Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-02-07; City Council; 18435; Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL Q LU occQ_Q. O o -Jo oo AB# 18,435 MTG. 2/7/06 DEPT. PLN TITLE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 & 2.2 PUD 04-01 (A) DEPT. HD. iy?W4i ClTYATTYjd^ CITY MGR J5^ RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2006-030 APPROVING Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04-01 (A) for Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project application(s) PUD 04-01 (A) Administrative Approvals Reviewed by and Final at Planning Commission To be Reviewed - Final at Council X On December 21, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential project. Since the Planned Unit Development Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action. The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 and is for the approval of architecture and plotting of 90 single-family dwelling units. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map CT 04-02 and Planned Development Permit PUD 04-01, both of which were approved by the City Council on November 16, 2004. Lots in these two neighborhoods are a minimum 7,500 square feet in size. A Planned Development Permit was required because the project included gated entries and private streets. The Planning Commission discussed the merits of the application, and voted 5-0 (absent Commissioners Cardosa and Baker) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. One member of the public voiced concern over the ridgeline lots and requested clarification of the proposed setbacks from existing development. A full disclosure of public comment and the Planning Commission's discussion are included in the attached minutes. A complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding PAGE 2 Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this project are available at the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts have been identified. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-030 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6007 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 21, 2005 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 21, 2005. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Jason Goff, (760) 602-4643, jgoff@ci.carlsbad.ca.us to\-\ \ 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-030 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO 3 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 04-01 (A) TO APPROVE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND 4 PLOTTING OF 90 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ALGA ROAD, 5 EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET, NORTH OF THE HCP OPEN SPACE IN NEIGHBORHOOD 2.A, AND WITHIN LOCAL 6 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE 7 NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 & 2.2 CASE NO.: PUD 04-01 (A) 8 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 9 follows: 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 11 Commission did, on December 21, 2005, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 12 law to consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and 13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 7th day of 14 February , 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit 15 Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests, 1" comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 04-01 (A); and 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1 o 1 o 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04-01 (A) is approved by the City Council and that 21 the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6007, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the 22 findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial 24 Review" shall apply: 25 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 26 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, 27 which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other 28 paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 7th day of February 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: None CLAUDE A. LEWIS, ATTEST: -2- EXHIBIT 2 SITE MAP NOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.1 & 2.2 PUD 04-01 (A) ' EXHIBITS 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6007 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 PERMIT AMENDMENT PUD 04-01 (A) TO APPROVE 5 BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING OF 90 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON PROPERTY 6 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ALGA ROAD, EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET, NORTH OF THE HCP OPEN SPACE IN 7 NEIGHBORHOOD 2.A, AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. 8 CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE 9 NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1& 2.2 ' CASE NO.: PUD 04-01(A) 10 WHEREAS, Pulte Homes, "Developer," has filed a verified application with the 12 City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Pulte Homes Corporation, "Owner," described 13 as 14 La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 Lots 1-90 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-02, Villages of 16 La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, 17 according to map thereof No. 15167 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 2, 2005, 18 as File No. 2005-0955442 19 ("the Property"); and 20 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit 21 22 Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" through "AA" dated December 21,2005,on file 23 in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 24 AND 2.2 - PUD 04-01(A) as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 25 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of December, 2005, 26 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 27 28 L WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 2 ,and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 3 relating to the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment. 4 5 - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 6 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 7 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 9 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2, based on the following findings and subject 10 to the following conditions: Findings; 12 1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included 13 within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for 14 90 single-family detached units located on approved lots with a minimum area of 7,500 square feet. The proposed project is consistent with Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and all proposed homes comply with the architecture and site planning standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 17 2. That the proposed project's density, site design and architecture are compatible with surrounding development, in that the existing surrounding residential neighborhoods 18 contain single-family detached homes and the future surrounding neighborhoods in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan will be developed with single-family detached homes. 20 3. The Planning Director has determined that: 21 a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a 22 project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the 24 activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or 25 b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection with the prior project or plan; and 28 d- the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior EIR; and PC RESO NO.6007 -2- e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR 2 under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 13163 exist; and 3 f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for this Subsequent Project. 4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and „ ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection 9 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the 10 project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 19 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project 13 is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. 6. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant shall 16 record a notice concerning aircraft noise. The project is compatible with the projected noise levels of the CLUP; and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the 17 CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that the project is not within noise contours greater than 60 CNEL as created by airport operations.18 19 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section IB). 20 The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 23 Conditions: 24 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of Building Permit. 26 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be 27 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy PC RESO NO.6007 -3- issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the 2 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to eompd-their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 3 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment. 4 - 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment 6 documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the 7 approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval,o 9 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment 11 of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are 12 challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid 13 unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies, with all requirements of law. 14 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and 15 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly 17 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use 19 contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from 20 the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 21 6. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar 22 copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. 23 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the 24 Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 26 8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to 27 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including, but not limited to the following.28 PC RESO NO.6007 -4- * 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 2 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 3 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 4 10. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003) between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project's market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the 7 Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development. 8 11. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Planned Unit Development Permit 11 Amendment by Resolution No. 6007 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a 14 showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 15 12. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such 18 taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 19 13. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official 22 CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: 23 a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor 25 of, or in which the City has an interest. 26 b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City 2g within 30 days for the official record. PC RESO NO.6007 -5- c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event 2 that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section the 3 City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the 4 Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with , particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the 6 giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the 7 period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. 9 d. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the 10 necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the * * City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's ,2 Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in 13 full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and 14 payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount 16 equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or 17 in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment * ° against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, jg plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is 20 levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring 21 all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration. 23 e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HO As and individual lot or unit owner 24 landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be established by the HOA and set forth in the CC&Rs.25 26 f. The proposed project CC&Rs shall provide a list of invasive plant species prohibited from landscaping adjacent to conserved habitat areas. 27 g. Outdoor lighting restrictions for private residential lots located adjacent to the 28 HCP/OMSP shall be noted in the proposed project CC&Rs. PC RESO NO.6007 -6- I f h. Educational materials regarding the sensitivity of the HCP/OMSP shall be given 2 to the proposed Project Residents as part of the CC&Rs. The material shall state the importance of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impacts to 3 them. 14. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community , Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, 6 then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer , disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the 7 existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the 9 fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. 10 15. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and recreational facilities. 13 16. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. 14 17. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks and streets. 17 18. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which ^ ° special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. 20 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing 21 Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). 23 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from 24 McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). £* 3 21. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be 27 approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning Department). 28 PC RESO NO.6007 -7- 22. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance 2 with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. 3 23. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 04-02 4 in Resolution No. 5734 and PUD 04-01 in Resolution No. 5735, which are e incorporated by reference herein. 6 24. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final 7 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in „ Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations 9 contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured slopes. 10 Engineering: General 13 25. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 26. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of 16 the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally established by the City. 17 Fees/Agreements18 27. This project shall be annexed into City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 2 (SL&LD #2). Prior to approval of any grading, building 20 permits or final map for this project, Developer shall cause Owner to execute an Agreement to annex the subject property into City of SL&LD #2. The Agreement shall be in a form approved by the Assistant City Finance Director. Developer shall pay all fees necessary to annex the property into SL&LD #2. 23 Grading 24 28. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits. A single 26 precise grading plan for the entire development shall be processed in lieu of individual plans coinciding with construction phasing. 27 29. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge ° Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall provide improvements constructed pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best PC RESO NO.6007 -8- 1 Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level 2 prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be 3 limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: a. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and <- hazardous waste products. b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, 6 antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain 7 or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective 9 containers. c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants 1 0 when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. 30. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, i~ Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions 13 established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce 14 to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall: a. include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements; 17 b. include the receipt of "Notice of Intent" issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board; recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging 20 to City right-of-way or natural drainage course; and d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special 21 considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants. 23 31. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)." 24 The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the 27 project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall: a. identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern;28 PC RESO NO.6007 -9- b. identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies 2 that could be impacted by this project; c. recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with 3 this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way; d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special considerations and effort shall be applied to (RESIDENT/EMPLOYEE) education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants; 6 e. ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity; and identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not 7 exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent practicable; and f. identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not 9 exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent practicable. 10 Code Reminders: 11 12 The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 13 32. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 14 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 33. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction 17 of the City Engineer. is.34. Some improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of 20 title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negations to acquire such property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If 21 unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and comply with requirements of Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation. 23 35. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 24 Code Section 18.04.320. oc 36. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 27 28 PC RESO NO.6007 -10- 1 NOTICE 2 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." 5 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government CodejSection 6 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. 9 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this 11 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise 12 expired. 13 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of. the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 21st day of December 2005, by the 15 following vote, to wit: 16 AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and Whitton 1 8 NOES: 19 ABSENT: 20" 21 22 23 „ JEFFRE N. SEGALL, Chairperson 24 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 25 26 27 DONNEU Assistant Planning Director28 PC RESO NO.6007 -11- Tins City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No.© P.C. AGENDA OF: December 21, 2005 Application complete date: September 1,2005 Project Planner: Jason Goff Project Engineer: David Rick SUBJECT: PUD 04-OKA) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2. A, and is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6007 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-01 (A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 90 single-family dwelling units located in the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 04-02) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04-01), approved by the City Council on November 16, 2004. The Planned Development Permits were required because of gated entries and private streets. Architecture for the units were not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 6.2.7 of the Master Plan, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment. At over 50 units the project requires City Council approval. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject neighborhoods. The proposed one and two-story homes consist of four separate and distinct floor plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 2,844 to 4,213 square feet. The project incorporates four architectural elevation styles and nine color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. r, PUD 04-01(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Background On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 04-02 created the residential lots for Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2. A final map has recorded for The Ridge; grading and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing. Project Description The project site, consisting of Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's Ridge Village, is generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is located in the Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The subject neighborhoods contain 90 single-family residential lots that are a minimum of 7,500 square feet in size. The Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans, elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, four different floor plans are being proposed with living areas ranging hi size from approximately 2,844 to 4,213 square feet. Proposed are 10, one-story units and 80, two- story units, each of which have an attached garage providing parking spaces for two to three cars. The project incorporates four architectural elevation styles and nine different color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans Plan No. 1 IX (1 modified) 2 3* 1st Floor Sq. Ft. 2,844 2,490 2,539 2,311 2nd Floor Sq. Ft. 1,171 1,553 2,361 Living Area Sq. Ft. 2,844 3,661 4,092 4,213 Garage Sq. Ft. 530 2 car 601 2 car 596 2 car 656 3 car Total Bldg. Sq. Ft. 3,374 4,262 4,688 5,328 Architectural Styles Spanish Colonial, European Country Spanish Colonial, Tuscan Spanish Colonial, Tuscan, European Country Spanish Colonial, Monterey Ranch, European Country * 1st Floor Square Footage includes a covered courtyard (213 sq. ft.) and porte cochere (246 sq. ft.) PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 3 To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment (PUD) is required for the development of homes in gated neighborhoods with private roads. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(C)) The project is located within the Ridge Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. The subject neighborhoods were divided into residential lots through CT 04-02, approved on November 16, 2004, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision were analyzed at that time. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan. Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) 15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages) A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5' minimum setback from property line. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 26.26' Please refer to the "Front Yard Setbacks" table (Attachment No. 6) for compliance with 15' minimum. All lots comply. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.e) Varies according to Neighborhood's minimum lot size • Min. 6,000 SF lot: 15' minimum setback . Min. 7,500 SF lot: 20' minimum setback . Min. 10,000 SF lot: 20' minimum setback Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15' All lots comply with Minimum 7,500 SF lot: 20' minimum rear yard setback. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 4 Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C) Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60' wide Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60' and wider Minimum of 5'per side Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20' in aggregate Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5' At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. Please refer to the "Individual Lot Data" table (Attachment No. 7) for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum All street side setbacks of 10' minimum have been met. Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details. Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1) Lot widths vary from 50' to 70' . 6,000 SF lots: 50' . 7,500 SF lots: 60' . 10,000 SF lots: 70' All lots were previously approved by CT 04-02 and have a minimum width of 60'. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 PageS Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 1-story units: 50% of net pad area 2-story units: 40% of net pad area Includes: • Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: • Exterior structures such as covered porches • Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8' from the building • Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22' and a width of 8' • Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the face of any building • Awnings • Open parking areas • Structures under 30" in height • Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Lot coverage: Plan 1 = 3,374 SF Plan IX = 3,091 SF Plan 2 = 3,135 SF Plan 3 = 2,967 SF Plan type 1 is a single-story unit and where plotted complies with the maximum lot coverage of 50%. Plan IX includes a second story and meets the 40% building coverage where plotted. Plan types 2 & 3 are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% of net pad area as required. Please refer to the "Individual Lot Data" table (Attachment No. 7) for building coverage. All lots comply. Plan 1 = 25'-6" max.; 1-story Plan IX = 25'-9" max.; 2-story Plan 2 = 30'-0" max.; 2-story Plan 3 = 29'-0" max.; 2-story Building Height (4.6.3.B.1) Maximum of 30' and 2 stories. Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.e & 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. All units comply. Plan 1 = 5 Planes (Spanish); 6 Planes(European) Plan IX = 7 Planes (Spanish); 5 Planes (Tuscan) Plan 2 = 5 Planes (Spanish); 7 Planes (European); 6 Planes (Tuscan) Plan 3 = 5 Planes (Spanish); 6 Planes (European); 5 Planes (Monterey) PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 6 Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan 1 = 2 Planes (All elev.) Plan IX = 4 Planes (Spanish); 3 Planes (Tuscan) Plan 2 = 5 Planes (All elev.) Plan 3 = 4 Planes (All elev. only if balcony is plotted) Plan IX (SP elev.) is plotted on 10 lots Plan 2 (All elev.) are plotted on 29 lots Plan 3 (w/ balconies) are plotted on 8 lots Total of 47 units meet this requirement or 52.2% Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to the "Building Elevation Design Element" matrix (Attachment No. 8) and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to the "Building Elevation Design Element" matrix (Attachment No. 8) and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation types. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads (4.6.3.A.La) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each of the proposed elevations. All plan types and elevation styles comply. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page? Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.C & 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes three floor plans with at least three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the architectural plans. Single-Story Units (5.7.3.6.0, 5.7.3.12.0 & 4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15', (10'preferred). These neighborhoods have been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop on 38 lots that are visible from a circulation element roadway by the Master Plan. Plan 1 is a single story unit and is plotted 8 times along the ridgeline, or 21.1%, meeting the minimum 20% requirement. Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n & 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first- story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the architectural plans that detail the single story features provided. All proposed plans comply. Planl: 0%(1 -story) Plan IX: 37.9% Plan 2: 49.5% Plan 3: 79.6% Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of!5'. Planl, Plan IX and Plan 2 incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building and are plotted where there are 3 units with less than 15' between them. Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with 15 ft to 20 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.C) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of IS'. Planl, Plan IX and Plan 2 incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building and are plotted where there are 3 units with less than 15' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3 .B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. All plan types (100%) incorporate a single-story building element, which is a minimum 3' in depth and greater than 40% of the front elevation width. Planl: 100% Plan IX: 100% Plan 2: 66.3% Plan 3: 42.3% All plan types comply. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 PageS Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9, 4.6.2.B.2.f& 4.6.2.B.3) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10'. Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'. A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. 6.7% of the elevations incorporate a front porch (European Country style of the Plan 1). 13.3% of the elevations incorporate a balcony (Monterey Ranch style of the Plan 3) 48.9 % of the elevations incorporate a front courtyard (Spanish style of the Plan 1, Spanish and Tuscan styles of the Plan IX and Spanish and Tuscan styles of the Plan 3) A total of 68.9% of the elevation styles within the development comply. Please refer to the architecture and site plan for compliance. Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the side yard setback more than 2' nor are any projections greater than 8' in length. All plans comply. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 9 Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: • Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking • "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking • Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. • More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) Not Applicable to this Neighborhood. Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20'by 20'. Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. All plan types include at a minimum of one 2-car garage with an interior measurement of 20'x20'. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 10 Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.h, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sq. ft. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations) Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum of 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages) All setbacks for garages that face the street are greater than or equal to 20'. All side-loaded garages have a setback of at least 15' and they appear as livable portions of the homes. All 3-car garages are a combination of front loaded, tandem and deeply recessed configurations. afr PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 11 Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k& 4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. Minimum roof pitch of 3:12 A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. Typical roof pitches: Planl: 4:12,6:12 Plan IX: 4:12 Plan 2: 4:12,7:12 Plan 3: 4:12,5:12,6:12 Colors (4.6.3.B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to show compliance. Please refer to the enclosed color and materials boards for details on each color scheme and to the site plan for specific plotting. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All plan types comply. Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 6.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: • Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Craftsmen Bungalow • Spanish Colonial • Monterey Ranch • Italian/Tuscan • European Country • California Coastal • California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 only) The elevation types included are as follows: Spanish Colonial European Country Tuscan Monterey Ranch 3,1 PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 • _ . ' Page 12 Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.I& 4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes). "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure 2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. Please refer to the elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All chimneys and their caps comply with proper scale and proportion. Window Detailing (4.6.3.B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: Please refer to the elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Deeply recessed windows Paned windows Decorative window ledges Accent and varied shape windows Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports Exterior wood trim surrounds Accent colors on shutters or other elements Arched elements Shutters Raised stucco trim around windows Window lintels The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2 such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation and floor plan (see Attachment No. 8). The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 04-02. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 December 21,2005 Page 13 development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this project are available at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS; 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6007 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Table "Front Yard Setbacks" 7. Table "Individual Lot Data" 8. Table "Building Elevation Design Elements" 9. Reduced Exhibits 10. Full Size Exhibits "A" through "A-A" dated December 21, 2005 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: PUD 04-0 If A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 APPLICANT: Pulte Homes REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and to approve a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Village, Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 11. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-90 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-02. Villages of La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. State of California, according to map thereof No. 15167 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 2. 2005. as File No. 2005-0955442. APN: 223-720-06. -07. -08, and -09 Acres: SJU Proposed No. of Units: 90 ' GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density (RIM) Density Allowed: 0-4 Density Proposed: 1.8 du/ac Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: P-C Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Current Land Use Site North South East West P-C RLM RD-M, P-C RMH,RLM P-C RLM, OS P-C RLM P-C RLM Vacant (Mass Graded) Multi-family Res., Vacant Vacant Vacant Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 90 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23. 2001 (EIR 98-07) Other, CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: PUD 04-0 UA) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 1 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: P-C (Planned Community) DEVELOPER'S NAME: Pulte Homes ADDRESS: 5993 Avenida Encinas. Suite 101, Carlsbad. CA 92008 PHONE NO.: (760) 795-2200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-720-06. -07, -08, and QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC.. SO. FT.. DU): 51.1 acres/ 90 du -09 A. B. C. D. E. 90 EDU .63 5.2 'D' F. G. H. I. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 312.90 Library: Demand in Square Footage = 166.86 Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools: 900 .= 2 per HCP J. K. Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = Elementary: 24 Middle: 7 High: 2 N/A (Vallecitos) N/A 49.500 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT [Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require) discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Pulte Homes Title Title Address Address 5993 Avenida Encinas. Ste 101 Carlsbad. CA 92008 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management Company Title Title ____^_ Address Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180 Carlsbad. CA 92008 1635 Faraday Dr. vCarlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carisbad.ca.us 3% NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person, serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust. Title ~_ Address Non Profit/Trust. Title "_ Address Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I I Yes IXI No If yes, please indicate person(s): '_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I cetti&.thatSFatasabove information is true and correct to Sigri ifcure of owner/date Agertt for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle President of Morrow Development Print or type name of owner Signature of applicant/date DARREN WARREN ATTnBMFY-lM-FACT Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 riflR.19.2004 3:03PM PL',' HOME S CflL (714)258 4440 NO. 430 P.2/5 CORPORATE RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PULTE HOME CORPORATION That each and every one of the individuals hereinafter named below, is hereby given the authorization on behalf of this corporation to enter into security instruments with the County of San. Diego, State of California, including without limitation, monument bonds, payment bonds, performance bonds, tax bonds, warranty bonds, and all other security instruments (collectively, "Security Instruments") and to enter into and execute agreements, contracts, subdivision maps, deeds, applications, permits, declarations of covenants, conditions and restrictions and other necessary documents for subdivision, resubdivision, boundary line adjustments, re-zoning, infrastructure, survey monuments, building and construction, easements, rights of way, performance agreements, maintenance agreements and all other purposes related to the development and sale of real property (including, without limitation, the construction of residential housing, common area facilities and infrastructure) owned or under option to the corporation and located in the County of San Diego (collectively, "Subdivision Agreements^. Any one of the following are authorized to enter into Security Instruments and Subdivision Agreements on behalf of the corporation: Name Title Bruce E. Robinson Vice President and Treasurer John R. Stoller Vice President and Secretary Maureen E. Thomas Assistant Secretary Calvin R. Boyd Assistant SecretaryyDir, of Treasury Operations Jane K. Bolting Director of Corporate Accounting Collette R. Zulcoff Director of Taxation Suzanne Treppa Tax Manager Julia T. Corcoran Accounting Manager Vincent J. Frees Vice President Robert Porter Senior Treasury Analyst L. J. Edgcomb Division President / Attomey-in Fact Darren Warren Director of Planning and Engineering / Attomey-in-Fact Tim Wellman Director of Land Development / Attomey-in-Fact Caryn Pollock Director of Sales / Attomey-in-Fact Larry Heglar Director of Land Acquisition / Attomey-in-Fact John Drew Director of Construction /Attomey-in-Fact BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolution and the powers and authority granted to the individuals therein name shall continue and remain in force until express notice in writing of their revocation has been duly delivered to and received by the County of San Diego, State of which said notice of revocation or cancellation shall be certified by a duly authorized officer of this corporation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of this corporation does hereby authorize, ratify, adopt and approve any and all Security Instruments and Subdivision Agreements entered into and executed by any one of fee following authorized persons on or after December 1,2001: Calvin R. Boyd, L.J. Edgcomb, Darren Warren, Tim Wellman, Caryn Pollock, Larry Heglar and John Drew, and that any of the foregoing officers or Attomeys-in Fact are hereby authorized, directed or empowered to cause and take any and all other acts and to execute such other documents as they deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the intentions of mis resolution. MflR.19.2004 3:09PM HOME S CflL (714)258 4440 NO.430 P.3/5 | The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is the duly sleeted and acting assistant secretary of the above ; corporation organized and existing under the lavyg of the State of Michigan, that the foregoing are true,; full and correct resolutions regularly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of said corporation. j fa) Duly and regularly called and held on the 29th dav of January. 2002 at which a quorum was I present and voted; or ~ That the same are now in full force and effect, and have not been altered, modified, amended or revoked. f IN "WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name this r 2ntL day of Bruce E. Robinson, Vice President .19. 2004 ' * 3 : 09PH __ & < ' HONE S CflL (714)258 444BI- 02 n-.aMflR .19. Fv p § DOC # 2001-0956101 DEC 26 " 2°O1 * = 5<5> DFFICJflt RECORDS SWKEffl (MY RECORDER'S OFFICE. -- SKQJY j; WhenRecorded ' Return To: Curtis HLVanHyfte QoPulte Home Corporation 10235 S. 51" Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85044 POWER OF ATJ^HNEY AND GRANT OF AGENCY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that PULTE HOME CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Che State of Michigan, authorized to do business in the State of California, having its principal office at Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, does hereby effective immediately, constitute and appoint the following employee(s) Darren Warren, Tim Wellman, Larry Heglar, Caryn Pollock, John Drew, Scott Pasternak, LJ. Edgcomb, Curtis H. VanHyfte, John S. Gallagher, as its true and lawful agents and additional attorneys-in-fact in the State of California, to act for and on behalf of the undersigned corporation in its name, place and stead, and for its use and benefit, in the following respects: (1) Enter into and execute any contracts, agreements, deeds or any other necessary documents, instruments or papers for the sale by the Corporation of finished homes or homes to be finished (together in each instance with the finished lot for the home), provided, however, that except for the sale of any lot together with such home, no such Employee shall have any power or authority to «eil any land whatsoever, C2) Enter into and execute any and all deeds, agreements, or documents relating » common areas and common facilities, any and all other contracts, deeds or other necessary documents, instruments or papers in connection with the sale by the Corporation of finished condominium, townhouse, or duplex unit* and any land associated with such finished units; P) Enter into and execute deeds and/or plats of dedication, subdivision, rcsubdi vision and boundary line adjustment; owner's consents; declarations of covenants, conditions and restrictions;, deeds or vacation of easements, easements and rights-of-way; performance agreements; maintenance agreements for and over any property owned or under option by the Corporation; re-zoning applications, proffer applications and amendments and proffer agreements and other similar documents related to the development of real property owned or under option by the Corporation; and (4) Enter into and execute development, supplier, subcontract and/or construction agreements for die development and/or construction of and on any property owned or under option by the Corporation. Description: Sma Ciego^CA 9acua«ae-T*«r.£oelD 3001.956101 fiffti 1 at 2 Order: 07-03-14-2003 04-00-32 at Camsienfc; raoHPR.19.20WU 3:10PM - Pf/ '". HONE S CflL (714)258 4440., , This Power of Attorney shall expire at midnight on June 30. 2006, unless extended or revoked by Che Corporation prior to such expiation dace. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Pulte Home Corporation has caused its corporate name Co be hereunto subscribed by the Authorized Agent, whose signature is acknowledged by two unofficial witnesses, this 12th day of December, 2001. HOME CORPORATION Unofficial Witness QirtiaH.VanHyfte Authorized Agent STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF On ) ) SS. fZ before n»,. a Notary Public in and for said Stale, personally appeared Curtis EL VanHyftc, personally known to me to be the Authorized Agent of Pulte Home Corporation whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacities, and that by hia signature on tha insttumam the entity upon behalf of which (he person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. : ff«a DX«go/ca Bo=us»ne-jr««r. aoaXD 2001.S3610I. Paw 2 of: 07-03-3.4-aOOS 04-00-22 I0t 37 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ,,15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Floor Plan 1X 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1X 2 3 R 2 R 1X 3 1X 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 R 3 R 1- R 2 R 3 R 1X R 3 R 1X 3 2 3 3 R 2 1X 3 2 3 R 2 R 1X R 2 R 1XR 2 1X R 2 R 3 R 1X R 3 R Individual Buildinq Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 45.70 39.70 63.80 39.50 27.20 20.20 22.70 26.30 30.80 - • 26.60 - 29.50 _ 19.20 29.90 31.50 28.90 21.90 24.90 . 26.30 31.80 29.20 20.90 18.80 19.10 21.10 21.10 18.90 17.40 26.40 19.70 42.90 20.00 25.00 15.40 26.90 31.30 30.10 38.70 35.20 22.90 13.30 20.10 22.30 30.80 2130 42.20 20.00 25.70 18.30 16.60 19.90 17.00 43.70 25.10 19.70 14.50 23.90 28.30 23.60 18.90 15.10 18.10 18.80 21.60 24.30 20.10 24.10 20.00 22.40 13.00 24.80 28.60 44.20 15.00 25.60 22.00 39.00 47.80 16.50 28.70 23.00 23.20 27.20 23.20 27.70 17.40 28.10 29.70 19.50 21.30 20.50 40.50 32.30 48.60 25.10 27.00 40.80 35.70 27.60 21.30 44.20 20.10 26.90 19.00 21.90 24.60 17.60 29.70 31.30 19.70 13.10 15.10 101.60 89.20 92.30 24.50 15.10 21.30 22.40 23.40 18.10 42.80 20.00 17.40 15.80 18.20 36.00 22.00 22.90 20.00 20.50 18.50 17.00 18.40 17.40 19.40 21.40 19.00 23.80 47.40 26.30 21.10 13.30 21.10 22.20 26.40 21.00 43.20 20.00 19.60 13.00 21.50 23.50 21.60 17.60 43.60 21.70 23.00 13.00 23.90 26.10 26.60 '15.10 19.30 25.10 19.10 42.20 21.50 25.40 24.60 21.70 Weighted Average 45.04 24.12 28.10 28.43 26.03 29.02 20.10 19.19 25.20 25.99 33.70 20.18 26,06 20.66 26.18 22.93 19.28 21.37 21.62 23.52 31.44 33.82 21.31 24.75 26.63 20.23 33.28 32.99 26.00 23.46 27.07 16.65 95.61 21.17 24.41 17.45 24.23 18.71 19.55 28.66 20.06 25.52 20.29 24.97 22.51 21.59 25.45 . 23.74 10/14/2005 Neighborhoods 2.1 &2.2 Section B Table 3 Page 3 of 6 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 '64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Floor Plan 1XR 2 R 3 R 2 1X 3 R 2 R 3 R 1XR 2 3 1 3 1 2R 1X R 3 2R 1X R 3 R 2 R 1X R 3R 2 R 3 1X 3 R 2 R 1X R 3 R 2R 1X R 2 3 t 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 • Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 23.60 19.10 44.70 22.50 25.30 ._ 18.00 26.20 27.20 38.60 2g^ ~ 30.70 - -..-26.40 23.30 15.90 23.90 24.90 23.30 18.80 44.80 23.80 25.90 23.90 22.40 25.90 15.60 26.20 27.90 25.80 18.80 21.80 20.00 15.70 40.70 27.10 35.20 29.90 24.50 23.60 24.60 17.60- 20.10 21.90 26.40 22.30 22.80 20.80 19.30 20.20 24.20 20.20 19.50 18.50 20.10 22.20 21.20 16.70 42.20 20.20 21.40 47.50 38.70 28.50 27.50 29.20 31.50 27.30 22.80 46.80 26.30 26.70 24.70 23.20 27.80 20.50 28.50 29.50 18.50 18.10 45.60 28.90 40.50 21.20 30.30 31.90 21.60 32.30 33.90 28.30 21.30 23.80 21.00 16.50 42.00 20.00 25.10 12.40 15.40 42.00 31.00 30.10 20.90 19.50 15.00 41.00 20.00 34.90 23.50 27.80 34.30 33.30 35.00 37.30 26.30 23.50 50.20 31.70 29.50 22.10 30.10 31.10 29.30 27.30 25.80 26.70 30.70 26.70 26.90 16.30 26.60 28.00 23.50 15.00 18.10 23.70 16.70 25.10 27.20 26.40 30.90 26.80 25.00 22.70 21.20 32.60 30.20 29.20 29.70 20.00 28.50 30.90 NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE: Weighted Average 26.15 24.88 32.20 22,67 26.66 24.11 24.80 22.93 26.29 27.24 21.52 23.72 21.01 21 '.75 20.44 23.78 33.08 29.57 29.60 24.91 27.25 28.30 32.93 30.83 25.22 23.58 18.89 29.29 22.86 29.99 35.37 32.71 28.87 27.51 28.25 25.27 19.79 24.04 28.22 23.04 30.22 25.50 26.26 10/14/2005 Neighborhoods 2.1 &2.2 Section B Table 3 Page 4 of 6 Individual Lot Data La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 Lot* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 53 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Plan 1X 3 1 2 3.. 1 2 3 1X 2 3 R 2 R 1X 3 1X 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 R 3 R 1 R 2 R 3 R 1X R 3 R 1X 3 2 3 3 R 2 1X 3 2 3 R 2 R 1X R 2 R 1X R 2 1X R 2 R 3 R 1X R 3 R 1X R 2 R 3 R 2 1X 3 R 2 R 3 R 1X R 2 3 1 3 1 2 R 1X R 3 2 R 1X R 3 R 2 R 1X R Elevation T EC SP T SP EC . SP M SP T SP EC SP M T EC M SP " EC T EC SP M EC T SP T EC SP •- EC T SP SP EC SP EC T M SP T EC SP EC SP T • •• . EC T M SP EC M EC SP M T SP T SP EC SP M. EC SP T EC SP T M EC SP Color 4 8 2 7 4 5 8 3 1 4 : 5 9 2 8 B 1 4 2 8 3 7 5 1 4 6 3 9 2 1 6 9 3 1 8 5 9 6 3 4 2 7 ...-••- 3 1 8 2 5 7 2 4 3 5 7 8 2 9 1 . 7 5 3 8 5 6 4 3 2 3 9 1 6 5 Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 45.04 24.12 28.10 28.43 26.03 29.02 20.10 19.19 25.20 25.99 33.70 20.18 26.06 20.66 26.18 22.93 19.28 21.37 21.62 23.52 31.44 33.82 21.31 24.75 26.63 20.23 33.23 32.99 26.00 23.46 27.07 16.65 95.61 21.17 24.41 17.45 24.23 18.71 19.55 28.66 20.06 25.52 20.29 24.97 22.51 21.59 25.45 23.74 26.15 24.38 32.20 22.67 26.66 24.11 24.80 22.93 26.29 27.24 21.52 23.72 21.01 21.75 20.44 23.78 33.08 29.57 29.60 24.91 27.25 28.30 28 35.1 27.1 24.2 22.9 20 20 20 20 : 26 55.7 20 20 20 20 22.6 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 20 25.7 27.7 36.5 86.7 21.6 20.2 37.1 20 112.5 20 20 20 21.1 20 20 21.2 20 20.5 21.1 24.4 21.6 22.4 21.9 31.4 21.2 27.7 26.9 27.5 29 43.5 59.6 81.2 33.7 20.2 20 20 20 20 20 20.4 20.4 49.3 50.5 68.3 72.4 73.8 14.3 16 15.5 15.5 16.8 -®&®^U 9.8 7.4 7 11.1 7 7 10.9 6.7 10 12.4 •- ' : 7.9 8.8 6 7.5 5 7 5 6 7.6 • 5 7.7 15.6 18.2 19.4 29.4 5 7 6 23 7 9 17.8 16.9 16 45.5 7 6 7.9 7 5.5 7.7 6.3 7 30.2 7.6 7.9 7 7 3.3 15.9 12.4 15.6 7.4 9.4 6.3 9.2 7.8 21.4 6 5 7 6 6.9 10 7 5 6.5 7.2 F 5.6 7.4 8.3 5.9 . 7 8 10.8 6.3 7.7 23 7.1 9.6 '-: 6.4 5 3 7.5 7 11.9 12.4 14.6 16.8 15.4 16.3 26.5 9.5 6 5.4 47.4 7.8 6 11.5 10 8 7.8 11.2 9.7 7.4 63.8 7 7.8 9.4 9.5 15.4 13.2 15 15 27.2 8 8.2 14.4 16.8 19.4 7.5 7 5 7 6 6.8 9 16.8 22 21.4 21.8 16.2 19.3 39.5 56.5 26.3 31.5 59.7 26.3 21.1 51.7 20 31.3 59.9 22.3 20 51.1 ' 25.1 28.3 54.4 24.3 v 20 28.6 60.5 22 44.6 23.2 29.7 50.9 25.1 54.4 20.1 56.3 31.3 50.5 128.1 22.4 20 43.7 20 52 21.4 26.3 22.2 20 23.5 21.7 26.1 53.3 21.5 56.1 22.5 27.2 66.7 24.9 23.8 56.7 27.9 57.3 27.1 23.6 54.6 21.9 53.6 20.2 22.2 20.2 38.6 31.5 26.3 57.5 29.5 28.9 Porch 37.8 17.320:5 22.6 13 17.6 16 14.1 17.1 . 19.5 18 13 14.9 13.4 27.1 13 18.7 28.6 19 16 15.3 17.3 22.2 13 34.1 15.3 19.8 15.5 18.6 14 18 19.3 20 17.9 19.3 16.9 18.2 16.2 15 15 13 16.5 20.5 22.6 22.5 22 Net Pad Area (SF) 9,983 8,464 8,272 8,119 7,937 9,166 8,143 7,850 9,194 8.897 11,213 9,645 12,363 8,236 3,340 8,857 8,493 8,239 7,577 8,140 9,975 10,318 9,927 7,390 8,069 8,784 9,334 14,714 9,722 7,478 8,747 11,026 35,119 8,238 7,727 11,476 3.565 7,700 9,527 11,758 . 9,366 12,589 12,737 3,468 3.438 7,935 8,997 10,239 3,363 8,115 8,649 3,038 8,306 8,130 8,134 9,227 9,691 9,336 7,418 7,138 7,900 7,335 7,902 7,940 12,421 7,828 7,812 8,028 8,414 9,177 Building Coverage" Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 3.091 2,967 3,374 3,135 2,967 3,374 3,135 2,967 3,091 3,135 2,967 3,135 3,091 2,967 3,091 3,135 2,967 3,135 3,374 3,135 2,967 3,374 2,967 3,374 3,135 2,967 3,091 2,967 3,091 2,967 3,135 2,967 2,967 3,135 3,091 2,967 3.135 2,967 3,135 3,091 3,135 3,091 3,135 3,091 3,135 2,967 3,091 2,967 3,091 3,135 2,967 3,135 3,091 2,967 3,135 2,967 3,091 3.135 2,967 3,374 2,967 3,374 3,135 3,091 2,967 3,135 3,091 2,967 3,135 3,091 31.0% 35.1% 40.3% 38.6% 37.4% 36.8%' 38.5% 37.8% 33.6% 35.2% 26.5% 32.5% 25.0% 36.0% 37.1% 35.4% 34.9% 37.8% 44.5% 38.5% 29.7% 32.7% 29.9% 45.7% 38.9% 33.8% 33.1% 20.2% 31.8% 39.7% 35.8% 26.9% 8.4% 38.1% 40.0% 25.9% 36.6% 38.5% 32.9% 26.3% 31.8% 24.6% 24.6% 36.5% 37.2% 37.4% 34.4% 29.0% 34.9% 38.6% 34.3% 39.0% 37.2% 36.5% 38.3% 32.2% 31.9% 33.6% 40.0% 47.3% 37.6% 46.0% 39.7% 38.9% 23.9% 40.0% 39.6% 37.0% 37.3% 33.7% 10/14/2005 Neighborhoods 2.1 &2.2 Section 3 Page5of6 Individual Lot Data La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2 Lota 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 30 81- 82 33 34 35 36 87 83 89 90 Plan 3 R 2 R 3 1X 3 R 2 R 1X R 3 R 2 R 1X R 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 Elevation EC T EC T SP EC SP EC SP T EC M EC T SP EC SP M SP EC Color 9 2 6 ' 8 2 9 1 •-.- 3 8 6 5 4 2 7 5 4 3 8 1 7 Avaraga Neighborhood Setback: Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear^^tLett Right Garage 32.93 30.33 25.22 23.58 18.39 29.29 22.36 29.99 35.37 32.71 28.87 27.51 28.25 25.27 19.79 24.04 28.22 23.04 30.22 25.50 26.26 55.2 84.3 48.9 53.7 20.5 20.9 40.9 60.1 60.3 20 23.8 29.3 20.5 20 20 20 20 20 22.7 20 -9.9 6.1 10 74.5 6 7 34.3 6.7 8 14.7 20.2 26 22.6 14.4 14.6 17.2 23.6 23.4 15 15 20.9 29.8 19.1 10.5 10.7 7 12 41.5 16 8 15.5 13 9.4 11 11.4 9.5 8.1 11.2 12 6.3 65.5 33.9 57.6 20 51.2 20.9 20 62.3 37.3 31.7 31.1 60.8 26.7 28 53.2 27.2 26.4 56.2 29.7 20 Porch 22.9 16.3 24.9 15.5 26.3 25.8 24.1 21.6 17.7 19.1 • 17.6 20.7 19.3 Net Pad Area (SF) 8,634 9,082 8,125 10,491 3,338 3,893 9,913 10,841 12,408 8,211 10,555 9,333 7,859 8,151 8,324 8,045 8,192 8.023 9,544 10,231 Building Coverage" Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,967 3,135 2,967 3,091 2,967 3,135 3,091 2,967 3,135 3,091 3,135 2,967 3,374 3,135 2,967 3.135 3,374 2,967 3,135 3,374 34.2% 34.5% 36.5% .29.5% 35.4% 35.3% 31.2% 27.4% 25.3% 37.6% 29.7% 31.8% 42.9% 38.5% 35.6% 39.0% 41 .2% 37.0% 32.8% 33.0% «^^iKs%*.«. * *f* o \l "Building Coverage * net pad ana or a silo occupied by the habitable area or any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feel and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open panting areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry wafts not greater than 8 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls. 10/14/2005 Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2 Section B Table 4 / . Page 6 of 6 »« / IEa on El3 -Accent ColOther EleVOExterior WoodWindow Boxes andArchitectural Evinters withSM r<l Li-.—i <- :<- *- *- *- .+1 •- *- 4- .!<.!*.- !*, •c.:<, !•«-.i*- *> • _±. . :<- X <- . j .. j. ;<. _j...... !<- es P!f"B i ? =il £j f° O§;§N ye 9s * i; s, 3 i" .'9 »I t CM * C5 J8i 5UU5 -I'llB illi«i: if! Q30. -5 3 sK ij \e I Sb 3* 3s rl CO S O5 - 1,1 ill 41, !L >i *-i g • ez It ij; 'I? P I I QQ <n•ou aoa •«! °zr i! ato *itj|c!^ ill!i,s l-'l «Ufi n Oo.. Fl It i f * au <j i 1 wo D H C/3 Ou O.Q- wjOo u GQ o) OU fs 'tttSis* Ill .f I" f rllM! - ll. I l OS O' U Off 1? «' of f3:! ~~ 1 ja- 1' |» Iv 1•i r-J I 1 £ *11 X " l^ Planning Commission Minutes December 21,2005 Page 5 EXHIBIT 5 4. PUD 04-01 (A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Item 4 and stated Associate Planner Jason Goff would make the staff presentation. Chairperson Segall opened the public hearing on Item 4. Mr. Goff gave a detailed presentation on the project and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Segall asked what size the garage door openings are. Mr. Goff stated the applicant would be able to answer. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any other questions. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant wished to give a presentation. Jack Henthorn, 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite A, Carlsbad, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Mr. Henthorn also clarified that the garage door openings are 9 feet wide. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Heineman stated that the arch over the garages in the Spanish Colonial floor plans make it appear as though a car would not be able to fit. Mr. Henthorn stated the arch is forward from the garage door and it only appears to be close in the exhibits. Commissioner Dominguez asked Mr. Henthorn if he had any plans which showed the optional deck on the models. Mr. Henthorn stated he did not have any incorporated into the presentation. Chairperson Segall stated that on the Plan 2 the Master Bedroom is downstairs. He asked if that is a new approach in marketing or if there is a demand for that type of floor plan now. Mr. Henthorn stated there is a demand for it now. Chairperson Segall asked what the price range of the homes would be. Mr. Henthorn stated the price range has not been determined yet. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any further questions. Seeing none, he asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Paul Ebert, 6787 Via Casa Del Sol, stated he is concerned about the placement of the homes in this development because his home is below these new homes and he does not want to see half of the home or just the roofs. Mr. Goff stated that the applicant did submit a slope analysis and the development does comply with zoning and setback requirements. Mr. Ebert asked if a study could be done to determine the views from his perspective. Chairperson Segall stated that the applicant could address that comment. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any other members of the public who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Mr. Neu responded to the issue raised by Mr. Ebert. Mr. Neu stated that one of the standards in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan is the plotting of single story homes on some of the higher elevations. Mr. Neu also described the citywide Hillside Ordinance which deals with the distance of a structure at the top of slope and provides that a structure is not "looming" over the edge of the slope if your home is down slope. Mr. Neu further stated that whatever will be built on the slope above Mr. Ebert, he will most likely see a structure at least as a distant view. There are no other city regulations that deal with modifying the viewshed. Planning Commission Minutes December 21,2005 Page 6 Commissioner Whitton commented that there is also a fence on the ridgeline which would also serve to mask the some if not all of the homes above Mr. Ebert's property. Chairperson Segall closed public testimony on the item. Commissioner Dominguez asked that Mr. Henthorn respond to the issues raised by Mr. Ebert. Mr. Henthorn stated that the open space lot does intervene within the viewshed which provides about 100 to 150 feet of separation from the road to the homes. He further stated that because of the Hillside Ordinance, he feels there is sufficient space between the top of slope and the placement of the homes. Commissioner Heineman asked how many feet are between the homes and the street. Mr. Henthorn estimated about 130 to 150 feet exclusive of the road. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution No. 6007 recommending approval of Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-01 (A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. DISCUSSION Commissioner Montgomery commented that the item before the Commission tonight was only for architecture and plotting. He stated that the concerns raised by Mr. Ebert related to a previous action already heard by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Montgomery further stated that the project is very unique and is in favor of the project. Commissioner Dominguez commented that the developer did a fantastic job with the architecture of the homes. Chairperson Segall concurred with Commissioner Dominguez's comments. VOTE: 5-0-2 AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and Whitton NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Baker and Cardosa Chairperson Segall closed the public hearing on Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp rdJanuary 23ro, 2006 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 23rd, Day of January, 2006 Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of - -. — *• r-v CASE FILE:PUD 04-01 (A) CASE NAME:VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGENEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCILNCT 1896040-01/23/06 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider a request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lots 1-90 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-02, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 15167 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 2,2005, as File No. 2005-0955442 Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after February 3,2006. If you have any questions, please call Jason Goff in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4643. If you challenge the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 04-01 (A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 PUBLISH: January 23,2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.1 & 2.2 PUD 04-01 (A) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider a request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lots 1-90 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-02, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 15167 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 2,2005, as File No. 2005-0955442 Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after February 3,2006. If you have any questions, please call Jason Goff in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4643. If you challenge the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 04-01 (A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 PUBLISH: January 23,2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL MOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.1 & 2.2 PUD 04-01 (A) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider a request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 90 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, generally located south of Alga Road, east of El Puerto Street, north of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lots 1-90 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-02, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.1 and 2.2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 15167 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on November 2, 2005, as File No. 2005- 0955442 Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after February 3, 2006. If you have any questions, please call Jason Goff in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4643. If you challenge the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 04-01 (A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.1 AND 2.2 PUBLISH: January 23, 2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL SITE MAP NOT TO SCALE Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.1 & 2.2 PUD 04-01 (A) Impression antibourrage et & sechage rapide Utilisez le gabarit 5160® HANTR 7033 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MAXINE FREIFELD STE 200 2755 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 92008 AVERY® 5160® GUS MUMTZIS 7049 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID J LAWRENCE 7042 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 OVERBECK TR 7030 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GARY & ANNA BACCI 7026 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHRISTOPHER FEUGE 3340 FOSCA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GERARD & NICOLE TYNEN 7057 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEISELHART TR 7065 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 STANDARD TR 7103 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 STAPP TR 7118 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SUSANA WEST 7110 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 THOMAS R BRILL 3654 CARMEL VIEW RD SAN DIEGO CA 92130 YATES TR 7066 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 KELLEY TR 7058 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SPIRITOTR 7050 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MORENO TR 6795 VIA CASA DEL SOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID A BROTHERS 6791 VIA CASA DEL SOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 PAUL & G EBERT 6787 VIA CASA DEL SOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 YALE & PRISCILLA ROTH 6786 VIA CASA DEL SOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 THEOFILOPOULOS TR 6790 VIA CASA DEL SOL CARLSBAD CA 92009 HADDEN & ALICE ROTH 343 FAIRHILLS DR SAN RAFAEL CA 94901 LA CASA DEL SOL HOA STE 1400 600 W BROADWAY SANDIEGOCA 92101 RECM STEK 770 N WOOD DALE RD WOOD DALE IL 60191 SHEA HOMES 9990 MESA RIM RD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 WARMINGTON HOMES STE 280 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD CARLSBAD CA 92009 PULTE HOMES STE 101 5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 CNLM STEH 425 E ALVARADO ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES STE A 5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 MORROW DEVELOPMENT STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ®09is AH3AV-O9-008-1 <g,09i.s 6uj)uud aaij e6pnius pue uier Impression antibourrage et a sechage rapide Utilisez le gabarit 5160® KEVIN F STEPHENS STE24 1500W11THAVE ESCONDIDO CA 92029 RICHARD C JACKAM 741 PLUMOSA AVE VISTA CA www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 92083 AVERY® 5160® JEFFREY M GOLDMAN 6847 CORINTIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID L & JAYNE GRAIN 6853 CORINTIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID L & 6853 CO CA 92009 FARLEY TR 6859 CORINTIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN P MARINEZ 2760 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 HARDING TR 2752 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 SYDNEY A HEATON 2744 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHRISTINE TRAURIG 2743 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID R & LILA WEBB 2747 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 BENJAMIN DVITEK 7027 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARINEZ TR 7033 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARGARITA SHENKER TR 7039 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLSON TR 7045 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 RAINER MOEGLING PO BOX 2807 RCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 PLUMB TR 7059 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARTIN & NORMA RANDANT 7052 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 KIM J BOYLE 7044 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREGORY J MATSUKOVIC 7036 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LACYTR 7028 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 DIOT TR 7020 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GERLANDO J COMPILATI 7014 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOYCE DEVIS-NORTON 7008 LLAMA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHARLES F BUMAN PO BOX 747 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 CHARLES F BUMAN PO BOX 747 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 PETER C TAN 6873 CORINTIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALMON-PESCH TR 7009 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JESSE E LARRAGA 7017 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SIMON D HALELOOYA 19308 ENTRADERO AVE TORRANCE CA 90503 ©cms ®AU3AV AM3AV-OD-008-1 «09 IS aiVldlAiai 4/J3AV Ban a6pnuis pue uier Impression antibourrage et a sechage rapide Utilisez le gabarit 5160® MALCOLM & JANE MCGAVIN 2859 CAZADERO DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 EDWARD W HOLUB 129 3RD ST ENCINITAS CA www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 92024 AVERY® 5160® KEVIN F STEPHENS 1500W11THAVE ESCONDIDO CA 92029 DOLORES YOUNG 6841 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARGARET WHITELEY 6839 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALBERT & JANICE KAISER 6844 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOYCE HICKMAN 6846 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 R J STIMKORB 708 GLEN ARBOR DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 VANDERLINDEN TR 3007 LEVANTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LAYTON TR 630 ALTA VISTA DR VISTA CA 92084 CLAUDE A WIEDMER 6814 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 VINCE B HARDING 6816 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIN GILLOTTI 6808 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SARAH SEDGWICK 3107 AVENIDA TOPANGA CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEPHEN D MERRICK 2177 SAN ELI JO AVE CARDIFF BY THE SEA CA 92007 ARLENE J HOURDAJIAN 6804 URUBU ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 HESTON TR 6801 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ELLIOT CANTER 331 W I ST ENCINITAS CA 92024 GARY & MARIA BRANHAM 6817 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MATTIO TR 6815 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 BENOIT TR 18EASTRIDGE TRABUCO CANYON CA 92679 KRIS SUBBARAO 6841 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MEREDITH TR 11062NDSTSTE270 ENCINITAS CA 92024 WILLIAM FLEMING 6843 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 FLAGE TR 6845 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MYRON & LYDIA SWIZE 6829 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANNE CANNOVA 6827 EL FUERTE ST 2 CARLSBAD CA 92009 SPERBERG TR 6823 EL FUERTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 SIMMONS TR 13054 OLD SYCAMORE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92128 KEVIN F STEPHENS STE24 1500 W11TH AVE ESCONDIDO CA 92029 ®09is AM3AV-OD-008-1 8,0915 31VldlAI31®AJ3AV asfl 6u|}uud aay e6pnuis pue uier Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160* CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER DAVID RICK CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER JASON GOFF H/06/2006 AU3AV-OD-008-1 Villages of La Costa Ridge Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2PUD 04PUD 04--01(A)01(A) Location MapLocation MapEL FUERTE STCORINTIA STURUBU STC ORINTIA STCACATUA STCAM IN O D E A M IG O SMELROSE D R LUCIERNAGA STS A N TA ISABEL STX A NA WYUNICORNIO STALGA RDVLC RidgeNeighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2 S ITIO O C E A N O EL FUERTE STCORTE LANGOSTACACATUA STSITIO TORTUGASITIO C A B A L L E R OCORINTIA STM E L R O S E D R LLAMA STURUBU STESTURION STCAMINO D E A M IG O S LUCIERNAGA STCEBU PLXAN A WYC O R IN TIA STCAZADERO DRUNICORNIO STALGA RD04008001,200200FeetPUD 04-01(A)Villages of La Costa RidgeNeighborhood 2.1 & 2.2Aerial Photo 2004 Project Background:Project Background:„„Project site was previously subdivided under Project site was previously subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 04Tentative Map (CT 04--02) and Planned 02) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04Development Permit (PUD 04--01)01)„„Approved by City Council on November 16, Approved by City Council on November 16, 20042004 Council Consideration:Council Consideration:„„Amendment to PUD 04Amendment to PUD 04--01 for Architecture & 01 for Architecture & Plotting of 90 detached singlePlotting of 90 detached single--family homesfamily homes Project Features:Project Features:„„7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot sizes7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot sizes„„4 floor plans (1 and 2 story)4 floor plans (1 and 2 story)„„20% of the required ridgeline/hilltop lots 20% of the required ridgeline/hilltop lots consist of 1consist of 1--story constructionstory construction„„Living area range: 2,844 to 4,213 sq. ft.Living area range: 2,844 to 4,213 sq. ft.„„3 elevations per floor plan3 elevations per floor plan„„4 architectural styles4 architectural styles(European Country, Monterey Ranch, Tuscan & Spanish Colonial)(European Country, Monterey Ranch, Tuscan & Spanish Colonial)„„9 color schemes9 color schemes Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2Neighborhoods 2.1 & 2.2„„Setbacks from El Setbacks from El FuerteFuerteStreet Street Project Consistency:Project Consistency:„„General PlanGeneral Plan„„Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 ––Planned Planned DevelopmentDevelopment„„Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98--01(C) 01(C) „„Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98--0707 Planning Commission ActionPlanning Commission Action„„December 21, 2005December 21, 2005„„Recommended adoption of Resolution 6007Recommended adoption of Resolution 6007„„Recommended approval of Planned Unit Recommended approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04Development Amendment PUD 04--01(A)01(A) Recommendation:Recommendation:„„Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2006Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2006--030030„„Approve Planned Unit Development Approve Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04Amendment PUD 04--01(A)01(A)