HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-02-10; City Council; 17499; Northwest Quadrant Park and Senior CenterCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB# 17,499 TITLE:
MTG. 2-Lrj NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
DEPT.
SENIOR CENTER
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06
DEPT. HD.
CITY ATTY.
CITY MGR
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Project application(s)
Negative Declaration
GPA 03-09
ZC 03-06
CUP 03-18
That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. NS-692 , APPROVING Zone
Change ZC 03-06, and ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-043 , APPROVING General
Plan Amendment GPA 03-09, based on the findings contained therein.
Reviewed by and
Administrative Final at Planning To be Reviewed -
Approvals Commission Final at Council
X
X
X
X
The proposed project involves several actions needed to allow development of the proposed
Northwest Quadrant Community Park in the area of Pine Avenue and Harding Street. The actions
before Council are a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA 03-09) and a Zone Change (ZC
03-06) to change the Land Use and Zoning designations of the site to Open Space as required by
the General Plan Land Use Element. The other actions needed for the project (adoption of a
Negative Declaration and approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 03-18)) were taken by the
Planning Commission and were final at Planning Commission unless appealed.
The project would allow the development and operation of a 7.52-acre community park on the former
Pine School site. The proposed park elements include: a 20,000-s.f. community center building, a
multi-purpose field, two basketball half-courts, batting cages, a tot lot, an ornamental community
garden, a picnic area, and an amphitheater. The project would also allow the continued operation of
the existing Senior Center (adjacent to the new park) under a combined CUP. (The Planning
Commission's approval of the new CUP nullified the old Senior Center CUP 88-04x1.) The
Northwest Quadrant Community Park Master Plan was approved by the City Council on January 21,
2003 and the proposed park development is consistent with that Master Plan.
The GPA is necessary to change the designations of two portions of the subject property. The larger
portion (the 10.5-acre former Pine School site) is currently designated Elementary School (E) on the
General Plan. The smaller portion (0.16-acre) consists of property fronting on Madison Street and
currently designated Medium High Density Residential (RMH) by the General Plan. These properties
were purchased by the City with the intent of utilizing them for park-related uses. The proposed GPA
would change the designations of both areas to Open Space (OS). The OS designation is the most
appropriate designation for park sites.
The Zone Change (ZC 03-06) is necessary to maintain General Plan and zoning consistency. The
zone change would apply only to the former residential properties fronting Madison (totaling 0.16-
acre) and would replace the current Multiple Family Residential (R-3) zoning with Open Space (0-S)
zoning .
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 17, 2003 to consider the proposed
actions. They voted unanimously to approve the Negative Declaration and CUP 03-18 and to
recommend approval of GPA 03-09 and ZC 03-06.
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,499
Growth Control Point
Net Density
Special Facility Fee
ENVIRONMENTAL:
n/a
n/a
n/a
The proposed project was reviewed pursuant to CEQA requirements and was found to have no
potentially significant impacts. A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published on
November 20, 2003 and no comments were received during the 20-day review period. The Planning
Commission then adopted the Negative Declaration for the project at a public hearing on December
17, 2003.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will have no fiscal impact upon the City. The actual
development of the proposed park (CUP 03-18, approved by the Planning Commission) will have
fiscal impacts. However, those impacts have already been taken into account by the inclusion of the
estimated costs in the City's Capital Improvement Program.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
Facilities Zone 11
Local Facilities Manaaement Plan I1
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Ordinance No. NS-692
2. City Council Resolution No. 2004-043
3. Location Map
4.
5.
6.
7.
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5524 and 5525 (GPA and ZC)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5523 (Neg. Dec.)
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 17,2003
Draft Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 17,2003.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Elaine Blackburn, (760) 602-4621, eblac@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. NS-692
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ClTYS ZONING
MAP PURSUANT TO SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF MADISON STREET BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND
CHESTNUT AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER
TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 03-06, FROM R-3 TO 0-S
CASE NO.: ZC 03-06
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That the City’s Zoning Map is amended as shown on the map
marked Exhibit “ZC 03-06” attached hereto and made a part hereof, pursuant to Section
21.050.30 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as
set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5525 constitute the findings and conditions of
the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinarice and cause it to be
published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a 1-egular meeting of the Carlsbad City
Council held on the 10th , day cf February , 2004, and thereafter
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
!I1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
Ordinance No. NS-692 (Page Two)
-2- .'-i.
PROPERTY ZONE CHANGE
Zone Change
Property : From: To:
A. 204-093-03 R-3 os os os B. 204-093-04 R-3
C. 204-093-05 R-3
D.
Attach additional pages if necessary
ZC: 03-06
Approvals
Council Approval Date:
Ordinance No:
Effective Date:
Signature:
draft p7J final
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-043
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM “E”
AND “RMH” ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MADISON
STREET BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND CHESTNUT
AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER
CASE NO.: GPA 03-09
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on December 17, 2003, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law to consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and
Conditional Use Permit, and adopted the Negative Declaration and the Conditional Use Permit
and recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 10th
day of February , 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said General
Plan Amendment and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, and
comments from all persons interested in or opposed to GPA 03-09.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
I. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of the
General Plan Amendment (GPA 03-09) as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5524
is hereby accepted, approved in concept and shall be formally approved with the GPA Batch
No. 1 comprised of GPA 01-03, GPA 01-04, GPA 02-01, GPA 03-01, GPA 03-04, GPA 03-09
and GPA 03-12.
3. That the Negative Declaration as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No.
5523, on file with the City Clerk is incorporated herein by reference.
4. That the amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map (GPA 03-09), is
approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5524, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference.
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 10th day of February 2004,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 2004-043 (Page Two)
-2- 7
EXHIBIT 3
SITE
NORTHWEST QUADRANT
COMMUNITY PARK
GPA 03=09/ZC 03-06
8
1
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5524
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE
DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO OPEN
SPACE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
HARDING STREET, BETWEEN PINE AVENUE AND
CHESTNUT AVENUE, AND CHANGE THE DESIGNATION
FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY TO OPEN
SPACE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
MADISON STREET, BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND
MENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
CHESTNUT AVENUE, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGE-
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER
CASE NO: GPA 03-09
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Tract 110 of Carlsbad Lands, according to Map No. 1661, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder on February 27, 1915;
and Portions of Blocks 45,46, and 59 and Lots 5 through 10 of
Town of Carlsbad Amended, according to Map No. 775, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder on February 15,1893, all
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan
Amendment as shown on Exhibit “GPA 03-09” dated December 17, 2003, attached hereto and
on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - GPA 03-09 as provided in Government Code Section 65350
et. seq. and Section 21.52.160 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of December 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
' 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and argumen s, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of NORTHWEST QUADRANT
COMMUNITY PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - GPA 03-09, based on the
following findings:
Findinps:
1.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
That the proposed General Plan Amendment from Elementary School (E) and
Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open Space (OS) is consistent with the
goals and policies of the various elements of the General Plan, in that the Land Use
Element (Special Planning Considerations) requires that, if a school site is converted
to a park, a General Plan Amendment be processed to change the designation to
Open Space (OS) and that a change in designation from both E and RMH to OS will
result in the total project site having the most appropriate General Plan designation
for the planned, long term use of the site.
PC RES0 NO. 5524 -2- io
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of December 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Heineman, Montgomery,
Segall, and White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Whitton and Dominguez
ABSTAIN: None @-
ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5524 -3-
GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property From: To:
A. 204-1 00-06 E os
B. 204-1 00-05 E os
C. 204-093-03 RMH os
D. 204-093-04 RMH os
E. 204-093-05 RMH os
GPA: 03-09
December 17,2003
draft finat cj
Approvals
Council Approval Date:
Resolution No:
Effective Date:
Signature:
1
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5525
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM MUTIPLE FAMILY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MADISON
STREET, BETWEEN WALNUT AVENUE AND CHESTNUT
AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
RESIDENTIAL (R-3) TO OPEN SPACE (0-S) ON PROPERTY
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER
CASE NO: ZC 03-06
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lots 5 through 10 of Town of Carlsbad Amended, according to
Map No. 775, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on
February 15, 1893, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on
Exhibit “X’ dated December 17, 2003, attached hereto and on file in the Planning Department,
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - ZC 03-06
as provided by Chapter 2 1.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of December, 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
13
I
c L
7 -
4
< -
6
c I
E
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of NORTHWEST QUADRANT
COMMUNITY PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - ZC 03-06 based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinw :
1. That the proposed Zone Change fiom Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open Space
(04) is consistent with the goals and policies of the various elements of the General
Plan, in that the subject property is intended for park uses within the Northwest
Quadrant Community Park and Senior Center.
2. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as
mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use
Element, in that the General Plan designation of the subject property is also changing
to Open Space (OS) and the Open Space zone is the appropriate zone to implement
the Open Space Land Use designation.
3. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general
welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the subject property is
intended for park uses within the Northwest Quadrant Community Park and Senior
Center, and the Open Space zone is the appropriate zoning designation for public
parks.
Conditions:
1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of GPA 03-09 and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5524 for those other
approvals incorporated herein by reference.
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5525 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You’ are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 17th day of December 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Heineman, Montgomery,
Segall, and White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Whitton and Dominguez
ABSTAIN: None
, Chairperson
CARL COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HO~MIL~ER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5525 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5523
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW THE CHANGE IN
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OVER 10.51 ACRES FROM
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO OPEN SPACE AND OVER 0.16
ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY TO
OPEN SPACE AND THE CHANGE IN ZONING OVER 0.16
ACRES FROM MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO OPEN
SPACE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A
COMMUNITY PARK OVER 7.36 ACRES AND THE
INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND
PARALLEL PARKING BAYS ON CHESTNUT AVENUE ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF HARDING *
STREET, BETWEEN PINE AVENUE AND CHESTNUT
AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY
PARK AND SENIOR CENTER
CASE NO.: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-18
WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Tract 110 of Carlsbad Lands, according to Map No. 1661, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder on February 27, 1915;
and Portions of Blocks 45,46, and 59 and Lots 5 through 10 of
Town of Carlsbad Amended, according .to Map No. 775, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder on February 15, 1893, all
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of December 2003,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby ADOPTS a Negative Declaration, Exhibit “ND,” according
to Exhibits “NOI” dated November 20, 2003, and “PII” dated November 10,
2003, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findinm:
1.
...
...
...
...
...
...
The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration and the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments
thereon prior to APPROVING the project; and
b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
d. based on the EL4 Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
PC RES0 NO. 5523 -2-
1
i
7
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of December 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Heineman, Montgomep,
Segall, and White
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Whitton and Doniinguez
ABSTAIN: None
JULIE-, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
. \M+&i.@&&&L &e
MICHAEL J. HOL+MILL&
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5523 -3-
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT -4
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CASE NAME: NORTHWEST QUADFKVT PARK
CASE NO: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03- IS
PROJECT LOCATION: West of Harding Street between Pine Avenue and Chestnut
Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 10.51
acres from Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16 acres
from Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone Change to change 0.16
acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open Space (0-S); and a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the development of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a vacant, graded site
previously occupied by an elementary school.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above-described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EM Part 2) did not identify any potentially
significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be
recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad City Council.
A copy of the initial study (EL4 Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative
Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California
92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approvaVadoption by
the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be
issued when those public- hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Elaine
Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602-462 1.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD NOVEMBER 20,2003 TO DECEMBER 10,2003
PUBLISH DATE NOVEMBER 20,2003
II
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.cjamtj&+us @
- City of Carlsbad
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CASE NAME: Northwest Quadrant Community Park
CASE NO: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-O6/CUP 03-1 8
PROJECT LOCATION: West of Harding Street between Pine Avenue and Chestnut Avenue in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 10.5 1 acres from
Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16 acres from Residential Medium
High Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family Residential
(R-3) to Open Space (0-S); and a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a Community Park
over 7.36 acres on a vacant, graded site previously occupied by an elementary school.
DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study
(EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of
Carlsbad finds as follows:
Ix1
cl
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
The proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at least
one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that
remained to be addressed).
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT
be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is
required.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file
in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
20
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
EN\.?RONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESShJENT FOIUI - PART 11
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLAhWING DEPL4RThlENT)
CASE NO: GPA 03-09 ZC 03-06,CLTP 03-1 S
DATE: November 10.2003
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CASE NAME: Northwest Quadrant CommuniW Park
LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carlsbad
CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Scott Bradstreet (760) 434-2856
PROJECT LOCATION: West of Harding Street, behveen Pine Avenue and Chestnut
Avenue, Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego
PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad Recreation Department.
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad CA 92008
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Elementan? School and Residential Medium High Density
ZONING: Open Suace and Multiple Family Residential
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing
approval or participation agreements): none
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
A General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 10.51 acres from Elementary School
(E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16 acres from Residential Medium High
Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family
Residential (R-3) to Open Space (0-S); and a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development
of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a vacant, graded site previously occupied by an
elementary school. The park would include a 20,000 square foot Community Center building, a
66,000 square foot multipurpose field, tot lot and picnic areas, shade structures and informal
stage, ornamental garden, parking areas and landscaping. The project also involves the
installation of traffic calming devices and parallel parking bays in the excess right-of-way on
Chestnut Avenue. The park site is located in a urbanized are of the City and is surrounded by
residential development.
1 Rev. 07/03/02 %I
ENVIRONhIENTAL. FACTORS POTESTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected b\, this prqec.1.
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Sigificant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Aesthetics 0 Geology/Soils 0 Noise
Agncultural Resources Hazards/Hazardous Materials 17 Popu1ation and Housing
0 Air Quality 0 HydrologyWater Quality 0 Public Services
c] Biological Resources 0 Land Use and Planning 0 Recreation
Cultural Resources Mineral Resources TransportatiodCirculation
u Mandatory Findings of 0 Utilities 8: Service Systems Significance
2 Rev. 07/03/02
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency) w
0
0
0
I find that the proposed project COULD XOT have a Significant effect on the environment. and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. there \vi11 not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been
added to the project. .4 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR4TIOIi will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the en\ironnient. and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as ‘described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed,
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
/
- 7-a3 I- Date DT
Planning Director’syignatur Date
3 43 Rev. Qi’/Q3IQ2
ESVIRONRIENTAL IJIPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELMES. Chapter 3. -4rticle 5. Section 15063 requires that the Cin. conduct an En\iro~mit.nta!
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The En~~iroimienta!
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the fomi of a checklist. This checklist identifies any ph>,sical.
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the Civ ivith domution
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Segative Declaration. or
to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “KO Impact” answers that are adequately supported by
an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A ”KO hipact“ amver is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not appl!, to
projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Inipact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.”
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than.significant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly
adverse.
Based on an “EIA-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the
environment, but potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement
to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental
document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required.
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any
of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared.
4 Rev. 07/03/02 044
An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked. and including but not linutrd to
the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards. and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant: (2) a “Statement of O\.erriding
Considerations” for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to ai1 earlier EIR: (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the
EM-Part I1 analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect.
or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a
level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed nlitigation measures appears at the end of the forni under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be detemlined significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than KO
Significant Significant Significant Impact impact Unless lmpnct
Mitigation Incorporated
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: 0 0 ow a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
0 D1xI b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and hstoric
buildings within a State scenic highway?
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 ow c)
0 0 om d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
11. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model- 1997 prepared by the California
Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would
the project:
0 0 UKI a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Fadand), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use? o 0 OH b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
5 Rev. OJlO3lO2 d5‘
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentiall!
Sign I fi cant
Impact
Potentidly
Significant
Lnless
hlitigstion
Incorporated rl
Less Than
Sign I ficm t
Impact
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment.
which, due to their location or nature. could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use'?
111. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district maj' be relied
upon to make the following determinations.) Would the
project:
0 0 0 a) Conflict with or obswct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
D b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
0 0 D c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for whch the project region is
in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? 0 0
0
0 IXI
IXI e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
17 0 0 a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian,
aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by California Department
of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
0 0
0 0 0 c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Rev. 07/03/02 ad 6
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentiall) Potentidl! Less Than \o
Significant Significant Significant inipxt
Impact Unless Impact
hlitigation
Incorporated Es 17 izl d) Interfere substantially nith the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or Jvildlife species or
with established native resident or migrator? Jvildlife
corridors. or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
0 Elm e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
o 0 OBI f, Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
0 0 OIXI g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally
sensitive?
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
0 0 OB a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a hstorical resource as defined in $15064.5?
0 0 ow b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to 9 15064.5?
0 0 om c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi-
cal resource or site or unique geologic feature?
0 0 ow d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
0 0 ow i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 IXI
7 Rev. 07tQ3tQ2 47
Issues i and Supportlng Information Sources).
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
IV. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project:
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
Be located on a site whch is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
environment?
For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
Potenti311>
Significant
Impact
17
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentiall)
Si gn I ficanr
Unless
bfitigation
Incorporated 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
17
0
0
cl
0
0
0
0
8 Rev. 07l03102
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). pot en ti all^ Potentiall> Less Thm \O
Significant Significant Significant In:pd;t
Impact ljnless Impact hlmgation
Incorporated I? DEI f, For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area'?
17 g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
17 17 0191
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the
project:
0 I7 ow a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
cl b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local ground water table
level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
0
0
0
c) Impacts to groundwater quality?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
0
0 e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in
a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
0 f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
0 ow
0 g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 ow
9 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentiall\. Potentlall>. Less Than ‘ic
Significant Sisnificant Significant Imp~zi
Impact bnless Impact Llitigation
Incorporated 17 17 h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation
map?
i) Place withm 100-year flood hazard area structures.
which would impede or redirect flood flows? 0 CIEI
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving flooding, includ,ing
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?-
17 0 ora
k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0
1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface
waters. 0 0 ow
m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals,
pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics,
nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash)
into receiving surface waters or other alteration of
receiving surface water quality (eg, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
0 0 ow
n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following construction? cl 0 ow
ow 0) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water
body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d)
list?
0 0
p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater
receiving water quality objectives or degradation of
beneficial uses?
0 cl ow
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 ow
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
0 0
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan? 0 0 UIXI
0 0 nIXI
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
10 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentiall\, Less Than ‘io
Significant Significant Significant Impxi
Impact Unless Impact
Mirigxion Incorporated c3 DE! b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan. or other land use plan?
X. NOISE - Would the project result in:
0 0 05 a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
0 0 ClB b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
0 0 OB c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
OB d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
0 0 UIXI e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
0 0 o[xI f, For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
X. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
0 0 OIXI a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
0 0 nIxi b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
0 0 OB c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
11 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of ne\v
or physically altered government facilities, a need for
new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION
Potent1311> Potentiall> Less Thm \O
Significant Significant Signiticmi impai:
Impact Unless Impxi
Slitigation Incorporated
0
17
17 o
17
0 a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
o b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
om
0 0 1510 Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
0 0 mn Exceed. either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
0 0 Elm Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
12 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g.. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in insufficient parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans. or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn-
outs, bicycle racks)'?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the
project:
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Potentiall\
Si-mificant
Impact
0
0
[7
0
17
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
bnless
Mitiption
lncorporated
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
Less Than
S tgnificant
Impact
El
[7
i3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13 Rev. 07/03/02 33
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICAYCE
0 0 El& a) Does the project have the potedtial to degrade the
quality of the environment. substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or nildlife species. cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to elininate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
cl ON b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable‘? (“Cumula-
tively considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects. and the effects of
probable future projects?)
0 ow c) Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
t Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering. program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review,
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects fiom the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,”
describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
14 Rev. 07/03/02 33
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIOK
A General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 10.51 acres from Elementary School (E) to Open Space
and to change the designation of 0.16 acres from Residential Medium High Density ( WlH) to Open Space: a Zone
Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open Space (0-S): and a Conditio113l Cse
Permit to allow the development of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a ~'acant. graded site previousl!. oscupird
by an elementary school. The park would include a 20,000-square foot Conmlunity Center building. 3 Ob.000-square
foot multipurpose field, tot lot and picnic areas, shade structures and infoml stage. ornamental garden. parkin:
areas and landscaping. The project also involves the installation of traffic calning devices and parallel parking bays
in the excess right-of-way on Chesmut Avenue. The park site is located in an urbanized area of the Cit), and is
surrounded by residential development.
AESTHETICS
No Impact. The project site is a relatively flat, previously developed pad; no scenic vistas or scenic resources exist
on the site. The proposed development would involve fewer buildings and structures than associated with the
previous elementary school and the proposed conmunit) center has been designed to be compatible and in scale \vith
the adjacent and neighboring buildings. The proposed ball fields will have lighting: however the lighting will be IOU.
sodium and will be shielded to prevent unnecessary light spillage onto adjacent properties. Additionally. standard
park operations direct that all lights will be turned off at 1O:OO p.m. No impact assessed.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
No Impact. The project site is located within an urbanized area and was previously an elementary school. No
agricultural operations have occurred on site and no prime farmland or Williamson Act lands exists on or near the
proposed park site. No adverse impacts to agricultural resources will occur as a result of the proposed community
park project.
AIR QUALITY-Would the project:
a) ' Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area
for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter
(PMlo). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin
(SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution
controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is
embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District
(APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG).
A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state-
mandated plan. Ths local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having
serious ozone problems and used to create the Califomia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by
the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly
regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996.
The proposed project relates to the SIP andlor RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are
mcorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the
County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project
presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that
the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact.
Section 15 125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference
to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management
plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps
needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources
Board provides criteria for determining whether a project 'conforms with the RAQS which include the following:
33- 15 Rev. 07/03/02
0 Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area'?
Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan?
The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin. and as such. is located in an area \vhere B RAQS IS being
implemented. The project is consistent with the gronzh assumptions of the Cin.'s General Plan and the RAYS.
Therefore, the project is consistent \\.it11 the regional air quality plan and \vi11 in no \la!- conflict or obsmict
implementation of the regional plan.
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an esisting or projected air
quality violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of
Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through, April. 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality
violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in
2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 23-hour state standard for suspended particulates
in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. (Add the following test
addressing short-term emissions, if there is grading associated with the project.) The project \vould involve
minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized
through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust
control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant
emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard
(comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine
particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net
increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the
proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project,
air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15 130 (a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered
de ntinimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. As noted above, the proposed project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or
concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the
project. No impact is assessed.
d) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. The construction of the proposed project could generate fumes from the operation of construction
equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short-term or
transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
No Impact. As stated above the project site was previously completely developed as an elementary school and no
native vegetation or habitats exist on or near the property. There a several mature trees on the site, some of which
would remain with the park development. In addition, no sensitive or endangered species reside or use the property.
The City's Habitat Management Plan does not identify the site for preservation and no local policies or ordinances
exist regarding the removal of mature non-native trees. Therefore, no adverse impacts to biological resources will
occur.
16 Rev. 07/03/02 36
CULTURAL RESOURCES
No Impact.
have no impact on cultural resources.
No recorded archeological sites are located aithin or near the project site. Therefore. the project nil1
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
NO Impact. The project proposes minor earthwork comprising 3,400 cubic yards of cut, 3,500 cubic yards of fill
and up to 1,000 cubic yards of import. Ths represents approxinlately 350 cubic yards per acre. All prading must
follow the City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards. According to the City of Carlsbad Geotechnical Hazard Analysis
and Mapping Study, no unusual geotechnical or seismic conditions exist on the project site. The park site is lot
located within a Fault-Rupture Hazard Zone and is not subject to liquefaction or landslides. Therefore no adverse
impacts due to geology or soils will occur.
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
No Impact. The proposed community park development would not cause any significant impacts with regard to
hazards or hazardous materials. The site for the park is not designated as a hazardous nlaterials site nor is it located
wihn an alrport land use plan or proximity to an airstrip. No uses other than the passive and active play areas are
proposed therefore no significant sources of hazardous emissions or materials are anticipated. The project is require
to maintain an all-weather access road throughout construction and pro\ride for emergency fire pretension water on
site prior to the storage of any hazardous construction materials. Therefore, the Northwest Quadrant Community
Park development would not produce any significant adverse impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
No Impact. No adverse hydrologic conditions or impacts are anticipated with the proposed community park
development. No wells or deep excavation are proposed therefore no impacts to groundwater supplies, recharge, or
quality will occur. The site grading closely follows the existing topography thus continuing to direct surface
drainage towards the existing surface drainage systems on the surrounding local streets. The project site is not withm
the 100-year floodplain nor is it subject to flooding, seiches, tsunamis, or mudslides. The project is designed with
Best Management Practices for storm water quality, including swales and subsurface drainage features, and must
comply with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements. Therefore, the
proposed community park project will not cause any significant adverse impacts to hydrology and water quality.
LAND USE AND PLANNING
No Impact. The project site is currently vacant, with the exception of an existing baseball field and is surrounded by
existing roadways; therefore redevelopment of the site will not physically divide an established community. The
proposed park development is consistent with and supportive to the surrounding residential, church, and education
uses in the area. No impact assessed.
MINERAL RESOURCES
No Impact. There are no known mineral resources within the project area and no locally important mineral resource
recovery site is delineated within the City’s General Plan or other land use plan. No loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State will occur. Therefore, the
proposed Northwest Quadrant Community Park project will not produce any significant adverse impacts to mineral
resources.
NOISE
No Impact.
POPULATION AND HOUSING
No Impact. The Northwest Quadrant Community Park project does not propose any residential development and
will provide needed recreational opportunities to the existing and future residents of the City. The amount of park
17 Rev. 07/03/02 37
acreage needed to serve the community is determined through the City‘s Groazh Managenient Plan and 1s tled to the
maximum amount of residential dwelling units possible in the area: therefore, development of the park ~ould not
induce substantial growth to the area. KO existing housing exists on site nor uses the property for access and no
displacement of any people would occur with redevelopment of the site. Should the Cit). Council adopt a 11011-
residential affordable housing linkage fee prior to the issuance of building pemits. the project is conditioned to pa!
such a fee to compensate for the fair share costs of constructing housing affordable to lo\ver income householdj.
Therefore. the proposed community park project will not produce any significant adverse inipacts to population and
housing.
PUBLIC SERVICE
KO Impact. The proposed 7.7-acre community park will not result in the need for new or physically altered
government facilities in that it complies with all requirements and standards of the City’s Gron-th Managemeni
Program. It is located in proximity to Fire Station #I and is served by the Carlsbad Police Department. Since no
residential development is proposed, the project would not generate additional student demand for the Carlsbad
Unified School District. All other public facilities are required to be in place concurrent, or prior to. construction.
Therefore, the Northwest Quadrant Community Park project \vi11 not produce any significant adverse impacts to
public services.
RECREATION
No Impact. The proposed development consists of a 7.7-acre community park with active and passive field areas
and a 20,000-square foot community center. Provision of the park will increase recreational opportunities in the
City, therefore no adverse environmental impacts to recreation will occur with the construction and operation of the
Northwest Quadrant Community Park.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate 390 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 25 peak hour trips.
This traffic will utilize the following roadways: Harding Street, Pine Avenue, Madison Street, and Chesmut Avenue.
While the increase in traffic from the proposed project may be slightly noticeable, the street system has been
designed and sized to accommodate traffic from the project and cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad.
The proposed project would not, therefore, cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street system. The impacts from the proposed project are, therefore, less than
significant.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated
three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad
as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Build-out average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS
on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
Existing ADT* Build-out ADT*
Rancho Santa Fe Road 15-32 “A-C” 28-43
El Camino Real 21-50 “#-C” 32-65
Palomar Airport Road 10-52 “A-B” 29-77
SR 78 120 “F” 144
*The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
1-5 183- 198 “D” 219-249
The Congestion Management Program’s (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is “E, or LOS “F” if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS “F” in 1990). Accordingly, all designated
roads and hghways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
18 Rev. 07/03/02 38
Note that the build-out ADT projections are based on the full implenientation of the region's general and conmiunin.
plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and. therefore. its traffic ~zts used in modeling tilt.
build-out projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Senice (LOS) "E" standard assumes
mplementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacityties) of the designated roads and
highways and implementation of the CMP strategies. they \vi11 function at acceptable level(s) of senice in the shon-
term and at build-our.
a) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent nith the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not. therefore. result in a change of air
traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed.
b) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses?
No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constructed to City standards: and, therefore.
would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's general plan and zoning.
Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed.
c) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to .satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police
Departments. No impact assessed.
4 Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project would comply with
the City's parking requirements to ensure an adequate parking supply. No impact assessed.
e) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks, etc.)?
No Impact. The project is located in an urbanized area. It is anticipated that many users of this park will walk to
the site or use other alternative transportation. The project will be conditioned to install bike racks. No impact
assessed.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
No Impact. The proposed community park is required to provide all necessary utility and service systems necessary
to serve the development concurrent or prior to construction. The proposed 4 EDUs of wastewater can be
accommodated in the local system without the need for expansions. The Carlsbad Municipal Water District has
indicated that there are adequate water supply and water distribution systems to serve the proposed park
development. The project also complies with all applicable regulations, including that for solid waste. Therefore,
the proposed Northwest Quadrant Community Park will not cause any significant adverse impacts to utilities and
service systems.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Imuact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
2. Stormwater Management Plan for the Northwest Quadrant Park, Citv of Carlsbad. California. Flores Lund
Consultants. June 2003.
19 Rev. 07/03/02 39
3. Northwest Ouadrant Communitv Park Master Plan Reuon. Schrmdt Design Group. April 2003
4. Citv of Carlsbad Geotechnical Hazard Analvsis and Mauuinz Studv. Leighton and Associates and David
Evans and Associates, November 1992.
20 Rev. 07/03/02
EXHIBIT 6
P.C. AGENDA OF: December 17,2003
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
Application complete date: August 5, 2003
Project Planner: Elaine Blackburn
Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. @
SUBJECT: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-1 8 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COM-
MUNITY PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - Request for a Negative
Declaration; a General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 10.51 acres
from Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16
acres from Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone
Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open
Space (0-S); and a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a
Community Park over 7.36 acres on a vacant, graded site previously occupied by
Pine Elementary School, and continued operation of the Senior Center, in Local
Facilities Management Zone 1.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5523,
ADOPTING a Negative Declaration, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5524
and 5525, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment GPA 03-09 and
Zone Change 03-06, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5526, APPROVING
Conditional Use Permit CUP 03-18, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves two components: a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change
the Land Use and Zoning designations of the site to Open Space as required by the General Plan
Land Use Element; and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the development and operation
of a 7.52 acre community park, and continued operation of the Senior Center. The Northwest
Quadrant Community Park Master Plan was approved by the City Council on January 21, 2003
and the proposed park development is consistent with that Master Plan. Staff is also proposing to
incorporate the existing Senior Center into the new Conditional Use Permit (CUP 03-18) and
nullify the existing Senior Center CUP (CUP 88-04x1). The proposed development complies
with all applicable regulations and staff has no issues with the proposal.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The City of Carlsbad Recreation Department is requesting approval of a General Plan
Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Negative Declaration to allow the
development and operation of a community park in the Northwest Quadrant and to incorporate
the existing Senior Center into the new CUP. The site is located west of Harding Street, between
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-O6/CI.JP 03-18 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Pine Avenue and Chestnut Avenue, a majority of which used to be occupied by Pine Elementary
School. The remaining portions of the park site include a portion of the Senior Center property
at the southwest comer of Harding Street and Pine Avenue (currently a small parking lot and
landscaped area) and several parcels fronting on Madison Street near the northeast comer of
Madison Street and Chestnut Avenue (currently single family homes). The main portion of the
site is designated Elementary School (E) in the City’s General Plan Land Use Element and zoned
Open Space (0-S). The parcels on Madison Street are designated Residential Medium High
Density (RMH) in the General Plan and zoned Multiple Family Residential (R-3). North of the
park site, across Pine Avenue, are the Carlsbad Community Church complex and some
residential uses. To the east, across Harding Street, are multifamily apartment buildings. South
of the site, across Chestnut Avenue, are Chase Field and single family homes and to the west,
across the existing alley, are single-family homes.
The majority of the park site was previously occupied by Pine Elementary School, which was
closed in 2001. The school buildings were removed from the site in 2002; however, several
features still remain on the site. The Centro de Informacion (Centro) and the Stay and Play after
school program are contained in modular buildings along the westem portion of the site,
operating under the authorization of Conditional Use Permit CUP 02-13, approved in July 2002.
The associated site improvements include a hard court playground, tetherball courts and a tot lot.
Also on the site is an active baseball field, with backstop, bleachers, and a scoreboard.
The proposed park will include: a community center building, a multi-purpose field, two
basketball half-courts, batting cages, a tot lot, an ornamental community garden, a picnic area,
and an amphitheater. The proposed community center will be located on the northeast comer of
the project site at Harding and Pine. It will consist of approximately 20,000 square feet of use
area for an activity center, fitness room, teen center, multi-purpose room, showers, office area,
and other areas. The community center will be a 35-foot high single-story structure. The
structure will incorporate stucco in two colors (cream and sunrise), colored honed concrete block,
and tile (blues and yellow) and will be compatible with the adjacent Senior Center. The southern
elevation will incorporate a stucco trellis area. The building will have a standing seam metal
(copper) roof with exposed wood beams. To the south of the new community center will be a
parking area. Along the northern side of Chestnut Avenue will be the multi-purpose field. The
field will incorporate artificial turf. The center of the project site will contain a tot lot with play
sand area and an amphitheater consisting of a tiered shade structure covering an informal stage.
The western perimeter (the formerly residential parcels) will contain an ornamental community
garden. The garden will be surrounded by a 6-foot high wooden fence. This passive use was
chosen for these parcels in consideration of the existing surrounding residential uses. (Note: The
garden portion of the park site may be used temporarily to accommodate the Centro de
Informacion. The City is currently considering several locations which might provide a
temporary or permanent home for the Centro. However, no decisions have been made at this
point regarding a specific site. If the City decides to pursue use of the ornamental garden to
house the Centro temporarily, it will be necessary to process a separate CUP or an Amendment to
the park CUP to do so.) The proposed ball field will be lighted; however, such lighting will be of
low intensity and will be shielded to prevent unnecessary light spillage. The ball field lights will
be turned off at 1O:OO p.m. in accordance with current City park rules.
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-18 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Page 3
The proposed park, combined with the existing Senior Center, will require and provide 255
parking spaces. This will require that the City terminate an expired shared parking agreement
with the Carlsbad Community Church on the north side of Pine Avenue. That parking agreement
(approved in 1990) allowed the Church exclusive use of the Senior Center parking lot
(approximately 135 spaces) for church attendees on Sundays between 7:30 a.m. and 1:OO p.m.
and at other times when not in conflict with Senior Center activities. In exchange, the City
(Housing and Redevelopment Commission) was allowed to use 87 parking spaces in a lot on
Harding Street for special public events when those events do not conflict with Church
operations. With the development of the Northwest Quadrant Community Park, the parking
spaces adjacent to the Senior Center will need to be available to the City at all times in order to
meet the parking requirements for the combined Community Park and Senior Center. The
termination of the shared parking agreement is not expected to result in any actual hardship to the
church since attendance at the church has been less than the maximum for which it was
approved. Thus, very few church members actually use the Senior Center parking area currently.
The CUP for the church (CUP 297) did not count the Senior Center parking spaces toward the
code-required parking for the church. Therefore no amendment to the church CUP is required as
a result of the termination of the parking agreement.
Finally, if approved, the CUP requested for the new Northwest Quadrant Community Park would
incorporate the existing Senior Center and its parking area, nullifying the existing CUP 88-04 for
the Senior Center. Because the new park facilities and the Senior Center are related civic uses
and will share parking areas, it is appropriate that they be merged under one CUP. The
conditions of approval which apply to the Senior Center, have been merged with the conditions
for the park and included in the attached CUP resolution.
The Northwest Quadrant Community Park project involves two legislative actions (General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change) and is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan;
B.
C.
D.
E.
Open Space Zone (Chapter 21.33 of the Zoning Ordinance);
Conditional Use Permit regulations (Chapter 21.42 of the Zoning Ordinance);
Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and
Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses the proposed legislative actions and the project’s compliance with each of the
applicable regulations/policies.
Y3
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-1 8 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Page 4
resident of the City.”
Open Space Planning and Protection
A. General Plan
City.
The proposed park use will Yes
General Plan Amendment
The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to change the current General Plan
designations on two portions of the subject property. The larger portion of the site (the former
Pine Elementary School site) is currently designated Elementary School (E) on the General Plan.
The proposed project would change that designation to Open Space (OS), which is the
appropriate designation for the proposed park use. The smaller portion of the project site
consists of property fronting on Madison Street currently designated High Density Residential
(RMH) by the General Plan. This portion of the property previously contained residences. The
properties were purchased by the City with the intent of utilizing them for park-related uses. The
proposed project includes use of these parcels to accommodate an ornamental garden. (This
more passive use would be located here in consideration of the existing residential uses adjacent
to the area.) The change of General Plan designation from RMH to OS on these properties
would more correctly reflect the nature of the proposed park use.
General Plan Consistency
The proposed Northwest Quadrant Community Park proposal is consistent with the applicable
policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the community park
development request are the Land Use and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1
(below) indicates how the project is consistent with these particular elements of the General Plan.
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Element
Land Use
Open Space
and
Conservation
Use Classification, Goal, Objective I Proposed Use and I Compliance
or Propram
Overall Land Use Pattern Objective
C.8 - “Provide for a sufficient
diversity of land uses so that schools,
parks and recreations areas, . . . are
available in close proximity to each
Improvements
The proposed use is a public
park to be located in close
proximity to the residences
and businesses in the
northwest quadrant of the
Yes
Goal A.4 - “A city with an adequate
amount and variety of open space for
outdoor recreation, including, but not
provide a needed recreational
opportunity for the residents
of the northwest quadrant of
limited to: parks; . . .” I the City.
Given the above, the proposed Northwest Quadrant Community Park project is consistent with
the various elements of the General Plan.
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-18 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
B. Open Space Zone
Zone Change
The bulk of the subject property (the area of the previous Pine Elementary School and the
existing Senior Center) is already zoned 0-S (Open Space) and, therefore, is already subject to
the OS Zone regulations (Chapter 21.33 of the Municipal Code). The portion of the project site
currently bearing an RMH General Plan designation (those parcels previously developed with
homes) carries a zoning designation of R-3 (Multiple Family Residential). This project would
change the zoning on those parcels to 0-S to maintain consistency with the proposed OS General
Plan designation and to put the most appropriate zoning on the property.
Zoning Regulations Compliance
According to Section 21.33.040 of the Open Space zone, features and uses such as playfields,
athletic fields, and public structures are allowed in the Open Space zone with the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. Section C below discusses the project’s compliance with the
Conditional Use Regulations. With regard to development standards, the Open Space zone only
regulates lot area and building height. No subdivision of land is proposed with the community
park development and the Open Space regulations merely state that the size of the lot shall be
dependent upon the existing or proposed use. The maximum building height allowed in the
Open Space zone is 25 feet unless, as stated in Section 21.33.060 of the ordinance, additional
height is allowed through a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Commission.
Chapter 2 1.42 (Conditional Uses) states that the height and area regulations of the underlying
zone (e.g., the 0-S Zone) in which the project is located shall prevail unless a specific finding is
made to allow an exemption to the underlying limit/requirement. The proposed height of the
community center (35 feet) exceeds the height allowed by the underlying 0-S Zone (25 feet);
therefore, an exemption is required to approve the additional height. Although the proposed
community center is a single-story structure, it does require additional height to accommodate the
proposed uses of the facility and to implement the building design approved in the Park Master
Plan. The proposed Community Center building in the northeast portion of the site would reach
a maximum height of 35 feet. The proposed structure height is consistent with other similar park
facilities throughout the city. In addition, other uses in the vicinity of the project site already
have approved heights exceeding the proposed Community Center height. The proposed
community center would be adjacent to the existing Senior Center.building (also located within
the Open Space zone), which has a maximum building height of 33 feet. To the north of the
project site, across Pine Avenue, is the Carlsbad Community Church property that contains a
multi-purpose building reaching 49 feet in height. While there are some residential buildings,
which generally have lower building heights, in the area, those are not the predominant uses.
Staff believes that, given the urbanized nature of the area surrounding the project site and the
building height of the existing buildings adjacent and near the project site, the proposed 35-foot-
high community center building would be compatible with the surrounding uses and structures.
Therefore, staff has included a finding in the attached CUP resolution to allow the requested
height limit exemption.
45-
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-1 8 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Page 6
C. Conditional Use Ordinance
According to Sections 21.33.040(3), (4), and (7), playfields and athletic fields, public structures,
and other related cultural, entertainment, and recreational activities and facilities are permitted in
the Open Space zone with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) pursuant to the
provisions contained in Chapter 21.42 and 21.50 of the Zoning Ordinance. Four findings must
be made in order to approve a CUP. These findings, and the ways in which the project satisfies
the findings, are discussed in Table 2 (below). (The required CUP findings have previously been
made for the Senior Center and need not be made again.)
TABLE 2 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FINDING
That the requested use is necessary or desirable for
the development of the community, is essentially in
harmony with the various elements and objectives of
the General Plan, including, if applicable, the certified
local coastal program, and is not detrimental to
existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the
zone in which the proposed use is to be located.
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the use.
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences,
landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the
requested use to existing or permitted future uses in
the neighborhood will be provided and maintained.
That the street system serving the proposed use is
adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by
the proposed use.
RESPONSE
The proposed park use is desirable to provide a
recreational opportunity for the residents of the
northwest quadrant of the city and will be harmonious
with the proposed Open Space General Plan
designation and has been designed to not be
detrimental to surrounding uses by the placement of
more passive use areas closer to surrounding
residences and provision of a wooden screening
fence.
The project site is adequate in size and shape in that
the site can accommodate the proposed uses and can
provide all required parking, screening and other
amenities.
The proposed project includes a wooden screening
fence and large areas of landscaping to properly
screen the use from other surrounding uses and all
lighting will be low-intensity and will be screened to
prevent unnecessary light spillage and lights will be
turned off at 1O:OO p.m.
The street system serving the project consists of local
roadways which can handle the anticipated 390 ADT
to be generated by the proposed project and all
required parking (255 spaces) can be provided.
D. Growth Management Ordinance
The Northwest Quadrant Community Park project is a non-residential project. Therefore many
of the Growth Management performance standards do not apply. The development of the
proposed park will contribute toward meeting the Growth Management park requirement for the
Northwest Quadrant. Table 3 (below) details the project’s compliance with the applicable
standards.
46
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUP 03-18 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AhrD
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Pane 7
Standard
City Administration
ImpactdStandard Compliance
NIA NIA
I Library I NIA I NIA I
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Water
I Waste Water Treatment I 4 EDU I Yes I
390 ADT Yes
Station #1 Yes
N/A NIA
NIA NIA
880 GPD Yes
I Parks I NIA I NIA I I Drainage I PLDA B I Yes I
Given the above, the proposed community park development is consistent with the Growth
Management Ordinance.
E. Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)
The Northwest Quadrant Community Park and Senior Center site are located in Local Facilities
Management Zone 1. No special development requirements, such as roadway construction or
other infrastructure requirements, apply to this park development. Since the park is to be located
on a previously developed site, and the Senior Center already exists, all existing facilities and
services are adequate to accommodate the proposed use. Therefore, the project is consistent with
thezone 1 LFMP.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Conditional Use Permit for
development of the Northwest Quadrant Community Park were reviewed for any potential
adverse impacts to the environment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The proposed community park, as designed and conditioned, would not create
significant adverse environmental impacts. No sensitive habitat or agricultural operations exist
on the previously developed site. The project is consistent with the applicable regulations; will
be graded in accordance with the City’s Grading Ordinance and City Standards; will comply with
the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit; and will provide all facilities
and services necessary to serve the development prior to, or concurrent with, construction. Given
this environmental analysis, a Notice of Intent to Issue a Negative Declaration was published on
November 20,2003. No public comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
The Senior Center underwent environmental review previously and a Negative Declaration was
approved. No new environmental review is required to merge the existing Senior Center use into
the new combined CUP.
41
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CUF’ 03-1 8 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND
SENIOR CENTER
December 17,2003
Page 8
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5523 (Neg. Dec.)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5524 (GPA)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5525 (ZC)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5526 (CUP)
Location Map
Disclosure Statement
Local Facilities Impact Assessment
Background Data Sheet
Letter terminating Shared Parking Agreement dated November 12,2003
Reduced Exhibits (previously distributed)
Exhibits “A” - “M” dated December 17,2003
- City of Carlsbad
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
t discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partpership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1.
;>
APPLICANT (Not tii applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or uartnershiu, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned comoration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person e& me CorpPart
Title #&z%eMw L2/- Title
Address /a daw b-?L4&8 Address
5\.
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
2.
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in ‘common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
comoration or uartnershiu, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO WIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
49 1635 Faraday AvenGe - Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-8559
3. NON-PROFIT ORGMZATION OR TRUST
4.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonmofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profiflmst </k Non Profiflrust
Title Title
Address Address
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (1 2) months? 0 Yes NO If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the
Signature of oderldate
hnt or type name of applicant
B&&osmt
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
_.
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 53
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Northwest Quadrant Community Park and Senior Center GPA 03-09/ZC
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: E and RMH
ZONING: 0-S and R-3
DEVELOPER’S NAME: City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
ADDRESS: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad CA 92008
03-06/CUP 03-18
PHONE NO.: 760-434-2856 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 204-100-05,-06,204-093-03.-04, -05
QUANTITY OF LAND USEIDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 10.67
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: January 2005
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
City Administrative Facilities:
Library:
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Identify Drainage Basin =
Demand in Square Footage =
Demand in Square Footage =
Circulation:
Fire:
Open Space:
Schools:
Sewer:
Water:
Demand in ADT =
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided =
Demands in EDU
Demand in GPD =
N/A
N/A
A
N/A
PLDA B
390
N/A
Carlsbad Unified
880
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06/CuP 03-1 8
CASE NAME: Northwest Quadrant Community Park and Senior Center
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A General Plan Amendment to change the desimation of 10.5 1
acres from Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16 acres
from Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone Change to change 0.16
acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open Space (0-S); and a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the development of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a vacant, .graded site
previously occupied by an elementary school.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 110 of Carlsbad Lands. according; to Map No. 1661, filed in
the Office of the County Recorder on February 27, 1915; and Portions of Blocks 45,46, and 59
and Lots 5 through 10 of Town of Carlsbad Amended, accordinp to Map No. 775, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder on February 15, 1893, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
APN: 204-100-05, -06,204-093-03, -04. -05 Acres: 10.67 Proposed No. of LotsNnits: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Elementary School (E) and Residential Medium High Densify (RMH)
Density Allowed: N/A
Existing Zone: OS and R-3
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: N/A
Proposed Zone: OS
Zoning General Plan
Site 0-S and R-3 E and RMH
North R-3 RMH
South R-3 and 0-S RM and HC
East R-3 RMH and RH
West R-3 RMH
Current Land Use
Senior Center, vacant,
single family residential
Residential and Church
Single family residential
and baseball fields
Multifamily residential
Single family residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration, issued November 20,2003
5-2
November 12,2003
Board of Trustees
Carlsbad Comdunity Church
3 175 Harding Street
Carlsbad California 92008
RE: Reciprocal Parking Agreement
Dear Board of Trustees,
This letter serves as notice that the Reciprocal Parking Agreement between
Carlsbad Community Church (CCC) and the City of Carlsbad (the City) has
expired. It also serves notice that the City will not be extending the Agreement.
The Agreement, dated March 20th, 1991, formally allowed CCC’s exclusive use
of parking at the Carlsbad Senior Center in exchange for the City’s exclusive use
of the CCC’s parking lot on the comer of Harding Street and Oak Street, both
during specific Fme periods. The Agreement allowed extensions beyond the
original term, but the City has chosen not to extend the agreement so that instead
the Senior Center parking lot could help serve the needs of the future park.
Since the Senior Center parking lot is a public lot, CCC is welcome to use it when
not conflict with the City’s use. The City intends to continue use of CCC’s
parking lot at the intersection of Harding Street and Oak Street when not in
conflict with CCC’s use, unless otherwise directed.
Thank you for your attention into this matter.
Sincerely,
kaymond R. Patchett
Secretary of Housing and Redevelopment
-. 5-3
1200 Carlsbad Village -Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008-1 989 (760) 434-2821 FAX (760) 720-9461 @
Planning Commission Minutes December 17,2003 DRAFTEWJFP
4. GPA 03-09RC 03-O6/CUP 03-18 - NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK AND SENIOR CENTER - Request for a Negative Declaration; A General Plan Amendment to change
the designation of 10.51 acres from Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to change the designation of 0.16 acres from Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open Space; a Zone
Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open Space (O-S); and a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a
vacant, graded site previously occupied by Pine Elementary School, and continued operation of the Senior Center, in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 4 and stated that Senior Planner, Elaine Blackburn, would make the
presentation.
Chairperson Baker opened the public hearing on Item 4 and asked the applicant if he wanted to continue with only five Commissioners. He stated he did.
Senior Planner, Elaine Blackburn, presented the Staff Report stating that Item 4 was for the Northwest
Quadrant Community Park. The park site is the former Pine Elementary School as well as three parcels
on Madison Street and the existing Senior Center, which has its own CUP, which would be combined with
the new CUP. Currently on the site in modular buildings are the Centro de Information and the Stay and
Play after school program. The proposed project involves the 7.52-acre community park and the incorporation of the existing Senior Center. The actions before the Planning Commission are a Negative
Declaration, which decision would be final, and the General Plan Amendment, which would go to the City Council. The General Plan Amendment is to change the General Plan designation of the former school
site from E to Open Space, and also to change the designation on the three residential parcels on Madison Street, which the City owns, from RMH to Open Space. There is also a Zone Change which
would go to Council and would affect the Madison Street parcels to change the zoning from Residential to Open Space. Finally, a Conditional Use Permit for the park itself and incorporates the Senior Center
CUP. That decision would be final with the Planning Commission unless appealed.
This park has been under design and review for more than a year and the park’s conceptual Master Plan
was approved by the City Council in January of 2003 after a lot of public input, including four public workshops, (three general workshops, one of which was attended by Council). There was also a special
workshop for children. The park elements include a Community Center Building of approximately 20,000
sq ft that will house a gymnasium and multi-purpose activity room for teens. There will be a multi-purpose
field that will accommodate either two soccer fields or one adult softball field. There will be two basketball
half courts, a batting cage area, a tot lot, a small informal amphitheatre, and picnic area with tables.
There will also be an ornamental community garden in the area near the residential units on Madison.
Chestnut Avenue is approximately 80 feet wide and there will be traffic-calming measures installed to slow traffic around the park. In particular, there will be a traffic circle where Jefferson comes into the park
property on the south side. Also, there will be some strip medians, some pop-outs or chokers, some enhanced paving, and some parallel parking spaces on both sides of the street.
Ms. Blackburn pointed out on a site map where the Community Center would be in Area 1. Area 12
would be south of that and would have the fields. Area 4 would have the amphitheatre with graded levels
which would serve as built-in modified stadium seating. She stated that there would be a 6-foot wooden fence around the ornamental garden area. With regard to parking, the combined use of the Senior
Center and the Park requires a total of 255 spaces and 256 will be provided. Staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Montgomery stated that there were many groups using the Pine field, including Pop
Warner Football, soccer teams, adult softball, Pony and Colt baseball teams, and high school baseball. He stated that all of those teams were accommodated except for the high school team. He asked Ms. Blackburn if she knew what the Parks and Recreation Department had done to relocate the high school
team. Ms. Blackburn stated that notifications regarding the workshops and inputs into the park design were provided to everyone involved and asked Mark Steyaert from the City Parks and Recreation
Department to address this question. Mr. Steyaert stated that the fields at Poinsettia and the new field at Aviara, which would closely correspond to when this field will be taken out of service, would
accommodate the junior varsity group. Commissioner Montgomery noted that the high school baseball team would need a field with a permanent mound rather than the temporary one at this new field. Mr.
Planning Commission Minutes December 17,2003 Page 5
Steyaert stated that they were aware of that need and would be considering that in the final design for the Aviara field.
Commissioner Segall stated that the City Council recently postponed the Community Center at Aviara. He asked if the Planning Commission’s approval of this Park and Community Center was subject to the availability of funds as determined by the City Council. Mr. Steyaert stated that the Planning Commission
was approving the Master Plan for the Park, and that the Community Center would be phased in.
Commissioner Segall asked if that was included in next year’s budget. Mr. Steyaert said that the Park was, but not the Community Center.
Cornmissioner Segall asked if parking spaces would be lost on Chestnut when the traffic-calming measures were installed. Mr. Steyaert responded that up to four parking spaces total would be lost for
the pop-outs. Commissioner Segall stated his concern that that park didn’t have any on-site parking and
he didn’t want to see spaces lost.
Chairperson Baker opened public testimony and invited to the podium those who would like to speak. Seeing none she closed public testimony.
Chairperson Baker congratulated the Parks Staff on a beautiful design.
Commissioner Montgomery agreed that it was a beautiful design and urged the Parks Commission and
the City Council to consider that much of the character of a community comes from the athletics of its schools and that many of the schools needed to reach out to the City for their sports’ needs.
Commissioner Heineman remarked to Mr. Price and Mr. Steyaert that in thinking back to his many years
on the Parks and Recreation Commission that he never thought it would happen and that it looked
beautiful.
Commissioner Segall stated that he supported the project.
Commissioner White stated that it was a great asset.
Chairperson Baker called for a vote.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner White, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5523, adopting a
Negative Declaration and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5524 and 5525, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment GPA 03-09 and
Zone Change 03-06, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5526, approving Conditional Use Permit CUP 03-1 8, based on the findings and subject
to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 5-0 AYES:
NOES: None
Baker, Heineman, Montgomery, Segall and White
Chairperson Baker closed the public hearing on Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next Item.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 4% 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
J
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This ;$ r$ Day of February, 2004
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Tract 110 of Carlsbad No. 1661, filed In the %i$Fi2@?vMg corder on February 27 1 15 and rtlons o Blocks 45 4 and 59 Ad Lots 5 through 10 01 Toum of &&bad Amended according to Ma
NO. 775 led (n the om~e of ihe County ~arod cr on February 15 1893 all in the Ci dCarls. bad. County of Sah Dlego. State of &omla.
If you c dcnge the General Plan Amendment and/or %ne Change In court
sues you or someone else ralsed at the ubllc hear-
8s notlce Dr In written correspon- dence dellv- ered to the Ctty of Carls; bad Atln Clt 'Clerk' 12db Carls: bad Vllla e rive Car& bad b 92- zi $&Et: NORTHWEST QUADRANT Hc hearina. COMMUNITY PARK " GPAOWWCo500 CASE FILE:
CASE NAM: NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNRY PARK
GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Tuesday, February IO, 2004, to consider a request for a General Plan Amendment to
change the designation of 10.51 acres from Elementary School (E) to Open Space and to
change the designation of 0.16 acres from Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to Open
Space; a Zone Change to change 0.16 acres from Multiple Family Residential (R-3) to Open
Space (0-S); to allow the development of a Community Park over 7.36 acres on a vacant,
graded site previously occupied by Pine Elementary School, and continued operation of the
Senor Center, in Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and more particularly described as:
Tract 110 of Carlsbad Lands, according to Map No. 1661, filed in
the Office of the County Recorder on February 27, 1915; and
Portions of Blocks 45, 46, and 59 and Lots 5 through 10 of Town
of Carlsbad Amended, according to Map No. 775, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder on February 15, 1893, all in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after February 6, 2004. If you have
any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4621.
If you challenge the General Plan Amendment and/or Zone Change in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: GPA 03-09/ZC 03-06
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH: JANUARY 30,2004
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARK
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
SITE
NORTHWEST QUADRANT
COMMUNITY PARK
GPA 03=09/ZC 03-06
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC W 0 RKS/COM MU N ITY
SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
E LA1 N E B LAC KB U RN
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENG I NEERl NG
DEPT
0 1/08/2004
AVERY@ Address Labels
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 BSTREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I .P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
ATTN TED ANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Laser 5160°
ABBINANTI JOSEPH R
835 CATHY LN
CARDIFF CA 92007
AFJR PARTNERSHIP L P
4255 OCEAN BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92 109
AFJR PARTNERSH~P
4255 OCEAWBZVD
SAN DIdO CA 92 109
/ /
/
ANGEL RAYMOND MBFLORENCE R
3329 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALMANZA THOMAS&MAGDALENA
1905 S DITMAR ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
ANDERSON MARY G REVOCABLE
3 12 1 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 04- 16-9 1 LIVING TRUST 03-20-91 '
ASBILL FAMILY TRUST 12-04-01 ANSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST APODACA MARIA TRUST
982 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3345 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3530 RIDGECREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
03-1 1-91
BAIRD WILLIAM T JR
3535 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
AYALA ANDREW L REVOCABLE
3380 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 12-08-01 ATKIN FAMILY TRUST 08-09-85
3565 TRIESTE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BALINO KATHERINE
5 1 1 WALNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BARRERA REYNALDO
3221 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BARKER MARTHA E TR
2435 MARK CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BATTEN BRYAN J
3461 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
AD CA 92008
BENNETT BELVA J
998 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BENNETT RUSSELL L
P 0 BOX 356
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
BORNIA COLIN A
10468 HOT MINERAL SPA RD
NILAND CA 92257
BOBBITT JAMES D LIVING TRUST
3730 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
08-27-0 1 BENNETT RUSSELL L
BUCK SIGNE M TR
458 N SIERRA BONITA AVE
LOS ANGELES CA 90036
CANALES ISABEL 0
3447 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BUSH JAMES R
P 0 BOX 645
CARLSBAD CA 920 18
CADMAN JOHN P&MENDOZA-
CADMAN GRISELDA
3600 HARBOR BLVD #110171
OXNARD CA 93035
3175 HARD
CARLSBAD COMMUNITY CHURCH
3175 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
AVERYB Address Labels Laser 5 160@
,. . - .. .__ *. . . .. ,?-.vz c..; =-G:'ryF. Lb... - -.*-
CARROLL G STANLEY&E GLORIA
C/O E W DAWSON CORP
302 E MANCHESTER BLVD
INGLEWOOD CA 90301
CARRENO DAGOBERTO
P&MERCED B
9 10 PALM AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARREON ROBERT SR&JOSEPHIKE
M
3309 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CASTRO LUPE <AKA ANGEL-
ARREOLA LIRE>
878 GRANADA DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
CHASE RICHARD L LIVING TRUST
2478 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
12-04-01 ET AL
CIRCLE K STORES INC-- - ~ .
C/O TOSCO MKT CO #DC 17
P 0 BOX 52085
PHOENIX AZ 85072
CHILDS THERESA
333 1 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008 2478 OCE
COLES ROBERT J TRUST 04-23-98
3 1 1 1 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CRISMAN PAMELA J
740 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CRUZ GUERRERO&ELEANOR L
635 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CUNNINGHAM FAMILY TRUST 10-
29-92
P 0 BOX 3634
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
CUNNINGHAM COASTAL L L C
P 0 BOX 3634
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
CVETKOVIC NEDELJKA
3017 QUAIL RD
ESCONDIDO CA 92026
DELOACH RALPH K&GENE BAKER
12141 AVENIDA CONSENTIDO
SAN DIEGO CA 92128
TRUST 08-22-95 DEWHURST DAVID
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DOKKEN MARY T LIVING TRUST
1022 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DU SHAUNE JESSICA
3 150 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EISEL ECKHARDT&SHIRLEY M
42 1 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
09-27-96
ESCOBEDO OFELIA
161 1 JAMES DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARQUHAR ELLEN E TR
6128 YEARLING ST
LAKEWOOD CA 907 13
6128 YEA
FERGUSON AVRIL R 1998 TRUST
4260 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FEULING JOSEPHLkSUZANNE
755 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FLORES JOE A&RUTH A TRS
2010 KARREN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GASTELUM EVA R FAMILY TRUST
640 WALNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
09-20-00 FRIEDRICHS JOSEPH S
3 160 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GAOIRAN FAMILY TRUST 09-06-94
3520 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5160@ AVERYO Address Labels
.-
GOMEZ FAMILY TRUST
4765 GATESHEAD RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GOMEZ FAMILJJR~
4765 GATmAD RD
GASTELUM RUBEN I
1975 MAGNOLIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRIJALVA LEONARD ALQRACHAEL
149 POLK ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92057
GONZALEZ MIGUEL&FRANCISCA
3119MADISONST#B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 06-22-00 GONZALES ADAM M
4887 FOXCREEK TRL
RENO NV 89509
GUERRA MAGDALENA M
3445 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GUSTAFSON HAROLD&ESTHERLEE HERNANDEZ ROSEMARY F
906 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
12 13 S FREEMAN ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
HERNANDEZ TONY F
3230 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HERNANDEZ VIRGINIA M
220 N EL CAMINO REAL #13
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
HIRATA FRANK S G&LORI L G
3434 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J&A DEBS FAMILY LTD
PARTNERSHIP
240 TRAFALGAR LN
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672
JAMES JOYCE A TR
3931 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JANICKI APARTMENTS
P 0 BOX 592
CARLSBAD CA 9201 8
JAUREGUI DOLORES A
C/O CONSUELO TREJO
P 0 BOX 281
CARLSBAD CA 92018
JOHNSTON E M TRUST 5/2 1/90
C/O JESS JOHNSTON
1025 1/2 IRVING RD
EUGENE OR 97404
JAUREGUI FRANCES
525 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE
3528 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KATZ STANLEY S&SANDRA L
7721 SEGOVIA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KELLEY FAMILY TRUST 0 1-3 1-95
3208 VIA RIBERA
ESCONDIDO CA 92029
KHALONA RAMON A
3267 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KINSER LARRY R LIVING TRUST 07- KIRBY CONNIE ,-.- __I VL-V3
2192 S COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
4845 TARANTELLA LN
SAN DIEGO CA 92 130
LANYI ANDY&CAROLYN
1629 CALLE LAS CASAS
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
LOPEZ RACHEL G
931 OAK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MAGGIO BETTY L
4125 TRIESTE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARKS ROBERT M&TURNER-
MARKS ROSIE
3 166 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MAMARIL ANGELITA F
4232 HUBBARD RD
STOCKTON CA 952 15
MANGEN CATHY
3228 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labels Laser 5160@ AVERYP
MARTINEZ FAMILY TRUST 07-29-94
3274 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARTINEZ JOSEFA <LE>
1292 AMADOR ST
VISTA CA 92083
MARTINEZ VIRGIKIA H
3367 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATA ANTHONY A&PHYLLIS T
450 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATA ROBERT&MAh'UELA .
3359 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATA ROMALDA M
3450 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MATSUBARA NORI EST OF
C/O COLLEEN MATSUBARA
983 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MAUGA TAFILELE P SR&MARIA G
3347 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCGEE DAVID JMACQUELINE M
TRS
6499 FAIRWATER PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MIER MONIC~
YeAA 920 18
MCNULTY JERRY&SHIELLA
4240 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MIER MONICA P
P 0 BOX 4301
CARLSBAD CA 92018
MIER MONICA/
P 0 BOX 4301 ,
MIER MONIC P 0 BOX 43
CA 92018
MISETIC 1994 FAMILY TRUST
1456 LEMON AVE
BRADBURY CA 9 10 10
MIYAO KANJI
3220 LOCUST AVE
LONG BEACH CA 90807
MOHAMMED1 ZIA T
838 LINCOLN BLVD #2
SANTA MONICA CA 90403
MONTGOMERY MICHAEL
D&REBECCA
C/O SCUBA ASSOCIATES
540 STEVENS AVE
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
MONTANEZ HENRY
3391 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MONTANEZ ROBERT J
3240 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORENO FRANCES
1611 JAMESDR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORENO SALVADOR R
3468 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORENO FRA
MUNOZ M GUADALUPE F
3250 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MURPHY STEVEN
3369 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3468 MADIS
NAVARRO RITA M
3463 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NIELSEN ROBERT L TR
525 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NOBEL FAMILY TRUST 02-1 8-98
6435 CAMINITO BLYTHEFIELD #C
LA JOLLA CA 92037
Laser 5160@ ,&$VERY- Address Labels
OROZCO JOSE A
P 0 BOX 607
CARLSBAD CA 920 18
OROZCO JOSE A REVOCABLE
786 PALM AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 08-0 1-95
PACHECO BERTHA <AKA PACHECO
MAGANA BERTHA>
9 10 WOODLAKE DR
CARDIFF CA 92007
PACHECO RUBEN TR
3357 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PALMER KATHLEEN M Y
3905 DAISY PL
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
PETERSON WILLARD C JR&SUE S
7428 AVILA AVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
RAMIREZ FAMILY REVOCABLE
735 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 05-27-98
RODRIGUEZ FLORENCIO FAMILY
2 106 CROWN VIEW WAY
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
TRUST 3-3 1-92
PEI DANIEL K
8 10 COLDSTREAM CT
DIAMOND BAR CA 9 1765
PINAMONTI MARY J TRUST
2244 S SANTA FE #B-02
VISTA CA 92084
REZA ALEX A
25024 HIGHSPRING AVE
NEWHALL CA 91321
RODRIGUEZ PATRICIA J
661 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUGAR GARYtkJEANETTE FAMILY
TRUST
921 DAVIS ST
RAMONA CA 92065
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF S D
P 0 BOX 85728
SAN DIEGO CA 92 186
SANCHEZ ROY R&ESTELA V
3482 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FAMILY TRUST 10-30-95 SANDWELL DAVID JtkBARBARA A
3390 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHICK LUAN TRUST 11-30-99
938 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHNEIDER WILLIAM&ELLEN
P 0 BOX 891
CARLSBAD CA 920 18
SEIDERMAN BRIAN&JOYCE TRUST SENTENO ALFONSO S&CRESPINA
04-2 1-00 REVOCABLE TRUST
13 15 KELLY ST 3323 MADISON ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CARLSBAD CA 92008
P G P CARLSBAD SESIORS LTD
CAPITAL GROJVTH PROP
1120 SILVERADO ST
LA JOLLA CA 92037
/ PACIFIC BELL
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSESSED
00000 ,,”
,/’ /’
PENDLETON FAMILY TRUST 07-06-
90
13 12 NEPTUNE AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
PUHEK L JOHNkLYNDA M
12944 AVENIDA LA VALENCIA
POWAY CA 92064
ROCHA FAMILY 2002 TRUST
4209 CIELO AVE
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
RODRIGUEZ STEVE F
3207 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUGGLES STEPHEN J&GINA S
3 149 FAIRVIEW DR
VISTA CA 92084
SANTANA FAMILY TRUST 12-04-96
3 183 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHNEIDER W
SERETTI ENRIQUE M
210 LILLE LN #206
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
AVERY’ Address Labels Laser 5160@
SHELLEN I1 LTD PARTNERSHIP
4522 TRIAS ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92 103
SHELLEN 11 LTD , PAR~’ERSHIP
4522 TRIAS ST J SAX DIEWCA 92 103 / ,‘
,/’
4522 TRIAS ST
SAN DIEG
SLAWSON GRANT H&MCCAFFERY
VICTORIA
3490 DEL REY ST #lo0
SAN DIEGO CA 92 109
SIMIKICH RATKO&CHERYL L
1029 HONEYSUCKLE DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SMITH SUSAN M
3320 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SOTELO VIRGINIA F TRUST 09-07-95
C/O RUDY F SOTELO
154 CREGAR ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
SOTELO VIRGINIA F TRUST69-07-95
C/O RUDY F SOTE,m ~ --’
STIMPSON RALPHBrLILLIAN
3482 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
REVOCABLE TRUST 02-04-9 1 SOUGIAS NIKOLAOS&MARIA TRS
P 0 BOX 232047
ENCINITAS CA 92023
STERNBERG TANYA 1998 TRUST
3 156 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STOUT FAMILY INTERVIVOS
29 14 LUANA DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
REVOCABLE TRUST 06-06-03 STRAW PILAR M
12543 CAMARERO CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92 130
TANGUMA PAULINE TR
200 S EMERALD DR #35
VISTA CA 9208 1
TERHUNE GENTRY G 1999 TRUST
45 13 COVE DR #20
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TREJO CONSUELO J
P 0 BOX 281
CARLSBAD CA 920 1 8
TREJO CONSUELO J&HENRY
P 0 BOX 281
CARLSBAD CA 920 18
TROUTMAN ERNESTINE G
820 BODEGA WAY
RODEO CA 94572
TRUEBLOOD DONALD MARK&ANH
P 0 BOX 274
DUCOR CA 932 18
URETA JAVIER A
3280 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
URETA JOEL A
C/O JIM URETA
801 1 CROSSRIDGE RD
DUBLIN CA 94568
VALDEZ FAMILY TRUST 02-25-92
C/O MANUEL VALDEZ
2506 SAN CLEMENTE AVE
VISTA CA 92084
VALADEZ JOSE A&SYLVIA M
3790 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MALDIBIESO ALEX J&SARAH C
3450 HARDING ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUST 10-17-96 VENSTROM CARL J&BARTLETT
LORI S
2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WALLACE CLICK B&AUTUMN
3378 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WALTERS JOHN C&PATRICE N A/B
LIVING TRUST
5070 LYNCH CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WOOD JUNE
P 0 BOX 2134
LEUCADIA CA 92023
WOOD JUNE
P 0 BOX 2134
LEUCADIA CA 92023
Address Labels Laser 5 1 6OS
. WOOLEN SIDNEY WkCLARA J TRS YANG HYUNG TgiYOUNG H
1312 AMBER PL
ONTARIO CA 91762
29 15 CACATUA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ZETTNER WILLIAM L
940 PALM AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labels
YOUNG ALEX R
926 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5160@
NORTHWEST QUADRANT COMMUNITY PARKGPA 03-09/ZC 03-06
Council Actions Requested!!General Plan AmendmentGeneral Plan Amendment""Former School SiteFormer School SiteE to OS (10.51 ac)E to OS (10.51 ac)""Former Residential LotsFormer Residential LotsRMH to OS (.16 ac)RMH to OS (.16 ac)!!Zone ChangeZone Change""Former Residential LotsFormer Residential LotsRR--3 to OS3 to OS
Location MapPINE AVEH A R D IN G S TINTERSTATE 5
CHESTNUT AVEM A D IS O N S T
R O O S E V E L T S T
J E F F E R S O N S T
WALNUT AVEJ E F F E R S O N S T SITEOAK AVEPALM AVE
Project Site!!Pine Elementary School (closed 2001)Pine Elementary School (closed 2001)""Centro de Informacion and Stay And Play Centro de Informacion and Stay And Play !!Existing Senior CenterExisting Senior Center!!3 parcels on Madison Street3 parcels on Madison Street
Proposed Project!!New 7.52 acre community parkNew 7.52 acre community park!!Incorporate existing Senior CenterIncorporate existing Senior Center
History!!Park Conceptual MP approved by Council Park Conceptual MP approved by Council ––January 2003January 2003!!4 public workshops 4 public workshops ""3 general workshops (1 with Council)3 general workshops (1 with Council)""1 children’s workshop1 children’s workshop
Planning Commission Actions!!December 17, 2003December 17, 2003!!Adopted Negative Declaration (Final)Adopted Negative Declaration (Final)!!Approved CUP 03Approved CUP 03--18 (Final)18 (Final)!!Recommended approval of GPA 03Recommended approval of GPA 03--09 09 and ZC 03and ZC 03--0606
Planning Commission Recommendation!!Recommended approval of GPA 03Recommended approval of GPA 03--09 09 and ZC 03and ZC 03--0606
Council Actions Requested!!General Plan AmendmentGeneral Plan Amendment""Former School SiteFormer School SiteE to OS (10.51 ac)E to OS (10.51 ac)""Former Residential LotsFormer Residential LotsRMH to OS (.16 ac)RMH to OS (.16 ac)!!Zone ChangeZone Change""Former Residential LotsFormer Residential LotsRR--3 to OS3 to OS
Site Plan
Park Elements!!Community center building (20,000 sf)Community center building (20,000 sf)""Gymnasium/MultiGymnasium/Multi--purpose roompurpose room""Activity Center (Stay and Play)Activity Center (Stay and Play)""Teen centerTeen center!!MultiMulti--purpose fieldpurpose field""2 youth2 youth--sized soccer practice fieldssized soccer practice fieldsoror""1 adult softball field1 adult softball field
Park Elements, cont’d!!2 basketball half2 basketball half--courtscourts!!Batting cageBatting cage!!Tot lotTot lot!!AmphitheatreAmphitheatre!!Picnic areaPicnic area""6 tables grouped; others dispersed6 tables grouped; others dispersed!!Ornamental community gardenOrnamental community garden
Chestnut Avenue!!Traffic Calming measures (Harding to Traffic Calming measures (Harding to Jefferson)Jefferson)""Traffic circleTraffic circle""Strip mediansStrip medians""PopPop--outs/Chokersouts/Chokers""Enhanced pavingEnhanced paving""Parallel parking spacesParallel parking spaces
Parking!!Required parking = 255 spaces totalRequired parking = 255 spaces total""108 for park108 for park""147 for Senior Center147 for Senior Center!!Spaces provided = 256 spacesSpaces provided = 256 spaces
Vicinity MapOAK AVEPINE AVEI N T E R S T A T E 5
H A R D IN G S T
J E F F E R S O N S T CHESTNUT AVEM A D IS O N S T
WALNUT AVEexistingparkingexistingSenior Centerexistingparkingworshipcenterparkingpublicparking(87 sp’s)educationbldg.sanctuaryCarlsbadCommunityChurchSenior CenterChase Field