Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-02-17; City Council; 17490; AT&T WirelessAB# 17,490 MTG. 2/17/04 DEPT. PLN I DEPT.HD. TITLE: AT&T WIRELESS CUP 03-22 CITY ATTY. @?* CITY MGR- Project application(s) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Administrative Reviewed by and To be Reviewed - Approvals Final at Planning Final at Council Commission That the City Council DIRECT the City Attorney to prepare documents denying the requested Conditional Use Permit, CUP 03-22. CUP 03-22 X In September of 2000, AT&T Wireless requested approval to install 6 wireless antennas and the required utility boxes at 7512 Cadencia Street (CUP 00-36). In October 2001, the City denied the request. Thereafter, AT&T filed suit in the United States District Court alleging that the City unlawfully denied the application. The U.S. District Court ruled in February 2003 that the City did in fact not have a basis supported by substantial evidence to deny the application. The court's ruling overturned the City's denial of the Conditional Use Permit and remanded the matter to the City to allow AT&T to install the requested wireless equipment at 7512 Cadencia Street. However, on June 19, 2003, AT&T Wireless Services requested approval for an alternative location at SDG&E Tower 173 (CUP 03-22). The City Council held a public hearing on August 19, 2003 and after consideration of all public testimony directed the City Attorney to prepare documents denying the request. Prior to the City Council adopting a resolution denying the AT&T Wireless Services application (CUP 03-22), the Council moved to reopen the August 19, 2003 hearing so that ownership information of the underlying property can be updated and additional wireless services coverage information may be considered. At the time the AT&T Wireless Services application was submitted, the property was being held by the bankruptcy court. Since that time, the property has been sold by the bankruptcy court to Monica and Ivan Jellinek, on behalf of several of the adjacent homeowners. The current property owners have not authorized submittal of an application for a wireless facility on this property. CompComm, a wireless communications engineering consulting firm, was hired by the City to conduct a search of locations within the Rancho Santa Fe Road vicinity to determine potential locations for the installation of wireless facilities that could adequately serve the Rancho Santa Fe Road corridor. Several locations were identified by CompComm and are listed in Exhibit 2, on file in the City Clerk's office. ENVl RON M E NTAL: Projects rejected or disapproved by a public agency are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Small, new equipment facilities or structures are a Class 3 Categorical Exemption under the Environmental Quality Act (Guidelines section 15303). In addition, the FCC requires compliance with radio frequency power density standards (ANSMEEE C95.1-1992) for the general public, therefore, if approved; the project would not have a significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. I PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,490 Local Facilities Management Plan Growth Control Point Net Density Special Facility Fee No additional environmental analysis is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. Zone 11 N/A N/A NiA FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact to the City since installation and maintenance of the wireless facility, if approved by the City, will be solely at the expense of the applicant. If no project is approved, the City's fiscal status quo is preserved. GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS: EXH I BITS : 1. Location Map 2. Report for the City of Carlsbad Regarding Analysis of Alternatives. Alternate Sites for Proposed AT&T Wireless Services Communications Facilities, dated January 7, 2004, on file with the City Clerk's Office. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Christer Westman, (760) 602-4614, cwest@ci.carlsbad.ca.us EXHIBIT 1 AT&T W I R ELESS CUP 03-22 (0) COMPCOMM Report for THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA Regarding ANALYSIS OF ALTERATE SITES for PROPOSED AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES January 7,2004 Table of Contents Section pape I Introduction & Background Summary of Conclusions II Technical Analysis Existence of Coverage Gap Coverage from Proposed SDG&E #173 Site Coverage from Proposed Cadencia Site Analysis of Alternative Sites III Conclusions Appendix I: Propagation Fundamentals Appendix II: Propagation Study Parameters Appendix III: Service Types and Associated Issues Appendix IV: COMP COMM, Inc. Qualifications Attachment 1 : List and Map of Existing and Potential Sites Attachment 2: AWS Propagation Study: Area Coverage with Cadencia Site Attachment 3: AWS Propagation Study: Area Coverage with SDG&E #173 Site Attachment 4-16: Comp Corn Propagation Studies for AWS Proposed and Attachment 17: CD-ROM of Site Photos and Lists of Photo Descriptions - This Alternative Sites is not on file with the City Clerk's Office, 2-18-04. 2 3 3 4 4 5 8 10 12 14 15 item Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 1 OS- 1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@compcominc.com www.cotnpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 2 of 20 Section I - Introduction & Background Comp Comm, Inc. (“Comp Comm”) is a wireless engineering consulting firm which has been designing, building and analyzing wireless networks since 1975. Comp Corn has been retained by the City of Carlsbad, CA (“Carlsbad”) to review materials submitted by AT&T Wireless Services (“AWS”) in their applications for a new wireless communications facilities site in the southeast section of the city, and to research and analyze potential alternative sites. The relevant AWS applications have been for sites at the San Diego Gas & Electric high tension tower #173 (SDG&E #173) and at the residence at 7512 Cadencia St. (“Cadencia”). The status and history of these applications is a matter of public record, and, for simplicity and brevity, will not be recounted here. Comp Comm has been specifically requested by Carlsbad to review the AWS submissions and: 1. Verify or refute their claim of a coverage gap in the Cadencia area. 2. Identify alternative sites that could potentially serve to cover any verified gap. 3. Perfom propagation analyses of these potential alternate sites. 4. Render an opinion as to which sites might also address the coverage needs of AWS. It must be kept in mind that our expertise is in the area of radiofrequency (RF) engineering, so our analysis is limited to what sites could provide signal coverage in those identified areas, i.e. what RF coverage could technically be achieved from these sites. Our analysis does not account for the ability (or not) to obtain a viable lease for the sites nor does it cover issues such as structural viability of the sites, or other potential constraints (access, environmental, etc.). Summary of Conclusions AWS does appear to have a coverage gap in two areas: 1. Sections of what we refer to as the La Costa Valley (defined below). 2. Sections of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. The proposed Cadencia site would cover the La Costa Valley gap but not all the relevant areas of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. A second site would likely be needed to provide complete coverage of these areas. The proposed SDG&E #173 site should, by itself, provide coverage to both these gap areas. The only alternative single site that would likely cover both gap areas is SDG&E #174. There are combinations of two sites that together should provide coverage of both these gap areas, and some of these sites are “preferred” under the guidelines of City Council Policy Statement #64. Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 081 08-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for Citv of Carlsbad, CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities D. 3 of 20 Section I1 - Technical Analysis Comp Comm reviewed select technical materials submitted by AWS as part of their applications as well as other materials in the public record (such as the Wireless Site Evaluation Report developed by Jonathan Krarner, dated September 17, 2002), and further materials provided by the city (e.g. zoning maps, copies of City Council Policy Statement #fA on Wireless Communication Facilities). Comp Comm then visited Carlsbad on November 8-11, 2003 to conduct field research which included driving the general area, visiting the AWS proposed sites, looking for alternative sites and collecting information (location, ground elevation photos, etc.) on these potential alternative sites. Propagation studies for select sites were created using the parameters discussed below and the results analyzed. Details and results are as follows: 1. Existence of AWS Coverage Gap 2. Coverage from Proposed SDG&E #173 Site 3. Coverage from Proposed Cadencia Site 4. Analysis of Alternative Sites Existence of Coverage Gap Normally, to analyze a licensee’s coverage of an area (and any gaps), we would gather information on the licensee’s existing sites and facilities and then create our own composite propagation study of the area network. This would then be analyzed and compared to the licensee’s propagation studies. However, in this case, we were not able to obtain information on AWS’s local area system and so were only able to analyze the propagation studies they submitted in the application process. These studies are included in this report as Attachment 2 & 3. Attachment 2 shows what AWS claims would be their area coverage with their existing sites (2 in the area: AWS site numbers “SD437” and “SD383”) plus SDG&E #174. Attachment 3 shows what AWS claim would be their area coverage’with their existing sites plus Cadencia. Extrapolating from these studies and based on our experience in designing cellular networks, these studies appear “reasonable” in their results. We would conclude that it is likely that AWS does indeed have coverage gaps in two areas in this vicinity: 1. The area we call the La Costa Valley (defined as the valley containing the La Costa Country Club east to the neighborhood surrounding Cadencia St., west to approaching El Camino Real, south to the bluff just south of La Costa Ave., and north to the Alicante Rd. neighborhood. 2. Sections of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. from north of Melrose Drive south to Olivenhain Rd. We would repeat the caveat that because we’ve not been able to verify whether there are other AWS sites in the area (including perhaps in neighboring towns) providing signal which are not shown in these Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. 0 Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1 334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad, CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 4 of 20 studies, and we don’t have the exact operating parameters for these sites, we are unable to make a more concrete assessment. Coverage from Proposed SDG&E #173 Site Attachment 2 shows AWS’ predicted coverage including the SDG&E #173 tower. Attachment 4 shows Comp Comm’s propagation study for this site (Site #l). Attachment 1 provides details of the parameters of this site. Both these studies show that this site would provide good to excellent coverage of almost all of the La Costa Valley area and a long stretch of Ranch Santa Fe Rd., from just below the curve near San Ellio Rd. south to and including large sections of Olivenhain Rd. There are still gaps on Rancho Santa Fe Rd. in the La Costa Meadows/Melrose Drive area (the northern section of the area of concern) that remain uncovered and would likely, at some point, require an additional site to provide “seamless7’ Rancho Santa Fe Rd. coverage, but this would likely be to the north of the existing sites or a “microcell” to cover that little valley area. [Because this area is not covered by any of the sites under consideration in this report, and under all circumstances coverage here would require an additional site as described above, it will be excluded from the discussion of the other sites, below.] Thus, this site on its own significantly covers both the La Costa Valley and the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap areas discussed above. Coverape from Proposed Cadencia Site Attachment 3 shows AWS’ predicted coverage including the Cadencia site (but excluding the SDG&E #173 site). Attachment 5 shows Comp Comm’s propagation study for this site (Site #2). Attachment 1 provides details of the parameters of this site. Both these studies show that this site would provide good to excellent coverage of almost all of the La Costa Valley area and significant stretches of Ranch Santa Fe Rd. similar to SDG&E #173. However, it would likely not provide adequate coverage of the section or Rancho Santa Fe Rd. just at the intersection with La Costa Ave. nor as good coverage of the Olivenhain Rd. area. Thus, this site would Zikeb necessitate an additional site to significantly cover both the La Costa Valley and the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap areas discussed above, in particular to cover the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and La Costa Ave. Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.9188 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcornminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for Citv of Carlsbad, CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 5 of 20 Analysis of Alternative Sites Attachment 1 shows a more detailed description of the 11 sites analyzed as possible alternatives to the AWS proposed sites. Each of these sites is discussed individually below. Five additional sites are included on this list as they were discussed, but they were excluded from our detailed analysis because of the existence of “better” sites (those higher on the list). The following sites were analyzed as possible alternatives to the Cadencia site: 1. Site 3A, Attachment 6: AWS Primary “SD-157A” This site is located on the grounds on the La Costa Resort, on the western edge of the golf course. This site was originally evaluated by AWS and was their “preferred” site, but they state they were unable to successfully contact the property owners to discuss lease arrangements. This site has the added benefit of being in a commercial zone, a “preferred” location per Policy Statement #64. This site provides excellent coverage of the La Costa Valley area, but only small sections of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area. A second site would likely be needed to cover the remaining Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap areas. 2. Site 3B, Attachment 7: SDG&E #174 This site is located between the Cadencia site and SDG&E #173, slightly above Cadencia and slightly below SDG&E #173. This site is in the same residential neighborhood as both Cadencia and SDG&E #173. This site provides excellent coverage of both the La Costa Valley area, and approximately the same Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area as SDG&E #173. Thus, this site on its own significantly covers both the La Costa Valley and the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap areas discussed above, and can be considered comparable (effectively interchangeable) with the SDG&E #173 site. 3. Site 3C, Attachment 8: High Tension Monopole, NE Corner, La Costa Ave. & El Camino Real This site is’ located on the grounds on the NE Comer of La Costa Ave. & El Camino Real, in the parking lot of the Albertson’s supermarket. This site has the added benefit of being in a commercial zone, a “preferred” location per Policy Statement #64. Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com w.cornpcom’nc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for City of Carlsbad, CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 6 of 20 This site provides excellent coverage of the La Costa Valley area, and good coverage of almost all relevant sections of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area. A second site might be added to improve coverage east of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 4. Site 3D, Attachment 9: High Tension Monopole, SE Corner, La Costa Ave. & El Camino Real This site is located on the grounds on the SE Comer of La Costa Ave. & El Camino Real, on the ridge east of and above the La Costa Town Center complex. This site provides excellent coverage of the La Costa Valley area, and good coverage of almost all relevant sections of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area. Coverage is slightly better along Rancho Santa Fe Rd. with this site vs. Site 3C. However, access to the site might be much more difficult as it is on a ridge. Furthermore, while it appears this site is in a commercial zone, this site overlooks (is visible from) the residential area to its east. 5. Site 3E, Attachment 10: SDG&E Tower #181 This site is located between El Camino Real and Del Mar Rd. just south of Alga Rd., in the Estrella Del Mar/Del Mar residential development. This site provides good to excellent coverage of much of the La Costa Valley area, but effectively none of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area. A second site would likely be needed to cover the remaining Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap areas. This site is also less desirable per Policy Statement #64 because, though it is an existing structure, it is located in a residential area. The following sites were analyzed as possible alternatives to provide coverage along the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area: 1. Site 4A, Attachment 11 : SDG&E Tower #170 This site is the second tower east of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. in the same chain of towers as #173. It is located on a small hill crest. This site provides excellent coverage of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area and significant sections of the La Costa Valley area, but a gap remains in the area in the Cadencia neighborhood just west of the Cadencia site. Thus, a second site (perhaps a micro cell) might be needed to cover the small, remaining La Costa Valley gap area. This area is currently undeveloped but appears it is being prepared for a residential development. Cornp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 cornpcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcominc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for Citv of Carlsbad, CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities 2. p. 7 of 20 Site 4B, Attachment 12: SDG&E Tower #171 This site is the first tower east of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. in the same chain of towers as #173. Like Site 4A, this site provides excellent coverage of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area and significant sections of the La Costa Valley area, but a gap remains in the area in the Cadencia neighborhood just west of the Cadencia site. Thus, a second site (perhaps a micro cell) might be needed to cover the small, remaining La Costa Valley gap area. This area is currently undeveloped but appears it is being prepared for a residential development. 3. Site 4C, Attachment 13: SDG&E Tower #172 This site is the first tower west of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. in the same chain of towers as #173. Like Site 4A, this site provides excellent coverage of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area and significant sections of the La Costa Valley area, but a gap remains in the area in the Cadencia neighborhood just west of the Cadencia site. Thus, a second site (perhaps a micro cell) might be needed to cover the small, remaining La Costa Valley gap area. This site is in the same residential neighborhood as SDG&E #173, but access to the site could be from Rancho Santa Fe Rd., eliminating truck travel through the residential neighborhood. 4. Site 4D, Attachment 14: High Tension Monopole, E. of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. This site is the first tower east of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. in a chain of monopole towers approximately .65 miles north of the chain of SDG&E towers including #173. This site provides good coverage of large sections of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area, but there is a gap around the intersection with La Costa Ave. Additional gaps remain in the La Costa Valley area, including parts of the Cadencia neighborhood and south of La Costa Ave. Thus, a second site would likely be needed to cover the remaining gap areas. This area is currently undeveloped but appears it is being prepared for a residential development. 5. Site 4E, Attachment 15: NE corner of La Costa Ave. & Rancho Santa Fe Rd. This site is the commercial zone, at the northeast comer of La Costa Ave. & Rancho Santa Fe Rd. This site is currently undeveloped but it is believed it is slated to be developed as a retail center in the next few years. This site provides excellent coverage of both the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area and almost all of the La Costa Valley area; there is only a very small gap surrounding the Sea Pointe Tennis Club Comp Corn, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Cotlingwood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com w.cornpcomminc.com COW COMM, Inc. for Ciw of Carlsbad, CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities D. 8 of 20 which could be served by a microcell. This site is in a commercially zoned area, which is a “preferred” location per Policy Statement #64. We can extrapolate that a site located in the commercial zone to the southeast comer of this intersection (i.e. the Sav-On Drug retail area) would cover a similar but slightly smaller area (with bigger gaps, especially in the La Costa Valley) as it has a lower ground elevation than Site 4E. The advantage to a facility at the Sav-on site is that it is an existing commercial development and other licensees are already approved and/or located at this site 6. Site 4F, Attachment 16: Fire Station #6 This site is the planned City Fire Station #6, just east of Rancho Santa Fe Rd., approximately one mile north of the intersection with La Costa Ave. This site provides excellent coverage of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. gap area with only a very small gap just south of the intersection with La Costa Ave. Coverage of the La Costa Valley area is also excellent except, again, a small .gap in parts of the Cadencia neighborhood and south of La Costa Ave (smaller gaps than for sites 4A-4D). Section 111 - Conclusions Based on our analysis of their propagation studies, AWS appears currently to have significant gap area including the La Costa Valley area and along Rancho Santa Fe Rd., in the general area from Olivenhain Rd. to just south of the La Costa Meadows Industrial Park area. Therefore, provided their submissions are accurate, AWS has a demonstrated need for an additional site or sites in this area. Sinele Site Coverage AWS proposed site SDG&E #173 (Site #1) would likely provide good to excellent coverage to both the gap areas of interest to this study. The only other single site that would likely provide comparable coverage is SDG&E #174 (Site #3B). Both of these sites are existing utility structures, which is “preferred”, but both are also located in the same residential neighborhood, which is considered “discouraged”, according to Policy Statement #64. All other alternatives for covering these gap areas would necessitate two sites, although one of those two might be a “microcell” in some instances. Dual Site Coverage There are a number of combinations of two sites which would likely provide good to excellent coverage of both the gap areas of interest to this study. Almost any combination of a Cadencia alternative site and Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 cornpcomm@cornpcomrninc.com www.cornpconuninc.com COMP COW, Inc. for City of Carlsbad, CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities D. 9 of 20 a Rancho Santa Fe alternative site would provide coverage of the whole area of concern (Le. gap area coverage comparable to or better than SDG&E #173). However, because some of these sites are “preferred” over others based on Policy Statement #64, some combinations would be preferable over others according to the City, and still meet the coverage objectives desired by AWS. Of the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. alternatives, Fire Station #6 (Site 4F) could be considered an “even more preferred” site because it is on property owned by the City, construction is slated to begin shortly, and the City has stated they are willing to accommodate wireless carriers on the site. This site combined with the commercial zone at the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and La Costa Ave. (either Site 4E or the Sav- On site) would provide coverage to the gap areas. Fire Station #6 (Site 4F) could also be combined with AWS Primary “SD-l57A”, the La Costa Resort site (Site 3A), or either monopole at the intersection of La Costa Ave. and El Camino Real (Sites 3C and 3D, both commercial sites, although, for reasons discussed above, 3C might be preferred). Any of these combinations of sites would provide coverage of the gap areas using “preferred” sites. The commercial zone at the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and La Costa Ave. (Site 4E) could be combined with Sites 3A, 3C or 3D to provide coverage of the gap areas using ‘‘preferred” sites. Sites 3C, 3D, 4E and perhaps Sites 4A-4C7 when combined with a “microcell” either along Rancho Santa Fe Rd. (for Sites 3C & 3D) or in the Cadencia neighborhood (for sites 4E and perhaps 4A-4C) could also adequately cover the coverage gaps discussed above. Therefore, base on our analysis, our conclusion must be that while both the proposed Cadencia and SDG&E #173 sites do a good job of adding coverage in the gap areas identified, both these sites are in “discouraged” areas according to Policy Statement #64. Furthermore, the Cadencia site would likely necessitate an additional site to fully cover the Rancho Santa Fe Rd. area. Other combinations of two sites could address the gap areas as well as or better than these sites, and be “preferred” according to Policy Statement #64. We must again add the caveat that our expertise is in the area of radiofrequency (RF) engineering, so our analysis has been limited to where the radio signals extend and what sites could provide signal coverage in those identified areas. Our analysis does not account for the ability (or not) to obtain a viable lease for the sites nor does it cover issues such as structural viability of the sites, or other potential constraints (access, environmental, etc.). Failure to meet the necessary requirements of any of these conditions could potentially disqualify a site. Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1 334 856.833.9188 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomrninc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites. for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 10 of 20 APPENDIX I - Propagation Fundamentals Cellular and Personal Communications Systems (PCS) operate by sending a signal from a transmitting antenna to a mobile unit, which transmits back a response to the base station. The transmitted signal travels by spreading out from the source antenna, or propagating, through the air. There are multiple sites in an area and the mobile unit “hands off’ from one site to the next as it travels. The coverage of one site should overlap the coverage of the neighboring site to facilitate this hand off. If there is no overlap, the call will drop and the customer will be dissatisfied. The main issues in the design stage are single site coverage and system coverage. For example, if each cell site can provide coverage out to ten miles in all directions before a call is dropped and the towers are twenty-five miles apart, there is a five-mile coverage hole in the system. Each site may be providing excellent coverage in its ten-mile radius, but outside that limit there is no coverage. This is an example of good single site coverage but poor system coverage. Cell sites rarely, if ever, provide such geographically symmetrical coverage. The real world presents too many problems to a radio signal trymg to propagate from the transmitting antenna. This is easiest to understand by comparing radio signals to light. Much as a radio system “covers” a geographic area, we use light to illuminate a room. If the room is devoid of objects such as furniture, the best way to light it is with a lamp in the middle. If there are obstacles, such as furniture, in the room, it can still be lit from the center, but now there will be shadows in some locations. Height is a very important criterion in radio communications design. The height of a site, as a combination of ground elevation (above mean sea level - AMSL) and the tower height (above ground level - AGL), must be high enough to provide the desired coverage. To understand this, think of the light example with obstacles (furniture) in the room. If the source of light is a twelve-inch high lamp placed on the floor, there will be many shadows. For example, the area on the opposite side of a chair will have a shadow. If on the other hand, the source is a ceiling lamp hung in the center of the room, there will still be shadows, but they will be contained to perhaps less important areas of the room. For example, the shadow will now be under the chair. Imagme the difference in trying to read a book while sitting on a chair. The lamp on the floor will make this task very difficult, since the source of light is below the book and the bottom will shadow the top of the book, while the ceiling lamp will improve the readability drastically. The height issue for the radio designer is one of trade-offs: there will always be shadows, but the challenge is to vary the height and location to force the location of those shadows to less important coverage areas. Shadows in the real world are not caused by pieces of furniture that can easily be re-arranged. They are the result of obstacles that are much more irregular in shape and harder to design around. These obstacles include mountains, foliage, buildings, water towers, in short, anything standing between the transmitting antenna and the mobile unit. Considering the type of obstacles mentioned above, it is obvious why height is so important in a tower site. If designing in a Town, the site should be higher than the surrounding buildings or the signal will be severely impaired. Similarly, if the obstacle is a mountain, the site should be above the mountain and be able to “see” the desired coverage location. Location is very important in radio system design. If you wish to provide light to a room for reading purposes, you would obviously choose to locate in the center of the room rather than one of the comers. If the center is not available, the best way to light the room is probably to place lamps in different parts of the room, for example one table lamp on each side of the room. A person walking across the room looking for something on the floor will be using the light from lamp A on one side of the room and the light from lamp B on the other side of the room. Somewhere in the middle of the room, this individual Cornp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1 334 856.833.9188 800.774.1525 Fax 856,833.91 89 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facihties ~ LL 1 1 of 20 will switch from the lamp A to lamp B light - this is hand off! This also demonstrates the importance of system design. The final issue with system design is capacity. This is the amount of radio traffic, in this case telephone calls, a system can handle simultaneously. A common example of a capacity issue is the check out area of a grocery store. A typical grocery store will have perhaps ten checkout areas. Most of the time only two or three are open and the lines are small. Occasionally the lines increase and more registers are opened to handle the additional traffic. The store is probably designed so that at the busiest time and with all the registers open, no customer will be more than third in line. This time of the day is known as the busy hour and probably occurs at the same time every day or every week. The capacity is defined by the blocking rate, which is the desire of the store manager to never have a customer further than third in line. In this case the actual capacity is thirty patrons at the checkout area at the same time. As an area grows and more customers come into the grocery store, more checkout areas must be added to accommodate them and maintain the no more than three in line quality of service. This same concept applies to mobile communications. Systems are designed to handIe the busy hour each day with a predetermined blocking (usually 2% of the calls will not have a channel when one is requested) given a set number of customers. As more customers come on the air, the service provider strives to maintain the quality of service. Since radio spectrum is a finite quantity, the provider accomplishes this by frequency reuse. The cell sites are made smaller (closer to the ground), the power is reduced, and more sites are added. Comp Comm, inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcornminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad, CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 12 of20 APPENDIX I1 - Propagation Study Parameters It is important to remember that a propagation study is a predictive model of signal strength and coverage. The programs that create the studies use thousands if not millions of mathematical calculations based on the physics of RF propagation in the earth’s atmosphere and the input parameters defined by the engineer running the program. These input parameters include such information as antenna height, antenna gain, output power, additional (i.e. environmental) path loss, etc. Creating accurate propagation studies is both a science and an art. While the laws of physics defining the situation may be well-defined, there is considerable leeway in defining the input variables on which these calculations are based. Thus, to create an accurate propagation study, there must be both a good program (software) and an experienced engineer defining the parameters. CoMP Corn uses a proprietary “Real World” program to create its propagation studies. The model used for the coverage prediction is based on Okumura studies and is well established in the wireless communications industry. This program was developed by COMP COMM’S engineers and has been in use (in various versions) for nearly 20 years. The results are then mapped to a local area for viewing and printing using ArcViewTM, a well-established GIS mapping application. Because of the variations possible in these input parameters - the “art” of the design process - different propagation studies created by different individuals andor different programs can look quite different. This may result in an “apples and oranges” situation when one is trying to compare two propagation studies created by two different programs or people for the same site. To enable such future analysis and interpretation of the propagation studies developed as part of this project, and to allay any potential concerns that these propagation studies are not comparable to others that might be reviewed, we have specified (below) the parameters used therein. For our analysis of the AWS proposed and alternative sites, we were able to determine some of the design parameters AWS used in their propagation studies from the materials they submitted and duplicate those parameters in our studies. For those parameters for which AWS provided no guidance, we used parameters derived from our experience working with other camers or in other locations. The environment in Carlsbad would generally be considered “suburban”. Sites generally serve residential neighborhoods or open fields. Therefore, we used “suburban” environment calculations to create the propagation studies. The following additional parameters were used in our studies: Frequency: 880 MHz Path: “Talk-out” (base-to-mobile) Base Unit Em: varies by site - see Attachment 1 for details Base station antenna: omni-directional, gain = 0.0 dB’ Mobile antenna: omnidirectional, 0.0 dB gain Mobile radiation (receive) center: 4 ft. AGL Receiver HeighVGain Factor: -3.3 dB Additional path loss: 0.0 dB Study Radius: 5 km Base Station Latitude, Longitude, Ground Elevation and Rad Center Height AGL are as declared in Attachment 1. ’ Except for Site #2, SDG&E #173, see Attachment 1 for details. Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1 334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 cornpcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcoinmhc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for City of Carlsbad, CA: Analysisof Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 13 of 20 Coverape Key Yellow Area >-75 dBm Good In-Building, In-Vehicle and Outdoor Coverage Pink Area Blue Area White Area < -95 dBm Poor to No Coverage -75 dBm to -85 dBrn -85 dBm to -95 dBm Fair In-Building, Fair to Good In-Vehicle, Good Outdoor Coverage Poor In-building, Spotty In-Vehicle, Some Outdoor Coverage The less negative the signal strength, the stronger the signal. Thus a -75 dBm signal is stronger than a - 95 dBm signal (just as -5” is “warmer” than -15O). The more difficult the coverage area, the stronger the signal required to get into the environment. Stronger signals are needed to travel through walls or car windows to reach inside buildings or cars. Thus, in order of difficulty, In-Building coverage is the most difficult, next is In-Vehicle coverage. Outdoor coverage is the “easiest” (because the signal doesn’t need to travel through so much additional matter). Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1 334 856.833.9188 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com m.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 14 of 20 APPENDIX I11 - Service Types and Associated Issues The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses various types of wireless (radio) services all over the US, everything from radio stations to microwave relays to commercial public mobile radio services, commonly referred to as “cellular” (this category also includes paging services). The commercial systems currently being built out are primarily Cellular, Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR), and Personal Communications Systems (PCS). New, primarily data, services, typically in the “unlicensed” 2.4 GHz range, are also being deployed. Each of these service types has certain characteristics affecting system design. An overview of the differences between these services is presented here. Due to their similarities, cellular and SMR will be treated the same in this discussion. The operating frequency is one of the most important differentiators between service types when determining coverage. Cellular and ESMR services both operate in the upper 800 MHz frequency range while PCS operates in the 1900 MHz frequency range. Cellular and ESMR services will encounter very similar properties when operating and will be treated as one entity called 800 MHz. The number of towers will vary according to the setting, with one every 20 miles in a rural environment and as close as every couple of blocks in a dense urban environment to provide acceptable coverage. Long needle pine trees are problematic for the 800 MHz frequency band and the signal will partially penetrate buildings. Typical suburban and urban cellular and ESMR sites operate with transmit power at 200 Watts ERP or less. Per the FCC, their maximum output power is 500 Watts ERP per site. The PCS frequencies are more than twice as high as the 800 MHz frequencies, and therefore have a wavelength half that of the 800 MHz frequencies. This means more energy is required to transmit a comparable signal the same distance as for the 800 MHz frequencies. Since the operating powers for the two bands are comparable, the service is not available as far away as it is for the 800 MHz frequency range. In general, the sites for PCS are placed two to four miles apart compared to the greater distances of three to eight miles for the 800 MHz frequency range. Most foliage will cause problems for PCS and the signal does very poorly at penetrating buildings. Again, typical suburban and urban PCS sites operate with transmit power at 200 Watts ERP or less. Per the FCC, their maximum output power is 1000 Watts ERP per site. Comp Corn, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774. I525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@cornpcomminc.com w.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for Citv of Carlsbad CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities D. 15 of 20 APPENDIX IV - COMP COMM, Inc. Qualifications COMP COMM is neither a traditional planning firm nor a typical engineering firm, we are an independent wireless communications engineering consulting firm with a focus on helping local governments manage their emerging wireless issues. Our position as independent experts, our service to local government clients, our years of experience in the wireless industry, our commitment to engineering excellence, and our knowledge of the regulations and industry players uniquely quallfL us to help local governments solve the new problems they are facing due to the explosive growth in wireless communications. CoMP COMM was incorporated more than 27 years ago and is a fully-staffed and equipped professional organization. Our staff includes not only technical personnel including a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.), but also project management, administrative and other support services. These staff members are COMP COMM employees and not contract personnel. Comuanv History Since 1975, COMP COMM has made a business of solving complex technical and operational problems in wireless telecommunications. While serving a broad base of both public and private clients, the Company has maintained its focus on the balanced expansion of wireless services throughout the United States. In our early years, COMP COMM provided comprehensive engineering services and technical support to FCC frequency spectrum applicants. The company soon gained recognition as a reliable industry resource and was employed to design wireless systems during the early years of cellular. COMP COMM designed 18 of the 30 largest markets and successfblly defended all its designs during the FCC comparative hearing process. Our engineers later designed and evaluated hundreds of systems ranging from the original New York City cellular system to single-site rural radio applications. After years of in-house design work, COMP COMM'S extensive experience and capabilities were tapped to develop and operate five rural cellular systems. The Company managed these systems from successful application and license award; through system design, build-out and operation; to marketing and subsequent sale. More recently, COMP COMM has performed significant field work for its clients, including evaluation of sites throughout the country to ensure compliance with FCC and FAA regulations. Through these services, we assure systems operate within authorized parameters and at peak efficiency. Service to Local Governments In 1996 we began leveraging our years of insider expertise to help local governments develop unbiased, fact-based and cost-effective solutions to their wireless issues - solutions which consider the interests of all their constituents. Our needs- and use-based analysis for local governments includes local traffic flows, land use restrictions, aesthetics, and the projected wireless communication needs of the community. COMP COMM understands that each community has its own needs and areas of concern in the management of wireless communications facilities, and we work with each client to develop solutions that address their unique priorities and requirements. Our clients value us because they know we will provide answers and solutions based on a complete and comprehensive evaluation. We generally recommend an approach which provides a way for local governments to bring the benefits of wireless services to their community and meet their obligations under the Telecom Act, while decreasing the chances of facilities being built in ways or locations that are less desirable to local Comp Corn, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 16 of 20 residents. CoMP COMM helps communities develop long-range plans and requirements for wireless facilities before more new towers are requested, allowing communities to rationalize their approval process, better manage and anticipate requests for sites, and eliminate many of the conflicts that might otherwise arise. The result is a clear “road mapy7 for wireless service providers to follow with minimal procedural delay, yet still retain their rights under the 1996 Telecom Act. Technical Oualifications and Resources COMP COMM’S engineers use standard and accepted engineering principles in all our analysis. Our staff includes a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in Electrical Engineering. We have extensive computing resources, including RF propagation modeling, GIS (mapping) applications, extensive terrain, FCC license, and population databases to support our analyses. Using our proprietary “Real World” radio propagation software, we provide an accurate and cost- effective predictive model of wireless coverage. The model used for the coverage prediction is based on Okumura-Hata studies and is well established in the wireless communications industry. Built into this analysis is the USGS 3-second survey data. Base Maps and Plots are created using ESRI’s Arcview@ GIS application. Outputs can be provided in hard copies or electronic files. For our field services we use a wide variety of modem test and measurement equipment, including GPS devices, spectrum analyzers, power density meters with dual polarity probes, antenna sweep gear, Watt meters, digital multimeters, digital cameras and laser range finders. Our staff includes personnel who are thoroughly knowledgeable in the FCC, FAA and OSHA requirements of wireless communications facilities, including those for RF emissions. Biographies of Key Personnel are included below. Outside Recognition COMP COMM and its principals are recognized experts on issues of wireless communications facilities by the industry and from a local government perspective. Dr. George Schrenk, COMP COMM’S founder and Chairman Emeritus, is a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and has authored works for the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society Committee on Radio Propagation. Christine Malone, COMP COMM’s President, has been an invited speaker at national conferences and seminars, including the 1999 NATOA Annual Conference in Atlanta, the 2001 NATOA regional conference in Seattle, and the 1999 and 200 1 Forum on Cable/Telco Franchising, where she has covered the issues such as tower siting and the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Ms. Malone was also the author of the “plain English” primer “How Wireless Works“ published by the Massachusetts Wireless Collaborative of the Massachusetts Municipal Association as part of their publication, Working with Wireless, and an article titled “What’s on Your Roof?” published in the March 2003 issue of Buildings magazine. COMP COMM has also been featured or quoted in many articles and radio and television programs on wireless facilities issues, including a feature article in the September 1999 issue of American Citv and County magazine COMP COMM has been part of the dynamic growth of wireless communications for over 25 years. Today, our professional staff displays the same commitment to service excellence and dedication to providing cost-effective solutions on which the company was originally founded. Comp Corn, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08 108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com w.cornpcomminc.com COMP COMM, Inc €or City of Carlsbad, CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS W-ireless Facilities p. 17 of 20 Biographies of Key Personnel CHRISTINE A. MALONE PRESIDENT and CEO Summary of Experience Ms. Malone has spent her career working in the areas of telecommunications and wireless engineering, in both technical and market development roles. She joined COMP COMM as VP of Marketing and Strategy in September 1998 and became President in May 1999 after she purchased a majority interest in the company. Ms. Malone has a BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and an MS in Industrial Administration from Carnegie MelIon University. Her combination of business and technical skills serve both the company and the company’s clients. Ms. Malone serves as client liaison, project manager and individual contributor to many of COMP COMM’s projects. Her particular areas of expertise center on evaluating wireless market, companies and technical developments, and explaining these in lay terms. Before coming to COMP COMM, Ms. Malone served in market strategy, new product deveIopment and business management capacities with the “baby bell” U S WEST (now QWEST) in Denver, Colorado. Earlier in her career, Ms. Malone worked as a radar engineer and technical trainer for Westinghouse Electric Corp. (now part of Northrop-Grumman), where she traveled the world training NATO Air Force personnel on airborne radar jamming equipment. She served as Engineer-in-Charge at field sites in England, Germany and Arizona. Credentials B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania M.S., Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University Publications “What’s on Your Roof”, Buildings magazine, March 2003 “How Wireless Technology Works” from Working With Wireless, published by the Massachusetts Municipal-Industry Wireless Collaborative, January 2000 Technical User Guides for US Air Force radar system support equipment manufactured by Westinghouse Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomrninc.com COMP COMM, Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analysis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities p. 18 of 20 JOHN T. ROUSSOS SENIOR ENGINEER Summary of ExDerience For more than 15 years, Mr. Roussos’ exclusive area of concentration has been wireless design and engineering. In his capacity as Senior Engineer, he has been extensively involved in RF system design and development, system feasibility studies, as well as site selection, equipment specification and frequency coordination. Using these studies, he has prepared hundreds of applications for cellular and microwave systems. He also provided technical support for the initial design, build-out, implementation and operation of five geographically separate rural cellular systems. He currently manages the relationships for a number of COMP COMM’S industry clients. Afier researching existing propagation models, Mr. Roussos was extensively involved in the development of “Real World”, COMP COMM’S radio frequency propagation program which accurately predicts the reliable service area of a transmitter site. He has used these propagation studies to analyze system coverage for a broad range of radio common carrier, cellular and Public Safety applications. Mr. Roussos also performs intermodulation (interference) analysis and the resulting system re-design necessary to improve the performance of various two-way radio systems. In recent years, Mr. Roussos has lead the teams and projects that have developed Comprehensive Plans for Wireless Facilities for a number of COMP COMM’S local government clients, including Oconee County, GAY Burlington, MA and Franklin Township, PA. Mr. Roussos has also been critical in the development of COMP COMM’S field audit methods and procedures for licensing compliance, due diligence, and performance improvement. He has personally conducted the independent field compliance audits of hundreds of wireless communications sites and simultaneously directed multiple teams in diverse geographic locations In addition to his engineering expertise, he is thoroughly knowledgeable in the FCC and FAA regulatory requirements for these sites. Credentials B.S., Chemical Engineering, University of Maryland B.S., Astronomy, University of Maryland Graduate Work in Mathematics, Kent State University Comp Comm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcominc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for Citv of-Carlsbad, CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities ~19 of 20 JULIA ANN V. SCHMITT, P.E. STAFF ENGINEER Summary of Exuerience Since joining COMP COMM in 1994, Ms. Schmitt has focussed primarily on the design and analysis of paging, cellular and two-way radio systems. She has performed extensive coverage and site analysis, propagation analysis, and interference studies for FCC spectrum licensees. Ms. Schmitt manages her own portfolio of COMP COMM paging clients, responding to all their engineering, application and licensing requests. Ms. Schmitt is COMP COMM’S resident expert in FCC and FAA filings, having completed thousands of filings and updates, as well as researched existing filings, for all types of wireless systems and sites. She is also knowledgeable on the international filing requirements for border sites near Canada and Mexico. Ms. Schmitt also provides technical support for COMP COMM’S field audits of existing wireless systems. In this capacity she researches existing licensing requirements, reviews field data, performs correction calculations on GPS measurements, and reports on non-compliance issues. Prior to joining COMP COMM, Ms. Schmitt worked for the FAA supporting the development of satellite location and operability software, and as an electrical engineer for Synetics in their development of Naval radar systems. Credentials B.S., Electrical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology B.S., Mathematics, Oglethorpe University Professional Engineer (P.E.), State of New Jersey (License #24GE04352800) Comp Corn, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. - Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.91 89 compcom@compcomminc.com www.cornpcotnminc.com COMP COMM. Inc. for City of Carlsbad. CA: Analvsis of Alternate Sites for AWS Wireless Facilities D. 2Q of 20 See Following Pages for Attachments: Attachment 1 : List and Map of Existing and Potential Sites Attachment 2: AWS Propagation Study: Area Coverage with SDG&E #173 Site Attachment 3: AWS Propagation Study: Area Coverage with Cadencia Site Attachment 4-16: Comp Comm Propagation Studies for AWS Proposed and Alternative Sites Attachment 17: CD-ROM of Site Photos and Lists of Photo Descriptions Cornp Conrm, Inc. 465 Haddon Ave. Collingswood, NJ 08108-1334 856.833.91 88 800.774.1525 Fax 856.833.9189 compcomm@compcomminc.com www.cornpcomminc.com C c - t- W W m ; c IOII $I $1 $I $I $1 IlI1I IIIIL IIIII i I Attachment I t \ , , I W t B n 4 8 1 W d C3 v) .. 0 cn .- I w a t) a t) Q v) t) W III) a I I w w 0% uo a w 5 v) Q) c .- - v) 0 E I a, 3 a iiT - a 0 -- ww ct 00 3333 .a, .a, .a, .a, >>>> 33333333 .a, .E .a, .a, .a, .a, .a, .a, >>>>>>>> m (D tu m m m m iiii .cI~c.c.-c.* v)v)v)rnuJv)v)~~~Q) 00000003333 rn 0 0 S Q I 0) v) c c .- 4 Q) c iij n 0 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Proof of Publication of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS, California This a34ay of January, 2004 a WrlrefeM tclccommunIca- AT&T IRELESS dL22 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will reopen and hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 2004, to review new information and reconsider a Conditional Use Permit CUP 03-22 to allow the installation of a wireless telecommunications facility on an SDG&E transmission tower on property generally located between Esfera Street and Piragua Street in the SDG&E transmission corridor and more particularly described as: Lot 401 of Carlsbad Tract 72-20, La Costa Vale, Unit No. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 7950, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 3, 1974. /’ as an alternative to a wireless telecommunications facility at 7512 Cadencia Street, more particularly described as : Lot 486 of Carlsbad Tract 72-20 of La Costa Vale Unit No. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 7950, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County . Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after January 30, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Conditional Use Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CUP 03-22 CASE NAME: AT&T Wireless PUBLISH: January 23, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT 1 AT&T W I RE LESS CUP 03-22 3 CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 92024 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR ENClNlTAS SCHOOL DlST 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DlST 701 ENClNlTAS BLVD 1960 LA COSTA AVE 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENClNlTAS CA 92024 ' CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENClNlTAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA CNTY WATER DlST OLIVENHAIN WATER DlST CITY OF ENClNlTAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024 -. CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SANDIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 VALLECITOS WATER DlST 201 VALLECITOS DE OR0 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEA IDE CA 92054 9 I. P. U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SANDAG STE 800 ATTN TED ANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SE RVI C ES DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER CH RlSTER W ESTMAN 12/09/2003 AVERW Address Labels a t ' Laser 5160@ Smooth Feed SheetsTM ALAN AND NANCY FISCHER 3312 FEBO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARY HAY 3320 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLARD AND IONA ROBERTS 7322 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ARTHUR LECLAIR AND M INTER CATHLEEN 7328 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN AND JEANETTE KOESTNER 7329 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 FREDERICK AND KAREN ZERLAUT 7323 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ESTA CHAMBERS 3317 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH AND ANGELA BEAR 3311 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WENGLER 2002 7314 BORLA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM AND JODY REED 7315 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DUNCAN AND JC EVANS ET AL 1919 SORRENTINO DR ESCONDIDO CA 92025 CHRISTOPHER AND ADRIENNE DURSO 3322 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 TIMOTHY AND SUSAN SULLIVAN 7324 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DONNA KANE 7330 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH AND JULIE CHASE 7327 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRED AND S LORELLE MARINELLO 7321 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRANK AND LUCILLE CHERASKY 3315 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 THIEMENS FAMILY 7313 BORLA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALI WAIEL 7312 BORLA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK AND SUSAN COPPA 7317 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAVERY@ Address Labels Use template for I GEORGE AND SUSAN BOSTROM 3318 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD AND DAVOS DWYER 3324 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH AND SUSAN KILKENNY 7326 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRANK AND JOANN NOLAN 7331 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 SUSAN BAHNKE AND GEORGE GAY DA 73254 LAS BRISAS CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAUREN WASSERMAN ET AL 3319 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ARTHUR AND SYLVIA VEITCH 3313 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 RAY LI PSON 7315 BORLA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARILY FAMILY TRUST 7313 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 STELLA MILES 7319 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 Laser 624lW Smooth Feed SheetsTM KING 1989 BRAUNSTEIN FAMIY PO BOX 1524 3230 PIRAGUA ST RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK AND JACQUELINE STEVENS JAMES AND AURORA SHRIVER 7356 CADENCIA ST 7346 CADENCIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CRAIG AND PENELOPE BAUMANN YOUNG 3221 PIRAGUA ST 3230 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL AND MARY GUNN 3250 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 FOYLE 437 S HIGHWAY 101 SUITE 103 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 FREDERICK AND HELEN ARBUCKLE JR 3307 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 BCE DEVELOPMENT 33 S gTH ST MINNEAPOLIS CA 55402 DAVID AND KAY DOKE 3240 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 BARTL 3305 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 EDWIN ALLARD AND MARION ALLARD 3301 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL AND KAREN BURCH 3302 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LPOBERT AND MICHELLE DOBSON WILLIAM AND ANNE HALL 3306 PIRAGUA ST 3308 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ISAK AND LIMA KHANIS 3312 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 HOWARD AND TERRI WIEDRE 7441 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL AND JOYCE COWNE GIHBSSON FAMILY 106 MAX HURT DR 3315 CABO CT MURRAY KY 42071 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CORONA LA COSTA HOME9WNERS ASSOCIATION 343 RICHMAR AVE SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ROBERT AND ANNE SCHMIDT 7336 CADENCIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHARLES STOOPACK 3240 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM AND MAUREEN HOPSON 3251 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 PS WOODCOX AND JANE FISHER 3309 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAKHSHIR FAMILY 3303 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LOUIS FAMILY 3304 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRADLEY AND LAURIE OWEN 3310 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL AND N ZINES 3319 CABO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT BAKER AND HELEN MARl 3313 CABO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 6241m Smooth Feed SheetsTM JORDHEIM 1993 3311 CABO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM AND CAROLYN SH I RRE FFS 3316 CABO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DONALD BRILL SR 3333 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WELCH 3327 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 AVA DAVIS 3326 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 IVAN AND MONICA JELLINEK EDWARD AND PATRICIA CERDA 3312 CABO CT 3314 CABO CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH AND SARA WAHL 7421 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MORGAN FAMILY 3311 FOSCA ST CARSLBAD CA 92009 BEATRICE KANE 3325 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DARBY SCHAFER AND ERICA BURLES 7411 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ELLIOT AND JACQUELINE BARROWS 3329 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CANCELLIER FAMILY 3323 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOMAS AND LINDA MURDOCK LARRY AND PENNY GUNDERSON 3328 FOSCA ST 3330 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOMAS AND JEANNE MEADOWS DAVID AND DEB1 CAPR 3322 FOSCA ST 3322 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 . LEE AND DIANE WOOD 3336 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARBREY 3325 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRED AND SHIRLEY DANIEL 3332 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SPRAGUE 3323 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GANO HAROLD AND VIVIAN 1991 MICHAEL AND MICHELLE SENGER MAXWELL AND LINDA COLON 3321 PIRAGUA ST 3319 PIRAGUA ST 3317 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEOFFREY AND MARIE YILDEBRANDT 3315 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT MILLER FAMILY 3222 LINDA VISTA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 YOURE AND LINDA SHADIAN 3321 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 FORD FAMILY 3318 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD AND CLAUDIA BARBOVF 3311 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JEFFREY AND KRISTI PETERSOi, 3320 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 6241TM Smooth Feed SheetsTM DAVID AND KIMBERLY CLARKIN RONALD AND ROBIN ISRAEL 3322 PIRAGUA ST 3324 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROY WISE JR AND ROSEMARY GRAF WISE 3328 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK AND CANDACE WEISS 7461 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN AND STEPHANIE MITCHELL RICHARD AND TERI MACY 3302 VENADO ST 3306 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHRISTOPHER AND VELYN CHU SHENG FAN ANDERSON 3316 VENADO ST 3314 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 YOURE AND LINDA SHADIAN 3321 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ?AUL AND MAIA MARANGOS 7402 CADENCIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH AND HEIDI GROSSHART 7328 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 TIMOTHY AND JANEAN STRIPE 7149 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 STANLEY AND GIEDRE MILAS 3339 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CANCELLIER FAMILY 3323 FOSCA ST CARSLBAD CA 92009 RONALD AND JUDY BOLTON 3326 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 NATHAN AND FARIBA SALEHI 7451 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WARD AND JANE KAO 3312 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANA TAVELMAN 3315 VENADO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LARRY AND JEANETTE YGLESIA MIHOLICH FAMILY 7412 CADENCIA ST 2735 CAZADERO DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 TIMOTHY AND DANNIELLE MILLIKEN 7326 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 PAUL AND JACKIE SCANLAN 7324 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CLARK AND AURA DEARMOND 7330 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROGER AND LINDA NIEMEYER 3343 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHANG FAMILY PO BOX 7028 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 ROBERT AND DIANE BOSTIC 3336 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 TURALBA LIVING 7332 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 TOM AND LAURA RIDER 3341 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL AND JAINAIN HOWARD 3335 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LACKEY FAMILY 3338 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 6241m Smooth Feed SheetsTM CHRISTOPHER AND DIETKE FEUGE 3340 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT AND SANDRA HOOK PETER ROLF OHNSTAD 7325 MUSLO LN 7323 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD AND SUSAN PODGORSKI 7321 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT AND VIRGINIA ACCETTA 7319 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 LEONARD OBERMAN AND NANCY HUTTER 7314 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH AND SIGLIA PIRAINO DARIN AND LAURI LOESCH KIPP AND ELIZABETH ANDERS 7316 ESFERA ST 7318 ESFERA ST 7320 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATRICK AND SANDRA GRAVITT ROBERT COSGROVE 7410 ESFERA ST 7420 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 ADAM AND DIANA SPRAGG JAN SOVINEE 3328 CABO WAY 3330 CABO WAY, CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 DONALD AND SUSAN HARTLEY JAMES AND MARY CLARK 3334 CABO WAY 3336 CABO WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 SOUKUP FAMILY 7432 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHERMAN FAMILY 7446 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 NICOLSON FAMILY 7445 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANNICKA FABIAN 3329 CABO WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARY POPOVICH 35-148 STACCATO ST PALM DESERT CA 92211 PETER HASKETT 3334 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ABRAHAM AND MARILYN ARKINZADEH 7441 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM AND FELECIA HAYS 3327 CABO WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOMAS AND HALICIA GONZALE? 3326 CABO WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD AND EDNA MINTON 3332 CABO WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 BETH BILLSTEIN PO BOX 1274 CARDIFF CA 92007 JAMES AND KIRSTEN RECCE 7442 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD AND JULIE KOCH 3336 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT AND DIANE KAATS 811 MORNING SUN DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 NANCY COLMER 7157 ARGONAUTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAVERY@ Address Labels Laser 6241m Smooth Feed SheetsTM BRIAN AND SUSAN YORK 3323 CAB0 WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 LORRAINE CLARK FAMILY 7466 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 aAERY@ Address Labels GREGORY AND TINA MURPHY 7450 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DIANNE VENNARD 7460 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 Laser 6241m