HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-07-20; City Council; 17717; Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09AB# 17,717
MTG. 7/20/04
DEPT. PLN @
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
%. TITLE: DEPT. HD.
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD CITY ATTY.
/ 1.09 ARCHITECTURE - PUD 02-11(B) CITY MGR
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-239 , APPROVING Planned Unit
Development Amendment PUD 02-1 1 (B) for the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09
architecture as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission.
Project application
PUD 02-1 1 (B)
Administrative Reviewed by and To be Reviewed -
Ap p rova Is Final at Planning Final at Council
Commission x
On June 16, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the architecture
proposed for the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09. Since the neighborhood has more
than 50 residential lots and the Planned Unit Development was originally approved by the City
Council, the Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for their action.
Two Planning Commissioners were absent from the June 16th Planning Commission hearing. There
were no requests to speak about the project at the hearing by the public. The Planning Commission
approved the proposed architecture without discussion by unanimous vote of those commissioners
present.
A full description and staff analysis of the project is in the attached report to the Planning
Commission.
ENVl RON M ENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant
impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the Final Prouram Environmental Impact Report for the Villaqes of La Costa Master
Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07
evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La
Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project
reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09
project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of
approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program
EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are
a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07
and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this project are
available at the Planning Department.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 173 717
Facilities Zone
Local Facilities Management Plan
Growth Control Point
Net Density
Special Facility Fee
FISCAL IMPACT:
10
Adopted
3.2
3.2
None
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS:
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-239
2. Location Map
3.
4.
5.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5658
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated June 16, 2004
Draft Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated June 16, 2004.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Christer Westman, (760) 434-461 4, cwest@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-239
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS,
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, AND PLOTTING FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
RES I DENT I AL S U B D IV I S I 0 N G EN E RAL LY LO CAT E D SO UT H
OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE AND EAST OF FUTURE
ALICANTE ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
IO.
CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09, A 75 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09 ARCHITECTURE.
CASE NO.: PUD 02-1 1 (B)
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on June 16, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 20th
dayof July 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit
Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests,
comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 02-1 1(B); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02-1 1 (B) is approved by the City Council and that
the findings of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No.
5632, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and
conditions of the City Council.
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
Review’’ shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 20th day of July 2004, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None A
ATTEST: ,
-2- 4
EXHIBIT 2
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.9 ARCHITECTURE
PUD 02-1 1(B)
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5658
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT PUD 02-ll(B) TO APPROVE BUILDING
FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR 75
LOCATED SOUTH OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE AND
EAST OF FUTURE ALICANTE ROAD WITHIN THE GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 10.
CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09 ARCHITECTURE
CASE NO.: PUD 02- 1 1 (B)
WHEREAS, Western Pacific Housing, “Developer,” has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral
Management Company, “Owner,” described as
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09, being a subdivision of lot
9 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, February 12,2003
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” - “G” and “Al” - “A31” dated June 16,
2004, on file in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09 ARCHITECTURE - PUD 02-ll(B) as provided by Chapter 21.06
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of June 2004, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testinion),
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09 ARCHITECTURE - PUD 02-1 1(B) based
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the Villages of
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09 was subdivided into 75 residential lots and the
project floorplans were designed to fit within the lot boundaries of each residential
lot and comply with all applicable development standards.
2. That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the proposed building floor plans, elevations and
plotting have been designed consistent with the design criteria of the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan which has taken the site, surroundings, environmental settings,
and traffic circulation into consideration prior to its adoption.
3. The Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan for
which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given,
which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program
approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for
the purposes of CEQA); [ 15 168(c)(2) and (e)]; and
b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and
c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior plan; and
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIR; and
PC RES0 NO. 5658 -2- 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1'6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e.
f.
none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist; and
the Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
which are apprapriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed,
incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for
this subsequent project.
4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
5. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a
precise grading plan or building permits whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all ' certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of
this Planned Unit Development Amendment.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Planned Unit Development Amendment documents, as
necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on
the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits.
Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to
this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
PC RES0 NO. 5658 -3- 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Planned Unit Development
Amendment, and (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein. This
obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if
the City’s approval is not validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar
copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making
body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of project approval.
Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit or building permit whichever
occurs first, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the
office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director,
notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has
issued a Planned Unit Development Amendment by Resolution No. 5658 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
9 PC RES0 NO. 5658 -4-
1
- 3
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 501 0.
Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project’s
market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 2 1.90. All such
taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
existing schools, parks and streets.
Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
-5- l6 PC RES0 NO. 5658
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 02-22
in Resolution No. 5486 which are incorporated by reference herein.
Envineering
21. Prior to issuance of a precise grading permit, Developer shall process and receive
approval of a construction revision to City Drawing No. 406-6 to document the
relocation of sewer laterals, water laterals, curb outlets, and driveways as necessary
to support development of the dwellings as shown on the site plan for this project.
The construction revision shall be processed and prepared to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
22. The rough grading for this project shall be done concurrently with CT 02-23. Any
change to concurrent rough grading shall require written approval by the City
Engineer. If rough grading between CT 02-22 and CT 02-23 is proposed to be
separated, Developer shall first revise the exhibits and construction plans to depict
the offsite slopes required to construct the building pads, slopes and public road and
utility improvements necessary to support this project as a “stand alone” project to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
23. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
24. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or
interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest.
The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The
Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessful,
Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the
requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the
City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
PC RES0 NO. 5658 -6- I,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th, day of June 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson White, Commissioners Baker, Heineman,
Montgomery and Segall
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Dominguez and Whitton
ABSTAIN: None
MELISSA WHITE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER v
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5658 -7-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No. @
P.C. AGENDA OF: June 16,2004
Application complete date: January 3 1. 2004
Project Planner: Christer Westman
Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle
SUBJECT: PUD 02-ll(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD
1.09 ARCHITECTURE - Request for a detemiination that the project is within
the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that
the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and
a recommendation of approval for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for
building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 75 single-
family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood
1.09 generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante
Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5658,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02- 1 1 (B)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 75 single-family dwelling
units located in Neighborhood 1.09 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map (CT 02-22) and Planned Unit
Development (PUD 02-11), approved by the City Council on December 2, 2003. A Planned
Unit Development (PUD) was required because lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet.
Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 4.6.4 of the
Master Plan, could be processed at a later time through a Planned Unit Development
Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject
neighborhood. The proposed two-story homes consist of three floor plans ranging in size from
3,200 to 3,800 square feet. Each floor plan has three elevation styles and the project has a total
of twelve color schemes. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
PUD 02- 1 1 (B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
! Sq. Ft.
1 1,779
2 1629
2x 1739
3 1868
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has recorded for The Greens, grading
and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing.
- Sq. Ft. Sqr Ft. Space Sq. Ft.
1,388 3,167 733 3,900 Spanish Colonial,
Craftsman Bungalow
Monterey Ranch
1,590 3,219 719 3,938 Spanish Colonial,
European Country
Monterey Ranch
1.602 3,341 44 1 3,782 Monterey Ranch
1,911 3,779 703 4,482 Spanish Colonial
European Country
Craftsman Bungalow
Proi ect Description
The project site, Neighborhood 1.09 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, is
generally located south of the future Poinsettia Lane and east of the future Alicante Road. The
subject neighborhood contains 75 single-family residential lots that are a minimum of 6,000
square feet in size. Architecture and plotting were not part of the previous approval. The Master
Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned Unit
Development Amendment. The applicant has now applied for the review and approval of
building floor plans, elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, three different floor
plans are proposed ranging in size from 3,200 square feet to 3,800 square feet. Each plan is two
stories with three garage spaces. Each floor plan is proposed with three different elevation styles
to create a variety of facades in the neighborhood. The following table provides a summary of
square footage and elevation styles:
Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans I Plan No. I 1st Floor I 2nd Floor 1 Living Area 1 Garage I Total Bldg. I Elevations Styles
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Planned Unit Development
Amendment is required for the development of homes on lots with less than a minimum area of
7,500 square feet.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the standards contained in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project’s
compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(B))
The project is within The Greens area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan
maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides
PUD 02-1 1 (B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
Page 3
detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by
which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhood was divided into 75 residential lots through CT 02-22 and compliance
with the Master Plan standards related to the subdivision was analyzed at that time. The current
application is for the approval of building floor plans, elevations and plotting of the units.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the
Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines, contained in the Master Plan.
TAB:
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Front Yard Setback
(4.6.2.8.2.a)
Rear Yard Setback
(4.6.2.8.2.e)
Side Yards
(4.6.2.8.2.c)
Street Side Setback
(4.6.2.8.2.d)
Slope Edge Building
Setback
(4.3.4)
E 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE
Standard
15’ minimum, 20’ neighborhood average
(See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages)
A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard
setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5’ minimum setback from property line.
Varies according to Neighborhood’s minimum lot size
Min. 6,000 SF lot: 15’ minimum setback
Min. 7,500 SF lot: 20’ minimum setback
Min. 10,000 SF lot: 20’ minimum setback
Minimum rear yard area is 15’ by 15’
Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less
than 60’ wide
Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60’
and wider
Minimum of 5’ per side
Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20’ in aggregate
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5’
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side
elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side
yard setback averages a minimum of 7’.
10’ minimum
~~ ~ All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops
and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than
15’ in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude
into a .7’ horizontal to 1’ vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is
measured from the edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building
setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements.
Comments
Neighborhood Average Front Yard
Setback = 22.59’
Please refer to the attached ‘Front Yard
Setbacks table for compliance with 15’
minimum. All lots comply.
All lots comply with Minimum 6,000 SF
lot: 15’ minimum rear yard setback.
All lots provide the required 15’ x 15’
usable rear yard area.
Please refer to the attached ‘Individual
Lot Data’ table for rear yard setbacks. All lots comply.
All street side setbacks of 10’
minimum have been met.
All proposed units will meet the required
slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please
refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details.
PUD 02-1 1(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED I LotWidth
(4.6.2.8.1 )
(4.6.3.B.2)
Building Height (4.6.3.8.1)
Front Building Planes (4.6.3.8.4.e &
4.6.3.8.4.f)
Rear Building Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
I
(4.6.3.8.6)
Lot widths vary from 50’ to 70’
6,000 SF lots: 50’
7,500 SF lots: 60’
10,000 SF lots: 70’
~~~ ~ 1-story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
Garages and the perimeter area of a basement.
Excludes:
Exterior structures such as covered porches
Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings
such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8’ from
the building Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22’ and a width of
8’ Roof eaves extending less than 30 from the face of any
building
Awnings
Open parking areas
Structures under 30 in height
Masonry walls not greater than 6 in height (wing-walls,
planter walls, grade separation retaining walls).
Maximum of 30’ and 2 stories.
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes
with a minimum of 10’ between front and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’.
33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is
substituted.
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes
with a minimum of 3’ between face of the forward-most plane and
rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’.
Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of
design elements to create character and interest to the home.
These elements vary depending on the architectural style used.
All lots are at a minimum of 50’
Lot coverage:
Plan 1 = 2,512 SF
Plan 2 = 2,348 SF
Plan 2X = 2,180 SF
Plan 3 = 2.571 SF
All plans are two-story structures and
do not exceed the maximum 40% of net
pad area as required.
Please refer to attached ’Individual Lot
Data’ table for rear yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Plan 1 = 24’””. 23-4”, 22’-I0
Plan 2 = 26’””. 29’-3, 27’-I0
Plan 2X = 26-2
Plan 3 = 25’-8”, 23’-10”
The details are shown on the
architectural plan and building plane
exhibits. All units comply.
Plan 1 = 4 Planes (Craftsman &
Spanish); 3 Planes (Monterey)
Plan 2 = 4 Planes (Spanish &
Monterey); 5 Planes (European)
Plan 2X = 4 Planes (Monterey)
Plan 3 = 4 Planes but does not meet
min. 10‘ separation
Plan 1 (CR & SC elev.) are plotted on
15 lots
Plan 2 (All elev.) are plotted on 26 lots
Plan 2X‘(Monterey) is plotted on 2 lots
Total of 43 units meet this requirement
or 57.3%
The details are shown on the
architectural plan and building plane
exhibits. All units comply.
Plan 1 = 4 Planes Plan 2 = 4 Planes
Plan 2X = 4 Planes
Plan 3 = 3 Planes
Plan types 1, 2, & 2X are plotted on a
total of 50 lots or 66.7%
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation
Design Elements” table.
PUD 02-1 1 (B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Side & Rear Elevations
(4.6.3.8.7)
Elevations Fronting
Circulation Element
Roads (4.6.3.A.1 .a)
Floor Plans
(4.6.3.8.5.c &
4.6.3.8.5.d)
Single-Story Units
(5.7.3.6.0, 5.7.3.12.0&
4.6.3.8.4.1)
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.8.4.n & 4.6.3.8.5.b)
Where (3) Two Story
Units occur in a row with
less than 15 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.8.4.b)
Where (3) Two Story
Units occur in a row with
15 ft to 20 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.8.4.c)
Single-Story Elements
(4.6.3.8.4.d)
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing
incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations
adjacent to publidprivate roads.
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to
receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the
roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than
that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall
planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged.
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan.
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a
circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be
single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15, (10’
preferred).
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square
footage, including all garage area.
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10’
deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’.
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5’
deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’.
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story
element, with a minimum depth of 3’, that is 40% or greater than
the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements
qualify.
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation
Design Elements” table.
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation
Design Elements” table.
The proposed project includes three
floor plans with three distinctive
elevation types for each plan. Please
refer to the enclosed architectural
plans.
Not Applicable. Neighborhood has not
been designated with a ridgeline or
hilltop that is visible form a circulation
element roadway by the Master Plan.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the single
story features provided. All proposed
plans comply.
Plan 1: 55.1%
Plan 2: 66.9%
Plan 2X: 72.3%
Plan 3: 71.5%
All plan types incorporate a single story
building edge that is at least 10’ wide
and runs the length of the building.
All plan types incorporate a single story
building edge that is at least 10 wide and runs the length of the building.
Plan types 1, 2 and 2X incorporates a
single story building element that is
greater than 40% of the width and a
minimum of 3’ deep. These plan types are plotted on a total of 50 lots or 66.7%
PUD 02-1 1(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
Page 6 ’
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Entries, Front Porches,
Courtyards, & Balconies
(4.6.3.8.9, 4.6.2.B.2.f &
4.6.2.8.3)
Octagonal or Round
Entry Tower (4.6.2.8.3.a)
Projections (4.6.2.8.3)
Recreation Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Resident Parking
(4.6.2.8.4.a)
25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5’ deep, across
33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony,
whichever is consistent with the architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10’.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5’.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided
over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this
purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required
and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane
for the purposes of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap
around the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may
encroach up to 5’ and 8’ respectively into the required front yard
setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude
up to 2’ into the required setbacks.
May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2’.
The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8’ and shall
be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may
encroach a maximum of an additional 12” into the required
setback.
A minimum 5’ setback must be maintained.
Fireplace structures not wider than 8’, cornices, eaves, belt
courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features
projecting from the building may intrude up to 2’ into the required
setbacks.
Common recreation areas:
Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking
“Pocket Parks” - Not required to provide parking
Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are
required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units.
More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it
is required to serve requires parking for those additional
units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20’ by 20’.
Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12 in
width by 20’ in length may be provided as an alternative.
2.7% of the elevations incorporate a
front courtyard (All elevation types for
the Plan 2X)
9.3% of the elevations incorporate a
front porch (Craftsman Bungalow style
of the Plan 1).
42.7% of the elevations incorporate a
balcony (Monterey Ranch style of the
Plans 1 & 2: Spanish and Craftsman
Bungalow styles of the Plan 3)
Please refer to the enclosed
architecture and site plan for
compliance.
Yone are proposed within the side yard setback.
Vo projections extend into the side yard
jetback more than 2’ nor are any
xojections greater than 8 in length. All
3lan.s comply.
Vot applicable to this Neighborhood.
411 plan types include at a minimum of
me 2-car garage with an interior neasurement of 20’ x 20’.
PUD 02-1 1 (B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
(4.6.2.8.2.b, 4.6.3.8.4.h,
& 4.6.3.8.13)
Colors (4.6.3.8.12)
(4.6.3.8.3)
20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors
face the street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property
line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of
the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot
area greater than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater,
an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages
facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50%
of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a
neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street
shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes
separated by at least 18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used within each
neighborhood to improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.8.1 3.9 for examples of garage configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a
maximum on 18 for garages. However, the projection shall not
extend to the second story living space.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages)
Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated
into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and
interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to
parallel the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12
Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected.
Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations
are acceptable depending upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color
schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same
architectural styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme.
However, similar or same colors may occur within different color
schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject
unit as well as those directly across the street.
Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development
standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
All setbacks for garages that face the
street are greater than 20'. All side-
loaded garages have a setback of at
least 15' and they appear as livable
Dortions of the homes.
911 3-car garages are a combination of
side and front loaded configurations.
4 variety of roof forms and massing are
iroposed with changes in direction and
iitches. See elevations and roof plans
'or compliance.
rypical roof pitches:
Jlan 1: 4:12, 6:12
Jlan 2: 4:12, 6:12 Jlan 2X: 4:12 Jlan 3: 4:12, 6:12
Iach plan type plotted on the site plan
ncludes a color scheme designation to
;how compliance. Please refer to the mclosed color and materials boards for
letails on each color scheme and to the
site plan for specific plotting.
411 plan types comply.
PUD 02-1 1(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Architectural Styles
Permitted
[4.6.3.C & 5.6)
Design Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.i & 4.6.3.B.5.e)
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
Window Detailing
(4.6.3.B.10)
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following
Architectural Styles:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Craftsmen Bungalow
0 Spanish Colonial
0 Monterey Ranch
0 ltalianmuscan
0 European Country
California Coastal
California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 1.10 & 1.12 only)
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit
shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window
frames shall by used (no mill finishes).
“Handcrafted” detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and
columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style.
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the
structure
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF.
The design of the windows shall include one or more of the
following features:
Deeply recessed windows
Paned windows
0 Decorative window ledges
0 Accent and varied shape
windows 0
Window boxes and 0
planters with 0
architecturally evident
supports 0
Exterior wood trim
surrounds
Accent colors on shutters
or other elements
Arched elements
Shutters,
Raised stucco trim around
windows
Window lintels
The elevation types included are as
follows:
Spanish Colonial
Craftsman Bungalow
Monterey Ranch
European Country
The windows and doors on the front
elevations are recessed a minimum of
2” or are trimmed with either wood or
raised stucco. Please refer to the
enclosed elevations on the architectural
plans for compliance. All plans comply.
Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for
compliance. Plan 3 of the proposed
project does include one standard
chimney in the Family Room and two
optional fireplaces in the Living Room
and Courtyard. Both of the optional fireplaces with chimneys will not be
allowed to occur within the same unit.
All chimneys and their caps comply with
proper scale and proportion.
Please refer to the enclosed elevations
on the architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation shall incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and side and rear elevations shall incorporate a minimum of 2 such
elements to create character and interest to the homes. The “Building Elevation Design
Elements” table (Attachment 7) shows which elements are used for each elevation and floor
plans.
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project’s
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 02-22.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially
significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously
PUD 02-1 1(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
June 16,2004
Pa.ge 9
examined and evaluated in the Final Prosram Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning
Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development
and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive
of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.09 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are
required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this
project are available at the Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5658
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Statement
Local Facilities Impact Assessment
Table “Individual Lot Compliance”
Table “Building Elevation Design Elements”
Reduced Exhibits
Full Size Exhibits “A” - “G” and “Al” - “A31” dated June 16,2004
CW:bd
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: PUD 02- 1 1 (B)
CASE NAME: Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09 Architecture
APPLICANT: Western Pacific Housing
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEOA; and to recommend approval of a
Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 75 single-family detached homes within Neighborhood 1.09 of the Greens
Village generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante Road in
Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09, being a subdivision of lot 9
of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County February 12,2003.
APN: 213-1 11-04 Acres: 25.3 Proposed No. of LotsAJnits: 75 single-family homes
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLM
Density Allowed: 0-4 Density Proposed: 2.70
Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: N/A
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
. Zoning
Site PC
General Plan
RLM
Current Land Use
VacantIGraded
North PC RLM
South PC RLM
Vacant/ Graded
VacantIGraded
East PC RLM Residential
West PC os Open Space & Golf Course
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Carlsbad
Sewer District: Leucadia County
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 75
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
0 Negative Declaration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23,2001 (EIR 98-07)
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
pplicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or uartnershiu, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned comoration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part Western Pacific Housins4D.R. Horton
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
Title Title
Address Address 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 210
Carlsbad. CA 92009
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or uartnershiu, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned comoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management
Comuanv
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180
Carlsbad. CA 92008
1635 Faraday Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
a3
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANy person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (1 2) months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):.
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
;3 )~J,&.<,./ , J.l;/
Signature of applihantj'date 0
Anthony Wyman
Vice President of Western Pacific Housinv
Print or type name of applicant
Agent for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle
President of Morrow Development
Print .or type name of owner
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY
The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:
1. He is a duly elected, qualified and acting Assistant Secretary of Western Pacific
Housing, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company“), is familiar with the facts herein certified
and is duly authorized to certify the same.
2. The following is a true, correct and complete copy ofresolutions related to the subject
matter as adopted by the Consent of Sole Director of the Company dated August 1, 2003 (the
“Resolutions”). The Resolutions have not been amended, rescinded or modified and remain in full
force and effect as of the date hereof.
Election of Vice President of Planninp and Acquisition San Diepo Division
RESOLVED, that effective May 19, 2003, Anthony Wyman is hereby
elected to the office of Vice President of Planning and Acquisition (the “Vice
President”) in the San Diego Division (the “Division”) to serve until the next annual
meeting of the directors of the Company and until his successor is duly elected and
qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Vice President is hereby authorized on
behalf of (i) the Company, (ii) any partnership of which the Company is a general
partner, manager or agent, and (iii) any limited liability company of which the
Company is a member, manager or agent (collectively, the “Entities”) to sign, modifL
and terminate, from time to time as he deems it to be in the best interest of the
Entities, various agreements and documents for the Division including, but not
limited to, maps, conditions, subcontract agreements, general contract agreements,
bonds, affordable housing agreements, consultant agreements, building permits,
improvementldeveiopment agreements, utility agreements and other similar or
equivalent agreements or documents for the Division relating to the business of the
Enti ties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand on the 3rd day of
September, 2003.
Assistant Secretary
i
UAJTEWALnMinl WPHInc103Sep03-COS.wpd .
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09 Architecture - PUD 02-1 1(B)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 10 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Western Pacific Housing
ADDRESS: 5790 Fleet Street Suite 210, Carlsbad CA 92009
PHONE NO.: (760) 931-4766 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 213-1 11-04
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 25.3 acres/75 du
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
The following facilities impact analysis was conducted for the subdivision of the property by CT
02-22.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 260.75 scl.ft.
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 139.07 s~.ft.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity 75 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.52 acres
Drainage: Demand in CFS = NIA
Identify Drainage Basin = “D”
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 750
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 and 5
Open Space: Acreage Provided = per HCP
Schools: San Marcos Unified Elementary: 18
Middle: 5
High: 5
Demands in EDU N/A (Leucadia)
Identify Sub Basin = NIA
Demand in GPD = 16,500
J. Sewer:
K. Water:
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neiahborhood 1.09
R:\0327\Plot\Planning\Submittals\Net 1.09 B Map Site Plan\O3 Mar-17-04 (1st to City)\N. 1.09- Sect.B Tables VlaAs
ExD-IndivLotData
3/17/2004 752 AM
Neighbomood 1.09
Section E
Table 4
Page50f6 227
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neiuhborhood 1.09
Coveraae
I/ "Bulding Coverage = net pad area of a site occwted by the habitabk area of any building or Strumre as measured from the omde of its surrovd~ng enemat walls or s~pporttng members lrrludes garages
and the penmeter area of a basemen Excludes exlenor stwlures szh as coverea porches. permanent stwtual elements protnrdlng from buldings sUth as overbnglng balcomes that prolect less thdn 8 It from
the building. and pone cocheres ml exceeding a kngth of 22 feet and a mdlh of 8 feet Also excluded are roof eaves exterdlng less than 30 inches from the lace of any buldtng. awtngs open pa*mng areas
strwtures under 30 lnhes In helght and masorry walls mt greater than 6 feet In height smh as Wng-walIS. Planer wails or grade-separatlon retaining walk.
R:\032APlot\Plannmg\Subm1itals\Ne1 1.09 B Map Site Plan\O3 Mar-17-04 (1st to City)\N 1.09- Sect.6 Tables Via&
ExD-IndivLotData
3/17/2004 752 AM
Neighborhood 1.09
Section B
Table 4
Page 6 of 6 4 8
\\\
\\\
\
II
a9
h 9.
.
'.
I\
'\
I
I'
il .I
I
I 1 i
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NV7d
SaLON
I
I
I
I
? I
# 3
I
I
I
I
2 maae
33
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 1 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa ~ Greens . Carlsbad, CA
BASIPNIAN I ACONI AICIIITECTJ ~ ._
SCALE,,, =I ci 2 19 04
1
t a
"B"
CRAFTSMAN
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 1 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
~- La Costa Greens .Carlsbad, CA
~ .___ BAILLNIAN LALONI ARCHITECTS
39 SLALL I/~.=I.u 2 19 04
I
i 1 t 1
'I c
MONTEREY
PLAN 1 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA ~________ BhSSEHlhN LAGON1 &RCI1IltTTI ~ ~~
SCALLII, 1 o. I 19 01
-7 -
1.
MONTEREY
SPANISH
PLAN 1 ADDENDA
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
_. La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
BASIINIAN LACONI ARCHfiLCrS-p---- -~ -
SCALLI/8'-I-Q '2 10 04
r.......+.. 7
......................
'C " 5 MONTEREY
...............
................
I
......... te-lg.~~ ................ -
..................... I
'A'
S I' AN 1 S H
CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW
ROOF PITCH
.) I2
ROOF PITCH
6 12
ROOF PI1 CH
4 I2
PLAN 1 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
~AIILNIAN LACONI ricnirec5- _. - ~~
SCALE l/.3 =I D 2 10 04
SINGLE STORY
SINGLE STOKY PORCH
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
PLAN 1 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
BASSLNIAN IACONI ARCHITICTI - .. .
%TAIL 111 -I LT 1 19 04 43
I
!
I I
I
:
I
I
~
I
I 1
PLAN REFLECTS SPANISH ELEVATION
3,219 SQ. FT. (IND FLR 67%)
PLAN 2
2
b n
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
1YPt-V.NON-RATELl
- DASSLHIAN I &CONI amzwmrn
5< A, I 114‘ , .? 2 IO 04
_.__ -. __ __
1
I
I
i
I
I I
I
I
I
i
UBC
OccWANci
C1ASSIRCAllON
GARAGESPACES U-1
LIVINGAREAS R-3
PmOF
COPSTRUCIION
PIPE- V. NON-HATED
I
i
I
I
z '#
t t
la
n
I
I
I
I
PLAN 2 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
45'
b
f--
, . % 1
"A"
SPANISH
L4 P-4 ! I 1 t R FA K
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 2 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens .Carlsbad, CA
~ - ~-~~ ~ASSFNIAH LACDNI *IcHirEcr%
5CALtli4 1-0 1 19 04
I 1 t "n.
EUROPEAN COTTAGE
I EFT
SC*Lt 3il6.I ,I'
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 2 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa ~- Greens . ___ Carlsbad, CA
0ASSLNIAN LAGON1 AICI~ITTICTS ._ .. . . . .
ICAIE ~,+'=I.w '2 19 04 47
I' c
MONTEREY
ELEVATIONS PLAN 2 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
- La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, ~~ CA
BASSLNLAN LACONI ARLIIITLLTS I< ALE l/<.*LU 2 19 04
EUROPOEAN COTTAGE
MONTEREY
PLAN 2 ADDENDA
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
--____ La Costa ~- Greens -~ .Carlsbad, CA
0ASSENIAN LACOHI AXCHIWCTS
SCALP n/a.=r.u I. 10.04 49
I - 1~- .......... ~!
....................
9 12 - ....................,
'A'
SPANISH
7-:
; .....
Ab -
......................
.- ... I
ROOF PlTCH
6.12
"B' EUROPEAN COTTAGE
ROOF PITCH
3 LIZ 12
PLAN 2'
La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
- BASSENIAN LACONI AUClllrLCrS _- ~~
sc*Ltt/a r (I 2 10 04
50
I
SHAl)hl> AlltA IS
SECONL) STORY
MIN LO7 AREA 5.7OU S.F
E
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
PLAN 2 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA -~ ._._ __ nI\(srNi*N IACDNI *?.ciriicrn
\,*It,,. -I c I IO 04
___ -
, I i
1 i
I
i
I
I
I
1
I
k
i I
_______---_-
I I
-.
\
PLAN REFLECTS MONTEREY ELEVATION
3,341 SQ FT (2ND FLR 72%)
PLAN 2X
La ~ Costa Greens .Carlsbad, CA WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
-.__ - ~ BASSENIAN LACONI ARCHITLCTI
SCALE 1/1 -1 LT 2 10 04
I
__ eo' 0' TYP DEPTH __ __ j
I
i
I i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-- __
PLAN 2X WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
- _. ._ La Costa Greens .Carlsbad, CA
CiASStNIAN LAGON, ARCRIT!2CTI
SLALtl/l =I U '2 10 04
__
7 1
B I'
MONTEREY
RIGHT
5'AI.L. ,110-1 '1-
~ 111 I
SLALL. III6.I u
ELEVATIONS
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING PLAN 2X
La Costa Greens - . Carlsbad, CA
BASILNIAN LACONI ARCIIITLCTI
SCAN L 111 -3 0. ? 19 04
-.
ROOF PITCH
4 12
'R" M 0 N T 1-I R E Y
PLAN 2X
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
- __ La Costa Greens .Carlsbad, __ CA
BAS5LNIr.N LACOM, ARCIII,IC,I
SCALLI,~' I-(r 1 IO 04
__ hn 1). NP DCPTll I---
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
PLAN 2X WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA ___ ~ __~ ~ __ bA51LNIAN LACDNl AICIIITLCTI - __
ICALLI/~ -I (I 2 10 04
47.6- . 7’4’ 7
I
I I
I I OPTIONAL I I 1 I
UBC oc(xIpANcI uAsswcAnm -
GARAGESPACES U-1
l”CAF&%S K-3
Type OF CONSlRUCnON
NE- V.NON-RAE0
-
NoraS
PLAN REFLECTS EUROPEAN COTTAGE ELEVATION
3,779 SQ. FT. (PND FLR 71 Sa)
PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
BASSLNIAN LACUNI ARCIIITECTI
SCAIP I/4’-l.C 9 10 04
57
60 o' DEPTH __ _- -_ i I i
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I 1
~
j
I
I
I
UBC NQISS
2. DMENSlONUNBSIiaOM LoT~TDeLooRRANS ARENOTTYPICALTHBYARE PORIWSIRATNBPURPOSHS 0NL.Y.
UVLNGAKtAS H-3
TYPEOF
CO~uCnoN
TYPE- V. NON-RATED PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA - ____ nA%%ilAN I ACONI ARClllTErlS
SCAIF!/~.-~ 5 1 10 04
58
"A"
EUROPEAN COTTAGE
ELEVATIONS PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
~- La Costa Greens .Carlsbad, CA
BASSENIAN LACONI ARCIIITECTS sc*trv, -r cr 1 19 04 59
i 1
I' B
SPANISH
n R
I 1 I- I --
0 -mu I PPl-
SCALE 1110-I 0'
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad. CA
I I
(' c *'
CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW
t RI'AK
ELEVATIONS
PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, - CA ____ I5ASSrNIAN LACONI ARCHITLCTS srAiei/+ I u 1 19 04
I
CRAFTSMAN
SPANISH
PLAN 3 ADDENDA
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
__ La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
8*SSCNI*N I*G"NI *ICHI,L',S
5CAI.E I/& -3 0. 2 IO 04
- ~- -
................. 'r!w:-I I I
I I
4
'B' S PA N 1 S H
EUROPEAN COTTAGE
HOOF PITCH
4 : 17
ROOF PITCH
4 : 12
....... ::.- ........... *A -1
'C" CKAFTSMAN RUNGALOW
PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
~ - - - __ - _._____ __._____ _- ~ 8ASSLNIAN LAGON1 AICHITLLTS
SCALLI/Q=V D 2 IO 04
~ i I
I I
I i ,
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SHADE17 AREA IS
MIN 1.0'1 AlltA 5.70<1 St- ~___ -
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
PLAN 3 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING La Costa ~ __ Greens .Carlsbacl, CA _..
bA5StNIAN LACONI ARCHITECTS - ~~
SCALLW, .,-w I IO n4
,OpTIONIu, BED. 2
PLAN 3
OPnONS
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
- La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA
~ - -____ ~- ~~ BASSENIAN LAGON1 ARCHITECTS
IC AI? 814 -I II 2 10 04
i.. .. -... . ..A
PI. AN 1
i ‘1
i I
PLAN 2
PLAN ZX PLAN 3
I/B ‘=I -0’
STORAGE
La Costa Greens . Carlsbad, CA WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
BASSENIAN LAGON1 ARCllllECTI
SLALL 11b’-! (I ‘2 IO 04
Planning Commission Minutes June 16,2004 DRAFT EXPA:LT25
1. CUP 99-30(A) - CANNON COURT - Request for an amendment to CUP 99-30 to allow
alcohol sales at the Westmart gas stationhini-mart within the Cannon Court project located on the northwest corner of Cannon Road and Interstate 5 at 4990 Avenida
Encinas, in the C-T-Q zone, the CommercialNisitor Serving Overlay Zone, and Local Facilities Management Zone 3.
2. CT 02-26/CUP 02-30/CDP 02-52 - SEASHORE ON THE SAND - Request for a
Tentative Tract Map, Conditional Use Permit and a Coastal Development Permit to allow the conversion of an existing 12 unit hotel into 9 timeshare units on property generally
located at 2805 Ocean Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
4. CUP 94-03x2 - HOLY CROSS EPISCOPAL CHURCH - Request for a five year extension of CUP 94-03x1 to allow the continued operation of a church located in the
Palomar Airport Business Park at 6066 Corte Del Cedro in Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
5. CDP 03-43 - DONAHUE RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development
Permit to allow the construction of a new single-family residence within the City's Coastal
Zone located along the east side of Surfside Lane south of Island Way within the La
Costa Downs subdivision (Specific Plan 201) within Local Facilities Management Zone 22.
6. CUP 04-10 - PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK - Request for a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the operation of a private school, Vitality College of Healing Arts, in a 1,417 square foot suite in an existing 54,160 square foot building, located at 6353 El
Camino Real within Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
7. PUD 02-11(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the
previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of
approval for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 75 single-family detached homes within the Villages
of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09 generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante Road in Local Facilities Management Zone IO.
Mr. Neu stated that agenda Items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are normally heard in a public hearing context,
however, these projects are minor and routine in nature with no outstanding issues and Staff
recommends approval. He recommended that the public hearing be opened and closed, and that the
Commission proceed with a vote as consent Items including the errata sheets, if any. If the Commission
or someone from the public wishes to pull an Item, Staff would be available to respond to questions.
Chairperson White asked if there was any who wished to pull items 1,2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 or if anyone wished
to speak on those Items.
Commissioner Montgomery asked that the errata sheets for Items 1 and 2 be read. Mr. Neu explained
the errata sheets for those items. Commissioner Segall asked why CUP 99-30(A) (Item 1) needed to be approved by Council. Mr. Neu explained that a special condition had been placed on the project by City Council during the project's first approval. He also stated the applicant has submitted a letter requesting
the item be withdrawn. Mr. Neu further explained that once the Planning Commission approves the denial of the project, the item would then be withdrawn.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Heineman, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission approve Items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 with errata sheets.
White, Baker, Montgomery, Heineman, and Segall VOTE: 5-0 AYES:
NOES: None
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 2004, to consider a request for a determination that the project is
within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the
Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval for a
Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 75 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.09 generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante
Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09, being a subdivision of lot 9
of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, February 12, 2003
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after July 16, 2004. If you have any
questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614.
If you challenge the Planned Unit Development Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD 02-1 1 (B)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
PUBLISH: July 9, 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD I .9 ARCHITECTURE
PUD 02-1 1(B)
c z 0
LL a
-- -1 e5
,--
,-
El 2
z P s 2 4 W c z 0
LL
u pe
L L a - -Ic',
,
' Isabelle i+fulsen - Public Hearing Notice - Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood Page I 1 ____ - ,,.,.
From: Isabelle Paulsen
To: legals@nctimes.com Date: 7/2/04 4:OOPM
Subject: Public Hearing Notice - Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood
Jane:
Please publish the attached public hearing notice for the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhod in the
Friday, July 9, 2004 newspaper.
I've also attached the map that must go with this ad
This will be a simple legal ad with City seal and border
Thank you.
Isabelle Paulsen, CMC Deputy Clerk
City of Carlsbad City Cler WRecords Management ipaul@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
cc: Christer Westman; Val Dinsmore
1 Isabelle PaUlsen - 7-20-04 Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood.doc Page I 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 2004, to consider a request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 75 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09 generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante
Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09, being a subdivision of lot 9 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, February 12, 2003
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after July 16, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614.
If you challenge the Planned Unit Development Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD 02-1 1 (B)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
PUBLISH: July 9, 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
\
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.9 ARCHITECTURE
PUD 02-1 1(B)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk’s Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of Proof of Publication of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This 9 Day of July, 2004
c
Signature
. -.~
If cu challenge the Planned Unn Development Amendment in court ou may be Ildtql bed to mishy in this md# n ce thq M in issues wnlten you corres or mn~lsgr~e&~~~
&%m: ,cii Clerk 1200 Carlsbad vulago Mhre arl~bad A 92008. at or prior to the publlc hearing.’
CASE FILE PUD 02-1 I@)
OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 4- 1.09
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
c
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENClNlTAS CA 92024
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST
101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DlST
701 ENClNlTAS BLVD TIM JOCHEN 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENClNlTAS CA 92024 1960 LA COSTA AVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST OLIVENHAIN WATER DlST
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
VALLEC ITOS WATER D I ST
201 VALLECITOS DE OR0
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE STE 100 STE B
SAN DIEGO CA 92123 9174 SKY PARK CT 5201 RUFFlN RD
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SD COUNTY PLANNING
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST SANDAG
91 50 CHESAPEAKE DR STE 800
SAN DIEGO CA 92123 401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
ATTN TED ANASIS
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
U.S. FISH &WILDLIFE CA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009 7575 METROPOLITAN DR
STE 103
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD
COMMUNITY SERVICES PUBLIC WORKSlENGlNEERlNG
JEREMY RIDDLE
MU N IC I PAL WATER DI STRl CT
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
CHRISTER W ESTMAN
06/25/2004
- . . -''r I
~EAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GARABET KAPRIELIAN
6547 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CURTIS & MARIE BARNES
6543 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACQUELYN S JOHNSON
6539 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM DEMMERS JR
6535 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NO JENNINGS
6531 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN E HlGGlNS
651 1 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EBRIGHT TR
6507 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NATHAN S HANLON
6506 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ABSHER TR
651 0 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TIMOTHY & SUSAN LEACH
651 8 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY FREEMAN
6514 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MATTY & LYNN SANDOVAL
6522 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK E SEIBERT
6534 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID W SOUTER
6542 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORMAN & CAROL HEWITT
2526 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANNY D & EMMA KRYGSMAN
2532 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES J REDMON
2538 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET E SHEPARD
2544 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM W HARRIS
2550 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REINMILLER TR
651 1 ONDA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL A MILLS
6523 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL L WALMAN
6503 ONDA PL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEANNE KNIGHT TR
6527 AVENIDA DEL PARAISO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LIBERATO D & 0 TORTORICI
6436 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
YAACOVA LAUGLIN
91 1 WIND DRIFT DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN B & DEBRA CZAJKOWSKI
2977 W BRIARWOOD DR
FRANKLIN WI 53132
ERIC B & MARY H LINDGREN
6440 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TORTORICI TR
6436 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EVERGREEN HEBRON L P
PO BOX 1454
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
f
JOSEPH COLEMAN JR
6439 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MERONOFF TR
755 VAN NUYS ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
RICHARD TRACEY
6433 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH E & SUSAN M HUME
3570 EMMA LN
VISTA CA 92084
STEVE & ANNE WALSH TR
6437 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HARRY A & CYNTHIA CESENA
6439 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM R & LESLIE WlTT
2521 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT H & SASKIA LEARY
2523 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS J & PHYLLIS BYRNE
2525 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN F & MARIE T DURKIN
6430 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
AARON COMERCHERO
6432 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RALAND E & KELLY CAMARA
6434 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MASOUD & BONNIE ATAIE
6436 CAYENNE LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALEJANDRO V TOVAR
2526 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GERALDINE B BROWN TR
6437 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DERDERIANTR
6435 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STRACHAN TR
6433 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FREDERICK W & CAROL PRICE
2528 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DOROTHY E HENDERSON
1519 ELON LN
ENCINITAS CA 92024
WILLIAM & KATHLEEN BLAIR
2534 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROY H LA FORGE JR
2536 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
I CHUNG CHENG
2538 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS C & KATHR SCHEETZ
2604 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARY R & BETTY LEE
2606 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROBERT R & MARIA FEASEL
6505 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HOPE M MITCHEM
6503 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS M & TERESA CESEAR
6501 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
E PAUL & MARTHA GOYETTE
6504 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DENNIS A & MARIA PEARSON
6502 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ED & GLORIA L TSU
6506 LA PALOMA ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
r
KAREN D MORRIS
9030 W SAHARA AVE
LAS VEGAS NV 891 17
FRENCH TR
2601 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BLAIR LIGGATT
2605 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GLENN C DODDS
6437 LA GARZA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
STE 210
5790 FLEET ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORROW DEVELOPMENT
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRAHAM & SUZANNE THORLEY
3612 COTTONWOOD SPRINGS
THE COLONY TX 75056
RICHARD A & JEA FOELLMER
2603 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY A & DONNA YEE
2607 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES SOLOWIEJ
6435 LA GARZA CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PULTE HOMES
STE 101
5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
Add!.ess Labels
CNLM
STE H
425 E ALVARADO ST
FALLBROOK CA 92028
DALEE&VALDBAKKENTR
2541 EL GAVILAN CT
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN & BRENDA ADAMS
2608 COLlBRl LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PONDEROSA COUNTRY HOA
STE 120
23382 MILL CREEK RD
LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653
WARMINGTON HOMES CA
STE 300
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC
STE A
5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LESE!- - C,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO
p.m. on Tuesday, [DATE], to consider a request for a determination that the project is within the
scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of
75 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09
generally located south of future Poinsettia Lane and east of future Alicante Road in Local
Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.09, being a subdivision of lot 9
of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to
map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, February 12, 2003
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after [DATE]. If you have any
questions, please call Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614.
If you challenge the Planned Unit Development Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public
hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD 02-1 1 (B)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.09
ARCHITECTURE
PUBLISH: [DATE]
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD I .9 ARCHITECTURE
PUD 02-1 1(B)
Villages of La Costa GreensVillages of La Costa GreensNeighborhood 1.09 Neighborhood 1.09 ArchitectureArchitecturePUD 02PUD 02--11(B)11(B)
Location MapLocation MapE L FU E R T E STE L C A M IN O R E A LPOINSETTIALN)DOVE LNAVIARA PKWYALGA RDSITECAMINOVIDAROBLELA GOLONDRINA STUNICORNIO ST(FUTUREALICANTE RD)(FUTURE
La Costa Greens 1.09La Costa Greens 1.09••Number of lotsNumber of lots––75 single family lots75 single family lots••Lot sizes:Lot sizes:––6,000 to 17,000 sq.ft.6,000 to 17,000 sq.ft.––2/3 greater than 7,500 sq.ft.2/3 greater than 7,500 sq.ft.
La Costa Greens 1.09La Costa Greens 1.09••Four floorplansFour floorplans––3,167 sq.ft to 3,779 sq.ft.3,167 sq.ft to 3,779 sq.ft.––TwoTwo--storystory––4 bedroom/4.5 bathroom4 bedroom/4.5 bathroom––Two car garage with third car optionTwo car garage with third car option
La Costa Greens 1.09La Costa Greens 1.09••Four Architectural StylesFour Architectural Styles––Spanish ColonialSpanish Colonial––Craftsman BungalowCraftsman Bungalow––Monterey RanchMonterey Ranch––European CountryEuropean Country