HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-10-12; City Council; 17838; VLC Greens Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 & 1.14n
VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.1 1,1.13 AND 1.14
MTG. 10/12/04 PUD 02-12(A)
DEPT.
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
CITY ATTY
Project Applications
PUD 02-1 2(A)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Ad mi nistrative Reviewed by and To be reviewed -
Approvals Final at Planning Final at Council
Commission
X
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-330 , APPROVING Planned Unit
Development Amendment PUD 02-12(A) for the Villages of La Cdsta Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1,
1.1 3 and 1.14 as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On September 15, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential
project. Since the Planned Unit Development Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action.
The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and 1.14 and
consists of approval of architecture and plotting for 129 single-family dwelling units. The lots for this
neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 02-24 and Planned Development Permit PUD
02-1 2, approved by the City Council on December 2, 2003. The neighborhoods consist of lots with a
minimum area of 5,000 square feet.
The Planning Commission had no issues with the proposal and voted 7-0, without discussion, to
recommend approval of the project to the City Council.
The Planning Commission’s action is included in the attached minutes. A complete description and
staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared initial studies for the project and concluded that no potentially significant
impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential
environmental effects of the development and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan”
and associated actions .inclusive of the proposed planning areas reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Planning Areas project have been completed,
incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR
98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies to all subsequent
projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are
a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07
I
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,838
and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the respective initial studies for each
application are available at the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-330
2. Location Map
3.
4.
5.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated September 15,2004
Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated September 15, 2004.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Saima Qu reshy, (760) 602-461 9, squre @ ci.carlsbad.ca.us
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-330
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 02-12 TO APPROVE
ARCHITECTURE AND PLOTTING FOR 129 SINGLE-FAMILY
DETACHED HOMES GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE
EAST AND WEST SIDES OF ALICANTE ROAD, SOUTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE AND JUST NORTH OF ALGA ROAD AND
EAST AND WEST OF ALICANTE ROAD WITHIN THE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11,
1.13 AND 1.14 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER
PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASE NAME: VLC GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.1 1,1.13 AND
1.14
CASE NO.: PUD 02-12(A)
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on September 15, 2004, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law to consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 12th day of
October , 2004, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit
Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests,
comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 02-1 2(A); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 02-12(A) is approved by the City Council and that
the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 5725, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the
findings and conditions of the City Council.
....
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
' 23
24
25
26
21
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 12th day of October , 2004, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES: None
Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
R. Kundtz, Assistant City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
SI
Ur'
TE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -
GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13AND 1.14
PUD 02=12(A)
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5725
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT PUD 02-12(A) TO APPROVE ARCHITECTURE
AND PLOTTING FOR 129 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
HOMES GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE EAST AND
WEST SIDES OF ALICANTE ROAD, SOUTH OF POINSETTIA
LANE AND JUST NORTH OF ALGA ROAD WITHIN THE
GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 OF THE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASENAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA
GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND
1.14
CASE NO. : PUD 02- 12(A)
WHEREAS, John Laing Homes, “Developer,” has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management
Company, “Owner,” described as
Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24, La Costa
Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, According to Map No. 14807 filed in the office of
the San Diego County Recorder on May 27,2004
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A” - “GGGG” dated September 15,2004, on
file in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 - PUD 02-12(A) as provided by Chapter 21.06 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of September 2004,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -
12(A) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11,1.13 AND 1.14 - PUD 02-
Findines:
1.
2.
3.
That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the Villages of
La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 were subdivided into 129
residential lots and the project floorplans were designed to fit within the lot
boundaries of each residential lot and comply with all applicable development
standards.
That the proposed project’s density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the proposed building floor plans, elevations and
plotting have been designed consistent with the design criteria of the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan which has taken the site, surroundings, environmental settings,
and traffic circulation into consideration prior to its adoption.
The Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan for
which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given,
which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program
approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for
the purposes of CEQA); [ 15 168(c)(2) and (e)]; and
b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and
c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior plan; and
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIR; and
7 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist; and
f. the Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed,
incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for
this subsequent project.
4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and
ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide fbnding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
5. - The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a
precise grading plan or building permits whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City’s approval of
this Planned Unit Development Amendment.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Planned Unit Development Amendment documents, as
necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on
the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits.
Any proposed development different fi-om this approval, shall require an amendment to
this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PC RES0 NO. 5725 -3- 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and issuance of this Planned Unit Development
Amendment, and (b) City’s approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein. This
obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if
the City’s approval is not validated.
Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar
copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making
body.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 18 months from the date of project approval.
Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit or building permit whichever
occurs first, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the
office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director,
notifylng all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has
issued a Planned Unit Development Amendment by Resolution No. 5725 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment
to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by
the Developer or successor in interest.
Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
7 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010.
Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project’s
market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by,
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
Local Facilit-ies Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxedfees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxedfees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited .to trails, future and
existing schools, parks and streets.
Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
JQ PC RES0 NO. 5725 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19.
20.
21.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice
that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing
Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City
Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department).
Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 02-24
in Resolution No. 5476 which are incorporated by reference herein.
Engineering
22. Prior to issuance of a precise grading permit, Developer shall process and receive
approval of a construction revision to City Drawing No. 406-3 or other applicable
City record drawings to document the relocation or installation of new sewer
- laterals, water laterals, curb outlets, and driveways as necessary to support the.
development of the dwellings as shown on this site plan for this project. The
construction revisions shall be processed and prepared to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
Code Reminders:
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
23.
24.
...
...
...
...
Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditions are
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or
interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest.
The Developer shall immediately initiate negotiations to acquire such property. The
Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If unsuccessfU1,
Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with the
requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the
City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
PC RES0 NO. 5725 -6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
“fees/exactions. ”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise’
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th, day of September 2004, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Whitton; Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez,
Heineman, Montgomery and Segall
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
4 PC RES0 NO. 5725 -7-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
P.C. AGENDA OF: September 15,2004
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Application complete date: June 4, 2004
Project Planner: Saima Qureshy
Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle
SUBJECT: PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14 - Request for a determination that
the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa
Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the
purposes of CEQA; and to recommend approval, pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan, of an amendment to Planned Development
Permit, PUD 02-12, for architecture and plotting for the development of 129
single-family detached homes located within Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and I. 14
-of La Costa Greens. The project neighborhoods are located along the east and
west sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and just north of Alga Road
in Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
L
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 02-
12(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 129 single-family
dwelling units located in Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa Greens of the Villages
of La Costa Master Plan. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT
02-24 and Planned Development Permit PUD 02-12, approved by the City Council in December
2003. The minimum lot size for this neighborhood is 5,000 square feet and therefore a Planned
Development Permit was required. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and
pursuant to Section 4.6.4 of the Master Plan, could subsequently be processed through an
amendment to the Planned Development Permit. The applicant is now proposing archtecture
and plotting for the subject neighborhoods. There are two product types proposed with a total of
six floor plans. For Neighborhood 1.14 (Product I), three floor plans are proposed ranging in
size from 2,766 to 2,965 square feet. For
Neighborhoods 1.1 1 and 1.13 (Product II), three floor plans are proposed ranging in size from
3,060 to 3,424 square feet. The project has a total of 12 color schemes. The project complies
with all City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings
can be made for the approval being requested. City Council action is required as the project
contains more than 50 residential units.
Each floor plan has three elevation styles.
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
Living Area
Sq. Ft.
2,766
2,838
2,965
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Garage Total Bldg. Elevation Styles
Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft.
426 3,192 European Cottage,
(2 car> Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
581 3,419 Spanish Colonial,
(2 car> Monterey Ranch,
59 1 3,556 Spanish Colonial,
Tuscan
(3 car) Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
B ackaround
2
3
On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has recorded for The Greens, mass
grading and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing.
Additionally, the final map for CT 02-24 was approved by the City Council on May 18, 2004.
Precise grading and improvement plans associated with this subdivision have also been
approved.
1,397 1,44 1
1,398 1,567
Proiect Description
The project site, Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 of The Greens of the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan, is located on the east side of the north course of the La Costa Golf Course,
extending from an area north of Alga Road to an area south of Neighborhood I. 10, with Alicante
Road passing through the middle. The project site is within Local Facilities Management Zone
10. The subject neighborhoods contain 129 single-family residential lots that are a minimum of
5,000 square feet in size. Architecture and plotting were not part of the previous approval. The
Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned
Unit Development Amendment. The applicant has now applied for the review and approval of
architecture and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, two product types are proposed for a total
of six floor plans ranging in size from 2,766 to 2,965 square feet for Product I, and from 3,060 to
3,424 square feet for Product II. A modified Plan 2 is also proposed for Product 11, referred to as
Plan 2X to address unique layouts and small net pad area. The Plan 2X has the same layout as
Plan 2 but has less square footage. Each plan is two stories high with a two or three car garage.
Each floor plan is proposed with three different elevation styles to create a variety of faGades in
the Neighborhoods. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation
styles:
Table 1 - Summarv of Floor Plans - Product I
Plan No. 1 1st Floor I 2nd Floor
S .Ft. S .Ft. I
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
1
2
Table 2 - Summary of Floor Plans - Product I1
Plan No. I 1st Floor I 2nd Floor I Living Area I Garage I Total Bldg. I Elevation Styles
Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. sq. Ft. Sq. Ft.
1,446 1,614 3,060 586 3,646 Spanish Colonial,
(3 car> Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
1,624 1,775 3,399 595 3,994 Monterey Ranch,
2x
(3 car) Santa Barbara,
1,560 1,535 3,095 595 3,690 Tuscan
3
To determine-compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit is required for the development of homes on lots with a minimum area of
less than 7,500 square feet. -
1,616 1,808 3,424 653 4,077 European Cottage,
(3 car) Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the standards contained in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project’s
compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(B))
The project is within The Greens area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan
maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides
detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by
which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhood was divided into 129 residential lots through CT 02-24 and
compliance with the Master Plan standards related to the subdivision was analyzed at that time.
The current application is for the approval of architecture and plotting of the units.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
Villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/
Site Planning Design standards and guidelines, contained in the Master Plan.
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
TAB
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Front Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.a)
Rear Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.e)
Side Yards
(4.6.2.B.2.c)
Street Side Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.d)
Slope Edge Building
Setback
(4.3.4)
Lot Width
(4.6.2.B.1)
E 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE
Standard
15’ minimum, 20’ neighborhood average
(See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages)
A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback
to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover
cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5’ minimum setback from property Line.
For lots with Min. 5,000 SF lot: 15’ minimum setback
Minimum rear yard area shall be 15’ by 15’
Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than
60 wide
Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60’ and
wider
Minimum of 5’ per side
Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20’ in aggregate
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5’
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side
elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard
setback averages a minimum of 7’.
10’ minimum
All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops andor
pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15’ in height
shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7’ horizontal
to 1’ vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of
slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback
standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other
development application requirements.
Lot widths vary from 50’ to 70’
5,000 SF lots: 50’
6,000 SF lots: 50
7,500 SF lots: 60’
10,000 SF lots: 70’
Comments
Product I (Neighborhood 1.14)
Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback
= 20.53’
Product I1 (Neighborhoods 1.11 & 1.13)
Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback
= 22.10’
Combined Neighborhood Average Front YardSetback=21.13’
Please refer to the attached ‘Individual Lot
Data” table for compliance with 15’
minimum. All lots comply.
All lots comply with Minimum 5,000 SF
lot: 15’ minimum rear yard setback.
All lots provide the required 15’ x 15’
usable rear yard area.
Please refer to the attached ‘Individual Lot
Data’ table for side yard setbacks. All lots
comply.
All street side setbacks of 10’
minimum have been met.
All proposed units will meet the required
slope edge setbacks by maintaining the
minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to
the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits
on the enclosed plans for further details.
All lots have a minimum lot width of 50’
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ca
Guideline (VLCMP Reference)
Building Coverage
(4.6.3.B.2)
Building Height
(4.6.3.B.l)
Front Building Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.e &4.6.3.B.4.f)
Standard
I-story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
Garages and the perimeter area of a basement.
Excludes:
Awnings
Open parking areas
Exterior structures such as covered porches
Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as
overhanging balconies that project less than 8’ from the building
Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22’ and a width of 8’
Roof eaves extending less than 30” from the face of any building
Structures under 30” in height
Masonry walls not greater than 6’ in height (wing-walls, planter
walls, grade separation retaining walls).
Maximum of 30’ and 2 stories
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a
minimum of 10’ between front and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’.
33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate
planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted.
dPLIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
Lot coverage: Product I:
Plan 1 = 2,313 SF
Plan 2 = 1,978 SF
Plan 3 = 2,399 SF (1,989 SF w/o Casita
option)
Product n:
Plan 1 = 2,032 SF
Plan 2 = 2,219 SF
Plan 2X = 2,155 SF
Plan 3 = 2,269 SF
All plans are two-story structures and do
not exceed 40% of net pad area as required.
Please refer to attached ‘Individual Lot Data’ table for building coverage.
All lots comply.
Product I:
Plan 1 = 25’-2W, 23’-4“,26’-11” Plan 2 = 24’-8’, 27’-4”, 27’-4W
Plan 3 = 25’-3”, 24’-5”, 25’-3”
Product I1 Plan 1 = 25’-11”. 26’-lo”, 25’”’’
Plan 2 = 23’-lo”, 25’-5”, 23’-10”
Plan 2X = 23’-IO”, 25’-5”, 23’-10”
Plan 3 = 26’4”, 27’-9”, 26.4’
The details are shown on the architectural
plan and building plane exhibits. All units
comply.
Product I:
Plan 1 = 5 planes
Plan 2 = 5 planes
Plan 3 = 4 planes (does not meet the min.
separation of IO’)
Plan types 1 & 2 are plotted on a total of 38
lots or 62.3%
Product 11:
Plan 1 = 4 planes
Plan 2 = 5 planes
Plan 2X = 4 planes (does not meet the min.
separation of 10’)
Plan 3 = 5
Plan types 1,2 & 3 are plotted on a total of 56 lots or 82.4%
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Rear Building Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
Front Building Elevations
(4.6.3.B.6)
Side & Rear Elevations
(4.6.3.8.7)
Elevations Fronting
Circulation Element Roads
(4.6.3.A.1 .a)
~ Floor Plans
(4.6.3.BS.c &4.6.3.BS.d)
Single-Story Units
(5.7.3.6.0.5.7.3.12.0 &
4.6.3.8.4.1)
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.8.4.11 &4.6.3.BS.b)
Standard
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a
minimum of 3’ between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with 45’ of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45’
__________~ Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of
design elements to create character and interest to the home. These
elements vary depending on the architectural style used.
~~ ~~ Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to
publidprivate roads.
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will
include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front
elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies,
where noise standards allow, is encouraged.
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan.
For neighborhoods on ridgelineslhilltops that are visible from a
circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-
story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’, (IO’
preferred).
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage,
including all garage area.
vlPLIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
The details are shown on the architectural
plan and building plane exhibits. All units
comply.
Product I Plan 1 = 5 planes
Plan 2 = 4 planes
Plan 3 = 4 planes
Product I1
Plan 1 = 4 planes
Plan 2 = 4 planes
Plan 2X = 3 planes
Plan 3 = 4 planes
Plan types 1,2, & 3 are plotted on a total of
56 lots or 82.4%
All elevation styles comply. Please refer to
the attached “Building Elevation Design
Elements” table.
All elevation styles comply. Please refer to
the attached “Building Elevation Design
Elements” table.
All elevation styles comply. Please refer to
the attached “Building Elevation Design
Elements” table.
The proposed project includes six floor
plans with three distinctive elevation types
for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans.
Not Applicable. Neighborhood has not
been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop that is visible foam a circulation element
roadway by the Master Plan.
Please refer to the enclosed architectural
plans that detail the single story features
provided. All proposed plans comply.
Product I
Plan 1 = 43.5% Plan 2 = 72.9%
Plan 3 = 7 1.5%
Product 11:
Plan 1 = 79.4%
Plan 2 = 80.0%
Plan 2X = 79.7%
Plan 3 = 7 1.2%
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
Page 7
TABLE 3: t I
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Where (3) Two Story Units
occur in a row with less
than 15 ft between homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.b)
occur in a row with 15 ft to
20 fl behveen homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.c)
Single-Story Elements
(4.6.3.B.4.d)
Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9,4.6.2.B.2.f & 4.6.2.B.3)
Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a)
LLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO
Standard
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10’ deep
and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15’.
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5’ deep
and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as aplateline maximum of 15’
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element,
with a minimum depth of 3’, that is 40% or greater than the front
elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify.
25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5’ deep, across 33% of
the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10’.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5’
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over
porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and
ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the
purposes of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on comer lots should consider having the porch wrap around
the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5’ and 8’ respectively into the required front yard setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2’
into the required setbacks.
May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2’. The total
length ofthe encroachment may not exceed 8’ and shall be located within
the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an
additional 12” into the required setback.
A minimum 5’ setback must be maintained.
dPLIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
Product I:
Plan 2 incorporates a single story building
edge that is at least 10’ wide and runs the
length of the building.
Product 11:
Plan 2X incorporates a single story building
edge that is at‘least IO’ wide and &s the -
length of the building.
Product I:
Plan 1 and 2 incorporate a single story
building edge that is at least 5’ and IO’
wide, respectively, and runs the length of
the building.
Product 11:
Plan 1 and 2X incorporate a single story
building edge that is at least 5’ and 10’ wide, respectively, and runs the length of
the building.
Producf I:
Plan types 1 and 2 incorporate a single story
building element that is greater than 40% of the width and a minimum of 3’ deep. These
plan types are plotted on a total of 38 lots or
62.3%
Product 11:
All plan types incorporate a single story
building element that is greater than 40% of
the width and a minimum of 3’ deep.
Product I:
29.5% of the elevations incorporate a front
:ourtyard (All elevation types for the Plan
2)
Product 11:
72.1% of the elevations incorporate a
balcony (Spanish Colonial style of the Plan
1 ; Monterey Ranch style of the Plans 2 &
2X; All elevation types for the Plan 3).
Please refer to the enclosed architecture and
site plan for compliance.
Product 11, Plan 1 includes an entry tower that is plotted on all three elevation types
within Neighborhoods 1.11 & 1.13. The
proposed tower element complies with the setbacks and maximum size criteria.
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
TABLE 3: 7 I
Guideline
VLCMP Reference
(4.6.2.B.3)
Recreation Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
(4.6.2.B.2.b,4.6.3.B.4.h, &
4.6.3.B. 13)
I
LLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO
Standard
Fireplace structures not wider than 8’, cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills,
buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the
building may intrude up to 2’ into the required setbacks.
Common recreation areas:
Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking
“Pocket Parks” -Not required to provide parking
Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to
serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units.
More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is
required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a
rate of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20’ by 20’.
Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12’ in width by
20’ in length may be provided as an alternative.
~~ 20’ minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the
street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15’ setback from property line.
They also must be designed to appear as a livable poi3ion of the home
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater
than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an
additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit’s frontage.
The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row
garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three
door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least
18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used within each
neighborhood to improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum of
18” for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages)
qPLIANCE CONTINUED
Corn men ts
No projections extend into the side yard
setback more than 2’ nor are any
projections greater than 8’ in length. All
plans comply.
Parking for the future recreation facility
located at southwest of the intersection of
Goldstone Road and Alicante Road will be
shown when the necessary amendment for
the facility is proposed.
All plan types include at a minimum one 2-
:ar garage with an interior measurement of
20’ x 20’.
All setbacks for garages that face the street
are greater than 20’. All side-loaded
garages have a setback of at least 15’ and
they appear as livable portions of the
homes.
All 3-car garages are a combination of side
md front loaded configurations.
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)
Roofs
(4.6.3.B.4.k 8~4.6.3.8.8)
Colors (4.6.3.B. 12)
Accessory Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Architectural Styles Permitted
(4.6.3.C & 5.6)
Design Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.i &4.6.3.B.5.e)
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
Standard
Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into
unit designs for each master plan neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and
interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel
the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12
Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations are
acceptable depending upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color
schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural
styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same
architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However,
similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes.
“Adjacent” includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those
directly across the street.
~~~ Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards
set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Muiiicipal Code.
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following
Architectural Styles:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Craftsmen Bungalow
Spanish Colonial
Monterey Ranch
ItalianiTuscan
European Country
California Coastal
California Contemporary-Q’Jeighborhoods 1.10 & 1.12 only)
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall
be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with
wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes).
“Handcrafted” detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns
shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style.
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the
structure.
2chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF.
4PLIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
A variety of roof forms and massing are
proposed with changes in direction and
pitches. See elevations and roof plans for
compliance.
Typical roof pitches:
Product I:
Plan 1 =4:12,5:12,8:12
Plan 2 = 4: 12
Plan 3 = 4:12,5:12
Product 11: Plan 1 =4:12,5:12
Plan 2 = 4:12,5:12
Plaii2X=4:12, 5:12
Plan 3 = 4:12,5:12,6:12
Each plan type plotted on the site plan
includes a color scheme designation to
show compliance. Please refer to the color and materials boards for details on each color scheme and to the site plan for specific plotting.
All plan types comply.
The elevation types included are as follows:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Spanish Colonial
Monterey Ranch
Italian/Tuscan European Country
The windows and doors on the front
elevations are recessed a minimum of 2” or
are trimmed with either wood or raised
stucco. Please refer to the enclosed
elevations on the architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
Please refer to the enclosed elevations on
the architectural plans for compliance
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
Guideline (VLCMF’ Reference)
Window Detailing (4.6.3.B. 10)
TABLE 3: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN CO
Standard
The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following
features:
Deeply recessed windows Exterior wood trim
Paned windows surrounds
Decorative window ledges Accent colors on shutters or
Accent and varied shape other elements
windows Arched elements
Window boxes and planters Shutters
with architecturally evident Raised stucco trim around
supports windows
Window lintels
APLIANCE CONTINUED
Comments
Please refer to the enclosed elevations on
the architectural plans for compliance. All
plans comply.
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation shall incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and side and rear elevations shall incorporate a minimum of 2 such
elements to create character and interest to the homes. The attached table, “Building Elevation
Design Elements,” shows which elements are used for each elevation and floor plans.
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project’s
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 02-24.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially
significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously
examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning
Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development
and operation of the “Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)” and associated actions inclusive
of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to Neighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 have been
completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the
project. The EIR 98-07 “Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations” applies
to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this
project are available at the Planning Department.
PUD 02-12(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1.11, 1.13 AND 1.14
September 15,2004
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Statement
5. Table “Individual Lot Compliance”
6.
7. Reduced Exhibits
8.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5725
Table “Building Elevation Design Elements”
Full Size Exhibits “A” - “GGGG” dated September 15, 2004
a3
NORTH NOT TO SCALE
VILLAGES OF
LA COSTA t OCATION MAP LA COSTA GREENS - NEIGHBORHOODS 1. 11 1.13 & 1.14
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: PUD 02-12(A)
CASE NAME: Villages of La Costa - La Costa Greens Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1.13 And 1.14
APPLICANT: John Laina Homes
REQUEST AND LOCATION: The proiect includes approval of architecture and plotting for
129 single-family dwelling units located in Neighborhoods - 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa
Greens of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Minimum lot size for these neighborhoods is
5,000 square feet. The lots were created with Tentative Map, CT 02-24 and Planned
Development Permit, PUD 02-12. The proiect neighborhoods are located along the east and west
sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and iust north of Alga Road in Local Facilities
ManaPement Zone 10.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24, La Costa
Greens, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map No.
14807 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on May 27,2004.
APN: Various Acres: 42.8 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLM
Density Allowed: 0-4
Existing Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Density Proposed: N/A
Proposed Zone: P-C
Zoning General Plan
Site P-c RLM
North P-C RLM
South RD-M-5000 RM
East P-c RLM
West P-C os
Current Land Use
Mass grading for development
Neighborhood 1.10
Residential Neighborhood
Open Space, Future and
Existing Residential
Open Space
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity):
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
0 Negative Declaration, issued
c] Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, Project is within the Scope of Progam EIR 98-07 approved earlier
- City of Carlsbad
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a coruoration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part John Laina Homes
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
Title Title
Address Address 6183 Paseo Del Norte, Ste. 160
Carlsbad. CA 92009
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (ie, partnership,
tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a coruoration or
partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned cornoration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page
may be attached if necessary.)
Person cOrp/Part Real Estate Collateral Manaaement ComDanv
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wriqht Place, Suite 180
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1 576 (760) 438-1 161 9 FAX (760) 438-0894
046
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes Ix] No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
above information is true and correct to the best o
.a
Age I t for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle President of Morrow Development Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicableldate
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neiqhborhoods 1.11,1.13 &1.14
I I I I Setbacks Ut) Building
PUD021 ZA.attachment5.xlsExD-IndivLotData
08/03/2004 9:24 AM Page 1 of 2
Neighborhood 1.14
Section 6 Table4 3 8
individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neiahborhoods 1.11,1.13 & 1.14
Lot #
Setbacks (ft) Building
Average Side Yard Net Pad Coveraae”
Plan Elevation Color Front Rear Left Right Garage Porch Area (SF) Sq. Footage K of Net Pad
areas, structures under 30 imhes in height and masonry walls rmt greater than 6 Let in height such as wing-walls. planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls
Neighborhood 1.11 -Product 2
Neighbohood 1.13 -Product 2
Neighborhood 1.14 - Product 1
The optional Casita for the Plan 3, Product II, cannot be accommodated on Lots 1,10, 24,34,36 and 41
PUDO212A.attachment5.xlsExD-lndivLotData
08/03/2004 9:24 AM
Page 2 of 2
Neighborhood 1.14
Section B
6
d c 0
0 al v)
.- .+a
,. ,*< n I).
2
I, ni
* .r
Y-- n
a Z
c3 T-
T- -
T-
T-
T- cn
0 0 I LT 0 m I
w z
a
a ai2
I
33
/ i
'.
a!-
Y o U
k W rn
m
35-
1 I)- >$
a?a
33
SEE SHEET 9
38
39
,
I nn I I
U
I rl I
,
nn
a
2
z 4
U
--1 I I I I I
I I _-_J
n
8 w
z U
nn
rr: 0
Lr, s
n
2
z 0 V
I
c
c I
I I I I I r
46
47
I !
C
,
I . I -.. .
,
I I
i I
\
F
el
f li
a
M rA
N z
U
II el L
h el
56
r
L
U
-1 I I I I I I
7- I I
. ..
I
I I
a z 4 ;;I
57
U
N
P
I I
w
P
U
4
I I I I J
3
0 0
0 V w,
U
K!
& 0
cr, s
n
w
z 0 V
Lz f
nn
m
r-----------i
U
-1
c4 0 0 4 LL
M
4 .ra
F
IA w
9
\
\
il
z -!, f
Cl a
z 4 Cl a
r--- I
4
s z
e,
d i:
4
I "". I --
U
I L_-_ II -v I I
77
I SU IL
nn 1
U
d 0 0
a
9
R
4
cl W
d 4 w d
E
2
P
z
4
4 W m
E
2
f!
5 2
m
d
a
W t? rA
83
P z 4 +l a
U
r -I- i
P z c cl a
85
U
-_
I I I I I
s
U
r-1-1
-1 I I I I I
I I
.A s
,
-'Y[r----Jl
93
P z 4 el a
U
rrii
I I I I I I
a z 2 14
PI
94
U
I I I
-7 t
I .-J
I I J
,
95
U
U
1 I I
a
el W
P
2
z 8
W el W
d 4 W d
W E! m
99
s
d
n
s 2
n
I -- I
I I /I h
t z c 4 a
t z c I4 a
,
I
n
5 z
a
7 I I I I I I I
,.I
.. . I
,
I
t
d w w E rA
I
9
z
4
el W
d
d
E
ii
2
9
z
4
el W
BI
E
ii
f!
s
m F- 3:
d
I
cl w
a
d
Planning Commission Minutes EXHIBIT 5
September 15,2004 DRAFT page4
5. PUD 02-12(A) -VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS
1 .I 1, 1 .I 3 AND 1 .I 4 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of
the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and to recommend approval,
pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, of an amendment to
Planned Development Permit, PUD 02-12, for architecture and plotting for the
development of 129 single-family detached homes located within Neighborhoods 1.1 1 ,,
1.13 and 1.14 of La Costa Greens. The project neighborhoods are located along the east
and west sides of Alicante Road, south of Poinsettia Lane and just north of Alga Road in
Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 5 and stated Associate Planner Saima Qureshy would make the staff
presentation.
Chairperson Whitton opened the public hearing on Item 5.
Ms. Qureshy stated the project is a request to amend PUD 02-12 for the approval of architecture and
plotting for lots located in Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1 .I3 and 1 .I4 of the La Costa Greens of the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan, which was approved by City Council October 2001, established
permitted uses, development standards and design criteria, and the development review process to be
utilized by subsequent projects. Neighborhoods 1.1 1, 1 .I3 and 1.14 are located immediately north of
Alga Road and on the east and west sides of Alicante Road. Lots for the neighborhoods were created by
the tentative map CT 02-24. These neighborhoods have a total of 129 single-family residential lots and
each lot is a minimum of 5,000 square feet in area. There are two product types proposed each with
three different floor plans. For Product 1, which is plotted in Neighborhood 1.14, three floor plans are
proposed which range in size from 2,700 square feet to around 2,965 square feet. Three different
elevations are proposed for each floor plan. Product 2, which is plotted in Neighborhoods 1.1 1 and 1.13,
also has three different floor plans as well as a 2 Plan, a smaller version of Plan 2 and is used on smaller lots. The floor plans range in size from 3, 060 square feet to around 3,400 square feet. Each plan with
this product type also has three different elevation styles.
Ms. Qureshy stated that the project is consistent with all the design guidelines and standards of the Master Plan, which include among other things, lot coverage, requirement of providing various building
planes and incorporating specific design features. The project is within the scope of the previously certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
Ms. Qureshy concluded her presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Whitton asked if any letters have been received regarding the project.
responded that there have not been any letters received.
Ms. Qureshy
Chairperson Whitton asked if the applicant wanted to make a presentation.
Commissioner Segall stated that the applicant serves on the Board of Director for the Carlsbad Chamber
of Commerce, and they have not had any discussions regarding the project.
Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite A, Carlsbad, representing
John Laing Homes, gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding the details of the project. He concluded
his presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Whitton asked if the Commission had any questions of the applicant or if anyone in the
public wished to speak on the Item. Seeing none, he opened and closed public testimony on the Item.
MOTION
ACTION : Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No. 5725 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit
Amendment PUD 02-12(A), based on the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
,/It
Planning Commission Minutes September 15,2004 Page 5
VOTE: 7-0
AYES:
NOES: None
Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman,
Montgomery and Segall
Chairperson Whitton closed the Public Hearing on Item 5
1f7
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter.
printer of
I am the principal clerk of the
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
October 02"d, 2004
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This 04th Day of October, 2004
/-
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Lots 1 through 129 of Carlsbad Tract No. CT 02-24 La Costa Greens in the City of Carlsbad County of .$an Die 0, State of California, Accordin to'Ma No 14807 file& the office of the San Diego 8ounly {ecorder on May 27, 2004.
am
CASE FILE: PUD 02-12(A) I CASE NAMEIVILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS NEIGHBORHOODS 1.11, 1.13AND 1.14
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NCT 1703336 October 02,2004
Signature
Jane Olson
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
CARLSBAD UNlF SCHOOL DlST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CITY OF VISTA
PO BOX 1988
VISTA CA 92085
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE B
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
6010 hlDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RECREATION AD M I N
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DlST
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SANMARCOS CA 92069
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SANDIEGO CA 92123
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DlST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SANDIEGO CA 92123
ATTN TED ANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTH 0 Rl TY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
JEREMY RIDDLE
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
.og@&mi@ Shipping Labels
CITY OF ENClNlTAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENClNlTAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DlST
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
SAIMA QURESHY
LaserAnk Jet Labels \ILL Lr-UHS - www.avery.com #Use Aveyy@ TEMPLATE 8160TM "" ) ' " J lC\ - 1 -800-GO-AVE RY
KSL LA COSTA RESORT CO REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M LAWRENCE D VALENT1
2035 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
50905 AVENIDA BERMUDAS
LA QUINTA CA 92253
JOHN T LUDEMAN
2043 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARRY W CLARK
2051 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SIEGEL TRUST
PO BOX 2172
SANTA MONICA CA 90407
EDWARD J MUSBACH
2105 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MELVEN & LYNN GENSER
21 13 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARRY A & ANNE WISH
2121 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MEADE TRUST
2129 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAY M & SANDEE FULLER
2145 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
W H PERRY
7001 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WEINBERGER TRUST
7009 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DONALD E WEBB
CARLSBAD CA 92009
7017 ALMADEN LN
TERRILL R MCCABE
7025 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
F M & NANCY CORRIGAN
9016 GREENSBORO LN
LAS VEGAS NV 89134
CHARLES H GREER
INCLINE VLG NV 89451
930 TAHOE 802-259 BLVD MATARWE TRUST
7042 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KENNETH & TRACI KAUFMAN
7018 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
IZNER TRUST
7034 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD L SIMONTON
7026 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SETH S & KATHY LEVINE
STE 10
6965 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOY R TUSHINSKY
2207 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH & ROSE PIAZZA
9423 SEA VIEW AVE
BROOKLYN NY 11 236
LUBICK TRUST
7011 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID KLEINMAN
7019 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RADES TRUST
7027 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARGARET S POMERANTZ
7035 ALICANTE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAPOSHNICK TRUST
2153 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VLADISLAV DROZDOV
2161 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VLC Gvce?n+ m www.avery.com 1 Laserhnk Jet Labels
Use Avev TEMPLATE 8160TM \ .\\ !. i3> \. \* - 1-800-GO-AVERY
CARL A & MARY BLAZE
2422 UNICORN10 ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WADOUD TRUST
2418 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN B & RUTH CLARK
PO BOX 2068
CAPISTRANO BEACH CA 92624
JACQUES P BRUYERE
2415 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD S GNAZZO
2419 UNlCORNlO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KOZlCKl COMMUNITY TR
7231 EL FUERTE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEORGE G WOOD
7009 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LE L HAYSLIP
701 3 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HERVE M MALAUSSENA
2 OVERLOOK TER
LARCHMONT NY 10538
SATYA P & URMILA SINGH
7023 VIA OSTIONES
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RALPH GARCIA
7016 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
COREY W & DONYA BRAUN
7012 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAMILLE R SHORE
7008 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT R DAVIS
7004 VISTA OLAS
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RANDALL M RAGAN
PO BOX 951
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
HOUSSEIN A JAHANGlRl
3906 N MESA VERDE AVE
FARMINGTON NM 87401
PAUL D GILL
2388 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KEVIN F STEPHENS
7339 BOLERO ST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY G COLEMAN
STE 73
6550 PONTO DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SUSAN A SWIFT
2380 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WES & FAYE SCARBROUGH
2372 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ADRIAN BROKKEN
2379 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KOLAN J HAIRSTON
2375 TERRAZA PANGA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BLAINE & KELLY BARTH
7006 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
THOMAS J VALENTE
7010 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SVEN M SCHRECKER
7014 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
L E & LINDA HEYDEN
701 8 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GAMBOA TRUST
2386 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SHAHIN MAHROIAN
2390 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICHARD CASSONI
2389 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
www.avery.com ytc Lr-LC-5 m Laser/lnk Jet Labels
Use Avetym TEMPLATE 816P \. \\ 1 .\?3,\-M - 1-800-GO-AVE RY
DOG AC BIRD
STE 200
7825 FAY AVE
LA JOLLA CA 92037
KOHRS TRUST
2385 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MANGIO TRUST
2381 VIA PELICAN0
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARPENTIER TRUST
2371 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GAYLE G KILLION
2367 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
TERRY L & RUBEN ZEPEDA
2361 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID & TRACY GUSTAFSON
2357 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN M NEWBERG
2353 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EBEL TRUST
2349 TERRAZA SALVO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALFRED NEWHUIS
7025 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAMELA L SCHAEFFER
7021 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES M SPAWTON
7017 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORMAN & MARY DUNCAN
701 3 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LARRY M MYRES
7009 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
HURN TRUST
2753 SW SHERWOOD DR
PORTLAND OR 97201
JOHN R & LINDA WlSS
7001 VIA COELLO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROGER & ANDREA EVANS
5289 MOHAVE DR
SlMl VALLEY CA 93063
STEVEN R LANDA
7004 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
EDDIE V HAMAMA
7008 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANDREW J SUTTNER
7012 VIA PADlLLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DEAN GRANDE
7016 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH M MARIANO
7020 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHERYL E HOFFMAN
7003 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRIAN MCCLUSKEY
7007 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRISTOPHER H ELLIS
7013 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRADLEY S VAUGHN
7017 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MASSEY TRUST
7021 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARYROSE BREHM
7025 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN C & LISA ESTILL
7029 VIA PADILLA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BORIS MATHlSZlK
7030 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
www.avery.com
1 -800-GO-AVERY
KIMBERLY A SCOTT
7026 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRIESEN TRUST
7022 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA
CRAIG G FENSTERMAKER
701 8 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009 92009
JAMES G & REA PICONE
7014 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT D GLISSMEYER
7010 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM E BARNETT
7006 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GARY REYNOLDS
7009 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CAMPBELL TRUST
7013 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BROADWAY TRUST
701 9 VIA CALAFIA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MAUREEN A GALLAGHER
7023 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARCIA L PINK
7027 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GREGORY FARM LTD PARTNER
PO BOX 1053
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
MARCUS TRUST
7035 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRIAN J SMITH
2322 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GEORGE &JEANIE KNOP
231 8 TERAZZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATHLEEN HEFFERNAN
2314 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEVEN W HAVERSTICK
2310 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FLORES TRUST
7042 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
POWELL TRUST
7405 NEPTUNE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
AARON M DRESSIN
7034 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JEFFREY L GAFFNEY
7030 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHARLES BECHER
801 MlDORl CT
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
SAMAD M EDLOU
7016 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM R WATSON
7024 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERKENBECK TRUST
7008 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANTHONY T WANG
1600 HARKNESS ST
MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266
MORILLA TRUST
701 5 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CARY E MANNING
701 9 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
NORDHOLM TRUST
703 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
LARRY L SOLDATY
7029 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
www.avery.com \LSGWrc+S m I LaserAnk Jet Labels Use Ave’tym TEMPLATE 8160TM \ .\ \ , \ . \3, \. \ - 1 -800-GO-AVERY @ AERY@ 18160TM
EDDY S HSlA
7033 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MARK R GOOD
7037 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GERALD C YOUNG
7041 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ROZA H GREGORCICH
7045 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FREDDY W CHANG
7049 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MUNSON TRUST
7051 VIA CABANA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID B & KERRI ROWE
2303 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DWINELL TRUST
2307 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JORGE A ROMAN
231 1 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
SCOTT L AIMONE
2315 TERAZZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
STEPHEN & MAR1 WRIGHT
2319 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KASHINAD TRUST
7019 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD S ARAUJO
7023 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
KATHY BABA
7027 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GORDON R MAYHEW
7031 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DANIEL YANG
7035 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
DAVID L DAUGHERTY
7039 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RAYMOND P SWARTZ
7043 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JESSICA M VANONI
7047 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN B MEYERS
7051 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MONDRE VANDERLEE
7055 VIA CANDREJO
CARLSBAD CA 92009
WILLIAM S KREMEN
2351 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JUDY H GAZE
18125 MOON SONG CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92127
LAVKESH & PRlTlE GARG
2343 TERM GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
VEEDA J LISLE
2339 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RONALD A & E HILL
2335 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALAN B MARCHER
2331 TERRAZA GUITARA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JAMES K & OLGA MORRIS
2324 TERM RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009 CARLSBAD CA 92009
HEATHER D HAND
2328 TERRAZA RIBERA
IOURI M CHElKlNE
2658 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD
DEL MAR CA 920 14
@ AVERWB 18160~~ I Laser/lnk Jet Labels uLC&v-k5 - www.avery.com
UseA~e!ry@'TEMPlATE8160~~ \. \\, \ .\3, I.\q - 1 -800-GO-AVE RY
CARLOS & LISA ORDAZ
2336 TERRAZA RIBERA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ALGA HILLS HOA
STE 250
5465 MOREHOUSE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC
STE A
5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
wO9 18 1
D & LANELL HAROLD
7002 VIA CALlFlA
CARLSBAD CA
JOHN LAING HOMES
STE 160
6183 PASEO DEL NORTE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MORROW DEVELOPMENT
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALGA HILLS HOA
PO BOX I60278
92009 BIG SKY MT 5971 6
PULTE HOMES
STE 101
5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CNLM
STE H
425 E ALVARADO ST
FALLBROOK CA 92028
!
0 (D F w
3 cn
c
t
W'
Villages of La Costa –La Costa GreensNeighborhoods 1.11, 1.13 and 1.14PUD 02-12(A)
Location MapEL CAMINO REAL ALGA RDUNICORNIO STALMADEN LNALICANTE RDESTRELLA DEMARRDSITEALICANTE(FUTURE RD)
Master Plan•Approved in 2001•Establishes–Permitted uses–Development standards–Design criteria–Development review process
••CT 02CT 02--24/PUD 0224/PUD 02--1212••Project InformationProject Information¾¾42.8 Acres42.8 Acres¾¾129 Single129 Single--Family Family Residential LotsResidential Lots99N. 1.11: 35 LotsN. 1.11: 35 Lots99N. 1.13: 33 LotsN. 1.13: 33 Lots99N. 1.14: 61 LotsN. 1.14: 61 Lots¾¾8 Open Space Lots8 Open Space Lots¾¾Min. 5,000 sq. ft. LotsMin. 5,000 sq. ft. LotsLa Costa Greens NeighborhoodsLa Costa Greens Neighborhoods1.11, 1.13, 1.141.11, 1.13, 1.14
Approval of Architecture and Plotting•Product I–Three floor plans•Plan 1: 2,766 sq. ft.•Plan 2: 2,838 sq. ft.•Plan 3: 2,965 sq. ft.–Three different elevation styles for each floor plan
Approval of Architecture and Plotting•Product II–Three floor plans•Plan 1: 3,060 sq. ft.•Plan 2: 3,399 sq. ft.•Plan 2x: 3,095 sq. ft.•Plan 3: 3,424 sq. ft.–Three different elevation styles for each floor plan
Relevant Policies•Villages of La Costa Master Plan•Evaluated in Final Program EIR 98-07•Proposed project determined to have no effects beyond those analyzed in EIR 98-07
Recommendation•That the City Council approve PUD 02-12(A)