HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-11-01; City Council; 18326; Report on City Investments as of 09/30/050 w
U a
i5
4
.. z 0
I- U
.-I
u z 3 0 u
-
a -
Par Value
18,326
MTG. 11/1/05
Current Month Prior Month
503,6643 1 506,669,975
DEPT. TRS
Cost of Investments
Amortized Cost (1)
Market Value (2)
1
REPORT ON CITY INVESTMENTS
504,110,621 507,106,985
503,100,154 506,078,459
499,112,476 504,143,423
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept and file report.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The City’s Investment Policy requires the City Treasurer to report to the City Council on a
monthly basis the status of the City’s pooled investment portfolio. A quarterly report is
also required for the investments of bond proceeds held separately. The City’s pooled
investment portfolio as of the month ended September 30, 2005 is summarized below.
(1) The cost of investments adjusted for amortized premiums and discounts.
(2) The amount at which the investments could be sold. Source of market values is Union
Bank of California’s custodial report as of 9/30/05.
The equity portion of the various funds in the total portfolio is summarized in the graph
below. Fund balances are restricted for various purposes. See Exhibit 7 for a more
detailed break1 Iwn.
FUND EQUITY IN POOLED INVESTMENTS
(Dollar Amounts in Millions)
Special Revenue General c 34-3
Enterprise
$147.9 ‘
Total Treasurer’s Investment Portfolio at Amortized Cost
$503.1 Million
Pooled investment Interest Income n I I
Current Prior Current Month
Month FYTD Month FYTD Income
Cash Income Fiscal
Year-to-Date * 4,276,462 2,740,822 1,535,640
July 2005
*The cash income received is adjusted for any accrued interest purchased.
Pooled investment PerformancelMeasurement
Average Life
(Years ) Average Yield Modified Duration
2.07 3.80% 1.916
August 2005
September 2005
2.07 3.84% 1.918
2.01 3.81 % 1.856
All pooled investments have been made in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy adopted
January 2, 1985 and last revised January 20, 2004. All investments were initially made in
accordance with the City’s Investment Policy. Events subsequent to the purchase might have
resulted in some investments not being in compliance with the current policy. These events are
typically a change in the City’s Investment Policy, a change in the credit rating subsequent to a
purchase, or a temporary reduction in total portfolio assets. See Exhibit 8 for details.
Current Quarter
The City’s Investment Policy requires that investments not less than $1 58,000,000 mature within
one year. Exhibit 2 shows that the portfolio is under this limit by $11,058,870 for the month of
September 2005. This situation will self correct by November 2005.
Prior Quarter
The pooled investment portfolio has the ability to meet the City’s cash flow demands for the next six
(6) months.
Par Value
cost
In summary, the City’s investments of bond proceeds held separately as of the quarter ended
September 2005 is as follows:
23,262,283 33,496,800
23,262,283 33,496,800
All investments of bond proceeds have been made in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy
and the trust indenture for each issue.
EXHIBITS FOR POOLED INVESTMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Investment Portfolio Breakdown By Amortized Cost, Market Value, Cash Income, and Average Yield
Investment Portfolio Breakdown Of Maturities
Yield Comparison Graph
Cumulative Cash Income Graph
First Quarter Transact ions
Detailed Investment Report
Fund Equity in Pooled Investments
Corporate Note and Commercial Paper Ratings
Percentage Weightings By Corporate Note Issuer
EXHIBIT FOR INVESTMENTS OF BOND PROCEEDS HELD SEPARATELY:
IO. Detailed Investment Report - Quarterly Report
EXHIBIT FOR SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING HOUSING LOANS:
11. Detail Of Outstanding Housing Loans - Quarterly Report
Department Contact: Nancy Sullivan (760) 602-2473 nsull@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
3
EXHIBIT 1
5 S s .- b h
5 S 0 I
2
U S
3 L-
0
5
b a'
S r" .-
5 S I"
U S e L 3 0
11 i3
a 2
5 z
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
N
d 9
N
d 9
0
0 0
a, W
a,
9
(0-
0 0
a,
a,
0"
'4
r
a, W 2 b
a, '9
03 b
b 0
a,
a-
b"
z L
0 2
0
0 9
0
0
0
0
0
IY k
EXHIBIT 2
s 8 s 8 s 8 s 9 s B s 8 s 2 s c? 0 v; 0 0 (u
3 vl P 3
3
3 M
0
0 R
3 0 0 0 n W N
0
0
3 0 0
0 z! m d
N N
'"*
"i. 3
N z- 0"
mn d
W m
3 2 P
3 r- m
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 m
W 2
0
3 ej
n 3
W s "! m N
0 0 0
m 0
0-
2 In
0 0 2
3
0 m W 2
2 In
0 3 In
00 W
'"i
2 d
N 0
m m
0-
w
m d
N N
In!
*, 3 3
0 k e a V z V E F;; E: !2 c m
cl
5
0
n '1
+
I I
EXHIBIT 3
+
8
s
B Ilt
1
8
8 t
4
8 + 8
8
\
1
(I , *
\
\
3
h
i
8
8 *
t
8 *
8 4
‘t
EXHIBIT 4
L
7
EXHIBIT 5
0 8 0
0 (3
(3
0-
9
0 8
8
g
0
(3 (0
7 d
0 8
2 0
0
(3
0"
0 8 0
0 0
(3
9
0-
(0 0 0 x 0 0
wmcuw *bbW
mob00 bmcumo
WKKOO
SSS$S zzzzz
zzzaa 00000
bOWQ3 0-00 0000
mro- vrm- (0 0
hl 7000
2222
aaaa 0
mmLnmLn 00000 00000
mw(Dcucu ocucuoo(0
00000
22222
zzszzg x
..... ZgSStl%
0 0 hl -0omm ooooow 00000~
22222I-
roomm3 -rrOOQ
li, 0 0 N w w mmmm 0000 0000 cucucucu k 3 GZE? e9.2 cocococo 0000
TrmLnom 00000 00000 cucucucucu azzs: e.==e2 amcur7 000-0
m
0000000
EXHIBIT 6
>s <
ww
3s 8 g ;;,8-S;,SS 8 8 8-2 8-8 8 s 8 c3gz-gggz cz 8 8 k2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8
$oooommocnooooocooo F~m00dF0wm0w-0F~co000oomoooommoo 0 0- 0- m- In 0 In 0 0- 0- 0- 0 m- 0 0- In- b- m- 0 0 0 m In 0 In m- 0 F- a- 0- m- m- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- b- 0- 0- 0- 0- F- N- 0- 0-
9t9qm-9m-9999o-m-9o-~-w m oom d 0como-t mo mm m o 90 o o m o o ooqqqq
7- N- d- m- -- 7- ui 0- N- ui N- d- d n- N- 7- ui In N' m- ro- d- 0- d d d - d m cn UJ N In N N v) N m Ln Ln m m N m In d
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 00000000000000000000
Om-N------NNNNNNNNNln 00000000000000000000 00000000000000000000
0N000000N~00m00m000N
QQepQQQQNNNNNNQQNNNN km-om--m:z:a:aro:i=aa i%g3ggggazggggggg$5$g
000000
EXHIBIT 7
Fund Equity in Pooled Investments
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,2005
Cash Balance by Fund:
General
Special Revenue
Debt Service
Capital Projects:
General Capital Construction
Traffic Impact Fees
Public Facilities Fees
Park Development
Transnet Taxes
Drainage Fees
Special Districts
Infrastructure Replacement
Other Capital Construction
Total
Enterprise:
Carlsbad Municipal Water District
Sewer Fund
Solid Waste
Storm Water
Golf Course
Total
Internal Service
Agency Funds
Redevelopment Funds (1)
Misc. Special Funds
Total General Ledger Balance **
Reconciling Adjustments (2)
Total Treasurer's Investment Portfolio at Amortized Cost
43,341,739
34,304,037
2,417,432
50,608,877
10,549,052
40,481,449
4,160,782
8,838,054
9,818,671
80,022,080
22,733,091
6,696
227,218,751
48,165,812
61,901,450
6,385,224
350,247
31,066,905
147,869,638
20,988,089
23,275,425
0
0
499,415,113
3,685,041
503,100,154
(I) Redevelopment Fund Balances are interspersed throughout all funds.
(2) The Reconciling Adjustments consist of differences between the General Ledger which is prepared
on an accrual basis and the Treasurer's report which is prepared on the cash basis. Accrued Interest,
amortized premium or discounts and outstanding checks and deposits in transit are not included in the
Treasurer's summary. Differences between the time journal entries are posted and the time this
report is produced may also be a component of the adjustment.
** Figures based on best estimate at the time report run on 1011 2/05 ra
EXHIBIT 8
CITY OF CARLSBAD INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,2005
CORPORATE NOTE AND COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS
Corporate Note Investments Meeting the Current Investment Policy:
(Ratings must be AA or better by both Moody's and S8P)
Moodv's - S&P
ALLSTATE FINANCIAL
ASSOCIATES CORP
ClTlGROUP
GENERAL ELECTRIC
WORLD SAVINGS BANK
SECURITY CAPITAL - GE
AA2 AA
AA1 AA-
AA1 AA-
AAA AAA
AAA AAA
AA3 AA-
Commercial Paper Investments Meeting the Current Investment Policy:
(Ratings must be AIIPI or better by both Moody's and S&P)
(Ratings of other debt must be AA or better by Moody's or S&P)
Investments with Subsequent Changes in Credit Rating *
CREDIT SUISSE
DEAN WITTER DISCV
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
PACIFIC BELL
SBC COMMUNICATIONS
Latest
Moodv's - S&P Maturitv Date Purchased
AA3 A+ 0411 8/07 AA~IAA-
AA3 A+ 11/01/05 AA3lAA-
AA3 A+ 0411 5/06 AA3lAA-
A2 A 0811 5/06 AASIAA-
A2 A 05/02/06 AA3lAA-
Carrying
Value
4,091,785
2,999,159
11,609,796
7,122,763
1,997,488
Market - Value
4,070,120
3,005,160
1 1,702,196
7,121,990
2,022,120
" The City's Investment Policy allows the City Treasurer to determine the course of action that would correct exceptions
to the policy. All of these investments are paying interest at the required times. The principal of all investments are
considered secure. It is the intent of the City Treasurer to hold these assets in the pot-lfolio until maturity unless events
indicate they should be sold.
13
EXHIBIT 9
CITY OF CARLSBAD INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,2005
WEIGHTINGS FOR CORPORATE AND FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUERS
PERCENTAGE WEIGHTINGS BY CORPORATE NOTE ISSUER
Investment Cost Percent of Portfolio*
ALLSTATE FINANCIAL 1,995,651.84
ClTlGROUP
ASSOCIATES CORP 2,000,784.90
CREDIT SUISSE 4,270,881.12
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAP
SECU Rl TY CAPITAL
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
DEAN WITTER DISCV
SBC COMMUNICATIONS
PACIFIC BELL
17,489,469.62
3,380,298.92
11,680,494.1 5
2,950,553.97
1,978,738.00
7,593,579.83
WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB 2,999,689.80
0.40%
0.40%
0.85%
4.14%
2.90%
1.90%
0.60%
PERCENTAGE WEIGHTINGS BY FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUER
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC
Investment Cost Percent of Portfolio**
8,990,343.30 I .7a%
137,679,772.08 27.31 Yo
129,122,435.00 25.61 %
9,659,665.28 1.92%
102,153,712.66 20.26%
Total Portfolio $504,110,621.37
* No more than 5% may be invested with a single corporate issuer.
**There are no percentage limits on federal agency issuers.
r4
* ! c
!
:
- f I c
P
n
m
0 S 0
P a
EXHIBIT 10
EXHIBIT 11
0- g 0 0 7.
m ftf
r
W
C
s ._
c m 0
W
W
- 3
c
- % m
0 0
W