HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-01-20; City Council; 17475; Cannon liftAB# 17,475
MTG. 1/20/04
DEPT. PLN# CITYMGR
TITLE:
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
ZC 03-02lLCPA 03-04
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Project application(s) Administrative Reviewed by and
Approvals Final at Planning
Commission
Environmental Review -
Negative Declaration
Zone Change/ZC 03-02
Local Coastal Program
Amendment/ LCPA 03-04
That the Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. , APPROVING Zone Change ZC
03-02, and ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-027 ADOPTING a Negative Declaration and
APPROVING Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 03-04, based on the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein.
NS-691
Reviewed by and
Final at Council
X
X
X
ITEM EXP LAN AT1 0 N :
The proposed project involves a Zone Change (ZC 03-02) and a Local Coastal Program
Amendment (LCPA 03-04) to change the zoning on two small parcels on the southeast side of
Cannon Road from R-3-Q (Multiple Family Residential with Qualified Overlay) to 0-S (Open Space).
The Zone Change is necessary to correct an inconsistency between the General Plan designation
on the property (OS) and the current residential zoning. The LCPA is necessary to maintain
consistency between the zoning shown on the City's Zoning Map and that of the Local Coastal
Program.
The project site consists of two small parcels totaling 1.6 acres. The easternmost (approximately
4,000-sf) lot contains the existing temporary sewage lift station. The larger (1.48-ac) westernmost
lot contains the existing detention basin. (The temporary lift station will be replaced by a permanent
lift station later this year pursuant to the February, 2003 approval of CUP 02-11 for the permanent
lift station.) The two parcels were created (originally as easements) specifically for the existing uses
by the project approvals for the Kelly Ranch development.
The project site has a General Plan designation of Open Space (OS) and R-3-Q zoning. The
parcels were given an OS General Plan designation because they were contiguous to permanent
open space and it was known that they would not be developed with any uses other than the
planned detention basin and lift station. The two current parcels existed originally as easements.
The proposed zone change and local coastal program amendment were heard by the Planning
Commission at a public hearing on November 19, 2003. The Commission voted unanimously to
recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration and to recommend approval of ZC 03-02 and
LCPA 03-04.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Based on an environmental impact assessment conducted by staff, the Planning Director prepared
a Negative Declaration. On July 22, 2003, a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17 9475
project was published. No written comments were received during the 30-day public review period.
Because this project involves an LCPA, staff also published a notice for a six-week review period for
the proposed LCPA. The six-week review period opened on July 24, 2003 and closed on
September 4, 2003. No Comments were received.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts are associated with this zone change and local coastal program amendment. The
only intended uses for the site (a sewage lift station and a detention basin) already exist.
EXHl BITS:
1. City Council Ordinance No. NS-691
2. City Council Resolution No. 2004-027
3. Location Map
4.
5.
6.
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5452, 5453 and 5455
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 19, 2003
Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 19, 2003.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Elaine Blackburn, (760) 602-4621, eblac@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. NS-691
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF
THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO
THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 03-02,
FROM R-3-Q TO 0-S ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF CANNON
ROAD WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
CASE NO,: ZC 03-02
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That the City’s zoning map is hereby amended as shown on the
map marked Exhibit “ZC 03-02” attached hereto and made a part hereof, pursuant to Section
21.050.30 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as
set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5453 constitute the findings and conditions of
the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its
adoption. (Not withstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the City’s
Coastal Zone until approved by the California Coastal Commission.)
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council held on the 20th day of January , 2004, and thereafter
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
Ordinance No. NS-691
Page 2
-2-
PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE ZC: 03-02
draft 0 final 0
I Project Name: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE I Related Case File No(s): LCPA 03-04
Legal Description(s): Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE AND
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO REZONE 1.6
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF
CANNON ROAD, WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL, IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
CASE NO.: ZC 03-021LCPA 03-04
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on November 19, 2003, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Negative Declaration, Zone Change
03-02 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 03-04 to rezone 1.6 acres of land from Multiple
Family Residential with a Qualified Overlay (R-3/Q) to Open Space (0-S), and adopted
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5452, 5453, and 5454 recommending to the City Council
that they be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 20th day of January , 2004
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Negative Declaration,
Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration, Zone Change, and Local Coastal Program Amendment.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5452, 5453 and 5454 constitute the findings of the City Council in this matter.
3. That the Negative Declaration, Zone Change and Local Coastal Program
Amendment, ZC 03-02 and LCPA 03-04 respectively, are approved as shown in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 5452, 5453 and 5454 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
herein by reference .
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 h
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 20th day of , January 2004, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
3rd
M. WOOD, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2004-027
Page 2
-2-
EXHIBIT 3
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
ZC 03-02lLCPA 03-04
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5452
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAhWING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW A
ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3-Q (MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL WITH QUALIFIED OVERLAY) TO 0-S (OPEN
SPACE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
SIDE OF CANNON ROAD WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
CASE NO.: ZC 03-02LCPA 03-04
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “O~ner/Developer,’~ has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of November 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon. hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration,
according to the “ND” and Exhibits “NOI” dated July 22, 2003, and “PIT’ dated
July 10, 2003, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
findings:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration for ZC 03-
02/LCPA 03-04, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and
any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project;
b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad;
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of November 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman,
Montgomery, Segall, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
~ \$~~lo@&l@(&,A, -I
MICHAEL J. H&,MILL+R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5452 -2-
Citofd .) am 0 D-0, -
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CASE NAME:
PROJECT LOCATION:
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
Southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real
CASE NO: ZC 03-02LCPA 03-04
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed action is a zone change for two parcels adjacent to
the Canterbury (Kelly Ranch) development on the southeast side of Cannon Road west of El
Camino Real containing a detention basin and a sewage lift station. The request is to change the
current R-3-Q (Multiple Family Residential with Qualified Overlay) zoning to 0-S (Open Space)
zoning to achieve consistency with the current OS (Open Space) General Plan designation on the
property.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above-described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EM Part 2) did not identify any potentially
significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Planning
Commission recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration to the City Council.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative
Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California
92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by
the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be
issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Elaine
Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4621.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD JULY 22,2003 TO AUGUST 22,2003
PUBLISH DATE JULY 22,2003
/I
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.yawf.us @
n
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CASE NAME:
PROJECT LOCATION:
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
Southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real
CASE NO: ZC 03-02ILCPA 03-04
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Zone Change and a Local Coastal Program Amendment to change
the zoning from R-3-Q to 0-S on a site containing a sewer pump station and a detention basin
DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above
described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, the initial study (EM Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the
environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows:
IXI
0
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
The proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but
at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative
Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed).
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
A copy of the initial study (EM Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is
on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04
DATE: July 10.2003
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Cannon Lift Zone Change
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad
3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Elaine Blackburn 760-602-4621
4. PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real
5. PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad, Planning Department,
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: OS
7. ZONING: R-3-0 TO 0-S
8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing
approval or participation agreements): N/A
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
The proposed action is a zone change for two parcels adiacent to the Canterbury (Kelly
Ranch) development on the southeast side of Cannon Road containing a detention basin and a
sewage lift station. The request is to change the current R-3-0 (Multiple Family Residential
with Oualified Overlay) zoning to 0-S (Open Space) zoning to achieve consistency with the
current OS (Open Space) General Plan designation on the property. 1
-
The proiect site consists of two small parcels created during the development of the Kelly
Ranch proiect specifically to accommodate a detention basin and a sewage lift station
necessary for the neighboring development. The detention basin and a temporary sewage lift
station already exist on the site. The temporary lift station will be replaced by a permanent
lift station in late-2003 pursuant to a previously aDproved Conditional Use Permit, Site
Development Plan, and Coastal Development Permit. No other development is intended for
these two small parcels. The current R-3-0 (Multiple Family Residential) zoning on the site
is not consistent with the OS (Open Space) General Plan designation of the property. By
changing the zoning from R-3-0 to 0-S (Open Space), the property would then be zoned
consistent with its General Plan designation.
1 Rev. 07/03/02 /3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist .on the following pages.
0 Aesthetics
0 Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
u Geology/Soils
[ZI HazardsiHazardous Materials
0 Hydrology/Water Quality
0 Noise
Population and Housing
u Public Services u Biological Resources u Land Use and Planning u Recreation
0 Cultural Resources 0 Mineral Resources 17 TransportatiodCirculation
Mandatory Findings of
Significance . 0 Utilities & Service Systems
2 14 Rev. 07103102
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
5l
0
0
cl
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the
environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have
been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
Rev. 07/03/02
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the
environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a
checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by
the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to
prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously
approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately
supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No
Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be
explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors
as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential
impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards
and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than
Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the
mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant
level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significantly adverse.
Based on an “EM-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse
effect on the environment, but &l potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards
and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative
Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present
and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been
incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required.
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to
prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding
Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the
project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant,
4 Rev. 07/03/02
and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case.
the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked
and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not
limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been
discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does
not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a
“Statement of Ovemding Considerations” for the significant adverse impact has not been made
pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to
less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is not possible to determine the
level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a
mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form
under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to
discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant.
5 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
Potentially Potentially
Significant Significant
Impact Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0 a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0
0 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
State scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual 0 character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
0 d) Create a new source of substantial light and
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
0
LessThan No
Significant Impact
Impact
UIXI
ow
ow
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1 997
prepared by the California Department of
Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agnculture and farmland.)
Would the project:
0 UIXI Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural 0 0 om use, or a Williamson Act contract?
0 ow Involve other changes in the existing 0
environment, which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland
to non-agncultural use?
111. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the
significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district
may be relied upon to make the following
determinations.) Would the project:
6 Rev. 01/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is in non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? .
Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the
project :
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by
California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including but not limited
to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
Potentially
Significanl
Impact
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated 17
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
Impact
[XI
IXI
1sI
Ixi
IXI
IXI
IXI
El
7 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Impact tributary areas that are environmentally
sensitive?
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined
in §15064.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique pale
ontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury or death involving:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Impact
17
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated 0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
No
Impact
(XI
IXI
[XI
IXI
No
Impact
IXI
[XI
IXI
IXI
8 Rev. 07/03/02 30
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
i.
11.
... 111.
iv.
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
Strong seismic ground shaking?
Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Landslides?
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
Be located on expansive soils, as defined in
Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1997), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?
IV. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
9 Rev. 07/03/02 ai
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or environment?
For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
VIILHYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -
Would the project:
Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water
recharge such that there would be a net deficit
in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
ground water table level (i.e., the production
rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated 0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
Impact
IXI
Ix1
Ix1
[XI
[XI
IXI
la
lxl
10 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
No
Impact
0
0
c) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 [XI
0 IXI d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner, which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
cl 0 0 e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the flow rate or amount
(volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
0 0 0 IXI f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
0
0
cl 0
0 0
IXI
IXI
g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood delineation map?
0 0 IXI i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area
structures, which would impede or redirect
flood flows?
0 IXI j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
IXI
IXI
k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving
surface waters.
0 0 0 m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy
metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives,
synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding
substances and trash) into receiving surface
waters or other alteration of receiving surface
water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
a3 11 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially
Significant Significant
Impact Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0 n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine,
fresh or wetland waters) during or following
construction?
0 0) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired
water body as listed on the Clean Water Act 0
Section 303(d) list?
0 p) The exceedance of applicable surface or
groundwater receiving water quality objectives
or degradation of beneficial uses?
0
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
0 0
0
0 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat 0
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
0 a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value
to the region and the residents of the State?
0
0 b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan,
or other land use plan?
X. NOISE - Would the project result in:
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
Impact
Ixl
[XI
IXI
[XI
[XI
Ixl
IXI
[XI
0 ON Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance or
applicable standards of other agencies?
0
0 nIxI Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundboume vibration or 0
groundbourne noise levels?
12 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated 0 ON c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
0 UEI d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
0
0 ON e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people
residing or worlung in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
0
o UIXI f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
0
X. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the
project:
0 OIXI a) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
o UIXI b) Displace substantial numbers of existing 0
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
0 01XI c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered government
facilities, a need for new or physically altered
government facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times, or other performance objectives
for any of the public services:
13 Rev. 07/03/02
1)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v>
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
XIV. RECREATION
Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the
project:
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial
in relation to the existing traffic load and
capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a
level of service standard established by the
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial
safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
14
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated cl
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rev. 07/03/02 ad
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
f) Result in insufficient parlung capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turn-outs, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of
the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction
of which would cause significant environmental
effects?
Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected demand in addition to
the provider’s existing commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project’s solid
waste disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
Impact
[XI
IXI
[XI
IXI
IXI
[XI
[XI
IXI
IXI
15 Rev. Q7lQ3lQ2
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause the substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
0 om
0
0
0
0
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for
review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined
from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions
for the project.
16 Rev. 07/03/02
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AESTHETICS
No Impact. Since no development is proposed, there would be no impacts to the aesthetic qualities of
the city. The existing and planned future development on the site (the existing detention basin and
existing temporary and future permanent sewage lift stations) have already undergone all necessary
environmental review and have received all necessary discretionary permits.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
No Impact, The subject property has not been in agricultural use recently and would not be expected to
be in such use in the future. The two small parcels were created specifically to accommodate a detention
basin and a sewage lift station needed for the development of the neighboring residential development.
AIR QUALITY
No Impact. This zone change will not impact the City’s air quality. The existing detention basin and
sewage lift station are the only uses expected to ever be on the site. Both are necessary to serve the
adjoining residential development.
BIOLOGICAL and CULTURAL RESOURCES
No Impact. The proposed zone change will not result in impacts to biological or cultural resources. The
detention basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent
sewage lift station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all
necessary discretionary permits.
GEOLOGYISOILS
No Impact. The proposed zone change will not result in impacts to geology or soils. The detention
basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift
station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary
discretionary permits.
HAZARDSJHAZARDOUS MATERIALS
No Impact. This zone change request does not involve the use or movement of such materials. The
detention basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent
sewage lift station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all
necessary discretionary permits.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
No Impact. This zone change would not result in impacts to hydrology or water quality. The detention
basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift
station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary
discretionary permits.
LAND USE PLANNING
No Impact. The proposed zone change is necessary to achieve consistency between the General Plan
designation and the zoning on the subject property. The site is currently designated OS (Open Space) on
17 Rev. 07/03/02 a?
the City's General Plan. However, it has a zoning designation of R-3-Q (Multiple Family Residential
with a Qualified Overlay), which is inconsistent with the OS General Plan designation. The R-3-Q
zoning on the property is an inadvertent carry-over from previous designations and zoning on the
property (prior to the development of the Kelly Ranch residential development). The two subject parcels
are currently and will remain in use only to accommodate the necessary detention basin and sewage lift
station. No residential development would ever be planned for the two parcels. By changing the zoning
to 0-S (Open Space) the necessary General Pladzoning consistency will be achieved.
MINERAL RESOURCES
No Impact. This zone change would not result in impacts to mineral resources. The detention basin and
the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift station
has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary discretionary
permits.
NOISE
No Impact. This zone change would not result in noise impacts. The detention basin and the temporary
sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift station has already
undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary discretionary permits.
POPULATION/HOUSING/PUBLIC SERVICES
No Impact. This zone change would not result in impacts to population, housing, or public services.
The detention basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future
permanent sewage lift station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received
all necessary discretionary permits.
RECREATION
No Impact. This zone change would not result in impacts to recreation facilitiesheeds. The detention
basin and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift
station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary
discretionary permits.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
No Impact. This zone change would not result in transportatiodtraffic impacts. The detention basin
and the temporary sewage pump station already exist on the site. The future permanent sewage lift
station has already undergone all necessary environmental review and has received all necessary
discretionary permits.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad
Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
18 Rev. 07/03/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5453
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH A QUALIFIED OVERLAY) TO
ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF CANNON ROAD WEST OF
MENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME:
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3-Q (MULTIPLE
0-S (OPEN SPACE) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
EL CAMINO REAL AND IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGE-
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
CASE NO: ZC 03-02
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “Owner/Developer,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on
Exhibit “X” dated November 5, 2003, attached hereto and on file in the Planning Department,
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE - ZC 03-02, as provided by Chapter 2 1.52 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of November 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
03-02 based on the following findings:
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE - ZC
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Find in gs :
1. That the proposed Zone Change from R-3-Q to 0-S is consistent with the goals and
policies of the various elements of the General Plan, in that the proposed 0-S zone is
consistent with the existing OS (Open Space) Land Use designation on the subject
property and is compatible with the R-1 and R-3 residential zoning of the abutting
properties to the south, east, and west and with the 0-S zoning of the property to
the north.
2. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as
mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use
Element, in that the proposed 0-S Zone, as shown on Exhibit “X,” implements the
existing OS Land Use Designation.
3. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general
welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the zone change from
R-3-Q to 0-S implements the objectives of the zoning ordinance regarding the 0-S
zone and will allow the continuance of the existing and planned development of the
subject site with a detention basin and sewage lift station, both of which are
consistent with the OS General Plan land use designation and are compatible with
and necessary for the surrounding residential development.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired. ...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5453 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 19th 'day of November 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman,
Montgomery, Segall, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None v R, Chairperson
C&IlJ$AD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5453 -3- 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5454
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM (LCP) TO BRING THE LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM AND ZONING MAP INTO
CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST
SIDE OF CANNON ROAD WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8.
CASE NAME: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
CASE NO.: LCPA 03-04
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Program,
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “Owner/Developer,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Local Coastal
Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit “LCPA 03-04’’ dated November 19th, 2003 attached
hereto, CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE - LCPA 03-04, as provided in Public Resources
Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Commission Administrative
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of November 2003
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review period
for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on July 24,
2003 and ending on September 4, 2003, staff had received no public comments
on the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment.
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CANNON LIFT ZONE
CHANGE - LCPA 03-04 based on the following findings:
Findinm:
1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is
in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and all applicable policies
of the Mello I1 Segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by
this amendment, in that the proposed 0-S (Open Space) zone is consistent with the
existing OS (Open Space) land use designation.
2. That the proposed land use and zone designation amendment to the Mello I1 Segment of
the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring the designations of the City’s
Zoning Map and the Mello I1 Local Coastal Program Segment into conformance.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RES0 NO. 5454 -2- 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1;
1F
l!
21
2
2'
2
2
2
2
2
2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of November 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman,
Montgomery, Segall, White, and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None m , Chairperson cw PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
-1 \,~~,~ivu~l& ! 7
MICHAEL J. HO~~MILLSI~R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5454 -3- 3Q
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
LCPA Map Designation Change
Property From: To:
A. 208-1 84-04 R-3-Q os
B. 208-1 84-08 R-3-Q os
C.
LCPA: 03-04
draft 0 final 0
Approvals
Council Approval Date:
Resolution No:
Effective Date:
Signature:
Project Name: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
Property/Legal Description@):
Legal Description(s):
Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
I Related Case File No(s): ZC 03-02
I Attach ddditional pages if necessary I
37
EXHIBIT 5
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 19,2003
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
Application complete date: da
Project Engineer: da
Project Planner: Elaine Blackburn
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SUBJECT: ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE - Request for a
recommendation of approval for a Negative Declaration, a Zone Change, and a
Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the zoning from R-3-Q to 0-S on a
site located on the southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real and
within Local Facilities Management Zone 8.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5452, 5453, and
5454 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration and RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of ZC 03-02 and LCPA 03-04 based upon the findings contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project involves a Zone Change (ZC 03-02) and a Local Coastal Program
Amendment (LCPA 03-04) to change the zoning on two small parcels on the southeast side of
Cannon Road from R-3-Q (Multiple Family Residential with Qualified Overlay) to 0-S (Open
Space). The Zone Change is necessary to correct an inconsistency between the General Plan
designation on the property (OS) and the current residential zoning. The LCPA is necessary to
maintain consistency between the zoning shown on the City's Zoning Map and that of the Local
Coastal Program. There are no unresolved issues associated with the project.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The proposed project zone change would change the zoning on two small parcels on the
southeast side of Cannon Road from R-3-Q to 0-S. The zone change is necessary to correct an
inconsistency between the General Plan designation on the property (OS) and the current
residential zoning. Staff became aware of this inconsistency during processing of the Cannon
Road Lift Station (CUP 02-1 1) approved in February 2003.
The project site consists oftwo small parcels (totaling 1.6 acres) located on the southeast side of
Cannon Road west of El Camino Real. (Cannon Road runs generally northeast to southwest in
this area.). The easternmost (approximately 4,000-sf) lot contains the existing temporary sewage
lift station. The larger (1.48-ac) westernmost lot contains the existing detention basin. (The
temporary lift station will be replaced by a permanent lift station later this year pursuant to the
February, 2003 approval of CUP 02-11 for the permanent lift station.) The two parcels were
created (originally as easements) specifically for the existing uses by the project approvals for the
Kelly Ranch development. The detention basin is necessary to accommodate drainage from the
38
ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
November 19,2003
Pane 2
adjacent Canterbury neighborhood. The lift station also serves that neighborhood as well as
others. The site contains no biological resources with any protected status.
The project site has a General Plan designation of Open Space (OS) and R-3-Q zoning. The
parcels were given an OS General Plan designation because they were contiguous to permanent
open space and it was known that they would not be developed with any uses other than the
planned detention basin and lift station. The two current parcels existed originally as easements.
It would not have been possible to rezone only the easements as 0-S if they were still a part of
the larger map area zoned for residential development.
The area immediately to the north and northwest of Cannon Road has an 0-S zoning and an OS
General Plan designation and contains no development. The area immediately south and
southwest of the project site has the same zoning (R-3-Q) and General Plan designation (OS) as
the project site and is undeveloped. This area consists of a steep (approximately 225' high)
disturbed natural slope, which drops down into the detention basin. The slope contains spotty
remnants of vegetation previously planted in an effort to establish native vegetation on the slope
and to control potential erosion. (Repeated efforts to establish such vegetation on the slope have
failed.) The area directly to the east and southeast of the project site is zoned R-1-Q (Single-
family Residential zone with a Qualified Development Overlay) and Residential Medium
Density (RM) General Plan designation. The area immediately to the east is developed with
single-family residential dwelling units, and the area to the southeast is undeveloped open space.
As discussed above, the detention basin and a temporary sewage lift station already exist on the
project site. The temporary lift station will be replaced by a permanent lift station in the near
future. However, all discretionary approvals required for that action have already been approved.
The Planning Commission (the final decision-maker) approved the Conditional Use Permit (CUP
02-11), Site Development Plan (SDP 02-17) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 02-22) in
February of this year. Those approvals were not appealed by the California Coastal Commission
and thus, are already final.
IV. ANALYSIS
This project requires approval of the following legislative actions:
A. Zone Change from R-3-Q to 0-S; and
B. Local Coastal Program Amendment to implement the zone change in the Local Coastal
Program.
The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements:
C. Carlsbad General Plan OS designation regulations;
D. R-3-Q (Multiple Family Residential with Qualified Overlay) Zone and 0-S regulations
(Chapters2 1.16, 21.06, and 2 1.33 of the Carlsbad Municipal %ode);
39
ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
November 19,2003
Pape 3
E. Coastal Development regulations for the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, Coastal
Resource Protection Overlay Zone, Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone, and
Coastal Resource Overlay Zone Mello I LCP Segment (Chapters 21.201, 21.202, 2 1.203,
21.204, and 21.205 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and
F. Growth Management regulations (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code).
The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with
each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
Legislative Actions
A. Zone Change
City staff is proposing to change the zoning on the subject property from R-3-Q to 0-S. This
change is being recommended in order to achieve consistency between the General Plan and the
zoning on the site.
B. Local Coastal Program Amendment
The Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) is required in order to implement the proposed
zone change from R-3-Q to 0-S in the Local Coastal Program. The LCPA would ensure
consistency between the zoning and coastal zoning designations on the property.
Regulatory Compliance
C. General Plan
The project site has a General Plan designation of OS and has R-3-Q zoning. The R-3-Q zoning
is atypical for a parcel with an OS General Plan designation. However, this situation resulted
from a series of City and Coastal Commission approvals for the Kelly Ranch project. When the
Kelly Ranch project was being designed it was known that a detention basin would be needed in
its present location (for Village E/Canterbury neighborhood). The need for the existing
temporary lift station was identified later. The two lots on which the detention basin and the lift
station exist were established specifically for those purposes. The two lots were given a General
Plan designation of OS because they were contiguous to open space and it was known that they
would not be developed as residential properties (despite their R-3-Q zoning). (As stated above,
the two lots were originally created as easements. That may explain why they carried R-3-Q
zoning.) Development of infrastructure facilities is consistent with the OS General Plan
designation. Thus, the change of zoning from R-3-Q to 0-S (with the presence of the
existing/planned uses) would be consistent with the General Plan.
ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
November 19,2003
Page 4
D. R-3, Q Overlay, and 0-S Zoning
The existing R-3-Q zoning, which allows residential development, is inconsistent with the
existing OS General Plan designation on the property. The 0-S zone is the implementing zone
for the OS General Plan designation. The proposed zone change would not result in any existing
uses or structures becoming non-conforming. The existing detention basin would be allowed in
the 0-S zone (or the existing R-3-Q zone) without the need for a discretionary permit. The
sewage lift station would be allowed in the 0-S zone (or the existing R-3-Q zone), subject to the
approval of a CUP. A CUP was approved in February 2003 for the proposed permanent sewage
lift station to be constructed later this year. Therefore, the existing and proposed uses of the site
are all consistent with the proposed 0-S Zone.
E. Coastal Development Regulations
The project site is located within the Mello 11 Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program. The
policies of the Mello II segment of the City's Coastal Zone emphasize preservation of pnme
agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive lands, provision of
shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion.
The project site contains no agricultural lands and, thus would have no detrimental impact to
agricultural lands. The project site also contains no water resources or sensitive habitats, and
thus would have no detrimental impact to such resources.
The existing/planned uses on the project site (the detention basin and the sewage lift station)
were previously determined to be consistent with the applicable Coastal regulations and policies.
The proposed zone change and local coastal program amendment are being processed only to
correct the existing General Pladzoning inconsistency.
F. Growth Management
The proposed zone change will have no growth management impacts. Any impacts associated
with development of the site were addressed in the project analysis and approvals for CUP 02-1 1
(Cannon Road Lift Station). That project was approved previously, and no new impacts would
occur as a result of this proposed zone change.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study was prepared for the proposed ZC/LCPA. That document concluded that the
proposed project could have no environmental impacts. Consequently, on July 22, 2003, the
Planning Director published a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project.
Because this project involves an LCPA, staff also published a notice for a six-week review
period for the proposed LCPA. The six-week review period opened on July 24,2003 and closed
on September 4,2003. No comments were received during that period.
ZC 03-02ILCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
November 19,2003
Page 5
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4. Location Map
5. Background Data Sheet
6. Disclosure Statement
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5452 (ND)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5453 (ZC)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5454 (LCPA)
EB: bd:mh
4a
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04
CASE NAME: Cannon Lift Zone Change
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A zone change for property containin.. a sewage lift station on
the southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
APN: 208-1 84-04, 08 Acres: 1.6_ Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 2 lots
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: OS (Open Space)
Density Allowed: N/A
Existing Zone: R-3-0
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: N/A
Proposed Zone: 0-S
Site
North
South
East
West
Zoning
R-3-Q
0-s
R-3-0
R- 1 -Q
General Plan
os
os
os
RM
R-3-Q; 0-S os
Current Land Use
Temporary lift station;
desiltation basin
Cannon Rd; open space
Open space
Single- family
residential;
Cannon Rd; open space
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity):
Sewer District: Carlsbad
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration
0 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
cf3
- City of Carlsbad
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on ali applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnershp, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, synhcate, in this and any other county, city and come, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or uartnershiu, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned cornoration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
Person ’4.Z /h/7m F‘/jMm, JF CorpPart
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
comoration or DartnershiD, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person&///, ,Q/LMrn,/ CorpPart
TitleflJ!ufi Title
Address /b 45- Address //
-a
% 1635 Fa’raday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-731 4 - (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonmofit organization or a trust. lljr the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profir
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non ProfitlTrust Non Profiflrust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (1 2) months? 0 Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):
* 9s $1
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of ownerldate Signature of applicanVdate
Print or type name of applicant
/&4,//, /3/2/, P /4,#?mJT
Print or type name of owner
-Jei
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
i
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98
Planning Commission Minutes November 19,2003
4. ZC 03-021LCPA 03-04 - CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE - Request for a recommendation of
approval for a Negative Declaration, Zone Change, and a Local Coastal Program Amendment to
change the zoning from R-3-Q to 0-S on a site located on the southeast side of Cannon Road
west of El Camino Real and within Local Facilities Management Zone 8.
Mr. Neu stated that agenda Items 3 and 4 are normally heard in a public hearing context, however, these
projects are minor and routine in nature with no outstanding issues and Staff recommends approval. He
recommended that the public hearing be opened and closed, and that the Commission proceed with a
vote as consent Items. If the Commission or someone from the public wishes to pull the Item, Staff would
be available to respond to questions.
Chairperson Baker asked the Commissioners if anyone wished to pull an Item and asked the public if
anyone wished to discuss an Item.
Commissioner Dominguez noted that there had been discussion some time back about the consistent
use of variances on Ocean Street and asked Staff if any decision or policy had been reached pertaining
to applying variances to different applications in that area. Mr. Neu replied that a consensus had not
been reached. He stated that the Planning Commission had discussed in the past whether to develop an
overlay zone or specific plan or some set of special criteria to recognize the constraints on the west side
of Ocean Street. He stated that there was not currently a proposal for the Planning Commission to
consider that and that applications were handled case-by-case. Commissioner Heineman stated that the
matter of changing regulations so that there wouldn’t have to be a variance on everything on the ocean
had been raised by the Planning Commission for at least eight years and nothing had been resolved,
thus, he didn’t believe it would be. Ms. Mobaldi commented that the Planning Commission could make a
minute motion to City Council requesting that Staff be directed to look into the issue.
Commissioner Montgomery applauded the architect on this project for doing a fantastic job. He stated
that the Planning Commission scrutinized everything built along the ocean and he thought this was a
great plan.
Chairperson Baker called for a vote.
MOTION
ACT I ON :
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSTAl N : None
Motion by Commissioner White, and duly seconded, to approve Items 3 and 4.
Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, Segall, White and Whitton
VOTE: 7-0
Cannon Lift Zone ChangeZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04
Location MapCANNONRD(FUTURE)FARADAYAVESITEASHBERRYRD
Proposed Site✺General Plan: Open Space✺Zoning: R-3-Q✺Coastal Zone: Mello II
Project Description✺Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment– Zoning Change from R-3-Q to OS✺Negative Declaration
Planning Commission Recommendation✺Approval of Negative Declaration and approval of ZC 03-02 and LCPA 03-04
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS, California
This 9~ Day of January, 2004
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Declarah, a Zone Ctiange, and a Local COesteT Pm- gy Amendment to change the zoning fmm R-3-0 to S on a site located on the southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino Real and whin Local Facilees Management Zone 8 and more particolatly described
CASE NAME CANNON LlH' ZONE CHANGE
CrrY OF CARLSBAD ClTy COUNCIL
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Tuesday, January 20, 2004, to consider a request for approval for a Negative
Declaration, a Zone Change, and a Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the zoning
from R-3-Q to 0-S on a site located on the southeast side of Cannon Road west of El Camino
Real and within Local Facilities Management Zone 8 and more particularly described as:
Lots 82 and 171 of Map No. 14340
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after January 16, 2004. If you have
any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4621.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Zone Change and/or Local Coastal Program
Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to
the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or
prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: ZC 03-02/LCPA 03-04
CASE NAME: CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
PUBLISH: January 9,2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
CANNON LIFT ZONE CHANGE
ZC 03=02/LCPA 03-04
- CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE 6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC W ORKS/CO MMU N ITY
SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
ELAINE BLACKBURN
12/1 Z2003
AWERY@ Address Labels
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC W 0 RKS/E N G I N E E R I N G
DEPT
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SANDIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
ATTN TED ANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER D ISTRl CT
Laser 5160@
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING
TRUST
C/O PROPERTY TAX DEPT 5029 ASHBERRY RD 38 REDHAWK
9200 E PANORAMA CIR MOO CARLSBAD CA 92008
ENGLEWOOD CO 80112
BENES ROBERT J & LAURIE D CALLAGHAN WAYNE & YVONNE H
IRVINE CA 92604
CLSBD CANTEBURY ASSN ERNST MARK R & MARIAN GREENHALGHDALER
C/O MARCIA GOODMAN REVOCABLE TRUST 5017 ASHBERRY RD 10721 TREENA ST #ZOO 5037 ASHBERRY RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN DIEGO CA 92131 CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRlFFlTH JEFFREY S
5025 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HORBOL TIMOTHY J & PATRICIA A
5036 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
KOTOL PAUL F & SANDRA L
5005 ASHBERRY RD
KROPF RENE J & DOROTHY C LlAO JIAYU & XIE ZHlYl
5020 ASHBERRY RD 5032 ASHBERRY RD 5024 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
MACK TIMOTHY P
MASHBURN KIRK L
5033 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MESZAROS GEORGE & MONIKA E
5023 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
ODAY JAMES R & CAROL A
5045 ASHBERRY RD
PATTERSON JOSEPH M & KAREN RENZONI FREDERICK & JULIE SANCHEZ FERNANDO & LEILA
5044 ASHBERRY RD 5048 ASHBERRY RD TRUST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 5028 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHNEIDER JEFFREY & ZENAIDA
5049 ASHBERRY RD C/O PAUL BARNES 10721 TREENA ST #200
CARLSBAD CA 92008 10721 TREENA ST #200 SAN DIEGO CA 92131
SAN DIEGO CA 92131
SHEA HMS LTD PARTNERSHIP SHEA HMS LTD PARTNERSHIP
SHERRER STEVE & NICOLE SNOWDEN LAURIE REVOCABLE WALKER TIMOTHY & HAZE
5021 ASHBERRY RD TRUST 5040 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008 5009 ASHBERRY RD CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
5001 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
5005 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
5009 ASHBERRY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 Z1 Z2003
aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160@
.Smooth Feed SheetsTb’
’ CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
JAN SOBEL
5934 PRIESTLY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CALTRANS DISTRICT 11
BILL FIGGE
MAIL ST 50
P 0 BOX 85406
SAN DIEGO CA 92186-5406
U S FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
JOHN MARTIN
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92009-
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
RONALD M JAEGER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
SUPERINTENDENT
1901 SPINNAKER DR
SAN BUENA VENTURA CA 93001
aAVERY@ Shipping Labels
ANTHONY & DICKY BONS
25709 HILLCREST AV
ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650
REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN WESTERN REG
PO BOX 92007
LOSANGELES CA 90009
BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY
PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING
STE 2450
980 NINTH ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
COASTAL CONSERVANCY STE 11 00
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
Laser 5163@
~ COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CHAIRMAN
722 JACKSON PL NW
' WASHINGTON DC 20006
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
STE 400
611 RYAN PLAZA DR
ARLINGTON TX 7601 1-4005
DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV
P 0 BOX 944246
SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD
P 0 BOX 944246
SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
RM 700
110 WESTAST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AVERW) Shipping Labels
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DlST ENGINEER
PO BOX 271 1
LOSANGELES CA 90053
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR
STE 350
901 MARKETST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE
STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
RM 100
1220 N ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE
DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN
450 GOLDEN GATE AV
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
DEPARTMENT 0 F TRANS PO RTATl ON
RM 5504
1120 N ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Laser 5163@
. .. .
ENERGY RESOURCES, CONSERVATION &
DEVELOPMENT COMM
CHUCK NAJARIAN
1516 NINTH ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR
350 GOLDEN SHORE
LONGBEACH CA 90802
OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC
ADMIN OCRM,55MC4
PO BOX 3044
SACRAMENTO CA 93044 1305 EAST-WEST HWY
N/ORM - 3
SILVER SPRING MD 20910
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION &
DEVMT COMMISSION
BILL TRAVIS
STE 2600
50 CALIFORNIA ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11-4704
U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT
STE RM W 1834
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
U S FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
2800 COTTAGE WAY
STE W-2605
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1 888
Shipping Labeis
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS
STE 1005
100 HOWE AV
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
MID-PACIFIC REGION
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LILY ALYEA
STE 702
333 MARKET ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197
Laser 5163@
USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPT 41 69
430 "G" ST
DAVIS CA 95616
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
COMDEV DEPT
505 S VULCAN AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR
GARY GALLEGOS
STE 800
1ST INT'L PLAZA 401 "B" ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CYRIUMARY GIBSON
12 142 ARGYLE DR
LOS ALAMITOS CA 90702
LANIKAI LANE PARK
SHARP SPACE3
6550 PONTO DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
@AERY@ Shipping Labels
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD
PO BOX 100
SACRAMENTO CA 95801
TABATA FARMS
PO BOX 1338
CARLSBAD CA 9201 8-1 338
LESLIE ESPOSITO
1893 AMELFI DR
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
LAKESHORE GARDENS
TOM BENSON
7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN LAMB
1446 DEVLIN DR
LOSANGELES CA 90069
Laser 5 163@
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
KIM BLESSANT
101 ASH STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101-
COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN
.ART DANELL
RM 335
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT
JAON VOKAC
5201 RUFFIN ROAD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
STE 8-5
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
RICHARD RETECKI
STE 11 00
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
DALE/DONNA SCHREIBER
7163 ARGONAUTA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
AVERY@ Shipping Labels
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
MARY GRIGGS
STE 100 S
100 HOWE AV
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
PERRY A LAMB
890 MERE POINT RD
BRUNSWICK ME 04011
CRA PRESIDENT
LEE ANDERSON
5200 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FLOYD ASHBY
416 LA COSTA AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024
GEORGE BOLTON
6583 BLACKRAIL RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
Laser 5163@
. CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES
STE 1311
1416 9TH ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS
NAN VALERIO
STE 800
401 “B” STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AVERYB Shipping Labels Laser 5163@