HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-08-08; City Council; 18682; General Municipal Election November 7 2006Page 2 ofAB "General Municipal Election November 7, 2006'
The deadline for filing written arguments (not to exceed 300 words) regarding the measure will be
5:00 p.m., on August 23, 2006.
The deadline for filing rebuttal arguments (not to exceed 250 words) will be August 31, 2006.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
A City-sponsored ballot measure is considered a project that is subject to environmental review in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff conducted an environmental
impact assessment to determine if the proposed ballot measure could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the City's Environmental Ordinance (Title
19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code). The Planning Director determined that the proposed ballot
measure would not have any significant, adverse impacts on the environment and a Notice of Intent to
adopt a Negative Declaration for the measure was issued on May 23, 2006. During the public review
process only two comments were received neither of which objected to the issuance of a Negative
Declaration. The first comment letter was from the State Clearing House and indicated that no state
agencies had submitted any comments or concerns. The second comment letter was from the Public
Utilities Commission containing a standard comment about rail corridor safety when considering future
development projects. The comment letters are attached to the Negative Declaration (Exhibit "2" of
this Agenda Bill).
Subsequent to the Notice of Intent being issued, the City Council reviewed the report from the
Citizens Committee studying the area affected by the proposed ballot measure and the Council
decided to accept the Committee's recommendation to make certain revisions to the proposed City
measure. Therefore, an Addendum to the Negative Declaration was prepared by staff which explains
the revisions in the measure and the reasons why a subsequent Negative Declaration is not required.
Therefore, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Negative
Declaration and Addendum prepared by the Planning Director.
EXHIBITS:
1. Resolution No. 2006-223 ordering the submission of the "Permanently Protect the Flower
Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006" measure to the qualified voters of
Carlsbad.
2. Resolution No. 2006-224 . adopting a Negative Declaration and Addendum
3. Resolution No. 2006-225 , authorizing certain council members to file a written argument.
4. Resolution No. 2006-226 directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.
5. Resolution No. 2006-227 , providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments.
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-223
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION
3 OF A CITY MEASURE TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF
4 THE CITY AT THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2006 AS CALLED BY
5 RESOLUTION NO.2006-164
6 WHEREAS, a General Election on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 has been called by
Resolution No. 2006-164, adopted on June 20, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the General Municipal Election is to be consolidated with the statewide
o
election on the same day; and
9 WHEREAS, the City Council also desires to submit to the qualified voters at the election
a question relating to amending the General Plan to protect the Flower Fields, Strawberry
Fields and Open Space Act of 2006;
11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
12 California, as follows:
13 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
14
2. That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order submitted to the
15 voters at the General Municipal Election the following question:
16
Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate the
provisions of the "Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and
Save Carlsbad Taxpayers' Money" Measure?
YES
NO
17
18
19
3. That the text of the proposed measure submitted to the voters is as attached as
Exhibit A.
21 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by
22 law.
5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and
conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
24 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is
25 authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election,
in time, form and manner as required by law.
7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CLAUDE A
ATTEST:
»««'"'"*
M. WOOD, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers* Money
The People of the City of Carlsbad do hereby enact and ordain:
1. Section 1. TITLE
1.1 This measure shall be known and may be cited as "Preserve the Flower and Strawberry
Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers' Money".
2. Section 2. PURPOSE, LOCATION AND FINDINGS
2.1 Purpose. The purpose of this measure is to ensure that the Flower Fields and Strawberry
Fields area located along the Cannon Road corridor east of the Interstate 5 freeway is preserved
in open space and that farming is allowed to continue as long as it is viable. The purpose is also
to allow public use, access and community gathering places to occur in the area in a manner that
will not adversely impact the unique open space and environmental resources located in the area.
This measure is intended to create a sustainable area that balances social, economic and
environmental values important to the community. This measure amends the General Plan which
contains the vision for the future of the City and the Zoning Ordinance to designate the area for
special planning consideration to ensure that the area is retained in open space, that farming is
allowed to continue and that public uses and access are allowed in the area.
2.2 Location and Description of the Area Affected by Measure. The area affected by this
measure is shown on Exhibit A provided herein. It contains approximately 307 acres of land
located in the central portion of the City along Cannon Road east of the Interstate 5 freeway. The
area presently consists primarily of open space and farming operations including the existing
Flower Fields located south of Cannon Road and the area generally known as the Strawberry
Fields located on the north side of Cannon Road adjacent to Interstate 5 and the south shore of
the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The area on the north side of Cannon Road also contains regionally-
significant public utility uses including existing SDG&E electrical transmission lines. The City
presently leases a portion of the Strawberry Fields area (approximately 91 acres and generally
known as Hub Park) which was leased for potential future, public park uses. The most easterly
end of the area on the north side of Cannon Road contains environmentally-sensitive, natural
vegetation that is identified in the City's Habitat Management Plan as part of a proposed habitat
preserve system. For purposes of this measure, the area shall herein be identified as "The Cannon
Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor."
2.3 Findings. The People of the City of Carlsbad find and declare that the subject area affected
by this measure is currently regulated by City policy and established land use documents
including the City of Carlsbad General Plan, the City Zoning Ordinance, the Carlsbad Habitat
Management Plan, the Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan, the Mello II Local Coastal Plan and the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. The City also has a comprehensive Growth Management Plan
that sets limits on the amount of residential development and that requires public facilities to be
provided concurrent with growth. The People of the City of Carlsbad desire the General Plan and
the Zoning Ordinance be amended to (1) prohibit residential uses in the area; (2) ensure that this
area is permanently protected and preserved for open space uses; (3) allow the farming
operations in the area such as the Strawberry Fields and flower growing areas to continue; (4)
enhance the existing protections of the Flower Fields; (5) provide for the protection of
environmental resources in the area including compliance with the City's Habitat Management
Plan; and (6)incorporate public trails, pedestrian accessibility, park uses, and other
complementary and compatible public uses into the area.
3. Section 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
The Carlsbad General Plan is hereby amended as set forth in this Section.
3.1 The Land Use Element at page 27, Section II (D) is hereby amended to add a new Land Use
Element Section II (D) (8) to read as follows:
8. The Cannon Road Open Space, Fanning and Public Use Corridor
The area along the Cannon Road corridor east of the Interstate 5 freeway presently
consist primarily of open space and existing farming operations including the Flower
Fields located to the south of Cannon Road and the existing Strawberry Fields located to
the north of Cannon Road. The open space areas on the north side of Cannon Road
provide spectacular views of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and contain environmentally-
sensitive natural habitat areas that need to be permanently protected.
The existing Flower Fields and the Strawberry Fields as open space uses provide
for productive use of portions of the area that enhance the cultural heritage and history of
the City. Although the Flower Fields are already protected and restricted to agricultural
use, the City shall utilize all existing programs and land use protections and explore other
possible new mechanisms to keep the Flower Fields in production. The City shall also
ensure that other farming uses such as the existing Strawberry Fields are allowed to
continue as long as it is economically viable for the landowner to do so.
The area is recognized for its significant open space opportunities; however, the area
lacks adequate public access and public use areas so that the community can enjoy the
open space opportunities provided in this area to their fullest potential. An
interconnecting public trail through the area preferably linking the south shore of Agua
Hedionda Lagoon with the existing Flower Fields could greatly enhance public access in
the area. In addition, park and recreation uses that allow public gathering spaces and are
compatible with other open space uses could offer opportunities for more community use
and enjoyment of the area.
Residential use is not appropriate for the area. Commercial and industrial-type
uses other than those normally associated with farming operations are also not
appropriate.
The Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor presents a
unique opportunity for the City to create a sustainable, community-oriented open space
area that balances social, economic and environmental values important to the
community.
3.2 The Land Use Element at pages 37 and 38, Agriculture-C. Implementing Policies and
Action Programs is hereby amended by deleting existing C.3 and replacing it with a new C.3 to
read as follows:
C.3 The City shall utilize all existing programs and land use protections and explore possible
new grant programs and other outside financial assistance to keep the existing Flower Fields
in permanent farming and flower production.
3.3 The Land Use Element at page 40, Section III; Goals, Objectives and Implementing
Policies and Action Programs, is hereby amended to add a new section entitled Special Planning
Considerations-The Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor to provide as
follows:
SPECIAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS-THE CANNON ROAD OPEN SPACE,
FARMING AND PUBLIC USE CORRIDOR
A. Goal
Create a unique, community-oriented open space area along the Cannon Road corridor
located immediately to the east of the Interstate 5 freeway including the existing Flower
Fields and Strawberry Fields.
B. Objectives
B. 1 To ensure that this area is permanently protected and preserved for open space uses.
B.2 To enhance the protection of the existing Flower Fields.
B.3 To allow the farming operations in the area such as the existing Strawberry Fields and
flower growing areas to continue.
B.4 To provide for the protection and preservation of environmental resources in the area in
coordination with landowners.
B.5 To increase public access and use to the area primarily through the incorporation of
compatible public trails and active and passive recreation.
C. Implementing Policies and Action Programs
C.I Protect and preserve this area as an open space corridor. Permit only open space, farming
and compatible public uses in the area. Permitted uses shall be as follows:
(1) Open Space
(2) Farming and other related agricultural support uses including flower and strawberry
Production
(3) Public trails
(4) Active and Passive park, recreation and similar public and private use facilities
(except on the existing Flower Fields)
(5) Electrical Transmission Facilities
C.2 Prohibit residential development in the area.
C.3 Prohibit commercial and industrial-type uses in the area other than those normally
associated with farming operations and open space uses.
C.4 Enhance public access and public use in the area by allowing compatible public trails,
community gathering spaces and public and private, active and passive park and recreation
uses.
C.5 Allow farming to continue in the area for as long as economically viable for the
landowner.
C.6 Utilize all existing programs and land use protections and explore possible new
mechanisms to keep the existing Flower Fields in production.
C.7 If determined to be necessary, the City shall amend the Zoning Ordinance and adopt a
Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor Overlay Zone to apply to the
area that would provide more detail on permitted uses and land use regulations applicable to
the area.
C.8 The City shall initiate a public planning process with broad public participation to fully
accomplish implementation of the goals, objectives and action programs listed above.
3.4 The Open Space and Conservation Element at page 16, Section F. Citywide Open Space
Plan, Category 2: Open Space for Managed Production of Resources,
Forestry/Agriculture/Aquaculture (2a), is hereby amended by changing the wording of the first
sentence to read as follows:
Forestry, agriculture and aquaculture are considered a category 5 citywide priority
for future open space planning except that agricultural uses in the Cannon Road
Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor shall be considered a category 1
priority.
4. Section 4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
The Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as set forth in this Section.
4.1 The official Zoning Map is amended to rezone the area as shown on Exhibit A provided
herein and not presently zoned Open Space to the OS (Open Space) zone.
5. Section 5. IMPLEMENTATION
5.1 Effective Date. This measure shall become effective upon passage by the voters in
accordance with Elections Code 9217. With respect to the General Plan Amendments contained
in Section 3 of this measure, if the number of General Plan Amendments in the calendar year as
permitted by California Government Code Section 65358 have already been utilized, the
Amendments to the General Plan enacted by this measure shall be the first amendment and shall
become effective on January 1 of the next year following passage. Upon the effective date of this
measure, all entitlements (whether discretionary or ministerial) not yet issued or project
approvals not yet approved, shall not be issued or approved unless they are consistent with all
provisions of this measure.
5.2 Interpretation And Authority To Amend Other City Ordinances, Codes And Policies.
This measure shall be interpreted so as to be consistent with all federal and state laws. It shall
also be broadly interpreted and construed in order to achieve the purposes and findings stated in
the measure. The City is hereby authorized to make any other amendments to the General Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance or any other plans, policies or ordinances necessary to fully implement the
provisions of this measure and to ensure consistency between the provisions of this measure and
all other elements of the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and any other plans, policies or
ordinances. If deemed necessary, the City is authorized to amend the Zoning Ordinance to create
and adopt a Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor Overlay Zone which
would then be applied to the area affected by this measure. The Overlay Zone could provide
more detail on permitted uses and regulations applicable to the area.
5.3 Public Process To Comprehensively Implement Measure. Upon the passage of this
measure, the City shall initiate a comprehensive planning process with broad public participation
and input to accomplish full implementation of the measure. The process shall include
determining the most appropriate open space, recreational and public uses for the area, should
farming become no longer economically-viable in the area. The process shall result in achieving
complete General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Program consistency so that the full intent of
this measure can be implemented by the City.
5.4 Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or other portion of
this measure, or application thereof, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a final judgment
of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions or
provisions of this measure. It is hereby declared by the people voting for this measure that this
measure, and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion thereof would
have been adopted or passed even if one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses,
phrases, part, or portions, or the application thereof, are declared invalid or unconstitutional.
5.5 Conflicting Ballot Measures. This measure is inconsistent with and intended as an
alternative to any other initiative(s) or measure(s) placed on the same ballot that addresses the
same subject matter as this measure. In the event that this measure and another initiative(s) or
measure(s) addressing the same subject matter as this measure, or any part thereof, is approved
by a majority of voters at the same election, and this measure receives a greater number of
affirmative votes than any other such initiative(s) or measure(s), then this measure shall prevail
and control in its entirety and said other initiative(s) or measure(s) shall be rendered void and
without any legal effect.
Exhibit List
Exhibit A - Map showing boundaries of Area affected by this measure
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-224
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
3 DECLARATION AND ADDENDUM FOR A CITY-SPONSORED
BALLOT MEASURE ENTITLED "PRESERVE THE FLOWER AND
4 STRAWBERRY FIELDS AND SAVE CARLSBAD TAXPAYERS
MONEY" TO BE PLACED ON THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL
5 ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 7, 2006.
CASE NAME: "PRESERVE THE FLOWER AND
6 STRAWBERRY FIELDS AND SAVE
CARLSBAD TAXPAYERS' MONEY"
7 BALLOT MEASURE
CASE NO.: El A 06-018
9 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
IQ the 8th day of August 2006, held a hearing to consider said Negative
Declaration and ballot measure, and at that time received recommendations, objections,
protests, comments, oral and written, from all persons interested in, supportive or opposed to
12 EIA 06-01;
13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
14 Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the Negative Declaration (Exhibit "ND") and Addendum (Exhibit "A") attached
17 hereto and made a part hereof is adopted, based upon information presented at the hearing and
18 contained in the notice of intent to adopt the Negative Declaration (Exhibit "NOI") dated May 23,
2006 and EIA Part II (Exhibit "Pll") dated May 10, 2006, attached hereto and incorporated
20 herein by reference and based on the following findings:
21 A. The City Council has reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative
22 Declaration and Addendum for the City's sponsored ballot measure as contained in EIA 06-01,
23
the environmental impacts therein identified for the measure and any comments thereon prior to
approval of the measure; and
25 B. The Negative Declaration and Addendum have been prepared in accordance
7fi
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
27 Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
28
1 C. It reflects the independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad;
2 and
3 D. Based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial
4 evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
5 //
6 //
7 //
8 //
9 //
10 //
11 //
12 //
13 //
14 //
15 //
16 //
17 //
18 //
19 //
20 //
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27
28 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad on the 8th day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
§r~CbRRAfN£Jvl. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL)
EXHIBIT "ND"
City of Carlsbad
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Planning Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
"Preserve the Flower and Strawberry Fields and Save Carlsbad Taxpayers'
Money" Measure
EIA 06-01
East of 1-5 Freeway along the north and south sides of Cannon Road west of
Faraday Avenue and north of Palomar Airport Road
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a City-sponsored ballot measure to ensure that the
Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields area in the City of Carlsbad located along the Cannon Road corridor
east of the 1-5 Freeway is preserved in open space, that farming is allowed to continue as a viable open space
use and that public access to the area is enhanced. The proposed measure amends the General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance to designate the area for special planning consideration and to establish the mechanisms
necessary to implement the purposes of the measure.
DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described
proj ect pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study
(EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of
Carlsbad finds as follows:
$Z\ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
I I The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least
one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant
to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that
remained to be addressed).
I I Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT
be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is
required.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file
in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
ADOPTED: August 8..20Qfespursuant to CrtvTbuncil Resolution No. 2006-224
ATTEST:
MARCELA ESCOBAR-ECK
Planning director
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
EXHIBIT "A1
ADDENDUM TO THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
CITY-SPONSORED BALLOT MEASURE
EIA 06-01
The purpose of this Addendum to the Negative Declaration is to acknowledge revisions to the City-
sponsored ballot measure relating to the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields Area and to state the
determination that these revisions do not create any new significant environmental effects, that none of
the conditions contained in Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have
occurred and that a subsequent Negative Declaration is not required.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Notice of Intent for the Negative Declaration for this project, the City
Council reviewed the report from the Citizens Committee studying the area affected by the proposed City
ballot measure and the Council decided to accept the Committee's recommendations to make certain
revisions to the proposed measure. The revisions include removing from the measure the 48 acre parcel
located in the area that is presently designated Travel/Recreation (TR) Commercial and leaving it as
presently designated, allowing active as well as passive recreation uses in the area and initiating a public,
planning effort for the area if the measure is approved. None of these revisions are considered substantial
or significant as they relate to the environmental effects associated with the project or the conditions
contained in Section 15162 of CEQA.
When City staff conducted the environmental impact assessment for the Negative Declaration, the only
area of potential environmental impact identified by staff concerned the re-designation of the 48 acre
parcel located in the area affected by the measure from Travel/Recreation (TR) commercial to Open
Space (OS). TR uses are a high priority in the coastal zone because they enhance public use and access to
and within the City's coastal area. Staff determined that this impact was not significant because an
additional 191 acres of TR use was added in the coastal zone in 1996 with the approval of the Carlsbad
Ranch Specific Plan. The 48 acre TR parcel has now been removed from the City-sponsored ballot
measure and the designation of TR will be retained. Therefore, the environmental impact associated with
the re-designation of this parcel and the resultant affect on public access and use in the coastal zone has
been eliminated. Active as well as passive recreational uses are presently allowed in the area. The revision
to the City ballot measure to allow active recreation to continue to be an allowed use, reinforces the
existing conditions relating to the area and, therefore, no environmental impact to existing conditions
occurs as a result of the revisions. The revision to initiate a public, planning effort or process, in and of
itself, would not create any new environmental impacts not previously discussed in the Negative
Declaration.
Date: July 25, 2006
Ma(rcela Escobar-Eck
Panning Director
EXHIBIT "NOT
City of Carlsbad
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Planning Department
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The Flower Fields. Strawberry Fields, Open Space and Public
Trails Protection Act of 2006
EIA 06-01
East of the Interstate 5 Freeway along the north and south sides of
Cannon Road west of Faraday Avenue and north of Palomar
Airport Rd
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a City-sponsored ballot measure to ensure
that the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields area in the City of Carlsbad located along the
Cannon Road corridor east of the Interstate 5 Freeway is preserved in open space, that farming is
allowed to continue as a viable open space use and that public access to the area is enhanced.
The proposed measure amends the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and the City's Local
Coastal Program to designate the area for special planning consideration and to establish the
regulatory mechanisms necessary to implement the purposes of the measure.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially
significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be
recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad City Council.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative
Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California
92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and adoption by the City
Council. An additional public notice will be issued when the public hearing is scheduled. If you
have any questions, please call Gary Barberio in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4606.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD May 23,2006 through June 24.2006
PUBLISH DATE May 23. 2006
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
EXHIBIT "PN"
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - INITIAL STUDY
(TO BE-COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: EIA 06-01
DATE: May 10. 2006
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: The Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields. Open Space and Public Trails Protection
Act of 2006
/
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad
3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Gary Barberio (760) 602-4606
4. PROJECT LOCATION: East of the Interstate 5 Freeway along the north and south sides of
Cannon Road west of Faraday Avenue and north of Palomar Airport Road
5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad. 1635 Faraday Avenue.
Carlsbad. Ca.. 92008
6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open SpaceCOS^ and Travel/Recreation CommercialCT-RI
7. ZONING: OSCQpen Space) and P-U(Public Utility')
8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing
approval or participation agreements): California Coastal Commission
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
The project consists of a city-sponsored ballot measure to be placed on the November. 2006
ballot entitled "The Flower Fields. Strawberry Fields. Open Space and Public Trails Protection
Act of 2006". The purpose of the measure is to ensure that the Flower Fields and Strawberry
Fields area in the City of Carlsbad Located along the Cannon Road corridor east of the Interstate 5•*.
freeway is preserved in open space and that farming is allowed to continue as long as it is viable.
The purpose is also to allow public access to occur in the area in a manner that will not adversely
impact farming and the other open space and the environmental resources located in the area. The
proposed measure amends the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and the City's Local Coastal
Program to designate the area for special planning consideration and to establish the regulatory
mechanisms to ensure that the area is retained in open space, that farming is allowed to continue
1 Rev. 02/22/06
and that public access is provided to the area. The area affected by this measure is shown on
Exhibit A attached. It contains approximately 355 acres of land located in the central portion of
the City along Cannon Road east of the Interstate 5 freeway. The area presently consists primarily
of open space and existing farming operations and contains the existing Flower Fields located
south of Cannon Road and north of Palomar Airport Road and the area generally known as the
Strawberry Fields located on the north side of Cannon Road adjacent to Interstate 5 and the south
*
shore of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The most easterly end of the area on the north side of Cannon
Road contains natural vegetation that is identified in the City's Habitat Management Plan as part
of a proposed habitat preserve system. For purposes of the measure the area has been divided into
five sub-areas also as shown on Exhibit A. Sub-area A is located at the northeast corner of
Cannon Road and the Interstate 5 freeway and is presently farmed. Sub-area B is the remainder of
the area located on the north side of Cannon Road adjacent to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. This sub-
area contains existing farming operations, powerline easements and some environmentally-
sensitive habitat restricted by an open space easement. Sub-area C is the existing Flower Fields
that are presently protected as open space as part of the previous approval of the Carlsbad
Ranch/Legoland project. Sub-areas D and E are existing open space lots located on the south side
of Cannon Road that were originally planned to be part of a larger golf course as part of the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan but was never developed as such. Surrounding developments in the
area include offices, hotels, retail businesses, the Legoland Theme Park and automobile
dealerships. A copy of the proposed ballot measure is attached as Exhibit B.
Rev. 02/22/06
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology/Soils
Hazards/Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
X. Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/Circulation
Utilities & Service Systems
Rev. 02/22/06
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because sthe mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
t
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
e
Pinner Signature Date
/1-S577 Planning Director's Signature
•5-/18/OG
Date'
Rev. 02/22/06
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
"'" ' ,11! .,. I |^ _
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES,-Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The
Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides
the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR),
Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
• A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported
by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
• "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact."
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
• ' "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly
adverse.
• Based on an "EIA-Initial Study", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on
the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a
supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project,- then no additional environmental
document is required.
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
•*.
• If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared.
Rev. 02/22/06
• An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is^hecked, and including but not limited to
the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding
Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the
EIA-Initial Study analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse
effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to
below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears after each related set of questions.
Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Rev. 02/22/06
AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State scenic highway?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
or Dc) Substantially degrade the existing visual character
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
a-d) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance and Local Coastal Program the purpose of which is to ensure that the affected area is retained in open
space, that farming is allowed to continue and that public access to the area is enhanced. The amendments will
only allow open space uses in the area. No development projects are approved by this action. As such, the
proposed action will not result in any adverse impacts to the aesthetics of the area.
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California
Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.)
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment,
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
a-c) No impacts. One of the primary purposes of the proposed ballot measure is to ensure that agricultural
uses are allowed to continue in the area as long as those uses are economically viable. Therefore, the proposed
project will not have any adverse effects on farming and agricultural operations and, in fact, will benefit existing
agricultural uses in the area.
Rev. 02/22/06
III. AIR QUALITY -'(Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied
upon to make the following determinations.) Would the
project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D
Rev. 02/22/06
a-e) No impact. The proposed project does not approve any development project that would affect air
quality. The purpose of the proposed ballot measure is to allow only open space uses in the affected area. The
project site is located in the San-Diego Air Basin which is a state non-attainment area for ozone (O3) and for
particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM10). The periodic violations of national Ambient
Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas,
requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In
San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS)
developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG).
A Plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state-
mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having
serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted
by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10* in 1994, and was forwarded
to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly
regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996.
The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are
incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the
County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project
presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure
that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact.
Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific
reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality
management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set
forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California
Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include
the following:
• Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area?
• Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan?
The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being
implemented. The project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct
implementation of the regional plan.
The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is at Camp Pendleton. Data available for this
monitoring site from 2000 through December 2004, indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded
were for the state one hour standard for ozone (a total of 10 days during the 5-year period). No other violations of
any air quality standards have been recorded during the 5-year time period.
The air basin is currently in a state non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. Open Space
uses allowed by the proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively potential net increase in
emissions throughout the air basin. However, emissions associated with the proposed project would be minimal.
Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the
same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section
15130(a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is
assessed as less than significant. '
As noted above, the proposed action would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations. In
addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the project. No
significant, adverse impacts to air quality are associated with this proposed action.
Rev. 02/22/06
i. Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fjsh and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian,
aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by California Department
of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
a-f) No impact. The proposed ballot measure requires that any open space use allowed by the proposed
amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program must comply with the City's
Habitat Management Plan. The most easterly end of the affected area on the north side of Canfton Road contains
environmentally-sensitive, natural vegetation that is identified in the City's Habitat Management Plan as part of a
proposed habitat preserve system. Most of this habitat area is also included in an open easement that was dedicated
to the California Coastal Commission as a condition of a previously-approved action on the property. The
proposed measure acknowledges this and requires all other open space uses to be conducted in a manner that does
not adversely affect these biological resources or any other environmental resources located in the area. No
development projects are approved by the proposed ballot measure that would impact any biological resources. As
such, the proposed action will not have any adverse effects on biological resources.
10 Rev. 02/22/06
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the. signifi-
cance of an archeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique pale
ontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
a-e) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance and Local Coastal Plan the primary purpose of which is to ensure that the affected area is retained in
open space and that existing farming operations are allowed to continue. No development projects are approved by
this action. The amendments will only allow open space uses in the area. As such, the proposed project will not
result in any adverse impacts to cultural resources.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
D
D
11 Rev. 02/22/06
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18
- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
a-e) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance
and Local Coastal Program the primary purpose of which is to ensure that the affected area is retained in open
space and that existing farming operations are allowed to continue. No development projects are approved by this
action. The amendments will only allow open space uses in the area. As such, the proposed action will not result in
any adverse impacts to geological resources.
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
- Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
environment?
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
12 Rev. 02/22/06
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
a-h) No impact. The purpose of the proposed action is to retain the area exclusively for open space uses.
Although the proposed measure would promote the continuation of farming and agricultural operations in the area,
"these operations are presently regulated by the appropriate governmental agencies regarding the use or transport of
hazardous material such as pesticides and other chemicals used for farming operations. The action does not, of and
by itself, result in increased agricultural use in the area. The intent is to allow existing farming to continue in the
area. No development projects are approved by this action. A portion of the area is located in the Airport Influence
Area as shown in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for McClellan-Palomar Airport. However, it is
located outside of the flight activity zone and any noise contours. The proposed ballot measure prohibits the
development of any residential or office uses in the affected area, so the action does not result in any airport safety
uses and the adopted CLUP does not present any regulatory issues associated with the proposed action.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local ground water table
level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in
a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
n n
n
13 Rev. 02/22/06 3ft
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g)
h)
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance. Rate Map or other flood delineation
map?
Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
a-j) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance
and Local Coastal Program the primary purpose of which is to ensure that the area is retained for open space uses.
No development projects are approved by the action and the proposed measure prohibits residential development
in the area so it will not result in exposing people or structures to flooding. The measure promotes the continuation
of existing farming operations in the area so it does not result in increasing runoff in the area. As a result, the
proposed action will not result in any significant, adverse impacts to hydrology and water quality.
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
14 Rev. 02/22/06
a and c) No impact. The proposed action will not physically divide an established community within the city.
The purpose of the proposed ballot measure is to retain the area for open space uses including existing farming and
agricultural operations. No development projects are approved by this action. The proposed measure also requires
that all permitted uses be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the City's Habitat Management Plan.
Therefore, the measure will-not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan.
b) Less than significant impact. The area affected by this ballot measure is currently regulated by existing
land use documents including the City of Carlsbad General Plan, the City Zoning Ordinance, the Carlsbad Habitat
Management Plan (Sub-areas A and B), the Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan (Sub-areas A and B), the Mello II
Local Coastal Plan (Sub-areas C, D and E), the South Carlsbad Coastal Redevelopment Plan (Sub-area A), the
Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan (Sub-areas C, D and E) and the City's Growth Management Plan.
Sub-area A is located at the northeast corner of Cannon Road and the Interstate 5 freeway. It is presently
designated in the General Plan for T-R (Travel/Recreation Commercial) uses. It is designated for TS (Travel
Services Commercial) in the Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan which is the segment of the City's Local Coastal
Program in which it is located. The sub-area is presently zoned P-U (Public Utility). The ballot measure proposes
to change the General Plan designation, the Local Coastal Plan designation and the Zoning to Open Space (OS).
The sub-area is approximately 48 acres in size. The General Plan and Local Coastal Plan designation for the sub-
area would allow approximately 48 acres of commercial use consisting of uses that serve the travel and
recreational needs of visitors, tourists, residents and employees of business and industrial areas. Examples of these
uses include hotels, motels, restaurants, recreation facilities, travel support services, and specialty retail uses
catering to tourists. These types of uses are considered to be high priority uses in the coastal zone by the General
Plan and the Local Coastal Plan. The uses help to enhance public access and use to and within the coastal zone.
The loss of 48 acres of this type of commercial use within the coastal zone could be considered a significant,
adverse impact to the environment in the area of Land Use and Planning if it were not for certain mitigating
factors. The first mitigating factor relates to the previous approval of the Carlsbad Ranch/Legoland project
(Specific Plan 207). This project was approved in 1996 and added 191.6 acres of T-R and TS uses to the city
inventory of that particular use in the coastal zone. The project contains the Legoland Theme Park (visitor-
serving), two hotels and several restaurants. The Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan was approved in 1982 and so,
even with a reduction of 48 acres of T-R and TS as a result of the proposed ballot measure, the inventory of this
use in the coastal zone and in close proximity to Sub-area A has increased significantly (increase of over 143
acres) from when the Agua Hedionda Coastal Land Use Plan was approved. In addition, the ballot measure
proposes to spend $1 million to construct a public access trail through the affected area which will greatly enhance
public access in the coastal zone and to Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Based on these-mitigating factors, it has been
determined that the impacts relating to changing Sub-area A to Open Space is considered less than significant.
Sub-area B is the remainder of the area located on the north side of Cannon Road adjacent to Agua Hedionda
Lagoon. This sub-area is presently designated for Open Space in both the General Plan and the Agua Hedionda
Land Use Plan, however except for a small portion, it is presently zoned P-U (Public Utility). The proposed action
would change the P-U zone to Open Space (OS) so that the entire sub-area would be zoned consistent with the
General Plan and the Local Coastal Plan. Therefore, regarding this sub-area, the proposed ballot measure would
not have any significant, adverse impacts in the area of Land Use and Planning.
Sub-area C is the existing Flower Fields located south of Cannon Road and north of Palomar Airport Road. The
Flower Fields are presently designated as Open Space in the General Plan, the Mello II segment of the Local
Coastal Program, the Zoning Ordinance and the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan. The ballot measure proposes to
protect the existing Flower Fields and does not propose any changes to the General Plan, Coastal Plan, Zoning
Map, or Specific Plan for this sub-area. Therefore, the proposed action has no significant, adverse impacts relating
to this sub-area.
Sub-areas D and E are located along the southern frontage of Cannon Road. The General Plan, Coastal Plan,
Zoning and Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan all designate these sub-areas for Open Space. The ballot measure does
not propose any change to this designation. The measure does propose to change some of the specific open space
uses permitted by the Specific Plan as the sub-areas were originally planned to be used as part of a larger golf
course which was never constructed and is not being considered any longer. Therefore, the proposed action does
not cause any significant, adverse impacts relating to these two sub-areas.
Overall, it has been determined that the proposed action has less than significant impacts to the environment with
respect to Land Use and Planning when taking into consideration the previously-approved net increase in T-R/T-S
acreage in the area in close proximity to the proposed action and the proposal to construct public trails in
conjunction with the proposed ballot measure.
15 Rev. 02/22/06
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a .locally
important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land
use plan?
a-b) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance
and Local Coastal Program the primary purpose of which is to ensure that the affected area is retained in open
space and that existing farming operations are allowed to continue. No development projects are approved by this
action. The amendments will only allow open space uses in the area. As such, the proposed project will not result
in any adverse impacts to mineral resources.
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
16 Rev. 02/22/06
a-f) No impact. The proposed .ballot measure does not approve any physical development project that would
generate any noise or increase ambient noise levels. The purpose of the proposed action is to retain the affected
area for open space uses and to allow existing farming operations to continue. Although a portion of the area
affected by the proposed ballot measure is located in the Airport Influence Area as shown in the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan (CLUP) for McClellan-Palomar Airport, the entire area is located outside the CNEL 60 noise
contour. Therefore, it has been determined that no significant impacts related to noise will result from the proposed
action.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
a-c) No impact. The proposed action does not involve or approve any development project. Residential
development is not presently an allowed use in the area affected by the proposed action and the ballot measure
does not propose to allow residential as a permitted use in the area: Only open space uses would be allowed by the
proposed measure. Therefore, no impacts would result from the proposed action relating to population and
housing.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered government facilities, a
need for new or physically altered government
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or
other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
17 Rev. 02/22/06
a) No impact. The purpose of the proposed action is to ensure that the area affected by the action is retained
for open space uses. No development proposals are approved by the action. Although certain public facilities such
as parks, recreation facilities, and city buildings are allowed in the Open Space designation by Conditional Use
Permit, no physical development of these public facilities are specifically approved as part of the proposed ballot
measure. Any proposal to develop public facilities in the area would have to go through it own, separate permitting
process. The measure does allow consideration of a civic center in the area (except on the existing Flower Fields)
but only if it is approved by a majority of city voters at an election specifically for such purpose. As such, the
proposed action does not result in any significant, adverse impacts in the area Public Services.
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XIV. RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
a-b) No impact. The proposed ballot measure consists of amendments to the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and the Local Coastal Program to ensure that the affected area is retained in open space and that
farming is allowed to continue in the area. No development projects are approved by the proposed action and,
therefore, there are no impacts on existing recreational facilities. Recreational uses are permitted as an open space
use. The measure also allows the city to construct a public trail throughout the affected area. As such, there is a
positive impact that results from the proposed action and it has been determined that there are no significant
adverse impacts on Recreation as a result of the proposed action.
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level
of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads
or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
18 Rev. 02/22/06
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature I • I
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
D
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in insufficient parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn-
outs, bicycle racks)?
a-g) No impact. No physical development projects*are approved by the proposed action. The primary
purpose of the action is to amend existing city land use documents to ensure that the area affected by the proposed
action is retained in open space and that existing farming operations are allowed to continue. There is no increase
in traffic that would result directly from the proposed action. The proposed ballot measure redesignates an
approximately 48 acre portion of the area (Sub-area A) from tourist-serving, commercial use to open space. This
should substantially reduce traffic generation in the affected area.
SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated three roads (Rancho Santa Fe
Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad as part of the regional
circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS on these designated
roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
Rancho Santa Fe Road
El Camino Real
Palomar Airport Road
SR78
1-5
Existing ADT*
17-35
27-49
10-57
124-142
199-216
LOS
"A-D"
"A-C"
"A-D"
"F"
"D"
Buildout ADT*
35-56
. 33-62
30-73
156-180
260-272
: The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS "F" in 1990). Accordingly, all
designated roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and
community plans. Traffic from the area affected by this proposed action was used in modeling the buildout
projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes implementation of
the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and highways and
implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-term and at
buildout.
19 Rev. 02/22/06
The proposed action does not include any aviation components. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air
traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. It does not include any parking variances or impacts on public
transportation components..
Overall, the proposed action does not result in any significant, adverse impacts traffic or transportation in the
affected area.
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the
project: >
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Kl
[x]
20 Rev. 02/22/06
a-g) No impact. No development projects which would require new utilities and service systems are
approved by the proposed action. The purpose of the proposed ballot measure is to retain the affected area for open
space uses and to allow existing farming operations to continue. The action does not result in the need for new
water, wastewater or solid waste systems. Therefore, the proposed action will not result in any significant, adverse
impacts in the area of Utilities and Service Systems.
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
"Mitigation
Incorporated
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula-
tively considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
U IEI
a-c) No impact. The purpose of the proposed action is to amend existing city land use documents to ensure
that the area affected by the proposed action is retained in open space and that existing farming operations are
allowed to continue. No physical development is approved by the action. All open space uses allowed by the action
must comply with the City's Habitat Management Plan so there will be no impacts to habitat or wildlife. No
cumulative impacts or significant, adverse impacts on humans will result from the action. Therefore, it has been
determined that there are no impacts associated with mandatory findings of significance.
21 Rev. 02/22/06 3fl
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES ,-
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects -were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
^c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
22 Rev. 02/22/06
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION, SOURCES
The following documents were-used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
2. Final Environmental Impact Report for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment (EIR 94-01). August
1995
23 Rev. 02/22/06 •Tff
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Governor Director
June 21,2006
Gary Barberio
City of Carlsbad >. ? "!
1635 Faraday Avenue v ^
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: EIA 06-01 The Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields, Open Space and Public Trails Protection Act of
2006 (City-sponsored Ballot Measure)
SCH#: 2006051105
Dear Gary Barberio:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for
review. The review period closed on June 20, 2006, and no state agencies submitted comments by that
date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements
for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the
environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to the
ten-digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office.
Sincerely,
I/
Terry Roberts
Director, State Clearinghouse
1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044
TEL (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 vww.opr.ca.gov
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
320 WEST 4™ STREET, SUITE 500
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013
sC-i •pif>,f*<'i-'M-Vi''""t\<f CAV\*f** ~.,,-u
June 19, 2006
Gary Barberio
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mr. Barberio:
Re: SCH# 2006051105; EIA 06-01 The Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields, Open Space, and Public
Trails
As the state agency responsible for rail safety within California, we recommend.that any
development projects planned adjacent to or near the North County Transit District right-of-way
be planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind. New developments may increase traffic
volumes not only on streets and at intersections, but also at at-grade highway-rail crossings. This
includes considering pedestrian circulation patterns/destinations with respect to railroad right-of-
way. •
Safety factors to consider include, but are not limited to, the planning for grade separations for
major thoroughfares, improvements to existing at-grade highway-rail crossings due to increase in
traffic volumes and appropriate fencing to limit the access of trespassers onto the railroad right-of-
way.
The above-mentioned safety improvements should be considered when approval is sought for the
new development. Working with Commission staff early in the conceptual design phase will help
improve the safety to motorists and pedestrians in the City. , , .. .
Please advise us on the status of the project. If you have any questions in this matter, please contact
me at (213) 576-7078 or at rxm@cpuc.ca.gov.
Rosa Munoz, P.
Utilities Engineer .
Rail Crossings Engineering Section
Consumer Protection & Safety Division
C: Richard Walker, NCTD
Hi
00
CD
CD
CD
CLCO CD
CDp tr
CD
O S
CD
GO
P
oo
CD
CD
O
r-K
O
CL
oa
CD
^ 2Po
° CD
tooo
H-». h-J H-J
CD. O CD
0)
3ft)•-I O
Oo
CD
CD p
o^ CL
cr
CD
0 dP t5^
5o^ i-HO^ ) •
P O
HPX
I
00
CD
00
o
o*
>a
0^ i— k •
CD
CD
0
dd
CfQ
CfQ
CD
P CD
CO
i-t
CD
W.S
^til?rtVs,f\
All Receive
For tiie Information of the:
Sempra Energy'
Sempra Energy
101 Ash Street
H012B
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619) 699-5049
Fax: (619) 699-5189
mlewis@sempra.com
July 31,2006
Ronald R. Ball
City Attorney
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: Revised Proposed Initiative Entitled "Permanently Protect the Flower Fields,
Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006 "
Dear Mr. Ball:
As you know, the City of Carlsbad (the "City") is currently considering placing two
proposed initiatives on the November ballot that would affect certain real property owned by San
Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E") located north of Cannon Road adjacent to Interstate
5 and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon (the "Property"): "Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing
Fields Act of 2006", sponsored by The Concerned Citizens of Carlsbad ("Proposition A"), and
"Permanently Protect the Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006",
sponsored by the City ("Proposition C"). SDG&E previously sent a letter to the City on July 13,
2006 describing some of its concerns regarding Proposition A and Proposition C.
Recently, a committee established by the City Council, The Citizens' Committee to Study
the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields Area, submitted a report to the City Council
recommending certain changes to Proposition C. SDG&E understands that the City Council
plans to consider whether to incorporate the Committee's recommended changes and place the
revised Proposition C on the November ballot at the City Council meeting scheduled on August
1, 2006. SDG&E has briefly reviewed the recommended changes to Proposition C, and would
like to commend the substantial efforts made by the Committee to address the various concerns
raised by many of the constituents potentially affected by Proposition C.
Page 2
SDG&E respectfully requests the opportunity to suggest a few changes to the revised
Proposition C, which are reflected in the attached pages. SDG&E is committed to working with
the City to identify potential uses of the Property that could be both beneficial both to SDG&E
and to the City and its constituents. SDG&E appreciates the opportunity to participate in the
process of developing an initiative that furthers this goal. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
/j**-'
Marie E. Lewis, Esq.
cc: Claude A. "Bud" Lewis, Mayor, City of Carlsbad
Matt Hall, City Council Member, City of Carlsbad
Ann J. Kulchin, City Council Member, City of Carlsbad
Mark Packard, City Council Member, City of Carlsbad
Norine Sigafoose, City Council Member, City of Carlsbad
Steven D. Davis, Senior Vice President - External Relations
J. Bret Lane, Vice President - Environmental, Safety & Facilities
Eugene "Mitch" Mitchell, Regional Vice President - External Affairs
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 13
AB# 18,682
MTG. 8/1/06
DEPT. Clerk
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 7, 2006
DEPT. HEADcT/^" !
CITYATTY. •'(^ j
CITYMGR. *^>O I
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 2006-223 , ordering the submission of the "Permanently Protect the Flower
Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006" measure to the qualified voters of Carlsbad.
Adopt Resolution No. 2006-224 . adopting a Negative Declaration and Addendum for the City-
sponsored ballot measure.
Adopt Resolution No. 2006-225 . authorizing certain council members to file a written argument.
Adopt Resolution No. 2006-226 , directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.
Adopt Resolution No. 2006-227 , providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
At its July 25, 2006 meeting, Council received the Report of the Citizens' Committee to Study the Flower
Fields and Strawberry Fields Area of the City. At this meeting Council directed the City Clerk to prepare
documents to place a city measure on the ballot for the General Municipal Election to be held November
7, 2006 that reflects all the recommendations made by the Citizens' Committee. The Council also
determined to delete the previously proposed section of the measure relating to trail funding. The City
measure is attached to Resolution No. 2006-223 ordering the submission of the measure to the voters.
The documents are attached and will accomplish the following:
Adoption of Resolution No. 2006-223 , amends Resolution No. 2006-J64, calling for the November
7, 2006 General Municipal Election by ordering the submission of the "Permanently Protect the Flower
Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006" measure to the qualified voters of the City of
Carlsbad.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2006-224 , adopting the Negative Declaration and Addendum for the ballot
measure.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2006-225 . authorizes certain council members to file a written argument.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2006-226 directs the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2006-227 , provides for the filing of rebuttal arguments.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Lorraine Wood 760-434-2808 clerk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED D
DENIED D
CONTINUED O
WITHDRAWN D
AMENDED D
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC O
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D
RETURNED TO STAFF Q
OTHER - SEE MINUTES D
w
Q
Z
z
-3
•3
fi P rn
&
!.c
''I
u iflB d
gg.2 •£
5
itin
s
•OP-
Sempra Energy Marie Lewis
Counsel
Sempra Energy
101 Ash Street
none
San Oiego, CA 92101
Tei: (619) 699-5049
fax: (619) 699-S189
August 1,2006
Ronald R. Ball
City Attorney
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: Revised Proposed Initiative Entitled "Permanently Protect the Flower Fields,
Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006"
Dear Mr. Ball:
With respect to the "Permanently Protect the Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space
Act of 2006" ("Proposition C"), currently being considered by the City of Carlsbad (the "City"),
the attached reflects the additional change that we discussed this morning, as well as a suggested
further revision to one of the comments in the documents delivered to you yesterday. Thank you
for taking the opportunity to speak to me this morning. If you have any questions or comments,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Marie E. Lewis, Esq.
cc: Steven D. Davis, Senior Vice President - External Relations
J. Bret Lane, Vice President - Environmental, Safety & Facilities
Eugene "Mitch" Mitchell, Regional Vice President - External Affairs
Joan M. LeSage, Assistant General Counsel
l\(\
r than those oxnpaiible puhfivc park and rei£ "z
C ? Prohibit commercial and industrial-type uses m Ihe area otassociated with farming operations and open space uses.CA Enhance public access and public use in the area by allowingcommunity gathering spaces and public and private, active and pauses.£o
§
1
S
s
•1
c
1
s
il;
J
r, l
a 1 1 I1 I1!
-a =»"> ™ ^C.6 Utili/c all existing programs and land use proleclions ammechanisms Irj keep the existing Flower Fields in production.C.7 I| determined lo he necessary, ;hc Cily shall amend ihe ZoninCannon Koud Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor Overarea that it-otild provide mure detail on permitted uses and iand usethe area.c participation is listed above |jS m
C-X The- City shall initiate a public planning process with broad pu:accomplish implementation of Ihe goals, objectives and action progr.I
17.S
o
c
a
1
g
H
1 nc Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as se! forth in this SiB.
|
c ^il Ihe official Zoning Map is- amended to rezone the area as shownherein and not prcscntlv zoned Open Space to the OS (Open Space) a5. Section 5. IMPLEMENTATION2 < '^ ^ r. •£ •*' **5.1 Effective Dale. This mcasLre shall become ctl'ective upon piiccprdanu- with Hcclions Code 9217. With respect lo the General Plann Section 3 of [his measure, if ihc number of General Plan Amendmentwimincd by California Government Code Section 6535S have air,\mcndmenls to the General Plan enacted by this measure shall be the li.>ccome dieclive on January 1 of the next year following passage. U(»nncasure. all cmiilcmi-nts (whether discretionary or ministerial) notipprovals not >ei approved, shall not be issued or approved unless ihe'Jro\ isions of ibis measure£ ga|l|l.£ls^5^J <3 .1" S s | 'g. s
*3 if, r"^*-^£ °* S SJ Jqo "2 c «*^5 ^ O ^ ^
» " .': S f . 1 cf-^_ «i .2 Interpretation And Authority To Amend Other Cil> Ordin.ncthis measure shall be imcrpreted so as lo be consistent with all federalIso be broadly interpreted and construed in order to achieve the purpos.'w measure. The Cily n hereby authorized to make any other amcKdmric Zoning Ordinance or any other plans, policies or ordinances necessarrovisions of this measure and to ensure consistency between the provisiII other elements of the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, «nd anvrdinanccs. If deemed necessary, ihe City is authorized n> amend the /ornd adopt a Cannon Road Open Space. lra:TT)injj and Public Use Con-id.•"uld !hrn bt- applied lo ihc area affected by this measure. The Ovc«(lore detail on permitted uses and regulations applicable lo the arcfsSV
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-225
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
3 COUNCIL MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT
4 REGARDING A CITY MEASURE
5 WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Carlsbad, California,
6 on November 7, 2006, at which there will be submitted the following measure:
Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate the provisions
of the "Permanently Protect The Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open
Space Act of 2006?"
YES
NO
7
8
9
10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
12 1. That the City Council authorizes the following Council Members:
13
CLAUDE T.EWTS MATT HALL
14 "
15
16 to file a written argument in support of the city measure as specified above, not to exceed 300
17 words, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, in
18 accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of
19
California and to change the argument until 5:00 p.m. on August 23, 2006, as fixed by the City
20
Clerk after which no arguments for or against the measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
21 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution.
22"
23
24
25
26
27
78
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad held on the 1st day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
E M. WOOD, City Clerk
Shall the Carlsbad General Plan be amended to incorporate the provisions
of the "Permanently Protect the Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open
Space Act of 2006?"
YES
NO
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-226
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY
3 TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF A CITY
4 MEASURE
5 WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Carlsbad, California
6
on November 7, 2006, at which there will be submitted to the qualified voters the following
7
measure, to wit:
8
9
10
11 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have an impartial analysis prepared showing the
12 effect of the measure on existing law and the operation of the measure;
13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
14 California, as follows:
15 1. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to
16 the City Attorney.
17 2. Pursuant to the provision of Section 9280 of the Elections Code of the State of
1 g California, this City Council does direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial
19 analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law
20 and operation of the measure.
21 3. That the impartial analysis shall not exceed 500 words in length.
22 4. That the impartial analysis shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk by the date
23 and time set by the City Clerk for the filing of rebuttal arguments.
24 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution;
25 and shall enter the same in the file of Original Resolutions.
26 //
27 //
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad held on the 1st day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
• MM *
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-227
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING
3 OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
4 SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.
5 WHEREAS, Section 9220 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the
6 City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments
7 for measures submitted a municipal elections;
g NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
9 California, as follows:
10 1 • That the above recitations are true and correct.
11 2. That pursuant to Section 9220 of the Elections Code of the State of California,
12 rebuttal arguments, not to exceed 250 words, shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the
13 printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
14 organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one
15 of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments,
16 Rebuttal arguments are due by 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2006, as fixed by the City Clerk.
17 Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments. Each
18 rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
19 3. That the provisions listed above shall apply only to the election to be held on
20 November 7, 2006.
21 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad held on the 1 st day of August, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
L
CORRAINEM: WOOD, city cierk
(SEAL)
CITY BALLOT MEASURE FOR CITY BALLOT MEASURE FOR THE FLOWER AND THE FLOWER AND STRAWBERRY FIELDS AREA STRAWBERRY FIELDS AREA
Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing Fields Act of 2006Fields Act of 2006––Submitted by Concerned Citizens of CarlsbadSubmitted by Concerned Citizens of CarlsbadDecember 2005December 2005Carlsbad Gateway Parkland and Open Carlsbad Gateway Parkland and Open Space Initiative of 2006Space Initiative of 2006––Submitted by C.C.U.P.P.Submitted by C.C.U.P.P.March 2006March 2006City Ballot MeasureCity Ballot Measure––Drafted May 2006Drafted May 2006
CitizensCitizens’’Committee to Study the Committee to Study the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields AreaAreaCommittee established April 18, 2006Committee established April 18, 2006––31 member Committee31 member Committee25 Citizen voting members25 Citizen voting members6 non6 non--voting membersvoting membersCommittee met May 16 to July 11, 2006Committee met May 16 to July 11, 2006Committee held 7 publiclyCommittee held 7 publicly--noticed noticed meetingsmeetings
CitizensCitizens’’Committee to Study the Committee to Study the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields AreaAreaCommittee Members were:Pete Aadland Len Martyns Non-voting MembersJill AgostiKip McBane Chris CalkinsJennifer Benner Gina McBride Claudia CarrilloMarvin Cap Laura Means Pope Marvin SippelBill Dominguez Leslea Meyerhoff Courtney HeinemanFarrah Douglas Robert Morgan Nancy CalverleyVern Farrow Eric MuñozBob Garcin Peder NorbyGary HillSeth SchulbergMark Johnson Daniel SwigerPat KurthHeidi WillesKeith Lewinger Mark WinklerCary Manning
Elections Code Section 9212 Report Elections Code Section 9212 Report (Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing Fields(Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing FieldsAct of 2006 Act of 2006 ––Concerned Citizens)Concerned Citizens)CC ordered report on June 20, 2006CC ordered report on June 20, 2006Report analyzed legal, procedural, land Report analyzed legal, procedural, land use, & fiscal impacts of initiativeuse, & fiscal impacts of initiativeCC accepted 9212 Report, July 18, 2006CC accepted 9212 Report, July 18, 2006CC authorized placement of Initiative on CC authorized placement of Initiative on November 7, 2006 BallotNovember 7, 2006 Ballot––July 25, 2006July 25, 2006
CitizensCitizens’’Committee ReportCommittee ReportThe Report contained the following:The Report contained the following:––Comparative Analysis matrix of the Measures Comparative Analysis matrix of the Measures ––Recommendations of Committee majorityRecommendations of Committee majority––A minority reportA minority reportCC accepted Report July 25, 2006CC accepted Report July 25, 2006Directed staff to incorporate:Directed staff to incorporate:––All of CitizensAll of Citizens’’CommitteeCommittee’’s recommendationss recommendations––Delete Delete ““trail fundingtrail funding””languagelanguage
CityofCarlsbadThe Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use CorridorA RMADA DRP A S E O D E L N O RTECA R C O U N T R Y D R
AV IA R A P YCOLLEGE BLCANNON RDPALOMAR AIRPORT RDC A R L S B A D B L RLMExhibit A
City Council City Council ––Sponsored Ballot MeasureSponsored Ballot MeasureFlower and Strawberry Fields AreaFlower and Strawberry Fields AreaWhat the Ballot Measure does:What the Ballot Measure does:––Designates the Area for Special Planning Designates the Area for Special Planning Consideration Consideration ––““The Cannon Road Open The Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use CorridorSpace, Farming and Public Use Corridor””––Reaffirms existing Open Space (OS) Reaffirms existing Open Space (OS) designation for the Area designation for the Area ––Permanently Permanently lockslocksinto placeinto placethe Open Space designationthe Open Space designation
What the Measure DoesWhat the Measure Does––Regarding SDG&E property, reaffirms and Regarding SDG&E property, reaffirms and lockslocks--ininthe existing Coastal Plan approved by the existing Coastal Plan approved by the City and the California Coastal the City and the California Coastal CommissionCommission208 acres of open space 208 acres of open space ––81% of property81% of propertyAllows development of 48 acresAllows development of 48 acresPromotes agricultural use as long as feasiblePromotes agricultural use as long as feasibleAvoids taking of property rightsAvoids taking of property rights
What the Measure DoesWhat the Measure Does––Prohibits residential development in the areaProhibits residential development in the area––Enhances the opportunity to provide public Enhances the opportunity to provide public accessibility and use to the area accessibility and use to the area ––Allows Allows consideration of active and passive recreation consideration of active and passive recreation usesuses––Provides for a comprehensive planning Provides for a comprehensive planning process, with significant citizen input, to process, with significant citizen input, to determine appropriate open space uses for determine appropriate open space uses for the areathe area
Section 3.3(c) of Ballot MeasureSection 3.3(c) of Ballot MeasurePermitted UsesPermitted UsesC.C.Implementing Policies and Action ProgramsImplementing Policies and Action ProgramsC.1 Protect and preserve this area as an open C.1 Protect and preserve this area as an open space corridor. Permit only open space, space corridor. Permit only open space, farming and compatible public uses in the farming and compatible public uses in the area. Permitted uses shall be as follows:area. Permitted uses shall be as follows:Open SpaceOpen SpaceFarming and other related agricultural support uses including flFarming and other related agricultural support uses including flower ower and strawberry productionand strawberry productionPublic trailsPublic trailsActive and passive park, recreation and similar public and privaActive and passive park, recreation and similar public and private te use facilities (except on the existing Flower Fieldsuse facilities (except on the existing Flower Fields®®))Electrical Transmission facilitiesElectrical Transmission facilitiesC.2 Prohibit residential development in the areaC.2 Prohibit residential development in the area
Recommended ActionsRecommended ActionsAdopt Resolution No. Adopt Resolution No. 20062006--223 223 , ordering the , ordering the submission of the submission of the ““Permanently Protect the Flower Permanently Protect the Flower Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006Fields, Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006””measure to the qualified voters of Carlsbad.measure to the qualified voters of Carlsbad.Adopt Resolution No. Adopt Resolution No. 20062006--224 224 , adopting a Negative , adopting a Negative Declaration and Addendum for the CityDeclaration and Addendum for the City--sponsored ballot sponsored ballot measure.measure.Adopt Resolution No. Adopt Resolution No. 20062006--225 225 , authorizing certain , authorizing certain council members to file a written argument.council members to file a written argument.Adopt Resolution No. Adopt Resolution No. 20062006--226226, directing the City , directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis.Adopt Resolution No. Adopt Resolution No. 20062006--227 227 , providing for the filing , providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments.of rebuttal arguments.
Subcommittee MembersSubcommittee Membersof the Citizensof the Citizens’’CommitteeCommitteeSeth Seth SchulbergSchulbergFarrahFarrahDouglasDouglasGary HillGary HillLesleaLesleaMeyerhoffMeyerhoffLaura Means PopeLaura Means Pope
COLLEGE BLC A R LS B A D B LCANNON RDPALOMAR AIRPORT RDAVIAR A P Y
211023132110102821102221211010052 1 1 0 1 0 2 4
2 1 1 0 2 3 1 1
21101031AGUAHEDIONDALAGOONPACIFICOCEANRLMRLMRLM
Add a new Section 3.4 to the City Ballot Measure:Add a new Section 3.4 to the City Ballot Measure:The Open Space and Conservation Element at page 16, The Open Space and Conservation Element at page 16, Section F. Citywide Open Space Plan, Category 2: Open Section F. Citywide Open Space Plan, Category 2: Open Space for Managed Production of Resources, Space for Managed Production of Resources, Forestry/Agriculture/Aquaculture (2a), is hereby amended by Forestry/Agriculture/Aquaculture (2a), is hereby amended by changing the wording of the first sentence to read as follows:changing the wording of the first sentence to read as follows:Forestry, agriculture and aquaculture are considered a Forestry, agriculture and aquaculture are considered a category 5 citywide priority for future open space planning category 5 citywide priority for future open space planning except that agricultural uses in the Cannon Road Open except that agricultural uses in the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor shall be Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor shall be considered a category 1 priority.considered a category 1 priority.PROPOSED CHANGES FOR PROPOSED CHANGES FOR COUNCILCOUNCIL’’S CONSIDERATIONS CONSIDERATION(proposed by Kip (proposed by Kip McBaneMcBane))
PROPOSED CHANGES FOR PROPOSED CHANGES FOR COUNCILCOUNCIL’’S CONSIDERATIONS CONSIDERATION(proposed by SDG&E)(proposed by SDG&E)At the end of Item B.4 of paragraph 3.3 add:At the end of Item B.4 of paragraph 3.3 add:““in coordination with landownersin coordination with landowners””In Item B.5 of paragraph 3.3 add the wordIn Item B.5 of paragraph 3.3 add the word““compatiblecompatible””before the words before the words ““public trailspublic trails””Add the following at the end of Item C.8 in Add the following at the end of Item C.8 in paragraph 3.3:paragraph 3.3:“…“…and may include reconfiguration of the 48 acre parcel currentlyand may include reconfiguration of the 48 acre parcel currentlydesignated as TR (Travel/Recreation Commercial use) located designated as TR (Travel/Recreation Commercial use) located adjacent to the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use adjacent to the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, so long as the City Council can make the findings requCorridor, so long as the City Council can make the findings required ired in paragraph C.20 of the Open Space and Conservation Element of in paragraph C.20 of the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan such that the proposed open space area within tthe General Plan such that the proposed open space area within the he Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, is Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, is equal to or greater than the area depicted on the official Open equal to or greater than the area depicted on the official Open Space Space and Conservation Map and that the proposed open space is of and Conservation Map and that the proposed open space is of environmental quality equal to or greater than that depicted on environmental quality equal to or greater than that depicted on the the official Open Space and Conservation Mapofficial Open Space and Conservation Map””..
Suggested Titles forSuggested Titles forCity Ballot MeasureCity Ballot MeasureThe Flower Fields, the Strawberry Fields and the The Flower Fields, the Strawberry Fields and the Carlsbad Taxpayers Protection Act of 2006Carlsbad Taxpayers Protection Act of 2006Preserve the Flower Fields and the Right of the Preserve the Flower Fields and the Right of the Property Owner to Continue to Farm the Property Owner to Continue to Farm the Strawberry FieldsStrawberry FieldsPermanently Protect the Flower Fields, the Permanently Protect the Flower Fields, the Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006Strawberry Fields and Open Space Act of 2006Protect the Future of the Flower Fields and Protect the Future of the Flower Fields and Strawberry Fields Area of the CityStrawberry Fields Area of the City
PROPOSED CHANGES FOR COUNCILPROPOSED CHANGES FOR COUNCIL’’SSCONSIDERATIONCONSIDERATIONAdd a new Section 3.4 to the City Ballot Measure: Add a new Section 3.4 to the City Ballot Measure: The Open Space and Conservation Element at page 16, Section F. The Open Space and Conservation Element at page 16, Section F. Citywide Open Space Plan, Category 2: Open Space for Managed Citywide Open Space Plan, Category 2: Open Space for Managed Production of Resources, Forestry/Agriculture/Aquaculture (2a), Production of Resources, Forestry/Agriculture/Aquaculture (2a), is is hereby amended by changing the wording of the first sentence to hereby amended by changing the wording of the first sentence to read as follows:read as follows:Forestry, agriculture and aquaculture are considered a categoryForestry, agriculture and aquaculture are considered a category5 5 citywide priority for future open space planning citywide priority for future open space planning except that agricultural uses in the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor shall be considered a category 1 priority.
At the end of Item B.4 of At the end of Item B.4 of paragraph3.3 add 3.3 add ““in coordination with landownersin coordination with landowners””In Item B.5 of paragraph 3.3 add the wordIn Item B.5 of paragraph 3.3 add the word““compatiblecompatible””before the words before the words ““public trailspublic trails””Add the following at the end of Item C.8 in paragraph 3.3Add the following at the end of Item C.8 in paragraph 3.3“…“…and may include reconfiguration of the 48 acre parcel and may include reconfiguration of the 48 acre parcel currently designated as TR (Travel/Recreational/Commercial currently designated as TR (Travel/Recreational/Commercial Use) located adjacent to the Cannon Road Open Space, Use) located adjacent to the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, so long as the City Council Farming and Public Use Corridor, so long as the City Council can make the findings required in paragraph C.20 of the Open can make the findings required in paragraph C.20 of the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan such Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan such that the proposed open space area within the Cannon Road that the proposed open space area within the Cannon Road Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, is equal to or Open Space, Farming and Public Use Corridor, is equal to or greater than the area depicted on the official Open Space and greater than the area depicted on the official Open Space and Conservation Map and that the proposed open space is of Conservation Map and that the proposed open space is of environmental quality equal to or greater than that depicted environmental quality equal to or greater than that depicted on the official Open Space and Conservation Mapon the official Open Space and Conservation Map””..
Openspace
Openspace
Commercial Visitor Serving Overlay Zone
www.cccpac.org
Negative EIR Declaration
Negative EIR Declaration
Negative EIR Declaration
Aqua Hedionda Lagoon Plan• Policy 2.3 Conversion of the 45 acre SDG& E south shore property shall be subject to the following conditions:• prior to the development SDG&E shall record a permanent open space easement over the remaining agricultural lands in favor of the City of Carlsbad.Said easement shall limit uses to agriculture, utility right-of-way and maintenance, roadways and recreations trails that do not interfere with agricultural operations.
Save the Strawberry and Flower Growing fields protect the city from liability & does what the name says• Section 5. EXEMPTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS FOR CERTAIN MATTERS.•5.1This initiative shall be subject to amendment by the City Council without the required vote of the People of Carlsbadupon a showing of substantial evidence on the record that implementation or operation of this initiative will frustrate City functions in any of the following circumstances:•To affect City compliancewith any State mandated programs, including but not limited to: housing requirements; density bonuses; development agreements; certified redevelopment plans; vesting tentative maps; or other matters otherwise required by State law;•To deprive any person, organization or entity of their Constitutional rights, including property rights,and no takings shall be allowed through the construction or implementation of this initiative;• To affect any development project that has obtained as of the effective date of the initiative a vested right pursuant to State or local law.• Upon such a showing the City Council may amend this Initiative in manner that most narrowly construes the City’s compliance obligations, or liability, as the case may be, yet at the same time balances the broadest possible construction and implementation of the intentions of this Initiative. Any such amendments allowable to the City Council shall not impair the right of the People of Carlsbad to subsequently seek a Referendum overturning such actions if they so choose.
www.cccpac.org