HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-07-11; City Council; 18644; La Costa Resort Lot Line AdjustmentCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 16
AB# 18,844
MTG. 7/11/oe
DEPT. PLN
LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A)
DEPT. HEAD «£^ /
CITYATTY. jtf&&
CITY MGR. ~^LTt^
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance Nos. NS-809 and NS-810
APPROVING Zone Change ZC 05-06 and Master Plan Amendment 03-02(A), respectively and ADOPT
Resolution No. 2006-193 ADOPTING a Negative Declaration and APPROVING General Plan
Amendment 05-09.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Project Applications
GPA 05-09
ZC 05-06
MP 03-02(A)
Administrative
Approvals
Reviewed by and
Final at Planning
Commission
To be reviewed -
Final at Council
X
X
X
On May 17, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for a General Plan
Amendment, Zone Change and Master Plan Amendment. The project requires approval by the City
Council since the project is requesting changes to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space
Elements and Zoning changes.
The La Costa Resort Lot Line Adjustment project consists of the conveyance of property know as the
"finger" lands of the La Costa Resort and Spa property to the adjacent property owners. The "fingers"
are open space lands that extend into existing residentially developed and designated properties west
of the La Costa Golf Course. The potential for the transfer of lands was identified and addressed with
the adoption of the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan in September of 2004. The transfer of
"finger" lands to the adjacent property owners was to be done though the Master Plan Amendment
process and related General Plan and Zone Changes as required. The "fingers" are to be almost
entirely dissolved into the adjoining residential lots. There are a few property owners who are not
participants in the transfer but this does not bias the proposal and the unaccepted lands would
continue to remain in the possession of La Costa Resort and Spa. La Costa Resort and Spa in
cooperation with the 53 adjacent property owners have negotiated the lot line adjustments.
The Planning Commission discussed the merits of all applications, and voted 6-0-1 (Heineman
absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. No negative comments were
received during the hearing.
A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's discussion for the La Costa Resort Lot Line Adjustment
project and a complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached minutes
and staff report to the Planning Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a
potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project does not have any
impacts to any significant native or wetland habitats or wildlife species identified as candidate,
sensitive or special status by the wildlife agencies and is identified as a developed area within the
HMP. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a
Negative Declaration for the project on December 6, 2005. No comments were received during the
20-day public review period.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Ordinance No. NS-809
2. City Council Ordinance No. NS-410
3. City Council Resolution No. 2006-193
4. Location Map
5. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6075, 6076, 6077 and 6078
6. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 17, 2006
7. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 17, 2006
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Van Lynch 760-602-4613 vlync@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED E" CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D
DENIED D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D
CONTINUED D RETURNED TO STAFF D
WITHDRAWN D OTHER-SEE MINUTES D
AMENDED D
1 ORDINANCE NO. NS-809
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF
3 THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AN AMENDMENT TO
THE ZONING MAP TO GRANT A ZONE CHANGE, ZC 05-06, TO
4 CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION ON MULTIPLE
PROPERTIES FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO
5 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, 7,500 SQUARE FOOT LOT
SIZE MINIMUM ON LANDS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
6 EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA
AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
7 CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO.: ZC 05-06
o
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Section 21.050.30 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being the
zoning map, is amended as shown on the map marked Exhibit "ZC 05-06," dated May 17, 2006,
1 _ 2006 attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as
14 set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6077 constitute the findings and conditions of
the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
17 adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
18 published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen days after its
19
adoption.
20
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
21
Council held on the llth day of July , 2006, and thereafter.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
2 of the City of Carlsbad on the day of , 2006, by the following vote:
3
4 AYES:
5 NOES:
6 ABSENT:
7 ABSTAIN:
8
9 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
10
11
RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney
13
14
CLAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor
16 ATTEST:
17
1 O
LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
19 (SEAL)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ZC 05-06 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17, 2006 EXISTING Draft
T £2> VJ. ,( ' ' -V •»1 <i"Kjyf« •>
r
Related Case File Nofs): GPA 05-09/MP 02-03(A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 2 16-593-0 1-00
B. 2 16-593-02-00
C.21 6-593-03-00
D.21 6-593-04-00
From:
PC
PC
PC
PC
To:
PC/R-1 -7,500 (portion)
PC/R-1 -7,500 (portion)
R-1 -7,500 (Portion)
R-1 -7, 500 (Portion)
ZC 05-06 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17. 2006 PROPOSED Draft
Related Case File Nofs): GPA 05-09/MP 02-03 f A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 21 6-593-01 -00
B. 2 16-593-02-00
C.21 6-593-03-00
D.21 6-593-04-00
From:
PC
PC
PC
PC
To:
PC/R-1 -7,500 (portion)
PC/R-1 -7,500 (portion)
R-1 -7,500 (Portion)
R-1 -7,500 (Portion)
1 ORDINANCE NO. NS-810
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE LA COSTA
3 RESORT AND SPA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT TO MODIFY
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MASTER PLAN AND APPROVE
4 LAND USE AND ZONING MAP CHANGES TO THE LA COSTA
MASTER PLAN ON LANDS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
5 EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA
AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
6 CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO.: MP 03-02(A)
7
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, has reviewed and
8
considered a Master Plan to guide the operations, special events and development of
9
commercial dwelling units for properties within the La Costa Resort and Spa so that they can be
regulated by proposed Master Plan MP 03-02(A); and
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the Hth day of July
2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Master Plan Amendment
consistent with Chapter 21.38 of the municipal code as shown on Exhibit "MP 03-02(A)",
incorporated herein by reference.16
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does
ordain as follows:
19 SECTION I: That Master Plan MP 03-02(A), on file in the Planning Department,
20 and incorporated herein by reference, is adopted. The La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan
2j (MP 03-02(A)) shall constitute the development plan for the property and all development within
22 the plan area shall conform to the plan.
23 SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in
24 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6078 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of
25 the City Council.
26 '»
27 "'
28 /7/
1 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its
2 adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
3 published at least once in a publication of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within
4 fifteen days after its adoption.
5 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City
6 Council on the 11th day of July 2006, and thereafter.
7 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
8 of the City of Carlsbad on the day of , 2006, by the following vote:
9
10 AYES:
11 NOES:
12 ABSENT:
13 ABSTAIN:
14
15 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
16
17
RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney
19
20
CLAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor
22 ATTEST:
23
24 LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
25 (SEAL)
26
27
28
SITE MAP
LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA
MASTER PLAN
MP 03-02(A)
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-193
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
3 DECLARATION AND APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN
4 AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AND OPEN
SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENTS FROM OPEN
5 SPACE (OS) AND RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY
(RMH) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (RLM)
6 AND TRAVEL RECREATION/ COMMERCIAL (TR) ON
MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
7 REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
8 CASE NAME: LA COSTA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
9 CASE NO.: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A)
IQ WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
11 Commission did, on May 17, 2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
12 law to consider a Negative Declaration and General Plan Amendment; and
13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the nth day
14 of July , 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
15 said Negative Declaration and General Plan Amendment and at that time received
16
recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or
17
opposed to the Negative Declaration and/or GPA 05-09.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
20 Carlsbad, California, as follows:
21 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
22 2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth
2~ in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6075, 6076, and 6078 on file with
the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and
24 conditions of the City Council.
25 3. That the application for a Negative Declaration and General Plan
Amendment on property generally located east of El Camino Real between
26 Alga Road and La Costa Avenue is approved as shown in Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 6075 and 6076.
28
16
1 4. That the application for a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use and
Open Space and Conservation Elements of the General Plan to change the
2 Land Use designation on multiple properties from Open Space (OS) and
Residential Medium-High Density (RMH) to Residential Low Medium Density
(RLM) and Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR) on lands generally located
4 east of El Camino Real between Alga Road and La Costa Avenue, as shown
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6076, is hereby accepted, approved
5 in concept, and shall be formally approved with GPA Batch No. 2 of 2006.
6 5. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits
for Judicial Review" shall apply:
8 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
9
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be
10 sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper
seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than
the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision
13 becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision
becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount
14 sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record,
the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended
15 to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his
16 attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the
preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the
17 City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
. c CA. 92008."
18 ///
19
20
21
22
23 '"
24
25 ///
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad on the 11 th day of July, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
LORRAINE M. WOOD, C|
(SEAL)
GPA 05-09 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17,2006 EXISTING Draft
Related Case File No(s): ZC 05-06 /MP 02-03(A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 215-160-01-00
B. 215-160-02-00
C. 21 5-1 60-03-00
D. 21 6-593-01 -00
E. 216-593-02-00
F. 216-593-03-00
G. 216-593-04-00
From:
RMH
RMH
RMH
OS (portion)
OS
OS
OS
To:
RLM
RLM
RLM
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM/RMH/T-R (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
GPA 05-09 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17.2006 PROPOSED Draft
Related Case File Nofs): ZC 05-06 /MP 02-03(A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 215-160-01-00
B. 21 5-1 60-02-00
C. 21 5-1 60-03-00
D.216-593-01-00
E. 2 16-593-02-00
F. 216-593-03-00
G. 2 16-593-04-00
From:
RMH
RMH
RMH
OS (portion)
OS
OS
OS
To:
RLM
RLM
RLM
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM/RMH/T-R (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
EXHIBIT 4
SITE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
GPA 05-09/ ZC 05-067 MP 03-02 (A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBITS
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6075
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT DESIGNATIONS ON
MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) AND
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH (RMH) TO RESIDENTIAL
LOW MEDIUM (RLM) AND TRAVEL
RECREATION/COMMERCIAL (TR), A ZONE CHANGE TO
CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION ON MULTIPLE
PROPERTIES FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC) TO
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 7,500 SQUARE FOOT LOT
SIZE MINIMUM (R-1-7,500) AND A MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENT TO MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES AND LAND
USE AND ZONING CHANGES TO THE LA COSTA RESORT
AND SPA MASTER PLAN LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO.: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A)
WHEREAS, KSL La Costa Resort Company LLC, "Developer/Owner," has
filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Lots 1, 25, 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 03-01-01, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof no. 14984, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number
2005-0224598
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of May 2006, hold a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
.
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission, considered all factors
2 relating to the Negative Declaration.
3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning4
<- Commission as follows:
6 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
7 B) That based on'the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration,
8 Exhibit "ND," dated according to Exhibits "NOI" dated
December 6, 2005, and "PII" dated November 23, 2005, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
10
Findings:
11
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
13 a. it has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration La Costa
Resort Lot Line Adjustment the environmental impacts therein identified for
14 this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of the project; and
,, b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
17 Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
18 c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad; and
2Q d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
21 "
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PCRESONO. 6075 -2- ,,-
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
NOES: "
ABSENT: Chairperson Montgomery and Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
. MONTGOMERY, Cfcffperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMKRON
ATTEST:
DONNEU
Assistant Planning Director
PCRESONO. 6075 -3-
FILE COPY
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
La Costa Resort Lot Line Adjustment
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/ MP 03-02f A)
Various properties generally located east of Estrella De Mar Road
north of Arenal Lane, south of Alga Road and west of the La Costa
golf course.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment,
Zone Change and Master Plan Amendment to change the land use and zoning designations of
land adjusted from the La Costa Master Plan to the adjacent residential properties in an area
referred to as the "finger" lands. The "fingers" are portions of the La Costa Resort and Spa open
space property being adjusted to the adjacent residentially land use and zoned property. The
project is a follow-up action for the implementation of the La Costa Master Plan MP 03-02.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially
significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be
recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative
Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California
92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by
the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be
issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Van
Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD December 6.2005 through December 26. 2005
PUBLISH DATE December 6. 2005
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us79
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
CASE NO: GPA 05-09/ ZC 05-06/ MP 03-02(A'>
DATE: 11/23/2005
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad .
3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Van Lvnchf 7601 602-4613
4. PROJECT LOCATION: The property is generally located east of Estrella De Mar Road and north of
Arenal Lane
5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: KSL La Costa Resort Co. LLC. 2100 Costa Del Mar
Rd. Carlsbad. CA 92009
6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space
7. ZONING: Planned Community
8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or
participation agreements): None
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES:
The applicant. La Costa Resort and Spa, is requesting the Land Use and Zoning of open space property be
changed to allow for resort owned property to be adjusted to the adjacent residences which is residentiallv
land use and zoned property. The existing Open Space land use designated property will be changed to
Residential Low-Medium and the Planned Community zoning will become R-1-7.5QO. The changes allow
the property to be adjusted and not cause any land use or zoning inconsistencies. The adjustment also
modifies the Master Plan boundary and requires the Master Plan Amendment. The "finger" lands are the
areas of narrow open space designated land within Planning Area 7 of the Master Plan that are westerly of
the golf course that extend into the adjacent residential area.
Rev. 07/03/04
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: -{
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
D Aesthetics
l~) Agricultural Resources
Q Air Quality
CH Biological Resources
n Cultural Resources
D Geology/Soils Q Noise
CD Hazards/Hazardous Materials l~l Population and Housing
Q Hydrology/Water Quality, ; Q Public Services
Q Land Use and Planning
Q Mineral Resources
O Mandatory Findings of
Significance
I""] Recreation
Q Transportation/Circulation
l~] Utilities & Service Systems
Rev. 07/03/04
DETERMINATION.
£3 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will tie prepared.
l~l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
l~] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
tH I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
f~1 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including- revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
'a*l/M*X--— ///237/7 J
Planner Sign^ure Date
Assistant Planning Director's Signature Date
Rev. 07/03/02
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or
to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
• A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported
by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A "Nonimpact" answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
• "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact."
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
• "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effecTfs significantly
adverse.
• Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the
environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a
supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental
document is required.
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
• If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared.
Rev. 07/03/02 ~ -,
• An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact"-, is checked, and including but not limited to
the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding
Considerations".for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the
EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect,
or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a
level of significance.
A discussion of pot&ntial impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant.
Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light and
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
H. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997
prepared by the California Department of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to
non-agricultural use?
ID. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.)
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
n
n
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
n
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
No
Impact
D D
D D
D D
D D
n
n
n
n
Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is in non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)? .
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? *
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
TV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including but not limited
to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D E
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D D
D
D , D
D D
Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally
sensitive?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in
Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1997), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
n
n
n
n
n
n
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D H
D
D
D
D
D
n
n n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Rev. 07/03/02
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or environment?
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D El
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D
D D
D
D ,
D
D
Rev. 07/03/02
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND
Would the project:
WATER QUALITY
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste [U
discharge requirements?
D D
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or d
interfere substantially with ground water
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground
water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level '
which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Impacts to groundwater quality? f~1
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern l~l
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner, which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern l~l
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the flow rate or amount
(volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would [~1
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? l~1
h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard l~l
area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood delineation map?
i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area l~1
structures, which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk Q
of loss injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? l~l
1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving [~"|
surface waters.
D
D
n
n
n
D
n
n
n n
n n
/
n n
n n
10 Rev. 07/03/02
m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy CD CD D
metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives,
synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding
substances and trash) into receiving surface I-
waters or other alteration of receiving surface
water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, CD (~1 CD
fresh or wetland waters) during or following
construction?
o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired CD ' Q CD
water body as listed on the Clean Water Act
Section 303(d) list? -.. t
p) The exceedance of applicable surface or CD CD CD
groundwater receiving water quality objectives
or degradation of beneficial uses?
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? Q CD CD
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, l~) CD CD
policy, or regulation of an agency with ^
jurisdiction over the project (including but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation CD CD CD
plan or natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known fj CD CD
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally Q DD
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan,
or other land use plan?
XL NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise l~] CD CD
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance or
applicable standards of other agencies? f
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of CD f~1 CD
excessive groundbourne vibration or
groundbourne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient l~| CD CD
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
11 Rev. 07/03/02
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
O
e) For a project located within an airport land use l~l
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private CD _
airstrip, would the project expose people '
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the
project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area either Q
directly (for example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing l~1
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, CD
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
XHI. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered government facilities,
a need for new or physically altered government
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times, or other performance objectives for any of
the public services:
i) Fire protection? D
ii) Police protection? D
iii) Schools? CD
iv) Parks? D
v) Other public facilities? Q
CD IS
CD CD
CD
l"l ["T
CD CD
D CD Kl
CD D E3
D D IS
D ' D IS
CD CD IS
12 Rev. 07/03/02 3/
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
D'D •'D
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or CD
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial [~1
in relation to the existing traffic load and
capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a Q
level of service standard established by the
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, d)
including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial
safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design [U
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? O
f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? D
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [H
programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turn-outs, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would
the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of I I
the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new fj
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction
of which would cause significant environmental
effects?
D
D
D
D
D
n
D
D
D
D D
D D
D IH
D D
f
D D
13 Rev. 07/03/02
c) Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
D
D
D
D
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVH. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
c) Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause the substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
D
D
Q
D D U.
D D
n n
14 Rev. 07/03/02
XVm. EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlieY EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Tharl Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
15 Rev. 07/03/02
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AESTHETICS - Would the project: I -
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
a) through d) No Impact: The lot line adjustment project area does not have scenic vistas and will not impact the
visual character of the area. No development is proposed which would create any light or glare.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
a) through c) No Impact: The properties are neither designated, used, zoned, nor are they und^Williamson Act
contract for farming.
AIR QUALITY—Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area
for ozone (O3), and a state non-attainment area for paniculate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter
(PMIO). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin
(SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution
controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is
embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District
(APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG).
A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state-
mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having
serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by
the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly
regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996.
The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are
incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the
County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project
presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that
the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. ,
Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific
reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality
management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set
forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California
Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the
following:
• Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area?
16 Rev. 07/03/02
• Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan?
The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being
implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions kjf the City's General Plan and the RAQS.
Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct
implementation of the regional plan.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of
Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality
violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in
2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates
in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. Any impact is assessed as
less than significant.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine
particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net
increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the
proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project,
air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 (a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered
de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. As noted above, the proposed project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or
concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the
project. No impact is assessed.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. No construction is proposed with the lot line adjustment and land use changes.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact - The project site involves lot line adjustments to absorb adjacent vacant open space maintained by the
property owners, or in some cases the adjacent property owner acquiring the land. The open space portions have
exotic plantings, non-native grasses or bare ground.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact - No direct impacts to sensitive wetland, riparian or aquatic vegetation will occur through
implementation of the subject project.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No impact - The project will be developed in an area that does not contain any federally protected wetlands or
"waters" as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
17 Rev. 07/03/02
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites? I'
No impact - The subject property will not impact the movement of any native resident, migratory fish, or wildlife
species as the open space lands terminate into residential areas. The 100 foot wide SDG&E corridor will remain
open space.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact - No biological resources exist, therefore no impacts are expected.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact - The project area is defined as "developed area" per the Habitat Management Plan.
g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally sensitive?
No Impact - No direct impacts to sensitive wetland, riparian or aquatic vegetation will occur through
implementation of the subject project
CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §1
5064.5?
No impact - No historical resources have been identified on the site or within the vicinity of the project; and
therefore no impacts to historical resources will result from construction of the project.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
No impact -The site is not identified as having known archeologically sensitive areas according to MEIR 93-01,
map 5.8-2. The project will not cause substantial adverse changes in the significance of archaeological resources
pursuant to §15064.5.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
No Impact - the site has been previously graded and landscaped and no new development is anticipated.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
No impact - No human burials or remains are known to exist in the location of the subject project.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury
or death involving:
t
\. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Existing condition: The project area is situated in the western portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic
province of southern California. This geomorphic province encompasses an area that extends 125 miles from the
Transverse Ranges and the Los Angeles Basin, south to the Mexican border, and beyond another 775 miles to the
18 Rev. 07/03/02 37
southern tip of Baja California. The westernmost portion of the province in San Diego County, in which the site is
located, generally consists of Tertiary and Quaternary age sedimentary rocks.
The most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by^ the State Geologist for the north San Diego
County area, indicates that the project is considered to be in a seismically active area, as is most of southern
California. This map however, indicates that the subject site is not underlain by known active faults, nor is there
evidence of ground displacement in the area during the last 11,000 years.
The Rose Canyon fault zone is the closest known fault, which is the onshore portion of an extensive fault zone that
includes the Offshore Zone of Deformation and the Newport-Inglewood fault to the north of the subject site. This
fault zone, located approximately 6.2 miles westerly of the subject site, is made of predominately right-lateral strike-
slip faults that extend south-southeast through the San Diego metropolitan area. The zone extends offshore at La
Jolla, and continues north-northwest generally parallel to the coastline. Portions of the Rose Canyon fault zone in
the San Diego area have been recognized by the State Geologist to be considered active.
Additionally, the Julian and Temecula segments of the Elsinore fault zone, about 24 miles to the northeast of the
subject site are also referenced in the Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
Environmental Evaluation: Based on resource investigation and field observations, no active faults have
been mapped across the project site. The closest fault is located approximately seven miles westerly of the site. The
Elsinore fault zone is located approximately 24 miles east of the site, and the Coronado Bank fault is located
approximately 22 miles west of the site. The potential for rupture resulting from earthquake is considered to be low.
The subject site is not within a fault-rupture hazard zone as indexed in the Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Because of the lack of known active faults on the site, the potential for surface rupture at the site is. considered low.
The seismic hazard most likely to impact the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake on one of the
active regional faults discussed above.
Finding: Less than significant impact - The project site is not within a fault-rupture hazard zone indexed in the
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42; therefore the project would not expose people or structures
to potential substantial adverse effects.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than significant impact - Earthquake faults exist within southern California, including three fault zones within
24 miles of the site. Historical records have indicated however, that the risk of strong seismic ground shaking of the
project site is minimal, and thus is considered a less than significant impact.
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
No Impact - The project does not propose grading or construction at this time.
iv. Landslides?
No impact - No landslides are anticipated to affect the proposed project.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
t
d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
b), c), d), and e) No impact - The project does not propose development or grading and the existing units are
connected to a sanitary sewer system.
19 Rev. 07/03/02
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials? 1 -
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or environment?
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area? '
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
a) through h) - No Impact - The project involves the adjustment of parcel lines with existing single family homes.
The project does not involve or is located near hazardous materials. The site is not located within two miles of an
airport and the project area is not adjacent to wildlands.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a
level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Impacts to groundwater quality?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount
(volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map?
i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows?
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
I) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. /
m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic
organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or
other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following
construction?
o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act
Section 303(d) list?
20 Rev. 07/03/02
p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives OF
degradation of beneficial uses?
a) through p) No Impact - The project involves the adjustment of ^parcel lines within an existing single family
residential development not within the 100 year floodplain. The project does not propose and development or
construction and may actually decrease runoff by the increased landscaping and maintenance of undeveloped
land. Downstream waters are not listed as impaired water bodies on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list.
LAND USE PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact - The project would not separate any contiguous community areas.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction
over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
No impact - The proposed project will not be in conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
any agency with jurisdiction over the project. The project will reestablish a previous residential zoning and land use
designation to allow the adjustment of adjacent open space designated to property to the adjacent residentially
developed and designated property. Land use and zoning consistency will be achieved by this project.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
No impact - The subject project site is consistent with the City of Carlsbad Habitat Management^lan (HMP) for
Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad. The project is identified as a developed area within the HMP.
MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the
region and the residents of the State?
No impact - No known mineral resource of regional or statewide value are known that would be affected through
implementation of the project. The site is not located in an area of mineral resources as identified in MEIR 93-01,
map 5.13-1.
NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ,
a) through f) No Impact - The lot line adjustment and land use changes will not create any new noise or
groundborne vibrations. The site is not near a public or private airport.
POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
21 Rev. 07/03/02
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? 1 -
a) through c) No Impact - The lot line adjustment will not induce growth or displace existing homes or people.
PUBLIC SERVICES- Would the project:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public
services: '
t\. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?
No Impact- The lot line and land use project will not increase the demand for public services.
RECREATION- Would the project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regionat_parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No impact - The proposed project will not result in an increase in demand beyond that already accommodated, on
recreational facilities of any kind. No additional recreational facilities, and no construction or expansion of
recreational facilities will result from implementation of the proposed project.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not generate any additional vehicle trips. The impacts from the
proposed project are, therefore, less than significant.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated
three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad
as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS
on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
Existing ADT* LOS 'Buildout ADT*
Rancho Santa Fe Road 17-35 "A-D" 35-56
El Camino Real 27-49 "A-C" 33-62
Palomar Airport Road 10-57 "A-D" 30-73
SR78 124-142 "F" 156-180
1-5 199-216 "D" 260-272
*The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
22 Rev. 07/03/02
The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS "F" in 1990). Accordingly, all designated
roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and community
plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the
buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes
implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and
highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-
term and at buildout.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial safety risks? '
No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. It would not, therefore, result in a
change of air traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses?
No Impact. The project does not alter existing traffic facilities; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's general plan and zoning. Therefore, it would not increase hazards
due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The proposed project does not change emergency access. No impact assessed.
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The proposed project does not require or reduce available parking. No impact assessed.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks, etc.)?
No Impact. The lot line adjustment project does not conflict with any adopted policies, plans or programs
supporting alternative transportation.
UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected/demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
a) through g) No Impact - The project will not increase demand of utility or services facilities as no new
development will result from the lot line adjustment and land use changes. No impact assessed.
23 Rev. 07/03/02
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
No Impact - The lot line adjustment and land uses changes proposed will not significantly change the physical
environment or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory as none
exist within the project area.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually • limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects o'f a project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other Current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects?)
No Impact - The project will not result in the increase of population or demand of services or infrastructure to
accommodate the existing residential development.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
No Impact - The project consists of lot line adjustments and land use designations for consistency and will not
impact the existing residential development.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
24 Rev. 07/03/02
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6076
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE AND
4 OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENTS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION ON MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM OPEN
6 SPACE (OS) AND RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM-HIGH (RMH) TO *
RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIUM (RLM) AND TRAVEL
7 RECREATION/COMMERCIAL (TR) ON LANDS
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL
8 BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE IN
o LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
10 ADJUSTMENT
CASE NO: GPA 05-09
11
WHEREAS, KSL La Costa Resort Company LLC, "Developer/Owner," has
13 filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
14 Lots 1, 25, 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 03-01-01, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
^ according to map thereof no. 14984, filed in the Office of the
, g County Recorder of San Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number
2005-0224598
17
("the Property"); and
18
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan
2Q Amendment as shown on Exhibit "GPA 05-09" dated May 17, 2006, attached hereto and on file
21 in the Carlsbad Planning Department LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -
^•nvn
22 GPA 05-09 as provided in Government Code Section 65350 et. seq. and Section 21.52.160 of
23 the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
24
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of May 2006, hold a
25
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and26
27 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
28 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT - GPA 05-09 based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in
conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan based on the facts set forth in
the staff report dated May 17,2006 including, but not limited to the following:
a. Land Use: The redesignation of land from Open Space to Residential Low-
Medium (RLM) is necessary to implement the La Costa Resort and Spa Master
Plan (MP 03-02). The "finger" lands were previously designated as RLM and
this amendment would allow the transfer of the "finger" lands to the adjacent
RLM Land Use designated properties. The Land Use amendment from
Residential Medium-High (RMH) to RLM is for Land Use and Zoning
consistency, as the underlying zoning is Residential Single Family and the
adjacent properties are designated and developed as residential single family.
The Land Use change from OS to TR is for a small portion of land adjacent to
existing lands within the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-
02)designated TR and Zoned Planned Community.
b. Open Space: - Property will be redesignated from Open Space to RLM. The
property is not identified as a preserve area in the City's Habitat Management
Plan. Previous to the latest Master Plan Amendment the subject property was
designated as RLM and this proposal is to redesignate the property RLM to
allow for the conveyance of the property to the adjacent residentially designated
properties.
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer ~
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
/
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
PCRESONO. 6076 -2-
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
2 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this General Plan Amendment.
3 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the General Plan Amendment documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
, Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
6
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
7 regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Q 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code
10 Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be
invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies
with all requirements of law.
12 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
12 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
14 and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this General Plan Amendment,
(b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
,,- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
17 including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation
18 survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's
approval is not validated.
2Q 6. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and
approval of ZC 05-06, MP 03-02(A) and adjustment plats and is subject to all
21 conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6075, 6077 and 6078 for
those other approvals.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PCRESONO. 6076 -3-
~)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
' NOES:
' ABSENT: Chairperson Montgomery and Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
*. MONT'
CARLSBAD PLA
ATTEST:
DONNEU
Assistant Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 6076 -4-
GPA 05-09 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17.2006 EXISTING Draft
Related Case File Nofs): ZC 05-06 /MP 02-03(A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 215-160-01-00
B. 21 5-1 60-02-00
C. 21 5-1 60-03-00
D. 2 16-593-0 1-00
E. 216-593-02-00
F. 216-593-03-00
G. 2 16-593-04-00
From:
RMH
RMH
RMH
OS (portion)
OS
OS
OS
To:
RLM
RLM
RLM
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM/RMH/T-R (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
GPA 05-09 LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17.2006 PROPOSED Draft
Related Case File /Vote): ZC 05-06 /MP 02-03 f A)
G.P. Map Designation Change
Property
A. 21 5-1 60-01 -00
B. 21 5-1 60-02-00
C. 21 5-1 60-03-00
D. 21 6-593-01 -00
E. 2 16-593-02-00
F. 216-593-03-00
G. 21 6-593-04-00
From:
RMH
RMH
RMH
OS (portion)
OS
OS
OS
To:
RLM
RLM
RLM
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM/RMH/T-R (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
OS/RLM (portion)
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6077
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE TO CHANGE THE
4 ZONING DESIGNATION ON MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM
PLANNED COMMUNITY TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY, 7,500 SQUARE FOOT LOT SIZE MINIMUM, ON
6 LANDS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE IN
7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
8 ADJUSTMENT
9 CASE NO: ZC 05-06
10 WHEREAS, KSL La Costa Resort Company LLC, "Developer/Owner," has
11 filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
12 Lots 1, 25, 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 03-01-01, in
13 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof no. 14984, filed in the Office of the
14 County Recorder of San Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number
2005-0224598
15
16 ("the Property"); and
17 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as shown on
18 Exhibit "ZC 05-06" dated May 17, 2006, attached hereto and on file in the Planning
19 Department, LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT - ZC 05-06 as provided by
20 Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
21
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of May 2006, holtfT" ~
22
„ duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
25 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
ryrzo relating to the Zone Change.
27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
28
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
2 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT - ZC 05-06 based on the following findings and subject to the
3 following conditions:
4 Findings:
1. That the proposed Zone Change from Planned Community to Residential Single
5 Family, 7,500 square foot lot size minimum is consistent with the goals and policies of
the various elements of the General Plan, in that the Zone Change to R-l-7,500 is
7 consistent with the proposed General Plan Residential Low-Medium Land Use
designation to allow for the conveyance of land pursuant to the La Costa Master
8 Plan.
9 2. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as
10 mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use
Element, in that the lands which are receiving the conveyed lands are zoned R-l-
11 7,500, consistent with the Land Use designation of RLM and the La Costa Resort
and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02.)
13 3. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity and general
welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the Zone Change allows
14 the lands to be conveyed to adjacent properties consistent with the implementation
of the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02).
, g 4. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained hi this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
17 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
18
Conditions:
20 1 • If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
21 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of"3n""f~"
22 future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
_, issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
24 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Zone Change.
25
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Zone Change documents, as necessary to make them internally
27 consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall
occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
28 different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
PC RESO NO. 6077 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code
Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be
invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies
with all requirements of law.
4. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Zone Change, (b) City's
approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary,
in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation
and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all
liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other
energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have
been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated.
5. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and
approval of GPA 05-09, MP 03-02(A) and adjustment plats and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6075, 6076 and 6078 for
those other approvals.
6. Developer shall provide the following note on the adjustment plats and final mylar of this
development submitted to the City:
"There shall be no further subdivision of land beyond the original number of lots
approved by La Costa Valley Unit No. 1, Map No. 5434."
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
^HMH
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing hi accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul then- imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PCRESONO. 6077 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of tKe City of Carlsbad, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
NOES:
ABSENT: Chairperson Montgomery and Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
MARTELL B. MONTG
CARLSBAD PLANNING CO
ATTEST:
>erson
"SIGN
DONNEU
Assistant Planning Director
PCRESONO. 6077 -4-
1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6078
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT TO
MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MASTER PLAN AND
5 APPROVE LAND USE AND ZONING MAP CHANGES TO
THE LA COSTA RESORT AND SPA MASTER PLAN FOR
6 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO
REAL BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE IN
7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
n CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT
9 CASE NO: MP03-02(A)
10 WHEREAS, KSL La Costa Resort Company LLC, "Developer/Owner," has
filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
12
Lots 1, 25, 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 03-01-01, in
13 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof no. 14984, filed in the Office of the
14 County Recorder of San Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number
15 2005-0224598
16 ("the Property"); and
17 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Master Plan
I O Amendment as shown on Exhibit "X" dated May 17, 2006, on file in the Carlsbad Planning
Department LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT - MP 03-02(A) as provided
20
by MP 03-02 and Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
21
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of May 20WT '
23 consider said request; and
24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
*\r /
•" and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
'jf:
relating to the Master Plan Amendment; and
27
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2004, the City Council approved, MP 03-02, as
28
described and conditioned hi Planning Commission Resolution No. 5700 and City Council
Resolution No. 2004-304.
\1
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
2 Commission of tKe City of Carlsbad as follows:
3
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
4
_ B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
6 * ADJUSTMENT - MP 03-02(A) based on the following findings and subject to
the following conditions:
7
Findings;8
The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance
with the Elements of the City's General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the staff
10 report dated May 17, 2006 including, but not limited to the following: The
redesignation of "finger" lands from Open Space to Residential Low-Medium is for
the implementation of the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02). The
"finger" lands were previously designated as RLM and this amendment would allow
the conveyance of the "finger" lands to the adjacent RLM designated properties.
13 The Land Use Amendment from Residential Medium-High (RMH) to RLM is for
Land Use and Zoning consistency, as the underlying Zoning designation is
14 Residential Single Family and the adjacent properties are designated and developed
as residential single family. The Land Use Amendment from OS to TR is for a small
portion of land adjacent to existing lands within the La Costa Resort and Spa
, fi Master Plan (MP 03-02) designated TR and zoned Planned Community. Property
will be redesignated from Open Space to RLM. The property is not identified as a
17 preserve area in the City's Habitat Management Plan. Previous to the latest Master
Plan Amendment the subject property was designated as RLM and this proposal is
18 to redesignate the property RLM to allow for the conveyance of the property to the
adjacent residentially designated properties.
2. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequate
provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the Capital Improvement
21 Program applicable to the subject property, in that all existing public facilities are in
place and no new development is proposed which would require additional faciliti€sT*t~~
22
3. That the residential and open space portions of the community will constitute an
environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that it will be in harmony with or
24 provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and that the sites
proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate to
25 serve the anticipated population and appear acceptable to the public authorities having
jurisdiction thereof, in that the open space portions of the project are so desirable by
6 the residents that they have illegally developed the property and now wish to receive
27 ownership of the property from KSL to sustain the quality of life they have become
accustomed to. The open space area is being conveyed to the adjacent residential
28 properties and will no longer be a part of the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan.
PC RESO NO. 6078 -2-
4. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
2 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
3 degree, of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
5 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
7 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gamed by Developer
10 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Master Plan Amendment.
11 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Master Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally
consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur
substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different
from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
14
3. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
17 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Master Plan Amendment, (b)
City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
18 discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
20 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation
survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's
21 approval is not validated.
22 4. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and
approval of GPA 05-09 05-06, ZC 05-06 and adjustment plats and is subject to all
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6075, 6076 and 6077 for
24 those other approvals.
t
25 5. Prior to the issuance of any permits for the project, the applicant shall submit to the
Planning Director a digital copy and a camera ready master copy of the La Costa
26 Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02(A), in addition to five (5) bound copies.
27
28
PCRESONO. 6078 -3- ,
St>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
ABSENT: Chairperson Montgomery and Commissioner Heineman
ABSTAIN:
MARTELL B. MONTG(
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI
:rson
ION
DONNEU
Assistant Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 6078 -4-
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 6
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 17,2006
Application complete date: January 12,2006
Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: Bob Wojcik
SUBJECT: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP Q3-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative
Declaration and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to
change the Land Use and Open Space and Conservation Element designations on
multiple properties from Open Space (OS) and Residential Medium-High (RMH)
to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR), a
Zone Change to change the Zoning designation of multiple properties from
Planned Community (PC) to Residential Single Family, 7,500 square foot lot size
minimum (R-1-7,500) and a Master Plan Amendment to modify the boundaries
and approve Land Use and Zoning map changes to the La Costa Resort and Spa
Master Plan on lands generally located east of El Camino Real between Alga
Road and La Costa Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 6.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6075
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolutions No. 6076, 6077 and 6078 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of
General Plan Amendment GPA 05-09, Zone Change ZC 05-06 and Master Plan Amendment 03-
02(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II.INTRODUCTION
The project consists of a request for a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use
designations from OS and RMH to RLM and TR and a Zone Change from PC to R-1-7,500,
consistent with the proposed Land Use designations. The project also includes a Master Plan
Amendment to modify the boundaries, Land Use and Zoning designations of the La Costa Resort
and Spa Master Plan on properties know as the open space "finger" lands of the La Costa Resort
and Spa which are generally located east of Estrella de Mar and north of Arena! Road.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission and City Council acting on this application, the
applicant will process lot line adjustments to convey ownership of the "finger" lands owned by
the La Costa Resort and Spa to the adjacent residential property owners. As designed and
conditioned the project is consistent with all applicable standards and policies and the necessary
findings to approve the project can be made.
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17,2006
Page 2
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project consists of the conveyance of property know as the "finger" lands of the La Costa
Resort and Spa property to the adjacent property owners. The "fingers" are open space lands
that extend into existing residentially developed and designated properties west of the La Costa
Golf Course. The potential for the transfer of lands was identified and addressed with the
adoption of the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan in September of 2004. The transfer of
"finger" lands to the adjacent property owners was to be done though the Master Plan
Amendment process and related General Plan and Zone changes as required. The "fingers" are
to be almost entirely dissolved into the adjoining residential lots. There are a few property
owners who are not participants in the transfer but this does not bias the proposal and the
unaccepted lands would then remain in possession of the La Costa Resort and Spa. La Costa
Resort and Spa in cooperation with the 55 adjacent property owners have negotiated the division
of the land.
The land to be conveyed is open space land that does not appear to be maintained and is void of
any significant habitats. In many cases, the land has been improved or maintained by the
adjoining property owners. One of the "fingers" will remain as it is under a SDG&E electric
transmission line.
As proposed, the application will modify the appropriate Land Use, Zoning and Master Plan
boundaries to reflect the lot line adjustments. In one case, the Alesha property, the RMH Land
Use designation is being changed to RLM for Land Use and Zoning consistency purposes. Also,
a small portion of the existing OS will be changed to a TR Land Use designation with the
proposed realignment of a private driveway serving five residences that are not part of the lot
line adjustments. This would be a minor expansion of the TR Land Use designation for the
resort portion of the Master Plan and contained within Planning Area 7 (resort and golf course).
No uses or improvements are identified or proposed for this area.
Prior to the approval of the new La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan for the resort complex, the
"fingers" had a Land Use and Zoning designation of RLM and Zoned PC, respectively. The
Master Plan Amendment approval (MP 03-02) changed the "fingers" to OS. This proposal is to
change the "fingers" back to RLM, so the Land Use designation would be the same as the
adjoining, and receiving, property.
Applicable Regulations
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards as analyzed
within the following section of this staff report:
A. General Plan Land Use Element - Open Space (OS), Residential Low Medium
(RLM) and Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR) General Plan Land Use
Designations; Open Space and Conservation Element;
B. Residential Single Family Zone - (R-l-7,500) (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter
21.10);
C. La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02);
D. Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 6); and
E. Habitat Management Plan.
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17,2006
Page 3
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. Therefore, this section will
cover the project's compliance with each of the regulations listed above in the order in which
they are presented.
A. General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The
following table indicates how the project, including the partial street vacation, complies with the
relevant elements of the General Plan.
TABLE 1: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
ELEMENT
Land Use
Housing
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL OBJECTIVE OR
PROGRAM
Proposed: RLM — Residential Low
Medium (0-4 dwelling units/acre)
Growth Management Control Point:
3.2 dwelling unit/acre
Proposed TR Land Use - To
remain under the Master Plan. Any
future development would require
Master Plan Amendment
Zoning consistency with General
Plan
15% inclusionary housing
requirement per Objective 3.6
PROPOSED USES &
IMPROVEMENTS
Redesignate RMH and OS
land as RLM to be conveyed
to the adjacent residential
properties. Proposed uses
would be open space,
landscaping and accessory
structures.
No new residential
development proposed.
Proposed TR Land Use
designation is minor
expansion of existing TR
Land Use designation.
Proposed R-l- 7,500 Zone is
consistent with the RLM
General Plan Land Use
designation and the PC
Zoning is consistent with the
TR Land Use designation.
No new residential
development proposed.
COMPLY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1,0
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17, 2006
Page 4
TABLE 1: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED
ELEMENT
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL OBJECTIVE OR
PROGRAM
PROPOSED USES &
IMPROVEMENTS
COMPLY
Public Safety Provide project review that allows
consideration of seismic and
geologic hazards, flood hazards,
fire.
Project improvements will
not significantly impact or
be impacted by geologic,
seismic, flood or fire hazard
conditions.
Yes
Open Space
&
Conservation
Minimize environmental impacts to
sensitive resources within the City.
Preserve open space consistent with
the habitat preserve and linkage
areas identified in the HMP.
The project will
redesignate/rezone OS areas
with no sensitive resources
previously designated as
RLM back to RLM.
The open space area was not
identified as an HMP habitat
preserve area or linkage. No
sensitive resources exist on
site.
Yes
Yes
Noise Residential exterior noise standard
of 60 dB A CNEL and interior noise
standard of 45 dBA.
The project does not contain
noise generating uses and is
not subject to significant
exterior noise sources.
Yes
All public infrastructures
necessary to serve the
properties already exist.
Circulation Requires new development to
dedicate and improve all public
rights-of-way for circulation
facilities needed to serve
development.
Yes
B. Residential Single Family Zone
The proposed Zone Change will change the Zoning designation of the "finger" lands from PC to
R-l-7,500 to allow for the conveyance of the land to the adjacent R-l-7,500 Zoned properties.
The residential properties within the project are to be increased in size by the acceptance of open
space land that is located behind the residential lots. The existing residential lots all presently
have street frontage on a publicly dedicated street. There are no proposed changes to the lot
frontages or lot widths, except for lots 63 and 64, whose lot frontages will increase by 30 feet.
Only the lot area is proposed to increase by the addition of the open space land being conveyed.
The amount of land being conveyed ranges from 549.5 square feet for lot 95 to 46,795.2 square
feet for lot 137. Please refer to the exhibits for the distribution of the property. Overall, the lots
will meet or exceed the residential lot width and size requirements of the R-l-7,500 Zone.
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17, 2006
PageS
C. La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan Amendment
The La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan identifies the subject property as part of Planning Area
7, which encompasses the La Costa Resort and Spa and the Golf Course open space, including
the "finger" lands. The Master Plan identified the Land Use and Zoning of the "finger" lands as
Residential Low-Medium and Residential Single Family with a Qualified Development Overlay
(R-l-Q) as an interim Zoning designation and anticipated the conveyance of the "finger" lands to
the adjacent residential property owners. The Master Plan also specifies the process in which to
implement the conveyance. Any development proposed within the "finger" lands area must
comply with the Qualified Development Overlay section of the Zoning Ordinance. With this
approval, the Qualified Development Overly will be removed and the resulting Zoning would be
R-l-7,500.
A small triangular shaped piece of land located easterly of Arenal Lane and defined by existing
and proposed private access ways will be changed from RLM to TR as a result of the
realignment of a private driveway serving five homes that are not a part of the project. As a
result of the driveway realignment, the triangular-shaped area will now be contiguous to land
currently designated as TR. This area is separated from the OS designated lands of the golf
course by access ways and not adjacent to any other OS designated lands.
The "finger" lands to be conveyed to the adjacent residential properties will be removed from the
La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan (MP 03-02). The Master Plan Amendment also includes
revisions to the General Plan and Zoning exhibits to reflect the proposed Land Use and Zoning
changes and minor text changes to remove wording identifying facilities as "existing" or
"proposed."
D. Growth Management Ordinance
The project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 6. Since the project does not
include any new development or increase in the numbers of dwelling units or impact existing
public utilities, there are no growth management impacts associated with the project.
£. Habitat Management Plan (HMP)
The City's HMP does not identify the project site as being within a hardline or standards area.
The open space areas are void of any significant habitats and are shown as "development area"
on the Habitat Management Plan Figure 28. No impacts are identified or assessed.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a
potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project
does not have any impacts to any significant native or wetland habitats or wildlife species
identified as candidate, sensitive or special status by the wildlife agencies and is identified as a
development area within the HMP. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director
issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project on December 6, 2005.
No comments were received during the 20-day public review period.
GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
May 17, 2006
Page 6
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6075 (Neg. Dec.)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6076 (GPA)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6077 (ZC)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6078 (MPA)
5. Location Map
6. Background Data Sheet
7. Disclosure Statement
8. Underlined/strikethrough Master Plan text (distributed separately)
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
APPLICANT: KSL La Costa Resort Company LLC
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a recommendation of adoption for a Negative
Declaration and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the
Land Use and Open Space and Conservation Element designations on multiple properties from
Open Space (OS) and Residential Medium-High (RMH) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and
Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR), a Zone Change to change the Zoning designation of
multiple properties from Planned Community (PC) to Residential Single Family, 7,500 square
foot lot size minimum (R-l-7,500) and a Master Plan Amendment to modify the boundaries and
approve Land Use and Zoning map changes to the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan on lands
generally located east of El Camino Real between Alga Road and La Costa Avenue in Local
Facilities Management Zone 6.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1. 25. 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 03-01-01. in the
City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 14984,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number 2005-
0224598.
APN: 215-160-01-03 and 216-593-01-04 Acres: Unknown Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A
(lot line adjustments only)
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: RMH, OS, and TR
Proposed Land Use Designation: RLMandTR
Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A
Existing Zone: PC Proposed Zone: R-l-7.500
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
General Plan Current Land Use
Site R-1/PC/OS RMH/TR/OS Open Space
North R-l-7,500 RLM Residential
South PC TR La Costa Resort
East PC OS Golf Course
West R-l-7,500 RLM Residential
Revised 01/06
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: Q Yes £3 No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: Q Yes E3 No Coastal Development Permit: O Yes £3 No
Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes [X] No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A
Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): No Change
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Categorical Exemption,
/\J Negative Declaration, issued December 6, 2005
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other,
Revised 01/06
JLU/.L//ZUUJ: j_o:oa JPAA reu aza LA UUSTA KHSUKl *
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require |
discretionary action on the pan of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee. \
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submiral. Your project cannoi
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club; fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, crust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, dry and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, lite legal name and entity of die applicant and property owner must be
provided below,
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons haying a financial
interest in the application." If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a mtbliclv-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person,
Title_
Corp/Part_
Title
Address Address.
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of. the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If die ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oubliclv-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person,
Title
Corp/ParL
Title
Address Address
1635 Faraday Avenue * Carlsbad, CA 92O08-7314 - (760) 6O2-46OO • FAX (76O) 6O2-S559
10/17/2002 16:59 FAX 760 929 .6313
3. NON-PROFIT . ^ANIZATION OR TRUST
Q|004
If any person identified pursuant 10 ( 1 ) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a crus:. ha: :'m-
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-prow
organization or as trustee or beneficiar of the.
Non ProficTTrusr
Title
Non Profit Trust
Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (-12) months?
Yes I No If yes, please indicate person(s):.
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
'O.
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of Applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMINVCOUNTER\DISCt.OSURE STATEMENT S/9S Page 2 of 2
City of Carlsbad
PI a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note: ' • "'\ "•' ''-,,„'••'''<; " "'';' >- ' '
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, - co-partnership, joint venture, association,-social club, fraternal'
organization, corporation, estate," trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other- county,- city and-county?-city
municipality, district or other political subdivision -or any other group or combination acting as a unit.'! , V '> .*'
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of^the applicant and-property owner must be
provided below. ,_ ' '-, ' -s'z.,~~-' , _'*--'"_< 1 **' "'' ; '
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the-
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares.-IF-NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) TN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part.
Title Title
Address Address
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of-all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASFmDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached ifnecessary.)
' A-
Corp/Part
Title : '
Person SHA-R.QAJ
Title
Address Address
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (76O) 602-46OO • FAX (760) 602-8559
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes VI No If yes, please indicate person(s):_
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 / 0
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title . Title__
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes V I No If yes, please indicate person(s):_
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
X
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 *")Q
Planning Commission Minutes May 17, 2006 Page 5
EXHIBIT 7
4. GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/M 03-02fA) - LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -
Request for A RECOMMENDATION OF ADOPTION OF A Negative Declaration and a
recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use and
Open Space and Conservation Element designations on multiple properties from Open
Space (OS) and Residential Medium-High (RMH) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and
Travel Recreation/Commercial (TR), a Zone Change to change the Zoning designation of
multiple properties from Planned Community (PC) to Residential Single Family, 7,500
square foot lot size minimum (R-1-7,500) and a Master Plan Amendment to modify the
boundaries and approve Land Use and Zoning map changes to the La Costa Resort and
Spa Master Plan on lands generally located east of El Camino Real between Alga Road
and La Costa Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 6
Mr. Neu introduced Item 4 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the Staff presentation.
Chairperson Montgomery stated due to a conflict of interest, he would have Commissioner Baker chair
the meeting.
Commissioner Baker opened the Public Hearing on Item 4.
Mr. Lynch gave a presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions.
Commissioner Baker asked if the applicant would like to continue with 5 commissioners present. The
applicant replied, yes.
Commission Baker asked if there were any questions for Staff.
Commissioner Dominguez asked if the currently non-maintained open space will have a maintenance
program. Mr. Lynch replied that he would need to review KSL's maintenance program and recommended
the applicant to answer the question.
Commissioner Whitton asked if all encroachments and infringements have been resolved by this
document. Mr. Lynch replies, yes.
Commissioner Segal questioned the meaning of one resident's non-participation. Mr. Lynch responded
by explaining why one of the residents has chosen not to accept the land adjoining to his property due to
a previous adjustment to his property.
Commissioner Cardosa asked about the timing of the road alignment. Mr. Lynch replied that all inquiries
regarding the maintenance and development of the private road should be directed to KSL.
Commissioner Cardosa asked if there are any existing lots that are under the minimum 7,500 square
footage size. Mr. Lynch replied that he did not know, he would have to check the map. There could be
existing non-conforming lots. If the additional square footage increased the total square footage to 7,500
or more, the lots would now be considered conforming.
Commissioner Cardosa asked if the one non-participating resident would cause any problems. Mr. Lynch
replied, no.
Commissioner Baker asked why the adjustment was not addressed at the time of the master plan
presentation and zoning change one year prior. Assistant Planning Director Neu replied that when the
master plan was set up, there was not enough time to contact property owners, etc. It was understood
that the lot adjustment would be addressed at a later time.
Commissioner Baker asked if there were any more questions of the staff. Seeing, none, she asked if the
applicant would like to make a presentation.
Jim Waples, Project Manager, KSL, 2100 Costa del Mar, Carlsbad stated the master plan was approved
in December of 2004, and they have been working through the property line issues with the home owners
Planning Commission Minutes May 17, 2006 Page 6
involved since that time. Mr. Waples stated he would be available to answer any questions and
expressed his high regards for the City of Carlsbad staff.
Commissioner Cardosa asked Mr. Waples about the realignment timing. Mr. Waples responded that he
felt it would be within a reasonable period of time and the process is solely the responsibility of KSL.
Commissioner Whitton asked Mr. Waples if the transfer and recordation was to be paid for by KSL. Mr.
Waples stated KSL agreed to take the project through the planning commission and city council process.
The next step is the lot line application. The homeowners would be responsible for escrow fees,
engineering fees, application and coordination. KSL will require no fees in return for the land.
Commissioner Dominguez asked if there will be a maintenance program for the reduced property area.
Mr. Waples responded that the existing maintenance program will be in place. There will no maintenance
or regular of irrigation.
Commissioner Baker asked if there were any questions of the applicant, seeing none she asked if any
members of the public wished to speak on the item.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Phil Hack, 2065 Caleta Court, Carlsbad stated his support of the project.
James Bond, 2041 Caracol Court, Carlsbad states his support of the project. Mr. Bond asked if the open
space will be permanently designated as open space.
Commissioner Baker asked if there were any other questions or comments. Seeing none, she closed
Public Testimony and requested Mr. Lynch to answer Mr. Bond's question.
Mr. Lynch stated the property at the end of Adrenal Lane is presently Open Space Land Use designated
in the Master Plan and is anticipated to remain as such. The property is also encumbered by open space
easements as recorded by the last map and is part of the Master Plan approval. Commissioner Baker
clarified that there would not be a structure built on the open space area and a General Plan and zone
change would need to be completed. Mr. Lynch concurred.
Commissioner Baker asked if there were any other questions of Staff.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Cardosa, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6075 recommending
adoption of a Negative Declaration and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions
No. 6076, 6077 and 6078 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment
GPA 05-09, Zone Change ZC 05-06 and Master Plan Amendment MP 03-02(A)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Whitton stated it is good the have the lots resolved for the homeowners and KSL's benefit.
He supports the project.
Commissioner Segall stated he is fine with the project.
Commissioner Dominguez stated he is in full support of the project. He thanked Staff and the applicant for
their diligence in resolving the issues.
Commissioner Cardosa applauded Staff and their due diligence. He supports the project.
Commissioner Baker supports the project. She congratulated all the homeowners and KSL for a "win-win"
situation.
Planning Commission Minutes May 17, 2006 Page 7
VOTE: 5-0
AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Hienmenan, Chairperson Montgomery (Recused due to conflict of
interest)
Chairperson Montgomery closed the Public Hearing on Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next
item.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 11, 2006, to consider a request for adoption of a Negative
Declaration and approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use and Open Space
and Conservation Element designations on multiple properties from Open Space (OS) and
Residential Medium-High (RMH) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Travel
Recreation/Commercial (TR), a Zone Change to change the zoning designation of multiple
properties from Planned Community (PC) to Residential Single Family, 7,500 square foot lot
size minimum (R-1-7,500) and a Master Plan Amendment to modify the boundaries and approve
Land Use and Zoning map changes to the La Costa Resort and Spa Master Plan on lands
generally located east of El Camino Real between Alga Road and La Costa Avenue in Local
Facilities Management Zone 6 and more particularly described as:
Lots 1, 25, 26 and 27 of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 98-01-01, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map
thereof No. 14984, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego, March 18, 2005 as file number 2005-0224598.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after July 7, 2006. If you have any
questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map and/or Master
Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the
City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008,
at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP 03-02(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
PUBLISH: June 26, 2006
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
SITE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
G PA 05-09/ ZC 05-06/ M P 03-02 (A)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
June 26th, 2006
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This 26th Day of June, 2006
Signature
Jane Allshouse
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
Proof of Publication of
NOTICE Of PUBLIC HgAMNG
1200CarTsL_6:00 p.m. on 1request for ad,—iroval of a IUse £
liar Low Mediumatton/Commercialthe zoning desi
I at the Council Champers,e, Carlsbad, California, atto consider a
_ sclaration andnendment to chanceand Conservation El-•*"Mto&
desci
Sum-High (F , .__... , , and Travel Recre-I), a Zone Change to changen of multiple properties from'C> to Residential Single Fam-lot size minimum (R-1-7,500)endment to modify the bound-J - e and Zoning map chang-... and Spa Master Plan oneast of El Camino Real be-La Costa Avenue in Locallanagement Zone 6 and more particularly
,lia. according to map therIB Office of the County Recirch 18. 2005 aslile n
lereof no.jorder ofnumber
Lots 1,25. 26 and 27 of C01-01, in the City of CartelState of CalifornU14984. filed in theSarrDiego, Ma2005-0224598.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal arecordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copiesof the agenda bill will be available on and after Jury 7,2006. If you have any questions, please call vanLynch in the Planning Department at [760) 602-4613.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration, GeneralPlan Amendment, Zoning Map and/or Master PjanAmendment in court/ you may be limited to raisingonly those issues you or someone else raised at thepublic hearing described in this notice or in writtensgrmB^SMS^'&&£$&&Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to (he publichearing.
CASE FILE: GPA 05-09/ZC 05-06/MP ,03-02(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINEADJUSTMENT
NCT 1951326 • 06/26/06
Jam and Smudge Free Printing
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160®
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
O
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF VISTA
600 EUCALYPTUS AVE
VISTA CA 92084
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
201 VALLECITOS DE ORO
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949VIEWRIDGEAVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STEB
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD
STE 110
9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RECREATION
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
ATTN TEDANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
BOB WOJCIK
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
VAN LYNCH
06/13/2006
®09LS AUaAV-OD-008-L ®091S »ueqe6 3|
tor
K S L LA COSTA RESORT CORP
50905 AVENIDA BERMUDAS
LA QUINTA, CA 92253
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGI
1903 WRIGHT PL 180
CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ''
ROBERT L & IRENE DONNELL
7062 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TIMOTHY J KLOOSTER *B*
7056 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TIMOTHY S MURRAY
7050 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
IMS WILLIAM & L M
2023 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
EMANUEL L WOLF
2035 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GIGI S GLEASON
2053 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HACK
2065 CALETA'CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
STEVEN H & LORI SAAR
2077 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SPIRO
19 HARBOUR RD
GREAT NECK, NY 11024
DAVID & JOAN BROWN
2086 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NORMAN H ROSENFELD
961 BLOOMFIELD WOODS
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304
PAULA E DUNN
2026 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
FREEDMAN ROBERT F RESIDENCE
226 23RD ST
SANTA MONICA, CA 90402
RICHARD S LAUREL BURROWS
2070 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
EDWARD F & RUTH FARKAS
7026 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
AKIRA & NAOKO FUJIOKA *M*
9366 LAKE JANE TRL N
LAKE ELMO, MN 55042
HENDERSON LE N D & JOYCE M
7014 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ANDREW H GERHARD
7008 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GREGORY V & JACQUELINE RENNA
2003 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LINDA R KUELTZO
2015 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALAN D & CYNTHIA SAKAL
2027 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARIO W CONTI
7044 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID A & KAREN YODER
7038 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MIR K MOSHIRI
7210 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BERT D & DOROTHY MANN
2032 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PETER W & SNEZANA RAGSDALE
2044 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
KENNETH FINNIGAN
2035 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID R KLENSKE
7216 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DIMITROFF
2066 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DIANE HEBOIAN
PO BOX 971
BONSALL, CA 92003
BRADLEY STEPHEN QUALIFIED REi
524 CENTER RD
FRANKFORT, IL 60423
PEGGY STREET *M*
2056 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HILLARD M MARVER
2068 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RUDI ENNERS
2086 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BOYAJIAN
2069 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LENNART S & MAYRA ANDERS SON
2057 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
INTERVIVOS EPSTEIN
7222 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JUNE BROIDO
7228 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID P TORRES *B*
6776 LONICERA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MARC PABLO *B*
7240 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LOGGER *B*
7246 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GARB MELVIN FOUNDATION
11995 EL CAMINO REAL 303
SAN DIEGO, CA 92130
MAE E MCCONNELL
7261 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GREG J & JENNIFER KUBCZAK
7255 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MAUREEN M FLANIGAN
7243 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RHODA UCHITEL
733 PARK AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10021
ROSTON
2075 PLAYA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009 CARL SBA&^CA-S£P09
FRANK IANNUZZI
1935 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SUZANNE WOOD
1935 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JANE T TAMAKI
1935 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MENG-FANG WU
3167 CAMARILLO AVE
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056
CHARLES D KNOWLTON
1935 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT E
CARLSBAD, CA 92009 ['
HARALD J & DEBORA FREY
7804 CALLE PINABETE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LAURA THOMAS
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HAROLD & BERTHA RICHMAN
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DOROTHY MARX
101 PARK AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10178
MARY B GAUNTT
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SANDRINE BERNIOLLES
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MATTHEW R HARNISH
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT F
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DENISE BAYS
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT G
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NANCY K KAUFMANN
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT H
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RON G TAYLOR
1911 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT I
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
AMY B SOLOMAN
1907 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CLYDE HADLEY
1907 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BRIAN WOLFF
ESTRELLA DE MAR(1907A)
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CT
ARTHUR A RACELA
1903 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RICHARD V DALEY
1903 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DONNA L ALLEN
1903 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALICE FLYNN *M*
445 PULLMAN RD
HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010
GRETCHEN BRAKEBILL
PO BOX 928
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
STEVEN K & DEBORAH MARTIN
28050 GLENMEADE WAY
ESCONDIDO, CA 92026
LINDA DANET
1923 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CHRISTOPHER BALDWIN
1923 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
FRED JONAS
PO BOX 130488
CARLSBAD, CA 92013
MICHAEL A WOLFE
1927 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MITCHELL D & PATRICIA ROBERTA
1927 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MICHAEL & JEANIE SERGENT
1720 KIRK PL
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
MARCIA VANDERWOUDE
9375 WHISPERING SANDS DR
WEST OLIVE, MI 49460
XDJ ESTABLISHMENT
1931 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHARI & MARK COHEN
3217 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RYAN J HENSCH
1931 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009 l"
ROBERT L & JOANNE MARSOLAIS
1915 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ANDREW G ZAFERAKIS
1915 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALFRED HANSER
1915 ESTRELLA DE MAR CT A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ELAINE R CHETISTER
1901 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
STEVEN W CLARE
1901 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
THOMAS L IHLAN
5335 WESTFIELD CT
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035
LISA & ETHEL HERRERA
1901 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JAMES M & TERESE DORR
1901 ALGA RD E
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHEILA SPENCE
1905 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID OGILVIE
1905 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DOUGLAS M LISTER
1905 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARC SANDKNOP
1905 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
KLIEN GARDNER
1909 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DICK AHLBORN *M*
716 BONAIR ST
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
MICHAEL I SHELTON
1909 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ARMSTRONG
1909 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DONAGH MCGOWAN
1909 ALGA RD E
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LINCOLN ENTERPRISES INC
10615 BELLAGIO RD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90077
VELIA TRUJILLO
1913 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHAWN T & FARAH GREEN
1913 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DEREK M CARAVANTES
1913 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
NATALY T PLUTA
1913 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARIANNE R TAYLOR
1913 ALGA RD E
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PHILLIP JARRETT
1913 ALGA RD F
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHEILA A STEPHAN
1913 ALGA RD G
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LORI R CHAMPAGNE
1941 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALPHONSE S KENISON
1941 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LAURA A MITCHELL *M*
1941 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
IRMA R BOWMAN
1941 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BRENDA A KLEIN
1941 ALGA RD F
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALANNA L TRIMBLE
1939 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JASON L MILLER
1939 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GUERRA R ANTHONY & MARIA O
1205 PLEIADES DR
VISTA, CA 92084
JAMES B HARRIS
248 12 S LASKY DR
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212
STEPHEN R BECKNER
1939 ALGA RD E
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JUDITH L WADE
1939 ALGA RD F
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID C & TERESA SCHIEL
1937 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
POLLAK
6341 LINDENHURST AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90048
YUMI SHIMOKATA
1937 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DANIEL LECUNA
1937 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TYRELL J FOLKER
PO BOX 26771
SAN DIEGO, CA 92196
JKRK
217 S CITRUS AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90036
DEBRA CASEY
1933 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CURTIS A HEINZE
1925 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LEE KLEINMAIER
1925 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
EVE O PECK
1925 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ABDENNAIM MARBOUGH
1925 ALGA RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JEAN LARKINS
1103 VIA CARRILLO
SAN MARCOS, CA 92078
LORIS M BAKER
225 WAKE AVE 94B
EL CENTRO, CA 92243
EMANUEL PELUSO
1917 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
FINBARR F WHOOLEY
1917 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DONALD R CONNORS
19960 3RD PL
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
HEACOCK 2002 *M*
266 CALIBAN CT
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
DOUGLAS PARR
1921 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TODD V SCHOLL
1921 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARIO J LOPEZ
680 NE 64TH ST A505
MIAMI, FL 33138
BABY
1929 ALGA RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
VIVIAN W JANSEN
1929 ALGA RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JERRY BRIDGE
1929 ALGA RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
STEVEN M ZIFF
7015 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARY G BRANCIFORTE
7013 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BRIANNA SCOTT
7011 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LESLIE V SCHULTZ
7141 BROOKSHIRE
DALLAS, TX 75230
ESTRELLA DEL MAR PARTNERS
221 N KANSAS ST 1502
EL PASO, TX 79901
MARGARET KENDALL
7005 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD 46
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MATTHEW A BUCUR
6520 ELMCREST DR
SAN DIEGO, CA 92119
PATRICK C & LORNA GRANT
7001 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JACQUELYN M LITTLEFIELD
121 BROADWAY 600
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
JAMES S UKEGAWA
4607 TELESCOPE AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
GLORIA S CHANG
7017 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SUSAN P HALLEN
7023 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BARBARA CHRISTLE
7047 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID C & LISA BERGUM
7045 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BRIAN L & TERI CLEMENT
7043 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD 55
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JOHN A & LINDA ROBINSON
651 W AZALEA DR
CHANDLER, AZ 85248
AARON HUNTER
7039 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DRASIN
18800 PASEO NUEVO DR
TARZANA, CA 91356
REISMAN
7035 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
WILFRED M & JANET ROOF
9862 DARON DR
VILLA PARK, CA 92861
EUGENE C & GWENDOLYN GRITTON
7031 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROBYN SOWELL
7029 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LESLIE V SCHULTZ
7027 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID G & BETH COHEN
10 BRIGGS POND WAY
SHARON, MA 02067
ROBERT S & SHELLY MARCUS
492 BEACON ST 16
BOSTON, MA 02115
M B J LA COSTA PARTNERSHIP
6006 BALCONES CT 18
EL PASO, TX 79912
SALVATORE A SAVASTIO
7059 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
WILLIAM 0 & DORIS YATES
7057 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD V-68
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MICHAEL S LANG
7049 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HOWARD SCHULTZ
9241 HBJ FREEWAY
DALLAS, TX 75243
MANDELL & ROBERTA WHITE
5375 E CAMINO RIO DE LUZ
TUCSON, AZ 85718
TANNER
7055 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JACK R & HARRIET SOWELL
7095 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HIALEAH WEST COAST INC
105 E 21ST ST
HIALEAH, FL 33010
MARY H RYAN
7095 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROSALEE R PASKOW
10155 COLLINS AVE 1710
BAL HARBOUR, FL 33154
ROSE
7079 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHEILA KANE
7079 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DELLA F JANIS
25341 TERRENO DR
MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691
HIALEAH WEST COAST INC
105 E 21ST ST
HIALEAH, FL 33010
BARBRO L HURLOCK
7087 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ANUPAMA N SRINIVASAN
7087 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HELEN KING
503 AVONDALE AVE E
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049
JEFFREY M KLOSKY
7083 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
HIALEAH WEST COAST INC
105 E 21ST ST
HIALEAH, FL 33010
SACHI RAO
7083 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BERAT CORP
1230 BLACKWOOD CLEMENTON RD
CLEMENTON, NJ 08021
JOHN K BERKOSKI
7079 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BENTON & BEVERLY GREENE
7109 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LUPE ORTEGA
7109 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LUPE ORTEGA
7109 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARNI L NEWBY
7109 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
STEPHANIE L HUNTER
1310 S SYCAMORE AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90019
ANNA NORIEGA
7115 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SCOTT L SUMWALT
7115 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD 23C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DARRELL E & CHARLENE HOLT
4817 PALM AVE E
LA MESA, CA 91941
WILLIAM & INA GELFOUND
38 SUNRISE WAY
SEA BRIGHT, NJ 07760
FOX
7127 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
IRA & JANET MARCUS
1313 S ANDREWS AVE
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316
JEROME L & BARBARA SILVERMAN
1400 OCEAN DR 1201A
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 784CJ4
RICHARD J & KAREN RIEHL
7185 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RENE LEONI
7185 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CAROLE D SMITH
7185 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
VALERIE SOBEL
8899 BEVERLY BLVD 111
LOS ANGELES, CA 90048
SHAHRAM & LISA PARVIZ
7189 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LYNDA A MILLER
7189 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
34
JAMES E NETTLE
7189 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SALVAREZZA
110 BRAEMAR DR
HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010
ROSEMARY L SAXON
7193 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD 37A
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROBERT PETERSEN
7193 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARIANNE ENDRISS
7193 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SCOT FERDON
930 VIA MIL CUMBRES 26
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
JOHN LUDEMAN
2043 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BARRY W CLARK
2051 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MACE SIEGEL
PO BOX 2172
SANTA MONICA, CA 90407
EDWARD J & SANDRA MUSBACH
2105 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MELVEN & LYNN GENSER
2113 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BARRY A & ANNE WISH
2121 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JERALD E & MARTHA PITZER
2129 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DAVID L & SHARON NASH
7237 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MARJORIE C NUNAN
7269 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BROWN *B*
7151 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ANDRE JOHNSON
7205 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LAWRENCE CHAPMAN
7213 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
PHILIP G & JOAN LAISNEY
7221 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MICHAEL C ROSTON
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 223
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
DAVID L & SHARON NASH
7237 ALMADEN LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
STEPHEN H & SUSAN HINCKLEY
PO BOX 231787
ENCINITAS, CA 92023
WILLIAM A & JARNETTA KROH
2401 STILL FOREST RD
BALTIMORE, MD 21208
BETTY J PIERATT
1858 TULE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JOHNSON
1859 TULE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
ROBERTA SINGHAUS
1857 TULE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
AL ILA COSTA SENIOR HOUSING I
2177 YOUNGMAN AVE
ST PAUL, MN 55116
GREGG C & KIM VURBEFF
1854 PENTAS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
HORVATH
1856 PENTAS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
SPENCE L & SUE STEVENS
1857 PENTAS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
PHILIP & SHARON PISCOPO
1855 PENTAS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JOHN P & JOELLE NORRIS
1854 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
SHAWN E & DIANA NOLAN
1856 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
KIRK J & MONIQUE WERNER
1859 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
OLIVER FELDHAUSEN
1857 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
WANDA K CZERKAS
1855 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MILTON & AUDREY NIMS
14910 VIA LA SENDA
DEL MAR, CA 92014
JUNE STAMES *M*
1851 LILAC CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MANU & SHANTA NICHANI
7202 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
DARREN L & HEATHER BENNETT
7204 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
CONSTANCE M MARTIN
7206 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
DUNNE
7208 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
HENDERSON & ANGELA NUGENT
7210 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MCMILLEN
30 SEA TER
NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657
EARL & JOYCE STARR
7214 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
WILSON WINEMAN
7216 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
DONALD & MARY SELTZER
7218 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JAMES & SUSAN WADE
7220 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
NORMAN R NELSON
7222 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
PETER VALLEAU
7224 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
CAMERON A & JACQUELINE CLARK
7226 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
LAWRENCE D & ANITA VALENTI
2035 ALGA RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ALLARD ROEN
2050 CALETA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
ROBERT P & LAURA ELLIOT
7080 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MIRKAMALEDIN MOSHIRI
7086 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DON C & ALICE DEVENDORF
2016 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
TIMOTHY S & AMANDA OMALLEY
2028 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DOUGLAS & NANCY HARTWIG
2040 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SEAN RICH
2052 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MCCANN
2029 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
WATTS
2017 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RUSSELL & VICKI DEFRANCESCO
7100 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GREISMAN
477 N EL CAMINO REAL A202
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
JOHN GREISMAN
477 N EL CAMINO REAL A202
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
PAUL W HAWRAN
PO BOX 1162
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
ADAMS
7136 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JAMES B BOND *M*
2041 CARACOL CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SALIMA RUFFIN
7100 ARENAL LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SHARON RUNAGER *M*
1035 SOLANA DR
DEL MAR, CA 92014
JOHN L & KRISTINE HEFFNER
2030 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
KENNETH D & MARY ROLFES
2042 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
DONALD D & DOROTHY AARTHUN
2054 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GOLDMAN 2002
2055 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
RICHARD & JOI CATLIN
2043 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
BARTELL CALIFORNIA PROPERTIED
28041 MOUNTAIN MEADOW RD
ESCONDIDO, CA 92026
RICHARD ROSENBERG *M*
2019 MAR AZUL WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
CUBIC CORP
9333 BALBOA AVE MZ10-
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
JOHN F & THERESA CONWAY
7172 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
SAMUEL & PAULA MILLIMET
7184 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MAX A STEWART
7196 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
G BRAKEBILL
7204 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
GARY F WAGNER
7228 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
GAYLE HOGG
7230 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
WILLIAM FREYBERGER
7232 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
PATRICK J & ANN HUGHES
7223 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MICHELLE K HOBBA
7221 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
ROGER SANDERS
7219 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
THOMAS A & KATHLEEN SNODGRASf
7217 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
WILLIAM E & JUANITA WARREN
18101 MARK CIR
VILLA PARK, CA 92861
MARK & PAMELA EVITTS
7213 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JOHN P SCARPELLI
7211 DURANGO CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
LOREN & MARY ODELL
566 SIERRA MADRE BLVD
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
MARK K & GRETCHEN EMBREE
7206 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
KYLE A SPORMANN
7208 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
TAMAYO
7210 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JAMES T & MONICA EVANS
7212 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
JACK A & CAROLYN KUTTNER
7214 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MARK E & BEVERLEE ABELL
7216 MANZANITA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
RICHARD & LISA ONO
1848 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
STEVE PETTERSEN
2564 NAVARRA DR 202
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JIM M & VICKI RUBY
1856 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
ADAM
1860 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
NIKI L ONEEL
1859 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MARTELL B & DIANE MONTGOMERY
1855 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
DAVID S & ANGELINE MILLER
1851 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
KIM L & POLLY JOHNSON
1847 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
RICHARD FARINELLA
1843 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
MATTHEW K BROWN
1839 LOTUS CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011
CORP LA COSTA RESORT 75 LLC
1105 QUAIL ST
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
CORP RT CORP
DAS
CORP
DAS
LT CORP
RMUDAS
T CORP ORP
ORP
CORP MARK R & JAN DOMASH
8 ROSELEAF
IRVINE, CA 92620
FRANK & SHARON ALESIA
2034 ARENAL RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
FRANK & SHARON ALESIA
2022 ARENAL 'RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
FRANK & SHARON ALESIA
10960 WILSHIRE BLVD 938
LOS ANGELES, CA 90024
ORP
K S CORP
JUNE H DANIELS
7242 ARENAL LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
LARRY D FLEMING
2959 N ROCK RD 5100
WICHITA, KS 67226
MAX SACKS
7210 ARENAL LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
MICHAEL D & MELANIE SHAUGHNEJ
7150 ARENAL LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
JUDITH BRODLIEB
7140 ARENAL LN
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
*** 353 Printed ***
STANLEY & BARBARA E MOURIN
7068 ESTRELLA DE MAR RD
CARLSBAD CA 92009
1
La Costa Resort Lot Line La Costa Resort Lot Line
AdjustmentAdjustment
GPA 05GPA 05--09/ZC 0509/ZC 05--06/MP 0306/MP 03--02(A)02(A)
Location MapLocation Map
ALGA RD
ALICANTE RDEL CAMINO REALMANZANITA STCOLUMBINE DRAVIARA PY
LOTUS CT
CEREUS CT
TULE CT
PAMPLONA WY
LILAC CT
2
LA COSTA RESORT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTBoundary
0400800200Feet
GPA 05-09/ ZC 05-06/ MP 03-02(A)
LA COSTA RESORT LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT
General PlanGeneral Plan
zz Land Use ElementLand Use Element
zz From OS to RLMFrom OS to RLM
zz From RMH to RLM (From RMH to RLM (AlesiaAlesia property)property)
zz From OS to TRFrom OS to TR
zz Open Space and Conservation ElementOpen Space and Conservation Element
3
Zone ChangeZone Change
zz From Planned Community to RFrom Planned Community to R--11--7,5007,500
4
La Costa Resort and Spa MPLa Costa Resort and Spa MP
zz Master Plan amendments to:Master Plan amendments to:
zz Reflect General Plan and Zoning changesReflect General Plan and Zoning changes
zz Modify boundaries of the Master PlanModify boundaries of the Master Plan
zz Minor text changesMinor text changes
5
C
A
L
E
T
A C
T
E S T R E LL A D E MAR RDEL CAMINO REALALGA RD
CARACOL
C
TESTRELLA DE MAR
CT
560Feet
ARENAL LNMAR AZ
UL WYPACIFICO RDEL CAMINO REALP
LAYA RDALMADEN LNA R E N A L R DESTRELLA DE MAR RD540Feet
6
RecommendationRecommendation
That the City Council:That the City Council:
zz Approve the Resolution adopting the Negative Approve the Resolution adopting the Negative
Declaration and approving the GPA Declaration and approving the GPA
zz Approve the Ordinances approving the ZC and Approve the Ordinances approving the ZC and
Master Plan AmendmentMaster Plan Amendment