be notified of the barricade at
College and what the process is to remove the barricade. Mr. Munoz replied that there is no specific
disclosure on that item, however, if they were to research the Master Plan or the EIR that created the
current allowance for Village K, there are discussions and mitigation measures in there as part of the
certified EIR that regulate when that opening with Oceanside and College can occur. It's basically an ADT
traffic generated based threshold. 2,500 ADT is the limit up to which building permits can be issued
without opening College Boulevard. There is disclosure if someone were researching the underlying
documents that allow Village K to be developed and approved, but there's no specific disclosure to the
of developing Village K so it will almost be a non-issue because it will be so close to being opened. The
new residents of Village K. By the time 2,500 ADT comes around it's going to be right about the midpoint
developer might make the disclosure as part of their marketinglsales program.
Mr. Wayne clarified that the issue on the opening of the barricade isn't just the units, it's whether or not
College and Cannon are constructed to El Camino Real. The City isn't going to open the barricade when
they get to 2,500 ADT; instead once McMillin has been issued enough building permits that would
generate 2,500 ADT, they won't be issued another building permit until College and Cannon are constructed. That gives McMillin incentive to finish that road in a timely manner and then the barricade
gets opened.
Commissioner Whitton asked if the garage is included in the square footage of the housing units that have
two full stories and in the 3,000 square foot area. Mr. Munoz replied that it is.
the third and fourth neighborhoods in a series of neighborhoods that will be coming before the
Brian Milich, Corky McMillin Companies, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City 91950, stated that these are
approved which set the tone for the final phase of Calavera Hills and addressed a variety of issues such
Commission and these are the first two single-family neighborhoods. The Master Plan has already been
with Staff dealt with the architecture. There is a section of the Master Plan that goes into all of the
as grading, landscaping, size of the lots, and open space corridors. A very large part of their discussions
different architectural elements that have to be addressed in this project. He said he had not worked with
a more complicated set of rules and regulations and that's because they not only have the Master Plan rules and regulations, but the new Planned Development Ordinance rules and regulations. He said it's
been a good challenge because they came out with some good architecture but it was a challenge to
address all the requirements. He highlighted a number of requirements they had: )OO
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 Page 15
Requirements for the number of single story, reduced two story, and two story units.
Requirements in terms of the maximum number of elevations of each of those different types
requiring architectural variety. They have architectural variety ensured as one of the specific
requirements and these all have certain percentages and certain criteria established with them in the
Side yard setbacks and garage placement. They have three-car garages, but those are in tandem or
Master Plan.
Front entry features that require either courtyards or porches.
side entry to one of the garages so no more than two garages are lined up.
Recreation areas required.
New PD Ordinance requirements in terms of how the units are established so that there are certain
offsetting planes both front, rear, and side to make sure there is enough shadow and relief on all the
units.
Commissioner White said the elevations she saw in Village K and Village L-2 had only two architectural
styles and they looked exactly the same on both sets of plans. She wanted to know if he intends for each
village to have something that makes it individual or sets it apart from the other villages so there's not a
community with a lot of homes shared between four architectural styles and four floor plans. She also asked what he might do for landscaping. Mr. Milich replied that there are provisions that they believe they
not be building all the neighborhoods. They will most likely build Villages K. L-2, and probably X, and
met in the master plan. He said one of the ways that will most likely be taken care of is that McMillin will
Brookfield will most likely be building the two multi-family projects, E, Y. U. and probably Village W. To
avoid direct competition with each other they'll most likely end up having different homes. Mr. Milich said
that Staff required that each neighborhood have some overlapping as well as some different architectural
styles. K and L-2 will have Mission, Early California, Craftsman, and Monterey styles. There are some
overlap with K and L-2, and then it will also have Spanish Colonial and Santa Barbara. There will be some
similarities but also some distinctions between them. Village W will have Craftsman and Monterey. which
mixing and matching between each of the neighborhoods but they didn't want each neighborhood to look
identical to the other. With the need to provide this information so far in advance of building, they came in with similar floor plans on the neighborhoods but different architectural styles so they wouldn't all look the
same. He said their goal right now is to develop different model complexes, different floor plans. As a
result he thought the units would look even more different even if the developer is the same.
Commissioner White said they would do the community a great service if when they market these homes
they would talk to their potential buyers about Cannon and College in a way that does not negatively impact their marketing. Mr. Milich said those are the types of things they like to disclose and will definitely
start clearing the site within the next couple of weeks and then start grading because that's important not
have in their disclosure. He added that they are highly motivated to get those roads built. They hope to
only to the City, but to them. He said it's their marketing window to the project, so they're very anxious to
get the roads under construction and completed.
Commissioner Segall said he thinks there's sometimes a tendency to have the homes look almost identical from the back because they're focusing on front elevations. He wanted to know how the rear
elevations would differentiate different styles of the same unit and if there is any plan to do that. He asked
if there are any amenities or articulations other than the color of the paint that would differentiate one
design from the other. Mr. Milich said there are some small nuances, but they won't be as different as the
front elevations. There are a lot of things happening on the rear elevations and that's driven as much by
the ordinances and the master plan as by their desire to show some changes in the rear elevations.
There will be balconies required in some cases there are offsets in planes, and different roof features. In
and dormer vents to address details that might be picked up from the front elevations.
some cases the roof tile will be different. There are minor features that could be added such as shutters
to two different elevations. Basically there's going to be two different styles that will be repeated all the
Referring to a drawing, Commissioner Segall said there will be a view from Glasgow Street that amounts
way down and you won't be able to discern one from the other, other than paint color. He wanted to know
how they could differentiate those, especially when there's a view of it from another street. Mr. Milich replied that there are some houses that will repeat and will have some differences in the back. He said he
didn't know to what degree you would see a lot of difference from a detail standpoint architecturally, but
shades and shadows will differentiate to a degree and break up a long monotonous row of houses. He
said they will have some landscaping, although in that case it's somewhat restricted because it's a brush /o I
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 Page 16
management area and there are certain things that can and can't be done in the rear yards. He said they
are willing to add more detail if that's the concern with some of the rear elevations. He said that particular
street was difficult because of the restrictions caused by the open space and the brush management so
that's why there are some groupings of two-story units. He deferred to Kirk McKinley to further address
that concern.
ridge. He said they not only have one-story buildings on the ridge, but they have reduced second story
Kirk McKinley, McKinley Associates, 1818 First Avenue, San Diego 92101 discussed the concerns of the
plans which have four offsetting planes on the rear elevation. He showed how the one-story edges and
offsetting planes of the various plans would lend variety and a feeling of separation from unit to unit. He
explained how they could add shutters, pot shelf elements, and venting details to the rear elevations. He
also noted different fascia details such as wood fascia with heavy outriggers, individual outriggers, and
plaster soffitt detailing that goes around the building. He said a lot of the detail is not picked up in the
drawing, but when you see the final product in reality you begin to see a lot of the architecture.
Commissioner Segall wanted to make sure that when the rear elevations are grouped together they won't
all look the same, except for different colors and mentioned adding other architectural enhancements that
do in visible locations. He said the City of Carlsbad has to be really committed to this one story edge
match the front and wrap them all the way around. Mr. McKinley said that's what they're saying they will
condition that the Planning Commission pushes because it's a very successful way of giving more
breathing room between houses. He said they try to get their clients, in this jurisdiction as well as others,
to take that along in the design process because they found from experience that it really helps with the
streetscape and the appearance of the project.
Commissioner Whitton asked him to address the requirement for front porches because he could not see
them on the drawing. Mr. McKinley replied that the requirement is for a certain percentage of either
porches or front courtyards. He pointed out which houses had courtyards and indicated that the houses
depicted in the streetscape don't have covered porches, but they do have covered porch solutions for
some of the alternate elevations that project out in front of the building that satisfy that requirement.
Commissioner Segall asked what the square footage is of the porches and if it meets the PD ordinance.
Mr. McKinley said it's 60 square feet and that meets the PD ordinance.
Mr. McKinley added that they made a recommendation to McMillin to have three separate color palettes -
a light color, medium color, and a dark color. Those vary from community to community so when you see
the architecture in one of these other communities it may provide some of the product segmentation that
you're concerned about. He said they have been very successful in doing this in several projects in Sari
Diego where they have six different architectural projects going on and were trying to get diversity behveen
them. The color diversity and the corresponding trends that go along with that really add to the variety.
Chairperson Trigas asked why the homes are exactly the same elevations in Village L-2, which is much
the larger 84-unit area. Mr. Milich stated that their plan has always been that K and L-2 would be
smaller and has a more intimate feeling, and if there would be something more unique in this area than
marketed out of the same set of models. They're right across the street from each other so rather than
thinking of it as an 84-unit project, it's really a 98-unit project. It has its own recreational facility although
able to use each other's facilities. The houses will be in the same price ranges and will most probably be
most likely they will be setting up a homeowners association where all of the single-family villages will be
built by McMillin out of one model complex.
Commissioner Heineman asked if the lots in L-2 are much larger. Mr. Milich said some of the lots are
quite a bit larger in L-2; however some of the lots in K are quite large also because there's some slope
included. He said they made sure that the houses would fit and would be interchangeable in either of the
neighborhoods.
Chairperson Trigas opened public testimony
Bob Hoffman, 3635 Terrace Place, Carlsbad, from the Sheffield Development located down the hill from
the proposed homes, wanted to-know if the pool planned for Village K would be available to all residents in
the Calavera Hills Master Community Association or if it would be strictly for the people who live in Village
K. lo a
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 Page 17
Brian Gallagher, 2900 Cliff Circle, Carlsbad, stated that a number of their homes will be directly across
from a hill that slopes up and homes that will look down. He had the following questions:
Will there be any effort to make the 90-degree turn at Harwich and Glasgow safer by giving it a gentler
turn than it currently has. There is no sidewalk so when they walk with their kids they're kind of close
to the traffic. What is the dimension of a sidewalk that's going to be on the Calavera Hills side of
Harwich to support people trying to get to the park?
What is the location and height of the noise wall identified as part of this development?
What is the process for having the ravine checked out where old couches and chairs end up and is
visible from the street.
In regard to Mr. Hoffman's question on recreational facilities, Mr. Milich said they would be setting up a
separate homeowners association for Calavera Hills Phase 11, and most likely the residents of the single- family neighborhoods, K, L-2, W, and X, will use those recreational facilities. They will not be available to
residents in Calavera Hills Phase I.
the intersection of Harwich and Glasgow Roads. They will be making improvements; they will be adding a
Regarding the questions raised by Mr. Gallagher. Mr. Milich said there are currently no plans to change
they will be adding frontage improvements which will include a sidewalk on one side. The open space is
sidewalk on one side and a trail segment on the other side. The alignment of the road is not changing but
going to be transferred soon to a non-profit organization that will be managing in perpetuity all of the open
space at Calavera Hills. That will be under the control and management of somebody who is set up to
make sure that trash is picked up, non-native vegetation is cleared, and a variety of other things.
Don Mitchell, Corky McMillin Companies, pointed out on the map where the noise wall would be located.
Chairperson Trigas closed public testimony.
Mr. Munoz stated that the area where Glasgow and Harwich currently form a 90-degree angle is straddled
by the open space preserve. The fact that it's in open space precludes the ability to straighten out that
road segment so that's why it has to stay as a 90-degree turn.
Mr. Wayne added for clarification that it's the open space for Phase II that would be maintained in
perpetuity. They are not responsible for Calavera Phase I so if the open space area referred to is in
Phase I, there's no mechanism currently, but ultimately there will be a managing entity for that if the
Habitat Management Plan gets put into place.
Chairperson Trigas asked where the ravine is located. Barbara Heit, 2908 Cliff Circle, Carlsbad, pointed
out the location of the ravine on the map and stated that it is in Calavera Hills Phase II.
Commissioner Segall wanted to make sure that Mr. Munoz understood his concern on the ridge and
wanted his opinion as to whether it's inherent in the plan or if they need to add a condition. He said he
would be satisfied to leave it to the satisfaction of the Planning Director as to where it is, but wanted to
make sure it is addressed in this project. Mr. Munoz said he would recommend a condition that targets
Lots 17 to 31 to have additional rear elevation enhancements to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Commissioner Segall said he would make that part of the motion if he had agreement with the rest of the
Commissioners.
Commissioner Baker said she didn't disagree, but was hesitant to saddle the homeowner with costly
maintenance that they won't do and then would have elevations from the rear with architectural details that
would require the same maintenance that would be required on the front of the home and didn't think there
are not maintained. Mr. McKinley said the items they would propose would be items such as shutters that
would be that type of issue. Commissioner White commented that if she were a homeowner that did not have the extra architectural
enhancements on the rear elevations that others had, she would be really disappointed. She said the developer may be in a situation where they feel they have to treat all elevations on that street the same to
make all houses look equally desirable.
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 Page 18
Chairperson Trigas said that the proposal is to leave it up to the Planning Director and it‘s understood
what they’re looking for.
Commissioner Dominguez asked if there’s anything that could be done with the HawichlGlasgow connection to mitigate the sharpness. He said he wasn’t satisfied with the answer that nothing could be
done because of habitat. Mr. Jimeno replied that the requirement to improve Glasgow/Harwich came with
the Master Plan last December. Both streets would be fully improved except they would probably be
narrowed down and they will have a sidewalk on one side and a trail on the other side. They’re trying to
smooth out the 90-degree corner a little but they cannot encroach in the restricted HMP area.
Commissioner Dominguez asked if the radical turn could be straightened out any within the given right-of-
way. Mr. Jimeno said they’re minimizing the curve staying within the existing right-of-way. Commissioner
Dominguez said he thinks it‘s a situational problem that needs to be addressed. He knows there are
complications involved, but feels that it should be conditioned that that particular situation be addressed.
Mr. Wayne stated that Mr. Jimeno said it was already approved as part of the Master Tentative Plan and
what they’re trying to do in final design is deal with some of these issues. He thought by doing that they might end up throwing this project out of conformance with an earlier project which would then create
some potential problems.
Commissioner Dominguez asked if Glasgow or Hawich will be extended at a future time. Mr. Jimeno said
that originally that was going to be a full intersection, but now they’re not going to continue Glasgow or
Harwich. so it becomes a 90-degree turn.
MOTION
ACTION:
VOTE:
AYES:
ABSTAIN: NOES:
MOTION
ACTION:
Motion by Commissioner Baker and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5295, adopting the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Planning
01-01 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01-04, based upon the
Commission Resolutions No. 5296 and 5297 approving Tentative Tract Map CT
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the Errata
Sheet for Village L-2.
7-0-0
Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez. Heineman, Segall.
White, and Whitton
None None
Motion by Commissioner Baker and duly seconded, that the Planning
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5289, recommending
Tentative Tract Map CT 01-02 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01-05,
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5290 and 5291 recommending approval of
based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, including the Errata Sheet for Village K, and including a condition to improve the rear
elevations on Units 17 through 31 in Village K to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
Planning Commission Minutes October 16,2002 Page 19
VOTE: 7-0-0
AYES:
White, and Whitton
Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Segall,
ABSTAIN:
NOES: None
None
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
None.
PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMENTS
None.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION
By proper motion, the Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of October 16, 2002 was adjourned at
9:17 p.m.
GARY WAYNE
Assistant Planning Director
Kathy Vande Voori
Minutes Clerk
MINUTES ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE WRITTEN MINUTES ARE APPROVED.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 6% 2011 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the
above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of
the printer of Proof of Publication of
North County Times
Fomlerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulatio
the Superior Court of the County of San Di 1
State of California, for the County of San Dif
that the notice of which the annexed is a prir
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel),
been published in each regular and entire issuc
said newspaper and not in any supplement the]
on the following dates, to-wit: 1
NOVERBER 9,2002
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated ai SkN IvIARCOS >- Calif01
this 11TH CASEFILE JCT 01-02,PUD 01-05
of NOVERBER, 2002 CASE NAME CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 9,2W2 PUBLISH!
CITY OF CARLSBAD CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CT 01-02IPUD 01-05
I
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, November 19,2002, to
consider a request for approval of a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned
Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family
development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located at
the northwest corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as:
Parcel A of Parcel Map 16233, file in the Office of the County
Recorder on September 21, 1990, in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the.staff report will be available on and after November 15, 2002. If you
have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map and/or Planned unit Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law andor city
ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map
and/or Planned Unit Development Permii in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the-City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01-02PUD 01-05
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
PUBLISH: SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 9,2002
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL.
w
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
CT OI-OZ/PUD 01-05
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, [DATE], to consider a
request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit
to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family development within Village
K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located at the northwest corner of
Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more
particularly described as:
Parcel A of Parcel Map 16233, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder on September 21, 1990, in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after [DATE]. If you have any
questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very
short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at
or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K
PUBLISH: [DATE]
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160"
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
801 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKSlCOMMUNlTY
SERVICES
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKSJCOMMUNITY
SERVICES
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
ERIC MUNOZ
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKSKOMMUNITY
SERVICES
10/30/2002
mAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160@
BERNICE C HILL
2984 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
BARBARA A STROTHER
2990 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
ROGER P SANTORA 2862 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552
DENISE L KOLDE
2854 NANTUCKET LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552
JEFF KUESTER CHARLES R CARTER
2986 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2988 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
CARL J ESQUEDA-CRIMSON CATHLEEN L ARMS
2858 NANTUCKET LN 2860 NANTUCKET LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552
KAREN J JEWETT PAMELA LANGNESS
2864 NANTUCKET LN 2856 NANTUCKET LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552
JEANNINE MENGER MARY J WALTER
174 WALNUT AVE 2855 NANTUCKET LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3193 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552
ROGER A OUILLETTE ROBERT W FILLER TR WEIN-QUARTARONE
2874 NANTUCKET LN 2872 NANTUCKET LN 2715 SPOKANE WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2188
DAMIEN B BROWER J T & J SMITH JAMES L LYONS
2876 SANFORD LN 2878 SANFORD LN 2880 SANFORD LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553
ROSEMARIE R ROWLETT TR EVYZIAN MARA L WARMBRAND
2884 SANFORD LN 2314 SHAWN CT 2886 SANFORD LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2078 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553
ADDIE M LYONS LYNNE C WELKE MARY E RORAPAUGH
2888 SANFORD LN 2890 SANFORD LN 10327 112TH CT NE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 KIRKLAND WA 98033-5175
DEBORAH A STILWAGEN NOEL ALLANMEYER JULIA RAGOZZINO
2894 SANFORD LN 2893 SANFORD LN 2891 SANFORD LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553
RUTH I SABULA TR SHAW BRIGHT LEE A 2889 SANFORD LN 2887 SANFORD LN 2875 SANFORD LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553
CAROL A LINCOLN STEPHEN E JACOBS LISA M CHAMNESS
6400 PULLMAN PL SW 2871 SANFORD LN 3766 PORTLAND CT
PORT ORCHARD 98367-7637 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6554
DANIEL MILICH VIRGIL CURRY STEVEN T TIPLITSKY
3768 PORTLAND CT 3770 PORTLAND CT 3772 PORTLAND CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6554 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555
PETER A & LAURA WALSH SAM D HERNANDEZ SYLVIA A PHILLIPS
2885 SANFORD LN 2883 SANFORD LN 2881 SANFORD LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553
GLENN T HAYASHI MICHAEL HODELL KENNETH D MARTINEZ
2879 SANFORD LN 3774 PORTLAND CT 3776 PORTLAND CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 .CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555
ROOSEVELT CLEVELAND JEFFREY H HAYES MAURICE COHN
3786 PORTLAND CT 3788 PORTLAND CT 2261 MASTERS RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 CARLSBAD CA 92008-3849
HARVEY P HARLIB DALE & MARY BODMAN SANDRA L PEARSALL
PO BOX 2564 3242 CELINDA DR 3782 PORTLAND CT
CARLSBAD CA 92018-2564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2071. CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555
T.?. JARVIS PAMELA M MONTANEZ CREST OF CALAVERA HILLS
3780 PORTLAND CT 3778 PORTLAND CT 3900 HARNEY ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825
CREST OF CALAV
3900 HARNE
SAN D CA 92110-2825
VILLAS OF CALAVERA HILL JONETTE C VOLLMER JON & LISA TIMMERMAN
3900 HARNEY ST 3540 RIDGEWOOD WAY 8 3538 RIDGEWOOD WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012
MARY A & MAURA OGRADY
3536 RIDGEWOOD WAY
STEPHEN T SHELLEY ROXANA J LUCAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012
PO BOX 1286 SAN CLEMENTE 92674-1286 CARLSBAD CA 92018-4451
PO BOX 4451
MARION D SWIFT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012
3550 RIDGEWOOD WAY
MARTHA F CAILLE
7544 RIDGEWOOD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012
MARY E HOLLAND
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
3537 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
SHIRLEY J SOMMERS
3531 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
BAKER JANIS M
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
3545 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
THIERRY FALLET
1905 FOXGLOVE VW
CARLSBAD CA 92009-4822
ANNA DEMETRIS
2870 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003
PATRICIA J YOUNG
TEMECULA CA 92592-3743
31935 CALLE ESPINOSA
RODNEY J & MARY BAIROS
SANTEE CA 92071-2984
9329 CALLE DEL VERDE
FRED L & CAROL CLARK
2859 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003
OLEARY ERIKA M TR BLOZAN
3548 RIDGEWOOD WAY 3546 RIDGEWOOD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012
NORMAN DOBRUSKIN DEBRA A BASOM
3542 RIDGEWOOD WAY 3539 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
JOHN P KRESSIN AILEEN L SCHICK
3535 CEDARBRIDGE WAY 3533 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
DARIN M MCGHEE SALLY CHERNESKY
3604 28TH ST 3547 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92104-3502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
HENRY BYZAK PATRICK M FARLEY
3543 CEDARBRIDGE WAY 3541 CEDARBRIDGE WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013
MICHAEL ANDREWS TR EMOA
220 PLUM AVE 327 LINDEN WAY
BREA CA 92821-5952 PLEASANTON CA 94566-6881
JOHN S COLLINS CLAIRE C FOSTER
2727 ROOSEVELT ST A 2882 ANDOVER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1617 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7004
JERI T MUSE PATRICIA M LINKINS
3054 JUNIPER ST 2867 ANDOVER AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92104-5437 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003
ERIK K TAPPIN CARL H TUTTLE
2863 ANDOVER AVE 14089 24TH AVE NE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 SEATTLE WA 98125-3401
SIGNE R JOHNSON RICHARD K JACOBS
2877 ANDOVER AVE 2104 WEDGEWOOD DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7004. OCEANSIDE CA 92056-3266
KARIN L DULAK
2873 ANDOVER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-700
DESHANO RODNEY A
15035 CALLE JUANITO
~ ~~~ ~~
3 SAN DIEGO CA 92129-1007
LON1 D SCHURR
2856 ANDOVER AVE
CgRLSBAD CA 92008-7002 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002
RANDOLPH K WHITTINGTON
2854 ANDOVER AVE
DARCY J BERGEN
2850 ANDOVER AVE GIESE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002
13076 MARLETTE. DR
LA MIRADA CA 90638-1933
PHILIP J BOSTROM
ENCINITAS CA 9202
PO BOX 230934
3-093 4
WILLIAM R BOLDT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-3702
6845 SHEARWATERS DR
RIZZO 6533 VISPERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009-5339
MICHAEL C DAQUILA THOMAS J SHIELDS DEENA L DISTEFANO 2864 ANDOVER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003
2862 ANDOVER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003
2860 ANDOVER AVE
JONATHAN D CHESNUT SCARLETT H MCCONNELL
2858 ANDOVER AVE 2847 ANDOVER AVE 49 BRADLEY R SCOTT
CqRLSBAE CA 92008-7002 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 2845 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002
TR DODD JAMES J & JOAN OCONNELL 218 CHAPALITA DR 105 GAS LIGHT DR 4
STEPHEN W PAAP
2855 ANDOVER AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024-4826 S WEYMOUTH MA 02190-2147 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002
CHRISTOPHER J LASKE
2853 ANDOVER AVE TIMOTHY G CAUFIELDS PAT & MONICA MCDONNOUGH 2851 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 2849 ANDOVER AVE
JAMES R HOWCROFT
2836 ENGLEWOOD WAY
DEBRA L KLOTZ SALLY A WON 2834 ENGLEWOOD WAY C.IRLSBAD CA 92008-7005 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 2832 ENGLEWOOD WAY 107 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005
CHARLES W CAGLIOSTRO MADELINE R ARNOLD MICAHEL S GOTTES 27 SEBASTIAN CT
H3PEWELL JUNC 12533-6705 2844 ENGLEWOOD WAY 2842 ENGLEWOOD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005
DIANE H SAITO JOHN K ROSS ROBERT C & SUSAN LLOYD
2840 ENGLEWOOD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 CARLSBAD CA 92008-3760
2838 ENGLEWOOD WAY 1809 HIGH RIDGE AVE
MARILYN J BRYANT ROBERT D JENSEN WILLARD L ERICSON
2852 ENGLEWOOD WAY 2850 ENGLEWOOD WAY 2848 ENGLEWOOD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005
SHERRIE L FERGUSON SVETLANA L FOUDA WILFRED0 R VALENZUELA
2274 S 1300 E G8 2860 ENGLEWOOD WAY 118 9212 BUTTERCUP AVE
SALT LAKE CIT 84106-2882 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 FOUNTAIN VALL 92708-1906
CHERYL S SMITH ALEXANDER K ARMOUR WALKER
2856 ENGLEWOOD WAY 120 2872 ENGLEWOOD WAY 4381 SHASTA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7914
MARIO & PATRICIA DELEON ROBERT J CONNOR TR ECK
2868 ENGLEWOOD WAY 451 LEXINGTON CIR 2880 ENGLEWOOD WAY 125
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 OCEANSIDE CA 92057-7355 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006
MARYLOU BELEW WASUNG
2878 ENGLEWOOD WAY 13033 TRIUMPH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 POWAY CA 92064-6404
HARRY S & DOREEN MAY
2874 ENGLEWOOD WAY 128 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006
YOUNG MELODIE A KELLEY JOANN GARCIA
3523 BROOKFIELD WAY 3525 BROOKFIELD WAY 3527 BROOKFIELD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017
LORA A ZAROFF JASMIN S KOCUR RENEE COOPER
3529 BROOKFIELD WAY 3531 BROOKFIELD WAY 3533 BROOKFIELD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017
CRONK TR CLAUDIA JONES NANCY HAGERMAN
3535 BROOKFIELD WAY 3537 BROOKFIELD WAY 1302 LEMON PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 ESCONDIDO CA 92027-4712
GUTIERREZ-TUNISON JESSICA L MOORE MURIEL M BRENNAN
3817 PINNACLE PL 3543 BROOKFIELD WAY 3545 BROOKFIELD WAY
ESCONDIDO CA 92025-7934 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017
KATHRYN MCKEE MITCHELL A SALTZ ELENOR F MCELLIOTT
3 503 PROVJDENCE LN 7234 E SHOEMAN LN 9 3507 PROVIDENCE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251-3315 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016
JULIA K BUTLER MICHELLE RICK CINDY L GIBBONS
3509 PROVIDENCE LN 3511 PROVIDENCE LN 3513 PROVIDENCE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016
KARL E SAIMRE WILLIAM & LEAH GOULD DAVY L MINGE
3515 PROVIDENCE LN 3365 PAR DR 3516 SOMERSET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 OCEANSIDE CA 92056-1705 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014
MALLOY MARVIN J MAROHN COLLETTE C EELLS
3514 SOMERSET WAY 3512 SOMERSET WAY 3510 SOMERSET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014
RALPH W & JEAN BLEAK DONNA GUGLER SUSAN B NIXON
10422 LORENZO PL 3506 SOMERSET WAY 3528 SOMERSET WAY
LOS ANGELES C 90064-4449 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015
JOSEPHINE G MAGDICH ALBERT W WILSON WILLIAM P LUND
1880 LAUREL RD 3524 SOMERSET WAY 3522 SOMERSET WAY 208
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-6152 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015
KELLY KORSMEIER GARY D FARMER ROBERT G ANDERSON
3520 SOMERSET WAY 3518 SOMERSET WAY 1217 GOLD FLOWER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3422
ANDREW P MIFABELLI CONSTANCE YANCHEWSKI BRIAN TAYLOR
3513 SOMERSET WAY 3511 SOMERSET WAY 3509 SOMERSET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014
AUDRIE E MCINNIS ENCINAS J N PIERCE
3507 SOMERSET WAY 3505 SOMERSET WAY PO BOX 8465
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 INCLINE VILLA 89452-8465
SHERRIAN K DEAN BJORN L BOUWMEESTER AMIELYN C DIZA
3525 SOMERSET WAY 3523 SOMERSET WAY 3521 SOMERSET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015
GEORGE J SHADE FRED S & KRISTIE LITTLE CAROLYN R CATALDO
3519 SOMERSET WAY 3517 SOMERSET WAY 3016 NEWSHIRE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031
MIKE & JILL KENNY TIMOTHY J BRENNAN PHILIP W & PAMELA WERTZ
3020 NEWSHIRE ST 3024 NEWSHIRE ST 3028 NEWSHIRE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 CARLSBAE CA 92008-7031
PHILLIP SHECKLER VALERIE ESCALANTE RICHARD H BROWN
1811 IVY RD 3641 CHESHIRE AVE 1831 IRVING ST NW
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-5642 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7022 WASHINGTON DC 20010-2614
LYNDSAY L JACKSON WILLIAM M MARTINEZ ALEXANDER & LISA ORTEGA
3642 CHESHIRE AVE 3644 CHESHIRE AVE 3646 CHESHIRE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7021 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7021 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7021
EDUARDO D CONSUNJI CLAUDE A & MARY NASH KENNETH BROWN
19320 SEGAL ST 2957 GREENWICH ST 2963 GREENWICH ST
CERRITOS CA 90703-7143 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7028 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7028
FRED D & JANET WATSON KEITH H PATTERSON CHRISTOPHER WESTROPP
PO BOX 325 2976 GLENBROOK ST 2972 GLENBROOK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92018-0325 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7023 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7023
HUTCHINGS FRANCINDA T ROVEY RAFT 0 & SHARON RANGEL
2977 GLENBROOK ST 2981 GLENBROOK ST 2985 GLENBROOK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024
DONALD E ELLING CLIFFORD SCHECHTEL J T & KATHLEEN MARTIN
3639 WILSHIRE ST 3641 WILSHIRE ST 3004 NEWSHIRE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7034 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7034 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031
LEX M & JUDY COWSERT ROBERT A VONDERHAAR TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL
3008 NEWSHIRE ST 3011 NEWSHIRE ST 3900 HARNEY ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7032 SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825
GO CA 92110-2825
*** 205 Printed ***
PAUL R RUNGE BARBARA L PRUIETT BERNARD R HEAD
3527 LANDSFORD WAY 3525 LANDSFORD WAY 3523 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047
MATTHEW P & DONNA BRAGG SHARON A RADT MARTHA M WOOLWEAVER
3521 LANDSFORD WAY 3519 LANDSFORD WAY 3517 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047
JACK B BROWN JUDITH A GRIESHABER JEFFREY D & MARY SAVAGE
3515 LANDSFORD WAY 3511 LANDSFORD WAY 3509 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047
MARY RYAN THOMAS H LUCAS KENNETH S WINFIELD
3507 LANDSFORD WAY 3505 LANDSFORD WAY 3508 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 .CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046
LINDA SHIRVANIAN
3510 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046
GEORGI
1875 BIENVENIDA CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-3804
RICHARD S ELDER
3606 MILFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
STEPHEN P DONOHUE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
3612 MILFORD PL
JENNIE L SMITH
3618 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
PHILIP J CLARK
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
3624 MILFORD PL
B WILSON JOHN ARCHDEACON
3512 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046
3514 LANDSFORD WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046
TRAILS OF CALAVE
OHANNES KITABSIZIAN HAZEL S & LINDA STEWART
3608 MILFORD PL 3610 MILFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
CONRAD C & LYNN HA"ANN CHRISTIAN B COWDREY
3614 MILFORD PL 6117 SUMMER PARK LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045 ALEXANDRIA VA 22315-5221
KEVIN C WALKER STEPHEN G LADLEY
3620 MILFORD PL 3622 MILFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045
SCHULZ TR
3626 MILFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92.008-7045 SAN
RICHARD M HANNASCH
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3611 HARWICH DR
MARK T & BETTY BLONDIN
3615 HARWICH DR LIGIA C LEAKE
3619 HARWICH DR
-7049 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049
JOHN & JOANN LOPEZ JERRY C SANDERS
3621 HARWICH DR 3623 HARWICH DR
WILLIAM & HARON MUNSON
134 CALIFORNIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049 ARCADIA CA 91006-3641
2771 SOUTHAMPTON RD STEVEN A & JUDY JOHNSON KAREN MORALES
3674 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-2883 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 MALIBU CA 90265-5142
JOHN M CASEMENT
3375 RAMBLA PACIFIC0 ST
JOHN B & JANE TRAYER TY P & ANNE TURLEY ROBERT I CHEKERDJIAN
PO BOX 758
CARLSBAD CA 92018-0758 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
3668 HARWICH DR 3666 HARWICH DR
JIMMIE C SEBRING QUANEY
3664 HARWICH DR
C R & JUDITH WALTERS
3660 HARWICH DR 3662 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
GRAHAM J ESPIE MICHAEL A AGUIRRE LINDA S BUTLER
4717 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6507
3656 HARWICH DR 3654 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
PATRICIA L ZADRA
3652 HARWICH DR JACK & AIDA SHAKARIAN JACK K & MARILYN KARINS
3650 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
3634 HARWICH DR
RUDY W NOVOTNY
4298 CORDOBES cv WILLIAM T HOFFMAN ROBERT L TUCCI
SAN DIEGO CA 92130-2221
3630 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
1216 BASINBROOK DR
N. LAS VEGAS 89032-7845
STAN TIGER
3626 HARWICH DR GLENN & PATRICIA HAKIUS ROBERT E CULBERTSON
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
3624 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048
3622 HARWICH DR
PGTER E & JUNE HUEBER LARRY J & BRENDA BROWN RICHARD Y YONEMURA
3461 CORVALLIS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2187
3614 ASHBY CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050
3612 ASHBY CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050
JOHN E SCHNEIDER
3610 ASHBY CT CHRISTOPHER S HELE HERMAN W SMITH
3521 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 HUNTINGTON BE 92646-8731
8932 AMADOR CIR 1312D
JOHN D LINDSLEY
3604 ASHBY CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050
CYPRESS VALLEY L L C
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
BRIAN C GALLAGHER ROBERT & JOAN PARTIN
2900 CLIFF CIR
CITY 91950-6625 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
2904 CLIFF CIR
RUDY & SHERRY GONZALEZ LOUIS F VELASCO
3708 AZIMUTH PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
RHETT W SAUNDERS
3712 AZIMUTH PL 2952 CLIFF CIR 22
ROGER W BROWN MARFELO 0 MAGAOAY TIMOTHY A MERCER
2956 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
2964 CLIFF CIR 25 2960 CLIFF CIR 24
CHIUMAN & JULIE TSANG
5003 ROSE CT SE DAVID R & SUSAN LEVINE THEODORE & KAREN WAIT
4 SIRIUS 296 CLIFF CIR SMYRNA GA 30082-1860 IRVINE CA 92612-5714 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
KEITH S & MARY BADINER GILBERT E & J GORDON
2975 CLIFF CIR 2959 CLIFF CIR HARRY J & KAREN TAYLOR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058
2949 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058
CriIUMAN & JULIE TSANG
2937 SEGOVIA WAY CAROLYN T MILARDO MOHAMMAJJ H ASLAMI
2935 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-8231 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058
2903 CLIFF CIR 35
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058
WENQING WU GERALD M HEIT
2920 CLIFF CIR ALEXANDER R STRILER
2908 CLIFF CIR 2912 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7051 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
TAMARA S STOGNER
2916 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
MARY M MILLS
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
2928 CLIFF CIR
BONNIE M TIGLIO
2940 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
JACOB MENDOZA
3711 AZIMUTH PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062
NEVIL KIRWAN ROBERT J MORRIS
2920 CLIFF CIR 2924 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
MARISA M LEE VICTOR J BAROTHY LANGER
2932 CLIFF CIR 2936 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
MICHAEL N & ANNA CALLAN R WYSMIERSKI
2944 CLIFF CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057
2948 CLIFF CIR
WENQING & ZHANG WU ROY L & LYDIA PARKER
3707 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062
3703 AZIMUTH PL
DAVID & TRACI TROXELL
3700 AZIMUTH PL LAWRENCE J MALONE LESLIE J SUTTLE
3704 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058
2919 CLIFF CIR
CYPRESS VALLEY L L C CALAVERA HILLS I1 L L C
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
2727 HOOVER AVE
KEVIN Y LEE PAUL S CHRISTENSON
3525 COASTVIEW CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6594 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6594
3529 COASTVIEW CT
AZIN HATEFI WHITESELL T JUSTINE ROBERT C & LINDA ALLEN
3533 COASTVIEW CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6594 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6594 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7036
3174 SEABURY ST 3537 COASTVIEW CT
MICHAEL T BILTUCCI CHRISTOPHER D WOOLSEY
16425 BRONCO LN JACK W & JOY HOOK
POWAY CA 92064-1911 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 CARLSBAD CA 92018-2582
3579 CAY DR PO BOX 2582
MARIAN L KUKLA JIANLI & ZHENG ZHU DONALD C & JOAN HANNAY
3571 CAY.DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7073
3824 STONERIDGE RD 3567 CAY DR
RICHARD A & MARY ISAAC DAVID B & KRISTEN KUNCL ROBERT R VESSINY
3559 CAY DR ~~~ ~ ~~
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072
3731 WHITESANDS CT
PLAZA VINCENT+TEANIO-PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7070
STEVEN L & BARBARA HILL
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7512
3109 DEL REY AVE
NANCY G MADDOCKS
3553 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060
3555 CAY DR~ 3551 CAY DR ~ ~~ ~~
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072
HSIEN H & WE1 MENG IVAN X DCUNHA
3735 WHITESANDS CT 3569 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7070 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060
RUSSELL R CURRAN YU-REN & XIAO-XIA ZHANG
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060
3561 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060
3557 BLUFF CT
DAVID N VINEGARD
4016 AGUILA ST
CONRAD B KREUTZER
3552 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4150 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059
PAUL & DYANNA BURAK
3556 BLUFF CT
HEDTKE MEHDI A SHARIFI
3560 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059
3564 BLUFF CT
JOAN GARATAN
3568 BLUFF CT LAWRENCE R MOORE RALPH W BROWN
1914 BLUERIDGE ST 3586 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 OCEANSIDE CA 92056-6021 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059
MATTHEW KILGORE JIN & CHAOTING YAO JOHN L HJELT
3590 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059
3594 BLUFF CT 3598 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059
KENNETH H PAYNE ROGER W & GEORGIA BEST DONALD C & JOAN HANNAY
3577 BLUFF CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7073
3824 STONERIDGE RD 3581 BLUFF CT
JOHN A & LORI TEKVERK ZHARGE & SU WANG
3589 BLUFF CT 12865 POINTE DEL MAR WA
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061
2727 HO
DEL MAR CA 92014-3860
GREGORY M & RUTH GAZDA KVEHWAN KIM FRAZIN BAHRINY
3566 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065
3570 HARWICH DR 3574 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065
JAY B & MICHELE KING
3578 HARWICH DR
MARK A & ANNA STONER NADER NIKFAR
3582 HARWICH DR 3586 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065
MICHAEL E HARTSHORN MICHAEL V RAVAN MICHAEL S GRIFFITHS
3590 HARWICH DR 1485 GENOA DR 3598 HARWICH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 VISTA CA 92083-5386 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065
CALAVERA HILLS MASTER A
2727 HOOVER AVE CYPRESS VALL CHRISTINE J PALILEO
NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
3699 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6590
CAMERON C & AMY ALDER CHAD E DUGAN
3695 STRATA DR JAYKANT B PATEL
4939 COMPOSITION CT 3693 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6590 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6590 OCEANSIDE CA 92057-7914
JOHN E FUTCHER
26 GRAND GARDEN CT
SPRING TX 77381-6439
BRIAN & MELANIE LEE
3634 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593
KENNETH WATSON
3639 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
KRISTOPHER J KOLLENDA
3627 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
SCOTT D & MONICA BEITH
3615 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
AN B & KIMCHI W
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
3603 TERRACE PL
SCOT R & C BENSON SCOTT A HENRIKSON
3626 TERRACE PL 3630 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593
GREGORY J JACKSON JOHN & MONIQUE RUSSELL
3638 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593
3642 TERRACE PL
ROBERT H HOFFMAN N LE ANH
3635 TERRACE PL 3631 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
RICK E SCHWARTZ KEVIN & ENNIFER LIPPERT
3623 TERRACE PL 3619 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
WEIDONG & JINGYI ZHENG KURT ERIKSON
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
3611 TERRACE PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592
3607 TERRACE PL
DARRELL DORTHICK
PO BOX 1851
MIXHAEL W BROWN
3612 TERRACE PL FREMONT CA 94538-0185 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6591
HOWARD J KELLER ROBERT S JENNINGS
2727 HOOVER 3805 SHALE CT 3809 SHALE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501
JASON T WILLIAMS GREGORY A & LINK AU TIN T & IVIAN TRIEU
3813 SHALE CT 3823 CROWNPOINT CT 3819 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
MICHEAL & LAUREN CONRAD SAMUEL K AFOLAYAN BRETT H POLLOCK
3815 CROWNPOINT CT 3811 CROWNPOINT CT 3807 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
RAYMOND H DREIFUSS PENG & WU ZHU GEOFFREY M & JULIE LESS
3808 CROWNPOINT CT 3812 CROWNPOINT CT 3816 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
KEVIN J HACKETT KENNETH C KENDRICK
3820 CROWNPOINT CT 3824 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
*** 194 Printed ***
DEVIN B CARNEY CYPRESS VALLEY CARL SARRAZOLLA
3804 CROWNPOINT CT 2727 HOOV 3803 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 N-CITY 91950-6625 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
JAMES W & SANDRA LEE CYPRESS VALL
3800 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
*** 5 Printed ***