Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-03-06; City Council; 18923; Robertson Ranch PA 15 Glen RidgeCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 12 AB# Mm DEPT. 18,923 03/06/07 PA15-GLEN SDP 06-04 DEPT. HEAD CITY ATTY. CITY MGR. RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2007-049 APPROVING Site Development Plan SDP 06-04 for Robertson Ranch Planning Area 15 - Glen Ridge as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Applications SDP 06-04 Administrative Approvals Reviewed by and Final at Planning Commission To be reviewed - Final at Council X On February 7 2007, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended to the City Council approval (6-1 - Commissioner Dominguez - No) of a Site Development Plan for a 78-unit affordable housing apartment project and a leasing office located within Planning Area 15 of the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan in the northeast quadrant of the City in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. The Robertson Ranch Master Plan, which was approved by the City Council on November 14, 2006, designated this site for development of a 78-unit affordable housing project. Therefore, the project review focused on the project's compliance with applicable Master Plan development standards and special requirements rather than the suitability of the site for an affordable housing project. The project contains a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartment units ranging in size from 697 to 1,041 square feet. The units would be affordable to households with maximum incomes at 70% of the area median income. The project would satisfy the 70-unit Inclusionary Housing Requirement for the East Village and would provide an additional 8 units that could be used as affordable housing credits for other projects in the northeast quadrant, subject to approval by the City Council. The project complies with all development standards of the RD-M zone and Master Plan with the exception of parking. A request for a 31-space parking reduction (18% reduction) was included as part of the development proposal. In addition to the presentations given by staff and the developer (McMillin), the Commission heard testimony from the management company (Chelsea Management) and from the City's Housing and Redevelopment Director supporting the proposed 18% reduction in parking. Additionally, two members of the public spoke and raised issues of concern at the hearing. Staff recommended support of the parking reduction due to the unique needs of the affordable housing apartment project. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 (Dominguez and Montgomery - No) to add a condition to allow the Planning Director to re-evaluate the parking thirty-six (36) months after the final Certificate of Occupancy had been issued, to determine if there was a parking shortage. In the event that there was found to be a parking shortage, the developer indicated that the site could be modified to add approximately 13 parking spaces in areas that are currently designed as recreational areas. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions and a complete description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONL Y. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED WITHDRAWN AMENDED n nnn CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER - SEE MINUTES n nnn Page 2 - Robertson Ranch PA 15 - Glen Ridge - SDP 06-04 Because the project contains over 50 units, the City Council is the final decision-making body. The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of the proposed discretionary action. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan MP 02-03 (EIR 03-03), dated April 2006, BRG Consulting, Inc. EIR 03-03 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Robertson Ranch Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed planning area project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 03-03 on November 14, 2006. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for EIR 03-03 which are applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. Mitigation Measures included the requirement for a supplemental acoustical analysis and to identify all necessary noise control requirements on project plans necessary to meet the City of Carlsbad interior and exterior noise levels. The required study was provided and the plans have incorporated noise walls where appropriate and the project is conditioned to incorporate the necessary noise attenuation features into the building design to ensure that the interior noise levels do not exceed the City's 45 dBA interior noise level. The EIR 03-03 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 03-03 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 03-03 is available for review at the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and or/constructed by the developer. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2007-049 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6243 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated February 7, 2007 5. Draft Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated February 7, 2007. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Barbara Kennedy, (760) 602-4626, bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-049 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP 06-04) FOR THE ROBERTSON RANCH PA15 - GLEN RIDGE 78-UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING APARTMENT PROJECT ON 5 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CANNON ROAD, EAST OF FUTURE WIND TRAIL WAY, AND 6 SOUTH OF FUTURE GLEN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 14. 7 CASE NAME: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE CASE NO.: SDP 06-04 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the 10 Planning Commission did, on February 7, 2007, hold a duly noticed public hearing as 11 prescribed by law to consider a Site Development Plan (SDP 06-04); and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 6th day 13 of March } 2007, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Site Development Plan and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all persons interested in or opposed to SDP 06-04; and 16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of 17 the City of Carlsbad as follows: 18 19 1. That all recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of the Site Development Permit SDP 06-04 is approved by the City Council 21 and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6243, on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by 22 reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. The action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City 24 Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: 25 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 26 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be 27 sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by 28 Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper 3 1 seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision 2 becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount 3 sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the 5 record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the 6 preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, 7 CA. 92008." 8 /// 9 III 10 11 12 13 14 '" 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 6th day of March, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members, Kulchin, Hall, Packard NOES: Council Member Lewis ABSENT: Council Member Sigafoose CtAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL) EXHIBIT 2 WOT TO SCALE SITEMAP Robertson Ranch PA 15 - Glen Ridge SDP 06-04 EXHIBITS 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6243 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW 4 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING . PROJECT CONSISTING OF 78 APARTMENT UNITS AND ONE LEASING OFFICE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING 6 AREA 15 OF THE ROBERTSON RANCH MASTER PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF CANNON ROAD, EAST OF FUTURE 7 WIND TRAIL WAY, AND SOUTH OF FUTURE GLEN AVENUE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 14. 8 CASE NAME: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN 9 RIDGE CASE NO.: SDP 06-04 10 WHEREAS, Calavera Hills II, LLC, "Owner/Developer," has filed a verified j2 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as 13 Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tentative Tract Map CT 02-16, being more particularly described in Attachment "A" 14 ("the Property"); and 16 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development 17 Plan as shown on Exhibits "A" - "FT" dated February 7, 2007, on file in the Planning 18 Department, ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE - SDP 06-04 as provided by 19 Chapter 21.06/Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 20 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 7th day of February, 2007, 21 -,- hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 23 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 24 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 2*5 relating to the Site Development Plan. 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 27 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 28 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 7 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 2 Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE - SDP 06-04 based on the following findings and 3 subject to the following conditions: Findings; 1. The Planning Director has determined that: 6 a. the project is a(n) subsequent activity of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan (MP 02-03) for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the 9 activity for the purposes of CEQA); [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and 10 b. this project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. the Robertson Ranch Master Plan Program EIR 03-03 was certified in connection with the prior plan; and 13 d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior EIR; and14 1,- e. none of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and 16 f. all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Robertson Ranch Master Plan Program EIR 03-03, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.lo 2. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will 20 not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the proposed 78-unit affordable housing project is consistent with the Residential High Density (RH) General Plan Land Use designation and density allowed by the Robertson Ranch Master Plan and will 23 satisfy the affordable housing requirements of the East Village. The project is consistent with the requirements of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan and is 24 consistent with all City policies and development standards, with the exception of an 18% reduction in the required amount of parking for which findings can be made for approval. The City Council approved the Master Plan, and in doing so, made 26 the finding that the Master Plan implements the General Plan and is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. 27 3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in 28 that the project complies with all City policies and standards including the RD-M PC RESO NO. 6243 -2- Zone and the standards and design criteria established by the Robertson Ranch 2 Master Plan. 3 4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be 4 provided and maintained, in that the project is consistent with the design criteria of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan in that all setbacks have been provided, an additional 10' landscape buffer is provided along Glen Avenue for a total landscape buffer 5 width of 30' from face of curb, landscaping has been integrated throughout the site, and the required community recreation facilities are integrated into the plan. 7 5. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic 8 generated by the proposed use, in that the surrounding public streets will be improved to their full-width improvements, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; and that the analysis included in the Program EIR for Robertson Ranch demonstrates that 10 the proposed streets will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated by this project. 11 6. That the requested 18% reduction in the required number of parking spaces 12 (31 spaces) will not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare in that a strict adherence to the parking standards for an affordable housing project would result in an over-abundance of parking as demonstrated by the parking 14 analysis included in the staff report and the reduced parking requirement will allow for additional landscape and recreation features which will benefit the residents. 15 7. That the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 16 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as the developer has been conditioned to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement to provide and deed restrict 78 dwelling units as affordable to lower-income households. 1 O 8. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new 19 construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to 20 Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project. 22 9. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan, and Robertson Ranch 23 Master Plan based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated February 7, 2007 including, but not limited to the following: 24 ~_ a. Land Use - The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed density of 22.8 du/ac, is within the density range of 15-23 du/ac for the 26 Residential High Density (RH) General Plan Land Use designation as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and provides a 27 minimum density of 20 du/ac as required by the Master Plan, and does not exceed the number of units (78 units) permitted in PA 15 by the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. PC RESO NO. 6243 -3- b. Housing - The project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General 2 Plan, the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, and the Robertson Ranch Master Plan as the developer is required to construct affordable housing units 3 consistent with the draft Affordable Housing Agreement for the East Village of Robertson Ranch. The Glen Ridge affordable housing apartment project 4 will be constructed with 78 affordable units, with 70 of those units required ^ to satisfy the Inclusionary Housing requirements for the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, and 8 units allowed to be used as affordable 6 housing credits for other projects in the Northeast Quadrant, subject to the approval of the City Council. 7 c. Open Space and Conservation - The project will conform to all NPDES requirements and Utilize Best Management Practices for control of storm 9 water and to protect water quality. 10 d. Public Safety - The project includes two points of access and sprinklered buildings to reduce fire hazards to an acceptable level. 12 e. Circulation - The circulation system is designed to provide adequate access to the proposed apartments and all necessary public street improvements will 13 be constructed with the previously approved Carlsbad Tract CT 02-16. 14 f. Noise - The project is designed to comply with the 60 dBA CNEL exterior 1<- noise standard and is conditioned to comply with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. 16 10. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local 17 Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14 and all City public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection 19 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the 20 project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically,21 22 a- the project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. 23 b. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and has 24 been satisfied by the dedication of parkland within PA 12 of the Robertson _,. Ranch Master Plan. 26 c- the Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. 27 11. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 14. PC RESO NO. 6243 -4- 12. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 2 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that 3 improvements necessary to maintain compliance with the Growth Management performance standards are contained in the Zone 14 Local Facilities Management Plan and the project is conditioned to comply with the general and special ~ conditions of the zone plan. 6 13. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B) and the Robertson Ranch 7 Master Plan. 14. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 9 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 10 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 12 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a 13 building or grading permit, whichever occurs first. 14 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 17 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Site Development Plan. 20 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Site Plan documents, as necessary to make them internally 21 consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 23 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and 24 regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 27 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with 28 all requirements of law. PC RESO NO. 6243 -5- /, 5. Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the Robertson Ranch 2 Master Plan Program EIR 03-03 Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 3 6. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and c representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly 6 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Site Development Plan, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 9 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's 10 approval is not validated. 7. Developer shall submit to the Planning Director a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. 13 8. Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plancheck, a reduced legible version of all approving resolution(s) in a 24" x 36" blueline drawing format (including any applicable Coastal Commission approvals). 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the 16 Director from the School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 17 10. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 14 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to 19 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits 20 11. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 22 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 23 12. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this 24 project within 18 months from the date of project approval. 25 13. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Final Map for CT 02-16 shall be 26 approved and recorded. 27 14. Architectural features needed to achieve the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL shall be noted on the building plans. A statement certifying that the required 2° architectural features have been incorporated into the building plans, signed by a PC RESO NO. 6243 -6- ,_ qualified acoustical consultant, shall be located on the building plans. The architect 2 shall also include his registration stamp in addition to the required signature. 3 15. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any units, the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to provide and deed restrict 78 dwelling 4 units as affordable to lower-income households for 55 years, in accordance with the „- requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The draft Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Director no later 6 than 60 days prior to the request to final the map for CT 02-16. The recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. 7 16. Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent with the project's market rate units, unless both the final decision-making authority of the City and the 9 Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development. 10 17. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 1 * Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and ,2 the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving 13 condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 14 is. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 16 19. The Secondary Community Entry features located on the northeast and northwest 17 corner of Cannon Road and future Wind Trail Way, as shown on Exhibit "CC" shall be installed prior to occupancy of the first unit.18 jo 20. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable 21 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 14, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such ~j taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 23 21. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and 24 concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Community Development and Planning. 26 22. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit, the Developer shall provide all required 27 passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including landscaping and recreational facilities. 28 PC RESO NO. 6243 -7- , 23. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice 2 of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning 3 Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Site Development Plan by Resolution No. 6243 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file j- containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The 6 Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer 7 or successor in interest. Q 24. Prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall 9 prepare and record a Notice that this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Corridor, in a form meeting the approval of the 10 Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department). 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of 13 aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning 14 Department). 26. Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices 16 associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning 17 Department). 27. Developer shall construct trash receptacle and recycling areas enclosed by a six-foot-high jo masonry wall with gates pursuant to City Engineering Standards and Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.105. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning 20 Director. Enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 21 28. The management company shall ensure that there is no outdoor storage of household goods, sports equipment, etc. on balconies and patios except for 23 barbeques, outdoor tables and chairs, or similar types of furniture commonly found on patios. 24 29. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of an exterior lighting plan including parking areas. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. 27 30. Developer shall construct, install, and stripe not less than 142 parking spaces, as shown on Exhibit "F". Signs shall be posted in the tuck-under parking spaces indicating that they are reserved for residents only. PC RESO NO. 6243 -8- 31. Bicycle storage lockers shall be provided for the use of the residents as shown on the 2 architectural plans. 3 32. The Planning Director shall review the adequacy of parking up to thirty-six (36) months after the final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the Glen Ridge affordable housing project and, if necessary, recommend a modification to the Site <- Development Plan. The Planning Commission shall retain jurisdiction to review any recommended modifications of the Site Development Plan to enhance on-site 6 parking. 7 Engineering o 33. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site 9 within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 10 34. Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the 11 Site Plan, Preliminary Grading Plans, Preliminary Utility Plan, and Preliminary Horizontal Control Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. The reproducible shall be submitted to the City engineer, reviewed and, if 13 acceptable, signed by the City's project engineer and project planner prior to submittal of the building plans, final map, improvement or grading plans, whichever occurs first. 14 35. Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other recorded document, for maintaining the shared private facilities within the project including but not limited to: private driveways, curbs, gutter, sidewalks and private storm drain all located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable 17 manner among the property owner of this project and Planning Area 21. 36. Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other recorded document that provides reciprocal pedestrian and vehicular access between this project and Planning Area 21. 20 Fees/Agreements 21 37. Developer shall cause property owner to apply for and obtain reapportionment of the assessments imposed on the subject project in accordance with law governing the 23 associated College Blvd and Cannon Road-East Assessment District (AD 2003-01), or the assessments must be paid in full. Developer shall pay all associated costs of said 24 reapportionment. The application shall be submitted to the City Engineer with the application for the grading plan. J-ttJ 38. Developer shall cause the Property Owner to execute an Encroachment Permit for private enhanced paving located within public utility easements shown on the Site Plan all to the 27 satisfaction of the City Engineer. 28 PC RESO NO. 6243 -9-16 1 Grading 2 39. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the 3 Site Plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. Dedications/Improvements 6 40. Developer agrees that prior to building permit issuance, the Master Tentative Map 7 improvements that serve this property as described in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6110 (Cannon Road, 84" storm drain, Street A, Street B, potable water, sanitary sewer, recycled water, etc.) shall be constructed or substantially completed to the 9 satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10 41. Developer shall cause Property Owner to dedicate to the City all public streets and other easements shown on the Site Plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate by separate recorded document. All land so offered shall be offered free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost. Streets that already public are not required to be rededicated. 13 42. Developer shall cause Property Owner to dedicate public pedestrian access easements 14 where meandering sidewalks extend outside of the proposed or existing right-of-way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. JL,_/ 43. Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or install drainage structures, as may be required by the City Engineer, prior to or concurrent 17 with any grading or building permit. 44. Developer shall provide the design of all private driveways and private drainage systems to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The structural section of all private drives shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private drives and 20 private drainage systems shall be inspected by the City. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plancheck and inspection fees. 21 45. Developer shall design the structural section for the access aisles using a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to truck access through the parking area 23 subject to approval by the City Engineer. Prior to placement, the structural pavement design of the drive aisles shall be verified by submitting the required R-value soil test 24 information subject to approval by the City Engineer. 46. Developer shall execute and record a City standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements shown on the Site Plan and the following improvements including, but not limited to 27 paving, base, signing & striping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, median improvements, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights, retaining walls and reclaimed water all constructed to City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements are: PC RESO NO. 6243 -10- // 1 2 a. Potable Waterline as shown on the Site Plan. b. Sanitary Sewer as shown on the Site Plan. 3 Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the 4 development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. 47. Developer shall complete all East Village improvements more fully described in the 6 Robertson Ranch EIR and Master Plan. 7 48, Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Developer shall provide improvements constructed pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best g Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to 10 and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: ,~ a. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and 13 hazardous waste products. b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, 14 antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, 16 herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective 17 containers. c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants ° when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. 19 49. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, 20 Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions 21 established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of 23 the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall: 24 a. include all content as established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements; b. include the receipt of "Notice of Intent" issued by the California Regional Water 2g Quality Control Board; c. recommend source control and treatment control Best Management Practices 27 (BMPs) that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging 28 to City right-of-way or natural drainage course; and PC RESO NO. 6243 -11-11 d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special 2 considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants. 3 50. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)." The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the San Diego Region of 6 the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from 7 storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction stage of the project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall: o 9 a. identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern; b. identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies 10 that could be impacted by this project; c. recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way; d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up. Special 13 considerations and effort shall be applied to resident education on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants; 14 e. ensure long-term maintenance of all post construct BMPs in perpetuity; and f. Provide hydraulic/hydrologic calculations to verify that numeric sizing criteria is met for filtration/treatment of the site. 16 g. identify how post-development runoff rates and velocities from the site will not exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent 17 practicable. 18 Water 19 51. Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with the Fire 20 Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be 21 considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the District Engineer. £*** 52. The Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way or within minimum 20-feet wide easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad. 24 At the discretion of the District Engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes. 25 53. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges " for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water 27 Authority capacity charge(s) prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2g 54. The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source. Said plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the District Engineer. PC RESO NO. 6243 -12- 55. The Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at 2 locations approved by the District Engineer. The locations of said service shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 3 56. The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at a location approved by the 4 District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. +J , 57. The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water facilities substantially as shown on the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the District 7 Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be shown on public improvement plans. 8 Fire; 9 58. If the private road improvements for the secondary access through PA 21 have not been installed prior to occupancy of the first unit within the Glen Ridge Affordable *, Housing Project, then the developer shall install a temporary all-weather access road through PA 21 to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. 12 Code Reminders; 13 59. Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section 14 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 15 60. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the 16 Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 17 61. The project shall comply with the latest nonresidential disabled access requirements pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code. 19 62. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 20 Code Section 18.04.320. 21 63. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance 22 with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. 23 64. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 26 65. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on 27 the Tentative Map are for planning purposes only. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. PC RESO NO. 6243 -13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2:8 NOTICE Please-take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service -fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY 4o any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations 'has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of February 2007, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Cardosa, Douglas Montgomery, Segall and Whitton Commissioner Domineuez ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JULIE BA3 CARLSBA ATTEST: hairperson .NNING COMMISSION DON NEU Assistant Planning Director PC RESO NO. 6243 -14- Attachment "A" ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREA 15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION PARCEL 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, FILED IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2001-0865064 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19804, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 3, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0659805 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDELINE OF CANNON ROAD, THENCE LEAVING SAID POINT OF BEGINNING NORTH 08°26'47" WEST, 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81°33'13" WEST, 313.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1400 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 80.62 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°17'58" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID 1400 FOOT RADIUS CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 351.32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°22'40"; THENCE NORTH 25°49'42" WEST, 109.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 550 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13.85 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°26'34"; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE SOUTH 65°36'52" WEST, 44.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04°56'41" WEST, 354.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°43'25" EAST, 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06°16'35" EAST, 64.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 60.71 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°35'39"; THENCE NORTH 81°39'08" EAST, 337.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08°20'52" EAST, 245.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08°26'47" EAST, 54.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 °44'01 EAST, 179.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. F \CURRENT PROJECT LIST\Meadowlark\pa 15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION doc The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: February 7, 2007 Application complete date: December 20, 2006 Project Planner: Barbara Kennedy Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle SUBJECT: SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan. Final Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a request for approval of a Site Development Plan to allow for the construction of an affordable housing project consisting of 78 apartment units and one leasing office within Planning Area 15 of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan located north of Cannon Road, east of future Wind Trail Way, and south of future Glen Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6243 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of SDP 06-04 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Development Plan that would create 78 affordable apartments and one leasing office within Planning Area 15 located within the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. The units in this project will be utilized to comply with the inclusionary housing obligations for the East Village of the Master Plan. The City Council has the final authority to approve projects proposing over 50 dwelling units. Therefore, the Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation of approval for the project. The project complies with City standards, with the exception of a request to reduce the parking requirements, and all necessary findings can be made for the approvals being requested. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Robertson Ranch Master Plan (MP 02-03) was approved by the City Council on November 14, 2006. The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the Robertson Ranch site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. Grading for the East Village of the Master Plan area was approved by Tentative Map CT 02-16 and the accompanying Hillside Development Permit (HDP 02-07) and Floodplain Special Use Permit (SUP 02-05). For planning purposes, the Robertson Ranch Master Plan is divided into two Villages with a total of 23 planning areas. The Master Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each planning area and provides general development and design standards, requirements, and the method by which the Robertson Ranch Master Plan will be implemented. o 33, SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 2 The 4.74 acre project site is located in the Planned Community (P-C) Zone within the boundaries of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. The site, which is identified as Planning Area (PA) 15 in the East Village, is designated for development of up to 78 affordable housing units which will be utilized to comply with the inclusionary housing requirements for the East Village of the Master Plan. The site is located on the north side of Cannon Road, east of future Wind Trail Road and south of future Glen Avenue. Future development surrounding the site will consist of small lot single-family residential development in PA 16 to the north, detached condominium development in PA 21 to the east, a future City park site to the west, an elementary school to the northwest, and an area currently designated as a Unplanned Area within PA 22 on the south side of Cannon Road. The site will be rough graded in association with the previously approved Master Subdivision Map for the East Village. Access to the site is via a primary entrance on Glen Avenue and a secondary access point through PA 21 on the east. The two access points are connected by a primary drive aisle on the eastern side of the site. The majority of the surface parking and tuck-under parking areas are located on the western two-thirds of the site and a small (23 space) parking area is located near the northeast corner of the site. The site plan includes three, three-story apartment buildings and a one-story leasing office. In order to encourage social interaction the apartment buildings are arranged so that the first floor residences face onto the perimeter streets (Glen Avenue and Wind Trail Way), landscaped walkways, or the centralized recreation area. A 30-foot wide landscaped pedestrian link with a meandering sidewalk is provided along Glen Avenue to connect the project with the East Village Community Recreation site in PA 19. Additional walkways throughout the landscaped open space areas provide pedestrian connections between buildings and to the 3,860 square foot recreation areas between buildings 2 and 3, and to the 2,260 square foot fenced tot lot and grassy play area on the east side of the site. Each of the buildings contains a mix of one, two, and three bedroom units ranging in sizes, respectively, of 697 square feet, 959 square feet, and 1,041 square feet as shown below: Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Total Units 1-bedroom units 4 6 7 17 2-bedroom units 6 13 10 29 3-bedroom units 10 11 11 32 Total Units 20 30 28 78 The buildings each contain tuck-under parking on about half of the first level. Residences are located within the remaining area of the first floor and on the second and third levels. The buildings are designed such that a two-story element faces each of the four corners of the site to help reduce the bulk and scale of the building. Additionally, roof accent elements at the first and second stories, and enclosed patio areas at the first floor units, help to provide interest and articulation to the building design and create a more pedestrian-scale environment. The buildings are designed to reflect the Mission Style of architecture in accordance with the Architectural Design Guidelines of the Master Plan. The buildings incorporate a number of design features representative of this style including stucco exteriors, hipped red-tile roofs, decorative tile vents, exposed rafter tails, arches, wood shutters, decorative raised wood window SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 3 sills, and decorative railings. All sides of the building are well designed with a great deal of movement and articulation on the building planes. Each building includes laundry facilities and the project is conditioned to provide bicycle storage lockers for use of the residents. Additionally, each unit has a private deck or patio. The 1,407 square foot leasing office is located in the southeastern corner of the site. In addition to the offices, it includes 700 square feet of interior recreation area in the form of a community room and computer room for the residents. The building is designed as a one-story structure with design features that complement the apartment units. Abundant landscaping is provided throughout the site and enhanced paving is utilized as an accent element at the main entrance and at other key locations. A 6-foot high Community Theme Wall located along Cannon Road and Wind Trail Way functions as a required noise barrier for the project. An additional Community Theme Wall is located along a portion of the eastern boundary to screen parking areas from the future development within PA 21. Stacked stone will be utilized on the pilasters and is also integrated into the patio walls, entry monuments, and trellis features as a theme element for the East Village. Landscaping within the enhanced landscape buffers on Cannon Road and Wind Trail Way were approved with the Master Tentative Map. However, the design details for the Community Entry Feature located at the northeast corner of Wind Trail Way and Cannon Road were deferred, with review to occur concurrently with the discretionary approvals for PA 15. The Community Entry Features (shown on Exhibit DD) are designed with a series of low terraced walls faced with a stacked stone veneer, consistent with the theme elements shown in the Master Plan. The development proposal requires approval of an 18% parking reduction from 174 spaces (required) to 142 spaces (proposed). Of the total 142 spaces, 30 are provided as tuck-under parking and the remaining 112 spaces are conveniently located throughout the site. A request for a reduction in parking (or other development standards) can be approved in association with review of a Site Development Plan for any affordable housing project. A detailed analysis and justification for the requested parking reduction is provided in Section C of the Staff Report. Rough grading for the site was reviewed in conjunction with the previously approved East Village Master Tentative Map (CT 02-16), Hillside Development Permit, and Floodplain Special Use Permit. The project will require approximately 2,700 cubic yards of cut and fill for final grading of the site. The required mitigation for loss of habitat on this site was previously considered with the review of the Master Plan and will be required prior to approval of grading permits for the East Village Master Tentative Map. The site is identified as Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract CT 02-16. CT 02-16 has not yet received approval of the Final Map and this project is conditioned such that building permits may not be issued until a legal lot is created through recordation of the Final Map for CT 02-16. In addition, as part of the requirements and/or mitigation measures for CT 02-16, the developer will be required to provide all public facilities necessary to serve the project in accordance with the Zone 14 Local Facilities Management Plan. This includes, but is not limited to, installation of the surrounding roadways, infrastructure, and signalized intersections at the intersection of Cannon Road/future Wind Trail Way and Cannon Road/future Hilltop Street. SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 4 IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following land use plans, policies, programs and zoning regulations: A. General Plan (Residential High Density (RH) 15-23 du/ac); B. Robertson Ranch Master Plan (MP 02-03) and underlying RD-M Zone (Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Chapter 21.24); C. Uses Generally (CMC Chapter 21.53) and Parking (CMC Chapter 21.44); D. Inclusionary Housing (CMC Chapters 21.85 and 21.53); and E. Growth Management Ordinance. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A.General Plan The Master Plan designates the subject property for high-density development with a minimum density of 20 du/ac. The proposed density of 22.8 du/ac is consistent with the Master Plan and with the site's General Plan Land Use designation of Residential High Density (RH) which allows a density of 15 -23 du/ac. The development proposal is also consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the proposed affordable housing apartment complex abutting a major circulation arterial roadway are the Land Use, Housing, Circulation, and Noise Elements of the General Plan. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Land Use Develop areas designated for high density residential uses with multi-family uses at 15-23du./ac. The Master Plan allows 78 units of multi- family housing for the site resulting in a density of 22.8 du/ac Yes Housing A minimum of 15% of all units approved in master plan communities shall be affordable to lower income households. The units in this neighborhood will be utilized to comply with the Inclusionary (affordable) Housing requirement for the East Village of Robertson Ranch. Yes SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 5 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT Open Space & Conservation Public Safety Circulation Noise USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Utilize Best Management Practices for control of storm water and to protect water quality. Ensure adequate fire and emergency services Require new development to construct all roadways necessary for development prior to or concurrent with need. 60 dBA CNEL is the exterior noise level and 45 dBA CNEL is the interior noise level to which all residential units should be mitigated. PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS Project will conform to all NPDES requirements. Project includes two points of access and sprinklered buildings. All necessary street improvements will be constructed with CT 02-16 (previously approved). The project is designed to comply with the 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard and is conditioned to comply with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes B. Robertson Ranch Master Plan (and underlying RD-M zone) The Master Plan requires development in PA 15 to comply with the standards of the RD-M zone unless otherwise specified. Development is also required to comply with standards and design guidelines outlined in the Master Plan. As discussed below, the proposed project is consistent with all Master Plan and zoning requirements, with the exception of parking. The request for a parking reduction is discussed and analyzed in Section C of the staff report. The Master Plan designates PA 15 as the affordable housing site for the East Village due to its proximity to a major arterial roadway (Cannon Road), public transit, the City park site (PA 12), and a potential elementary school site (PA 13 and 14). The Master Plan allows up to 78 dwelling units on this site which results in a net density of 22.8 du/ac. As illustrated in Table 2, the project is also consistent with all development standards and design guidelines required by both the RD-M zone and the specified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Development Standards for PA 15. SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 6 TABLE 2: COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Standard Requirement Proposed Density (MP)Maximum of 78 units Density of no less than 20 du/ac (23 du/ac max.) 78 units 22.8 du/ac Product Type (MP) Multi-family apartments or condominiums Multi-family apartments Lot Coverage (RD-M) 60%23.4% Setbacks (MP): Cannon Road: 40' structure setback from Cannon Rd. r.o.w. 75% of required setback to be landscaped (30') Wind Trail Way and Glen Avenue 10' additional landscape buffer required 10' front building setback provided that carports or garage openings do not face onto the front yard and that the front yard is landscaped 5' sideyard setback 10' Building Separation Units are set back 81' or greater from the Cannon Road r.o.w. 30' min. landscape provided from Cannon Road r.o.w. (40' from curb) 10' additional landscape buffer provided (30' L/S from curb) Setbacks (RD-M): Wind Trail Way: 20' min. landscape Glen Avenue: 20' min. landscape 5' or greater provided Minimum 13.31' separation Building Height (MP) Bldg Height: 40' and 3 stories if a min. roof pitch of 3:12 is provided Leasing Office/Rec: 18'-2" Building 1,2 and 3: 3-story, to roof line: 39'-3" Buildings 1 and 3: To 2-story roofline: 24'-6" Recreation Space (MP) Minimum 100 sf of Community Recreation Facilities per unit to be provided on-site (7,800 sf required) 75% allocated for active uses 7,960 sf provided * 7,260 sf of landscape; * 700 sf interior recreation within Leasing Office 5,850 sf active (83.5% ofreq'd) Parking (CMC) See analysis for parking reduction in Section C of the staff report Resident parking 1.5 spaces/1 bdrm unit 26 spaces 2 spaces/2 or more bdrm 122 spaces Guest parking 0.5 spaces/unit for units 1-10 5 spaces 0.25 spaces/unit for units 11-78 17 spaces Leasing office (700 sf) 1/250 sf 3 spaces Total required: 173 spaces 30 covered spaces (4 HC and 26 standard) 113 surface parking spaces (2 HC. 6 compact and 104 std.) 142 total spaces provided Affordable Housing (MP) 70 affordable units are required for development of 391 market rate units in the East Village. 8 additional affordable units are for future projects in the Northeast Quadrant. 100% low income Min. 10% 3-bedrooom 78 affordable units provided 100% low income 21.8 % 1-bdrm units (17 units) 37.2 % 2-bdrm units (29 units) 41.0 % 3-bdrm units (32 units) Architectural Design (MP) Five different styles allowed per the Master Plan Mission Style Architecture SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 7 TABLE 2: COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONTINUED Standard Requirement Proposed Special Requirements: Acoustical Study requires 5' minimum noise wall on Cannon Road and portion of Wind Trail Way. Units should be designed to front on "A" Street and the east-west collector road. Carports or garages shall not be directly accessed from "A" Street or the east-west collector road. Screen parking areas with shrubs, berms and/or low walls Screen development from Circulation Element roadways. Use enhanced elevations of buildings facing Circulation Element roadways. Incorporate single-story elements into the building design where feasible. Provide bicycle storage lockers for residential units Pedestrian connections shall be included to facilitate access to bus stops, adjoining neighborhoods trails and the park site. Special Landscape Treatment • 6' high noise wall provided along Cannon Road and portion of Wind Trail Way • Interior noise mitigation required for Building 3 Units have been designed to front on Glen Avenue and Wind Trail Way where possible. Designed to comply with criteria. Primary parking areas are screened from public views. A 6' high split-face block wall and 40' wide landscape buffer (from r.o.w.) will screen development from Cannon Road. Building elevations facing Cannon Road are enhanced. A substantial setback is provided between Cannon Road and the closest building (over 81'). Single-story roof elements have been incorporated into elevations facing public streets and community recreation areas. Conditioned to provide bicycle storage lockers use of residents. A pedestrian connection located at the southwest corner of the site will provide access to the future bus stop on Cannon Road. The project is connected to PA 21 on the east and the enhanced pedestrian access way on Glen Avenue will provide access to the Community Recreation site and trails in PA 19. Streetscape landscaping, community theme walls and entry monuments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan. SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 PageS TABLE 2: COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONTINUED Standard Requirement Proposed City Council Policy 66 Comply with City Council Policy 66, Principles for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods: • Building Facades, Front Entries, Porches • Parkways • Pedestrian Walkways • Centralized Community Recreation Areas The project has been designed to create visual interest along the street- facing elevations; parkways have been designed with street tree plantings; pedestrian walkways are provided throughout the development and enhanced pedestrian pathways are provided along the perimeter of the site; and a variety of community recreation areas will be provided with both active and passive uses. C. Uses Generally (CMC Chapter 21.53) and Parking (CMC Chapter 21.44); The applicant is requesting a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for the project from 173 spaces (required) to 142 spaces (provided). This represents an 18% reduction (31 spaces) of the required parking. CMC Section 21.53.120 (Uses Generally) requires approval of a Site Development Plan (SDP) for affordable housing projects. Through the SDP process, the Planning Commission and City Council may allow less restrictive development standards than specified, provided that the project is in conformity with the General Plan and adopted policies and goals of the City, and that it would have no detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare. In order to support the request, Chelsea Investment Corporation, developer of eleven low-income housing developments in San Diego County, has submitted a parking analysis (Attachment 6) of their low-income housing developments of similar size showing that there is generally more parking provided than is used by the tenants and guests. The analysis shows that the percentage, of parking spaces used in each project varies from a low of 51.69 % to a high of 80.17%. Since the majority of the projects are located outside of Carlsbad, staff evaluated the parking analysis and made adjustments for the number of spaces that would be required under City of Carlsbad Standards as shown in the table below: TABLE 3: PARKING ANALYSIS Project Mariposa (Carlsbad) Rancho Del Norte Windwood Village #of Units 106 119 92 Unit Mix Ibdrm: 10 2bdrm: 64 3bdrm: 32 Ibdrm: 24 2bdrm: 47 3bdrm: 48 Ibdrm: 12 2bdrm: 48 3bdrm:32 Total Bedrooms 234 262 204 Total parking spaces provided (# of spaces required by Carlsbad standards) 236 (236) 187 (259) 154 (204) Total Cars Parked 122 147 108 % of spaces used (% of spaces used based on Carlsbad requirements) 51.69% (51.69%) 78.61% (56.76%) 70.13% (52.94%) SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 9 TABLE 3: PARKING ANALYSIS CONTINUED Project Torrey Highlands Rancho Buena Vista Glen Ridge #of Units 76 150 78 Unit Mix 2bdrm: 40 3bdrm: 36 Ibdrm: 60 2bdrm: 79 3bdrm: 1 1 Ibdrm: 17 2bdrm: 29 3bdrm: 32 Total Bedrooms 188 401 171 Total parking spaces provided (# of spaces required by Carlsbad standards) 121 (174) 345 (340) 143 (173) Total Cars Parked 97 239 N/A % of spaces used (% of spaces used based on Carlsbad requirements) 80.17% (55.75%) 69.28% (70.29%) (57.5% average) Using an average of 57.5% of parking used (based on City of Carlsbad standards for the five projects analyzed), it can be projected that approximately 100 parking spaces would be used by residents and guests at Glen Ridge. The applicant is proposing to construct 142 spaces which would result in adequate parking for the development based on the projections. Additionally, the City's Housing and Redevelopment Director has concurred that they have found most affordable projects to be over-parked. The site design could be redesigned to provide parking adjacent to the private driveway, although it would reduce the amount of recreational area provided. Staff believes that the site plan as proposed is superior to a revised site plan with more parking, particularly in light of the fact that the project will provide about 82% of the required parking which is 42 spaces in excess of the number of spaces projected to be used by guests and residents. Therefore, staff recommends support of the requested parking reduction of 31 spaces because strict adherence to the parking standards would result in an over-abundance of parking; the reduced parking requirement will allow for additional landscaping and recreational features which will benefit the residents; and the parking reduction will not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare. D. Ihclusionary Housing (Chapters 21.85 and 21.53 of the Zoning Ordinance) The Robertson Ranch Master Plan is required to provide affordable housing in accordance with the requirements of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Section 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The total number of affordable units required is based on the maximum number of units allowed by the Tentative Maps approved within the Master Plan. The Master Plan allows for 1,122 dwelling units within the various neighborhoods (East: 469 units; West: 653 units), and up to 1,154 dwelling units (East: 486 units; West: 668 units) if alternative land uses are implemented for the elementary school site. Based on this figure, 168 units (or 173 units with alternative land use) or 15% of the total units proposed must be affordable to low income households. The Master Plan specifies that the East and West Villages shall satisfy their affordable housing requirements individually. This project proposes 78 affordable units which would allow for the construction of the 391 market-rate units proposed in the East Village. The 78 units will be 100% affordable to low- income households with incomes not exceeding 80% of the median income for San Diego County, adjusted for family size. The East Village proposes a total of 469 dwelling units 3o SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 10 resulting in the requirement of 70 affordable units (15%). Because 78 units are proposed, the Draft Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) would allow for the 8 excess units to be used for housing credits for another project, at the discretion of the City Council. The AHA must be finalized and approved prior to approval of any final map for the East Village. The agreement will allow the developer to initially obtain building permits for 133 market-rate units and 78 affordable units. Once foundations for a minimum of 70 affordable units are inspected and approved, building permits may be issued for an additional 133 market-rate units. After the final Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the 70 required affordable units, the remaining 125 market-rate building permits may be issued. The required findings for compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance include consistency with General Plan goals and policies, adequacy of the site and street system, and a determination that the affordable units are compatible with surrounding uses, and will not adversely impact the site or surrounding areas including traffic circulation. Additionally, as required by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, a minimum of 10% of the units are required to be constructed as 3-bedroom units. As proposed, 41% of the units would contain 3-bedrooms. The project site is located at the northeast corner of the future intersection of Cannon Road and Wind Trail Way. The location is close to major routes to jobs throughout northern San Diego County and a future bus stop is planned near the intersection of Cannon Road and Wind Trail Way. The site is in close proximity to the future commercial center in PA 11 of the West Village and is located just east of the future City park site in PA 12 and a potential elementary school site in PA's 13 and 14. The site was analyzed and selected as an affordable housing site in the Robertson Ranch Master Plan due to its ideal location. The project is compatible with the proposed future land uses and the site is suitable for the proposed use. E. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 14 in the northeast quadrant of the City and is subject to the conditions of the Zone 14 LFMP. The 78 units planned for this neighborhood are consistent with the number of units permitted by the Master Plan and the project does not exceed the density allowed by the site's Residential High Density (RH 15-23 du/ac) General Plan Land Use designation. The Master Plan stipulated that the project density shall be at a minimum of 20 du/ac in order to help meet the City's Regional Fair Share of Affordable Housing. The impacts on public facilities created by this project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 4 as follows: 31 SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 11 TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water IMPACTS 271.18 square feet 144.63 square feet 80EDU 0.54 acres Drainage Basin B 474 ADT Station No. 3 and 5 Provided throughout Master Plan CUSD E = 1 8.24 / Middle = 9. 1 3/HS = 1 1 .25 80EDU 0.02 MOD COMPLIANCE? Yes Yes Yes Yes Provided in PA 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes - Yes Yes Yes *The project is 0 units below the Master Plan dwelling unit allowance. V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan (EIR 03-03). dated April 2006, BRG Consulting, Inc. EIR 03-03 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Robertson Ranch Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed affordable housing project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 03-03 on November 14, 2006. At that time, CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. The EIR 03-03 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 03-03 applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design, or are required as conditions of approval for the project or for the previously, approved Master Tentative Map for the East Village (CT 02-16). Mitigation required for the grading plan and final map for CT 02-16 to permit rough grading of the project area have been applied. Mitigation measures for the affordable housing project required preparation of a supplemental acoustical analysis. The acoustical analysis identifies that a 5-foot high noise barrier is required along Cannon Road, as was anticipated in the Program EIR, and identifies that interior noise mitigation will be required for units in Building 3 within the line of sight of Cannon Road. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 03-03 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 03-03 is available for review at the Planning Department. SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE February 7, 2007 Page 12 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6243 (SDP) 2. Location Map 3. Disclosure Form 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Local Facilities Impact Form 6. Parking Analysis, Chelsea Investments Corporation, dated May 22, 2006 7. Reduced Exhibits 8. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "FF" dated February 7, 2007 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant' s agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.). _ m . Calavera Hills II, LLCPerson Corp/Part Title Title Address 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) person_ Corp/Part Calavera Hills II, LLC Title Title Address Address__2750 ^Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 6O2-46OO • FAX (760) 6O2-8559 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SDP 06-04 CASE NAME: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE APPLICANT: CALAVERA HILLS II. LLC REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Site Development Plan (SDP) to allow for the construction of an affordable housing project consisting of 78 units and one leasing office within Planning Area 15 of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan located north of Cannon Road, east of future Wind Trail Way, and south of future Glen Avenue in Local facilities Management Zone 14. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tentative Tract Map CT 02-16. being more particularly described in Attachment "A" APN: Portion of 168-050-47 Acres: 4.74 acres Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 78 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: High Density Residential (RH) Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 20-23 du/ac Density Proposed: 22.8 du/ac Existing Zone: P-C (underlying zone: RD-M Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site North South East West P-C P-C P-C P-C P-C RH RM UA RMH OS and E vacant vacant vacant vacant vacant LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No • Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: | | Yes [X] No Coastal Development Permit: [~| Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Amendment: | [ Yes |/<] No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A Revised 01/06 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer-Capacity): 80 EDU ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption, Negative Declaration, issued_ Certified Environmental Impact Report, EIR 03-03, dated November 14, 2006 Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 06-04 - Robertson Ranch PA 15- Glen Ridge LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 14 GENERAL PLAN: RH ZONING: P-C (underlying zone: RD-M) DEVELOPER'S NAME: Calavera Hills IL LLC ADDRESS: 2750 Womble Road San Diego. CA 92106 PHONE NO.: 619-794-1286 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: Portion of 168-050-47 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 4.74 acres. 78 DUs ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: A. B. C. D. E. City Administrative Facilities: Library: Demand in Square Footage = 271.18sq. ft. Demand in Square Footage = 144.63 sq. ft. 80EDU 0.54 acres 23.5 CFS Basin B F. G. H. I. J. Wastevvater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 3 and 5 Open Space: 474 ADT Acreage Provided - K. L. Schools: E = 18.24 / Middle - 9.13/HS = 11.25 Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = Provided throughout Master Plan CUSP 80 EDU 14A 0.02 MOD The project is 0 units below the Master Plan Dwelling unit allowance. May-22-2005 10:36am From-CHELSEA INVESTMENT CORPAT I ON 7604566001 C l | I""! .MVESTMENT CORPDRAT.DN T-824 P. 002/003 F-497 Attachment 6 Finance Development Management 725 South Coast Highway 101 Enanitas,CA 92024 May 22, 2006 Barbara Kennedy Associate Planner City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Dear Ms. Kennedy: Chelsea Investment Corporation and its affiliate, Chelsea Management, Inc. own and manage 966 low-income housing units in eleven developments in the Cities ofCarlsbad, San Diego and Chula Vista. All but two of our San Diego County projects have been built during the last five years. Low-income housing developments of comparable size to the PA 15 development, from our experience have more parking spaces than used by the tenants and guests. The following table summarizes the number of parking spaces occupied out of the total number of parking spaces available at each of the following low-income developments; (1) the 106 unit Mariposa Apartments in Carlsbad, (2) the 119 unit Rancho del None Apartments in San Diego, (3) the 92 unit Windwood Village Apartments in San Diego (4) the 76 unit Torrey Highlands Apartments in San Diego and (5) the 150 unit Rancho Buena Vista Apartments in Chula Vista. The data was collected between 6:30 and 7:00 AM on Saturday, May 20, 2006. We feel strongly the affordable projects would benefit greatly by reducing the amount of area dedicated to parking. Reduced parking would, of course, increase the landscaped area of the project, thereby improving the appearance of the project. Also, reduced parking would increase the amount of open space and recreational amenities for the tenants. One example is that a paved area not required for parking could be used for a half-court basketball facility, which is both highly popular with tenants and provides a healthy outlet for young residents. We respectfully request that the City reduce the parking requirements for the Robertson Ranch affordable project to the level requested by the developer. May-22-2006 10:36am From-CHELSEA INVESTMENT CORPATiON 7604566001 T-324 P 003/003 F-437 Our property management staff in available to discuss the findings of this survey. Please contact Robert Harington, Vice President at CIC Management, Inc. (760-456-6000, ext 110). Sincerely, Wallace KJ. Dieckmann Chief Financial Officer Parking Survey T°tal T0tal Mariposa Rancho Del Norte Windwood Village Torrey Highlands Rancho Buena Vista 106 119 92 76 150 1bdrm~10 2bdrm-64 3bdrm-32 1bdrm-24 2bdrm-47 1bdrm-12 2bdrnrh48 3bdrm-32 2bdrm-40 3bdrm-36 2bdrm-60 3bdrm-79 4bdrm-11 234 292 204 188 401 236 187 154 121 345 122 147 108 97 239 51.69% 78.61% 70.13% 80.17% 69.28% ino CO SIu (ACO T3CO xLil CM •^ *"" ^3CO •D ""*» O CL U) £oo -^COco "5 0 'o -t— 'cCDO CD CL cbo CM 0)CDOCCQ CO CO __ ,o ^TO COo CO WCO 3 O £ ™ 5 •*—in=^ Q. O D 12 TO0, _03 Ii_o LL i_ CD CL c13 O O CO 'c CD CD C O 5?LO O) CM LO CO ^_ CDCL LO CDCM CD_Q 6 1- totoco o Ioo •DCO CQ O (/)COu Q. CO *+-O o "TO CC * ,n c§ S » §UsJ \-\J f(-\ Cvi CO ^ °W ^ CM 0 1 O ""si" ^- , ^D 05 ^ ^ ^ ^ j_ "^1" CD 1-CL CD CM ^"T~ CM CDCO 1^ •^ I m -^ ^CD 9^ CO 'r,CD -3 "--• ii- O CD 1 — 1- to CD CM "vt" ^- *vj" T~* T~ (/> CD13CT "o o^LO CO^ — 'T3 W CO paces Provideompact Spacetandard SpaceCO O CO CM '^~ T3(D•u *^ '>0 a Eo 8 0) CQ ^^C 0 eo °fiSO 3 0 ffl > C Q 3 O ,^ E O £/3•)•«<f>0) d oz: *w 10 a ©ac re ^S-Qh- "o 'cCDO CD CL ^g COq C/5 CD Q CO co _cc —I Ei_o LL j_ CL CDO O CO 'c Z) T3CDrs co a. 5?co COCO CO LO i_ CDQ. CM en CM -a0•96 (0toCO d 1 O 0i» 0)m o <fiCOuTOa. CO 15o nCC * r5 CO CD°'. CD CO ^ CM CO CD •* ^ i_ CL CM CMCO t±Three-bedOffice/SuppoExtra/Guesto 0 CD 0 CD eg L_ CT)CM inCD 03 c ^ co" o 35 COJI ou._£ V O)E TO CO CTO CO (0 to"(OCO d o 'TO Eoo •DCO2 rea. TO O) U)CO eadowLark xLJJ ^(CarlsbacCO *•"£ 0) 4-1k_ COQ <MariposaCDO OCM in co "D Z3 CO CO E CO Oqf^. CDco CD _CO "5co0CC -aZ3 CO ac j*:±-cOa. ~m oH "o c0o 0 CL _>, 'oCOQ.COCJ S?O)CD In II •a0 j^COQ. en^_ COO CMOJ 3?CDCO CD co0 O COQ CO m Formulai_ 0a. m T — cZJoO O 'Ez> -D0 JO CD C0 •a-COCM •n rooms ProvideiTJ0)m ^g ^o0^ 0^^t CMCM T- ^ N^m CM 00 VI-^ CD 0 0CL O. OJ CM •* CMCD CO •§« E -9 U CD0 OCM in co~a Zi i- "co 0 CO 7 E(/) cd £ ° 0 °O N- 3hM '•D 00) CO DO CD O J2 S «u ^cc CCa >en -a N- ^O CO 0 a'~ cm '^ f 1 "co 0«s i i r-i """"• C3 C:± CM o 0••" B0a. >,.±±oco Q. COo 5?COCM CDCD II TD 0J£^_ COQ. CO COO O) CO OJ s?COh- •sfco CO s« I | CO oCM co*-•to _. "*• ° > "5 1^- 1 i-- § £ l_0Q. CM co CD 0 g '1 1CD -^ ° „ 0 2 ° OCD 0)3m "co to 7S ° *-00 S J= 'F Z3 ZI 0 0 -5 C50 1- g =) CC TJ0JO 6 1- r"O•3" TJ rooms ProvideTJ 0)m gg°q fe3 os co „-,Ln g 0 0Q. Q. CM CO a> -i- N- T- 130 i 0 Z3 t= O H^ (OCO d CO oo^. TJ0) CO 0 (00)ucoa(/) "o _0 *-CDGC ** S? gCD O a? CD 05 0 ^ !§CO g 0in 1 «3 0o i- cbo oOJ in COTJ Z3 "cO CO F COo0 1^1oco CD CO Zico 0CC -oZ3 CO DC CO Q_ "CO 0\- ~o "c0o 0 D_ •)< >- oco CD- CO O^o ^ro- oCO CM CD TJ cars parked = 7rooms Provide°° ^° m >9 S? 5?Sf. in CD^ ^. ^rv! ^D i-"^ xf -* co0o COQ CO CM CM •* T- N. CD in Dieqo)Formulai—*- (D *- K°-K r ^ CM CO C/3 0 c O 3CC O— o CM CO CMT- ^J- CO > Tl Windwoo<UnitTJ TJ "g£%% gj § S °^i^ inr*d (0 0o^_ TJ0) CQ O+^ (00)oCOQ. (/} M—O _0 "(0 CC ** s?oCD CO CD -t— •CO0 Zi O S?o0 CD0 ^rm T — CMCD To 0 41 x HI oaCD Q EreCO 04-« ^o2 "3 Q O£0EreDC CDO OCM LO >COp " _J "SCO ECO oo IY dCO CD CO "5coCD CC T3Z! CO crc 1>£ COCL *_>, 'oCOCL COo ^oa- CD COr^ 1! T30.>£!— COQ. C/3 COo N. •stT — _cg oh- 'o "ECD £?0CL. X? xP 0-~ S-co ooo r-. CM NT- CO CO0oCOQ CO •st ^CM 0 _cg3 E oLL.!l "c. 13 Oo •* N-CM ^J- 'c Z> 13 T3 0 0•9 -9CD 6 £5S^ 1 CMCOCM 73V•g o CL COEoo 730m ssCMCD •sf •sf •stco 1_ 0CL LO!•-. T~~ CO^1- T3 0_a CD 0 -Ch- T- h-; O CO£oo 730 CO O COCDOrea. CO•*-oo 4^reCC *•K ss § LO O ^ d^r o % » a> T — 1 « 3 O CD 1- CJDOc5CM LO>. COT3!^_ 13 "CO CO Ere 0o K 6CO cb _w Z3 CO 0CC >-o _) CO Q-c '^Li— CO CL fCD d £? <i>'o ECO O Q- 0CO i-0 oo T3 g » fi -.**.& 0 <" rn00 S SII > O-o 2 ** 5 ^ ^ CO 1 1 o co O Oi- O *3CO i- (0Z 'S *a> OQ * csoh- "o 0y0a_ S9 5s 5S CDSS « § ^5 LO 8 ^-40 coO 00) 0•Q § E CO S S ^ ^ reCOin ^= 14> E £ ,?r u- \_ x_0 0Q. Q. LO LO rea«j M § H o 1 ° O CD CD•st CO h> ^~^_a ± I io -§"§ ^^-^ 1 «II 1 21- <- \- CO 00 6 "D 0 T3 ">2 Q -D_3 CO capacity0c 1^ COQ O^ CO £oo CO "0LO 0CM CO •B S .1 Si> 0o re£ o-0. CO « M- E ° 0 0 O '•=* am j _cO O ^ ^gc^ SS0 CD ^ 5 CMI . 1 ,-*. ^si ^J - (~,^- UJ . . lij § " %% » 0CL co 1 cogg « "ofo0 5 EreCO co *-<u£4-1^reQ<aqewoodCO CO CO~-^ i— i— 1—3 000E CL CL CL O i- CM CM LL "c =5 Q-, -st -sf O C0 •sl- LOo "O "0 "0 ~ E E -9 «1 ill 1u h- H 6?oo do COCMCM CDO lg oh- T30 ^C3cs >tv«•1^ce^.0£j) ^"^ E0 £ 0 O)reECS S E O >*•*re 0aL» OO 4-»E 0 4-^to0) _G re0to 0.£ O 1 •»-)E 0!5'm0^a.0o > sfoCJBl U) .E"£Z!«,CST«*-*^.0o•uO CC 5*1 JQ •o Sre_e,_ o 0o > T33 Parking si-x CO0tore £o0 TJ £to EO •^ 0CO3 CO0oreaco«*-o0 O)re 1 percentre4-1 04^ 0JZ 4^ to"0co increaE ^Ook.•D0&^ 0Q. to0Oreato ]? LOc o5 oo reo CL (/) M—0 0 o 5 1~B »U4-« 1- S E 0 O£ 2In -a **| ? §?3 re0 Q.Study shAverage** i« Ikj & C-, '-".--=!----"'-aSiO^F-;Vf~J/aaV- N-'rr4',"" --l^-=-f-^i:-^^V-N si Us < <z 3 z 3 2i 3% °33 Il^iQ = J 2 Q : <=-z 0 ^0000000000000001^0;^.QQQOQQQClQQQCiQQaUU>_J_J_J_)_J_]_J_J_]_J-J_J_1_1_)UOJ u c/} cO CO to<o o o r-<N — ' CO 0 t~ __ 1 "^- OH-1 > Q || < 2 ^1 h-1 «< -SI b 3 H-l H-J<:o O Q O X3 CN t H O Q CQ O Q H-JO X cuI O Q CQ Q W H-1 "•O X OH o Q CQ OQ 3 P-l O ii! X PHi CN O Q H—H CQ OQ t-Jo XPL: pi o o C oo Xpa H-l PH a PQ O Q o X PH O Q >—i CQ tq O O 9 Xp-1i-3 PH o53i—i PQ O o XP-I o5Q K-3 o O ftnu pm HpnLJffl! XpaH-I PM <O CO CNo Qi-l h—-f PPQ WOQs ^:p-1 cJo, X oo CO X H-l Ioo O£a OQ: )— H Pi! O 3 PH OO i Si PQ O - O I Xa PH oo O SQ_} *— H ^cq O Q -O • HE I I XWK-l P-H oo o Q PQ O ao r L 0. oo CJ oCJ o Q O P-l P-lo O: -O Q O, 3 i n}o 3}isaxvioossvQHVMOH 133HS 31111 31111133HS VO peqspeo DTI 'IIS||!H BraABjio 91. Vd - ipuey uosyeqoy § 3 il e0 D)SHEET TITLE1 ma Title SheetLandscape Concept•»- CM 0 to o C (A D) S 1Concept Planting LeEntry Monument DeCO ^3" roa. m ^E ?Water ConservationMaintenance Respoin to — a) ro <( CO A 4* S31VIOOSSV QHVMOH adeospuei DTI 'II SHIH eraA6|B3 SI Vd - ipuea uosyoqoy 3HVNIO3rO«d sjnjo 3}iqo JBsax v 10 o ss v dXVAVOH S1IV13Q « 'S31ON 'QN3931 ONIlNVld ld30NOO D11 'II S||iH BJaAB|e3 SI Vd - i ! 1 Dz111vO HI I- 9 1 n}D 3} Jt{ O J'Bsaxvio o ssv QHVMOH S1IV130 311 'II S||!H EBAeiBD SI Vd - ipuea uospeqoy HJEIMOPB3H £ 1 S I i ^ D Q T tL 3 jn;39}Il[0 JBsaxvioossv QHVMOH ue|d uoije/uasuoo j Tlilii33HS an 'n SIHH exuvvo 91. Vd - ipuey uosysqoy s IIm a J nj a gjiqo JB S3XVIOOSSV QHVMOH 91. Vd - M3uey uosueqoy GLENAVE Planning Commission Minutes February 7,2007 tJfflf Jsikf* I Pa9e 3 t/\r"IIDI I 2. SDP 06-04 - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a request for approval of a Site Development Plan to allow for the construction of an affordable housing project consisting of 78 apartment units and one leasing office within Planning Area 15 of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan located north of Cannon Road, east of future Wind Trail Way, and south of future Glen Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Barbara Kennedy would make the Staff presentation assisted by Associate Engineer Jeremy Riddle. Chairperson Baker opened the Public Hearing on Item 2. Ms. Kennedy gave a brief presentation and stated Staff would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Baker asked if the Commission had any questions of Staff. Commissioner Segall asked what size the sound mitigation wall located on Cannon Road would be. Ms. Kennedy stated it will be a 6-foot split-face block wall. Commissioner Segall asked for confirmation that the Robertson Ranch Master Plan designates this location as the low-income inclusionary housing element and the three-story height was also approved at that time. Ms. Kennedy confirmed these statements to be true. Commissioner Segall stated in terms of the reduced parking, the possibility was discussed in briefing about adding precautionary wording, as a safeguard, in the event that in three or five years there is a parking problem. The property management or HOA would be responsible to adjust parking so that there was sufficient parking on-site. Ms. Kennedy stated a supplemental condition of approval regarding parking has been drafted, if the Commission should choose to add it. Commissioner Douglas asked Staff to compare the reduction in parking at Glen Ridge to the parking situation at the Villa Loma development. Ms. Kennedy stated Villa Loma does not have any reduction in parking and meets the normal City standards of two parking spaces for units with two or more bedrooms and one and one-half space for studio or one bedroom units. Commissioner Douglas stated the Commission is aware of the parking problems on Cassia Road associated with Villa Loma. She added the on-site property manager of Villa Loma has stated there are particular difficulties associated with low-income units and nonresidents parking within the complex. Commissioner Douglas asked Ms. Kennedy to explain any precautions that will be taken in the Glen Ridge development to prevent the same type of problems. Ms. Kennedy stated the parking will be managed differently at Glen Ridge than at Villa Loma. She added it is her understanding that in the Villa Loma development a parking pass is required for residents and guests to be able to park on-site and if a vehicle is parking on-site without one, it will be towed. In order to obtain a parking pass, valid insurance, vehicle registration, and a driver's license is required and many residents either do not possess those documents or do not make the effort to obtain a parking pass and will instead opt to park on Cassia Road to avoid their vehicle being towed. Ms. Kennedy stated the Glen Ridge development will not have the same type of parking management and the applicant would address this issue in further detail. She added the Director of the City's Housing and Redevelopment Department, Debbie Fountain, is present and available to answer questions with regard to affordable housing. Commissioner Dominguez stated the Commission has heard complaints from residents of Cassia Heights and Villa Loma regarding parking issues on Cassia Road. He added both projects have met the full requirement of the City parking standard, yet still experience difficulty with parking. Commissioner Dominguez stated his concern that Glen Ridge is the first project within the Planning Commission Minutes February 7, 2007 Page 4 Robertson Ranch development and any decision may set a precedent for the remaining planning areas. He asked if there is a possibility of retaining the ability to relocate the leasing office, at a later date, should additional parking become necessary. Ms. Kennedy stated if the leasing office were going to be relocated, it would need to be done now rather than later. The foundations for the buildings are one of the first things that need to be accomplished prior to beginning construction on any of the market rate units. She added building the affordable housing project will be the first thing to occur in the entire Robertson Ranch Master Plan. Commissioner Dominguez stated he understands that it is admirable to bring the affordable housing component forward first. He added his understanding there are funding opportunities that need to be utilized, but stated he would like to see some safeguards regarding parking prior to approving the project. Ms. Kennedy stated the applicant has prepared a sketch of possible locations for an additional thirteen parking spaces. She added including additional parking would reduce some of the recreation area on-site. Commissioner Montgomery asked if this Site Development Plan includes a reduction in the number of units from what was initially proposed in the Master Plan. Ms. Kennedy stated the Master Plan designates the number of units to be built within each planning area and this affordable housing project in the East Village contains 391 market rate units, of which 70 affordable units are required; this proposal includes an additional 8 affordable unit credits. Commissioner Montgomery asked if a reduction is taken in the total number of units, would the number of affordable units be reduced proportionately. Ms. Kennedy stated there would be a proportionate reduction, but the requirement for affordable units is 15 percent of the total number of units constructed. Commissioner Montgomery asked if 70 units equal exactly 15 percent of the total number of units proposed. Ms. Kennedy stated this is correct. Commissioner Baker asked Ms. Kennedy to explain a possible condition that would allow some remedy, if parking were to become an issue at a later date. Ms. Kennedy read a possible additional condition of approval. Commissioner Baker asked Staff to provide an overview of City experience with parking at low- income housing sites. Housing and Redevelopment Director Debbie Fountain stated she wished to offer some facts to help clarify some incorrectly reported information regarding the Villa Loma development. She added Villa Loma fully meets the City's parking requirement and is consistently overparked. Ms. Fountain stated Villa Loma experiences difficulty with individuals who are not authorized residents and are unable to obtain parking passes who then park on Cassia Road. She added there is not an actual parking shortage, but rather the problem has developed from the strict parking enforcement policies of the property's management. Ms. Fountain stated another issue the development faces with unauthorized residents is the fact that the individuals are not present during daytime hours, but sneak onto the property at night. The eviction process requires proof that the individual is actually residing in the unit and evidence of that is often very difficult to obtain. She added there are 344 units and the number of households posing this type of problem is about 10 to 12 units or approximately 3 percent, which is not a huge problem and there are serious efforts to remedy the situation. Ms. Fountain stated Villa Loma, as well as the other low-income housing projects located within the City, has not experienced a parking shortage. She added a survey was conducted among residents of low-income units in Carlsbad and, on average, most households own only one vehicle. She stated the average number of residents per household is 2.3 and most of the households are comprised of one adult and one to two children. Ms. Fountain stated the Housing and Redevelopment Department is comfortable supporting a reduction in the parking requirement for Glen Ridge based on the information obtained from actual projects within the community. Commissioner Segall asked if Staff is comfortable with a provision requiring the Planning Director to review parking at this site on a periodic bases for a period of time to ensure there are no problems. Planning Commission Minutes February 7, 2007 Page 5 Ms. Fountain stated there is no objection and if a parking problem arose, the property manager would most likely already be looking for a remedy to the situation. Commissioner Segall stated it seems this type of provision should be included now rather than having to revisit the situation after the fact where enforcement would be an issue. Commissioner Dominguez asked when the most recent housing survey was conducted. Ms. Fountain stated it was a few years ago and Staff is in the process of conducting another similar survey. She added upon review of individual projects, no parking inadequacies were found. Commissioner Dominguez asked if an 18 percent reduction to the parking standard had been previously applied to an affordable housing project. Ms. Fountain stated no request has come forward for that type of reduction, but if it had, the housing and Redevelopment Department would not have had any objection. Commissioner Montgomery asked if Staff is comfortable with this type of reduction, would Staff feel equally comfortable supporting a permanent change to the low-income housing requirement. Ms. Fountain stated it would be possible to review a potential change to the parking standard, but the preference of the Housing and Redevelopment Department is to conduct a case-by-case review, which can be accomplished though the Site Development Plan. This process allows some flexibility to either hold a project to the current standard or a reduction to the parking requirement could be offered; Staff finds this method more effective. Commissioner Montgomery stated it seems that if there is a strong feeling about offering those types of reductions on the affordable housing sites, in theory what would happen is a site would not have as many size restrictions. He added if this were the case, the possibility would open up for other projects around the City to offer more affordable housing. He stated in his mind it would be better to attack this situation proactively rather than through the Site Development Plan on a case-by-case basis. Ms. Fountain stated parking is always a key issue and this would be something to think about. Commissioner Cardosa asked if a comparative analysis had been conducted on parking at the Villa Loma project. Ms. Kennedy stated the analysis presented was provided by Chelsea Development and is representative of projects owned and managed by Chelsea and are of similar size to the one being submitted for review tonight. She added Villa Loma is neither of comparable size nor owned by Chelsea. Commissioner Cardosa asked if that type of data was available on the Villa Loma development. Ms. Kennedy stated the Villa Loma project is almost four times the size of the project being submitted and comparable analysis is not available. She added it would be better to analyze projects of similar size. Commissioner Cardosa asked if Staff would encourage a revised parking policy for this project and if offering a parking policy different than the one currently implemented at the Villa Loma development would curtail some of the parking difficulties that they are experiencing. Ms. Fountain stated there are pros and cons to the parking policy at Villa Loma. It offers some control and ensures the residents are good citizens by requiring the appropriate documentation on their vehicles. She added she does not believe it is a bad policy, but added she would defer to the applicant to explain their own management policies regarding parking at Glen Ridge. Commissioner Cardosa stated when a previous project came before the Commission, he had monitored parking on Cassia Road and the number of vehicles, at a minimum, exceeded 34 and was as high as 39. He added he counted cars parked on Cassia Road on 10 different days and that does not mean that all of the cars came from the Villa Loma development, but chances are most of them did because the other projects were complaining about parking from Villa Loma. He added that is quite a large number for only 10 units. Ms. Fountain stated that it is important to remember that the Traditions apartment complex is also located at the same location. She added she had spoken to the manager at the Traditions and they also have residents parking on Cassia Road and it is not Planning Commission Minutes February 7, 2007 Page 6 necessarily from the affordable units. The case exists where there is a roommate situation with four adults with four automobiles and only two parking spaces per apartment; those additional cars end up parking on the street. Ms. Fountain stated it is her understanding that there are additional cars from Cassia Heights also parking on Cassia Road, but not in the same numbers as Villa Loma and the Traditions. Commissioner Segall stated the concern he has is parking, but the bigger concern now is the inclusionary housing where the units are subsidized under what seemed to be fairly stringent guidelines. He added all of a sudden there are other people living in the units that should not be. How does the Commission protect this project from the same type of issue where certain people qualify and are living there, but they bring other people in to sub-rent or sub-lease. Ms. Fountain stated the applicant can probably explain their policies regarding that, but the potential for this abuse exists in almost every project. She added it does not mean there is an absence of strict rules and enforcement against this type of behavior; it only means some people are very clever in the way that they try to evade management. Ms. Fountain stated the risk the residents are taking is very severe because if they are found to have individuals living in the unit without permission who are not included on the lease, they can be evicted from the home for allowing that to occur. She added it is not just the person who is showing up that is not supposed to be there, but the entire household that can lose their housing as a result. The majority of the people are complying with the rules, but in any situation there will always be a small percentage of people who find it difficult to obey the rules and look for a way around them. It does not mean the situation is not being taken seriously by management or is not being dealt with as quickly as possible. Commissioner Segall stated he understood earlier statements declared there was a problem, for instance, at Villa Loma in terms of the eviction process. Ms. Fountain stated it is not a problem with the eviction process, but evictions cannot take place based on hearsay or what management believes might be happening. She added there has to be some actual proof that there is a person illegally living within a unit. When this is suspected at Villa Loma, management conducts an inspection of the unit and tries to find evidence of the suspicion. If none can be found, just from a legal standpoint, it is hard to evict a resident because there are no grounds for it, only suspicions, and an eviction cannot take place based on suspicions or on somebody else's word. She added generally evidence must be found, which can normally be accomplished, but sometimes it takes some time. She stated Villa Loma actually came in support of no parking on Cassia Road, in hopes that it would benefit the process. Assistant City Attorney Jane Mobaldi reminded the Commission to focus on the findings for the Site Development Plan. She added she understands the Commission's concern about parking and it is certainly related to this Site Development Plan, but the review of City subsidies, evictions, and illegal tenants is out of the purview of this hearing. She encouraged the Commission to focus on the specific findings for the Site Development Plan. Commissioner Segall stated his understanding, but added the focus has turned to the reduction in the parking standard for this Site Development Plan and the Commission is looking for some assurance that if an issue arises a remedy is available. Chairperson Baker stated Villa Loma is four times the size of Glen Ridge and contains larger units with more bedrooms. It would be more appropriate for the Commission to focus on projects of similar size and their experience with parking. She added the applicant has not had a chance to give a presentation and they might be able to shed light on some of the questions that have come up. Commissioner Whitton stated the Commission is beginning to stray from the original issue and is entering a discussion of property management issues. Chairperson Baker asked if the differences in color on the elevations would have some articulation differences as well. Ms. Kennedy stated there are a couple of areas where there is only a color difference on the same building plane, but some of the vertical elements pop out from the main plane of the building. Planning Commission Minutes February 7,2007 Page 7 Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further questions for Staff; seeing none, she asked if the applicant would like to give a presentation. Josh Gates, Corky McMillin Companies, 2750 Womble Road, San Diego, gave a brief presentation enlisting the assistance of Wally Dikeman, Senior Project Manager, Chelsea Investment and Robert Harington, CIC Management. Commissioner Segall asked Staff to point out the areas of the development that would be bordered by walls. Ms. Kennedy complied with the request and added there would be no parking along Cannon Road or Wind Trail Way. Commissioner Dominguez asked the applicant if their past experience had shown typical types of units that experienced more parking policy violations. Mr. Harington stated he would not single out a specific type of unit and added property management violations are broadly spread across all types of developments. He stated a larger size complex will typically experience a greater number of violations of all types based solely on the volume of residents. Commissioner Dominguez asked if the applicant agrees that convenience is a driving factor in illegal parking. Mr. Harington asked for clarification of the meaning of the term "illegal parking" within the context of the Commissioner's question. Commissioner Dominguez stated his meaning to be "on-street parking." Mr. Harington stated he can understand the idea of a resident parking on the street to enter the complex at a location that is more convenient. Ms. Mobaldi reminded the Commission that parking on a public street, unless prohibited by signage, is not illegal. Commissioner Dominguez stated that although that is true, it does relate to the decision-making process for this project and whether to support a parking reduction or not. Ms. Mobaldi stated her desire to clarify for the record that it is not illegal to park on a public street, unless it is otherwise prohibited. Commissioner Dominguez stated his understanding. Commissioner Douglas asked the hours of operation for on-site management at this project. Mr. Harington stated the hours would be Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and added that the manager would also reside on the premises. Chairperson Baker asked if the applicant had anything further to add. Josh Gates stated the Master Plan for Robertson Ranch designates this property as a high density development area with a minimum of 20 dwelling units per acre. The Glen Ridge project is currently at 22.8 dwelling units per acre. He added the civil engineer, for the project, could testify that this is an extremely tight site plan as evidenced by the fact that there is tuck parking underneath the units. Mr. Gates stated if the site were to meet City parking standards, it would be below the required 20 dwelling units per acre. He added a secondary site plan has been created that eliminates the tot lot and all additional landscaping. It incorporates the maximum possible additional parking, which only creates 13 extra spaces and would still fall below the required 173 spaces. Mr. Gates stated copies of this supplemental site plan are available for the Commission. Kirk McKinley, McKinley Associates, 1818 First Avenue, San Diego, stated the vertical elements shown on the renderings have a vertical off-set plane with a color break. Commissioner Segall asked if there are entrances to the project located on Glen Avenue. Mr. McKinley stated there are entrances to six units on Glen Avenue. Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further question of the applicant; seeing none, she opened public testimony. Kari Atherton, 4781 Brookwood Court, Carlsbad, stated she is representing the Colony residents and their concerns are the same as have been presented many times before. She stated the residents Planning Commission Minutes February 7, 2007 Page 8 have a specific concern for the density of the development and traffic and any associated impact to the surrounding communities. Ms. Atherton stated that the Colony is not directly connected to the East Village, but she believes the precedent set for the East Village will affect decisions made in the development of the West Village. She added that the Colony was not notified about the Planning Commission hearing tonight and stated her understanding that the Colony is not within the radius area required to be notified of pending hearings, but they have requested notification of all hearings associated with Robertson Ranch. Rich Bryer, 5213 Milton Road, Carlsbad, stated he is concerned with the reduction in the parking requirement for this development and suggested the developer reduce, instead, the total number of units in order to create additional parking spaces. Mr. Bryer asked about the drainage basin adjacent to this site and the possibility of vector problems that are commonly associated with these types of basins. He added his understanding that the Homeowners Association (HOA) will be responsible to manage the maintenance of the drainage basin and he is concerned about their ability to do so appropriately. Chairperson Baker asked if any other members of the audience wished to speak on this item; seeing none, she closed public testimony. Jeremy Riddle, Associate Engineer, addressed the concerns expressed by Mr. Bryer stating a water quality channel will be constructed adjacent to this development, but there is no water detention facility being proposed or any water that will be standing for more than 72 hours. Mr. Riddle stated the City would be responsible to maintain the public road and drainage systems within the streets, but there is a proposal with the developer that the HOA will be maintaining the water quality channel. The City is providing notification and recordation against the HOA property to ensure that they are aware of this fact and the Covenants Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's), for the proposed HOA, are under review to make sure the HOA is aware of their obligation. Commissioner Dominguez asked if there would be multiple HOA's responsible for the management of that operation. Mr. Riddle stated it is his understanding there would be one master HOA responsible for the management of the entire East Village. Commissioner Whitton asked how management by the HOA will be structured. Mr. Riddle stated the grass line channel has a basic policy regarding grass trimming, which is embedded into the maintenance requirements and is being explained in the CC&R's to advise the HOA of their obligations. He added the water quality channel is not difficult to manage and maintain and could be outsourced to a contractor, if necessary. Mr. Riddle stated the obligations that are being evaluated are actually embedded into the Robertson Ranch project and will remain in effect for the lifetime of the development. Commissioner Whitton stated he does understand the HOA's responsibility as far as the cleanliness of the drainage area, but he expressed apprehension about delegating this responsibility to an HOA. Mr. Riddle stated he understands this concern and an easement, on behalf of the City, has been established over the drainage channel to ensure appropriate maintenance occurs in the event the HOA is unable to fulfill this obligation. Commissioner Whitton asked who would absorb the cost of maintenance if the City enforced that easement. Mr. Riddle stated it would be a City expense. Commissioner Montgomery stated the requirement for inclusionary housing for the East Village is 70 units and 78 are proposed. He asked if 8 units would be taken off the overall total of McMillin's allotment within the project. Ms. Kennedy stated planning area 15 was designated for 78 units and added that the Master Plan allows for some shifting of units from planning area to planning area and that may be something that occurs in the future. Commissioner Segall asked if the additional eight units are a safeguard in the case where the school site does not develop. Ms. Kennedy stated that may be the case in the future. Planning Commission Minutes February 7,2007 Page 9 Commissioner Douglas asked why the Colony residents were not informed of the public hearing on this matter. Ms. Kennedy stated the Colony had previously requested notification of any public hearings regarding the Master Plan process and subsequent projects that occur in the adjoining West Village. She added it may have been a misunderstanding that they wanted notification of hearings regarding the East Village as well, but they can certainly be added to the public notice list from this point forward. Commissioner Whitton stated he is perfectly satisfied with the parking reduction, but would like to see an additional condition allowing a parking review in the future. He added the proposed additional condition only includes a recommendation and he would prefer a more definitive statement. Ms. Kennedy stated Staff would work with the developer to determine the appropriate modifications at that time and then prepare an amendment to the Site Development Plan. Commissioner Segall asked Ms. Kennedy to read the proposed additional condition. Ms. Kennedy re-read what had been prepared. Commissioner Segall asked how long Staff would retain jurisdiction over the parking at the development. He stated he felt the condition needed some type of time frame added. Ms. Kennedy stated the condition is written to allow Staff to require additional parking "once the project is fully occupied;" maybe that needs to be changed to read "once the East Village is fully occupied" or "when the final certificate of occupancy is issued." Commissioner Segall stated he prefers a specific amount of time be added after the project is fully occupied, as a protection. Chairperson Baker stated perhaps two years after occupancy would be a fair amount of time to determine if any serious parking issue had arisen. Ms. Mobaldi stated the amount of time to add would be up to the Commission to decide, but it might be a good idea to see the East Village to completion in order to ascertain the impact to the surrounding area. Commission Dominguez stated he still has an issue with the reduction to the parking standard on this project. He added that he feels the amount by which it is being reduced is excessive for the initial development in the Master Plan and it will set a precedent for the remaining planning areas. Commissioner Dominguez added he believes these types of parking problems will take time to manifest, even at 3- to 4-percent. Don Neu, Acting Planning Director, stated the Site Development Plan has a provision for affordable housing projects to modify development standards. He added future projects within the Master Plan will be different than this application; the mechanism to reduce the development standard will occur through a variance application and the Planning Commission is very stringent in their review of those. Mr. Neu stated it is important to make a distinction between market rate developments and affordable housing developments. The modification of standards is in place to address the fact that an affordable housing project has different needs; sometimes a modification is made to create a financially feasible development, other times it is made to account for different operating conditions with an affordable project. Commissioner Montgomery stated proposals for affordable housing are usually rife with conflict, but the nice thing about this project is that it is the first planning area to be developed in Robertson Ranch. He added in his review he has taken special caution to ensure the number of units is in line with what was approved in the Master Plan. Commissioner Montgomery stated he is in favor of the project in spite of the parking concerns that have been expressed. He added he has used the Mariposa Development as a comparable property regarding the reduction in the parking standard. Planning Commission Minutes February 7, 2007 Page 10 Commissioner Cardosa stated he is in support of the project and it is nicely designed with considerable amenities. He added he is comfortable with the reduction to the parking requirement provided there is a 36-month term added from the notice of completion date. Chairperson Baker stated she is in support of the project and is grateful for the opportunity to review the need for the full parking standard within an affordable housing project. She added she would much rather see green grass, tot lots, and play areas than more parking spaces. Chairperson Baker stated the Commission appears to be in agreement regarding the additional condition and the developers are nodding their head in agreement. Ms. Mobaldi stated a vote of the Commission members regarding the additional condition needs to be taken. Commissioner Segall asked if the term being recommended is for 36 months after the notice of completion for both the East and West Villages or only the East Village. Commissioner Cardosa stated his intention was only the project before the Commission at this hearing. Mr. Milich stated 36 months would work if it were tied to the completion of this project. Commissioner Whitton stated he is comfortable with a 36-month term. Commissioner Douglas asked what the difference is between the East Village and "this project." Chairperson Baker stated the East Village will contain additional homes to the ones proposed in this affordable housing project, and the proposal before the Commission is either the completion of the East Village or the completion of the affordable housing project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he is not in favor of the additional condition and is satisfied with the reduction to the parking standard. Commissioner Dominguez stated he does not feel that 36 months is a sufficient amount of time to develop the maturity he desires and would rather see this tied to the completion of the East Village. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Cardosa, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission approve an additional condition reading, "The Planning Director shall review the adequacy of parking up to thirty-six (36) months after the final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the Glen Ridge affordable housing project and, if necessary, recommend a modification to the Site Development Plan. The Planning Commission shall retain jurisdiction to review any recommended modifications of the Site Development Plan to enhance on-site parking." VOTE: 5-2 AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Cardosa, Douglas, Segall, and Whitton NOES: Commissioners Montgomery and Dominguez MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Cardosa, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6243 recommending approval of SDP 06-04 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 6-1 AYES: Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Cardosa, Montgomery, Douglas, Segall, and Whitton NOES: Commissioner Dominguez PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010& 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: February 24th, 2007 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 26th Day of February, 2007 Signature Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that theCity Council of the City of Carlsbad will holda public hearing at the Council Chambers.1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at6.00 p.m on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, to considerapproval of a Site Development Plan to allow for theconstruction of an affordable housing project consist- ing of 78 apartment units and one leasing officewithin Planning Area 15 of the Robertson RanchMaster Plan located north- of Cannon Road, east offuture Wind Trail Way, and south of future Glen Ave-nue in Local Facilities Management Zone 14 andmore particularly described as: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tentative Tract Map CT 06-16, aportion of Parcel 1'of Certificate of Compliance, filedin the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State ofCalifornia, in trie-Office of the County Recorder ofSan Diego County, recorded November 28, 2001, asinstrument No 2odl-0865064. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal arecordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copiesof the agenda bill will be available on and after March2, 20077 If you have any questions, please call Bar-bara Kennedy in the Planning Department at (760)602-4626. If you challenge the Site Development Plan in court',you may be limited to raising only those issues you orsomeone else raised at the public hearing describedin this notice or in written correspondence deliveredto the City of Carlsbad, Attn. City Clerk's Office, 1200Carlsbacf Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at orprior to the public hearing CASE FILE- SDP 06-04 CASE NAME. ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLENRIDGE PUBLISH: MARCH 6, 2007 NCT 2031270 CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, {DATE}, to consider approval of a Site Development Plan to allow for the construction of an affordable housing project consisting of 78 apartment units and one leasing office within Planning Area 15 of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan located north of Cannon Road, east of future Wind Trail Way, and south of future Glen Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 14 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tentative Tract Map CT 06-16, a portion of Parcel 1 of Certificate of Compliance, filed in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, recorded November 28, 2001, as instrument No. 2001- 0865064. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after {DATE}. If you have any questions, please call Barbara Kennedy in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4626. If you challenge the Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SDP 06-04 CASE NAME: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 15 - GLEN RIDGE PUBLISH: {DATE} CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ;r S'gr-sffi NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP Robertson Ranch PA 15 - Glen Ridge SDP 06-04 Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.avery.com 1-800-6O-AVERY AVERY® 5160® CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 RANCHO CARLSBAD HOA ATTN BILL ARNOLD 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92010 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEW RIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 SCOTT MALLOY - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER CITY OF CARLSBAD RECREATION CALAVERA HILLS II LLC 2750 WOMBLE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92106 COLONY @ CALAVERA HILLS HOA c/o GRC MANAGEMENT INC STE 200 3088 PIO PICO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 02/16/2007 AM3AV-OD-008-I- Ul CD "A J 3 A6'MMM apjde.! eBeipas e j.e aBaunoq^ue uoissajdiuj Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE S16Q®" www.avery.eom 1-SOG-GO-AVERY RITTER DON W & BETTY A 5106DONMATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 STEPHENSON LIVING TRUST 5110 DON MATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DEELEY-BARNARD FAMILY TRUST 5116 DON MATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SHAW HILDA J, ARON ADRIENNE F 5120 DON MATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 GIBSON FAMILY TRUST 5124 DON MATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DUFFIN GORDON L & LUCILLE H 5128DONRODOLFODR CARLSBAD CA 92008 STOABS LEON H & SHIRLEY M 5184 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PRUITT RAYNEL I 5136 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HILLARD FAMILY TRUST 5140 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 JAFFE LIVING TRUST 5144 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WELLS ANNE REVOCABLE TRUST 5148 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SHADRICK ROGER C & PEGGY P 5152 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HALL SHANDRA PROPERTY TRUST 5156 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WATSON LIVING TRUST 5160 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 NAJARIAN FAMILY TRUST NUMBER 219 140SDOLLIVERST PISMO BEACH CA 93449 STIPP IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 5168 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 JUHL CLARENCE A & JUDITH H 5172 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ESKIBORN TRUST 5155 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 BRISTOW JOYCE LIVING TRUST 5147 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARTIN C WESLEY TRUST 5139 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 DIELI SALVATORE & ALICE M 5131 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARBONE MARTIN R & GLADYS K 5123 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 STEADMAN HELLEN F 5132 DON MATADR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CUNRADI DAVID R & ELLEN V 5128 DON MATA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROBINSON FAMILY TRUST 5117 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SABOURIN WES, SABOURIN PATRICIA 5101 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 STOLMAKER CHARLOTTE TRUST 5107 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CRANDALL ANAMAE B LIVING TRUST 5115 DON RODOLFO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 II, LLC )NAL CITYC'94,950 ROBERTSON FAMILY TRUST 29408 PASO ROBLES RD VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 afir>ma«: p imiccaiHim Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® www.averif.eom 1-800-QO-AVERY 516G© CURRENT RESIDENT 4706 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4710 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4714 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4718 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4720 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4722 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4726 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4728 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4730 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4734 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4738 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4740 INVERNESS CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4742 INVERNESS CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4744 INVERNESS CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4746 INVERNESS CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4748 INVERNESS CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2754 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2758 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2762 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2766 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4737 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4733 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4729 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4725 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4721 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4717 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2777 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2773 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2769 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2765 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 AM3AV-OD-008-I. afipmac p la afimmnnmm iimcc=i/-ii Jam and Smudge Free Use Avery® TEMPLATE www, a ve ry. co m f-800-GO-AVERY IKY® 5160® CURRENT RESIDENT 2761 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2757 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2753 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2744 BANFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2746 BANFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2748 BANFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2750 BANFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2752 BANFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2766 DUNDEE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2768 DUNDEE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2770 DUNDEE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2772 DUNDEE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2774 DUNDEE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4713 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4709 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4705 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2737 STIRLING CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4760 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4758 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4756 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4754 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4752 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4750 ABERDEEN CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4805 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4803 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4801 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4799 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4797 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2742 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2740 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 AH3AV-OD-008-!. Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 1-800-GQ-AVERY 5160® CURRENT RESIDENT 2738 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2734 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2730 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2726 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2729 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2733 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2737 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2741 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2745 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2749 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2750 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2746 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2744 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2734 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2730 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2733 STIRLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2739 STIRLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2735 STIRLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2743 STIRLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2753 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2757 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4747 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4749 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4751 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4753 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4757 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4761 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4765 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2741 STIRLING CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4774 BROOKWOOD CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 AM3AV-O9-008-1 Jam ar.d Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®" V'Avw.svery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY CURRENT RESIDENT 4774 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 COLONY AT CALAVERA HILLS GRG MANAGEMENT 3088 PIO PICO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 RANCHO CARLSBAD OWNERS ASSOC. 5200 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CURRENT RESIDENT 2722 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2718 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2714 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2710 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2706 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2696 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2692 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2688 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2684 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2680 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2725 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2721 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2717 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2713 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2709 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2705 GLASGOW DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2726 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2722 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2718 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2714 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2710 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2706 INVERNESS DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2731 GREENOCKCT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2729 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2727 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2725 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2723 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 ®09is AJJ3AV-O9-008-I. LUOD'AjSAB'MAftAA Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE SI SO® www, a vs ry. co m 1-80Q-GO-AVERY 5160® CURRENT RESIDENT 2721 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2719 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2717 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 2715 GREENOCK CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4770 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4772 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4776 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4778 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4780 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4781 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4779 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4777 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4775 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4773 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4771 BROOKWOOD CR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4769 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4773 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4777 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4781 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4785 EDINBURGH DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4717GATESHEADRD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4721 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4725 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4729 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4733 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4737 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4741 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4745 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4749 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4753 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 ®09LS 0AU3AV AW3AV-OD-008-1 UUOT/tjaAP'AAAAAft jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Aveiy® TEMPLATE 5160® www.aveiy.CQm 1-800-GO-AVERY 5160© CURRENT RESIDENT 4757 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4761 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4765 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4769 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4734 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4738 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4742 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4746 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4750 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4754 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4758 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4762 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4768 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4770 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4772 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4776 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4780 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4782 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4771 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4773 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4775 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4777 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4781 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4783 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4785 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4787 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4789 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4791 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4793 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 CURRENT RESIDENT 4795 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 0,09IS 0AU3AV AM3AV-OD-008-S. amriio: afioi itac K in =>Kn. mmi Robertson RanchPlanning Area 15 – Glen RidgeSDP 06-04 Location MapWIND TRAIL WYGLEN AVHILLTOP STCANNON RDEL CAMINO REAL FROST AVC O LLEGE B LGATESHEAD RDTAMARACK AVCRATER RIM RDRIFT RDRANCHO CARLSBAD Site Project Features• 78 affordable housing units & leasing office• Satisfies the affordable housing requirement for the East Village of Robertson Ranch– 70 units for East Village– 8 housing credits for future projects in NE Quad• Requires approval of an SDP• Complies with all standards of the Master Plan and RD-M zone, except for parking– Requires approval of an 18% parking reduction (31 spaces) Parking Reduction• Parking reduction may be approved with the SDP– 173 spaces required; 142 spaces proposed• Affordable Housing may have less-restrictive standards– Must comply with General Plan goals and policies– Must find that there are no detrimental effects on public health, safety and welfare• Parking analysis shows average use of 57.5% of spaces provided (82% of required parking provided)• Affordable Housing Projects have unique parking needs Analysis• Findings for Parking Reduction:– A strict adherence to the parking standards would result in an over-abundance of parking– The reduced parking requirement will allow for additional landscaping and recreational features which will benefit the residents– The parking reduction will not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare• The project complies with all other City standards and Master Plan requirements Recommendation• The project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 03-03• Recommend City Council Approval of SDP 06-04 ROBERTSON RANCHEAST VILLAGE COLORED SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN POTENTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL 13 SPACES RENDERING FROM CANNON ROAD LOOKING NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BUILDING & LEASING OFFICE