HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-12-02; City Council; 17388; Villages of La Costa Greens Neighorhood 1.10AB# 17,388
MTG. 12-2-03
DEPT. PL”&
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
TITLE:
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 CITY ATTY.
CITY MGR
CT 02-201PUD 02-1 0
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. , APPROVING Tentative Tract Map
CT 02-20 and Planned Unit Development PUD 02-10 for Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood
1 .I 0 as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission.
2003-307
Project Applications
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Ad m in is tra tive
Approvals Final at Planning Final at Council
Reviewed by and To be reviewed -
CT 02-20 (Neighborhood 1.10)
PUD 02-1 0 (Neighborhood 1 .I 0)
CT 02-21 (Neighborhood 1.12)
Commission
X
X
X
On October 15, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for two residential
subdivisions. Neighborhood 1 .IO (CT 02-20/PUD 02-10) requires approval by the City Council since
the subdivision contains more than 50 residential lots. Neighborhood 1.12 (CT 02-21) contains 36
lots and the Planning Commission’s action for this subdivision is final unless appealed. No appeals
were received for this project within the IO-day appeal period.
The Greens Neighborhood 1.10 consists of the subdivision of 37.3 acres into 64 single-family
residential lots with a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, 5 open space lots, and one private street
lot. In addition to the Tentative Tract Map, a Planned Development Permit is required by the Master
Plan to allow for a gated community with privately owned and maintained streets. The Master Plan
specifically identified this neighborhood as a gated community. Architectural review of the homes will
be presented to the City Council at a later date as an amendment to the PUD.
The Planning Commission discussed the merits of both applications, and voted 5-1 (Dominguez -
No, Heineman -Absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council.
4 full disclosure of the Planning Commission’s discussion for both Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1 .I2 are
n the attached minutes. Neighborhood comments were focused primarily on loss of views as a result
sf the development of Neighborhood 1.12, however, as previously noted, the Planning Commission’s
3pproval of this neighborhood was final. A complete description and staff analysis of the project is in
:he attached report to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
:CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant
mpacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
zvaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master
’Ian MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential
znvironmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan”
md associated actions inclusive of the proposed planning area project reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,388
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into
the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. Mitigation Measure 4.8-
1A required an acoustical analysis for certain areas of the Master Plan to identify all necessary noise
control requirements on project plans necessary to meet the City of Carlsbad interior and exterior
noise levels. The required study was provided and the plans have incorporated noise walls where
appropriate. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies
to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR.
The proposed activities would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-
07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study prepared for the
project are available at the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
EXHl BITS :
1. City Council Resolution No. 2003-307
2. Location Map
3.
4.
5.
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5472 and 5473
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 15, 2003
Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 15, 2003.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Barbara Kennedy, (760) 602-4626, bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-307
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP AND PLANNED UNiT DEVELOPMENT FOR VILLAGES OF
LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 TO SUBDIVIDE
LOTS, AND 1 PRIVATE STREET LOT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF ALICANTE ROAD, NORTH
OF ALGA ROAD AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE IO.
CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
37.3 ACRES INTO 64 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 5 OPEN SPACE
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
CASE NO.: CT 02-20IPUD 02-1 0
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does'hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on October 15, 2003, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 2nd day of
December , 2003, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Unit Development, and at the time received recommendations, objections,
protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT 02-20/PUD 02-1 0; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map CT 02-20 and Planned Unit Development PUD 02-10 is approved by the
City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5472 and 5473, on file with the City Clerk and made a
part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
....
. . ..
. . ..
3
L
1
t
1
E
5
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicia
Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 2nd day of December , 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard
NOES: None
ATTEST:
\
LORRAINE M.) WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 2003-307 -2-
EXHIBIT 2
SITE
VLC - GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD I .IO
CT 02-20/PUD 02-10
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5472
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
SUBDIVIDE 37.3 ACRES INTO 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 5
OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND 1 PWATE STREET LOT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF ALICANTE ROAD NORTH OF ALGA ROAD AND SOUTH
OF POINSETTIA LANE IN LOCAL, FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASE NAME:
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT NUMBER CT 02-20 TO
VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
CASE NO.: CT 02-20
WHEREAS, Morrow Development, “Developer,” has filed
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral
Management Company, “Owner,” described as
Being a subdivision of Lot 10 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La
Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map No. 14543, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February
12,2003
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibits “A” - “Q” dated October 15, 2003, on file in the Planning
Department VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - CT 02-20, as provided by Chapter
20.12 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of October 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
L9
EXHdBlT
a verified
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
CT 02-20, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 -
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with 'and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the lots
being created satisfy all minimum requirements of Title 20 governing lot sizes and
configuration and have been designed to comply with all other applicable City
regulations including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for single-family residential development or as
open space on the General Plan, in that they are designated as RLM (Low-Medium
Density Residential) or OS (Open Space).
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that the project site can accommodate the proposed residential
development while providing all required setbacks and other amenities required by
the applicable City regulations including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that prior to recordation of the final map the developer is conditioned to obtain any
easements required for the proposed development.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the proposed
development will consist of single-family residences with adequate separation to
provide residents with adequate air circulation within and surrounding any future
residential units.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -2- 1
1
L
I!
1
c
c I
8
s
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposed development is not within a preserve area of the Habitat
Conservation Plan approved for the property. The project area is a designated
development area in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan which was evaluated in
Final Program EIR 98-07.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has
been designed in accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality
protection in accordance with the City’s sewer and drainage standards and the
project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, Villages of La Costa Master
Plan based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated October 15,2003 including, but
not limited to the following:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
Land Use -The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the
proposed density is within the density range of 0-4 du/acre specified for the
site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and does not
exceed the number of units permitted within each neighborhood by the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
Housing - The project is consistent with the Housing Element of the
General Plan, the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, and the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan as the developer is required to construct affordable
housing units consistent with the First Amended and Restated Affordable
Housing Agreement (dated 2/21/03) approved for the Villages of La
Costa. The Greens Affordable Apartment Project has been approved and
units in that project will satisfy the inclusionary housing requirements for
this project.
Open Space and Conservation - The Open Space Preserve Areas are
identified in the Habitat Conservation Plan, certified Final EIR 98-07,
and master plan. The project will not impact the designated open space
and will provide master plan trails and connections to the adjacent
neighborhoods as identified in the master plan.
Noise - A project specific noise study prepared for the tentative map
identified an area requiring a 4-foot high noise wall which is shown on
the project plans in conformance with the recommendations of the noise
study.
Public Safety - The project includes fire suppression zones to reduce fire
hazards to an acceptable level.
s PC RES0 NO. 5472 -3 -
I
L
-
4
C -
f
i
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
f. Circulation - The circulation system is designed to provide adequate
access to the proposed lots and complies with all applicable City design
standards and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
Specifically,
a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the San Marcos
Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for
school facilities.
b. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44,
and have been satisfied by the use of existing parkland credits in
addition to the dedication of land for the future Alga Norte Park Site.
c. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and
will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit.
The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to
Chapter 2 1.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10.
That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that
improvements necessary to maintain compliance with the growth management
performance standards are contained in the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management
Plan and the project will comply with the general and special conditions of the zone
plan.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B) and the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan.
The Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan for
which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, 9 PC RES0 NO. 5472 -4-
1
L
-
4
4 "
E
i
E
S
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program
approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for
the purposes of CEQA; [15168(c)(2) and (e)];
b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above;
C. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior Master Plan;
the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIR; and
d.
e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist.
f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the EIR 98-07 which are appropriate to this Subsequent
Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
17. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of
the Final Map or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, (b)
City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until
all legal proceedings have been concluded and coiitinues even if the City’s approval is not
validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Director a reproducible 24” x 36,” mylar copy of
the Tentative Map reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities for the permits being issued.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. Notes: A note to this
effect shall be placed on the Final Map.
The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation
Measures 4.4-22, 4.4-23, 4.4-29, 4.4-30, 4.7-2, 4.7-3, 4.7-6, 4.7-7, 4.7-9, 4.7-13, 4.8-1,
4.8-2, 4.8-3, 4.9-1, 4.9-2, 4.9-3, 4.9-4, 4.10-5, 4.10-8, 4.10-9, 4.10-10, 4.10-11, 4.10-12,
4.11-2, 4.11-3, 4.11-6, 4.11-7, 4.11-8, 4.11-9, 4.11-10, 4.12-4, 4.12-9, 4.12-10, 4.12-11,
4.13-5, and 4.13-8.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -6- //
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of PUD 02-10 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5473 for that other
approval.
Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Real Estate Collateral Management Company and the City of Carlsbad
concurrent with the project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making
authority of the City and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to
an alternate schedule for development.
Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and
Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and
the City’s Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as
shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving
condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the
project’s building, improvement, and grading plans.
Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor
of, or in which the City has an interest.
b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right
to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City
within 30 days for the official record.
c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event
that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” as provided in Article , Section the
City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If
the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the
Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with
particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the
same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the
giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements within the
period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -7- /a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the
Owners as provided herein.
Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements,
the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the
City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association’s
Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the
Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in
full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in
the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and
payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If
the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified,
payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount
equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may
pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or
in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other
rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment
against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice,
plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and
shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is
levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to
levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring
all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
hisher respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner
landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in the project Exhibits.
Outdoor lighting restrictions for private residential lots located adjacent to the
HCP/OMSP shall be noted in the proposed project CC&Rs.
Invasive species shall not be used in landscaping adjacent to conserved habitat
areas. A list of invasive species shall be provided in the CC&R’s of the
Homeowners Association. Invasive/Exotic species not to be used include those
species listed on List A & B of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council’s list of
“Exotic Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California as of October 1999.”
Educational materials regarding the sensitivity of the HCP/OMSP shall be given
to proposed Project Residents as part of the CC&Rs. The materials shall state
the importance of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impacts to
them.
16. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
13 PC RES0 NO. 5472 -8- .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxedfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name policy
subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval.
Prior to the issuance of the grading permit or recordation of the final map, Developer
shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County
Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested
parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Development Permit by Resolutions No. 5472 and 5473 on the
property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the
file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any
conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The
Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice
which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer
or successor in interest.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
existing schools, parks and streets.
Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Comdor, in
a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form
#1 on file in the Planning Department).
Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or the issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property
is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar
-9- /Lf PC RES0 NO. 5472
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney
(see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
24. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
25. Removal of native vegetation and development of Open Space Lots 65 - 69, including
but not limited to fences, walls, decks, storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways and
landscaping, other than that approved as part of (the grading plan, improvement plans,
biological revegetation program, landscape plan, etc.) as shown on Exhibits “A” - “Q” is
specifically prohibited, except upon written order of the Carlsbad Fire Department for fire
prevention purposes, or upon written approval of the Planning Director, and (California
Coastal Commission if in Coastal Zone), based upon a request from the Homeowners
Association accompanied by a report from a qualified arboristhotanist indicating the
need to remove specified trees and/or plants because of disease or impending danger to
adjacent habitable dwelling units. For areas containing native vegetation the report
required to accompany the request shall be prepared by a qualified biologist.
26. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Engineering
General
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City’s anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is
formally established by the City.
Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other
recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all
the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, entry median hardscape/
landscape/irrigation, street trees, concrete drainage swales, entry gates, and storm
water quality treatment facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the
subdivision.
There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project.
Developer shall install sight distance corridors (see below for types) at all street
intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -10- /T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
statement on the Final Map (and in the CC&Rs).
Tvpe I
“No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches
above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area
identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard
Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner
or Homeowners Association shall maintain this condition.”
Type I1
“No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object shall be placed or
permitted on the subject property within the Caltrans corner sight distance
corridors. No obstructions shall impede nor conflict with the line-of-sight
which is established per City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section
8.B.l The sight line is depicted on the tentative map. The underlying
property owner or Homeowners Association shall maintain this condition.”
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement,
grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development.
32. No more than 25 residential building permits (units) within this subdivision shall be
issued until there are two circulation access roads installed. Prior to exceeding 25
units, the circulation improvements must be completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the Fire Marshal.
FeedAgreements
33. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation, the City’s standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement.
34. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
35. Developer shall cause property owner to execute, record and submit a recorded copy to
the City Engineer, a deed restriction on the property which relates to the proposed sight
distance corridor as shown on the Tentative Map over lots 15,20,47,63,65,66,67,68,
and 69. The deed restriction document shall be in a form acceptable to the City Engineer
and shall:
a. Clearly delineate the limits of the Caltrans sight distance lines and City sight
distance corridors on a plat to be attached to the deed restriction; and
b. State that the sight distance corridor is to be maintained in perpetuity by the
underlying property owner; and
C. State that no objects such as along the sight distance corridor will not restrict, or
impede the ability of motorist at the intersection to identify approaching
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -1 1- lb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vehicles pursuant to Caltrans sight distance standards.
36. Devmper shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights on the final map for all lots
having frontage on more than one street (corner lots or though lots).
Grading
37.
38.
39.
40.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of this approval unless
Developer obtains, records and submits a recorded copy to the City Engineer a grading or
slope easement or agreement from the owners of the affected properties. If required, a
recorded slope easement shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
Tentative Map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and
obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer for the rough grading of this project.
Developer shall prepare, process and receive approval of precise grading plans to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Developer shall either obtain a separate
grading permit for these precise grading plans or include them with the rough
grading permit.
DedicationdImprovements
41.
42.
43.
44.
Developer shall cause Owner to dedicate to the City and/or other appropriate entities for
all public streets and other easements shown on the Tentative Map. The offer shall be
made by a certificate on the final map and/or by separate document. All land so offered
shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost. Streets that
already public are not required to be rededicated.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or
install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent
with any grading or building permit.
Developer shall provide the design of all private streets and drainage systems to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform
to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and private
drainage systems shall be inspected by the City. Developer shall pay the standard
improvement plancheck and inspection fees.
Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement
to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements
shown on the Tentative Map and the following improvements including, but not limited
to street paving, base, signing & striping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, medians, grading,
clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of facilities, sewer, water, fire
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -12- /I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
45.
hydrants, street lights, water quality treatment devices and reclaimed water, to City
Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements are:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
Construct road, underground potable water, sewer, storm drain, and
recycled water improvements for Streets “HH,” “11,” “JJ,” and “KK” as
shown on the Tentative Map.
The improvements shown on approved City of Carlsbad Drawing Numbers
397-2, 397-2D, 397-2F, 397-2<3, 397-21, 397-2K, 397-2s or 397-2T (the
“Improvements”) shall be substantially complete to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer prior to the approval of the Final Map. If the Improvements
have not been substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, then the City Engineer may require additional security for the
improvements, prior to the approval of the Final Map.
Construct onsite 18-wide trail improvements extending beyond the southerly
terminus of Street “KK” to the subdivision boundary and shown on the
Tentative map to the Satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Planning
Director.
Construct pedestrian access improvements and stairs (8-foot wide minimum
paved width) between lots 51 and 52 to provide a pedestrian link between
Street “11” and “KK”.
The offsite sewer and 18-wide trail extending from Alga Road to the
southerly subdivision boundary that serves this project shall be installed and
operational prior to the issuance of development permits for this subdivision.
At the time of final design for this project, if these improvements are not yet
completed, Developer shall design and post security for these offsite
improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the
provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP).” The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions
established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce
to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of
the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall:
a. include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board requirements;
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -13- /8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. include the receipt of “Notice of Intent” issued by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board;
c. recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices
(BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said
pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging
to City right-of-way or natural drainage course; and
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper
procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
46. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP).”
The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban
Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal
Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from
storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the
project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall:
a. identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern;
b. identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies
that could be impacted by this project;
c. recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with
this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the
maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way;
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to resident education on the proper
procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants;
e. ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity; and
f. identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not
exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent
practicable.
g. provide calculations to verify numeric sizing criteria is satisfied.
47. Developer shall incorporate into the grading/improvement plans the design for the project
drainage outfall end treatments for any drainage outlets where a direct access road for
maintenance purposes is not practical. These end treatments shall be designed so as to
prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consist of a
modified outlet headwall consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with
longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed appropriate,
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -14- l?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
io
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Final Map Notes
48. Developer shall show on Final Map the gross and net acres for each lot.
49. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data:
f. All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with the
exception of the following:
1. Public sewer system
2. Public water system
3. Public reclaimed water system
4. Public storm drain
b. Geotechnical Caution:
1. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in
interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad
from any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground
water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent .damage that may occur
on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or
maintenance.
Water
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire
Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations,
building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants shall be considered
public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way or
within minimum 20-feet wide easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad.
At the discretion of the District Engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate
maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges
for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Dieno County Water
Authority capacity charae(s) prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a
source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the District Engineer and the
Planning Director.
The Developer shall install potable water and recycled water services and meters at a
location approved by the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be
reflected on public improvement plans.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -15-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
Fire
61.
-
62.
63.
The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the Tentative Map to the satisfaction of the District
Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be
issued for the development of the subject property, unless the District Engineer has
determined that adequate water facilities are available at the time of occupancy. A note to
this effect shall be placed on the Final Map, as non-mapping data.
Developer shall install a total of 64 potable water meters (one for each lot) for the project
and additional irrigation meters to irrigate the HOA maintained lots.
The Developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Leucadia County Water
District regarding sewer infrastructure available or required to serve this project.
The water system shall be installed in conformance with "The Water System
Analysis for La Costa Greens CT 02-20 through CT 02-24" prepared by Dexter
Wilson Engineering, Inc. dated June 12,2003, as approved by the District Engineer.
Developer shall install a pressure reducing station, near the northerly project entry,
and all necessary potable water distribution lines, valves, fire hydrants, and
appurtenances necessary to serve the water demands required by this project to the
satisfaction of the District Engineer. Developer shall post security for these
improvements however; security for these improvements may be waived if these
utility improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the District Engineer.
All backbone potable water infrastructure that serves this project must be installed
prior to issuance of any development permits for this subdivision.
Entry gates shall be required to have installed an OPTICOM entry system as well as a
KNOX key switch, no exceptions.
Lots 1, 12, 13, 17 and 18 shall be designed with fire-rated construction on the aspect of
the structures that face the Fire Suppression Zone, in-lieu of automatic fire sprinklers.
Lots 14 and 19 will be evaluated upon submittal of plotting and architectural plans.
There shall be no combustible fencing within one hundred (100) feet of undisturbed
natural vegetation.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
64. The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map
approval becomes final.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -16- 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
65. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
66. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and
shown on the Tentative Map are for planning purposes only. Developer shall pay
traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the
City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively.
67. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
68. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
69. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has suficient title or
interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest.
The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The
Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessful,
Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the
requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to noti@ and enable the
City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the ‘statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -17-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of October 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Montgomery, Segall, White,
and Whitton
NOES: Commissioner Dominguez
ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN: None
R, Chairperson
AD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLMILLEX-
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5472 -18- 43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5473
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
WEST SIDE OF ALICANTE ROAD NORTH OF ALGA ROAD
AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASE NAME:
CASE NO.: PUD 02- 10
WHEREAS, Morrow Development, “Developer,” has filed a verified
PUD 02-10 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral
Management Company, “Owner,” described as
Being a subdivision of Lot 10 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La
Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map No. 14543, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February
12,2003
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “Q” dated October 15, 2003, on file in the
Planning Department, VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - PUD 02-10, as provided by
Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of October, 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
PUD 02-10, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 -
Findings:
1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, in that the development of a
gated community with private streets and single-family homes on minimum 9,000
square foot lots is consistent with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, is
compatible with adjacent existing and planned land uses, and the project design
conforms to all design and development standards applicable to the property.
2. That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the project conforms with all the design and
development standards applicable to the property as contained in the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan such as lot width, lot area, and maximum number of residential
lots. Public improvements will be provided concurrent with development of the
project to meet all city standards. All manufactured slopes will be landscaped to
prevent erosion and visually screen the slopes.
3. All findings of Resolution No 5472 for CT 02-20 are incorporated herein by
reference.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of
a Final Map or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Planned Development Permit.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Planned Development Permit documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PC RES0 NO. 5473 -2- css
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
...
...
...
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Planned Development
Permit, (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or
non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Director a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar copy of
the Tentative Map reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide
school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
This. approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 02-20 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5472 for that other
approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Major Planned Unit Development
Permit Amendment shall be approved by the Planning Commission for the
architecture and plotting of units. Approvals are also required for the RV storage
area to meet the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
PC RES0 NO. 5473 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service ’fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of October 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Montgomery, Segall, White,
and Whitton
NOES: Commissioner Dominguez
ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN: None
NLIE?Y$&ER, Chairperson
C&ZLJ$AD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
? r
MICHAEL J. HObkMILl%R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5473 -4-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 15,2003
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Application complete date: March 18, 2003
Project Planner: Barbara Kennedy
Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham
SUBJECT: CT 02-20/PUD 02-1O/CT 02-21 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS
NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10 and 1.12 - Request for a determination that the
project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa
Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the
purposes of CEQA; and 1) a recommendation of approval for a Tentative Tract
Map and Planned Development Permit for 64 residential lots, 5 open space lots
and 1 private street lot for Neighborhood 1.10; and 2) approval of a Tentative
Tract Map for 36 residential lots and 5 open space lots for Neighborhood 1.12.
The project sites are located east and west of Alicante Road, north of Alga Road
and south of Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5472 and 5473
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 02-20 and Planned
Development Permit PUD 02-10; and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5474
APPROVING Tentative Tract Map CT 02-21, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project consists of two tentative tract maps within the La Costa Greens area of the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Neighborhood 1.10 contains 37.3 acres and will be
subdivided into 64 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, 5 open space
lots, and 1 private street lot. A Planned Development Permit is required for this neighborhood
since the proposal includes a gated community with private streets. Neighborhood 1.12 contains
28.2 acres and will be subdivided into 36 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 11,000
square feet and 5 open space lots. Architectural plans for the residences are not proposed at this
time and will require approval at a future date of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for
Neighborhood 1.10 and a Site Development Plan for Neighborhood 1.12. The project complies
with City standards and all necessary findings can be made for the approvals being requested,
Neighborhood 1.10 requires approval by the City Council since the subdivision contains more
than 50 residential lots. Neighborhood 1.12 may be approved by the Planning Commission.
CT 02-2OPUD 02- 1 O/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOuS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Pape 2
Master Plan Area Residential Minimum
Neighborhood Lots Lot Size
Permitted Required
by the MP
1.10 37.3 64 9,000 s.f.
1.12 28.2 38 11,000 s.f.
acres
acres
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Number of Lots
Proposed
64 residential / 5 open
space/ 1 private street
36 residential / 5 open
space
Background
On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
the neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has been recorded for the La Costa
Greens area. Plans for mass grading and improvement plans have been approved, and mass
grading and backbone infrastructure is currently underway.
Proiect Description
The sites are located approximately midway between Alga Road and Poinsettia Lane with
Neighborhood 1.10 on the west side of Alicante Road and Neighborhood 1.12 east of Alicante
Road within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management
Plan. Development of the neighborhoods requires further subdivision of the neighborhood
planning area lots created by Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03, along with finish grading
for the site and infrastructure improvements. As shown on Attachment 8, Neighborhood 1.10 is
bordered by Alicante Road on the east, open space and the La Costa Golf Course to the north and
west, and Neighborhood 1.11 to the south. Neighborhood 1.12 is separated from Alicante Road
by an open space lot on the west, an open space lot is located to the south, open space and
Neighborhood 1.09 are located to the north, and existing single-family residential development
borders the site on the east.
The proposed project includes a number of applications as summarized below in Table 1.
Application
Number
CT 02-20 /
PUD 02- 10
CT 02-21
Along with the proposed Tentative Tract Maps, a Planned Development Permit is required by the
Master Plan for Neighborhood 1.10 to allow for a gated community with privately owned and
maintained streets. The Master Plan specifically identifies this neighborhood as a gated
community.
The architectural plans and plotting for the subdivisions also require discretionary approval,
however, the Master Plan allows this review to be postponed to a future date. To determine
compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan for plotting and architecture, an amendment to
a9
CT 02-20/PUD 02-1 O/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOuS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15, 2003
Page 3
Land Use
Housing
the Planned Development Permit (PUD 02-10) will be required for Neighborhood 1.10 and a Site
Development Plan (SDP) will be required for Neighborhood 1.12.
CATION, GOAL, IMPROVEMENTS
OBJECTIVE OR
PROGRAM
Site is designated for Single-family lots at 1.3 to Yes
RLM at 0 - 4 ddac 1.7 ddac*
Provisions of The Master Plan includes Yes
affordable housing two affordable sites, one of
which has already received
SDP approval.
IV.’ ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use Designation;
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01);
Planned Development Regulations (Chapter 2 1.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and
Growth Management Regulations (Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan). *
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of
the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. General Plan
The General Plan designation for the project site is Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM).
The RLM designation allows single-family residential development at a range of 0-4 dwelling
units per acre (ddac). The Villages of La Costa Master Plan limits the maximum number of
dwelling units for each neighborhood. The density in Neighborhood 1.10 is 1.7 ddac with 64
units allowed and proposed. Neighborhood 1.12 has a density of 1.3 ddac with 38 units allowed
and 36 units proposed.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan was found to comply with all applicable General Plan
Goals, Objectives and Policies, including the Housing Element. This project is in conformance
with the Master Plan and therefore is also in compliance with the General Plan. The project
complies with Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
ELEMENT I USE, CLASSIFI- I PROPOSED USES & I COMPLY
36
CT 02-2OPUD 02-10KT 02-21 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOUS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
The project includes
measures such as fire
suppression zones.
The project will
construct public
Pane 4
Yes
Yes
TABLE
ELEMENT
Open Space &
Conservation
Public Safety
Circulation
! - GENERAL PLAN
USE,
CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL,
OBJECTIVE OR
PROGRAM
Minimize
environmental
impacts to sensitive
resources within the
City
City Wide Trail
Program
Residential exterior
noise standard of 60
CNEL and interior
noise standard of 45
CNEL
Reduce fire hazards to
an acceptable level.
Require new
development to
construct roadway
improvements needed
to serve proposed
development.
'OMPLIANCE. CON
PROPOSED USES
&
IMPROVEMENTS
Open space preserve
areas are identified in
the Habitat
Conservation Plan
(HCP), certified EIR
and Master Plan.
These areas are not
proposed for
development.
Master Plan trails and
connections to the
adjacent neighbor-
hoods identified in the
dan are included.
Project specific noise
studies for each
tentative map
identified areas along
Alicante Road in
Neighborhood 1.10
that will require 4'
high noise bamers.
[NUED
COMPLY
Yes
Yes
Yes
I
maximum allowable units. Since the proposed number of units will not exceed that number, the density of the
subject neighborhoods is consistent with the General Plan.
B. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(A))
The project is within the La Costa Greens area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village
and provides detailed development and design standards, requirements, development phasing and
CT 02-2OPUD 02-10/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOUOS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Page 5
timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. Compliance with the
development and design standards of the Master Plan applicable to dwelling units will be
assessed at a later date through a Planned Development Permit Amendment (Neighborhood 1.10)
or Site Development Plan (Neighborhood 1.12). The project complies with the following
requirements of the Master Plan as demonstrated in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER P
STANDARD
Street Standard
Trail System
Village Landscape Concept &
Palette
Signs
Affordable Housing
Village Theme Walls
REQUIRED
4 % ft. landscaped parkways
between the curb and sidewalk
City wide and Master Plan
trails as shown in the La Costa
Greens Trail and Recreation
Plan (Exhibit 5-5)
Compliance with the land-
scape theme tree and plant
varieties
Compliance with the design
and location requirements for
neighborhood entry signs
15% of the total number of
units in the Master Plan are to
be affordable
Required along arterial streets
and major collectors
4N REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED
4 ?4 to 7 % ft. wide landscaped
parkways between the curb
and sidewalk.
Required City-wide trails
along Alicante Road are
shown on the approved master
tentative map and a
neighborhood connection to a
local trail is shown at the
south end of Street “KK.”
The Conceptual Landscape
Plans have been found to
comply with the Master Plan.
Signs comply in design and
location with Section 4.9.2 of
the Master Plan.
This requirement is being
satisfied through the
construction of two multi-
family rental apartment
projects. The SDP for the
180-unit La Costa Greens
apartment project has been
approved allowing for final
maps for a total of 1,020
market-rate units anywhere in
the Master Plan.
Wall design and locations are
shown as part of the
conceptual landscape plans.
The Master Plan designates Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1.12 for single-family detached homes.
The minimum lot size and width for each neighborhood will be evaluated in the Subdivision
Section of this report.
The Master Plan also includes a special provision for Neighborhood 1.12 with regard to the
height of the future residences in relationship to the existing homes on Unicornio Street. The
Master Plan requires that “the elevation of the top of the roof shall not extend above the
elevation of the pad elevation of the existing residence directly to the east.” In order to comply
CT 02-2OPUD 02-1 O/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Page 6
with this requirement, the pad heights of the lots adjacent to these residences have been lowered
to a minimum of 30 feet below the pads of the residences directly to the east, with the exception
of Lot 35. With the one exception, this would allow for construction of a 30-foot high two-story
residence on any of the lots.
In the case of Lot 35, the lot has been designed at a pad elevation of 340.0 feet so that it is 35
feet below the vacant lot directly to the east. The residence located at 2508 Unicornio Street
(just north of the vacant lot), which is at the 363.4-foot elevation, also abuts a portion of Lot 35.
The result is that the northern portion of the pad of Lot 35 is only 23.4 feet below the pad of the
residence at 2508 Unicornio. The developer has submitted an exhibit (Attachment 9) showing
that with future development of Lot 35, a majority of the site could accommodate a 30-foot high
home. However, any portion of the future home directly west of 2508 Unicornio would not be
permitted to exceed a height of 23.4 feet (as shown on the attachment) such that the peak of the
roof is at or below the 363.4 foot elevation. A detailed review of the plotting of the home will be
conducted with the submittal of the Site Development Plan.
The pad heights substantially conform with the conceptual grading and lotting study included in
the Master Plan (Attachment 10). The Master Plan identifies that the composite plan was
conceptual in nature and that the final lot configurations, street alignments and grading design
would be set during tentative subdivision map review. During rough grading, deep bedrock
areas were encountered in this area and as a result, the subdivision and grading plan for
Neighborhood 1.12 was designed to minimize blasting in this area. Consequently, Lot 30 was
reconfigured slightly so that access to the site is from Zodiac Street rather than Amber Lane.
Although this raised the pad height of Lot 30, from that anticipated in the conceptual lotting
study, it is still over 30 feet below the height of the pads directly to the east, and it is at the same
elevation as Lot 29. There has been some neighborhood concern from residents on Unicornio
Street (north of Zodiac Street) regarding preservation of views towards the southeast. In
response to these concerns, the plans were revised to lower the pads to the greatest extent
possible while minimizing the amount of blasting required for grading operations. The pad
elevations proposed on the tentative map comply with the requirement of the Master Plan in that
the peak of the roof for future homes will be lower than the pad elevations of the residences
directly to the east.
C. Planned Development Regulations
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan contains development standards for a variety of lot sizes
and product types. Generally, lots with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet or greater are
not required to comply with the Planned Development standards. However, in neighborhoods
where the Master Plan allows for a gated community with private streets, approval of a Planned
Development Permit is required. Since Neighborhood 1.10 anticipated and allowed for private
streets within a gated community, this subdivision is subject to the Planned Development
standards. Certain standards are included in the Master Plan that are different than those that
were adopted in the Planned Development Ordinance. The Master Plan provides that the
Citywide Planned Development Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 2 1.45) shall be
utilized unless otherwise modified in the Master Plan.
As stated previously, no dwelling units are proposed with this tentative map. Therefore,
compliance with the Planned Development Regulations/Master Plan requirements will be limited 33
CT O2-20/PUD 02-1OICT 02-21 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOLIS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Recreational Vehicle Storage
Common Recreation Area
Minimum Lot Size
Minimum Lot Width
to those regulations applicable to the subdivision of Neighborhood 1.10. Future review of the
architectural design and plotting will be through a Planned Development Permit amendment for
Neighborhood 1.10. Table 4 demonstrates the project’s compliance with the required standards.
20 sq. ft./du To be provided in
Neighborhood 1.2 upon
approval of building permits.
N/A
2 9,450 sq. ft. min.
Not required per Master Plan
for lots over 7,500 sq. ft.
9,000 sq. ft.
70 ft. > 71) ft
TABLE 4 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS/
MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 1 STANDARD I PERMITTED/REQUIRED I PROPOSED I I Visitor Parking 24 spaces required
(5 sp/l 0 du + 1 sp/4 du)
Adequate parking is provided
on the adjacent local streets as
Derrnitted bv the Master Plan.
D. Subdivision Ordinance
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and concluded that the
subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s
Subdivision Ordinance. All major subdivision design criteria have been complied with including
the minimum lot depth of 90 feet, provision of public access, required street frontage, minimum
lot area, and the design of the project so that individual residential lots do not have street
frontage or access to circulation element roads.
The project is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan and Title 21. The required lot sizes for Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1.12 are
9,000 and 11,000 square feet, respectively. Each of the proposed residential lots meets the
applicable minimum lot area required by the Master Plan. The corresponding minimum lot
width is 70 feet for both neighborhoods, and the project complies with this requirement.
The developer will be required to offer various dedications (e.g., drainage easements, street
right-of-way) and install street lights and utility improvements including, but not limited to,
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, landscaping, street trees, fire
hydrants, and street lights.
E. Growth Management
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance
with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 5 below.
3r‘
CT 02-2OPUD 02- lO/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Pane 8
City Administration
Library
Waste Water Treatment
Parks
Drainage
TABLE 5 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
I STANDARD I IMPACTS I COMPLIANCE
347.67 sq. ft. Yes
185.42 sq. ft. Yes
100 EDU Yes
0.70 acres . Yes
Basin D Yes
Circulation
Fire
1,000 ADT Yes
Station No. 2 & 5 Yes
Open Space
Schools
Provided pursuant to the HCP Yes
San Marcos Unified Yes
Elementary - 23.2 students
Middle School - 6.4 students
Hi& School - 5.8 students
The proposed project is 2 units below the Villages of La Costa Master Plan dwelling unit
allowance. One of these units is proposed to be reallocated to one of the VLC Greens
Neighborhoods (1.09, 1.11, 1.13, or 1.14) with approval of Master Plan Amendment MP 98-
Ol(B). Pursuant to Section 2.5.2 of the Master Plan, the remaining unit may be allocated to a
future neighborhood within the Greens.
Sewer Collection System
Water
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
100 EDU Yes
22.000 GPD Yes
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially
significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously
examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning
Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development
and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive
of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from ElR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Neighborhood projects have been
completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the
project. Mitigation Measure 4.8-1A required an acoustical analysis for certain areas of the
Master Plan to identify all necessary noise control requirements on project plans necessary to
meet the City of Carlsbad interior and exterior noise levels. The required studies were provided
and the plans have incorporated the required noise wall. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
35
CT 02-2OPUD 02-1 O/CT 02-2 1 - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10 and 1.12
October 15,2003
Page 9
The proposed activities would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as
they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. The total number of Master Plan units evaluated
in EIR 98-07 will not be increased, and will be two (2) residential units below the number
allowed by the Master Plan for Neighborhood 1.12. This project is within the scope of Final
Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the respective
initial studies for each application are available at the Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5472 (CT 02-20)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5473 (PUD 02-10)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5474 (CT 02-2 1)
Location Maps (2)
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Disclosure Statement
La Costa Greens Development Plan
Neighborhood 1.12 - Conceptual Plotting Study for Lot 35
Conceptual Grading and Lotting Study
Reduced Exhibits
Full Size Exhibits “A” - “Q,” dated October 15,2003 (CT 02-2OPUD 02- 10)
Full Size Exhibits “A” - “0,” dated October 15,2003 (CT 02-21)
BK:bd:mh
36
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 02-20PUD 02-10 and CT 02-21
CASE NAME: VLC Greens Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1.12
APPLICANT: Morrow Development
REQUEST AND LOCATION: The proposed proiect consists of two tentative tract maps within the La Costa
Greens Villages of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Neighborhood 1.10 contains 37.3 acres and will be
subdivided into 64 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet. 5 open space lots, and 1
private street lot. A Planned Development Permit is required for this neighborhood since the proposal includes
a gated community with private streets. Neighborhood 1.12 contains 28.2 acres and will be subdivided into 36
residential lots with a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet and 5 open space lots. Plans for the residences
are not proposed at this time and will reauire approval at a future date of a Planned Development Permit
Amendment for Neighborhood 1.10 and a Site Development Plan for Neighborhood 1.12. The proiect area is
located along Alicante Road between Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road with neighborhood 1.10 west of Alicante
Road and Neiphborhood 1.12 east of Alicante Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Being a subdivision of Lot 10 and Lot 12 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa
Greens, in the Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California. according to Map No. 14543, filed
in the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv, February 12.2003.
APN: 213-1 12-01 and 213-1 12-03. Acres: 65.5 Proposed No. of LotsNnits: 100
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLM
Density Allowed: 0-4
Existing Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: 1.3 to 1.7 ddac
Proposed Zone: P-C
Zoning General Plan
Site P-c RLM
North P-C RLM/os
South P-C RLM
East R- 1 RLM
West P-c os
Current Land Use
Mass grading for
development
Future Residential
DevelopmentIOpen Space
Future Residential
Development
Single-family Residential
Open Space
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia Countv
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 100
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
0 Negative Declaration, issued
0
(XI
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, Project is within the Scope of Program EIR 98-07 approved earlier
37
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Villapes of La Costa - La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1.12 - CT
02-20/PUD 02- 10 and CT 02-2 1
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 10 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: P-C
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Morrow Development
ADDRESS: 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180, Carlsbad, CA 92008
PHONE NO.: (760) 929-2701 ASSESSOR’S PARCELNO.: 213-1 12-01 and 213-1 12-03
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 100 residential lots, 10 open
space lots and 1 Drivate street lot.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 347.67
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 185.42
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 100
Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.70 acres
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin = D
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 1,000 ADT
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 5
Open Space: Acreage Provided = Provided pursuant to
the HCP
Schools: San Marcos Unified
Elementary - 23.2 students, Middle School- 6.4 students, High School - 5.8 students
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU 100 EDU
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 22,000 GPD
The project is 2 units below the Villages of La Costa Master Plan dwelling unit allowance.
38
- City of Carlsbad
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project.cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defmed as "Any individual, firm, co-paxtnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEG& names and addresses of ALI, persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cornoration or bartnersh ip, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% 'of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned comration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the coprate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Fred M. Arbuckle corp/part Morrow Development
Title President Title
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
Address 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180 Address 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. L EG& names and addresses of & persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (it,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
cornoration or ~artntrs hin, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDMDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) M THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned comration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Real Estate Collateral Management
Person N/A COrpRart Comeany
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180
Carlsbad, CA 92008
3/
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 @
3. NON-PROFIT OBGAMZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonmofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Rofiflrust Non Profinrust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business msacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees andor Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
e above information is true and correct t
*crt
Sagnature of applicant/date
Agent for RECM:
Fred M. Arbuckle
Print or type name of owner
Fred M. Arbuckle, President of Morrow Development
Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owncr/applicant’s agent if applicablddate
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98
40
Page 2 of 2
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY
I, L. S. Mattenson, the Secretary of Real Estate Collateral Management Company,
a Delaware corporation, certify that the persons named below are officers of this
corporation, holding the offices set forth opposite their names, and that their
appointments have not been cancelled as of the date hereof.
L. e. Klug President
D. A. Watts Vice President
T. P. Shanley Vice President
Dated: December 14,200 1
v - L.@attenson,
Srecretary
law\hcfs\LaCosta\RECMincumb.cert
SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE OF
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL, MANAGEMENT COMPANY
THE UNDERSIGNED, the Secretary of Real Estate Collateral Management
Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that the
following is a true and correct copy of the resolutions adopted by the unanimous written
consent of the Board of Directors of the Corporation on December 12,2001 and the same
are in hll force and effect as of the date hereof:
RESOLVED, that the Corporation is hereby authorized to enter into all
agreements, indentures, mortgages, deeds, conveyances, licenses, permits, transfers,
contracts, discharges, releases, satisfactions, settlements, petitions, schedules, accounts,
affidavits, bonds in an aggregate amount of up to One Hundred and Thirty Million
Dollars ($130,000,000), undertakings, proxies and other instruments or documents
required or deemed necessary by an Authorized Officer to be delivered in connection
with the development of the property owned by the Corporation and the project known as
thee Villages of La Costa.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the President or any Vice President of the
Corporation (the “Authorized Officers”) are hereby authorized and directed to execute
and deliver on behalf of the Corporation any documents and instruments necessary ’or
appropriate to effectuate and to perform such other acts as may be deemed necessary and
proper to effectuate the intent and purposes of the foregoing resolution.
FURTHER RESOLVED, the Corporation does hereby ratify and confirm all
actions that have been taken in conjunction with the foregoing resolutions as of the date
hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand on this 14* day of
December, 200 1.
Secretary/
a
1
ATTACHMENT 8 1.1 7
- l.& MI WE
* Potential School Location
NOTE THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS LARGER IN EACH NEIGHBORHOOD
THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZES SHOWN ABOVE
VILLAGES OF
LA COSTA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 5-3
THE GREENS
y 3
ATTACHMENT 9
...
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS, NEIGHBORHOOD 1.12 (CT 02-21) LOT 35 PAD HEIGHT EXHIBIT wl ADJACENT Ex RESIDENTS LA COSTA
JACK HE~ORN 6~ ~ssmm
+4
ATTACHMENT 10
e a
n WE
I
I I
! i
, 1
1 I
t
..* $ >..< ....
C
C C
C
T
- f
C c
C C I- C
z-
I
I
P
s
d >
C
C C
C
v
- P C C
C C t
54
L.
=/ '
I
-
::::ti
53
/ NIA .9-.S
3 2
'*-
e- -
c
C c
I
1
E c C
C c ".. .
14
H /B B
z-
P
v
a 3
I
a c
C
C C
C
7
- g
C C
C C
t (
z. =. .
C
C C
L
C
C C
C C c
t
-
i
1.
0
L.
11 :
C
c C
v I
E
c:
- 0
C
c C !- c
z
-. '. .
-. -.. 1.
C
@ C
v I
c
c: C
@ C t
I/ I
i ..
C
C C
7
<
C C
C C
1 c
I1 Ld]
P
1
'5 _.
<
C C
1
I z
C C
C <
t (
I I
z-
5
E
i
i i
I
7
a
Planning Commission Minutes %gYT DRAFT October 15,2003
5. CT 02-20/PUD 02-1OlCT 02-21 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.10 AND 1.12 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the
activity for the purposes of CEQA; and 1) a recommendation of approval for a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit for 64 residential lots, 5 open space lots and 1 private
street lot for Neighborhood 1.10; and 2) approval of a Tentative Tract Map for 36 residential lots and 5 open space lots for Neighborhood 1.12. The project sites are located east and west of
Alicante Road, north of Alga Road and south of Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management
Zone IO.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 5 and stated that Associate Planner, Barbara Kennedy, assisted by Associate
Engineer, Clyde Wickham would make the presentation.
Chairperson Baker opened the public hearing on Item 5 and acknowledged a letter received by the
Planning Commission that was signed by several residents of Unicornio Street in relation to this Item.
Associate Planner, Barbara Kennedy, presented the Staff report stating that the two subdivisions under
consideration are for Neighborhoods 1.10 and 1.12. These neighborhoods are located on the east and west sides of future Alicante Road. Open space and future residential developments surround
neighborhood 1.10 and border neighborhood 1.12 on the north, south, and west. An existing single-
family residential development borders 1.12 on the east. Both neighborhoods have an RLM General Plan
designation, which allows for medium-low density, single-family residential development. The planning
area for neighborhood 1 .IO allows for 64 residential lots with a minimum lot size requirement of 9,000 sq
ft. The proposal will require the City Council’s approval since the subdivision contains over 50 lots. Along with the Tentative Map, a Planned Development Permit is required for this neighborhood to allow for a
gated community with private streets. The architecture and the plotting of the homes are not included at
this time and will require approval of an Amendment to the Planned Development Permit.
Neighborhood 1.10 complies with the requirements of the Master Plan and with the Planned Development
requirements with regard to the number of residential lots allowed and the minimum lot size and width.
The Planned Development Ordinance also requires visitor parking that will be provided along the private streets as allowed by the Master Plan. RV storage for this neighborhood will be provided in
Neighborhood 1.2 in the future. A common recreation area is not required for this subdivision since the
lots are over 7,500 sq ft. A noise wall will be required along portions of Alicante Road and that will be
incorporated into the Village theme wall. Towards the south of the project, there will be a neighborhood
trail connection that will connect to the local trail and open space area. The streets in this neighborhood
have been designed to incorporate the livable neighborhood concepts, such as parkways with street trees, interconnected streets, and pedestrian connections between the streets where feasible.
Neighborhood 1.12 is located on the east side of future Alicante Road and an existing residential development abuts this neighborhood on its eastern boundary. Neighborhood 1 .I2 allows for 38
residential lots and 36 lots are proposed. The minimum size for these lots is 11,000 sq ft. Since this
subdivision contains less than 50 units, the Planning Commission’s action will be final unless this project is appealed to the City Council. The architecture and plotting of the single-family homes is not included at
this time and that will require approval of a Site Development Plan. This neighborhood has also been designed with a livable neighborhood concept. This neighborhood also has a special requirement for the
street trees to be selected from varieties that have anticipated maximum heights of 30 ft or less and the
proposal complies with this requirement. The Master Plan also includes several provisions for future construction in Neighborhood 1.12. The Master Plan requires that with construction of the new homes
the elevation of the top of the roof shall not extend above the pad elevation of the existing residence directly to the east. In order to comply with this regulation, all but one of the pads have been designed so
that they are 30 ft or more below the pad elevations of the residential lots directly to the east. This would
allow a two-story home with a maximum height of 30 ft to be built on any of the lots with the exception of
a portion of Lot 35. There has been quite a bit of concern from the neighbors on Unicornio Street about the preservation of views. The Master Plan addresses the height of future residences in direct east-to-
west relationship, but the neighbors have views of the lagoon toward the southwest rather than directly
west and they.would like to have the new homes to be lower than their pads when viewed in a southwest direction. Several of the neighbors have indicated that they would like the homes on Lots 28-30 and 35 to
Planning Commission Minutes October 15,2003 Page 11
be single story, so that their views can be preserved. However, Carlsbad does not have a view
ordinance. When the Master Plan was reviewed, the views were taken into consideration and that is why there is the requirement regarding the pads to the east. This neighborhood has a requirement for 20% of
the homes to be single story, but that only apply to the homes on the west side of Amber Lane. The
single-story requirement was included to provide some variety in structure height for the homes along the ridgeline, which would be visible from a circulation element roadway, and not for preservation of views for
the existing residences.
Both of these projects comply with the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and the
subdivision ordinance and provide for all the required street and infrastructure improvements.
Neighborhood 1.10 meets all the applicable requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance for a
gated community. The projects are subject to the Growth Management Requirements of Zone 10 and comply with the 11 public facility standards. The inclusionary housing requirement for these projects was
reviewed at the Master Plan level and the inclusionary housing will be provided in the La Costa Greens Apartment project that is on the corner of Alga Road and Estrella Del Mar. With regard to CEQA, the
subdivisions are within the scope of the final program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and no
further CEQA compliance is required. Because all of the findings for approval can be made, Staff is
recommending approval of both of the subdivisions.
Commissioner Segall stated that he had been at the site that day and noticed that on plan 1.12 that there is a 90-degree turn off of Zodiac. He stated that it looked like a very steep grade going down and asked
Ms. Kennedy to comment on that and what protection the lots would have that are immediately to the west of Zodiac where cars may not negotiate that 90-degree turn. Ms. Kennedy stated that there would
not be a barrier there. Mr. Wickham addressed the circulation stating that the 90-degree turn is 100 ft away from Unicornio Street. It is used because a longer radius would not fit. The lots will be at grade
with the street. There will be a six-inch curb and gutter running along the street. If a vehicle did not' maneuver the turn, it would hit the curb and end up in the front yard of a house.
Commissioner Montgomery asked if the four lots fronting Zodiac Street have to be at the grade at Zodiac.
Mr. Wickham stated that that was correct. The lots front on Zodiac. Other designs were considered, but
bringing the street up created a better neighborhood connection. Commissioner Montgomery asked if
those lots could receive a single-story house. Mr. Wickham reviewed the pad elevations. Ms. Kennedy stated that the existing residences north of Zodiac Street start dropping down to 416 at the corner and
then the next residence is 409 ft, 400 ft, 393 ft.
Commissioner Montgomery asked if the residents originally negotiated with Mr. Arbuckle and Morrow Development about the westward views. Ms. Kennedy confirmed that that was how the Master Plan was
written, looking strictly at an east-west relationship. Commissioner Montgomery asked if the views are actually to the southwest. Ms. Kennedy stated that those residences have an unobstructed 180-degree
view.
Chairperson Baker asked Ms. Kennedy to review the lots that were to have single-story homes. Ms.
Kennedy indicated the lots that were requested by the neighbors to be single story, including Lot 35.
Chairperson Baker asked if any consideration had been given to having the four lots on Zodiac Street
front on Amber. Ms. Kennedy answered that she had discussed that with the developer, but it involved
blasting bedrock.
Chairperson Baker opened public testimony and invited those who would like to speak to the podium.
Stan Prowse, 7206 Aviara Drive, Carlsbad, stated that he was speaking on behalf of Paul and Gretchen
Donndelinger, who live at 2474 Unicornio Street, and William and Phyllis Baker, who live at 2478
Unicornio Street. They are asking for one additional condition to be imposed upon the motion approving the map. Mr. Prowse showed photographs taken by Mr. Donndelinger depicting the views and the
potential obstruction thereof. They feel that the developer had done an admirable job of meeting the City's requirements and the needs of the people who live along Unicornio Street. The 304 height
differential from pad to pad seems to have worked well for most people. Mr. Prowse stated that in looking
at the Tentative Map there appears only one place where the pad differential is at the lower limit of 30 ft.,
Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2003 Page 12
and that is between Lot 30 and the Donndelinger’s pad. A two-story house will obstruct the view looking
down to the coastline and the lagoon. They are asking that this be made a condition of approval.
Commissioner Segall stated that the view from the photographs appeared to be to the southwest. He
commented that it sounded like they’ve changed what was originally agreed upon. Mr. Prowse stated that he wasn’t present at the initiation of this, but said that the view from those lots due west is of a water
tank or the new construction. The view they want to preserve is a southwest view.
Anatole Raif, 2508 Unicornio Street, Carlsbad, submitted a letter to the Planning Commission. He stated
that the issue with the 1.12 neighborhood was that if the homes are built as planned, they would
completely lose their ocean view and part of their golf course view. He had been told that the City of Carlsbad does not have a view ordinance. The Master Plan for this project does, however, call for some
kind of view preservation. New pad elevations are required to be lower than existing elevations by at least the height of the new house, which is limited to 30 ft. That is certainly not the case for the pads in
their line of sight, which is southwest. Some of these pads are only three or four feet lower than their elevation. The impact is dramatic once the distance between homes is taken into account. Specifically,
Lots 6-10 and 31-35 would completely block their ocean view. Some of these lots would need to be
lowered by 40 ft to preserve the view. Another solution would be if all of these lots were restricted to
single-story construction. He stated that he lives next to Lot 35.
Commissioner Montgomery noted that single-story homes would reduce the rooflines only about 10 ft.
and would still block the ocean view. Mr. Raif stated that 40 ft. was the worst offender, and 10 ft. would, indeed, not solve the problem, but would mitigate the problem somewhat.
Chairperson Baker asked Mr. Raif what he thought would be on that property when he purchased his
home. Mr. Raif stated that he purchased his home six years ago while the property was still in
bankruptcy. There was no plan when he asked the City what would happen there. He stated that they
had paid a premium for their ocean view.
Steve Sutphin, 2502 Unicornio Street, Carlsbad, addressed the same issue that Mr. Raif addressed, as he lives two houses to the south of Mr. Raif. He spoke about Lots 11 and 12 that are 650 and 700 ft from
his lot. The height of those homes will completely block his ocean view from his first and second stories. He purchased his home two and a half years ago. He asked the Planning Department if his long distance
views of the ocean would be blocked. He was told that they wouldn’t be. His view is to the southwest. The lots are 30 ft lower, but with the distance between his lot and the others, the line of sight will be
blocked. Elevation reduction or single-story homes on Lots 11, 12, and 31 would allow him to retain his
ocean view from his second story.
Commissioner Whitton asked Mr. Sutphin if he wouldn’t still have an ocean view, just not the one closest to shore. He replied that Lot 12 will be 19 ft higher than his ocean view, extrapolated 3 miles that covers
a lot of ocean because of the angle. He didn’t know if he even would be able to see the horizon with 19
ft. He stated that currently he can see the shore and the entire lagoon from his backyard.
William Baker, 2478 Unicornio Street, Carlsbad, stated that Mr. Prowse had already spoken on his behalf,
but he wanted to add that the dust problem from the project has been severe and was aggravating his
wife’s emphysema.
Joe McDevitt, 2454 Unicornio Street, Carlsbad, submitted a letter to the Planning Commission. He stated
that he agreed with the comments made by his neighbors. He addressed the issue of which trees would be designated for the slopes. The trees selected for the streets were stated in the presentation, but not
for the slopes. He noted that there are seven trees planned for the slopes, namely, a California Sycamore that grows 50-100 ft, a Holly Oak that grows 40-70 ft with a spread of about 70 ft, Eucalyptus
trees, New Zealand Christmas Tree, and an American Sweet Gum that grows up to 60 ft. He stated that
he did not feel that these trees were compatible with the existing neighborhood as the trees on the slopes
around Unicornio were kept to a certain height to not obstruct any views. He stated that he had fruit trees
on his slopes that were 10 ft. He stated his concern about the trees on the slope on Amber Lane that are too high. He asked for an Amendment to this plan limiting the heights of these trees on the slopes to no
more than 20-30 ft as well as reducing the density of the trees.
Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2003 Page 13
Selma Castanedo, 2471 Unicornio, Carlsbad, stated that her home is directly in front of Zodiac. She is
afraid that the lights coming up there will shine directly into her master bedroom, which is in the front of her home. She is also afraid that with the pitch of Zodiac that the cars taking it will end up in her front
yard or on one of her cars parked in the front. She stated her concern about the home on Lot 30 blocking her westward ocean view. She would like that home to be single story. She asked if the plots as
currently graded were at the maximum level.
Chairperson Baker closed the public testimony and asked the applicant to respond to these comments.
Mr. Arbuckle responded to Ms. Malton’s question regarding the lot elevations being 40 ft stating that there is a variation in the separation between the existing and the proposed. The restriction is the height of the
roof versus the height of the existing pad to the east. Regarding the dust issue, Mr. Arbuckle stated that
they have increased the amount of water to reduce the dust. They asked Investigative Science and
Engineering to test the air quality to ensure compliance and they received a report that they did comply with PM-10 as well as other standards. They also reported that they were in compliance with noise
standards as required by the EIR. Regarding the views, he stated that there were no views purchased
from their property, no view shed, nor view easement purchased over their property and for the past
seven years they have proceeded to do the best job they could to accommodate the constraints of habitat
set aside and they continue to get constraints on areas that they can develop. In addition, they are required to make certain connections to help facilitate the movement of traffic through their property and
also to allow for the movement of traffic out of the existing community and across their property to
schools, open space, and parks. That requires certain connections. They have lowered the pads and will keep to the 30-ft restriction, but there is only so much they can do. With respect to the trees and shrubs,
they will review the plant palette to ensure that those trees are the correct size, recognizing that there is a
City requirement to use certain trees. The City also has requirements for the number of trees to plant on
a slope.
Ms. Kennedy clarified that the slide she showed pertaining to Lot 35 indicated how they were going to interpret the height of any residence that would be constructed on Lot 35. She stated that they weren’t
going to get any special deal. There’s not a requirement for the pad to be 30 ft below the existing
residence. The requirement is that the peak of the roof shall not be above the pad elevation of the
existing residence that would be to the east. Regarding the slope trees, the Master Plan did not address the height of any trees for this particular neighborhood other than the street trees being 30 ft maximum.
She stated that the developer’s landscape architect indicated that he understood that the views should be
preserved whenever possible. With the new plan, they are doing some modified grading so there will be
new landscape plans showing the location of some of those trees.
Mr. Wickham noted that there is a crest on Zodiac, and adjacent to Zodiac the elevation is 416 and about
five houses north of that the elevation is 375. There is, therefore, a 254 drop just on the existing homes
on Zodiac. So, in looking over the crowning effect to the south, there will be homes and pads at the same
elevation. Some of the requests to further lower pads are not possible. Zodiac exists at an 8.6% grade,
which is not steep, but not flat either. The grade of Zodiac will not be changed. The knuckle that comes
into Zodiac with the subdivision is at 8.6% grade. Not connecting Zodiac does not solve a neighborhood and a traffic circulation pattern to their benefit. The street access would outweigh a view issue. However, flipping these pads to a lower street below might be a solution.
Commissioner White asked why Amber was a cul-de-sac rather than connected. Mr. Wickham
responded that there was a great topography difference between the SDG&E easement and the streets below. The subdivision is being stepped into a hillside. There is a 30-ft difference to the level below.
Commissioner White stated that she could not understand why any resident would use Zodiac to go in
and out of that neighborhood unless there was a fire. Mr. Wickham stated that the hope is that some traffic patterns will change, because Alga Road is impacted.
Chairperson Baker asked if Zodiac would have a gate. Mr. Wickham stated that it would not, that Zodiac is a public street. The subdivision below Alicante will have a gate in Neighborhood 1.10.
Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2003 Page 14
Commissioner Whitton asked if the Planning Commission would have an opportunity to see the
landscape plans for the slopes. Ms. Kennedy stated that they would not as part of this approval. The
conceptual plan shows a slope tree symbol with seven different varieties. The City landscape architect
reviews those. Commissioner Whitton asked if the Planning Commission would be assured that there wouldn’t be 100-ft trees on the lot that obstructs the view. Ms. Kennedy reiterated that the City does not
have a view preservation ordinance, but stated that the developer’s landscape architect had assured her that he would take that into account.
Commissioner Whitton asked why Zodiac Street was needed. He commented that if Zodiac Street was
not there, the whole project could be moved over and tucked in a bit. Mr. Wickham explained that Zodiac Street from the original development in the 1960s was always designated to be a connection with this
Master Plan in mind. From an engineering perspective, it’s a good idea to connect all streets in all
directions whenever possible. The City needs to make more local connectors to take the pressure off the
arterial connectors. Also, a lot of cul-de-sacs tend to isolate neighborhoods.
Chairperson Baker asked what the elevations of the pads would be of those four lots if the took access off
Amber. Mr. Wickham replied that the street below on Amber is at 357. The proposed pads directly above
it are 386, so flipping them over; there would be a very low pad with a very large slope behind it up to Zodiac.
Commissioner Segall asked if there weren’t also some safety issues in having two ways out of a
community. Mr. Wickham stated that the Fire Department wants access in all directions. He stated that the Unicornio area is very isolated. Commissioner Segall noted that if Zodiac was closed as some had
suggested, then it would create one large cul-de-sac. He asked Mr. Wickham to comment on the ramifications of that. Mr. Wickham stated that this existing subdivision alone could not stand without
another access.
Commissioner Dominguez asked Ms. Kennedy to review Exhibit 5-36 Section J of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan that was adopted by the City Council in the original Master Plan and was referred to in
a letter that the Planning Commission had received from the residents on Unicornio. Ms. Kennedy stated
that it required that 20% of the homes on the west side of Amber had to be single-story homes.
Commissioner Dominguez commented that he thought the City Council may have applied those restrictions to take corrective action to mitigate the blocking of views believing the views were to the west,
when in fact they are more to the southwest. Ms. Kennedy stated that the single-story requirement along that side was not for the purpose of preservation of views, but rather for off-site views up towards homes
that were along the ridgeline and to provide variation on the height of homes along the ridge. Commissioner Dominguez asked why that wouldn’t be applied throughout that section of that Village. Ms.
Kennedy replied that they had had some conceptual grading plans that were part of the Master Plan and that the elevations on the concept plans are very close to what the proposed elevations will be and when
the City Council approved the Master Plan it may have.been evaluated and determined that the homes on the other side of Amber Lane weren’t necessary to comply with the single-story requirement. The
developer could still choose to mix single-story homes in throughout the whole development, but only
20% are required on the west side of Amber Lane. Commissioner Dominguez stated that the common sense approach seemed to be to do exactly that.
Commissioner Montgomery stated that if the single-story requirement were to be applied to Lots 11-19,
then there would be about five single-story homes that the applicant would have to build, and the cluster of those homes there would be view preservation to the homes to the east.
Commissioner Segall stated that he thought this was to approve a Tentative Tract Map not a Site
Development Plan. A Site Development Plan would look at the homes being one or two story and how
they would be placed on the lot. He stated that he thought the discussion was going in a direction not pertaining to the Tentative Tract Map. Ms. Kennedy concurred, but added that the Planning Commission
could offer direction to Staff and the developer with regard to the plotting of the homes. Mr. Neu stated that the Master Plan deals with the 20% single-story on the west side of Amber Lane. The standard was
Planning Commission Minutes October 15,2003 Page 15
not regarding view preservation, but rather the view as seen from a circulation road. The City’s Hillside Ordinance considers views from public places.
Commissioner White asked the applicant if in Neighborhood 1.10 he would consider eliminating the gated
community concept. Mr. Arbuckle stated that they were working with several different builders who had
different ideas about how that neighborhood would ultimately evolve. He stated that pedestrian access
through that gated community would be open to all of their residents. It is located across from the major
recreation facility. There will not be another common facility. Commissioner White asked that if the final decision by the builder is to have a gated community, would there be a pedestrian doorway. Mr. Arbuckle
stated that that was correct and that there would be a trail at the end of the street. She stated that there
should not be a lock on the gate that suggests to other community members that they cannot go through.
Chairperson Baker asked Mr. Arbuckle if there was any way to resolve the view issues. Mr. Arbuckle responded that with regard to the suggestion of moving the four homes down to Amber Lane causes
several issues to occur. One is that it would create the slope in aggregate that would exceed the Hillside Ordinance and would be problematic. The other issue is that while it is cut down currently, they would
have to cut that area down even further which would require additional blasting and the blasting is
scheduled to be completed in two weeks. It would also increase their quantities of cut and they are at the
limit in terms of the grading that they are allowed to do in the area. He stated that they would work with their builders and with Staff to look at where the actual siting of the one-story requirements should be.
One of the issues when they are clustered is that there would be several single-story elevations in a row.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner White stated her concern about the view issue, in spite of the absence of a City View Ordinance. The issue had been introduced when a 304 limitation had been negotiated between the
developer and the neighbors. She noted that there’s a certain amount of tension between the private property interests of the people who already live on Unicornio and the property rights of the applicant, and
everyone’s right to protect his or her investment. She urged the applicant to consider some single-story homes in a cluster off of Zodiac.
Commissioner Whitton concurred with Commissioner White and added that he would appreciate the
applicant giving consideration to the proposal that Commissioner Montgomery made.
Commissioner Dominguez stated that he didn’t hear the positive feedback from the applicant that he was hoping to hear.
Commissioner Montgomery stated that he was in favor of the project. He stated that he understood the
grading issues that the applicant had to contend with. He stated that he wasn’t advocating a row of single-story homes, but perhaps one every other home, or every third home.
Commissioner Segall stated that this is an issue that the Planning Commission was constantly struggling
with. However, with the lack of a view ordinance in Carlsbad, there is little that the Planning Commission can really require of a developer in these instances. He stated that he was concerned to hear that some
Commissioners want three or four single-story homes in a row to open up a view corridor, because diversity has also been an issue that the Planning Commission has required of developers. He stated
that he trusted that the applicant had heard the concerns expressed, and the Planning Commission was
not looking at Site Development Plans and will have another opportunity to look closely at these issues.
He stated that he could support the project.
Chairperson Baker stated that the view issue was opened with the Master Plan that did make some
allowances. She stated that she didn’t know how to solve this problem and that the Planning Commission would have to look at the Site Development Plan when they have the opportunity.
Commissioner Segall added that he was on the Planning Commission when this Master Plan was approved and he recalled that one of the persuasive points was that great effort had been taken on the
ridgeline on Amber Lane to ensure that there was a diversity of single-family homes mixed with two-story
to give the ridgeline variation. Thus, that was the intent three years ago when this was approved.
Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2003 Page 16
Chairperson Baker reiterated that the Planning Commission wanted the slope trees to be consistent with
staying below 30 feet wherever possible. Ms. Mobaldi stated that that could be made a condition that
they had to use a certain type of tree that grows no higher than a certain height.
Commissioner Dominguez explained that his concerns were not specifically addressed to view corridors. He stated his concern about community integration and he felt that to ask some concessions to allow
these two communities to meld together in an acceptable manner was reasonable.
Chairperson Baker called for a motion.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner White, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5472 and 5473
recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map CT 02-20 and Planned Unit
Development PUD 02-1 0; and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5474
approving Tentative Tract Map CT 02-21, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the errata sheet and with the following
condition that slope trees in area 1.12 should be of a type of tree that matures at
a height of 30 feet or under.
Chairperson Baker called for a vote.
VOTE: 5- 1
AYES: NOES: Dominguez
ABSTAIN: None
Baker, Montgomery, Segall, White, and Whitton
Chairperson Baker closed public hearing on Item 5, thanked Staff, and asked Mr. Neu to introduce Item 6.
69
PROOF OF
(2010 &
PUBLICATION
2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp $ P
Proof of Publication of
NOTICB OF PUBLlC HEARING
Bang a subdivision of Lot 10 of of Carlsbad County in the Ci to Ma %. 14543. Rld in the Ill coun&. Febnmy 12.2003
'Ihase Ersons wtshln to speak on tNs ro I are cordially invited to attend e public h&~Cogies of the a&-&% wlll be avallable on and after Wednesday Novan r 6 2003. you have an questlons. please call Barbara KcMedy In the Plahng Department at (7hI 602-4626.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
CASE FlLE. CT 02-20/lkJD 02-10
CASE NAME-
NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10
VILIAGES OP LA COSTA - GREENS
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This a loB Day of November, 2003
w
VLC - GREENS -;21,2003
; cITpcouNcLL OF cARLsBAD NEIGHBORHQOD 1.1 0 I CT 02-2OlPUd 02-10 111 .
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, December 2, 2003, to
consider a request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously
certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the
activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and
Planned Development Permit for 64 residential lots, 5 open space lots and 1 private street lot
for Neighborhood 1 .IO. The project sites are located east and west of Alicante Road, north of
Alga Road and south of Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more
particularly described as:
Being a subdivision of Lot 10 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La
Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map No. 14543, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, February 12, 2003
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after Wednesday, November 26,
2003. If you have any questions, please call Barbara Kennedy in the Planning Department at
(760) 602-4626.
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned
Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very
short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Development Permit in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad,
Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 at or prior to the public
hearing.
CASE FILE: CT 02-20/PUD 02-1 0
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA- GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.10
PUBLISH: November 21, 2003
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
I I JJ
// a
SITE
VLC - GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD I .IO
CT 02-201PUD 02-10
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use tenpiate ic- :SC
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 OCEANSIDE CA 92054
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC W 0 RKS/CO M M U N ITY
SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
BARBARA KENNEDY
LEUCADIA CNTY WATER DIST 0 L 1 V E N H AI N WATER D I ST
1960 LA COSTA AVE 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
VALLECITOS WATER DlST
201 VALLECITOS DE OR0
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
I .P. U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100 URBAN STUDIES 9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR STE B
SANDIEGO CA 92123 5201 RUFFIN RD
SD COUNTY PLANNING
SANDIEGO CA 92123
CA COASTAL COMMISSION SANDAG
STE 103 STE 800
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SAN DIEGO CA 92101
401 B STREET
ATTN TED ANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
DEPT
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUN IC1 PAL WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
SAIMA QURESHY
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
CHRISTER W ESTMAN
10128l2003
BAvVERYa Address Labels Laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM
PONDEROSA COUNTRY HOA
STE 120
23382 MILL CREEK DR
LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K S L LA COSTA RESORT CO
50905 AVENIDA BERMUDAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER A
STE 100
2237 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GLENN C & CHERYL B DODDS
6437 LA GARZA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES & BELINDA SOLOWIEJ
6435 LA GARZA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT A & RENE VANHORNE
6409 EL PATO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL P & CHRIST1 HALL
641 1 EL PATO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JULIA TESCHLER
641 3 EL PATO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLENN E DEMAR
2514 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN & VALSA STEPHEN
251 0 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MONICA WHITMAN ETAL
2512 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MORGAN TRUST
17315 PLAZA MARIA
SAN DIEGO CA 92128
MICHAEL S & KAREN A WILL
2506 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RYAN J GAGLIANO
2504 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS L & L HENDRICKSON
2502 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GUNTWIN & BARB GALLEISKY
2500 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRANK & JEAN I MERCURIO
2503 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL T & MAR MCNAMARA
2505 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORA LACORTE TR
2507 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RYUJl & KATSUKO OHNUMA
2509 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HENRY TR
251 1 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN W & SHARON MARMOR
251 3 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIEL W MCFARLAND
251 5 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES E &ANN E HILL
2517 LA GOLONDRINA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATHLEENASTRESHLY
6415 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DEBORAH L MURRAY
PO BOX 131265
CARLSBAD CA 92013
SEllCHlRO & MIEKO TANAKA
6419 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS A DURAN
6421 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROGER A & CAROL GARTLAND
6420 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Address Labels Laser 5 160@
,Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5: :~-
WILLIAM T & PHYLLI BAKER
2478 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DONNDELINGER TR
2474 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANN R CHAPPELOW
2470 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLUTE TR
2466 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HIROKO T & YASUKO OGINO
2462 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN B & ELLIOT J PALAY
2458 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY J & LINDA MCDEVITT
2454 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS & MONDA BLACKMORE
12492 RUETTE ALLIANTE
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
BENGT-OLOV ANDERSSON
2479 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRED B & INDRA K STARR
2475 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WALTER & SELMA CASTANEDO
2471 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH J & DEBORA SKALA
2467 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC J & ELYSE L MATSON
6708 ABANTO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KNUDSEN TR
6714 ABANTO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT A & VERONA VERNON
2514 ABEDUL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HEINLE TR
6705 ABEDUL PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EUGENE JR & DORIS KELLEY
6702 ABEDUL PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WAYNE M & IRMGA PETERSON
2614 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LINDON &ANNA LEWIS
PO BOX 131 133
CARLSBAD CA 92013
JAMES C & GLEN WICKSTROM
251 7 ABEDUL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DALE W & CAROL M HOFF
251 1 ABEDUL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GIAMMARINARO TR
2505 ABEDUL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LIMBER TR
6719 ABANTO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RHONDA R MlGLlACClO
671 1 ABANTO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STOWELL TR
2459 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD J & CHRISTE BOWLING
2455 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JERRY BLOCK
2451 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY RAMESON
6802 VIANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT F & TERl K SWETTE
681 0 VIANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM W & DEE MOWBRAY
6814 VIANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Address Labels laser 5 160@
S:::oth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5?w-
EDWARD & DORRACE SHOEN
6818 VIANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LLOYD R & EVELYN NORRIS
6821 WANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM J & JANET NAGLE
2518 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOEL REED
2510 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANATOLE & HOLLY C RAlF
2508 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES E YACABUCCI
2635 VISTA DEL CONQUISTA
JAMUL CA 91 935
STEVEN M & NANCY SUTPHIN
2502 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DONALD D &JOAN PHILLIPS
2486 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
IRA S BUSHEY TR
2482 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JONATHAN H & KELLY VITT
251 1 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BENNINGTON TR
6606 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ELWIN WILSON TR
6612 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GORDON A NESBITT II
6624 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD P & CAROL THORPE
6628 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
COREY D & GWEN MElTCHlK
6618 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID B & KRISTIN PETERS
6632 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTIN A & DONNA LIBERMAN
6636 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ARTHUR F & HILLARY PATHE.
2483 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID M PATRICK KERSTEN
6611 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FERGUSON TR
661 7 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JON S MELNYK TR
6627 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SEYFRIED TR
6633 GRULLA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOEL A & JANN MACCOLLAM
2532 ABEDUL ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RAYMOND A & DEVR SHAFFER
6553 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARABET & DIM KAPRIELIAN
6547 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CURTIS & MARIE BARNES TR
6543 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACQUELYN S JOHNSON
6539 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM JR & DOR DEMMERS
6535 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JENNINGS TR
6531 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEANNE KNIGHT TR
6527 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
a AERY@ Address labels Laser 516OS
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use temptate for 5 12 :.:
PAUL A MILLS
6523 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
YAACOVA LAUGLIN
91 1 WIND DRIFT DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN B & DEBRA CZAJKOWSKI
2977 W BRIARWOOD DR
FRANKLIN WI 53132
STEVEN E & DOLOR HlGGlNS
651 1 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EBRIGHT TR
6507 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOANN F SZYMONIK
6506 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ABSHER TR
651 0 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY FREEMAN
6514 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TIMOTHY & SUSAN LEACH
6518 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MATTY & LYNN SANDOVAL
6522 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK E & CATHERI SEIBERT
6534 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID W & SANDRA SOUTER
6542 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORMAN & CAROL HEWITT
2526 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANNY D & EMMA KRYGSMAN
2532 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES J & SANDRA REDMON
2538 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET E SHEPARD
2544 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM W HARRIS JR
2550 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD P & SANDRA MEYER
6519 ONDA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REINMILLER TR
6511 ONDA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL L & MARY WALMAN
6503 ONDA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RIZZO TR
6533 VISPERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN ELIOT
6529 VISPERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES L WEEMS
6525 VISPERA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CATHERIN CARDER-WHITEBREAD
2535 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHARLES W KERSHAW
2527 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WARREN & CHARLOT RESNICK
251 9 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRISTINA BANTOFT TR
2446 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JIMMY W & ROSELLE TAYLOR
2442 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT D & JUD ST AUSTIN
2438 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RADOJEVICTR
2434 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160s
Szooth Feed SheetsTM Use template fo: 510.
WILLIAM B & MARSHA RIDER
2430 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HELGA B MALTON TR
2426 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARL A & MARY J BLAZE TR
2422 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CLAYTON S & SHlR JOHNSON
2418 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN B & RUTH A CLARK TR
PO BOX 2068
CAPISTRANO BEACH C 92624
JACQUES P BRUYERE TR
2415 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD S GNAZZO TR
2419 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TYBURSKI TR
2423 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LALIT C & SUBHASANI SAWH
2425 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAVIER & RO HUARCAYA-PRO
2427 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID A & BARBAR SMALLEY
2431 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIKE &JANET K BLACK
2433 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BOWMAN TR
2435 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TIMOTHY A MCADAMS
2437 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTTJ DOWELL
2439 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARLSBAD TR
1
5200 N OCEAN DR
WEST PALM BCH FL 33404
PANCE & ANA SMILJKOVICH
6807 VIANDA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM E & MAR SALTZMAN
251 5 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC L WAITE JR TR
2537 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JASON W & AMY J LAUER
2525 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH A & GLORI BRADER
2527 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MAXINE H GRIMM
2535 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC L WAITE
2537 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TERESA M DITTMER
2545 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VICTORIA J MONICA
2547 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KAILYNN M EMMEL
2555 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LARRY S & DOROTHY MILLER
2557 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT A MYRES
6088 4TH AVE
MIAMISBURG OH 45342
MARIA CONSTANTINE
2567 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EUGENE & WGENIA CHUDIN
2575 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~AVERW Address Labels laser 51606
,Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5:: :
DANIEL J MEDIC1
2577 CORTE CASITAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LAS CASITAS TERRAZA
519 ENClNlTAS BLVD
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
DOVE FAMILY HOUSING ASSOC
1820 S ESCONDIDO BLVD
ESCONDIDO CA 92025
KOZlCKl COMMUNITY TR
7231 EL FUERTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEORGE G WOOD
7009 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LE LY HAYSLIP
701 3 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HERVE M MALAUSSENA
2 OVERLOOK TER
LARCHMONT NY 10538
SATYA P & URMILA SINGH
7023 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RALPH GARCIA
701 6 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
COREY W & DONYA H BRAUN
7012 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAMILLE R SHORE
7008 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT R DAVIS
7004 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NATHALIE M & RANDA RAGAN
7000 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOUSSEIN A JAHANGlRl
3906 N MESA VERDE AVE
FARMINGTON NM 87401
PAUL D GILL
2388 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEVIN F STEPHENS
7339 BOLERO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN A SWIFT
2380 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY G COLEMAN
6550 PONTO DR 73
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WES & FAYE SCARBROUGH TR
2372 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ADRIAN ROKKEN
2379 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KOLAN J & MARIA HAIRSTON
2375 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BLAINE & KELLY J BARTH
7006 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS J & SUSAN VALENTE
701 0 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SVEN M & JILL SCHRECKER
7014 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
L E & LINDA L HEYDEN
7018 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK F & SUSAN M GAMBOA
2386 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAHIN MAHROIAN
2390 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD & MARY J CASSONI
2389 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KOHRS TR
2385 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MANGIOTR
2381 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
aAvERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5ltiC;
JAMES B JR & REGIN JONES
2375 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARPENTIER TR
2371 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GAYLE G KILLION TR
2367 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RUBEN 8t TERRY L ZEPEDA
2361 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID & TRACY GUSTAFSON
2357 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NEWBERGlERSKlAN TR
2353 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALFRED & ESTHER NEWHUIS
7025 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAMELA L & JAM SCHAEFFER
7021 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EBELTR
2349 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES M & MARLEN SPAWTON
701 7 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORMAN & MARY R DUNCAN
701 3 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LARRY M & GAYLYN A MYRES
7009 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROGER & ANDREA EVANS
5289 MOHAVE DR
SlMl VALLEY CA 93063
EDWIN J HURN
7005 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN R & LINDA B WlSS
7001 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN R LANDA
7004 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDDIE V & SHATHA HAMAMA
7008 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANDREW J SUlTNER
7012 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DEAN & ELLEN GRANDE
7016 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH M & LISA MARIANO
7020 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHERYL E HOFFMAN
7003 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY S & ANDRE VAUGHN
701 7 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN J i3 LYNN DROTTER
2 SPOONWOOD CIR
BERWYN PA 19312
CHRISTOPHER H & MA ELLIS
7013 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MASSEY TR
7021 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARYROSE BREHM TR
7025 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN C & LISA A ESTILL
7029 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BORIS &JUNE N MATHlSZlK
7030 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KIMBERLY A SCOTT
7026 VIA CALIFIA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRIESEN TR
7022 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~AVERW Address Labels Laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template fo: 51:.
CRAIG G FENSTERMAKER
7018 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES G & RlSA P PICONE
7014 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT D & ELA GLISSMEYER
701 0 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALGA HILLS HOMEOWNERS AS
STE 250
5465 MOREHOUSE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
WILLIAM E & BREN BARNETT
7006 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NANCY M FOURNIER
7009 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BROADWAY TR
701 9 VIA CALAFIA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MAUREEN A GALLAGHER
7023 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARCIA L PINK
7027 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREGORY FARM LTD PARTNER
PO BOX 1053
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
MARCUSTR
7035 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRIAN J & BRENDA J SMITH
2322 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEORGE &JEANIE KNOP
2318 TERAZZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATHLEEN HEFFERNAN
2314 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN W & LI HAVERSTICK
2310 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SAMUEL A FLORES
7042 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
POWELL TR
7405 NEPTUNE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN & NELLY CANCHOLA
7034 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY L & SYLVIA GAFFNEY
7030 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM R & SHARO WATSON
7024 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES A & LINDA WILLIAMS
7020 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SAMAD M EDLOU
7016 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANTHONY T WANG
1600 HARKNESS ST
MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266
JAMES B & JOCE ERKENBECK
7008 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY MORILLA
701 5 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARY E & RACHELL MANNING
701 9 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARL D & JULIE NORDHOLM
7023 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LARRY L SOLDATY
7029 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDDY G HSlN
7033 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK R & PATRICIA A GOOD
7037 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
AVERW Address Labels Laser 51608
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 516( .
GERALD C YOUNG
7041 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROZA H GREGORCICH
7045 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FREDDY W CHANG
7049 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MUNSON TR
7051 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID B & KERRI S ROWE
2303 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DWINELL TR
2307 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JORGE A & SONDRA J ROMAN
231 1 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT L & MEEGHAN AIMONE
231 5 TERAZZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN & MAR1 WRIGHT
231 9 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KASHINAD TR
701 9 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD S & SALLY ARAUJO
7023 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATHY BABA
7027 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GORDON R MAYHEW
7031 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID L & JOAN DAUGHERTY
7039 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIEL YANG
7035 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RAYMOND P & MARET SWARTZ
7043 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JESSICA M VANONI
7047 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN B & LYNElTE MEYERS
7051 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MONDRE & JENNI VANDERLEE
7055 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALGA HILLS HOMEOWNERS AS
PO BOX I60278
BIG SKY MT 59716
JUDY H GAZE
181 25 MOON SONG CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92127
AUGUSTIN W ROLLINSON
2343 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VEEDA J LISLE
2339 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD A & E R HILL
2335 TERFWZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN 6 &JULIE L MARCHER
2331 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES K & OLGA L MORRIS
2324 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HEATHERDHAND
2328 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
IOURI M CHElKlNE
2658 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD
DEL MAR CA 920 14
CARLOS & LISA ORDAZ
2336 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN T LUDEMAN
2043 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
~AVERYB Address Labels Laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 516:''.
BARRY W CLARK
2051 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MACE &JAN SIEGEL
PO BOX 2172
SANTA MONICA CA 90407
EDWARD J & SANDR MUSBACH
21 05 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MELVEN & LYNN GENSER TR
21 13 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARRY A & ANNE M WISH
2121 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARTHA M MEADE
21 29 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAY M & SANDEE S FULLER
2145 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
W HELEN PERRY TR
7001 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WEINBERGER TR
7009 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DONALD E & PAMELA A WEBB
7017 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TERRILL R MCCABE
7025 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
F M & NANCY L CORRIGAN
9016 GREENSBORO LN
LAS VEGAS NV 89134
IZNER TR
7034 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEAN P DELORME
7026 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH & TRACI KAUFMAN
7018 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SETH S & KATHY E LEVINE
10
6965 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOY R TUSHINSKY
2207 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH & ROSE PIAZZA
9423 SEA VIEW AVE
BROOKLYN NY 11236
MARCIN M & ELDRIE LUBICK
701 1 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID & DOROTHY KLEINMAN
701 9 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RADES TR
7027 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET S POMERANTZ TR
7035 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAPOSHNICK TR
21 53 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VLADISLAV & YANA DROZDOV
2161 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
IRENE MCMILLAN
7015 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY G BRANCIFORTE
7013 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ELLE FRANCE
2251 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ESTRELLA DEL MAR PARTNER
STE 1502
221 N STANTON ST
EL PAS0 TX 79901
LESLIE V SCHULTZ
7141 BROOKSHIRE
DALLAS TX 75230
MARGARET KENDALL TR
7005 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Address Labels Laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5 IOC
ELAINE J LERER
PO BOX 131 624
CARLSBAD CA 92013
PATRICK C & LORNA GRANT
7001 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACQUELYN M LllTLEFlELD
121 BROADWAY 600
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
JAMES S UKEGAWA
4607 TELESCOPE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GLORIA S CHANG
7017 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN P HALLEN TR
7023 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LOIS R LEE
7047 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS A & A JEA EMANUEL
7045 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRIAN L & TERl L CLEMENT
7043 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIEL J CZAPSKI
2315 SANDY LN
VISTA CA 92083
KATHRYN L DEMONTE
5055 AVENIDA ENCINAS 120
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LAWRENCE-MARLENE DRASIN
7037 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SONJA KNIGHT TR
7035 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILFRED M & JANET A ROOF
9862 DARON DR
VILLA PARK CA 92861
LOUIS H & VIVIAN LAUFER
541 1 LOUISE AVE
ENCINO CA 91316
ROBYN SOWELL
7029 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LESLIE V SCHULTZ
7027 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANTOINETTE LAJOYE
7025 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT S & SHELLY MARCUS
16
492 BEACON ST
BOSTON MA 02115
M B J LA COSTA PARTNERSH
18
6006 BALCONES CT '
EL PAS0 TX 79912
SALVATORE A SAVASTIO
7059 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM 0 & DORIS YATES
7057 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL S LANG
7049 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOWARD SCHULTZ
9241 HBJ FWY
DALLAS TX 75243
MANDELL & ROBERTA WHITE
61 10 E SAN MATE0
TUCSON AZ 8571 5
TANNER TR
7055 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LIBERATO D & 0 TORTORlCl
6436 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TORTORlCl TR
6436 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EVERGREEN HEBRON L P
PO BOX 1454
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
ERIC B & MARY H LINDGREN
6440 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Address labels laser 5160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use ternpiate for 516;-
JAMES T COLLINS JR TR
6423 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WALPUSKI TR
6425 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PHILIP M &JOYCE S FUSCO
6427 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GILLES TR
6429 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MERONOFF TR
755 VAN NUYS ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
RICHARD TRACEY
6433 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH E & SUSAN M HUME
3570 EMMA LN
VISTA CA 92084
STEVE & ANNE WALSH TR
6437 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY A & CYNTHIA CESENA
6439 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM R & LESLIE WlTT
2521 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT H & SASKIA LEARY
2523 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS J & PHYLLIS BYRNE
2525 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS J &JULIE MEAGHER
6422 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PATRICK & MlRlA GALLAHUE
6424 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EARL H KROEKER JR
6426 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BILL & GAIL MANISHOR
6428 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN F & MARIE T DURKIN
6430 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
AARON COMERCHERO
6432 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RALAND E & KELLY CAMARA
6434 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MASOUD & BONNIE ATAIE
6436 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALEJANDRO V TOVAR
2526 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CRAIG L & DIANNA J WELLS
6439 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GERALDINE B BROWN TR
6437 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DERDERIANTR
6435 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STRACHAN TR
6433 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JANIE E ALBERTS
6431 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL T & LISA M WALSH
2254 VISTA LA NlSA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK L & DENISE T HERMAN
6427 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FREDERICK W & CAROL PRICE
2528 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOROTHY E HENDERSON
1519 ELON LN
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
Address Labels Laser 516OS
Smogth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160F
WILLIAM & KATHLEEN BLAIR
2534 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROY H LA FORGE JR
2536 EL GAVlLAN CT
I CHUNG CHENG
2538 EL GAVILAN CT
THOMAS C & KATHR SCHEETZ JOHN & BRENDA ADAMS
2604 COLlBRl LN 2606 COLlBRl LN 2608 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY R & BETTY LEE
THOMAS M & TERESA CESEAR
6501 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOPE M MITCHEM
6503 LA PALOMA ST
ROBERT R & MARIA FEASEL
6505 LA PALOMA ST
ED & GLORIA L TSU
6506 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
E PAUL & MARTHA GOYETTE
6504 LA PALOMA ST
DENNIS A & MARIA PEARSON
6502 LA PALOMA ST
KAREN D MORRIS GRAHAM & SUZANNE THORLEY DALEE&VALDBAKKENTR
9030 W SAHARA AVE
LAS VEGAS NV 891 17 THE COLONY TX 75056 CARLSBAD CA 92009
36 12 COTTONWOOD SPRINGS 2541 EL GAVILAN CT
FRENCH TR RICHARD A & JEA FOELLMER DAN A TUFT0
2601 COLlBRl LN 2603 COLIBRI LN 2605 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY A & DONNA S YEE
2607 COLlBRl LN 701 3 VIA CALlFlA 7002 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAMPBELL/DAMPLO TR D & LANELL M ALSTON HAROLD
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC
STE A
5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARTHA M MEADE
2129 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 SANTA ANA CA 92799
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
PO BOX 251 11
MORROW DEVELOPMENT CNLM
STE 180 STE H 1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008 FALLBROOK CA 92028
425 E ALVARADO ST
Address Labels Laser 516OS
Villages of La Costa
Greens Neighborhoods
Item 10 – Neighborhood 1.10
Item 11 – Neighborhoods 1.08 & 1.09
Item 12 – Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13, & 1.14
LA COSTA GREENS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LA COSTA GREENS SUBDIVISIONS MAP
CT 02CT 02--20/PUD 0220/PUD 02--1010
Project InformationProject Information
➤➤37.3 Gross Acres37.3 Gross Acres
➤➤64 Single64 Single--Family LotsFamily Lots
➤➤5 OS Lots5 OS Lots
➤➤1 Private Street Lot1 Private Street Lot
➤➤Gated CommunityGated Community
➤➤Min. 9,000 sq. ft. LotsMin. 9,000 sq. ft. Lots
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.08La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.08
CT 02CT 02--2323
Project InformationProject Information
➤➤42.9 Gross Acres42.9 Gross Acres
➤➤82 Single82 Single--Family LotsFamily Lots
➤➤6 Open Space Lots6 Open Space Lots
➤➤Min. 7,500 sq. ft. LotsMin. 7,500 sq. ft. Lots
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09
CT 02CT 02--22/PUD 0222/PUD 02--1111
Project InformationProject Information
➤➤25.3 Gross Acres25.3 Gross Acres
➤➤75 Single75 Single--Family LotsFamily Lots
➤➤2 Open Space Lots2 Open Space Lots
➤➤Min. 6,000 sq. ft. LotsMin. 6,000 sq. ft. Lots
1.11
1.14
1.13
CT 02CT 02--24/PUD 0224/PUD 02--1212
Project InformationProject Information
➤➤42.8 Acres42.8 Acres
➤➤129 Single129 Single--Family Residential LotsFamily Residential Lots
––N. 1.11: 35 LotsN. 1.11: 35 Lots
––N. 1.13: 33 LotsN. 1.13: 33 Lots
––N. 1.14: 61 LotsN. 1.14: 61 Lots
➤➤8 Open Space Lots8 Open Space Lots
➤➤Min. 5,000 sq. ft. LotsMin. 5,000 sq. ft. Lots
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.11, 1.13, 1.14La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.11, 1.13, 1.14
Relevant Policies
VLC Master Plan
Subdivision Ordinance
Planned Development
Ordinance
Growth Management – Zone 10
Inclusionary Housing
CEQA
Environmental Review
Evaluated in Final Program EIR
98-07
Applicable mitigation measures
have been completed,
incorporated into the project
design or are required as
conditions of approval
Proposed activities determined
to have no effects beyond those
analyzed in EIR 98-07
Recommendation
That the City Council approve:
Neighborhood 1.10
➤CT 02-20/PUD 02-10
Neighborhoods 1.08 & 1.09
➤CT 02-23
➤CT 02-22/PUD 02-11
Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 & 1.14
➤CT 02-24/PUD 02-12