Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-01-14; City Council; 17037; Report On City Investments As Of November 30, 2002CITY OF CARLSBAD -AGENDA BILL AB# 17,037 MTG. 1-14-03 TITLE: - REPORT ON CITY INVESTMENTS AS OF November 30,2002 DEPT. TRS RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept and file report. ITEM EXPLANATION: The City’s Investment Policy requires the City Treasurer to report to the City Council on a monthly basis the status of the City’s pooled investment porlfolio. A quarterly report is also required for the investments of bond proceeds held separately. The City’s pooled investment portfolio as of the month ended November 30,2002 is summarized below. I Pooled Investment Portfolio (Cash and Securities) 1 Current Month Prior Month Par Value Cost of Investments 388,597,190 389,012,033 400,361,816 399,695,726 Market Value (2) 390,182,339 391,047,587 Amortized Cost (1) 389,910,100 390,584,975 (1) The cost of investments adjusted for amortized premiums and discounts. (2) The amount at which the investments could be sold. Source of market values is Union Bank of California’s custodial report as of 11/30/02. The equity portion of the various funds at the amortized value of the total portfolio is summarized below: a Fund equity balances are restricted for various purposes as listed above. See Exhibit 7 for a more detailed breakdown. 4 3 5 3 > 3 PAGE TWO OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,037 Pooled Investment Interest Income Current Prior Current Month Month FYTD Month FYTD Income Cash Income Fiscal Year-to-Date * 1,540,568 7,024,926 8,565,494 *The cash income received is adjusted for any accrued interest purchased. Pooled Investment PerformancelMeasurement Average Life (Years) Modified Duration Average Yield September 2002 1.830 4.69% 2.04 I I I October 2002 1.824 4.60% 2.03 I I I November 2002 1.719 4.36% 1.90 All pooled investments have been made in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy adopted January 2, 1985 and last revised January 8, 2002. All investments were initially made in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy. Events subsequent to the purchase might have typically a change in the City’s Investment Policy, a change in the credit rating subsequent to a resulted in some investments not being in compliance with the current policy. These events are purchase, or a temporary reduction in total portfolio assets. See Exhibit 8 for details. The City’s Investment Policy requires that modified duration not exceed 1.8. New computer software has been adopted that calculates modified duration in a different way, causing modified duration to be higher than previously calculated. It is the opinion of the City Treasurer that the modified duration now reported is a better indication of the portfolio’s maximum exposure to interest rate changes. A change to the maximum modified duration allowed in the City’s Investment Policy will be recommended in the next annual review, scheduled in January 2003. This will not reflect any divergence from other requirements of the Investment Policy The pooled investment portfolio has the ability to meet the City’s cash flow demands for the next six (6) months. EXHIBITS FOR POOLED INVESTMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Investment Portfolio Breakdown By Amortized Cost, Market Value, Cash Income, and Average Yield Investment Portfolio Breakdown Of Maturities Yield Comparison Graph Cumulative Cash Income Graph Second Quarter Transactions Detailed Investment Report Fund Equity in Pooled Investments Corporate Note and Commercial Paper Ratings Percentage Weightings By Corporate Note Issuer EXHIBIT 1 Q 5: ii 3 EXHIBIT 2 h v N s 8 s 8 s v! U s 2 N s- 8 0 0 0 0 0 I c VI 0; m vi c 2 m 0 0. % m 0 0 M" 8 vi 0 s 0 - 10 N m w t- 0 m- 0 0 0 0 m VI h v s 2 W 0 0 0 0 P VI - 0" m U m m '4 2 .- 0 0 U 0 vi "" " " -N z 0 r ! 0 u E 1 i c EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 I . . . 4 000 Nr 0 EXHIBIT 5 0 0 R w u k .. 0 0 N a. W z 3 a 0 5 l- q 22 uuu00u0uu aaazz4zaa zzz z 000 0 222 uuuuuuu aaaaaaa zz 00 EXHIBIT 6 m Y Y 0 I LL 3 o 0 s a o : Y I Y m K F h 0 r N '0 I- 0 a L 3 v) xn I-0 x 0 0 4 *. m E z 0000000 EXHIBIT 7 Fund Equity in Pooled Investments AS OF NOVEMBER 30,2002 Cash Balance by Fund: General Special Revenue Debt Service Capital Projects: General Capital Construction Traffic Impact Fees Public Facilities Fees Park Development Transnet Taxes Drainage Fees Special Districts Infrastructure Replacement Other Capital Construction Enterprise: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Sewer Fund Solid Waste Golf Course Total Total Internal Service Redevelopment Funds (1) Agency Funds Misc. Special Funds Total General Ledger Balance ** Reconciling Adjustments (2) Total Treasurer's Investment Portfolio at Amortized Cost 75,253.872 25,485,236 1,918,079 11,824,801 6,437,250 31,282,951 7,466,341 7,622,178 7,502,339 60,697,828 11,639,937 2,430,003 146,903,629 52,008,362 59,105,585 4.238.788 2,588,228 117,940,963 14,398,962 0 10,918,789 0 392,819,529 (1,771,943) 391,047,587 (1) Redevelopment Fund Balances are interspersed throughout all funds. (2) The Reconciling Adjustments consist of differences between the General Ledger which is prepared on an accrual basis and the Treasurer's report which is prepared on the cash basis. Accrued Interest. amortized premium or discounts and outstanding checks and deposits in transit are not included in the Treasurer's summary. Differences between the time journal entries are posted and the time this report is produced may also be a component of the adjustment. ** Figures based on best estimate at the time report run on 12/06/02 EXHIBIT 8 CITY OF CARLSBAD INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AS OF NOVEMBER 30,2002 CORPORATE NOTE AND COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS Corporate Note Investments Meeting the Current Investment Policy: (Ratings must be AA or better by both Moody's and S&P) ALLSTATE FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES CORP ClTiGROUP COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO CREDIT SUE DEAN WITTER DISCV GENERAL ELECTRIC EASTERNENERGY JERSEY CENT PaL MERRILL LYNCH MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER NORTHERN ILL GAS OHIO BELL TEL PACIFIC BELL PITNEY BOWES INC SBC COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY CAPITAL - GE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TEL SOUTHWESTERN BELL Moodv's - S&P AA2 AA+ AA1 AA- AA1 AA- AAI AA- AA3 AA3 AA- AA- AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AA3 AA- AA3 AA- AA1 AA AA2 AA- AA3 AA- AA3 AA3 AA- AA AAA PA3 AAA AA2 AA- AA- Commercial Paper Investments Meeting the Current Investment Policy: (Ratings must be AI/PI or better by both Moody's and S&P) (Ratings of other debt must be AA or better by Moodvs or S&P) NONE Investments with Subsequent Changes in Credit Rating * Moodv's Latest Carrying Market - S&P MaturitvDate Purchased Value ABN AMRO BANK AI A+ 05/31/05 AA3/AA- 4,163,453 4,438.938 CAMPBELL SOUP CO A3 A 10/01/03 AA3/AA- 1,971,432 2,045.680 WACHOVIA CORP A1 A 07/15/05 AA3/AA- 4,014,660 4,349,720 * The City's Investment Policy allows the City Treasurer to determine the wurse of action that would Correct exceptions to the policy. All of these investments are paying interest at the required times. The principal of all investments are considered secure. It is the intent of the City Treasurer to hold these assets in the portfolio until maturity unless events indicate they should be sold. EXHIBIT 9 CITY OF CARLSBAD INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AS OF NOVEMBER 30,2002 PERCENTAGE WElGHTlNGS BY CORPORATE NOTE lSSUER ABN AMRO BANK ALLSTATE FINANCIAL CAMPBELL SOUP GO ClTlGROUP / ASSOCIATES CORP COMM CREDIT CREDIT SUlS EASTERN ENERGY GENERAL ELECTRIC CAP / SECURITY CAPITAL JERSEYCENTP&L MERRILL LYNCH MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER I DEAN WITTER DISCV NORTHERN ILL GAS OHIO BELL TEL PACIFIC BELL PITNEY BOWES INC SBC COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TEL SOUTHWESTERN BELL WACHOVIA CORP Total Portfolio * No more than 5% may be invested with a single issue. Investment Cost 4,228,884.98 8,020,253.19 1,868,682.02 16,793,793.13 7,474,695.94 4,270,881.12 2,199,911.90 14,441,31955 Percent of Portfolio' 1.08% 2.05% 0.48% 4.30% 1.91% 1.09% 0.56% 3.70% 2,974,560.00 0.76% 6,145,447.87 1.57% 18,739,685.00 4.80% 715,349.40 1,947,308.26 7,593,579.83 1,919,298.74 4,058,275.56 1,113,832.90 2,097,205.18 4,023,404.94 0.18% 0.50% 1.94% 0.49% 1.04% 0.29% 0.54% 1.03% $390,584,974.75