Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-07-25; City Council; 18666; Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06Q UJSDCQ. QL o oo CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# 18,666 MTG. 7/25/06 DEPT. PLN TITLE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 PUD 04-1 4(A) "TUT} y DEPT.HD. /^^<-— CITY ATTY. ' /ff CITY MGR jdfc^-* RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No.2006-213 _, APPROVING Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-14(A) for Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project application(s) PUD 04-1 4(A) Administrative Approvals Reviewed by and Final at Planning Commission To be Reviewed - Final at Council X On May 17, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential project. Since the Major Planned Development Permit Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action. The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and is for the approval of architecture and plotting of 91 detached single-family dwelling units. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 04-16 and Planned Development Permit PUD 04-14, both of which were approved by the City Council on February 16, 2005. Lots in this neighborhood are a minimum of 6,000 square feet in size. A Planned Development Permit was required because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. The Planning Commission discussed the merits of the application, and voted 6-0 (Commissioner Heinemann absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. There were no public requests to speak about the project at the hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's discussion is included in the attached minutes. A complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning Commission. • ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the 'Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding PAGE 2 Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts have been identified. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-213 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6086 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 17, 2006 5. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 17, 2006. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Jessica Galloway, (760) 602-4631, jgall@ci.carlsbad.ca.us 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-213 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR PLANNED 3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT, PUD 04-14(A) FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR 4 THE DEVELOPMENT OF 91 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA, GREENS 5 NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, AND EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD WITHIN 6 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS 7 NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 CASE NO.: PUD 04-14(A) 8 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 9 follows: 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 11 Commission did, on May 17, 2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to 12 consider a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment; and 13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 25th day of 14 July , 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Major Planned !5 Development Permit Amendment, and at that time received recommendations, objections, 1" protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 04-14(A); and 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: lo 19 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-14(A) is approved by the City Council 21 and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6086, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by 22 reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial 24 Review" shall apply: 25 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 26 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, 27 which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other 28 paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not 1 later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the 2 decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of 3 such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the 4 date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written 5 request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad 6 Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 25th day of July, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: tORrtAINEM. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) o EXHIBIT 2 SITEMAP NOT TO SCALE La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.6 PUD04-14(A) EXHIBIT 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6086 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 4 PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT 5 OF 91 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA, GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06, 6 GENERALLY LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE, AND EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD IN LOCAL 7 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 9 CASE NO.: PUD 04-14(A) 10 WHEREAS, Davidson Homebuilders, LLC., "Developer," has filed a verified 11 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral 12 Management Company, "Owner," described as La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 14 Lots 1-43 and 45-92 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-16, 15 Villages of La Costa - La Costa Greens - Neighborhood 1.06 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, 16 according to map no. 15052 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on July 27, 2005, as file 17 No. 2005-639125 18 19 ("the Property"); and 20 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Major Planned 21 Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "YY" dated May 17, 2006, on 22 file in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 23 1.06 - PUD 04-14(A) as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 24 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of May 2006, hold a 25 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 26 27 28 7 1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 2 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 5 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 6 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS 9 NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 10 Findings: 11 1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included 12 within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for 91 single-family detached units located on previously approved lots with a minimum 1 . area of 6,000 square feet. The proposed project is consistent with Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and all proposed homes comply with the architecture 15 and site planning standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 16 2. That the proposed project's density, site design, and architecture are compatible with surrounding development, in that the existing surrounding residential neighborhoods 17 contain single-family detached homes and the future surrounding neighborhoods in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan will be developed with single-family detached 18 homes. 19 3. The Planning Director has determined that: 20 a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a ~i project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the 22 program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or 23 b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and 24 c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection with the prior project or plan; and d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as 27 significant in the prior EIR; and 28 PCRESONO. 6086 -2- rt 1 e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, 4 which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for 5 this Subsequent Project. 6 4. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10, and all City public facility policies and ^ ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational p facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 10 5. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 11 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project 12 is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan. 14 6. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned, the applicant shall 15 record a notice concerning aircraft noise. The project is compatible with the projected noise levels of the CLUP, and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the 16 CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that the project is not within noise contours greater than 60 CNEL as created by airport operations. 17 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal 18 Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B). 19 8. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 20 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 21 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 22 Conditions: O-5 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of 24 Building Permit. 25 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so 26 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all 27 future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 28 PC RESO NO. 6086 -3- 1 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. 4 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections 5 and modifications to the Major Planned Development Permit Amendment documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on 6 the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to ' this approval. o 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and o regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project 11 are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be 12 invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 14 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and 15 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly 16 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Major Planned Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether 17 discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the , n facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 20 6. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making 21 body. 22 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 24 8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required 25 as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 26 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 27 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that 28 PCRESONO. 6086 -4- , adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. •j 10. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First A Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003) between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project's 5 market rate units, unless both the final decision-making authority of the City and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for 6 development. 7 11. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment by Resolution No. 6086 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a 12 showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 13 12. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 17 13. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, 18 conditions, and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the 19 Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: 21 a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the 22 obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the City has an interest. 23 b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the 24 City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City 25 within 30 days for the official record. c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event 97 that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section the 28 PCRESONO. 6086 -5- City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with _ particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the 4 giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the 5 period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the 6 Owners as provided herein. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the 10 Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in 11 the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City 14 may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all 15 other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share 16 of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any , Q Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration. 20 e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner 21 landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be established by the HO A and set forth in the CC&Rs. 22 f. Landscape Material Restrictions: Restrictions to landscape materials adjacent to conserved habitat areas shall be as set forth in Exhibit Invasive/exotic species not to be used include those listed on Lists A and B of the "Exotic Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California" adopted by the 25 California Exotic Pest Plan Council, October, 1999. 26 g. HCP/OMSP Educational Material: Exhibit describes the importance and sensitivity of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impact to them. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6086 -6- ,- 1 h. Lighting Restrictions on Private Residential Lots: Restrictions on lighting within residential lots adjacent to open space conservation areas shall be as set forth in 2 Exhibit 14. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community 4 Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, 5 then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the 6 existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning ' Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. 9 15. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 10 Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as 11 shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 12 16. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the 14 project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 15 17. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. 16 18. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to 17 the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets. 19 19. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which 20 special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. 21 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice 22 that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). 24 21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice 25 that this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and 26 the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6086 -7- 1 22. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning _ Department). 4 23. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the 5 Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. 6 24. The required recreation area on lot 44 shall obtain approval and begin construction prior to the occupancy of the first unit of either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07, ' whichever occurs first, and shall be approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the units within Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07. o 25. Prior to occupancy of any units within Neighborhood 1.06, 1,820 square feet of permanent RV storage shall be made available in La Costa Greens Neighborhood 10 1.2, or temporary RV storage shall be made available within the Village of La Costa Greens. 11 26. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by CT 04-16 12 in Resolution No. 5840 and PUD 04-14 in Resolution No. 5841, which are incorporated by reference herein. 14 27. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final 15 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07. 16 Fire; 28. Lots 72-91 on Halite which are designated with the letters 'FR' (Fire Resistive) shall be provided with automatic fire sprinkler systems. These systems shall require the installation of one-inch water service meters with the appropriate double-check valves in place. 20 Code Reminders: 21 The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 22 29. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 23 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 24 30. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 25 Code Section 18.04.320. 26 31. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6086 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton ABSENT: & Commissioner Heineman MARTELL B. MONTGOMERY,%Ehairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION DON NEU Assistant Planning Director PC RESO NO. 6086 -9- The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: May 17,2006 Application complete date: January 18, 2006 Project Planner: Jessica Galloway Project Engineer: Glenn Van Peski SUBJECT: PUD Q4-14fA) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 91 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens Neighborhood 1.06, generally located to the north of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Alicante Road in.Local Facilities Management Zone 10. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6086 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-03(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 91 single-family dwelling units located in the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 04-16) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04-14), approved by the City Council on February 16, 2005. A Planned Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 1.06 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section 6.2.7 of the Master Plan, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject neighborhood. At over 50 units the project requires City Council approval. Pursuant to the Master Plan, a common recreation area will be provided on Lot 44, east of Lot 43, which will be designed by the Master Developer and completed prior to occupancy of 50% of the units in either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07. The proposed one and two-story homes consist of four separate and distinct floor plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 2,820 to 4,592 square feet. The project incorporates three architectural elevation styles and nine color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. 3.PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Background On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 04-16 created the residential lots for Neighborhood 1.06. A final map has recorded for The Greens; grading and improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing. Project Description The project site, consisting of Neighborhood 1.06 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's Greens Village, is generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Alicante Road, and is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. The subject neighborhood contains 91 single- family residential lots that are a minimum of 6,000 square feet in size. Pursuant to the Master Plan, Planned Development Permits for neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet require a common recreation area, which will be provided on Lot 44, east of Lot 43. The common recreation area will be designed by the Master Developer and completed prior to occupancy of 50% of the units in either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07. The Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans, elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, four different floor plans are being proposed with living areas ranging in size from approximately 2,820 to 4,592 square feet. Proposed are 8, one-story units and 83, two-story units, each of which have an attached garage providing parking spaces for at least two cars. The project incorporates three architectural elevation styles and nine different color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans Plan No. 1 2 3 1st Floor Sq. Ft. 2,820 1,828 1,931 2nd Floor Sq. Ft. N/A 1,893 1,989 Living Area Sq. Ft. 2,820 3,721 3,920 Garage Sq. Ft. 663 2car + 687 2car + 655 2car + Total Bldg. Sq. Ft. 3,483 4,408 4,575 Architectural Styles Santa Barbara, Tuscan, Monterey Ranch Santa Barbara, Tuscan, Monterey Ranch Santa Barbara Mediterranean, Italian/Tuscan, Monterey Ranch PUD 04-14(A) -VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 3 Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans Continued Plan No. 3X 4 1 st Floor Sq. Ft. 1,819 2,189 2nd Floor Sq. Ft. 1,977 2,403 Living Area Sq. Ft. 3,796 4,592* Garage Sq. Ft. 655 2 car + 816 2car + Total Bldg. Sq. Ft. 4,451 5,408 Architectural Styles Tuscan Santa Barbara, Tuscan, Monterey Ranch * Square footage includes the optional cabana and 5 bedroom To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD) is required for the development of homes in neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(C)) The project is located within the Greens Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. The subject neighborhoods were divided into residential lots through CT 04-16, approved on February 16, 2005, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision were analyzed at that time. The VLCMP required a recreation lot to fulfill the recreation requirements of Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07. Initially the recreation lot was to be provided as part of Neighborhood 1.07. However, the purchase of an elementary school site by the Carlsbad Unified School District will now greatly reduce the overall size and scope of Neighborhood 1.07. The result will be the development of a recreation lot in Neighborhood 1.06, to meet the combined recreation requirement for Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07. The recreation requirement for Neighborhood 1.06 and 1.07 is approximately 16,200 square feet, and the subject neighborhood includes a recreation area of approximately 17,000 square feet. The required recreation area on Lot 44 per CT 04-16, shall obtain approval and begin construction prior to occupancy of the first unit in either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07, whichever occurs first, and shall be approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the units within Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan ~) PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 4 villages. The following Table 2 shows compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan. Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) 15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages) A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5' minimum setback from property line. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 22.37' Please refer to the attached 'Individual Lot Data' table for compliance with 15' minimum. All lots comply. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.6) Varies according to Neighborhood's minimum lot size • Min. 4,500 SF lot: 15' minimum setback • Min. 5,000 SF lot: 15' minimum setback • Min. 6,000 SF lot: 15' minimum setback Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15' All lots comply with Minimum 6,000 SF lot: 15' minimum rear yard setback. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C) Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60' wide Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60' and wider Minimum of 5' per side Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20' in aggregate Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5' At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. Please refer to the attached 'Individual Lot Data' table for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. Side yard offsets and cutouts are provided on Plans 2,3,3X & 4 that average greater than a 7' setback Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum All street side setbacks of 10' minimum have been met. Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units meet the required slope edge setbacks. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details. Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1) Lot widths vary from 45' to 70' 4,500 SF lots: 45' 5,000 SF lots: 50' 6,000 SF lots: 50' 7,500 SF lots: 60' 10,000 SF lots: 70' All lots were previously approved by CT 04-16 and have a minimum width of 50'. PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 PaeeS Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Continued Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 1-story units: 50% of net pad area 2-story units: 40% of net pad area Includes: • Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Judes: Exterior structures such as covered porches Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8' from the building Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22' and a width of 8' Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the face of any building Awnings Open parking areas Structures under 30" in height Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Maximum lot coverages: Plan 1 = 3,483 SF Plan 2 = 2,515 SF Plan 3 = 2,586 SF Plan 3X = 2,474 SF Plan 4 = 3,005 SF Plan type 1 is a single-story unit and where plotted complies with the maximum lot coverage of 50%. Plan types 2 thru 4 are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% of net pad area as required. Please refer to attached 'Individual Lot Data' table for building coverage. For the calculations we have used the largest footprint square footage for each plan type. In some cases the footprint maybe less per elevation. All lots comply. Building Height (4.6.3.B.1) Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Plan 1 = 21 '-0" max.; 1 story Plan 2 = 27'-0" max.; 2 story Plan 3 & 3X = 27'-0" max.; 2 story Plan 4 = 27'-0" max.; 2 story Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.e & 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45* of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan 1 2 3 3X 4 4 w/ opt SB 3 5 5 5 5 5 T 4 4 5 5 4 4 MR 4 6 5 5 5 6 Plans 1 (IT & MR), 2 (all elev.), 3 (all elev.) & 4 (all elev.) are plotted on 88 lots Total of 88 units meet this requirement or 96.7% Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan 1 2 3 3X 4 4 w/ opt SB 3 3 3 5 4 4 T 3 3 4 5 4 4 MR 3 3 4 5 4 4 Plans 3 (IT & MR), 3X (all elev.) & 4 (all elev.) are plotted on 49 lots Total of 49 units meet this requirement or 53.8% Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to the attached "Building Design Element Matrix" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 6 Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Continued Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to the "Building Design Element Matrix" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation types. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads (4.6.3.A.l.a) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each of the proposed elevations. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.c&4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes four floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Single-Story Units (5.7.3.6.0, 5.7.3.12.o & 4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single- story. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15', (10' preferred). Neighborhood has been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop that is visible form a circulation element roadway by the Master Plan. There are 38 homes located on the ridge line , the project is required and provides 8 single story units. Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n & 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided. All proposed plans comply. Plan 1: 0% Plan 2: 75.3% Plan 3: 76.9% Plan3X: 79.9% Plan 4: 80.0% Plan 4 w/opt: 80.0% Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10" deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan types 1,3 and 3X incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building and are plotted where there are 3 units with less than 15' between them. Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with 15 ft to 20 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.C) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan types 1,2, 3 and 3X incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 5' wide and runs the length of the building and are plotted where there are 3 units with 15' to 20' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. All plan types, except for the Plan 2 EC incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the width and a minimum of 3' deep. Plan 1: 100.0% Plan 2: 45.8% (23.2% on IT elev) Plan 3 &3X: 100.0% Plan 4: 62.1% on SB & MR elev (40.7% on IT elev Plan 4 w/ opt: 83.2% on SB & MR elev (57.9% on IT elev) Plan types 1-4, except for the Plan 2 IT, are plotted on 85 lots, or 93.4% of the unit mix, meeting this requirement 3..PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17,2006 Page? Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Continued Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9,4.6.2.B.2.f& 4.6.2.B.3) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10'. Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'. A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. 72.5% of the elevations incorporate a balcony (SB and MR elev. styles of the Plan 2, SB and IT elev. styles of the Plan 3/3X & all elev. styles for the Plan 4). 72.5% of the units proposed within the development comply. Please refer to the enclosed architecture and site plan for compliance. Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the side yard setback more than 2' nor are any projections greater than 8' in length. All plans comply. Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: • Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking • "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking • Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. • More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) Lot 44 of CT 04-16 is the required recreation lot for the subject neighborhood and adjacent Neighborhood 1.07. The parking for the recreation lot was previously approved on-street with CT 04-16. Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'. Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. All plan types include at a minimum one 2- car garage with an interior measurement of 20' x 20'. PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17,2006 Page 8 Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Continued Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b,4.6.3.B.4.h, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sf. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations) Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages) All setbacks for garages that face the street are greater than or equal to 20'. All proposed 3-car garages are of a tandem or side-loaded configuration. Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k&4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. Minimum roof pitch of 3:12 A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. Typical roof pitches: Planl: 4:12 Plan 2: 4:12 Plan 3: 4:12 Plan3X: 4:12 Plan 4: 4:12 Colors (4.6.3.B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to show compliance. Please refer to the color and materials boards for details on each color scheme and to the site plan for specific plotting. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All plan types comply. 33 PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 9 Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table Continued Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 6.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Spanish Colonial Monterey Ranch Italian/Tuscan European Country California Coastal California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 only) The elevation types included are as follows: Santa Barbara Tuscan Monterrey Ranch Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.i&4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall by used (no mill finishes). ."Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure 2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All chimney and their caps comply with proper scale and proportion. Plan type 2 includes one standard fireplace/chimney and two optional fireplaces/chimneys. However as noted on the architecture plans only one of the two optional fireplaces may be optioned in order to comply with the Master Plan. Window Detailing (4.6.3.B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Deeply recessed windows Paned windows Decorative window ledges Accent and varied shape windows Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports Exterior wood trim surrounds Accent colors on shutters or other elements Arched elements Shutters Raised stucco trim around windows Window lintels The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2 such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation and floor plan (see Attachment No. 7). The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 04-04. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 May 17, 2006 Page 10 evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6068 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Table "Individual Lot Data" 7. Table "Building Elevation Design Elements" 8. Reduced Exhibits 9. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "YY" dated May 17,2006 CASE NO: BACKGROUND DATA SHEET PUD 04-14(A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 APPLICANT: DAVIDSON HOMEBUILDERS LLC REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 91 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens Neighborhood 1.06, generally located to the north of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Alicante Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-43 and 45-92 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-16, Villages of La Costa — La Costa Greens - Neighborhood 1.06 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map no. 15052 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on July 27. 2005 as file no. 2005-639125. APN: 213-280-1 thru 39: 213-2821 thru 17. and 213-283-1 thru 23 Acres: 36_ Lots/Units: 91 Units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 0-4 du/ac Density Proposed: 2.5 du/ac Existing Zone: P-C (R-l per VLCMP) Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Proposed No. of Site North South East West P-C(OSperVLCMP) P-C (R-l per VLCMP) P-C (OS per VLCMP) General Plan RLMP-C(R-lperVLCMP) P-C (R-l per Bressi Ranch) RLM OS RLM OS Current Land Use Vacant Developing SFR Vacant Developing SFR Vacant Revised 01/06 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: I I Yes ER] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: | | Yes [X] No Coastal Development Permit: [~] Yes ^ No Local Coastal Program Amendment: | | Yes [X] No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 91 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption,, Negative Declaration, issued_ X] Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23. 2001 (EIR 98-07) Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: CT04-16/PUD 04-14 (A) LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 10 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: R-l DEVELOPER'S NAME: Davidson Homebuilders LLC ADDRESS: 1302 Camino del Mar. Del Mar CA 92014 PHONE NO.: 858-259-8500 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 213-280-1 thru 39: 213-2821 thru 17. and 213-283-1 thru 23 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT : 36 acres A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 316.38 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 168.74 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 91 D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.63 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 242.3 CFS Identify Drainage Basin = D F. Circulation: Demand in ADT= 910 G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 and 5 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 0.11 I. Schools: Elementary 21.3 students Middle 10.65 students High 13.12 students J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 91 K. Water: Demand in GPD= 20.020 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant' s agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)^ Person V/<!g/yV' ^-Qa^^u. _ Corp/Part Davidson Homebuilders, LLC TitleTitle Address Address 1 302 Camino del Mar Del Mar. CA 92014 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management Company x Title Title Address Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180 Carlsbad. CA 92008 1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.oarlsbad.ca.us NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-ppofit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust. Title Address Non Profit/Trust. Title Address Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes [Xj No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signal; ire of owner/date Agent for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle President of Morrow Development Print or type name of owner Print or type name of appJicam Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 30 Individual Lot Data La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 Lots 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »tv^44",^'- 45 46 47 48 49 50 . 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Plan 4* 1 3 1 3 1 4* 3 2 R 1 4- 1 4 3 2 2 R 4 R 3 2 4 1 3 2 3 R 1 R 3 3X 2 R 1 R 4* R 3 2 R 3X R 2 R 4 3 R 2 3 R 2 R 4* R 3 R 4* R 2 R Common; Rec 3 2 3 2 4* R 3 4* 3 2 3X 4* 2 R 3 R 4* R 3 R 2 R 3 R 2 3X R 2 R 3 R 4* R 3 R 4* R 3 R 4* Elevation C B C . A B C • B C -.' A B C A B A C B A C A B A C B A B C A B- : C A B C B A C B C . A B • C A C A reation'Lot". C A A C B A B C A C B C . B A C B A B B C A C B A C A Color 8 7 6 .. .5 3 : 6 • - -1 : 9 7 5 2 B 7 6 5 4 : 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 3 4 5 2 B 4 8 3 1 2 3 4 6 8 1 3 4 5 8 2 <5^/V^#i 1 3 5 7 9 5 7 9 2 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 1 9 4 6 8 4 1 2 3 4 Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 23.37 18.80 23.01 19.99 22.35 19.40 15.00 15.00 15.00 19.73 24.87 20.43 27.46 15.00 19.20 19.73 24.36 15.00 15.00 24.62 21.30 20.85 15.00 20.62 18.39 21.61 29.75 19.82 20.45 21.55 15.00 15.00 15.00 17.91 27.82 15.00 21.03 15.00 18.32 18.47 25.55 15.00 23.10*»^ oorj: 20.33 15.00 19.54 15.00 18.58 24.80 19.87 15.00 15.00 15.00 25.32 15.00 15.00 15.00 20.85 19.72 15.00 19.82 20.55 18.16 15.00 15.00 25.09 27.05 29.75 26.05 19 20.5 23.8 -19.2 26.1 23.4 '•• •- 27 A 15 22.4 • 24.6 .: 39.9 28.9 - •:•• 20.7 22.3 .- 26.7 •• 24.5 23.4 22.6 25.2 22 21.5 20.7 24.3 - 16.1 27.8 15 18.3 34.7 29.9 45.4 23.2 18.9 15.2 21.1 15 17.9 22.5 17.6 21.8 20 : 34.1 37.5 33 rfs **j.r. 16.5 21.7 16 17.3 17.9 30.1 26.5 18.8 21 16.1 26.5 20.4 17.2 19.1 21 21.3 33.2 40.5 40.3 54.8 57.4 17.4 61 50.3 51.2 47.5 12 16.9 17.4 . 16.8 ••;•• 12.2 7.5 7.5 : 8 I--- 7.5 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.5 6 6.2 7.5 8.5 8.3 6.3 6 6 7.5 20.6 7.5 5.3 25.2 5 5 6.5 5.3 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.9 9.6 6 6.5 7 6.6 5 6.2 5.1 9.3 ••f.'tWi'*- 9 8.8 7.8 8.1 10.6 8.8 9 9 8.2 6.6 24.7 8 5.7 5 7.6 20.3 5 6 5 6.3 7.5 28.1 7.2 8.5 7.5 8.8 11.3 8.6 7.2 : 7.7 8.4 • - : 5 5 •- . • 5 5 6.3 6.3 6.3 5 6.5 6.3 5 5 V 6.3 7.5 7 6.5 . 9.7 11.8 20 7.2 7.3 15.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 8.5 9.3 7.5 8.3 7.5 7.8 6.8 6.2 7.7 6.6 7.7 6.8 •"SBS-CI-* 28.2 10.2 8.7 9.6 5.7 8.7 8.7 8.5 8.1 9.5 7.2 29.2 7.6 11 8.8 8.8 19.6 6.5 : 7.5 6.2 6 63.7 37.6 14.8 10.4 9.3 : 25.1 : 25.8 29.8 '.- : 22.8 •••••>•• 29.8 23.7 •-•.-• 20 ;. 25.2 - •:•.--, 21 .-.•••-: 23.8 26.6 : 23.9 20.5 28.5 : 23.5 22.9 20.3 25.7 .• 20.5 21.2 26.5 28.3 20.8 28.6 : 20 ••• -, 20 37.2 23 23.8 24.6 29.7 22.6 27.7 20.1 20.3 21.4 23.5 27.6 21.5 20 35.5 20.3 27.9 f, 4^,9 27.9 25.2 24.9w, ~0 36.6 21.6 27.5 21 22.4 32.8 31.9 24.4 •• 20.1 28.3 22.9 27.5 23 28 20.2 : 22.3 43.4 32.6 30.1 37.2 29.1 Porch 17.7 18.5 16.6 ••••. 10.9 ..: 16.5 19.1 . .16.6 17.1 • . , 17.3 12.6 30.7 13.6 13 &*,t>f,,i\ 18.9 Net Pad Area (SF) 8,324 7,444 7,359 7,773 7,113 8,415 8,043 6,806 6,522 7,867 8,955 8,078 6,951 6,678 6,577 6,495 7,888 8,696 8,289 7,315 8,423 7,631 8,739 7,337 7,738 8,629 6,440 6,390 7,256 7,616 7,124 6,986 7,088 7,174 7,606 7,410 7,520 6,670 6,354 8,091 8,767 8,926 8,552 *»!W,G3I 7,886 7,017 6,737 8,810 10,397 8,382 7,993 7,070 6,471 8,372 11,415 6,795 7,937 7,562 7,228 7,921 6,863 6,230 6,207 - 6,381 6,778 11,477 6,763 7,939 9,839 9,134 Building Coverage v Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 3,005 3,483 2,586- 3,483 2,586 3,483 3,005 2,586 2,515 3,483 3,005 3,483 2,760 2,586 2,515 2,515 2,760 2,586 2,515 2,760 3,483 2,586 2,515 2,586 3,483 2,586 2,474 2,515 3,483 3,005 2,586 2,515 2,474 2,515 2,760 2,586 2,515 2,586 2,515 3,005 2,586 3,005 2,515 2,586 2,515 2,586 2,515 3,005 2,586 3,005 2,586 2,515 2,474 3,005 2,515 2.586 3,005 2,586 2,515 2,586 2,495 2,474 2,515 2,586 3,005 2,586 3,005 2,586 3,005 36.1% '• 46.8% -,45.1% 4478% 36.4% 41.4% 37.4% 38.0% 38.6% 44.3% 33.6% 43.1% 39.7% 38.7% 38.2% 38.7% 35.0% 29.7% 30.3% 37.7% 41.4% 33.9% 28.8% 35.2% 45.0% 30.0% 38.4% 39.4% 48.0%. 39.5% 36.3% 36.0% 34.9% 35.1% 36.3% 34.9% 33.4% 38.8% 39.6% 37.1% 29.5% 33.7% 29.4% 32.8% 35.8% 38.4% 28.5% 28.9% 30.9% 37.6% 36.6% 38.9% 29.6% 26.3% 37.0% 32.6% 39.7% 35.8% 31.8% 37.7% 40.0% 39.9% 39.4% 38.2% 26.2% 38.2% 37.9% 26.3% 32.9% 1/5/2006 Page 5 of 6 Neighborhood 1.06 Section B Table 4 31 Individual Lot Data La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 Lot# 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Plan 2 3 4* 3 4* 2 3 4* 3 2 4* R 4*R 3 R 4* R 3 R 2 R 4* R 3 R 4* R 3 R 2 R 4* R Elevation C B C : A B C : A : B c .••• • A ••••' - C-- - - B C A B C B •;• A C - B A - B • Color 5 6 ..... 4: . . 5 6 : .7 • 8 -9 . -. 4 3 . 2 •-. 1 9 8 7 : ; g -.; 5 . . 4 • : 3 2 1 9 Average Neighborhood Setback: Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 26.18 27.06 28.77 35.85 32.97 38.28 38.75 34.24 41.60 39.11 38.77 42.08 26.96 29.47 30.41 31.99 31.97 33.55 25.74 25.05 26.48 23.37 22.37 74.2 72.3 61.9 67.2 69.2 80.5 ' . 78.2 75 82.3 98 ,' . 94.2 45.2 45.5 52.5 42.9 : 57.7 42.4 37.9 23.7 28.7 :; 31.3 20.6 -V:. 13.6 17.6 .17.8 - 7.5 18.4 ." 19.2 19 ..' 16.2 10.6 7.8 9.1 f-. 7.5 6.9 5.7 7.6 ; 8.6 ...- 7.1 -7.5 >• 6.5 8.5 8.5 13 : : 8.9 7.9 7.7 5 5.6 6.3 6.5 8.3 : 6.9 8.5 5 5 8.6 10.8 , .14.8 •20 19.4 19 20 '• 18 : 18 15 30.3 36 30.5 43.3 34.7 42.4 46.2 '- 36 50.6 : • 44.1 38.4 50.4 32.5 25.4 37.5 36.1 33.7 41 27.5 32.5 29.7 25.1 Porch 23 39.6 20 Net Pad Area (SF) 6,986 6,790 7,792 9,241 9,498 9,764 10,140 10,920 11,069 12,604 12,833 13,597 10,032 11,355 9,939 9,134 9,491 8,785 8,101 7,567 7,405 8,545 Building Coverage1' Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,515 2,586 3,005' 2,586 3,005 2,515 2,586 3,005 2,586 2,515 3,005 3,005 2,586 3,005 2,586 2,515 3,005 2,586 3,005 2,586 2,515 3,005 36..0% -38.1% .-TM.6% 28.0% 31.6% 25.8% 25.5% 27.5% 23.4% 20.0% 23.4% 22.1% 25.8% 26.5% 26.0% 27.5% 31.7% 29.4% 37.1% 34.2% 34.0% 35.2% M "Building Coverage1 - net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of Hs surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the building, and porle cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls. * includes optional cabana/office of 245 SF and Bdrm 5 of 196 SF for the Plan 4 Elevation Styles A = Santa Barbara Mediterranean B = Italian/Tuscan C = Monterey Ranch 1/5/2006 Page 6 of 6 Neighborhood 1.06 Section B Table 4 JSzS | <•• BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS |1 PLAN FOUR 1PLAN THREE & THREE X1 PLAN TWO |PLAN ONE| £* 1 e tt IP 1 1 g '"8« S -g s £* I c 1 1 II 1 Santa Bar| Mediterra1 Monterey Ig 5 1 I I ™ •« n I 1 S IPIf II DESIGN ELEMENTSis Is 1 s is I s ! \ is ! s. I s Is i s s s i s Is ! s is Is Is is 1 s Is I s ! Is 1 s | s is Is |s Is 1 s Is Is 1 s 1 I a. Van'etyofRoofplanesS S s s s s s s s s s V s s s s s 1 I i .0 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s \ s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 1 1 u s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 1 d. Exposed Roof Beams or Rafler TailsS S S S S s s s s s s s '1 t! s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s I, Accent Materials such as Stucco,Wood. SidinE and StoneS s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s S s s s | g. Window and Door Lintels, S S s s \ s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s | 1. Accent and Varied Shape WindowsS S s s s s «. Window Boxes and Planters with 1J' Architecturally Evident SunrmrtsS S s s s s s s Ik. Exterior Wood ElementsS S s N S S S S S s s \ s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s \ s s s s s 1. Variations in Colors of Stucco and 1' Other ElementsS S S s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 1Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or 1""' Other ElementsS S S s s s In. Stucco WainscotingS S N S S S 1 o. Covered Balconies^ S S S s s s | p. Arched ElementsS S s s s s s s s | q. ShuttersS S s s s s s s s s «Raised Stucco Trim around Windowsand Dnnrs 1I < 3 a* -I*1 I i Q 2 I Imm CM & en iii ffi '41 i GTIIt 2 Si IPi •r-:£. |9 5 •T^Pi III CO nt<*5*S'' "J S «£ 5 !£•» it UJ "• 3 LU |2 O Z Z ID £ 5 P CO " O Iu 1<r 2. —3 >: &. .LU I U LU O&. Q- _I < U ZOu CO Ou 1Q 1 CO LJLJ Oil O CO Ou CO o1 i ou IQ I CO O CO O U < Cki •O O CO LLJ ou zOCOQ I 00 Z O CO OU ^o I Q 55 OS 3 'I ou OCO Q 1 CO LU OIou5 O CO JTPRfffff S I QCo CO UJ o U Oco Q I CO ZLULU Q^ O COoU CD •31 I s 55 O mmm33333 a ' Ill CO ou zoCOQ ! CO LLJ UJQ-: O COo<J < CO ml o I Q </> t ffc ZZ) Ou OCOQ I CO LUQ^ O Ou o i CO ou OCO O I CO Z LLJ LU O£ou NOo Q<73 t ZZ) Ou Q I QQ CO O CO OU L QCcr 5 El Q 55 is •ft J>.iZ •It S i < !i Z) Ou OCOQ I to Z LU LJJ Q^ O Ou NOo s55 t CO Ou OCO Q O < 2 CO OU LL 8 Q $Q CO Z LLJ LLJ O$Ou o S55 t z § g, ll Ou oCO Q I CO LU Q^ O < 2 COo U 5 SS < A J~~~ I; i COLLJ o«J Q I CO o Ou 3 oIsi S55 S s! CO oU OCOQ 1 CO CO O COo O il coLU ou O COQ I CD CO o COou cctf. 5 I i COLLJ ouzo COg1 CO CO Z LLJLLJ 0* O £Ou o ii o w j>y si M CO oU OCOg1 CO O COO U < 2a LL DCt/ Isi S»t toLU oU 1Q I CO LU C£ O £Ou5 NOo I CO o U O 9 I CD C/5z LU LU aio o U 2 Q LL O o toLJLJ ou o COg I CO LU LJJ C^ O CO Ou 3 LL < C cc 1 ?/ p*.s3<s*2 eSffs^g fSgsSg tal*5g* o(J oco Q I CD CO r /•// / .\ Is . LJU O, i<1 to 1 0 E U5^ ^ «isJ cr. 'fa .IE. Us s I LU ou oto Q1 DO CO LULU Q^ O COo U O CO LL •o s s! Q35 t l ou oenQ I CO O COou u ccc/". c/: si >o LL QCcr.I 77 S 55 O li I Ou zOCO Q I CO O Ou 5 a u < (. o O oI CO o U Si oCOg I CO O CO OU U |! Jill i3S 3:Pa .31 o tOuu Ou OtoQ I CO O £Ou O ^y i CO ZID o U OCOQ 1 CO LU LU O £OU a55 IJ coLU ou oCO Q CO O CO OU LL at/ Planning Commission Minutes May 17,2006 "\D J\ CT Page 10 EXHIBITS 6. PUD 04-14(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 91 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens Neighborhood 1.06, generally located to the north of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Alicante Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. Mr. Neu introduced Item 6 and stated Associate Planner Jessica Galloway would make the Staff presentation. Chairperson Montgomery opened the Public Hearing on Item 6. Ms. Galloway gave a presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any questions for Staff. Seeing none, he asked if the Applicant would like to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn & Associates, gave a presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any questions of the Applicant. Commissioner Segall asked if any of the garage door openings were 8 feet wide. Mr. Henthorn stated no. Commission Cardosa asked for an explanation and the implementation of the required recreation area. Mr. Henthorn stated that there is a recreation area required within Neighborhood 1.6. The Master Plan requires that the recreation area be under construction before the first occupancy. It also requires completion before 50 percent of the units in the development are occupied. In addition, the residents in this community will also have access to the main recreation area, known as the Presidio, as shown on the exhibit as the green shaped area. There will be tennis court facilities that will be available immediately to the owners, a city park is within close proximity, and a school that has playfields and recreational areas is also nearby. He reiterated that from the start of the construction the recreational facilities will be available. Commissioner Whitton asked if there will be any blasting in this particular project and if the neighbors have been notified in event of this type of situation. He stated there will be "no" blasting will occur and that the project is in the finished grading and trenching phase. Commissioner Baker asked if this is the project discussed during briefings that could have an area for a pedestrian trail. Mr. Neu stated it is the next item on the agenda. Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any other questions of the Applicant. He asked if any members of the public wished to speak on the item. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6086 recommending approval of Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-03(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. DISCUSSION Chairperson Montgomery thanked Mr. Henthorn for his presentation. He commented that the project is unique site in that the residents are able to walk their children to the nearby school. The school is a nice amenity in the neighborhood. Planning Commission Minutes May 17, 2006 Page 11 VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman Chairperson Montgomery closed the Public Hearing on Item 6, and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 14th, 2006 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 14th Day of July, 2006 Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of QE EUBUC HEABJMfi 1200 6:00 p.m. onrequest lor i merit Permitelevations ni luosuay, JUiv 25, 2006, to consider a lit Amendment for building floor plans,and plotting for the development of 91v datachort nrtfw*"* «j«*.j- **-- • •"• ~ »•« nyiui ui rumsenia Lane,'and east 013 Road in Local Facilities Management Zonemore particularly described as: * U L Wl" "•** «V>. If you have any qilloway in the Plann hearing. CASE FILE: PUD04-14(A) ES OF LA COSTA GREENS PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 21st, 2006 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This21sl, Day of July, 2006 ft X? Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of . that thewill hold ,„, UUMUIIIU noor plans, eleva-tions and plotting for the development of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Cos-ta, Greens Neighborhood 1.07, on property generallylocated north of Poinsettia Lane, east orAlicanteRoad, west of El Fuerte Street, south of GreensNeighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Area 11, andwithin Local Facilities Management Zone 10 andmore particularly described as: Lots 1-71 of Carlsbad Tract 04-15, La Costa Greens- Neighborhoods 1.04 and 1.07 of the Viii«««<- -' • -.e ounty Recorder of San2005, as file no. 2005-639126. ~ u r= Fuuiiu rieanng. Copiesor me agenda bill will be available on andafter July28, 2006. If you have any questions, please call Co-rey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) If you challenge the Planned Development PermitAmendment in court, you may be limited to raisingonly those issues you or someone ejse raised at thepublic hearing described in this notice or in writtencorrespondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad,Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad VillageDrive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the publichearing. CASE FILE: PUD 04-13(A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENSNEIGHBORHOOD 1.07 , 8i'#8o'tfNAcR ltSBAD NCT 1958549- 07/21/06 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 25, 2006, to consider a request for approval of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 91 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens Neighborhood 1.06 generally located to the north of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Alicante Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as: Lots 1-43 and 45-92 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 04-16, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Greens - Neighborhood 1.06 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 15052 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on July 27, 2005, as File No. 2005- 639125. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after July 21,2006. If you have any questions, please call Jessica Galloway in the Planning Department at (760)602-4631. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 04-14(A) CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 PUBLISH: July 14, 2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL SITEMAP NOT TO SCALE La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.6 PUD 04-14(A) Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ,. LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949VIEWRIDGEAVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD STE110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ATTN TED ANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER BOB WOJCIK/GLENN VAN PESKI CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER JESSICA GALLOWAY 06/19/2006 ®091S Aa3AV-OEH)08-L Jaiti and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M STE180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 VINH NGUYEN 6257 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 SAEED SADRI 6261 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 HOE TRAN 6265 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 NICOLAS SKARIC 6269 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANIEL & DALENA LE 6273 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL & JULIE LEVESQUE 6277 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 GREG & SARA KALTENBACH 2561 DOGWOOD RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 MELLOR TR 2565 DOGWOOD RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIN & AMEL ESPOSITO 2569 DOGWOOD RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES JACOB 2582 DOGWOOD RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 KENNETH & REINA ELLIS 2575ARUNDELAVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 GEORGE RAVAZZOLO TR 2571 ARUNDELAVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 ERDEN ALKAR 2563 ARUNDELAVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRESSI GARDENLANE LLC STE 200 24800 CHRISANTA DR MISSION VIEJO CA 92691 GREYSTONE HOMES INC STE 302 1525 FARADAY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BARRATT AMERICAN INC STE 101 5950 PRIESTLY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 MATTHEW & KIM VIERNES 2567 ARUNDEL AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 NHAT DOAN 2559 ARUNDEL AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 MANUEL GARCIA 2555ARUNDELAVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 TOM & VICTORIA PHANCO 6256 ALVERTON DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 JEROME & BEVERLY ROBERTS 2576 ARUNDEL AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 BORIS & RAISA TAYLOR 6270 TOPIARY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 LEE & SEDEN HENDRICKSON 6274 TOPIARY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES & SHAYNE SARCINELLO 6278 TOPIARY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAIME EIB 6282 TOPIARY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSE MORAN 6281 TOPIARY ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 PORTIA MERTAS STE 302 1525 FARADAY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 K HOVNANIAN 2525 CAMPUS DR IRVINE CA 92612 DAVIDSON COMMUNITIES LLC 1302CAMINODELMAR DEL MAR CA 92014 ©cms ®Ail3AV AH3AV-O9-008-1 ®091S *ueqe6 a] aBeuias P la afipnnnnmip nnic irimi Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® CNLM STEM 425 E ALVARADO ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC STEA 5365AVENIDAENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 MORROW DEVELOPMENT STE180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ©09LS AM3AV-OD-008-1 ®091S »ueqe6 aoidej aBemss P is aRpjjnnniiiio iiniccairlim 1 Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 PUD 04-14(A) Location Map HALITE PLMICA RD MU IRFIELD S DRGREENHAVEN DREDENDALE ST 2ALICANTE RDMICA RD P O IN S E T TI A L NHALITE PLEL CAMINO REAL GREENHAVEN DRKEENELAND DR PA RA DISE R D MUI R F IEL DS D R G E O D E L N HUNTI NGTON DRPEPP ERTREE WY DI VI TA DRBRESSI RANCH WY TOPIARY STALLEY 00 DOGWOOD RD EDENDALE STALVERTON DRALLSTON STHERI TAGE DRKYANITE PLARBOR ROSE DRECH O AV0500250Feet PUD 04-14(A) La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.6 Project Background • Project site was previously subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 04-16) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04-14) • Approved by the City Council on February 16, 2005 3 Project Features • Amendment to PUD 04-14(A) for Architecture and Plotting of 91 detached single-family homes • Minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. • 3 floor plans (1 and 2 story construction) • Living area range: 2,820 to 4,592 sq. ft. • Each plan provides 2 – 3 car garages Project Features Cont. • 3 architectural styles (Santa Barbara, Tuscan, and Monterey Ranch) • 9 color schemes • Common recreation area processed separately 4 Project Consistency • The project complies with: – C.M.C 21.45 – Planned Developments – Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98- 01(C) • The project is consistent with: – Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 Recommendation • Recommend to City Council adoption of Resolution No. 6086 • Recommend to City Council adoption of Resolution No. 6086 5 Recommendation •Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6086 to recommend the project to the City Council on May 17, 2006. •Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2006-213 to approve PUD 04-14(A)