HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-17; City Council; 17020; Calavera Hills Village X CT 01-06/PUD 01-07n
U
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CT 01 -06/PUD 01 -07
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2002-368 , ADOPTING the Negative
Declaration, and APPROVING the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for the
Calavera Hills Village X single-family development.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On November 6, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended
adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development for the Calavera Hills Village X single-family project, with a 7-0 vote. The proposed
project is for 115 single-family units on a 25.1 net acres site. The Village X site has a gross acreage
of 52 acres.
The currently vacant site would be graded in accordance with the Master Tentative Map for Calavera
Hills Phase II, approved by the City Council on January 15, 2002 (along with EIR 98-02 and MP 150-
H). The site is located west of future College Boulevard, south of the Carlsbad Village Drive and
College Boulevard intersection.
The proposed units would be developed in accordance with Citywide and Master Plan architectural
criteria. Required numbers of single story and reduced second story units are being provided with
versions of Mission, Early California, Monterey, Craftsman and Spanish Colonial architectural styles.
Access would be off of College Boulevard and two recreation areas are proposed with the project,
containing a swimming pool, cabana, turf areas and picnic facilities.
The proposed development is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Calavera Hills Master Plan,
Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Growth Management Program and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, the single-family project of Village X is
recommended for approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The potential environmental impacts associated with the creation and grading of the Village X site
Nere reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master
Tentative Map (EIR 98-02), certified on January 15, 2002. Therefore the project-specific
environmental review dealt only with those facets of the project not included in the Phase II Master
Tentative Map proposal.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village X single-family project, as designed and conditioned, would not
create any significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, the Planning Director issued a
Negative Declaration on September 26, 2002, in accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of
Carlsbad. No comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible since all development fees will be collected at the time of
grading and building permit issuance. All public facilities necessary to serve the development will be
in place prior to, or concurrent with, development.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,020
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2002-368
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5307, 5308 and 5309
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 6, 2002
5. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 6, 2002.
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-368
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CALAVERA
WEST OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE, IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CASE NO.: CT 01 -OG/PUD 01 -07
HILLS VILLAGE X SINGLE-FAMILY PROJECT, LOCATED
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on November 6, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 17th -day of
December , 2002, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Negative
Declaration and Site Development Plan, and at the time received recommendations, objections,
protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT OI-OG/PUD 01-07; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council adopts Resolution No. 2002-368 and
that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 5307, 5308, and 5309, on file with the City Clerk and made a part
hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
3. Prior to occupancy, permanent on-site signage will indicate the CMWD lot
adjacent to College Boulevard and the internal road connection to Village “Y”, to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director.
4. That the applications for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit
Development for an 115 unit single-family development on property generally located west of
future.College Boulevard, south of the intersection of College Boulevard and Carlsbad Village
Drive, are approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5307, 5308, and 5309.
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
f 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 17th day of December , 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard, and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
/ SITE
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CT Ol-O6/PUD 01-07
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5307
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW
THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF 4 115 UNIT
VILLAGE X OF THE CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FUTURE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CASE NO.: CT 01 -06PUD 0 1-07
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, “Developer”/”Owner,” has filed a verified
-.
SINGLE-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Portion of Lots “D,” “E,” and “J” of the Rancho Agua
Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the
San Diego County Recorder on November 6, 1896, also being
Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration
according to Exhibit "ND" dated September 26, and "PII" dated September 17,
2002, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinm:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
A.
B.
C.
D.
It has reviewed, analyzed and considered Negative Declaration and the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments
thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and
The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
It reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
Based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HWZMIIXER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5307 -2-
- City of Carlsbad
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Address/Location: Villages X and W within the Calavera Hills Master Plan, generally
located east and west of future College Boulevard south of the
College BlvdCarlsbad Village Drive intersection in the Northeast
Quadrant.
Project Description: 115 single-family detached homes (Village X)
114 single-family detached homes (Village W)
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above-described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments fiom the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date
of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at
(760) 602-4608.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 26,2002
CASE NO: CT 0 1 -06PUD 01 -07 AND CT 0 1 -05PUD 0 1-06
CASE NAME: VILLAGE X AND VILLAGE W
PUBLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 26,2002
Planning Director
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 II. (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPLETED BIT THE PLAhXIKG DEPARTMEST)
CASE NO: CT Ol-O5/PUD 01-06 and CT 01-06PUD 01-07
DATE: September 17.2002
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village W and X
2. APPLICANT: McMillin Homes
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2727 Hoover Ave. National
City, CA 92950 (619) 336-3138
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: May 17,2001 .
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Mau and Planned Unit Development for the
construction of two single family Villages within the Calavera Hills Master Plan: Village
X urouoses 115 units and Village W prouoses 114 units, generallv located on both sides
of future College Blvd, south of the intersection of College Boulevard and Carlsbad
Village Drive. in Local Facilities Management Zone 7.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
0 Land Use and Planning (XI TransportatiodCirculation 0 Public Services
0 Population and Housing c] Biological Resources Utilities & Service Systems
c] Geological Problems 0 Energy & Mineral [51 Aesthetics
0 Water Cultural Resources
(XI Air Quality 0 Recreation
Resources
0 Hazards
0 Noise
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
1 Rev. 03/28/96
9
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
0
CI
€3
0
I find that the proposed project COULD XOT ha\x a significant effeci on thc
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have significaht effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative
Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier, including
revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore,
a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature J Date
14 02,
Planning DirectoH Signhre Date
2 Rev. 03/28/96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the follun.ing
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A ,brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
“No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
“Potentially Sign.ificant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
Based on an “EIA-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of
Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
3 Rev. 03/28/96
If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public revien. In this
case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporalrd”
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
e An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses? (#1 :Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-1 8)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income
or minority community)? (#1 :Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6- 18)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0
cl
0
0
0
0
IXI
0 IXI
0 IXI
0 ixI
population projections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 IXI
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 17 IXI
4 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
b) Seismic ground shaking? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1 :Pgs 5.1 -
e) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
(#l:PgS 5.1-1 - 5.1.15)
1 - 5.1-15)
(#l:PgS 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
g) Subsidence of the land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
h) Expansive soils? (# 1 :Pgs 5.1 - 1 - 5.1 - 15)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs
5.1-1 - 5.1-15)
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff! (#l:Pgs
Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -
Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) '
Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -
Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
5.2-1 1)
5.2-1 1)
(#l:PgS 5.2-1 - 5..2-11)
5..2-11)
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs
5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Onless I mpacr
Mitigation Incorporated 4.
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
cl
IXI
0 0 IXI 0 0 IXI 0 0 IXI
0 0 151
cl 0 151 0 0 IXI
0 0 IXI 0 0 IXI 0 0 IXI
0 0 IXI
0 0 [x1
0 0 IXI
0 0 IXI
0 0 151
0 0 IXI
0 0 IXI
0 0 151
0 0 la
0 0
5 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (+l:P?s
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-
12) d) Create objectionable odors? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-
12)
5.3-1 - 5.3-12)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
(#l:PgS 5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
5.7-1 - 5.7.22)
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal result in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds? (#I :Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-
24) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-
24) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1 :Pgs
(#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
pool)? (#1 :PgS 5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
5.4-1 - 5.4-24)
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal?
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 &
(#l:PgS 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
6
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless . Impact
Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 El K!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Ix1
0 (XI
0 Ix1
0 (XI
0 (XI
0 (XI
0 0 (XI
0 0 Ixi
0 0 (XI
cl 0 IXI
0 [7 Ixl
0 0 IXI
0 0 €3
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant impact lmpact Unless Impact
Mitigation Incoaorated c) Result in the loss of availability of a honn 0 e 151
mineral resource that would.be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs
5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
0 0 IE3 IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
(#l:PgS 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response 0 0 0 IXI
plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs
5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 (xi
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 SI 0 IXI health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
potential health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 -
5.10.1-5)
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 IXI
brush, grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5)
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1 :Pgs 5.9-1 - 0 0 IXI
5.9-15)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 IxI
(#l:PgS 5.9-1 - 5.9-15)
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) o
b) Police protection? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.6- 1 - 5.12.6-4) 0
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0
e) Other governmental services? (#1 :Pgs 5.12.1 - 1 - 0
C) Schools? (#l:PgS 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5) 0
5.12.8-7)
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the. following
utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 0
b) Communications systems? 0
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3- 0
e) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8) cl
& 5.13-1 - 5.13-9)
facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7)
7)
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 IXI
0 0 IXI 0 0 €3
0 Ixl
0 0 €3
7 Rev. 03/28/96 w-
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant impact impact Unless impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
f) Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3) 0 0 0 El g) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 Is1 - 5.12.3-7)
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrated negative aesthetic effect? 0
c) Create light or glare? (#1 :Pgs 5.1 1 - 1 - 5.1 1-5) 0
(#l:PgS 5.1 1-1 - 5.1 1-5)
(#l:PgS 5.11-1 - 5.11-5)
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#1 :Pgs 5.8-1 -
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1 :Pgs 5.8-1 -
c) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-
10) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
5.8-10)
5.8-10)
(#l:PgS 5.8-1 - 5.8-10)
the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10)
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional 0
parks or other recreational facilities? (#I :Pgs
5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8y7)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
(#l:PgS 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7)
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0
b) Does the project have impacts that are 0
0 0 Ix1
0 0 E
0 E
0 0 El
0 0
o 0 IXI
0 0 El
8 Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
lncoaorated
c) Does the project have environmental effects 0 El
which will cause the substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
The following site-specific technical studies were used in the analysis and design of this project
and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, 92008. (760) 602-4600.
1. Update of Geotechnical Report. Calavera Hills Villages W, X and Y City of Carlsbad,
California, dated October 20, 1999, Geosoils, Inc.
2. Interim Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Calavera Heights Villages W. X and Y
Carlsbad. California, dated March 20, 1990, Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.
3. Noise Technical Report for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase I1 Village W, City of
Carlsbad. California, dated May 1,2002.
4. Noise Technical Report for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase I1 Village X. City of
Carlsbad. California, dated August 13,2002.
9 Rev. 03/28/96 /7
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The project involves the construction and occupation of two single-fmily.‘irillages within the
Calavera Hills Master Plan: 1 15 detached single-family units within Village X and 1 14 detached
single-family units in Village W. Both sites \vi11 be created through the recordation of the hlusrcr
Tentative Map for Calavera Hills Phase I1 (CT 00-02) and will be mass graded in accordance
with that map.
The potential environmental impacts associated with the grading of Villages X and W site were
reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master
Tentative Map (EIR 98-02, SCH No. 991 11082), certified January 15,2002. The Environmental
Impact Report also reviewed the impacts associated with the development of Village X with up
to 1 17 single-family units; and Village W up to 121 units. These maps propose less units than
allowed by the master plan and comply with all design and development standards. EIR 98-02,
as certified, also reviewed the potential environmental impacts associated with the major public
improvements required for the buildout of the master plan including Villages X and W.
Since the development of Village X and W cannot proceed until the Master Tentative Map (CT
00-02) has been recorded, and the site has been graded in accordance with that map, the
following environmental analysis deals only with the development of Villages X and W and the
project differences compared to the EIR. The differences center on revised noise studies (which
does not result in more or higher walls than those analyzed in the EIR) and a reduced unit
amount (proposing less units than allowed by the master plan).
College Boulevard separates the Village X and W sites. The proposed single-family residential
uses are compatible with all of the existing and future uses allowed by the master plan.
The residential designation of both Villages is Residential Medium (RM) in the City’s General
Plan, allowing up to 8 dwelling units per developable acre. The proposed densities of 4.6
(Village X) and 4.8 (Village W) is within the RM range. The project site is zoned P-C (Planned
Community) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 15O(H)), both sites are to be
developed in accordance with the R-1 - Single Family Residential Zone, except as modified in
the Master Plan. The proposed developments will consist of single-family residential units with
open space and common recreation lots. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan
and meets all development standards and design criteria of the Master Plan and the R-1 zone.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 60,000 cubic yards (Village X) and
65,000 cubic yards (Village W) of balanced grading subsequent to the mass grading associated
the above referenced master tentative map (CT 00-02). All grading operations would be required
to conform to the recommendations of the site-specific geotechnical report, as well as the City of
Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. In addition, an all-weather access
throughout construction and Fire Marshal approval would be required
hazardous materials on site.
The residential project would take access off of future College Blvd
(Village X) and 1140 (Village W) average daily traffic trips, which
existing and required road segments in the area.
road would be provided
prior to the storage of any
and would generate 1150
can be accommodated by
The project will be required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best Management Practices, thus
reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain system. All facilities needed to
.10 Rev. 03/28/96
serve the single-family developments will be provided prior to occupancy, in association with the
Phase II Master Tentative Map grading and improvement plans. In addition, the Carlsbad
Unified School District has stated that there are adequate school facilities to serve the proposed
apartment project.
Noise wall locations and heights are not greater than those covered in the earlier analysis (EIR
98-02) and the proposed unit yields are less than the maximums allowed by the master plan.
These two elements represent the variation in the project as reviewed by the master plan’s
certified environmental review (EIR 98-02) and now proposed. Given the above analysis, the
previous environmental documentation and the site-specific technical reports, the proposed
projects for Calavera Hills Villages W and W would not create any significant adverse
environmental impacts as designed and conditioned.
AIR QUALITY:
In 1994 the City prepared and certified an EIR which analyzed the impacts which will result
fiom the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concludes that
continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will have
cumulative significant impacts in the form of increased gas and electric power consumption and
vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon
monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates.
These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego
Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a “non-attainment basin”, any additional air
emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to build-out
as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air
quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan build-out, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures
to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand
Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass
transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is
located within a “non-attainment basin”, therefore, the “Initial Study” checklist is marked
“Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City
Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a “Statement Of Overriding Considerations” for air
quality impacts. This “Statement Of Ovemding Considerations” applies to all projects covered
by the General Plan’s Final Master EIR. This project is within the scope of that MEIR
11 Rev. 03/28/96 /P
CIRCULATION:
In 1994 the City prepared and certified a Master EIR which analyzed the impacts which would
result from the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concluded
that continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan \\oulJ rcsuil in
increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate build-out
traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional
through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all
freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the
implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the
City’s adopted Growth Management performance standards at build-out.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan build-out,
numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include:
1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to
develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks,
pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation
strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from .a failing Interstate or
State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to
control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either
been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the
failure of intersections at build-out of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore,
the “Initial Study” checklist is marked “Potentially Significant Impact”. This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the
recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a “Statement Of Ovemding Considerations” for circulation impacts. This “Statement Of
Overriding Considerations” applies to all projects covered by the General Plan’s Master EIR.
This project is within the scope of that MER This document is available at the Planning
Department.
A MEIR may not be used to review projects if it was certified more than five years prior to the
filing of an application for a later project. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to
determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was
certified more than five years ago, the City’s preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no
substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was
certified. The only potential changed circumstance, the intersection failure at Palomar Airport
Rd. and El Camino Real, is in the process of being mitigated to below a level of significance.
Additionally, there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have
been known at the time the MEIR was certified. Therefore, the MEIR remains adequate to
review later projects.
EARLIER ANALYSES USED/SOURCE DOCUMENTS CITED
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of
Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Impact Reuort for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update
(MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City of Carlsbad Planning Department.
12 Rev. 03/28/96 090
2. Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase 11. Bridge and Thoroughfare District No. 4 & Detention
Basins Final Environmental Imuact Report (EIR 98-02), dated November 2001, RECON.
3. Noise Technical Reuort for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase 11. Villages X and UT, dated
c
August 13,2002 and May 1,2002, respectivel)., b). RECON.
13 Rev. 03/28/96 dl
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
.22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5308
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
SUBDIVIDE 25.1 ACRES INTO 115 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS
WITHIN CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE X
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FUTURE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CASE NO.: CT 0 1-06
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, "Developer"/"Owner," has filed a verified
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 01-06 TO
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as:
Portion of Lots "D," "E," and "J" of the Rancho Agua
Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the
San Diego County Recorder on November 6, 1896, also being
Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibits "A" - "CCC" dated November 6, 2002, on file in the Planning
Department CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - CT 01-06 provided by Chapter 20.12 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - CT
01-06 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposed single family development conforms to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance
and has been designed to comply with other applicable regulations including the
Planned Development Ordinance and the Calavera Hills Master Plan.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding fbture land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single-family residential, multi-family
residential, and park development on the General Plan, in that the project is an in-fill
development and already bounded by earlier phases of master plan development
and/or major arterial roadways (Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard).
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the project site can accommodate the proposed residential
development while complying with all development standards and public facilities
requirements.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that concurrent with the recordation of the final map the developer shall vacate and
adjust any easements that conflict with the proposed development.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures are oriented
in various directions, adequate separations will be provided to allow for breezes to
cool the areas, and landscaping will be installed to provide shade and reduce the
temperature of developed areas.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposed residential density is within the limits analyzed by the
Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -2- 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
12.
Amendment (EIR 98-02/MP 150(H)), and noise attenuation walls are being provided
along the project frontages with College Boulevard.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has
been designed in accordance with Best Management Practices for water quality
protection in accordance with the City’s sewer and drainage standards, and the
project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the facts set forth in
the staff report dated November 6,2002 including, but not limited to the following:
The proposed density of 4.6 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the existing
RM General Plan designation;
The project minimizes the number of access points to major and prime arterials by
using two access points off of College Boulevard pursuant to Engineering standards;
The project includes a revised noise study (to reflect final grades) dated August 13,
2002, with recommendations to reduce the traffic noise impacts from College
Boulevard to 60 dBA CNEL;
The project provides a mixture of architectural styles, contributing to the diversity
of housing within the master plan and City; and
The project will provide emergency water systems and all-weather access roads
throughout construction.
That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 identifies the maximum residential yield on
the Village X site as 117 units (115 proposed) and all facilities within the zone are
planned to accommodate this maximum amount of dwelling units.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
Specifically,
A. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified
School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -3- a4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
15.
16.
B. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and
will be collected prior to issuance of building permit unless already credited by
park dedication.
C. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be
collected prior to the issuance of building permit.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading permit
or final map for this project/map, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modi@ all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by. the City’s approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, &d local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -4- d Dk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, (b)
City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein.
Developer shall submit to Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy
of the Tentative Map and Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final
decision making body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. A note to this effect
shall be placed on the Final Map.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of PUD 01-07 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5309 for that other
approval incorporated herein by reference.
The Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape
and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan
and the City's Landscape Manual. The Developer shall construct and install all
landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the
project's building, improvement, and grading plans.
The Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map ,approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
PC RES0 NO, 5308 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
A. General Enforcement bv the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in
favor of, or in which the City has an interest.
B. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to
the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City.shal1 have
the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be
transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record.
C.
D.
Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the
event that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” as provided in Article , Section
the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary
maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give
written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project,
setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required
and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty
(30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to
carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements within the period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be
entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to
reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein.
Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s
Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs
incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and
or Association’s Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to
each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to
pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection
against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full
within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be
subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of
the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by
means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available
to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot
in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such
special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing
lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in
the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special
assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal
actions andor to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -6- 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
hisher respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
E. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit
owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibits “U” - “AAA”, dated November 6,2002.
F. Balconies, trellis and decks. The individual lot or unit owner allowances. and
prohibitions regarding balconies, trellis and decks shall be as set forth in Exhibit
“R” -“T”, dated November 6,2002.
The Developer shall provide bus stops to service this development at locations and with
reasonable facilities to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District and the
Planning Director. Said facilities, if required, shall be free from advertising and shall
include at a minimum include a bench and a pole for the bus stop sign. The facilities
shall be designed to enhance or be consistent with basic architectural theme of the
project .
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #I special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 7, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxeslfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and
recreational facilities, unless a construction phasing plan is submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map or grading permit, whichever
occurs first.
The Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any
address change from that which is shown on the permit application.
Prior to the issuance of the grading permit or final map, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the
County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a
Tentative Tract Map and PUD Permit by Resolutions No. 5308 and 5309 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -7- af
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative,
suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are
distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future
and existing schools, parks and streets.
The developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses
which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall
remain posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever OCCUTS first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in
a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form
#1 on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
Open Space Lot 124, which constitutes General Plan open space in Village X in
compliance with the Calavera Hills Master Plan and Certified EIR 98-02, shall be
dedicated to a third party environmental manager with a conservation easement
dedicated to the City of Carlsbad concurrent with final map approval, to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Lot 118, intended for the location of a Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD)
reclaimed water pump station, shall be dedicated to the CMWD concurrent with
final map approval, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Lot 118 shall be developed by CMWD pursuant to a future Conditional Use Permit
approval.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map, or issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice of
Restriction on each lot disclosing the planned development and operation of a
CMWD water pump station on Lot 118 within Village X.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -8- J9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
28. All dwelling units in the project shall have enhanced architectural treatments for all
rear elevations. The enhanced rear elevations shall be to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director, prior to building permit issuance.
Engineering:
General
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
...
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is
formally established by the City.
Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs andor other
recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all
the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, and storm drain facilities
located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner
among the owners of the properties within the subdivision.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install rain gutters to convey roof drainage to an
approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The final map for the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02 shall be recorded prior to the
recordation of the Final Map for this Tentative Map.
There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project.
Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance
with Engineering Standards. A statement shall be included in the Final Map (see Final
Map Notes) and in the CC&Rs.
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement,
grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development.
Building permits for this project will not be issued beyond the cumulative traffic
generation of 2500 ADT by building permits issued for all Calavera Hills Phase I1
projects if the roadway improvements connecting College Boulevard from Carlsbad
Village Drive southerly to El Camino Real have not been completed. Additional
permits may be allowed subject to approval of the City Engineer based on
substantial completion of the required roadway improvements. A note to this effect
shall be included in the Final Map.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -9- 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FeesIAgreements
37.
38.
39.
40.
Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation, the City’s standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement.
Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
Developer shall cause property owner to execute, record and submit a recorded copy to
the City Engineer, a deed restriction on the property which relates to the proposed cross
lot drainage as shown on the tentative map. The deed restriction document shall be in a
form acceptable to the City Engineer and shall:
A. Clearly delineate the limits of the drainage course;
B. State that the drainage course is to be maintained in perpetuity by the underlying
property owner; and
C. State that all future use of the property along the drainage course will not restrict,
impede, divert or otherwise alter drainage flows in a manner that will result in
damage to the underlying and adjacent properties or the creation of a public
nuisance.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall
cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area
shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street
Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Grading
41.
42.
43.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and
obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for
the project.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board.
This project requires off site grading. No grading for private improvements shall occur
outside the limits of this approval unless Developer obtains, records and submits a
recorded copy to the City Engineer a grading or slope easement or agreement from the
owners of the affected properties. If Developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope
easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case Developer must
either apply for and obtain an amendment of this approval or modi@ the plans so grading
will not occur outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial
conformance from both the City Engineer and Planning Director.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -10-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DedicationdImprovements
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City
andor other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the
tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so
offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost.
Streets that already public are not required to be rededicated.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or
install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent
with any grading or building permit.
Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement
to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements
shown on the tentative map and the following improvements including, but not limited to
paving, base, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, medians, signing and striping, traffic
control, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer,
water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water), to City Standards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
A. Streets "A," "B," "C," "D", "E", and "F"
B. Traffic signals at the intersections of streets "A" and "B" and College
Boulevard
A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the
provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Developer shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights on the final map for all lots
abutting College Boulevard.
Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit, latest version.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan
(SWMP)." The SWMP shall be in compliance with the NPDES permit requirements
and provisions as established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board and the City of Carlsbad. The SWMP shall address
measures to reduce to the maximum extent possible storm water pollutant runoff at
both construction and post-construction stages of the project. The SWMP shall:
1. Identify construction activity and post-development on-site pollutants of
2. Recommend structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs)
concern.
to remove said pollutants.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 % -1 1- 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee and resident education on
the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
4. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construction BMPs in perpetuity.
5. Incorporate measures to ensure-development runoff rates and velocities from
the site are not increased as a result of the project.
Additionally, concurrent with the SWMP, the applicant shall submit for City
approval a “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).” The SWPPP shall
be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the
California Water Resources Control Board.
49. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install streetlights along all public and private street
fiontages abutting and/or within the subdivision boundary in conformance with City of
Carlsbad Standards.
50. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install sidewalks along all public streets abutting the
subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
5 1. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install wheelchair ramps at the public street comers
abutting the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Utilitv Conditions
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire
Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations,
building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants shall be considered
public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way or
within minimum 20-feet wide easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad.
At the discretion of the District Engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate
maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges
for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water
Authority capaciw charne(s1 prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The Developer shall prepare a colored recycled water use map and submit this map to the
Planning Department for processing and approval by the Deputy City Engineer -
Utilities.
The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a
source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
The Developer shall install potable water and recycled water services and meters at
locations approved by the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be
reflected on public improvement plans.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -12- 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
58.
59.
60.
The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the
District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the District
Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
Prior to issuance of building permits the entire potable water, recycled water, and sewer
system shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity, pressure, and flow
demands can be met to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
Final Map Notes
61. Developer shall show on Final Map the net developable acres for each parcel.
62. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
...
All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with
the exception of Streets "A," "B," "C," "D", "E" and "F", and the traffc
signals.
Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless
the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available.
Geotechnical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest
has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action
that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land
subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this
subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above
the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified
as sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design
Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this
condition.
No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or
permitted to encroach within the area identified as the Caltrans intersection
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-
Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain
this condition.
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Fire Department:
63. All building permit applications for units adjacent to native open space/preserve
areas shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.
64. The Developer shall submit for Fire Marshal review and approval a 400 scale mylar
showing the location of all proposed fire hydrants.
Code Reminders:
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 18.04.320.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map
approval becomes final.
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.6 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Some improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of
title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such
property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If
unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and
comply with the requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.6.095 to notify
and enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -14- 3 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN: None n
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. MZ&LER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5308 -15-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5309
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
07, TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION AND CONSTRUCTION
OF A 115 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN VILLAGE X OF THE CALAVERA
HILLS MASTER PLAN LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD
VILLAGE DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CASE NO.: PUD 01-07
WHEREAS, Calavera Hills 11, LLC, "Developer"/"Owner," has filed a verified
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD 01-
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as:
Portion of Lots "D," "E," and "J" of the Rancho Agua
Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the
San Diego County Recorder on November 16,1896, also being
Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planning Unit
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - "CCC" dated November 6, 2002, on file in
the Planning Department, CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - PUD 01-07 as provided by
Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of November, 2002,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the PUD Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - PUD
01-07, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the
Municipal Code, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all
adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the project is
consistent with the Residential Medium density (RM) General Plan designation as it
has a density of 4.6 dwellings per acre; the project complies with the development
standards and design criteria of the Calavera Hills Master Plan for detached single
family homes.
That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community, in that the project site is designated for single-
family units in the Calavera Hills Master Plan and provides diversity of housing
types within the City.
That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, in that the project design conforms to all design and development standards
applicable to the property and public improvements will be provided prior to, or
concurrent with, the development of the project to meet all City standards.
That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.080,
and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design
Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides private and common recreation areas;
guest parking is adequately distributed throughout the project, traffic calming and
livable street features are proposed, and the internal street system has a minimum
width of 34 feet.
That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the
site, in that the proposed development in Village X is consistent with the wildlife
corridors and areas established by the Calavera Hills Master Plan and certified
environmental impact report (EIR 98-02).
That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the proposed single family residential
product type and density are compatible with the master plan’s single family
residential, multifamily residential, and community park land uses that surround it.
That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project.
PC RES0 NO. 5309 -2- 38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
...
Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to grading
permit or final map, whichever occurs first.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or Mer condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Planned Unit Development.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the PUD documents, as necessary to make them internally
consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall
occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this PUD, (b) City’s approval or
issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in
connection with the use contemplated herein.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 01-06 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5308 for that other
approval, incorporated herein by reference.
PC RES0 NO. 5309 % -3- 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November, 2002, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN: None
SEENA TRIGAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
t
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5309 -4-
? EXHIBIT 4 qhe City of Carlsbad Planning Departmen
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. @
Application complete date: August 26,2002
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 6,2002 Project Planner: Eric Munoz
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
SUBJECT: CT 01-06/PUD 01-07 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - Request for a
Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and. Planned Unit Development
Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of a 115 unit single family
development within Village X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property
generally located on the west side of future College Boulevard, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 7.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5307,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director
and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5308 and 5309 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 01-06 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01-
07, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves the subdivision and construction of 115-unit single-family units within
Village X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. Village X will be mass graded in accordance with
the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Tentative Map (CT 00-02). A Tentative Tract Map is required
for the subdivision of property and final grading. A PUD Permit is also being requested. The
project meets all applicable regulations and staff recommends approval.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development
Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of 115-unit single-family homes within Village
X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 52-acre site of Village X has 25.1 net acres and is
allowed a maximum of 117 single-family units by the recently approved Calavera Hills Master
Plan (MP 150(H) which was approved by the City Council in January 2002).
Village X is bounded by College Boulevard to the east, the Robertson Ranch area to the south,
the Colony at Calavera to the west, and Village Y to the north. Village X is designated
Residential Medium (RM) in the City’s General Plan, allowing up to 8 dwelling units per
developable acre with a Growth Management Control Point of 6 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed density is 4.6 dwelling units per acre and is within the allowable General Plan range.
The project site is zoned Planned Community (P-C) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master
Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be developed in accordance with the Planned Development
Ordinance, the Village X standards, and provisions of the Master Plan.
CT 0 1 -06PUD 0 1 -07 - C HILLS VILLAGE X
November 6,2002
Page 2
The proposed development would consist of 115 single-family homes that comply with the
master plan’s single-family development criteria for architectural variety and articulation. These
criteria include: minimum lot size, a mix of single-storyheduced second story homes and two
story homes, architectural variety, plan variety, setbacks, garage placement, fiont porches, front
entry features and recreation areas. The Village X proposal complies with or exceeds all of
above noted master plan criteria for single-family development within Calavera Hills. Versions
of the following architectural styles will be represented in Village X: Mission, Monterey,
Craftsman, Italian, Spanish Colonial and Early California.
The single-story units will be under 17 feet in height with approximately 2,050 square feet of
area (including garage). The reduced second story units will be approximately 21 feet in height
with the second story being no more than 25% of the first floor area. Total square footage of the
reduced second story units (including garage area) is approximately 2,575 sq. ft. The proposed
two-story units will be under 25 feet in height with a total square footage range of approximately
3,090 to 3,300 (including garage area). A 34-foot internal street system will serve the project
and sewer and water services will be available. Recreational amenities include active and
passive areas. A swimming pool with a pool house and a neighborhood park with picnic
facilities are proposed as common recreation areas. Every unit will also have the required
amount of private rear yard recreation space. The project’s fair share of affordable housing is
being provided at the Master Plan level in Village Y (SDP 01-05), therefore none is included in
this project.
The proposed development would necessitate approximately 60,000 cubic yards of cut and fill,
after the mass grading of CT 00-02. The development would also include retaining walls, with a
maximum height of six feet. The project site would take access off of future College Boulevard
to the east and would generate 1,150 average daily traffic trips, which can be accommodated by
the collector street and the adjoining major arterial roadways of Carlsbad Village Drive and
College Boulevard. The project is required to comply with the City’s National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best
Management Practices, thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain
system.
Due to the project’s proximity to College Boulevard, the master plan required that a site-specific
noise study be conducted. The noise study indicates that noise attenuation walls are needed
along some of the project’s perimeter units facing southeast towards College Boulevard. These
walls would range in height up to 12 feet but in compliance with master plan criteria, no more
than six feet of exposed wall will be allowed (berming and landscaping will be required for the
balance of the noise attenuation barrier) and are incorporated into the project design.
Village X will also be the site of a future Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) pump
station. It will be located adjacent to College Boulevard on Lot 11 8 as shown on the tentative
map exhibits. The pump station will be approved and constructed via a future Conditional Use
Permit to be processed by CMWD.
The project is depicted on Exhibits “A” - “CCC” dated November 6, 2002. The Calavera Hills
Village X project is subject to the following regulations:
CT 01 -06/PUD 01-07 - C HILLS VILLAGE X 0
November 6,2002
Page 3
A. General Plan;
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 15Og-I));
C. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
D. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance);
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The Calavera Hills Village X project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of
the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the residential development are the Land Use,
Circulation, Noise, Housing, and Public Safety elements. Table 1 below indicates how the
project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan.
Element
Land Use
Circulation
Noise
Housing
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
Site is designated for medium
density (RM) residential
development.
Minimize the number of
access points to major and
prime arterials to enhance the
functioning of these streets
and thoroughfares.
Require that a noise study be
submitted with all residential
projects over five units. Enforce
the City policy that 60 dBA
CNEL is the maximum exterior
noise level for residential units.
New housing developed with
a diversity of types, prices,
tenures, densities, and
locations to meet the demand
of anticipated City growth.
Proposed Use and
Improvements
Proposed residential density of
4.6 dwelling units per acre is
below the 6.0 dwellings per
acre maximum allowed in the
RM designation.
The project has two points of
access off of College
Boulevard, in accordance with
Engineering standards.
The project includes a noise
study with recommendations to
reduce traffic noise ji-om
College Boulevard to 60 dBA
CNEL.
The project provides a mixture
of architectural styles; and the
single-family product type
contributes to the diversity of
housing within the City.
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
43
0 CT 01-06PUD 01 -07 - C HILLS VILLAGE X
November 6,2002
Pane 4
Element
Public
Safety
TABLE 1 - GENERA
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
~~ ~~
Provision of emergency water
systems and all-weather
access roads.
L PLAN COMPLIANCE
Proposed Use and Compliance Improvements
All necessary water mains, fire
hydrants, and appurtenances
must be installed prior to
occupancy of any unit and all-
weather access roads will be
maintained throughout
construction.
Yes
Given the above, the Calavera Hills Village X single-family project is consistent with the City’s
General Plan.
B. Calavera Hills Master Plan
The proposed 1 15-unit project is within Village X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan area and,
therefore, subject to the provisions of that master plan (MP 150(H)). Table 2 below summarizes
the project’s conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan.
TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
Standard
~
Allowed Uses:
Maximum of 1 17 detached
single-family residential units.
Setbacks: Per PD Ordinance
(40’ arterial setback involved)
Architectural Criteria
Specified in Master Plan
Building Height:
Maximum of 30 feet to the
peak of the roof.
Proposed I Conformance I
Proposed project is 11 5 detached
Compliance (40’ setback from
single-family residential units
Yes
College Boulevard provided) Yes
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
Compliance with elements of
architectural criteria; includes
architectural styles of: Mission,
Early California, Craftsman and
Monterey
Single-Story: 10 units
Reduced 2-Story: 20 units
Total: 1 15 units
Two-StOry: 85 units
Proposed highest structures
measure 25 feet in height, to the
roof peak.
0 0 CT 01-06PUD 01 -07 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
November 6,2002
Page 5
~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~
TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
Standard
Recreation Area:
Minimum of 100 square feet
per unit of common recreation
area (for 115 units, a minimum
of 11,500 square feet is
required).
Design Criteria:
Access via College Blvd.
A fence/trellis plan shall be
approved in conjunction with
the Planned Unit Development
permit.
Proposed
The two proposed recreation areas
contain a total of 13,490 square
feet of common recreation area.
The project proposes access off of
College Blvd
A fencehellis plan is provided on
Exhibits “R” - “T”.
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
The inclusionary affordable housing requirement for this village is being satisfied by the
development of Village Y and the Calavera Hills Affordable Housing Agreement.
Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the provisions of the
Calavera Hills Master Plan.
C. Subdivision Ordinance
Since the Calavera Hills Village X project involves a subdivision into 123 lots (1 15 of which are
residential lots), the proposal is subject to the regulations of Title 20, the Subdivision Ordinance.
Chapter 20.6 of the Subdivision Ordinance addresses the requirements for a major subdivision,
that being a subdivision that creates more than four parcels. These requirements deal mostly
with providing the drainage, sewerage, and circulation dedications and improvements needed to
serve the subdivision. There are also requirements concerning consistency with Title 21, the
Zoning Ordinance, which is addressed in the other sections of this staff report.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village X residential subdivision would provide all necessary
facilities prior to, or concurrent with, construction. The hydrology report, submitted by the
applicant, indicates that all runoff can be controlled on-site and conveyed into existing storm
drain facilities. The on-site sewer system would be connected with the existing system in
Carlsbad Village Drive. Water distribution would involve looped service from the existing lines
in College Boulevard. No standards variances are needed to approve the project. Given the
above, the subdivision provides all necessary facilities and improvements consistent with the
Subdivision Ordinance.
CT 0 1 -06PUD 0 1 -07 - C e AVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
November 6,2002
Pape 6
D. Planned Development Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Master Plan states that Village X shall develop in accordance with the
Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.45 of the Zoning Ordinance), except as modified
within the Master Plan. As indicated above, the Master Plan contains regulations governing
building setbacks, building separation, building height, and recreation areas. The Calavera
Master Plan area already has a recreational vehicle storage area (Village I - RV Storage) that
serves the entire master plan. Therefore, the proposed project is subject to the Planned
Development Ordinance standards regarding visitor parking, private streets and driveway, and
storage space. Table 3 below details the project’s conformance with these remaining
development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance.
I TABLE 3 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE 1
I Standard I I Visitor Parking: I For projects over 10 units, 5 spaces
for the first 10 units and 1 space per
every 4 units above 10 (for 1 15
units, a minimum of 32 spaces is
required).
Streets:
Minimum of 34 feet wide streets
fiom curb-to-curb with minimum 7-
foot wide parkways.
FStorage Space:
All units must contain a minimum
of 480 cubic yards of storage space.
I I
Proposed Conformance
I
The project provides 135 guest
parking spaces distributed
throughout the project site.
Yes
The proposed street measures
34 feet curb-to-curb and are
Yes
parkways.
adjacent to 7-foot wide
Each unit has a minimum of
480 cubic yards of storage
Yes
space via 2-car garages per unit
Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the applicable portions of
the Planned Development Ordinance.
E. Growth Management Ordinance
The Calavera Hills Village X project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management
Program, as contained in Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. As discussed above, the
proposed project density of 4.6 dwelling units per net developable acre is within the Growth
Management Control Point of 6.0 dwelling per acre for the Residential Medium density (RM)
General Plan designation. Table 4 below outlines the project’s conformance with the
requirements of the Growth Management Program.
CT 01-06IPUD 01-07 - C HILLS VILLAGE X 0.
November 6,2002
Page 7
I TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Standard I Impacts/Standards I Compliance I
City Administration I 426 sq. ft. I Yes I
Library
Yes 64 CFS Drainage
Yes .80 Parks
Yes 115 EDU Wastewater Treatment
Yes 227 sq. ft.
Circulation 1150 ADT Yes
Fire I Station #3 I Yes I
Open Space
Yes 115 EDU Sewer Collection System
Yes Carlsbad Unified Schools
Yes Satisfied through MP 150(H)
Water
~~ 1 25,300 GPD
~~ I Yes I
The project is below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance
F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7
The project site lies within LFMP Zone 7. There are no special conditions or requirements
within the Zone 7 LFMP that apply to this residential project. The project is conditioned to pay
the appropriate public facilities fee, water and sewer connection fees, and traffic impact fees.
The project site is located within a Mello Roos District that covers their proportionate obligation
for school fees. All facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in
place prior to, or concurrent with, development. The Zone 7 LFMP requires the completion of a
connection between College Boulevard and El Camino Real prior to building permit issuance
beyond 2,500 ADT. Therefore, the Calavera Hills Village X residential development is
consistent with the LFMP Zone 7.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The potential environmental impacts associated with the construction of Village X were
reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase I1 Master Plan
Amendment (EIR 98-02, certified January 15, 2002). Village X was analyzed with up to 117
single-family units. Mitigation affecting this village centers on monitoring during the Master
Plan’s mass grading (approved via CT 00-02). In addition, a revised noise study for Village X
was required to determine the heights and locations of noise walls.
The proposed Calavera Hills Village X project, as designed and conditioned, would not create
any significant adverse environmental impact than previously identified and addressed in EIR
98-02. The project is consistent with the applicable regulations; will be graded in accordance
with the City’s Grading Ordinance and City Standards; will comply with the City’s National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit; will provide all facilities necessary to serve the
CT 01 -06PUD 01 -07 - C HILLS VILLAGE X 0
November 6,2002
Page 8
development prior to, or concurrent with, construction; and will provide noise attenuation walls
along the College Boulevard per the revised noise study as required by EIR 98-02, and is
consistent with EIR 98-02.
Given this environmental analysis, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on
September 26, 2002. No public comments were received during the 20-day public review
period.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5307 (Neg Dec)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5308 (CT)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5309 (PUD)
Location Map
Disclosure Statement
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Background Data Sheet
Reduced Exhibits
Exhibits “A” - “CCC”, dated November. 6,2002.
EM: m:mh
c ity of Carlsbad.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications \vhich \vi11 require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Cornminee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application subminal. Your prqjecl C~IIOI
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual. h, co-partnership, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and counv. city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propeny owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnersllio. include the
names. title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corooration. include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessav$
Person a California limited Corp/Part
Title
Address National citv. CA 91950 Address
. INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-
lavera Hills 11, LLC,
liability company Title 2727 Hoover Avenue
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (;.e,
partnership. tenants in common, non-profit. corporation, etc.). If the ownership ‘includes a
corooration or oartnershio, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned corooration. include the names. titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
.Person McMillin Coypanles .. LLc 0 /Part . Tamarack Properties, Inc. d U~LUWC~L~: LLILULC~ Ilabil=fp a California corporation
Title company Title C/O RrePlrl H- 2727 Hoover Avenue Address Nntinnal ritv. +. (‘A 91950 Address ]Size. 200
49 2075 Las Palmas Ur. Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @
3. NOIV-PROFIT OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit oreanization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profinrust N/A Non Profiflrust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit). staff.
Boards. Commissions. Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (1 2) months? 0 Yes HNo If yes. please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
%nature of applican$ate S ignature of ownergate %nature of applican$ate
Qat4 47Llft'CL Am&&(
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98
0 CITY OF CAIUSBAD 0
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: CT 01-06/PUD 01-07 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X -
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: RM
ZONING: PC - Calavera Hills Master Plan
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Calavera Hills I1 L.L.C.
ADDRESS: 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City. CA
PHONE NO.: f619) 336-3138 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 167-101-28,168-041-03/06/07/10
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU):
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 2004
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 426
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 227
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 115 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = .80
Drainage: Demand in CFS = 64
Identify Drainage Basin = Buena Vista
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 1150
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 3
Open Space: Acreage Provided = Per MP 150(A)
Schools: Carlsbad Unified
Elementary: 30 Middle: 8.2 High: 15.6
Sewer: Demands in EDU 115
Identify Sub Basin = SAH
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 25,300
The project is 1.0 units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
0 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET 0.
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
APPLICANT:
CT 01-06PUD 01-07
CALAVERA HILLS - VILLAGE X
MCMILLIN COMPANIES
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 1 15 single-family homes in Village X
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map 823, filed in the
Office of the San Diego County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad
Tract No. 00-02
APN: 167-101-28, 168-041-03/06/07/10 Acres: 25.1 net Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 115 units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RM
Density Allowed: 4-8 Density Proposed: 4.6
Existing Zone: PC Proposed Zone: PC
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning
Site PC
General Plan
RM
North PC RH
south PC RLM
East PC Major Arterial
West PC RLM/os
Current Land Use
Vacant
Village Y affordable site
Robertson Ranch -
fbture master plan site
College Blvd.
Village A / open space
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 115
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued September 26.2002
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated .
53
a P
c h
6
a P
i E
E
5
3-7
3
J
I
3
b ZI
I
I
li
8 Q
I
Q
I
I
L
73
I
Q
I
U E
97
‘b Iu
I
H x
P 0 I
m 0
.h
I
0
E
e
0 F
0
I F-I
3 PI
.e \o 0 I F-I 0
E
.. . - . . . . .. .
J
.h s F4 0
83
F 0 I
\o 0
.n
I
M 0
c
0
n
F4 0
8
cl 3 k
3 ? r( 0 6
H 0
\D 0
.C)
I
4 0
... . . .. ... . .
L
+ p. Au
+ ""~""""""""" L- I I I
I I
I I I
t I
l- I
t
d
- _. . . .., . . ."
0
r
0
89
.n
? d 0
b
E
E
m
E
1
E
b 0 I
e- 0
4
I
0
n
rl 0
?
f2 3 k
6
0 0
i
f CI 1 hu
r----
93
0 l?
I
.h \9 0 I e 0
0
0
M- I-: 2 -17 I
k -M
r"""""""""""""""""-
u 0
.n
I 4 0
I
F 0 I
d 0
0 1 8 1 1
E
- "
1
99
+ 0
0
b
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
- E
ii
99
'F t
-'! ""~""""""""""""-
F I
I
I H N
I I
f
. . ... .. . /a
3 “A I I 11 7
k
4 0
C
1 k i
. . ..
t- 9 4 0
PC
Q 0
.h
I 4 0
I
E
mn
\L
IL
d 0 E
m m
m
lo4
.. .. ... . "
I
a
. .. . .. . . . ..
I
.
I
Planning Commission Minutes
6. CT Ol-OG/PUD 01-07 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X - Request for approval of a Negative
Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision
and construction of a 115 unit single family development within Village X of the Calavera Hills
Master Plan, on property generally located on the west side of future College Boulevard, in Local
Facilities Management Zone 7.
Mr. Wayne introduced Item 6 and stated that the presentation would be made by Eric Munoz, assisted by
Bob Wojcik. He said the Commission’s action is advisory and would be forwarded to the City Council.
Chairperson Trigas opened the public hearing.
Eric Munoz, Senior Planner, stated that the Planned Development and Tentative Tract Map for Village X is
compliant with the Master Plan. Development of up to 117 single-family homes is allowed by the Master
Plan and 11 5 are proposed. They are providing general plan open space in the western part of the Village.
The affordable housing requirement is being satisfied in Village Y, approved earlier this year. Mr. Munoz
said that Lot 118 is being set aside and dedicated to the City of Carlsbad Water District to be used as a
reclaimed water pump station. The development of it will be by separate permit by the City of Carlsbad
through a Conditional Use Permit. All units in Village X will be notified that Lot 118 will be used for a water
pump station.
Mr. Munoz stated that an Errata Sheet was generated because the school children generation numbers
were incorrect in the Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form. He clarified that the Staff Report
references square footages for the plan types proposed and the square footages include the garage
space. Garages are itemized separate from the balance of the living area on the floor plans, but the Staff
Report gave a combined total.
Commissioner Baker wanted to know the purpose of the cul-de-sac where there are no houses. Mr. Munoz replied that the cul-de-sac goes into an adjacent planning area, the southwest corner of Village Y,
and serves as an emergency access for that project and connects internally to that project. Mr. Wojcik
added that the connection would be used for emergency access only; the streets won’t be connected and
open for normal vehicular traffic between the two villages.
Commissioner Baker asked if there were any issues regarding children using the access. Mr. Wojcik said
it doesn’t prohibit pedestrian use; the gate is there to prevent vehicular use. Bicycles and pedestrians
could go around the gate.
Commissioner Baker asked about the height of the chimneys on the modified single-story and indicated
they look like smokestacks. Mr. Munoz said the applicant would address that.
Brian Milich, Corky McMillin Companies, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City 91950, thanked Eric Munoz
and Frank Jimeno for their effort on the project. He said the homes are similar in terms of square footage
and floor plans to what was seen before and they have introduced some different styles to make sure
they’re compliant with the master plan requirements relating to architectural standards and guidelines. He
said they’re agreeable to a similar condition to address the rear elevation issue as was done on Village K
and L-2. Mr. Milich said the chimneys are per code; it requires a two-foot chimney above the nearest roof
elevation within ten feet and above that are the spark arresters. He said the chimneys are attached to the
second story feature.
Commissioner Dominguez wanted to clarify that there are no embellishments in the chimneys; they just
meet the minimum. Mr. Milich confirmed that was correct.
Chairperson Trigas asked if there were going to be more variations in color. Mr. Milich said they have
color boards that have a number of different variations to the style, and believed there were 9 different
color schemes. He said they try to keep the colors traditional to the architectural styles, but there are
subtle differences in terms of trim, garage door and front door treatments, and roof tiles.
Commissioner Dominguez suggested that they do the same for the rear elevations as they did for the last project since Mr. Milich offered to add the trim.
Planning Commission Minutes November 6,2002 Page 7
Commissioner Baker asked if they identified the units that back up along College that they would want to
apply the enhancements to. Mr. Munoz said they’re flexible and can concur with the desire of the
Commission. He said they could word a condition to say “enhanced architectural elevations to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director shall be approved with building permit for the rear elevations of lots
that face College Boulevard and the project‘s entry.”
Commissioner White stated for the record that she thinks every house should have rear elevation
enhancements, not just the ones that face the street.
Chairperson Trigas agreed with Commissioner White and asked Mr. Milich for his opinion. Mr. Milich said
he has mixed feelings but would have no objection if that‘s what the Commission desires. He said, for the
most part, people don’t really focus on rear elevations. He added that they have been faced with this
issue before where certain areas needed architectural enhancements but he said they have no problem doing it for all the units.
Commissioner Baker asked if the architectural enhancements impact the final price of the house. Mr.
Milich said it most likely would not, unless they would be adding things such as balconies.
Chairperson Trigas opened public testimony.
Anita Cancelleri, 3718 Saddle Drive, Carlsbad 92008, stated she lives in the Capistrano project of
Calavera Hills and wanted to know if the pool in Village X would be specifically for that village or for all
residents of the Calavera Hills master community.
Bud Green, 2965 Lancaster Road, Carlsbad, said they live on a nearby street with respect to the two
village sites discussed and wanted to know if the City required the developer to brush the areas away from the existing homes so the critters don’t come towards their homes. He also asked if it’s standard practice
to water down the area prior to doing so.
Barry Whittle, 3737 Saddle Drive, Carlsbad, asked if the neighborhoods had been made aware of what the
impact is going to be on their local schools when these two developments are developed. He also wanted
to know what the proposal is for the speed limit on College by the school and the hours.
Chairperson Trigas closed public testimony.
Mr. Wojcik stated that it is standard practice to water down the sites or use any other means of controlling
dust during grading operations. That‘s something the Public Works Inspector looks for and lets the
contractor know at the pre-construction meeting that’s one of the standard things expected of him.
Regarding the speed limit on College, Mr. Wojcik said the design speed for College is 50 mph. In order to
set a speed limit that is enforceable by radar, an engineering study has to be done which includes
measuring the speed of cars once the road is opened, proximity to schools, number of pedestrians, etc.
Once the speed study is done, it would be brought forward to establish the legal speed limit for that area.
Right now it wouldn’t be faster than 50 mph but what the actual speed limit will be set at will be determined
with the traffic study.
Commissioner Baker asked him to address the school zone. Mr. Wojcik said that is included in the traffic
study, so it‘s part of the standards. If the school fronts on the street and the CalTrans standards are used,
it will have a 20 mph school zone. The Traffic Engineering Division goes strictly by the CalTrans
regulations. They would make that recommendation to City Council and City Council would have the final
say on what the speed limit would be. The hours would also be addressed in the traffic study and the
wording on the signs is governed by CalTrans.
Mr. Wojcik said the brush clearance of the subdivision is one of the things they could pass on to the inspector when they have the pre-construction meeting and ask that they grade from the open space area
towards College. Mr. Munoz clarified that if the area is in a preserved or natural open space area there
may be more limitations on what can be done. Mr. Milich stated they are already conditioned in the Master
Tentative Map to clear away from the homes. He said they will also be installing a silt fence along the
perimeters of the projects that will help keep most if not all the critters from going into the residential
areas.
Planning Commission Minutes November 6,2002 Page 8
In response to the question on the pool, Mr. Milich stated that Calavera Hills Phase II is a separate
homeowners association. Only the homeowners who will be living in Villages K, L-2, W, and X will have
access to those facilities because that homeowners association will be maintaining them separate from
the facilities already built and being used by the Calavera Hills Phase I homeowners associations.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Baker and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5307, recommending
adopting of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5308 and 5309 recommending approval of
Tentative Tract Map CT 01-06 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01-07,
including the Errata Sheet concerning school children and also the added
condition to include architectural rear enhancements on all units in Village X,
based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner White said she appreciates the developer’s sensibility about the rear elevations and would
support the project, but brought up the subject of variation between villages in a master planned
community. She said she recognizes that each master planned community has its own character that
sets it apart from other communities within Carlsbad and that their plans are in compliance with the master
plan for Phase It, however, she feels that using the same four floor plans with six styles throughout all these single-family villages in a master planned community doesn’t give enough variety of aesthetic style.
She said she would appreciate more variation in floor plans and elevations in future communities.
Chairperson Trigas supported Commissioner White’s comments and said she also hopes that there will
be more variation in the future.
Commissioner Heineman seconded the idea and said cookie cutter houses don’t speak well of Carlsbad
and hopes that in the future anyone bringing projects before them will keep that in mind.
VOTE: 6-0-0
AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 4% 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the
above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of
the printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizcn and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the County of San Diego,
that the notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof
on the following dates, to-wit:
NOVERBER 26,2002
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS 9- California
this 27 TH day
of NOVERBER, 2002
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Thetimewithinwhich ou mav iudiaallv challed the
described in this notice orih
CASE FILE @ ZZiTLE:ZVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
PUBLISH. TUESDAY,
ITY OF CARLSBAD CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X NovEMBER26,m
CT OI-06PUD 01-07 & couNaL
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, December 17, 2002 to
consider a request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit
Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of a 115 unit single family
development within Village X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located
on the west side of future College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more
particularly described as:
Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the San Diego County
Recorder on November 6, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad
Tract No. 00-02
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 13, 2002. If you
have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608.
The time within which you may judicially challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map, and/or Planned Unit Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or
city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map, and/or Planned Unit Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk’s Office, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01 -O6/PUD 01 -07
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
PUBLISH: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26,2002
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
/ SITE
CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
CT 01 -06/PU.D 01 -07
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, December 17, 2002 to
consider a request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit
Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of a 115 unit single family
development within Village X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located
on the west side of future College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more
particularly described as:
Portion of Lots “D” and “J” of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the San Diego County
Recorder on November 6, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad
Tract No. 00-02
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after December 13, 2002. If you
have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608.
The time within which you may judicially challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map, and/or Planned Unit Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or
city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract
Map, and/or Planned Unit Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk’s Office, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 01 -O6/PUD 01-07
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
PUBLISH: MlQIWAY, NOVEMBER 25,2002
TUGDRY 96
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, [DATE], to consider a
request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit
to allow the subdivision and construction of a 115 unit single family development within Village
X of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located on the west side of future
College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as:
Portion of Lots "D" and "J" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map 823, filed in the Office of the San Diego County
Recorder on November 6, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad
Tract No. 00-02
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after [DATE]. If you have any
questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608. ( MG DEL The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative fract Map, an d/F lanned Unit
Development Permit, if approved, is established by t te law and/or city ordinance, and is very
short. If you challenge Tract Map, an JYr anned Unit Development Permit in court,
you may be limited to those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, at
or prio; to the public hearing\
CASE FILE: CT 01 -O6/PUD 01 -07
My=' I
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE X
PUBLISH: [DATE]
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 516@
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST CITY OF ENCINITAS
801 PINE AVE 505 S VULCAN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008 ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF OCEANSIDE CITY OF VISTA
300 NORTH COAST HWY PO BOX 1988
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE STE 100
SAN DIEGO CA 92123 9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
PAUL KLUKAS
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE PLANNING SYSTEMS
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD STE 100
CARLSBAD CA 92009 1530 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
SERVICES DEPT
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
ERIC MUNOZ
11/18/2002
AVERYm Address Labels Laser 5 160@
DOROTHEA L CLARKE
2945 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
EiTGENE S FORSYTH
2939 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
BROWN & JOHN SILVIA
2931 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
JAMES J STEPAN
3080 MAQUA CT
CARMEL IN 46033-4134
ZC)BERT L STAKES
2915 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
RUTH E DAY
2 909 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
JOHN K & SUSAN HUMPHREY
2932 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
ti!DRE 0 CHMIELEWSKI
2967 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
JULIE A SEVERINO
2959 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
-
NILA DAWSON
2953 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
WALTER W & LORRI HAYS WILLIAM H STROUP
3943 LANCASTER RD 2 941 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
RALPH A BELLERUE LORI S BARTLETT
2935 LANCASTER RD 2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
BARBARA S GWINN S BERTRAM
2045 JANET CIR 2 925 LANCASTER RD
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-6120 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
SEAMANS FLOYD D & MARY HENRY
2921 LANCASTER RD 2 919 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
GORDON M FRENCH CRAIG J & JILL ANDERSON
2913 LANCASTER RD 2 911 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568
STEPHEN J SEGRO DOYE & LELAH LESTER
2 928 LANCASTER RD 9012 SAINT JEAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6568 BAKERSFIELD C 93312-4337
THE CAPE AT CALAVERA HI THOMAS P PERFETTO
6992 EL CAMINO REAL 105 2969 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92009-4145 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
ALFRED0 D DONOVAN RESIDUAL T LALLO
2965 LEXINGTON CIR 2963 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
MICHAEL D ADAMS JOHN BORG
2957 LEXINGTON CIR 1058 GINGER GLN
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 SAN MARCOS CA 92069-4903
EVELYN L SAMMON GARY M WILLIAMS
2949 LEXINGTON CIR 2947 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
CAVID N ANDERSON
2945 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564
LAWRENCE FARHAT
1528 VISTA CLUB CIR 303
SANTA CLARA C 95054-3755
-
DAVID L & DAWN TACKER
2990 LEXINGTON CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
J'3SEPH D & KRISTI PAYNE
681748 LAIE ST WAIKOLOA HI 96738-5122
MARY DEMEO
1330 OAK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1931
RANDOLPH C ADAMS
2977 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
P.SBERT P & TAMARA IRWIN
SAN DIEGO CA 92124-3006
io988 BAROQUE LN
STEPHANIE A GROSS
2993 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
THOMAS A MAYER
2952 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
I.7bLIE A RICHTER
2958 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD'CA 92008-6569
ANDREAS KALLINIKOS PATRICIA J BROWN
2943 LEXINGTON CIR 2998 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6564 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
JEFFREY HOYDAL ROBERT N BROUGHTON
2994 LEXINGTON CIR 2992 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
-
DAVID A PLOESER DAVID M & PAULA LEMKUIL
2988 LEXINGTON CIR 2986 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
SHARON M LUTHER DAVID G THOMPSON
19524 REDWOOD GLN 2980 LEXINGTON CIR
CASTRO VALLEY 94546-3518 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
ALEXANDRIA BRAVA MAULTSBY
2976 LEXINGTON CIR PO BOX 70
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CASHIERS NC 28717-0070
SANDRA R TOLLACK PETER J BURINSKAS
2979 LEXINGTON CIR 2981 LEXINGTON CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565
WADDY E STEPHENSON ERNEST C ALCANTARA
2985 LEXINGTON CIR 1020 S DITMAR ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 OCEANSIDE CA 92054-5007
MARNI L WALKER GILBERT
2995 LEXINGTON CIR 3465 CHARTER OAK DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6565 CARLSBAD CA 92008-2008
JOHN C SPERO ANN B HARRISON
2954 LANCASTER RD 2956 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
SANDRA K STAMPER CLYDE E & LINDA HORNER
2 962 LANCASTER RD 2964 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
STEPHEN A BELGUM
16002 FANTASIA LN
HUNTINGTON BE 92649-2206
GILBERT LAURENCE
2972 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6570
Er3NNARD M KOUNS
1340 LAS FLORES DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1031
SHAHRYAR ROKNI
2955 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
GLORIA L TOTH
4652 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
J.I)HN A & LISA ERBACHER
4658 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
PRESCOTT ROBERT B EST 0
4749 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534
E T & JANICE FLAGG
1777 YUCCA RD OCEANSIDE CA 92054-6156
Q-4.ULY
1516 OLD CREEK CT CARDIFF BY TH 92007-1145
* MURPHY MARJORIE 0
4651 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
OLIVER J BLOCK
2968 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6570
NAUM & NAUHADE DAOU
2967 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
KATHLEEN 'M CHANDLER
2 700 GREEN OAK CT
LEWISVILLE TX 75077-8661
EARL s PICKELL
4648 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
RICHARD HOPPE
4654 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
LEWIS C LAFFEY
4662 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
TERRILL L & HOLLY HART
2740 AUBURN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2170
YOUNGJA P CHUN
320 W HAWTHORNE CT
LAKE BLUFF IL 60044-2309
ADELLA VINCENT
4657 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
CALAVERA HILLS I1 LLC
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625
ENGLESON
3502 CELINDA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2768
EARL V GREEN
2965 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
-
KIM STEIER
2 957 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6569
LEONARD J SAVALLO
4650 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
-
JAY L & LINDA TANK
4656 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
ROMEO & MARISA APOSTOL
4664 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
"
CAROLINE T PRESCOTT
2727 ROOSEVELT ST B
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1617
HASAM M SULEMAN
4661 WOODSTOCK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
THEODORE A WHEELER
4653 WOODSTOCK ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6571
COLONY AT' CALAVERA HILL
9373 MIRA MESA BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92126-4816
STEVE & JEAN BROWN
'l.72 2 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
GREGORY C & JILL AGOSTI
412 WILLOWGROVE AVE
GLENDORA CA 91741-2980
-
ASHOK & ANITA BHARDWAJ
4740 INVERNESS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6501
JOHN & JEANNE SANDERS
4/46 INVERNESS CT
\.IARLSBAD CA 92008-6501
OKEEFE
4737 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6533
CHARLIE S & NANCY CATES
4725 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6533
KENT R PATERSON
4' 749 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534
RALPH A PORTER
4769 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-6507
4774 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD'CA 92008-6577
CAPE AT CALAVERA HILLS
3900 HARNEY ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825
STANLEY & MARY MAZYCK
4726 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
MCCAIN
4734 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
JAMES & HAZEL WHITTAKER
4742 INVERNESS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6501
-
RANDOLPH S VORHIS
4720 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
EMMA L SCOTT
4728 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
MELVYN W & KAREN TAYLOR
4738 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6502
DONALD P MILLER
4744 INVERNESS CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6501
CAMINER TR FRED R & IRENE REALE
4748 INVERNESS CT 2766 INVERNESS DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6501 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6522
JOHN H DEEGAN
4733 EDINBURGH DR 4729 EDINBURGH DR
" DAVID R BEITH
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6533 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6533
AMANDA J SHAFFER R K & JANE DROST
4721 EDINBURGH DR 4747 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6533 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534
WAYNE P MURRAY BRITTON B GARRETT
4751 EDINBURGH DR 4753 EDINBURGH DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6534
ARTHUR G & BARBARA WOOD CONDIT
4770 BROOKWOOD CT 4772 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
ATTILA H & PATTI FELSEN HAROLD T & SUSAN HARRIS
2612 LA COSTA AVE 4778 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009-7324 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
TIMOTHY D TRABER
4780 BROOKWOOD CT
CZRLSBAD CA 92008-6577
FRANK & JOANNE VOLPE
4777 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
LOUISE T BARCLAY
4771 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
RONALD A & EMMA GOODWIN
4772 GATESHEAD RD
C";RLSBAD CA 92008-6578
TR PRIORE
4780 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6578
WILDERS FAMILY
4803 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
DAVID E BUTTERFIELD
4797 GATESHEAD RD
L^iRLSBAD CA 92008-6580
TR WILLIAMSON
4791 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
MICHAEL A GUNZELMAN
4785 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6579
DENNI SON
4777 GATESHEAD RD
C: iRLSBAD CA 92008-6579
HELM1 ABU HAMID SCOTT A MILLER
4781 BROOKWOOD CT 4779 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
MEYER TR MARY B CASEMENT
4775 BROOKWOOD CT 4773 BROOKWOOD CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6577
ROBERT P VIRGADAMO GARY PHILLIPS
4768 GATESHEAD RD 4770 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6578 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6578
DANIEL P OBRIEN JAMES W WESSELL
4655 COUNTRY VALE CT 20750 VENTURA BLVD 140
ANNANDALE VA 22003-4524 WOODLAND HILL 91364-6202
KEVIN J ANDERSON JILL S GONGOLA
4782 GATESHEAD RD 4805 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6578 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
DAVID & FIONA ROUSE THEODORE E GALLUP
4801 GATESHEAD RD 4799 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
HARVEY J SCHROEDER EVANGELINE E ALMANZA
4795 GATESHEAD RD 4793 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
CHRIS TAMMARIELLO MARILYN A DAY
4789 GATESHEAD RD 4787 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6580
CRAIG J & ROSE MOHNACKY THOMAS A & CAROL KING
4783 GATESHEAD RD 4781 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6579 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6579
JOHN LUITGAARDEN JAMES MASAMOTO
4775 GATESHEAD RD 4773 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6579 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6579
SB & A DECTOR COLONY AT CALAVERA HILL
23622 CALABASAS RD 333 251 N EL CAMINO REAL
CALABASAS CA 9 13 0 2 - 1'5 94 ENCINITAS CA 92024-2808
GARY A FOX DAVID A & JUNE DUET
4760 ABERDEEN CT 8130 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR C
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6505 PLEASANTON CA 94588-4752
ROBERT L SHEPPARD THOMAS F BLAYLOCK
4754 ABERDEEN CT 4752 ABERDEEN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008-6505 CARLSBAD CA 92008-6505
COLONY AT CALAVERA HILL
251 N EL CAMINO REAL
ENCINITAS CA 92024-2808
ERICH M & ERIKA SCHAAF
4756 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6505
TARUT TR
4750 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6505
.I .
.*** 159 Printed ***
Calavera Hills – Village XCT 01-06/PUD 01-07
Village X – Calavera Hills• Calavera Hills Phase II development.• Consistent w/Calavera Hills Master Plan Amendment (MP 150-H).• City Council approved MP 150-H on January 15, 2002.• Village X designated for Single-Family Development within Master Plan.
Village X – Calavera Hills• Master Plan allows up to 117 SF units• 115 SF units are proposed• Complies w/MP Development Standards• Complies w/MP Arch/Design Criteria• Affordable Housing compliance - Village Y• 2 Recreation Lots (passive + active w/pool)• CMWD lot/pump station via Future CUP