HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-09-19; City Council; 18731; North County Parkway Plan Projects(w&i^jjj^
^1 jgfcj*Afiff f4T$i ',
MTG. 9/19/06
DEPT. ENG
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
'.•'...•,
SUPPORT FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE
MHRTM COUNTY PARKWAY PI AN PROJECTS
HZQ^V-T vrv ^
DEPT. HEAD /%^
CITY ATTY. ^
CITY MGR.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No.
projects.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
2006-277 to support the completion of the North County Parkway Plan
Since 2001, staff and the designated City Council member or County Supervisor in North County,
have been working with SANDAG on the North County Parkway Plan. The participating agencies
include Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, Vista,
County of San Diego, the North County Transit District, and Caltrans.
The purpose for developing a project list of roads to be built or improved is to help the respective
agency to direct local funding decisions based on local revenues, including revenues that will be
available from the Local Streets and Roads Program of the TransNet Ordinance extension. The list
will also serve as the basis for future discussions among agencies when setting regional project
priorities for future federal annual appropriation project submittals.
On March 24, 2006, the North County Parkway Plan representatives (elected officials) met to review
and approve the project list, project evaluation, and screening criteria. The list includes a total of
44 projects totaling $1.26 billion.
The criteria provides extra credit to neighboring agencies that agree to work together to complete
multi-agency projects. Each evaluated project will total 100 points. However, the project evaluation
criteria will also provide five bonus points to projects having two partnering agencies and ten bonus
points for projects with three or more agencies agreeing to work on a specific project. SANDAG has
requested that each agency willing to partner with another agency provide a resolution supporting the
future partnering in order to receive bonus credit.
The list of North County Parkway Plan projects include five widening/extension projects in Carlsbad,
as follows:
ARTERIAL
1 . Cannon Road
2. College Boulevard
3. El Camino Real
4. El Camino Real
5. Poinsettia Lane Reach "E"
FROM
College Boulevard
El Camino Real
Olivenhain Road (in Encinitas)
Palomar Airport Road
Cassia Road
.-.-,- ' . TO .;'.'-•- -.' '
Mystra Drive (in Oceanside)
Cannon Road
Palomar Airport Road
SR-78 (Caltrans and Oceanside)
Skimmer Court
• ESTIMATED
' "Q08T: "',
1*000$)
$35,636,000
$11,918,000
$8,060,000
$12,912,000
$14,059,000
Completion of North County Parkway Plan projects in Carlsbad would require the cooperation and
coordination with the cities of Oceanside and Encinitas, in addition to Caltrans. Also, projects in Vista
and San Marcos will require coordination with Carlsbad during construction.
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
CONTINUED
WITHDRAWN
AMENDED
Q
D
Do
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D
RETURNED TO STAFF D
OTHER - SEE MINUTES Q
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15378, this action does not constitute a "project" within the
meaning of CEQA and, therefore, does not require environmental review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None until processing for projects is initiated.
EXHIBITS:
1. Location Map.
2. North County Parkway Plan projects.
3. Project Screening and Evaluation Criteria Descriptions.
4. Evaluation Criteria and Weight Factors.
5. Resolution No. 2006-277 to support the completion of the North County Parkway
Plan projects.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Robert T. Johnson, Jr., (760) 602-2752, bjohn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
LOCATION MAP
18
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CIRCULATION PLAN
RAILROAD
FREEWAY
PRIME ARTERIAL
MAJOR ARTERIAL
SECONDARY ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR STREET
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:..J
N.C.P.P. PROJECT LIMITS
ARTERIAL PROJECT NUMBER IN AGENDA BILL
PROJECT NAME
WORTH COUNTY PARKWAY PLAN (N.C.P.P.) PROJECTS
EXHIBIT
1
DRAWN BY: SCOTT EVANS, CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT. 8/30/06 C:\TRAmC\JOHNSON\NCPP PROJECTS.DWG
Table 1
North County Parkway Plan Projects
ft Arterial
Widening/Extension
1 Bear/East Valley Pkwy.
2 Bear/East Valley Pkwy.
3 Buena Creek Rd.
4 Buena Creek Rd./Las Posas Rd.
5 Buena Creek Rd./Las Posas Rd.
6 Barham Dr.
7 Cannon Rd.
8 Cannon Rd.
9 Citracado Pkwy.
10 Citracado Pkwy.
11 College Blvd.
12 College Blvd.
13 Deer Springs/Twin Oaks
14 El Camino Real
15 El Camino Real
16 El Camino Real/Manchester Ave.
17 El Norte Pkwy.
18 Encinitas Blvd.
19 Melrose Drive
20 Melrose Drive
21 Melrose Drive
22 Mission Ave.
23 Poinsettia Lane
24 Rancho Santa Fe Ave
25 San Marcos Blvd
26 South Santa Fe Ave.
27 South Santa Fe Ave.
28 Sycamore Ave.
29 Twin Oaks/Deer Springs
30 Via De La Valle
31 Vista Way
32 Vista Way
33 Vista Way
From
1-15
SR78
South Santa Fe Ave.
Avenida Abega
San Marcos/County Limit
Twin Oaks Dr.
College Blvd
Melrose Drive
SR78
W. Valley Parkway
Thunder Dr.
El Camino Real
1-15
Olivenhain Road
Palomar Airport Rd
Santa Fe Ave.
AshSt
Calle Magdelena
Spur Ave.
Vista/County Limit
SR78
1-15
Cassia Road
Melrose Drive
Viewpoint Dr
Montgomery Dr.
Smilax Rd.
S. Melrose Dr.
San Marcos Blvd.
Jimmy Durante Blvd
SR76
Santa Fe Ave.
Thunder Dr.
To
SR78
North City Limits
Twin Oaks Valley Rd.
San Marcos/County Limit
Buena Creek Rd.
Opper St.
Mystra Dr
SR78
W. Valley Parkway
1-15
SR78
Cannon Rd
Twin Oaks Valley Rd
Palomar Airport Rd
SR-78
Manchester Ave.
East Valley Pwky
Via Cantebria
Oceanside Blvd.
SR78
Vista/Carlsbad Limit
AshSt
Skimmer Court
South Santa Fe Ave
Twin Oaks Valley Rd.
Smilax Rd
Bosstick Blvd.
SR78
Mulberry Dr
Coast Hwy
Vista City Limits
Vista/County Limit
N. Melrose Dr.
Jurisdiction(s)
Escondido
Escondido
County
San Marcos
County
San Marcos
Carlsbad
Vista/County
Escondido
Escondido
Oceanside
Carsbad
County
Carlsbad
Carlsbad
Encinitas
Escondido
Encinitas
Oceanside
Vista
Vista
Escondido
Carlsbad
San Marcos
San Marcos
County
San Marcos
Vista
San Marcos
Del Mar
County
Vista
Vista
Subtotal Arterial/Extension
Interchange Modifications
34 College Blvd.
35 El Camino Real
36 El Camino Real
37 Encinitas Blvd.
38 Lomas Sante Fe Ave.
39 Manchester Ave.
40 Mar Vista Rd.
41 NordahlRd.
42 Sycamore Ave.
43 Villa De La Valle
44 Woodland Prkwy.
SR 78-lnterchange
SR 76 - Interchange
SR-78 Interchange
I-5 Interchange
I-5 Interchange
I-5 Interchange
SR 78 Interchange
SR 78 Interchange
SR 78 Interchange
I-5 Interchange
SR 78-lnterchange
Oceanside
Oceanside
Oceanside
Encinitas
Solana Beach
Encinitas
Vista
San Marcos
Vista
Del Mar
San Marcos
Subtotal Interchange Modifications
TOTAL
Estimated Total
Cost (2005 $$)
$34,317,000
$35,847,000
$40,512,889
$3,788,000
$32,586,505
$11,707,000
$35,636,049
$19,857,786
$19,011,000
$13,628,000
$110,160,000
$11,917,612
$21,579,511
$8,059,600
$12,911,600
$5,410,700
$4,063,000
$8,082,125
$7,872,800
$11,997,502
$21,000,138
$25,329,000
$14,058,900
$20,976,000
$19,904,000
$76,600,000
$8,032,000
$16,153,284
$14,127,000
$5,083,726
$15,513,267
$17,434,557
$17,479,070
$720,636,621
$97,080,000
$45,000,000
$116,176,000
$33,800,000
$34,600,000
$64,600,000
$3,485,990
$30,432,000
$1,174,602
$80,000,000
$33,657,600
$540,006,192
$1,260,642,813
NORTH COUNTY PARKWAY PLAN
PROJECT SCREENING AND EVALUATION CRITERIA DESCRIPTIONS
Project Screening Criteria
Projects will be screened against the two key factors, the two screening criteria are as follows:
a. Only capacity increasing projects will be considered eligible.
b. Projects must be on the Regional Arterial System (RAS) network.
Project Evaluation Criteria
1.Congestion Relief
Each project requested for evaluation will be evaluated for its congestion relief value by using
the six criteria defined below. Each arterial will be given a "3" for meets or supports the
criteria (full credit), a "2" for partially meets or supports the criteria (partial credit), or a "1"
for does not meet or support the criteria. Exhibits developed by the Cities/County
Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) and 5ANDAG staff depicting employment density,
population density, employment/population density with activity centers, Regional Transit
Vision, and average daily traffic volumes will be used to evaluate the arterial. The six criteria
and methodology for applying the criteria are as follows:
a. Existing Traffic: Generally accommodate high traffic volumes. Arterials with over 20,000
average daily trips (ADT) in 2005 will receive partial credit. Arterials with over 40,000 ADT
will receive full credit. On-ramp volumes are used for local freeway interchange projects.
b. Critical Link: Provide congestion relief in high volume corridors. Arterials parallel to other
congested arterials will receive partial credit. Arterials parallel to congested freeways will
receive full credit.
c. Population: Located in areas with high concentrations of existing and future populations.
Arterials located in areas with a population density of 1,500 persons per quarter square
mile in 2030 will receive partial credit. Arterials located in areas with a population density
greater that 3,000 persons per quarter square mile in 2030 will receive full credit.
d. Employment: Linking areas with high concentrations of existing or future employment.
Arterials serving areas with employment densities of 1,500 employees per quarter square
mile in 2030 will receive partial credit. Arterials serving areas with employment densities of
greater than 3,000 employees per quarter square mile in 2030 will receive full credit.
e. Activity Centers: Activity centers are defined as hospitals, retail centers over 75,000
square feet, major entertainment centers, major hotels, colleges and universities, civic
centers, and fairground locations. Arterials linking at least one activity center per two miles
will receive partial credit. Arterials linking at least one activity center per one mile will
receive full credit.
f. Intel-modal: Provide access to intermodal facilities. Arterials serving a major freight, port,
rail, military or airport facility will receive partial credit. Arterials serving multiple freight,
port, rail, military or airport facilities will receive full credit.
2. Cost Effectiveness
Cost effectiveness measures the cost of the project divided by the 2030 average daily traffic
(ADT) that will travel on the arterial. The on-ramp ADTs are used for local freeway interchange
projects. The 2030 Cities/County forecast is used as the common base for the analysis. The ADTs
are obtained for each project assuming all projects are in place. This provides a long-term,
system-wide measure of cost effectiveness. Higher ranking projects have a lower cost per ADT.
3. Project Readiness
Project readiness measures the deliverability of the project. Deliverability is defined as 1) the
percentage of the total project funding that has been secured and in terms of four major
milestones including 2) feasibility study, 3) federal environmental document, 4) right of way
acquired, 5) design plans. Higher ranking projects have a higher measure of deliverability.
4. Environmental Compatibility
This item measures the potential for unplanned environmental impacts resulting from the
project. Projects whose impacts are not shown in habitat plan mapping do not receive credit.
5. Transit Vision Supportiveness
This item measures the potential for supporting the region's transit vision. Projects on a
designated regional or corridor service route in the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan -
Mobility Network receive credit.
6. Bonus Points
Bonus points will be awarded to projects that involve the coordination and cooperation of
multi-agencies for completing a project. Neighboring agencies will need to show proof and
agreement of working together through adopted resolution. Partial credit will be provided to
projects involving the participation of at least two agencies, and full credit to projects with
three or more agencies.
North County Parkway Plan
Evaluation Criteria and Weight Factors
EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Congestion Relief
2. Cost Effectiveness
3. Project Readiness
4. Environmental Compatibility
5. Transit Vision Supportiveness
6. Bonus Points
MEASURES WE'GHT
FACTOR
Existing Traffic, Critical Linkages, Population
and Employment Density, Activity Center
Proximity, Intermodalism
Project Cost and Future Travel (2030)
Percent of Funding Secured 10%
Project Status
• Feasibility Study Complete 2.5%
• Federal Environmental Clearance 2.5%
• Right of Way Acquired 2.5%
• Design Plans Complete 2.5%
Subtotal:
Habitat plan compatibility
Supports Regional Transit Vision
Total:
Multi-Agency Projects Maximum Credit
• Two Agencies 5%
• Three or More Agencies 10%
30%
30%
20%
10%
10%
100%
10%
Possible Total:110%
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-277
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
3 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPORT THE COMPLETION
OF THE NORTH COUNTY PARKWAY PLAN PROJECTS.
4
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2006, the North County Parkway Plan representatives
5
reviewed and approved the North County Parkway Plan projects (Plan) and Project Screening and
6
Evaluation Criteria; and
7
WHEREAS, the Plan was initiated in 2001 to identify roadway and interchange
8
improvements in coordination with the cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Escondido,
9
Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, Vista (Cities), and the County of San Diego (County); and
10
SANDAG, Caltrans, and the North County Transit District (NCTD); and
WHEREAS, the Cities, the County, Caltrans, SANDAG, and NCTD have reached
consensus that the Plan improvements represent key roadway and interchange improvements that
1 O
would improve mobility and reduce congestion throughout the North County Parkway Plan area;14
15 and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of Carlsbad to support the completion of North County16
Parkway Plan projects in the Caltrans right-of-way and in the adjacent cities of Encinitas and
Oceanside, where mutually connected roads are situated so as to facilitate the regional18
transportation system; andi y
„_ WHEREAS, the extension of Cannon Road from College Boulevard to Mystra Drive in
P, Oceanside requires a mutual effort on the part of Carlsbad and Oceanside; and
22 WHEREAS, the extension of College Boulevard from El Camino Real to Cannon Road
23 will complete the missing segment of College Boulevard; and
24 WHEREAS, the spot widening of El Camino Real between Olivenhain Road and SR-78
25 will require a mutual effort with Encinitas, Oceanside, and Caltrans; and
26 WHEREAS, the construction of the missing segment of Poinsettia Lane between Cassia
27 Road and Skimmer Court will provide for the connectivity of Poinsettia Lane from Carlsbad
28 Boulevard to Melrose Drive as a major arterial roadway; and
1 WHEREAS, public transit components associated with the arterial roadways will require
2 coordination with the North County Transit District.
3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
4 California, as follows:
5 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
6 2. That a cooperative effort with Encinitas, Oceanside, and Caltrans will be
7 undertaken to complete the projects in the North County Parkway Plan.
8 3. That Carlsbad supports the completion of the 44 North County Parkway Plan
9 projects and will cooperate and assist with the completion of the projects to the greatest extent
10 feasible, including coordination with North County Transit District.
11 4. That Carlsbad will pursue all potential funding sources for completing the
12 North County Parkway Plan projects in Carlsbad and support the efforts of other agencies to
1 3 obtain funding for projects within their jurisdiction.
14
15
16 „
17 //
18
19
20 „
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad on the 19th day of September, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
TORRAfoiE M. WOOD, City Clerk,,,,^
(SEAL)