HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-09-21; City Council; 17798; VLC Greens Neighborhood 1.10n
Project Applications
PUD 02-1 O(A)
Q w 6
2
a 0
.. z 0 F 0 a
J si z 3 0 0
Administrative Reviewed by and To be reviewed -
Approva Is Final at Planning Final at Council
Commission
X
VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
PUD 02-1 O(A)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-302 , APPROVING Planned Unit
Development Amendment PUD 02-10(A) for the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 as
recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On August 18, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential project.
Since the Planned Unit Development Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action.
The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 and consists of
approval of architecture and plotting for 64 single-family dwelling units. The lots for this
neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 02-20 and Planned Development Permit PUD
02-10, approved by the City Council on December 2, 2003. This neighborhood consists of lots with a
minimum area of 9,000 square feet. However, because the project was proposed as a gated
community with private streets, a Planned Development Permit was required.
The Planning Commission had no issues with the proposal and voted 6-0 (1 vacancy), without
discussion, to recommend approval of the project to the City Council.
The Planning Commission’s action is included in the attached minutes. A complete description and
staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared initial studies for the project and concluded that no potentially significant
impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential
environmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan”
and associated actions inclusive of the proposed planning area reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Planning Area project have been completed,
incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR
38-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent
irojects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR.
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,798
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are
a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07
and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the respective initial studies for each
application are available at the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-302
2. Location Map
3.
4.
5.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5684
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 18, 2004
Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 18,2004.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Barbara Kennedy, (760) 602-4626, bkenn@ci.carisbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-302
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR
LOCATED NORTH OF ALGA ROAD AND WEST OF ALICANTE
ROAD WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
10.
CASE NAME: VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.1 0
CASE NO.: PUD 02-1O(A)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 02-10 TO APPROVE
64 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on August 18, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 21st day of
September , 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit
Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests,
comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 02-1O(A); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02-1 O(A) is approved by the City Council and that
the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 5684, on-file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the
findings and conditions of the City Council.
....
....
....
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 21st day of SeDt- , 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewisr Finilla, Kulchin, Hall and Packard.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
SITE
VLC GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1
PUD 02=10(A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5684
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR 64
LOCATED NORTH OF ALGA ROAD AND WEST OF FUTURE
ALICANTE ROAD WITHIN THE GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD
1.10 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASE NAME: VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
AMENDMENT PUD 02-10(A) TO APPROVE BUILDING
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY
CASE NO.: PUD 02-10(A)
WHEREAS, Pulte Homes Corp., “Developer,” has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management
Company, “Owner,” described as
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10, being a subdivision of lot
10 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, February 12,2003
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” - “FF” dated August 18, 2004, on file in
the Planning Department, VLC - GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - PUD 02-10(A) as
provided by Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of August 2004, hold
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development Amendment.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VLC - GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - PUD 02-10(A) based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
Findinm:
1.
2.
3.
That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the Villages of
La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 was subdivided into 64 residential lots and the
project floorplans were designed to fit within the lot boundaries of each residential
lot and comply with all applicable development standards. -.
That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the proposed building floor plans, elevations and
plotting have been designed consistent with the design criteria of the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan which has taken the site, surroundings, environmental settings,
and traffic circulation into consideration prior to its adoption.
The Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan for
which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given,
which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program
approved earlier, and that the program ETR adequately describes the activity for
the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and
b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and
c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior plan; and
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIR; and
e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist; and
f. the Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed,
PC RES0 NO. 5684 -2- I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for
this subsequent project.
4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
5. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance. of
building permits.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or hrther condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Planned Unit Development Amendment.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Planned Unit Development Amendment documents, as
necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on
the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits.
Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to
this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
PC RES0 NO. 5684 -3- 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Planned Unit Development
Amendment, and (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein. This
obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if
the City’s approval is not validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar
copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making
body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of project approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice
of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction
of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the
City of Carlsbad has issued a Planned Unit Development Amendment by Resolution
No. 5684 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall
note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and
all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion
in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record
an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of
good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010.
-4- 9 PC RES0 NO. 5684
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project’s
market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxedfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
existing schools, parks and streets.
Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses whlch
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 02-20
in Resolution No. 5472 which are incorporated by reference herein.
PC RES0 NO. 5684 -5- lo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Enpineering:
21.
Fire:
22.
-
22.
23.
24.
Prior to issuance of a precise grading permit(s), Developer shall process and receive
approval of a construction revision to City drawing no. 406-5 to document any
necessary relocation of sewer laterals, water laterals, curb outlets and driveways as
necessary to accommodate the development of the dwellings as shown on the site
plan for this project. The construction revision shall be processed and prepared to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Lots 1, 11, 12, 13, 17, and 18 shall be required to be constructed to one-hour fire
exterior walls and features rated in conformance with the California Building Code
that abut the Fire Protection Zones. Contact the Carlsbad Fire Department for
approved materials and methods.
Strict adherence to the adopted Landscape Manual for the 60-foot clearance from
combustible vegetation is required. No combustible or wood fencing within 100 feet
of undisturbed natural vegetation is permitted on Lots 1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17,-18,
and 19. All subsequent submittals shall indicate that these lots are conditioned by
adding the suffix “FR” to the lot designator and shall be noted by lot number on the
title sheet of the working drawings.
The following items shall be included in the CC&Rs:
a. The maintenance of common areas and fuel modification shall be submitted
to the Fire Department for review and approval.
b. Strict adherence to the adopted City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual for the
60 foot clearance from combustible vegetation is required. There shall be no
combustible or wood fencing within 100 feet of native undisturbed vegetation
(F.3-6).
c. No patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes occur within the first
twenty (20) - feet of the afore mentioned sixty (60) - foot fuel modification
zone unless fire rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of
said materials shall be obtained prior to installation from the Building
Department.
Please note that in accordance with the City’s adopted landscape manual, unless the
60-foot fuel modification zone begins at the property line, Section F.3-1 prohibits
tree and shrubs in the first twenty (20)- feet of the sixty (60) - foot zone.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
PC RES0 NO. 5684 -6- /I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactbns
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th, day of August 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez,
Heineman, Montgomery, and Segall
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
.A / 5 w-’*,---- ._ ,?-&.e* -dj yf&
FkANK H. WHITTON, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: .
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 5684 -7- 12
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
P.C. AGENDA OF:
ppplication complete date: May 14,2004 I I August 18,2004 I Project Planner: Barbara Kennedy
Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle
SUBJECT: PUD 02-10(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - Request for a
determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified
Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes
the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval for a
Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and
plotting for the development of 64 single-family detached homes within the
Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 generally located north of Alga
Road and west of future Alicante Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
I. RECOMMENDATION -.
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5684,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02- 10(A)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 64 single-family dwelling
units located in Neighborhood 1.10 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map (CT 02-20) and Planned Unit
Development (PUD 02-10), approved by the City Council on December 2, 2003. A Planned
Unit Development (PUD) was required because the development proposal included a gated
community with private streets. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and
pursuant to Section 4.6.4 of the Master Plan, could be processed at a later time through a Planned
Unit Development Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the
subject neighborhood. The proposed one- and two-story homes consist of four floor plans
ranging in size from 3,723 to 4,913 square feet. Each floor plan has three elevation styles and
the project has a total of fifteen color schemes. The project complies with City standards
including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the
approval being requested.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved' the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
PUD 02-10(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has recorded for The Greens, grading
and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing.
Additionally, the final map for CT 02-20 was approved by the City Council on May 18, 2004.
Precise grading and improvements plans associated with this subdivision have also been
approved and this phase of construction is expected to commence in July 2004.
Proiect Description
The project site, Neighborhood 1.10 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, is
generally located north of Alga Road and west of the future Alicante Road. The subject
neighborhood contains 64 single-family residential lots that are a minimum of 9,000 square feet
in size. Architecture and plotting were not part of the previous approval. The Master Plan
provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned Unit
Development Amendment. The applicant has now applied for the review and approval of
building floor plans, elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, four different floor
plans are proposed ranging in size from 3,723 square feet to 4,913 square feet. Plan one is one-
story and the remaining three plans are two-stories. Plans one through three have two-car
garages with an option for a tandem third car space and plan four has two, two-car garages. Each
floor plan is proposed with three different elevation styles, with a total of six architectural styles
proposed throughout the development to create a variety of facades in the neighborhood. The
following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles:
2-B, 2-C
3 -D
4-A, 4-C 1 &4-F
1 st Floor
Sq. Ft.
3,727
3,727
3,723
2,355
2,349
2,345
2,344
2,497
Table 1 - Sum
2nd Floor I Living Area
3,727
2,396 4,745
2,383 4,728
iary of Floo
Garage
Space
764
764
764
718
646
646
646
917
Plans
Total Bldg.
Sq. Ft.
4,49 1
4,49 1
4,487
5,060
5,391
5,374
5,382
5,830
Elevations Styles
Santa Barbara
Mediterranean
Craftsman Bungalow
European Country
Santa Barbara
Mediterranean,
Craftsman Bungalow,
Monterey Ranch
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara
Mediterranean
European Country
Spanish Colonial,
Craftsman Bungalow ,
Tuscan
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Planned Unit Development
Amendment is required for the development of homes on lots within a gated community with
private streets.
PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 3
A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage
configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size
and must have a 5’ minimum setback from property line.
Varies according to Neighborhood’s minimum lot size
Min. 6,000 SF lot: 15’ minimum setback
Min. 7,500 SF lot: 20’ minimum setback
Min. 10,000 SF lot: 20’ minimum setback
IV. ANALYSIS
Please refer to the attached ‘Front Yard
Setbacks table for compliance with 15’
minimum. All lots comply.
All lots comply with Minimum 7,500 SF
lot: 20’ minimum rear yard setback.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the standards contained in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project’s
compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(B))
The project is within The Greens area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan
maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides
detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by
which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhood was divided into 64 residential lots through CT 02-20 and compliance
with the Master Plan standards related to the subdivision was analyzed at that time. The current
application is for the approval of building floor plans, elevations and plotting of the units. -.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the
ArchitecturaVSite Planning Design standards and guidelines, contained in the Master Plan.
TABLE
Guideline
Front Yard Setback
(4.6.2.6.2.a)
Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.8.2.8)
Neiahborhood 1.10
2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE
Comments Standard
15’ minimum, 20’ neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages) Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 26.17’
Minimum rear yard area is 15’ by 15’ All lots provide the required 15’ x 15’
usable rear yard area.
30’ rear yards setback for homes adjacent to Alicante Road I All affected lots comply.
PUD 02-10(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 4
TABLE 2: VI1
Guideline (VLCMP Reference)
Side Yards
(4.6.2.B.2.c)
Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d)
Slope Edge Building
Setback
(4.3.4)
Lot Width (5.7.3.10.9)
Building Coverage
(4.6.3.8.2)
Building Height (4.6.3.8.1)
,AGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CON
Standard
Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less
than 60’ wide
Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60’
and wider
Minimum of 5’ per side
Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20’ in aggregate
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5’
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side
elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side
yard setback averages a minimum of 7’.
10’ minimum
All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than
15’ in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude
into a .7’ horizontal to 1’ vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is
measured from the edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building
setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements.
70’ minimum lot width
1 -story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
Garages and the perimeter area of a basement.
Excludes:
Exterior structures such as covered porches
Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings
such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8’ from
the building Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 and a width of
8’ Roof eaves extending less than 30 from the face of any
building
Awnings
Open parking areas
Structures under 30 in height
Masonry walls not greater than 6’ in height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls).
Maximum of 30’ and 2 stories.
’LIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
Please refer to the attached ‘Individual
Lot Data‘ table for side yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
All street side setbacks of 10’
minimum have been met.
All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the
minimum rear yard setback. Please
refer to the Slope Edge Building
Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details.
All lots &eat a minimum of 70.’
Plan 1 = 4,491 SF (max.)
Plan 2 = 3,073 SF (max.) Plan 3 = 2,995 SF (max.) Plan 4 = 3,414 SF (max.)
Plan 1 is a one-story structure and does
not exceed the maximum 50% of net
pad area. Plans 2 thru 4 are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40%
of net pad area as required.
Please refer to attached ‘Individual Lot
Data’ table for rear yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Plan 1 =B-l8-6, C-17’-6, D-20’,
Plan 2 = 8-26‘, C-25’-6, E-26
Plan 3 = A-25’-6, 8-25’-6, D-28-6 Plan 4 = A-27’-6, C-26-6, F-26’-6
PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 5
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COM
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Front Building Planes
(4.6.3.8.4.e & 4.6.3.B.4.f)
Rear Building Planes
(4.6.3.8.4.9)
Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.8.6)
Side & Rear Elevations
(4.6.3.8.7)
Elevations Fronting
Circulation Element
Roads (4.6.3.A.1 .a)
(4.6.3.B.5.c &
4.6.3.B.5.d)
Single-Story Units (5.7.3.6.0, 5.7.3.12.0 &
4.6.3.B.4.1)
(4.6.3.B.4.n &
4.6.3.B.5.b)
Standard
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10’ between front and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’.
33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted.
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes
with a minimum of 3’ between face of the forward-most plane and
rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’.
_____ Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of
design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used.
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to publidprivate roads.
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the
roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than
that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall
planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged.
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan.
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a
circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be
single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15, (10’
preferred).
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square
footage, including all garage area.
’LIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
The details are shown on the
architectural plan and building plane
exhibits. Plans 1, 3, and 4 comply.
Plan 1 = 4 or 5 Planes
Plan 2 = 2 or 4 Planes Plan 3 = 6 or 7 Planes Plan 4 = 7 or 9 Planes
Plan 1 is plotted on 9 lots (14.1%) Plan 2 is plotted on 19 lots (29.7%) Plan 3 is plotted on 17 lots (26.5%)
Plan 4 is plotted on 19 lots (29.7%)
Total of 45 units meet this requirement or 70%.
The details are shown on the
architectural plan and building plane exhibits. Plans 1, 3, and 4 comply.
Plan 1 = 4 Planes
Plan 2 = 2 or 3 Planes
Plan 3 = 5 Planes
Plan 4 = 4 Planes
Total of 45 units meet this requirement or 70%.
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation Design Elements” table.
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation
Design Elements” table.
All elevation styles comply. Please
refer to the attached “Building Elevation
Design Elements” table.
The proposed project includes 4 floor plans with three distinctive elevation
types for each plan. Please refer to the
enclosed architectural plans.
Not Applicable. Neighborhood has not
been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop that is visible form a circulation element roadway by the Master Plan.
Plan 1 : 14% of the units proposed are
single-story.
Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single
story features provided. All proposed
plans comply.
Plan 2: 64.9%
Plan 3: 79.7%
Plan 4: 71.5%
PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 6
TABLE 2: VIL I Guideline VLCMP Reference
Units occur in a row- with
less than 15 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.8.4.b)
Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with 15 ft to 20 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.8.4.c)
Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.8.4.d)
Entries, Front Porches,
Courtyards, & Balconies
(4.6.3.8.9, 4.6.2.8.2.f & 4.6.2.8.3)
Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.8.3.a)
I
(4.6.2.8.3)
,AGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COM
Standard
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'.
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'.
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements
qualify.
25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across
33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony,
whichever is consistent with the architectural style.
Porches require a'minimum front yard setback of 10'.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required
and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane
for the purposes of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap
around the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may
encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard
setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks.
May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2'.
The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may
encroach a maximum of an additional 12 into the required
setback.
A minimum 5' setback must be maintained
Fireplace structures not wider than 8, cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features
projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required
setbacks .
LIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
There are no three units with less than
15' between homes.
rhere are no three units with less than
15' - 20' between homes.
'Ian types 1,2 and 4 incorporate a single story building element that is
areater than 40% of the width and a ninimum of 3 deep.
14% of the elevations have a courtyard All Plan 1)
5% of the elevations incorporate a ront porch (Plan 3A, Plan 3D, and Plan
LF).
'lease refer to the enclosed
uchitecture and site plan for :ompliance.
Uone are proposed within the side yard
jetback.
\lone are proposed within the side yard setback.
PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 7
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Recreation Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Resident Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.a)
Visitor Parking
(4.6.2.8.4. b)
Recreational Vehicle Parking
(4.6.2.8.4.c)
Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.6.4.h,
& 4.6.3.8.13)
Standard
Common recreation areas:
Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking
“Pocket Parks” - Not required to provide parking
Within a 114 mile radius of the units for which they are
required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units.
More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it
is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20’ by 20’.
Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12’ in width by 20’ in length may be provided as an alternative.
19 spaces required (5 sp/lO du + 1 sp14 du)
20 sf/dwelling unit
20’minimum setback from the property line where garage doors
face the street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15’ setback from property
line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of
the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot
area greater than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit‘s frontage. The maximum number of units in a
neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street
shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages,
three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used within each
neighborhood to improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.8.13.9 for examples of garage configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum of 18” for garages. However, the projection shall not
extend to the second story living space.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages)
Comments
\Jot applicable to this Neighborhood.
411 plan types include at a minimum of me 2-car garage with an interior neasurement of 20’ x 20’.
idequate parking is provided on the
idjacent private streets as permitted by
he Master Plan.
To be provided in Neighborhood 1.2 ipon approval of building permits.
411 setbacks for garages that face the itreet are greater than 20. All side-
oaded garages have a setback of at
east 15’ and they appear as livable
iortions of the homes.
ill 3-car garages have a tandem third
ipace.
ill 4 car garages are designed as 2 wo-car garages that are perpendicular o one another.
PUD 02-10(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 8
Standard
Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to
parallel the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12
Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected.
Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations
are acceptable depending upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same
architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street.
TABLE 2: VI1 7
Comments
A variety of roof forms and massing are
proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans
for compliance.
Typical roof pitches: Plan 1: 4:12, 6:12 Plan 2: 4:12 Plan 3: 4:12, 6:12, 9:12 Plan 4: 4:12,3.5:12, 5512
Each plan type plotted on the site plan
includes a color scheme designation to show compliance. Please refer to the
enclosed color and materials boards for
details on each color scheme and to the
site plan for specific plotting.
Guldeline
(4.6.3.8.4.k & 4.6.3.B.8)
Patio and accessory structures 'shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following
Architectural Styles:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Craftsmen Bungalow
Spanish Colonial
Monterey Ranch
Italiafluscan
European Country
California Coastal
California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 1.10 & 1.12 only)
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit
shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window
frames shall by used (no mill finishes).
"Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and
columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed
architectural style.
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the
structure
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF.
L Colors
All plan types comply.
The elevation types included are as
follows:
A - Spanish Colonial
6 - Santa Barbara Mediterranean
C - Craftsman Bungalow
D - European Country
E - Monterey Ranch
F - Tuscan
The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of
2 or are trimmed with either wood or
raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural
plans for compliance. All plans comply.
Please refer to the enclosed elevations
on the architectural plans for
compliance. All chimneys and their
caps comply with proper scale and
(4.6.3.8.1 2)
Accessory Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Permitted (4.6.3.C & 5.6)
Design Standards (4.6.3.8.4.i & 4.6.3.8.5.e)
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
,AGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
I
PUD 02-10(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 9
TABLE 2: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
Guideline (VLCMP Reference}
Window Detailing
(4.6.3.8.10)
Standard
The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features:
Deeply recessed windows
Paned windows
Decorative window ledges
Accent and varied shape
windows
Window boxes and
planters with
architecturally evident
supports
Exterior wood trim
surrounds
Accent colors on shutters or other elements
Arched elements
Shutters
Raised stucco trim around
windows
Window lintels
Comments
Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation shall incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and side and rear elevations shall incorporate a minimum of 2 such
elements to create character and interest to the homes. The “Building Elevation Design
Elements” table (Attachment 7) shows which elements are used for each elevation and floor
plans.
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project’s
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 02-20.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially
significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously
examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning
Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development
and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive
of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.09 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are
required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program ElR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
August 18,2004
Page 10
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this
project are available at the Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5684
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Statement
Local Facilities Impact Assessment
Table “Individual Lot Compliance”
Table “Building Elevation Design Elements”
Reduced Exhibits
Full Size Exhibits “A” - “EE’ dated August 18,2004
Colored Plotting Plan Exhibit “FF” dated August 18,2004
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: PUD 02-10(A)
CASE NAME: VLC Greens Neighborhood 1.10
APPLICANT: Pulte Homes Corn.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Pro,gram EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEOA; and a recommendation of approval
for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for
the development of 64 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.10 generally - located north of Alga - Road and west of hture Alicante Road in
Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10, being a subdivision of Lot 10
of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 La Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map No. 14543, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, February 12,2003.
APN: 213-1 12-01 Acres: 37.3 acres Proposed No. of LotsAJnits: 64
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLM
Density Allowed: 0-4
Existing Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: 1.3 du/ac
Proposed Zone: N/A
Zoning General Plan Current Land Use
Site P-c RLM Vacant/graded
North P-C RLM Vacant/graded
South P-C RLM Vacanvgraded
East P-c os Open Space
West P-C os Open Space/Golf Course
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia County
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 64
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
0 Negative Declaration, issued
[XI
[7 Other,
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23.2001 (EIR 98-07)
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, htemal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
-.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in fhe application. If the appkant includes a cornoration or uartnershiu, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned cornoration, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person ~~~~~ t.~ 9u1~k3- corp/part -,%Mgs ~lep *
Title /n&€%%7/-/-N - FfldT Title
INDNIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership,
tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or
partnershiu, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE-THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE @/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned
cornoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page
may be attached if necessary.)
Person COrpA?art fi
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wriaht Place. Suite 180
Carlsbad. CA 92008
2075 Las Palmas Dr. C.arlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-1 161 FAX (760) 438-0894
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Tmt Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staffy Boards,
Commissions, Committees andor Council within the past twelve (12) months?
0 Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
* oe --&A
signature of appi;cant/ciate
I Agent for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle President of Morrow DeveloDment Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date
~~ ~ ~ Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
2 5
When Recorded
Return To:
Puite Homes
41’41 JutIand Dr., Ste. 200
San Diego, CA 92117
Attn: Leonard Steinberg
PULTE HOME CORPORATION
POWER OF ATTORPiEY ,4ND GRANT OF AGENCY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that PULTE HOME
CORPORATION (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of LMichigan, authorized to do business in the State of California,
having its principal office in San Diego County, California, does hereby effective
immediately, constitute and appoint the following employee Robert Quiles as its true
md lawful agents and additional attorneys-in fact in San Diego County, California, to
act for and on behalf of the undersigned corporation in its name, place and stead, and
for its use and benefit, in the following respects:
-
(1) Enter into and execute deeds and/or plats of dedication, subdivision,
resubdivision and boundary line adjustment; owner’s consents; declarations of
covenants, conditions and restrictions; deeds or vacation of easements, easement and
rights-of-way; performance agreements; maintenance agreements for and over any
property owned or under option by the Corporation; re-zoning applications, proffer
applications and amendments and proffer agreements and other similar documents
related to the development of real property owned or under option by the Corporation:
and
(2) Enter into and execute development, supplier, subcontract andor
construction agreements for the development andor construction of and on any
property owned or under option by the Corporation.
This Power of Attorney shall commence on September I, 2003 and expire at
midnight on June 30, 2006, unless extended or revoked by the Corporation prior to
such expiration date.
IhT WITNESS WHEREOF, a Pulte Home Corporation has caused its corporate
name to be hereunto subscribed by the Authorized Agent, whose signature is
acknowledged by two unofficial witnesses, this 18* day of August, 2003.
..
Ti- - Witness
1
PULTE HOME CORPORATION
1 Authorized Agent
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
Public in and for said State,
personally appeared Daniel Ripps, personal known to me to be the Authorized Agent
of Pulte Home Corporation whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
zckaowledged to rre tkt he executed the sane i? his authorized czpacities, ard %at Iy
his signature on the instnunent the entity upon behalf of which the person acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/-
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGFUM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: VLC -Greens Neighborhoods 1.10 - PUD 02-10(A)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 10 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: P-C
DEVELOPER’S NAME: Pulte Homes Cow.
ADDRESS: 5993 Avenida Encinas, # 100 Carlsbad. CA 92008
PHONE NO.: 1760) 795-2200 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 213-1 12-01
QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 64 residential lots
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
The following facilities impact analysis was conducted for the subdivision of the property by CT
02-20.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 222.5 1
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 118.67
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.45 acres
Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
64
Identify Drainage Basin = D
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 640 ADT
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 5
Open Space: Acreage Provided = Provided pursuant to the HCP
Schools: San Marcos Unified
Elementary - 14.8 students, Middle School- 4.1 students, High School - 3.7 students
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU Leucadia
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD = 14,080 GPD
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neicihborhood 1.10
tl "Building Coverage' = net pad area d a Site occupied by the habitable area of any building or Structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding extemai walls or supporting members. lncludss garaws
and the perimeter area of a basement Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from bulldings such as overhanging balconies that poject less than 8 ft.
from the building. and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a vidm of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 Inches from the face of any building, awnings. open parking
areas. structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in helght Such as vnng-walls, planter wails or grade-separation retaining walls
N 1 10 . lndwduai Lo1 Tablesxis ExD-IndivLolDala
07/21120043 13PM
Neighborhood 1.10
Section B
Table 4
Page 1 of 1
i ,.i . .;. 1 t 1. I d .~ i .,..I. . i..
d
b
- r
31
r*i 2,'
Y ?, ui '1.;
33
35-
w
.:
f
d
6
t)
37
6
t)
6 4
38
39
w
I
i
c
a
e: 3
a
6 L
T
1 u w
4a
1 I --
E
46
w
f
5'1
c
2
f 4 a 5
53
H
e f
58
t I
I
Planning Commission Minutes
1. CUP 94-04x2 - CARLSBAD SD-475 - Request for an extension of CUP 94-04x1 to
allow the continued operation of a cellular communication facility at the southeast corner of Pi0 Pic0 Drive and Chestnut Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
3. GPA 04-04/LCPA 04-04 - LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA - Request for a Negative
Declaration, General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to
change the land use designation of approximately 4.47 acres from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM), on property generally located
west of El Camino Real, north and south of Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 21.
7. CDP 04-02 - FLETCHER RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow the demolition of an existing residence and the construction
of a new single-family residence within the City’s Coastal Zone located at 5030 Tierra del Oro Street within Local Facilities Management Zone 3.
8. CDP 04-25 - LYNN RESIDENCE - Request for approval of a Coastal Development
Permit to allow for the construction of a single family residence within the City’s Coastal
Zone located on the west side of Black Rail Road between Triton Way and Corte Orchidia within Local Facilities Management Zone 20.
10. PUD 02-1O(A) - VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.10 - Request for a determination
that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the
purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval for a Planned Unit Development Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 64
single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.10 generally located north of Alga Road and west of future Alicante Road in Local Facilities
Management Zone 10.
Mr. Neu stated that agenda Items 1, 3, 7, 8, and 10 are normally heard in a public hearing context,
however, these projects are minor and routine in nature with no outstanding issues and Staff recommends approval. He recommended that the public hearing be opened and closed, and that the
Commission proceed with a vote as a consent Item, including the errata sheets, if any. If the Commission or someone from the public wishes to pull an Item, Staff would be available to respond to questions.
Chairperson Whitton asked if there was anyone who wished to pull Items 1, 3, 7, 8 or 10 or if any of the Commissioners wished to speak on those Items.
MOTION
ACT ION : Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning
AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman,
NOES: None
Commission approve Items 1,3, 7, 8 and 10.
VOTE: 6-0
Montgomery and Segall
VLC Greens Neighborhood 1.10VLC Greens Neighborhood 1.10PUD 02-10(A)
Location MapLocation MapALGA RDAVIARA PKWYEL CAMINO REAL
POINSETTIALN(FUTURESITECASSIA RDALICANTE(FUTURE RD)POINSETTIALN)
VLC GREENSNEIGHBORHOOD 1.10
RecommendationRecommendation•Approve PUD 02-10(A)