HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-08-01; City Council; 18681; Villages of La costa Neighborhood 1.07CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB# 18.681
MTG. 8/1/06
DEPT. PLN
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
PUD 04-13(A)
DEPT. HEAD
CITY ATTY.
CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2006-222 APPROVING Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-13(A) for Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07 as
recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Project application(s)
PUD 04-1 3(A)
Administrative
Approvals
Reviewed by and
Final at Planning
Commission
To be Reviewed -
Final at Council
X
On June 7, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this residential project. Since
the Major Planned Development Permit Amendment is for more than 50 homes, the Planning
Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for its action.
The project is located within the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07 and is for the approval
of architecture and plotting of 71 detached single-family dwelling units. A common recreation area will
be processed as a separate application for the future neighborhood. The lots for this neighborhood were
created through Tentative Map CT 04-15 and Planned Development Permit PUD 04-13, both of which
were approved by the City Council on March 15, 2005. Lots in this neighborhood are a minimum of
5,000 square feet in size. A Planned Development Permit was required because the minimum lot sizes
are less than 7,500 square feet.
The Planning Commission discussed the merits of the application, and voted 6-0 (Commissioner
Heineman absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. There were no public
requests to speak about the project at the hearing.
A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's discussion is included in the attached minutes. A
complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached report to the Planning
Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with
the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final
Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR
98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential
environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)"
and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood projects reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were
approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07
Page 2
project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of
approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations"
applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a
part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no
further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impacts have been identified.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-222
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6113
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated June 7,2006
5. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated June 7, 2006.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Corey Funk, (760) 602-4645, cfunk@ci.cartsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
CONTINUED
WITHDRAWN
AMENDED
H'
D
D
Da
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN
RETURNED TO STAFF
OTHER - SEE MINUTES
D
D
Da
it \
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-222
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAJOR PLANNED
3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR
PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE
4 DEVELOPMENT OF 71 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES
WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA, GREENS
5 NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE, EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD, WEST OF EL
6 FUERTE STREET, SOUTH OF GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06
AND BRESSI RANCH PLANNING AREA 11, AND WITHIN
7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
8 NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
CASE NO.: PUD 04-13(A)
9
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
10 follows:
11 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
12 Commission did, on June 7, 2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
13 consider a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment; and
14 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the lst day of
15 August , 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Major Planned
1" Development Permit Amendment, and at the time received recommendations, objections,
17 protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 04-13(A); and
18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
2Q 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
21 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-13(A) is approved by the City Council
22 and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 6113, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by
23 reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
24 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, 'Time Limits for Judicial
25 Review" shall apply:
26 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
27 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be
sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
28 which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by
1 Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other
paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not
2 later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this
decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
3 decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in
an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of
4 such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in
court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the
5 date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to
the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
6 request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall
be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad
7 Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008."
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad held on the 1st day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
^ j
tORRINEMT WOOD, City'Cletfk
(SEAL)
EXHIBIT 2
NOT TO SCALE
SITEMAP
Villages of La Costa Greens, Neighborhood 1.7
PUD 04-13(A)
EXHIBITS
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6113
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
4 PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS,
ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
5 OF 71 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA, GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07,
6 GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF POINSETTIA LANE,
EAST OF ALICANTE ROAD, WEST OF EL FUERTE STREET,
7 SOUTH OF GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.06 AND BRESSI
RANCH PLANNING AREA 11, AND WITHIN LOCAL
8 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10.
9 CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
10 CASE NO.: PUD 04-13(A)
11 WHEREAS, K. Hovnanian Companies of California, Inc., "Developer," has
filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate
Collateral Management Company, "Owner," described as
14 Lots 1 - 71 of Carlsbad Tract 04-15, La Costa Greens -
15 Neighborhoods 1.04 and 1.07 of the Villages of La Costa, per
final map no. 15053 filed in the Office of the County Recorder
16 of San Diego County, July 27,2005, as file no. 2005-639126
17 ("the Property"); and
1 8 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Major Planned
19 Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "LL" dated June 7, 2006, on file
20
in the Planning Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
21
- PUD 04-13(A) as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
22
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 7th day of June, 2006, hold a
..,. duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
25 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
26 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
27 relating to the Major Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment.
28
7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
3
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
4 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
5 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS
NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07, based on the following findings and subject to the
6 following conditions:
7 Findings;
Q
1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included
within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for
10 71 single-family detached units located on previously approved lots with a minimum
area of 5,000 square feet. The proposed project is consistent with Chapter 21.45 of
11 the Carlsbad Municipal Code and all proposed homes comply with the architecture
and site planning standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
12
2. That the proposed project's density, site design and architecture are compatible with
13 surrounding development, in that there are existing and future single-family
residential neighborhoods to the north and east of the site which are similar in
character and density.
3. The Planning Director has determined that:
a. the project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a
17 project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has
been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the
18 program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the
activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or
19
b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and
c. the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection
with the prior project or plan; and
22
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant
23 in the prior EIR; and
24 e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR
under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and
f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
27 which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed,
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -2- O
1 incorporated into the project design o^ are required as conditions of approval for
this Subsequent Project.
2
_ 4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and all City public facility policies and
4 ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer
5 collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other
recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space,
6 related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent
with need.
7
5. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
o created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project
is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the
10 Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan.
11 6. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April 1994, in that as conditioned the applicant shall
12 record a notice concerning aircraft noise. The project is compatible with the projected
noise levels of the CLUP; and, based on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the
CLUP, the proposed land use is compatible with the airport, in that the project is not
, 4 within noise contours greater than 60 CNEL as created by airport operations.
15 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B).
16
8. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
17 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
° degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
19 Conditions:
20
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of
21 Building Permit.
22 1. if any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
» . revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
25 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
26 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Major Planned Development
27 Permit Amendment.
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -3- (\
1 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Major Planned Development Permit Amendment documents,
2 as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on
_ the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits,.
Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to
4 this approval.
5 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
6
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment
of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project
are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code
Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be
invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies
with all requirements of law.
10
5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
11 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims
12 and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly
or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Major Planned Development
Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and
(c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby,
15 including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the
facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
16
6. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar
17 copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making
18
, o 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the
Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its
20 obligation to provide school facilities.
21 8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required
as part of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to
22 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including, but not limited to the
following.23 B
9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing
water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that
25 adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the
time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and
26 facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
27
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -4-
10. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First
Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003)
between Morrow Development and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project's
_ market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the City and the
Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for
4 development.
5 11. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a
Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the
6 satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in
interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Planned Development Permit
7 Amendment by Resolution No. 6113 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall
note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and
° all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion
in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and
record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
1 Q showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
12. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy
#17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
12 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable
13 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 10, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such
taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this
14 approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void.
13. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants,
conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit the
17 Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official
CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning
18 Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
19 a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor
of, or in which the City has an interest.
21 b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
22 City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right
to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City
23 within 30 days for the official record.
24 c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event
that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the
Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section the
City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If
the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the
27 Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with
particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -5- ,.
1 same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the
giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
2 maintenance of-the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the
., period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to
be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the
4 Owners as provided herein.
5 d. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the
necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements,
6 the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the
City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's
' Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the
Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in
full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in
o the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and
payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If
10 the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified,
payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an
11 amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City
may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at
12 law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all
other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special
assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of
14 the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on
the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special
15 assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right
and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot
16 and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any
Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment
17 in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration.
1 O e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HO As and individual lot or unit owner
jo landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be established by the HOA and set
forth in the CC&Rs.
20
f. The proposed project CC&Rs shall provide a list of invasive plant species
21 prohibited from landscaping adjacent to conserved habitat areas.
22 g. Outdoor lighting restrictions for private residential lots located adjacent to the
HCP/OMSP shall be noted in the proposed project CC&Rs.
24 h. Educational materials regarding the sensitivity of the HCP/OMSP shall be given
to the proposed Project Residents as part of the CC&Rs. The material shall
25 state the importance of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impacts to
them.
26
i. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur
27 within the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -6- /-
1 rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall
be obtained prior to installation from the Building Department.
- j. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs
shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone.
4 14. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community
5 Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council
Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers,
6 then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer
shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the
existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for
the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the
o fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information
regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
10
15. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to
11 the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed
or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and
12 existing schools, parks and streets.
13 16. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which
special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain
posted until ALL of the units are sold.
15
17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice
16 that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing El
Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane Transportation Corridors, in a form meeting the
17 approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the
Planning Department).18
1 n 18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice
that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from
20 McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and
the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
21
19. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices
22 associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning
Department).
24 20. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance
25 with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall require review and approval of the
Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
26
27
28 PCRESONO. 6113 -7-
1 21. The required recreation area in Neighborhood 1.06 shall obtain approval and begin
construction prior to the occupancy of the first unit of either Neighborhood 1.06 or
1.07, whichever occurs first, and shall be approved for use prior to the occupancy of
_ 50% of the units within Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07 combined.
4 22. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an interior noise assessment to determine
proper architectural treatments (i.e., specialized door and window treatments) shall
5 be required for project lots where the CNEL exceeds 60 dBA at the second story as
identified in the Acoustical Site Assessment for the Villages of La Costa Greens
6 Planning Area 1.07 (Investigative Science and Engineering, 6/8/04).
23. Prior to occupancy of any units within Neighborhood 1.07, 1,420 square feet of
permanent R.V. storage shall be made available in La Costa Greens Neighborhood
1.2, or temporary R.V. storage shall be made available within the Village of La
9 Costa Greens.
10 24. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Developer shall record a Notice that
this property may be subject to noise impacts from a future school site and odor
11 impacts from an existing sewer lift station, in a form meeting the approval of the
Planning Director and City Attorney.12
25. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by MP 98-
13 01(D) in Resolution No. 5837, CT 04-15 in Resolution No. 5838 and PUD 04-13 in
14 Resolution No. 5839, which are incorporated by reference herein.
15 26. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures
required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final
16 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation
Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations
contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured
slopes.
19 Engineering:
20 General
21
27. Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval for CT 04-15, which are
22 incorporated by reference.
23
24
25
26
27
28 PCRESONO. 6113 -8-
1 28. Developer shall install sight distance corridors (see below for types) at all street
intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards.
3 Type II
"No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object shall be placed or
4 permitted on the subject property within an intersection sight distance
corridor established per Carlsbad Engineering Standards, Volume 1,
5 Chapter 3, Section 8.B. The underlying property owner shall maintain this
condition."
6
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any grading or
' landscape plan prepared in association with this development.
g
Fees/Agreements
9 29. Developer shall cause property owner to execute, record and submit a recorded copy to
10 the City Engineer, a deed restriction on the property which relates to the proposed sight
distance corridors as shown on the Site Plan over lot 34. The deed restriction document
11 shall be in a form acceptable to the City Engineer and shall:
12 A. Clearly delineate the limits of the sight distance corridors on a plat to be
attached to the deed restriction;
,4 B. State that the sight distance corridor is to be maintained in perpetuity by the
underlying property owner; and
15
C. State that objects along the sight distance corridor will not restrict or impede the
16 ability of motorist at the intersection to identify approaching vehicles
pursuant to Caltrans sight distance and City sight distance corridor
17 standards.
18 Grading
19 30. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
20 Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start
of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board.
21
31. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site
22 plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a
grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits.
£3
24 Fire:
25 32. Developer shall provide a copy of the CC&Rs for Fire Department review and
approval with respect to language describing construction and protective measures
26 to be provided for any lot or parcel that is adjacent to or influenced by either
natural native vegetation or Fire Protection Zones. CC&R protective measures
27 shall include:
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -9-
1 a. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur
within the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire
rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials
- ' shall be obtained prior to installation from the Building Department.
4 b. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs
shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone.
5
33. Lots 16, 17, 28 and 38 shall be provided with "Fire Resistive" construction as
6 defined in the Carlsbad Building Code and/or any other model or prescriptive code
adopted by the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, or the State of California,
' where that structure is adjacent to or within any Fire Protection Zone.
Code Reminders;
9 The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to
10 the following:
11 34. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
12
35. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance
14 with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
15
36. Some improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and/or required by these
16 conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of
title or interest. The Developer shall immediately initiate negations to acquire such
property. The Developer shall use its best efforts to effectuate negotiated acquisition. If
unsuccessful, Developer shall demonstrate to the City Engineer its best efforts, and
, n comply with requirements of Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.095 to notify and
enable the City to successfully acquire said property by condemnation.
20
37. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal
21 Code Section 18.04.320.
22 38. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
24
25
26
27
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -10-
1 NOTICE
2 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
3 dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
4
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
7 follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
8
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
9 DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
10 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
12 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
13 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of June 2006, by the
14
following vote, to wit:
15
AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa,
Dominguez, Segall, and Whitton
lg NOES:
19 ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
20 ABSTAIN^
21
22
23
24
ATTEST:
25 "
26
DON NEU
97^' Assistant Planning Director
28
PCRESONO. 6113 -11-
MARTELL B. MONTfrOMER^jphairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: June 7, 2006
Application complete date: January 26, 2006
Project Planner: Corey Funk
Project Engineer: Bob Wojcik
SUBJECT: PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD
1.07 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the
previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a
recommendation of approval of a Major Planned Development Permit
Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development
of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens
Neighborhood 1.07, generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante
Road, west of El Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi
Ranch Planning Area 11, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
I.RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6113
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD
04-13(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 71 single-family dwelling
units located in the Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07. The lots for these
neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 04-15) and Planned Development
Permit (PUD 04-13), approved by the City Council on March 15, 2005. A Planned Development
Permit was required for Neighborhood 1.07 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500
square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to Section
5.2.8 of the Master Plan, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for
the subject neighborhood. At over 50 units the project requires City Council approval. Pursuant
to the Master Plan, a common recreation area for Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhoods
1.06 and 1.07 will be provided on Lot 44 of Neighborhood 1.06, which will be designed by the
Master Developer and completed prior to occupancy of 50% of the units in either Neighborhood
1.06 or 1.07. The proposed one and two-story homes consist of four separate and distinct floor
plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 1,950 to 3,280 square feet. The project
incorporates four distinct architectural elevation styles and twelve color schemes to provide
variation throughout the project. The project complies with City standards including the Villages
of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being
requested.
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORFTOD 1.07
June 7,2006
Page 2
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 04-15 created the
residential lots for Neighborhood 1.07. A final map has recorded for The Greens; grading and
improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing.
Project Description
The project site, consisting of Neighborhood 1.07 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's
Greens Village, is generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante Road, west of El
Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Planning Area 11, and
within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. The subject neighborhood contains 71 single-
family residential lots that are a minimum size of 5,000 square feet. Pursuant to the Master Plan,
Planned Development Permits for neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of less than 7,500
square feet require a common recreation area, which will be proposed at a later time as a separate
Planned Development Permit Amendment. The recreation area will be provided on Lot 44 of
Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and will serve Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07.
The common recreation area will be designed by the Master Developer and completed prior to
occupancy of 50% of the units in either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07. The Master Plan provides
for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Major Planned Development
Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the previous approval,
the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans, elevations, and
plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, four different floor plans are being proposed with living
areas ranging in size from approximately 1,950 to 3,280 square feet. Plans 2X and 3X are
variations of Plan 2 and 3 respectively, and incorporate a slightly reduced building footprint.
Proposed are 3, one-story units and 68, two-story units, each of which have an attached garage
providing parking spaces for a minimum of two cars. The project incorporates four distinct
architectural elevation styles and twelve different color schemes to provide variation throughout
the project. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles:
//
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHTOD 1.07
June 7, 2006
Page 3
Table 1 - Summary of Floor Plans
Plan No.
1
2
2X
3
3X
4
1st Floor
Sq. Ft.
1,953
1,604
1,580
1,571
1,571
1,517
2nd
Floor
Sq. Ft.
1,502
1,502
1,710
1,604
1,695
Living
Area Sq.
Ft.
1,953
3,106
3,082
3,281
3,175
3,212
Garage
Sq. Ft.
430
2 car
598
3 car
451
2 car
592
3 car
433
2 car
602
3 car
Total
Bldg. Sq.
Ft.
2,383
3,704
3,533
3,875
3,608
3,814
Architectural Styles
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Italianate
Spanish Colonial,
Italianate,
European Cottage
Spanish Colonial,
Italianate,
European Cottage
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
European Cottage
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
European Cottage
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Italianate
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Development
Permit Amendment is required for the development of homes in neighborhoods with minimum
lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(C))
The project is located within the Greens Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and
timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhoods were divided into residential lots through CT 04-15, approved on
March 15, 2005, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision were
analyzed at that time.
The VLCMP required a recreation lot to fulfill the recreation requirements of Neighborhoods
1.06 and 1.07. Initially the recreation lot was to be provided as part of Neighborhood 1.07.
However, the purchase of an elementary school site by the Carlsbad Unified School District has
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES
June 7,2006
Page 4
f LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBO'RHm D 1.07
greatly reduced the overall size and scope of Neighborhood 1.07. The result will be the
development of a recreation lot in Neighborhood 1.06, to meet the combined recreation
requirement for Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07. The recreation requirement for Neighborhood
1.06 and 1.07 is approximately 16,200 square feet, and the Master Developer proposes a
recreation area of approximately 17,000 square feet. The required recreation area on Lot 44 per
CT 04-16, shall obtain approval and begin construction prior to occupancy of the first unit of
either Neighborhood 1.06 or 1.07, whichever occurs first, and shall be approved for use prior to
the occupancy of 50% of the units within Neighborhoods 1.06 and 1.07 combined.
To comply with the Master Plan requirements for maximum lot coverage (40% for two story
homes), Plan 2X and 3X were designed without a third car garage to create a reduced building
footprint. Plan 2X and 3X are otherwise similar to Plan 2 and 3 respectively and are plotted a
total of twelve times in the neighborhood.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following Table 2 shows compliance of the proposed project with the
Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan.
Table 2 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance Table
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Front Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.a)
15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average
(See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages)
A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard
setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage
configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size
and must have a 5' minimum setback from property line.
Neighborhood Average Front Yard
Setback = 20.51'
Please refer to the attached "Individual
Lot Data" table for compliance with 15'
minimum setback. All lots comply.
Rear Yard Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.6)
Varies according to Neighborhood's minimum lot size
• Min. 4,500 SF lot: 15' minimum setback
• Min. 5,000 SF lot: 15' minimum setback
• Min. 6,000 SF lot: 20' minimum setback
Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15'
All lots comply with Minimum 5,000 SF
lot: 15' minimum rear yard setback.
All lots provide the required 15' x 15'
usable rear yard area.
Side Yards
(4.6.2.B.2.C)
Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less
than 60' wide
Combined 20% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots 60'
and wider
Minimum of 5' per side
Maximum setback does not need to exceed 20' in aggregate
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5'
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side
elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side
yard setback averages a minimum of 7'.
Please refer to the attached "Individual
Lot Data" table for side yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Plan types 2, 2X, 3 and 3X incorporate
side yard courtyards and offsets. These
plan types are plotted on 43 lots or
60.6% of the total unit mix.
Street Side Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.d)
10' minimum All street side setbacks of 10'
minimum have been met.
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES
June 7,2006
PaeeS
f LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORPTOD 1.07
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Slope Edge Building
Setback
(4.3.4)
All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops
and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than
15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude
into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is
measured from the edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building
setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted
with all other development application requirements.
All proposed units meet the required
slope edge setbacks. Please refer to the
Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits
on the enclosed plans for further details.
Lot Width
(4.6.2.B.1)
Lot widths vary from 45' to 70'
4,500 SF lots: 45'
5,000 SF lots: 50'
6,000 SF lots: 50'
7,500 SF lots: 60'
10,000 SF lots: 70'
All lots were previously approved by CT
04-15 and have a minimum width of 50'.
Building Coverage
(4.6.3.B.2)
1-story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
• Garages and the perimeter area of a basement.
Excludes:
• Exterior structures such as covered porches
• Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings
such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8' from
the building
• Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22' and a width of
8'
• Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the face of any
building
• Awnings
• Open parking areas
• Structures under 30" in height
• Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height (wing-walls,
planter walls, grade separation retaining walls).
Lot coverage:
Plan 1 = 2,383 SF
Plan 2 = 2,202 SF
Plan 2X = 2,031 SF
Plan 3 = 2,163 SF
Plan 3X = 2,004 SF
Plan 4 = 2,119 SF
Plan type 1 is a single-story unit and
where plotted complies with the
maximum lot coverage of 50%.
Plan types 2 thru 4 are two-story
structures and do not exceed the
maximum 40% of net pad area as
required.
Please refer to attached "Individual Lot
Data" table for rear yard setbacks.
All lots comply.
Building Height
(4.6.3.B.1)
Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Plan 1 = 16'-10" max., 1 story
Plan 2 & 2X = 28'-6" max., 2 stories
Plan 3 & 3X = 25'-6" max., 2 stories
Plan 4 = 24'-10" max., 2 stories
Front Building Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.e &
4.6.3.B.4.f)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes
with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'.
33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4
separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is
substituted.
Please refer to the architectural plans
for the building plane exhibits.
Plan
1*
2&2X
3&3X
4
SC SB IT EC
* Front planes do not meet the minimum
separation of 10'
Plan 2, 3 & 4 (All elev.) are plotted on
68 lots
Total of 68 units meet this requirement
or 95.8%
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
June 7, 2006
Page 6
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Rear Building Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes
with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and
rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'.
Please refer to the architectural plans
for the building plane exhibits.
Plan
1
2&2X
3&3X
4
SC
2
3
4
4
SB
2
4
4
IT
2
3
4
EC
3
4
Plan 3 & 4 (All elev.) are plotted on 48
lots
Total of 48 units meet this requirement
or 67.6%
Front Building Elevations
(4.6.3.B.6)
Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of
design elements to create character and interest to the home.
These elements vary depending on the architectural style used.
Please refer to the attached "Building
Design Element Matrix" and the
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements incorporated
for each front elevation type. All plan
types and elevation styles comply.
Side & Rear Elevations
(4.6.3.B.7)
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing
incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations
adjacent to public/private roads.
Please refer to the "Building Design
Element Matrix" and the architectural
plans that detail the various design
elements incorporated for each side and
rear elevation types. All plan types and
elevation styles comply.
Elevations Fronting
Circulation Element
Roads(4.6.3.A.1.a)
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to
receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the
roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than
that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall
planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements incorporated
for each of the proposed elevations. All
plan types and elevation styles comply.
Floor Plans
(4.6.3.B.5.C &
4.6.3.B.5.d)
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan.
The proposed project includes four floor
plans with three distinctive elevation
types for each plan. Please refer to the
enclosed architectural plans.
Single-Story Units
(5.7.3.6.0, 5.7.3.12.0 &
4.6.3.B.4.I)
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a
circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be
single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15', (10'
preferred).
This neighborhood has been designated
with a ridgeline or hilltop on 12 lots that
are visible from a Circulation Element
roadway by the Master Plan. Plan 1 is
a single story unit and is plotted 3 times
along the ridgeline, or 25.0%, of the
designated lots, meeting the minimum
20% requirement.
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.B.4.n &
4.6.3.B.5.b)
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square
footage, including all garage area.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the single
story features provided. All proposed
plans comply.
Plan 1: 0%
Plan 2: 68.2%
Plan2X: 74.0%
Plan 3: 79.1%
PlanSX: 80.0%
Plan 4: 80.0%
Where (3) Two Story
Units occur in a row with
less than 15 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b)
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10'
deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'.
Plan types 1, 2 and 2X incorporate a
single story building edge that is at least
10' wide and runs the length of the
building and are plotted where there are
3 units with less than 15' between them.
Where (3) Two Story
Units occur in a row with
15 ft to 20 ft between
homes- (4.6.3.B.4.C)
One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5'
deep and shall run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'.
Plan types 1, 2, 2X, 3 and 3X
ncorporate a single story building edge
:hat is at least 5' wide and runs the
ength of the building and are plotted
where there are 3 units with 15' to 20'
between them.
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES
June 7, 2006
Page?
f LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORtTOD 1.07
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Single-Story Elements
(4.6.3.B.4.d)
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story
element, with a minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or greater than
the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements
qualify.
All plan types, except for the Plan 2/2X
EC and 3/3X SB) incorporate a single
story building element that is greater
than 40% of the width and a minimum of
3' deep.
Percent of Front Elevation Width:
Plan 1:100.0%
Plan 2 & 2X: 72.4% (27.6% on EC elev)
Plan 3 & 3X: 47.6% (22.1% on SB elev)
Plan 4: 62.5%
Plan types 1-4, except for the Plan 2/2X
EC and Plan 3/3X SB, are plotted on 55
lots, or 77.5% of the unit mix, meeting
this requirement
Entries, Front Porches,
Courtyards, & Balconies
(4.6.3.B.9, 4.6.2.B.2.f&
4.6.2.B.3)
25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across
33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony,
whichever is consistent with the architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10'.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided
over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this
purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required
and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane
for the purposes of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap
around the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may
encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard
setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude
up to 2' into the required setbacks.
11.3% of the elevations incorporate a
balcony (SB elev. style of the Plan
3/3X).
21.1% of the elevations incorporate a
front porch (all elev. styles for the Plan
1, SC and IT elev. styles for the Plan
2/2X)
32.4% of the units proposed within the
development comply.
Please refer to the enclosed
architecture and site plan for
compliance.
Octagonal or Round
Entry Tower
(4.6.2.B.3.a)
May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2'.
The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall
be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may
encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required
setback.
A minimum 5' setback must be maintained.
None are proposed within the side yard
setback.
Projections
(4.6.2.B.3)
Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt
courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features
projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required
setbacks.
No projections extend into the side yard
setback more than 2' nor are any
projections greater than 8' in length. All
plans comply.
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES
June 7, 2006
Page 8
f LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07TOI
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Recreation Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Common recreation areas:
• Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking
• "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking
• Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are
required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units.
• More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it
is required to serve requires parking for those additional
units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options)
Not Applicable to this Neighborhood
The common recreation lot for the
subject neighborhood is located within
Neighborhood 1.6
Resident Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.3)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'.
Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in
width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative.
All plan types include at a minimum of
one 2-car garage with an interior
measurement of 20' x 20'.
Garage Criteria
(4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.h,
&4.6.3.B.13)
20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors
face the street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property
line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of
the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25%
of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot
area greater than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater,
an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages
facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50%
of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a
neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street
shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages,
three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes
separated by at least 18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used within each
neighborhood to improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a
maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not
extend to the second story living space.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages)
All setbacks for garages that face the
street are greater than or equal to 20'.
All proposed 3-car garages are of a
tandem or side-loaded configuration.
All side-loaded garages have a setback
of at least 15' and appear as livable
portions of the homes.
Roofs
(4.6.3.B.4.k&4.6.3.B.8)
Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated
into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and
interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to
parallel the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12
A variety of roof forms and massing are
proposed with changes in direction and
pitches. See elevations and roof plans
for compliance.
Typical roof pitches:
Planl: 4:12
Plan 2: 4:12,6:12
Plan 3: 4:12,5:12
Plan 3X: 4:12
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORH
June 7, 2006
Page 9
TO D1.07
Guideline
(VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments
Colors
(4.6.3.B.12)
Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected.
Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations
are acceptable depending upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color
schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same
architectural styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same
architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme.
However, similar or same colors may occur within different color
schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject
unit as well as those directly across the street.
Each plan type plotted on the site plan
includes a color scheme designation to
show compliance. Please refer to the
color and materials boards for details on
each color scheme and to the site plan
for specific plotting.
Accessory Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development
standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
All plan types comply.
Architectural Styles
Permitted
(4.6.3.C & 6.6)
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following
Architectural Styles:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Craftsman Bungalow
Spanish Colonial
Monterey Ranch
Italian/Tuscan
European Country
California Coastal
California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 only)
The elevation types included are as
follows:
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara
Italianate
European Cottage
Design Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.i&4.6.3.B.5.e)
50 /o of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit
shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be
trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window
frames shall by used (no mill finishes).
"Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and
columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed
architectural style.
The windows and doors on the front
elevations are recessed a minimum of
2" and are trimmed with either wood or
raised stucco. Please refer to the
enclosed elevations on the architectural
plans for compliance. All plans comply.
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the
structure
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF.
Please refer to the enclosed elevations
on the architectural plans for
compliance. All chimney and their caps
comply with proper scale and
proportion.
Window Detailing
(4.6.3.B.10)
The design of the windows shall include one or more of the
following features:
Please refer to the enclosed elevations
on the architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
Deeply recessed windows
Paned windows
Decorative window ledges
Accent and varied shape
windows
Window boxes and
planters with
architecturally evident
supports
Exterior wood trim
surrounds
Accent colors on shutters
or other elements
Arched elements
Shutters
Raised stucco trim around
windows
Window lintels
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2
such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation
Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation
and floor plan (see Attachment No. 7).
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's
PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OT LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBOURED 1.07
June 7, 2006
Page 10
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 04-15.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts
would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07). dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning
Consultants, Inc. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development
and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive
of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.07 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are
required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the
Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6113
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Table "Individual Lot Data"
7. Table "Building Elevation Design Elements"
8. Reduced Exhibits
9. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "LL" dated June 7, 2006
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: PUD 04-13(A) __
CASE NAME: Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07
APPLICANT: K. Hovnanian Companies of California, Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA: and a recommendation of approval
of a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and
plotting for the development of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La
Costa, Greens Neighborhood 1.07, generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante
Road, west of El Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Planning
Area 11, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 - 71 of Carlsbad Tract 04-15. La Costa Greens -
Neighborhoods 1.04 and 1.07 of the Villages of La Costa, per final map no. 15053 filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. July 27. 2005. as file no. 2005-639126.
APN: 213-270-01 through 18. 213-271-01 through 31. 213-272-01 through 22 Acres: 27.5
Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 71
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: RLM
Proposed Land Use Designation: RLM
Density Allowed: 0-4 du/ac Density Proposed: N/A - 71 homes on existing lots
Existing Zone: P-C (R-l per VLCMP) Proposed Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
General Plan Current Land Use
Site P-C RLM Vacant
North P-C RLM Future single-family homes
(VLC Greens Neighborhood
1.06)/
Single-family homes (Bressi
Ranch Planning Area 11)
South P-C RLM/ Future school site/
Open Space
East P-C RMH Single-family homes (Bressi
Ranch Planning Area 12)
West P-C O-S/ Open Space/
RLM Future single-family homes
(VLC Greens Neighborhood
1.06)
Revised 01/06
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: I I Yes 1X1 No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes IX| No Coastal Development Permit: I I Yes EX] No
Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes Ex] No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A
Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Leucadia
Wastewater District Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 71
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
XI Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23. 2001 (EIR 98-07)
Revised 01/06 ^ ~/
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: PUD 04-13fA) - Villages of La Costa Greens Neighborhood 1.07
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: H) GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: P-C
DEVELOPER'S NAME: K. Hovnanian Companies of California. Inc.
ADORESS:420 Stevens Ave. Ste 170. Solana Beach. CA 92075
PHONE NO:: (8581 847-9660
271-01 to -31 and 213-272-01 to-22
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 213-270-01 to-18. 213-
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 27.5 acres/71 du
The following facilities impact analysis was conducted for the subdivision of the property by CT
04-15.
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 247
Library: Demand in Square Footage = 132B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. =
Open Space: Acreage Provided =
Schools:
71
.49 acres
N/A
"D"
710
per HCP
J.
K.
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD =
Elementary: 17
Middle: 8
High:10
71
N/A
39.050
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part K. Hovnanian Companies of CA
Title Title
Address Address 420 Stevens Ave. Ste 170
Solana Beach. CA 92075
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management
Company
Title Title
Address Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180
Carlsbad. CA 92008
1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-46OO • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trustf* "~~
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes [XJ No If yes, please indicate person(s):.
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Sig lature ofowner/date Signature of applicant/date
Agent for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle Bob Cummings
President of Morrow Development Area President
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Greens
Neighborhood 1.7
Lot*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Plan
i
2
t
;
t
2
4
2
4
2
3
4
3X
'4
2
4
2X
3X
2X
3X
2X
3
4
3
2
4
2
4
3
4
3
4
3
2
3
4
4
3
1
4
3
2
4
3
1
2X
1
4
3X
4
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
3
2
4
2
4
2X
3X
2X
3X
4
3
R
R
3
R
R
R
R
3
R
^R
R
R
R
R
R
*
R
R
R
R
R
R
;
l
R
?
!
;
R
R
{
R
R
*R
Elevation
C
A
B
D
A
C
B
A
C
D
B
A
D
C
B
A
3
0
3
A
3
3
A
3
3
~
3
3
A
3
3
3
C
3
3
A
3
3
3
C
A
3
A
A
1
B
C
A
3
A
;
J
A
C
J
A
i
)
A
C
i
D
A;
i
A
!
)
A;
A
Color
5
2
12
3
7
4
•
6
9
2
3
10
8
4
1
7
1-
9
2
3
12t
•
11
(5
9t
'
3
10
5
t
9
3
t
7
2
B
4
12
1
2
11
3
8
1
4
2
6
3
1
5
9
3
2
10
1
8
4
11
3
7
2
4
1
10
3
5
2
Average Neighborhood Setback:
Setbacks Ift)
Average Side Yard
Front Rear Left Right Garage
22.96
22.61
16.32
26.31
25.57
26.34
23.24
22.93
24.27
19.27
19.56
19.76
17.82
20.31
22.63
24.96
18.18
20.11
17.82
20.26
17.93
20.11
18.05
15.00
18.64
20.11
22.89
20.85
21.86
22.19
23.53
29.55
25.41
24.30
23.41
21.80
21.92
19.52
19.86
18.78
20.57
17.80
26.42
32.61
23.56
19.12
19.94
18.02
20.57
18.72
21.50
17.80
15.00
19.81
17.80
20.19
15.00
19.35
18.38
15.00
17.60
18.89
20.02
20.35
15.00
19.99
17.82
20.13
17.82
15.00
19.36
20.11
24.7
24.5
29.5
30.I
60.5
70.2
42.4
30.-
19.9
17.4
17.8
17
18.9
20.5
11.5
17.3
26.5
17.2
17.7
17.'
17.8
17.2
17.7
15.!
16.6
15
16.3
45.!
47.!
51.6
58.6
32.4
31.5
36.1
32.6
36.7
46.9
23.7
24
21
17.1
20.1
15
29.8
29.4
25.7
17.1
19.4
20.7
16.8
16.5
21.6
17.2
18.2
19.1
16.9
15.5
17.2
16.6
15.6
20.4
17.3
16.1
18.4
16.1
16.8
17.9
17.3
18.5
15.8
16.5
' "
13.8
14
10.81:
12.'
13
11.4
13.2
6.2
6.2
7.6
6.'
6
9.'
15
20.6
f
BA
5.9
5.9
6.3
5.5
9.3
15
10.8
5
9.8
7.6
11.2
9.2
7.5
6.5
6.6
'6
6
6
75.4
5
7.8
6.1
7.5
6.9
15
5
6.7
6.5
6.3
7.5
20
16.4
8.8
8.8
9
9
9.8
9.7
8.8
9.6
9.6
9
7.6
24.4
11.8
8.2
12
8.3
6.5
7.3
6.9
8.4
19.6
« . *
21.:
6.5
6.6
8.1
13.8
1
9.2
!
7.3
8.'
8.8
7.'
6.5
5
42.4
8.2
20.'
6.2
6.6
6.6
6.2
7
6.2
6
5.E
8.E
6.2
8.S
13.41!
12.3
13
25.8
7.5
7.5
11.9
5
14.7
7.2
6.4
7
7
17.1
7.5
5.8
6
6.7
6.8
7
7.2
11.8
8.7
8.5
8.5
8.7
9.4
13.9
9.8
7.7
12.2
6.9
5
5
6.1
5.8
7.3
7
6.2
6
6.2
7
£ >•* ?!
32.5
23.i
28.'
27.5
35
27.S
32.6
28.5
35.!
20
23.5
26.1
20
22.6
33.2
3C
2C
21.3
20
21.3
20
21.3
20
24.6
20
21.3
30.4
20.5
29.2
23.2
30.4
27.7
34.5
26.5
24.6
24
29
23.4
20
20.6
27.8
20
32
37.3
27.9
21.4
20.9
20
27.8
22.1
29.5
20
25.8
21.3
20
21.3
26.4
20
20
25.8
20
20
26.7
21.4
24.7
21.3
20
21.7
20
25.8
23.1
, ,""*'
Porch
16.'
12.5
19.1
27,1
15.8
18
13.9
15
18.5
11.3
•\2.i
1C
32.7
16.3
1C
16.3
18.9
1C
21.6
15
21.4
25.5
21.3
19.6
22.5
25.3
15.6
19
10
44.4
15.3
10
14.5
19
18.1
17
10
10
17
16.9
17.3
15
20.8
10
18.9
10.2
16.7
17
*"'*' :
Net Pad
Area (SF)
7,961
5,763
5,777
7.025
8.103
6.136
5,899
6,353
7,106
5.770
6.278
6.421
5.199
5.762
10.564
8.608
9.790 ,
5,317
5,083
5.093
5,093
5,085
5,953
6.364
6,240
5,556
5,593
6.048
6,106
6.615
5,893
6,310
8,198
5,806
5,753
6,184
8,657
6,916
7,876
5,428
5,532
5.537
10.951
7.143
6,078
5.712
5,394
5,496
7,217
5.161
7,111
5,823
5,740
5,704
5,816
6,178
6.189
6,181
6,031
6,159
5,428
5,961
6,325
5,946
6,047
5.756
5.194
5.210
5,168
5,537
7,479
'? ' -'•
Building
Coverage "
Sq. Footage % of Net Pad
2,119
2,202
2,119
2.163
2,119
2,202
2,119
2,163
2,119
2.202
2,163
2.119
2,004
2.202
2,119
2,202
2.119
2.031
2.004
2,031
2,004
2,031
2,163
2,119
2.163
2.202
2.119
2.202
2,119
2,163
2,119
2,163
2,119
2,163
2,202
2.163
2,119
2.119
2.163
2.383
2.119
2.163
2.202
2.119
2.163
2,383
2.031
2.383
2.119
2,004
2,119
2,163
2,119
2,202
2.163
2,202
2.119,
2.202
2,163
2.119
2,163
2,202
2,119
2,202
2,119
2,031
2,004
2.031
2.004
2.119
2,163; ,--.\> ,-
26.6%
38.2%
36.7%
30.8%
26.2%
35.9%
35.9%
34.0%
29.8%
38.2%
34.5%
33.0%
38.5%
38.2%
20.1%
25.6%
21.6%
38.2%
39.4%
39.9%
39.3%
39.9%
36.3%
33.3%
34.7%
39.6%
37.9%
36.4%
34.7%
32.7%
36.0%
34.3%
25.8%
37.3%
38.3%
35.0%
24.5%
30.6%
27.5%
43.9%
38.3%
39.1%
20.1%
29.7%
35.6%
41.7%
37.7%
43.4%
29.4%
38.8%
29.8%
37.1%
36.9%
38.6%
37.2%
35.6%
34.2%
35.6%
35.9%
34.4%
39.8%
36.9%
33.5%
37.0%
35.0%
35.3%
38.6%
39.0%
38.8%
38.3%
28.9%
1*1 * *r
VBuiding Coverage" = net pad area of a lit* occupied by the habitable aree of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and
the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project le» than B R. from the
building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 6 feet. Also excluded are roof eavas extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awningi, open parting areas, structures
under 30 inches In height end masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wingwalls. planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls.
4/24/200610:11 AM
Page 5 of 5
Neighborhood 1.7
Section B
Table 4
_.,
vt
zK
EJ
iE
i§5
w
Ei•i
a
Sta
a
z
S
Xg
|
z
Xo
j*
z
s
2°
si
1
f
i
s %1 i
&l
73
2
w*
6. I
uJ
i i
a 1s 3iii
s
OT
3 ?-Iswu
9
f
2
1
O
£
ii
s §
3 a
ll
!S
u.cI
I DESIGN ELEMENTSS
S
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
\
\
s
s
la. Variety of Roof PlanesS
S
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
\
s
•2a
t
i
>*!•!&&j>
\
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
\
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
I c. Paned Windows and Doors1
s
CO
&
•a
S
S
s
s
s
1 e. Decoradve Window LedgesS
s
s
\
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
1Accent Materials such as Stucco, 1' Wood, Siding and Stone jS
S
s
s
s
\
s
N
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
i
•o
1
BO fZ
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
1 I. Accent and Varied Shape WindowsS
s
\
\
\
\
s
\
s
s
1. Window Boxes and Planters withJ' Architecturally Evident SupportsIk. Exterior Wood Elements 1S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
1Variations in Colors of Stucco and 1' Other Elements |S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
\
\
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
121
1
5 a
_ sII
6
M
d
\
s
a
6
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s.
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
|p. Arched ElementsS
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
csI
6-
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
\
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
s
s
\
s
s
s
s
\
s
(Raised Stucco Trim around Windows 1'' and Doors 1
g
m
o
i t is* gS if**
Is 1 ? 1 i IMP I' B*si^I i iPII '* l^^li9i8«$Hiiii !£ =!i is Ki ii Hi &.£ s&lmmM mm iiiiiMi
IPS Rig i|i ?i sii|jl?s SIB!! Slii slii liHil § i s I iissss^sS ihiil^dl!3£ig!li!£liy!liie;itiilsiii §°i*J;
D-3 s v H d iv111w a n s N o i s a a
Oa
R
iiII
'r'
'- >!:f *-•• ./ - *J'tVv '- d 9
•„] -j, -* • -••« <
i-ir*»^»2lint.: ^??fiifS33& _ , - + *• . •• ^ „*! -^ S < Zt
^j *-•*->• f^, " jJ 3; ' •*/ "*^ *v. •* * ^ * * >*%'?,^* •f^&'g, ftS-" f* iV- r jT^J1* *)•*''** \ „£ r j^* 5, '_^,B«(, •_ > j]i * SM^?'* * t -. " 5-^i^j-a^
D-
3 s v H d i vii i w a n s -a
n-
o B ^
" £2
S S5
3'S
OS 5
. 4/3
D-3svHd i viiiwans -a
r
L 15
O l-l
£ Z
s w
i;;
D--D
n-3 S V H d 1 V i 1 I W 9 0 S NDIS3Q -c
£w
Hi
1
-D
3svHd i viiiwans NDISBQ
u
h-4
PS
n-
o
«*sH!
CC 2
O*
U"
o
S ^25J «<«
H O W
52
5'S
D-3 s v H d i vii i w a n s
w
(A
H
K
O
O
Os
U"
<
hJ
a
Hao<; K -s
H O I—I
H * Jg
O J -«
5*
O
O
OS
D-3 s v H d i vii i wa n s NDISBQ
H
O
kM
<JS
>
O
01u"
15
O I-H« ::
tfi>*^
IllOO
D-
D-3 s v H d i vii i w a n s NDISHQ
o z ^ea rh •< a ^
> W H P«
o*o ; iz o
-D
3 s v H d i VJLJLI wa n s NDISHQ D
D-3SVHd1VJLllW8n$ NDIS3Q
D-
D-3 s v H d i vi 11 w a n s
D-HSVHdlVJLJLIWanS NDIS3Q
n-n
3SVHd 1VJLJL
asvHdiviiiwans N D i s 3 a
D-3 s v H vn i w a n s
H
<
Z
H
Ml
O
jffFj
i
i
^(|
«, 1J
i i i
1 i i
i?N (1ll*\ li
C/5
w
o
Ou
55O I— I
sS
2
O
^Ou
K
en
in
<
-a
n-3svHd iviiiwans NDis3 a -D
O
22
3'S
D--D
3 SVH d 1 V 11IW9 n S N
r
D 3SVHd 1 VllIW9 n S NDIS3Q
D
• ,' i
D-3 S V H d 1 Vli I W 9 0 S NDIS3Q -c
D--D
D-3 s v H vi 1 1 w a n s NDISHQ
DQ
O
n-
3 s v H d i v JL11 wa n s NDISHQ
3SVHd ivj.j.1 wans -c
>-)
Id>IDi-i
fiSU
*o-1
8
5s
Jm"
PH
CC
fc
Wwa:
O
si
05-
O^
S5O >-l
£ »5
sJ
5 5BO H« >H
hJrt *,i«
w>Id
Ida.
IX
-a
3SVHdlVlllWanS N D I S 3 Q
n-3 S V H d 1 Vll I W 9 n S NDIS3Q -D
w
>
O)
jz:w
« 5
C/5 «
01
-D
VH d 1VIJL I W9 PI S NDIS3Q
H-l
W
wh-l
wo.
l!
I
n-3 s v H d i vii i w a n s NDISSQ c
n--n
D-3 S V H d ~l Vll I W 9 0 S NDIS3Q D
g
D-
z<Ja*
i-l
H
>J
•<NXz
O^£
O
<' tn
^^a.ce
o 15
O w
S 25
• Q'«•< < o
" S M
OO
n-3 s v H d i vi 11 w a n s
D-
Q
n-3 s v H d "i vi 11 w a n s NDISBQ n
*
w
K
H
Z
Oft
to Prj
W
•* <z
Z 3
J H
(in "
Ajt^ go ^>w S -2;oH s«
H<
05«
Os
So05 03M **^
-D
Planning Commission Minutes June 7,2006 f^D J\ CTP Page 8
EXHIBITSDRAFT
5. PUD 04-13(A) - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07 -
Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified
Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the
activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens
Neighborhood 1.07, generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante Road,
west of El Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Planning
Area 11, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 10.
Mr. Neu introduced Item 5 and stated Staff Assistant Planner Corey Funk will make the staff presentation.
Mr. Funk completed his presentation and stated he would be available to answer questions.
Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any questions of staff; seeing none, he introduced the
applicant.
Jack Henthorn, 5365 Avenida Encinas, Suite A, Carlsbad gave a presentation.
Chairperson Montgomery asks if there were any questions of staff; seeing none, he asked the public if
anyone wished to speak on this item. Seeing none, Chairperson Montgomery entertained a motion of
approval.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Resolution No. 6113 recommending approval of
Major Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 04-13(A) based on the
findings entered, subject to conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 6-0
AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Segall,
and Whitton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Heineman
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Baker stated the design of the project was good but would like to see more walkways in a
project like this which would provide more pedestrian connections to the school.
Commissioner Dominguez stated a preference for more walkways in the project as well but commended
the neighboring school as being one of few with adequate school site circulation.
Commissioner Segall stated he liked the project and the design particularly how each house had freedom
in the front and the rear of the property.
Commissioner Whitton stated he supported the project and felt Mr. Henthorn and the developer have
done an outstanding job once again.
Chairperson Montgomery stated his support for the project and the architecture. He felt this project would
be a great site for a young family particularly due to the nearby school site.
Commissioner Dominguez commended Commissioner Segall on his role in encouraging the builders to
enhance the rear elevations. Commissioner Dominguez commended the developer as well.
Chairperson Montgomery closed the public hearing and thanked Staff for their presentations.
II
North Count
To: SHELIA'"of
(760) 740-5464 07/11/06 12:24:17
OF CARLSBAD From: Jane Allshouse
Page 2 of 2
LEGAL ADVERTISING
Printed on 07/11/2006 at 12:19 by 11
Ad* 1958549 First taken by 11
Last changed by 11
07/11/2006 12:15
07/11/2006 12:19
!7SOi 434-2917 Acct* 16158
CITY OF CARLSEAD
1200 CARLSEAD VILLAGE DR.
CITY CLERK
CARLSEAD, CA 92008
Subscr ? N
Given by SHELIA
Start 07/21/2006 Stop 07/21/2006
Transient Eili Expir.
Class 16000 LEGAL ADVERTISING
Index: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE I
Cola 2 Lines 74 Inches 5.61 Words 289 Graphics 2 Box? Y
Pb# Code Rate Ease-Charge Addl-Charge Total-Cost Ins Start Stop SMTWTFS
EORD 15.00
1 CARL 174.64 15.00 189.64 1 07/21/2006 07/21/2006 1111111
23 CARL 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 07/21/2006 07/21/2006 1111111
TOTAL AD COST 189.64
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that theCity Council of the City of Carlsbad will holdr haaring at the Council Chambers, 1200iDrive. Carlsbad California at 6:00p.m. on Tuesday, August 1. 2006. to consider a re-guest for approval of a Major Planned Devetopnient1 building flodment for g floor plans, eleva-,tions and plotting for the development of 71 single-family detached homes within theVillages of La Cos-ta, Greens Neighborhood 1 .07, on property generallylocated north of Poinsettia Lane, east or AlicanteRoad, west of El Fuerte Street, south of GreensRanch, ,Neighborhood 1 06 and Bressi Ranch Area 1 1 . andwithin Local Facilities Management Zone 10 andmore particularly described as:
Lots 1-71 of Carlsbad Tract.Ofcl 5, La (Nei;- Neighborhoods 1 04 and 1.07 of the Villages of LaCosta, per final map no. 105053 filed in the Office ofthe County Recorder of San Diego County, July 27,2005, as file no. 2005-639126.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal arecordially invited to attend the public hearing Copiesof the agenda bill will be available on and after July28, 2006. |f you have any questions, please call Co-rey Funk in the Planning Department at (760)602-4645.
If you challenge the Planned Development PermitAmendment in court, you may be limited to raisingonly those issues you or someone else raised at thepublic hearing described in this notice or in writtencorrespondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad.Attn: tfity Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad VillageDrive, Carlsbad. CA 92008. at or prior to the publichearing.
CASE FILE: PUD04-13(A)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENSNEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCIL
NCT 1958549 • 07/21/06
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 1, 2006, to consider a request for approval of a Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens
Neighborhood 1.07, on property generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante
Road, west of El Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Area 11,
and within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
Lots 1-71 of Carlsbad Tract 04-15, La Costa Greens - Neighborhoods
1.04 and 1.07 of the Villages of La Costa, per final map no. 105053 filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 27, 2005,
as file no. 2005-639126.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after July 28, 2006. If you have any
questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645.
If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD04-13(A)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
PUBLISH: July 21,2006
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
NOT TO SCALE
SITE MAP
Villages of La Costa Greens, Neighborhood 1.7
PUD 04-13(A)
Jam c.nd Smudge Free Printing
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERY
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
AVERY® 5160®
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST
101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST
701 ENCINITAS BLVD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST
1966OLIVENHAIN RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CITYOFOCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF VISTA
600 EUCALYPTUS AVE
VISTA CA 92084
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
201 VALLECITOS DE ORO
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARKCT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STEB
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD
STE 110
9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
9150 CHESAPEAKE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RECREATION
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
ATTN TEDANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
BOB WOJCIK
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
COREY FUNK
06/29/2006
®09l£AH3AV-OD-008-1 ®091S
Impression antibourrage et a sechage rapide
Utilisez le gabarit 5160®
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160®
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K S L LA COSTA RESORT CO
50905 AVENIDA BERMUDAS
LAQUINTACA 92253
MODEL HOMES PARTNERS LLC
318 NARCISSUS AVE
CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625
SCHEKTR
PO BOX 9515
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
GREYSTONE HOMES INC
STE 302
1525 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVID J MOLYNEAUX
2735 ASCOT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
FRANK & JOSIE DELKER
6419 ARCHES WY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MICHAEL & SUSANNE DORN
6415 ARCHES WY
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BARRATT AMERICAN INC
STE 101
5950 PRIESTLY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRESSI GARDENLANE LLC
STE 200
24800 CHRISANTA DR
MISSION VIEJO CA 92691
IRENE BOCCHETTI
2733PLUMERIADR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OLIVER & AMBER BAUDIER
2729 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PAUL ROYKO
2725 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOSEPH & ANTHEA GRANT
2721 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ERIC & ANNA SINNETT
2717 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
ANTHONY & ELICIA LAVASSEUR
2713 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
BRANDON & SAM MEYERHOFF
2709 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JASON & KERI HERCZEG
2723 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CHRISTIAN & AMY AUBERTIN
2727 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
JOHN &QING NAPLES
2731 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
GORDAON CROMWELL III
2735 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
RICARDO & SUSANNE PARLADE
2739 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
MONA MALIHI
2743 PLUMERIA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92009
PONDEROSA COUNTRY HOA
STE 120
23382 MILL CREEK DR
LACUNA HILLS CA 92653
RANCHO CARILLO MASTER ASSO
STE 100
2237 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
K HOVNANIAN
2525 CAMPUS DR
IRVINE CA 92612
DAVIDSON COMMUNITIES LLC
1302CAMINO DEL MAR
DEL MAR CA 92014
CNLM
STEH
425 E ALVARADO ST
FALLBROOK CA 92028
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC
STE A
5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORROW DEVELOPMENT
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
®09ts AJJ3AV AaaAV-OD-008-L ®09LS 31\ndl/\l31
6imui.u 33.1-1 e6onujc DUB wer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a
public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, {DATE}, to consider a request for approval of a Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 71 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Greens
Neighborhood 1.07, on property generally located north of Poinsettia Lane, east of Alicante
Road, west of El Fuerte Street, south of Greens Neighborhood 1.06 and Bressi Ranch Area 11,
and within Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
Lots 1-71 of Carlsbad Tract 04-15, La Costa Greens - Neighborhoods
1.04 and 1.07 of the Villages of La Costa, per final map no. 105053 filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 27, 2005,
as file no. 2005-639126.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after {DATE}. If you have any
questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645.
If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200
Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD04-13(A)
CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 1.07
PUBLISH: {DATE}
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
WOf TO SCALE
SITE MAP
Villages of La Costa Greens, Neighborhood 1.7
PUD 04-13(A)
Villages of La CostaVillages of La CostaGreens Neighborhood 1.07Greens Neighborhood 1.07PUD 04PUD 04--13(A)13(A)
Location MapLocation MapMICA RDPOINSETTIA LNQ U A R T Z W Y
POINSETTIA LNALICANTE RDMICA RDHALITE PLLAPIS RDG R E E N H A V E N D R
KEENELAND DRMUIRFIELDS DRTITANITE PLGEODE LNASCOT AVPALMETTO DRCAYENNE LNA L L S T O N S T
E D E N D A L E S T PLUMERIA DRO N Y X P L
KYANITE PLBROOKITE CT0500250FeetPUD 04-13(A)Villages of La Costa Greens,Neighborhood 1.7
Project BackgroundProject BackgroundProject site was previously subdivided Project site was previously subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 04under Tentative Map (CT 04--15) and 15) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 04Planned Development Permit (PUD 04--13)13)Approved by the City Council on March Approved by the City Council on March 15, 200515, 2005
Project FeaturesProject FeaturesAmendment to PUD 04Amendment to PUD 04--13 for Architecture 13 for Architecture and Plotting of 71 detached singleand Plotting of 71 detached single--family family homeshomesMinimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft.Minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft.4 floor plans (1 and 2 story)4 floor plans (1 and 2 story)Living area range: 1,950 to 3,280 sq. ft.Living area range: 1,950 to 3,280 sq. ft.Each plan provides 3 Each plan provides 3 ––5 bedrooms5 bedrooms
Project Features Cont.Project Features Cont.4 architectural styles4 architectural styles(Spanish Colonial, Santa Barbara, Italianete, (Spanish Colonial, Santa Barbara, Italianete, European Cottage)European Cottage)12 color schemes12 color schemes20% of ridgeline/hilltop lots are 120% of ridgeline/hilltop lots are 1--storystoryCommon recreation area processed Common recreation area processed separatelyseparately
Project ConsistencyProject ConsistencyThe project complies with:The project complies with:––C.M.C 21.45 C.M.C 21.45 ––Planned DevelopmentsPlanned Developments––Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98--01(C)01(C)The project is consistent with:The project is consistent with:––Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98--0707
RecommendationRecommendationPlanning Commission adopted Resolution Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6113 to recommend the project to the No. 6113 to recommend the project to the City Council on June 7, 2006.City Council on June 7, 2006.Staff recommends that the City Council Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2006adopt Resolution No. 2006--222 to approve 222 to approve PUD 04PUD 04--13(A)13(A)