HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-08-19; City Council; 17293 Exhibit; AT&T Wireless CUP 03-22CHRISTOPHER ROWAN, 3213 FOSCA STREET, SUBMIITED
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS TO DISAPPROVE CUP 03-22 AT&T
WIRELESS AT THE SEPTEMBER 9,2003 COUNCIL MEETING
(AB 17,293 - ITEM NO. 8)
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
&QLsm & hS#?S-/:
City Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Ad
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7-743 Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
pror>ertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
c
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above ground A
q-l-oy
Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blieht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
A I q/k/43
Signature Date
)-I .-3i=#KW I
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a’ resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
on on the above grounds.
9/pb 3
date
Name(pnnt)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
g-a-03
Date
Emmy r/l RR Lo:
Namebrint)
ekbLs ~,+b
City
72ya CWpA (3
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
imrncdiate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
we3
Signature Date
Ric/~rd hvbwr
Namebrint)
City V Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Date
....
Name(urint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please rehun to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propew values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
ingtalled in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight.
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
,..;=' ..--
Signature n Dke
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
W Signature I Date
Address City J
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Sidature /LA?- \ Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application
I \ d3d3
Signature Date
&35&5 p GflDE-l c
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
on the above grounds.
9/6 /03
Date ‘
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9-6-07
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
ation on the above grounds.
9 (2/*3
Date
Cwls bctd
City
ILI\J Xer~ Shk
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Narnebrint )
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise Dollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
8-30 -03 k00" Signature Date 77ZK AS OC B cJdL<
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
&- T/a/c73
Signature I Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise Pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
f ‘r&zZ?i-c 8
Signature ’ Dad
MrPhikipCe
3323 Farco St carkbodcl 92-7835
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
,
Name(print) J
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this qeighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above F grounds.
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
44-03
Signature Date
3319 Cabo c+. Curls b aJ
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
44
Signature Date
P=#V 5
Namebrint)
3\q
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
Chris &zJG~
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
q\oz\ 03
Date ‘I
NameCprint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traMic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
ap$lication on the above grounds.
Signature
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
dd9
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please retum to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
L- I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
fP application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Date
QLU
Signature
\L-* 1 G Q&t-i s‘
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
applicatiog on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
A
-c-- City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9-4-03
Signature Date
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Y/ZJJ
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bli&
noise DoUution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me,
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on
3
Signadre Date
pl(ktm\ BwwL
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
A
. 9 1 03
Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7323 A* P-d r.! ‘ L&LJ
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
htalled in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
PprT~c& & 6W1K
Namebrint)
2hlb Bf%U+ 51 -69
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7-2-03
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
‘noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative Issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
g-30-07
Signa& Date
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise r>ollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proper@ values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
. of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
&P&L Signature Date Lfiee\l E‘ &rC/?F-Ase/t/
Address 9- City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justiQ a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
- Signature Date
A Namebrint)
City Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proper@ values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
F / ’ bate
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
inetalled in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blifit,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Dite
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
SWT I 2303
Signature Date
Anne //
Namebrint)
U City
s+
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature ’ Date
Narnebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proDerty values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than Just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proper@ values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such,
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Date
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
the above grounds.
Date
. Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
&/&...&- ,754 Date 5
Signature
Namebrint)
3306 g~a coud CPMLSB~~~ flzoo?
Address cfty
Upon completion: Please ab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proper@ values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Name(&ne) / I- -
City
>>OKq&
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Address City‘
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blidlt,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
o express, in terms, my disapproval of this
Upon completion: Please retum to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
/IC e 5-31-05
Narnebrint) - Narnebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
L?
Signature
- 3/ -0-3
31- 63
Date
PV
-
Name(prid)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
domir- 1 &??
Namebrint)
7325 mH5h LA/. &L5,P @ 9zDd7
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the abo
9- /- yd&
Dat6
/ Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Date
Namehint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
7h.3
D/te /
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
htalled in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bli&t,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
4/6 /os
Date'
tbtxd 077 &d
Signature LhEfY' ' JOM HLM
Namebrint)
&1(LSbAA 7Loq
City
3311 (!it50 &UT
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proPertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, fubher compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site Is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after middght, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
I 4 103
batk
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
..I
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds. t
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7-4-03
Date
Narnebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Y/~/o
Date
Name(print)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Namebrint)
_. \ Sc=k - \%-aA (3
City Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight.
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property vaIues are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refnsed to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
aboxgrounds. -4- KmJZ
32 spp3 Y- KW
Date Signaturecl
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of ATBET Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bbht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proPertv values are all items of signifcant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propem values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
ion on the
Dale I A
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds. .--r
eg3
Date/ 1
6 9 LL$i?-ggdk /* I
Address 73?? e&YJo/p * sfi
at- d&
*iecCiLc 5YY6 5
7 Si e z&?J V/ldkg / .uQ.4 (*
Namebrint)
(7ArnfSLAd City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blidt,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
8-3/ -03
Date
Address City /
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
\ Signature W&WWi /& ?ha3 Date
Namebrint)
/s4 I
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7 -027 c
Signature ’ Date
Address I City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
J qkyi-3 Signature U u- Date
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proDertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potcntial noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
c-U c b- Date
MflP&A P 48 r-l K-5-
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
July 26*, 2003
To: Concerned Neighbors
From: Committee to Protect Our haighborhood from
Corporate Intrusion
AT&T plans to ask the Carlsbad Planning Commission
for permission to add cell site perihelia and a building in
the access area just off Esfera and Fosca.
This is the area where there is already an existing electrical
tower,
The tower is an eyesore as is and would be become far more
visually unappealing and potentially a hazard in other ways.
The concerns are:
1. Visual blight
2. Potential Real Estate Depreciation
3. Health Hazard
Please sign the petition below to show the Carlsbad Planning
Commission you are in opposition to ANY CELL SITE
PROLIFERATION.
AFTER YOU SIGN YOUR NAME, BRING IT TO JAY &
CATHY LECLAIR RESIDENCE. PUT ON OUR DOOR OR
IN MAILBOX AT 7328 LAS BRISAS COURT. Phone # is
Ps: We successfully won the previous case two years ago when
another Cell Company wanted to do the same thing,
Your signature is critical to fighting “City Hall” and
Corporate Intrusion!
760-436-5068
Name Address Phone Number
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bliclht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's currcnt application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
ah/o 3
Signature Datk
Namebrint)
7 33a F sca a
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date ‘
Name(print)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Namebrint)
City
74YS 7.7
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
?/a/u3
Date
City J Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blidt,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Namebrint)
City I Address
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
c
Signature (J J bate
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7-1-03
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially,
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
9/h3
Signature Date
e Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox I
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
instailed in residentid neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictIy residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given bow quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carisbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to tbis CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9/%/ m3
Signature Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
?Ill la 3
Date
en
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
- g/3Q-c7~
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bliht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
t terms, my disapproval of this
City U Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justitj a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsba&s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Name(print j
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7/34>
Date
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds. n
o/lz/03
Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9 I& 5
Signature Date
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
7
Namebrint) I
-33oy pc R&@M
Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I beiieve that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bfight,
noise polla tion. View obstruction, additional &a@c and devaluation of local
property values are d items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, fnrther Compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justiry a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Name(print)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traMic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
DRD
Namebrint) /
7,& 5-7R,QO c9- e
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bliat,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the.City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on
I d.3Jfi Date
Signature D/W€ 5&HSHI,CI- A&fL 2km-y 33a3 PfiwczuaM* Namebrint)
City Address
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
t
L
/ *%,2aCl3
Signatbe Date
Namebrint)
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature Date U
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proper@ values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Signature Date
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
J Dde
Name(print )
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of signifcant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
6L J3
Date
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Signature &h.d-, Date
9-/ “0)
LkWw x.l. LJA<S<&Ilw
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bliht,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
proaertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. F’urther, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has affered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uaiformty
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9-7-03
Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
on the above grounds. I
~ r Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blieht,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T's current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad's
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
applicatiom the above grounds.
Namebrint)
!? Y.03
Date
Namebrint)
!? Y.03
City "9 dy-
Address
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual bli&t,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
/ Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
\ 43 -r) 3
SignaGe Date
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1. I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution. view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
2. Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
3. The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
4. The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
94-03
Sbature Date
-c& E. 2-w
Namebrint)
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 3312 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blight,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
property values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
application on the above grounds.
9- f- 0-3
Date
Address City
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
Petition to Disapprove CUP 03-22
AT&T Wireless
I am a resident in the City of Carlsbad and do not approve of the
application of AT&T Wireless Communications CUP 03-22.
1.
2.
3.
4.
I believe that cellular equipment with antennae and attendant structures
belong solely in commercial areas of the City. These items should not be
installed in residential neighborhoods. Such negative factors as visual blipht,
noise pollution, view obstruction, additional traffic and devaluation of local
propertv values are all items of significant concern to me.
Further, the installation of cellular equipment on Tower 173 sets a precedent
thereby opening the possibility of additional companies with their attendant
equipment adding themselves to this tower, further compounding the
aforementioned negative issues. AT&T’s current application even shows
future expansion of their equipment at this location. Tower 173 is in the
middle of a strictly residential neighborhood and should be treated as such.
The potential noise impact at this site is of major concern also, especially
given how quiet this neighborhood is now. Air conditioners running at all
hours, including after midnight, would pose a major detriment to the quality
of life in a large area surrounding the tower, much larger than just the
immediate adjacent homeowners.
The City of Carlsbad has offered numerous alternative commercial sites to
resolve this matter, which AT&T has refused to consider. Courts uniformly
have held that economic or technological necessity do not mandate approval
of any proposed tower site or justify a failure by the tower company to
consider alternative sights upon request. I believe that the City of Carlsbad’s
own Policy 64 should apply to this CUP application.
I wish to express, in the strongest terms, my disapproval of this
Upon completion: Please return to 33 12 Cab0 Ct. Please leave in mailbox
NOISE IMPACI' ANALYSIS
Prewred For
AT&T WIRELESS TELJ$"ICATIUNS FACILm Site Number 950-010.102A
BETWEEN ESFERA STREET
AND PIRAGUA STREET
CARISBAD, California
EILAR ASSOCIATaS
Acoustid & Environmental Consulting
321 North Willowspring Drive
Encinitas, California 92024
www ,ei 1 arassociates.com
Phone 760-753-1866 Fax 760-763-0111
Project #A3090
September 9,2003
EILAR ASSOCIATES
ACOUSTICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
September 9,2003
AT&T Wireless Project #A3090
SUBJEm NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF AT&T WIRELESS "~LECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
AND PIRAGUA STREET, CARISBAD, CALIFoRNIA
SW&E TOWER #173, SITE NUMBER 950-010-102A,B~~~~~~ ESFERA STREET
Summary
At your request, we have conducted a site-specific noise evaluation of the AT&T wireless
telecommunications equipment facility proposed for installationin the SDG&E transmission Line Righbof-way, Carlsbad, California. Based on the information available, it is our conclusion that
this facility, with the &foot high sound wall planned as part of the project, will be in compliance with the City of Carlsbad exterior noise limit of 65 dB L, and interior noise limit.
Project Setting
The subject property is located in the SDG&E transmission line right-of-way in Carlsbad,
California. The subject property's Assessor's Parcel Number is 223-240-23-00, and the parcel
zoning Is Open Space. For a graphic representation of the site, please refer to the Thomas Guide
Map, Assessor's Parcel Map, Satellite Aerial Photograph, Topographic Map and Land Use Map, which are attached as Figures 1 through 5, respectively.
Project Description
The property is an SDG&E Transmission Line right-of-way; the land use immediately adjacent
the right+f-way is hxlly developed residential.
The proposed project is the placement of an unmanned telecommunications facility consisting of
a concrete mounting pad for an Argus TE12 Outdoor Cabinet power supply system, and one
Nokia Ultrasite Cabinet, with mom for two additional Nokia Ultrasite Cabinets. TRe directional cellular antennas will be mounted on the SDG&E transmission line tower.
3Zl North Willowspring Drive, Eneinitae, CA 92024 780-753-1865 F~K 760-753-0111 info@eildam
AT&T Wireless Noise Impact Analpis of AT&" Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September 9, !ZOO3
Page 2
The planned AT&T equipment location iS 100 feet northwest of SDG&E transmission tower
#173. The proposed cabinets are adjacent the southwestern residential property line for the
residence at 3327 Fosca Street. This location is 46 feet southeast of the property line corner at
3323 Fosca Street and 80 feet northwest of the property corner at 3329 Focsa Street.
"he project site is on a moderate slope facing west. The adjacent home to the north is
approximately 5 feet higher in elevation.
For more project detail, please refer to the Project Plan, Enlarged Site Plan, and Elevations
provided in Appendix A.
Noise and Sound Level Descriptors
Noise level or sound level values presented herein are expressed in terms of deci'bels (dB), or
"dBA" for A-weighted measurements that approximate the hearing sensitivity of humans. Time- averaged noise levels are expressed by the symbol Lw Some of the data may also be presented
as octave-band-filtered and/or 1h+ctave-band-fidtered data, which are a series of sound spectra
centered about each stated fkequency,with half of the bandwidth above and half of the bandwidth
below each stated frequency. This data is @pically used for machinery noise analysis and barrier- effectiveness calculations.
Noise emission data is often supplied per the industry standard format of Sound Power, which
is the total acoustic power radiated from a given sound source as related to a reference power level. Sound Power should not be confused with Sound Pressure, which is the fluctuations in air
pressure caused by the presence of sound waves, and is generally the format that descrii noise
leveIs as heard by the receiver.
Applicable Noise Standards
The applicable noise regulations for this project, which are limited, are found in the City of
Carlsbad Noise Gulidelines Manual and the Noise Element to the General Plan. Another relevant document is the City of Carlsbad Council Policy Statement on Wireless Communications
Facilities, dated September 21,2001. According to these regulations, the noise limit for a single-
family residential zone is 65 dB LDN for exterior and 45 dB LDN for interior (of residence).
Eilar Associatm b 9w North Willowspring Drive, Eminitas, CA 9#124 760-'7!%1865 Fax 1604584111
-
Date
Time
Conditions
Measured LE,
Location
Notes
AT&T Wireless Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wimless Facility #950-10-102A
Tuesday, September 9,2003
1:30 to 1:45 p.m.
Clear, 2 to 3 mph breeze from west, mid 80's
47.8 dBA LE,
Near planned installation site
Mostly traffic noise some distant construction
September 9,2003
Page 3
Sensitive Receptors
The only locations potentially impacted by noise from the proposed project are the adjacent
property line, the residential property line to the northwest at a distance of 45 feet, and the
residential property line across the right-of-way to the southwest at a distance of approximately
80 feet.
Ambient Noise
The only major noise source in the area is Rancho Santa Fe Road to the east of the project site.
Noise Measurement Equipment
Some or all of the following equipment was used at the site to measure existing noise levels:
0 Larson-Davis Model 820, Type 1 Sound Level Meter, Serial #0176 (with windscreen)
Digital camera, distance measurement wheel, tripod
0 Larson-Davis Model CAl50, Type 1 Calibrator, Serial #OB9
e
The sound level meter was field-calibrated immediately prior to the noise measurement, and
checked afterwards to ensure accuracy. All sound level measurements conducted and presented in this report were made with a sound level meter that conforms to the American National
Standards Institute specifications for sound level meters (ANSI SI.4-1971). All instruments are
maintained with National Bureau of Standards traceable calibration, per the manufacturers'
standards.
Eilar Associates 321 North Willowspring Drive, Enchitas, CA 92024 760-753-1865 Fax 760-753-0111
AT&T Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September 9,2003
Page 4
Potential Project-Related Similar Noise Source(s)
Noise levels of the same model equipment, in operation, were measured at 3:OO p.m. on Aupt
12,2003, at a wireless installation located at 2424 Ribbonwood Road in the rural comrnUnity of
Manzanita, in San Diego County, California. The equipment was installed outdoors on a concrete
slab in a large chain-link fenced enclosure.
The installed equipment consisted of a single Argus Technologies "Tempest" TE12 Outdoor
Power Systems Dual Door Cabinet and a Single Nokia "Ultrasite" Cabinet. "he equipment was
mounted in a line with the ''front cabinet doors facing approximately west."
The Argus TE12 Cabinets noise is generated by a small fan bank in the battery compartment
door; this door with the fans is on the left side (north side with west facing main doors) of the
cabinets. The Nokia "Ultrasite" Cabinet. door (also west facing) has a fan system in the door.
Noise from these four directions is highly directional based onfanlocation. Noise on the backand
right sides (east and south) is negligible when compared with front and I& sides (west and north).
Ambient noise was at moderately high levels from tMic onnearby Interstate 8. Measurements
were made during low traffic noise periods to provide as accurate of measurement as possible.
However, the measurements are presumed to include some contribution from traffic noise even
though it was possible in this remote vicinity to make brief measurements when no vehicles were
in the immediate vicinity.
The measured overall noise level (one-minute average) fmm the left hand (north facing) TE 12
battery cabinet door was 59.6 dBA LE, at 5 feet. The Noh "Ultmite" Cabinet door produced
60.5 dBA L, at 5 feet. The combined noise level from the Argus and Nokia (fr0nt)was 63.0 dBA
L, at 5 feet. Refer to Table 2.
Eilar Associates 321 North Willowspring Ihme, Eminitas, CA 92M4 760-753-1865 Fax 760-7!534111
AT&" Wireless Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless FaciliQ #950-10-102A
September 9,2003
pw5
Table 2 Equipment Noise Measurements
Item Description Measured Noise Distance
Number Level dBA, LE,
1 TE 120 battery cabinet door 59.5 5 feet
2 Nokia "ultrasite" cabinet door 60.5 5 feet
The octave data is shown in Table 3 below.
Table 3. Noise Measurement of Operational AT&T Argus TE 120 Power Supply and
Due to the slight contriiution of traffic noise, the measured noise levels provide a worstcase
maximum noise emission level for the equipment. Thus, when these measurement data are
utilized "as is," the resultant analysis will be conservative.
Noise Measurement Eauiment
The similar equipment noise emission levels were measured with a Lamon Davis Model 824,
Qpe 1 Sound Level Meter, Serial #343 (with windscreen), and Larson Davis Model CA200,TYpe
1 Calibrator, Serial #2181. The sound level meter was fieldcalibrated immediately prior to the
noise measurements and checked afterwards, to ensure accmcy.
The Larson Davis 824 sound level meter was mounted on a tripod at a five-foot elevation and at
a distanee of approximately fwe feet from the cabinets, in the four quadrants (west, north, east,
and south).
-
Eilarhiates 3Zl North Wilhw~Prirrg Drive, Eneinitsa, CA 92024 760-753-1865 Fax 760-758-0111
AT&T Wireless Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September 9,2003
P-6
Analysis Notes
Decibel Addition
To determine the combined logarithmic noise level of two known noise source levels, the values
are converted to the basevalues, added together, and thenconvertedbackto the final logarithmic
value, using the following formula:
L, = 10 log ( lowo + low0 + .... lPfl@)
Where L, = the combined noise level, dB
LN = the individual noise sources, dB
To approximate this equation please refer to Table 4. This procedure is also valid when used
successively for each added noise source beyond the first two. "he reverse procedure can be used
to estimate the contribution of one source when the contriitionof another concurrent source is
known and the combined noise level is horn These methods can be used for L, or other
metrics (such as LDN or CNEL), as long as the same metric is used for all components.
I Table 4. Sound Level Addition for Wo Noise Sources
I
I I 1 dB 4-9dB I I 0 dB 10 or more dB I
Eilar Associates 32l North Willowspring Ihme, Erninitas, CA 9f#)24 760-759-1865 Fax 760-7!j3-0111
AT&T Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September 9,2009 page7
Attenuation Due to Distance
Attenuation due to distance is calculated by the equation SPL, = SPL, - 20 * Log ( Dn,) where:
SPL, = Calculated sound pressure level at distance
SPLz = Known sound pressure level at known distance D1 = Distance from source to known sound pressure level
D, = Distance from source to location of calculated sound pressure level
This is identical to the more commonly used reference of 6 dB reduction for every doubling of
distance. This equation does not take into account reduction in noise due to atmospheric
absorption.
Hourly LE, Spmation
To determine the hourly average noise levels (Lm) when the noise is created for less than the full
hour, convert the logarithm values to the base energy value, multiply by the percentage of the
hour that the noise occurs, and then convert the sum back to a logarithmic value. This is done with
the following formula:
L, = 10 log ( P, * IOLR”O)
Where P, = the percent or fraction of the hour noise is created
Lp = the partial hour noise level, dB
Table 5 can be used as a guide to approximate the hourly average noise levels. It is similar and
equivalent to tables found in many municipal noise ordinances, which present the allowable
duration of a noise in excess of a statutory limit. The decibel reduction in the following table
corresponds exactlyto the excess noise level which would be allowable for a period shorter than
one hour.
Eilar Assoehtw 3Zl North WilEowspFirrg Drfee, Eminitas, CA 92024 760-753-1865 Fax760-753-0111
AT&T Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wimless Facilitp #!)50-10-102A
September 9,2003
Page8
* to Obtain Equivalent Hourly Aversge
Sound Power to Sound Pressure
To convert sound power levels to sound pressure levels, the following formula is used:
Where: SPL, = Calculated sound pressure level at distance
D1 = Distance from some to location of calculated sound pressure level
Analysis
Table 6 provides the equipment sound pressure at 6 feet converted to a calculated sound pressure at a specified distance or location (Le., the proposed project's northeastern property line etc.).
These calculations include shielding from the planned walls. For more information regarding these calculations, please refer to the noise attenuation calculation spreadsheets in Figures 6,7 and 8.
Eilar Associates 321 North Wdlomprhg hhe, Eminitas, CA !l20!?4 760-759-1885 Fax 760-758-0111
AT&" Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of ATW Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September9,2003
-9
All calculations are based on the assumption that all the equipment will be operating 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and 365 days per year and that the facility will be fully developed with three
Nokia cabinets.
Mitigation
The chain link fence gate planned for the 6-foot high noise control barrier shall be replaced by a noise control gate (as described below).
General Specifications for Sound Attenuation Wall Construction
A sound attenuation wall should be solid and construM of masonry, wood, plastic, fiberglass,
steel, or a combinationof those materials, with no cracks or gape, through or below thewall. Any seams or cracks must be filled or caulked. If wood is used, it can be tongue and groove and must
be at least 7hinch thick or have a density of at least 3% pounds per square foot. Where arcbitatma1 or aesthetic factors allow, glass or clear plastic may be used on the upper portion,
if it is desirable to preserve a view. Sheet metal of 18-gauge (minimum) maybe used, if it meets the other criteria and is properly supported and stiffened so that it does not rattle or create noise itself from vibration or wind. Any door or gate@) must be designed with overlapping closures on the bottom and sides, and meet the rninirnumspecifications of thewall materials descni above. The gat@) may be of %-inch or thicker wood, solidsheet metal of at least 18-gauge metal, or an exterior-grade solid-core steel door with prefabricatd door jambs.
Eilar Associstes 321 North WilIowapring Dme, Encinitas, CA 9B24 760-7!53-1865 Fax 760-7534111
AT&T Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless Facility 8950-10-102A
-
Conclusions And Recommendations
The planned installation would produce a noise level below the exterior property line noise limit of 65.0 LD, and interior 45.0 L,, at all residentiallocations.This proposedwireless facilitymuld be in compliance with the City of Carlsbad property line and residential interior noise limits. The installation would not create a significant adverse noise impact to the area.
These conclusions and recommendations are based on the best information available. H&ever, noise characteristics of mechanical equipment are normally determined in laboratory tests and may vary for specific installations. Verification of compliance with City of Carlsbad noise regulations can be provided, ifdesired, byconductinga noise survey after the project is built and in operation. The noise survey would consist of sound level measurements at or close to the nearest impacted locations in each direction. This is best accomplished in the late night or very early morning hours while the equipment is in full operation and other noise sources are
mumuzed. If any additional sound attenuation is found to be necessary, it canbe specified at that
time. We do not expect any additional sound attenuation will be necessary.
Certification
.. .
This report is based on the information received and represents a true and factual analysis of the acoustical issues associated with the proposed AT&T Wireless SDG&E Tower #173, Site Number 95e010-102k This report was prepared by Charles Terry and Douglas Eilar.
EILAR ASSOCIATES //+ sj<a Douglas K. Ear, Principal Consultant in Aeo
CPmp
EUar Associatea gU Ihth WdIowsprhg Dripe, Enchitas, CA 9#)24 760-753-1865 Fax 760-753-0111
AT&T Wireless
Noise Impact Analysis of AT&T Wireless Facility #950-10-102A
September 9,2003
Page 11
Figures
1. Thomas Guide Map
2. Assessor's Parcel Map
3. Satellite Aerial Photograph 4. Topographic Map 5. Land Use Map
6.
7.
8.
Noise Attenuation Calculation Spreadsheet-North Property Line
Noise Attenuation Calculation Spreadsheet-Northwest Property Line
Noise Attenuation Calculation Spreadsheet - Southwest Property Line
Appendices
A. Site Plans for AT&T Wireless Site 950-020-104A
References
Beranek, Leo L., AcoustiCaZ Measurements, Published for the Acoustical Society of America
by the American Institute of Physics, Revised Edition, 1988.
Harris, Cyril M., Handbook ofAcousticalMeasurements andNoise Control, Acoustical Society
of America, 3d Edition, 1998.
Eilar Associates 321 North Willowspring Drive, Encinitas, CA 92024 760-753-1865 Fax 760-753-0111
FIGURES
P z w u w
J
t! 8
I
APPENDIX A
Site Plans for AT&T Wireless Site 950-020-1048
APPENDIX B
Pertinent Sections from the County of San Diego Noise Ordinance
and the County of San Diego Noise Element to the General Plan
Pertinent Sections from the City of San Diego Municipal Code
Land Use Zone
9 59.5.0401, Sound Level Limits
One-Hour
Time of Day Average Sound
Level (decibels)
50 7:OO am. to 7.40 p.m.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause noise by any means to the extent that the one-
hour average sound level exceeds the applicable limit given in the following table, at any
location in the City of Sun Diego on or beyond the boundaries of the property on which the
noise is produced. The noise subject to these limits is that part of the total noise at the
specified location that is due solely to the action of said person.
1. Residential: All R-1
TABLE OF APPLICABLE NOISE LIMITS
7:OO p.m. to 1O:OO p.m.
1O:OO p.m. to 7:OO am.
7:OO a.m. to 7:OO p.m.
45
40
55
1O:OO p.m. to 7:OO am.
7:OO am. to 7.40 p.m.
45
60
2. All R-2 I 7:OO p.m. to 1O:OO p.m. I 50
200 a.m. to 7.40 p.m. 65
55 3. R-3, R-4, and all other
Residential 7:OO p.m. to 1O:OO p.m.
I 1O:OO p.m. to 7:OO am. I 50
I 7:OO p.m. to 1O:OO p.m. I 60 I 10:OOp.m. to 7:OO am. I 60
5. Manufacturing all other I I industrial including
Agricultural and anytime 75
Extractive Industry
(b) The sound level limit at a location on a boundary between two zoning districts is the
arithmetic mean of the respective limits for the two districts. Permissible construction noise
level limits shall be governed by Sections 59.5.0404 of this article.
***
0 59.5.0404 Construction Noise
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, between the hours of 7:OO p.m. of any day and 7:OO a.m.
of the following day, or on legal holidays as specified in Section 21.04 of the Sun Diego
Municipal Code, with exception of Columbus Day and Washington’s Birthday, or on Sundays,
to erect, construct, demolish, excavate for, alter or repair any building or structure in such a
manner as to create disturbing, excessive or ofensive noise unless a permit has been applied
for and granted beforehand by the Noise Abatement and Control Administrator. In granting
such permit, the Administrator shall consider whether the construction noise in the vicinity
of the proposed work site would be less objectionable at night than during the daytime because
of diflerent population densities or diflerent neighboring activities; whether obstruction and
inteflerence with trafic particularly on streets of major importance, would be less
objectionable at night than during the daytime; whether the type of work to be performed emits
noises at such a low level as to not cause significant disturbances in the vicinity of the work
site; the character and nature of the neighborhood of the proposed work site; whether great
economic hardship would occur if the work were spread over a longer time; whether proposed
night work is in the general public interest; and he shall prescribe such conditions, working
times, types of construction equipment to be use4 and permissible noise levels as he deems
to be required in the public interest.
(b) Except as provided in subsection C. hereoj it shall be unlawful for any person, including
The City of Sun Diego, to conduct any construction activity so as to cause, at or beyond the
property lines of any property zoned residential, an average sound level greater than 75
decibels during the 12-hour period from 7:OO a.m. to 7:OO p.m.
m S
ID
S S aa * 0
D m cn
Q) 0 C
Q)
x C
I. 0 cn
Q)
3
L
z 0 -
Q) S rn Q
v)
0 0 0 * rn
Q)
-
L
I 0 0
cn -
CI
3 oa 3 0 .0' t,
m- S 3 m C
C m-
m n I 5
Q) >
m m- 0
rn
0 3
L 0 0 0 m- E
0 C L m- ag rn
0 z 0 m- z W
ni d
Q U Q k
R E!
43 I"
mm E Q 3
m m b
a,
F
t a, 0 m
a, 0
cn cn cn
Q)
a, -
t
.0'
t 3 0
)I
P,
C 0
A U 0 *
C 0 m I. 0- 0 0
a 0 m C C cv a,
C m
* rn
C m
'\
I ,. *' I
,' II' . 7'. * . tt-
1. I.
' 'I
l
4
1. I
. I. I.
C
cn cn m- E E
t)
P) C
C C
m-
m n
Q)
t
Q
Q cn
W
)I 0 a
Q) > 0
Q Q cd
h
t
tu 0
Q)
a
Q)
0
Q)
*
m1
Q) t
0 S S 0
0 0 0 N
t
Q) Q
Q
Q)
u)
C m- L n 0 0 0
(v
0 U r m- C cn rn C C
Q)
C rn
)r Q
'c3
Q)
S 0
CI
L
0 E
'c3
Q) L m- t Q) I. S cn n
'c3 C rn c mm Q) 3 cn
0 cn C rn
'c3
m- 0 LL c 0 cn
Q)
3
m-
'c3
Q) rn
Q)
0 cn
.c.r
L
U
rn 0 0 - 0 cn m- C 3 C
m- E m- Q) >
a
m- c,
0 0
m- C S s L m- 0 rn L
cn B c) t) a
U
U U fi
+ a a t a s
C
(b
P) a Q
*
a >
(b S
a
B- *
t
U
t) B- 3 (b mm S t 0
(b
h cn cn a a -
t
0 I. v)
(b c- all
d) B=
S L a 6 0 0 cv a U
c
3 - (3
0 a
+ 0
v)
C
Bm > .T= h,, E 0 0
0 U L
CI Q)
S
Q) 0 m S
Qs * mm
cf)
0 Q 0 s cn - m 2 m Q 0 C
m
m- E
t) - a
I. 0 W
0 6 t) cn t
LL d
cn
I
a S i! E 0 0 a I
II m
cn
)1
.clr
U
L m
a 0 m a 0 m
0 .clr
S 0 mm U
Q
cn
* a a L * cn m
0 S a a m
m-
t)
m- 0 m
m S S a
I.
U s m
E 0 U i cn 0 cn t 0 L. .IrcI 0 aa 0
Q)
w
F 0 0 'D
v) 0 h v) cv
Q t
Q) Q 0 c)
'D
L Q 0
v) a m
Q) Q Q m
-
C
mm k a Q)
Q) t * cn 0 a m
0 C >r U Q) .-
3 -
t) v)
w* aa >a .o'
t
om
m cn 0
t)
.).r
I 0
Q) '0' t
c, 0
B- I. 0 0 C
m
m- E
t)
L c, cn w m-
L S 3 2 v S 0 0 a
v)
Q) m c,
3 W
m cn C 0
c, 0
t) m I w
Q) v) S 0 IC 0 C 2
3 0
0 I
c,
0 *
a
* VJI
cn * D-
t n
rn
Q) a
Q)
Q) s
L
I.
*
h N 0 0
3 c
Q) LL
S 0
I. 0
c 0 > m I.
S m-
Q)
I. 0 - m
Q) Q Q m
m
Q) w C rn Q K
Q) C 0 m- CI Q) w m- a m > 0 L
m
L 3
3 L I. 0 CI cn rn L I.
L
Q) 16
J C
E S m- 0 cn m Q) L r m-
Q)
L
Q) > cn cn 0 n
CI m- E m- I
0 * I- €
OQ
g& cn
Q) 0 m-
Q) c) C m C h
Q) cn s
S * Q)
S ic1 a n
0 cn cn
Q)
Q)
-
L
m- i!
Q)
cn * m-
0- a =S a0
E
1 0' m- v) a= u a- a= 0
13
*
Q) * * m- E E
3 N I
Q) 13 m cn 0 0 0 I-
F
L s 0 I-
> 0 L s I- I-
Q
m- cn a cn
T- ci d:
Q) > 0 E
Q) L
c)
0 * a n 3 c): m 3 c 2 L
Q) m- 'D L L m Q a S 3
h h m
x e4
cn
h h Q, S x
3 m Q m Q 'D
h h m S
A 3u
F x
E
h 3u
0 cn S + X Q)
S * S a 0 cn m
m x cn m- m m- n I I I I
0 0 0 0
L
L .I
0 c, .I
0 L t -
.I E
S .I €
wm
C ca s C aa
0 a ca S
c,
.I E .I - aa tn c, .I -
eta mQ '13
aa >
$
2
.I 5 2
-- m .I QE 2x ES
U a,
3 0 cn n 0
L U c cn a, m a,
-
b
CI 0 S cn S
I m
a, 1=: cn
S .I .- E 0
m .- + B a, > .I
~
.I U
.= a, SL raj s '5 L
vcn w '5
cn w
a w
L a3 > Qz c I 0 * a cn .clr * cn A * Q a- *a
-a m- *>
cn
Q) S
Q a 0
c,
m-
O c) 2"
C 0 cn c, 3
Q) cn
. ts L m- C
0 C
C c,
E Q
3 m
m-
s
S 0
rn m S
L
rn S C 0 cn ; a
0
CI Q 0 m m- Q W r
m- a 0 cn w S a
m i- > 0 a mm I- I 3 cn W
p1
E B m I
aa >
aa 0
aa cn
S "\; a a, L
a, m 0 L a, s m m L I- S 0 .c, cn a, > 0 o
a, o m-
CT a, L m S m S
I- - cn x a,
I- >
0 cn a,
0
S a, S 0
0 o
-
L
I. -
E"
B a, cn
m I. 0 U m S S a,
S m
-
L
c
a S a,
Q cn
a, S
m-
-
- a, o m '0' 3 a,
t n a, o m Q s
a, S 0 >r - 6
m m
S a, cn
I- - m S S a,
S - cn a
0 cn W a
cn
UI
L - P
cn
'0' L n
cd
Q)
m
Q)
P) m
Q) > 0 o
'CI
Q) o C rn s C
Q)
L
L
m I.
C
C