Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-09-19; City Council; 18736; Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# MTG. DEPT. 9/10/08 PLN VILLAGES OF LA COSTA NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 CT05-13/CP05-12 DEPT. HEAD CITY ATTY. RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No._2006-280 , APPROVING Tentative Tract Map CT 05-13 and Condominium Permit CP 05-12 for Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 as recommended for adoption and approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Applications CT05-13 CP 05-12 Administrative Approvals Reviewed by and Final at Planning Commission To be reviewed - Final at Council X X On August 2, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for a residential subdivision in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Neighborhood 2.6 (CT 05-13/CP 05-12) requires approval by the City Council since the subdivision contains more than 50 residential units. The Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 consists of the subdivision of 9.1 acres into five residential lots for 53 detached airspace condominium units with a minimum exclusive use area of 3,500 square feet, four open space lots, and one private street lot. In addition to the Tentative Tract Map, a Condominium Permit is required by the Master Plan for the development of multiple-family and single- family small lot detached homes. The Master Plan specifically identified Neighborhood 2.6 for townhomes/small lot single family units. The Planning Commission discussed the merits of all applications, and voted 5-0-0 (Segall and Baker Absent) to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. Except for a brief statement from the applicant's representative, no public testimony was offered at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's discussion for Neighborhood 2.6 and a complete description and staff analysis of the project is included in the attached minutes and staff report to the Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts have been identified. FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONL Y. COUNCIL ACTION:APPROVED H DENIED D CONTINUED O WITHDRAWN D AMENDED D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D RETURNED TO STAFF D OTHER - SEE MINUTES O Page 2 - Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 - CT 05-13/CP 05-12 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed planning area project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. Mitigation Measure 4.8-1 A required an acoustical analysis for certain areas of the Master Plan to identify all necessary noise control requirements on project plans necessary to meet the City of Carlsbad interior and exterior noise levels. The required study was provided and the plans have incorporated noise walls where appropriate. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR. The proposed activities would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 and the initial study prepared for the project are available at the Planning Department. GROWTH MANAGEMENT STATUS: Facilities Zone Local Facilities Management Plan Special Facility Fee 11 11 None EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-280 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 2, 2006 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated August 2, 2006. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Corey Funk 760-602-4645 cfunk@ci.carlsbad.ca.us 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-280 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT 3 MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT TO SUBDIVIDE 9.1 ACRES INTO 10 LOTS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 53 DETACHED 4 AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6, LOCATED SOUTH 5 OF MELROSE DRIVE AND EAST OF CORINTIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. 6 CASE NAME: LA COSTA GREENS NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 CASE NO.: CT 05-13/CP 05-12 7 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as o follows: 9 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on August 2, 2006, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 19th day of September 2006, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit, and at the time received recommendations, objections, 16 protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to CT 05-13/CP 05-12; and 1? NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 19 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of 21 Tentative Tract Map CT 05-13 and Condominium Permit CP 05-12 is approved by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning 22 Commission Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial 2 Review" shall apply: 3 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 4 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been 5 made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in 6 the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the 7 decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the 10 record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 19th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Kulchin, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: None , Mayor ATTEST: .ORR^INE M. WOOD, City (SEAL) EXHIBITS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6143 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CARLSBAD TRACT CT 05-13 TO 3 SUBDIVIDE 9.1 ACRES INTO 10 LOTS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 53 DETACHED AIRSPACE 4 CONDOMINIUM UNITS WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6, LOCATED SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND EAST OF CORINTIA STREET IN 6 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE 7 NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 CASE NO.: CT05-13 9 WHEREAS, Western Pacific Housing, Inc., "Developer," has filed a verified 10 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management Company, "Owner," described as 12 Lot 223 of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-04-02, Village of La 13 Costa Ridge - Neighborhood 2.6, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map 14 thereof No. 14838, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County July 14,2004 16 ("the Property"); and 17 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract 18 Map as shown on Exhibits "A" - "CC" dated August 2, 2006, on file in the Planning 19 Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 - CT 05-13, as 20 provided by Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 21 22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd clay of August, 2006, hold 23 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 25 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 26 relating to the Tentative Tract Map. 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning28 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 - CT 05-13, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: That the proposed map and the,proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the proposed map satisfies all minimum requirements of Title 20 and has been designed to comply with all other applicable regulations including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding properties are designated for residential development or Open Space on the General Plan, in that the site has a General Plan designation of Residential Medium- High Density (RMH) and surrounding properties are designated as Residential Medium Density (RM), Utility (U), and Open Space (OS). That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed, in that the project is consistent with the development criteria of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that prior to recordation of the final map the developer is conditioned to obtain any easements required for the proposed project. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act). ^ That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the proposed development will consist of detached air space condominium units with adequate separation to provide future residents with adequate air circulation within and surrounding any future residential units. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environmental resources. PCRESONO. 6143 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed development is not within a preserve area of the Habitat Conservation Plan approved for the property. The project area is a designated development area in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan that was evaluated in Final Program EIR 98-07. 9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has been designed in accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality protection in accordance with the City's sewer and drainage standards and the project is conditioned to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. 10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan, and Villages of La Costa Master Plan based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated August 2, 2006, including, but not limited to the following: a. Land Use - The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed density is within the density range of 8-15 du/ac specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and does not exceed the number of units permitted for Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. b. Housing - The project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan, the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan as the developer is required to construct affordable housing units consistent with the First Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated 2/21/03) approved for the Villages of La Costa. The Greens Affordable Apartment Project has been constructed and occupied, and units in that project will satisfy the inclusionary housing requirements for this project. c. Open Space and Conservation - The Open Space Preserve Areas are identified in the Habitat Conservation Plan, certified Villages M La Costa Master Plan EIR, and Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The project will not impact the designated open space and will provide Master Plan trails and connections to the adjacent neighborhoods as identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. d. Public Safety - The project does not require fire suppression zones to reduce fire hazards to an acceptable level. e. Circulation - The circulation system is designed to provide adequate access to the proposed lots and complies with all applicable City design standards and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. PCRESONO. 6143 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the San Marcos Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. b. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44. c. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. 12. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. 13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11. 14. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that improvements necessary to maintain compliance with the growth management performance standards are contained in the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and the project will comply with the general and special conditions of the zone plan. 15. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I BXand the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 16. The Planning Director has determined that: a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01) for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and PCRESONO. 6143 -4- c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified in connection 2 with the prior plan; and 3 d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior EIR; and 4 c e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and 6 f. All feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.o o 17. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed 10 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 11 Conditions:12 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of final map or issuance of a grading permit whichever occurs first. 14 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so . , implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all 17 future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the 18 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Tentative Tract Map. 20 Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections 21 and modifications to the Tentative Tract Map documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on^the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 24 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 25 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are 27 challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid 28 unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. PCRESONO. 6143 -5- 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold 2 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims 3 and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map, ^ (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or 5 nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, 6 including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation 7 survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated.8 9 6. Developer shall submit to Planning Director a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the Tentative Map reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. 10 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the San Marcos Unified School District that this project has satisfied its j2 obligation to provide school facilities. 13 8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to 14 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 16 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 17 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map. 19 10. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures 20 required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, as contained in ^ 1 Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010. 22 11. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CP 05-12 and is subject to all 23 conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6144 for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. 24 _,. 12. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units as stipulated in the First Amended and Restated Affordable Housing Agreement (dated February 21, 2003) 26 between Real Estate Collateral Management Company and the City of Carlsbad concurrent with the project's market rate units, unless both the final decision-making 27 authority of the City and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development.28 PCRESONO. 6143 -6- 13. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 2 Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as 3 shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 4 <- 14. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the 6 project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 7 15. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the 9 Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning 10 Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: 11 a. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the , ~ obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the City has an interest. 13 b. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the 14 City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record. 16 c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event 17 that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as provided in Article , Section the 1 ° City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If , Q the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with 20 particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the 21 giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to 23 be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. 24 d. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the 5 necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, 2g the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's 27 Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in 28 full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and PCRESONO. 6143 -7- payable by the Association within twenty, (20) days of receipt by the Association. If 2 the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount 3 equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other <- rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal prorata share of the invoice, 6 plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is 7 levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration. 10 e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HO As and individual lot or unit owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit _. 12 f. Landscape Material Restrictions: Restrictions to landscape materials adjacent 13 to conserved habitat areas shall be as set forth in Exhibit Invasive/exotic species not to be used include those listed on Lists A and B of the 14 "Exotic Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California," adopted by the California Exotic Pest Plan Council, October, 1999. 16 g. HCP/OMSP Educational Material: Exhibit describes the importance and sensitivity of the conserved habitat areas and ways to avoid impact to them. 17 h. Lighting Restrictions on Private Residential Lots: Restrictions on lighting within residential lots adjacent to open space conservation areas shall be as set forth in i o Exhibit 20 16. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shalTalso pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such 23 taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 24 17. Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's street name policy subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approval. 26 18. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit or recordation of the final map, Developer 27 shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract Map and a Condominium Permit by Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144 on the property. PCRESONO. 6143 -8- Said Notice of Restriction shall note the ^property description, location of the file 2 containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The 3 Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer 4 or successor in interest. 19. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community 6 Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, 7 then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for 9 the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the 10 fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. 11 , ~ 20. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed 13 or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets. 14 21. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain 16 posted until ALL of the units are sold. 17 22. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property ° may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in I n a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). 20 23. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building permits, 21 whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney 23 (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). 24 24. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning 2g Department). 27 25. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and shall 28 require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. PCRESONO. 6143 -9- 26. The project shall complete an interior noise analysis, compliant with the CCR, 2 Title 24, Noise Insulation Standards, prior to the issuance of building permits for future homes to demonstrate that the proposed architectural design would limit 3 interior noise to 45 dBA CNEL or less. 4 27. The required recreation area shall begin construction prior to the occupancy of the c first unit in Neighborhood 2.6, and shall be approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the units within Neighborhood 2.6. 6 Engineering 7 General8 9 28. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from the City Engineer 10 for the proposed haul route. 11 29. Developer shall provide to the City Engineer an acceptable means, CC&Rs, and/or other . 2 recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all the private improvements: streets, sidewalks, street lights, and storm drain facilities 13 located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. 14 30. There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project. jg 31. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards. 17 32. Developer shall install sight distance corridors (see below for types) at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following , n statement on the Final Map (and in the CC&Rs). 20 "No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City 21 Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition." x £iZ* 23 The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement, grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development. 24 The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement, grading, or landscape plan prepared in association with this development. 26 Fees/Agreements 27 33. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for 28 recordation the City's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. PCRESONO. 6143 -10- 34. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for 2 recordation the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property. 3 35. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall cause Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area <- shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an 6 additional Street Lighting and Landscaping District. Said written consent shall be on a form provided by the City Engineer. 7 36. Prior to approval of the first final map, Developer shall enter into a Prepayment Agreement with the City for prepayment of Developer obligation for the funding to 9 improve Rancho Santa Fe Road, which will satisfy the special condition in the Zone 11 LFMP requiring a financing plan guaranteeing construction of Rancho Santa Fe 10 Road. 1l Grading 12 37. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, 13 Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention for the start of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board. 14 38. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and 16 obtain a grading permit from the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. 17 39. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall obtain approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA for any grading within the regulatory floodplain. Prior to occupancy of any units, Developer shall obtain approval of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. 20 Dedications/Improvements 21 „„ 40. Developer shall cause Owner to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City and/or other appropriate entities for all public streets and other easements shown on the tentative 23 map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost. Streets that already 24 public are not required to be rededicated. 25 41. Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit. 27 42. Developer shall provide the design of all private streets and drainage systems to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage PCRESONO. 6143 -11- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 43. 44. 45. systems shall be inspected by the City. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plancheck and inspection fees. Developer shall execute and record a City Standard Improvement Agreement to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements including, but not limited to paving, base, signing and striping, medians, grading, clearing and grubbing, relocation of utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water, to City and district standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements are: a. Add driveway approaches to Corintia Street with appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to pedestrian ramp and street cross gutter. b. Add sewer, potable and reclaimed water facilities per Vallecitos Water District standards and fire hydrants per City Standards. c. Decorative pavement to the median on Corintia Street subject to the City Engineer's approval. d. Designating 'No Parking' on portions of Corintia Street as directed by the City Engineer. A list of the above shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the Final Map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall: a. Include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. b. Include the receipt of "Notice of Intent" issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. x c. Recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right- of-way or natural drainage course. d. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine cleanup. Special considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper procedures for handling cleanup and disposal of pollutants. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)." The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of PCRESONO. 6143 -12- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 46. 47. 48. the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall: a. Identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern. b. Identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies that could be impacted by this project. c. Recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or -filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way. d. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine cleanup. Special considerations and effort shall be applied to (RESIDENT/EMPLOYEE) education on the proper procedures for handling cleanup and disposal of pollutants. e. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity. f. Identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent practicable. All onsite storm water treatment facilities shall be privately owned and maintained, including but not limited to, the inlet filters, vortechnics unit and vegetated swale on Lot 6 (Rec Area), unless otherwise stated. Prior to building permit or grading permit issuance, whichever occurs first, Developer shall have design, apply for and obtain approval of the City Engineer, for the structural section for the access aisles with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. The structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-value soil test information and approved by the City Engineer as part of the building or grading plan review whichever occurs first. Developer shall incorporate into the grading/improvement plans the design for the project drainage outfall end treatments for any drainage outlets where a direct access road for maintenance purposes is not practical. These end treatments shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consist of a modified outlet headwall consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a. All easements identified on sheet 6 of 6 of the Tentative Map/Condominium Permit noted to be quitclaimed shall be quitclaimed prior to or concurrent with approval of the final map. The revestment of access rights at the driveway locations shall also be accomplished by quitclaim. AH City easements to be quitclaimed are subject to the City Council's approval. 49.The final drainage study shall analyze the existing public street and drainage system's ability to accept public street drainage on Corintia Street rather than route the drainage through Private Street 'C' and Private Street 'A' as shown on the PCRESONO. 6143 -13- tentative tract map. Analysis shall include determining existing downstream inlet 2 and storm drain flows and capacities for a 100-year 6-hour storm. If downstream public drainage facilities can accommodate the proposed drainage per City 3 Standards, then drainage shall be routed to said facilities as directed by the City Engineer. If the developer is directed to route public drainage through the 4 development as currently proposed, public easements shall blanket all drainage ^ facilities routing said public water between Corintia Street and the point of discharge. 6 Final Map Notes 7 50. Developer shall show on Final Map the net developable acres for each parcel. o 9 51. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the map as non-mapping data. 10 A. All improvements are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with the exception of the following: . 2 1 • All improvements within the Corintia Street public right-of-way. 2. All storm drain, sewer, reclaimed water, and potable water facilities located within 13 the public utility easement unless otherwise noted as private. 14 B. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available. 16 C. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as sight 17 distance corridors. 1 O10 Vallecitos Water and Sewer District 19 52. The Developer shall prepare a colored recycled water use map and submit this map to the 20 Planning Department for processing and approval by the District Engineer. 21 53. The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Mstrict Engineer. 22 54. The Developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Vallecitos Water District •* regarding sewer infrastructure available or required to serve this project. 24 55. The Developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Vallecitos Water District 25 regarding potable water infrastructure available or required to serve this project. 26 56. The Developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Vallecitos Water District regarding recycled water infrastructure available or required to serve this project. 27 28 PCRESONO. 6143 -14- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Code Reminders , The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 57. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Tentative Map are for planning purposes only. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. 58. The tentative map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date this tentative map approval becomes final. 59. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 60. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 61. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.3^2.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PCRESONO. 6143 -15- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 118 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of August 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton ABSENT: Commissioners Baker and Segall ABSTAIN: MARTELL B. MON^OMERl^hairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: / jAssissant Planning Director PCRESONO. 6143 -16- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6144 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM PERMIT CP 05-12 TO 4 SUBDIVIDE 9.1 ACRES INTO 10 LOTS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 53 DETACHED AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA 6 COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6, LOCATED SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND EAST OF CORINTIA STREET IN 7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE 8 NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 9 CASE NO.: CP 05-12 10 WHEREAS, Western Pacific Housing, Inc., "Developer," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral 12 Management Company, "Owner," described as 13 Lot 223 of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-04-02, Village of La 14 Costa Ridge - Neighborhood 2.6, in the City of Carlsbad, . r County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 14838, filed in the office of the County Recorder of 16 San Diego County July 14, 2004 17 ("the Property"); and 1 8 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Condominium 19 Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - "CC" dated August 2, 2006, on file in the Planning 20 Department, VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 - CP 05-12, as 21 „„ provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 23 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd day of August, 2006, hold 24 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 25 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 26 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 27 relating to the Condominium Permit.28 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 3 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 4 <- B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE 6 NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 - CP 05-12, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 7 Findings:8 9 1. That the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards included within Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, in that the proposed project of 10 53 detached airspace condominiums on the subject site conforms to all the design and development standards applicable to the property as contained in Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 12 2. That the proposed project's density, site design, and architecture are compatible with 13 surrounding development, in that the surrounding developments consist of single- family projects and the surrounding development of the neighborhood is of a 14 similar architectural style. 3. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer i f contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 17 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 18 Conditions: 19 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of 20 final map or issuance of a grading permit whichever occurs first. 21 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such Conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 23 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 24 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said 25 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 2g or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Condominium Permit. 27 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Condominium Permit documents as necessary to make them 28 internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development PCRESONO. 6144 -2- shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development 2 different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval. 3 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.4 , 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are 6 challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid 7 unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.8 9 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents* and 10 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly * or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Condominium Permit, ,2 (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and 13 (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 14 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 16 6. This approval is granted subject to the approval of CT 05-13 and is subject to all 17 conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6143 for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. 1 o jp 7. This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential home ownership purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for 20 such rental shall be not less than 26 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this requirement. 21 _9 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer shall submit to the Planning Director a recorded copy of the Condominium Plan filed with the Department of Real Estate 23 which is in conformance with the City approved documents and exhibits. 24 NOTICE 25 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, 26 reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." 27 2g You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section PCRESONO. 6144 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager 'for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of August 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman, and Whitton ABSENT: Commissioners Baker and Segall ABSTAIN: MARTELL B. MONT€OMERYg#airperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTES T Assistant Planning Director PCRESONO. 6144 -4- The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: August 2, 2006 Application complete date: August 3, 2005 Project Planner: Jessica Galloway Project Engineer: David Rick SUBJECT: CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 9.1 acres into 10 lots, for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6, located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Tentative Tract Map (CT 05-13), and Condominium Permit (CP 05-12), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project includes a Tentative Tract Map (CT) to subdivide and grade a total of 9.1 acres into 10 lots for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units. The project site is located in Neighborhood 2.6 of the Ridge of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (VLCMP). The site is located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia Street. The VLCMP established a product type of multiple-family attached townhomes or single-family small lot detached homes. Sections 3.5 and 6.2.1.2 of the Master Plan require a Condominium Permit (CP) prior to the development of Multiple-family and single-family small lot detached homes. Architectural and dwelling unit plot plans are proposed at this time. The project complies with City standards and all necessary findings can be made for the approvals being requested. The CT and CP applications require City Council action as the project contains more than 50 residential units. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Background On October 23, 2001, the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be used. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established o CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 2 \ j - the neighborhood development area boundaries. A final map has been recorded for the La Costa Ridge area. Plans for mass grading and circulation element roadway improvements have been approved and are currently under construction. Project Description The 9.1-acre project site is located south of Melrose Drive and east side of Corintia Street within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. Development of the neighborhood requires further subdivision of the large neighborhood planning area lot created by Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04, along with finish grading for the site and infrastructure improvements. The project area is bordered to the north, northwest, and northeast by single family residential neighborhoods, to the south by open space, and to the southwest by Vallecitos Water District facilities. The proposed project includes a number of applications as summarized below in Table 1, TABLE 1 -NEIGHBORHOOD APPLICATIONS Application Number CT05-13 CP 05-12 Master Plan Neighborhood 2.6 2.6 Area 9.1 acres 9.1 acres Residential Lots/Units Permitted by the MP 57 57 Minimum Lot Size Required 3,500 sq. ft. (exclusive use area) N/A Number of Lots/Units Proposed 5 residential lots (53 units) 1 private street lot 4 open space 53 units Along with the proposed CT, a CP is required by the VLCMP for Neighborhood 2.6. The CP proposes private streets and a minimum exclusive use area of 3,500 square feet for detached airspace condominiums. The applicant has applied for the review and approval of building floor plans and elevations and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, three different floor plans are proposed ranging in size from 1,976 square feet to 2,356 square feet. All three plans are two stories high with two car garages. All plans are proposing three different elevation styles to provide a variety of facades in the Neighborhood. x The following Table 2 provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 3 1- TABLE 2 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS Plan No. 1 2 3 1st Floor SQ. FT. 908 931 1,120 2nd Floor SQ. FT. 1,069 1,090 1,236 Living Area SQ. FT. 1,976 2,021 2,356 Garage SQ. FT. 429 445 428 Total Bldg. SQ. FT. j 2,406 2,466 2,784 Elevations Styles Italian, European Cottage, Spanish Italian, European Cottage, Spanish Italian, European Cottage, Spanish IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards: A. Residential Medium-High Density (RMH) General Plan Land Use designation; B. Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01); C. Planned Development Regulations (Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and E. Growth Management Regulations (Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan). The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site is Residential Medium-High Density (RMH). The RMH designation allows single-family residential development at a range of 8-15 dwelling units per acre. The RMH range has a Growth Management Control Point of 11.5 dwelling units per acre. The density that is proposed for Neighborhood 2.6 is 5.8 dwelling units per acre. The VLCMP limits the maximum number of dwelling units for e^ch neighborhood. The Neighborhood 2.6 dwelling unit maximum of 57 units is not being exceeded. The VLCMP was found to comply with all applicable General Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. This project is in conformance with the Master Plan and therefore is also in compliance with the General Plan. The project complies with Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table 3 below. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 4 i- TABLE 3 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT Land Use Housing Open Space & Conservation Noise Public Safety Circulation USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Site is designated RMH at 8- 15 du/ac with a Growth Management Control Point of 11.5 du/ac; maximum 57 dwelling units • Provision of affordable housing Minimize environmental impacts to sensitive resources within the City City Wide Trail Program Residential exterior noise standard of 60 CNEL and interior noise standard of 45 CNEL Reduce fire hazards to an acceptable level. Require new development to construct roadway improvements needed to serve proposed development. PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS Single-family lots at 5.8 du/ac; 53 dwelling units The Master Plan includes two affordable sites, which have received SDP approval and one is currently occupied. Open space preserve areas are identified in the HCP, certified EIR and Master Plan. These areas are not proposed for development. Master Plan trails and connections to the adjacent neighborhoods identified in the plan are included. Project specific noise studies for each tentative map identified that an interior noise assessment to determine proper architectural treatments (i.e., specialized door and window treatments) would be required, prior to the issuance of building permits, for any identified lots where the CNEL exceeds 60 dBA at the second story. The project includes measures such as fire suppression zones. The project will construct public and private streets needed to serve the development. COMPLY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes B. Villages of La Costa Master Plan The project is located within the Ridge Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. 30 CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 5 (. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan Villages. The following Tables 4 and 5 show compliance of the proposed project with the Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan. TABLE 4 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS STANDARD Street Standard Trail System Village Landscape Concept & Palette Signs Affordable Housing Village Theme Walls REQUIRED 4 Yz ft. landscaped parkways between the curb and sidewalk City wide and Master Plan trails as shown in the La Costa Ridge Trail and Recreation Plan (Exhibit 5-5) Compliance with the landscape theme tree and plant varieties Compliance with the design and location requirements for neighborhood entry signs 15% of the total number of units in the Master Plan are to be affordable Required along arterial streets and major collectors PROPOSED 5 ft. wide landscaped parkways between the curb and sidewalk. Required trails are shown on the approved master tentative map on the south and east side of project's property lines. This project will also provide a private connection to the public trail system. The Conceptual Landscape Plans have been found to comply with the Master Plan. Signs comply in design and location with Section 4,9.2 of the Master Plan. This requirement is being satisfied through the construction of two multi-family rental apartment projects. The 180-unit La Costa Greens apartment project has been constructed and occupied allowing for final maps for a total of 1 ,020 market-rate units anywhere in the Master Plan. The La Costa Oaks affordable apartment project has been approved and has begun construction. Wall design and locations are shown as part of the conceptual landscape plans. 31 CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 6 TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.3& 4.6.2.E.2.a) 10' minimum to habitable and side-loaded garages, 20' minimum to front loaded garages, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages) A Porte cochere or arbor structure is allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5' minimum setback from property line. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 20.68'. Please refer to the attached 'Individual Lot Data' table for compliance with 15' minimum. All lots comply. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.C & 6.7.3.6.i) Minimum usable rear yard area is 15' by 15' Minimum Rear Yard Setback is 10'. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. All units comply with 10' minimum rear yard setback. Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C& 4.6.2.E.2.b) At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. The minimum distance between homes on common lots shall be 10' excluding architectural feature projections and wrap around porch encroachments. Plans 1 and 3 both have offsets that exceed a minimum of the 7' average setback. All units maintain the minimum 10' separation between buildings. Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum All street side setbacks of 10' minimum have been met. Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback exhibits on the enclosed plans for further details. Lot Width (4.6.2.E.1) Planned Development projects shall have a minimum lot width of 40 feet. Exclusive use areas are a minimum 3,500 square feet with a minimum width of 40'. : r CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page? TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 1-story units: 50% of net pad area 2-story units: 40% of net pad area Includes: • Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: • Exterior structures such as covered porches • Permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8' from the building • Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22' and a width of 8' • Roof eaves extending less than 30" from the face of any building • Awnings • Open parking areas • Structures under 30" in height • Masonry walls not greater than 6' in height (wing- walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Lot coverage: Plan 1 = 1,337 SF Plan 2 = 1,376 SF Plan 3 = 1,548 SF All plan types are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% of net pad area of the exclusive use area as required. Please refer to the attached 'Individual Lot Data' table for lot coverages. All lots comply. Building Height (6.7.3.6.J) Maximum of 35' and 3 stories.Plan 1 = 28'-2" max.; 2 stories Plan 2 = 24'-9" max.; 2 stories Plan 3 = 26'-ll" max.; 2 stories Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.6& 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. All units comply Plan 1 2 3 EC 4 4x3 IT 3 4 4 SP 4 4 3 33 CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 PageS TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward- most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum 3 separate building planes for lots with a 45' of frontage or less. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. All units comply Plan 1 2 3 EC •j3 4 3 IT 3 4 3 SP 3 4 3 Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to the attached "Building Design Element Matrix" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to the "Building Design Element Matrix" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation types. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads(4.6.3.A.l.a) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each of the proposed elevations. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.C& 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes three floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Single-Story Units (6.7.3.1.0,6.7.3.2.0, 6.7.3.5.0 & 4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15',(10'preferred). Not Applicable. Neighborhood has not been designated with a ridgeline or hilltop that is visible form a Circulation Element roadway by the Master Plan. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 9 TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n& 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided. All proposed plans comply. Planl: 80.0% Plan 2: 79.2% Plan 3: 79.8% Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan 3 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building and is plotted where there are 3 units with less than 15' between them. Where (3) Two Story Units occur in a row with 15 ft to 20 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.C) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan 3 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building and are plotted where there are 3 units with 15' to 20' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single- story element, with a minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or greater than the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. Plan types 1 and 3 incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the width and a minimum of 3' deep. Planl: 100% Plan 3: 66.7% Plans 1 and 3 make up 56.6% of the overall unit mix. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 10 TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9,4.6.2.B.2.f &4.6.2.B.3) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10'. Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'. A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony above a porch may also serve this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. 43.4% of the elevations incorporate a balcony (All elev. styles of the Plan 2) 17.0% of the elevations incorporate a porch (Italian style of the Plan 3) A total of 60.4% of the elevation styles within the development comply. Please refer to the enclosed architecture and site plan for compliance. Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the side yard setback more than 2' nor are any projections greater than 8' in length. All plans comply. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 11 , ^ TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: • Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking • "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking • Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. « More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) The project includes a 7,390 SF common recreation area. All common recreation area parking is to be located on-street. Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'. Two 1-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. All plan types include a 2-car garage with a minimum interior measurement of 20' x 20'. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 12 TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.H, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. Three-car garages in a row facing the street are permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sf. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. The maximum number of units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of 50% of the units. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage configurations) Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages) All setbacks for garages that face the street are greater than or equal to 20'. No 3-car garages are proposed with the project. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 13 TABLE 5 -VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k& 4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. Minimum roof pitch of 3:12 A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. Both S-tile and Flat-tile roofs with a variety colors to correspond with the architectural styles will be incorporated. Typical roof pitches: Plan 1: 4:12,6:12 Plan 2: 4:12,6:12 Plan 3: 4:12,6:12 Colors (4.6.3 .B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred, however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same .color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to show compliance. Please refer to the color and materials boards for details on each color scheme and to the site plan for specific plotting. The homes have been plotted to ensure that adjacent homes of the same architectural style have a different color schemes. Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) All plan types comply. Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 6.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: • Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Craftsmen Bungalow • Spanish Colonial • Monterey Ranch • Italian/Tuscan • European Country • California Coastal • California Contemporary-(Neighborhoods 2.3 & 2.4 only) The elevation types included are as follows: Spanish Colonial Italian/Tuscan European Country CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 14 TABLE 5 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLANNING DESIGN STANDARDS CONTINUED Guideline (VLCMP Reference)Standard Comments Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.1& 4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall by used (no mill finishes). "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3 .B.I 1) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure 2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All chimney and their caps comply with proper scale and proportion. Window Detailing (4.6.3 .B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Deeply recessed windows Paned windows Decorative window ledges Accent and varied shape windows Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports Exterior wood trim surrounds Accent colors on shutters or other elements Arched elements Shutters Raised stucco trim around windows Window lintels The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 3 enhanced architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2 such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation and floor plan (see Attachment No. 7). C.Planned Development Regulations The VLCMP contains development standards for a variety of lot sizes and product types. Generally, lots with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet or greater are not required to comply with the Planned Development standards. However, Neighborhood 2.6 is proposing 53 detache.d airspace condominiums with a minimum exclusive use area of 3,500 square feet in size and therefore requires approval of a Condominium Permit (CP). Certain Master Plan standards differ from those adopted in Municipal Code Chapter 21.45 (the Planned Development CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 15 ^. Ordinance). The Master Plan provides that the Planned Development Ordinance shall be used unless otherwise modified in the Master Plan. Fifty-three dwelling units are proposed with this tentative map. Therefore, compliance with the Planned Development and Master Plan regulations will be limited to those that are applicable only to the subdivision of the property. Table 6 demonstrates the project's compliance with the required standards. TABLE 6 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS/ MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 STANDARD Visitor Parking Recreational Vehicle Storage Shared Recreation Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width PERMITTED/REQUIRED 1 5 spaces required (5sp/10du+l sp/4du) 20 sq. ft/du 5,300 sq. ft. required (100 sq. ft. /unit) 3,500 sq. ft. 40ft. PROPOSED Adequate parking is provided either in parking bays or on the internal local streets as permitted by the Master Plan. A common Master Plan RV storage facility is to be provided in Neighborhood 3.2 prior to occupancy of any Neighborhood 2.6 residences. 7,390 sq. ft. provided in Lot 6 to meet the requirements of Neighborhood 2.6. > 3,500 sq. ft. min. exclusive use area >40ft. D.Subdivision Ordinance The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has concluded that the subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. All major subdivision design criteria have been complied with including the provision of public access, required street frontage, minimum lot area, an$ the design of the project so that individual residential lots do not have street frontage or access to circulation element roads. The project is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, the VLCMP and Title 21. The minimum required exclusive use size for Neighborhood 2.6 is 3,500 square feet. Each of the proposed exclusive use areas meets the applicable minimum area and width required by the Master Plan. The developer will be required to offer various dedications (e.g., drainage easements, street right-of-way) and install street lights and utility improvements, including but not limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, street trees, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, fire hydrants, and street lights. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 16 l- E. Growth Management The subdivision is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the subdivision, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 7 below. TABLE 7 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water IMPACTS 184.27 sq.ft. 98.27 sq. ft. 53EDU 0.37 acres 20 CFS / Basin D 424 ADT Station No. 6 N/A San Marcos Unified Elementary - 13.97 students Middle School -4. 31 students High School - 4.71 students 53 EDU/Vallecitos 71.3 GPM COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Under the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the maximum residential unit allowance in Village 2.6 is 57 dwelling units. The proposal for Neighborhood 2.6, at 53 dwelling units, will then be 4 units below the allowance of the VLCMP. Pursuant to Section 2.5.2 of the VLCMP, the remaining 4 units may be allocated to a future neighborhood within the Ridge. V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed-pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has reviewed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated October 23, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed planning area project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Planning Area have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. Mitigation Measure 4.8-1A required an acoustical analysis for certain areas of the Master Plan to identify on project plans all necessary noise control requirements necessary to CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 August 2, 2006 Page 17 t- meet the City of Carlsbad interior and exterior noise levels. The required studies were provided and the plans have incorporated noise walls where appropriate. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan Final Program EIR. The proposed activities would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as. they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. The total number of Master Plan units evaluated in EIR 98-07 will not be increased. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6143 (CT) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6144 (CP) 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form 6. Disclosure Statement 7. Building Elevation Design Elements 8. Individual Lot Data 9. Reduced Exhibits 10. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "CC" dated August 2, 2006 (CT 05-13/CPUD 04-12) BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO:CT05-13/CP 05-12 CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 APPLICANT: Western Pacific Housing. Inc. REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 9.1 acres into 10 lots, for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6, located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 223 of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-04-02. Village of La Costa Ridge - Neighborhood 2.6, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 14838, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County July 14.2004 APN: 223-720-03 Acres: 9.1 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 53 Units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Medium-High (RMH) Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 8-15 du/ac Density Proposed: 9.8 du/ac Existing Zone: Planned Community (P-C) Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Site P-C (Master Plan: Residential Density-Multiple) North Residential Density Multiple with a Qualified Development Overlay Zone (RDM-Q) South PC (Master Plan: Open Space) East One family Residential (R-D West RDM-Q/Public Utility (PU) RMH Residential Medium (RM) OS RM RM/Utility (U) Current Land Use Vacant Single family Vacant Single Family Single family Vallecitos Water District Revised 01/06 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program S-egment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes [X] No Coastal Development Permit: [~~l Yes [>^| No Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes [X] No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Marcos Unified Water District: Vallecitos Water District Sewer District: Vallecitos Water District Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 53 EDUs ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption,_ Negative Declaration, issued_ XI Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated October 23. 2001 (EIR 98-07) Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM i - LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: CT 05-1 3/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 1 GENERAL PLAN: Residential ZONING: Planned Community Medium High DEVELOPER'S NAME: Western Pacific Housing, Inc. ADDRESS: 5790 Fleet Street Ste 210, Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE NO.: 760-929-1600 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-720-03 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SO. FT., DU): 9.1 acres ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: As soon as possible A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 184.27 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 98.27 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 53 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .37 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 20 Identify Drainage Basin = D (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT= 424 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 6 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A I. Schools: San Marcos Unified Elementary - 13.97 students Middle School - 431 students High School - 4.71 students J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 53 EDU Identify Sub Basin = Vallecitos (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPM = 73.1 L. The project is 4 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Western Pacific Housing. Inc Title Title Address Address 5790 Fleet Street. Ste 210 Carlsbad. CA 92009 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10%*OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person __ Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management Company Title title Address Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180 Carlsbad. CA 92008 1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Address Title Address Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? DYes No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. t for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle dent of Morrow DeveloDment information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 3 C! HZW o o H wM Zo a 1K Z a. o£ 1 o Z al Id o Z si S £•is B^ 1tf-s VI s i1 ll w 1d 1 § H = is U) <- 1 <?1 G i 1 5 >,it D °WL 1 •aI s i 1 I DESIGN ELEMENTSi 1 I 1 1 i 1 j I s ! if j Sj i L 1 ! ! ! I \ \ \ \ 3* 5 L i : \ i L ! s1 5u 3t I : I "o s s s s s s I Deeply Recessed Windows and[ ' DoorsS N S S s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s c. Paned Windows and DoorsS s s s s s s s s s ^ s s s s s s s s s s s s s 1 o 031QZ Xw •o s s s s s s s N s s. s s s s s s s s s. s s s s s e. Decorative Window Ledgess s 1 Accent Materials such as Stucco, j1 ' Wood, Siding and Stone 1S s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s \ s s s s s s. 1 D11 oo l s s s s s s s s s s s s \ s s s s s \ s s s s \ 3oe£ ICO•3•5 a g1 s s s s s s \B. Window Boxes and Planters withJ' Architecturally Evident SupportsS s s s s s k. Exterior Wood ElementsS s s s s s s ll Variations in Colors of Stucco and jII " Other Elements 1S s s s s s s s •s s s s s s s s s s N s s s s s s N s s s s s s s s s ^1 Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or 1II m' Other Elements 1n. Stucco WainscotingS s s s s s s s 0. Covered BalconiesS s s s s s s s s s s s s -v s s s d. s s s s s s s s s s s. s s s s s N s s s s s s s s s. s s s s s s s 1 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s N.(Raised Stucco Trim around Windowsand Doors.e I Individual Lot Data La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 Lot* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 . 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Plan 1 R 3 R 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 3 2 1 R 2 1 3 2 2 R 3 R 3 2 3 2 2 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 3 R 3 2 2 R 3 R 1 2 1 R 2 3 2 2 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 2 R 1 3 R 2 R 1 3 R 1 R Elevation SP EC SP EC IT. SP EC - IT EC SP ' SP EC IT SP EC SP IT EC SP IT EC IT SP IT EC IT SP EC IT SR EC IT SP IT EC IT EC SP. SP EC • IT SP IT EC SP EC IT EC IT SP SP EC IT Color W Y S Zu T X V YT-_ S • Z W R: Y S V X T W Y V S U Z V T X V I Y U T W Y U X R U X V T U Z R X W Y W S W X V Average Neighborhood Setback: Setbacks (ft) J'Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 15.00 15.00 15.00 38.98 18.51 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 21.98 15.00 15.00 23.81 41.87 27.08 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 24.55 36.33 15.00 15.00 53.12 34.51 39.19 22.52 18.51 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 19.64 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 42.73 33.05 ' 15.00 35.26 15.00 36.26 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 18.02 15.00 20.68 61 53 53 50 48 44 41 37 .29 29 17 23 20 26 21 19 23 10 22 - 21 19 . 19 21 21 19 21 19 20 14 14 13 19 21 19 19 21 34 47 22 22 24 12 41 34 18 21 24 23 21 40 .16 10 17 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 6 5 5 0 ^5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 7 0 5 5 0 5 0 7 5 6 7 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 ~ 5 16 5 n 5 5 0 9 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 7 0 5 5 5 5 •0 5 0 5 0 5 0 10 0 5 0 9 6 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 10 5 0 5 0 10 5 0 5 5 5 10 21 20 20 52 20 51 20 51 51 -20 51 20 51 20 20 51 26 60 30 20 51 . .51 20 30 54 20 51 68 36 55 25 20 20 51 51 ' 20 20 42 21 51 20 59 47 21 52 20 53 20 20 51 21 20 24 Porch 11 10 14 10 28 12 .10 10 10 Excl. Use Net Pad Area(SF) 4,883 5,977 5.243 5,515 5,364 4,960 4,915 4,651 4,460 4,322 3.975 4,021 3.990 4,348 4,076 3,870 4,280 4,465 3,998 3,961 3,870 3,870 3,982 4,571 4,178 3,960 3.710 5.284 4.914 4,457 3,993 4,395 4,049 3,763 3.763 4,026 4.009 5,104 3,427 4.188 4,065 4,573 5,012 4,469 3,989 3,916 5.098 4,175 4,491 5,004 3,828 4.805 4,229 Building Coverage1' Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 1,337 1,548 1,548 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,376 1,548 1.376 1.548 1,376 1,548 1,548 1,376 1,337 1,376 1,337 1,548 1,376 1,376 1,548 1,548 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,548 1.548 1,548 1,376 1,376 1,548 1.337 1,376 1,337 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,548 1,376 1,337 1,548 1,376 1,337 1,548 1,337 27.4% 25.9% 29.5% 25.0% 28.9% 27.7% 31.5% 29.6% 30.9% 35.8% 34.6% 38.5% 34.5% 35.6% 38.0% 35.6% 31.2% 30.8% 33.4% 39.1% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 33.9% 32.9% 39.1% 37.1% 26.0% 31.5% 30.9% 38.8% 35.2% 38.2% 36.6% 36.6% 38.5% 33.3% 27.0% 39.0% 32.9% 38.1% 30.1% 27.5% 34.6% 34.5% 39.5% 27.0% 32.0% 34.5% 27.5% 34.9% 32.2% 31.6% M "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external wSb or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than S ft. from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls. Neighborhood 2.6 Section 8 Table 4 10/26/2005 s I g fe d*laM; pSss 1.8- ! |gj ?S8fc*-e *"=|§ ytw< *'tot\ Is |l|| k/K &i$| e» asf* i!•aj piisi* !?|l ssfs ,?| U?i T- & CO "UJ CM Q« JxCOo UJ CM if§5§ ^irJs.i ril->^l!s'lifsl "i^l^if^ IvHlJU^ | s^lJvi^ii XX dO > Q 9 o S a X o innm ! H H E1 E (H *l S i ji 11 L * i. .i • * ill j^.^jjj^j^ ti^jj^^^j ^.^«3^S 11 n i P ii I :^:^!^!^-^: ^:?:^^!-^ ^^::^:?::! i I \ \ \ jf ii "1. . . .... - .. . || 6 ..Mi I iLJLyi . .i2,i! i|.| i Pr * 5 *i^ 3!i fa.hi Fi! ssS ¥ Hi hiin? iiji «i !! Is -!iii^iSi*5^Q£^-yiSshs H! j "<Q- UJ W O) -81u -- — g olN iloS gc > XX dO uv i it isa t583 i 1 iUill 4 IE i! I! UJ UJ& vf) 1- o OQ- vnxin * BtpiF lfE o ^= TCO KXdO vn IM! i n in s g i (I!*i 5 ES <XdO 111 Ijl 11 !§ PP1P III«"'• h ii ••il S 1 - il i ilsl! CD S 03 1 co [Sfl)j| XX dO !* f !* MH Mi ,f is is t i I s Ilk n ! ,t *&>-. * E^« L !i EF ii i ^ fcSSS « 1 III !|!Stf 5s|j« 5*! il 4»^«> EH< *^11 "sl M.I riiriib * f < f 05 ME !!!!!! SSiSS Ji'1!.'!!!!^"^ "Li!!!!.'!"! MM*ill llli*in U I" -HI lij 0 IU\DUJ 0. o o S o 8 o S lit i* OO OO. OQ O OO 0 OO 0 O Q OOO OOOOOO;1 OO O OOOO.OOOO mm **SfcV •? in ci in fi^t fi ci ^. inn^t o^A^^itQV^t^ bin «>t$o^t>t n iIjii lilt il-JF P-^Tlji.B.'iii^ — wSJHj- 42' -0"87 '-0" 43'-0" 44'-0" j. IS'-0" -if "-^ f PLANS REFLECT SPANISH ELEVATIONSPLAN1 1.976 SQ.FT.3 bed. 2 1/2 bath, living/dimkitchen / nook, tach ipace 2ND FLOOR Ana - 1069 mth PLAN 2 1 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR. An*-1090uj 1ST FLOOR Are»-931WJiU iqamd.ISTFLpQR AIM-1376 iuiti«iu«ad. PLANS 2,356 SQ. FT.5 b*d, opt den and opt. loft , 3 b»tfc. Uviog/dine 1NDFUDOR AM*-1236imlUiqu.wL J~S^2^ A~-1130»nU.«iUBB<l. BXCBBD40%)(RATIO MUST NOT EXCEED 40*3 2ND TO 1ST FLOORSQ. PTO. RATIO W/OARAOH 79%(RATIO MUST NOT EXCEED 80*) 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. MORTON SCALE: 1/8' = MT SECOND LEVEL GROUND LEVEL 1,1 2ND FLOOR 1 LAIN 1 EUROPEANCOTTAGE 1ST FLOOR 5 2ND FLOOR r4! L__ PLAN2 k EUROPEAN COnAGE 1 3 s??.- E KSJ EUROPEANCOTTAGETTAUAN PLAN 3 ADDENDA 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON ~ SCALE 1/8'= 1'-0' 2ND FLOOR ©© 100% SINGLE STORY EDGE ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS REQUIRE A MIK. OF 3 PLANES PLAN1 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. MORTON SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0' EUROPEAN COTTAGE SCALfit/4'-MT ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A MOT. OF 3 FLAMES PLAN1 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8'= 1'-0' 7/ © © 3 G i Q,. ia > i >< M ) 1% SINGLE -i— (3)" , © STORY EDOB ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A MM. OF 3 PLANES PLAN1 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. MORTON SCALE 1/8-= 1-0' EUROPEAN COTTAGE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A MIN. OF 3 PLANES PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8'= 1'-0' ITALIAN ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR EI^VATIONSREQUIRE A MIN. OF 3 PLANES PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8'= l'-a SPANISH MATERIALS: _©_@ -U © © ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A MM. OF 3 PLANES PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8' = !'-<)• EUROPEAN COTTA GE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE AMIN. OF 3 PLANES PLAN3 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8'= 1'-0' ITALIAN SCALBl/V-MT ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A MIN. OF 3 PLANES PLAN3 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. MORTON SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0' »%S1NOLBSTORYEDOE ROOF PLAN FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONSREQUIRE A Mm. OF 3 PLANES PLAN3 ELEVATIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE 1/8'= 1-0' / w PLAN 3 4«0 CUBIC FEET OP STORAGE SPACE •CALM I Iff «!•-«• PLAN2 512 CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE SPACE PLAN1 506 CUBIC FEET OP STORAGE SPACE STORAGE PROVISIONS 3 PAC VILLAGES OF LA COSTA 2.6 D.R. HORTON SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' Planning Commission Minutes August 2, 2006 Page 2 EXHIBIT 5 1. CT 05-13/CP 05-12 - VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 9.1 acres into 10 lots, for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6, located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 1 and stated Associate Planner Jessica Galloway, assisted by Associate Engineer David Rick, would make the staff presentation. Ms. Gallaway gave a presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Montgomery asked if there were any questions of staff; seeing none, he asked the applicant if he would like to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, 5365 Avenida Encinas, Suite A, Carlsbad, gave a presentation. Chairperson Montgomery opened public testimony and asked if any members of the audience would like to speak on Agenda Item 1; seeing none, Chairperson Montgomery closed public testimony. Chairperson Montgomery asked the applicant if he would like to continue with only 5 Commissioners present. The applicant replied yes. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Cardosa, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Tentative Tract Map (CT 05-13), and Condominium Permit (CP 05-12), based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 5-0 AYES: Chairperson Montgomery, Commissioners Cardosa, Dominguez, Heineman and Whitton NOES: None Chairperson Montgomery closed the Public Hearing on Item 1 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 08th, 2006 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 08th Day of September, 2006 f \ Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of NQTiCf Qf PUfUC HEflntWi INOTICE IS HEREBY <' vpur interest iCounc8o<the< es Management Zone 11 and more pa s wishing to speak on this the Ptannina Deoartment at CASE RLE:CT05-taCP 05-12 ILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE -.6 PUBLISH: September 8, 2006 NOT 1976508 Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 AVERY® 5160® ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST 701 ENGINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST 1966OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DIST 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949VIEWRIDGEAVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLJC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER DAVID RICK CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER COREY FUNK 08/21/2006 AH3AV-O9-008-1 ®091S lueqeB a| zasijpn Jani and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® CAROL LEVERENZ 6877 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 LESLIE R ROBERTS 3515CORTEMORA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ERIC R & ALICIA CUNNINGHAM 6881 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 BOBBY L & CYNTHIA MICKIS 6885 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT & ROBIN PASSERELLO 6889 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 TRACT 85-19 COMMUNITY ASSN 3103 VILLA WAY NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 GEORGE S & ANGELA S KUCK 3501 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEVEN J & JEWEL A VERRET 3505 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 BADALUCO FAMILY TRUST 3509 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 DOUGLAS A & SUSAN B WESTON 3513 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANIEL D & JUDITH SIMAS 3517 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARTIN S & KATHLEEN ANDERSON 3521 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 JEFFREY B & CAROL M ROBERTS 3524 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARC NORTHOVER 3520 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK D & JULIE L WALSH 3516 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 GAILEY FAMILY TRUST 3512 CORTE RAMON CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEVIN & KANDICE L KRETZSCHMAR 6898 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID M & LYNDA PURCELL 6894 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 ELLEN GRANDE 6890 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARTIN S & SHERYL S GORDON 6886 CAMINO DE AMIGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALICE & ROBERT SMITH 1687 LA PLAZA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92078 PER/KOLL LLC 4343 VON KARMAN AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 LEONARD P & MARY MILLER 6820 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 LIESE^CCORNWELL 6822 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARK E & KATHY S LIGGETT 6824 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARC A RAPP 6826 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANDREW DEAL UNIT 18 1633 DIAMOND ST SAN DIEGO CA 92109 HOBIE H TRIVITTE 6830 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID & MONICA BERWICK 6841 XANAWAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 FREDERICK D & PAMELA KIM 6843 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ®09is AM3AV-OD-008-1 aplde.1 ? ia sBejjnoqiiue uoissejduii Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® JIMMY & JENNY RAMIREZ 6845 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 NICOLAS & CLAUDIA VAZQUEZ 6847 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ' - BRADLEY J & DAWN WARREN 6849 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARC VONMUSSER 6851 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHRILEY B MITCHELL 6848 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 BURTON J & VALARIE LO 6846 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 THEODORE A KINDER 6844 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT C & SUSAN RUBENSTEIN 6842 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCOTT MARTIN 6838 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAN & NANNETTE GOLDBERG 6837 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 RITA LISA 6839 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANIEL M & HEATHER PITTARD 6838 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL A & CYNTHIA MCCLURE 6836 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 PAUL D & COLLEEN LOEGERING 6834 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL J & CYNTHIA PACING 6832 CAMINITO SUENO CARLSBAD CA 92009 BROOKFIELD OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 2835 CAMINO DEL RIO S SAN DIEGO CA 92108 STEVEN D GONZALES 6830 VIA MARINERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES D & ROSEMARIE MARTIN 6828 VIA MARINERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 PATTERSON TRUST 6826 VIA MARINERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ROBERT J HENDERSON 6824 VIA MARI NERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID & GERALDINE HICKOX 6822 VIA MARINERO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GILLEN FAMILY TRUST 6831 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM K NOTT 6835 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 GERALD F MYERS JR 6837 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALEXANDER & LARISA KRICHEVER 6839 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEBRAVELLA 6841 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES R & JENNIFER UWINS 6847 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARC & TORI FOLEY 6853 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM & CHRISTINE GRAWIN 6855 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 PILLAI TRUST 6867 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ®09is AH3AV-OD-008-1 a6eu39S e IB aBejjnoanue uoisssjdwi Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® JENKS TRUST 6870 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANNY B & MELINDA NEAL 6868 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 i- COOK TRUST 133 HUMMINGBIRD HL ENCINITAS CA 92024 RANDALL D YEE 6864 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 ERIC K & COLETTE ASMUSSEN 6862 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEAN N & VANESSA HARRIS 6860 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 LUIS G & LISA REVILLA 6858 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 STEPHANIE DANIAL 6856 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 TIMOTHY HUGHES 6854 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DIANNE R WADLEY 6852 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL KREISCH 6850 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DANIEL A & ARLENE L NORRIS 6848 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN & THERESA A CIHOMSKY 6846 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 TODD & TYLER B MOREHEAD 6844 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOSHUA G & MELANIE R NICHOLS 6842 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 PETER J & LESLEE L ARMSTRONG 6840 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOAN RENFROW 6838 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID & JENNIFER A WILSON 6836 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 JAMES R & MARY L BROWN 6834 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 FRANK & TERESA DOMINGUEZ 6832 VIA VERANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 T & N 2005 TRUST 6850 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 BARRIE E GOLDFLAM 6854 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVID G & NADINE V LU 6858 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 TIMOJHY S CARES 6862 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 SIVAKUMAR THIYAGARAJAN 6866 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 DEAN N ROSSMANN 6870 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALICE RWIEDENHOFF 6874 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHAN WANG 6878 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 BETH A BRADTMILLER 6882 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 RICHARD N & MIKKI M VOSPER 6886 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 ®09LS AM3AV-OD-008H ®091S iueqeS a] aDidej a6emas e la aBejjnocmue Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY AVERY® 5160® RAVUT CHHIT 6890 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 BRIAN W & ENID A ROBERT 6894 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 l' BERNARD & JENNIFER TRUST GALLO 6898 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 JIM I-PING & MEEI-CHUN GAU 6893 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 GARY B & KIMBERLY J STYVE 6889 VIA BORREGOS CARLSBAD CA 92009 KOHRS FAMILY REVOC TRUST 2385 VIA PELICANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 WILLIAM E DEAL III 3395 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CHRISTOPHER B & SARINA MENDOZA 3391 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN F BLACK JR TRUST PO BOX 532 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 PARVIN ABADY TRUST 4429 CASS ST SAN DIEGO CA 92109 CHANG CHAN FAMILY TRUST 13634 DERBY DOWNS CT SANDIEGOCA 92130 EDISON G & MARY G FABIAN 3378 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 JOHN P GERVASI 3382 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 SHERRY THOMAS 3386 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 ALBERT & AIDA S FLAVIER 3390 CORTE TERRAL CARLSBAD CA 92009 KEYSTONE LACOSTA LLC UNIT 201 9683 TIERRA GRANDE ST SANDIEGOCA 92126 MARK M MIURA 6861 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 MICHAEL & VICKI S CHUCK 6857 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 ERIC M & TRACY FEFFER 6853 XANA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009 CNLM STEH 425 E ALVARADO ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 LO LAND ASSESTS LP STE1150 2020 MAIN ST IRVINE CA 92614 BROOKFIELD UNIVERSITY COMMON LLC STE 200 12865 POINTE DEL MAR WAY DEL MAR CA92014 HUNTER INDUSTRIES INC UNIT 1150 550 W C ST SANDIEGOCA 92101 DR HORTON STE 2-10 5790 FLEET STREET CARLSBAD CA 92009 RECM STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 KB HOME COASTAL STE 100 12235 EL CAMINO REAL SANDIEGOCA 92130 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES STE A 5365 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 MORROW DEVELOPMENT STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ©09LS ©AU3AV AU3AV-O9-008-L ®091S jueqe6 a\ aoirfoj aBemac P la afipimnnmm nniccairlm NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, {DATE}, to consider approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 9.1 acres into 10 lots, for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 on property located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 223 of the City of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-04-02, Village of La Costa Ridge - Neighborhood 2.6, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 14838, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County July 14, 2004. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after {DATE}. If you have any questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and/or Condominium Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Condominium Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad. Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 05-13/CP 05-12 CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE - NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 PUBLISH: {DATE} CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 CT05-13/CP05-12 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, to consider approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 9.1 acres into 10 lots, for the development of 53 detached airspace condominium units within the Villages of La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 on property located south of Melrose Drive and east of Corintia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 223 of the City of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-04-02, Village of La Costa Ridge - Neighborhood 2.6, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 14838, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County July 14, 2004. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after September 15, 2006. If you have any questions, please call Corey Funk in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4645. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and/or Condominium Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and/or Condominium Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad. Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT05-13/CP 05-12 CASE NAME: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA RIDGE - NEIGHBORHOOD 2.6 PUBLISH: September 8, 2006 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 CT05-13/CP05-12 La Costa Ridge La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6Neighborhood 2.6CT 05CT 05--13/CP 0513/CP 05--1212 Location MapLocation MapCORINTIA STXANA WYSITIO TORTUGA R A N C H O S A N T A F E R D M E LR O S E D R S IT IO C A B A LLERO VIA BORREGOS CORINTIA STM E L R O S E D R XANA WYR A N C H O S A N T A F E R D VALLECITOS WD DYVIA BORREGOS VIA VERANO 0200100FeetCT 05-13 / CP 05-12La Costa Ridge Neighborhood 2.6 Project FeaturesProject Features„„Subdivision, architecture and plotting review of Subdivision, architecture and plotting review of 53 detached single53 detached single--family homesfamily homes„„Minimum exclusive use area of 3,500 sq. ft.Minimum exclusive use area of 3,500 sq. ft.„„3 floor plans (2 story construction)3 floor plans (2 story construction)„„Living area range: 1,950 to 2,350 sq. ft.Living area range: 1,950 to 2,350 sq. ft.„„Each plan provides a 2 car garageEach plan provides a 2 car garage Project Features Cont.Project Features Cont.„„3 architectural styles3 architectural styles(Italian, European Cottage, and Spanish)(Italian, European Cottage, and Spanish)„„9 color schemes9 color schemes„„Common recreation areaCommon recreation area„„Tot lotTot lot„„Picnic tablesPicnic tables„„Grill areaGrill area Project ConsistencyProject Consistency„„The project complies with:The project complies with:„„C.M.C 21.45 C.M.C 21.45 ––Planned DevelopmentsPlanned Developments„„Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan, MP 98--01(C)01(C)„„The project is consistent with:The project is consistent with:„„Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98--0707 RecommendationRecommendation„„The Planning Commission adopted Resolutions The Planning Commission adopted Resolutions No. 6143 and 6144 to recommend the project to No. 6143 and 6144 to recommend the project to the City Council on August 2, 2006.the City Council on August 2, 2006.„„Recommendation: City Council adoption of Recommendation: City Council adoption of Resolution No. 2006Resolution No. 2006--280 approving CT 05280 approving CT 05--13/CP 0513/CP 05--1212