HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-17; City Council; 17019; Calavera Hills Village U CT 01-04/CP 01-02CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL
AB# 17,019
CITY e DEPT. PLN
CITY ATTY. CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U MTG. ~7/17/~2
DEPT. HD. WW TITLE:
CT 01-04/CP 01-02
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2002-367 , ADOPTING the Negative
Declaration, and APPROVING the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit for the Calavera
Hills Village U multifamily condominium development.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On November 6, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium
Permit for the Calavera Hills Village U multifamily condominium development with a 6-0 vote (Segall
absent). The proposed project entails 135 condominium units on a 61.6-acre site, with over 41 acres
being preserved in natural open space. The currently vacant site will be graded in accordance with
the Master Tentative Map for Calavera Hills Phase II, approved by the City Council on January 15,
2002. The site is located southeast of the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive and College
Boulevard and would be bounded by natural open space to the north, east, and south and College
Boulevard to the west.
The proposed condominium units would be contained in 26 residential buildings and would range in
size from 1,350 to 1,550 square feet. The architecture would follow a Mediterranean theme with
stucco walls and tile roofs, incorporating strong relief and a variety of building materials. The
condominium site would be served by a system of private roads and accessed by two openings on
College Boulevard. A large centralized common recreation facility will be provided, along with a
smaller turf area for passive recreation.
There was no public testimony regarding the Village U proposal at the Planning Commission hearing.
The proposed development is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Calavera Hills Master Plan,
Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Growth Management Program, and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, staff and the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the Calavera Hills Village U multifamily condominium development.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The potential environmental impacts associated with the creation and grading of the Village U site, as
well as the future extension of College Boulevard, were reviewed through the Environmental Impact
Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master Tentative Map (EIR 98-02), certified on January 15,
2002. Therefore the project specific environmental review dealt only with those facets of the project
not included in the Phase II Master Tentative Map proposal.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village U multifamily condominium project, as designed and
conditioned, would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore the Planning
Director issued a Negative Declaration on October 16, 2002, in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the
City of Carlsbad. No comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible since all development fees will be collected at time of
grading and building permit issuance. All public facilities necessary to serve the development will be
in place prior to, or concurrent with, development.
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,019
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2002-367
3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5304, 5305, and 5306
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 6,2002
5. Excerpts of Draft Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 6, 2002.
2. Location Map
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-367
A RESOLUTION OF THE CtTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR THE CALAVERA HILLS
VILLAGE U MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION
OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE
DRIVE, IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
CASE NO.: CT 01 -04/CP 01 -02
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on November 6, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 17th day of
DECEMBER , 2002, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Negative
Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit, and at the time received
recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT
01 -04/CP 01 -02; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council approves the application for a Tentative Tract Map
and Condominium Permit for a 135-unit multifamily condominium development on property
generally located east of the future extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village
Drive, as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5304, 5305, and 5306 and the
findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in those resolutions, on file with
the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City
Council.
. . ..
. . ..
....
....
. . ..
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 17th day of DECEMBER , 2002, by
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
;q
f
(SEAL) J
-2-
the
EXHIBIT 2
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
CT 01-04/CP Ol=.O2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5304
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW
THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 135 UNIT
MULTIFAMILY AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUM LOCATED
EAST OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
CASE NO.: CT 0 1 -04/CP 0 1-02
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC “Developer,” has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by McMillan Companies, LLC, and
Tamarack Properties, Inc., “Owner,” described as
A portion for Lot “D” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
according to Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder on November 16, 1896, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, also being Lot 4 of
Carlsbad Tract No. CT 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit "ND" dated October 16, 2002, and "PII" dated October 3,
2002, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinm:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration and the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments
thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and
b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the city of
Carlsbad; and
d. based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: .
MICHAEL J. MLZMLLER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5304 -2- 3
- City of Carlsbad
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project AddressLocation: East of fbture College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive,
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
Project Description: Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit for the subdivision
and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium
development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date
of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at
(760) 602-4623:
DATED:
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH DATE:
OCTOBER 16,2002
CT 0 1 -04/CP 01 -02
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
OCTOBER 16,2002 x-
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 * FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ 8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: CT 0 1 -04/CP 0 1-02
DATE: October 3.2002
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village U
LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carlsbad
CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Michael Grim (760) 602-4623
PROJECT LOCATION: East of the future extension of College Boulevard. south of
Carlsbad Village Drive, Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego. State of California.
PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: McMillan Homes. 2727 Hoover Ave.
National Citv, CA
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Medium High Densitv (RMH)
ZONING: Planned Communitv (P-C)
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits,
financing approval or participation agreements): none
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
Tentative Tract Mar, and Condominium Permit for the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit
mulifamly air-space condominium develooment within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master
Plan which is currently vacant but to be graded in accordance with the Calavera Hills Phase II
Master Tentative Mar, (CT OO-O2/EIR 98-02).
The multifamilv condominium site is bounded bv the future extension of College Boulevard to
the west. the existing single familv development known as Capistrano to the north, existing
master Dlan native or,en suace to the east. and the future single familv development in Village W
to the south.
1 Rev. 07/03/02
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Aesthetics 0 Geology/Soils Noise
Cultural Resources 0 Mineral Resources 0 TransportatiodCirculation
0 Mandatory Findings of 0 Utilities & Service systems Significance
2 Rev. 07/03/02
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
0
0
0
0
0
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
3 Rev. 07/03/02
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the. form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with dormation
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or
to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Irnpact” answers that are adequately supported by
an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved.. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
sislllficantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect fiom “Potentidly Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.”
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than sigmficant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly
adverse.
Based on an “EIA-Part II”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the
environment, but glJ potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed‘upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement
to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental
document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required.
When “Potentially Signifcant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any
of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared.
4 Rev. 07/03/02 I2
0 An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not limited to
the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a “Statement of Ovemding
Considerations” for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than sipficant; or (4) through the EIA-Part Il analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect,
or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a
level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State scenic highway?
17 0 OB
0 0 om
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 UIXI
d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
0 0 EIIXI
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and . Site
Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California
Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would
the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Fadand Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
cl 0 om
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 0 OB
5 Rev. 07/03/02 13
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
m.
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment,
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied
upon to make the following determinations.) Would the
project:
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
Expose sensitive receptors to Substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a Substantial
number of people?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
Have a Substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a Substantial adverse effect on any riparian,
aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by California Department
of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a Substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to mars4
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Potentially Significant Impact
0
0
0
0
0
CI
0
0
0
Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0
0
a
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
la
IXI
0
0
0
0
6 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Impact tributary areas that are environmentally
sensitive?
IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of an archeological resource pursuant to 8 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi-
cal resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
i.
11.
iii.
iv .
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Strong seismic ground shaking?
Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Landslides?
7
Potentially Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigation tncorporated I7
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.a
0
0
0
Rev. 07/03/02 /5
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1 997), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
IV. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project:
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
environment?
For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
8 Rev. 07/03/02 ld
h) Expose people or structures to a sigdicant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
WI. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the
project:
Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local ground water table
level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in
a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation
map?
Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
9 Rev. 07/03/02 I3
Ix.
X.
X.
1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface
waters.
m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals,
pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics,
nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash)
into receiving surface waters or other alteration of
receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, flesh or
wetland waters) during or following construction?
0) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water
body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d)
list?
p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater
receiving water quality objectives or degradation of
beneficial uses?
0 n[x1
0 0 oIx1
0 0 om
0 0 OIXI
0 0 0
LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
Physically divide an established community? 0 0 om
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
0 0 OIXI
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan? 0 oIx1
MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral 0 resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
0 0 0
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
0 0 0
IXI
10 Rev. 07/03/02 I8
A substantial permanent. increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
X. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered government facilities, a need for
new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION
11 Rev. 07/03/02 /?
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
0 om
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational OB
facilities, which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
0 0
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
Result in a change in air trafflc patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in insuMicient parking capacity?
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn-
outs, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the
project:
0 0
0
0
IXI
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of OM
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
0 uIx1
0 0
Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing 0 OM
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
12 Rev. 07/03/02 ao
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufiicient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste
disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XW. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumula-
tively considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
17
0
0
0
0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, EVALUATION
Ixl
IXI
IXI
Ix1
Ix)
IXI
IXI
The Calavera Hills Village U project involves the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space
condominium development within Village Y of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 61.6 acre Village site will be
created through the recordation of the Master Tentative Map for Calavera Hills Phase I1 (CT 00-02) and will be
graded in accordance with that map. The potential environmental impacts associated with the creation and grading of
the Village U site were reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master
Tentative Map (EIR 98-02, SCH No. 991 11082), certified January 15,2002. The Environmental Impact Report also
reviewed the impacts associated with the development of Village U with up to 179 condominium units, 44 units more
than is proposed with this Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit. Th~s environmental document also
reviewed the potential environmental impacts associated with the future extension of College Boulevard, which will
provide frontage and access to Village U. Since the development of Village U cannot proceed until the Master
Tentative Map has been recorded and the site has been graded in accordance with that map, the following
environmental analysis deals only with the development of Village U with the proposed air-space condominium
development.
The 61.6 acre Village U site is mostly in native open space, with approximately 17.9 acres set aside for development.
The project site is bound by the future single family development in Village W and the existing single family
13 Rev. 07/03/02
development known as Capistrano to the east, the future multifamily affordable apartment development in Village Y
to the south, the existing multifamily residential development known as The Cape to the west, and existing College
Boulevard and the future single family development in Village K to the north. The proposed multifamily residential
use is compatible with all of the existing and hture surrounding residential and open space uses.
The Village Y site is designated Residential Medium High Density (RMH) in the City’s General Plan, allowing up to
15 dwelling units per developable acre. The proposed density is 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The project site is
zoned P-C (Planned Community) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be
developed in accordance with the Planned Development Ordinance, except as modified in the Master Plan. The
proposed development would consist of 26 residential buildings, private streets and driveways, a common active
recreation area, and 93 surface guest parking spaces. The residential buildings would consist of seven three-plex
buildings and 19 six-plex buildings in a motor court style development, all units possessing a two-car garage. The
buildings would measure a maximum of 34 feet in height and the condominium units would range in size from
approximately 1,350 square feet to 1,550 square feet in area. The total building coverage for the project is 4.7
percent (or 2.9 acres). The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and meets all development standards
and design criteria of the Master Plan and Planned Development Ordinance.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 28,800 cubic yards of balanced grading subsequent to
the mass grading that creates Village U. The site development would also include several retaining walls, with a
maximum height of six feet. All grading operations would be required to conform to the recommendations of the
site-specific geotechnical report, as well as the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. In addition, an all-weather
access road would be provided throughout construction and Fire Marshal approval would be required prior to the
storage of any hazardous materials on site.
The residential project would take access off of the future extension of College Boulevard and would generate 1,080
average daily traff~c trips, which can be accommodated in the future major arterial roadway. The project would be
required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the
implementation of Best Management Practices, thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm
drain system. All facilities needed to serve the 135 air-space condominium units would be provided prior to
occupancy, in association with the Phase I1 Master Tentative Map grading and improvement plans. In addition, the
Carlsbad Unified School District has stated that there are adequate school facilities to serve the proposed apartment
project.
Due to the project’s proximity to College Boulevard, the Master Plan requires that a site-specific noise study be
conducted. That noise study indicates that noise attenuation walls are needed along the project’s frontage with
College Boulevard. These walls would range in size from four feet to nine feet high and are incorporated into the
project design. The project archtecture incorporates strong relief and a variety of materials and colors, thus not
creating any negative aesthetic visual impacts from public views. Given the above analysis, the previous
environmental documentation and the site-specific technical reports, the proposed Calavera Hills Village U air-space
condominium project would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts as designed and conddoned.
AIR QUALITY-Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area
for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter
(PMlo). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution
controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is
embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District
(APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SNAG).
A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state-
mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having
serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by
the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public heahgs on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly
regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996.
14 Rev. 07/03/02 23
The proposed project relates to the SIP andlor RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are
incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city’s and the
County’s general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project
presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that
the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact.
Section 15 125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference
to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management
plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps
needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources
Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following:
Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area?
0 Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan?
The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being
implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions of the City’s General Plan and the RAQS.
Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct
implementation of the regional plan.
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of
Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality
violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in
2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates
in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. The project would involve
minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized
through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust
control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and fiom the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant
emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard
(comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine
particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net
increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the
proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project,
air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 (a)(4), the proposed project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considered
de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than sigmficant.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. As noted above, the proposed project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or
concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the
project. No impact is assessed.
d) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. The construction of the proposed project could generate fumes fiom the operation of construction
equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short-term or
transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFC-Would the project:
15 Rev. 07/03/02 a3
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate 1,080 Average Daily Trips (ADT). This traffic will
utilize the following roadways: College Boulevard. While the increase in traffic from the proposed project may be
slightly noticeable, the street system has been designed and sized to accommodate traffic from the project and
cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad. The proposed project would not, therefore, cause an increase in
traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system The impacts from
the proposed project are, therefore, less than significant.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated
three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad
as part of the regional circulation system The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS
on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
Existing ADT* - LOS Buildout ADT*
Rancho Santa Fe Road 15-32 “A-c” 28-43
El Camino Real 2 1-50 “A-c” 32-65
Palomar Airport Road 10-52 “A-B” 29-77
SR 78 120 “F” 144
1-5 183-198 “D 2 19-249
*The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
The Congestion Management Program’s (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is “E”, or LOS “F” if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS “F” in 1990). Accordingly, all designated
roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the 111 implementation of the region’s general and community
plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general. plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the
buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) “E” standard assumes
implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and
highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-
term and at buildout.
a) Result in a change in air traffic patierns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air
traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed.
b) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses?
No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore,
would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City’s general plan and zoning.
Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed.
* 4 Result in inadequate emergency access?
16 Rev. 07103lQ2 JY
No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police
Departments. No impact assessed.
d) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project would comply with
the City’s parking requirements to ensure an adequate parking supply. No impact assessed.
e) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks, etc.)?
No Impact. The project site includes a bus stop on College Boulevard.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
2. Update of Geotechnical Re~ort. Calavera Hills Village U, Citv of Carlsbad, California, dated October 20,
1999, Geosoils, Inc.
3. Noise Technical Report for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase I1 Village U. Citv of Carlsbad. California,
dated October 12,2001.
17 Rev. 07/03/02 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5305
A RESOLUTION 03 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
SUBDIVIDE 61.6 ACRES INTO A 135 UNIT MULTIFFAMILY
LOCATED EAST OF THE FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD,
SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILL VILLAGE U
CASE NO.: CT 0 1-04
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills I1 LLC, “Developer,” and McMillan
Communities LLC and Tamarack Properties, Inc., “Owner,” have filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
APPROVAL OF CAFUSBAD TRACT CT 01-04 TO
AIR-SPACE CONDOMINIUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
A portion for Lot “D” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
according to Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder on November 16, 1896, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, also being Lot 4 of
Carlsbad Tract No. CT 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibits “A” - “11” dated November 6, 2002, on file in the Planning
Department CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U - CT 01-04, as provided by Chapter 20.12 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
&?d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U - CT
01-04, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposed multifamily air-space condominium development conforms to the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance and has been designed to comply with other applicable
regulations including the Planned Development Ordinance and the Residential
Density - Multiple zoning designation, as called for in the approved Master Plan.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single family development on the General Plan,
in that the project site is already bounded by single family development and open
space and the remaining side is separated by a major arterial roadway.
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the project site can accommodate the proposed residential
development while complying with all development standards and public facilities
requirements.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that concurrent with the recordation of the final map the developer shall vacate and
adjust any easements that conflict with the proposed development.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures are oriented
in various directions, adequate separations will be provided to allow for breezes to
cool the areas, and landscaping will be installed to provide shade and reduce the
temperature of developed areas.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the project site does not contain any sensitive wildlife, the proposed
residential density is within the limits analyzed by the Environmental Impact
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
12.
Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan Amendment (EIR 98-02/MP
150(H)), and noise attenuation walls are being provided along the project frontage
with College Boulevard.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has
been designed in accordance with Best Management Practices for water quality
protection in accordance with the City’s sewer and drainage standards, and the
project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan based on the facts set forth in
the staff report dated November 6,2002 including, but not limited to the following:
The proposed density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the existing
RMH General Plan designation;
The project includes a noise study with recommendations to reduce the traffic noise
impacts from College Boulevard to 60 dBA CNEL;
The project provides a mixture of three-plex and six-plex multifamily air-space
condominiums, contributing to the diversity of housing stock within the City;
The project will provide emergency water systems and all-weather access roads
throughout construction.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
Specifically,
A. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified
School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
B. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and
will be collected prior to issuance of building permit.
C. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be
collected prior to the issuance of building permit.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -3- a8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Chapter 2 1.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7.
14. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).
15. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading permit
or final map for this project/map, whichever occurs first.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shaIl and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -4- a9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, (b)
City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein.
Developer shall submit to Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36”, mylar copy
of the Tentative Map and Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final
decision making body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director fkom the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. A note to this effect
shall be placed on the Final Map.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of CP 01-02 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5306 for that other
approval.
The Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape
and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan
and the City’s Landscape Manual. The Developer shall construct and install all
landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the
project’s building, improvement, and grading plans.
The Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
A. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
PC RES0 NO. 5305 - 5- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to
the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have
the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be
transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record.
C. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the
event that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” as provided in Article , Section
the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary
maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give
written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project,
setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required
and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty
(30) days from the giving of such notice, In the event that the Association fails to
cany out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements within the period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be
entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to
reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein.
D. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association’s Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to
each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to
pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection
against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full
within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be
subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of
the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by
means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available
to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot
in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing
lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in
the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal
actions andor to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
hisher respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
E. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit
owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibits “j?” - “H”, dated November 6,2002.
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -6- 3/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
F. Balconies, trellis anci decks. The individual lot or unit owner allowances and
prohibitions regarding balconies, trellis and decks shall be as set forth in Exhibit
“E”, dated November 6,2002.
The Developer shall provide bus stops to service this development at locations and with
reasonable facilities to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District and the
Planning Director. Said facilities, if required, shall be free from advertising and shall
include at a minimum include a bench and a pole for the bus stop sign. The facilities
shall be designed to enhance or be consistent with basic architectural theme of the
project.
This project is. being approved as a condominium permit for residential homeownership
purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for
such rental shall be not less than 26 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this
requirement.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 7, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxesjfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and
recreational facilities, unless a construction phasing plan is submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map or grading permit, whichever
occurs first.
The Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any
address change from that which is shown on the permit application.
Prior to the issuance of the grading permit or final map, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the
County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a
Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit by Resolutions No. 5305 and 5306 on
the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the
property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all
conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in
the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record
an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of
good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -7- 32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative,
suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are
distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future
and existing schools, parks and streets.
The developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses
which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall
remain posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in
a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form
#1 on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
Developer shall construct, install and stripe not less than 76 parking spaces, as shown on
Exhibits “A” - “C”, dated November 6,2002.
The Developer shall construct a community trail access parking lot and driveway
access at the northerly entrance to the subdivision prior to issuance of building
permits, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and Public Works Director.
Engineering:
General
27. Prior to hauling dirt or constfiction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
28. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is
formally established by the City.
29. Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs andor other
recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -8- 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, and storm drain facilities
located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner
among the owners of the properties within the subdivision.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install rain gutters to convey roof drainage to an
approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The final map for the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02 shall be recorded prior to the
recordation of the Final Map for this Tentative Map.
There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project.
Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance
with Engineering Standards. A statement shall be included in the Final Map (see Final
Map Notes) and in the CC&Rs.
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement,
grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development.
Building permits for this project will not be issued beyond the cumulative traffic
generation of 2500 ADT by building permits issued for all Calavera Hills Phase I1
projects if the roadway improvements connecting College Boulevard from Carlsbad
Village Drive southerly to El Camino Real have not been completed. Additional
permits may be allowed subject to approval of the City Engineer based on
substantia1 completion of the required roadway improvements. A note to this effect
shall be included in the Final Map.
FeedAnreements
35. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation, the City’s standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement.
36. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
37. Developer shall cause property owner to execute, record and submit a recorded copy to
the City Engineer, a deed restriction on the property which relates to the proposed cross
lot drainage as shown on the tentative map. The deed restriction document shall be in a
form acceptable to the City Engineer and shall:
A. Clearly delineate the limits of the drainage course;
B. State that the drainage course is to be maintained in perpetuity by the underlying
property owner; and
C. State that all future use of the property along the drainage course will not restrict,
impede, divert or otherwise alter drainage flows in a manner that will result in
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -9- 3-9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
damage to the underlying and adjacent properties or the creation of a public
nuisance.
38. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall
cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area
shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street
Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Grading
39. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and
obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for
the project.
40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board.
Dedications/Improvements
41.
42.
43.
44.
Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City
andor other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the
tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so
offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost.
Streets that already public are not required to be rededicated.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or
install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent
with any grading or building permit.
Developer shall provide the design of all private streets and drainage systems to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform
to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage
systems shall be inspected by the City. Developer shall pay the standard improvement
plancheck and inspection fees.
Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement
to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements
shown on the tentative map and the following improvements including, but not limited to
paving, base, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, medians, signing and striping, traffic
control, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer,
water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water, to City Standards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
A. Private Streets "A," "B," and "C."
B. Traffic signal at the intersection of College Boulevard and Street "B."
C. Modify existing traffic signal at the intersection of College Boulevard
and Carlsbad Village Drive to incorporate Street "A."
PC RES0 NO. 5305 ,lo- 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the
provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Developer shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights on the final map for all lots
abutting College Boulevard except at Streets “A” and “B.”
Developer shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit, latest version.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Management Plan
(SWMP).” The SWMP shall be in compliance with the NPDES permit requirements
and provisions as established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board and the City of Carlsbad. The SWMP shall address
measures to reduce to the maximum extent possible storm water pollutant runoff at
both construction and post-construction stages of the project. The SWMP shall:
1. Identify construction activity and post-development on-site pollutants of
concern.
2. Recommend structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to remove said pollutants.
3. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee and resident education on
the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
4. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construction BMPs in perpetuity.
5. Incorporate measures to ensure-development runoff rates and velocities from
the’site are not increased as a result of the project.
Additionally, concurrent with the SWP, the applicant shall submit for City approval a
“Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).” The SWPPP shall be in compliance
with current requirements and provisions established by the California Water Resources
Control Board.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install street lights along all public and private street
frontages abutting and/or within the subdivision boundary in conformance with City of
Carlsbad Standards.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install sidewalks along all public streets abutting the
subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install wheelchair ramps at the public street comers
abutting the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Utility Conditions
50. Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire
Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations,
PC RESONO. 5305 - -1 1- 3’6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants shall be considered
public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way
or within minimum 20-feet wide easements granted to the District or the City of
Carlsbad. At the discretion of the District Engineer, wider easements may be
required for adequate maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges
for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water
Authoritv capacity charpe(s1 prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The Developer shall prepare a colored recycled water use map and submit this map to the
Planning Department for processing and approval by the Deputy City Engineer -
Utilities.
The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a
source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
The Developer shall install potable water and recycled water services and meters at
locations approved by the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be
reflected on public improvement plans.
The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the
District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the District
Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
Prior to issuance of building permits the entire potable water, recycled water, and sewer
system shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity, pressure, and flow
demands can be met to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
Final Map Notes
59. Developer shall show on Final Map the net developable acres for each parcel.
60. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data:
A. All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with
the exception of the following:
1. Sewer and Water facilities
2. Traffic signals
B. ’ Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available.
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -12- 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C.
D.
E.
Geotechnical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest
has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action
that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land
subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this
subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above
the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified
as sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design
Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this
condition.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or
permitted to encroach within the area identified as the Caltrans intersection
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-
Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain
this condition.
Fire DeDartment:
61. All buildings shall be equipped with fire sprinklers to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.
62. The Developer shall submit for Fire Marshal review and approval a 400 scale mylar
showing the location of all proposed fire hydrants.
Code Reminders:
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 18.04.320.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map
approval becomes final.
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
PC RES0 NO. 5305 13- 38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner SegalI
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5305 -14- 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5306
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDS
ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
135 UNIT MULTIFAMILY AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUM ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF FUTURE
COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE
DRIVE IN LOCAL, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
CASE NO.: CP 0 1-02
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills I1 LLC, “Developer,” has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by McMillan Companies, LLC and
Tamarack Properties, Inc., “Owner,” described as
APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM PERMIT CP 01-02 TO
A portion for Lot “D” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
according to Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder on November 16, 1896, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, also being Lot 4 of
Carlsbad Tract No. CT 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Condominium
Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “11” dated November 6, 2002, on file in the Planning
Department, CALAVERA HILL VILLAGE U - CP 01-02 as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Condominium Permit
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U - CP
01-02, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinm:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the
Municipal Code, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all
adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the project is
consistent with the Residential Medium High Density (RMH) General Plan
designation as it has a density of 7.5 dwelling per acre; the project complies with the
development standards and design criteria of the Calavera Hills Master Plan and
the Residential Density - Multiple zoning designation.
That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or faciiity which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community, in that the project site is designated for multifamily
condominiums in the Calavera Hills Master Plan and provides for the diversity of
housing types within the City,
That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, in that the project design conforms to. all design and development standards
applicable to the property and public improvements will be provided prior to, or
concurrent with, the development of the project to meet all City standards.
That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.080,
and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design
Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides private and common recreation areas;
guest parking is adequately distributed throughout the project, and all vehicular
accessways are a minimum of 34 feet wide.
That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the
site, in that the development is contained in the flatter portion of the site and no
development within the existing native habitat areas is proposed.
That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the proposed multifamily residential
product type and density are consistent with the single family residential,
multifamily residential, and open space land uses that surround it.
That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project.
PC RES0 NO. 5036 .2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading permit
or final map, whichever occurs first.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Condominium Permit.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Condominium Permit documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined tg be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Condominium Permit, (b)
City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 01-04 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5305 for that other
approval, incorporated herein by reference.
The Developer shall submit to the Planning Director a recorded copy of the
condominium plan filed with the Department of Real Estate which is in
conformance with the City approved documents and exhibits prior to building
permit issuance.
PC RES0 NO. 5036 -3- sla
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN: None
u
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HO~MILL%R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5036 -4-
ae City of Carlsbad Planning Departme d) EXHIBIT 4
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Application complete date: June 27,2002
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 6,2002
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
Project Planner: Michael Grim
SUBJECT: CT 01-04KP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U - Request for a
Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit to allow
the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium
development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property
generally located on the east side of the hture extension of College Boulevard,
south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5304,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director
and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5305 and 5306 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 01-04 and Condominium Permit CP 01-02, based upon
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves the subdivision and construction of a 135-unit multifamily air-space
condominium project within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. Village U and the
future extension of College Boulevard along the project’s western boundary will be graded in
accordance with the Calavera Hills Phase TI Master Tentative Map. A Tentative Tract Map is
required for the subdivision of property and a Condominium Permit is required to allow an air-
space condominium subdivision. The project meets all applicable regulations and staff has no
issues with the proposal.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Calavera Hills 11, LLC is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium
Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of a 135-unit multifamily air-space
condominium project within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The entire Village U
site covers 61.6 acres, however a majority of the site is contained in natural open space and
includes the dedication of College Boulevard through the Master Tentative Map (CT 00-02).
The actual development area totals 17.9 acres. The Village U site was created through the
Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan Amendment and Master Tentative Map (CT 00-02).
According to the Master Plan, a maximum of 179 attached residential units could be placed on
the site. The site will be mass graded in accordance with the Calavera Hills Phase I1 map. Final
site grading will be done in accordance with this Village U Tentative Map. Development of the
1 CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C &ERA HILLS VILLAGE U
November 6,2002
Page 2
Village U multifamily condominium units can proceed once the Master Tentative Map has been
recorded and the associated grading permit has been issued and implemented.
The multifamily condominium site is bounded by the future extension of College Boulevard to
the west, the existing single family development known as Capistrano to the north, existing
master plan native open space to the east, and the future single family‘development in Village W
to the south. The Calavera Hills Village U site is designated Residential Medium High (RMH)
in the City’s General Plan, allowing up to 15 dwelling units per developable acre with a Growth
Management Control Point of 11.5 dwelling per acre. The proposed density of 7.5 dwelling
units per acre lies below the maximum density allowed by the General Plan. The project site is
zoned Planned Community (P-C) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)),
the site is to be developed in accordance with the Planned Development Ordinance, except as
modified in the Master Plan.
The proposed development would consist of 26 residential buildings, private streets and
driveways, a centralized common recreation facility, a passive recreational turf area, and 76
surface guest and recreation area parking spaces. The residential buildings would consist of 19
six-plex buildings and 7 three-plex buildings in a motor court style development; all units would
include a private two-car garage. The buildings would contain two-stories and measure 34 feet
in height to the peak of the roof. The air-space condominium units would range in size from
1,362 square feet to 1,538 square feet and would possess private rear yards. The project
architecture would follow a Mediterranean theme with stucco walls and tile roofs, incorporating
strong relief and a variety of materials and colors. The total building coverage for the project
would be 16 percent (or 2.87 acres). A swimming pool with spa, sun deck, restroom facilities,
children’s play equipment, and bocce ball area would be located within the three proposed
common recreation areas. The project’s fair share of affordable housing is being provided in
Village Y (SDP 01-05), therefore none is included in this project.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 28,800 cubic yards of cut and
28,800 cubic yards of fill subsequent to the mass grading associated with the Calavera Hills
Phase I1 Map (CT 00-02) for Village U. The site development would also include several
retaining walls, with a maximum height of six feet. The project site would take access off of
College Boulevard to the west at two gated locations and would generate 1,080 average daily
traffic trips, which can be accommodated by the major arterial roadway (College Boulevard).
The project would be required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best Management Practices,
thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain system. Due to the
project’s proximity to College Boulevard, the master plan requires that a site-specific noise study
be conducted. That noise study indicates that noise attenuation walls are needed along the
project’s frontage with College Boulevard. These walls would range in size from three (3) feet
to eight (8) feet high and would be incorporated into the project design.
The Calavera Hills Village U project is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan;
L CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C &ERA HILLS VILLAGE U 0'
November 6,2002
Page 3
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H));
C. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
D. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.45 of the Zoning Ordinance);
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The Calavera Hills Village U project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of
the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the residential development are the Land Use, Noise,
Housing, and Public Safety elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with
these particular elements of the General Plan.
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Element
Land Use
Noise
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
Site is designated for medium
high density (RMH) residential
development.
Require that a noise study be
submitted with all residential
projects over five units. Enforce
the City policy that 60 dBA
CNEL is the maximum exterior
noise level for residential units.
Proposed Use and Compliance Improvements
Proposed residential density of
below the 15 dwellings per acre
7.5 dwelling units per acre is
Yes
maximum allowed in the RMH
designation.
The project includes a noise study Yes
with recommendations to reduce
exterior traffic noise from College
Boulevard to 60 dBA CNEL.
CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C &u HILLS VILLAGE u 0
November 6,2002
Page 4
Element
Housing
~
Public Safety
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
New housing developed with a
diversity of types, prices,
tenures, densities, and locations
to meet the demand of
anticipated City growth.
Provision of emergency water
systems and all-weather access
roads.
~~ ~~ ~
Proposed Use and Compliance Improvements
The project provides a mixture of
multifamily air-space
three-plex and six-plex
Yes
condominium, contributing to the
City.
diversity of housing within the
All necessary water mains, fire Yes
hydrants, and appurtenances must
be installed prior to occupancy of
any unit and all-weather access
roads will be maintained
throughout construction.
Given the above, the Calavera Hills Village U condominium project is consistent with the City’s
General Plan.
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan
The proposed 135 unit air-space condominium project is within Village U of the Calavera Hills
Master Plan area and, therefore, subject to the provisions of that master plan (MP 150(H)).
Table 2 below summarizes the project’s conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan.
TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
Standard Conformance Proposed
Allowed Uses:
Maximum of 179 attached
residential units.
Proposed project is 135 attached
multifamily air-space condominium
units.
Yes
Arterial Setbacks: I I
Minimum 40 foot setback from
College Boulevard.
All structures are set back a minimum of
40 feet from the Carlsbad Village Drive
right-of-way.
Yes
Building Setbacks:
Motor court developments shall
have a building separation of 10
feet provided that the front facade
massing is separated by at least 22
feet and setback at least 10 feet.
The proposed front facade massing is
separated by well over 22 feet and
setback a minimum of 10 feet, therefore
the building separation of a minimum of
10 feet is acceptable.
Yes
47
CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C HILLS VILLAGE u
November 6,2002
Page 5
TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
Standard
Building Height:
Maximum of 35 feet to the peak
of the roof.
Recreation Area:
Minimum of 100 square feet per
unit of common recreation area
(for 135 units, a minimum of
13,500 square feet is required).
Design Criteria:
A fence/trellis plan shall be
approved in conjunction with the
condominium permit.
A community trail shall be
installed along the northerly open
space corridor.
Bus stop facilities shall be
provided near the southerly
entrance to Village U.
Proposed
Proposed structures measure 33.5 feet in
height, to the peak of the roof.
The proposed common active recreation
area would be centrally located and
would measure 14,000 square feet in
area.
A fence/trellis plan is provided on
Exhibit “E, dated August 7,2002.
Community trail is being installed with
the Phase 11 mass grading operations.
Bus stop facilities are shown on site plan
and developer is conditioned to
coordinate final bus stop design and
location with North County Transit
District (NCTD).
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Given the above, the proposed air-space condominium project is consistent with the provisions
of the Calavera Hills Master Plan.
C. Subdivision Ordinance
Since the Calavera Hills Village U project involves a subdivision into air-space lots, the proposal
is subject to the regulations of Title 20, the Subdivision Ordinance. Chapter 20.16 of the
Subdivision Ordinance addresses the requirements for a major subdivision, that being a
subdivision that creates more than four parcels. These requirements deal mostly with providing
the drainage, sewerage, and circulation dedications and improvements needed to serve the
subdivision. There are also requirements concerning consistency with Title 21, the Zoning
Ordinance, which is addressed in the other sections of this staff report.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village U residential subdivision would provide all necessary
facilities prior to, or concurrent with, construction. The hydrology report, submitted by the
applicant, indicates that all runoff can be controlled on site and conveyed into the future storm
drain facilities in the southerly extension of College Boulevard. The on-site sewer system would
be connected with the future system in College Boulevard. Water distribution would involve
looped service from the existing and future lines in College Boulevard. All proposed internal
CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C &ERA HILLS VILLAGE U
November 6,2002
Pane 6
circulation would consist of private streets, therefore no dedications of such are necessary. No
standards variances are needed to approve the project. Given the above, the proposed
subdivision would provide all necessary facilities and improvements without producing land title
conflicts, therefore the project is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance.
D. Planned Development Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Master Plan states that Village U shall develop in accordance with the
Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance), except as modified
within the Master Plan. As indicated above, the Master Plan contains regulations governing
building setbacks, building separation, building height, and recreation areas. The Calavera
Master Plan area already has a recreational vehicle storage area that serves the entire master plan.
Therefore, the proposed multifamily condominium project is subject to the Planned Development
Ordinance standards regarding visitor parking, private streets and driveway, and storage space.
Table 3 below details the project’s conformance with these remaining development standards of
the Planned Development Ordinance.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~
TABLE 3 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
For projects over 10 units, 5 spaces for
the first 10 units and 1 space per every
4 units above 10 (for 135 units, a
minimum of 36 spaces is required).
Proposed
The project provides 65 guest
parking spaces distributed
throughout the project site.
Minimum of 34 feet wide streets from
curb-to-curb with minimum 4.5 foot
wide parkways.
Private Driveways:
Minimum 24 feet wide with no parking
permitted in the travel way.
I
Storage Space:
All units must contain a minimum of
480 cubic yards of storage space.
:
The proposed private streets
measure 34 feet curb-to-curb and
are adjacent to 4.5 foot wide
parkways.
The proposed private driveways
are represented by the entrances
to the motor courts and measure a
minimum of 24 feet wide.
Each unit has a minimum of 480
cubic yards of storage space.
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Given the above, the proposed air-space condominium project is consistent with the applicable
portions of the Planned Development Ordinance.
CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - C &ERA HILLS VILLAGE U
November 6,2002
Pane 7
E. Growth Management Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Village U condominium project is subject to the provisions of the Growth
Management Program, as contained in Chapter 2 1.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed
project density of 7.5 dwelling units per developable acre is below the Growth Management
Control Point of 11.5 dwelling per acre for the Residential Medium High Density (RMH)
General Plan designation, Table 4 below details the project's conformance with the requirements
of the Growth Management Program.
~~ ~~ ~ -~ ~ TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE r-- Standard I Impacts/Standards I Compliance I
~ "~- -~
City Administration 469.35 sq. ft. Yes
Library 250.32 sq. ft. Yes
Wastewater Treatment
Yes PLDA B (41 CFS) Drainage
Yes 0.94 acres Parks
Yes 135 EDU
Circulation 1,080 ADT Yes
Fire Station #3 Yes
Open Space Satisfied through MP 150(H) Yes
Schools Carlsbad Unified Yes
Sewer Collection System 135 EDU Yes
Water 29,700 GPD Yes
The project is 44 units below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance.
-~
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7
The project site lies within LFMP Zone 7. There are no special conditions or requirements
within the Zone 7 LFMP that apply to this residential project. The project is conditioned to pay
the appropriate public facilities fee, water and sewer connection fees, and traffic impact fees.
The project site is located within a Mello Roos District that covers their proportionate obligation
for school fees. All facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in
place prior to, or concurrent with, development. The Zone 7 LFMP requires the completion of a
connection between College Boulevard and El Camino Real prior to building permit issuance
beyond 2,500 ADT. Therefore, the Calavera Hills Village U residential development is
consistent with the Zone 7 LFMP.
CT 0 1 -04/CP 01 -02 - C &ERA HILLS VILLAGE U 0
November 6,2002
Page 8
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The potential environmental impacts associated with the construction of Village U were
reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan
Amendment (EIR 98-02, certified January 15, 2002). Village U was analyzed with up to 135
multifamily condominium units. This environmental document also reviewed the potential
environmental impacts associated with the future extension of College Boulevard, which will
provide frontage and access to Village U. Since the grading of Village U cannot proceed until
the Master Tentative Map has been recorded and the associated grading permit has been issued,
the attached environmental analysis deals only with the development of Village U with the
proposed multifamily air-space condominium project.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village U condominium project, as designed and conditioned,
would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. The project is consistent with
the applicable regulations; will be graded in accordance with the City’s Grading Ordinance and
City Standards; will comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permit; will provide all facilities necessary to serve the development prior to, or concurrent with,
construction; and will provide noise attenuation walls along the College Boulevard frontage.
Given this environmental analysis, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on
October 16,2002. No public comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5304 (Neg Dec)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5305 (CT)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5306 (CP)
4. Location Map
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
7. Background Data Sheet
8. Exhibits “A” - TI”, dated November 6, 2002.
MG:cs:mh
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interesrs on all applications which !vi11 require
discretionary action on the parr of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Cornminee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cm101
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Not e:
Person is defined as “Any individual. firm, co-pamenhip, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, spdicate, in this and any other county, city and counr).. city
municipalitj, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propeq owner mist be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant‘s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of && persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the
names. title, addresses of all individuals ownins more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (WA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation. include the
names, titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate paze may be attached if
necessa
Person a California limited Corp/Part
Title Title
Address N- citv . CA 9 1950 Address
. INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-
?!$laVera Hills 11, LLC,
liability company
2727 Hoover Avenue
7 &. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership. tenants in common, non-profit. corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes. a
corporation or partnershiu, include the names, title. addresses of all ‘individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be anached if necessary.)
Person McMi!lin CoyF’anfes, .. LLc /Part . Tamarack Pro erties, Inc.
Title company Title c/o Rrnnkfield HQDJPS
Address Natinnal ritv. (’A 91950 Address ne Mar. (A 9 ~II 4
UeLawaLe LUUL LW Lkabili!? a CaliforniaPcorporation
2727 Hoover Avenue 12765 Poiqte gef Mar, Ste. 2OU
2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad. CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-1161 FAX (760) 438-0894 %
4.
NON-PROFIT 0-ZATION OR TRUST 0
If any person identified pursuant to (I) or (2) above is a nonorofit organization Or a trUSf.
names and addresses of ANY person serving as officer or director of the non
organization or as trustee or beneficiv of the.
list the
-profit
Non ProfitlTmst N/A Non Profitcrust
Title Title
Address Address
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit?. staff.
Boards. Commissions. Committees and/or Council within the past rwelve ( 12) months? 0 Yes HNo If yes. please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledse.
1.
1 h
gnature of own#ldate Signature of applica&date F 7
Print or type name of owner
~~ ~ Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
J*" t/C;r/7z&FLC
Print or type name of applicant
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
, 'H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 .. Page 2 of 2 53
CITY OF CARLSBAD 0
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL, FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Calavera Hills Village U - CT 01-04/CP 01-02
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 2 GENERAL PLAN: RMH
ZONING: P-C
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Calavera Hills 11, LLC
ADDRESS: 2727 Hoover Ave, National Citv, CA
PHONE NO.: 619-336-3138 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 168-040-29,168-041-11
QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 135 units
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: January 2004
A.
B.,
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Identify Drainage Basin =
Circulation: Demand in ADT =
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided =
Schools:
Student demand: Elementary = 13; Middle = 6; High = 7
Sewer: Demands in EDU
Water: Demand in GPD =
469.35
250.32
135 EDU
0.94
PLDA B
1.080
#3
Satisfied through
MP 150(H)
Carlsbad Unified
135
29,700
The project is 44 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET e
CASE NO: CT 0 1 -04/CP 0 1-02
CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village U
APPLICANT: Calavera Hills 11, LLC
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map. and Condominium Permit to allow the
subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development
within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property Penerallv located at the east of
the hture extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion for Lot “D” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to
Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
APN: 168-040-29.168-041-11 Acres: 61.6 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 135
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RMH
Density Allowed: UD to 1 1.5 ddac Density Proposed: 7.5 du/ac
Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning
Site P-c
North P-C
General Plan
RMH
os
Current Land Use
Vacant
Open Space
South P-C RH
~~~
Vacant
East P-c os Open Space
West P-C RM Single family residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 135
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued 10/16/02
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
[I] Other,
Planning Commission Minutes November 6,2002 DRAFTNmT
5. CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U - Request for approval of a Negative
Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit to allow the subdivision and
construction of a 135 unit multifamily air space condominium development with Village U of the
Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located on the east side of the future extension
of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7.
Mr. Wayne introduced Item #5 and stated that the presentation would be made by Michael Grim, assisted
by Bob Wojcik. The Commission’s action is not final and the item would be forwarded to the City Council.
Chairperson Trigas opened the public hearing.
Michael Grim, Senior Planner, stated that Village U is the last remaining multi-family area within Calavera
Hills Phase II. Village U is located southeast of the current intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive and
College and will take frontage and access along the future southern extension of College Boulevard. Mr.
Grim said that the actual planning area, its land use, the total amount of units provided and its developable
area were established in the Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II, so the actual design of the subdivision
and the architecture were the only items before the Commission. The site is over 61 acres and over 41
acres will be permanent open space and will include one of the community trails that winds through the
Master Plan. 135 units ranging in size from 1,350 to 1,550 square feet will be arranged in three-plex and
six-plex buildings in a motor court style development similar to what was approved for Village E-1 . The
architecture of the 2-story buildings is Mediterranean style with a lot of articulation and it complies with all
the Master Plan standards. The project includes more than ample surface guest parking, a centralized
common recreation area, and a passive turf area. Mr. Grim stated that Staff found the project to be
consistent with the General Plan, the Calavera Hills Master Plan, the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management
Plan, the applicable portions of the Zoning Ordinance, the Growth Management Ordinance, and the
California Environmental Quality Act and therefore recommends approval.
Commissioner Heineman wanted to know if the square footage included the garage area. Mr. Grim
replied that the square footage is the actual unit size.
Commissioner Baker asked if one of the units is a %story. Mr. Grim replied that there is a 3rd story and
pointed it out.
Commissioner Baker asked if two different units use the same double garage. Mr. Grim replied that one
unit has two one-car garages. Commissioner Baker asked if the storage is for things other than the car.
Mr. Grim replied that the storage areas are for other things and they are elevated enough for a car to get
beneath them so they do not impede in the footprint for the car. He said they do not allow use of any of
the floor area of a 12x20 or 40x40 garage for the storage area because that‘s considered all car area.
Brian Milich, Corky McMillin Companies, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City 91950, thanked Mike Grim and Frank Jimeno for their work and effort on the project. He clarified that each unit has two covered
parking spaces. Each unit has a one-car garage, but has two covered parking spaces and direct access
to both of those covered parking spaces. He said the project exceeds the requirements for recreational
facilities and they are well below the density that was allowed under the approved master plan. 179 units
were authorized and they’re proposing 135 units. Mr. Milich said they worked extensively with Staff through the master plan process on the design, the shape of the pad for the project, all of the issues
relative to the open space, and the architectural criteria that were established under the master plan.
Commissioner Baker asked what price range he anticipates the units would sell for. Mr. Milich replied
they would probably be on the market sometime by the end of next year and would probably start in the high $200,000 to low $300,000 range.
Chairperson Trigas closed public testimony.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Baker and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5304, recommending adoption of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
56
Planning Commission Minutes November 6,2002 Page 5
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5305 and 5306 recommending approval of
Tentative Tract Map CT 01-04 and Condominium Permit CP 01-02, based upon
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 6-0-0
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, White, and
Whitton
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the
above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of
the printer of
North County Times
Fmmedy knou.n as the Blade-Citizen acd The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the County of San Diego,
that the notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof
on the following dates, to-wit:
NOVERBER 27,2002
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS, California
this 27 TH day
of NOVERBER, 2002
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
A rion.for Lot "D of the &cho A aHedionda accordin to Map No. 3Efiled m the Office of the Coun Eorder on Ndvember 1$1896, m the 36 of Carlsbad, County of San Divzo. State of Callforma nose rsons wishing io spk on this prrd are cordially invited to attendge public heanng. oples of the s f report will be available on.and after December 13 2002 If you have an ueshons, please call We Gnm m he Planning Depirtmeit at (760) 6024&
ne time within which you ma judicially challen e this Negative Declaration rentative Tract Map and/or C&dominium Perms, if approved, isestablishec 3y state law and/or city xdinance and is ver short. If bu challenle the Negazve Dedarahon, rentabve Tract Map and/or Condominlum Permit in court ou ma tw limited d'raising 3.5 those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing , described in this nohce Dr in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad Attw City Clerk's &ice i2m Carlsbad Villi e Drive, Carlsbad CAh00S at or prior tb the pub&
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, [DATE], to consider a
request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit to allow the
subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development
within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located on the east
side of the future extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local
Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as:
A portion for Lot “D” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to
Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on
November 16, 1896, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after [DATE]. If you have any
questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. ’
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and Condominium
Permit, if approved, is established by date law andlor city ordinance, and is very short. If you
challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public
hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01 -04ICP 01 -02
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
PUBLISH: [DATE]
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, December 17, 2002 to
consider a request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit
to allow the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium
development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located
on the east side of the future extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive,
in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as:
A portion for Lot "D of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to
Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on
November 16, 1896, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 13, 2002. If you
have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map and/or Condominium Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance,
and is very short. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map and/or
Condominium Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA
92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01 -041CP '01 -02
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
.y
PUBLISH: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27,2002
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
t'
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U
CT 01=04/CP 01-02
Smooth Feed SheetsfM Use template for 5160@
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
801 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKSlCOMMUNlTY
SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
MICHAEL GRIM
11 I1 912002
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS SA. 92024
A 92069-2949
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
91 50 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKSlENGlNEERlNG
DEPT
~~ ~~
aAMRY@ Address Labels
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Laser 5 160@
KEBLEY PS JAMES A KETCHAM LORETTA E REYNOLDS
4537 HARTFORD PL 4535 HARTFORD PL 4501 GOOSE VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514 HARRISBURG PA 17112-2172
TERESA S CIOCCA RONALD D GERDES ELIZABETH G HARRISON
4531 HARTFORD PL PO BOX 6385 4527 HARTFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514 OCEANSIDE CA 92052-6385 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514
DOUGLAS J ANDERSON RICHARD A RECK KIMBERLEE J PEASE
4536 HARTFORD PL 4534 HARTFORD PL 4532 HARTFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514
PAMELA R PATERSON WILSON PAMELA S GLOVER
4749 EDINBURGH DR 1031 DAISY AVE 4526 HARTFORD PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534 CARLSBAD CA 92009-4821 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6514
JAMES H & CHERYL LEAMON GEORGE D & LINDA HOOD RANDOLPH S VORHIS
4535 NORWICH PL 4533 NORWICH PL 4720 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6542 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6542 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
HEDWIG D GORSZWICK MAUREEN LEHAN EVA M PETRY
4534 NORWICH PL 2973 RIDGEFIELD AVE 500 EL CAMINO REAL 208
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6542 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 BURLINGAME CA 94010-5154
WILLIAM H MCWETHY WILLIAM L CHAMPION VERA M THEISS
11839 SORRENTO VALLEY R 2979 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2974 RIDGEFIELD AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92121-1039 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
EVA M BROWN THOMAS J & JILL NASH KEITH M KENNEDY
2796 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2978 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2990 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CAKLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
BERNICE C HILL JEFF WESTER CHARLES R CARTER
2384 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2986 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2988 RIDGEFIELD AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543
BARBARA A STROTHER LOUIS F JOHNSON LAURA SKARVADA
2990 RIDGEFIELD AVE 2 990 WOODBURY CT 2150 CORTE CIDRO CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6545 CARLSBAD CA 92009-9010
DEBRA C NELSON BILLIE J KELLY THOMAS J CONNORS
2 986 WOODBURY CT 2984 WOODBURY CT 2979 WOODBURY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6544 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6544 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6544
ALEX & ALICE KREMER RUTH M FUQUA CYD L & SIDNEY SHAW
21193 S MATTOON RD 170 ELY ST 2985 WOODBURY CT ESTACADA OR 97023-8644 OCEANSIDE CA 92054-3858 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6544
JUDITH D WESTFALL CURTIS A ROBERTSON RUBEN B LUJAN
2987 WOODBURY CT 2989 WOODBURY CT 2988 BRANDON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6545 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6545 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
JACQUELINE ERSKINE GLEN TAYLOR HARRY P ACHENBACH
2990 BRANDON CIR 2992 BRANDON CIR 16416 WIKIUP RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 RAMONA CA 92065-4644
DERK & ERIKA FOLKERT SHERI LUONGO W H DRAPER
2996 BRANDON CIR 2998 BRANDON CIR PO BOX 381 C.'IRLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 OCEANSIDE CA 92049-0381
E BASTONE ERIC VANHAMERSVELD ROBERT L DAVIS
3002 BRANDON CIR 3003 BRANDON CIR 3001 BRANDON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6547 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6547 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6547
NOUHADE DAOU KAREN S KELLY EDWARD MARTINET 2999 BRANDON CIR 2997 BRANDON CIR 2995 BRANDON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
JAMES L GATES RICHARD L KFLANTZ STALEY RUSSELL K EST OF
1332 ARCADIA AVE 924 ALYSSUM RD 1880 N HARBOR DR 32 V'LSTA CA 92084-3415 CARLSBAD CA 92009-3907 SAN DIEGO CA 92101-2218
HILARY JOHNSON RICHARD G CROSS WILLIAM B EVANS 3999 SAN AUGUSTINE WAY 2982 BRANDON CIR 2978 BRANDON CIR SAN DIEGO CA 92130-2261 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
SKEWES LEO J & BEVERLEY MILLER GLENN THOMASHOW
537 E LOS AMIGOS AVE 2970 BRANDON CIR 2966 BRANDON CIR
MONTEBELLO CA 90640-2847 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
FRANCES T ROBLES M BATEMAN MARIANNE S WALDROP
2962 BRANDON CIR 3513 HASTINGS DR 2951 BRANDON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7041 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
AMY M SCHWEITZER RYAN J BIRDSYE PETER S & JULIE SUN
2955 BRANDON CIR 7215 DURANGO CIR 2963 BRANDON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92009-5115 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
HENRY C MANZOLA NICHOLAS M DETURI MICHAEL L LEWIS
2967 BRANDON CIR 1546 AVENIDA DE LAS LIL 2975 BRANDON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 ENCINITAS CA 92024-4108 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546
JOSHUA B KIRCHNER VINCENT F GRILL0 HEBRON EVERGREEN
2979 BRANDON CIR 2983 BRANDON CIR PO BOX 1454
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6546 RANCHO SANTA 92067-1454
FIELDS TR THOMAS R PROTZELLER DAVID L PHILLIPS
1761 MOUNT HAMILTON DR 2960 CAPE COD CIR 8603 CALMOSA AVE
ANTIOCH CA 94509-8816 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6548 WHITTIER CA 90605-1526
JACKOB YERMIAN STEFFAN & SHAWNEE COX FRANK A PUGLIESE
32 18 LONE JACK RD 4542 CAMBRIDGE WAY 4544 CAMBRIDGE WAY
ENCINITAS CA 92024-7011 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6550 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6550
STACEY C GOODSON WARREN E & DORIS JENKS COLETTE NESBIT
4546 CAMBRIDGE WAY 4548 CAPE COD CIR 4545 CAPE COD CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6550 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549
ROBERT SANTONI JANET GOSSELIN JAMES M & MARILYN HOPE
4552 CAPE COD CIR 4554 CAPE COD CIR 4558 CAPE COD CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549
HUGH J & TERESA MCGRANE FREDERICK E SPADA ROBERT L WEXLER
4560 CAPE COD CIR 4562 CAPE COD CIR 2206 BROOKHAVEN PASS
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 VISTA CA 92083-8334
GAYLEN FREEMAN WILLIAM S DICKEY CAPE AT CALAVERA HILLS
4566 CAPE COD CIR 44 E COLORADO BLVD 1/2 3900 HARNEY ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6549 ARCADIA CA 91006-7130 SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825
CAPE AT CALAVE
SAN
WILLIAM H STROUP
2 941 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
LORI S BARTLETT
2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
STEPHEN J SEGRO
2928 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
THE CAPE AT CALAVERA HI
6992 EL CAMINO REAL 105
CARLSBAD CA 92009-4145
PATRICK W CAWLEY
4595 SALEM PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563
CAROLYN M TAGARIELLO
4592 SALEM PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563
DOROTHEA L CLARKE WALTER W & LORRI HAYS
2945 LANCASTER RD 3943 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
EUGENE S FORSYTH RALPH A BELLERUE
2939 LANCASTER RD 2935 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
BROWN & JOHN SILVIA DONALD G CRAWFORD
2931 LANCASTER RD 2926 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
DOYE & LELAH LESTER JOHN K & SUSAN HUMPHREY
9012 SAINT JEAN CT 2 932 LANCASTER RD
BAKERSFIELD C 93312-4337 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
LINDA M MANNES PATRICK E FRAWLEY
4591 SALEM PL 4593 SALEM PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563
JEANNE PARRISH SCOTT F COLTON
4597 SALEM PL 25342 CALLE BECERRA
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563 LAGUNA NIGUEL 92677-1414
ERNEST A JAKSIK WILLIAM OSBORN
4594 SALEM PL 4596 SALEM PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6563
FRANK M TORRE DAVID G & RUBY JOHNSON JOAN S WARNER
6832 PEAR TREE DR 2958 LEXINGTON CIR 2960 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3936 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
GOEDERT TR ROBERT G BURTON JOAN M BALL
2753 INVERNESS DR 2964 LEXINGTON CIR 2966 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6521 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
JAMES H LAIDERMAN GERMAN A GUERRERO MINDY CHRISMAN
2968 LEXINGTON CIR 2970 LEXINGTON CIR 2972 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD'CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
ALLEN P & VICKI AUTH THOMAS P PERFETTO ANDRE 0 CHMIELEWSKI
4705 TRAVIS VIEW CT 2969 LEXINGTON CIR 2967 LEXINGTON CIR
AUSTIN TX 78732-1736 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
ALFRED0 D DONOVAN RESIDUAL T LALLO JULIE A SEVERINO
2965 LEXINGTON CIR 2963 LEXINGTON CIR 2959 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
MICHAEL D ADAMS JOHN BORG NILA DAWSON
2957 LEXINGTON CIR 1058 GINGER GLN 2953 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 SAN MARCOS CA 92069-4903 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
EVELYN L SA”0N GARY M WILLIAMS DAVID N ANDERSON
2949 LEXINGTON CIR 2947 LEXINGTON CIR 2945 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
ANDREAS KALLINIKOS PATRICIA J BROWN LAWRENCE FARHAT
2943 LEXINGTON CIR 2998 LEXINGTON CIR 1528 VISTA CLUB CIR 303
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 SANTA CLARA C 95054-3755
JEFFREY HOYDAL ROBERT N BROUGHTON DAVID L & DAWN TACKER
2994 LEXINGTON CIR 2992 LEXINGTON CIR 2990 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
DAVID A PLOESER DAVID M & PAULA LEMKUIL JOSEPH D & KRISTI PAYNE
2988 LEXINGTON CIR 2986 LEXINGTON CIR 681748 LAIE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 WAIKOLOA HI 96738-5122
SHARON M LUTHER DAVID G THOMPSON MARY DEMEO
19524 REDWOOD GLN 2980 LEXINGTON CIR 1330 OAK AVE
CASTRO VALLEY 94546-3518 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-1931
ALEXANDRIA BRAVA MAULTSBY RANDOLPH C ADAMS
2976 LEXINGTON CIR PO BOX 70 2977 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CASHIERS NC 28717-0070 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
SANDRA R TOLLACK PETER J BURINSKAS ROBERT P & TAMARA IRWIN
2979 LEXINGTON CIR 2981 LEXINGTON CIR 10988 BAROQUE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 SAN DIEGO CA 92124-3006
WADDY E STEPHENSON ERNEST C ALCANTARA STEPHANIE A GROSS
2985 LEXINGTON CIR 1020 S DITMAR ST 2993 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 OCEANSIDE CA 92054-5007 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
MARNI L WALKER GILBERT THOMAS A MAYER
2995 LEXINGTON CIR 3465 CHARTER OAK DR 2952 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2008 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
JOHN C SPERO ANN B HARRISON JULIE A RICHTER
2 954 LANCASTER RD 2 95 6 LANCASTER RD 2 958 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
SANDRA K STAMPER CLYDE E & LINDA HORNER STEPHEN A BELGUM
2 962 LANCASTER RD 2964 LANCASTER RD 16002 FANTASIA LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 HUNTINGTON BE 92649-2206
OLIVER J BLOCK ENGLESON GILBERT LAURENCE
2968 LANCASTER RD 3502 CELINDA DR 2 972 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6570 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2768 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6570
NAUM & NAUHADE DAOU EARL V GREEN BENNARD M KOUNS
2967 LANCASTER RD 2965 LANCASTER RD 1340 LAS FLORES DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-1031
KATHLEEN M CHANDLER KIM STEIER SHAHRYAR ROKNI
2700 GREEN OAK CT 2957 LANCASTER RD 2955 LANCASTER RD
LEWISVILLE TX 75077-8661 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
EARL S PICKELL
4648 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
RICHARD HOPPE
4654 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
LEWIS C LAFFEY
4662 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD'CA 92008-6571
LEONARD J SAVALLO GLORIA L TOTH
4650 WOODSTOCK ST 4652 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
JAY L & LINDA TANK JOHN A & LISA ERBACHER
4656 WOODSTOCK ST 4658 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
ROMEO & MARISA APOSTOL ADELLA VINCENT
4664 WOODSTOCK ST 4657 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
THEODORE A WHEELER MURPHY MARJORIE 0 CALAVERA HILLS I1 L L C
4653 WOODSTOCK ST 4651 WOODSTOCK ST 2727 HOOVER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571 NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
TR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7879 EL CAJON BLVD PUBLIC AGENCY
LA MESA CA 91941-3623 LOS ANGELES C 90017-1466
CYPRESS VALLEY L L C MICHAEL B RAPSKE BEEJAL PARMAR
2727 HOOVER AVE 3633 STRATA DR 3629 STRATA DR
NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6589 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6589
STEVEN M MUSKAL LUTHER B & TAMMY URIE DONALD C & JOAN HANNAY
3625 STRATA DR 3276 AVENIDA ANACAPA 3824 STONERIDGE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6589 CARLSBAD CA 92009-9301 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7073
STEVE M & BARBARA KELLY
3613 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6589
LARRY BROWN
3604 BAYVIEW PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6599
ASAD & HURNA ASHRAF
3616 BAYVIEW PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6599
VAN & BECKY LE DANG
3618 CONTOUR PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6596
CEFFREY A DORFMAN
3630 CONTOUR PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6595
C J ODELL JEFFREY T KAMHOLZ
3609 STRATA DR 3600 BAYVIEW PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6589 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6599
ERIC G STEPHENS JOSEPH & SUSAN CROWLEY
3608 BAYVIEW PL 3612 BAYVIEW PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6599 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6599
HOANG Q & LAURA TRAN DAVID L PARKER
2811 ULRIC ST 3614 CONTOUR PL .
SAN DIEGO CA 92111-5525 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6596
LACHU & BINDU KHIATANI RUDOLF 0 DALLENBACH
3622 CONTOUR PL 3626 CONTOUR PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6596 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6596
CYPRESS VALLEY L L C
2727 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
STEVE & KRISTINE HERMAN MATTHEW C LAW STEPHAN T MELNYCHUK
3825 SHALE CT .3750 CALDERA PL 3754 CALDERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502
MARILYN K LANDBLOM JOHANNES R ROEBERS RONALD W EMERICK
3758 CALDERA PL 3762 CALDERA PL 3766 CALDERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502
SACHA & SOPHIE NINKOVIC CHRISTOPHER M MURRAY STEPHEN G WILKINSON
3771 CALDERA PL 3767 CALDERA PL 3763 CALDERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502
ADRIAN C FIGUEROA MARK W & JULIE ROSS1 STANLEY G & HIROKO AMBO
3759 CALDERA PL 3755 CALDERA PL 3751 CALDERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5502
BRIAN GOODING ROY H & HOPE GASTELUM RIAZ & ZHILA ZABOORI
3704 STWTA DR 3708 STRATA DR 3712 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503
ZIAEDIN DANESHFAR CARMINE A & KATHY ROCCI MIKE L GONZALES
3716 STRATA DR 3720 STRATA DR 3724 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503
DIONY L & M SANPEDRO MARK & BARBARA SENDAR EDMUNDO B GONZALES
3728 STRATA DR 3732 STRATA DR 3733 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575
RICHARD E FIELDEN JOHN H & MICHELLE HEIL FRANCISCO J LOPEZ
3729 SADDLE DR 3725 SADDLE DR 3721 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575
JAMES L JOHNSON XINGANG & ZHENG WANG LIEM K NGUYEN
3717 SADDLE DR 3821 SHALE CT 3817 SHALE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501
RAYMOND L WILHELM MICHEAL A VALVERDE HOWARD J KELLER
3733 STRATA DR 3729 STRATA DR 3805 SHALE CT
CARLSBAD'CA 92008-5504 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5504 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501
ROBERT S JENNINGS JASON T WILLIAMS GREGORY A & LINK AU
3809 SHALE CT 3813 SHALE CT 3823 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
TIN T & IVIAN TRIEU MICHEAL & LAUREN CONRAD SAMUEL K AFOLAYAN
3819 CROWNPOINT CT 3815 CROWNPOINT CT 3811 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
BRETT H POLLOCK RAYMOND H DREIFUSS PENG & WU ZHU
3807 CROWNPOINT CT 3808 CROWNPOINT CT 3812 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
GEOFFREY M & JULIE LESS KEVIN J HACKETT KENNETH C KENDRICK
3816 CROWNPOINT CT 3820 CROWNPOINT CT 3824 CROWNPOINT CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
CALAVERA HILLS MASTER A DEVIN B CARNEY
2727 HOOVER AVE 3804 CROWNPOINT CT NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CITY 91950-6625 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
CYPRESS VALLE / CARL SARRAZOLLA JAMES W & SANDRA LEE
GF1950-6625 2727 HOO
3803 CROWNPOINT CT 3800 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500
MICHAEL A VALVERDE BRIAN & DON PETERSON JAMES Y SHISHIDO
3729 STRATA DR 3736 STRATA DR 3740 STRATA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-5504 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503 CARLSBAD CA 92008-5503
PAUL & TERI FAPPAPORT PHILLIP J VOGEL BASSAM C ABISAMRA
3739 CAVERN PL 3735 CAVERN PL 3745 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6586 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6586 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576
KEVIN R & SHARNA SKJEI BARRY & DEBORAH WHITTLE DANIEL R CANCELLER1
3741 SADDLE DR 3737 SADDLE DR 3718 SADDLE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6575 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
RANDY & DOREEN BERGERON ATUL C & SMIRA PATEL MONTE L & LUISA BIBLE-
3722 SADDLE DR 3726 SADDLE DR 3 734 SADDLE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
SEAN M PIROUZFAR GERALD W FLECK PIJUSIN K DEWANJEE
3738 SADDLE DR 3742 SADDLE DR 3746 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
RICHARD E BISHOP LUIS F CAMOLAS ABDOLHAMID KARIMI
3750 SADDLE DR 3754 SADDLE DR 3758 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
THOMAS M & MARY AYKROID JACK A & JOY GORZMAN PIERRE R & JODI BRETON
3762 SADDLE DR 3766 SADDLE DR 3763 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576
GARY & CAROL RAMOS JOSE M & ANGELA DUENES RICHARD C PYLE
3 759 SADDLE DR 3755 SADDLE DR 3751 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576
MARVIN K JOHNSON MICHAEL B & KAREN KLEIN ANITA W MINARD
3747 SADDLE DR 3732 CAVERN PL 3736 CAVERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6576 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585
LAWRENCE N BALICH ANTHONY J GULLOTTA MITCHELL R MILLER
3740 CAVERN PL 3744 CAVERN PL 3748 CAVERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585
WILLIAM J SCHILDGE ALAN & ANNETTE CROSS DENNIS 0 SHAY
3752 CAVERN PL 3756 CAVERN PL 3760 CAVERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585
TR VANPESKI MARIO A CARZO BRIAN J STRINGFELLOW
3764 CAVERN PL 3761 CAVERN PL 3757 CAVERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6585 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6587 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6587
MIKE & JOANN BOURS WILLIAM T SCHMITZ KEITH G HENDRICKSON
3753 CAVERN PL 3749 CAVERN PL 3745 CAVERN PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6587 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6587 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6587
DEREK N GASCON
3741 CAVERN PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6586
STER A ADOLPH J & MARY KUHN RICHARD D GLOGER
3702 SADDLE DR 3706 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
DENNY K & CYNTHIA KING
3710 SADDLE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6574
*** 95 Printed ***