HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-07-01; City Council; 19504; La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL
AB#
MTG.
DEPT.
19,504
07/01/08
PLN
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
PUD 05-1 2(A;
DEPT. HEAD Mtf ft
CITY ATTY. (j^
CITYMGR. [u^-i ^^
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 2008-201 APPROVING Planned Development
Permit Amendment No. PUD 05-12(A) for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 53 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.3 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Project Application(s)
PUD 05-1 2(A)
Administrative
Approvals
Planning
Commission
RA
City Council
X
RA = Recommended Approval
* - Final City decision-making authority
•s - requires Coastal Commission approval
On May 21, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval (5-0-1; Commissioner
Douglas absent) of a Planned Development Permit Amendment application for the floor plans,
plotting and architecture for 53 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa
Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive
and north of Cadencia Street. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative
Map CT 05-15 and Planned Development Permit PUD 05-12, both of which were approved by
the City Council on September 26, 2006.
The project complies with all of the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the
Planned Development Ordinance, and City Council Policy 66 for Livable Neighborhoods. The
project is designed with three (3) floor plans, one (1) variation to Floor Plan 1, and three (3)
different elevations for each floor plan. The total living area ranges in size from 3,162 to 3,688
square feet.
No public comment was received at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the
Planning Commission's actions and a complete project description and staff analysis of the
proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report.
The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the proposed discretionary
action.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: SHELLEY ESTEYBAR 760-602-4625 seste@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
CONTINUED
WITHDRAWN
AMENDED
Jan
Dn
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN
RETURNED TO STAFF
OTHER -SEE MINUTES
Dnnn
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the
developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts
would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-
07. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation
of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed
project reviewed here.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time, CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for EIR 98-07 which are applicable to the proposed project have been
completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the
project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies
to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the
Planning Department.
EXHIBITS:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2008-201
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6420
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 21, 2008
5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated May 21, 2008.
EXHIBIT 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-201
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED
3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING
FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE
4 DEVELOPMENT OF 53 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
, HOMES WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS
NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 GENERALLY LOCATED
6 WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, SOUTH OF
MELROSE DRIVE AND NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET
7 IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 1 .
CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
8 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
CASE NO.: PUD 05-1 2(A)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the
Planning Commission did, on May 21, 2008, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
12 prescribed by law to consider a Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 0-12
13 (A)); and
14 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 1st day
of July 2008, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Planned
16 Development Permit Amendment and at that time received recommendations,
17
objections, protests, and comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD OS-
IS
19
2Q NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
22 1 . That all recitations are true and correct.
23 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the
approval of the Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 05-1 2(A)) is approved
by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as
25 set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6420, on file with the City Clerk and
made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
26
3. The action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City
27 Council. The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits
for Judicial Review" shall apply:
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be
sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper
seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than
the nineteenth day following the date on which this decision
becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision
becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an amount
sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record,
the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended
to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his
attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the
preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the
City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
CA. 92008."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad on the 1st day of July , 2008, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulcbin, Packard and Nygaard.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Council Member Hall.
ATTE
M. WOOD, City ClerkC
-2-
EXHIBIT 2
TO SCALE
SITEMAP
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
PUD 05-12 (A)
EXHIBIT 3
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6420
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
4 AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS,
, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF 53 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE
6 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD
3.3 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE
7 ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND NORTH OF
CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
8 ZONE 11.
9 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS, NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD
3.3.
10 CASE NO.: PUD 05-1
WHEREAS, LC OAKS 3.3, LLC, "Developer," has filed a verified application
12 with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management
13
Company, "Owner," described as
14
Lots 19 through 35 and 80 through 115 of the City of Carlsbad
tract CT 05-15, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North -
16 Neighborhood 3.3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 15596
17 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
on August 22, 2007 as file no. 2007-0560436.
1 o
19 ("the Property"); and
20 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned
21 Development Permit as shown on Exhibit(s) "A"-"OO" dated May 21, 2008, on file in the
22 Planning Department, LA COSTA OAKS, NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3, as provided by
23
Chapter 2 1 .45/2 1 .47 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
24
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on May 21, 2008, hold a duly noticed
26 public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
27 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
2° and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment.
f. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project
2 alternatives identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07,
which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed.
3 incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for
this Subsequent Project.
4
r 4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and
6 ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or
provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection
7 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational
„ facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the
project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need.
9
5. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will
10 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project
is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the
12 Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan.
13 6. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section IB).
14
, - 7. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed
16 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
17
Conditions:
19 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of
Building Permit.
20
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
22 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of
23 all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of
occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of
24 violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights
are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this
26 Planned Development Permit Amendment.
27 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all
corrections and modifications to the Planned Development Permit Amendment
documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with
the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the
PCRESONO. 6420 -3-
the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity
and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy.
12. Developer shall pay the Citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council
Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal
4 Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits
authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay
any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter
21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the
taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and
7 shall become void.
° 13. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any
q address change from that which is shown on the permit application.
10 14. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a
Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said
notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of
the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that
the City of Carlsbad has issued a Planned Development Permit Amendment by
13 Resolution(s) No. 6420 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the
property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all
14 conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion
in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and
record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
17 15. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape
and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape
Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all
landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a
healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
20
16. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
21 landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by
the project's building, improvement, and grading plans.
23 17. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur
within the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire
24 rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall
be obtained prior to installation from the Building Department and must be
25 identified within the CC&Rs.
9/i
18. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs
27 shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone and must be identified
within the CC&Rs.
28
PCRESONO. 6420 -5-
,
26. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for
recordation the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement.
Grading
27. Developer shall apply for separate grading permits for the precise grading associated
with the single family lot development, all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
6 28. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the City's current Standard
1 Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). Developer shall provide
improvements constructed pursuant to best management practices as referenced in the
"California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface
9 pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such
improvements shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
10 Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants
of the following:
11
,~ A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous
13 waste products.
14 B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil,
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids
shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm
water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides,
insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State,
1 7 County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers.
* ° C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants
when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
20 29. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
21 (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and
provisions established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address
23 measures to reduce to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff
during construction of the project.
24
30. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first,
^ Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan
(SWMP)." The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad
Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order R9-2007-0001 issued
27 by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and
City of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid
28 contact or filter said pollutants from storm water, to the maximum extent practicable,
for the post-construction stage of the project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall:
PC RESO NO. 6420 -7-
1 NOTICE
2
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
g annul their imposition.
9 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
11 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
12 expired.
13 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on May 21, 2008, by the following vote, to
15 wit:
16
AYES: Commissioners Baker, Boddy, Cardosa, Dominguez, Montgomery,
and Chairperson Whitton.
1 8 NOES:
19
ABSENT: Commissioner Douglas
20
ABSTAIN:21
22
23 'FRANK H. WHITTON, Chairperson
24 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
25
ATTEST:
26"
27
DONNEU
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 6420 -9-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 21, 2008
Application complete date: March 3,2008
Project Planner: Shelley Esteybar
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
SUBJECT: PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3-
Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously
certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately
describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of
approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans,
elevations and plotting for the development of 53 single-family detached homes
within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located
west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia
Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6420
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-
12(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 53 single-family dwelling
units located in the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3. The lots for these
neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 05-15) and Planned Development
Permit (PUD 05-12), approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. A Planned
Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 3.3 because the minimum lot sizes are less
than 7,500 square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to
Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 05-12 Condition of Approval No. 7, could be
processed at a later date through a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. The
applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject neighborhood. At over 50
units the project requires City Council approval. The proposed two-story homes consist of four
separate and distinct floor plans with living areas ranging in approximate size from 3,162 to
3,792 square feet. The project incorporates three distinct architectural elevation styles and nine
color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The project complies with City
standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made
for the approval being requested.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 2
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 05-15 created the
residential lots for Neighborhood 3.3. A final map has recorded for The Oaks; grading and
improvement plans have been approved, and construction is presently ongoing.
Project Description
The project site, consisting of Neighborhood 3.3 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's Oaks
North Village, is generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and
north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The subject neighborhood
contains 53 single-family residential lots that are a minimum size of 6,000 square feet. Pursuant
to the Master Plan, Planned Development Permits for neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of
less than 7,500 square feet require a common recreation area, which was approved under a
separate Planned Development Permit Amendment, No. PUD 05-11 (A). The required common
recreation area must be under construction prior to the occupancy of the first unit of
Neighborhood 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, or 3.5, whichever occurs first, and shall be available for use prior to
the occupancy of 50% of the first units in Neighborhoods 3.1, 3.3, 3.4 or 3.5. The Master Plan
provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Major Planned
Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the
previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans,
elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, four different floor plans are being
proposed with living areas ranging in size from approximately 3,162 to 3,792 square feet. Plan
IX is a variation of the Plan 1 Tuscan Theme, and incorporates a slightly reduced building
footprint. Proposed are 53 two-story units, each having an attached garage providing parking
spaces for a minimum of three cars. The project incorporates three distinct architectural
elevation styles and nine different color schemes to provide variation throughout the project.
The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles:
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS
PLAN
NO.
1
IX
1ST
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
2,133
2,078
2ND
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
1,101
1,084
LIVING
AREA
SQ.FT.
3234
3,162
GARAGE
SQ. FT.
617
3 car
446
3 car
TOTAL
BLDG.
SQ. FT.
3,851
3,608
ARCHITECTURAL
STYLES
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
Tuscan
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 3
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS CONTINUED
PLAN
NO.
2
^
1ST
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
1,854
1,884
2ND
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
1,828
1908
LIVING
AREA
SQ. FT.
3,682
3,792
GARAGE
SQ. FT.
601
3 car
604
3 car
TOTAL
BLDG.
SQ. FT.
4,283
4,396
ARCHITECTURAL
STYLES
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Tuscan
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Development
Permit Amendment is required for the development of homes in neighborhoods with minimum
lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with .the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01 (G))
The project is located within the Oaks North Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and
timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 05-15 and PUD 05-12,
approved on August 16, 2006, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the
subdivision were analyzed at that time.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following Table 2 shows compliance of the proposed project with the
Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 4
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Front Yard
Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.a)
15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average
(See VLCMP for instructions about
calculating averages).
All proposed porte cochere or arbor
structures are allowed within the front
yard setback to accommodate applicable
alternate garage configurations.
The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet
in size and must have a 5' minimum
setback from property line.
Neighborhood Average Front
Yard Setback = 22.14'.
Please refer to the attached Front
Yard Setbacks Table 1 for
compliance with 15' minimum.
The proposed porte cochere on
Plan 2A is in compliance.
All units comply with the front
yard setback requirements.
Rear Yard
Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.e &
7.7.3.3-i)
15' minimum setback.
Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15.'
All units comply with 15'
minimum rear yard setback.
All lots provide the required 15'
x 15' usable rear yard area.
Side Yards
(4.6.2.B.2.C)
Combined 25% of the minimum
standard lot size width for lots less than
60' wide.
Minimum combined side yard setback:
12.5.'
Minimum of 5' per side.
Maximum setback does not need to
exceed 20' in aggregate.
\
Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may
reduce each side yard to 5'.
At least 50% of the units in each
neighborhood shall have one side
elevation where there are sufficient
offsets or cutouts so the side yard
setback averages a minimum of 7'.
Please refer to the attached
'Individual Lot Data' Table 3 for
side yard setbacks. All lots
comply.
Plan types 1, 2 & 3 incorporate
side yard courtyards and offsets.
These plan types are plotted on
49 lots or 92.5% of the total.
Street Side
Setback
(4.6.2.B.2.d)
10' minimum.All units comply with the
minimum 10' street side setback.
14
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGES
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Slope Edge
Building
Setback
(4.3.4)
All main and accessory buildings that are
developed on hilltops and/or pads created
on downhill perimeter slopes of greater
than 15' in height shall be setback so that
the building does not intrude into a .7'
horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary
diagonal plane that is measured from the
edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to
this slope edge building setback standard,
a profile of the diagonal plane shall be
submitted with all other development
application requirements. • •
All proposed units will meet the
required slope edge setbacks by
maintaining the minimum rear
yard setback. Please refer to the
Slope Edge Building Setback
Exhibit on Page 3 of the enclosed
plans for further details.
Lot Width
(4.6.2.B.1 &
7.7.3.3.g)
Minimum lot width shall be 50'.All lots were previously approved
by CT 05-15 and have a
minimum width of 50'
Building
Coverage
(4.6.3.B.2)
1-story units: 50% of net pad area.
2-story units: 40% of net pad area.
Includes:
. Garages and the perimeter area of a
basement.
Excludes:
• Exterior structures such as covered
porches;
Permanent structural elements
protruding from buildings such as
overhanging balconies that project
less than 8' from the building;
• Porte cocheres not exceeding a
length of 22' and a width of 8';
Roof eaves extending less than 30"
from the face of any building;
• Awnings;
• Open parking areas;
Structures under 3 0" in height; and
• Masonry walls not greater than 6' in
height (wing-walls, planter walls,
grade separation retaining walls).
Please refer to attached Individual
Lot Date Table 3 for building
coverage.
All plan types are two-story
structures and do not exceed the
maximum 40% of net pad area as
required.
Please refer to attached Individual
Lot Data Table 3 for rear yard
setbacks.
All lots comply.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 6
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Building Height
(4.6.3.B.1 &
7.7.3.3.J)
Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Plan 1 = 24'-2" max.
PlanlX = 24'-2"max.
Plan 2 = 27'-5" max.
Plan 3 = 27'-8" max.
Front Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.e&
4.6.3.B.4.f)
50% of units in the neighborhood must
have 18 inch offset planes with a
minimum of 10' between front and rear
planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum
3 separate building planes for lots with a
45' of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a
frontage greater than 45'.
33% of the above 50% required, may
reduce the limit from 4 separate planes
to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard
is substituted.
Please refer to the architectural
plans for the building plane
exhibits.
Plan*
1
IX
2
3
SC
5
4
4
4
SB
5
4
5
IT
5
4
5
All units comply.
Rear Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
50% of units in the neighborhood must
have 18 inch offset planes with a
minimum of 3' between face of the
forward-most plane and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum.
3 separate building planes for lots with a
45' of frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a
frontage greater than 45'.
Please refer to the architectural
plans for the building plane
exhibits.
Plan*
1
IX
2
3
SC
4
4
4
3
SB
4
4
3
IT
4
4
3
Plans 1 (all elev.), IX (Spanish)
& 2 (all elev.) are plotted on 34
lots.
Total of 34 units meet this
requirement or 64.2% of the unit
mix.
SC - Spanish Colonial SB - Santa Barbara IT - Italian Tuscan
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE?
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Front Building
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.6)
Front building facades shall incorporate
a minimum of 4 varieties of design
elements to create character and interest
to the home. These elements vary
depending on the architectural style
used.
Please refer to the attached
"Building Design Element
Matrix" Table 5 and the
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements
incorporated for each front
elevation type. All plan types
and elevation styles comply.
Side & Rear
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.7)
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced
architectural detailing incorporating
good design is required for side & rear
elevations adjacent to public/private
roads.
Please refer to the "Building
Design Element Matrix" Table 5
and the architectural plans that
detail the various design elements
incorporated for each side and
rear elevation types. All plan
types and elevation styles
comply.
Elevations
Fronting
Circulation
Element Roads
(4.6.3.A.l.a)
Homes adjacent to circulation element
roads are required to receive special
attention to detailing on the elevation
fronting the roads. This will include
window detailing equal to or better than
that of the front elevation. The
introduction of additional wall planes
and balconies, where noise standards
allow, is encouraged.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements
incorporated for each of the
proposed elevations. All plan
types and elevation styles
comply.
Floor Plans
(4.6.3.B.5.C &
4.6.3.B.5.d)
Minimum of 3 per neighborhood.
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be
provided for each floor plan.
The proposed project includes
four floor plans with three
distinctive elevation types for
each plan. Please refer to the
enclosed architectural plans.
Single-Story
Units
(4.4 &
4.6.3.B.4.1)
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops
that are visible from a circulation
element roadway, at least 20% of the
units shall be single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a
plateline maximum of 15', (10'
preferred).
Not Applicable within this
Neighborhood.
n
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 8
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.B.4.n &
4.6.3.B.5.b)
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80%
of the first-story square footage,
including all garage area.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the
single story features provided.
All proposed plans comply.
Planl: 40.0%
Plan IX: 42.9%
Plan 2: 74.5%
Plan 3: 76.7%
Where (3) Two
Story Units
occur in a row
with less than
15 ft between
homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.b)
One of the units must have a single-story
building edge at least 10' deep and shall
run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a
plateline maximum of 15'.
Plan 1 incorporates a single story
building edge that is at least 10'
wide and runs the length of the
building. This plan type is
plotted where there are 3, 2-story
units with less than 15' between
them.
Where (3) Two
Story Units
occur in a row
with 15 ft to 20
ft between
homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.C)
One of the units must have a single-story
building edge at least 5' deep and shall
run the length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a
plateline maximum of 15'.
Plan types 1 & 3 incorporate a
single story building edge that is
at least 5' wide and runs the
length of the building. These
plan types are plotted where there
are 3,2-story units with 15' to
20' between them.
Single-Story
Elements
(4.6.3 .B.4.d)
33% of units within a Neighborhood
must have a single-story element, with a
minimum depth of 3', that is 40% or
greater than the front elevation width.
Porches and porte cochere elements
qualify.
Plan types 1, IX and 3
incorporate a single story
building element that is greater
than 40% of the front elevation
width and a minimum of 3' deep.
Planl: 100%
Plan IX: 66.3%
Plan 2: 38.3%
Plan 3: 77.9%
Plan types 1, IX and 3 are plotted
on 36 lots, or 67.9% of the unit
mix, meeting this requirement.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 9
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Entries, Front
Porches,
Courtyards, &
Balconies
(4.6.3.B.9,
4.6.2.B.2.f&
4.6.2.B.3)
25% of the units must have either a
porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the
width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or
balcony, whichever is consistent with
the architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard
setback of 10'.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and
length of 5'.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed,
etc.) shall be provided over porches. A
balcony above a porch may also serve
this purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall
be open except for required and
ornamental guardrails. These features
shall qualify as a plane for the purposes
of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider
having the porch wrap around the side of
the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches
and balconies may encroach up to 5' and
8' respectively into the required front
yard setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height
of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into
the required setbacks.
37.7% of the elevations
incorporate a front balcony
(Spanish and Tuscan elev. styles
of Plan 1; and the Santa Barbara
and Tuscan elev. styles of Plan
3).
Please refer to the enclosed
architecture and site plan for
compliance.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE10
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Octagonal or
Round Entry
Tower
(4.6.2.B.3.a)
May encroach into the required side yard
setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total
length of the encroachment may not
exceed 8' and shall be located within the
larger side yard. The roof eave may
encroach a maximum of an additional
12" into the required setback.
A minimum 5' setback must be
maintained.
None are proposed within the
side yard setback.
Projections
(4.6.2.B.3)
Fireplace structures not wider than 8',
cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills,
buttresses, and other similar architectural
features projecting from the building
may intrude up to 2' into the required
setbacks.
No projections extend into the
side, rear or front yard setback
more than 2' nor are any
projections greater than 8' in
length. All plans comply.
Recreation
Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Common recreation areas:
. Less than 8,000 SF - Do not
require off-street parking.
. "Pocket Parks" - Not required to
provide parking.
• Within a 1/4 mile radius of the
units for which they are required to
serve shall include 1 space for
every 20 units.
. More than a 1/4 mile radius from
any of the units for which it is
required to serve requires parking
for those additional units at a rate
of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation
parking options)
The common recreation area for
the subject neighborhood is
located within Neighborhood 3.1.
Recreation parking will be
provided in Neighborhood 3.1.
-20
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 11
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Resident
Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.a)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior
measurements of 20' by 20'.
Two 1-car garages each having interior
measurements of 12' in width by 20' in
length may be provided as an
alternative.
All plan types include a minimum
of one, 2-car garage with an
interior measurement of 20' x
20'.
Roofs
(4.6.3.B.4.k&
4.6.3.B.8)
Varied building roof heights and roof
massing shall be incorporated into unit
designs for each master plan
neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be
provided to create diversity and interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of
slopes should attempt to parallel the
slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used
within each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12.
A variety of roof forms and
massing are proposed with
changes in direction and pitches.
See elevations and roof plans for
compliance.
Change in roof direction is
provided.
Roof planes for units at the top of
slopes are in compliance.
There are a total of 6 proposed
roofing tiles, including: Los
Padres Blend, Albuquerque,
Sunset Blend, Carlsbad Blend,
Santa Fe and Winslow.
All roofs comply with the
minimum roof pitch of 3:12.
n
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 12
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Garage Criteria
(4.6.2.B.2.b,
4.6.3.B.4.h, &
4.6.3.B.13)
20' minimum setback from the property
line where garage doors face the street.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15'
setback from property line. They also
must be designed to appear as a livable
portion of the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the
street are permitted on 25% of the total
number of lots in a neighborhood with a
minimum lot area greater than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot
size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional
25% of the units may have three-car in a
row garages facing the street provided
garages do not exceed more than 50% of
unit's frontage. The maximum number
of units in a neighborhood with three-car
in a row garages facing the street shall
not exceed a total of 50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a
mix of two door garages, three door
garages, and offset two door garages (2
planes separated by at least 18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should
be used within each neighborhood to
improve the street scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.I3.g for examples
of garage configurations)
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach
into the setback a maximum on 18" for
garages. However, the projection shall
not extend to the second story living
space. (See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.I3.d-ffor
more specifics about garages)
All setbacks for garages that face
the street are greater than or
equal to 20'.
All proposed 3-car garages are
of a side-loaded configuration.
They comply with the minimum
15' setback and are designed to
appear as a livable portion of the
home.
There are no proposed three-car
garages in a row facing the
street.
Not applicable.
All homes are a mix of 2 car
garages with one side loaded
garage.
All garages are designed to fit
the proposed elevation.
All garages comply.
All units comply.
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 13
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Colors
(4.6.3.B.12)
Colors should be consistent with the
architectural style selected. Warm, earth
tones are preferred; however other color
combinations are acceptable depending
upon architectural style.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum
of 3 different exterior color schemes shall
be used for each floor plan within the
same architectural styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods,
adjacent units within the same
architectural style shall not utilize the
same color scheme. However, similar or
same colors may occur within different
color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units
on either side of the subject unit as well
as those directly across the street.
Each plan type plotted on the site
plan includes a color scheme
designation to show compliance.
Please refer to the enclosed color
and materials boards for details
on each color scheme and to the
site plan for specific plotting.
Accessory
Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Patio and accessory structures shall
comply with development standards set
forth in Section 21.10.050 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All plan types comply.
Architectural
Styles Permitted
(4.6.3.C & 7.6)
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or
more of the following Architectural
Styles:
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
• Craftsman Bungalow
• Spanish Colonial
Monterey Ranch
Italian/Tuscan
• European Country
The elevation types included are
as follows:
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Italian/Tuscan
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 14
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
GUIDELINE
(VLCMP
REFERENCE)
STANDARD COMMENTS
Design
Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.1&
4.6.3.B.5.e)
50% of exterior openings
(doors/windows) in the front of each unit
shall be recessed or projected a minimum
of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with
wood or raised stucco. Colored
aluminum window frames shall by used
(no mill finishes).
"Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter
tails, knee braces and columns shall be
used when appropriate to the proposed
architectural style.
The windows and doors on the
front elevations are recessed a
minimum of 2" and are trimmed
with either wood or raised
stucco. Please refer to the
enclosed elevations on the
architectural plans for
compliance. All plans comply.
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in
scale with the size of the structure
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots
less than 7,500 SF.
Please refer to the enclosed
elevations on the architectural
plans for compliance. All
chimneys and their caps comply
with proper scale and proportion.
Window
Detailing
(4.6.3.B.10)
The design of the windows shall include
one or more of the following features:
• Deeply recessed windows
. Paned windows
• Decorative window ledges
• Accent and varied shape windows
• Window boxes and planters with
architecturally evident supports
• Exterior wood trim surrounds
. Accent colors on shutters or other
elements
• Arched elements
Shutters
• Raised stucco trim around windows
• Window lintels
Please refer to the enclosed
elevations on the architectural
plans for compliance. All plans
comply.
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of 4 enhanced
architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of 2
such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation
Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation
and floor plan (see Attachment No. 9).
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's
PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
May 21,2008
PAGE 15
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 05-15.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts
would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the
potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa
Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project
reviewed herein.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23,2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Oaks
Neighborhood 3.3 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are
required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the
Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6420
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Table 1 - Front Yard Setbacks
7. Table 3 - Individual Lot Data
8. Table 4 - Gross & Net Lot Acreage
9. Table 5 - Building Elevation Design Elements
10. Table 6 - Unit Summary Table
11. Reduced Exhibits
12. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "OO" dated May 21,2008
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: PUD OS-12(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3
APPLICANT: Jack Henthorn and Associates. P O Box 237 Carlsbad. CA 92018
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval
of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting
for the development of 53 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa, Oaks
North Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose
Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 19 through 35 and 80 through 115 of the City of Carlsbad Tract
CT 05-15. Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North - Neighborhood 3.3 in the City of
Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596 Files in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on August 22. 2007 as file No. 2007-
0560436.
APN: 223-841-01 through 17: 223-841-25 through 45 -Acres: 12.3 Proposed No. of Lots/Units:
53 Lots.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Low Medium (RLM)
Proposed Land Use Designation: Same
Density Allowed: 3.2 Density Proposed: 2.8
Existing Zone: Planned Community PC (R-l) Proposed Zone: P-C (R-l)
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
General Plan Current Land Use
Site P-C (Master Plan R-l) RLM Vacant
North P-C (Master Plan R- RLM/OS Vacant/Open Space
1/O-S)
South P-C (Master Plan R- RLM/OS Vacant/Open Space
1/O-S)
East P-C (Master Plan R-l) RLM Vacant/Open Space
West P-C (Master Plan O-S) OS Open Space
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: |~~| Yes 1X1 No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes E<3 No Coastal Development Permit: |~~] Yes IXI No
Revised 01/06
Local Coastal Program Amendment: |~~1 Yes 1X1 No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A
Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Dieguito Union High School District and Encinitas Union Elementary
School District.
Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 53
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Categorical Exemption, N/A
Negative Declaration, issued N/A
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
XI Other. Within the scope of EIR 98-07
Revised 01706
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 PUD 05-15(A)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 11 GENERAL PLAN: RLM
ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY (P-O
DEVELOPER'S NAME: COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
ADDRESS: 4747 Morena Boulevard Suite 100 San Diego. C A 92117
PHONE NO.: (858) 490-2300 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-841-01 through 17; 223-841-
25 through 45
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 12.3 ac/53 du
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
City Administrative Facilities:
Library:
Demand in Square Footage = 184.27 sq. ft.
Demand in Square Footage = 98.27 sq. ft.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 53 EDU
Park: Demand in Acreage = .37 acres
Drainage: Demand in CFS = 160.1
Identify Drainage Basin = Basin D
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 530 APT
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 6
Open Space: Acreage provided =
Schools (San Dieguito Union High/
Encinitas Union Elementary School Distrct)
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD =
17.5 gross acres
Elementary: 116 Students
Middle School: 93 Students
High School: 93 Students
53 EDU
N/A
11.660 GPD
The project (CT 05-15) is 85 dwelling units below the number of Master Plan units
planned for this area.
Citv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note: .
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, socjal club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below. - ' '"
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Part LC Oaks 3.3. LLC
Title . Title '
Address Address 4747 Morena Blvd. Ste 100
SanDieoo. CA92117
2.OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned (corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
.ed if necessary.)
Title
Corp/Part Real Estate Collateral Management
OPV Company
Address 1903 Wright Place. Suite 180
Carlsbad. CA 92008
1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust : Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
| I Yes A. No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of applicant/date
for RECM; Fred M. Arbuckle
President of Morrow Development
P rint or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
Table J-
Front Yard Setbacks
Lot*
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
_ 87
88
89
90-
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
Floor Plan
2 R
3 R
1 R
2
1 R
3
1
3
2 R
1X R
3
2 R
1
2 R
3
1
3
1 R
2
3
1 R
3
2
1X
3
2
3 R
1XR
2 R
1 R
3
2 R
3
2
1
3
1 R
3
2
1XR
3 R
1 R
3
2 R
1 R
2
3 R
2 R
Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet
Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6
16.70 26.60 15.70
15.00 24.90
15.10 31.10 27.80
21.70 33.70 30.50
20.50 34.20 30.40
15.20 20.00
16.10 28.10 23.00
17.50 24.60
16.00 26.00 16.20
18.10 23.80 20.00
15.00 24.60
16.00 25.90 15.00
17.10 26.60 20.00
18.60 31.50 22.70
17.10 26.70
15.20 31.00 25.80
18.80 31.50
15.70 28.90 21.20
15.80 26.70 25.10
21.40 30.90
24.60 39.80 36.60
15.00 25.40
16.80 26.70 15.80
19.70 25.40 21.60
16.00 25.50
15.00 25.30 25.30
26.20 35.80
24.00 29.70 26.00
15.20 25.60 25.60
15.50 25.60 20.00
26.30 27.20
18.60 37.00 23.50
16.30 25.90
25.60 35.60 35.30
15.10 30.10 26.30
15.00 29.40
20.00 30.70 21.80
15.00 25.70
16.10 25.00 27.90
16.80 23.60 20.00
16.90 20.00
15.00 31.00 28.80
42.20 31.00
15.00 28.10 24.00
17.90 31.80 22.60
16.10 27.20 15.20
16.50 34.40
15.00 26.60 24.70
Weighted
Average
20.33
15.00
23.76
28.38
27.49
18.24
21.45
22.00
19.94
20.04
15.00
19.63
20.21
24.56
23.18
22.91
26.85
20.67
22.16
27.42
32.80
15.00
20.43
21.64
22.02
15.00
32.28
25.98
21.62
19.43
26.87
26.88
22.38
31.70
22.91
15.00
22.86
15.00
22.25
19.52
18.86
15.00
35.10
15.00
22.65
20.22
27.84
15.00
3/14/2008
Neighborhood 3.3 South
Sections
Table 3
Page 3 of 5
Front Yard Setbacks
Lot # Floor Plan
111
112
113
114
115
2 R
3
3 R
2 R
1 R
Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet
Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6
22.00 35.70 20.10
16.20 21.60
17.50 24.40
18.70 22.50 32.10
18.50 28.50 20.00
NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE:
Weighted
Average
26.90
19.62
21.87
23.23
21.09
22.14
3/14/2008
Neighborhood 3.3 South
Section B
Table 3
Page 4 of 5
e
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.3
Lot*
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
TO7
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Plan
2 R
3 R
1 R
2
1 R
3
1
3
2 R
1X R
3
2 R
1
2 R
3
1
3
1 R
2
3
1 R
3
2
1X
3
2
3 R
1X R
2 R
1 R
3
2 R
3
2
1
3
1 R
3
2
1X R
3 R
1 R
3
2 R
1 R
2
3 R
2 R
2 R
3
3 R
2 R
1 R
Elevation
A
B
U
B
C
A
B
r*
A
C
B
A
C
B
A
A
C
A
C
A
B
C
A
C
A
B
A
C
B
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
B
A
A
C
C
A
B
C
B
B
Color
1
5
8
4
7
1
5
7
6
8
3
5
9
1
2
4
9
3
8
6
3
9
2
7
3
2
4
9
5
6
7
3
4
8
5
2
8
6
5
9
1
3
8
6
2
4
9
7
5
4
7
3
1
Average Neighborhood Setback:
Average
Front
20.33
15.00
23.76
28.38
27.49
18.24
21.45
22.00
19.94
20.04
15.00
19.63
20.21
24.56
23.18
22.91
26.85
20.67
22.16
27.42
32.80
15.00
20.43
21.64
22.02
15.00
32.28
25.98
21.62
19.43
26.87
26.88
22.38
31.70
22.91
15.00
22.86
15.00
22.25
19.52
18.86
15.00
35.10
15.00
22.65
20.22
27.84
15.00
26.90
19.62
21.87
23.23
21.09
22.14
Setbacks (ft)
Side Yard
Rear Left Right
30.4
20.4
28.4
36.2
51.7
27
37.2
24.8
25.3
26.3
15
20.2
20.7
18.5
38.8
29.5
15.3
18.4
21.8
22.4
21.5
19.4
24.6
28.1
•16.7
20.9
15
23.6
28
24.4
46.9
19.3
21.3
22.1
44.2
30.5
25.6
20.1
19.5
27.6
15.8
15.6
45.3
21.2
27.2
19.3
17.1
33
20
30.4
39
46.7
30.6
10
10.2
12
11.1
9.8
16.9
7.4
7.2
9
6.2
6.8
7.2
8.8
5
7.6
7.4
17.4
12.6
6.1
5
13.3
5
5.5
5.5
5
19.5
10.4
10.4
9.3
7.9
7.7
7
5
12.4
5.5
6.3
6.1
6.7
6.5
5.5
5
8.6
8.3
6.4
7.5
8.6
7.5
5
5
7.5
6.1
6.2
6.5
8.2
7.5
7.3
7.5
8
8.3
7
6.5
7.5
6.3
5.7
5.8
5
57.1
6.6
9.8
7.2
8.5
12.8
9.8
10.3
9.4
9.8
9.8
9.8
7.8
12.2
5.5
5
10.5
5
15.4
8
10
13.6
6.2
6.9
6.2
6
7.5
7.5
5.5
5
8.6
7.5
5.8
5
7.6
12.3
5
6.1
6.8
6.5
Garage
26.6
24.9
27.8
33.7
30.4
20
23
24.6
26
20
24.9
25.9
20
31.5
27
25.8
35.7
21.2
26.7
31.2
36.6
26.7
26.7
21.6
25.8
25.3
36.1
26
25.6
20
27.2
37
26.2
35.6
26.3
32.2
21.8
27
25
20
20
28.8
31
28.1
22.6
27.2
40.6
26.6
35.7
21.6
24.4
22.5
20
Porch
Net Pad
Area(SF)
7,324
7,161
7,544
8,982
9,191
9,427
9,690
8,058
7,704
6,310
6,220
6,130
7,588
10,187 .
8,753
9,815
7,300
7,820
6,273
8,149
10,422
6,435
6,639
6,722
6,633
6,365
6,886
6,982
6,680
8,975
10,442
8,665
6,756
6,827
7,358
7,678
6,921
6,412
6,466
6,336
6,288
7.148
11,203
6,564
7,018
6,350
7,822
7,086
7,203
7,192
7,913
7,916
7,040
Building
Coverage1'
Sq. Footage % of Net Pad
2,455
2,488
2,750
2,455
2,750
2,488
2,750
2,488
2,455
2,524-
2,488
2,455-
2,750
2,455
2,488
2,750
2,488
2,750
2,455
2,488
2,750
2,488
2,455
2,524
2,488
2,455
2,488
2,524
2,455
2,750
2,488
2,455
2,488
2,455
2,750
2,488
2,750
2,488
2,455
2,524
2,486
2,750
2,488
2,455
2,750
2,455
2,488
2,455
2,455
2,488
2,488
2,455
2,750
33.5%
34.7%
36.5%
27.3%
29.9%
26.4%
28.4%
30.9%
31.9%
40.0%
40.0%
40.0%
36.2%
24.1%
28.4%
28.0%
34.1%
35.2%
39.1%
30.5%
26.4%
38.7%
37.0%
37.5%
37.5%
38.6%
36.1%
36.2%
36.8%
30.6%
23.8%
28.3%
36.8%
36.0%
37.4%
32.4%
39.7%
38.8%
38.0%
39.8%
39.6%
38.5%
22.2%
37.4%
39.2%
38.7%
31.8%
34.6%
34.1%
34.6%
31.4%
31.0%
39.1%
'•*' A- ^
V "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and
the perimeter area of a basement Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the
building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking areas, structures
under 30 inches in height and masonry walls rot greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-wads, planter walls or grade-separation retaining wals.
3/14/2008
Neighborhood 3.3 South
Section B
Table 4
Page 5 of 5
Table.
LC 3.3 South
Lot*
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Gross Lot
Area (SF)
7324
7161
8450
9083
9640
10409
9690
8058
7704
6310
6220
6130
7588
10187
8753
9815
7985
8132
7052
8156
10422
6435
6639
6722
6633
7470
8000
6982
6680
9675
11625
8923
6757
7759
8723
7678
6921
6412
6466
6336
6288
7148
11221
6565
7019
6350
7822
7086
7235
7220
7913
7916
7040
Net Pad Area
(SF)
7,324
7,161
7,544
8,982
9,191
9,427
9,690
8,058
7,704
6,310
6,220
6,130
7,588
10,187
8,753
9,815
7,300
7,820
6,273
8,149
10,422
6,435
6,639
6,722
6,633
6,365
6,886
6,982
6,680
8,975
10,442
8,665
6,756
6,827
7,358
7,678
6,921
6,412
6,466
6,336
6,288
7,148
11,203
6,564
7,018
6,350
7,822
7,086
7,203
7,192
7,913
7,916
7,040
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.3 South
BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS
DESIGN ELEMENTS
a. Variety of Roof Planes
b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors
c. Paned Windows and Doors
d. Exposed Roof Beams or Rafter Tails
e. Decorative Window Ledges
, Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood,
Sidina and Stone
g. Window and Door Lintels
h. Dormers
1 , Accent and Varied Shape Windows
. Window Boxes and Planters with
Architectural Iv Evident Suooorts
k. Exterior Wood Elements
. Variations in Colors of Stucco and Other
Elements
Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or Otherm. ri .Elements
n. Stucco Wainscoting
o. Covered Balconies
p. Arched Elements
q. Shutters
Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and
Dnnrs
PLAN ONE
Spanish Colonial
Front
•/
S
S
•/
•/
•/
•/
•/
s
V
s
s
Side
S
V
V
s
s
/
s
/
Rear
/
•/
S
s
s
s
•/
s
Santa Barbara
Front
S
s
s
s
s
•/
s
s
s
s
s
Side
/
/
S
v'
v'
S
S
S
Rear
s
s
s
s
s
V
s
s
s
Tuscan
Front
S
s
/
s
</
s
S
s
s
s
V
Side
s
s
s
s
s
•/
s
s
s
Rear
•/
S
S
s
•/
s
s
s
PLAN1X
Spanish Colonial
Front
v'
S
V
S
V
s
s
</
s
Side
^
•/
S
s
V
s
s
Rear
s
•/
s
s
s
s
•/•
V
PLAN TWO
Spanish Colonial
Front
^
V
V
S
s
•/
s
s
V
s
s
Side
s
s
J
•/
s
s
s
•/
s
s
Rear
/
S
S
•/
S
s
s
V
s
s
'
Santa Barbara
Front
/
•/
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
V
s
s
Side
s
s
s
V
s
s
•/
•/
s
s
Rear
s
•/
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Tuscan
Front
S
S
s
s
s
V
•/
s
s
V
s
s
Side
v'
•/
S
•/
S
V
V
s
s
s
Rear
s
V
V
s
•/
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
PLAN THREE
Spanish Colonial
Front
/
^
/
/
S
s
s
•/
s
s
V
</
V
Side
•/
S
•/
s
s
V
s
s
s
s
s
s
Rear
S
s
s
•/
V
s
s
s
s
s
•/
Santa Barbara
Front
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
•s
s
s
s
Side
S
•/
s
•/
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Rear
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Tuscan
Front
v'
S
S
S
V
S
S
•/
•/
•/
S
/
/
Side
S
S
s
s
s
•/
s
s
s
V
s
s
Rear
V
s
s
s
s
s
s
V
s
s
s
s
3/31/2008 Section A, Item #9
Unit Summary Table
1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage % of 2nd Floor Total Building
Plan Area Area Area vs. 1st Floor1' Area Height2'
1
1X
2*
3*
2,133
2,078
1,854
1,884
1,101
1,084
1,828
1,908
617
446
601
604
40.0%
42.9%
74.5%
76.7%
3,851
3,608
4,283
4,396
24.1
24.1
24.5
27.6
1/ The 2nd story of any house does not exceed 80% of the 1st story square footage, including all garage area.
21 Building heights shown indicate the maximum building height for each proposed plan type.
*Plans 2 & 3 1st floor square footages include 2nd story overhang (P2 =171 sf & P3 = 104 sf)
3/14/2008
Neighborhood 3.3 South
Section B
Table 1
Page 1 of 5
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
PUD AMENDMENT SITE PLAN COMPOSITE EXHIBIT
LA GOSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
ELEVATION STYLES
(LOTS 19-35, 80-115)
WAN 1A- SPANISH
PLAN 19 -SANTA BARBARA
PLAN 1C -TUSCAN
P| PLAN IXC -TUSCAN
[ | PLAN 2A- SPANISH
PLAN ZB- SANTA BARBARA
PLANK -TUSCAN
[~~] PLAN 3A- SPANISH
PLAN 3B - SANTA BARBARA
PLAN 3C- TUSCAN
LOT NUMBER AND PAD ELEVATION
PLANTYPE
ELEVATIONS STYLE AND COLOR SCHEME
SETBACK DIMENSION TO QAHAQE
SETBACK DIMENSION TO PORCH/PATIO OR DECK
SETBACK DIMENSION TO LIVABLE
BUILDING MIX
P1 = 13
P1x = 4
P2 = 17
P3 = 19
TOTAL = 53
NOTE.
ALL SIDE YARD FENCES SHALL NOT ENCROA&H ONFRONT YARD SCTBACK.
PUD 05-12 (A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PUD 05-12 (A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
GENERAL NOTES
TOTAL SITE AfiEA: APFKOXIHATELY 12.3 ACRESEXISTING LAIC USE; VACANT - ROUGH CRAXO fPEJ? CM*IMC 446-S*)PROPOSED LAN) «SF: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AtC OPEN SPACETOTAL HJUBEK OF CTCU 'AC UNI T& 5JTOTM. NUGEK CF ffSICfNTIAL LOTS S3ASSESSOR'S PARCEL UMBERS 223-84t-Ot-1?. 23-45 t 223-013-01-15
EXISTING GEtfHAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION:SUM (ffSlfXNTIAL LCm-lfUltM DENSITY 10-4 du/ae/JPOOPOSEO CDfKAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION:OJI (RESIDENTIAL LOW-tfDUM DENSITY 10-4 Ou/aci)EXISTING ZONING: PC'. MASTER PLAN UNOERLYING ZONING: K-J (SINGLE FAMILY OETAOfD). CROSS OVERALL fflSHBCOCOO VENSITK2.S OU/AC (JZO WS/4B.9 AC) PER TU CT OS-IS'. Lnf ZOf: ZONE II
(. AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS 530 (53 WITS r 10 TRIPS/DAY)
. BUILDING COVERAGE: AfVROXIUATELY J. I ACRE'S'. PERCENTAGE LANDSCAPING AFFROXtUATELY 53. IX
GENERAL DESIGN NOTES-SITE PLAN
ALL GRADING FOR PROPOSED AND FUTURE STREETS SHALL CONFORU TO THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS ANO AS REWIRED BY Tff CITY ENGINEER.
ALL CAS&fNTS SHALL BT PROVIDED. REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS REOUIREO
BY THE CITY ENGINEER. PUBLIC UTILITIES AM) THEIR APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS.
ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.
SOURCE OF TOPOSRAPm-.
SAH-LO AfJtIAL SURVEYS FLOHN 01-30-97
R.J. LUNG FLOWN OS-1I-C4
AND Tlf HJNSAKtX * ASSOCIATES MUCH GRADING PLAN (DRAXING NO. 446-3A)
CONTOURED INTERVALS: 1'/5' FEETUANUFACTUREQ SLOPE RATIOS SHALL BE VARIABLE (2: I- MX).FINISHED GRAXS ARE PER ROUGH GRADING PLANS 446-5A.
SOILS INrORUATION WAS OBTAINED FROU THE UPDATED GEOTEGHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PREPARED BY: GEQCON INC., DATED: 08-OJ-Of
GRADED SWALES SHALL HAVE A UINIUJH OF IX FLOH LINE GRAX AND AS SHOHN
ON GRADING PLAN DIG 44S-5A.
I. ALL STREET tXSIGNS. STREET LIGHT, AND FIRE HYDRANTS TO CONFORM
TO CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS REWIRED BY CITY ENGINEERAtC PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON ItffKH&fNT PLANS OK 446-5.
'. LANDSCAPING AND TRET PLANTING SHALL K PER THE CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE HANUAL
AND THE VILLAGES CF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN. (SEE THE MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR THE OAKS) , AND PER LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY CILLCSPIE DESIGN.
'. CUL-OE-SAC CURB GRADES SHALL BE A UINIUUU OF IX.
r. THE SUBDIVIO£a/t3EVELOPEK SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL APPROVED STREET
LIGHT STANDARDS AND FIXTURES IN THE TYPE ANO NUUBER APPROVED BY THE
CITY OF CAOLSSAD. THE PUBLIC HOOKS DEPARTMENT - TRAFFIC SECTION ANDPER THE CITY'S STREET LIGHT CONSTRUCT ION STANDARDS.
STREET LICHTS AS SHOtN ON THIS HAP ARE TO K USED AS A GVIOE ONLY.sneer LIGHTS AS SHOWN ON THIS HAP ARE PEP ana. 429-7 AND 446-s.
I. THIS PUD ASSUCS CERTAIN BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE IS EXISTING Off
APPROVED AND OOHXD FOP TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.
THEY INCLUDE fTANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, SAN ELMO ROAD AND THE SOUTHERLY
PORTION CF SITIO CORAZON.
'. WHERE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO tCET FHT 5' UlNIUUt POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON
SIDEYARDS, DEEPENED FOOTINGS HILL BE UTILIZED AS ALLOWED PER GEOCON. INC.
LETTER DATED KC-O5-O7.
\. ALL. MfWVEteNrS AND GRADING ARE EXISTING PER lUPROVBfNT AND GRADING
PLANS 448-5 ANO 44S-5A RESPECTIVELY.
'. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PRECISE GRADING PERUIT OR ANY BUILDING
PERMITS, THE EXISTING llfROVfXNT OR AH INGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCT 1 OH
CHANCED TO SHOW THE RELOCATION OF ANY DRIVEWAYS, SEWER AND WATER
LATERALS WHICH HAY CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY STANDARDS OR PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL UtITS/DRIVEVAYS.
I. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION
ZONES. FIRE RATED * IGNITION RESISTIVE GAZEBOS, DECKS ANO PATIOS CAN
ENCROACH WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROTECTION ZONE.
I. LOTS 91-115 ME REWIRED TO HAVE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS.
OWNER
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL UOUT. CO.,A DELAWARE CORPORATION
1003 mCHT PUCESUITE 100CARLSBAD, CA «<M0(790) 939-2701
Of UORROW DEVELOPUENT
AS AGENT FOR REAL ESTATE
COLLATERAL UGUT. CO.
APPLICANT
1C OAKS 3.3, LLC
4J47 UORENA BOULEVARD
SAN OtftW, CA 92117(838) 490-3300
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
U COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
1
OF
6
PUD 05-12 (A)
DRIVEWAYS. SEVER A WATER LATERAL LOCATIONS ARE TYPICALAND SHALL K PLACED IH ACCORDANCE mm CITY STANDARDS
AND AS APPLICABLE. LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT STANDARDS,AS SHOW PER CITY DWG. 44S-5.
XWALX UHDERORAINPER SDRSD D-27.
OOtlfWAY SHALL MCLUOE CROSS-FALL
TO SIDE OF LOT WIN D-27 DRAIN
AND LATERAL LOCATION PETSTAIL
•ALLOWED PER CEOCON INC. SOILS LETTER DATED DEC-OS-O?
SEE SHEET I CEHERAL DESIGN-SITE PLAN NOTE / 15.SIDEWALK UNDERDRAW PER REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGSWL1 BE PKOVOED ON EVERY LOT PER DETAIL 0-27.
SMMMflD CPAMHG MQ. GS-U
LANDSCAPE CQRRIVORTYPICAL SECTION CORNER LOT
b H —
AVENIDA SOLEDAD UAJOHENTRY.UXM.STREETw
TYPICAL DRAINAGE SWALE DETAILS
SAN ELI JO ROAD MAJOR Effrm-LOCAL STREET wm MEDIAN
PER DtK 129-7
KHOTES 5e' MOT X.Q.W. Mm X'cum TO cum rat CUL-K-SAC ORIMP STKETS (Ft* UASTO> PUM)
COBTEPAAOMM4. S/T7O EMHM, SITJO CAUENTE& CORTEALTUHA
PUftlW
we ft;.T fwcjw.i
RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD muEmmn STRUT
PER DUG 429-7
EXISTING STREET SECTIONS
I. UTVTT LOC4TMNS Wf TVKM.
1. ACTVM. SmKTUUL SECTION TO K OfTOHMED BAOOOH 1HCV Witt TEST, APMOtCD BT THE CITY EWOWW
PUBLIC STREETS
PORTION OF STREET CORTE PANORAMA
PUNNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
2
OF
_Q
PUD 05-12 (A)
n
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "A" - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 9.7' MtN. DISTANCE IS MAIN TAWED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
LOT 30 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'B* - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1' - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.2' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARC MET.
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "P" • TYPICAL
SCALE: T - I01
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.2' Mm. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
LOT 80 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'D" • TYPICAL
SCALE: 1' - Iff
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 1B.O' UN. DISTANCE K MAINTAINED.THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *E' - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1' - tO'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.2' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP Of SLOPESETBACKUNE OF SIGHTI ffl
OT 105 'PUN3-C
LOT 109 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'P - TYPICAL
-TOP OF SLOPESETBACKLINE OF SIGHT
LOT 107 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "QT - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.0' MIN, DISTANCE IS MAMTAINED,
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *H* • TYPICAL
SCALE: 1" - 1tf
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.2' MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX
scut i' - «t
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH(IOT819-35.60-115)
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL PLANE DETAIL
SCM£ I', tff
HUNSAKER& ASSOCIATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
3
OF
6
PUD 05-12 (A)
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
(LOTS 19-35,80-115)
SEE SHEET 5
PLAN TYPE
1A
1B
1C
1XG
2A
2B
2C
3A
3B
3C
ELEVATION STYLE
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
TUSCAN
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
112 LINE AOJUSTMENT DETAIL
LOT ZOO
HOP OPEN SPACE
MAP NO 1437±!
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKERSu ASSOCIATES
PUNNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Ol Carlsbad, California
SHEET
4
OF
6
. ' • LOT ZOO x •.
HCF..OPEN SPACE.
.MAP ,NO'., 14379
LOT '20O
HOP OPEN SPACE
MAP NO 14379
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOIF
(LOTS 19-35, 80-115)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
HUNSAKER& ASSOCIATES
SEE SHEET 4 Citv Of Carlsbad, California
PUD 05-12 (A)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LA COST* OUCS MIRTH XIGHKRKUD 3.3 SOUTH
LOTS IS 7HMUK 35 *C 00 TUKJUCH JIS OF Tt£ CITr OF CMLSBW TRACT Cl
OS- IS, VILLAGES OF LK COST* - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH - ttlOOORHOOD J.3.IN 1W CITY OF CAOLS8M). COUNTY OF SAH OIEOO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO lUf HO. nCRCGT HO. I55X FILED IN TtC OFFICE OF TIC
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY OH AUGUST 22. 2007 AS FILE HO.2007-OS604X.
EASEMENT NOTES
THE FOLLOWS CASEMENTS ARf FROH THE CITY ONUU8ER JtlTt (THE LA COSTA ULLAGE OAKS ~A~ HAP).HUNSAKER AHO ASSOOA TES.
. A WSJfNC DRAIHACE EASEUEHT TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD PER 1HACT HU> 99-04-3.
EXIST. 20' WITX EASEueNT GRANTED TO VALLECtTOS WATER DISTRICT KR DOC.
REC. 1-13-2006. AS FILE NO. 2006-0104869, OF O.R. A PORTION OF THIS
EASEUENT LIES WITHIN COHTE PANORAMA DEDICATED PEW IMP NO. 15310,
AND IS HOT SHOWN H&tEQN. SEE CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO- 99-04-03,
IMP HO. 15316 fQtt LOCATION.
A DRAINAGE EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD PER UAP HO.
J531B. A PORTION OF IMS EASEUENT LIES WITHIN COffTf PANORAMA.
DEDICATED PER UAP HO. 15318, AND IS NOT SHOWN HEREQN. SEE CITY OF
CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 99-04-03, UAP NO. 15318 FOR LOCATION.
AN EASEMENT STUNTED TOVALLECffOS WATER DtSTffKTAS SHOWN PER Cm OFCARLSBAD TRACT 99-04-03
(UAP 15318)
EXISTING EASEMENT EXHIBIT
PREPARED BY:PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 SOUTH
(LOTS 19-35 & 80-115 OF C.T. 05-15)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
6
OF
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
INARCH 17,2008
r
6ECOMP PLOOR PLAN I 'A
BEDRM 2 OPTION
BEDRM/DEN OPTION
PLAN ONELA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
x:HKJARCH)7,20«
PIR6T PLOOR PLAN! t 'A
FIRST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SQ. FT.OAKAOE: 617 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,233 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
DECOKATtVE B1UCCO RBCEWDBCORATIVE TUB VENTwnooonr IRON IL
RIQHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'FRONT ELEVATION! 'A1
OLAZtNQ AT OARAGE DOORS TO BE OPTIONAL
SPANISH COLONIAL
LEFT eiDB ELBVATIONI 'A'REAR ELEVATION 'A1
PLAN ONE - SPANISH COLONIALLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENTm
IJARCH17.MM
XT
PLANE ONE
PLANE ONE
PLANE FOUR
PLANE THREE
PLAN ONE ALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLR1CH DEVELOPMENT
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 40%
SECOND FLOOR [:?"iT]
FIRST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SQ.FT.GARAGE: 617 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,233SQ.FT.
HINARCH 17,2001
r
66COND PLOOR PLAN I 'B'PLAN ONE
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
P R6T PLOOR PLAN I 'B
FmST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SO. FT.OARAOE: 617 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,233 SQ.FT.
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
—INARCH 17,2001
ITTVB STUCCO CORBEL
VENT— AWNING W/ W.I. SUPPORTS
KOOF-FIXTURE
RI6HT SIDE ELEVATION! 'S1 PROSIT eiEVATIONl 'B'SANTA BARBARA
LPT eiPB ELEVATION 'B'RBAR ELEVATION 'B1
PLAN ONE - SANTA BARBARALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
___
ft^ARCH 17,200*
PLANE ONE
PLANE TWO
PLANE FOUR
PLANE FIVE
PLANE THREE
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 40%
SECOND FLOOR [~p3
PLAN ONE BLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SO. FT.OARAGE: «17 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3J33SQ.FT.
H*ARCHI7,200I
feECOMD FLOOR PLAN I 'C'PLAN ONELA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
PIR&T FLOOR PLAN! I 'C'
FIRST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SQ. Fr.OARAGE: 617 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,233 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
GLAZING AT GARAGE DOORS TO BE OPTIONAL
RI6HT 6IPE ELEVATION! 'g1 PROMT 61-evATIONI 'g'TUSCAN
LEFT 6IDE ELEVATION 'C'REAR BLBVATION 'g'
PLAN ONE -TUSCAN
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COIJUCH DEVELOPMENT
PLANE FOUR
PLANE FIVE
PLAN ONE C
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
COVERAGE: 2,750 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 40%
SECOND FLOOR [j j; |
FIRST FLOOR: 2,133 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,100 SO. FT.OARAGE: 617SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,233 SQ.FT.
r
6SCONIP FLOOR PLAN I 'CX'
J
BEDRM/DENOPnON
PLAN ONE XLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST PLOOR PLAN 1 'CX'
FIRST FLOOR: 2,078 SO. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,084 SO. FT.OARAGE: 446 SQ. FT.TOTAL: 3,162 SQ.FT.
COVERAGE: 2,524 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
___
KiARCH17.200»
RIQHT SIDE ELEVATION! 'CX PROMT BLEVATION 'CX'
GLAZING AT OARAGE DOOM TO BE OPTIONAL
TUSCAN
r
LBPT 6IPE BLBVATIONI REAR BLBVATION 'CX'
PLAN ONE X - TUSCAN
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
HINARCH 17.20M
PLANE ONE
PLANE TWO
PLANE FOUR
PLANE FOUR
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
COVERAGE: 2,524 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 43%
SECOND FLOOR Plnl
PLAN ONE 'CX1
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST FLOOR: 2,078 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,084 SQ. FT.OARAGE: 446 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,1«2 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN 2 'A PIRST FLOOR PLAN 2 'A'
PLAN TWO
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRJCH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST FLOOR: 1.683 SQ.FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.OARAOE: 601 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,511 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG: 171 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
RIOHT SIDE ELS VAT ION 'A'PROSIT ELEVATION 'A'
GLAZING AT GARAGE DOORS TO BE OPTIONAL
SPANISH COLONIAL
LSFT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'REAR ELEVATION 'A'
PLAN TWO - SPANISH COLONIALLA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
PLANE FOUR
PLANE THREE
PLANE ONE
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO
PLANEFOUR
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
PLAN TWO ALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRJCH DEVELOPMENT
SECONDFLOOR [..;>[
FIRST FLOOR: 1,683 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.OARAGE: 601 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,5II SQ.FT.
PORCH: 177 SQ.FT.
\lMICHn,l
I
6SCONID FLOOR PLAN 2
PLAN TWOLA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST FLOOR PLAN! 2 'S'
FIRST FLOOR: 1,683 SQ.FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.GARAGE: 601 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,511 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG: 171 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
INARCH 17,200S
RI6HT &IPB ELS VAT ION 'B'PROMT ELSVATIOM 'B1
GLAZING AT OARAOE DOOM TO BE OPTIONAL
6ANITA BARBARA
LEFT 6IOB SUE VAT ION 'B1 R6AR ELEVATION 'B'
PLAN TWO - SANTA BARBARALA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
KjARCH 17,200*
PLANE FOUR
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
I——I
PLANE TWO
PLANE FOUR
-PLANE ONE
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
PLAN TWO BLA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
SECOND FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR: 1,683 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.
GARAGE: «01 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,511 SQ.FT.
PORCH: 177 SQ.FT.
I
6BCOMD FLOOR PLAN 2 'C'
PLAN TWOLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIR&T FLOOR PLAN 2 'C'
FIRST FLOOR: 1,683 SQ.FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.OARAGE: 601 SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,511 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHAND: 171 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
INARCH 17,2001
RISHT 6IP6 ELEVATION 'C'
GLAZING AT OAHAOE DOORS TO BE OPTIONAL
PROMT EtBVATlON 'C'TUSCAN
LEFT 6IPE ELEVATION! 'C'REAR ELEVATION 'C1
PLAN TWO - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
H4ARCH17.200I
PLANE FOUR
PLANE ONE
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
PLANE THREE
COVERAGE: 2,455 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
PLAN TWO CLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
SECONDFLOOR [g,a|
FIRST FLOOR: 1,683 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,828 SO. FT.GARAGE: 601 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,511 SQ.FT.
PORCH: 177 SQ.FT.
REAR ELEVATION 'A' HI/ VERANDA
REAR ELEVATION 'B' 0)/ VERANDA REAR ELEVATION 'C' UJ/ VERANDA
PLAN TWO - W/ VERANDALA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
INARCH 17.2001
REAR ELEVATION 'A' U)/ OBCK
RBAR BLBVATIOM 'B' UIX PECK REAR ELEVATION 'C' LU/ PSC<
PLAN TWO - W/ DECKLA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
86CON1P PLOOR PLAN 3 'A WR6T PL.OOR PLAN 3 'A'
PLAN THREELA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
6"
CD
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.
OARAGE: 604 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,688 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG: 104 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A'FRONT ELEVATION 'A'
OLAZINO AT OARAOE DOORS TO BE OPTIONAL
&PANI6H COLONIAL
LEFT 61OB ELEVATION 'A1 REAR ELEVATION 'A'
PLAN THREE - SPANISH COLONIAL
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
._~MARCH 17,2oot
PLANE ONE
PLANE THREE
PLANE FOUR
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO
PLANE ONE
PLAN THREE ALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
o
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
SECOND FLOOR | "' |
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.OARAGE: 604 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,688 SQ. FT.
PORCH (second floor above): 104 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3 'B'
PLAN THREELA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
FIRST PIOOR PLAN 3 'S1
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.OARAGE: 604 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,688 SQ.FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG: 104 SQ. FT.
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
k4A>CH17,200l
6IPE ELEVATION 'B'
tCMJtW.T-0'
FRONT ELEVATION 'B1
GLAZING AT GAKAOE DOOM TO BE OPTIONAL
&ANTA BARBARA
LEFT &IOB ELSVATIOM 'B1 REAR ELBVATIOM 'B'
_J
PLAN THREE - SANTA BARBARA
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLWCH DEVELOPMENT
INARCH 17.20
PLANE ONE
PLANE THREE
PLANE FOUR
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
PLAN THREE B
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
SECOND FLOOR K-I
w/,.
K4ARCH 17,2008
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.QARAOE: 604 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,688SQ.FT.
PORCH (second floor tbove): 104 SQ. FT.
6SCONP FLOOR PLAN 3 'C'
PLAN THREELA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
PIR6T FLOOR PLAN 3 'C'
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.OARAGE: 604 SQ. FT.
TOTAL: 3,688 SQ. FT.
SECOND FLOOR OVERHANG: 104 SQ.FT.
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-3CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE VB
RIQHT 6IDB ELEVATION!PROMT el-BVATIO^sl 'C'
GLAZING AT GARAGE DOOM TO BE OPTIONAL
TUSCAN
LEPT 61DB ELBVATIONI 'C'REAR ELEVATION 'C1
PLAN THREE - TUSCAN
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRJCH DEVELOPMENT
PLANE TWO
PLANE FIVE
PLANE THREE
PLANE FOUR
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
PLANE ONE
PLAN THREE CLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
COVERAGE: 2,488 SQ. FT.
2ND FLOOR S.F. AS A PERCENT OF FIRST FLOOR S.F.: 80%
SECOND FLOOR Fsf]
FIRST FLOOR: 1,780 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR: 1,908 SQ. FT.GARAGE: 604SQ.FT.
TOTAL: 3,688 SQ.FT.
PORCH («econd floor ibove): 104 SQ.FT.
&4ARCH I7,200t
REAR ELEVATION 'A' LJ/ EXTERIOR PECK
REAR ELEVATION 'B' OIX EXTERIOR DECK REAR ELEVATION! 'C' UJ/ EXTERIOR DECK
-4
PLAN THREE - EXTERIOR DECK
LA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.3
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
WARCH17.20M
EXHIBIT 5
Planning Commission Minutes May 21,2008 Page .1
Minutes of. PLANNING COMMISSION
Time of Meeting: 6:00 p.m.
Date of Meeting: May 21,2008
Place of Meeting: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Whitton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Boddy led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioners Baker, Boddy, Cardosa. Dominguez, and
Montgomery.
Absent: Commissioner Douglas
STAFF PRESENT:
Don Neu, Planning Director
Ron Kemp, Deputy City Attorney
Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst
ChristerWestman, Senior Planner
Shelley Esteybar, Assistant Planner
Deborah Milam, Planning Technician
David Hauser, Deputy City Engineer
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery, and duly seconded, that the. Planning
Commission approve the minutes from the Regular Meeting of May 7, 2008.
VOTE: 5-0-2
AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioner Baker, Commissioner Boddy, Commissioner
Cardosa, and Commissioner Montgomery
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Douglas
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Dominguez
Chairperson Whitton directed everyone's attention to the slide on the screen to review the procedures the
Commission would be following during that evening's Public Hearing.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
None.
Planning Commission Minutes May 21,2008 Page 2
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUD 05-12(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH. NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3-Request for a
determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La
Costa Program E1R and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the
purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit
Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 53
single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood
3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north
of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
Mr. Neu Introduced Item 1 and stated Assistant Planner Shelley Esteybar would make the staff
presentation.
Chairperson Whitton asked if the applicant wished to proceed with the hearing without a full Commission
present The applicant stated he wanted to proceed.
Chairperson Whitton opened the public hearing on Item 1.
Ms. Esteybar gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant
wished to make a presentation.
Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, PO Box 237, Carlsbad, gave a brief presentation and
stated he would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of the applicant.
Commissioner Montgomery Inquired about the color palette. Mr. Henthorn stated the intent is to use the
more muted color tones as presented on the color boards, Commissioner Montgomery asked if there
could be any discretion by which the Planning Director could suggest or otherwise force the developer to
tone the paint color down. Mr, Henthorn stated he was willing to consider any alternatives and he shares
the Commission's concern.
Commissioner Boddy asked if Staff has reviewed and is supportive of the color palette. Ms. Esteybar
stated Staff did find that the colors on the color board were much more muted than what was previously
provided and Staff does support the colors.
Commissioner Cardosa asked about any corrosion control and prevention for the many wrought iron
elements on the homes. Mr. Henthorn stated the majority of the elements are powder-coated and not just
painted because of the maintenance issues. As the elements are installed, specifications are developed
for corrosion resistance.
Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, he asked if
there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Chairperson
Whitton opened and closed public testimony.
Planning Commission Minutes May 21,2008 Page 3
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery, and duly seconded, that the Planning
Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6420 recommending
approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-12(A) based on the
findings and subject to the conditions'contained therein.
VOTE: 6-0
AYES: Chairperson Whitton, Commissioner Baker, Commissioner Boddy, Commissioner
Cardosa, Commissioner Dominguez and Commissioner Montgomery
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Douglas
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Whitton closed the public hearing and thanked Staff for their presentation.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
None.
PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMENTS
None.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of May 21, 2008, was adjourned at
6:25 p.m.
DON NEU
Planning Director
Bridget Desmarais
Minutes Clerk
iuaiuao.ieip ap sues
T
(8,091.5 ®AM3AV iueqe6
jajad e sajpej sauanbi)
CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DIST
STE 250
255 PICO AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DIST
101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DIST
701 ENCINITAS BLVD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92009
OLIVENHAIN WATER DIST
1966OLIVENHAINRD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AVE
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CITY OF VISTA
600 EUCALYPTUS AVE
VISTA CA 92084
VALLECITOS WATER DIST
201 VALLECITOS DE ORO
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND
URBAN STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME
4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
STE 100
9174 SKY PARK CT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STEB
5201 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
LAFCO
1600 PACIFIC HWY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST
10124 OLD GROVE RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92131
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B STREET
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE
6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD
CARLSBAD CA 92011
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
ATTN TEDANASIS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT
AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
SCOTT MOLLOY - BIASD
STE 110
9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407
CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
5934 PRIESTLEY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RECREATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT PLANNER
16/05/2008
! ®09is®Afcl3AV Ygjnjeaj |aaj Aseg joj.
uoipnnsui aas
jadej paajj ®091S 3J.V1dl/\l3.L ®AJBAV asn
|aa<j
J^Feed Paper
See ln
for Ea$
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL M
STE180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CNLM
21-5 W ASH ST
FALLBROOK CA 92028
LA COSTA OAKS 3.3 LLC
STE 100
4747 MORENO BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92117
MORROW DEVELOPMENT
STE 180
1903 WRIGHT PL
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC
PO BOX 267
CARLSBAD CA 92018
Etic AHKW-O9-008-1 Consultez la 31V1
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer
of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-
Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of
Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the
County of San Diego, that the notice of which the
annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpariel), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
June 21st, 2008
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at OCEANSIDE, California
This 23rd, day of June, 2008
Jane Allshouse
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
Proof of Publication of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the CityCouncil of the City of Carlsbad will hold a publichearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carls-bad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00jp.m. onTuesday, July 1,2008, to consider approval of a PlannedDevelopment Permit Amendment for building floor plans,elevations and plotting for the development of 53 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La CostaOaks North, Neighborhood 3.3 on property generally lo-cated west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of MejrpseDrive and north of Cadencia Street in Local FacilitiesManagement Zone 11 and more particularly describedas:
Lots 19 through 35 and 80 through 115 of the City ofCarlsbad tract CT 05-15, Villages of La Costa - LaCosta Oaks North - Neighborhood 3.3, in the City ofCarlsbad, County of San Dietjp^State of California,
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal arecordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies ofthe agenda bill will be available on and after June 27,2008. If you have any questions, please call Shelley Es-teybar in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4625.
If you challenge the Planned Development PermitAmendment in court, you may be limited to raising onlythose issues you or someone else raised at the publichearing described in this notice or in written correspon-dence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: CityClerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad;CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: PUD 05-12(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBOR-HOOD 3.3
PUBLISH: June 21, 2008 NCT 2157190
CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCIL
La Costa Oaks NorthLa Costa Oaks NorthNeighborhood 3.3Neighborhood 3.3PUD 05PUD 05--12(A)12(A)
Location MapLocation MapSITIO CORAZONCORTE PANORAMARANCHO SANTA FE RDSITIO CO L I N A SITIO DESTINOGeneral Plan: RLMZoning: PC12.3 acres
SITIO CORAZONRANCHO SANTA FE RDCORTE PANORAMASITIO CALIENTESITIO COLINASAN ELIJO RDSITIO DESTINOCALLE HIERRO0600300FeetPUD 05-12 (A)LA COSTA OAKS NORTHNEIGHBORHOOD 3.3OSOSOSRLM(vacant)Common Recreational Lot(vacant)RLM(vacant)RM(vacant)RMH(Apartments)3.53.13.4Fire Station(Under Construction)3.33.3
Project BackgroundProject BackgroundProject site was previously subdivided under Project site was previously subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 05Tentative Map (CT 05--15) and Planned 15) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05Development Permit (PUD 05--12)12)Approved by City Council on September 26, Approved by City Council on September 26, 2006.2006.
City Council ConsiderationsCity Council ConsiderationsAmendment to PUD 05Amendment to PUD 05--12 for the 12 for the architecture & plotting for 53 of the architecture & plotting for 53 of the 120 detached single120 detached single--family homes family homes located within the Villages of La Costa located within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3.Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3.
Plan 2Plan 2““SpanishSpanish””Plan 1Plan 1““Santa Santa BarbaraBarbara””Plan 3Plan 3““TuscanTuscan””
Project ConsistencyProject ConsistencyGeneral PlanGeneral PlanVillages of La Costa Master PlanVillages of La Costa Master PlanCarlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21 Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21 Planned DevelopmentPlanned DevelopmentPlanned Community (PPlanned Community (P--C) ZoneC) ZoneCalifornia Environmental Quality Act California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CEQA)
Planning Commission ActionMay 21, 2008 May 21, 2008 --Planning Commission conducted a Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the project.public hearing for the project.No public comment was made.No public comment was made.Planning Commission voted 6Planning Commission voted 6--00--1 to recommend 1 to recommend approval of PUD 05approval of PUD 05--12(A).12(A).
RecommendationRecommendationThat the City Council That the City Council ADOPTADOPTResolution No. Resolution No. 20082008--201 201 APPROVINGAPPROVINGPlanned Development Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05Permit Amendment No. PUD 05--12(A) based on 12(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions the findings and subject to the conditions contained thereincontained therein..
SITIO CORAZONRANCORTE PANORAMASITIO CALIENTEView Facing NorthView Facing North
SITIO CORAZONRANCORTE PANORAMASITIO CALIENTEView Facing SouthView Facing South
SITIO CORAZONRANCORTE PANORAMASITIO CALIENTEView Facing SouthwestView Facing Southwest
SITIO CORAZONRANCORTE PANORAMASITIO CALIENTEView Facing EastView Facing East