HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-06-15; City Council; 17670; BluffsAB# 17,670
BLUFFS 1 CT 02-18/CP 02-1O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 MTG. 6-15-04
TITLE:
DEPT. PLNN
Project application(s)
Environmental Review
@
CITY MGR-
Administrative Reviewed by and To be Reviewed -
Approvals Final at Planning Final at Council
Commission
X
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
CT 02-1 8
CP 02-1 0
SDP 03-03
CDP 03-35
HDP 02-09
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and APPROVING Carlsbad Tract 02-
18, Condominium Permit 02-1 0, Site Development Plan 03-03, Coastal Development Permit 03-35
and Hillside Development Permit 02-09, based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
2004-194
X
X
X
X
X
On May 19, 2004, the Planning Commission recommended (5-0-2, Segall and Montgomery absent)
approval, without revisions, of a 78-unit multifamily air-space condominium project on 5.33 acres of
land located on the north and east side of Harrison Street, east of Adams Street and south of
Chinquapin Avenue in LFMP Zone 1. The project which is comprised of a mix of two and three story
buildings surrounding a common recreation area will include 68 market rate condominiums and 10
for-sale condominium units restricted to very low income households. A Tentative Tract Map is
required for subdivision of the property and a Condominium Permit is required to allow an airspace
condominium subdivision. A Hillside Development Permit is also required based on the subject’s
existing topography. The Site Development Plan is required because the site is zoned RD-M-Q, and
a density increase is proposed for the 10 unit very low affordable housing component of the project.
The Mello I1 and Agua Hedionda Local Coastal Program segments bisect the property. Thus, it will
necessitate a Coastal Development Permit from both the City and the California Coastal
Commission. The project meets all applicable regulations and staff has no issues with the proposal.
More detailed project information is included in the staff report to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Based on an environmental impact assessment conducted by staff, potentially significant impacts
related to noise impacts from traffic on Interstate 5 and potential paleotological resources were found
to impact the project. Mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce those impacts to below a
level of significance. The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Issue a Mitigated Negative
Declaration on January 21, 2004. No comments were received during the 30-day public review
period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All public infrastructure required by this project would be funded by the developer.
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,670
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-194
2. Location Map
3.
4.
5.
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5634, 5635, 5636, 5637, 5638, and 5639
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 19, 2004
Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 19, 2004.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Van Lynch, (760) 602.461 3, vlync@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-194
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT 78 AIRSPACE
CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF HARRISON
STREET, WEST OF ADAMS STREET AND SOUTH OF
CHINQUAPIN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
CASE NO.: CT 02-1 8/CP 02-1 O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/
HDP 02-09
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 19, 2004, hold a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract Map 02-1 8, Condominium Permit
02-1 0, Site Development Plan 03-03, Coastal Development Permit 03-35, and Hillside
Development Permit 02-09 to develop 5.33 acres of land with 78 airspace condominium units
and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5634, 5635, 5636, 5637, 5638, and 5639
recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 15th day of June , 2004
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract Map,
Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside
Development Permit and;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all
factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit. 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
P
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as
follows:
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 5635, 5636, 5637, 5638, and 5639 constitute the findings and
conditions of the City Council in this matter.
3. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program is adopted for Tentative Tract Map 02-1 8, Condominium Permit 02-1 0, Site
Development Plan 03-03, Coastal Development Permit 03-35, and Hillside Development Permit
02-09 as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5634, on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 15th day of June 2004, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard
NOES: None
/ 1 . WOOD, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2004-194
Page Two
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
SITE
BLUFFS
CT 02-1 8lCP 02-1 OISDP 03-031
CDP 03-35lHDP 02-09
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5634
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM TO SUBDIVIDE, GRADE AND CONSTRUCT A 78
UNIT 4IRSPACE CONDOMINIUM ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE
OF HARRISON STREET, WEST OF ADAMS STREET AND
SOUTH OF CHINQUAPIN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
CASE NO.: CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/
HDP 02-09
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited ~bility
Company, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Lot 3, 7, 8,9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1,2, 3, 5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3,1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with
said project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of May 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors
relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
6, Commission as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program, Exhibit “ND”
according to “NOI” dated January 21, 2004 and “PII” dated January 7, 2004.
attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration for
BLUFFS - CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03KDP 03-35/HDP 02-09, the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments
thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project; and
b. the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines
and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and .
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
d. based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Conditions:
1. The Developer shall implement or cause the implementation of the Bluffs Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program.
...
...
..
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5634 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
2t
2;
22
C mmissi
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
. and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
- /(L:-c, '7 7 -
' I' < ;, ,':; L
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOMMIL&R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5634 -3-
- City of Carlsbad
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CASE NAME: The Bluffs
CASE NO: CT 02- 18/CP 02- 1 O/HDP 02-09/SDP 03-03
PROJECT LOCATION:
of Chinquapin and west of Adams Street. APN 206-120-03,08 thru 12, 14, 15.
4120 Harrison Street, on the noi-th and east side of Harrison Street, south
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The subdivision, grading and construction of 78 multifamily dwelling
units on 5.33 acres. The project includes 10 affordable dwelling units, RV parking, passive and active
recreational areas, street improvements and off site grading for street improvements for Harrison Street.
DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above
described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, and
the City of Carlsbad finds as follows:
Ixl
0
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project.
The proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based
on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Mitigated Negative Declaration applies
only to the effects that remained to be addressed).
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on
file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director 9 63 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
- City of Carlsbad
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT -4
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR4TION
CASE NAME: The Bluffs
CASE NO: CT 02-1 8/CP 02-10/HDP 02-09/SDP 03-03
PROJECT LOCATION:
south of Chinquapin and west of Adams Street. APN 206-120-03,08 thru 12, 14, 15.
4120 Harrison Street, on the north and east side of Harrison Street,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The subdivision, grading and construction of 78 multifamily dwelling
units on 5.33 acres. The project includes 10 affordable dwelling units, RV parking, passive and
active recreational areas, street improvements and off site grading for street improvements for
Hamson Street.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review
of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As
a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the
environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the
applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the
environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before
the City that the project “as revised” may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad
Planning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and
approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional
public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions,
please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
PUBLISH DATE January 2 1,2004
January 2 1,2004 to February 2 1,2004
/o
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
CASE NO: CT 02-18/CP 02-10/HDP 02-09/SDP 03-03
DATE: January 7,2004
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CASE NAME: The Bluffs
LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad
CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Van Lynch (760) 602-4613
PROJECT LOCATION: 4120 Harrison Street, on the north and east side of Harrison Street,
south of Chinauapin and west of Adams Street
PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: Anastasi Development Company, LLC, 1200
Aviation Blvd. Redondo Beach, CA 90278
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Medium High (8 to 15 du/ac)
ZONING: Residential Density Multiple - Oualified overlay zone (RDM-O)
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (Le., permits, financing
approval or participation agreements): California Coastal Commission
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
The subdivision, mading and construction of 78 multifamily dwelling units on 5.33 acres. The
proiect includes 10 affordable dwelling units, RV parking, passive and active recreational areas,
street improvements and off site mading for street improvements for Harrison Street. The site is
300 feet northerly of Aqua Hedionda Lagoon and 300 feet easterly of Interstate 5 in an urbanized
area surrounded bv existing single- and multi-family housing and existing publicly dedicated
roadways. The northerly half of the property is relatively flat and is covered in annual grasses
with a remnant avocado grove on the easterly property line. The southerly half is split between
annual masses and an avocado move with the topography mostly flat and dropping roughly 22
feet in elevation (15%) at the southerly 114 to existing Harrison Street. Elevation ranges from 76
to 74 feet across most of the site and down to 50 at the very southerly end. Aerial photos from
the late 60’s show the site covered by Avocado groves with the southern tip being fallow and at
least one residence on the site. Surrounding land uses are single family to the east and south and
multi-family housing to the west and north and a few vacant residentially land uses designated
1 Rev. 07/03/02
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this projec:.
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Aesthetics 0 Geology/Soils Noise
.,
Agricultural Resources 0 Hazards/Hazardous Materials 0 and.Housine
0 Air Quality HydrologyNater Quality 0 Public Services
Biological Resources 0 Land Use and Planning 0 Recreation
Cultural Resources 0 Mineral Resources 0 TransportatiodCirculation
0 Utilities & Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings of
Significance
2 12 Rev. Q7lQ3lQ2
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the. Lead Agency)
0
[x1
0
0
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
.. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
3 13 Rev. 07/03/02
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or
to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported
by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact“ answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
“Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
“Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.”
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
“Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly
adverse.
Based on an “EIA-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the
environment, but potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a
supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental
document is required. ,
When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR. pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those. mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate “Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated” may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared.
4 Rev. 07/03/02
0 An EIR & be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and including but not limited to
the following circunlstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding
Considerations” for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the
EM-Part I1 analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect,
or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a
level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant.
5 15 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings wihn a State scsnic highway?
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
Create a new source of substantial light and glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
11. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES - (In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model-1 997 prepared by the California
Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would
the project:
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act contract?
Involve other changes in the existing environment,
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
111. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied
upon to make the following determinations.) Would the
project:
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporated
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
Ix1
0
0
0
0
0
IXI
No
Impact
El
Ixl
0
Ixl
IXI
IXI
Ixl
0
6 lb
Rev. 07/03/02
. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to Substantial pollutant
concentrations?
./
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a Substantial
number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
Have a Substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fish and
Game or US. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a Substantial adverse effect on any riparian,
aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by California Department
of Fish and Game or US. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a Substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or nligratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Impact tributary areas that are environmentally
sensitive?
Potentially
Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporated
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CI
0
0
0
0
Less Than Significant No
Impact Impact
OIXI
om
om
7 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource .as defined in
$15064.5?
0 0 OIxl
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi-
cance of an archeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
0 Ixl 0
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi-
cal resource or site or unique geologic feature? 0
0
Ixl
0 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries'? Ixlo
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
0 0
ii. Strong seismic ground shahg? 0
0
0
0
OIXI
OIXI iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
0 0 iv. Landslides? om om b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil'? 0 0
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
0 0
d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
0 0
18 Rev. 07/03/02 8
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS hlATERIALS -
Would the project:
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
environment?
For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
h.1 itigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
Impact
E
Ixl
Ixl
Ix1
ixl
ixl
Ix1
Ixl
IXI
IXI
9 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local ground water table
level (Le., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in
a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation
map?
Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface
waters.
Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals,
pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics,
nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash)
into receiving surface waters or other alteration of
receiving surface water quality (e.g.. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ixl
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
0
I7
IXI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
Impact
IXI
[XI
IXI
KI
0
IXI
IXI
[XI
IXI
Ixl
0
(XI
10 20 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation
Incorporated
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact
NO
Impact
n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following construction? 0 0 0
0 0 0 0) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired
water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section
303(d) list?
p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of
beneficial uses?
0 0 0 [XI
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0
0
0 Ixl
[XI b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
0 0
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan? 0 0 0 IXI
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
0 0 Ix1
Ixl b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land
use plan?
0 0
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
0 IXI 0
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Ix1
(XI
IXI
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
11 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supponing Information Sources). Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation Incorporated
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
KO
Impact
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or worlung in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
0
0 0 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
0
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
0 0 0 Ixl
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
0 0 0 IXI
IXI c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 0 0 0
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered government facilities, a
need for new or physically altered government
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or
other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i) Fire protection? 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Ixl
1x1
1x1
IXI
[XI
ii) Police protection? 0
iii) Schools?
0
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
0 Ixl
2A Rev. 07/03/02 12
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level
of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads
or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)'?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in insufficient parking capacity?
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn-
outs, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the
project:
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
Potentially Significant
Impact
0
cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cl
0
0
0
0
Less Than Sign i ficmt
Impact
0
Ixl
Ixl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
so
Impact
Ixi
0
0
IXI
IXI
IXI
IXI
IXI
KI
IXI
IXI
IXI
13 Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant KO
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
0 ow e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
0 0 ow f) Be served by a landfill ‘with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste
disposal needs?
0 OIXI g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
0 0 0 IXI
o 0 OIX] b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumula-
tively considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
0 0 om c) Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
4 Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,”
describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
14 Rev. 07/03/02
.
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AESTHETICS- The project is designed to be sensitive to the topography of the site and the building mass follo\\-s
the slope of the property thereby reducing the visual mass of the buildings. The buildings also incorporate varied
building planes, rooflines, building materials and colors that reduce the visual impact of the project. The site is not
located between the first public roadway and the lagoon, therefore not obstructing vie\vs of the lagoon.
AIR QUALITY-Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. The project site is IocateJ in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area
for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter
(PM,o). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin
(SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution
controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is
embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District
(AFCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG).
A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state-
mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having
serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by
the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly
regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996.
The proposed project relates to the SIP andor RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are
incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the
County's general plan. If a proposed project is Consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project
presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that
the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact.
Section 15 125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific
reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality
management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set
forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California
Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the
following:
Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area'?
Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan?
The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and-as such, is located in an area where a R4QS is being
implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions of the City's General Plan and the RAQS.
Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct
implementation of the regional plan.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of
Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality
violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in
2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates
in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. (Add the following text
addressing short-term emissions, if there is grading associated with the project.) The project would involve
minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized
through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust
control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant
emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard
15 Rev. 07/03/02 af
(comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine
particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net
increase in emissions throughout the air bash As described above, however, emissions associated with the
proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project,
air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15 130 (a)(?), the proposed project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considered
de mininrus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. As noted above, the proposed project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or
concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the
project. No impact is assessed.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. The construction of the proposed project could generate fumes from the operation of construction
equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short-term or
transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - No significant biological resources have been identified on the site.
CULTURAL RESOURCES - Although no paleontological resources have been identified on the project site, there
is the potential for fossil resources to be discovered during excavation. The project has been conditioned to have a
paleontologist on site during excavation.
a. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of excavations and, if
necessary, salvage exposed fossils. The frequency of inspections will depend on the rate of
excavations, the materials being excavated, and the abundance of fossils.
b. The palentologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil to
facilitate excavation and, if necessary, salvage.
c. Because of the small nature of fossils present in these rock units, matrix samples should be
collected for processing through fine mesh screens.
d. Provisions for preparation and curation shall be made before the fossils are donated to their final
repository.
e. All fossils collected should be donated to a museum with a systematic palentological collection,
such as the San Diego National History Museum.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - The project has been conditioned to implement Best Management
Practices and develop a Storm Water Management Plan to eliminate any off site impacts as a result of runoff. The
project site is located 300 feet north of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, a CWA Section 303(d) listed impaired water
body. The project is conditioned to limit grading to the dry season to reduce the potential to cause impacts in the
form of sedimentation and pollutants from entering the lagoon to a level of insignificance.
NOISE- The project is subjected to roadway noise generated from the Interstate Five freeway. The noise report for
the project identifies noise mitigation measures that will reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. The project
is conditioned to implement the mitigation measures of the noise study (Prepare an interior acoustical analysis to
insure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 &A Cnel and implement the recommended construction details for
noise attenuation). The project is conditioned to record a notice of restriction that the project is in proximity to a
major circulation roadway and subject to roadway noise.
16 Rev. 07/03/02
PUBLIC SERVICES/RECREATION - The project is conditioned to provide proof of availability of senice and
will pay statutory fees for mitigation of impacts to school facilities. The project is also subject to the Local Facility
Management Plan for Zone 1 to provide adequate public services to reduce impacts to a level of insignificance.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-\.Vould the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate 624 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 62 peak hour trips.
This traffic will utilize the following roadways Harrison St, Chinquapin Ave, Adams St. While the increase in
traffic from the proposed project mry be slightly noticeable, the street system has been designed and sized to
accommodate traffic from the project and cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad. The proposed project
would not, therefore, cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system. The impacts from the proposed project are, therefore, less than significant.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated
three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad
as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS
on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
Rancho Santa Fe Road
El Camino Real
Palomar Airport Road
SR 78
1-5
Existing ADT* - LOS Buildout ADT*
15-32 “A-C” 28-43
21-50 “A-C” 32-65
10-52 “A-B” 29-77
120 “F” 144
183-198 “D” 2 19-249
*The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
The Congestion Management Program’s (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is “E”, or LOS “F” if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS “F” in 1990). Accordingly, all designated
roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region’s general and community
plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the
buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) “E” standard assumes
implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and
highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-
term and at buildout.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air
traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses?
No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore,
would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City’s general plan and zoning.
Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed.
17 Rev. 07/03/02
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police
Departments. No impact assessed.
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project ivould coniply
with the City’s parking requirements to ensure an adequate parhng supply. No impact assessed.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks,.etc.)?
No Impact. The project is not served by or not located in an area conducive to public transportation.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Final Master Environmental Imuact ReDort for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
Preliminary Bioloeical Assessment. the Bluffs. Carlsbad, CA Planning Systems, January 4, 2004
Preliminary Drainaee Studv for The Bluffs, O’Day Consultants, Job No. 01-1022, October 20,2003
Storm Water Manacement Plan for The Bluffs. CT 02-18, O’Day Consultants, July 2003
Sewer Studv for The Bluffs Proiect in the Citv of Carlsbad, Revised October 15. 2003, Dexter Wilson
Engineering, Inc.
Water Svstem Analvsis for The Bluffs Proiect in the CiW of Carlsbad, Revised October 15, 2003 Dexter
Wilson Engineering Inc.
Noise Analvsis for “The Bluffs” Citv of Carlsbad, Mestre Greve Associates, Dated June 5,2003
18 Rev. 07/03/02
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
All construction activities shall be planned so that grading will occur in units that can be easily completed u itliin
the summer construction season. All grading operations shall be limited to April 1 to October 1 of each year. .4ll
areas disturbed by grading shall be planted within 60 days of initial disturbance and prior to October 1 nith
temporary or permanent (in the case of finished slopes) erosion control methods. The October 1 grading season
deadline may be extended with the approval of the City Engineer subject to implementation by October 1 of
erosion control measures designed to prohibit discharge of sediments offsite during and after the grading operation
is completed. Extensions beyond November 15 may be allowed in areas of very low risk of impact to sensitive
coastal resources and may be approved either as part of the original coastal development permit or as 3 formal
amendment to an existing coastal development permit.
Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit. Developer shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and
provide improvements constructed pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm
Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge
to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the City
Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective tenants of the following:
A. All residents shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to
remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents,
paints, paint thnners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any
street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal
of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments
shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective
containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning
any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
D. SWPPP will include calculations of anticipated pollutant loading, and sizing of structural BMPs to
remove pollutants prior to storm water entering a storm drain. Required maintenance of the BMPs
and the maintenance interval will be specified for each BMP.
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent
offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad
Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
E.
A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of excavations and, if necessary, salvage
exposed fossils. The frequency of inspections will depend on the rate of excavations, the materials being excavated,
and the abundance of fossils. The palentologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed
fossil to facilitate excavation and, if necessary, salvage. Because of the small nature of fossils present in these rock
units, matrix samples should be collected for processing through fine mesh screens. Provisions for preparation and
curation shall be made before the fossils are donated to their final repository. All fossils collected should be donated
to a museum with a systematic palentological collection, such as the San Diego National History Museum.
Prepare an interior acoustical analysis to insure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dBA Cnel and implement the
mitigation measures found in the noise report prepared by Mestre Greve and Associates dated June 5,2003. Project
shall record a notice of restriction that the property is subject to roadway noise from Interstate 5.
19 Rev. 07/03/02
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION hIEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND COSCVR
WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
20 Rev. 07/03/02 30
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 1 of I
0 z
P) C
C C m
.-
h
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 2 of 2
0: d
c 0
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 3 of 3
0 z
ci
,.
0 z
m
E 6 't a, a
0 c
U a, C
e- hi 'if
m!?!
"a, .% n 2- a3
c
.- 6
;ti fi ci
1
r L
-
4
4
E
c I
E
S
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5635
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
SUBDIVIDE 5.33 ACRES INTO A 78 UNIT AIRSPACE
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF HARRISON
STREET, WEST OF ADAMS STREET AND SOUTH OF
CHINQUL2PIN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 02-18 TO
CASE NO.: CT 02- 18
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Lot 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3,1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract
Map as shown on Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19, 2004, on file in the Planning Department
BLUFFS - CT 02-18, as provided by Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of May 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
33
1
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of BLUFFS - CT 02-18, based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is cmsistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
project is consistent with all the minimum requirements of Titles 20 and 21
governing airspace subdivisions and the design of multi-family condominiums.
That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since
surrounding properties are designated for Residential Medium-High density
development on the General Plan, and are developed with multi-family development
with a comparable housing type and density.
That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed, in that all required development standards and design criteria required by
the applicable zoning ordinances are incorporated into the project without the need
for variances from development standards.
That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in
that the project has been designed and conditioned such that there are no conflicts
with established easements. The street vacation of Locust Street does not conflict
with the Circulation Element of the General Plan as it is not a Circulation Element
roadway and does not disrupt the local traffic patterns as the street is not improved
to local street standards.
That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures are oriented
in a manner that allows for solar exposure and will receive prevailing breezes.
That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental
resources.
That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the project site has been previously developed with single-family
homes and agricultural uses and is surrounded by residential development.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -2- 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has
been designed in accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality
protection in accordance with the City’s sewer and drainage standards and the
project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the facts set forth in
the staff report dated May 19,2004.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
Specifically,
a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified
School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
b. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and
will be collected prior to issuance of building permit.
c. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be
collected prior to the issuance of building permit.
That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in
excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City’s public facility plans
will not be adversely impacted.
That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below
the control point to offset the units in the project above the control point so that approval
will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit.
That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards.
That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
Note:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Unless otherwise specified herein, all condi ions shall be satisfied prior
recordation or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
I final map
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Tentative Tract Map.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval. and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, (b)
City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator’s installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until
all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City’s approval is not
validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar
copy of the Tentative Map reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision
making body.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -4- 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that
Plan prior to the issuance of building permits
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. A note to this effect
shall be placed on the Final Map.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CP 02-10, SDP 03-03, CDP 03-
35 and HDP 02-09 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5634, 5636, 5637, 5638 and 5639 for those other approvals incorporated
herein by reference.
Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map is not
being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units, the
Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and
deed restrict 10 dwelling units as “for-sale” affordable units for a minimum of thirty
years in accordance with the requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code. Ten units within Building “0” shall be reserved for very
low-income households (maximum 50% Area Median Income (AMI)). The draft
Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Director no later than
60 days prior to the request to final the map. The recorded Affordable Housing
Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.
Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent with the project’s
market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and
Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and
the City’s Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as
shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving
condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the
project’s building, improvement, and grading plans.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -5- 38
1
2
1
4
5
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15. Developer shall establish a homeowner’s association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
a.
b.
C.
d.
General Enfcrcement bv the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor
of, or in which the City has an interest.
Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right
to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City
within 30 days for the official record.
Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event
that the Association fails to maintain the “Common Area Lots and/or the
Association’s Easements” as provided in Article , Section the
City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If
the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the
Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with
particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the
same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the
giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements within the
period specified by the City’s notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to
be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the
Owners as provided herein.
Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association’s Easements,
the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the
City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association’s
Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the
Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in
full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in
the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and
payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If
the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified,
payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount
equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may
pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or
in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other
rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment
against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice,
plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and
shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -6- 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
e.
f.
g.
levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to
levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring
all legal actions andor to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
hisher respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner
landscape mcintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit
Balconies, trellis and decks. The individual lot or unit owner allowances and
prohibitions regarding balconies, trellis and decks shall be as set forth in Exhibit
No room additions whether habitable or not or conversions of patios or open
deckshalconies to enclosed areas or habitable space will be permitted.
This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential homeownership
purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for
such rental shall be not less than 26 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this
requirement.
Developer shall apply for and obtain approval of a Coastal Development Permit issued by
the California Coastal Commission or its successor in interest, that substantially conforms
to this approval. A signed copy of the Coastal Development Permit must be submitted to
the Planning Director. If the approval is substantially different, an amendment to the
project shall be required.
Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise
impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the
approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the
Planning Department).
Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s street name policy
subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map approval. All individually
identified “Streets” shall be given a unique street name per the Fire Marshal.
Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
existing schools, parks and streets.
Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer shall submit to the Planning Director
a recorded copy of the Condominium Plan filed with the Department of Real Estate
which is in conformance with the City approved documents and exhibits.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -7- 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23.
24.
25.
26.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. in
substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Community Development and Planning.
Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and
recreational facilities.
Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the
County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a
Carlsbad Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit by Resolutions No. 5635,
5636, 5637, 5638, and 5639 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the
property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all
conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in
the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record
an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of
good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of an exterior lighting plan
including parking areas. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any
impacts on adjacent homes or property.
Engineering
General
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other
recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all
the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, and storm drain facilities
located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner
among the owners of the properties within the subdivision.
Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install rain gutters to convey roof drainage to an
approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project.
Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance
with Engineering Standards and shall record the following statement on the Final Map
(and in the CC&Rs).
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -8- 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the
street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight
distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section
8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition.”
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement.
grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development
32. Developer shall apply for the vacation of Locust Street as identified on the Tentative
Map. The vacation of the public street shall be completed prior to recordation of
the final map or issuance of any grading permits.
FeedAgreements
33. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City’s standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding
drainage across the adjacent property.
34. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall
cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area
shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street
Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an
additional Street Lighting and Landscaping District. Said written consent shall be
on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Grading
35.
36.
37.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board.
This project requires off site grading. No grading for private improvements shall occur
outside the limits of this approval unless Developer obtains, records and submits a
recorded copy to the City Engineer a grading or slope easement or agreement from the
owners of the affected properties. If Developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope
easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case Developer must
either apply for and obtain an amendment of this approval or modify the plans so grading
will not occur outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial
conformance from both the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and
obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit
for this project.
Dedications/Improvements
38. Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City and/or
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -9- a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the tentative
map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map and/or separate recorded
document. All land so offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances and without cost.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or
install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent
with any grading 3r building permit.
Developer shall provide the design of all private streets and drainage systems to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform
to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage
systems shall be inspected by the City. Developer shall pay the standard improvement
plancheck and inspection fees.
Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement
to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, the private street and
drainage improvements onsite, as well as all public improvements shown on the
tentative map including, but not limited to: paving, base, signing & striping, sidewalks,
curbs and gutters, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of
utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water, to
City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements are:
a)
b)
c)
d)
The onsite public water system including appurtenances.
The onsite public sanitary sewer system.
Improvements to Harrison Street, Adams Street and Chinquapin Avenue
as generally shown on the Tentative Map.
Storm drain improvements downstream of the site as identified on the
Tentative Map.
A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the
provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above
shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
Developer shall execute and record a City standard Basin Maintenance Agreement prior
to the approval of grading, building permit or final map, whichever occurs first for this
Project.
Harrison Street shall be dedicated by Owner along the project frontage based on a
centerline to right-of-way width of thirty feet and in conformance with City of Carlsbad
Standards.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall underground all existing overhead
utilities along and within the subdivision boundary.
Developer shall have the entire drainage system designed, submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer, to ensure that runoff resulting from 10-year frequency storms of 6
A
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -10- 43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are equal to or less than the
runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing developed
conditions. Both 6 hour and 24-hour storm durations shall be analyzed to deterniine the
detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results.
46. Developer shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall provide improvements constructed
pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the “California Storni Water Best
Management Practices Handbook” to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level
prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to
and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be
limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following:
A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and
hazardous waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain
or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides,
herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet
Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective
containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants
when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
47. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP).” The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions
established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce
to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of
the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall:
a.
b.
C.
include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board requirements;
include the receipt of “Notice of Intent” issued by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board;
recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices
(BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said
pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging
to City right-of-way or natural drainage course; and
establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper
procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
d.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -1 1- 4+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
48. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a “Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP).”
The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban
Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal
Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from
storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the
project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall:
a.
b.
c.
identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern;
identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies
that could be impacted by this project;
recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with
this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the
maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way;
establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to resident education on the proper
procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants;
ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity; and
identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not
exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent
practicable.
d.
e.
f.
49. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install streetlights along all public and private street
frontages abutting and/or within the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad
Standards.
50. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install sidewalks along all public streets abutting the
subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
5 1. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install wheelchair ramps at the public street comers
abutting the subdivision in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
Final Map Notes
52. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data:
A. All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with the
exception of the following:
1.
2.
The public water and system and associated appurtenances serving
the property.
The sanitary sewer systems serving the property. Laterals connecting
the individual units to the main line are to be privately maintained.
Maintenance shall be covered in the project’s CC&Rs.
53. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the
appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -12- 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
54. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street
level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as sight distance
corridors.
Water:
55.
56.
57
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire
Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations,
building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be
considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the
satisfaction of the District Engineer.
Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges
for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water
Authority capacity charge(s1 prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The Developer shall install potable water services and meters at a location approved by
the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at a location approved by the
District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the Tentative Map to the satisfaction of the District
Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
The Developer shall provide separate potable water meters for each separately owned
unit.
Prior to Final Map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever is first, the entire
potable water, recycled water, and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that
adequate capacity, pressure, and flow demands can be met to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall submit a detailed sewer study, prepared by a Registered
Engineer, that identifies the peak flows of the project, required pipe sizes, depth of
flow in pipe, velocity in the main lines, and the capacity of the existing
infrastructure. Said study shall be submitted concurrently with the improvement
plans for the project and the study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the
District Engineer.
The Developer shall submit a detailed potable water study, prepared by a
Registered Engineer that identifies the peak demands of the project (including fire
flow demands). The study shall identify velocity in the main lines, pressure zones,
and the required pipe sizes. Said study shall be submitted concurrently with the
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -13- ;sl
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
improvement plans for the project and the study shall be prepared to the
satisfaction of the District Engineer.
- Fire:
64. All buildings with the notable exception of the community (pool) building(s) shall be
required to have installed an approved Automatic Fire Sprinkler system.
65. Each building shall have the required water flow (Fire sprinkler) alarm bell be placed on
the address side of the building.
66. Each unit shall be addressed separately.
67. All streets shall be designated as FIRE LANES in perpetuity and as such, no on-street
parking shall be permitted outside of designated parking areas. This shall also require the
posting of approved signage.
68. Any present or future plans or interest in installing gates across any or all of the access
drives shall be required to be submitted to the Carlsbad Fire Department for approval.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the final map as
required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map
approval becomes final.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
The project shall comply with the latest non-residential disabled access requirements
pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code.
Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 18.04.320.
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation of such signs.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -14- 47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
76.
77.
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or
interest to permi: the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest.
The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The
Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessful,
Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the
requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the
City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you
protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
...
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -15-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
/ I , ,, / /y ;"
I/ . , - I c .'- -L-
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
.
PC RES0 NO. 5635 -16- 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5636
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
SUBDIVIDE 5.33 ACRES INTO A 78 UNIT AIRSPACE
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATE9 ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF HARRISON
STREET, WEST OF ADAMS STREET AND SOUTH OF
CHINQUAPIN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
CASE NO.: CP 02-10
APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM PERMIT 02-10 TO
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Lot 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2, 3,5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3, 1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Condominium
Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19, 2004, on file in the Planning
Department, BLUFFS - CP 02-10 as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of May 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Condominium Permit.
50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commissim RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of BLUFFS CP 02-10, based on
the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
FindinPs:
1. That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the proposed project of 78 condominiums (1 4.6
du/ac) on the subject site is consistent with the allowable density range of the RMH
(8-15 du/ac) General Plan designation. As discussed in the staff report, the site is
designed to be consistent with the applicable development standards and the
proposed residential use is compatible with adjacent existing and planned multi-
family residential land uses.
2. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, in that as discussed in the staff
report the proposed project of 78 condominiums on the subject site conforms with
all the design and development standards applicable to the property as contained in
Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the project is compatible with
existing surrounding residential development.
Conditions:
Note:
1.
2.
Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map
recordation or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Condominium Permit.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Condominium Permit documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
PC RES0 NO. 5636 -2- 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 02-18, SDP 03-03, CDP 03-
35 and HDP 02-09 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5634, 5635, 5637, 5638 and 5639 for those other approvals incorporated
herein by reference.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5636 -3 - 52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
v MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLI~
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5636 -4- 53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5637
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
CONSTRUCT A 78 UNIT AIRSPACE CONDOMINlUM
PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH -WD EAST SIDE OF HARRISON STREET, WEST OF
ADAMS STREET AND SOUTH OF CHINQUAPIN AVENUE
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 03-03 TO
CASE NO.: SDP 03-03
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company, “Developer/Owner,” described as
Lot 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3, 1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development
Plan as shown on Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19,2004, on file in the Planning Department,
BLUFFS - SDP 03-03 as provided by Chapter 21.06/Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of May, 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Site Development Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 3-4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of BLUFFS - SDP 03-03 based
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental
settings, is consictent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or
traffic circulation, in that the project is located in an area of medium to high density
projects and is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan by
developing at 14.6 du/ac which is within the density range of 8 to 15 du/ac; the site
or surroundings will not be adversely impacted as there are no significant habitats
present and adjacent properties are already developed; and that the traffic
circulation will not be affected as the local roadways are existing. The proposed
vacation of Locust Street will not impact circulation, as the roadway does not
presently exist as an improved roadway.
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in
that all of the project’s buildings, parking, open space, and other amenities can be
provided without the need for variances.
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be
provided and maintained, in that the project provides the required setbacks and
incorporates architectural enhancements and landscaping consistent with the
Planned Development Ordinance and City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual.
4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that the additional 624 ADT generated by the project
will not significantly impact the surrounding road segments or intersection levels of
service.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map
recordation or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Site Development Plan.
PC RES0 NO. 5637 -2- j”r”
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Site Development Plan documents, as necessary to make them
internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 02-18, CP 02-10, CDP 03-
35, and HDP 02-09 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5634, 5635,5636,5638 and 5639 for those other approvals incorporated
herein by reference.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations. has previously otherwise
expired.
...
PC RES0 NO. 5637 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CAFUSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLMILLIM
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5637 -4- 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5638
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
35 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH
AND EAST SIDE OF HARRISON STREET, WEST OF ADAMS
STREET AND SOUTH OF CHINQUAPIN AVENUE IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 03-
CASE NO.: CDP 03-35
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Lot 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2,3,5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3,1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19, 2004, on file in the
Planning Department, BLUFFS - CDP 03-35 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of May 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the CDP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of BLUFFS - CDP 03-35 based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal
Program and all applicable policies in that the development does not obstruct public
views of the coastline as seen from public lands or rights-of-way; no agricultural
activities, sensitive resources, public access or shoreline access, or water-oriented
recreation activities are impacted.
The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3
of the Coastal Act in that there are no public access or recreation requirements for
the property.
The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay
Zone (Chapter 21.03 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the City's
Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban
Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management
Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban run off, pollutants and soil erosion. No steep
slopes or native vegetation is located on the subject property and the site is not located in
an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction.
The project is not located between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and,
therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Protection Zone
(Chapter 21.204 of the zoning Ordinance).
The project is not located in the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone, according to Map X
of the land Use Plan, certified September 1990 and, therefore, is not subject to the Coastal
Agricultural Overlay Zone (Chapter 2 1.201 of the Zoning Ordinance).
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map
recordation or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of
this Coastal Development Permit.
PC RES0 NO. 5638 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 02-10, CP 02-10, SDP 03-
03, and HDP 02-09 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5634,5635,5636, 5637 and 5639 for those other approvals incorporated
herein by reference.
The applicant shall apply for and be issued building permits for this project within two
(2) years of approval or this coastal development permit will expire unless extended per
Section 21.201.2 10 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a
grading permit issued by the City Engineer.
All construction activities shall be planned so that grading will occur in units that can be
easily completed within the summer construction season. All grading operations shall be
limited to April 1 to October 1 of each year. All areas disturbed by grading shall be
planted within 60 days of initial disturbance and prior to October 1 with temporary or
permanent (in the case of finished slopes) erosion control methods. The October 1
grading season deadline may be extended with the approval of the City Engineer subject
to implementation by October 1 of erosion control measures designed to prohibit
discharge of sediments offsite during and after the grading operation is completed.
Extensions beyond November 15 may be allowed in areas of very low risk of impact to
sensitive coastal resources and may be approved either as part of the original coastal
development permit or as a formal amendment to an existing coastal development permit.
The Developer shall apply for and obtain approval of a Coastal Development Permit for
the portion of the project within the Agua Hedionda LCP issued by the California
Coastal Commission or its successor in interest, that substantially conforms to this
approval. A signed copy of the Coastal Development Permit must be submitted to the
Planning Director. If the approval is substantially different, an amendment to the project
approvals shall be required.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
PC RES0 NO. 5638 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside. void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT -WPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
/
\- ' ' ,') L- , ,,, I, 4 ' <-. ___, ,., -(
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZ~ILL&
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5638 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5639
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HDP
NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF HARRISON STREET, WEST OF
ADAMS STREET AND SOUTH OF CHINQUAPIN AVENUE
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
02-09 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
CASE NO: HDP 02-09
WHEREAS, Anastasi Development Company, LLC, a Limited Liability
Company, “Developer/Owner,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Lot 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of
Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof no. 2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego, April 3,1928
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Hillside
Development Permit as shown on Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19, 2004, on file in the
Carlsbad Planning Department, BLUFFS - HDP 02-09, as provided by Chapter 21.95 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of May 2004,
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Hillside Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of BLUFFS - HDP 02-09 based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map which show
existing and proposed conditions and slope percentages.
That the development proposal is consistent with the intent, purpose, and requirements of
the Hillside Ordinance, Chapter 21.95, in that the hillside conditions are properly
identified and are incorporated in the design. The project is designed to relate to
the slope of the land and alteration of the natural hillside will be done in an
environmentally sensitive manner so that the Agua Hedionda lagoon will be
protected from increased erosion. The site does not contain any natural resources,
wildlife habitats, or native areas; therefore, no substantial impacts will occur.
That the proposed development or grading will not occur in the undevelopable portions
of the site pursuant to provisions of Section 21.53.230 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code,
in that the project site does not have any undevelopable portions as defined by
Section 21.53.230.
That the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in
the Hillside Development Guidelines Manual, in that the project complies with the
design standards contained in the manual which include screening of manufactured
slopes, grading within the acceptable grading quantities, and hillside architecture by
stepping the buildings with the slope and roof pitches following the slope direction.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map
recordation or issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Hillside Development Permit.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Hillside Development Permit documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
PC RES0 NO. 5639 -2- b3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 02-18, CP 02-10, SDP 03-
03, and CDP 03-35 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolutions No. 5634, 5635,5636,5637 and 5638 for those other approvals incorporated
herein by reference.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
...
...
...
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 5639 -3-
I
r
L
-
f!
4 I
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commi sion of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of May 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
and Whtton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Montgomery and Segall
ABSTAIN: None
I ' I ,-,' .i, ;/ ' /,, /. ,;< .'( ,' 2 /./
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5639 -4-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 19,2004
Application complete date: November 19, 2003
Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: John Maashoff
SUBJECT: CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-39HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS - Request
for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan,
Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to allow the
construction of a 78-unit condominium project on 8 contiguous parcels located on
the north and east side of Harrison Street, west of Adams Street and south of
Chinquapin Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5634
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5635,
5636,5637, 5638, and 5639 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 02-
18, Condominium Permit CP 02-10, Site Development Plan SDP 03-03, Coastal Development
Permit CDP 03-35, and Hillside Development Permit HDP 02-09 based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves the subdivision, grading and construction of a 78-unit multi-family air-
space condominium project on 5.33 acres of land located on the north side of the Harrison Street
“bend,” between Adams Street and Chinquapin Avenue in LFMP Zone 1. A Tentative Tract
Map is required for subdivision of the property and a Condominium Permit is required to allow
an airspace condominium subdivision. A Hillside Development Permit is also required based on
the existing topography. The Site Development Plan is required because the site is zoned RD-M-
Q, and a density increase is proposed for the 10-unit affordable housing component of the
project. The property is bisected by the Mello I1 and Agua Hedionda LCP segments. Thus, it
will necessitate a Coastal Development Permit from both the City and the California Coastal
Commission. The project meets all applicable regulations and staff has no issues with the
proposal.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant, Anastasi Development Company, has requested a Tentative Tract Map,
Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit, and a Hillside
Development Permit, to allow the construction of a multi-family residential project consisting of
78 condominium units. The 5.33-acre property is an accumulation of eight existing lots in a
semi-rectangular shape. On these previously developed lots presently exists an abandoned
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35kIDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Pane 2
single-family structure with detached garage, and two abandoned foundation slabs. The site also
has .3 acres of a remnant avocado grove. Neighboring adjacent lots along Adams Street to the
east include three existing single-family homes, and an existing vacant lot along Chinquapin
Avenue. The property is characterized as relatively flat, but slopes downward gradually from
north to south to a more steeply sloping portion at the south end. Off-site to the north, across
Chinquapin Avenue are three existing apartment complexes. In addition, to the west of the
subject property across Harrison Street is another apartment complex, a condominium complex
and, rounding the bend to the south, several single family homes are situated on the bluff above
Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The project includes street improvements to Harrison Street, including
the south side at the “bend,” and Chinquapin Avenue. Locust Street, an unimproved publicly
dedicated street that runs east and west between Adams Street and Harrison Street, is to be
vacated.
The project is being proposed at a density of 14.6 units per acre. The General Plan Land Use and
LCP land use designation both allow densities to range from 8 to 15 units per acre with the
Growth Management Control point being 11.5 units per acre. The project is requesting units
from the “excess dwelling unit bank” pursuant to City Council Policy 43. The project site is
zoned for Residential Density-Multiple that allows multiple dwellings as a permitted use.
The proposed project involves four different types of buildings. As shown on Exhibit “M,” two-
story Buildings A and B are located along the southern frontage of Harrison Street and include
twelve 2,233 sq. ft. three-bedroom units (six units in each building). These buildings have views
to the south (Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and the Pacific Ocean coastline). Buildings C and D are
located just north of Buildings A and B in the center portion of the subject property, and consist
of 2-story units over an individual 2-car garage (3 stories total) and contain 9 3-bedroom 1,672
sq. A. units. Distributed throughout the center of the site, Buildings E through N consists of 2-
story units over an individual 2-car garage (3 stories total). The 10 buildings contain a total of
47 three-bedroom 1,582 sq. ft. units. Buildings C through N all appear as three story structures
on the garage-entry side but, due to the proposed split grades, as two story structures on the
exterior (front) side (see Exhibit “0”). The final building type (Building 0) is located adjacent
to the single-family homes to the east. Building 0 includes 10 very affordable 1-story with loft
units with adjacent garages. There are three different sizes of affordable units; 555 sq. ft. (one
bedroom, one unit only); 777 sq. ft. (one bedroom, eight units); and 952 sq. ft. (three bedroom,
one unit only). All units are accessed off of private driveways. Each unit in Buildings A and B
includes both a patio and balcony; units in buildings C and D contain private patios and storage
space located on the garage level. Buildings E - N possess balconies on the second story.
Building 0 has a private patio space for each unit.
The Spanish architectural style proposed for the project includes light-colored stucco finish with
wood fascia and trim, accented with wood shutters and cultured stone base. Roof materials are
concrete roof tile over numerous roof planes. As shown on Exhibit “M” - “HH,” the building
profile of Buildings A and B are designed with a receding upper floor so that the building profile
follows the angle of the underlying slope.
Vehicular access to the project is via private driveways with three separate entrances off of
Hamson Street, Locust Street, and Chinquapin Avenue. Guest parking is proposed as open
parking bay spaces distributed throughout the site. Enhanced paving is proposed at all entries off
of public streets, and at important visual locations internally along the drives. Coast Waste 17
CT 02-1 8/CP 02- 1 O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Element Use Classification, Goal, Proposed Use and Improvements
Objective or Program
The site is designated for
Residential Medium High
density (RMH) residential
development.
Land Use Proposed residential density of 14.6
dwelling units per acre is below the 15
dwelling units per acre maximum
allowed in the RMH designation.
Page 3
Compliance
Yes
Management has indicated that they are supportive of individual trash pick-up for the units so
there are no common trash facilities/enclosures provided.
The project also includes extensive landscaping within and around the project, decorative site
walls, and retaining walls. A centralized outdoor active recreation area, including a swimming
pool, and open active areas for volleyball and lawn bowling are provided. For compatibility
reasons, a minimum 17-foot building setback, with pedestrian path and landscaping, is
maintained along the eastern edge of the project, adjacent to the single-family lots along Adams
Avenue.
IV. ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Residential Medium High Density (RMH) General Plan Land Use Designation;
Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance) and Qualified
Overlay Zone;
Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 2 1.95 of the Zoning Ordinance);
Local Coastal Program (LCP) Mello I1 and Agua Hedionda Segments
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance) and City
Council Policy 43 and;
Alternative Street Design Policy
Growth Management Ordinance
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
A. General Plan
The project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan.
Particularly relevant to the residential development are the Land Use, Circulation, Noise,
Housing, and Public Safety elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with
these mrticular elements of the General Plan.
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Element
Circulation
Noise
Housing
Public
Safety
TABLE 1 - GENER
Use Classification, Goal,
Objective or Program
Require new development
to construct roadway
improvements needed to
serve the proposed
development. Adequate
circulation infrastructure
to serve the projected
population.
Require that a noise study
be submitted with all
residential projects over
five units. Enforce the
City policy that 60 dBA
CNEL is the maximum
exterior noise level for
residential units.
New housing developed
with a diversity of types,
prices, tenures, densities,.
and locations to meet the
demand of anticipated
City Growth.
Provision of emergency
water systems and all-
weather access roads.
L PLAN COMPLIANCE, Cont’d
Proposed Use and Improvements
The project is conditioned to provide
street improvements to Harrison Street
and Chinquapin Ave. The vacation of
a portion of Locust Street between
Adams St and Harrison St is not a
circulation element roadway and is
consistent with this policy because it
is not required for local circulation.
A noise analysis has concluded that
with specific mitigation measures
traffic noise from Interstate 5 can be
mitigated to 60 dBA CNEL.
The project provides a mixture of
multi-family air-space condominiums,
contributing to the diversity of
housing within the City. The project
also provides ten units that will be
sold at prices that are affordable to
very low-income households
consistent with the City’s Inclusionary
Housing; requirements.
All necessary water mains, fire
hydrants, and appurtenances must be
installed prior to occupancy of any
unit and all-weather access roads will
be maintained throughout
construction.
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Given the results of the above analysis, the Bluffs condominium project is consistent with the
Elements of the City’s General Plan.
B. Subdivision Ordinance
The project proposes an airspace subdivision of multi-family units. Chapter 20.16 of the
Subdivision Ordinance addresses the requirements of a major subdivision (a subdivision creating
more than four parcels). These requirements deal mostly with providing the drainage, sewerage,
and circulation dedications and improvements needed to serve the subdivision.
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Page 5
The proposed residential subdivision will provide all necessary facilities prior to, or concurrent
with, construction. The hydrology report, submitted by the applicant, indicates that all runoff
can be controlled onsite, with no overall increase, and conveyed into existing storm drain
facilities. The onsite sewer system would be connected to the existing system in Harrison Street.
The water system would involve provision of looped service from the existing lines in Harrison
Street, Adams Street and Chinquapin Avenue. All proposed internal circulation would consist of
private driveways, and as a result no dedications are necessary. Improvements will be made
along the frontage on Harrison Street and Chinquapin Avenue. Ten feet will be dedicated to
Harrison Street and it will be improved to “half street plus 12-feet,” which allows for full
improvements on the project side, and an improved 12-foot travel lane on the opposite travel
side. Locust Street is proposed to be vacated between Adams Street and Harrison Street. No
standard variances are needed to approve the project. Given the above, the proposed subdivision
would provide all necessary facilities and improvements without producing any land title
conflicts; therefore the project is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance.
C. Planned Development Ordinance and Qualified Overlay Zone
The project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the Planned Development
Ordinance. Table 2 below indicates how the project complies with the Planned Development
Ordinance.
TABLE 2 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
Standard - - __ - - - -
Livable Neighborhood Policy 66
Front entriedporches:
Garages:
Parkways:
Central Recreation area:
Arterial Setbacks:
Setbacks required for arterials.
Building Setbacks:
From Public Street: Front 15-fOOt
average w/parkway street design.
From driveway: 5 feet to garage and 8
feet to unit.
Proposed
Units have front entries and porches.
Garages are alley loaded and not
visible from public street.
Project provides parkways along
public street.
Project provides centralized
recreational area.
The project is not adjacent to any
arterial streets.
15 feet w/parkway street design.
8-foot setback from driveway for
both garage and unit.
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Page 6
TABLE 2 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
Standard
Architectural Design Elements:
Three building Planes:
Minimum of four design elements:
Minimum Building Separation:
20 feet average with a minimum of 10
feet between structures.
Maximum Lot Coverage:
60% on a project basis
Maximum Building Height:
35 feet
Parking:
Resident: One car garage plus one
covered/uncovered space.
Guest: 5 spaces for the first 10 units,
plus 1 space for each 4 units above 10.
25% visitor may be comr>act
Private Driveways:
Minimum 24 feet wide with no parking
Dermitted in travel way.
Dwelling Unit Setback from Parking:
All dwelling units shall be set back a
minimum 5 feet from open parking
areas.
Screening of Parking Areas:
All open parking shall be screened from
adjacent residences and public rights-of-
way.
ONTINUED
ProDosed
Elevations have a minimum of three
building planes.
Project provides a variety of roof
planes, paned windows and doors,
raised trim and a variety of accent
materials.
20-foot separation maintained
throughout the project.
Building coverage constitutes
70,660 square feet of the 232,175
sauare foot site (30% site coverage).
35-feet from natural/finish grade.
68 units with 2-car garage.
Affordable units have one car garage
and one open space.
22 spaces required, 25 spaces are
provided, in perpendicular parking
bays.
20% are compact.
All private driveways are at least 24
feet in width.
Buildings are all set back at least
five feet from open parking.
Open parking is shielded from
adjacent residences and public
rights-of-way by either buildings or
project walldfences.
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 02-1 8/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
TABLE 2 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE
ONTINUED
Standard
Recreational Space:
Common: 200 square feet of centralized
community recreational space per unit;
75% must be allocated for active uses;
recreation must be provided for all ages.
Private: 10 x 10 patio or 120 square feet
of balcony.
Lighting:
Adequate for pedestrian and vehicular
safety.
Utilities:
Separate utilities shall be provided for
each unit.
Recreation Vehicle Storage:
20 square feet for each unit; screened via
landscaping.
Storage Space:
480 cubic feet per unit.
Antennas:
Master antenna and/or cable television
hookur,.
Proposed
A total of 15,533 square feet of
recreational space is required; the
project provides for a total of 16,608
square feet of centralized common
recreational space (1 1,767 sq. ft.
active and 4,841 sq. ft. passive);
active recreation includes a
swimming pool and spa facility,
volleyball area and bocce ball field.
All units have 10 x 10 patios.
Buildings A and B also have
deckhalconv.
A lighting plan will be provided
which will provide for adequate
Dedestrian and vehicular safetv.
There shall be separate utility
systems for each unit. This condition
has been incorporated into the
attached CT resolution.
1,560 sq ft required; 1,598 provided.
Screening will be accomplished with
landscaping and a screening trellis
structure.
The project has been designed with
storage closets within the units’
private garages and, in some units,
in the balcony areas also. The total
storage area required for the project
is 37,440 cu. ft. and 64,142 cu. ft. is
provided.
Cable television hookup to be
Drovided to all units.
Conformance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Given the above, the proposed air-space condominium project is consistent with the applicable
portions of the Planned Development Ordinance.
CT 02-1 8/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Findings required by the Qualified Overlay Zone ensure that the project is consistent with the
General Plan, compatible with surrounding uses, and can be adequately accommodated by the
site and street system. The project density of 14.6 dwelling units/acre is in compliance with the
density permitted by the RMH General Plan designation and the multi-family subdivision is
compatible with surrounding multi-family development and the applicable RDM zoning.
Existing local streets, that will provide access to three separate private street/driveways serving
the project, would adequately serve the proposed units.
D. Hillside Development Ordinance and Hillside Development Guidelines
The project is subject to the Hillside Ordinance because the site contains slopes over 15% and
slope elevations differences greater than 15 feet, which occur only on the southern portion of the
site. The remainder of the site is relatively flat. The slope area is roughly 17,800 square feet
with a slope gradient of less than 25% and does not contain any sensitive habitat. The slope area
is considered developable per the Hillside Ordinance and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay
Zone.
The development complies with the hillside ordinance and guidelines by: grading within the
acceptable quantity range with 2,307 cu. yds/ac.; no slopes over 40 feet are being created as a
result of the grading scheme; multi-storied buildings are stepped to follow the topography of the
site; and roof slopes that are oriented in the same direction as the slope.
E. Local Coastal Program (LCP) Mello I1 and Agua Hedionda Segments
The project site, at Locust Avenue, is bisected by the Mello I1 and Agua Hedionda Segment
boundaries of the Local Coastal Program. The southerly portion is within the Agua Hedionda
Segment, an area of Deferred Certification, and will require permit approval from the California
Coastal Commission. The northern Mello I1 section is within the City's coastal permit
jurisdiction.
The project will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-
of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses
currently exist on the site, nor are there any sensitive resources located on the previously
developed property. The proposed project is not located on an area of known geologic instability
or flood hazard. No public opportunities for coastal shoreline access are available from the
subject site since it is not located between the first public road and the ocean, and no public
access requirements are conditioned for the project. The residentially designated site is not
suited for water-oriented recreation activities.
The subject site is located in the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone, however, due to its
location and the absence of slopes steeper than or equal to 25% inclination and/or native
vegetation, additional submittals, standards or requirements do not apply. Based on estimated
grading quantities, the project will require a grading permit. Construction of the project will
adhere to the City's Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan and Grading
Ordinance to avoid increased runoff and soil erosion. The project has been conditioned in the
Coastal Development Permit to grade during the summer construction season to further reduce
erosion and discharge of sediments offsite.
73
CT 02-1 8/CP 02-1O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
F. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
All residential projects within the City of Carlsbad are subject to the City’s Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance, Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. In accordance with the City’s
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the total housing units constructed must be affordable
to lower income households.
The project is allowed 61 units per the growth management control point. The applicant has
requested a density increase of approximately 28% to allow a total of 78 units on the site. The
Planning Department and Housing Department support the additional density because it is still
within the density range of the RMH General Plan designation and meets the development
standards for the site. The inclusionary requirement for this 78-unit project is 12 low-income
affordable units. The applicant has proposed to provide 10 for-sale units within the project
affordable to very low-income households. These units will be more affordable than required by
the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Therefore, the developer is requesting an incentive credit
for these more affordable, for-sale units.
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Section 21.85.060, authorizes the City Council to approve
an incentive credit adjustment when a preferred affordable housing product is provided. This
means that the Council may reduce the total inclusionary housing requirement to less than 15%
in order to provide an incentive to a developer to provide a more affordable housing product
and/or a preferred product type. Anastasi is proposing to provide 10 very low-income units
rather than 12 low-income units. This would represent a reduction in the inclusionary
requirement from 15% and to provide these units for-sale. To allow this reduction in the
inclusionary housing requirement, the City Council must first adopt a schedule of inclusionary
housing incentive credit specifying how credit may be earned. This schedule is being processed in a
separate agenda bill and must be approved prior to the approval of this item. Should the City
Council not adopt the proposed schedule or not accept the developer’s offer, the developer will be
required to revise their permits to indicate how the requirement to provide 15% of the project
affordable to low income households will be met.
Nine of the very low-income units would be one-bedroom units and sell for less than $100,000
and the one three-bedroom unit would be sold in the low $100,000 range. The low-income one-
bedroom units would have sold for less than $150,000, and the three-bedroom unit would have
sold for approximately $200,000. These are very approximate numbers and represent the
affordability of the units for comparison purposes.
The allocation of excess dwelling units is consistent and provided for within City Council Policy
43. Projects that request a density increase are determined to be “qualified” residential projects
to receive excess dwelling units. As stated previously above, the increase in the projects density
is compatible with the existing residential neighborhood and is in compliance with the General
Plan land use designation. Adjacent residential projects with RMH land use designations have
densities of up to 53 units per acre.
G. Alternative Street Design Policy
The project will implement the Alternative Street Design by having parkways adjacent to the
street rather than sidewalks. Pursuant to the Livable Street standards, the Engineering 74
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03ICDP 03-35/HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Standard
City Administration
Librarv
Department notified the property owners adjacent to Harrison Street that the project is required
to do street improvements. The street improvements consist of slightly widening the roadway as
well as installation of concrete curb and gutter, a landscaped parkway, and a sidewalk. With the
exception of some minor street widening, the proposed improvements will be constructed
exclusively on the project side of the street. The street design and improvements are in
conformance with the City’s current Livable Street design criteria. No comments were received
during the notice period.
ImpactdStandards Compliance
271 sq ft Yes
144 sa ft Yes
H. Growth Management Ordinance
Wastewater Treatment
Parks
The project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Program, as contained in
Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. The site will accommodate 61 dwelling units per the
Growth Management Control Point. As discussed in Section F, the project applicant is
requesting a density increase to accommodate a total of 78 dwelling units, 10 of which (13% of
78 units) are proposed to qualify as affordable to very low income families. With 78 dwelling
units proposed, the project results in a density of 14.6 dwelling units per acre, which is near the
top end of the RMH density range (8-15 dwelling units per acre).
78 EDU Yes
0.54 ac. Yes
Table 3 below details the project’s conformance with the requirements of the Growth
Management Program.
Drainage
Circulation
Provided (NAH Basin) Yes
624 ADT Yes
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water
Station #1 Yes
0 Yes
Carlsbad Unified Yes
E: 7M: 3 HS: 4
78 EDU (1 I) Yes
17,160 gallons per day (GPD) Yes
(220 gpd/EDU x 78 EDU).
The project exceeds the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance pursuant to Section , I 21.86.030(b) by 17 dwelling units.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a
potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A potentially
significant environmental impact was identified for noise and paleontological resources. No
significant residual chemical or pesticide residues are expected from the abandoned avocado
75
CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35IHDP 02-09 - BLUFFS
May 19,2004
Page 11
grove, as avocado groves do not require a significant use of pesticides or chemical for
production. The developer has agreed to mitigation measures to reduce the identified impacts to
below a level of significance in accordance with CEQA. In consideration of the foregoing, a
Notice of Intent to Issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted on January 2 1, 2004. No
public comments were received during the 30-day public review period.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
VL:mh
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5634 (Mit. Neg. Dec.)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5635 (CT)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5636 (CP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5637 (SDP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5638 (CDP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5639 (HDP)
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
Disclosure Statement
Exhibits “A” - “JJ” dated May 19,2004
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 02- 18/CP 02- 1 O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09
CASE NAME: Bluffs
APPLICANT: Anastasi Development Company
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A 78 unit condominium project on eight contiguous parcels
located on the north and east side of Harrison Street, west of Adams Street and south of
Chinquapin Avenue.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3. 7, 8, 9 and 10 inclusive, in Block “A” and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 6 inclusive in Block “D” of resubdivision of portions of Tract 238 and 243 of Thum Lands,
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. State of California, according to map thereof no.
2103, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego. April 3, 1928.
APN: 206-120-03,08,09,10, 11, 12, 14, 15 Acres: 5.33 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 78
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Residential Medium High (RMH)
Density Allowed: 8 - 15 du/ac
Existing Zone: Residential Density Multiple - Oualified Overlay Zone Proposed Zone: RDM-Q
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: 14.6 du/ac
Zoning
Site RDM-Q
North R-3
South RDM
East R- 1
West R-3/RD-M-Q
General Plan Current Land Use
RMH Vacant
RH Multi-family housing
RM Single-family
RLM Single-family
RMH Multi- family
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 78
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued January 2 1, 2004 u Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
0 Other,
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Elementary Middle
7 students 3 students
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
High School
4 students
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: BLUFFS - CT 02-18/CP 02-10/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35IHDP 02-09
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: RMH
ZONING: RDM-O
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Anastasi Development Company
ADDRESS: 1200 Aviation Blvd, Redondo Beach, CA 90278
- 15
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 5.33 ac
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ASAP
PHONE NO.: (310) 798-9772 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 206-120-03,08,09,10, 11, 12, 14,
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 271
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 145
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 78 EDU
Park:
Drainage :
Circulation:
Demand in Acreage = .54
Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin = NAH
Demand in ADT = 624
10.62 (100 yr)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 1
Open Space: Acreage Provided = 0
Schools: Carlsbad
Sewer: Demands in EDU 78
Identify Sub Basin = 11
Water: Demand in GPD = 17,160
The project is 17 units above the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
\=m c n I .
- Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applicsrions \\ hr;h \\ lil rrau:rt.
Idiscretionar). action on the pan of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Cornminer
WIIy ot Garisbad
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of appiication subminal \'our prole21 canno:
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please pnnt. ._
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual. firm, co-parmmhip. joint venture, association. social club. irarernsl
organization, corporation. estate, trust receiver, syndxate. in this and any other counc. ci? and counn. cip-
municipality. dismct or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however..the legal name and entity of the applicant and propeny oHner must be
provided be lo^.
1 APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons havrng a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cornoration or uannershiu. include the
names. ntle, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE @/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned cornoration, include the names, ntles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
MDMDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
- necessary,) n nb CorpPa C
Title Y
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the propeny involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a
cornoration or DartneTShlD, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE ("A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a pubiiciv-
owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
Title Tit le e,dA
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad. CA 92008-731 4 - (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 @
74
3. NON-PROFIT C SANEATION OR TRUST
Ifezy 7~;: in idr.r,ti?'c-I 7lrsuar.t to (1) or (2) above is a nonDrofit orcarkr::> or a-trust, list the
"ST'; c.;: L~(+cc:!s . c-_
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profiflrust
-- ,A* .LL;1;y person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit .*- -- *
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (1 2) months?
If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
and correct to the best of my howledge.
Print or type name of owner
Signature of applicaddate
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
Print or type nzme of applicznt
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
I P
4
I
82
I L; I
83
.. .. -
..... ._ .I
.....
I I J
I 1 I I i I I I 53 4 i 3 9 --t 8
i I i
I I
I I i I ! i
I , 4 8 b 3 I
87
88
I i
i
i
j
i I
I j
j
I --
- ~. . ____
Y
S
29
8
__---
my* nvamarro
0 c 9
I/
---
L _.
90
._..-
” ,MIS yo.!lJDY
I
2 P
0 =
VI z 0
e
c 0
I
..I 0 ‘1-
2 -
L
I .
%- Y VI
>
E z w
0
,
.
1
I I
I
I I
......_ I
.... ~
P 0 u
93
i
94
c
1; i
0 0 cl !& n
N N
n
4 c3
97
P
? Y
6 0 u
c
99
.....
--
E
.. -
f :
L
.-
,..~
. .
P
0 0 A R n z 0 v w r/ll
B 0 'U
9
d
z 0 il
N m
N r
m
c a
3
d w P
!i I' ,I
d
CI a
5, 3
d 0 0 c;l k
P d
0 u
t.
i 4
I. I
8 i:
- ., .h" I i
t
d 0 0 d E
z 0 u W
n
UI
N
4
N N
0 N
P
i
N N
N N
3
0
0 z
0 ii
a
Planning Commission Minutes May 19,2004 DRAFT EXY&T95
7. CT 02-181CP 02-101SDP 03-031CDP 03-351HDP 02-09 - BLUFFS - Request for a
Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative
Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit
and Hillside Development Permit to allow the construction of a 78-unit condominium
project on 8 contiguous parcels located on the north and east side of Harrison Street,
west of Adam Street and south of Chinquapin Avenue in Local Facilities Management
Zone 1.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 7 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the staff presentation
assisted by Associate Engineer John Maashoff.
Chairperson White asked if the applicant wished to go forward with the hearing with only 5
Commissioners present. The applicant responded he would go forward with the hearing.
Chairperson White opened the Public Hearing on Item 7.
Mr. Lynch stated that the project site is located in the northwest quadrant south of Chinquapin Avenue
west of Adams, east of Harrison and bisected by Locust Street. The project consists of a 78-unit
residential condominium project with 68 market rate units and 10 very low income units. The project
consists of 4 and 6 plex buildings consisting of two story units over private garages with private patios
and/or balconies. The project also includes a pool, spa, pool house, a common recreation facility and RV
parking for 7 vehicles.
Chairperson White acknowledged the Commission did receive a letter from Mr. Merritt, a neighbor, and
one from Mr. Simons, representing Anastasi Development.
Chairperson White asked if there were any questions of staff from the Commission.
Commissioner Whitton stated that some of the information in the staff report was incorrect. Mr. Lynch
responded that were some corrections to the staff report. The number in the third paragraph on page 2
should be 47 and not 56. He also stated that Section H should be stricken in its entirety as it was revised
and reprinted as Section F.
Mr. Lynch further stated he had received a phone call from a gentleman named Russ who lives on
Adams. His concern was over the increase in traffic and the safety of his children. Mr. Lynch stated he
did not receive the fax prior to the night's meeting.
Commissioner Baker asked about the grading of the project. She asked how much grading was
proposed and whether it would be an import or export job. Mr. Maashoff responded that the grading
quantities are fairly balanced, and it is an export job with about 2,800 cubic yards. Commissioner Baker
also inquired about the street improvements on Chinquapin Avenue. Mr. Maashoff responded that project
only proposes to improve Chinquapin Avenue only along the project frontage.
Commissioner Baker voiced her concern over the small sections of street improvements the City is doing
throughout the older portions of the Carlsbad and how odds it looks on an older street to have the old
street then part of it improved then it goes back to the old street again.
Commissioner Baker asked what the highest density allowed in the City is dwelling units per acre. Mr.
Lynch responded that the Residential High Density has a cap of 23 dwelling units per acre with a Growth
Control Point of 19 units per acre.
Commissioner Baker asked if Mr. Ruiz from Housing and Redevelopment was available to answer any
questions. Mr. Lynch stated Mr. Ruiz was available to answer questions.
Commissioner Baker asked Mr. Ruiz to comment on affordable housing and how long the very low
income units will remain as such. Mr. Ruiz explained why the Housing and Redevelopment Department
recommended this type of affordable housing component. He also explained the Affordable Housing
policy.
Planning Commission Minutes May 19,2004 Page 10
Commissioner Baker asked how the sale of the 10 affordable units would be handled. Mr. Ruiz
responded that the developer handles the sale but the department works with the developer in every step
of the process.
Commissioner Baker also inquired about the homeowner association dues and how that will be handled
with the affordable units. Mr. Ruiz responded the residents would be responsible for the dues.
Commissioner Dominguez asked about the facilities for trash pick-up.
explained the curbside pick-up arrangement.
Mr. Lynch responded and
Commissioner Dominguez stated his concern over individual curbside trash pick-up. He stated that there
was plenty of opportunity to redesign the project to include community trash facilities. He further
expressed concerns about the line of sight at the project’s egress and ingress points, specifically potential
conflicts with existing vegetation adjacent to the Chinquapin driveway.
Commissioner Heineman stated his support of the proposed individual trash pick-up.
Chairperson White asked if there were any other questions of staff. Seeing none, she closed the Public
Hearing.
Chairperson White asked the applicant would like to make a presentation.
John Simons, 4737 Bryce Circle, representing Anastasi Development, made a brief presentation and
stated he was available to answer any questions.
Chairperson White asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she opened Public
Testimony on the item.
Chairperson White stated she had received a speaker slip from Mr. Huber
Gene Huber, 6470 El Pato Court, stated he has worked on the project for years and gave his support for
the project.
Chairperson White asked if the applicant wished to respond to Mr. Huber’s comments. The applicant
stated he did not.
Chairperson White closed Public Testimony on the item.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Dominguez discussed community trash pick-up with other projects in the area. He further
commented that it would be more desirable to include community trash facilities into this project.
Commissioner Heineman asked Mr. Lynch where the trashcans would be placed if the project were
approved as it is proposed with individual trash pick-ups. Mr. Lynch responded’ that would be within the
interior private drives just pulled out from the garage to the curbside and not on the street. Commissioner
Heineman stated that the project is fine as proposed and gave his support of the support.
Commissioner W hitton commended the applicant on the project.
Commissioner Baker stated she could support the project as is but was unsure as to why it did not
propose a community trash pick-up. Mr. Lynch responded that the way the project is proposed would
provide the most open space such a recreation area or visual amenities as opposed to an unsightly
common trash facility.
Chairperson White commented she understands and appreciates her fellow Commissioners’ points-of-
view as well as Mr. Lynch’s.
Planning Commission Minutes May 19,2004 Page 11
Commissioner Baker inquired if there was ever a problem in the future with the trash not getting picked up
in a timely manner, would there be any recourse to address it at a later time. Mr. Lynch stated that it
would be very easy for the Homeowners Association to come back at a later date to either request a
Consistency Determination or a minor amendment to their project to include common trash facilities.
Chairperson White asked the applicant to respond to the trash pick-up concerns.
Mr. Simons responded that most of their communities have individual trash pick-up and most residents
prefer that type of trash pick-up. He further explained how the Homeowner’s Association could enforce
the issue of individual trash pick-up.
Commissioner Heineman commented that individual trash pick up would not be problem to enforce
through the Homeowner’s Association.
Commissioner Dominguez asked the applicant if there are community trash facilities does the
Homeowners Association have an easier time managing the trash facility as opposed managing individual
trash pick-up. Mr. Simons stated he agreed with staffs recommendation of individual trash pick-up.
Assistant City Attorney Mobaldi asked Mr. Ruiz to clarify the Affordable Housing sales requirement. Mr.
Ruiz responded by explaining the sales process.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Whitton, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5634 recommending
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5635,
5636, 5637, 5638, and 5639 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map CT
02-18, Condominium Permit CP 02-10, Site Development Plan SDP 03-03,
Coastal Development Permit CDP 03-35, and Hillside Development Permit HDP
02-09 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, White and Whitton
None
5-0 VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This 4 Day of June, 2004
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
OCATIOM: his project is within the C d Carlsbad‘s Ccastal Zone on the norlh and east side of larrison Street west of A&ns Street and south of Chinquapin Avenue in Local Fa- iries Management Zone 1.
‘~20&12&, 09,10,11: 12.14. and 15 and 206-120-03
tPPUCAHT:
’SPAN LNUMBER
AnagtaSi”iel0pment company 1MoAvia Boulevard RedonhEch CA 90278
C Councilinthe LEE!? &%?E; tk$%~Lw~v&ll~bk~%* on June 15, 004 at 6:W porn.
‘mons are cordial invlted to attend the public hearing and e the decision asgn&wa -<-pa q&i&p%gg. ts
iony qu Uons and a dedslon. pies of the agenda%l%l be available on or after une 4,234.
:A FI E CT 02-1 CP 02-UUSDP 03-0UCDP 03-WHDP 02-09 ;&&~~~&q~~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
DESCRIPTION:
Request for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to the allow the construction of a
78-unit condominium project on 8 contiguous parcels.
LOCATION:
This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone on the north and east side of
Harrison Street, west of Adams Street and south of Chinquapin Avenue in Local
Facilities Management Zone 1.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER:
206-1 20-08, 09, IO, 1 1, 12, 14, and 15 and 206-1 20-03
APPLICANT:
Anastasi Development Company
1200 Aviation Boulevard
Redondo Beach CA 90278
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the City Council in the Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on June 15, 2004 at 6:OO p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with
any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be
described and a staff recommendation given, followed by .public testimony, questions and a
decision. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after June 4, 2004.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch
at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 530 p.m.,
Friday 8:OO a.m. to 5:OO p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602-
461 3.
... 6
..
...
...
APPEALS
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site
Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit, if approved,
is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract
Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and/or Hillside
Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008,
prior to the public hearing.
1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council,
appeals must be filed in writing within ten (IO) calendar days after a decision by the
Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. 0
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the
Coastal Commission within ten (IO) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the
Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California
92108-4402.
CASE FILE: CT 02-1 8/CP 02-1 O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
PUBLISH: June 4,2004
SITE
BLUFFS
CT 02-1 8/CP 02-1 O/SDP 03-03/HDP 02-09
.. . - *. . ..
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054 VISTA CA 92085
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE STE 100
SAN DIEGO CA 92123 9174 SKY PARK CT
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 7575 METROPOLITAN DR
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY SERVICES
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENG I NEERl NG
JOHN MAASHOFF
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
VAN LYNCH
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SANDIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
ATTN TED ANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
WENDY WESTBERG
STE 370
26440 LA ALAMEDA
MISSION VlEJO CA 92691
CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TED OWEN
5934 PRIESTLY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CALTRANS DISTRICT 11
BILL FIGGE
MAIL ST 50
P 0 BOX 85406
SAN DIEGO CA 92186-5406
U S FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
JOHN MARTIN
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD
CARLSBAD CA 92009-
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
RONALD M JAEGER
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA
RUSS KOHL
5200 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ANTHONY & DICKY BONS
25709 HILLCREST AV
ESCONDIDO CA 92026-8650
REG WATER QUALITY CONTROL BD
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN WESTERN REG
PO BOX 92007
LOSANGELES CA 90009
BARRY BRAYER, AWP-8
BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION & HSG AGENCY
PATRICIA W NEAL DEPUTY SEC HOUSING
STE 2450
980 NINTH ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Lase: 5163@
Smooth Feed SheetsTM - , . ,-__ ~ - ~ . . .. . .I i.. . . ,_
CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK
SUPERINTENDENT
1901 SPINNAKER DR
SAN BUENA VENTURA CA 93001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
LOS ANGELES DlST ENGINEER
PO BOX 271 1
LOSANGELES CA 90053
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
CLIFFORD EMMERLING, DIR
STE 350
901 MARKETST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CHAIRMAN
722 JACKSON PL NW
WASHINGTON DC 20006
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
STE 400
611 RYAN PLAZA DR
ARLINGTON TX 7601 1-4005
DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIV
P 0 BOX 944246
SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460
DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE
STEVE SHAFFER, AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
RM 100
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
DOUG WICKIZER, ENVIR COORD
P 0 BOX 944246
1220 N ST SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2460
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVE
DUNCAN LENT HOWARD, REG ADMIN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
450 GOLDEN GATE AV
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102 110WESTAST
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
RM 700
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
Laser 5163@
. Smooth Feed SheetsTM
’ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RM 5504
1120 N ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
MARINE RESOURCES REGION, DR & G
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, SPR
350 GOLDEN SHORE
LONGBEACH CA 90802
OFFICE OF PLANNING & RESEARCH
OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC
ADMIN OCRM,55MC4 PO BOX 3044
SACRAMENTO CA 93044 1305 EAST-WEST HWY
N/ORM - 3
SILVER SPRING MD 20910
SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION &
DEVMT COMMISSION
BILL TRAVIS
STE 2600
50 CALIFORNIA ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 11-4704
U S BUREAU OF LAND MGMT
STE RM W 1834
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
U S FISH &WILDLIFE SERVICE
2800 COTTAGE WAY
STE W-2605
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-1 888
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
DWIGHT SANDERS
STE 1005
100 HOWE AV
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
2800 COTTAGE WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
MID-PACIFIC REGION
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LILY ALYEA
STE 702
333 MARKET ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2197
Laser 5263“
. Smooth Feed SheetsTN:
USDA - RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPT 41 69
430 "G" ST
DAVIS CA 95616
CITY OF ENCINITAS
COMDEV DEPT
505 S VULCAN AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SANDAG-EXEC DIRECTOR
GARY GALLEGOS
STE 800
1 ST INT'L PLAZA 401 "B" ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CYRIUMARY GIBSON
12142 ARGYLE DR
LOSALAMITOS CA 90702
LANlKAl LANE PARK
SHARP SPACE3
6550 PONTO DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD
PO BOX 100
SACRAMENTO CA 95801
TABATA FARMS
PO BOX 1338
CARLSBAD CA 92018-1338
LESLIE ESPOSITO
1893 AMELFI DR
ENCINITAS CA 92024
LAKESHORE GARDENS
TOM BENSON
7201 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN LAMB
1446 DEVLIN DR
LOSANGELES CA 90069
Laser 5 163@
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
KIM BLESSANT
101 ASH STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101-
COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR BILL HORN
ART DANELL
RM 335
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
S D CO PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT
JAON VOKAC
5201 RUFFIN ROAD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
STE B-5
FLOYD ASHBY
P 0 BOX 232580
ENClNlTAS CA 92023-2580
GEORGE BOLTON
6583 BLACKRAIL RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STATE LANDS COMMISSION
MARY GRIGGS
STE 100 S
100 HOWE AV
SACRAMENTO CA 95825-8202
PERRY A LAMB
890 MERE POINT RD
BRUNSWICK ME 04011
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
RICHARD RETECKI
STE 11 00
1330 BROADWAY
OAKLAND CA 94612
DALEID0 N N A SC H REI BER
7163 ARGONAUTA WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCIES
STE 1311
1416 9TH ST
SACRAMENTO CA 95814
Laser 5169
SANDAG-LAND USE COMMISS
NAN VALERIO
STE 800
401 "B" STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
BAT1 QU ITOS LAGOON FOUNDATION
JOHN BURNS
P 0 BOX 130491
CARLSBAD CA 92009-
LENNAR HOMES
CHRIST1 N E ZORTMAN
STE 320
5780 FLEET ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4702
Smooth Feed Sheets"\'
DAYTON CORP
SUITE 200
1371 OAKLAND BLVD
WALNUT CREEK CA 94596
MR & MRS HINDS
SUITE 204
9720 WlLSHlRE BLVD
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212
MASUE
SUITE 100
77 TARRYTOWN RD
WHITE PLAINS NY 10607
WOODRIDGE VILLAGE UNITS
SUITE 160
1775 HANCOCK ST
SAN DIEGO CA 921 10
LIME GROVE PARTNERS LP
17952 ATHENS AVE
VILLA PARK CA 92861
ADAMS STREET
321 5 MAEZEL LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A HASSO
389 S AVENIDA MARGARITA
ANAHEIM CA 92807
MR & MRS MAZEROLL
4049 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A HASSO
J UKEGAWA
4607 TELESCOPE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MERIT
4090 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SARKARIA
PO BOX 5766
ORANGE CA 92863
K POURGHAHREMAN
1061 9 ADAMSONG AVE
LAS VEGAS NV 89135
R ARDlSSONl
4123 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAUTER
41 13 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S KEISER
341 WESTBORNE ST
LA JOLLA CA 92037
JOHNSON
UNIT 2
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PO BOX PO BOX
J CAPUT0
UNIT I
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J TAYLOR
UNIT 3
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SCALERA
36 VIA SONRISA
SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673
G BlSBlNG
1041 PAINTED PONY CIR
VISTA CA 92083
MR & MRS CONONICO
8823 RUTLEDGE AVE
FLUSHING NY 11385
K KENNEDY
1733 CALAVO CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS ANAYA
UNIT 2
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G WHITELEY
UNIT 1
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
THOMPSON
181 8 STEWART ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
E% AVERY@ Address Labeis Laser 5 16OS i 52.7
Smooth Feed SheetsTh4
MR & MRS DOBBS
UNIT 4
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J LOPEZ
370 HIDDEN LAKE LN
VISTA CA 92084
MR & MRS HALLOWS
UNIT 2
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MONTGOMERY
UNIT 4 UNIT 3 4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J EISNER
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M SMITH
1237 LAURA LN
ESCONDIDO CA 92025
MR & MRS OSORIO
UNIT 2
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
H GEIGER
431 5 TRIESTE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS PIERCE
UNIT 4
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D PLUMLEE
UNIT 3
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CHAPA
4239 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RHODES
UNIT 22
600 N STRAND
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
K OLSEN
1085 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GAYNOR
4235 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SOUTHALL
1125 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WALL
1135 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MERllT
4090 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
V HALLBERG
1145 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
F DONEZ
1165 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS COZENS
1175 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WEST
11 50 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS TURNBULL
1120 HARBORVIEW LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A SClORTlNO
6001 CHATFORD DR
RALEIGH NC 27612
E BENDER
2980 WINTERGREEN DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS KERN
446 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HART
4030 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOWMAN
4010 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS RACHMAN
1125 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS ZANKICH
1145C CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labels Laser 5 160@ AVERYE)
Smooth Feed SheetsTtv‘
G RHODES
1165 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
R HATEFI
11 10 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS RODRIQUES
1120 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D GUNTER
1 130 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T HUDSON
1140 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JOHNSON
1150 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J ROACH
11 60 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PORTER
11 70 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHANEY
1175 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HOLLINGSWORTH
1165 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JOHNSON
1155 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M STEPHAN
4005 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LUNDBERG
4015 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
B TRAYER
4025 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS OLSON
4033 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SADIL
4045 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A BEACH
4055 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MARTIN
4065 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS OLSON
4075 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HARGRAVE
4085 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S RITTER
3060 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
B FORNERON
4005 ROYAL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T COSTELLO
4015 ROYAL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C WATRY
4025 ROYAL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WATSON
4035 ROYAL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JUDD
4040 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BENNElT
4050 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
P MORlSOLl 4030 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS WATSON
4020 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FLOYD
4010 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 1608 Address Labets
Smooth Feed SheetsTr*'
PATEROS
41 50 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JOHNSON
1125 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS GODWIN
4320 BROOKS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MELLGREN
PO BOX 1861
CARLSBAD CA 9201 8
MR & MRS SIMMONS
UNIT A
841 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CHAN
PO BOX 720067
SAN DIEGO CA 921 72
SCOTT
UNIT A
831 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L VONIMM
UNIT D
831 KALPATI CIR '
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J WILLIS
UNIT G
831 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS COHEN-KAISER
UNIT B
821 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SINGH
1135 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L HOWARD
4140 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RUSING
4310 BROOKS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
B A KAPLAN LTD
8881 BELLSHIRE DR
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646
I SOT0
600 J AVE
CORONADO CA 921 18
S BREEN
UNIT B
831 KALPATl CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T QUIGLEY
UNIT E
831 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS KRYGSMAN
2532 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
B OROURKE
4538 CASS ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
S LOWERY
1145 CAPE AlRE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SARKARIA
SUITE 200
906 SYCAMORE AVE
VISTA CA 92083
MCFARLAND
4300 BROOKS WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M WOSNAK
UNIT C
841 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS DEYO
UNIT F
841 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS DANIEL
UNIT C
831 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
H TOLLER
UNIT F
831 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G GILLISPIE
UNIT A
821 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
W JOHNSON
UNIT G
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
AVERYC Address Labels Laser 5 160@
Smooth Feed SheetsTr\"
J FLANNIGAN
UNIT A
822 KALPAIT CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T PABST
UNIT B
822 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BA KAPLAN LTD
8881 BELLSHIRE DR
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646
S FLOOD
UNITA ,
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S WOLKENFELD
UNIT B
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S CALHOUN
PO BOX 9000
CARLSBAD CA 9201 8
MR & MRS HULL
UNIT C
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CALENDER
UNIT 750
785 MARKET ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
MR & MRS BAILLIE
UNIT E
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BIRKETT
UNIT F
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J DAVIS
UNIT G
832 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BRACAMONTES
2208 HILLVIEW DR
FULLERTON CA 92831
LUCIO
UNIT A
4020 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C SLEEPER
UNIT B
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J JAMES
UNIT C
4020 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
P MARSHALL
UNIT D
4020 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CHRIST
UNIT A
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K NAKAO
UNIT B
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J CAPUT0
UNIT C
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS KING
UN1T.E
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T PENTALERI
PO BOX 124931
SAN DIEGO CA 921 12
R BUSIER
UNIT F
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
N WOOD
UNIT H
4021 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS TRAFTON
1128 TRIUMPH CT
LAS VEGAS NV 891 17
MR & MRS FAIRBANKS
UNIT A
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A WAGER
UNIT B
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D HENRY
UNIT C
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BETANCOURT
UNIT D
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D BUTH
UNIT E
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS KOCHON
UNIT F
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERW Address Labels
Smooth Feed SheetsTh'
S COFFRE
UNIT H
4022 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CHURCH
UNIT B
4011 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS TRINKLE
10907 RIM RD
ESCONDIDO CA 92026
J ROTH
UNIT A
4011 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S LARSEN
UNIT D
401 1 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C ASHJIAN
UNIT C
4011 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
F WILLIAMS
UNIT E
401 1 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J BLAKE
UNIT F
4011 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J SMITH
UNIT G
4011 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G REYES
UNIT B
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L ZASTROW
UNIT D
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS COTRAN
14158 DORENE CT
SARATOGA CA 95070
L RICHARDSON
UNIT E
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HAIGHT
UNIT C
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M WRIGHT
UNIT G
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS LOHMEYER
UNIT H
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J HARRIS
291 CARISSA DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92057
MR & MRS FLYNN
213 CIMARRON RD
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124
S RAGAN
UNIT J
4009 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
R DURAN
UNIT B
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J CAMU
13754 MANGO DR 122
DEL MAR CA 92014
MR & MRS KAUMP
UNIT E
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WAILES
2729 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D COOK
PO BOX 2304
CARLSBAD CA 9201 8
D LEWIS
UNIT 13
9938 BUENA VISTA DR
SPRING VALLEY CA 91 977
D LAMSKI
UNIT F
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J NEWBOLD
UNIT H
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G ARBENZ
UNIT I
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M COFFMAN
UNIT J
4007 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K SAPIENZA
UNIT A
4006 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labeis Laser 5 160@ AVERW
Smooth Feed SheetsTkq
M STITES
UNIT C
4006 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS RICHARD
UNIT B
4006 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C EVANS
UNIT E
4006 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SARVER
UNIT B
4008 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L CHOTKEVYS
UNIT A
4008 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSON & KARIMI-AZAD
3254 MEADOWLARK LN
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K FANG
PO BOX 482
DEL MAR CA 92014
MR & MRS HAIRE
26086 SAND CANYON RD
SANTA CLARITA CA 91387
L BAREN
PO BOX 1254
ALEXANDRIA VA 2231 3
P PETERSON
UNIT A
4010 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D VANHORSSEN
UNIT D
4010 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BAKHDA
19543 SINGING HILLS DR
NORTHRIDGE CA 91 326
J MCNALLY
UNIT B
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T ROGERS
104 E FERN AVE
REDLANDS CA 92373
KELLY
2232 LA CRESTA RD
EL CAJON CA 92021
R NORSETH
UNIT A
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D NELSON
UNIT C
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MYNA LLC
PO BOX 841 18
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
M BREEN
UNIT F
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
P AMICK
UNIT G
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HERRERA
7972 LA GACHA LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MR & MRS JAMAL
UNIT H
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS GUNTHER
UNIT J
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
F MCDONALD
804 CITRUS PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TESORO
UNIT 246
4025 CANARIO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L DU PLOOY
UNIT 338
4021 CANARIO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HARPOLE
63 W GRAND BLVD
CORONA CA 92882
MR & MRS LLOYD
UNIT 103
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS LOWERY
UNIT 104
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
F FAUL
UNIT 105
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labels Laser 5 160@
Smooth Feed Sheets".'
G DURANTE
UNIT 106
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J ORRANTIA
UNIT 107
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TRUFFA
UNIT 108
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C MCMILLON
UNIT 109
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A ZARAGOZA
UNIT 110
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T MOXON
UNIT 11 1
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J MINK
UNIT 112
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
R WOOD
UNIT 113
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L SMIDDY
UNIT 114
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS DlON
UNIT 115
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M ELLIOT
UNIT 116
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J BERDY
UNIT 129
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SMITH
UNIT 130
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M RUTHERFORD
UNIT 131
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HARKEY
UNIT 132
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS SAVILLE
UNIT 201
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C GOODHEIM
UNIT 203
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CULBERTSON
3616 GENISTA PL
FALLBROOK CA 92028
MR & MRS MOLLOY
UNIT 205
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS POLLAK
PO BOX 1808
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS CHUNG
16 E FERN AVE
REDLANDS CA 92373
B OBRIEN
UNIT 208
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS MANN
UNIT 209
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
H JOHNSTON
UNIT 210
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
L SOLON
UNIT 21 1
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D DICKSON
UNIT 21 3
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS BALLARD
9312 N PICTURE RIDGE RD
PEORIA IL 61615
S WHITEHEAD
UNIT 214
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
E MULLENSKY
UNIT 215
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MOODY
UNIT 216
817 KALPATI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labels Laser 5 160@
Srooth Feed SheetsTr,'
KAMEL
18825 BARDEEN AVE
IRVINE CA 92612
MR & MRS BAUMANN
521 1 HIGHLAND AVE
YORBA LINDA CA 92886
E JENNINGS
8427 RAINTREE AVE
RIVERSIDE CA 92504
BOEHM
UNIT 301
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS HAWKINS
UNIT 302
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS ANTONOPULOUS
7302 FAIRWAY LN
PARKER CO 80134
MR & MRS HASKINS
UNIT 303
823 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS STUART
UNIT 306
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WHETZEL
PO BOX 610
SKYFOREST CA 92385
E LEE
UNIT 308
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S AHN
UNIT 309
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KALPATI LLC
3171 MONTESANO RD
ESCONDIDO CA 92029
MR & MRS IACOBELLIS
UNIT 312
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J BUSCHER
UNIT 10
4525 COVE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KEITHLEY
79653 CIDRA
LA QUINTA CA 92253
MR & MRS WHITMER
UNIT 314
817 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
S REYNOSE
UNIT 330
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Q AL
18825 BARDEEN AVE
IRVINE CA 92612
GASTAUER
UNIT 331
805 KALPATI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J GASTON
1143 CAMINO DEL SOL CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ESHELMAN
1133 CAMINO DEL SOL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JEROME
1123 CAMINO DEL SOL CIR
CARLSBAD CA'92008
MR & MRS ALLEN
11 13 CAMINO DEL SOL CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS LISLE
3960 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G BRUNACHE
1150 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS EDWARDS
3980 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS ANGEL
1 11 0 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS JACKSON
1120 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
M SCHMIDT
1 130 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G BRUNACHE
11 50 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERW Address Labels
Srrooth Feed Sheets'?.
MR & MRS JONES
11 70 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS NOWELL
1708 E DORADO CT
VISTA CA 92084
MARK BUTCHERT
SUITE C
4645 PARK DRIVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
G RHODES
1165 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ANASTASI DEV
SUITE 203
1200 AVIATION BLVD
REDONDO BEACH CA 90278
J MCCOY
3995 SYME DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR & MRS WAKEHAM
17952 ATHENS AVE
VILLA PARK CA 92667
AWERY@ Address Labels Laser 5 160@
Sr,iooth Feed SheetsTrL"
OCCUPANT
UNIT A
41 13 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
1085 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
1075 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
41 13 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4049 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
1092 LOCUST AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4129 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4120 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4239 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4215 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4123 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
41 15 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4125 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
4235 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
4095 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
4085 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
4085 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
4085 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
4085 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
4075 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
4065 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ RVERW) Address Labels
Smooth Feed Sheets'"'
OCCUPANT
APT 2
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
4055 HARRISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A1 0.1
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A1 02
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A1 03
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A1 04
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A201
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A201
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A203
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A204
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B105
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B106
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 8107
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B108
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B205
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B206
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B207
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 6208
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C109
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C110
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT Clll
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APTC112
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C209
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C210
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C211
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C212
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D113
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D114
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERY@ Address Labels
Smooth Feed Sheets”’
OCCUPANT
APT D115
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D116
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D2 13
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D214
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D215
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D2 16
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E117
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT El 18
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E119
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E120
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E217
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E218
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E219
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E220
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F121
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F122
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F123
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F124
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F221
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F222
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F223
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F224
3969 ADAMS ST .
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT G225
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT G226
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT H227
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT H228
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT J229
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT J232
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT J230
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT J231
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERYC Address Labels
\ .i ~
Smooth Feed SheetsTr.’
OCCUPANT
APT K133
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K134
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K135
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K233
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K136
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K234
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K235
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K236
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L137
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L138
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L139
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L140
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L237
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L238
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L239
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L240
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT M241
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT M242
3969 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 5
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 6
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 7
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 8
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 9
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 10
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 11
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 12
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 16OS AVERW Address Labels
Smooth Feed SheetsTM
OCCUPANT
APT 13
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 14
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 15
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 16
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 17
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 18
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 19
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 20
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 21
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 22
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 23
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 24
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 25
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 26
1060 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 1
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 2
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 3
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 4
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 5
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 6
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 7
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 8
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 9
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 10
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 11
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 12
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 13
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 14
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 15
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 16
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERW Address Labels
Smooth Feed SheetsTrb:
OCCUPANT
APT 17
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 18
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 19
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 20
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 21
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 22
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 23
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT 24
1050 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A
1003 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B
1003 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F
1005 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT G
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT H
1007 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT A
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F
1009 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Laser 5 160@ AVERYF Address Labels
Smooth Feed SheetsTr\'
OCCUPANT
APT A
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT D
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT G
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT J
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT M
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT B
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT E
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT H
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT K
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT N
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT C
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT F
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT I
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
APT L
101 1 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Address Labeis Laser 5 16OS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMPLETE DATE: November 19,2003
DESCRIPTION:
Request for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit to the allow the construction of a
78-unit condominium pr6ject on 8 contiguous parcels.
LOCATl ON :
This project is within the City of Carlsbad’s Coastal Zone on the north and east side of
Harrison Street, west of Adams Street and south of Chinquapin Avenue in Local
Facilities Management Zone 1.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER:
206-1 20-08, 09, 10, 1 1, 12, 14, and 15 and 206-1 20-03
APPLICANT:
Anastasi Development Company
1200 Aviation Boulevard
Redondo Beach CA 90278
A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the City Council in the Council
Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on {DATE) at 6:OO p.m.
Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with
any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be
described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a
decision. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after {DATE).
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch
at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Friday 8:OO a.m. to 500 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602-
461 3.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
APPEALS
The time within which you may judicially challenge this Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit, Site
Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit, if approved,
is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Tentative Tract
Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and/or Hillside
Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing.
1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council,
appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the
Planning Commission.
2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
[XI 0 This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the
Coastal Commission within ten (1 0) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a
Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the
Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California
921 08-4402.
CASE FILE: CT 02-1 8/CP 02-1 O/SDP 03-03/CDP 03-35/HDP 02-09
CASE NAME: BLUFFS
PUBLISH: {DATE}
SITE
BLUFFS
CT 02-1 8lCP 02-1 O/SDP 03-031
CDP 03-35lHDP 02-09