Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-10-12; City Council; 17838; VLC Greens Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 & 1.14n VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.1 1,1.13 AND 1.14 MTG. 10/12/04 PUD 02-12(A) DEPT. CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL CITY ATTY Project Applications PUD 02-1 2(A) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Ad mi nistrative Reviewed by and To be reviewed - Approvals Final at Planning Final at Council Commission X That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-330 , APPROVING Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02-12(A) for the Villages of La Cdsta Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.1 3 and 1.14 as recommended by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: On September 15, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential project. Since the Planned Unit Development Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action. The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and 1.14 and consists of approval of architecture and plotting for 129 single-family dwelling units. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 02-24 and Planned Development Permit PUD 02-1 2, approved by the City Council on December 2, 2003. The neighborhoods consist of lots with a minimum area of 5,000 square feet. The Planning Commission had no issues with the proposal and voted 7-0, without discussion, to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. The Planning Commission’s action is included in the attached minutes. A complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared initial studies for the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan” and associated actions .inclusive of the proposed planning areas reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Planning Areas project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 I PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,838 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the respective initial studies for each application are available at the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts have been identified. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-330 2. Location Map 3. 4. 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725 Planning Commission Staff Report, dated September 15,2004 Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated September 15, 2004. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Saima Qu reshy, (760) 602-461 9, squre @ ci.carlsbad.ca.us 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-330 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 02-12 TO APPROVE ARCHITECTURE AND PLOTTING FOR 129 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF ALICANTE ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND JUST NORTH OF ALGA ROAD AND EAST AND WEST OF ALICANTE ROAD WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASE NAME: VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.1 1,1.13 AND 1.14 CASE NO.: PUD 02-12(A) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on September 15, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 12th day of October , 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 02-1 2(A); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02-12(A) is approved by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. .... 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ' 23 24 25 26 21 28 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 12th day of October , 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: None Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and ABSENT: None ATTEST: R. Kundtz, Assistant City Clerk -2- EXHIBIT 2 SI Ur' TE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13AND 1.14 PUD 02=12(A) 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXHIBIT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5725 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PUD 02-12(A) TO APPROVE ARCHITECTURE AND PLOTTING FOR 129 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF ALICANTE ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE AND JUST NORTH OF ALGA ROAD WITHIN THE GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 CASE NO. : PUD 02- 12(A) WHEREAS, John Laing Homes, “Developer,” has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management Company, “Owner,” described as Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24, La Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map No. 14807 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on May 27,2004 (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” - “GGGG” dated September 15,2004, on file in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 - PUD 02-12(A) as provided by Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of September 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Planned Unit Development Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) B) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - 12(A) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11,1.13 AND 1.14 - PUD 02- Findines: 1. 2. 3. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included within Chapter 21.45 and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 were subdivided into 129 residential lots and the project floorplans were designed to fit within the lot boundaries of each residential lot and comply with all applicable development standards. That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with surrounding development, in that the proposed building floor plans, elevations and plotting have been designed consistent with the design criteria of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan which has taken the site, surroundings, environmental settings, and traffic circulation into consideration prior to its adoption. The Planning Director has determined that: a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA); [ 15 168(c)(2) and (e)]; and b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection with the prior plan; and d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior EIR; and 7 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist; and f. the Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for this subsequent project. 4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide fbnding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 5. - The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a precise grading plan or building permits whichever occurs first. 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of this Planned Unit Development Amendment. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Planned Unit Development Amendment documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different fi-om this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. PC RES0 NO. 5725 -3- 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Planned Unit Development Amendment, and (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City’s approval is not validated. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 18 months from the date of project approval. Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit or building permit whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifylng all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Planned Unit Development Amendment by Resolution No. 5725 on the real property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 7 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003) between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by, Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilit-ies Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxedfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited .to trails, future and existing schools, parks and streets. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning Department). JQ PC RES0 NO. 5725 -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19. 20. 21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 02-24 in Resolution No. 5476 which are incorporated by reference herein. Engineering 22. Prior to issuance of a precise grading permit, Developer shall process and receive approval of a construction revision to City Drawing No. 406-3 or other applicable City record drawings to document the relocation or installation of new sewer - laterals, water laterals, curb outlets, and driveways as necessary to support the. development of the dwellings as shown on this site plan for this project. The construction revisions shall be processed and prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Code Reminders: The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 23. 24. ... ... ... ... Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessfU1, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation. PC RES0 NO. 5725 -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as “fees/exactions. ” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise’ expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th, day of September 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Whitton; Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery and Segall NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Planning Director 4 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -7- EXHIBIT 4 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department P.C. AGENDA OF: September 15,2004 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application complete date: June 4, 2004 Project Planner: Saima Qureshy Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle SUBJECT: PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and to recommend approval, pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, of an amendment to Planned Development Permit, PUD 02-12, for architecture and plotting for the development of 129 single-family detached homes located within Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and I. 14 -of La Costa Greens. The project neighborhoods are located along the east and west sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and just north of Alga Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. L I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 02- 12(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. INTRODUCTION The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 129 single-family dwelling units located in Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 02-24 and Planned Development Permit PUD 02-12, approved by the City Council in December 2003. The minimum lot size for this neighborhood is 5,000 square feet and therefore a Planned Development Permit was required. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 4.6.4 of the Master Plan, could subsequently be processed through an amendment to the Planned Development Permit. The applicant is now proposing archtecture and plotting for the subject neighborhoods. There are two product types proposed with a total of six floor plans. For Neighborhood 1.14 (Product I), three floor plans are proposed ranging in size from 2,766 to 2,965 square feet. For Neighborhoods 1.1 1 and 1.13 (Product II), three floor plans are proposed ranging in size from 3,060 to 3,424 square feet. The project has a total of 12 color schemes. The project complies with all City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. City Council action is required as the project contains more than 50 residential units. Each floor plan has three elevation styles. PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 Living Area Sq. Ft. 2,766 2,838 2,965 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Garage Total Bldg. Elevation Styles Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. 426 3,192 European Cottage, (2 car> Santa Barbara, Tuscan 581 3,419 Spanish Colonial, (2 car> Monterey Ranch, 59 1 3,556 Spanish Colonial, Tuscan (3 car) Santa Barbara, Tuscan B ackaround 2 3 On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has recorded for The Greens, mass grading and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing. Additionally, the final map for CT 02-24 was approved by the City Council on May 18, 2004. Precise grading and improvement plans associated with this subdivision have also been approved. 1,397 1,44 1 1,398 1,567 Proiect Description The project site, Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, is located on the east side of the north course of the La Costa Golf Course, extending from an area north of Alga Road to an area south of Neighborhood I. 10, with Alicante Road passing through the middle. The project site is within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. The subject neighborhoods contain 129 single-family residential lots that are a minimum of 5,000 square feet in size. Architecture and plotting were not part of the previous approval. The Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The applicant has now applied for the review and approval of architecture and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, two product types are proposed for a total of six floor plans ranging in size from 2,766 to 2,965 square feet for Product I, and from 3,060 to 3,424 square feet for Product II. A modified Plan 2 is also proposed for Product 11, referred to as Plan 2X to address unique layouts and small net pad area. The Plan 2X has the same layout as Plan 2 but has less square footage. Each plan is two stories high with a two or three car garage. Each floor plan is proposed with three different elevation styles to create a variety of faGades in the Neighborhoods. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: Table 1 - Summarv of Floor Plans - Product I Plan No. 1 1st Floor I 2nd Floor S .Ft. S .Ft. I PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 1 2 Table 2 - Summary of Floor Plans - Product I1 Plan No. I 1st Floor I 2nd Floor I Living Area I Garage I Total Bldg. I Elevation Styles Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. 1,446 1,614 3,060 586 3,646 Spanish Colonial, (3 car> Santa Barbara, Tuscan 1,624 1,775 3,399 595 3,994 Monterey Ranch, 2x (3 car) Santa Barbara, 1,560 1,535 3,095 595 3,690 Tuscan 3 To determine-compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, an amendment to the Planned Development Permit is required for the development of homes on lots with a minimum area of less than 7,500 square feet. - 1,616 1,808 3,424 653 4,077 European Cottage, (3 car) Santa Barbara, Tuscan IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency with the standards contained in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project’s compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(B)) The project is within The Greens area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. The subject neighborhood was divided into 129 residential lots through CT 02-24 and compliance with the Master Plan standards related to the subdivision was analyzed at that time. The current application is for the approval of architecture and plotting of the units. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan Villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/ Site Planning Design standards and guidelines, contained in the Master Plan. PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 TAB Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.e) Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.c) Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1) E 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE Standard 15’ minimum, 20’ neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages) A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5’ minimum setback from property Line. For lots with Min. 5,000 SF lot: 15’ minimum setback Minimum rear yard area shall be 15’ by 15’ Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60 wide Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60’ and wider Minimum of 5’ per side Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20’ in aggregate Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5’ At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7’. 10’ minimum All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops andor pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15’ in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7’ horizontal to 1’ vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. Lot widths vary from 50’ to 70’ 5,000 SF lots: 50’ 6,000 SF lots: 50 7,500 SF lots: 60’ 10,000 SF lots: 70’ Comments Product I (Neighborhood 1.14) Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 20.53’ Product I1 (Neighborhoods 1.11 & 1.13) Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 22.10’ Combined Neighborhood Average Front YardSetback=21.13’ Please refer to the attached ‘Individual Lot Data” table for compliance with 15’ minimum. All lots comply. All lots comply with Minimum 5,000 SF lot: 15’ minimum rear yard setback. All lots provide the required 15’ x 15’ usable rear yard area. Please refer to the attached ‘Individual Lot Data’ table for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. All street side setbacks of 10’ minimum have been met. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details. All lots have a minimum lot width of 50’ PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ca Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) Building Height (4.6.3.B.l) Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.e &4.6.3.B.4.f) Standard I-story units: 50% of net pad area 2-story units: 40% of net pad area Includes: Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: Awnings Open parking areas Exterior structures such as covered porches Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8’ from the building Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22’ and a width of 8’ Roof eaves extending less than 30” from the face of any building Structures under 30” in height Masonry walls not greater than 6’ in height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Maximum of 30’ and 2 stories 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10’ between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with 45’ of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. dPLIANCE CONTINUED Comments Lot coverage: Product I: Plan 1 = 2,313 SF Plan 2 = 1,978 SF Plan 3 = 2,399 SF (1,989 SF w/o Casita option) Product n: Plan 1 = 2,032 SF Plan 2 = 2,219 SF Plan 2X = 2,155 SF Plan 3 = 2,269 SF All plans are two-story structures and do not exceed 40% of net pad area as required. Please refer to attached ‘Individual Lot Data’ table for building coverage. All lots comply. Product I: Plan 1 = 25’-2W, 23’-4“,26’-11” Plan 2 = 24’-8’, 27’-4”, 27’-4W Plan 3 = 25’-3”, 24’-5”, 25’-3” Product I1 Plan 1 = 25’-11”. 26’-lo”, 25’”’’ Plan 2 = 23’-lo”, 25’-5”, 23’-10” Plan 2X = 23’-IO”, 25’-5”, 23’-10” Plan 3 = 26’4”, 27’-9”, 26.4’ The details are shown on the architectural plan and building plane exhibits. All units comply. Product I: Plan 1 = 5 planes Plan 2 = 5 planes Plan 3 = 4 planes (does not meet the min. separation of IO’) Plan types 1 & 2 are plotted on a total of 38 lots or 62.3% Product 11: Plan 1 = 4 planes Plan 2 = 5 planes Plan 2X = 4 planes (does not meet the min. separation of 10’) Plan 3 = 5 Plan types 1,2 & 3 are plotted on a total of 56 lots or 82.4% PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.8.7) Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads (4.6.3.A.1 .a) ~ Floor Plans (4.6.3.BS.c &4.6.3.BS.d) Single-Story Units (5.7.3.6.0.5.7.3.12.0 & 4.6.3.8.4.1) Two Story Units (4.6.3.8.4.11 &4.6.3.BS.b) Standard 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3’ between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with 45’ of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’ __________~ Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. ~~ ~~ Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to publidprivate roads. Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Minimum of 3 per neighborhood Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. For neighborhoods on ridgelineslhilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single- story. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’, (IO’ preferred). Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. vlPLIANCE CONTINUED Comments The details are shown on the architectural plan and building plane exhibits. All units comply. Product I Plan 1 = 5 planes Plan 2 = 4 planes Plan 3 = 4 planes Product I1 Plan 1 = 4 planes Plan 2 = 4 planes Plan 2X = 3 planes Plan 3 = 4 planes Plan types 1,2, & 3 are plotted on a total of 56 lots or 82.4% All elevation styles comply. Please refer to the attached “Building Elevation Design Elements” table. All elevation styles comply. Please refer to the attached “Building Elevation Design Elements” table. All elevation styles comply. Please refer to the attached “Building Elevation Design Elements” table. The proposed project includes six floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Not Applicable. Neighborhood has not been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop that is visible foam a circulation element roadway by the Master Plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided. All proposed plans comply. Product I Plan 1 = 43.5% Plan 2 = 72.9% Plan 3 = 7 1.5% Product 11: Plan 1 = 79.4% Plan 2 = 80.0% Plan 2X = 79.7% Plan 3 = 7 1.2% PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 Page 7 TABLE 3: t I Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b) occur in a row with 15 ft to 20 fl behveen homes- (4.6.3.B.4.c) Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9,4.6.2.B.2.f & 4.6.2.B.3) Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) LLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO Standard One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10’ deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’. One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5’ deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as aplateline maximum of 15’ 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3’, that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5’ deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10’. Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5’ A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on comer lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5’ and 8’ respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2’ into the required setbacks. May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2’. The total length ofthe encroachment may not exceed 8’ and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12” into the required setback. A minimum 5’ setback must be maintained. dPLIANCE CONTINUED Comments Product I: Plan 2 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 10’ wide and runs the length of the building. Product 11: Plan 2X incorporates a single story building edge that is at‘least IO’ wide and &s the - length of the building. Product I: Plan 1 and 2 incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 5’ and IO’ wide, respectively, and runs the length of the building. Product 11: Plan 1 and 2X incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 5’ and 10’ wide, respectively, and runs the length of the building. Producf I: Plan types 1 and 2 incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the width and a minimum of 3’ deep. These plan types are plotted on a total of 38 lots or 62.3% Product 11: All plan types incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the width and a minimum of 3’ deep. Product I: 29.5% of the elevations incorporate a front :ourtyard (All elevation types for the Plan 2) Product 11: 72.1% of the elevations incorporate a balcony (Spanish Colonial style of the Plan 1 ; Monterey Ranch style of the Plans 2 & 2X; All elevation types for the Plan 3). Please refer to the enclosed architecture and site plan for compliance. Product 11, Plan 1 includes an entry tower that is plotted on all three elevation types within Neighborhoods 1.11 & 1.13. The proposed tower element complies with the setbacks and maximum size criteria. PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 TABLE 3: 7 I Guideline VLCMP Reference (4.6.2.B.3) Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) (4.6.2.B.2.b,4.6.3.B.4.h, & 4.6.3.B. 13) I LLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO Standard Fireplace structures not wider than 8’, cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2’ into the required setbacks. Common recreation areas: Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking “Pocket Parks” -Not required to provide parking Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20’ by 20’. Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12’ in width by 20’ in length may be provided as an alternative. ~~ 20’ minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15’ setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable poi3ion of the home Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sf. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit’s frontage. The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations) Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum of 18” for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages) qPLIANCE CONTINUED Corn men ts No projections extend into the side yard setback more than 2’ nor are any projections greater than 8’ in length. All plans comply. Parking for the future recreation facility located at southwest of the intersection of Goldstone Road and Alicante Road will be shown when the necessary amendment for the facility is proposed. All plan types include at a minimum one 2- :ar garage with an interior measurement of 20’ x 20’. All setbacks for garages that face the street are greater than 20’. All side-loaded garages have a setback of at least 15’ and they appear as livable portions of the homes. All 3-car garages are a combination of side md front loaded configurations. PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO Guideline (VLCMP Reference) Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k 8~4.6.3.8.8) Colors (4.6.3.B. 12) Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 5.6) Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.i &4.6.3.B.5.e) Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) Standard Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. Minimum roof pitch of 3:12 Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. “Adjacent” includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. ~~~ Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Muiiicipal Code. Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsmen Bungalow Spanish Colonial Monterey Ranch ItalianiTuscan European Country California Coastal California Contemporary-Q’Jeighborhoods 1.10 & 1.12 only) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes). “Handcrafted” detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure. 2chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. 4PLIANCE CONTINUED Comments A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. Typical roof pitches: Product I: Plan 1 =4:12,5:12,8:12 Plan 2 = 4: 12 Plan 3 = 4:12,5:12 Product 11: Plan 1 =4:12,5:12 Plan 2 = 4:12,5:12 Plaii2X=4:12, 5:12 Plan 3 = 4:12,5:12,6:12 Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to show compliance. Please refer to the color and materials boards for details on each color scheme and to the site plan for specific plotting. All plan types comply. The elevation types included are as follows: Santa Barbara Mediterranean Spanish Colonial Monterey Ranch Italian/Tuscan European Country The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2” or are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 Guideline (VLCMF’ Reference) Window Detailing (4.6.3.B. 10) TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO Standard The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: Deeply recessed windows Exterior wood trim Paned windows surrounds Decorative window ledges Accent colors on shutters or Accent and varied shape other elements windows Arched elements Window boxes and planters Shutters with architecturally evident Raised stucco trim around supports windows Window lintels APLIANCE CONTINUED Comments Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. The Master Plan requires that each front elevation shall incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced architectural design elements and side and rear elevations shall incorporate a minimum of 2 such elements to create character and interest to the homes. The attached table, “Building Elevation Design Elements,” shows which elements are used for each elevation and floor plans. The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project’s compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 02-24. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this project are available at the Planning Department. PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 September 15,2004 ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Table “Individual Lot Compliance” 6. 7. Reduced Exhibits 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725 Table “Building Elevation Design Elements” Full Size Exhibits “A” - “GGGG” dated September 15, 2004 a3 NORTH NOT TO SCALE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA t OCATION MAP LA COSTA GREENS - NEIGHBORHOODS 1. 11 1.13 & 1.14 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: PUD 02-12(A) CASE NAME: Villages of La Costa - La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 And 1.14 APPLICANT: John Laina Homes REQUEST AND LOCATION: The proiect includes approval of architecture and plotting for 129 single-family dwelling units located in Neighborhoods - 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Minimum lot size for these neighborhoods is 5,000 square feet. The lots were created with Tentative Map, CT 02-24 and Planned Development Permit, PUD 02-12. The proiect neighborhoods are located along the east and west sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and iust north of Alga Road in Local Facilities ManaPement Zone 10. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24, La Costa Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map No. 14807 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on May 27,2004. APN: Various Acres: 42.8 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM Density Allowed: 0-4 Existing Zone: P-C Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Density Proposed: N/A Proposed Zone: P-C Zoning General Plan Site P-c RLM North P-C RLM South RD-M-5000 RM East P-c RLM West P-C os Current Land Use Mass grading for development Neighborhood 1.10 Residential Neighborhood Open Space, Future and Existing Residential Open Space PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 0 Negative Declaration, issued c] Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, Project is within the Scope of Progam EIR 98-07 approved earlier - City of Carlsbad Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Note: Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.” Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a coruoration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part John Laina Homes INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- Title Title Address Address 6183 Paseo Del Norte, Ste. 160 Carlsbad. CA 92009 2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (ie, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a coruoration or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned cornoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person cOrp/Part Real Estate Collateral Manaaement ComDanv Title Title Address Address 1903 Wriqht Place, Suite 180 Carlsbad, CA 92008 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-1 161 9 FAX (760) 438-0894 046 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes Ix] No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. above information is true and correct to the best o .a Age I t for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle President of Morrow Development Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicableldate Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 Individual Lot Data La Costa Greens Neiqhborhoods 1.11,1.13 &1.14 I I I I Setbacks Ut) Building PUD021 ZA.attachment5.xlsExD-IndivLotData 08/03/2004 9:24 AM Page 1 of 2 Neighborhood 1.14 Section 6 Table4 3 8 individual Lot Data La Costa Greens Neiahborhoods 1.11,1.13 & 1.14 Lot # Setbacks (ft) Building Average Side Yard Net Pad Coveraae” Plan Elevation Color Front Rear Left Right Garage Porch Area (SF) Sq. Footage K of Net Pad areas, structures under 30 imhes in height and masonry walls rmt greater than 6 Let in height such as wing-walls. planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls Neighborhood 1.11 -Product 2 Neighbohood 1.13 -Product 2 Neighborhood 1.14 - Product 1 The optional Casita for the Plan 3, Product II, cannot be accommodated on Lots 1,10, 24,34,36 and 41 PUDO212A.attachment5.xlsExD-lndivLotData 08/03/2004 9:24 AM Page 2 of 2 Neighborhood 1.14 Section B 6 d c 0 0 al v) .- .+a ,. ,*< n I). 2 I, ni * .r Y-- n a Z c3 T- T- - T- T- T- cn 0 0 I LT 0 m I w z a a ai2 I 33 / i '. a!- Y o U k W rn m 35- 1 I)- >$ a?a 33 SEE SHEET 9 38 39 , I nn I I U I rl I , nn a 2 z 4 U --1 I I I I I I I _-_J n 8 w z U nn rr: 0 Lr, s n 2 z 0 V I c c I I I I I I r 46 47 I ! C , I . I -.. . , I I i I \ F el f li a M rA N z U II el L h el 56 r L U -1 I I I I I I 7- I I . .. I I I a z 4 ;;I 57 U N P I I w P U 4 I I I I J 3 0 0 0 V w, U K! & 0 cr, s n w z 0 V Lz f nn m r-----------i U -1 c4 0 0 4 LL M 4 .ra F IA w 9 \ \ il z -!, f Cl a z 4 Cl a r--- I 4 s z e, d i: 4 I "". I -- U I L_-_ II -v I I 77 I SU IL nn 1 U d 0 0 a 9 R 4 cl W d 4 w d E 2 P z 4 4 W m E 2 f! 5 2 m d a W t? rA 83 P z 4 +l a U r -I- i P z c cl a 85 U -_ I I I I I s U r-1-1 -1 I I I I I I I .A s , -'Y[r----Jl 93 P z 4 el a U rrii I I I I I I a z 2 14 PI 94 U I I I -7 t I .-J I I J , 95 U U 1 I I a el W P 2 z 8 W el W d 4 W d W E! m 99 s d n s 2 n I -- I I I /I h t z c 4 a t z c I4 a , I n 5 z a 7 I I I I I I I ,.I .. . I , I t d w w E rA I 9 z 4 el W d d E ii 2 9 z 4 el W BI E ii f! s m F- 3: d I cl w a d Planning Commission Minutes EXHIBIT 5 September 15,2004 DRAFT page4 5. PUD 02-12(A) -VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1 .I 1, 1 .I 3 AND 1 .I 4 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and to recommend approval, pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, of an amendment to Planned Development Permit, PUD 02-12, for architecture and plotting for the development of 129 single-family detached homes located within Neighborhoods 1.1 1 ,, 1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa Greens. The project neighborhoods are located along the east and west sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and just north of Alga Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. Mr. Neu introduced Item 5 and stated Associate Planner Saima Qureshy would make the staff presentation. Chairperson Whitton opened the public hearing on Item 5. Ms. Qureshy stated the project is a request to amend PUD 02-12 for the approval of architecture and plotting for lots located in Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1 .I3 and 1 .I4 of the La Costa Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan, which was approved by City Council October 2001, established permitted uses, development standards and design criteria, and the development review process to be utilized by subsequent projects. Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1 .I3 and 1.14 are located immediately north of Alga Road and on the east and west sides of Alicante Road. Lots for the neighborhoods were created by the tentative map CT 02-24. These neighborhoods have a total of 129 single-family residential lots and each lot is a minimum of 5,000 square feet in area. There are two product types proposed each with three different floor plans. For Product 1, which is plotted in Neighborhood 1.14, three floor plans are proposed which range in size from 2,700 square feet to around 2,965 square feet. Three different elevations are proposed for each floor plan. Product 2, which is plotted in Neighborhoods 1.1 1 and 1.13, also has three different floor plans as well as a 2 Plan, a smaller version of Plan 2 and is used on smaller lots. The floor plans range in size from 3, 060 square feet to around 3,400 square feet. Each plan with this product type also has three different elevation styles. Ms. Qureshy stated that the project is consistent with all the design guidelines and standards of the Master Plan, which include among other things, lot coverage, requirement of providing various building planes and incorporating specific design features. The project is within the scope of the previously certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Ms. Qureshy concluded her presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if any letters have been received regarding the project. responded that there have not been any letters received. Ms. Qureshy Chairperson Whitton asked if the applicant wanted to make a presentation. Commissioner Segall stated that the applicant serves on the Board of Director for the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce, and they have not had any discussions regarding the project. Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite A, Carlsbad, representing John Laing Homes, gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding the details of the project. He concluded his presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if the Commission had any questions of the applicant or if anyone in the public wished to speak on the Item. Seeing none, he opened and closed public testimony on the Item. MOTION ACTION : Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 02-12(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ,/It Planning Commission Minutes September 15,2004 Page 5 VOTE: 7-0 AYES: NOES: None Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery and Segall Chairperson Whitton closed the Public Hearing on Item 5 1f7 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. printer of I am the principal clerk of the North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: October 02"d, 2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 04th Day of October, 2004 /- This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24 La Costa Greens in the City of Carlsbad County of .$an Die 0, State of California, Accordin to'Ma No 14807 file& the office of the San Diego 8ounly {ecorder on May 27, 2004. am CASE FILE: PUD 02-12(A) I CASE NAMEIVILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13AND 1.14 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NCT 1703336 October 02,2004 Signature Jane Olson NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE B 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 hlDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION AD M I N SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SANMARCOS CA 92069 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SANDIEGO CA 92123 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SANDIEGO CA 92123 ATTN TED ANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTH 0 Rl TY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING JEREMY RIDDLE DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER .og@&mi@ Shipping Labels CITY OF ENClNlTAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENClNlTAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DlST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER SAIMA QURESHY LaserAnk Jet Labels \ILL Lr-UHS - www.avery.com #Use Aveyy@ TEMPLATE 8160TM "" ) ' " J lC\ - 1 -800-GO-AVE RY KSL LA COSTA RESORT CO REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M LAWRENCE D VALENT1 2035 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 50905 AVENIDA BERMUDAS LA QUINTA CA 92253 JOHN T LUDEMAN 2043 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 BARRY W CLARK 2051 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 SIEGEL TRUST PO BOX 2172 SANTA MONICA CA 90407 EDWARD J MUSBACH 2105 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 MELVEN & LYNN GENSER 21 13 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 BARRY A & ANNE WISH 2121 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 MEADE TRUST 2129 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAY M & SANDEE FULLER 2145 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 W H PERRY 7001 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 WEINBERGER TRUST 7009 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 DONALD E WEBB CARLSBAD CA 92009 7017 ALMADEN LN TERRILL R MCCABE 7025 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 F M & NANCY CORRIGAN 9016 GREENSBORO LN LAS VEGAS NV 89134 CHARLES H GREER INCLINE VLG NV 89451 930 TAHOE 802-259 BLVD MATARWE TRUST 7042 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH & TRACI KAUFMAN 7018 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 IZNER TRUST 7034 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 RONALD L SIMONTON 7026 ALMADEN LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 SETH S & KATHY LEVINE STE 10 6965 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOY R TUSHINSKY 2207 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH & ROSE PIAZZA 9423 SEA VIEW AVE BROOKLYN NY 11 236 LUBICK TRUST 7011 ALICANTE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID KLEINMAN 7019 ALICANTE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 RADES TRUST 7027 ALICANTE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARGARET S POMERANTZ 7035 ALICANTE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAPOSHNICK TRUST 2153 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 VLADISLAV DROZDOV 2161 ALGA RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 VLC Gvce?n+ m www.avery.com 1 Laserhnk Jet Labels Use Avev TEMPLATE 8160TM \ .\\ !. i3> \. \* - 1-800-GO-AVERY CARL A & MARY BLAZE 2422 UNICORN10 ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 WADOUD TRUST 2418 UNlCORNlO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALAN B & RUTH CLARK PO BOX 2068 CAPISTRANO BEACH CA 92624 JACQUES P BRUYERE 2415 UNlCORNlO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD S GNAZZO 2419 UNlCORNlO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 KOZlCKl COMMUNITY TR 7231 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE G WOOD 7009 VIA OSTIONES CARLSBAD CA 92009 LE L HAYSLIP 701 3 VIA OSTIONES CARLSBAD CA 92009 HERVE M MALAUSSENA 2 OVERLOOK TER LARCHMONT NY 10538 SATYA P & URMILA SINGH 7023 VIA OSTIONES CARLSBAD CA 92009 RALPH GARCIA 7016 VISTA OLAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 COREY W & DONYA BRAUN 7012 VISTA OLAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAMILLE R SHORE 7008 VISTA OLAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT R DAVIS 7004 VISTA OLAS CARLSBAD CA 92009 RANDALL M RAGAN PO BOX 951 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 HOUSSEIN A JAHANGlRl 3906 N MESA VERDE AVE FARMINGTON NM 87401 PAUL D GILL 2388 TERRAZA PANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIN F STEPHENS 7339 BOLERO ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRADLEY G COLEMAN STE 73 6550 PONTO DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 SUSAN A SWIFT 2380 TERRAZA PANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 WES & FAYE SCARBROUGH 2372 TERRAZA PANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ADRIAN BROKKEN 2379 TERRAZA PANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 KOLAN J HAIRSTON 2375 TERRAZA PANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BLAINE & KELLY BARTH 7006 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOMAS J VALENTE 7010 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 SVEN M SCHRECKER 7014 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 L E & LINDA HEYDEN 701 8 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GAMBOA TRUST 2386 VIA PELICAN0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAHIN MAHROIAN 2390 VIA PELICAN0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD CASSONI 2389 VIA PELICAN0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 www.avery.com ytc Lr-LC-5 m Laser/lnk Jet Labels Use Avetym TEMPLATE 816P \. \\ 1 .\?3,\-M - 1-800-GO-AVE RY DOG AC BIRD STE 200 7825 FAY AVE LA JOLLA CA 92037 KOHRS TRUST 2385 VIA PELICAN0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 MANGIO TRUST 2381 VIA PELICAN0 CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARPENTIER TRUST 2371 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GAYLE G KILLION 2367 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 TERRY L & RUBEN ZEPEDA 2361 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID & TRACY GUSTAFSON 2357 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEVEN M NEWBERG 2353 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 EBEL TRUST 2349 TERRAZA SALVO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALFRED NEWHUIS 7025 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 PAMELA L SCHAEFFER 7021 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES M SPAWTON 7017 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 NORMAN & MARY DUNCAN 701 3 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 LARRY M MYRES 7009 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 HURN TRUST 2753 SW SHERWOOD DR PORTLAND OR 97201 JOHN R & LINDA WlSS 7001 VIA COELLO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROGER & ANDREA EVANS 5289 MOHAVE DR SlMl VALLEY CA 93063 STEVEN R LANDA 7004 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 EDDIE V HAMAMA 7008 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANDREW J SUTTNER 7012 VIA PADlLLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEAN GRANDE 7016 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSEPH M MARIANO 7020 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHERYL E HOFFMAN 7003 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRIAN MCCLUSKEY 7007 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHRISTOPHER H ELLIS 7013 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRADLEY S VAUGHN 7017 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MASSEY TRUST 7021 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARYROSE BREHM 7025 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN C & LISA ESTILL 7029 VIA PADILLA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BORIS MATHlSZlK 7030 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 www.avery.com 1 -800-GO-AVERY KIMBERLY A SCOTT 7026 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRIESEN TRUST 7022 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA CRAIG G FENSTERMAKER 701 8 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 92009 JAMES G & REA PICONE 7014 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT D GLISSMEYER 7010 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM E BARNETT 7006 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 GARY REYNOLDS 7009 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAMPBELL TRUST 7013 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BROADWAY TRUST 701 9 VIA CALAFIA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MAUREEN A GALLAGHER 7023 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARCIA L PINK 7027 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREGORY FARM LTD PARTNER PO BOX 1053 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 MARCUS TRUST 7035 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRIAN J SMITH 2322 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE &JEANIE KNOP 231 8 TERAZZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 KATHLEEN HEFFERNAN 2314 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEVEN W HAVERSTICK 2310 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 FLORES TRUST 7042 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 POWELL TRUST 7405 NEPTUNE DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 AARON M DRESSIN 7034 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JEFFREY L GAFFNEY 7030 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHARLES BECHER 801 MlDORl CT SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 SAMAD M EDLOU 7016 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM R WATSON 7024 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ERKENBECK TRUST 7008 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANTHONY T WANG 1600 HARKNESS ST MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 MORILLA TRUST 701 5 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARY E MANNING 701 9 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 NORDHOLM TRUST 703 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 LARRY L SOLDATY 7029 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 www.avery.com \LSGWrc+S m I LaserAnk Jet Labels Use Ave’tym TEMPLATE 8160TM \ .\ \ , \ . \3, \. \ - 1 -800-GO-AVERY @ AERY@ 18160TM EDDY S HSlA 7033 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK R GOOD 7037 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 GERALD C YOUNG 7041 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROZA H GREGORCICH 7045 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 FREDDY W CHANG 7049 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 MUNSON TRUST 7051 VIA CABANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID B & KERRI ROWE 2303 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 DWINELL TRUST 2307 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JORGE A ROMAN 231 1 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT L AIMONE 2315 TERAZZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEPHEN & MAR1 WRIGHT 2319 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 KASHINAD TRUST 7019 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 RONALD S ARAUJO 7023 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 KATHY BABA 7027 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GORDON R MAYHEW 7031 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANIEL YANG 7035 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID L DAUGHERTY 7039 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 RAYMOND P SWARTZ 7043 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JESSICA M VANONI 7047 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALAN B MEYERS 7051 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MONDRE VANDERLEE 7055 VIA CANDREJO CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM S KREMEN 2351 TERRAZA GUITARA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JUDY H GAZE 18125 MOON SONG CT SAN DIEGO CA 92127 LAVKESH & PRlTlE GARG 2343 TERM GUITARA CARLSBAD CA 92009 VEEDA J LISLE 2339 TERRAZA GUITARA CARLSBAD CA 92009 RONALD A & E HILL 2335 TERRAZA GUITARA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALAN B MARCHER 2331 TERRAZA GUITARA CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES K & OLGA MORRIS 2324 TERM RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009 HEATHER D HAND 2328 TERRAZA RIBERA IOURI M CHElKlNE 2658 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD DEL MAR CA 920 14 @ AVERWB 18160~~ I Laser/lnk Jet Labels uLC&v-k5 - www.avery.com UseA~e!ry@'TEMPlATE8160~~ \. \\, \ .\3, I.\q - 1 -800-GO-AVE RY CARLOS & LISA ORDAZ 2336 TERRAZA RIBERA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALGA HILLS HOA STE 250 5465 MOREHOUSE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC STE A 5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 wO9 18 1 D & LANELL HAROLD 7002 VIA CALlFlA CARLSBAD CA JOHN LAING HOMES STE 160 6183 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 MORROW DEVELOPMENT STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ALGA HILLS HOA PO BOX I60278 92009 BIG SKY MT 5971 6 PULTE HOMES STE 101 5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 CNLM STE H 425 E ALVARADO ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 ! 0 (D F w 3 cn c t W' Villages of La Costa –La Costa GreensNeighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14PUD 02-12(A) Location MapEL CAMINO REAL ALGA RDUNICORNIO STALMADEN LNALICANTE RDESTRELLA DEMARRDSITEALICANTE(FUTURE RD) Master Plan•Approved in 2001•Establishes–Permitted uses–Development standards–Design criteria–Development review process ••CT 02CT 02--24/PUD 0224/PUD 02--1212••Project InformationProject Information¾¾42.8 Acres42.8 Acres¾¾129 Single129 Single--Family Family Residential LotsResidential Lots99N. 1.11: 35 LotsN. 1.11: 35 Lots99N. 1.13: 33 LotsN. 1.13: 33 Lots99N. 1.14: 61 LotsN. 1.14: 61 Lots¾¾8 Open Space Lots8 Open Space Lots¾¾Min. 5,000 sq. ft. LotsMin. 5,000 sq. ft. LotsLa Costa Greens NeighborhoodsLa Costa Greens Neighborhoods1.11, 1.13, 1.141.11, 1.13, 1.14 Approval of Architecture and Plotting•Product I–Three floor plans•Plan 1: 2,766 sq. ft.•Plan 2: 2,838 sq. ft.•Plan 3: 2,965 sq. ft.–Three different elevation styles for each floor plan Approval of Architecture and Plotting•Product II–Three floor plans•Plan 1: 3,060 sq. ft.•Plan 2: 3,399 sq. ft.•Plan 2x: 3,095 sq. ft.•Plan 3: 3,424 sq. ft.–Three different elevation styles for each floor plan Relevant Policies•Villages of La Costa Master Plan•Evaluated in Final Program EIR 98-07•Proposed project determined to have no effects beyond those analyzed in EIR 98-07 Recommendation•That the City Council approve PUD 02-12(A)