HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-02-07; City Council; 18436; Village of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
OUi§cc
0.S:
O
Oo
AB# 18,436
MTG. 2/7/06
DEPT. PLN
TITLE:
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE
NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 - NORTH
PUD 04-02(8)
DEPT. HD. \U^/^--~
CITY ATTY. OP^
CITY MGR ^^p
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2006-031 APPROVING Planned Unit
Development Amendment PUD 04-02(B) for Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 -
North as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Project application(s)
PUD 04-02(6)
Administrative
Approvals
Reviewed by and
Final at Planning
Commission
To be Reviewed -
Final at Council
X
On December 21, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential
project. Since the Planned Unit Development Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action.
The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 and is for the
approval of architecture and plotting of 55 single-family dwelling units. The lots for these
neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map CT 04-03 and Planned Development Permit
PUD 04-02, both of which were approved by City Council on November 16, 2004. Lots in these two
neighborhoods are a minimum 10,000 square feet in size. A Planned Development Permit was
required because the project included gated entries and private streets.
The Planning Commission discussed the merits of the application, and voted 5-0 (absent
Commissioners Cardosa and Baker) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council.
A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's discussion is included in the attached minutes. A
complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the
Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant
impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc.
EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the
"Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed
neighborhood projects reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 &
2.4 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions
of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program
EIR.
PAGE 2
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are
a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07
and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this project are
available at the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-031
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6008
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated December 21, 2005
5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 21, 2005.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Jason Goff, (760) 602-4643, jgoff@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
G-AVvVb; -V \
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-031
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
3 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 04-02(B) TO
APPROVE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND
4 PLOTTING OF 55 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH AND NORTHEAST
5 OF FUTURE CORINITIA STREET, EAST OF EL FUERTE
STREET AND NORTH OF THE HCP OPEN SPACE IN
6 NEIGHBORHOOD 2.A IN THE RIDGE VILLAGE OF THE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN, AND WITHIN LOCAL
7 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11.
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE
8 NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 - NORTH
CASE NO.: PUD 04-02(6)
9
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
10 follows:
11 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
12 Commission did, on December 21, 2005, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
1^ law to consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment; and
14 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 7th day of
15 February , 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planned Unit
1" Development Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections, protests,
1 7' comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 04-02(B); and
18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
2Q 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
21 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04-02(B) is approved by the City Council and that
22 the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 6008, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the
23 findings and conditions of the City Council.
24 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial
25 Review" shall apply:
26 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
27 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be
sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
28 which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other
paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not
later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this
decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in
an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of
such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in
court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the
date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to
the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall
be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 7th day of February 2006, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
.^VyDOINE M/WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
SITE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.3 & 2.4
PUD 04-02(6)
EXHIBIT 3
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6008
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MAJOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
4 PERMIT AMENDMENT PUD 04-02(B) TO APPROVE
5 BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING
OF 55 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON PROPERTY
6 GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF
FUTURE CORINITIA STREET, EAST OF EL FUERTE STREET
7 AND NORTH OF THE HCP OPEN JSP ACE IN
NEIGHBORHOOD 2.A IN THE RIDGE VILLAGE OF THE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN, AND WITHIN
9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11.
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE
10 NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
CASE NO.: PUD 04-02(6)
11
WHEREAS, Shea Homes, "Developer," has filed a verified application with the
13 City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Shea Homes Limited Partnership, "Owner,"
14 described as
La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4
16
Lots 49-103 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-03, Villages of
17 j La Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
18 According to map thereof No. 15098 filed in the Office of
19 County Recorder of San Diego County on September 12, 2005
as File No. 2005-0786139
20
("the Property"); and
21
22 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
23 Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" through "TT" dated December 21, 2005, on
24 file in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS
25 2.3 AND 2.4 NORTH - PUD 04-02(B) as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal
26
Code; and
27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of December 2005,28
i hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
2 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring -to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
3
relating to the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment.
4
5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
6 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
7 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
o
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
9 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE
NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 AND 2.4 NORTH, based on the following findings
10 and subject to the following conditions:
H Findings:
12 1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
13 within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for
14 55 single-family detached units located on approved lots with a minimum area of
10,000 square feet. The proposed project is consistent with Chapter 21.45 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code and all proposed homes comply with the architecture and
i £ site planning standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
17 2. That the proposed project's density, site design and architecture are compatible with
surrounding development, in that the existing surrounding residential neighborhoods
1B contain single-family detached homes and the future surrounding neighborhoods in
the Villages of La Costa Master Plan will be developed with single-family detached
homes.
20 3. The Planning Director has determined that:
21
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan a
22 project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has
been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the
program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the
24 activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or
25 b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and
96^° c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
27 with the prior project or plan; and
28 d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
in the prior EIR; and
PC RESO NO. 6008 -2- 7
1
2
none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and
3 f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed,
r incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for
this Subsequent Project.
6
4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and
„ ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
9 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
10 project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project
13 is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan.14
,f. 6. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant shall
16 record a notice concerning aircraft noise. The project is compatible with the projected
noise levels of the CLUP; and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the
17 CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that the project is not
within noise contours greater than 60 CNEL as created by airport operations.
18
19 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section IB).
20
The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
22 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is hi rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
23
Conditions;
24
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of
building permits.
26
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
27 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
PC RESO NO. 6008 -3- #
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
2 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
3 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Major Planned Unit
Development Permit Amendment.
5 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment
6 documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the
final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the
7 approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require
an amendment to this approval.8
9 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
10
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
11 of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are
j2 challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section
66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid
13 unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with
all requirements of law.
14
5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
16 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
17 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Major Planned Unit
Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or
action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use
19 contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the
facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from
20 the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
21 6. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar
22 copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making
body.
23
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
24 Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
obligation to provide school facilities.
26 8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
27 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
28 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
PC RESO NO. 6008 -4- Q
adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
2 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
3
10. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
4 Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project's
market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
development.
7
11. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a
8 Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in
interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Planned Unit Development Permit
10 Amendment by Resolution No. 6008 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall
note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and
11 all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion
in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and
record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
14 12. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
15 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
1 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
j 7 taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this
approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
18
13. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants,
19 conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
22
a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
^obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor
of, or in which the City has an interest.
25 b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right
26 to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City
within 30 days for the official record.27
c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event
that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the
PC RESO NO. 6008 -5- 10
Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section the
2 City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If
the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the
3 Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with
particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the
same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the
, giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the
6 period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to
be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the
7 Owners as provided herein.
o d. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
9 necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements,
the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the
10 City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's
Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the
Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in
full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in
the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and
13 payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If
the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified,
14 payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount
equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may
pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or
in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other
rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment
17 against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice,
plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and
shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is
19 levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to
levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring
20 all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in
21 accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
22 e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HO As and individual lot or unit owner
23 landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be established by the HOA and set
forth in the CC&Rs.
24
f. Outdoor lighting restrictions for private residential lots located adjacent to the
25 HCP/OMSP shall be noted in the proposed project CC&Rs.
26 g. Educational materials regarding the sensitivity of the HCP/OMSP shall be given
27 to the proposed Project Residents as part of the CC&Rs. The material shall
state the importance of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impacts to
28 them.
PC RESO NO. 6008 -6- //
h. The proposed project CC&Rs shall provide a list of invasive plant species
2 prohibited from landscaping adjacent to conserved habitat areas.
3 i. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur
within the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire
rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall
c be obtained prior to installation from the Building Department.
6 j. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs
shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone.
7
14. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
9 Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
10 shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
12 Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
13 regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
14 15. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all required
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and
recreational facilities.
16
16. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address
17 change from that which is shown on the permit application.
1 810 17. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
, Q the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
20 existing schools, parks and streets.
18. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
23
19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice
24 - that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing
Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City
Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department).
26 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice
27 that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from
McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and
the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
PC RESO NO. 6008 -7- /^
21. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
2 associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
3 Department).
22. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
c with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
6
23. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 04-03
7 in Resolution No. 5736 and PUD 04-02 in Resolution No. 5737, which are
incorporated by reference herein.8
9 24. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
10 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation
Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations
12 contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured
slopes.
13
25. The loft shown on Plan No. 3 is not approved as part of the Major Planned Unit
Development Amendment. Prior to issuance of a building permit, revised plans
, , shall be submitted for approval showing the loft deleted.
16 Engineering:
17 General
18 26. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route.
20
27. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of
the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is
formally established by the City.
23 Fees/Agreements
24 28. This project shall be annexed into City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and
Landscaping District No. 2 (SL&LD #2). Prior to approval of any grading, building
permits or final map for this project, Developer shall cause Owner to execute an
26 Agreement to annex the subject property into City of SL&LD #2. The Agreement
shall be in a form approved by the Assistant City Finance Director. Developer shall
27 pay all fees necessary to annex the property into SL&LD #2.
28
PC RESO NO. 6008 -8- ]3
Grading
2 29. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site
3 plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a
grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits. A single
precise grading plan for the entire development shall be processed in lieu of
- individual plans coinciding with construction phasing.
6 30. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall provide improvements constructed
7 pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best
Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level
prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to
9 and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be
limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following:
10
a. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and
, 2 hazardous waste products.
b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
13 antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain
14 or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides,
herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet
Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective
containers.
c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants
17 when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
1 O 31. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions
20 established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce
to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of
the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall:
23 a. include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board requirements;
24 b. include the receipt of "Notice of Intent" issued by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board;
c. recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices
(BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said
pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging
27 to City right-of-way or natural drainage course; and
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper
procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
PC RESO NO. 6008 -9- /-/
1
2 32. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)."
3 The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban
Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal
<- Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from
storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the
6 project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall:
7 a. identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern;
b. identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies
that could be impacted by this project;
9 c. recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with
this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the
10 maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way;
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special
1 * considerations and effort shall be applied to (RESIDENT/EMPLOYEE) education
, 2 on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants;
e. ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity; and
13 identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not
exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent
14 practicable; and
f. identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not
exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent
16 practicable.
17 Code Reminders:
181 ° The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
the following:
20 33. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
21
34. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
23 with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
24
35. Some improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of
title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negations to acquire such
27 property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If
unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and
comply with requirements of Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and
enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
PC RESO NO. 6008 -10- AT
1
2 36. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 18.04.320.
3
37. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
r permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 6008 -11-
1 NOTICE
2
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
3 reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
5 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
6 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
g annul their imposition.
9 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
10 zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
12 expired.
13 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
14 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 21st day of December 2005, by the
following vote, to wit:
16
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman,
Montgomery, and Whitton
18 NOES:
19
ABSENT:
20"
22 L^^ ^S^fJEFFRE NT^EGALL, CHairperson
23 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
EST:
24
25 DONNEU
26 Assistant Planning Director
27
28
PC RESO NO. 6008 -12-
City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: December 21, 2005
Application complete date: September 21, 2005
Project Planner: Jason Goff
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: PUD 04-02(8) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS
2.3 AND 2.4 NORTH - Request for a determination that the project is within the
scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the
Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a
recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit
Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development
of 55 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge
Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 North, generally located north and northeast of future
Corintia Street, east of El Fuerte Street and northwest of the HCP open space in
Neighborhood 2.A, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6008
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment
PUD 04-02(B) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 55 single-family dwelling
units located in the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North. The lots for
these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 04-03) and Planned Development
Permit (PUD 04-02), approved by the City Council on November 16, 2004. The Planned
Development Permits were required because of gated entries and private streets. Architecture for
the units were not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 6.2.7 of the Master Plan, could
be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment. At
over 50 units the project requires City Council approval. The applicant is now proposing
architecture and plotting for the subject neighborhoods. The proposed two-story homes consist
of three floor plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 4,182 to 5,127 square
feet. Each floor plan has three elevation styles and the project has a total of twelve color
schemes. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
O
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 2
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 04-03 created the
residential lots for Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 North. A final map has recorded for The Ridge,
grading and improvement plans have been approved and construction is presently ongoing.
Project Description
The project site consisting of Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 North of the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan's Ridge Village, is generally located north and northeast of future Corintia Street,
east of El Fuerte Street and northwest of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and is
located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The subject neighborhoods contain 55
single-family residential lots that are a minimum of 10,000 square feet in size. The Master Plan
provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Major Planned Unit
Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the
previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans,
elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, three different floor plans are being
proposed with living areas ranging in size from approximately 4,182 to 5,127 square feet. All
plans consist of two-story units each with attached garages providing parking spaces for 3 or 4
cars. Four different elevation styles are proposed for the neighborhood, and each floor plan
utilizes three of the four styles to create a variety of facades in the neighborhood. The following
table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles:
Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans
Plan
No.
1
' 2
3
1st Floor
Sq. Ft.
3,649
2,626
2,709
2nd
Floor
Sq. Ft.
533
2,166
2,160
*258
Living
Area Sq.
Ft.
4,182
4,792
5,127
Garage
Sq. Ft.
710
3 car
966
4 car
981
4 car
Total
Bldg. Sq.
Ft.
4,892
5,758
6,108
Architectural Styles
Santa Barbara,
Italian/Tuscan,
Monterey Ranch
Italian/Tuscan,
Monterey Ranch,
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara,
Italian/Tuscan,
Spanish Colonial
* loft area
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Unit
Development Permit Amendment (PUD) is required for the development of homes in gated
neighborhoods with private roads.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES oF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 3
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(C))
The project is located within the Ridge Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and
timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhoods were divided into residential lots through CT 04-03, approved on
November 16, 2004, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision
were analyzed at that time.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following table shows compliance of the proposed project with the
Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan.
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Front Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.a)
15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average
(See VLCMP for instructions about calculating
averages)
A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within
the front yard setback to accommodate applicable
alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot
exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5'
minimum setback from property line.
Neighborhood Average Front
Yard Setback = 27.10.
Please refer to the "Front Yard
Setbacks" table (Attachment
No. 6) for compliance with 15'
minimum. All lots comply.
Rear Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.e)
Varies according to Neighborhood's minimum lot
size
. Min. 6,000 SF lot: 15' minimum setback
. Min. 7,500 SF lot: 20' minimum setback
. Min. 10,000 SF lot: 20' minimum setback
Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15'
All lots comply with Minimum
10,000 SF lot: 20' minimum
rear yard setback.
All lots provide the required 15'
x 15' usable rear yard area.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES oF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 4
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Side Yards
(4.6.2.B.2.C)
Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size
width for lots less than 60' wide
Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size
width for lots 60' and wider
Minimum of 5' per side
Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20' in
aggregate
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side
yard to 5'
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall
have one side elevation where there are sufficient
offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a
minimum of 7'.
Please refer to the "Individual
Lot Data" table (Attachment
No. 7) for side yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Street Side Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.d)
10' minimum All street side setbacks of 10'
minimum have been met.
Slope Edge
Building Setback
(4.3.4)
All main and accessory buildings that are developed
on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter
slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so
that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal
to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is
measured from the edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge
building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal
plane shall be submitted with all other development
application requirements.
All proposed units will meet the
required slope edge setbacks by
maintaining the minimum rear
yard setback. Please refer to the
"Slope Edge Building Setback"
exhibits on the enclosed plans
for further details.
Lot Width
(4.6.2.B.1)
Lot widths vary from 50' to 70'
. 6,000 SF lots: 50'
. 7,500 SF lots: 60'
. 10,000 SF lots: 70'
All lots were previously
approved by CT 04-03 and have
a minimum width of 70'.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES uF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
PageS
Building Coverage
(4.6.3.B.2)
1-story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
• Garages and the perimeter area of a basement.
Excludes:
• Exterior structures such as covered porches
« Permanent structural elements protruding from
buildings such as overhanging balconies that
project less than 8' from the building
» Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22'
and a width of 8'
« Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the
face of any building
• Awnings
• Open parking areas
• Structures under 30" in height
• Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height
(wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation
retaining walls).
Lot coverage:
Plan 1 = 4,359 SF
Plan 2 = 3,592 SF
Plan 3 = 3,690 SF
All plan types are two-story
Structures and do not exceed
the minimum 40% of net pad
area as required.
Please refer to the "Individual
Lot Data" table (Attachment
No. 7) for rear yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Building Height
(4.6.3.B.1)
Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Plan 1 = 22'-9" max.; 2-story
Plan 2 = 26'-0" max.; 2-story
Plan 3 = 3Q'-0" max.: 2-story
Front Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.6 &
4.6.3.B.4.f)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch
offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front
and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of
frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage
greater than 45'.
33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit
from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front
courtyard is substituted.
Please refer to the architectural
plans for the building plane
exhibits. All units comply.
Plan 1 = 7 Planes
Plan 2 = 8 Planes
Plan 3 = 7 Planes
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 6
Rear Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch
offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of
the forward-most plane and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of
frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage
greater than 45'.
Please refer to the architectural
plans for the building plane
exhibits. All units comply.
Plan 1 = 5 Planes
Plan 2 = 5 Planes
Plan 3 = 5 Planes
Front Building
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.6)
Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum
of 4 varieties of design elements to create character
and interest to the home. These elements vary
depending on the architectural style used.
Please refer to the "Building
Elevation Design Elements"
matrix (Attachment No. 8) and
the architectural plans that
detail the various design
elements incorporated for each
front elevation type. All plan
types and elevation styles
comply.
Side & Rear
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.7)
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural
detailing incorporating good design is required for
side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private
roads.
Please refer to the "Building
Elevation Design Elements"
matrix (Attachment No. 8) and
the architectural plans that
detail the various design
elements incorporated for each
side and rear elevation types.
All plan types and elevation
styles comply.
Elevations Fronting
Circulation Element
Roads (4.6.3.A.I.a)
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are
required to receive special attention to detailing on
the elevation fronting the roads. This will include
window detailing equal to or better than that of the
front elevation. The introduction of additional wall
planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is
encouraged.
Please refer to the architectural
plans that detail the various
design elements incorporated
for each of the proposed
elevations. All plan types and
elevation styles comply.
Floor Plans
(4.6.3.B.5.C &
4.6.3.B.5.d)
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for
each floor plan.
The proposed project includes
three floor plans with three
distinctive elevation types for
each plan. Please refer to the
architectural plans.
Single-Story Units
(5.7.3.6.0,
5.7.3.12.o &
4.6.3.B.4.1)
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are
visible from a circulation element roadway, at least
20% of the units shall be single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum
of 15', (10'preferred).
Not Applicable. Neighborhood
has not been designated with a
ridgeline or hilltop that is
visible from a circulation
element roadway by the Master
Plan.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page?
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.B.4.n &
4.6.3.B.5.b)
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-
story square footage, including all garage area.
Please refer to the architectural
plans that detail the single story
features provided. All proposed
plans comply.
Plan 1: 12.2%
Plan 2: 60.3%
Plan 3: 58.5%
Where (3) Two
Story Units occur in
a row with less than
15 ft between
homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.b)
One of the units must have a single-story building
edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the
building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum
of 15'.
Plan types 1 and 3 incorporate a
single story building edge that
is at least 10' wide and runs the
length of the building and are
plotted where there are 3 units
with less than 15' between
them.
Where (3) Two
Story Units occur in
a row with 15 ft to
20 ft between
homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.C)
One of the units must have a single-story building
edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the
building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum
of 15'.
Plan types 1 and 3 incorporate a
single story building edge that
is at least 10' wide and runs the
length of the building and are
plotted where there are 3 units
with 15' to 20' between them.
Single-Story
Elements
(4.6.3.B.4.d)
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a
single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3',
that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width.
Porches and porte cochere elements qualify.
All plan types (100%)
incorporate a single-story
building element, which is a
minimum 3' in depth and
greater than 40% of the front
elevation width.
Plan 1: 100%
Plan 2: 100%
Plan 3: 73.0%
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
PageS
Entries, Front
Porches,
Courtyards, &
Balconies
(4.6.3.B.9,
4.6.2.B.2.f&
4.6.2.B.3)
25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5'
deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a
courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the
architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10'.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be
provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may
also serve this purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open
except for required and ornamental guardrails. These
features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of
the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider having the
porch wrap around the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and
balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively
into the required front yard setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches
may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks.
10.9% of the elevations
incorporate a front porch (The
Plan 2 Tuscan includes a
porch/entry that is 36.9% of the
width).
18.2% of the elevations
incorporate a balcony (Santa
Barbara Mediterranean and
Monterey Ranch styles of the
Plan 1)
A total of 29.1% of the
elevation styles within the
development comply.
Please refer to the architecture
and site plan for compliance.
Octagonal or Round
Entry Tower
(4.6.2.B.3.a)
May encroach into the required side setbacks a
maximum of 2'. The total length of the
encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located
within the larger side yard. The roof eave may
encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the
required setback.
A minimum 5' setback must be maintained.
None are proposed within the
side yard setback.
Projections
(4.6.2.B.3)
Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices,
eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar
architectural features projecting from the building
may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks.
No projections extend into the
side yard setback more than 2'
nor are any projections greater
than 8' in length. All plans
comply.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 9
Recreation Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Common recreation areas:
• Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street
parking
• "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide
parking
• Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which
they are required to serve shall include 1 space
for every 20 units.
• More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the
units for which it is required to serve requires
parking for those additional units at a rate of 1
space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking
options)
Not Applicable to this
Neighborhood.
Resident Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.a)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of
20'by 20'.
Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements
of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as
an alternative.
All plan types include at a
minimum: one 2-car garage
with an interior measurement of
20'x20'.
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES UF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 10
Garage Criteria
(4.6.2.B.2.b,
4.6.3.B.4.H, &
4.6.3.B.13)
20' minimum setback from the property line where
garage doors face the street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback
from property line. They also must be designed to
appear as a livable portion of the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are
permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a
neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than
5,000 sq. ft.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000
sq. ft. or greater, an additional 25% of the units may
have three-car in a row garages facing the street
provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of
unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a
neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing
the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two
door garages, three door garages, and offset two door
garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used
within each neighborhood to improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage
configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the
setback a maximum of 18" for garages. However, the
projection shall not extend to the second story living
space.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about
garages)
All setbacks for garages that
face the street are greater than
or equal to 20'. All side-loaded
garages have a setback of at
least 15' and they appear as
livable portions of the homes.
All 3-car garages are a
combination of side, tandem
and front loaded configurations.
•37
PUD 04-02(8) - VILLAGES UF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21, 2005
Page 11
Roofs
(4.6.3.B.4.R &
4.6.3.B.8)
Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall
be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan
neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create
diversity and interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes
should attempt to parallel the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within each
neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12
A variety of roof forms and
massing are proposed with
changes in direction and
pitches. See elevations and
roof plans for compliance.
Typical roof pitches:
Planl: 4:12
Plan 2: 4:12
Plan 3: 4:12
Colors
(4.6.3.B.12)
Colors should be consistent with the architectural
style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred,
however other color combinations are acceptable
depending upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different
exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor
plan within the same architectural styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units
within the same architectural style shall not utilize the
same color scheme. However, similar or same colors
may occur within different color schemes.
"Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject
unit as well as those directly across the street.
Each plan type plotted on the
site plan includes a color
scheme designation to show
compliance. Please refer to the
color and materials boards for
details on each color scheme
and to the site plan for specific
plotting.
Accessory
Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Patio and accessory structures shall comply with
development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All plan types comply.
Architectural Styles
Permitted
(4.6.3.C & 5.6)
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the
following Architectural Styles:
• Santa Barbara Mediterranean
• Craftsmen Bungalow
• Spanish Colonial
• Monterey Ranch
• Italian/Tuscan
• European Country
• California Coastal
• Cal ifornia Contemporary-{Ne ighborhoods 1.10
& 1.12 only)
The elevation types included
are as follows:
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Italian/Tuscan
Monterey Ranch
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES UF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 12
Design Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.i &
4.6.3.B.5.e)
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the
front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a
minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood
or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames
shall be used (no mill finishes).
"Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee
braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to
the proposed architectural style.
The windows and doors on the
front elevations are recessed a
minimum of 2" and are
trimmed with either wood or
raised stucco. Please refer to
the elevations on the
architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with
the size of the structure
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than
7,500 SF.
Please refer to the elevations on
the architectural plans for
compliance. All chimneys and
their caps comply with proper
scale and proportion.
Window Detailing
(4.6.3.B.10)
The design of the windows shall include one or more
of the following features:
Deeply recessed
windows
Paned windows
Decorative window
ledges
Accent and varied
shape windows
Window boxes and
planters with
architecturally
evident supports
Please refer to the elevations on
the architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
Exterior wood trim
surrounds
Accent colors on
shutters or other
elements
Arched elements
Shutters
Raised stucco trim
around windows
Window lintels
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2
such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation
Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation
and floor plan (see Attachment No. 8).
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 04-03.
V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially
significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously
examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B
Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the
PUD 04-02(B) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 & 2.4 NORTH
December 21,2005
Page 13
development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated
actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Ridge
Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North project have been completed, incorporated into the project
design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact
and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study for this
project are available at the Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS;
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6008
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Table "Front Yard Setbacks"
7. Table "Individual Lot Data"
8. Table "Building Elevation Design Elements"
9. Reduced Exhibits
10. Full Size Exhibits "A" through "TT" dated December 21, 2005
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO:PUD 04-02(B)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 AND 2.4
NORTH
APPLICANT: Shea Homes ~
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA: and to approve a Major Planned
Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 55 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Village,
Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 North, generally located north and northeast of future Corintia Street,
east of El Fuerte Street and northwest of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and within
Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 49-103 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-03, Villages of La
Costa - La Costa Ridge - Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego. State of California, According to map thereof No. 15098 filed in the Office of County
Recorder of San Diego County on September 12, 2005 as File No. 2005-0786139.
APN: 223-721-03 & -02 (Portion) Acres: 3M Proposed No. of Units: 55
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RLM (Residential Low-Medium Density)
Density Allowed: 0-4 Density Proposed: 1.8 du/acre
Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
General Plan
Site
North
South
East
West
P-C RLM
P-C RLM
P-C RLM
P-C RLM, OS
R-1,OS RLM, E (Elementary)
Current Land Use
• Vacant (mass graded)
Vacant (mass graded)
Vacant (mass graded)
Vacant
Residential, School
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 55
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23. 2001 (EIR 98-07)
3f
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: PUD 04-02(6} - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE
NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 AND 2.4 NORTH
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 1 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: P-C
DEVELOPER'S NAME: Shea Homes
ADDRESS: 9990 Mesa Rim Road. San Dieeo, CA 92121
PHONE NO.: (858) 526-6546 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-721-03 &-02 (Portion)
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC.. SO. FT.. DU): 30.8 acres/ 55 du
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
55 EDU
.38
77
'D'
F.
G.
H.
I.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 191.22
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 101.97
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No.
Open Space: Acreage Provided =
Schools:
550
O
per HCP
J.
K.
Sewer:
Water:
Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin:
Demand in GPD =
Elementary: 15
Middle: 5
High: 5
N/A (Vallecitos)
N/A
30,250
Citv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part Shea Homes
Title Title
Address Address 9990 Mesa Rim Road
SanDieoo. CA92121
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management
Company
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180
Carlsbad. CA 92008
1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
33
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust.
Title
Non Profit/Trust.
Title
Address Address
Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
I I Yes 1X1 No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I cert iove information is true and correct to ti^ best of my knowledge.
Sigm tare of owner/date 5> v ( T. ^O S
Agenwor RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle
President of Morrow Development
Print or type name of owner
.Si!gnature~3f applicant/date
Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE SECRETARY
OF
J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
RESOLUTION
OF
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
August 5, 2005
I, James G. Shontere, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting Secretary of J.F. Shea
Construction Management, Inc., a California corporation (the "Corporation") , who is the sole General
Partner of JFS Management, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, who is the sole General Partner of J.F
Shea L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, who is the sole General Partner of Shea Homes Limited
Partnership, a California limited partnership (the "Limited Partnership"), and that the following resolutions
have been duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to the by-laws of the
Corporation and are in full force and effect:
RESOLVED, that, in accordance with the subsequent paragraph, the following named
individuals are appointed as officers with the title appearing after their respective names
to serve as authorized agents of the Limited Partnership, having the authority equivalent
to that of a corporate officer with the same title under the California Corporations Code,
and these officers will serve as agents for the remainder of the year or until their
successors are appointed and qualified;
followng: named; officersvimayj^act^lone; as an*
bfthis;iimfted Partriership: John F. Shea, Chairman of the
Board; Peter 0. Shea, Jr., President; Edmund H. Shea, Jr., Executive Vice President;
Peter 0. Shea, Executive Vice President; and John C. Morrissey, Executive Vice
President; or any other person or persons, who have been designated in writing to act
alone on behalf of the Limited Partnership by any one of the officers named above as
individual agents;
JRESQtVEBy that any t*o of die individual's, named, as, officers, below, acting together,
-are authorized agents and empowered for and on behalf of this Limited Partnership; to-
execute any bids, contracts,, bid bonds,, deeds, maps, plats or any other agreements or
documentT'lae'cessary for the- performance of such contracts, agreements and/or
documents^ to- execute any "Socutnehts feqUirectTto''borrow funds from any lender to be?
secured by reaToTpersohal property owned by this Limited Partnership, to execute
agreements to purchase', escrow i nstructions, a nd a ny related documents i n c onnection
with the sale and conveyance of real property' "developed and sold by this Limited
Partnership, or any other real property owned by this Limited Partnership, and to execute
notes, deeds,"maps, performance and payment bonds,"deeds of trust, mortgages,
guarantees, receipts, and all other documents necessary and convenient to carry out the
business operations of this Limited Partnership; *
RESOLVED, that any third party may rely upon this resolution regarding the authority of
the named officers as authorized agents without a duty of inquiry;
John F. Shea, Chairman of the Board
Peter O. Shea, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer
John C. Morrissey, Executive Vice President
Edmund H. Shea, Jr., Executive Vice President
Peter O. Shea, Executive Vice President
Bruce J. Varker, Executive Vice President
Richard C. Andfeen, Vice President
Charles H. Atherton, Vice President
Paul L.L. Barnes, Vice President
W. William Gaboury, Vice President
Robert B. Gordon, Vice President
Max B. Johnson, Vice President
E. (Ed) J. Kernaghan, Vice President
Ronald L. Lakey, Vice President
Chester T. Latcham, Vice President
Layne C. Marceau, Vice President
Edward W. Marcus, Vice President
James M. Marquardt, Vice President
David B. Miller, Vice President
Paul E. Mosley, Vice President
Ray Mullen, Vice President
Don Murphy, Vice President
Dennis Poulton, Vice President
Andrew T. Roundtree, Vice President
Buddy Satterfield, Vice President
Peter S. Seley, Vice President
Roberto (Bert) F. Sel va, Vice President
Les Thomas, Vice President
Joel VanRyckeghen, Vice President
Richard R. Wojcik, Vice President
Robert J. Yoder, Vice President
Robert R. O'dell, Vice President & Treasurer
James G. Shontere, Secretary
Scott Adams, Assistant Secretary
Joanne Anderson, Assistant Secretary
Susan Andrade, Assistant Secretary
Joseph C. Anfusd, Assistant Secretary
Steven C. Armanino, Assistant Secretary
Alex Baird, Assistant Secretary
Sharon K. Baker, Assistant Secretary
Janet Benavidez, Assistant Secretary
Juan Bernardino, Assistant Secretary
Bryan Binney, Assistant Secretary
Ernest J. Boitano, Assistant Secretary
John P. Boland, Assistant Secretary
Michael Brekka, Assistant Secretary
Robert M. Burke, Assistant Secretary
Susan Canada, Assistant Secretary
Jack S. Carrier, Assistant Secretary
Steve Castles, Assistant Secretary
Michael Ciauri, Assistant Secretary
Robert V. Claflin, Assistant Secretary
R. (Russell) Clark, Assistant Secretary
Nicki Cometa, Assistant Secretary
Barry Cunningham, Assistant Secretary
Carol Cure, Assistant Secretary
Scott Custer, Assistant Secretary
John C. Danvers, Assistant Secretary
Damien Delany, Assistant Secretary
Perry Devlin, Assistant Secretary
Burt Dezendorf, Assistant Secretary
Ava Domanovski, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey H. Dqnelson, Assistant Secretary
Carrie Jean Dunnam, Assistant Secretary
Jason L. Enos, Assistant Secretary
Jeff Fenton, Assistant Secretary
Tod Fontana, Assistant Secretary
Michael L. Fraley, Jr., Assistant Secretary
Scott Gale, Assistant Secretary
Shelly Galvin, Assistant Secretary
Thorn Gamble, Assistant Secretary
David Garcia, Assistant Secretary
Jessica Garcia, Assistant Secretary
Donald J. Gause, Assistant Secretary
Robert Gillis, Assistant Secretary
W. Stephen Gilmore, Assistant Secretary
Kelly Given, Assistant .Secretary
Jack Godard, Assistant Secretary
. Lyndon Graham, Assistant Secretary
Jeff Gunderson, Assistant Secretary
J. Terence Hanna, Assistant Secretary
Carly Harlacher, Assistant Secretary
Leilani Haugen, Assistant Secretary
Alexander Hawxhurst, Assistant Secretary
Joseph Hayes, Assistant Secretary
Matthew J. Henry, Assistant Secretary
Laura Hersc, Assistant Secretary
Steven Hextell, Assistant Secretary
Renee Hill, Assistant Secretary
JeffHinkle, Assistant Secretary
Donald A. Hofer, Assistant Secretary
Steve Howry, Assistant Secretary
Catherine M. Huff, Assistant Secretary
Norm Hutchins, Assistant Secretary
William A. Inglis; Assistant Secretary
Hank L. Jacky, Assistant Secretary
Kathryn Jones, Assistant Secretary
Cliff C. Kao, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey F. Kappes, Assistant Secretary
Virginia Karras, Assistant Secretary
David W. Kay, Assistant Secretary
Barbara Kelley, Assistant Secretary
David Kemmerer, Assistant Secretary
T. (Terri) G. Kershisnik, Assistant Secretary
Greg Kibble, Assistant Secretary
Jim Kilgore, Assistant Secretary
John Kilrow, Assistant Secretary
Mitchell Dean Kindred, Assistant Secretary
Alison B. Knoll, Assistant Secretary
Joon Kwon, Assistant Secretary
Colleen Lakshin, Assistant Secretary
Christine LaRocca, Assistant Secretary
Kathy Leary, Assistant Secretary
Linda Lockman, Assistant Secretary
Harold Looney, Jr., Assistant Secretary
Marcela Malek, Assistant Secretary
Joyce Manigold, Assistant Secretary
Marion P. Marcum, Assistant Secretary
37
Michael McCann, Assistant Secretary
Oren Jon McCaustland, Assistant Secretary
Michael McCormack, Assistant Secretary
Sean McDonald, Assistant Secretary
Sean McDonald, Assistant Secretary
Jenifer McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey McQueen, Assistant Secretary
Dale Meredith, Assistant Secretary
Ron Metzler, Assistant Secretary
Karen Mikuls, Assistant Secretary
William L. Morris, Jr., Assistant Secretary
Steve Mulhern, Assistant Secretary
Andrea Mullens, Assistant Secretary
Dennis Murphy, Assistant Secretary
Yasmine Naffa, Assistant Secretary
Kevin Neill, Assistant Secretary
Gilbert L. Neilsdn, Assistant Secretary
Christopher Nev'ins, Assistant Secretary
Daniel J. O'Brien, Assistant Secretary
Mike O'Melveny, Assistant Secretary
Richard J. Obemesser/Assistant Secretary
Michael D. Odette, Assistant Secretary
Brad Olsen, Assistant Secretary
David Olson, Assistant Secretary
Steve Ormiston, Assistant Secretary
John C. Owen, Assistant Secretary
Lee Pacheco, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey K. Palmer, Assistant Secretary
David Perreault, Assistant Secretary
Kevin Peters, Assistant Secretary
Ken Peterson, Assistant Secretary
Robert Pigg, Assistant Secretary
William J. Pisetsky, Assistant Secretary
Alexander L. Plishner/Assistant Secretary
Greg Ponce, Assistant Secretary
Craig Powell, Assistant Secretary
Steve Ray, Assistant Secretary
Alan Ridd, Assistant Secretary
James Riela, Assistant Secretary
Brian Riggs, Assistant Secretary
Timothy Roberts, Assistant Secretary
Darlene Robinson, Assistant Secretary
Gonzalo Rodriguez, Assistant Secretary
Suzette Rodriquez, Assistant Secretary
Cynthia Roush, Assistant Secretary
Kris Russell, Assistant Secretary
Katherine E. Rath, Assistant Secretary
Carol A. Ryan, Assistant Secretary
Jeff Salai, Assistant Secretary
Timothy H. Salai, Assistant Secretary
Nobelyn Salazar, Assistant Secretary
Evelyn Saracco, Assistant Secretary
David Sargent, Assistant Secretary
Douglas Sauder, Assistant Secretary
Wm. S. Seemann, Assistant Secretary
Ping Shaw, Assistant Secretary
Edmund H. Shea, HI, Assistant Secretary
James W. Shea, Assistant Secretary • '*"
John F. Shea, Jr., Assistant Secretary *
Ten Shusterman, Assistant Secretary
George Smith, Assistant Secretary
Eric Snider, Assistant Secretary
Amy Sovolskis, Assistant Secretary
Stephen Stambaugh, Assistant Secretary
Roger Standley, Assistant Secretary
Tim Steckbeck, Assistant Secretary
Bjorn Stehr, Assistant Secretary
L. (Lori) Symans, Assistant Secretary
Richard Thompson, Assistant Secretary
Delia Thurston, Assistant Secretary
Stephen Tindle, Assistant Secretary
Alan F. Toffoli, Assistant Secretary
Michael J. Tracy, Assistant Secretary
Renee Lynn Trommler, Assistant Secretary
Ruth Truman, Assistant Secretary
Ron Turner, Assistant Secretary
Thomas Uric, Assistant Secretary :
John Vander Velde, Assistant Secretary
Martin Vliegenthart, Assistant Secretary
Laura W. Vuolo, Assistant Secretary
Robert Wainwright, Assistant Secretary
Lily A. Wallace, Assistant Secretary
Susan Waterman, Assistant Secretary
Adam Watkins, .Assistant Secretary
Matthew S. Watson, Assistant Secretary
Sharon Wible, Assistant Secretary
Dennis H. Williams, Assistant Secretary
Robert W. Williams, Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey D. Willis, Assistant Secretary
Gregg Yensan, Assistant Secretary
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the Corporate seal this 5th day of August,
2005.
JamerG. Shontere, Secretary
Front Yard Setbacks
Lot#
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
,,63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Floor Plan
1
2
3
1
3
2
1
3R
2 R
1 R
3 R
2 R
1
3
2 R
2
1
3
1
2
1
3
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3 R
2
3 R
2 R
2
1
3
2
1
3 R
3
2 R
3 R
2 R
1 R
3
2
3
1
Individual Buildinq Plane Setbacks in Feet
Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6
28.70 17.70 17.70 20.90
26.30 16.00 19.10 30.60
22.00 20.00 20.50 39.70 "'•••
26.20 16.20 18.70 35.70
18.00 16.10 15.70 40.40
22.20 15.20 27.00 38.30
20.50 17.00 27.90 34.90
15.80 19.80 18.50 51.50
20.00 23.80 38.00 26.60
33.40 22.40- 23.40 21.40
22.00 20.00 19.00 39.70
30.80 20.50 27.30 35.00
20.40 32.70 49.20 56.00
18.10 17.70 26.30 35.70
65.00 43.00 35.40 19.30
32.30 20.60 23.90 35.50
27.20 15.70 15.80 19.30
18.90 25.10 23.50 35.60
28.00 19.60 23.80 35.60
31.70 23.30 33.70 42.80
27.10 19.20 24.20 27.60
22.50 20.50 21.10 40.20
27.00 18.10 24.20 36.80
19.10 21.60 18.10 37.80
27.00 16.00 16.00 19.10
28.80 18.50 21.60 33.00
21.50 18.90 16.90 40.90
34.00 17.50 15.70 17.30
27.90 15.50 19.60 25.10
18.90 21.40 17.90 37.60
25.30 15.00 21.90 20.70
18.50 16.50 15.10 15.10
63.80 47.50 33.40 21.00
32.80 23.90 29.10 41.30
30.40 21.90 23.70 28.90
20.70 23.40 20.30 39.40
33.60 23.30 30.20 37.90
33.70 21.40 2.1.80 24.90
33.70 16.00 18.20 34.40
16.80 23.40 23.30 35.40
20.10 20.00 32.00 45.50
22.80 18.80 17.90 41.70
27.60 17.30 20.40 30.80
47.00 31.20 29.90 24.20
25.10 21.90 18.50 46.20
20,00 21.40 '37.70 48.00
26.80 29.90 27.90 46.30
60.00 36.70 36.70 19.40
Weighted
Average
22.03
23.29
27.14
24,96
24.49
24.62
24.22
28.45
24.96
25.69
26.80
28.19
37,07
25.58
43.00
28.43
20.30
26.10
27.09
32.08
24.54
27.66
26.34
25.23
20.30
25.77
26.42
22.42
22.30
25.03
20.47
16.39
44.26
31.7/U
26.66"
26.99
31.03
26.26
28.25
25.09
27.89
27.32
24.31
34.09
30.05
29.59
33.74
39.26
Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North
Section B
Table 3
10/12/2005
Front Yard Setbacks
Lot # Floor Plan
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
2
3 R
2 R
3 R .
2 R
1 R
3 R
Individual Buildinq Plane Setbacks in Feet
Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6
20.00 28.10 47.40 59.30
17.20 15.70 16.60 35.30
25.20 15.50 20.00 32.00 ....
16.40 20.20 17.40 34.50
25.00 15.40 19.90 31.90
26.60 15.90 18.20 21.90
23.00 21.50 23.60 40.60
NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE:
Weighted
Average
35.71
22.73
23.25
22.95
23.12
21.16
28.64
27.12
Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North
Section B
Table 3
10/12/2005
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North
Lot*
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
38
39
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
Plan
1
2
3
1
3
2
1
3 R
2 R
1 R
3 R
2 R
1
3
2R
2
1
3
1
2
1
3
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3 R
2
3 R
2 R
2
1
3
2
1
3 R
3
2 R
3 R
2 R
1 R
3
2
3
1
2
3R
2R
3 R
2R
1 R
3 R
Elevation
8 .
C
B
A
0
C
B . - • '
A
D
c ;
D
8
A
B
D
C
8
A
C
B
A
3
D
A
B
C
D
C
B
A
B
D
C
D
B
A
B
C
D
A
D
B
C
A
D
B
A
A
D
8
C
A
D
C
B
Color
82
C2
81
AD2
AD4
C4
83
AD1
AD3
C1
A02
84
ADS
sa
AD4
C1
84
AD3
C2
81
AD4
B2
ADT
AD2
B4
C1
AD1
C3
82
AD4
83
AD3
C4
AD4
81
AD2
B4
C4
AD1
AD4
LAD3
82
C3
AD1
ADS
82
AD4
LAD2
AD1
84
C2
ADI
AD2
D3
83
Average Neighborhood Setback:
Setbacks (ft)
Average Side Yard
Front Rear Left Right Garage
22.03
23.29
27.14
24.96
24.49
24.62
24.22
28.45
24.96
25.69
26.80
28.19
37.07
25.58
43.00
28.43
20.30
26.10
27.09
32.08
24.54
27.66
26.34
25.23
20.30
25.77
26.42
22.42
22.30
25.03
20.47
16.39
44.26
31.71
26.68
26.99
31.03
26.26
28.25
25.09
27.89
27.32
24.31
34.09
30.05
29.59
33.74
39.26
35.71
22.73
23.25
22.95
23.12
21.16
28.64
27.12
26.1
32.9
32.4
26.5
24.6
25.9
42.9
76.4
92.4
99.1
106.5
71.7
70.3
76.4
• 150.8
23.5
22
35.7
35.9
45.6
32.9
28
31.3
50.2
53.3
41.3
45.5
. 20
20
28.4
24.7
27.6
28.6
. 59.4
63.2
77.5
70.4
53.3
56
28.5
34.6
32.8
23.7
24.6
35.1
54.4
50.6
92
29.8
29.8
27.7
30
26.5
20.5
27.3
- 9.2
10.4
9.2
11.4
5.5
7
9
9
9.1
5.4
7
17.3
28 2
6.5
19.3
11
16.5
12.5
16.7
13.8
15
14.6
11.4
5.5
' 7
7.4
5.5
Li- • 10
- 7
7
7
10.2
21
13
15.9
14.3
13.2
11
10.2
7.5
5.8
9.4
5
30.1
10.3
7.2
8.5
11.1
11
10.7
8.7
8.7
7.7
6.5
7
24.9
5
7.2
7.1
8.3
26.4
18
16.1
11.2
12.6
9.1
9
20
14.3
8.8
10
:-• 5.1
7
5.3
7
5
7.1
8.8
9
7
7.6
10
5
14.8
9.1a
5.3
20
29.5
5.9
7.2
5
5
5.5
9.7
8.2
13.8
15.8
• 16.6
26.7
7.5
7
5
20.5
7.5
8
6.5
9
10
9.2
28.7
26.3
39.7
26.2
35.7
22.2
20.5
34.9
20
33.4
39.7
30.8
20.4
35.7
65
30.6
27.2
35.6
28
31.7
27.1
40.2
27
37.8
27
28.8
40.9
34
27.9
37.6
25.3
36.2
63.8
32.8
30.4
39.4
33.6
33.7
34.4
35.4
20.1
41.7
27.6
47
46.2
20
46.3
60
20
35.3
25.2
34.5
25
26.6
40.6
Porch
17.7
19.1
20
18i7
16.1
27
27.9
19.8
,38
23.4
20
26.2
49.2
21,7
35.4
23.9
15.8
25.1
23.8
•; 34.2
24.2
20.5
24.2
21.6
16
21.6
18.9
15.7
16.2
21.4
20.7
16.5
33.4
29.1
23.7
23.4
29
21'.8
.18.1
23.4
32
18.8
20.4
29.9
21.9
40.2
29.9
31.4
47.4
15.9
20
20.2
19.9
18.2
22.5
Net Pad
Area (SF)
11,224
10,757
10,525
11,599
11,039
15,724
19,463
10,478
12,389
11,045
10,811
11,237
16,166
14,245
14,562
10,921
11,616
12,446
13,895
13,850
12,365
10,163
12,079
11,919
11,154
10,438
10,666
12,707
13,297
10,210
9,995
9,824
15,463
14,303
11,131
10,334
10,259
11,241
11,786
10,746
11,246
10,804
9,145
12,798
13,264
11,606
10,589
14,967
14,891
10,783
11.034
10,853
10,759
10,914
10,066
Building
Coverage1'
Sq. Footage V. of Net Pad
4,359
3,592
3,690
4,359
3,690
3,592
4,359
3,690
3.592
4,359
3,690
3,592
4,359
3,690
3,592
3,592
4,359
3,690
4,359
3,592
4,359
3,690
3,592
3,690
4,359
3,592
3,690
4,359
3,592
3,690
3,592
3,690
3,592
3,592
4,359
3,690
3,592
4,359
3,690
3,690
3,592
3,690
3,592
4,359
3,690
3,592
3,690
4,359
3,592
3,690
3,592
3,690
3,592
4,359
3,690
38.8%
33.4%
35.1%
. 37.6%
33.4%
22.8%
22.4%
35.2%
29.0%
39.5%
34.1%
32.0%
27.0%
25.9%
24.7%
32.9%
37.5%
29.6%
31.4%
25.9%
35.3%
36.3%
29.7%
31.0%
39.1%
34.4%
34.6%
34.3%
27.0%
36.1%
35.9%
3-7.6%
23.2%
25.1%
39.2%
35.7%
35.0%
38.8%
31.3%
34.3%
31.9%
34.2%
39.3%
34.1%
27.8%
30.9%
34.8%
29.1%
24.1%
34.2%
32.6%
34.0%
33.4%
39.9%.
'36.7%
titrt'&b-1: •sv.4;HV:.,?'>'(v'V-- j< «!V-*i «f~ - ,"\ •* ^»\ "**.-' *'-»•*"$, <»;$69;.''
1/ "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from tha outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages
'and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 3 ft
from the building, and ports cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet Also axduded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from tha face of any building, awnings, open parking
areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls.
10/12/2005
Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 North
Section B
Table 4
u
15
CD
W
fcd
Ed
jru
E3uQ
7,
0
H
£W
U
O
NMO
«
HWas
Sz
a.
O
z
J
tdzoz
ja.
M
13•g
1GO
C
CQ
"rt
2S
SS
£
"<3
1
<3-•g
8.w
x
&
1
' 1
\ca
1
|
n
1§
c
ii
ss
ffiss
DESIGN ELEMENTS 11
3V)
£
Sat
•Sto
iu.
3a
•Sin
u.
1
1
I
1
.-§co
1
1
3CQ
1U.
ia.
MW
u.
I
3CO
u.
1
-sw
1
s
s
\
N
S
S
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
Variety of Roof PlanesC3
\
S
S
s
s
s.
s
s
s.
s
\
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
N.
s
s
s
s
s
Deeply Recessed Windows and Doorsj=
\
S
S
\
s
%
s
s.
s
\
\
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Paned Windows and Doorsu
S
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s.
s
s
s.
s
s
s.
s
s
s.
s
s
\
s
\
s
s
s.
s.
\
w
£Ms.
o
<*H
1
•a
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
Decorative Window LedgesV
S
s
s
s
s.
s.
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
^
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s.
s
s
Accent Materials such as Stucco,Wood, Sidine and 'Stone\
\
S
\
S
S
\
S.
s
\
s
s
\
s.
s.
s.
s.
s.
s
s.
s.
s.
s
s
\
s
s
Window and Door Lintelsso
u
j:
\
\
\
\
S
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
\
s
s
s
Accent and Varied Shape Windows*—Window Boxes and Planters withArchitecturally Evident Supports— '
S
S
s.
s
s
s
s
s.
s
\
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
J2
a
1
"xu
^
S
Ss
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
%Variations in Colors of Stucco and 1Other Elements 1-~
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
s
Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or' Other Elementsh Stucco Wainscotingc
\
S
\
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
\
^Covered Balconieso
\
s
s
s
s.
s.
s
s
\
s
s
N.
s
Arched Elementsa
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
Shutters<T
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Raised Stucco Trim around Windows 1and Doors 1o>tt
I
'SOT
a
£
,l!g*3ui!l
SKIiHitSiifnitiml
,.saSo=Sto;th5t«!S
II
lilt
*'»9?*S§;|' i Ii m8 'atiB*
II5 SlPI8SkJ*s
a 6=
Mi
„ EiJ iI iiPii!i glllisiii
,i P
tt.UH'iM*4611
.ill ISMil Iffl .III! U
Q
l> iH •t i1!
.44
a
£
is
!•*
HI!
ml
SII
fcS)b
If1!
|j
*f
I,
CM
58.
ISia!ligbir f\ LJ (1io°c/)<;<9iuiP|gt
w.
i!:I
w
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
SCACff: I/*" - I'-O*
10/05/05
1
T
T
_jsr I a.
FRONT & REAR BUILDING PLANES
T
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3AJ1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1STFLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4482 SF
PORCH 65 SF HRST FLOOR 'A'
SCALE: I/*' - V-O"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
AACtmcnjRAL ^f Merit(MOOT, tec S niu«k,
X^ SfSSloSA _ x teopto-aa.W .rr ¥F asfjas,.• « PiEiM)S4Wm
SECOND FLOOR 'A'
SECOND FLOOR 'A'
1/4' - I'-O'
10/05/05
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4J82 SF
PORCH 65 SF
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1STFLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4.1S2SF
PORCH 65 SF FIRST FLOOR 'B'
LA GOSTA RIDGE
WOOWJT . *
lUCHtncniut, ^f MM*
Guxir. IK S^ m>iu<idiHH4.»aUif g*-*.^*""^-w\s^asnaTttlMWMf
SECOND FLOOR 'B'
SECOND FLOOR 'B'
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4,182 SF
PORCH 65 SF
9CAIE; 1/4* - I'-O
to/os/os LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4,182 SF
PORCH 65 SF FIRST FLOOR 'C
SCALE: I/*" - l'-O"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
SECOND FLOOR 'C'
Pv
SECOND FLOOR 'C
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
SCAlf: !/»' - V-o'
10/05/05
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 3,649 SF
2ND FLR. 533 SF
TOTAL 4,182 SF
PORCH 65 SF
LA COSTA RIDGE
PLAN I
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE; 1/»- - I'-o"
[0/05/05
ROOF PLAN 'A'
ROOF PLAN'B'
ROOF PLAN 'C
LA COSTA RIDGE
WDODUK „ 'w*(Vr s&
STUCCO OVER m
•WOO SHUTTERS
•f PROFlf CONCRETE I£
•BRICK era
•8W.T-UP STUCCO SU
SANTA BARBARA / MEDITERRANEAN
ELEVATION 'A'RECESS «/ WOUGHT RON
•WOO SHUTTERS
•'S1 PROFTlf CONCRETE TIE
•2x6 RAFTER MS
•SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER
TUSCAN
ELEVATION 'B'•SMOC STONE VENEER
•WOO SHUTTERS
WOD GUARDRAIL
•BRICK VENEER
•MWGHT IRON SHUTTER AWING
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: 1/+' - T-O"
LO/05/05
MONTEREY RANCH
ELEVATION 'C'
LA COSTA RIDGE
AftCBIBCntlM. ^f 0*0*
GROUP. INC ^r mi.tifeiBM.Mt'Mf SSS-iS™"1/j/ ~:rM/r gv
•SIUCCO OVER Mil
•'? PBH£ CONCRETE H£
•M WER TAIS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'
-ROUGH-SAW SONG WIH GROOVES f O.C.
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/*' - I'-o-
10/05/OS
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'
LA COSTA RIDGE
•STUCCO OVER IHM
'J PROnf CONCRETE Tt£
•2x6 RAFTER TMS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
REAR ELEVATION 'B'
PLAN1
SHEA
HOMES
SCAL£: I/*" - r-O'
10/05/05
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
LA COSTA RIDGE
•STUCCO OVER BU
•'? fflfflE CONC8E1E HIE
•2x6 RAFTER TAILS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'C
REAR ELEVATION 'C'
•iiin
PLANl
SHEA
HOMES
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'C
LA COSTA RIDGE
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
ONOU SIMI 2DQI MW (49
1.
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
Of*' 9
SCALE: 1/4- - I'-O"
10/05/05
A ? ?
9
T" 1d> <* ' ^
®I jm
ii "
FRONT * REAR BUILDING PLANES
PKxrr BcaDon tuna • *UAl BUILDim FUHBS - J
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3AJ1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR, 2,626 SF
2ND FLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF
PORCH 147 SF FIRST FLOOR 'B'
SCALE: t/4* - t'-O*
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1STFLR. 2,626 SF
2NDFLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF
PORCH 147 SF SECOND FLOOR 'B'
SCALE; !/•' - f-O"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3AJ1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMFS
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,626 SF
2ND FLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF FIRST FLOOR 'C
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMFS
TABULATIONS
1STFLR. 2,626 SF
2NDFLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF SECOND FLOOR 'C
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
TABULATIONS
1STFLR. 2,626 SF
2NDFLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF FIRST FLOOR '
SCALE: 1/4" » I'-O"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
Wmourr . '
AxcHrrecnnuu. ^^ <Unb
GtoUF. IHC ^T Mr^mrT IIw 5t ••• C««M™.l>f,- " £m»»5S
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/** - I'-o'
10/05/05
TABULATIONS
ISTFLR. 2,626 SF
2NDFLR. 2,166 SF
TOTAL 4,792 SF SECOND FLOOR 'D'
LA COSTA RIDGE
ROOF PLAN 'B'
r-tf*
ROOF PLAN 'C'
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/+-
10/05/05
ROOF PLAN 'D'
LA COSTA RIDGE
•HMO SHUTTERS
•SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER
•'S1 mm CONCRETE TIE
•2i6 RAFTER TAIS
.T-UP STUCCO SU.
TUSCAN
ELEVATION 'B'•WOO SHUTTER AWING
•WOO SHUTTERS
•SWIM STONE VENEER
•'S1 PROaE CONCRETE RE
MONTEREY RANCH
ELEVATION 'C'•STUCCO <m m
•BRICK VENEER
•RECESS V IROUGHT Mi
•'S1 POTIE CONCRETE IU'
•MOD SHUTTER AIMING
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
SPANISH
ELEVATION 'D1
LA COSTA RIDGE
•STUCCO OVER TBU
'? mOE CONCRETE HE
•2*6 RARER TAIS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
REAR ELEVATION 'B'
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: 1/*~ « l'-O-
10/OS/OS
OPTIONAL RREFUCE
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
LA COSTA RIDGE
AKomccuui ^P a*w*
"h/Vlinf .<—™'"• Sasa"
•STUCCO OVER THU
•'? PROFU CONCRETE BE
•M RAFTER TAIS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'C'
REAR ELEVATION 'C
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
OPTIONAL FIREPLACE
10/05/05
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'C
LA COSTA RIDGE
•SIUCCO OVER TRU
•'S1 PROH£ CONCRETE H£
•M RAFTER TAILS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION '
REAR ELEVATION 'D1
PLAN 2
SHEA
HOMES
1/4- - t'-o-
10/05/05
OPHONAL RREPLACE
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'D*
LA COSTA RIDGE
+- (PHONAL RREPUtt
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/+" - I'-O"
10/05/05
FRONT & REAR BUILDING PLANES
PIOHT MIILDIW} KAHB. T1HA» BUILDING FUMES-S
LA COSTA RIDGE
WOODUT , '
OKOUF INC ^^ mriuiniki miJ it^iii^ tint n
A / fe'SSSSi
/^ .SL.f If SSS5S,".• » Pn(iws«nra
•f in WMkf AMbiKnnl CMP. IK
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/*" - I'-O"
10/05/05
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,709 SF
2ND FLR. 2,160 SF
LOFT 258 SF
TOTAL 5427 SF
PORCH 58 SF
FIRST FLOOR 'A'
LA COSTA RIDGE
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
o r v ••
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,709 SF
2NDFLR. 2,160 SF
LOFT 258 SF
TOTAL 5,127 SF
PORCH 58 SF
SECOND FLOOR 'A'
SCALt: I/*" - l'-O"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE •; »' />
*sassas.-ax** H Qat <ta WMter AnbiMcnoX <3r«B. Im. II
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/*' - I'-O
10/05/05
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,709 SF
2ND FLR. 2,160 SF
LOFT 258 SF
TOTAL 5427 SF
PORCH 86 SF
FIRST FLOOR 'B'
LA COSTA RIDGE
LOFT 'B'
OCCUPANCY: R3/UI
CONST TYPE: V-NR
1 LZL
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
or.- «•
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR.
2ND FLR.
LOFT
TOTAL
PORCH
2,709 SF
2,160 SF
258 SF
5,127 SF
86 SF
SECOND FLOOR 'B'
SCALE: I/*" • !'-0~
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE gf eta ffaottft Anhtumnl 0™»», Iw
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE; 1/V* - I'-O-
10/05/05
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,709 SF
2ND FLR. 2,160 SF
LOFT 258 SF
TOTAL 5,127 SF
PORCH 86 SF
FIRST FLOOR 'D*
LA COSTA RIDGE
HLOFTfi/Ht
OCCUPANCY: R3/U1
CONST TYPE: V-NR
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
o *• 4' a"
TABULATIONS
1ST FLR. 2,709 SF
2NDFLR. 2,160 SF
LOFT 258 SF
TOTAL 5,127 SF
PORCH 86 SF
SECOND FLOOR 'D*
SCAUE: I/*' - T-0"
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE or u» WH«kr AiiwSS ana*. uIT
ROOF PLAN 'A'
ROOF PLAN 'B'
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/V - I'-<T
10/05/05
ROOF PLAN 'l
LA COSTA RIDGE
woo SHUTTERS
•BUir-UP STUCCO SU
WOO SHUTTER AWMG
•S PROFILE CONCRETE HI•era VEKEER
SANTA BARBARA / MEDITERRANEAN
ELEVATION 'A'
•SYNTHETIC STONE VENEER
•*MD SHUTTERS
•V PRIME CONCRETE TIE
•STUCCO OVER TRIU
•2x6 RAFTE8 TAIS
TUSCAN
ELEVATION 'B'
•'? PROFII CONCRETE TIE
•BRICK VENEER
•BUILT-UP STUCCO SU.
•«ETAL SEAK ROOF
•STUCCO O/ FOAM ACCENT
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SPANISH COLONIAL
ELEVATION 'If
- SCALE: I/*' - V-CT
10/05/05 LA COSTA RIDGE
STUCCO <WR TRIM
•f PHME CONCRETE Dlf
•2x6 RAFTER TAIS
«*•*•»•»*•*•*•••*••»*•*•••*••»•
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'
REAR ELEVATION 'A'
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I /+" ™ 1'—O'
10/05/05
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'
LA COSTA RIDGE
OKKH. he ^Tgii«im»«
/I// !•?r Hv a*rE5c*»,f"' si^tSliS
STUCCO OVER Ml
'? PBHf CONCRETE RE
•M RAPIER FAILS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
REAR ELEVATION 'B'
PLANS
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE: I/*' - r-
10/05/05
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B'
LA COSTA RIDGE
•STUCCO OW 1RB
•'S1 fflOFIf CONCRETE TU
•2x6 RAFTER TAIS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'D1
REAR ELEVATION
PLAN 3
SHEA
HOMES
SCALE; 1/+- - r-Q'
10/05/05
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'V
LA COSTA RIDGE
iMLMkia
S8SMST""
AxcioncnuL ^ UMIOnur. INC S mnwtoi
. / S8SMS
IWf «• KOMMUM.' ** tefMMMV
Planning Commission Minutes December 21,2005 Page 7
EXHIBIT 5
5. PUD Q4-02(B1 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS 2.3 AND 2.4
NORTH - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the
previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of
approval of a Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment for building floor
plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 55 single-family detached homes
within the Villages of La Costa, Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.4 North, generally
located north and northeast of future Corintia Street, east of El Fuerte Street and
northwest of the HCP open space in Neighborhood 2.A, and within Local Facilities
Management Zone 11.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 5 and stated Associate Planner Jason Goff would make the staff presentation.
Chairperson Segall opened the public hearing on Item 5.
Mr. Goff gave a detailed presentation on the project and stated he would be available to answer any
questions.
Commissioner Dominguez commented that one of the floor plans had a loft which was not allowed. He
asked if that issue has been resolved. Mr. Goff stated yes.
Commissioner Montgomery asked if the deletion of the loft created any redesigns with that particular floor
plan or amendments to the plan. Mr. Goff stated that he was not aware of any redesigns.
Chairperson Segall asked if there were any further questions of Staff. Seeing none, he asked if the
applicant wished to make a presentation.
Jack Henthorn, 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite A, Carlsbad, gave a brief presentation during which he was
able to produce an elevation of the Plan 3 minus the loft and stated he would be available to answer any
questions.
Chairperson Segall asked if there were any questions of the applicant or if there were any members of
the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, he opened and closed public testimony on
the item.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6008 recommending
approval of Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-02(6)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including
the errata sheet.
VOTE: 5-0-2
AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Dominguez, Heineman, Montgomery, and
Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Baker and Cardosa
Chairperson Segall closed the public hearing on Item 5.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
rdJanuary 23ra, 2006
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This 23rd, Day of January, 2006
Signature
Jane Allshouse
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
Proof of Publication of
are cordially mvrea TO anenu mo HUU.».you nave any questions or would like astaff report, please contact Cliff Jones1ino and Redevelopment Department at
S, ' I£UU UCMliat/uu', at or prior to the
CASE FILE NO.: RP04-23/CT 04-21
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
NCT 1896173-1/23/06
CITY OF CARLSBAD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing & Redevelopment Commission of the City of
Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, California, 92008, at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider approval
of a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP04-23) and a Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-21) for the
construction of a 13,895 square foot, two-story, nine-unit condominium on the property located
at 2683 & 2687 Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 8 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment
Area. Consideration is also being given to approve the operation of a Bed & Breakfast Inn
within Unit 6, which has 4 bedrooms.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. If you have any questions or would like a copy of the staff report, please contact Cliff
Jones in the Housing and Redevelopment Department at (760) 434-2813. You may also
provide your comments in writing to the Housing and Redevelopment Department at 2965
Roosevelt Street, Suite B, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
As a result of the environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the Housing &
Redevelopment Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the
requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 of the State
CEQA Guidelines as an infill development project. The Design Review Board will be
considering recommending approval of the environmental determination during the public
hearing.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit and/or Tentative Tract Map in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City
Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE NO.: RP04-23/CT 04-21
CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SITE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
RP 04-23
CITY OF CARLSBAD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing & Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad
will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, 92008, at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider approval of a Major
Redevelopment Permit (RP04-23) and a Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-21) for the construction of a
13,895 square foot, two-story, nine-unit condominium on the property located at 2683 & 2687
Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 8 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area. Consideration
is also being given to approve the operation of a Bed & Breakfast Inn within Unit 6, which has 4
bedrooms.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If
you have any questions or would like a copy of the staff report, please contact Cliff Jones in the
Housing and Redevelopment Department at (760) 434-2813. You may also provide your comments
in writing to the Housing and Redevelopment Department at 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B,
Carlsbad, CA 92008.
As a result of the environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the Housing & Redevelopment
Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for
preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines as
an infill development project. The Design Review Board will be considering recommending approval
of the environmental determination during the public hearing.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit and/or Tentative Tract Map in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE NO.: RP04-23/CT 04-21
CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SITE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
RP 04-23
CITY OF CARLSBAD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Housing & Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad
will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, 92008, at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, to consider approval of a Major
Redevelopment Permit (RP04-23) and a Tentative Tract Map (CT 04-21) for the construction of a
13,895 square foot, two-story, nine-unit condominium on the property located at 2683 & 2687
Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 8 of the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area. Consideration
is also being given to approve the operation of a Bed & Breakfast Inn within Unit 6, which has 4
bedrooms.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If
you have any questions or would like a copy of the staff report, please contact Cliff Jones in the
Housing and Redevelopment Department at (760) 434-2813. You may also provide your comments
in writing to the Housing and Redevelopment Department at 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B,
Carlsbad, CA 92008.
As a result of the environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, the Housing & Redevelopment
Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for
preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines as
an infill development project. The Design Review Board will be considering recommending approval
of the environmental determination during the public hearing.
If you challenge the Major Redevelopment Permit and/or Tentative Tract Map in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad
Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE NO.: RP04-23/CT 04-21
CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SITS
CARLSBAD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES
RP 04-23
ANA CABO
1485 LYCOMING ST
APT 302
SAN DIEGO CA 92154-5724
BETTY LEWIS
2569 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1612
DONALD DEWHURST
7541 GIRARD AVE
LA JOLLA CA 92037-5102
DOROTHY PATERSON
1375BASSWOODAVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1904
ELLEN SPEERT
2633 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1627
H S ERGIN
PO BOX 218
CARLSBAD CA 92018-0218
HENRY TREJO
PO BOX 281
CARLSBAD CA 92018-0281
ISOKAZU TABATA
4929 PARK DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3825
J K EDWARDS
3980 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3503
JACK PHILLIPS
2667 OCEAN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2238
JAMES DAVIS
13215 PENNST
APT 302
WHITTIER CA 90602-1725
JANE WILSON
2710 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1727
KAREN BARLOW
226 E BROADWAY
VISTACA 92084-6018
LISA BENTSON
2644 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1721
HOWARD-JONES
2785 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1617
HOWARD-JONES
2785 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1617
MARSHALL MACK
3542 DONNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2722
OTIS HEALD
PO BOX 1707
FALLBROOK CA 92088-1707
PAUL WEBER
580 BEECH AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1657
RALPH STRAESSER
1518 AVOCADO RD
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-5706
RICHARD HILL
PO BOX 1935
CARLSBAD CA 92018-1935
ROBERT DUFF
2690 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1613
SETH HOENIG
PO BOX 232401
ENCINITAS CA 92023-2401
SOLEDAD SOTO
2615 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1722
SONDRACURTIN
3499 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2039
PALENSCAR
2739 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1629
MR & MRS BROWN
5157 SHORE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4347
MR & MRS BEAZLEY
16633 VENTURA BLVD
APT 1030
ENCINOCA 91436-1861
MR&MRSWULLENJOHN
1462 S 33RD DR
YUMAAZ 85364-9139
MR & MRS DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2038
MR & MRS DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2038
MR & MRS SMITH
3271 WESTWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1146
MR & MRS SMITH
3271 WESTWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1146
MR& MRS AGUINA
2646 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1626
MR & MRS JACKSON
2718 ROOSEVELT ST
APTF
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1685
MR & MRS JACKSON
2718 ROOSEVELT ST
APTF
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1685
MR & MRS CASTENS
2381 JEFFERSON ST
APT A
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1484
MR & MRS APODACA
2647 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1722
MR & MRS MORENO
2605 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1722
MR & MRS HARRISON
364 2ND ST
APT 6
ENCINITAS CA 92024-3557
MR & MRS ROSSALL
605 LACUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1610
MR & MRS PENA
2712 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1727
MR & MRS CHAMBERLAIN
2653 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1667
MR & MRS DESAI
2266 CHANNEL RD
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661-
1513
MR & MRS JONES
2608 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1626
MR & MRS ROJAS
2650 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1613
MR & MRS ALBA
PO BOX 2711
CARLSBAD CA 92018-2711
MR & MRS ALBA
PO BOX 2711
CARLSBAD CA 92018-2711
MR & MRS ALBA
PO BOX 2711
CARLSBAD CA 92018-2711
MR & MRS ZAVALANI
735 LACUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1651
MR & MRS ZAVALANI
735 LACUNA DR
92008-1651
MR & MRS HARRIS
722ARBUCKLEPL
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1701
MR & MRS BALAKER
3811 ALDER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2704
MR&MRSSGUEGLIA
12588 CARMEL CREEK RD
APT 18
SAN DIEGO CA 92130-2317
CASSARA
2244 S SANTA FE AVE
APTB2
VISTA CA 92084-7846
ARMY & NAVY ACADEMY
PO BOX 3000
CARLSBAD CA 92018-3000
BALLERINI
3529 CANNON RD
APT2B
OCEANSIDE CA 92056-4985
BLACKBURN
202 RAINBOW LN
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-3537
BLACKBURN
202 RAINBOW LN
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-3537
BLACKBURN
202 RAINBOW LN
OCEANSIDE CA 92054-3537
BONSALL TRUST
31499 LAKE VISTA CIR
BONSALL CA 92003-5308
CANTABRANA
3570 DONNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2761
CITY OF CARLSBAD REDEV
CITY OF CARLSBAD REDEV CITY OF CARLSBAD REDEV DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2038
DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2038
DEWHURST
3425 SEACREST DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2038
ERE PROPERTIES
1054LASOMBRADR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078-1322
EISLER
6631 LITTLER DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92119-2435
HUSTON
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1653
HYSPAN PRECISION
PO BOX 636
VISTA CA 92085-0636
JEFFERSON PROFESSIONAL
2755 JEFFERSON ST
APT 200
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1714
JOHNSON
4513 COVE DR
APT 12
CARLSBAD CA 92008-4213
KORNBERG
10880 WILSHIREBLVD
SUITE 1840
LOS ANGELES CA 90024-4115
LANCER INDUSTRIES
1547 AVENIDA LA POSTA
ENCINITAS CA 92024-5602
NELSON FAMILY
3425 ANN DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008-2002
NEMETH FAMILY
1132 SAXONY RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024-2225
NEMETH FAMILY
1132 SAXONY RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024-2225
N SD COUNTY TRANSIT N SD COUNTY TRANSIT
N SD COUNTY TRANSIT OSTRIE
PO BOX 8
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067-
0008
PEACOCK
2763 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1697
PERL
511 N MAPLE DR
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210-3408
PINAMONTI
2244 S SANTA FE AVE
APTB2
VISTA CA 92084-7846
ROOSEVELT TAMARACK INV
6 VENTURE
APT 215
IRVINE CA 92618-7364
RYANNE APARTMENTS
1540 SAPPHIRE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92011 -1230
S D C PROPERTIES
2155RAMONALN
VISTA CA 92084-7715
SDG&E
STROTHER
3811 MARGARET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008-3409
SWANSON
24 BLUFF VW
IRVIN EGA 92603-3602
TAMARACK PARK
PO BOX 27781
SAN DIEGO CA 92198-1781
TREJO
2687 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008-1722
VENSTROM
2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92010-6569
Villages of La Costa RidgeVillages of La Costa RidgeNeighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 NorthNorthPUD 04PUD 04--02(B)02(B)
Location MapLocation MapO BE LISC O CREL FUERTE STC O R IN T IA S T
BABILONIA STCEBU PLLLAMA STURUBU STALGA RDARGONAUTA STXAN A W Y
LUCIERNAGA STVLC Ridge Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4North
SITIO O C E A N O
EL FUERTE STCORTE LANGOSTAO B E L I S C O CR
C OR IN T IA S T SITIO TORTUGASITIO C A B A L L E R O
BABILONIA STXAN A W Y
ARGONAUTA STCEBU PLLLAMA STURUBU STLUCIERNAGA STUNICORNIO STALGA RD04008001,200200FeetPUD 04-02(B)Villages of La Costa RidgeNeighborhood 2.3 & 2.4Aerial Photo 2004
Project Background:Project Background:Project site was previously subdivided under Project site was previously subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 04Tentative Map (CT 04--03) and Planned 03) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04Development Permit (PUD 04--02)02)Approved by City Council on November 16, Approved by City Council on November 16, 20042004
Council Consideration:Council Consideration:Amendment to PUD 04Amendment to PUD 04--02 for Architecture & 02 for Architecture & Plotting of 55 detached singlePlotting of 55 detached single--family homesfamily homes
Project Features:Project Features:10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot sizes10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot sizes3 floor plans (all 23 floor plans (all 2--story)story)Living area range: 4,182 to 5,127 sq. ft.Living area range: 4,182 to 5,127 sq. ft.3 elevations per floor plan 3 elevations per floor plan 4 architectural styles4 architectural styles(Santa Barbara, Italian/Tuscan, Monterey Ranch & Spanish Colonia(Santa Barbara, Italian/Tuscan, Monterey Ranch & Spanish Colonial)l)12 color schemes12 color schemes
Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 NorthNorthSetbacks from El Setbacks from El FuerteFuerteStreetStreet
Project Consistency:Project Consistency:General PlanGeneral PlanZoning Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 ––Planned Planned DevelopmentDevelopmentVillages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98--01(C)01(C)Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98--0707
Planning Commission ActionPlanning Commission ActionDecember 21, 2005December 21, 2005Recommended adoption of Resolution 6008Recommended adoption of Resolution 6008Recommended approval of Planned Unit Recommended approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04Development Amendment PUD 04--02(B)02(B)
Recommendation:Recommendation:Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2006Adopt City Council Resolution No. 2006--031031Approve Planned Unit Development Approve Planned Unit Development Amendment PUD 04Amendment PUD 04--02(B)02(B)