Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-09; City Council; 17880; GP/LUE amendmentCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL TITLE: APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN 2004 TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT FOR GPA 02-05, GPA 03-05, GPA ‘03-08, GPA 03-13, GPA 04-01, GPA 04-04, GPA 04-08, GPA 04- 11 AND GPA 04-13 CITY MGR- RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2004-360 APPROVING the second amendment in 2004 to the Land Use Element, Circulation Element, and Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan for the projects commonly known as Carlsbad Family Housing (GPA 02-05), Emerald Pointe Estates (GPA 03-05), La Costa Resort & Spa Master Plan (GPA 03-08), Residential General Plan/Zoning Consistency Amendments (GPA 03-1 3), Circulation Element Update (GPA 04-01), Lohf Subdivision GPA (GPA 04-04), Palomar Pointe (GPA 04-08), Thompsonflabata GPA (GPA 04-1 I), and Tabata Residential Subdivision (GPA 04-1 3). ITEM EXPLANATION: State law allows a jurisdiction to amend a mandatory element of the General Plan no more than four times per year. The mandatory elements are Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space, Noise, Safety, and Conservation. Each amendment to a mandatory element, however, may include more than one change to that element. The following nine General Plan Amendment applications propose changes to the Land Use Element, Circulation Element and the Open Space and Conservation Element. The City Council has approved in concept each of the applications at duly noticed public hearings on the meeting dates noted below. Staff has grouped the applications together so they comprise the second General Plan Amendment of 2004, referred to as “GPA Batch No. 2.” The recommended action would formally adopt all of the changes, which will enable consistency between the General Plan and zoning and the permits required for the projects associated with each application. Carlsbad Family Housing (GPA 02-05) - On August 10, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan amendment for the Carlsbad Family Housing project. This amendment would change the General Plan Land Use designation for the project site from Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) to Residential High Density (RH) for a 56-unit inclusionary apartment project. In its action, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2 (as shown in Resolution 2004-271). Emerald Pointe Estates (GPA 03-05) - On October 5, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment for the Emerald Pointe Estates project to clarify, refine and adjust land use designation boundaries and implement the proposed Residential Low Density (RL) and Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use designations. In approving the project, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2 (as shown in Resolution 2004- 31 8). La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (GPA 03-08) - On September 21, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment for the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan. A part of the approval was to amend the General Plan to change certain properties from Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) to Open Space (OS); Residential High Density/Office (RH/O) to TraveVRecreation Commercial (T-R); and Residential Medium High Density (RMH) to T-R. The City Council adopted a resolution approving in concept the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan General Plan Amendment and directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2 (as shown in Resolution 2004-304). I -- PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. ‘7,880 Residential General PlanEoning Consistency Amendments (GPA 03-13) - On September 21 , 2004, the City Council approved in concept an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element text to (1) specify that residential density shall not be permitted below the low end of the density range, except that a provision will be added to allow a one-family dwelling on any existing residential lot, regardless of density; (2) clarify the intent and purpose of each residential land use designation, which includes a proposal to allow dwelling types other than one-family dwellings, subject to a planned development permit, in the Residential Low Density (RL) and Residential Low-Medium (RLM) land use designations on sites that contain sensitive habitat; and (3) incorporate the provisions of Government Code Section 65863, which restricts the City’s ability to reduce residential densities below the density utilized to determine compliance with housing element law. As part of its action, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2 (as shown in Resolution 2004-301). Circulation Element Update (GPA 04-01) - On July 27, 2004, the City Council approved in concept an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element text to add the Citywide Trails Program. The amendments will allow for certain Circulation Element roadway trails and sidewalks to be designated as part of the Citywide Trails Program and also provide support and guidelines for the construction of trails in-lieu of sidewalks on portions of selected Circulation Element roadways. As part of its action, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2 (as shown in Resolution 2004-252). Lohf Subdivision GPA (GPA 04-04] - On September 21,2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designations within the Lohf and Steiner subdivisions. The amendment is part of the General Plan/Zoning Consistency program and would relocate the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM), changing the designation of approximately 4.47 acres. The new boundary would be coincident with the subdivision boundaries and the existing One-family Residential, Q Overlay (R-I - Q) zoning designation boundary. As indicated in Resolution 2004-303, the resolution approving the project, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2. Palomar Pointe (GPA 04-08) - On October 19, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for the Palomar Pointe project from Planned Industrial (PI) to PI and Open Space (OS). As indicated in Resolution 2004-339, the resolution approving the project, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2. Thompsonflabafa GPA (GPA 04-11) - On September 14, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation to relocate the boundary between the Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) and Residential Medium Density (RM) designations, changing the designation of approximately 7.9 acres. As indicated in Resolution 2004- 294, the resolution approving the project, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2. Tabata Residential Subdivision (GPA 04-13) - On October 19, 2004, the City Council approved in concept the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on the property from Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) to RLM and Open Space (OS). As indicated in Resolution 2004-338, the resolution approving the project, the City Council directed the formal approval of this amendment as part of GPA Batch No. 2. Staff anticipated GPA 04-07 (Enhanced Retail Opportunities) would also be a part of this second amendment to the General Plan. However, its Council review will not occur in time to be a part of the second amendment. PAGE 3 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17,880 ENVIRONMENTAL: Carlsbad Family Housing (GPA 02-05) - The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on June 21, 2004, in accordance with CEQA. The Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council on August IO, 2004. Emerald Pointe Estates (GPA 03-05) - Potentially significant biological, paleontological and noise impacts were identified in an environmental impact assessment for the project. The developer agreed to mitigation measures to reduce the identified impacts to below a level of significance in accordance with CEQA, and a Mitigated Negative Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated. In response to the circulation, comments were received from the US Fish & Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish & Game, Preserve Calavera and the California Native Plant Society (San Diego Chapter). Based on comments received, the project was revised to avoid impacts to sensitive coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitat. The City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 5, 2004. La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (GPA 03-08) - A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and noticed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). During the public review period, various letters were received. Comments expressed in the letters were already adequately addressed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, through project design, or were not applicable environmental concerns. The City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration on September 21, 2004. Residential General Plan/Zoning Consistence Amendments (GPA 03-13) - A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was prepared by the Planning Director on April 16, 2004. No comments were received and the Negative Declaration and Addendum were adopted by the City Council on September 21,2004. Circulation Element Update (GPA 04-01) -The Planning Director prepared a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on April 28, 2004. No comments were received. The Negative Declaration was adopted by City Council on July 27, 2004. Lohf Subdivision GPA (GPA 04-04) - The boundary adjustments proposed by this project would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Planning Director prepared a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on June 29, 2004. In response, no comments were received. The City Council adopted a Negative Declaration on September 21,2004. Palomar Pointe (GPA 04-08) - Staff conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Potentially significant biological, paleontological, cultural, and noise impacts were identified. The developer agreed to mitigation measures to reduce the identified impacts to below a level of significance in accordance with CEQA. The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on July 12, 2004. Comments were received from CalTrans and from US Fish & Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish & Game (joint Wildlife Agency letter). Based on comments received from the Wildlife Agencies, an errata was prepared to add additional mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Staff responded in writing to comments from CalTrans on August 24, 2004 and to the Wildlife Agencies on August 31, 2004. No new significant impacts requiring mitigation were identified; therefore, changes to the Mitigated Negative Declaration are documented in the addendum presented to the Planning Commission. The Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 19,2004. PAGE 4 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 17*880 Thompsonflabata GPA (GPA 04-77) - The Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration on June 18, 2004. In response, the City received no comments. The City Council adopted a Negative Declaration on September 14, 2004. Tabata Residential Subdivision (GPA 04-13) - The environmental impact assessment identified potentially significant impacts to biological resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and noise. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the design of the project or have been placed as conditions of approval for the project such that all potentially significant impacts have now been mitigated to below a level of significance. Consequently, a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published in the newspaper and sent to the State Clearinghouse for public agency review. One public comment was received via email (dated July 19, 2004) during the 30-day public review and comment period (June 21, 2004 to July 21 , 2004), and one comment was received via email after the 30-day public review and comment period (dated August 19, 2004). The email comments, received as joint comments from the “Wildlife Agencies” (USFSW and CA DF&G), did not identify any new significant environmental effects requiring mitigation. Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 19, 2004. Second amendment to the General Plan - This amendment to the General Plan is considered a project and therefore subject to CEQA. Since the amendment consists of nine different projects, the impacts of each project need to be considered cumulatively. The City’s environmental review of each project determined either the projects would cause no significant environmental effects or that all potential significant effects would be reduced to a level of insignificance because of adopted mitigation measures. Furthermore, the environmental analysis performed revealed that the projects would produce no cumulatively considerable impacts when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probably future projects. Therefore, the cumulative impacts resulting from this second General Plan Amendment have been addressed adequately. FISCAL IMPACT: Carlsbad Family Housing (GPA 02-05) - All infrastructure required by the project would be funded by the developer. The fiscal impact resulting from the applicant’s request for financial assistance from the City will be addressed by a separate agenda bill at a later date. Emerald Pointe Estates (GPA 03-05) - All public infrastructure required by this project will be funded by the developer. La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (GPA 03-08) - The master plan and new uses proposed are anticipated to generate an additional $2.5 million in revenues to the City through TOT, property and sales taxes. At project buildout projected for 2009, the site is anticipated to generate over $6.6 million annually to the City. While providing services to the site (outside the scope of Special Events) will be an expense to the City, these efforts are compensated and balanced by the expected revenue generation from the upgraded resort. Residential General PlanEoning Consistence Amendments (GPA 03-13) - The only anticipated fiscal impact would be from staff time required to complete the amendment process through the Coastal Commission, and to process future development proposals subject to the amended policies and regulations. Circulation Element Update (GPA 04-01) - The proposed amendment will not create a fiscal impact nor hinder the implementation of trails citywide. Lohf Subdivision GPA (GPA 04-04) - The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible in that the proposed action only revises the land use designations and regulations on the property. PAGE 5 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 171880 Palomar Pointe (GPA 04-08) - All public infrastructure required by this project would be constructed by the developer. A portion of the costs associated with grading and improvement of the public street may be reimbursable in accordance with the August 7, 2000 agreement between the Carlsbad Public Financing Authority and James L. Hieatt and Mildred E. Hieatt. Thompsonflabata GPA (GPA 04-77) - The fiscal impacts to the City are negligible in that the proposed action only revises the land use designations and regulations on the property. Tabata Residential Subdivision (GPA 04-13) - All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2004-360 Department Contact: Scott Donnell, (760) 602-461 8, sdonn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-360 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SECOND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT BATCH OF 2004 CONSISTING OF NINE CHANGES TO THE GENERAL PLAN FOR PROJECTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS CARLSBAD FAMILY HOUSING (GPA 02-05), EMERALD POINTE ESTATES (GPA 03-05), LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA MASTER PLAN (GPA 03-08), RESIDENTIAL 03-13), CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE (GPA 04-01), LOHF SUBDIVISION GPA (GPA 04-04), PALOMAR POINTE (GPA 04- 08), THOMPSONnABATA GPA (GPA 04-11) AND TABATA RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (GPA 04-1 3). GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY AMENDMENTS (GPA APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO.: WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65358 and pursuant to the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Planning Commission, on June 2, 2004 (GPA 04-01), June 16,2004 (GPA 03-05), July 7,2004 (GPA 02-05), June 16 and July 21,2004 (GPA 03-13), GPA 04-11 (July 21, 2004), August 18, 2004 (GPA 04-04 and GPA 03-08), and September I, 2004 (GPA 04-13 and GPA 04-08), held duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to consider the proposed changes to the General Plan; and SECOND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT OF 2004 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted resolutions No. 5642, 5644, 5651, 5666, 5676, 5680, 5698, 5710, and 5719, recommending approval in concept of the proposed changes to the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council on July 27, 2004, August 10, 2004, September 14, 2004, September 21, 2004, October 5, 2004, and October 19, 2004, held duly noticed public hearings to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendations and to hear all persons interested in the proposed changes to the General Plan and the related environmental review; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad wishes to consolidate the changes to the General Plan as proposed by GPA 02-05, GPA 03-05, GPA 03-08, GPA 03-13, GPA 04-01, GPA 04-04, GPA 04-08, GPA 04-1 1 and GPA 04-1 3 into a single amendment constituting the second General Plan Amendment of 2004. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. 2. That the above recitations are true and correct. That this is the second of four annual permitted amendments to a mandatory element of the General plan consisting of the following nine changes: a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. i. . . .. .... That the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Carlsbad Family Housing is amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 02-05 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-271 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element and Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Emerald Pointe Estates are amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 03-05 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-31 8 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element and Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan are amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 03-08 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-304 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Residential General Plan/Zoning Consistency Amendments is amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 03-13 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-301 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Circulation Element Update is amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 04-01 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-252 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Lohf Subdivision GPA is amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 04-04 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-303 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element and Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Palomar Pointe are amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 04-08 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-339 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Thompsonmabata GPA is amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 04-1 1 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-294 (on file in the City Clerk’s office). That the Land Use Element and Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan for the project commonly known as Tabata Residential Subdivision are amended as shown on attached Exhibit GPA 04-13 and as provided in City Council Resolution No. 2004-338 (on file in the City Clerk’s off ice). -2- 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption, except as to the General Plan Amendment, which shall be effective thirty (30) days following its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 9th day of November , 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Hall and Packard. NOES: None ABSENT: Council Ifember Kulchin. ATTEST: (SEAL) -3- GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE G.P. Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 21 5-021 -06 RLM RH GPA: 02-05 draft [x1 tinal 0 Approvals Council Approval Date: Resolution No: Effective Date: Signature: JUY 7,2004 Project Name: Carlsbad Family Housing All that portion of fractional northeast quarter of southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. I Related Case File No(s): Property/Legal Description@): ZC M-OWSDP 02-1 3/ SUP 02-09 4 GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE GPA: 03-05 dnfl finat Project Name: Emerald Pointe Estates Parcel 1: All that portion of that parcel of land designated as “description No. 5, 103.54 acres as shown and delineated on Record of Survey Map No. 5715, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, December 19,1960. Excepting therefrom portions of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15661 as described in official records. Parcel 2: Lot 115 of Carlsbad Tract No. 84-32(A), Unit No. 1 (Cobblestone Sea Village) in the Citv of I Related Case File No(s): Propedy/Legal Description(s): LCPA 02-02RC 02-02/CT 02-07/CDP 02-071HDP 02- 02 10 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, According to map thereof No. 13428, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 3,1397. Parcel 3: Easement for roadway and utility purposes over those certain strips of land designated as “60 foot strip and 66 foot easement reserved for roadway ad utility purposes”. As shown on said Record of Survey Map No. 5715. Excepting from 60 foot strip, that portion which lies within Parcel No. 1 above. Parcel 4: A temporary easement for pedestrian and vehicular access, ingress and egress as contained in document recorded May, 1996 as File No. 1996- 02 1877 of official records being a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15661, that portion being a portion of the easement for roadway and utility purposes over those certain strips of land designated and as described in official records. G.P. Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 21 2-1 90-53 RLM RL 6.21 2-040-50 RURLM/OS RUOS ~~ Approvals Council Approval Date: Resolution No: Effective Date: I Attach additional pages if necessary // Signature: CPA 03-08 - existing August 4, 2004 - LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA MASTER PLAN GPA 03-08 GPA 03-08 - proposed August 4, 2004 - PROPOSED I LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA MASTER PLAN GPA 03-08 Exhibit “GPA 03-1 3” June 16,2004 Land Use Element SCHOOLS Elementary Junior High High School Continuation Private OPEN SPACE & COMMUNITY PARKS (0s) TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (TC) UNPLANNED AREAS (UA) COMBINATION DI STRICT Within each land use designation, there exists the potential for certain unique land uses for which there are no specific designations. Such uses may include, but are not limited to churches, or hospitals. These and other unique types of uses cannot be automatically placed within any “A City which provides for a variety of housing types and density ranges to meet the diverse economic and social requirements of residents.. . I” particular land use classification and must be reviewed on an individual site basis through the conditional use permit process (Title 21, Chapter 21.42, Carlsbad Municipal Code). Discussed below are descriptions of the land use classifications including population density and building intensity permitted within each classifi- cation. 1. RESIDENTIAL Density is the unit of measure used to compare and describe the intensity of residential land use. Different categories of density constitute policy statements used in establishing the public facility requirements for each area. Density allocations are not intended to specifically identify building types but rather intensity of use. The City’s goals regarding the need for specific types of residential housing are contained in the Housing Element. That element should be referred to for more detailed information regarding the housing needs of the community and an integrated set of goals, policies and programs to assist the community in meeting those needs. Five ranges of residential density, as shown below, have been incorporated into the General Plan. Each of these categories is implemented by one or more zone classifications that contains specific site development standards. The City also has a specific mobile home park zoning classification although individual mobile homes are permitted in any dmstty residential land use classification. Notwithstandinn the densitv provisions and intent of each residential land use desinnation, as specified below, a one-family dwelling shall be permitted on any legal lot that existed as of October 28, 2004. and which is designated and zoned for residential use. Anv proposal to subdivide land or construct more than one dwelling shall be subject to the densitv and intent of the underlving residential land use designation. a. b. Low Densitv (RL): Low density residential intended to be developed with smgk one- family dwellings on parcels one-half acre or larger at a densitv between 0 to 1.5 units per acre. On sites containinq sensitive biological resources, as identified in the Carlsbad Habitat Mananement Plan, development other than one-familv dwellinns may be approved with a planned development permit, subject to the density ranqe of this designation. ri Y Sy - areas Low-Medium Densitv (RLM): L4badLow- medium density residential areas intended to be developed with angle --family hwtes dwellinqs at a densitv between 0 to 4 dwelling units per gwss acre. #+&e+ef Amended March 27,2001 Page 9 Land Use Element . .... RMH RH C. d. e. I .- 8- 15.0 I 11.5 15-23 I 19.0 On sites containing sensitive biological . resources, as identified in the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, development other than one-familv dwellinns may be approved with a planned development permit, subiect to the densitv ranne of this designation. Medium-Densitv (RM): Lkban-mlVJedium density residential areas 6kfasWked by intended to be developed with sfwW& single --family dwellinns, kms+&~~ 1 dwellings and multiple-familv dwellinas at a densitv between 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. -): mm Medium-hiah densitv residential areas intended to be developed apa#men)- two-family dwellinas and multiple-familv dwellings, as well as one-familv dwellinas (developed as two or more detached units on one lot) at a densitv between 8 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Development of one-family dwellinas on individual lots mav be approved with a planned development permit, subiect to the densitv ranne of this desianation. .. Hiqh Density (RH): High-density residential c&ss&&~ - areas cMra&ewed Sy intended to be developed with twe-afd two-familv and multiple- E$ZZIinns, as well as one-family dwellinns (developed as two or more detached units on one lot) at a density between 15 to 23 dwelling units per acre. .. Certain areas of the City designated for planned communities may have several residential designations or combinations of residential designations. To accommodate good design and planning, as well as environmental and topographical factors, planned communities shall be controlled by a master plan. As part of the City’s Growth Management Plan, a dwelling unit limitation was established for each quadrant of the City. The City shall not approve any general plan amendment, zone change, tentative subdivision map or other discretionary approval for a development that could result in the development above the limit in any quadrant. To ensure that development does not exceed the limit, the following growth management control points are established for the Land Use Element density ranges. The City shall not approve any residential development at a density that exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range without making the following findings: a. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City’s public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted. b. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit. c. All necessarv public facilities reauired bv the Citv’s Growth Management Proaram will be constructed, or are guaranteed to be constructed, concurrentlv with the need for them created bv this development and in compliance with the adopted Citv standards. Ranges Management Control Point RL I 0-1.5 I 1 .o RLM I 0-4.0 I 3.2 t RM I 4-8 I 60 I The residential land use designation2 indicates MAXIMUM development unit yields. To meet the General Plan goals and objectives, including, but not limited to population goals and environmental Page 14 Amended March 27,2001 15 Land Use Element considerations, the ACTUAL yield may be less than maximum potentials, but not less than the minimum densitv of the underlvina land use designation: except. densitv mav be approved below the minimum of the densitv range in the -- a. When a lot is leaal nonconforming, or when two leaal nonconforming lots are consolidated into one lot. b. When a legal lot is developed with one or more residential units that existed as of October 28. 2004: provided, the existing units are to remain and it is not feasible to construct the number of additional units needed to meet the minimum densitv without reauirina the removal of the existing units. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65863. the Citv shall not by administrative, Quasi-iudicial. or legislative action, reduce, reauire or permit the reduction of residential densitv on any parcel to a densitv below that which was utilized bv the California Department of Housina and Communitv Development in determining compliance with housina element law, unless, the Citv, makes written findings SUppOf'kd by substantial evidence of both of the following: a. The reduction is consistent with the adopted qeneral plan. includinq the housina element. b. The remaininq sites identified in the housina element are adeauate to accommodate the Citv's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Government Code Section 65584. If a reduction in residential densitv for any parcel would result in the remainina sites identified in the housina element not being adeauate to accommodate the Citv's share of the reqional housing need, the Citv may reduce the densitv on that parcel provided it identifies sufficient additional, adequate, and available sites with an eaual or greater residential densitv so that there is no net loss of residential unit capacitv. The Citv shall be solelv responsible for compliance with Government Code Section 65863. unless a proiect applicant reauests in his or her initial application. as submitted, a densitv that would result in the remaining sites in the housina element not being adeauate to accommodate the Citv's share of the reaional housing need. In that case, the City may reauire the proiect applicant to complv with Government Code Section 65863. For the purposes of determinina or reauiring compliance with Government Code Section 65863, the submission of an application does not depend on the application beins deemed complete or being accepted bv the Citv. Government Code Section 65863 does not applv to parcels that, prior to Januarv 1, 2003, were either 1) subiect to a development agreement, or 2) parcels for which an application for a subdivision map had been submitted. Residential density shall be determined based on a number of dwelling units per developable acre of property. The following lands are considered to be undevelopable and shall be excluded from density calculations: a. b. d. e. f. 9. h. C. I. Beaches; Permanent bodies of water; Floodways; Slopes with an inclination of greater than 40%; Significant wetlands; Significant riparian woodland habitats; Land subject to major power transmission easements; Land upon which other significant environmental features as determined by the environmental review process for a project are located; and Railroad track beds. No residential development shall occur on the lands listed above, however, the City Council may permit limited development of such property, if when considering the property as a whole, the prohibition against development would constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of property. Limited development of accessory or nonresidential uses may be permitted. Development on slopes with an inclination of 25% to 40% shall be permitted if designed to minimize Amended March 27,2001 Page 15 /6 Land Use Element the grading and comply with the slope development provisions of the hillside ordinance and the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program. However, only 50%. of the area shall be used for density calculations. In instances where a property owner is preserving a significant amount of open space land beyond what would normally be required by city ordinances for purposes of environmental enhancement, establishing wildlife corridors or reserves or otherwise leaving developable property in its natural condition, the City shall consider allowing the density or development potential of the property being preserved to be transferred to another portion of the property or another distinct property. In these instances, the density/development potential of the property being left in open space shall be reserved for and used on the remainder of the land owned by the property owner, or through a negotiated agreement with the City, may be transferred to land owned by another property owner. All legally existing R-2 lots, as of December 1, 1986, may be developed with a two-family residence regardless of the density allowed by their General Plan designation if they can comply with all applicable development standards in effect at the time of their development and if the following findings can be made: a. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted; b. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit; and c. All necessary public facilities required by this chapter will be constructed, or are guaranteed to be constructed, concurrently with the need for them created by this development and in compliance with the adopted City standards. There are exceptional cases where the base zone is consistent with the land use designation but would permit a slightly higher yield than that recommended in the low and low-medium density residential classifications. In those exceptional cases, the City may find that the project is consistent with this element if: a) the project is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs expressed herein, b) all of the necessary infrastructure is in place to support the project, and c) the proposed density does not exceed the maximum density allowed at the top of the range by more than an additional 25%. Affordable Housing - Density Increases The City recognizes that the feasibility of providing housing affordable to lower-income families is dependent upon the ability to achieve residential densities higher than allowed by the underlying land use designation. Therefore, it is necessary to consider development of housing projects containing lower-income affordable housing units at densities that may exceed the ranges and growth management control points indicated above. The density which may be approved for those projects which include affordable housing shall be determined on an individual project proposal basis, and may be independent of the residential land use designation of the site, subject to the criteria listed under Residential, Implementing Policies and Programs, C.3. ~ Page 16 Amended March 27, 2001 G PA W- -8 I ATTACHMENT 3 These elements should be referred to for more detailed discussion. For example, the public facilities discussed in the Circulation Element are also discussed in the Land Use Element. It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad that the Circulation Element be consistent with all other elements of the General Plan. D. THE CITY OF CARLSBAD SETTING The dominant natural and manmade features in Carfsbad, which establish the framework within which the circulation network must function, include the Pacific Ocean to the west, the three natural lagoons extending from the ocean to the interior of the City, the steep hills and canyons which punctuate the eastern half of the community, Highway 78 along the northern boundary, the Coast Highway, the AT&SF railroad and Interstate 5. These features all serve to separate the coastal portion of the City from the interior portion. There are three major, existing, arterial roads in the City, including, El Camino Real which runs north and south through the center of the City, Palomar Airport Road which runs east and west through the center of the City, and Rancho Santa Fe Road which runs along the southern and easterly boundary of the City. In addition, Carlsbad has a general aviation commuter airport located in the central portion of the City adjacent to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Goals, objectives, and policies and programs related to air transportation are included in this element, but are also discussed in the Land Use Element. Given the existing topographic constraints, the City has developed an integrated land use and circulation plan to take advantage of the natural landform features and the existing transportation facilities. A major challenge for the City in the future will be to complete the remaining roadway segments of the Circulation Element in a timely manner within a climate of increasingly strict environmental guidelines. The City must also find ways to refine the existing circulation network in the developed portions of the City to accommodate increased redevelopment activity and the development of surrounding communi- ties. Finally, it is recognized that the City circula- tion system is a part of the larger regional, state, and national transportation systems. As such, the City circulation system will continue to be influ- enced by the demands placed upon it by larger transportation system needs. E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT The construction of unbuilt circulation element roads and public utilities will be brought about through a combination of construction activities undertaken by the development community and the City of Carlsbad. The guiding theme for the construction of the circulation element infrastruc- ture is the provision of facilities prior to or concur- rent with the need for such facilities. To this end the City has established the Growth Management Program, the Capital Improvement Program and a development exaction program consisting of pub- lic facility impact fees and direct developer con- struction of public road, public trail and utility improvements. PROGRAM The Growth Management Program establishes minimum standards for the provision of basic public infrastructure including circulation element roads, sew8r collection, s8wer treatment, water distribution and flood control. In addition, the Growth Management Program requires the preparation of Local Facilities Management Plans to ensure that the public facility standards are met through buildout for each of the 25 local facility zones. For the most part, roads and public utilities will be constructed as a condition of development activity in accordance with the dictates of the Growth Management Program. Where a particular facility exceeds the financial capability of any one developer or the need for the facility cannot be attributed to a single development, the City, and various utility districts within the City, have established facility impact fees to generate the revenues needed to finance construction of those facilities. These impact fees combined with direct developer construction activities will assure com- pletion of the majority of the circulation element network. The remaining portion of the network for which the need is not attributable to future devel- opment, must be financed through other local, regional and federal funding sources. An example of one such facility is the improvement of Carlsbad Village Drive west of Interstate 5 which will be funded through redevelopment tax incre- ment bonds. Timing for the construction of the missing circula- tion element links is, for the most part, a function of development activity. For those facilities financed through facility impact fees or other funding sources, the City prepares on a yearly Page 2 Amended October 16,2001 16 C. Implementing Policies and Action Programs c. 1 c.2 c.3 c.4 c.5 C.6 c.7 C.8 c.9 Ekourage the construction ' of sidewalks along all public roadways with special em- phasis given to collectors, arterials, and areas with high pedestrian traffic generators such as schools, commercial centers, transportation facilities, public buildings, beaches and parks. Encourage pedestrian circulation in com- mercial areas through the provision of con- venient parking facilities, increased side- walk widths, pedestrian-oriented building designs, landscaping, street lighting and street furniture. Design pedestrian spaces and circulation in relationship to land uses and available parking for all new construction and rede- velopment projects. Link public sidewalks to the network of pub- lic and private trail systems. Provide for handicapped access to and along public sidewalks and along as much of the trail system as feasible. Install sidewalks and trail systems within existing and new industrial developments. Encourage school districts to implement safety programs for pedestrians and bicy- clists within the public school system. Maintain a Traffic Safety Commission com- posed of Carlsbad citizens for the purpose of studying matters of traffic and pedestrian safety and making recommendations to the City Council regarding measures to promote and improve traffic and pedestrian safety. Employ improved traffic control devices and monitor police accident reports to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety. C.10Prepare and maintain an inventory of all missing and incomplete sidewalk segments within the City for the purpose of prioritizing future sidewalk construction. C.11 Coordinate the location of bicycle routes with the Parks and Recreation Element and the Open Space and Conservation Element. C.12 Extend bicycle routes to cultural, educational and recreational facilities whenever practical. C.13 Develop and implement employer incentive programs to encourage the placement of strategic bicycle storage lockers, and the construction of safe and convenient bicycle facilities. C.14 Design bicycle routes in accordance with the "Bike Route Standards" Chapter 1000 of the State of California Highway Design Manual. C.15 Improve bicycle access to beach areas. C.16 Review, periodically, the Circulation Element Bicycle Route Map and revise, as necessary, to reflect existing roadway conditions and changed land uses. C.17 C.18 c.19 c.20 c.21 c.22 Coordinate with the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the North County Transit District (NCTD) on the in- stallation of any new trolley or light rail tran- sit systems. Provide linkage to bus, pedestrian and bicy- cle routes from any new light rail commuter transit facility. Encourage passive and active use of the railroad right-of-way as trail linkage and bi- cycle pathway. Plan and coordinate park-and-ride facilities with CALTRANS. NCTD and SANDAG. Encourage commuter usage of buses, car- pools and vanpools through a combination of employer incentives, public education programs and construction of safe, con- venient and aesthetically pleasing transfer facilities. Encourage the expansion of bus service and new routes into developing or rede- veloping areas of the City. C.23 Desian public trails in accordance with the ODen Space and Conservation Element including multi-use and eauestrian segments where apDroDriate. ~~ Amended January 2,2002 Page 7 C.24 Review. periodicallv, the conceutual Open Suace and Conservation MaD, which is shown as Map 2 in the Open Space and Conservation Element and revise the trails svstem to reflect existina roadwav conditions and land use chanaes. AIR TRANSPORTATION A. Goal A City which balances the needs of the existing general aviation airport with the needs of the citi- zens of the city. 6. Objectives B.l To encourage the continued operation of McClellan-Palomar Airport as a general aviation airport. B.2 To prohibit the expansion of McClellan- Palomar Airport unless approved by a rna- jority vote of Carlsbad electorate as re- quired by the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.53.01 5. C. Implementing Policy and Action Coordinate with the San Diego Association of Governments and the Federal Aviation Adrnini- stration to protect public health, safety and wel- fare by ensuring the orderly operation of the Air- port and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around the air- port. Program PUBLIC UTILITY AND STORM DRAl N AGE FACl LlTlES A. Goals A. 1 A.2 A City with a comprehensive network of ufilities and storm drainage facilities which provide appropriate public utility and flood control services to all land uses. A City in which the public utility and storm drainage infrastructure are constructed concurrent with or prior to the actual de- mand for such facilities. U B. Objectives 6.1 To maintain a clear and consistent set of standards for the design and construction of public utilities. 8.2 To implement and regularly update devel- oper fee programs for the financing of pub- lic utility and storm drainage facilities. 8.3 To enhance the economic value of property and improve the economic competitiveness of the City through the construction of well designed, efficient and cost effective public utility and storm drainage facilities. To maintain current master plans for the expansion of local public facilities for sewer, potable water, reclaimed water and storm drainage. B.5 To comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding the preser- vation and enhancement of water quality. B.4 c.1 c.2 c.3 (2.4 c.5 C.6 C. Implementing Policies and Action Programs Require new development to construct all public facilities needed to serve the pro- posed development prior to or concurrent with the circulation needs created by the development. Develop, and update periodically, a set of standards for the design and construction of public utilities. Coordinate the planning and construction of public utilities with existing public utilities in adjoining neighborhoods. Require new development to dedicate and improve all public rights-of-way for public utility and storm drainage facilities needed to serve development. Inform the public and contractors of the danger involved, and the necessary pre- cautions that must be taken when working on or near, pipelines or utility transmission lines. Monitor the adequacy of public utilities as an integral part of the Growth Management Plan and Public Facilities Management System. Page 8 Amended October 16,2001 a0 C.7 Ensure developer conformance with all adopted public utility and storm drainage master plans and adopted ordinances re- garding the provision of public utility and storm drainage facilities. C.8 Ensure continued coordination between the City and special utility districts and public utility companies operating in Carlsbad. C.9 Develop and implement a program of "Best Management Practices" for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter into andlor are transported within storm drain- age facilities. C.10 Review and update, on a regular basis, master plans for the expansion of local public facilities for sewer, potable water, re- daimed water and storm drainage. SCENIC ROADWAYS A. Goal A City which preserves and enhances the visual, environmental and historical characteristics of the local community through sensitive planning and design of transportation and utility corridors. B. 0 bjectives B.1 8.2 B.3, 8.4 8.5 To enhance the scenic, environmental and historical quality of roadways in conjunction with the Circulation, Open Space and Con- servation, and Parks and Recreation Ele- ments of the General Plan. To establish a route map identifying existing and future scenic roadway, railroad and utility corridors within the City. To consider a system of routes and special treatments to increase the enjoyment of and opportunities for recreational and CUI- tural pursuits and tourism in Carlsbad. To provide a process for the establishment of convenient and safe scenic routes to major recreational areas and points of his- toric, scenic or cultural significance. To provide multiple recreational uses, such as bikeways, public trails, roadside rests and observation points, when appropriate, on lands within and adjacent to designated scenic corridors, and provide a means of coordinating scenic roadways with other transportation and recreational oppor- tunities within the City. B.6 To provide a means of enhancing scenic roadways and making them identifiable to the traveling public. C. implementing Policies and Action C.1 Implement the policies, standards and guidelines contained within the Carlsbad Scenic Corridor Guidelines. Programs C.2 Establish four categories of scenic corridors and designate streets to be included within those categories as follows: Communitv Theme Corridors - connect Carlsbad with adjacent municipalities and present the City of Carlsbad to persons entering and passing through the commu- nity. Community Theme Corridors include: El Camino Real Carlsbad Boulevard Palornar Airport Road La Costa Avenue Melrose Drive Communitv Scenic Corridors - interconnect major subareas of the present and planned Carlsbad community. Community Scenic Corridors include: College Boulevard Cannon Road Carlsbad Village Drive Faraday Avenue Interstate 5 La Costa Avenue Olivenhain RoadlRancho Santa Fe Poinsettia Lane/Carrillo Way Road Natural ODen SDace and Recreation Corri- - dors - offer spectacular views of water- scapes, landforms, wildlife and the Pacific Ocean. Natural Open Space and Recrea- tion Corridors include: Adams Streetl Park Drive Batiquitos Drive Jefferson Street (portion adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon) ~~~~ ~ Amended January 2,2002 Page 9 c.3 Railroad Corridor - presents the City of Carlsbad to people passing through the City by rail. The only Railroad Corridor is: Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Review and update periodically the list of roadways designated as scenic corridors. c .4 c.5 C .6 c.7 C.8 c.9 c.10 c.17 c.12 Utilize and update the criteria for designat- ing scenic roadways and selecting commu- nity identity entries outlined in the Carlsbad Scenic Corridor Guidelines Manual. Include roadways as scenic routes which provide significant views of the ocean, la- goons, open space lands, back country and urban activity. Enhance and preserve the natural and de- veloped environments along each desig- nated scenic route. Approve projects adjacent to El Camino Real only if the proposed project is con- sistent with the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards. Coordinate the planning, design and imple- mentation of designated scenic corridors with the Planning, Engineering, Parks and Recreation and Utilities and Maintenance Departments. Coordinate the scenic corridor program with the State, County and adjacent cities wher- ever possible. Review the need to establish additional special overlay zones along designated scenic corridors and initiate the appropriate rezoning if an overlay zone is warranted. Develop guidelines to improve the visual quality of the corridor adjacent to the Atchi- son Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. Seek financial assistance from federal and state sources whenever possible to assist in the implementation of the scenic road- ways program. CONSIDERATIONS A. Goals A.l A City with a modern public utility and trans- portation system based upon integrated pro- grams for the management of air quality, water quality and land resources. A.2 A City with a transportation system which helps minimize air pollution and traffic con- gestion and supports commerce and eco- nomic development. A.3 A City which participates with other cities in the County, through the San Diego Associa- tion of Governments, in working toward the solution of regional transportation issues. B. Objectives 6.1 To develop programs and strategies for Transportation Demand Management con- sistent with the San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy. To participate with other cities in the County in developing the Regional Growth Man- agement Strategy which addresses air quality, transportation system management, and transportation demand management for San Diego County on a “regional com- munity” basis. To comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding the preser- vation and enhancement of air quality. 8.2 6.3 C. Implementing Policies and Action C.l Implement the policies of the Regional Growth Management Strategy when the program is adopted by the City. Prog ra ms C.2 Encourage the inclusion of onsite or nearby amenities such as day care facilities, dry cleaners and convenience stores within residential and industrial projects to reduce vehicular trips. C.3 Coordinate with CALTRANS as develop- ment proceeds and CALTRANS funds be- come available to ensure that the capacity of onloff ramps is adequate. Page 10 Amended October 16,2001 C.4 Consider noise impacts in the design of road systems and give special considera- tiqn to those road corridors. in scenic or noise sensitive areas. C.5 The City shall work with the adjacent communities and agencies of Oceanside, Vista, Encinitas, San Marcos, County of San Diego, Caltrans, North County Transit District, San Diego Association of Govern- ments and other appropriate agencies to coordinate local traffic management reduction efforts. Amended February 19,2002 111. CIRCULATION PLAN NOTES Several areas of the Circulation Plan require fur- ther explanation of the City's intent. As a result, the following notes are provided to clarify the plan. A. Rancho Del Oro - Classified as a secondary arterial roadway only if a freeway interchange with SR78 is provided. If an interchange is not provided, this roadway is not to be in- cluded in the plan. B. Tamarack Avenue - Classified as a modified collector street between Carlsbad Boulevard and Skyline Road. An 80-foot right-of-way west of Jefferson to Carlsbad Boulevard should be maintained. Secondary arterial standards should be maintained between Jefferson Street and Adams Street. C. Avenida Encinas - The City might downgrade the southernmost link of this roadway (be- tween Lakeshore Gardens Mobile Home Park and Carlsbad Boulevard) to a collector street if a master plan for the immediate area indi- cates low intensity development. Such downgrading should not require an amend- ment to this element. D. Leucadia Boulevard Extension - The City should support and encourage adjoining ju- risdictions to extend Leucadia Boulevard from Interstate 5 to El Camino Real. E. Melrose Drive - The City should support and encourage adjoining jurisdictions to extend Melrose Drive from the Carlsbad city limits south to an appropriate connection. Melrose shall maintain its classification as a prime ar- terial north of Rancho Santa Fe Road. South of Rancho Santa Fe Road, Melrose may be built to secondary or modified standards with- out an amendment to this element but should preserve adequate right-of-way to construct a full width major arterial road. Amended January 2, 2002 Page 11 33 Alternative Concepts For Circulation Element Trails I 1 Sidewalk Bike Road. I 5’4” I Lane *I ft. under certain drcumstanar Trail un be paved or unplvd .. 4/10101 GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE Project Name: Property/Legal Description(s): LCPA 04-04 Lots 1 - 9 of Steiner Property, CT 99-1 3, according to Map No. 14039, filed on September 19,2000; and Lots 1 - 13 and 49-51 of Lohf Subdivision, CT 97-15, according to Map No.13839, filed on August 23, 1999, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Property From: To: Council Approval Date: l A. see attached RM RLM Resolution No: 6. Effective Date: ~ c. Signature: 0. I Related Case File No@): G.P. Map Designation Change Approvals Attach additional pages if necessary GPA: 04-04 . draft final [7 August 4, 2004 EXISTING PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Project Name: PALOMAR POINTE GPA: 04-08 . - draft final Related Case File No(s): ZC 04-03/ LCPA 04- 07KT 04-061 PUD 03-02/PIP 03-02 /CDP 03- OWHDP 03-02 September 1,2004 G.P. Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 21 2-1 20-33 PI PI &OS Attach additional pages if necessary PROPOSED Approvals Council Approval Date: Resolution No: Effective Date: Signature: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN MAPCHANGE G.P. Map Designation Change See map for line Property From: To: A. 214-17o-ao B. 214-170-81 adjustment C. 214-170-84 D. 214-170-85 E. 214-170-89 Attach additional pages if necessary EXISTING Approvals Council Approval Date: Resolution No: Effective Date: Signature: PROPOSED GPA: 04-1 I draft final 0 47 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ~ G.P. Map Designation Change Property From: To: A. 21 5-080-20 RLM RLM 81 OS 6. 215-080-21 RLM RLM & OS C. 21 5-080-28 RLM RLM Attach Additional pages if necessary GPA: 04-13 . draft final 0 Approvals Council Approval Date: Resolution No: Effective Date: Signature: September 1,2004 I Project Name: TABATA RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION A portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22, T12S, R4W, SBBM, in the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California I Related Case File No@): Property/Legal Description(s): LCPA 03-07lZC 03-051CT 0396KDP 03-241HDP 04- 02 .