Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-11-07; City Council; 18776; Annual Housing Production ReportCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# 18,776 MTG. 11/7/oe DEPT. PLAN ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2006 DEPT. HEAD \M N CITY ATTY. <^ CITY MGR. (^ — RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2006-312 AUTHORIZING the submittal of the attached report to the State Office of Planning and Research and Department of Housing and Community Development. ITEM EXPLANATION: Section 65400 of the Government Code requires that each jurisdiction "provide an annual report to the Office of Planning and Research and the Department of Housing and Community Development on the status and progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs." The purpose of this requirement is to summarize each year's housing program accomplishments and how those accomplishments contribute toward meeting the goals of the Housing Element. Pending legislation is requiring a change in the reporting format in order to streamline the process and highlight program schedules. Information will be reported on the calendar year rather than the fiscal year. Reporting for 2006 will be required April 1st of next near, 2007. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This is an information report only. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This is an information item only that does not have the potential to physically impact the environment. Therefore, it is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2006-312 2. Memorandum to the City Manager from the Community Development Director dated October 12, 2006 with the subject: Annual Housing Production Report - Fiscal Year 2006. FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONL Y. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED WITHDRAWN AMENDED / D D D D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER - SEE MINUTES D D D D DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Michele Masterson, (760) 602-4615, mmast@ci.carlsbad.ca.us 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-312 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 3 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY 2005-2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT 4 WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the General Plan requires that an annual 5 Housing Production Report be prepared and submitted to the local agency, the Governor's 6 Office of Planning and Research and the California Department of Housing and Community 7 Development; and o WHEREAS, the current report covers the period July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006; 10 and WHEREAS, Carlsbad continues to see significant results from its commitment to 12 the development of housing affordable to lower-income families; and 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 14 of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 15 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 16 2. That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad accepts the report and directs the Planning Director to submit the report to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research and the state Department of Housing and Community Development. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 7th day of November, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Packard, Sigafoose NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin AHEWIS/Mayor&6/-&* ATTEST: LXAH LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Cleft l ?J (SEAL) EXHIBIT 2 October 12,2006 TO: CITY MANAGER VIA: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~v> ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: Management Analyst - Planning Dept. ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 2006 This document constitutes the thirteenth annual report describing the City's progress in producing housing. It describes our progress during the previous fiscal year (July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, FY 2006) in meeting, through the construction of new homes, Carlsbad's estimated share of the region's forecasted growth for the four income groups identified in state law. Report Purpose - The Annual Housing Production Report is prepared pursuant to California Government Code Section 65400 (b)(1) which in part requires an agency to report annually to its legislative body on the progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. Reporting Period - As required by State Law, the City has been processing an update to the General Plan Housing Element. The report covers housing production and affordability in FY 2006. Along with covering FY 2006, this report also discusses production and affordability from 1999 through FY 2006. Report Format - The City's production and progress during FY 2006 and the housing cycle is reported with data contained in the following tables: • Table 1 defines the four income groups. • Tables 2 - 4 set out the qualifying income levels for the four income groups and the corresponding rents and sales prices considered affordable to the income groups during the reporting period (FY 2006). • Table 5 provides the counts of new housing built, by income group and housing type, in FY 2006. • Table 6 highlights the low-income housing built in FY 2006. • Tables 7 and 8 provide price information on the market rate homes built in FY 2006. • Table 9 compares our progress so far to the current housing cycle objectives. • Tables 10-12 focus on production and affordability overall during the current housing cycle. FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Pape2 Regional Share Needs - The determination of housing need for Carlsbad and all other jurisdictions in California derived from the Regional Housing Needs Statements prepared by regional councils of government (COG) before the beginning of each housing cycle. Based upon these assessments of need the local jurisdictions are charged to adopt housing objectives in the housing elements of their general plans. A regional assessment of need is an estimate of the total need for new housing construction throughout the region due to growth forecasted to occur during the six-year cycle. The overall housing need is then broken out by four income groups: very low, low, moderate, and other (or above moderate or upper-income) - all as defined by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, and the state Department of Housing and Community Development, or HCD. The regional needs are then allocated to the local jurisdictions on a "regional share" basis, according to models and formulas designed by the COG. Table 1 shows the regional share estimate of need prepared for Carlsbad for the current housing cycle. It is based, in part, upon the growth that the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), the region's COG, estimated for the City in its 2020 Regional Growth Forecast. This forecast was prepared in 1998. Table 1: Carlsbad's Regional Share Need Estimates For Housing Cycle 1999-2006 Income Group Definition* (%ofAMI**) New Construction Needs(in housing units) Very Low Low Moderate Other Totals 80% or under 51 - 80 % 81 - 120% Over 120% 1,770 1,417 1,436 1,591 6,214 * Definitions are from HUD, via the California Department of Housing and Community Development " AMI is the County Area Median Income. The 2006 San DiegoCounty Area Median Income for a family of four is $64,900. The combined very low and low-income (1ower"-lncome) estimate of need is 3,187 units. This equals 51% of the total estimated need for the housing cycle. Definition of Income Groups - Table 1 also defines each of the four income groups with reference to a percentage of the county area median income (AMI). Defined as the median income for a family of four in a specific geographic area, the AMI changes over FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12, 2006 Page 3 time and with location. HCD annually revises the AMI based on HUD data and cost of living issues such as the relationship of housing prices to income. For 2006, HCD established the AMI for San Diego County at $64,900. Additionally, HCD modifies the area median income to reflect the differences in costs of living throughout California, as the 2006 AMI information for different counties shows: > San Diego: > Orange: > Shasta: > Santa Clara: $64,900 $78,300 $50,800 $105,500 Some regions of California, including San Diego County, have high housing costs relative to incomes. In recognition of this factor, HCD adjusted the AMI and increased the income limits in 2006 for the very low and low-income groups in these regions. This potentially enables a larger group of people to qualify for housing assistance. However, these adjustments did not have an effect on housing built in Carlsbad; they did not cause the affordability of any housing produced in FY 2006, for example, to change from one income group to another. Furthermore, the housing in the City built specifically for low-income families in FY 2006 was already restricted to occupancy by that income group. The income maximums for each income group listed in Table 1 are adjusted for family size so that larger households have higher income limits. Table 2 shows the FY 2006 income limits for very low, low, moderate, and other income groups for 2,4,6,8, and 10 person households. The income limits in Table 2 correspond to the standard percentages stated in Table 1, but they also reflect the adjustments discussed in the prior paragraph that are necessary to recognize our region's high housing costs relative to incomes. Table 2: FY 2006 Qualifying Limits On Annual Income By Household Size Income Group Persons Per Household 4 6 10 Very Low Low Moderate Other $27,600 $34,500 $40,000 $45,550 $50,700 $44,150 $55,200 $64,050 $72,850 $81,100 $62,300 $77,900 $90,350 $102,800 $115,000 >$62,300 >$77,900 >$90,350 >$1 02,800 >$1 15,000 Source: "2006 Income Limits," state Department of Housing and Community Development, April 6, 2006; and Carlsbad Housing Authority table on "Lower and Moderate Income Rental Rate Calculations" (based on HUD income data effective March 8, 2006). i FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Page 4 Prices of Affordable Housing - Generally, the federal and state rule is that housing affordable to a given family if the family pays 30% of its monthly income for housing expenses that include the rent or mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance, utilities, and the like. A determination of whether a housing unit is affordable can be easily made for assisted public rental housing and other public housing programs because documentation is maintained on both the individual household's income and the actual cost of the unit in question (typically rental). A determination of whether market rate housing is affordable according to the 30% rule, on the other hand, presents some challenges. Builders of market rate rental and for- sale housing do not set prices based upon an individual buyer's ability to pay. Rather, the rents/prices are set to that the market will bear. Further, rents and prices do not generally vary with the number of people in the household. For example, a market rent for a two-bedroom apartment will remain constant no matter if it is being rented to a 1-, 2-, 3-, 4, or 5-person household. So the challenge is how to determine to what income group (as opposed to an individual household) a given market rate house is affordable, and to do so based upon the number of bedrooms it has (as opposed to persons). A convention developed in 1993 by member agencies of the San Diego Association of Governments assumes two persons per bedroom. Thus a two-bedroom unit is assumed to house four people. To determine affordable housing expenses for rentals, the practice is to set thresholds for each income group, using the 30% rule, with adjustments for the number of bedrooms. An additional adjustment is also made for utility allowance, as required by HUD. Table 3 provides the resulting maximum market rate rental expenses (which include rent and a $32-$63 utility allowance that increases with household size) for the very low, low, and moderated-income groups for FY 2006. Table 3: FY 2006 Qualifying Rent and Utility Expenses By Number of Bedrooms Income Group Number of bedrooms 1 2 3 Very Low Low Moderate Other $1,000 $1,139 $1,104 $1,380 $1,601 $1,821 $1,558 $1,948 $2,259 $2,570 >$1,558 >$1,948 >$2,259 >$2,570 Source: "2006 Income Limits," state Department of Housing and Community Development, April 6, 2006; and Carlsbad Housing Authority table on 'Lower and Moderate Income Rental Rate Calculations" (based on HUD income data effective March 8, 2006). 7 FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12, 2006 PageS For-sale market rate housing is even more complicated for purposes of determining affordability. Neither state nor federal regulations provide a formula to determine affordability. A multitude of factors are potentially involved. First, buyers do not pay the full price of a house in cash. Instead, they take out many types of mortgages, subject to many variables (fixed or variable interest rate, down payment, pay-back period, mortgage insurance, loan origination fees, etc.). In addition, other housing costs must be factored in, including property taxes, insurance, utilities, and homeowners' association dues. All of these factors are recognized "housing costs" and indirectly affect how much a family can pay each month under the 30%-of-income rule. Only the principal and down payment, however, relate directly to the sales prices of the house. All the others are related to financing and operating a home. Lacking guidance from state or federal law, SANDAG member agencies developed a simple formula in 1993 for use in determining the affordability of market rate for-sale houses. The formula, provided below, follows a rule-of-thumb used by many mortgage- lending institutions. As with the rental formulas discussed earlier, it was subsequently reviewed and accepted by the SANDAG Board and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Affordable sales price = 3.0 x maximum-allowed-annual income for each class, adjusted for bedroom count. Based on this formula Table 4 gives the qualifying purchase price for housing for the different income groups. The table illustrates that a three-bedroom house costing no more than $271,050 would be the maximum affordable to a moderate-income family. Table 4: FY 2006 Qualifying Purchase Price By Number of Bedrooms Income Group Number of Bedrooms 2 3 Very Low Low Moderate Other $82,800 $103,500 $120,000 $136,650 $152,100 $132,450 $165,600 $192,150 $218,550 $243,300 $186,900 $233,700 $271,050 $308,400 $345,000 >$186,900 >$233,700 >$271,050 >$308,400 >$345,000 * 3X multiplier was developed by an ad hoc committee at SANDAG with subsequent approval by the SANDAG Board in 1993. (There is no formula in state law.) The rule also assumes 2 persons per bedroom to provide a correspondence back to HUD affordability rules based upon persons per household (as opposed to bedrooms). Since HUD tables do not provide for 12 or more person households hnrrms with mnre than 5-hertrnnms are treated as if thev were fi-herirnnm hnmes FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Page 6 Determining Affordability - Based on the above information, two variables must be known about a housing unit to determine its affordability: a) the sales price or rent, and b) the number of bedrooms. Staff must collect this information for each individual housing unit. For housing created under one of the City's housing assistance programs this is relatively easy, as we get the data via the program. On the other hand, for new market rate rentals and for-sale homes, staff must obtain the sales price or rent information directly from the builders. Staff performs this task once a month via a voluntary survey of all newly constructed units. Most builders are cooperative and provide the information we need. A few are not. If the builder is not responsive, staff attempts additional contacts by mail and phone. If necessary, we also research Building Department records and County Assessor's data, the latter on the Internet, for any missing information on bedroom counts and sales prices. Due to the research and delays involved in documenting prices and rents and assembling data, this report trails the end of the reporting period by a few months. For this reporting period, staff obtained with the monthly survey and additional research sales prices and rents for all but a few homes. Housing Activity and Affordability in FY 2006 - Table 5 and the information below summarize and expand on housing completed in FY 2006. Definitions of terms used in the table and the remainder of the report are as follows: Market Rate Units - Units that received no financial assistance from the City and have no affordability restrictions. Assisted Units - Units that received financial assistance from the City and/or other subsidy sources and have affordability restrictions. Single-family detached - A single home on a single lot, detached from any other unit, except for an attached second dwelling unit. Condominium - A detached or attached home on commonly owned property. Apartment - A unit that can only be rented and not owned. Duplex- Two units on a single lot. Units cannot be individually sold. Second Dwelling Unit - A completely independent dwelling unit on the same lot as a primary residence. A second dwelling unit may be attached to or detached from the primary residence. FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Paae7 Table 5: Type and Affordablltty of Housing Units Constructed In FY 2006 Income Group Very Low Low Moderate Other Unknown*** Total Units BuW Market Rate S£ paS 255; Sf Du"-Detached* Attached minium ment 0 0000 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 1,195 0 150 3 0 6 0 18 2 0 Assisted Apartment 2 29 0 0 0 1,201 0 246 24 0 31 Second Dwelling Totals Unit 0 2 9 116 0 19 0 1,348 0 26 9 1,511 * One single family detached home was built with a second dwelling unit This second dwelling unit is counted in the second dwelling unit category. ***The 'unknown* income group counts units for which sales prices could not be obtained. Comments on Housing Production in FY2006 > Developers built 1,511 new homes in Carlsbad, compared to 1,706 units built in FY 2005 and 591 units built in FY 2004. The decrease in production is attributed to the buildout of several master planned/large developments (e.g., Villages of La Costa, Calavera Hills, Bressi Ranch, and Thompson/Tabata). Highlights on Carlsbad's newest lower-income housing. Table 6 highlights Carlsbad's newest lower-income housing. Tabto 6: Low -income Housing Built In FY 2008 Protect Mulberry The Summit Traditions Second Dwelling Units Location Bressi Ranch Matron Road El Camirto Real & Cassia Way Throughout Carlsbad Number of Units 78 29 2 9 Description Town Homes Apartments Apartments Small, independent living units located on property with a larger primary residence. Occupancy Restrictions Households earning up to 80% of the Area Median Income. Households earning up to 80% of the Area Median Income. Households earning up to 80% of the Area Median Income. If rented, second dwelling units must be affordable to low- income persons. City Assistance Yes- Homebuyer Assistance None None None FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12, 2006 Page 8 Medians and Extremes - Table 7 compares the median price of for-sale, market rate housing built in FY 2005 and FY 2006. Table 8 provides high and low sales prices during FY 2006. Table 7: Comparison* of Median Sales PrlcM FY 2005 vs. FY 2006 (Market Rate Units Only) Median Sales Prices . _, ._, Structure Type *T™™ FY2005 FY2008 Change Single-Family Detached $859,992 $907.680 $47,688 Condominium $619,900 $595,000 -24,900 All For-Sate Units $897,621 $901,000 $3,379 Percent Change 5.5% -4.0% 0.4% Table 8: Low and High Sales Prices FY 2006 (Market Rate Units Only) Structure Type Sales Price Low High Single-Family Detached $501,000 $8,200,000 Condominium $409,000 $1,300,000 Progress Toward Housing Cycle Objectives - Table 9 below provides the number of dwellings completed during the first seven years of the current housing cycle. The table also shows the cumulative progress achieved during those years toward meeting the new housing needs (from Table 1) estimated for the housing cycle over its original six- year term (1999-2006). Table 9: Cumulative Progress Toward Current Housing Cycle Objectives By Income Group Income Group Very Low Low Moderate Other Unknown* Totals FY FY FY 2000 2001 2002 23 138 17 159 158 106 42 94 75 1,679 1,700 1,255 11 7 7 1,914 2,097 1,460 Housing Units Bum FY FY 2003 2004 0 69 0 6S4 2 725 0 50 53 480 8 591 FY 2005 114 347 197 1,013 35 1,706 FY 2006 2 116 19 1,348 26 1,511 Total 294 1,005 480 8,129 96 10,004 Housing Units Needed Percentage Objective of Objective Achieved 1,770 1,417 1,436 1,591 n.a. 6,214 17% 71% 33% 511% n.a. 161.0% * Neither sale price nor rent information were available for these units. 8 FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Page 9 Affordability of Housing Produced from 1999-2006 - Table 10 shows the affordability of housing produced in the first seven years of the current housing cycle. Table 10: Affordabiilty of Housing Built July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2006 Income Group Very Low Low Moderate Other Total* * 26 "unknown" table. Vary Low 3% L"* W /10* Units Buitt* ^r4 .... 294 A:l^n 5% 1.005 L ,,*T <) 480 V ' ', ;J 8,129 nth^-^ 9,908 St units, lor which prices could not to determined, am not reflected in this Type of Housing Produced from 1999-2006 - Based on the type of housing built, the nearly 10,000 units constructed over the past seven years break down as follows: Table 11: Type of Housing Built July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2006 Type Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached Condominium Apartment Duplex Second dwelling Unit Totals Corwto 17% Units Built SFA 6.288 2,y£ 161 j^L 1,708 • 1,681 V 18 SFD167 Rp* 10,004 Apt L 17% 7SVJ Duplex J \^ o% ^•\SDUJj^ 2% FISCAL YEAR 2005 - 2006 ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT October 12,2006 Page 10 Type of Lower-Income Housing Produced from 1999-2006 - Developers have built nearly 1,300 homes for lower-income households in Carlsbad, most resulting from Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements and requiring city financial assistance. Table 12 breaks down the type and number of lower-income housing built during the current Housing cycle. Table 12: Type of Lower-Income Housing Built July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2006 Type Apartment Condominium Single-family Attached Second Dwelling Unit Totals Units Built ^, ™ 877 K"^^. 24 "* l^l^B 167 ^^fr™ 1299 Conclusions As this report demonstrates, Carlsbad has seen significant results from this commitment to the development of housing affordable to lower-income families. This commitment is evidenced in its policy framework, the allocation of its own resources, and its efforts to pursue creative partnerships with the private sector in all aspects of housing production. While the City has made positive strides in producing lower-income housing, the need for housing affordable to very low, low, and moderate-income families continues to exceed the community's collective ability to produce it. At the same time, total production of new homes affordable to upper-income groups remains dominant. Clearly, Carlsbad's private sector continues to produce primarily up-scale housing. A number of factors contribute to the trend: Demand for higher-end housing remains strong; tax incentives for producing more affordable housing are few, land costs are high; and, despite lower, relatively stable or declining interest rates in recent years, per- square-foot production costs remain substantial, so that profit margins on more affordable housing are low. Additionally, when the City considered including a moderate-income requirement as part of its inclusionary housing ordinances in the early 1990s, the requirement was set aside when the private sector assured the City that it would produce moderate-income housing without inclusionary requirements. Based upon this assurance, the City made a conscious decision to focus its own resources and efforts on lower-income housing. Michele Masterson 10 13