HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-01-15; City Council; 19285; Reporting Out the Terms & Conditions of the General Release and Settlement Pacific Bell V. City of Carlsbad, CMWD, La Costa de Marbella HOACITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
19,285AB#
MTG. 1/15/08
DEPT. CA
REPORTING OUT THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL
RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT
REGARDING PACIFIC BELL V. CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CMWD, LA COSTA DE
MARBELLA HOA
DEPT. HEAD
CITY ATTY.
CITY MGR.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
There is no action the Council needs to take.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The parties have now settled this claim under the authority given to the City Attorney by the
City Council at its closed session meeting of October 16, 2007. This item satisfies the Brown
Act requirement to report the fact of a settlement of a claim approved in a prior closed
session, and makes the terms and conditions of the settlement available to the public. The
General Release and Settlement of Claims is attached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The settlement amount is $99,000.
EXHIBITS:
1. General Release and Settlement
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Ronald R. Ball, (760) 434-2891 rball@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
CONTINUED
WITHDRAWN
AMENDED
tf-8n
Dn
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN
COUNCIL DIRECTED THE CITY
ATTORNEY AND STAFF ON THE
MATTER
D
Dn
JAN-03-2008 THU 12:01 PM CITY OF CARLSBAD Risk De
DEC. 13, 2007 1:59PMWHWTXf>
GRAND PROFESSIONAL
FAX NO, 1760 602 8555
NO, 394
P. 01
P. 3
IJ.O At-
EELEASfc OP CLAIMS
P; idfio Sf& Tdqphone Company ("Pacific Boll) is a utillcy that ovwi* certain telephone
eqidpmei it ID the vicinity of the La Costa de MarbeJh condominium o>veto.mnwiT Irwtwi at
3401A t£ roufth 2433DLaCo$taAvenxwin tha Chyofftm-towd /"™imv rf*** ni « «•
«tflc Boll la aware of and ftdcuuwkdgea die following:
A|. A landslide occurred in or about 2005 which damaged condominium units and
common area within the La Costa, de Marbella development, and damaged public
:;,' improvements located on the property of ta Costa de Marbella and within the
\. right of i»*y for La Costa Avenue directly adjacent 10 the La Costa de Marbella
i- development.
B
D.
£.
_t
ir.
contends that the landslide resulted in, among other thmga, ttama..^ to
and destruction ofks telephone equipment bowed vvlthin and adjacent TO the La,
Costa deMaltella development.
Pacific B«U contends th&i it TO9 required to relocate, repair and/or replace
portions ofiu telephone t^oipmcm an a result of the damage caused by the
landslide.
Pacific Bell ha« sued the City of Cartsbad C'city") »nd the Carlsbad Municipal
Water Dlscrict ("CMWD") nsaertLig a uuiete of action based on the legal theory of
inverse covideauuJton. In the sameUwsuit, Pacific Udl ba< also suud the U. Costa
d« Martffilla HoroeoMvaerB1 AssociAtktn Thfi IAWSUIS « defiifixaw) »/toe{(9<?J?«*//
Telephone Cvtnpany v. City of Carlsbad, tst al., San Diego Superior Court Cute
No. 37-2GQ7-00051729-CU'PaNC (rcfemjd TO herein & the "Lawsuit").
In the Lawsuit against the City and CMWD, Pacific Sell alleges that the water
tytitan ar t* Costa de Marbeia, <x\va*J by CMWD, was e substantial factor iu
causing the landslide, reBuMng in damage 10 Pacific Bell's telephone equipment
which constituted A taking of Pacific Bell's zelephona equJpmeat pursuant w
Article J Sectioa 19 of ih« CaHfcniia Constitution. Pacific Bell alleges, among
other tilings, that the pipwt couplbgs, o-rb§j, valv« wd other dements of the
water sysrctn w^* tJcsiKned, constructed, maintained, inspected, repaired, owned
and operated by the City and/or CMWD in such a manner as to cause one or more
water lealrs at ta Cost* & M&rbell*. Pacific B«D tllogcp that th« wiicj- kato were
a substantial factor in causing the landslide and resulting damage to the telephone
equipment owned by Pacific Bell The City and CMWD deny the material
allegations of the Lawsuit,
Without fidmiiaoo of HafcUity, Pacific Bell and lb« City and CMWt? have agreec) to
settle the Lawsuit.
20
Page 1 of 3
pin
BEST
ORIGINAL
JAN-03-2008 THU 12:01 PM CITY OF CARLSBAD Risk De
.DEC, 13,200? 1:5Wl GRAND PROFESSIONAL
FAX NO. 1760 602 8555
NO. 394 P. 4
P. 02
Jr.
(399,000;
tedircdcnrkin for payment to Pacific Dell of the sum of Ninety-Nine Ttunwaiul Dollars
t>0), BUS fiall compensation for (a) the alleged physical taking of and/or damage to Pacific
Ball's tetojphone equipment; (bl the loss or impairment of Pacific Ball's telephone equipment; (c)
Pacific Bill's financial loss; (d) Pacific Bell's cost* and attorney feesj and (e) all other toss, known
and/or udbown, as Pacific Bell may hive sostaihfcd, .Pacific Bell, for Iwelf and on behalf of Its
legal representatives and assigns, does hereby release and forever discharge the City and CMWD,
mchicfinglkhdr employees, agents, council members, directors, «nd officers (the "Related
Pirti«")Iof wA from any and all ckumo, action*, causes or action of nay kind or nature at law or
in equity (including without limitation claims based on theories of inverse condemnation.
. nuisance, dangerous condition of public property, bioetti ofmanditory duty, and all
other !eg.j! Theories), demands, rights damages, losses, costs, anorneys* fees, Toss of profits,
dimirdsheji value, expenses, and compensation whatsoever, which Pacific Bell now has or which
may herepor accrue, on account of any and all known and imkoo%vn and foreseen and unforeiecn
acts, omi:ioAs, conditions, occurrewea* imcidwns, acddentE and matters pertaining to the
The landslide at La Costa, de Marhella that wan discovered Sn, or nboui February
and/or March 2005;
The water leak in B lateral pipe rurwing from the water main TO the fire hydrant at
or near 2407C La Costa Avenue that was reponed TO the Cby/CMWD on or about
March 1, 2005 and repaired by the City/CMWD on March 2, 200S;
The water leak in the 6 inch water tnak near 2407 A La Costa Avenue reported to
the Cfty/CMWD and repaired by ihc City/CMWD on or about March 1 1 , 2005,
including wuhoui linirtBrion.all actions taken by ihe City/CMWD with reject to
dischareing and recharging the water main on March 11, 2005: and
All matters that are the subject of the Lawsuit in ca w number 37-2007-0005 1729-
CIT-PO-NC, Clcil LIL tljc Sou Dlegu County Suporiur Cuiul, CcuUd Divblufi, us
they relate to claims against tKe City and/or CMWD,
T je aforfTnentioned p»ymi?nT shall b« wu»d?tn Panific ftall following the execution of this
Vfldfr Rrtll Thi* R*ili3»Sr) nf naimi: *h»M h* «ff«rtivfc upnn PftoifiC BeH'x
receipt ot the setilement tunds described above.f,
C in«in-f,ntly -uvnli the er«vtion of iMt Rdeace, Pacific Bell shall txecuti uvd deliver TO
couustl fi ir the Giy and CMWD a ftaqucsL for DisDisav! on the appropriate court form,
} the L»\vsuit with prejudice as against the Cit>' and CM\VD as to aJl causes of action.
C ilifomia Civil Cod« § 1542 provides as follow:
A general release does not extend to claiois which the creditor does not know
10 nht in hi* or her favor »i the time gf executing the release,
if known by him or her most have materially affected his or be/
tictp enc with the debtor,
Page 2 of3 BEST
ORIGINAL
ee
JAN-03-2008 THU 12:01 PM CITY OF CARLSBAD Risk De
DEC. 13.2007
Dea la u/
2;OOPM GRAND PROFESSIONAL
FAX NO, 1760 602 8555
NO. 394
P, 03
P. 5,
1 adflc Bell hereby \vab« application of California Civil Code 5 1542 and acknowledges
thai this means that if Pacific Bell should euffisr any Additional injuries, damages, or lossei aming
out of H e landslide and wat w leaks referred to above tlw are the subject of the above referenced
Lawsuit ;of which Pacific Bel! is DOT currently awsre and which if ICOOWD would materially affect
Pacific I jell's decision to execute this release, Pacific Bell win not he able to nuke any claim for
those inj jrics, damages ov losses against the Crty, CMWD, and/or their Related Panics,
( iftlifomia Code of Civil Procedure 5 1 016 which providac as follows:
1 1 any inverse condemnation proceeding, the court rendering judgment for the
p bdroiff by ewudiiQi compensation, or ite attorney representing the pubfio entity
v ho effects a settlement of ibct proceeding jshail determine and award or allow to
tt & plaintiff! as & part, of that judgment or settlement, ft Hum llmt win, In the opinion
o | the court, reimburse the plaintiffs reasonable costs, disbursements, and
c: ipenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and engineering fees,
i'n curred because of chat proceeding In the trial court or in any appellate
p; breeding hi wta'ch the piafotiffprcvails on uny issue in
allowed t
rcasooail
cngineerit
Uit Law* it.
this Relea
fees or oo (ft
P; p'rficBeU acknowledge; that counsel for the City and CMWD Uve determined and
?ttc»fic Bell, as a pan of this settlement, a sum that vdU t«mxVur«« Pawfio Bdl'6
costs. ditbuisementE, and expeneee, inducing reasonable attoratey, appraisal, and
cngineerit ig feea, actually incurred because of the inverse condemnation proceedings asserted in
That man Is included In the sums to be paid by the Guy and CMWD as reflected in
ie, and Pacific fid! shall have no right to recover any additional amount for attorney's
incurred in oonnectiort with tlui muter, OUici U«m as recited above wttb respect to
Code of C jvil Procedure § 1036, Pacific Bell shell bear its own attorney's fees and costs,
^signed tit
plfc Bell hereDy represents and warrants (a) that Pacific Bell has not heretofore
transferred any claims heron released; (b) that Pacific Bed has the requisite authority
to enter Jn> this Release, (c) duit in execuriug ihb Release, Pacific »dl has had the opponimity
to seek lei pi advice from die attorney ofTacific Bell's choice; (d) thai Pacific Bell fully
underMMii fi the terms of ihis Release; one? (e) that Pacific Bell's execution of this Release a
,: jree and voluntary.
Ex toned this Vffir dav ofT.tcfrh.Ap*. . 2QQ7 at rri
i-
iV
ii
/Ac£>kAp<. . 2007 at
CMonih) (Place o/«pjing) ~^~~
PACIFIC BEIJJ-ELHPHQNE COMPANYrjf.,(/A
Signature:
Kame
ntle:
P«fie3<jf3 BEST
ORIGINAL
esssi