Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-09-12; City Council; 18724; Carltas Medical OfficeCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL RECOMMENDED ACTION: 19 AB# MTG. DEPT. 18,724 9-12-06 PLN CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA GPA05-15/MP 98-01 (G) DEPT. HEAD HZL Tfl CITY ATTY. >^$ CITY MGR. ~2ip That the City Council INTRODUCE Ordinance No. NS-816 Amendment 98-01 (G) and ADOPT Resolution No. 2006-270 Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Amendment 05-15. ITEM EXPLANATION: , APPROVING Master Plan ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative and APPROVING General Plan Project Applications Negative Declaration GPA05-15 MPA 98-01 (G) SDP05-18 SUP 05-17 Administrative Approvals Reviewed by and Final at Planning Commission X X To be reviewed - Final at Council X X X On July 19, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended to the City Council approval (6-0 - Commissioner Segal did not participate due to a potential conflict of interest) of a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment and a Master Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use designation on a 7.68 acre parcel generally located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble in Local Facilities Management Zone 10. At the same hearing, the Planning Commission also approved (6-0) a Site Development Flan and Special Use Permit to construct two 42,500 square foot medical office buildings. The approval of the Site Development Plan and Special Use Permit were final at the Planning Commission. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Master Plan Amendment would change the General Plan Land Use designation on the property from Planned Industrial (PI) to Office (O) The Zoning of the property is Planned Community (PC) and does not need to be changed. The proposed Master Plan Amendment is necessary to provide consistency between the proposed development and the General Plan. Except for a brief statement from the applicant's representative, no public testimony was offered at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions and a complete description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of the proposed Land Use and Master Plan Amendments. FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructures required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. As estimated by the developer, there will be a four fold increase in the property value developed as medical office. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project does not have any impacts to any significant native or wetland habitats or wildlife species identified as candidate, sensitive or special status by the wildlife agencies and is identified as a development area within the HMP and Villages of La Costa Habitat Conservation Plan. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2006. No comments were received during the 20-day public review period (May 23, 2006 - June 12, 2006). GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS: Facilities Zone Local Facilities Management Plan Special Facility Fee 10 10 None EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Ordinance No. NS-816 2. City Council Resolution No. 2006-270 3. Location Map 4. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6125, 6126, 6127 5. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated July 19, 2006 6. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 19, 2006. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Van Lynch 760-602-4613 vlvnc@ci.carlsbad.ca.us FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED H^ CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC O DENIED D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D CONTINUED O RETURNED TO STAFF D WITHDRAWN O OTHER-SEE MINUTES D AMENDED D Page 2 1 ORDINANCE NO. NS-816 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN 4 AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF VILLAGE 1.1 FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN TOWN GARDEN LANE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. 8 CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 15 16 17 23 24 25 MPA/GPA CASE NO.: MP 98-01 (G) WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Villages of La Costa 11 Master Plan on October 23, 2001 by adopting Ordinance No. NS-605; and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 12th day ofseptember 13 2006 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said 14 request; and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Master Plan Amendment as shown on Exhibit "MP 98-01 (G)" dated July 19, 2006, incorporated 18 yjy iciddiuc. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad ordains by reference. 19 20 as follows: 21 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.22 2. That Master Plan Amendment MP 98-01 (G) dated July 19, 2006, attached, and incorporated herein by reference, is approved. The Master Plan shall constitute the development plan for the property and 26 all development within the plan area shall conform to the plan. 27 28 1 2 Commission Resolution No. 6127 shall also constitute the findings and 3 conditions of the City Council. 4 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after 5 its adoption; and the city clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause it6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 12th day of September, 2006, and thereafter. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day of , 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY RONALD R. BALL, City Attorney CLAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-270 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE 3 DECLARATION AND APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN . AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE ELEMENT FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL (PI) TO OFFICE (O) ON 5 PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN TOWN GARDEN LANE AND 6 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. 7 CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA CASE NO.: GPA 05-15/MP 98-01 (G)8 9 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 10 Commission did, on July 19, 2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 11 law to consider a Negative Declaration and General Plan Amendment; and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 12th day 14 of September j 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider 15 said Negative Declaration and General Plan Amendment and at that time received 16 recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or 17 opposed to the Negative Declaration and/or GPA 05-15; and 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 19 Carlsbad, California, as follows: 20 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 21 2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth 22 in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6125 and 6126 on file with the City Clerk and 23 made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 24 3. That the application for a Negative Declaration and General Plan Amendment on property generally located east of El Camino Real between Town 25 Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble is approved as shown in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6125 and 6126. 26 27 4. That the application for a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to change the Land Use designation on property from 28 1 Planned Industrial (PI) to Office (O) on land generally located east of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble as shown in Planning Commission 2 Resolution No. 6126, is hereby accepted and formally approved as GPA No. 3 of 2006. 3 5. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. 4 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, 'Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: 5 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 6 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be 7 sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision 10 becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount 11 sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended 12 to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the 14 preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, 15 CA. 92008." 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 12th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: None ayor ATTEST: -LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk ' (SEAL) EXHIBITS S'TE a AP HOT TO SCALE CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA GPA 05-15/MP 98-01 (G) EXHIBIT 4 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6125 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A 4 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT DESIGNATION FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE, A MASTER 6 PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LAND USE AND ZONING 7 DESIGNATIONS FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE, AND A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A 8 SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A 7.68-ACRE PARCEL o WITH TWO 42,500-SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO 10 REAL BETWEEN TOWN GARDEN LANE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 11 ZONE 10. CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA 12 CASE NO.: GPA 05-15/MP 98-OKGVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 13 WHEREAS, Carltas Company, "Developer," has filed a verified application 14 with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management , £ Company, "Owner," described as 17 Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 99-03, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof 18 No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder 19 ("the Property"); and 20 WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said 21 project; and 22 x WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of July 2006, hold a 24 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 25 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony *}f\zo and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and 27 considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors 28 relating to the Negative Declaration. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2 Commission as follows: 3 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 4 - B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration, 6 Exhibit "ND," dated according to Exhibits "NOI" dated May 23, 2006, and "PII" dated May 17, 2006, attached hereto and made a 7 part hereof, based on the following findings: o Findings: 9 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: 10 a. It has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Negative Declaration Carltas 11 Medical Office MPA/GPA - GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project. 13 b. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of 14 the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad. 15 c. It reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad. 17 d. Based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence 18 the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6125 -2- // 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES:Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN- Commissioner Segall MARTELL B. MONFGOMER^Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: DONNEU Assistant Planning Director PCRESONO. 6125 -3-19. City of Carlsbad CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA GPA 05-15/MP 98-01G/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 East side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble. Carlsbad. San Diego County. APN 213-110-01-00. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment and Villages of La Costa Master Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use Element from Planned Industrial to Office and the construction of two two-story 42,500 square foot Medical Office buildings (85,000 sq ft total) on a 7.68 acre site. DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: 1X1 The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. I I The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). I I Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. ADOPTED: ATTEST: , pursuant to City Council Resolution Number MARCELA ESCOBAR-ECK Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us•II City of Carlsbad CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: Planning Department NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Carltas Medical Office MPA/GPA GPA 05-15/MP 98-01G/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 East side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble. Carlsbad, San Diego County. APN 213-110- 01-00. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of a General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Villages of La Costa Master Plan Amendment to change the Land Use from Planned Industrial to Office and the construction of two two-story 42,500 square foot Medical Office buildings (85,000 sq ft total) on a 7.68 acre site. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad City Council. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice. The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD May 23. 2006 through June 12. 2006 PUBLISH DATE May 23,2006 v 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - INITIAL STUDYi - CASE NO: GPA 05-15/MP 98-01G/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 DATE: May 17.2006 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Van Lynch (760) 602-4613 4. PROJECT LOCATION: East side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble. Carlsbad. San Diego County. APN 213-110-01-00 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Real Estate Collateral Management Company. 1093Wright Place. Suite 180. Carlsbad CA 92008 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing Planned Industrial fPD (proposed Office CO)) 7. ZONING: Planned Community (PC) (Villages of La Costa Master Plan) 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): None 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use designation of the site from Planned Industrial to Office. A Master Plan Amendment is to reflect the proposed Land Use changes in the adopted Villages of La Costa Master Plan from Planned Industrial Zoning to Office Zoning. A Site Development Plan and Special Use Permit are for the construction of two two-story 42,500 square foot Medical Office buildings (85,000 sq ft total) on an existing 7.68 acre parcel. The Special Use Permit is required because the project site is located within the el Camino Real Scenic Corridor. The site is a previously graded industrial pad with utility services provided. Site access is provided via a shared driveway off of El Camino Real and Metropolitan Street from the north. The surrounding land uses are Planned Industrial to the north. Open Space to the south and east, a Community Facilities Site teethe southwest and a prime arterial roadway (El Camino Real) to the west. Planned Industrial is to the west of El Camino Real. The project site is located within Village 1.1 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Many of the environmental impacts of the project were evaluated in the Program Environmental Impact Report TEIR 98-07) for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad certified EIR 98-07 and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations on October 23. 2001. Mass grading of the project site was authorized as part of the approval of the Master Tentative Map for La Costa Greens (CT 99-03). The project has been reviewed for compliance with EIR 98-07 for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and has been designed or will be conditioned to incorporate the applicable mitigation measures as required. Rev. 02/22/06 IS ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics I I Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources I I Geology/Soils Hazards/Hazardous Materials || Hydrology/Water Quality I | Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Circulation | | Mandatory Findings of Significance J Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 02/22/06 DETERMINATION. D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED-NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impacts)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. Date ' T Plann/jig Director's Signature Date / Rev. 02/22/06 11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS i - STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an 'information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Initial Study", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. ' • • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately hi an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less man significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 02/22/06 • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Initial Study analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears after each related set of questions. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 02/22/06 I. AESTHETICS-Would the project:. a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (#l:Pgs 4.3-1 -4.3-48) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? (#l:Pgs 4.3- 1-4.3-48) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (#l:Pgs 4.3-1 -4.3-48) d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (#l:Pgs 4.3-1-4.3-48) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact n n The project is proposed along El Camino Real, a designated scenic corridor. The project would not have an impact as the project is setback from the roadway which would help preserve distant views and reduce a corridor effect caused by buildings being placed near the roadway. The site is Land Use designated as a Planned Industrial building site and the change of the site to an Office Land Use designation would not have any negative effects above those analyzed with the previous land use designation as the same type, intensity and design of building could be developed under either land use designation. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (#l:Pgs 4.1-1 -4.1-46 and4.10-1 -4.10-25) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless • Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Rev. 02/22/06 c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? (#l:Pgs 4.1-1 -4.1-46 and4.10-1 -4.10-25) The site is a previously graded industrial pad and does not support agricultural uses and is not under Williamson Act contracts. III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (#1 :Pgs 4.9-1 - 4.9-21) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#l:Pgs 4.9-1 -4.9-21) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (#l:Pgs 4.9-1 - 4.9-21) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (#l:Pgs 4.9-1 -4.9-21) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (#1 :Pgs 4.9-1 - 4.9-21) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Rev. 02/22/06 a) No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which-is a state non-attainment area for ozone (O3) and for participate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM]0). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). A Plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed hi 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located hi the San Diego Ah- Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. The project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and "will in no way conflict or obstruct implementation of the regional plan. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is at Camp Pendleton. Data available for this monitoring site from 2000 through December 2004, indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (a total of 10 days during the 5-year period). No other violations of any air quality standards have been recorded during the 5-year tune period. The project would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with finish grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result hi the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected ah" quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. Rev. 02/22/06 c) Less Than Significant Impact. The air basin is currently in a state non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. d) No impact. As noted above, the proposed would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the project. No impact is assessed. No Impact. The construction of the proposed project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short-term or transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1-4.4-48) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1-4.4-48) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1 -4.4-48) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1 -4.4-48) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D Rev. 02/22/06 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1 - 4.4-48) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (#l:Pgs 4.4-1 -4.4-48) D D The project site is a previously graded industrial pad and does not contain any flora or fauna. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? (#l:Pgs 4.6-1 -4.6-5) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? (#l:Pgs 4.6-1 -4.6-5) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique pale ontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (#l:Pgs 4.6-1-4.6-5) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (#l:Pgs 4.6-1 -4.6-5) Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D D D The project site is a previously graded industrial pad and does not contain any cultural resources. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the proj ect: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated-^ Impact Impact 10 Rev. 02/22/06 u. in. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 -4.10-25) Strong seismic ground shaking? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 - 4.10-25) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 -4.10-25) D iv. Landslides? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 -4.10-25) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 - 4.10-25) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 -4.10-25) d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? (#l:Pgs 4.10-1 - 4.10-25) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ^ D D n The project site is a previously graded industrial pad which has been graded pursuant to the grading standards of the City of Carlsbad. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1 - 4.13-21) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated*" Less Than Significant No Impact Impact n Rev. 02/22/06 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1-4.13-21) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1-4.13-21) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1 -4.13-21) e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (#l:Pgs 4.13- 1-4.13-21) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1-4.13-21) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (#l:Pgs 4.13-1 -4.13-21) e) The site was reviewed by the San Diego County Airport Authority for consistency with the'*McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Authority found the Land Use amendment project is conditionally consistent with the ALUCP. The project has been modified to incorporate the conditions which requires development within this area to be kept free of intensive development and all uses which involve the assembly of large groups of people (more than one hundred (100) persons per assembly area (as defined by the California Building Code Group A Occupancy). D 12 Rev. 02/22/06 Vffl. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1 -4.11-31, # 3) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1 -4.11-31) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1-4.11-31, #3) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1-4.11-31) e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1 -4.11-31) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (#l:Pgs4.11-l-4.11-31,#3) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1 -4.11-31) h) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1-4.11-31) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D D D 13 Rev. 02/22/06 i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (#l:Pgs4.11-l-4.11-31) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (#l:Pgs 4.11-1-4.11-31)n Impact. Development of the Proposed Project site would result in an increase in the cumulative amounts of urban pollutants entering San Marcos Creek and Batiquitos Lagoon. Although the cumulative contribution to urban runoff would be minimal and would not result in water pollution and/or contamination that would significantly impact human health and safety or biological communities, impacts are regarded as significant. Finding. With the incorporation of the mitigation measures contained in Section 4.11 of Program EIR 98-07, the identified direct significant impact would be avoided and thereby reduced to below a level of significance, but the proposed project's cumulative contribution to cumulative impacts would remain significant and unmitigable. The required mitigation measures include: (1) designing and incorporating the current Best Management Practices and Best Available Technologies (BMPs and BATs) available at that time for pollution control and erosion/siltation control, as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" and meeting all regulatory standards; (2) in conjunction with the sale, rental or lease of business property, all prospective owners and tenants shall be notified hi writing of the requirements for properly disposing of toxic and hazardous waste products; and (3) applicable standards of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the San Diego County area shall be met. Factual Support and Rationale. The new storm water point source discharge requirements apply to urban pollutant elimination. In addition, the project applicant will be required to educate occupants as to the need to eliminate or reduce general non-residential pollution entering the storm drain systems. Regulating the source, plus onsite detention and filtering, all consistent with the RWQCB order No. 2001-1, will further reduce urban pollutants from entering the lagoon and ocean. EX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (#l:Pgs 4.1-1-4.1-46 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (#l:Pgs 4.1-1 - 4.1-46 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (#l:Pgs 4.1-1-4.1-46 ' Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D n 14 Rev. 02/22/06 The proposed General Plan Land Use change from Planned Industrial to Office will not have an impact in that the site will be developed as an Office building which could be built under the Planned Industrial land use designation. The difference in the use of the building would be that the Office uses would allow the sales of goods and services to the general public whereas the Planned Industrial office uses are not retail in nature, do not cater to the general public, and do not generate walk-in or drive-in traffic and are incidental to the industrial uses in the vicinity. The proposed development of an Office Land Use would not have an impact on the Industrial Park hi that the site is located along El Camino Real, a prune arterial roadway, and would not bring traffic into the industrial parks. The site is separated from other industrial uses by El Camino Real and would no bias the ability of industrial users to conduct uses allowed in the industrial zone. Other uses in the immediate area are health club facilities, school district offices, professional office uses and light manufacturing uses. X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 6-1 - 6-2) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? (#l:Pgs 6-1-6-2) Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? (#1 :Pgs 4.8-1 - 4.8-19, #2) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundboume noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (#l:Pgs 4.8-1 -4.8-19, #2) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase hi ambient noise levels hi the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (#l:Pgs 4.8-1 - 4.8-19, #2) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D 15 Rev. 02/22/06 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (#l:Pgs 4.8-1 -4.8-19) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? D Project will not create or be subject ground borne vibration. The project site is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (#1 :Pgs 4.14-1-4.14-6) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (#l:Pgs 4.14-1 -4.14-6) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (#l:Pgs4.14-l -4.14-6) Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result hi substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, hi order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? (#1 :Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12-47) ii) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) iii) Schools? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact n 16 Rev. 02/22/06 30 iv) Parks? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) v) Other public facilities? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12- 47) D D XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12-47) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 -4.12-47) Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact n XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (#1 :Pgs 4.7-1 - 4.7-53) a) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (#l:Pgs 4.7-1 - 4.7-53) b) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (#l:Pgs 4.7-1-4.7-53) c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 4.7-1-4.7-53) d) Result in inadequate emergency access? (#l:Pgs 4.7- 1-4.7-53) Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact n 17 Rev. 02/22/06 31 1 - Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in insufficient parking capacity? (#l:Pgs 4.7-1 -4.7-53) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs I I I I supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn- outs, bicycle racks)? (# 1 :Pgs 4.7-1 - 4.7-53) a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate 4,250 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 468 peak hour trips. This traffic will utilize the following roadways: El Camino Real and Town Garden Lane. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan analyzed the traffic for this site as 7.9 acres of Industrial Business Park generating 630 ADT. This increase in ADT is partially offset by the reduction in Day Care building for Neighborhood 1.2 from 21,780 s.f. to 10,000 s.f, saving 942 ADT. Taking that into account, the change of land use to Medical Office increases the traffic generation over the master plan levels by 2,678 ADT. This increase was analyzed by Linscott Law & Greenspan in their letter report dated December 30,2005. Their analysis showed that for "Year 2020 with Project", the El Camino Real / Town Garden Lane intersection still operated at Level of Service (LOS) D or better. Therefore, the proposed changes would not result in any new significant project traffic impacts over those analyzed and mitigated hi the Villages of La Costa and Bressi Ranch EIRs. b) Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS on these designated roads and highways hi Carlsbad is: Existing ADT* LOS Buildout ADT* Rancho Santa Fe Road 17-35 "A-D" 35-56 El Camino Real 27-49 "A-C" 33-62 Palomar Airport Road 10-57 "A-D" ' 30-73 SR78 124-142 "F" 156-180 1-5 199-216 "D" 260-272 * The numbers are in thousands of daily trips. The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 hi Carlsbad was LOS "F" hi 1990). Accordingly, all designated roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS. Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and community plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service hi the short-term and at buildout. c) No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of ah- traffic patterns or result hi substantial safety risks. No impact assessed. 18 Rev. 02/22/06 d) No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed iand constructed to City standards; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's general plan and zoning. Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed. e) No Impact The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police Departments. No impact assessed. No Impact The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project would comply with the City's parking requirements to ensure an adequate parking supply. No impact assessed. g) No Impact. The project is near public transportation. The project also incorporates bike racks. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12-47) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12-47) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1-4.12-47) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D m D 19 Rev. 02/22/06 33 g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (#l:Pgs 4.12-1 - 4.12-47) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact n n IEI 20 Rev. 02/22/06 The proposed project was evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000') MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001, T & B Planning Consultants, Inc. EIR 98- 07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions. The "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" is a planning document which will guide the development of 2,390 dwelling units, and some non-residential land uses on a 1,866.4 gross acre area consisting of three villages. The Greens Village consists of 660.7 gross acres and provides for a maximum of 1,038 residential units with some non-residential land uses. The Ridge Village consists of 493.1 acres and provides for a maximum of 320 residential units. The Oaks Village consists of 712.5 acres and a maximum of 1,032 residential units as well as a community facilities site. The Greens (Zone 10) portion of the project is generally located approximately 2,500 feet south of Palomar Airport Road, east of El Camino Real, north of Alga Road, and west of Unicornio Street. The Ridge and Oaks (Zone 11) portion of the project site is located north and east of La Costa Avenue, south of Alga Road, east of El Fuerte Street, and straddles portions of Rancho Santa Fe Road. EIR 98-07 analyzed the following environmental issue areas: Land Use and Community Character, Landform Alteration, Visual Quality, Biological Resources, Archaeological Resources, Paleontological Resources, Transportation, Noise, Air Quality, Geology/Soils, Hydrology, Water Quality and Drainage, Public Facilities and Services, Human Health and Safety Hazards, and Population and Housing. The Initial Study prepared for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and related action is included in Volume 1 of the Appendices for EIR 98-07 and analyzed additional issues, which were determined not to have a significant environmental impact. The City of Carlsbad City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures applicable to this Neighborhood have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 21 Rev. 02/22/06 35- EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES i- The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98-01 (EIR 98- 07). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. July 16,2001. 2. Interior Noise Study. La Costa Greens Medical Offices. Medlin and Associates, Inc, January 9, 2006. 3. Storm Water Mitigation Plan and Preliminary Hydrology Study. La Costa Greens - Lot 1 City of Carlsbad. San Diego County. California. RBF Consulting, January 31, 2006. 4. VLC Neighborhood 1.1 Land Use Change. Linscott, Law and Greenspan, December 30, 2005 (Traffic Impacts analysis). 5. Bressi Ranch Master Plan EIR. Cotton/Bridges/Associates, December 2001. 22 Rev. 02/22/06 31, 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6126 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE 4 ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON 6 THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN TOWN GARDEN LANE AND CAMINO VIDA ROBLE IN LOCAL 7 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA 8 CASE NO.: GPA 05-15 9 WHEREAS, Carltas Company, "Developer," has filed a verified application 10 with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management 11 Company, "Owner," described as !3 Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 99-03, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof 14 No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder 15 ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan 17 Amendment as shown on Exhibit "GPA 05-15" dated July 19, 2006, attached hereto and on file 18 in the Carlsbad Planning Department CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - 20 GPA 05-15 as provided in Government Code Section 65350 et seq. and Section 21.52.160 of the 21 Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the ^th^day of July 2006, hold a 23 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 25 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors26 27 relating to the General Plan Amendment. 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 2 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 3 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - GPA 05-15, based on the following findings: 4 ,- Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan based on the facts set forth in 7 the staff report dated July 19, 2006, including, but not limited to the following: 8 Land Use: The Land Use redesignation of 7.68 acres from Planned Industrial (PI) to Office is for the purpose of developing a professional medical office complex. The proposed Office Land Use designation would be compatible with adjacent Planned Industrial, Community Facility, and Open Space Land Uses. Land Use: The project is not adjacent to the McClellan-Palomar Airport; is not subject to the height limitations in the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land 12 Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP); is located outside the 60 dB CNEL noise contour; is outside the Runway Protection Zone; and has been determined to be consistent, as conditioned, with the McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP by 14 the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority on March 6, 2006. 15 Circulation: The change of Land Use to Medical Office increases the traffic generation over the master plan levels by 2,678 ADT. This increase was 16 analyzed by Linscott Law & Greenspan in their letter report dated December 30, 2005. Their analysis showed that for "Year 2020 With Project, the El Camino Real/Town Garden Lane intersection still operated at Level of Service (LOS) D or better. Therefore, the proposed changes would not result in any new significant project traffic impacts over those analyzed and 19 mitigated in the Villages of La Costa and Bressi Ranch EIRs. 20 Open Space and Conservation: The proposed project maintains adequate buffers from native habitat areas and is consistent with the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 22 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 23 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 24 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 25 Conditions: 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 28 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the PCRESONO. 6126 -2- property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said 2 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this General Plan Amendment. 3 Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the General Plan Amendment documents, as necessary to make <- them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed 6 development different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval. 7 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.8 n 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project 10 are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be 11 invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 13 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and 14 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this General Plan Amendment, ,f (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and 17 (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 18 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 20 6. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and 21 approval of MP 98-01(G) and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6125 and 6127 for those other approvals. 23 24 25 26 27 28 PCRESONO. 6126 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES:Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Segall MARTELL B. MONTGOMERY, Jpiirperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: DON NEU Assistant Planning Director PCRESONO. 6126 -4- GENERAL PLAN MAP CHANGE GPA: 05-15 CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA Draft: July 19. 2006 DRAFT EXISTING PROPOSED Related Case File /Vote): MP 98-01 (GVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 G.P. Map Desig Property A. 21 3-11 0-01-00 B. C. D. From: PI nation Change To: O 1 PLANNING COMMISSION ESOLUTION NO. 6127 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION OF 5 VILLAGE 1.1 OF THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO OFFICE FOR 6 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN TOWN GARDEN LANE AND 7 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE IN LOCAL FACILITIES g MANAGEMENT ZONE 10. CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA 9 CASE NO: MP98-OUG) 10 WHEREAS, Carltas Company, "Developer," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral 12 Management Company, "Owner," described as 13 Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 99-03, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof I, No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder 16 ("the Property"); and 17 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Master Plan 18 Amendment as shown on Exhibit "MP 98-01(G)" dated July 19, 2006, on file in the Carlsbad Planning Department CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - MP 98-01(G) as 20 provided by MP 98-01 and Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of July 2006, ^- 23 consider said request; and 24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Master Plan Amendment; and 27 WHEREAS, on October 23, 2001, the City Council approved MP 98-01, as 28 described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5013 and City Council Resolution No. 2001-318; and amended MP 98-01 (Amendment D) most recently on February 2 19,2005, as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5837. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 4 - Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 5 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 7 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE 8 MPA/GPA - MP 98-01(G) based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 10 Findings: The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated July 19, 2006, including but not limited to the following: that the Office 13 Land Use designation would be compatible with the surrounding Planned Industrial, Community Facility and Open Space Land Uses and the project has been 14 found conditionally compatible with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan.15 ,., 2. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequate provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the Capital Improvement 17 Program applicable to the subject property, in that all public facilities are existing or are conditioned to be installed concurrent with the project. 18 3. That the proposed commercial and industrial uses will be appropriate in area, location, and overall design to the purpose intended, that the design and development are such as 2Q to create an environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that such development will meet performance standards established by Title 21, in that the project 21 is compatible with the existing and future uses and that there is a need for medical office facilities. The medical office use is centrally located and takes access from a "*•prime arterial roadway. The project meets or exceeds the development standards of the Office Zone. 24 4. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to carry the anticipated traffic thereon, in that El Camino Real has adequate capacity to handle the 25 traffic generated by the project. 5. That the area surrounding the development is, or can be planned and zoned, in 27 coordination and substantial compatibility with the development, in that the adjacent uses of Planned Industrial, which allows professional office development, and the 28 Community Facility site, which is planned for a daycare use, would be compatible uses. PCRESONO. 6127 -2- 6. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 2 contained in this resolution and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 3 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be 5 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 7 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy ° issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 10 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Master Plan Amendment. 11 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Master Plan document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occur 13 substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 14 3. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and * f representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly 17 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Master Plan Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or 18 nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 2Q facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's 21 approval is not validated. 22 4. This approval is granted subject to the adoption of the Negative Declaration arid approval of GPA 05-15 and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6125 and 6126 for those other approvals incorporated 24 herein by reference. 25 5. Prior to the issuance of any permits for the project, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director a digital copy and a camera-ready master copy of the Villages of 26 La Costa Master Plan-MP98-01(G). 27 28 PCRESONO. 6127 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES:Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Baker, Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Segall 1ARTELL B. MONJGOMEI CARLSBAD PLANNING CO! ATTEST: hairperson ISSION DONNEU Assistant Planning Director PC RESO NO. 6127 -4- Exhibit "MP 98-01(G) July 19, 2006 Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 (Master Plan Development of 2,390 dwelling units, a business park, a community park, 2 community facilities sites, elementary school site and the preservation of 834.9 acres of open space located within Local Facilities Management Zones 10 and 11.) APPROVED BY: City Council Ordinance #NS-604 andNS-605, October 16, 2001 *** La Costa Oaks South MP 98-01(A) (Minor amendment to transfer two dwelling units from Neighborhood 3.15 to Neighborhood 3.13.) APPROVED BY: City Council Ordinance # NS-653, November 12, 2002 *** La Costa Greens MP 98-01(B) (Minor amendment to transfer five dwelling units between Neighborhoods 1.8 — 1.14 and to modify the Village's plant palettes) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # 5478, October 15, 2003 *** La Costa Ridge MP 98-01(C) (Minor amendment to transfer one dwelling units between Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.6) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # 5738, October 6, 2004 *** La Costa Greens MP98-01(D) (Minor amendment to reflect the relocation of the School Site within Neighborhood 1.7 and common recreation area from Neighborhood 1.7 to 1.6) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution #5837, February 16, 2005 *** La Costa Oak North MP 98-01(E) (Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units between Neighborhoods 3.3 to 3.1 and to modify the location of the recreation centers to Neighborhood 3.1) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # *** La Costa Greens MP98-01(F) (Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units from Neighborhood 1.16 to 1.3 and to modify the location of the recreation vehicle parking area from Neighborhood 1.2 to 1.3) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # *** La Cost Greens MP 98-01 (G) (Minor amendment to change the permitted use from Planned Industrial to Office in Planning Area 1.1) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTSi. Chapter/Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Organization 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Master Plan 1-4 1.3 Project Description 1-6 1.3.1 La Costa Greens 1-6 1.3.2 La Costa Ridge 1-6 1.3.3 La Costa Oaks 1-8 1.4 Master Applications 1-9 1.4.1 Master Plan Concurrent Applications 1-9 1.4.2 Applications Subsequent to Master Plan Approval 1-11 1.5 Master Plan Goals 1-13 1.5.1 Purpose 1-13 1.5.2 Master Plan Vision Statement and Goals 1-13 1.6 Relation to the La Costa Master Plan 1-16 1.7 Adoption and Agreements of HCP/OMSP 1-17 2.0 GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2.1 General Plan 2-1 2.2 Zoning Description 2-3 2.3 Legal Description 2-6 2.4 Land Use Summary 2-6 2.4.1 Residential ^ 2-6 2.4.2 Open Space 2-8 2.4.3 Office 2-8 2.4.4 Community Facilities 2-9 JHAWLC MP —i— April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS( - Chapter/Section _ Page 2.4.5 School Site ................................................... . ..................................... 2-9 2.4.6 Street System ............................... '. ..................................................... 2-9 2.4.7 Pedestrian System ............................................................................ 2-10 2.5 General Provisions ....................................................................................... 2-11 2.5.1 Maximum Dwelling Units ............................................................... 2-1 1 2.5.2 Dwelling Unit Transfer .................................................................... 2-11 2.5.3 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ 2-12 2.5.4 Relationship to LFMP ...................................................................... 2-12 2.5.5 Master Plan Enforcement ................................................................. 2-13 2.5.6 Hillside Development Ordinance ..................................................... 2-13 2.5.7 Master Homeowners' Association ................................................... 2-13 2.5.8 Architectural Review Board ............................................................ 2-15 2.5.9 Affordable Housing ......................................................................... 2-15 2.5.10 Miscellaneous Provisions ................................................................. 2-19 2.6 Local Facilities Management Plans .................. '. .......................................... 2-22 2.6.1 Community Facilities ....................................................................... 2-22 2.6.2 Utilities And Infrastructure .............................................................. 2-25 3.0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS 3 . 1 Relation of the Master Plan and the Village Development Plans .................. 3-1 3.2 Master Plan Amendments ................................................... ^ ......................... 3-1 3.3 Master Tentative Tract Map ........................................................................... 3-2 3.4 Tentative Tract Maps and Final Maps ........................................................... 3-2 3.5 Planned Development Permits ....................................................................... 3-3 3r6 - InduGtrial Permits ........................................................................................... 3 1 (Section 3.6 removed per amendment MP 98-01 3.7 Conditional Uses ............................................................................................ 3-4 JHAWLC MP —ii— April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter/Section Page 4.7.2 Streetscapes 4-77 4.7.3 Village Themes 4-78 4.7.4 Entry Accent Trees 4-78 4.7.5 Slopes 4-78 4.7.6 Landscape Zones 4-80 4.7.7 Landscape and Irrigation Standards 4-81 4.7.8 Landscape Maintenance 4-81 4.7.9 Fire Protection Plan 4-82 4.8 Walls and Fencing 4-87 4.8.1 Perimeter Neighborhood Walls 4-87 4.9 Signage 4-87 4.9.1 Temporary Signs 4-88 4.9.2 Permanent Signs 4-92 4.9.3 Corner Sight Distance Specifications 4-97 4.10 Lighting -. 4-99 4.11 Screening and Edge Treatments 4-101 5.0 LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.2 Village Land Use Plan 5-2 5.2.1 Residential 5-8x 5.2.2 Community Facilities 5-10 5.2.3 Recreational Vehicle Storage 5-11 5.2.4 Office 5-11 5.2.5 Open Space 5-11 5.2.6 Circulation 5-17 JHAWLCMP —iv— December, 2000 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ,. Exhibit Number/Title 5-13 5-14 5-15 5-16 5-17 5-18 5-19a 5-19b 5-19c 5-19d 5-20 5-21 5-22 5-23 5-24 5-25 5-26 5-27 5-28 5-29 5-30 5-31 5-32 5-33 5-34 Poinsettia Streetscape - West Poinsettia Streetscape — Central Alga Road Streetscape Alicante Road - South Alicante Road - Wetland Crossing Alicante Road - Central & North Village Gated Entry (Type 1) Village Gated Entry (Type 2) Major Village Entry Village Entry Public Village Edge/Typical Existing Residential Neighborhood Streetscape 1 Neighborhood Streetscape 2 Village Theme Walls Office Area 1.1 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.2 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.3 Development Plan School Area 1.4 Development Plan Park Area 1.5 Development Plan Neighborhood Area 1.6 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.7 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.8 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.9 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.10 Development Plan Neighborhood 1.11 Development Plan LIST OF EXHIBITS Page 5-53 5-54 5-56 5-57 5-58 5-59 5-61 5-62 5-63 5-64 5-66 5-67 5-68 5-72 5-86 5-91 5-97 5-103 5-108 X 5-113 5-120 5-129 5-135 5-142 5-149 JHAYVLC MP —xiii— April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION i- 1. Tentative Tract Maps and Final Maps shall be processed to further subdivide neighborhood areas created by the Master Tentative Tract Map. 2. Planned Unit Development Permits or Condominium Permits shall be processed to create single-family residential lots which are less than 7,500 square feet in area, to allow for airspace ownership of dwelling units, or to provide for gated Neighborhoods with private roads. 3. Hillside Development Permits shall be processed for all neighborhoods proposed on land with a slope gradient of 15 percent or greater and a slope height greater than 15 feet in accordance with Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. Scenic Corridor Special Use Permits shall be obtained before construction or development occurs within any area adjacent to El Camino Real. 5. Conditional Use Permits shall be obtained for any fire station, church, community services facility, or child day care facility. Community recreation centers that are not subject to the Planned Development Ordinance shall also require a Conditional Use Permit. 6. Site Development Plans shall be processed for any multiple family residential developments having more than four dwelling units or an affordable housing project of any size. A Site Development Plan is also required for neighborhoods having a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet or greater and for any development in the Office Zone (planning Area 1.1). Permit requirements are further defined for each Master Plan neighborhood by a Village Permit Matrix, which can be found in each of the Village Development Plan chapters (see Sections 5.2.8, 6.2.7, and 7.2.7). 1-12 JHAYVLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN 2.0 GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2.1 General Plan The General Plan designations of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are shown on Exhibit 2-1, General Plan Land Use. They include the following designations: OS — Open Space RLM — Residential Low Medium, 0-4 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point -3.2 du/ac) RM — Residential Medium, 4-8 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point - 6.0 du/ac) RMH — Residential Medium-High, 8-15 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point -11.5 du/ac) CF — Community Facilities O — Office and Related Commercial E — Elementary School All development within the Master Plan area shall be consistent with these land use designations as well as complying with the Master Plan, Village Development Plans and Neighborhood Development Standards. Residential density consistency for each of the Master Plan villages is demonstrated within the section entitled Village Land Use Plan in each of the Village Development Plan chapters (Sections 5.2, 6.2 and 7.2). JHAWLC MP 2-1 April 2006 LEGEND RLM RM Residential-Low Medium Density Residential-Medium Density RMH CF Residential-Medium High CommunityFacilities 0 OK Office Master PlanOpen Space © o/s PARK ElementarySchool Public CommunityPark VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 2-1 GENERAL PLANLAND USE Page 2-2 LEGEND R-1 RD-M One-FamilyResidential ResidentialDensity-Multiple C-F 0 CommunityFacilities Office ® o-sp School o Park -s Open Space VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 2-3 MASTER PLAN ZONING Page 2-5 < 2 HenO U H ^P5•^ H 5^< ^| C/2 P Q § *J <3j fS HS 3X 1za z. 1 x<<! ,5 z' u=- : <2 !td •Z •td 1Ui ^\ < 1I! HC> io| °' iU DESIGNATIONS01U a OPMENT AREAS!jCd U)a EdU J 2 d Ep a B < *a n ZS 3 '3jd ta H Ocd2 : <j5i •5 1 1o I O O 1 Ij".oo -lity FacilitiesS U iL., GREENS0 ^-< Or- CN oo CN DO CN fl vdvo z:ial Low MediumResidentS Qd —-0 00 r-Tf o oo 00 ial MediumResident2 ~ o (N Seri 12 CN On ial Medium HighResidentS 1 o o i s. - s1 O c c nf 1 £ •) J 1 o o 1 1 rN ace/Power Easementf 1.o S c c c ;• •t. 3 D 1 Ii3J3; a.^ oo O, § — " m" § 2 H BJ) = •=; (N " § S*3- fN CN CN 9.ial Low Medium11 2 a; EdH 8 -J oo tA Jn oCN-" !Q ci r ial Medium High-g 3 EC2 o o 1 1 s J S s~ S r-o^o I I 1H BJD.2 1 O o 1 3 vo lity Facilities3S 5 U 'A OAKSOU ^i_3 P CN 00 ^ON 2 ooONCN a ial Low MediumResident1 5 m" ^ ON O S 2 ial MediumS t? 2 P T •"• W) rj- 1 ial Medium HighResidentXS c c r» c* IiV 1 s;c 5 5 I?• •>i o o 1 1 £ g CirculatiI JH M (Ns f£ — r ON CN 15- ^ *(S CN iCN" i90 i^ UPi z.kSTEU PLAj I I t 1 l o. 0.s I VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2. Multiple Family Housing [ • In order to provide for a variety of housing types and density ranges, four Multiple Family Housing neighborhoods are provided in the Master Plan. Multiple Family Housing is typically located in Neighborhoods designated RMH - Residential Medium-High on the General Plan. These Neighborhoods shall be designed to provide densities of approximately 8.0 to 11.5 dwelling units per acre. A total of 505 multiple-family dwelling units are projected by the Master Plan. 2.4.2 Open Space Preservation and enhancement of Open Space is an important aspect of this Master Plan. Areas designated Open Space by the General Plan constitutes approximately 892 acres or 48% of the Master Plan area. The Master Plan addresses open space for the preservation of natural resources (HCP/OMSP), open space for outdoor recreation and open space for public health and safety. The Master Plan identifies additional open space areas within many of the residential neighborhoods. Each of the Village Land Use Plans includes an Open Space Program (Sections 5.2.5, 6.2.4, and 7.2.4) which describes the distribution of open space within the respective Village. 2.4.3 Office The Master Plan provides for one Office site. Thrs land use category allows for office uses, including medical. The General Plan also allows for agricultural and outdoor recreation uses on lots of one acre or more as interim uses. JHAWLC MP 2-8 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS (- 3.7 Conditional Uses A Conditional Use Permit processed pursuant to Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code shall be submitted and approved prior to the development of a fire station, hospital, church or community services facility (all of which require a CUP). Community recreation centers located in neighborhoods which are not subject to the Planned Development Ordinance shall also require the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit shall be consistent with the concepts, goals and standards specified in this Master Plan to ensure compatibility with all appropriate City policies and ordinances. After final approval of each Conditional Use Permit, grading, building and other ministerial permits for the development of the site may be issued provided that all conditions of approval and public facility requirements have been satisfied per the relevant Zone 10 and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plans. Each Conditional Use Permit shall be submitted and processed as set forth in Chapter 21.42, Conditional Uses, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3.8 Child Day Care Center A child day care center is permitted in the Villages of La Costa within the La Costa Greens area designated Community Facilities on Exhibit 2-3, Master Plan Zoning. The proposed'day care center, located along El Camino Real, is subject to the provisions of Section 21.83.080, Development Standards For Child Day Care Centers, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A child day care center located directly adjacent to Planning Area 1.1, designated for Office (O) zoning district permitted uses, is subject to the limitations and provisions within Code Section 21.83.060 (Child Care) regarding the potential health and safety risks associated with hazardous materials used in nearby businesses. The limitations include a required risks evaluation, parental and property owner notifications, an emergency operating plan, and an operational agreement with the City. Child day care center is defined as a facility other than a family day care home which provides non-medical care, protection, and supervision for children under eighteen years of age for periods of less than twenty-four hours per day. Child 3-4 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS i „ day care centers include preschools through kindergarten, nursery schools, employer-sponsored child day care facilities, and before- and after-school recreational programs, but do not include public or private elementary schools. 3.9 Site Development Plans A Site Development Plan processed pursuant to Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code shall be submitted and approved prior to the development of apartment projects which include more than 4 dwelling units, for single-family home neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and greater, and for any development in the Office Zone (Planning Area 1.1). The Site Development Plan shall be consistent with the concepts, goals and standards specified in this Master Plan. After final approval of each Site Development Plan, grading, building and other ministerial permits for the development of the site may be issued provided that all conditions of approval and public facility requirements have been satisfied. 3.10 Public Facility Phasing The Zone 10 and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plans contain detailed development phasing programs for eleven public facilities covered by the City of Carlsbad Citywide Public Facility Plan. These plans ensure that public facilities will be in place when they are needed. The Master Plan will be developed in multiple phases. Each phase has specific offsite and onsite improvements that must be provided prior to or concurrent with development. The Citywide Public Facilities plan established performance standards for public facilities. These performance standards were adhered to by the Zone 10 and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plans to ensure the appropriate timing of facilities and services. All public facility performance standards identified in the Local Facilities Management Plans and any amendments thereto must be complied with as the Master Plan develops. The phasing of public facilities is addressed within each of the Village Development Plan chapters of the Master Plan. Public facilities phasing for La Costa Greens is discussed in Section 5.4 and illustrated on Exhibits 5-6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The phasing of public facilities for La Costa Ridge is described in Section 6.4 and shown on Exhibits 6-6, 7, 8, and 9. Public facilities phasing for 3-5 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS i- La Costa Oaks is described in Section 7.4 and depicted on Exhibit 7-6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. 3-6 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN i - 5.2 Village Land Use Plan The La Costa Greens Village consists of approximately 660 acres. Generally located around the north course of the La Costa Resort golf course, the La Costa Greens Village is bounded to the south by Alga Road and by West Bluff Plaza and El Camino Real to the west. Poinsettia Lane, which extends northeasterly from El Camino Real, will serve as a primary pedestrian and vehicular corridor within the community. The La Costa Greens Village Development Plan, Exhibit 5-1, envisions a full spectrum of land uses for the La Costa Greens Village. As defined by the La Costa Greens Village Development Plan Table, Exhibit 5-A, the La Costa Greens Village will provide for a wide range of residential products, active and passive recreation areas, natural open space, a potential elementary school site, a community facilities site, a child daycare site, an RV storage site, and a an Office site. As shown on Exhibit 5-2, individual La Costa Greens neighborhoods are located within the larger General Plan Land Use category areas, which are also shown on Exhibit 2-1, General Plan Land Use. In order to determine the number of dwelling units allowed within any particular land use category, the Growth Management Control Point of the category is multiplied by the number of net developable acres located within the category area. The number of General Plan Dwelling Units and Maximum Allowable Dwelling Units for each General Plan Land Use category are shown on Exhibit 5-B, Residential Density Consistency Table. Dwelling units may be clustered within a General Plan Land Use Category provided the density of each neighborhood falls within the density range allowed by the General Plan Land Use category (see Section 2.1). The density of an individual neighborhood, therefore, may exceed the Growth Management Control Point as long as all the La Costa Greens Village neighborhoods located within the General Plan category do not, in aggregate, exceed the Allowable Dwelling Units shown in Exhibit 5-B. 5-2 JHAWLC MP April 2006 o r u td Q a Sou bo 1/31/3 Cd U Sip- 3 u OH 1 P^WH s uo C0 C. b<y C? MH QOO nca O uZ S. iQ.O tu0 jj> II ^ OfiQ a .11 s 5 (/3 SU5 •< O Z ZoSI NOLLVN3t H 3 "»3 WQ j.. 3* •< g 2 W £ feo § v~ ' .-•*" " ;J ' £ cc/ cc Vex«t S C 1- o o H •f1 33^ •T3 J> 5 ! < J Va \< _;"*' 0(i ': t !c t~ C U r j">c:>r •>9 j ) i ^ 5 ) 4 ) 1 s on . § CT* oo<n Q uEo e oH GO CO *^41 fvj , "1 o ot/3 tc JBS (N O\ ^" i S •* " e i "\ £ C ^ •<3 ff VC if A 3 H i' 3 3 i- h1 ) 3 5 ~1 «j00 _g (J-, in | i1 Q t/3 S O\ f) e! S ^> ? o c 1 y (I cc/1 V uc/ V« rao C£ 5 r^ ^i 3 4 H r0 3 5^ -T 3 5 •> 3 J 31 t df V C ! y b c0 iV f [Ic/ fex oe V ^ ft 5 S ex 3 0 2 4 H T3 >>•i 3 H3 1 3 3 1r / ) ? tx c ! y b cc/ cccM; bi/ Vt~ o Ifr- a 2 K o 3 0 3 4 N j-0 >>3 3" 3« 3 1 s 14 t \ i t/ C 1 y b Ca ccco Cbc/ •qvc c c•<a ft 5 S c i •3 3 4 -I r3 333_ •T 3 3 (•3 > > ^ 4 4 > S t/3 .S S d- 0o 11 Qb.1/3 £ <n ^^ Bi S '"H 4 Ci» ! y U t C/ Cc cuu r-c* T] Cf B 2 P r 3 3 4 H 3"n 33_ 5 5 ^ h 31 i 4 4 J C C/ C 1 y b ct/1 I/ bV r»r*1 r-r^ Ct 2 5 f i •3 3 4 •I 7-3 333_ •C 3 3 1 1 1 / 4 1 1 C/ c ! y b c(/ cccI/ bc/ VC t~ (-r- ft 5 H- * •51 i •3 3 4 N r3 333^ •T 3 3 ^ 3 44 t 4 ^^'an 3o JO 1 tL- .9- "3s ooo m 1—1 r-^1 Q£ a: ""i s on . is CT O0in 1*1abt/37sej 0 1 f— 1 CN O 1—1 ^§' BJ ^ e^o c t y b ca ccV ^ bt/ t~c o 0r*1 ff 5 t~ ^o 4 H r 3 3 3•> h 3 3 3 \ s ^ i H 4 1 01 o" CL,O TC tN 6 on O < t/3 1 O a* E r~ ™^ 6 C/3 O oa §CLon 1o S- UE t r^i 6 on 0 U 1w !o OHO \D O 6 t/3 0 a raa.on 1O OH U E 1 cn 6 o w t«i a. -< «5 Ou<~ H > Q O HW5 O wJ 03 .^£ H £ ^< PH g HH ^/^ {sS wo w w o> ^ Q 05 [LLAGELA CO^•^ 1 H33X EW PROCESS |cJ y Z J 0- aHi evelopment TypeQ « llS w •< Ms-s11a Q S t/3 C« /"? A? oi uo <ZONINGAND USESIGNATIONQ C O ^, MO rl u ^ ,v ill^ o 2uz :- \ ~'\ os T^- CN(N C/l6 C/2 O 5S Corridor/Open Space |g..^ 5 1 in 6 C/2 O q Corridor/Open Space>-> ^3 5 i , ^ 6 C/l O 5 1a. 1O UX 1 invd op6 o -on Element RoadwaysS"3.So [•*- ^2 t/11 O C^ 4->C 1 .2 "ctf3o1— 1 CJ '.S TJ, ' -- 'i '."^ , 90s .o •0 tlinJ O td U j ^ ^ OH CJ 1.1 1.2 1 1.3 LEGEND 1.15 | Village Neighborhood R%H | General Plan Land Use Category VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 5-2 LA COSTA GREENSGENERAL PLAN DENSITY CONSISTENCY Page 5-6 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.2.3 Recreational Vehicle Storage !" A recreational vehicle (RV) storage site is identified by the La Costa Greens Village Development Plan within the community facilities site in Neighborhood 1.3. The required area of .34 acre, exclusive of driveways and approaches, provides for 20 square feet per dwelling unit within the planned development neighborhoods (those with minimum lot areas less than 7,500 sq. ft. or gated). The .34 required common area assumes that rental apartments will be provided in Neighborhood 1.15. If ownership units are offered, however, then up to an additional .08 acre of RV storage area is required. If Neighborhood 1.12 applies as a planned development for a gated community, then an additional 760 square feet of RV storage space will be required. Independent storage may be provided onsite, within a particular development to serve the neighborhood. The common storage area may also be reduced if the RV storage spaces required to accommodate a neighborhood are provided for within a particular development. The RV storage site must be screened from public view by a fence, wall, or landscaping. 5.2.4 Office The La Costa Greens Village Development Plan identifies a 7.9-acre Office site. Planning Area 1.1 is located in the northwest corner of La Costa Greens, to the east side of El Camino Real. The area is designated Office and Related Commercial (O) by the General Plan. This classification designates areas which are compatible with and environmentally- suited for office uses. Permitted uses and potential conditional uses are identified in sections (d) Permitted Uses and (e) Conditional Uses of Neighborhood 1.1 section of this Master Plan. 5.2.5 Open Space Per Section 21.38.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, all Master Plans must provide fifteen percent (15%) of the total Master Plan area in an integrated open space program which addresses 5-11 JHAWLC MP . April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.2.6 Circulation '- The Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) addresses all Circulation Element roads located within the boundaries of La Costa Greens. The La Costa Greens Circulation Plan is illustrated by Exhibit 5-4. Typical street sections are provided within the master plan. In general new local streets within the master plan will include landscaped parkways having a minimum width of four and one-half feet located between the curb and sidewalk. Sidewalks having a minimum width of five feet shall be provided on both sides of all streets unless the' Planning Commission or City Council determines that it is appropriate to construct sidewalks on one side of the street only. 1. Traffic Calming During the buildout of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan the City Council may approve standards for the use of traffic calming devices. Should the use of traffic calming devices be approved by the City Council such devices may be incorporated into project designs for neighborhoods which have not yet received discretionary approvals for development or into existing developed neighborhoods. The inclusion of such devices shall not require substantial modifications to the neighborhood concept designs or yields. Recommendations on appropriate locations to achieve better design and slow traffic shall be provided during project review by City departments particularly the Engineering, Fire and Planning Departments. 2. Village Circulation Plan Four Circulation Element roadways are located within or adjacent to La Costa Greens. El Camino Real, a Prime Arterial Street (126-foot divided right-of-way), is adjacent to portions of the western Village boundary. El Camino Real provides access to Office Area 1.1, Community Facilities Area 1.2, and Neighborhood 1.3. El Camino Real intersects with Poinsettia Lane at the west end of Neighborhood 1.17. Improvements to El Camino Real within the segment adjacent 5-17 JHAWLCMP April 2006 9^O g< r o \u ,< I PH W O HHHP3 V)Ou ^ •<o j cc PH •< CM J fa< 8O OU t^ ^vo TH ^H If)i-H »— 1 1^ rH ff) ^^ c^*H ^^ ^H ^^ o 1—1 ON 00 ^• ^ 'O•^H "J TTi-5 i-H (S i-H ^H LOPMENT PERMITHH a Q * 9 O • • 0 • • * • A Q • • •ive Subdivision Map"S O)H © © © © © © © © © © (^} © © © ©1 © ©e Development Permitrs'c/i S • o o • • • * A 0 0 d Development Permitc 15H O O O minium Permito oO O 0 • • • e -»-» 1 "u Q +-* bo • • • •4— >• ^^ (£ 1 'o 1"EoUo'3 CX} © © © © © © © © • i-H PU ."2'o g ^5 T3O_0E © • O O -»-> o D 13 -*— > oO • Pi dO SjQ © 0 ^JS6 ^«)s§, ^U>Denotes permit required for de• -W §S0,o"3 1 , depending on type of§%5.-S r^Denotes permit required for deO ^.0 •aQ arlsbad Unified Schoo,U -5t,**» O*_ .^*All permits are the responsibiLe ity of Carlsbad.O „£••*»•* <*o^ •O All permits are the responsibille s; •Sf& \1*3 t<|^* c ^3 C 1|ll2! .s *l *tjSj S ^i C)*» ^JC^ "*tj « "Q> O% Ool« ^^ -^^ '~ t! **S. "3 J"7! s 1 1-5s e E^J vl^ ^ -Si K^ 3 ^ S§*ff* "^^ ||rocessed concurrentlyV not be reauired for tkS> 1-!5" . ^i O O ^ t-3 Q'C S A Hillside Development PermitHillside Development Permits ,® •vv a "a=n ^.aitp^ "^>j ^ tt o^ o.o g O cj. O 5U"-1 ^S^i*s* si~ o v£ s°d,^5f S? 1 ll « 0fS; t^ o "-CJ .s? 5 S; -^ "Q*« jj 1|processed concurrent^iy not be required for i.£? 5 it "^ ^CQ ^\A Floodplain Special Use PernFloodplain Special Use Permit© 5 0"£0-o-s;•2?<i> ^S ^§5•g-s **** 1 -s:Q -c•SP ^•S ^^i the common recreatiotfc "7^ ^^>j G"1 A Conditional Use Permit is re© r- >ri > < VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN i. - 5.7 La Costa Greens Development Standards 5.7.1 Introduction The La Costa Greens Village is composed of a variety of residential products ranging from 11,000-square-foot lots for single-family detached dwellings to townhomes and multi-family residences with each product being discretely designed within 13 distinct Neighborhoods. These residential products are located in Neighborhoods 1.3 and 1.6 through 1.17. Area 1.3 also includes a permanent Recreational Vehicle storage facility. Additionally, Neighborhood 1.1 has been established for Office uses, including medical offices, and Neighborhood 1.2 is planned for Community Facilities. It is intended that day-care facilities, places of worship, youth and/or senior center activities, and other community facilities may be situated on the Community Facilities parcel. Active recreation is provided by a Community Park, located in Park Area 1.5, and an elementary school is expected to be constructed in School Area 1.4. These 17 Neighborhoods are encompassed within a vast Habitat Conservation Plan area, which itself is divided into seven individual Open Space Areas. These HCP Open Space Areas are located in Open Space Areas A through F and I. No residential, commercial or industrial development will occur in any of these HCP Open Space Areas. HCP Open Space Areas will remain in their natural state except for the provision of road, drainage and utility crossings as well as City-Wide or Local Pedestrian Trails as detailed in Section 5.2.6. In addition to the HCP Open Space Areas, Open Space Areas l.G and 1 .H provide for utility corridors. x Specific development standards and criteria for office, commercial and residential uses are detailed in Section 5.7.3 below, and Open Space Area standards and criteria are provided in the Open Space Area Section, 5.7.4. Also provided below are Neighborhood Development Plans, Exhibits 5-24 through 5-41, for each Neighborhood and Open Space Area exhibits for each of the nine sub-areas of Open Space, Exhibits 5-42 through 5-50. These exhibits show, as appropriate, location and type of road entry monumentation, walls, trails, 5-83 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN community facilities and recreation facilities. These exhibits are conceptual in nature and are provided to show the proposed development concept for each Neighborhood or Area. These exhibits show only conceptual street layouts, as the exact numbers of lots (though not to exceed the maximum allowed), street configurations and other details will be determined during the individual (or Neighborhood) tentative maps. 5.7.2 Common Neighborhood Development Standards All neighborhoods within the La Costa Greens Village shall comply with the Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines contained in Chapter 4 unless modified by the specific Neighborhood Development Standards. 1. Neighborhood Development Plans Neighborhood Development Plans are provided for each residential Neighborhood. These exhibits show the location of entry monumentation, walls, trails, community facilities, landscaped slopes/undeveloped areas and recreation areas. These exhibits are conceptual in nature and are provided to indicate the proposed development concept for each Neighborhood. Precise street configurations, location of slopes and open space as well as other details will be determined during the final design process. 5-84 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.7.3 Individual Neighborhood Development Standards 1. La Costa Greens Office Area 1.1 a. Description Area 1.1 is located in the northwest corner of La Costa Greens and is devoted to office uses, including medical offices. The Area is bounded to the north by the proposed Bressi Ranch industrial uses, to the east by open space, to the south by the onsite Community Facilities Area 1.2, and by El Camino Real and the adjacent industrial park to the west. Area 1.1 consists of approximately 7.9 gross acres. Access will be provided by one or more of the following: a frontage road from El Camino Real, a right-in-right-out access onto El Camino Real pursuant to City Engineer approval or through the property to the north. The access shown in the following exhibit is conceptual in nature and may be relocated or deleted without the necessity of an amendment to this Master Plan. Details for this area are illustrated on Office Area 1.1 Development Plan, Exhibit 5-24. b. Use Allocation The General Plan designation for this Neighborhood is O (Office) and the (O) Development Standards, as established by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.27 et seq., shall be utilized, unless otherwise modified within this Master Plan. ^ c. Required Development Permits The following development permits are required: Tentative Map (may be required), Hillside Development Permit (may be required), Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit (may be required), and Site Development Plan for Office Uses. A Hillside Development Permit (HDP) 5-85 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN will be processed with the master tentative map for La Costa Greens 5-86 JHAWLC MP April 2006 7/ LEGEND 50' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 1 Village Boundary [ Neighborhood Boundary *$> | Project Boundary Marker ^ | Neighborhood Entry >••••) Village Theme Wall Landscaped Slopes/ Undeveloped Area Fire Protection Zone Project Roadways Open Space 1 Edge of Pad • 1.A OQ Key map VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 5-24 /./! Cosr/iOFFICE AREA 1.1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 5-86 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN f. Village. Additional HDP permits may be necessary for the development of individual Neighborhoods depending on the final grading plan and development design. Permitted Uses Uses permitted in this zone shall be all those allowed under Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.27.020. Conditional Uses Conditional uses on this planning area shall be those allowed under Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.27.030. Minimum Lot Size Minimum lot size shall be one acre. g. Lot Coverage Maximum lot coverage shall be fifty percent (50%) of the gross lot area. Open parking areas shall not be counted in determining lot coverage. Setbacks Front: Street Side: Rear: 50' from R.O.W., if facing El Camino Real 20' from curb of internal private roads 50' from R.O.W., if facing El Camino Real 20' from curb of internal private roads 20' or 50' from R.O.W. if on El Camino Real side of lot All other setbacks apply per Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21. 27.020 unless modified herein. JHAYVLC MP 5-87 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN i. Height Limits Height limitations shall be as provided for within Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21. 27.050. j. Special Design Criteria All Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines described in Chapter 4 shall be implemented, as applicable, in this area. The following specific design criteria also shall be incorporated in Office Area 1.1. • Special attention relative to sitting of structures and landscape treatment shall be devoted to the interface between any development of this Neighborhood and El Camino Real, which is a Community Theme Corridor, as defined within the Circulation Element of the City of Carlsbad General Plan. Large expanses of unarticulated structure or roofline should not be viewable to passers by. Because of the Area's proximity to El Camino Real, an acoustic study shall be undertaken in conjunction with the tentative subdivision map or permit process, and any recommended noise attenuation measures, including but not limited to the erection of sound walls, shall be implemented as necessary. • Lighting adjacent to Open Space Area l.A shall be selectively placed, shielded and directed away from the Open Space Area. Landscaping adjacent to Open Space Area l.A shall be compatible with existing natural vegetation. « Disturbance to Open Space Area l.A will be 5-88 JHAWLC MP April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN avoided to 'the maximum extent possible during and after construction. Where disturbance is unavoidable and has been authorized by the HCP/OMSP, the disturbed area shall be restored and/or revegetated as appropriate. A Fire Protection Zone, as defined and illustrated in Section 4.7.9 and which separates developed areas and manufactured slopes from HCP Open Space Areas, will be incorporated where necessary so as to have limited, if any, impact on the Open Space Areas. The final location of the zone will be determined during review of the Tentative Subdivision Map or other permit process applicable to development of the neighborhood. Common streetscape and landscape areas shall conform to community requirements as established within this Master Plan. Street trees, landscape zones, entries, irrigation systems, walls, fencing, etc., have been selected to provide consistency in design and quality. Sight distance and open corridors shall be required per Section 4.9.3. JHAYVLC MP 5-89 April 2006 CO UJ X Q 3REENSCOO0 COCOUJ AN REVIEW PROC0. 1 GROWTH0)lopment Typ1 H£« z g £Maximum AllowableDwelling UnitsAL PLANNG UNITSGENERDWELL!MANAGEMENTCONTROL POINTDENISTYW COCO UJ £ ou < O zs GNATIONSSEDESa .FERENCEI uz 5, 85,000 Sq.0eo 1 1 I 1 to^ O 8 0 o CO «3 u_ 'E3 0 1 1 1 1 CO (O 6 ena> 1u.ommunito 0 CM Min. Lot SizeX O co"Townhomes/SFDCO CO r-- CD 7 ao:al MediumResident!S CO eg CM CM CO CO i Low-Mediumsidential2 OL *Community POiQ- 1 1 1 1 6 8COQ. S8 o co" Qu_CO CO . s CM CO CO o:Low-MediumCO 1 QL 5: CO CO in" u_CO CO vnCO CM CO CM o:Low-Medium1 o: a:- 7,500 Sq. \Qu.CO CM COCO CM CO CO *Low-Mediumsidentialori 00 - 6.000 Sq. [QLL.CO CO inr- CM CM CO CMCM *Low-MediumCO1•g ce 5:- 9,000 Sq.Qu.CO CM S CM CO CO or Low-Mediumsidentialo: 5 o: o CO m" Q fe CM CO CM CO CO £Low-Mediumsidentiali cc S \ QLL.CO *~ r-co CO CM CO" CM ^ 1 CO 1 U) o: 5 CM CO in" i Qu_CO CM COCO O) CM CO CM (X Low-MediumCO 1 o: CO - 5.000 Sq. foLL.CO CO CO CO CM CO CO a:Low-Mediumsidentiali •i 1 ly (AffordabkMultiple FamCO i S CO ? aa:Medium-HighCOss 1 1 in Min. Lot Size3,500 Sq. FtTownhomes/SFDCO CMO> 01 in CO ? D Medium-High1 K. X a: CO - 4,500 Sq.QLi_CO CO o ao CM CO COCO *Low-Mediumsidential2 cc r^.'/Open Space0I 1 1 1 1 1 6 in I 0 '/Open Spaceo X 1 1 1 I 1 6 8COa. I o m '/Open Spaceo 1 1 I 1 1 U 6 Sa.rnc0)a. 0 0 '/Open Spaceoi 1 1 I 1 1 " 6 CLin c a. 0 Q '/Open Spaceoi 1 1 I 1 1 6 a.in c(Ua.0 0 UJ '/Open Spaceo X 1 1 1 1 1 6 ! 0 0 u_'/Open Spaceai 1 1 I 1 1 6 in 0 -'/Open SpaceoX 1 1 1 1 1 6 in 1 O X '/Open SpaceoI 1 1 I 1 1 6 8COQ. §a.0 0 ttia Lanevays - PoinseMajor Roadv1 1 I 1 1 1 1 C 6 c-j (DeOO_ O CM <0in |S.E TOTALS| VILLAG The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION EXHIBIT 5 Item No•0 P.C. AGENDA OF: July 19, 2006 Application complete date: March 1, 2006 Project Planner: Van Lynch Project Engineer: Bob Wojcik SUBJECT: GPA 05-15/MP 98-OKGVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use Element designation from Planned Industrial to Office and a Master Plan Amendment to change the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Land Use and Zoning designations from Planned Industrial to Office and a request for approval of a Site Development Plan and Special Use Permit to develop a 7.68-acre parcel with two 42,500 square foot medical office buildings located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble in the Greens Neighborhood 1.1 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Local Facilities Management Zone 10. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6125 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6126 and 6127 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 05-15 and Master Plan Amendment 98-01(G) and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6128 and 6129 APPROVING Site Development Permit 05-18 and Special Use Permit 05-17 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The 7.68-acre project site is located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble in the Greens Neighborhood 1.1 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Local Facilities Management Zone 10. The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element to change the Land Use designation of the site from Planned Industrial (PI) to Office (O) to allow the development of two medical office buildings. A Master Plan Amendment is required to change the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Land Use and Zoning designations from Planned Industrial (PM) to Office (O). Any development, other than child day care facilities, requires the processing of a Site Development Plan in the Office Zone. A Special Use Permit is required for development adjacent to El Camino Real. The project meets all regulations applicable to these legislative and permitting actions, and staff has no issues with the proposal. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant, Carltas Company, has requested a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Master Plan Amendment (MPA), Site Development Plan (SDP), and Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for the construction of two 42,500 square foot medical office buildings on a 7.68 acre site. The site, 77 GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19,2006 Page 2 i- Greens Neighborhood 1.1 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, has already been graded with the mass grading of the Villages of La Costa Greens project, CT 99-03. The project site is located adjacent and south of the industrial development of Bressi Ranch and access will be provided from Metropolitan Street (off Town Garden Lane) and a shared driveway off El Camino Real. To the north is a graded industrial pad. The property to the south is located within the Village of La Costa Master Plan and is designated Community Facilities (CF), allowing for a future child day care use. Open space currently exists to the east and southeast. To the west is El Camino Real and existing Planned Industrial uses. Both of the medical office buildings are rectangular in shape and are two stories tall. The buildings are mirror images of each other and are placed end to end with a drive aisle placed between the buildings. The buildings are oriented along the length of the existing development pad which is oriented northwesterly/southeasterly while El Camino Real runs north/south. The concrete tilt-up buildings will be painted off-white with tan color trim. Metal accent entry features, decorative cornice trim, green tinted glass windows and granite stone panels enhance the buildings architecture. The buildings mechanical equipment will be placed within masonry mechanical enclosures located on the ground within landscaped areas. The project also includes associated parking, three outdoor patio areas and landscaping within and around the project. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards: A. General Plan Office (O) Land Use Designation; B. Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01; C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) including: 1. Chapter 21.27 - Office Zone 2. Chapter 21.40 - Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone; D. Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport; and E. Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 and Growth Management. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilising both text and tables. A. General Plan The proposed General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element would change the Land Use designation of the site from Planned Industrial (PI) to Office (O). The proposed Office designation would be compatible with surrounding uses of Planned Industrial (professional office buildings) and Open Space to the north and east. The site is topographically suitable for the development of Office type uses, as the developable portion has been graded for professional office/industrial development. The proposed Office Land Use designation would not result in any unavoidable adverse impacts to the area. The project will not generate a significant increase in average daily vehicle trips and the existing roadways and El Camino Real are capable of handling the proposed vehicle trips. Adequate buffers in the form of a Circulation Element GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19, 2006 Page 3 ' I- roadway, El Camino Real, separate the existing industrial land uses to the west from the proposed office site. The project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the proposed office development are the Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Circulation, Noise, Housing and Public Safety Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use Commercial development to serve the employment and service needs of Carlsbad residents. The project proposes a General Plan Amendment to Office (O) for the development of medical/professional office services. Yes Open Space and Conservation To preserve, protect and enhance unique open space functions like buffers between uses and wildlife habitats. The project maintains adequate buffers from native habitat areas and is consistent with the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Yes Circulation Adequate circulation infrastructure to serve the projected population. The existing El Camino Real roadway is adequate in capacity to handle the traffic generated by the proposed use. Street improvement plans and bonding for the improvements was completed with the Master Tentative Map CT 99-03. Yes Noise Require that a noise study be submitted with all non- residential projects. Enforce the City policy that 55 Leq (h) dBA is the maximum interior noise level for general office uses. Project has been conditioned to submit a noise report showing compliance with interior noise standards. Yes Housing Provision of affordable housing. Project site is not being developed as residential and therefore is not x required to provide affordable housing. Yes Public Safety Provision of emergency water systems and all- weather access roads. All necessary water mains, fire hydrants, and appurtenances must be installed prior to occupancy of any building and all-weather access roads will be maintained throughout construction. Yes GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19, 2006 Page 4 i- B. Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 The project site is located in the Greens, Village 1.1. of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. This planning area is designated (Land Use and Zoning) as Planned Industrial in the Master Plan. The proposed Office designation would be compatible with surrounding uses of Planned Industrial (professional office buildings) and Open Space to the north and east. The Master Plan Amendment is to change the Master Plan Land Use and Zoning of Village 1.1 to Office consistent with the proposed Office General Plan Land Use designation. The Master Plan Amendment includes text and map changes to the Master Plan document to reflect the Land Use and Zoning change. C.I Chapter 21.27 - Office (O) Zoning The project proposes a Zone Change from Planned Industrial (PI) to Office (O). The Office Zone (Chapter 21.27 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) would implement the proposed Office Land Use designation. The Office Zone has a built-in Site Development Plan requirement and a Qualified Overlay Zone is not required. The proposed project complies with the Office Zone as shown in Table 2 below. TABLE 2 - OFFICE COMPLIANCE Code Section Building Height Setbacks- Buildings Setbacks- Driveways and Parking Lot Area Lot Width Lot Coverage Parking Employee Eating Area Standard Not to exceed 35 feet/three levels. Front: 50 ft. (Prime arterial) Street side: 50ft. Interior side: 10 ft. Rear: 10ft. Front: 30 ft. (Prime Arterial) Street side: 30ft. Interior side: 10 ft. Rear: 10ft. Min. 10,000 square feet 75 ft wide minimum 50 % max. 1:200 or 425 parking stalls required 300 sq ft / 5,000 sq ft of building area; 5,100 sq ft required Provided Building A and B = 35 feet max./ two levels. Front: >200ft. Street side: n/a. Interior side: 65 ft. Rear: 130' ft. Front: 50ft. Street side: n/a. Interior side: 10 ft. Rear: 45 ft minimum. 7.68 Ac (334,8 14 sq ft) 309.72 ft 13% 436 parking stalls "*• 6,3 16 sq ft Compliance Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C.2 Chapter 21.40 - Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone (El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards) The proposed project is located adjacent to and on the east side of El Camino Real, and thus is subject to the regulations of the Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone, as implemented through the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.40.040, a Special Use Permit is required. GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19, 2006 Page 5 i- The project is located within Area 4 of the El Camino Real Corridor (College Avenue to Sunfresh Rose Company). Compliance with the corridor standards is shown in Table 3 below. TABLE 3 - EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR STANDARDS COMPLIANCE Standard Design Theme Median Breaks Sidewalks Signs Building Height Grading Setback Street Furniture Street light spacing Roof Equipment Land Uses Adopted Criteria Planned "campus type" research, business, service center Major intersections Determined by Staff Freestanding monuments, not to exceed 5 ft above street grade, and 24 sq. ft. in area. 35' from grade maximum No cut or fill exceeding 15' from original grade At grade: 30' minimum. Some screening to be incorporated into setback As appropriate to match adjacent development City standard Not visible Land Use changes should be addressed at time of request. Proposed Project Office type design theme where both buildings complement each other No median break provided at the driveway entrance on El Camino Real Provided per City standard None proposed at this time 35' from grade maximum Negligible Cut/fill (not to exceed 15 feet) 50' minimum proposed with landscape screening None required City standard Proposed ground placed mechanical equipment in screened enclosure Land Use change proposed. Compliance Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes D. Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for McClellan - Palomar Airport•v The project site is located within the Airport Influence Area and approximately 4,000 feet southeast of McClellan-Palomar Airport. The site is outside the 60 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contour and outside the Runway Protection Zone. The CLUP identifies the proposed Office use as being a compatible use with essentially no interference from aircraft noise. The southerly portion of the site is within the Flight Activity Zone (FAZ), which is an area most likely to experience a crash since it is beneath the flight pattern. The CLUP identifies that the land beneath the flight activity zone areas should be held free of intensive development such as residential at 10 units per acre, high rise development, and all uses which involve large groups of people, (more than 100). The proposed Office Land Use designation would preclude residential uses at that density and the zoning restrictions would preclude high- rise development. Any proposed use involving a large assemblage of people would likely require a Conditional Use Permit, which should be found to be incompatible with the CLUP. As GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19, 2006 Page 6 i- the project involves a General Plan Land Use Element Amendment, the project was submitted to the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) for a determination of consistency with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). On March 6, 2006, the SDCRAA adopted Resolution 2006-0015 ALUC finding the project conditionally consistent with the ALUCP. The condition added was the restriction that all assembly areas within the proposed project that are located within the FAZ be limited (as defined by the Uniform Building Code Group A Occupancy) to no more than one hundred (100) persons per assembly area in order to be consistent with FAZ guidelines in the McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP. E. Local Facilities Management Plan and Growth Management The proposed project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Program, as contained in Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance and in the approved Zone 10 LFMP. The change to Office uses on the site will have minimal impact on public facilities as the industrial lot was planned to be developed with 137,650 square feet of industrial and/or professional office uses. Thus, the proposed project public facility demand will be in compliance with the public facility assumptions of the Zone 10 LFMP. No special conditions or requirements exist within the Zone 10 LFMP applicable specifically to the subject site. The project is conditioned to pay the appropriate public facilities fee, water and sewer connection fees, traffic impact and school fees to mitigate its impact on these respective facilities. As conditioned, all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in place prior to, or concurrent with, development. Therefore, the proposed Carltas development is consistent with the Zone 10 LFMP. Table 4 below details the project's conformance with the requirements of the Growth Management Program. TABLE 4: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools - Carlsbad Unified School District Sewer - Carlsbad Waste Water District Water - Carlsbad Municipal Water District IMPACTS N/A N/A 47EDU N/A 20.7 cfs * 4,250 ADT Station Nos. 2 and 5 N/A N/A 49EDU 19,550 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA July 19,2006 Page? i. does not have any impacts to any significant native or wetland habitats or wildlife species identified as candidate, sensitive or special status by the wildlife agencies and is identified as a development area within the HMP and Villages of La Costa Habitat Conservation Plan. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2006. No comments were received during the 20-day public review period (May 23, 2006 - June 12, 2006). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6125 (Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6126 (GPA) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6127 (MPA) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6128 (SDP) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6129 (SUP) 6. Location Map 7. Background Data Sheet 8. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 9. Disclosure Statement 10. Underlined/strikethrough Master Plan text (distributed separately) 11. Reduced Exhibits 12. Exhibits "A" - "G" dated July 19, 2006 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: GPA 05-15/MP 98-OKGVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 \ - CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA APPLICANT: Carltas Company REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use Element designation from Planned Industrial to Office and a Master Plan Amendment to change the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Land Use and Zoning designations from Planned Industrial to Office and a request for approval of a Site Development Plan and Special Use Permit to develop a 7.68-acre parcel with two 42.500 square foot medical office buildings located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble in the Greens Neighborhood of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Local Facilities Management Zone 10. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 99-03. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof no. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder APN: 213-110-01-00 Acres: 7.68 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 1 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Planned Industrial Proposed Land Use Designation: Office Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A Existing Zone: Planned Community Proposed Zone: Planned Community Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning (Master Plan) General Plan Current Land Use Site Planne'd Community (O) Office Vacant North Planned Community (PI) Planned Industrial Vacant South Planned Community (CF) Community Facility Vasant East Planned Community (OS) Open Space Open Space West Planned Industrial Planned Industrial Industrial Revised 01/06 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: I 1 Yes EX] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes 1X1 No Coastal Development Permit: I I Yes IXI No Local Coastal Program Amendment: f~1 Yes [>\| No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 47 EDU ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption, /\ Negative Declaration, issued May 23, 2006 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - GPA Q5-15/MP 98- OKGVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 10 GENERAL PLAN: Office (proposed) ZONING: Planned Community (Proposed Office from Planned Industrial) DEVELOPER'S NAME: Carltas Company, John White ADDRESS: 5600 Avenida Encinas, Suite 100. Carlsbad CA 92008 PHONE NO.: 760-431-5600 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 213-110-01-00 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 85.000 sg ft ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ASAP 47EDU N/A 20.7 A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = N/A B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = N/A C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) D. Park: Demand in Acreage = E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 and 5 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = I. Schools: J. Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = K. Water: Demand in GPD = 19,550 4.250 0 Carlsbad Unified 47 Ponto/lOC City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: . ? Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, ^association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county,, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of .the applicant and property owner must be provided below. '.„•. ~ ': ' - * ,: • ' 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Title Corp/Part Title Address Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-ownedI corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Title Corp/Part. Title Address 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 603-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust _ Non Profit/Trust _ Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I I Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ;Wature-t5f owner/date £&£>» (AtetYWJ &A/ Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant **"•*•• — i0.05 Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 '" (Master Plan Development of 2,390 dwelling units, a business park, a community park, 2 community facilities sites, elementary school site and the preservation of 834.9 acres of open space located within Local Facilities Management Zones 10 and 11.) APPROVED BY: City Council Ordinance #NS-604 and NS-605, October 16, 2001 *** La Costa Oaks South MP 98-01 (A) (Minor amendment to transfer two dwelling units from Neighborhood 3.15 to Neighborhood 3.13.) APPROVED BY: City Council Ordinance # NS-653, November 12, 2002 *** La Costa Greens MP98-01(B) (Minor amendment to transfer five dwelling units between Neighborhoods 1.8 - 1.14 and to modify the Village's plant palettes) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # 5478, October 15, 2003 *** La Costa Ridge MP98-01(C) (Minor amendment to transfer one dwelling units between Neighborhoods 2.3 and 2.6) APPROVED BY: x Planning Commission Resolution # 5738, October 6, 2004 *** La Costa Greens MP98-01(D) (Minor amendment to reflect the relocation of the School Site within Neighborhood 1.7 and common recreation area from Neighborhood 1.7 to 1.6) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # 5837, February 16, 2005 *** La Costa Oak North MP98-01(E) (Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units between Neighborhoods 3.3 to 3.1 and to modify the location of the recreation centers to Neighborhood 3.1) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # *** La Costa Greens MP98-01(F) (Minor amendment to transfer four dwelling units from Neighborhood 1.16 to 1.3 and to modify the location of the recreation vehicle parking area from Neighborhood 1.2 to 1.3) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # *** La Cost Greens MP 98-01 (G) X (Minor amendment to change the permitted use from Planned Industrial to Office in Planning Area 1.1) APPROVED BY: Planning Commission Resolution # VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS^ - Chapter/Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Organization 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Master Plan 1-4 1.3 Project Description 1-6 1.3.1 La Costa Greens 1-6 1.3.2 La Costa Ridge 1-6 1.3.3 La Costa Oaks 1-8 1.4 Master Applications 1-9 1.4.1 Master Plan Concurrent Applications 1-9 1.4.2 Applications Subsequent to Master Plan Approval 1-11 1.5 Master Plan Goals 1-13 1.5.1 Purpose 1-13 1.5.2 Master Plan Vision Statement and Goals 1-13 1.6 Relation to the La Costa Master Plan 1-16 1.7 Adoption and Agreements of HCP/OMSP 1-17 2.0 GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2.1 General Plan 2-1 2.2 Zoning Description 2-3 2.3 Legal Description 2-6 2.4 Land Use Summary 2-6 2.4.1 Residential * 2-6 2.4.2 Open Space 2-8 2.4.3 Planned Industrial Office 2-8 2.4.4 Community Facilities 2-9 JHAWLCMP —i— December. 2000 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter/Section Page 2.4.5 School Site 2-9 2.4.6 Street System 2-9 2.4.7 Pedestrian System 2-10 2.5 General Provisions 2-11 2.5.1 Maximum Dwelling Units 2-11 2.5.2 Dwelling Unit Transfer 2-11 2.5.3 Mitigation Measures 2-12 2.5.4 Relationship to LFMP 2-12 2.5.5 Master Plan Enforcement 2-13 2.5.6 Hillside Development Ordinance 2-13 2.5.7 Master Homeowners' Association 2-13 2.5.8 Architectural Review Board 2-15 2.5.9 Affordable Housing 2-15 2.5.10 Miscellaneous Provisions 2-19 2.6 Local Facilities Management Plans .' 2-22 2.6.1 Community Facilities 2-22 2.6.2 Utilities And Infrastructure 2-25 3.0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS 3.1 Relation of the Master Plan and the Village Development Plans 3-1 3.2 Master Plan Amendments ?r 3-1 3.3 Master Tentative Tract Map 3-2 3.4 Tentative Tract Maps and Final Maps 3-2 3.5 Planned Development Permits 3-3 3r6 Industrial Permits 3 1 (Section 3.6 removed per amendment MP 98-01 (G) 3.7 Conditional Uses 3-4 JHAYVLC MP —ii— December, 2000 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTSi- Chapter/Section Page 4.7.2 Streetscapes 4-77 4.7.3 Village Themes 4-78 4.7.4 Entry Accent Trees 4-78 4.7.5 Slopes 4-78 4.7.6 Landscape Zones 4-80 4.7.7 Landscape and Irrigation Standards 4-81 4.7.8 Landscape Maintenance 4-81 4.7.9 Fire Protection Plan 4-82 4.8 Walls and Fencing 4-87 4.8.1 Perimeter Neighborhood Walls 4-87 4.9 Signage 4-87 4.9.1 Temporary Signs 4-88 4.9.2 Permanent Signs 4-92 4.9.3 Corner Sight Distance Specifications 4-97 4.10 Lighting -. 4-99 4.11 Screening and Edge Treatments 4-101 5.0 LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.2 Village Land Use Plan 5-2 5.2.1 Residential 5-8•*. 5.2.2 Community Facilities 5-10 5.2.3 Recreational Vehicle Storage 5-11 5.2.4 Industrial Office 5-11 5.2.5 Open Space 5-11 5.2.6 Circulation 5-17 JHAWLC MP —iv— December. 2000 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Number/Title Page 5-13 Poinsettia Streetscape - West 5-53 5-14 Poinsettia Streetscape - Central 5-54 5-15 Alga Road Streetscape 5-56 5-16 Alicante Road - South 5-57 5-17 Alicante Road - Wetland Crossing 5-58 5-18 Alicante Road - Central & North 5-59 5-19a Village Gated Entry (Type 1) 5-61 5-19b Village Gated Entry (Type 2) 5-62 5-19c Major Village Entry 5-63 5-19d Village Entry Public 5-64 5-20 Village Edge/Typical Existing Residential 5-66 5-21 Neighborhood Streetscape 1 5-67 5-22 Neighborhood Streetscape 2 5-68 5-23 Village Theme Walls 5-72 5-24 Planned Industrial Office Area 1.1 Development Plan 5-86 5-25 Neighborhood 1.2 Development Plan 5-91 5-26 Neighborhood 1.3 Development Plan 5-97 5-27 School Area 1.4 Development Plan 5-103 5-28 Park Area 1.5 Development Plan 5-108 5-29 Neighborhood Area 1.6 Development Plan 5-113 5-30 Neighborhood 1.7 Development Plan 5-120 5-31 Neighborhood 1.8 Development Plan 5-129 5-32 Neighborhood 1.9 Development Plan 5-135 5-33 Neighborhood 1.10 Development Plan 5-142 5-34 Neighborhood 1.11 Development Plan 5-149 JHAYVLCMP —xiii— February, 2005 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION i-1. Tentative Tract Maps and Final Maps shall be processed to further subdivide neighborhood areas created by the Master Tentative Tract Map. 2. Planned Unit Development Permits or Condominium Permits shall be processed to create single-family residential lots which are less than 7,500 square feet in area, to allow for airspace ownership of dwelling units, or to provide for gated Neighborhoods with private roads. 3. Hillside Development Permits shall be processed for all neighborhoods proposed on land with a slope gradient of 15 percent or greater and a slope height greater than 15 feet in accordance with Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. Scenic Corridor Special Use Permits shall be obtained before construction or development occurs within any area adjacent to El Camino Real. 5. Conditional Use Permits shall be obtained for any fire station, church, community services facility, or child day care facility. Community recreation centers that are not subject to the Planned Development Ordinance shall also require a Conditional Use Permit. 6. Site Development Plans shall be processed for any multiple family residential developments having more than four dwelling units or an affordable housing project of any size. A Site Development Plan is also required for neighborhoods having a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet or greater and for any development in the Office Zone (planning Area 1.1). Permit requirements are further defined for each Master Plan neighborhood by a Village Permit Matrix, which can be found in each of the Village Development Plan chapters (see Sections 5.2.8, 6.2.7, and 7.2.7). 1-12 JHAYVLC MP February 2005 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN 2.0 GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2.1 General Plan The General Plan designations of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are shown on Exhibit 2-1, General Plan Land Use. They include the following designations: OS — Open Space RLM — Residential Low Medium, 0-4 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point -3.2 du/ac) RM — Residential Medium, 4-8 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point-6.0 du/ac) RMH — Residential Medium-High, 8-15 dwelling units per acre (Growth Control Point - 11.5 du/ac) CF — Community Facilities P4O — Planned Industrial Office and Related Commercial E — Elementary School All development within the Master Plan area shall be consistent with these land use designations as well as complying with the Master Plan, Village Development Plans and Neighborhood Development Standards. Residential density consistency for each of the Master Plan villages is demonstrated within the section entitled Village Land Use Plan in each of the Village Development Plan chapters (Sections 5.2, 6.2 and 7.2). 2-1 JHAWLC MP December. 200QApril 2006 LEGEND RIM RM Residential-Low Medium Density Residential-Medium Density RMH CF Residential-Medium High CommunityFacilities .-WO o/s MannerMustHalrCfrit-6 Master PlanOpen Space <B o/s PARK ElementarySchool Public CommunityPark VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 2-1 GENERAL PLANLAND USE Page 2-2 LEGEND R-1 RD-M One-FamilyResidential ResidentialDensity-Multiple C-F ~p=«0 CommunityFacilities Planned Cf>ic.£Industrial ® o-sp School o Park -s Open Space VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 2-3 MASTER PLANZONING Page 2-5 < 2 O U O </} OH W OS ^2 W< HJ cc spa H PM•<J^Ha g C/5 § Q ^ _j 1= H MHHa w <*>z ,(d ;O : 1' ts j s • sia, ; •* - a "-z • U-: g{ Sgu ^MANAG= -P< n I i! CAU U SIGNATIONS'"d)auVIa Q ^ELOPMENT AREAS>HQ UO J c 2a ,6 a =C o 3 3 ^Q O ^5 3'3jd>a M Cr-5j 3 L, ^3 • J 1 c/l o g C c If» \£ r- 'tClu i ^uc. u2bU c. -^ ccv.•e •3 3 1 } I 53 J ' 5 JJ i5 C \); 5 t-- tN 00 I— w-i OO CN iCN ^Low Medium!a ResidentMJQi —^d OO r- o 00r-' OO Medium!3 I S — . 0 (NR Sfi 2 SO(N O Medium High"3 Residenti o o r-" <-' 1"^ T | 11 c£ 01 A ii o o 1 1 S 1 8 o o 1 vO (N /Power Easementu 1o s 11 O 0 1 1 1*1 g Circulati(N OO 3 8 en g 1 9L •J 'i '- * \ (N (N r^-OO S CN 0 Low Medium•a Resident2 a;STA RIDGE |O J OO wS 1/1 O(N 2 o ;;Medium High•3 Resident1 o o 1 1 s(N U !§ CTs S g i gj I Ml = -3 s^ -*. .'. ^ i 11 O O 1 *o X3 Facilities.§•Commur'-i,U STA OAKS ]OU ^J en <N VO DO S cs 00C7\(N t—r-t Low Medium."a Resident2 a; ON ^ OS o 2 rn Medium3 1 2 r- (N P S ^ 5 S Medium High3 Resident33 11 o o 1 1 (NCN § 1O s 11 o o 1 s g D i -^ S r^ OS (N 1 eo = *iri § Si 00 i i •»•VSTER PLAtTOTAL Mt§ ,A2' — eIJH ! i C )E >Cl a. U VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN GENERAL PLAN AND LAND USE PROVISIONS 2. Multiple Family Housingl" In order to provide for a variety of housing types and density ranges, four Multiple Family Housing neighborhoods are provided in the Master Plan. Multiple Family Housing is typically located in Neighborhoods designated RMH - Residential Medium-High on the General Plan. These Neighborhoods shall be designed to provide densities of approximately 8.0 to 11.5 dwelling units per acre. A total of 505 multiple-family dwelling units are projected by the Master Plan. 2.4.2 Open Space Preservation and enhancement of Open Space is an important aspect of this Master Plan. Areas designated Open Space by the General Plan constitutes approximately 892 acres or 48% of the Master Plan area. The Master Plan addresses open space for the preservation of natural resources (HCP/OMSP), open space for outdoor recreation and open space for public health and safety. The Master Plan identifies additional open space areas within many of the residential neighborhoods. Each of the Village Land Use Plans includes an Open Space Program (Sections 5.2.5, 6.2.4, and 7.2.4) which describes the distribution of open space within the respective Village. 2.4.3 Planned Industrial Office The Master Plan provides for one Planned Industrial Office site. This land use category allows for research and development, light manufacturing, warehousing, storage, business and professional offices, and utility office uses, including medical. The General Plan also allows for agricultural and outdoor recreation uses on lots of one acre or more as interim uses. JHAWLC MP 2-8 February. 2005 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS i- &6 - Planned Industrial Permits Prior to development within areas designated Planned Industrial by Exhibit 2 3, Master Plan Zoning, a Planned Industrial Permit shall be submitted and approved pursuant to Chapter 21.34 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3.7 Conditional Uses A Conditional Use Permit processed pursuant to Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code shall be submitted and approved prior to the development of a fire station, hospital, church or community services facility (all of which require a CUP). Community recreation centers located in neighborhoods which are not subject to the Planned Development Ordinance shall also require the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit shall be consistent with the concepts, goals and standards specified in this Master Plan to ensure compatibility with all appropriate City policies and ordinances. After final approval of each Conditional Use Permit, grading, building and other ministerial permits for the development of the site may be issued provided that all conditions of approval and public facility requirements have been satisfied per the relevant Zone 10 and Zone 1 1 Local Facilities Management Plans. Each Conditional Use Permit shall be submitted and processed as set forth in Chapter 21.42, Conditional Uses, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3.8 Child Day Care Center A child day care center is permitted in the Villages of La Costa within the La Costa Greens area designated Community Facilities on Exhibit 2-3, Master Plan Zoning. The proposed day care center, located along El Camino Real, is subject to the provisions of Section 21.83.080, Development Standards For Child Day Care Centers, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A child day care center located directly adjacent to a Planned Industrial (PM) Planning Area 1.1, designated for Office ..(O) zoning district permitted uses, zoned area is subject to the limitations and provisions within Code Section 21.83 .060 (Child Care) regarding the potential health and safety risks associated with hazardous materials used in the nearby businesses. The limitations include a 3-4 JHAWLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 101 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS i- required risks evaluation, parental and property owner notifications, an emergency operating plan, and an operational agreement with the City. Child day care center is defined as a facility other than a family day care home which provides non-medical care, protection, and supervision for children under eighteen years of age for periods of less than twenty-four hours per day. Child day care centers include preschools through kindergarten, nursery schools, employer-sponsored child day care facilities, and before- and after-school recreational programs, but do not include public or private elementary schools. 3.9 Site Development Plans A Site Development Plan processed pursuant to Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code shall be submitted and approved prior to the development of apartment projects which include more than 4 dwelling units^asd for single- family home neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and greater, and for any development in the Office Zone (Planning Area 1.1). The Site Development Plan shall be consistent with the concepts, goals and standards specified in this Master Plan. After final approval of each Site Development Plan, grading, building and other ministerial permits for the development of the site may be issued provided that all conditions of approval and public facility requirements have been satisfied. 3.10 Public Facility Phasing The Zone 10 and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plans contain detailed development phasing programs for eleven public facilities covered by the City of Carlsbad Citywide Public Facility Plan. These plans ensure that public facilities will be in place when they are needed. The Master Plan will be developed in multiple phases. Each phase has specific offsite and onsite improvements that must be provided prior to or concurrent with development. The Citywide Public Facilities plan established performance standards for public facilities. These performance standards were adhered to by the Zone 10 and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plans to ensure the appropriate timing of facilities and services. All public facility performance standards identified in the Local Facilities Management Plans and any amendments thereto must be complied with as the Master Plan develops. 3-5 JHAYVLC MP December. 2000 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS i- The phasing of public facilities is addressed within each of the Village Development Plan chapters of the Master Plan. Public facilities phasing for La Costa Greens is discussed in Section 5.4 and illustrated on Exhibits 5-6,7, 8,9, and 10. The phasing of public facilities for La Costa Ridge is described in Section 6.4 and shown on Exhibits 6-6,7, 8, and 9. Public facilities phasing for La Costa Oaks is described in Section 7.4 and depicted on Exhibit 7-6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. 3-6 JHAWLC MP December. 2000 April 2006 103 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN \- 5.2 Village Land Use Plan The La Costa Greens Village consists of approximately 660 acres. Generally located around the north course of the La Costa Resort golf course, the La Costa Greens Village is bounded to the south by Alga Road and by West Bluff Plaza and El Camino Real to the west. Poinsettia Lane, which extends northeasterly from El Camino Real, will serve as a primary pedestrian and vehicular corridor within the community. The La Costa Greens Village Development Plan, Exhibit 5-1, envisions a full spectrum of land uses for the La Costa Greens Village. As defined by the La Costa Greens Village Development Plan Table, Exhibit 5-A, the La Costa Greens Village will provide for a wide range of residential products, active and passive recreation areas, natural open space, a potential elementary school site, a community facilities site, a child daycare site, an RV storage site, and a planned industrial site Office site. As shown on Exhibit 5-2, individual La Costa Greens neighborhoods are located within the larger General Plan Land Use category areas, which are also shown on Exhibit 2-1, General Plan Land Use. In order to determine the number of dwelling units allowed within any particular land use category, the Growth Management Control Point of the category is multiplied by the number of net developable acres located within the category area. The number of General Plan Dwelling Units and Maximum Allowable Dwelling Units for each General Plan Land Use category are shown on Exhibit 5-B, Residential Density Consistency Table. Dwelling units may be clustered within a General Plan Land Use Category provided the density of each neighborhood falls within the density range allowed by the General Plan Land Use category (see Section 2.1). The density of an individual neighborhood, therefore, may exceed the Growth Management Control Point as long as all the La Costa Greens Village neighborhoods located within the General Plan category do not, in aggregate, exceed the Allowable Dwelling Units shown in Exhibit 5-B. 5-2 JHAWLC MP October. 2003 April 2006 03Z u Q O £Ou O J 03 OHw a:r ^ ^^^ P"H PH H ZW en S ZPH tJo w w o Q" r^CC W Oa u H S•H ffl ooooW UOtfCM^.S- Sw Z Ja.a;uHoo 3 uo1 0 N, tiw C ?< QO0M<£nea WZ Q. a iQ.O 1 SS = 3 < BO E J 3 00 5 U 3 •< O Z Zo NOIXVN3t, *+j S a M w us ^< g Z |y ^Cj ^o 2 %vyp% •ft '•:>>". r* ~ **)• "? v': * ;& £\ t~j,~ * ti '* * ^tT" ••"' .•••',' ,; f1'. iy: >'; J fcc V 1C. Ec c M r* c'I £ Tfl £ £ 0 f- Oi § - " r- >>> i i ) i i • t < * uO \J t [S i i E i t f ; uc. r />U J a T ~l 0 6 n) -i i> 5 H ; 3 •i S CO 5 is £ a- oo a oo•a e 1oH oon- oo ^1i , n "o u00 c u 5 "* CTN 2 1 s -* J <c •^ ^r* c c/ V 4 3 L, 1'3 5 i- r•> i J -i 4J5 c t»« u cc/ ccc N< uc/ NC CT 0 t~<* a 2 S NC 3 3 •4 r•3 535 j" 2 3 >\ s 1 * 4 ^ ) K ,3 .s u, a- ooo | Qtu oo (N OO oi 1 t-; 1 O c croooo 1 Qfcu00 oo oo !? ei 1 oo 1 c/ ( s *• b cO1 c N£ [IO1 Vt- o wc^ CE 2 ^-ft CT 30 3 j-0 >>5^ 3~ 2 H5 1 •\ 14 ^ s 41 (> < :*• ti cc/1 a Clo1 •flN: c c^a a *; S C 30 3 H r0 3 3^ C 2 H3 1-3 > 3f- / N , > 0 ( * u c<J ccc V gty Vc* w •^ D: ^S 30 3 H r0 333^ •T 2 H 3 "I •1 1 hN ^^ H 4 _. "b <^ t li U c cc gB c-r* •^ Cf* a 5 c r g 0 ^J f 33^ H 2 3 •^ 1- )1 ' 4 H •1 ai'6 c t* a cc/ c V bo1 r*1 f r-o pt 2 S r*1 3•3 4 H 7-•3 33 •C 2 3 11 4 i 4 1 d1 S c j ^ b cu ccG V bo1 NC r- or- a 2 S •a ^0 4 H f•3 333^ •T 2 3 H5 J J f y-*v ^c 3 rdable HeS .9- "3 ooo 2 *"*"q K in S C/3 2 s £ d- oo Q "Si ownhomH ts 0 NO ^q X NO I S c _! *« b cO1 ccV ^ bO" t~c CT CTf i B S >—a t^ | 4 H r3>?•i f" i 5 •) \\i i 4 0 c 5 T r c u C •< 1n 3 I f 4 •> 3 3 C 0 c 0 5 r- T C o1 C a | o1 u • 3 3 2 I" 1O OHCJ s 6 C/3 O O a.oo 0* CL, O K NO O 6 00O Q 1a.oo g OH U ffi m 6 00 O « S8 'B C- o co 53 o HCOO U PH X Wj 09 .^£H Z ^PH H f-* 1 1o g w o - HQ to [LLAGELA CO^^ ^C •A H33Xtd VIEW PROCESSW z PH CO < S Development Typei *a c« 1 '3M h^•^3 en IIsa CO COCO td O KSJUO <ZONINGAND USESIGNATIONQ Q S •<! ^a § z IP j; O 2tdZ 1 •£* ' 1 i^iSj^jjt ~4' "t"."}•• \* •, ^, ^ ;*"" ;., *'•', *{: »-Li 7 -•" - . "f ;_HCP/Open Space(N(N CO6 CO0 tu §ty Corridor/Open Spi^ S 1 Vl CO6 CO0 q ua ty Corridor/Open SpiM 5 i 2 CO6 coO X HCP/Open Space1 2 CO6 COO - CO >lation Element Roadv3 ii u t-; C/l (§ e <u W CH.0 ^"3H 0 1 ". »if fe **„<#• f?S-^ ~j V V.A.. £» P;"r*»- Vi v£ ,' v> V* .^1 aos ^^ o VO CO-J HO O J ^ Q-c 1 LEGEND 1.15 I Village Neighborhood R^H I General Plan Land Use Category VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 5-2 LA COSTA GREENSGENERAL PLAN DENSITY CONSISTENCY Page 5-6 101 VILLAGES or LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.2.3 Recreational Vehicle Storage '" A recreational vehicle (RV) storage site is identified by the La Costa Greens Village Development Plan within the community facilities site in Neighborhood 1.3. The required area of .34 acre, exclusive of driveways and approaches, provides for 20 square feet per dwelling unit within the planned development neighborhoods (those with minimum lot areas less than 7,500 sq. ft. or gated). The .34 required common area assumes that rental apartments will be provided in Neighborhood 1.15. If ownership units are offered, however, then up to an additional .08 acre of RV storage area is required. If Neighborhood 1.12 applies as a planned development for a gated community, then an additional 760 square feet of RV storage space will be required. Independent storage may be provided onsite, within a particular development to serve the neighborhood. The common storage area may also be reduced if the RV storage spaces required to accommodate a neighborhood are provided for within a particular development. The RV storage site must be screened from public view by a fence, wall, or landscaping. 5.2.4 Industrial Office The La Costa Greens Village Development Plan identifies a 7.9-acre industrial Office site. Planned Industrial Planning Area 1.1 is located in the northwest corner of La Costa Greens, to the east side of El Camino Real. The area is designated Planned Industrial Office and Related Commercial (O) by the General Plan. This designation provides for business and professional offices, businesses and light industries engaged primarily in research and/or ^testing, compatible light manufacturing, and certain commercial uses which cater to and are ancillary to the uses allowed in the P M Zone. This classification designates areas which are compatible with and environmentally- suited for office uses. Permitted uses and potential conditional uses are identified in sections (d) Permitted Uses and (e) Conditional Uses of Neighborhood 1.1 section of this Master Plan. 5.2.5 Open Space 5-11 JHAWLC MP February, 2005 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Per Section 21.38.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, all Master Plans must provide fifteen percent (15%) of the total Master Plan area in an integrated open space program which addresses 5-12 JHAWLC MP February, 2005 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.2.6 Circulation JHAWLC MP The Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) addresses all Circulation Element roads located within the boundaries of La Costa Greens. The La Costa Greens Circulation Plan is illustrated by Exhibit 5-4. Typical street sections are provided within the master plan. In general new local streets within the master plan will include landscaped parkways having a minimum width of four and one-half feet located between the curb and sidewalk. Sidewalks having a minimum width of five feet shall be provided on both sides of all streets unless the Planning Commission or City Council determines that it is appropriate to construct sidewalks on one side of the street only. 1. Traffic Calming During the buildout of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan the City Council may approve standards for the use of traffic calming devices. Should the use of traffic calming devices be approved by the City Council such devices may be incorporated into project designs for neighborhoods which have not yet received discretionary approvals for development or into existing developed neighborhoods. The inclusion of such devices shall not require substantial modifications to the neighborhood concept designs or yields. Recommendations on appropriate locations to achieve better design and slow traffic shall be provided during project review by City departments particularly the Engineering, Fire and Planning Departments. 2. Village Circulation Plan x Four Circulation Element roadways are located within or adjacent to La Costa Greens. El Camino Real, a Prime Arterial Street (126-foot divided right-of-way), is adjacent to portions of the western Village boundary. El Camino Real provides access to Planned Industrial Office Area 1.1, Community Facilities Area 1.2, and Neighborhood 1.3. El Camino Real intersects with Poinsettia Lane at the west end of Neighborhood 1.17. Improvements to El Camino Real within 5-17 February, 2005 April 2006 116 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN the s'egment adjacent 5-18 JHAYVLC MP February, 2005 April 2006 III Ou wa HhH 03 I Ou |-~i— i l-H VO i— 1 i— 1 ID i— Ii-H Tt ^H ^ i-H fS»H i-H i«H l— 1 i— 1 O1-H ON i— H 00 ^H f; *O V) rr i-H f^ i-H rs i-H i-Hi-5 EVELOPMENT PERMITQ • • O • • • • • • • • • • •sntative Subdivision MapH © © © © (r^) © © © © © © (ffi) © © © ©illside Development PermitE • O O • • • • • • O anned Development PermitOH O o o ondominium PermitU O • • •I te Development PlanCO • • • « ^N £H <uOH 0)ft S is'o &CO 1-1o"O"S0Uo'2D CO • "tt <5 OH ~:l•T 4 i!c 1 TJ S3H- H T!o ci * © © © © © © © © • 1— t 1UOH 1) 2is'ooa CO •i S-a0o HH ITS) "*•" • O o onditional Use PermitO • -4-»• ^H <UOH 1 £03Q (?N) e kH^ 0 11s•«^• Denotes permit required fo•*£K % ^"S hi •3so5 1cog)1s,t Ii !U H) •« 1_O Denotes permit required fow ^•S?P| •X \> of the Carlsbad Unified Scho.c.^ <s ® All permits are the respons1•sa^^Gtu-s ^.0 •-S @ All permits are the responsc •1 •S*, ^3s: -« a 1C5< Q% ss^*; 'S .IP§ JS (X^- .s =n "3S S <U U5U Q CD •§^"^^1« 2^^^i ,&j •^ '1str ««s> "^t^ ^•4-b ?i?^ §^% °« c^ Bl 11rv "S ""-s: ^>•13 ^3*^s being processed concurrent!)ay or mav not be required for i^ S M Q A Hillside Development PeHillside Development Pern•*^s;Ss o %-S f]•^ «i1 ^ Si,S '5> ^>§J a r^ •« 2 §s !vJ a.Q a>>-) -s:« r^s 143 ^al"31! ^•*« ^2Q vS |{ § F^ 1= b -Qt; -BJ -SP5 gm .^-5; Q -^•^ •> ^ ^•^-s t is being processed concurrennay or may not be required for5 ^ £ S°- S ^-1^ ^& is<n•S ^-S c A 5 1*b, o ^ h, © o\ "*H•?o•5o -Q^:•SPftj ^%I$•wQ•S <N"^ *~*>• 0o-5o •§,^ •S •5" Usa c uiredfor the common recreatic*•R\S&*® A Conditional Use Permit it-~«?V~l OH O VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN i- 5.7 La Costa Greens Development Standards 5.7.1 Introduction The La Costa Greens Village is composed of a variety of residential products ranging from 11,000-square-foot lots for single-family detached dwellings to townhomes and multi-family residences with each product being discretely designed within 13 distinct Neighborhoods. These residential products are located in Neighborhoods 1.3 and 1.6 through 1.17. Area 1.3 also includes a permanent Recreational Vehicle storage facility. Additionally, Neighborhood 1.1 has been established for Planned Industrial Office uses, including medical offices, and Neighborhood 1.2 is planned for Community Facilities. It is intended that day-care facilities, places of worship, youth and/or senior center activities, and other community facilities may be situated on the Community Facilities parcel. Active recreation is provided by a Community Park, located in Park Area 1.5, and an elementary school is expected to be constructed in School Area 1.4. These 17 Neighborhoods are encompassed within a vast Habitat Conservation Plan area, which itself is divided into seven individual Open Space Areas. These HCP Open Space Areas are located in Open Space Areas A through F and I. No residential, commercial or industrial development will occur in any of these HCP Open Space Areas. HCP Open Space Areas will remain in their natural state except for the provision of road, drainage and utility crossings as well as City-Wide or Local Pedestrian Trails as detailed in Section 5.2.6. In addition to the HCP Open Space Areas, Open Space Areas l.G and l.H provide for utility corridors. Specific development standards and criteria for industrial, office, commercial and residential uses are detailed in Section 5.7.3 below, and Open Space Area standards and criteria are provided in the Open Space Area Section, 5.7.4. Also provided below are Neighborhood Development Plans, Exhibits 5-24 through 5-41, for each Neighborhood and Open Space Area exhibits for each of the nine sub- areas of Open Space, Exhibits 5-42 through 5-50. These exhibits 5-83 JHAWLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 113 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN show, as appropriate, location anfr type of road entry monumentation, walls, trails, community facilities and recreation facilities. These exhibits are conceptual in nature and are provided to show the proposed development concept for each Neighborhood or Area. These exhibits show only conceptual street layouts, as the exact numbers of lots (though not to exceed the maximum allowed), street configurations and other details will be determined during the individual (or Neighborhood) tentative maps. 5.7.2 Common Neighborhood Development Standards All neighborhoods within the La Costa Greens Village shall comply with the Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines contained in Chapter 4 unless modified by the specific Neighborhood Development Standards. 1. Neighborhood Development Plans Neighborhood Development Plans are provided for each residential Neighborhood. These exhibits show the location of entry monumentation, walls, trails, community facilities, landscaped slopes/undeveloped areas and recreation areas. These exhibits are conceptual in nature and are provided to indicate the proposed development concept for each Neighborhood. Precise street configurations, location of slopes and open space as well as other details will be determined during the final design process. 5-84 JHAWLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 LEGEND 50' LANDSCAPE SETBACK —-—| Village Boundary | Neighborhood Boundary *t* | Project Boundary Marker •%• | Neighborhood Entry • ••••I Village Theme Wall ~—~~\ Landscaped Slopes/ _ Undeveloped Area Sni'aiii'l Rre Protection Zone ••••j Project Roadways ("'•' \ | Open Space —-—| Edge of Pad . 1.A Key map VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Exhibit 5-24 LA COSTA GREENS-PawN£[rfimsTRiAL AREA 1.1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 5-86 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5.7.3 Individual Neighborhood Development Standards 1. La Costa Greens Planned Industrial Office Area 1.1 a. Description Area 1.1 is located in the northwest corner of La Costa Greens and is devoted to planned industrial office useSi including medical offices. The Area is bounded to the north by the proposed Bressi Ranch industrial uses, to the east by open space, to the south by the onsite Community Facilities Area 1.2, and by El Camino Real and the adjacent industrial park to the west. Area 1.1 consists of approximately 7.9 gross acres. Access will be provided by one or more of the following: a frontage road from El Camino Real, a right-in-right-out access onto El Camino Real pursuant to City Engineer approval or through the property to the north. The access shown in the following exhibit is conceptual in nature and may be relocated or deleted without the necessity of an amendment to this Master Plan. Details for this area are illustrated on Planned Industrial Office Area 1.1 Development Plan, Exhibit 5-24. b. Use Allocation The General Plan designation for this Neighborhood is P-^-O (Office) and the P M CO) Development Standards, as established by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54 .27 et seq., shall be utilized, unless otherwise modified within this Master Plan. X c. Required Development Permits The following development permits are required: Tentative Map (may be required), Hillside Development Permit (may be required), Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit (may be required), and Site Development Plan for Planned Industrial Permit. Office Uses. A Hillside 5-85 JHAYVLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 Ilk VILLAGES OF LA COSTA LA COSTA GREENS MASTER PLAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Development Permit (HDP) will be processed with the master tentative map for La Costa Greens 5-86 JHAWLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 111 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Village. Additional HDP permits may be necessary for the development of individual Neighborhoods depending on the final grading plan and development design. d. Permitted Uses Uses permitted in this zone shall be all those allowed under Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.27.020. 34.020 and such conditional uses as those provided by Section 21.31.030 010. Such permitted uses shall include, — b«t — net — be — limited — 1% Research — aad Development, manufacturing, storage and warehousing and business and professional offices. e^ Conditional Uses Conditional uses on this planning area shall be those allowed under Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.27.030. erf Minimum Lot Size Minimum lot size shall be one acre. f.g. Lot Coverage Maximum lot coverage shall be fifty percent (50%) of the gross lot area. Open parking areas shall not be counted in determining lot coverage. Setbacks Front: Street Side: 50' from R.O.W., if facing El Camino Real 20' from curb of internal private roads 50' from R.O.W., if facing El Camino Real 20' from curb of internal private roads JHAYVLC MP 5-87 December, 2000 April 2006 lit VILLAGES or LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Rear:20' or 50' from R.O.W. if on El Camino Real side of lot All other setbacks apply per Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.31.070(2) 27.020 unless modified herein. k.i. Height Limits Height limitations shall be as provided for within Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.31070 27.050. JTJ. Special Design Criteria All Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines described in Chapter 4 shall be implemented, as applicable, in this area. The following specific design criteria also shall be incorporated in Planned Industrial Office Area 1.1. • Special attention relative to sitting of structures and landscape treatment shall be devoted to the interface between any development of this Neighborhood and El Camino Real, which is a Community Theme Corridor, as defined within the Circulation Element of the City of Carlsbad General Plan. Large expanses of unarticulated structure or roofline should not be viewable to passers by. . Because of the Area's proximity to El Camino Real, an acoustic study shah be undertaken in conjunction with the tentative subdivision map or permit process, and any recommended noise attenuation measures, including but not limited to the erection of sound walls, shall be implemented as necessary. Lighting adjacent to Open Space Area LA shall be selectively placed, shielded and directed 5-88 JHAYVLC MP December, 2000 April 2006 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN LA COSTA GREENS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN away fromlthe Open Space Area. Landscaping adjacent to Open Space Area l.A shall be compatible with existing natural vegetation. Disturbance to Open Space Area l.A will be avoided to the maximum extent possible during and after construction. Where disturbance is unavoidable and has been authorized by the HCP/OMSP, the disturbed area shall be restored and/or revegetated as appropriate. A Fire Protection Zone, as defined and illustrated in Section 4.7.9 and which separates developed areas and manufactured slopes from HCP Open Space Areas, will be incorporated where necessary so as to have limited, if any, impact on the Open Space Areas. The final location of the zone will be determined during review of the Tentative Subdivision Map or other permit process applicable to development of the neighborhood. Common streetscape and landscape areas shall conform to community requirements as established within this Master Plan. Street trees, landscape zones, entries, irrigation systems, walls, fencing, etc., have been selected to provide consistency in design and quality. Sight distance and open corridors shall be required per Section 4.9.3. JHAYVLC MP 5-89 December, 2000 April 2006 I a* REENS| LA COSTA GCO<nUJ AN REVIEW PROC_iQ. Ct GROWTHCL Q.O Q >- -p Maximum AllowableDwelling UnitsGENERAL PLANDWELLING UNITSMANAGEMENTCONTROL POINTDENISTY1- CO z a. </> COin uj £ o0 < oz N 3NATIONSAND USE DESKOOD/ OPENFERENCENEIGHBORhAREA REi < L ! c Lc r C c u r- c r- r f I! C ~ t • C c Ld*o 3 8 Z I'l i >*i -tl - 3 • E i5 i i i i i in - CO n o> - r- : "FacilitiesCF - CommunitySCO 3 c IL. 3un co"Townhomes/SFD(0 CO - CO '""• tn CO 7 VL MediumRM - ResidentiaCM CM CM CO CO en CO OL ow-MediumM - Residential Lo:Community Pu S c? 1 1 1 1 1 ^S 6 Q. 1o COo - 6,000 Sq. FQu.CO CO . 8 CM CO ^ CO en CO *ow-Medium.M - Residential Lo:- 5,000 Sq. FoLi-CO CO in03 oo CM CO CO CM CM CM K ow-Medium.M - Residential LOL - 7,500 Sq. Fou_CO CM S CM CM co" OO r-.CO "*• ce ow-Medium.M - Residential LQL trCO co"1 ou_CO CO s CMp- CM CO CMCM CM K ow-MediumM - Residential Lo: to | Dn.to CM IS 1 CM CO CO CO *ow-MediumM - Residential L* CO 10"1 QU.to CM . 5 CM co" CO CO or ow-MediumM - Residential Lo: a-CO i Ou. CO *"* CO CO00 CM CO ^ IN CO u:ow-Medium.M - Residential Ltr - 5,000 Sq. FQu_CO CM S3 O)CO CM CO CM *ow-Medium•-S 1 U) a: trCO io~ OLL. CO CO CO s CM CO CO CM K ow-Medium.M - Residential Lcr 1 (D Multiple FamCO oCO s s CO " •p DC /ledium-High1H - Residential to:Min. Lot Size jut crCOI co"Townhomes/SFDCO . .n in oo CO ? Q<r /ledium-High1H - Residential t- 4,500 Sq. FQ LLCO CO r-o 00o CM CO CO " *ow-Medium.M - Residential Lor a.to § 9 OI 1 1 1 1 1 y 6 §a- ftoo I o 1 1 1 1 1 6 , finO m 1 gQ-9 o 1 1 1 1 1 6 8 S. cVa. CO O O '/Open Spaceo 1 1 1 1 1 6 8 EL 1o COO 0 '/Open SpaceoX 1 1 1 1 1 6 Sa. O COO in '/Open Space0i 1 1 1 1 1 6 Q. f COO u.'/Open Spaceoi 1 1 1 1 1 6 Q. f COO O - Q.CO f OX 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 COo X cli oI 1 1 1 1 1 6 s §s inO tia Lane1o0- cn 1 Major Roadv1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | o CO 00n o «TOTALS-i3 SUOSIAOV JUTV3H AJU31S3NU S1N3N1S3ANI SVilHVO H31N33 31VdOddOO UO3 3 S 1 \1 «-•I (/) .UJJT-&L (BSB)ocitt vo'<*ia'»sastvs 8UO8IAOV AJ.1V3U AJJO1S3NU S1N3IUS3ANISVJL1UV3 U31N3O HlVUOddOO UO3 I iihii CM9Q. Q <c © SUOSIAOV Ajnvau AJJO isaNU SlNaiUS3ANI SV11HVO U31N30 aiVUOdUOO d03 Irfiil CO 9OL Q <c SUOSIAOV AJ.1V3U AJJ3 JS3NU S1N3H1SHANISV11UV9 U31N30 31V«OddOO d03 a.a <c «c 1 i Planning Commission Minutes July 19,2006 f^D /V CT Page? UK/All EXHIBIT? 2. GPA 05-15/MP 98-OKGVSDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 - CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Negative Declaration and a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use Element designation from Planned Industrial to Office and a Master Plan Amendment to change the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Land Use and Zoning designations from Planned Industrial to Office and a request for approval of a Site Development Plan and Special Use Permit to develop a 7.68-acre parcel with two 42,500 square foot medical office buildings located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Camino Vida Roble in the Greens Neighborhood 1.3 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Local Facilities Management Zone 10. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the staff presentation. Commissioner Segall recused himself and stepped down from the dias. Mr. Lynch gave the staff presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Whitton stated he was concerned about southbound traffic which would need to make a u- turn to access the medical center off of El Camino Real and the potential traffic hazard this could present on the road. Bob Wojcik Deputy City Engineer referenced the signalized access point on Town Garden Road and stated the intersection would be the main access point for the medical center. Commissioner Baker asked if the access along the property line would be a street or a driveway and if the access would be used by the day care as well as the medical center. Mr. Wojcik stated the driveway will serve the day care and the medical center. Chairperson Montgomery asked if the access had a radius on the curbs coming in and out. Mr. Wojcik replied yes. Chairperson Montgomery asked the applicant if he would like to make a presentation. Eric Munoz, Hofman Planning Associates, 1500 Pasteur Court, Suite 150, Carlsbad, thanked the commission and staff and made a presentation. John White, 5600 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, thanked the commission and made a presentation. Chairperson Montgomery asked Mr. White what the likelihood was that the bridge between the two buildings would be built. Mr. White stated building the bridge was more likely than not. Chairperson Montgomery stated the bridge was a nice architectural feature. Chairperson Montgomery opened public testimony and asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to speak on Agenda Item 2; seeing none, Chairperson Montgomery closed public testimony. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Baker, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6125 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6126 and 6127 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 05-15 and Master Plan Amendment 98-01 (G) and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6128 and 6129 APPROVING Site Development Permit 05-18 and Special Use Permit 05-17 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 01st, 2006 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 01st Day of September, 2006 Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of lafive De«Sam«on,Ge«eral .Plan. .„ it in court, you may be limited toissues you or someone else raised at the public heart--notice or in written correspondence delivered to "CityClerk's Office. 1200 Carlsbad Village Drivprior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 05-15/MP 98-01 (G) CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL and/or **$&Attn:at or NCT1972179• 09/01/06 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 12, 2006, to consider adopting a Negative Declaration and approving a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use Element designation from Planned Industrial to Office and approve a Master Plan Amendment to change the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Land Use and Zoning designations from Planned Industrial to Office on property generally located on the east side of El Camino Real between Town Garden Lane and Carnino Vida Roble, in the Greens Neighborhood 1.1 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, and Local Facilities Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 99-03, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 14543, filed in the office of the County Recorder. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after September 8, 2006. If you have any questions, please call Van Lynch in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4613. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, and/or Master Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA05-15/MP 98-01(G) CASE NAME: CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA PUBLISH: September 1, 2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL WOT TO SCALE SITEMAP CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA GPA05-15/MP98-01(G) Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 AVERY® 5160® CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITYOFOCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBNC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER DAVID HAUSER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER VAN LYNCH 08/04/2006 ®091S AH3AV-OD-008-1 ®09 IS iueqeB e| zasifjin aBemas e la aSejjnonmip im and^mudge Free Printing 50 Au^AOrfnflnai ATC i;'icn® X EViNE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PA 310 702 E HIGHLAND AVE 30ENIX A2 85016-4666 www.avery.coiti GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSUARN #1150 !- 333 S HOPE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90071-3051 AVERY® 5160® 5160® CARLSBAD DISTRIBUTION CENTER #102 2333 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-1691 SAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MGMT L80 >03 WRIGHT PL IRLSBAD CA 92008-6584 LNR BRESSI COMMERCIAL INC #200 4350 VON KARMAN AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 VECTOR ASSOCIATES LLC 1810 S BAYFRONT NEWPORT BEACH CA 92662-1345 iWEST INDUSTRIAL PROPS LLC 5 HOWARD ST N FRANCISCO CA 94105-2625 GRANDONA INVESTMENT ASSOCIAT 2610 HARRISBURG AVE FREMONT CA 94536-25'60 PUfl-LiiC RLSB. 25 EL C, RLSBAD CHOOL DISTR 'REAL .09 CARLTAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY #100 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 FMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES 50 JO PASTEUR COURT ILSBAD CA 92008 1 CarltasCarltas Medical Office BuildingMedical Office Building GPA 05GPA 05--15/MP 9815/MP 98--01(G)01(G) LocationLocation MapMap EL CAMINO REAL ALI CANTE RDTown Garden Ln Camino Vida Roble 2EL CAMINO REAL ALI CANTE RDTOWN GARDEN RD0400200Feet GPA 05-15/MP 98-01(G)/SDP 05-18/SUP 05-17 CARLTAS MEDICAL OFFICE MPA/GPA 7.68 Acre site, two 42,500 sq ft buildings 3 General Plan AmendmentGeneral Plan Amendment „„From Planned Industrial to OfficeFrom Planned Industrial to Office 4 General Plan consistencyGeneral Plan consistency „„Compatible with adjacent usesCompatible with adjacent uses „„Serve the service and employment Serve the service and employment needs of Carlsbad residentsneeds of Carlsbad residents „„Preserve and protect Open SpacePreserve and protect Open Space „„Adequate streets to serve the Adequate streets to serve the sitesite „„CompatibleCompatible with the airportwith the airport Special Planning Special Planning ConsiderationsConsiderations „„Comprehensive Comprehensive Land Use Plan Land Use Plan McClellan McClellan ––Palomar Palomar AirportAirport „„San Diego County San Diego County Regional Airport Regional Airport AuthorityAuthority „„Project consistent Project consistent with CLUPwith CLUP „„Restriction of useRestriction of use 5 Master Plan AmendmentMaster Plan Amendment „„Change Change Neighborhood 1.1 Neighborhood 1.1 from Planned from Planned Industrial to OfficeIndustrial to Office „„Text and graphic Text and graphic changeschanges RecommendationRecommendation „„That the City Council Adopt the That the City Council Adopt the Negative DeclarationNegative Declaration „„Approve the General Plan Amendment Approve the General Plan Amendment and Master Plan Amendmentand Master Plan Amendment 6