HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-24; City Council; 19758; Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk ImprovementsCITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL AND
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - AGENDA BILL
8
AB#
MTG.
DEPT.
19,758
3/24/09
ENG
APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZE
ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS FOR VALLEY AND MAGNOLIA
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 6019-1 & WATER
LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 3904-1
DEPT. HEAD 'T^ J^T
CITY ATTY. (jj£?
CITY MGR. [jj^
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council of the City of Carlsbad Adopt Resolution No.2009-061 to approve plans and
specifications, and authorize advertisement of bids, for Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements,
Project No. 6019-1 and Water Line Replacement, Project No. 3904-1.
Board of Directors
1349
of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) Adopt Resolution No.
approving the plans and specifications, and agreeing to reimburse the City of
Carlsbad the actual costs for the Water Line Replacement, Project No. 3904-1.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This project is located on portions of Valley Street and Magnolia Avenue and includes the following
improvements:
• Widen both sides of Valley Street between Chestnut Avenue and Magnolia Avenue
• Widen a portion of the north side of Magnolia Avenue from Valley Street to 456 feet
easterly
• Install sidewalks, curbs, and gutters
• Abandon the existing 8-inch diameter asbestos cement pipe (ACP) in Valley Street and
install a new 8-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe
• Repave Valley Street and a portion of Magnolia Avenue and the resident's driveways on
both streets affected by the widening
The project improvements on Valley Street and Magnolia Avenue are adjacent to or in the vicinity of four
local schools and impact 19 property owners directly. Each street is a "compatible improvement street" in
accordance with the Street and Sidewalk Policy Committee's Final Report, adopted by City Council
Resolution 2000-78. The Street and Sidewalk Policy Committee's Final Report define a "compatible
improvement street" as a street where standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street width does not exist and
are deemed necessary due to their location, pedestrian activity, demand for parking, and other factors.
The improvements will enhance pedestrian safety, provide parking on both sides of the street, and improve
vehicle and bicycle circulation near the schools. Exhibit 1 shows the project location.
The Valley and Magnolia Water Line Replacement includes abandoning an existing 8-inch diameter ACP
installed in 1962 on Valley Street between Chestnut Avenue and Magnolia Avenue and replacing it with a
new 8-inch diameter PVC pipe. A new PVC water line is necessary to minimize safety concerns. In
addition, construction activities for the sidewalk improvements may affect the structural integrity of the
existing ACP that will be subject to increased vehicle and construction equipment loading due to the
change in street grades. By virtue of its 1962 installation, the age of the ACP is nearing the end of its
service life. Considering that street improvements are being made, replacing the ACP water line at this
time will minimize water delivery impacts to the public in the future and avoid trenching the new pavement
that will be installed with the Sidewalk Improvement project.
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Jacob Moeder, (760) 602-2736, imoed@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL/BOARD ACTION: APPROVED D
DENIED D
CONTINUED D
WITHDRAWN D
AMENDED D
CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC
CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN
RETURNED TO STAFF
OTHER-SEE MINUTES
Page 2
Plans and specifications have been completed as a joint project for both the Sidewalk Improvements and
the Water Line Replacement and do not include undergrounding the overhead utilities. The plans and
specifications are on file in the Public Works - Engineering Department. Pursuant to Section 3.28.130 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code, prevailing wages are not required for this project. The majority and most
disruptive portions of the construction that will cause public inconvenience will take place in summer when
schools are not in session.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The project is exempt from environmental review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15302(c), relative to
replacement of existing utilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity, and Section 15303(d),
relative to new construction of small facilities for street and sidewalk improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Tables 1 and 2 below show the current status of the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvement and
Water Line Replacement projects:
TABLE 1
VALLEY & MAGNOLIA SIDEWALKS - PROJECT NO. 6019
TASK DESCRIPTION
Design
Construction, Inspection, Materials Testing
Right-of-Way Acquisition
TOTAL
APPROPRIATED
TO DATE
$85,000
530,000
15,000
$630,000
EXPENDITURES/
ENCUMBRANCES
TO DATE .,,
$53,265
0
0
$53,265
;:v.r, REMAINING^' '« BALANCES
$31,735
530,000
15,000
$576,735
TABLE 2
MISCELLANEOUS WATER PIPELINE REPLACEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 3904
TASK DESCRIPTION
Design
Construction, Inspection, Materials Testing
Studies and Reports
TOTAL
3 ife" ~ *+ '''< rfij-^i" I
~ APPROPRIATED"
TdtJATE— '""<
$145,000
852,000
3,000
$1,000,000
EXPENDITURES!
'ENCUMBRANCES
TO DATE
$28,328
228,219
0
$256,547
t .. ., . « , „, . ..
' REMAINING .
BALANCES
$116,672
623,781
3,000
$743,453
The Engineer's Estimate for the construction portion of the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvement
project (Project No. 6019-1) and Water Line Replacement project (Project No. 3904-1) is shown in Table 3.
Page 3
TABLE 3ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
Sidewalk Improvements -CIP Project No. 6019-1 ,
Engineer's Estimate for Construction
Construction Inspection, Testing, and Administration (15%)
Construction Contingencies (15%)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
PROJECT AVAILABLE BALANCE
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUIRED (TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES)
Water Line Replacement - CIP Project No. 3904-1 •H":-
Engineer's Estimate for Construction
Construction Inspection, Testing, and Administration (15%)
Construction Contingencies (15%)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
PROJECT AVAILABLE BALANCE
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUIRED (WATER CAPITAL REPL.)
v,--
$587,000
88,000
88,000
$763,000
$576,735
$186,265
$234,000
35,000
35,000
$304,000
$743,453
$0
Staff estimates an additional $186,265 will be required to complete the sidewalk improvement portion of the
project. As the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project falls within the guidelines of the Sidewalk/Street
Construction Program, staff will use a portion of these funds to accommodate the estimated increase in
project cost. Staff believes that using existing funds instead of asking for an additional appropriation would
be a more prudent course of action. Like the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project, the Sidewalk/Street
Construction program is also funded by TIF. As such, funds will be transferred from the Sidewalk/Street
Construction program to the Valley and Magnolia sidewalk project. Sufficient monies are available for the
fund transfer required to accommodate the anticipated Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project increase.
Future Improvement Agreements Background
Five of the 19 property owners directly affected by the Sidewalk Improvement project have Future
Improvement Agreements with the City. Future Improvement Agreements (FIA's) are agreements between
a property owner and the City in which the City has agreed to allow the owner to delay the installation of
public improvements required as a result of some benefit conferred on the owner by the City, such as a lot
split or a building permit. The City is currently holding over 580 FIA's. The agreements are usually called
in at a later date when improvements are made for the surrounding area. The property owners may elect
to install the improvements themselves or pay the City their fair share portion for the work. If, after proper
notice from the City, the owner does not choose either option, the City can install the improvements and
place a lien on the property.
Paving for a Portion of the Project with Future Improvement Agreements
The five property owners directly impacted by the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvement project are
shown in Table 5 below.TABLE 5
FUTURE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS
FIA Recorded No.
1991-0515450
79-485552
77-307353
73-002190
73-002190
Recording Date
10/04/91
11/16/79
7/29/77
1/03/73
1/03/73
Current Owner and
Address
Kekoa & Tara Ede
1790 Magnolia Ave.
Russell Friesen
1740 Magnolia Ave.
Eric Dejong
1685 Chestnut Ave.
Russell Friesen
1710 Magnolia Ave.
Michael Perdue
3670 Valley St.
Total
Estimated Cost Share of
Improvements
$20,091
$12,969
$17,994
$17,126
$6,559
$74,739
Page 4
Based on the estimated cost of the improvements, staff anticipates recovering approximately $75,000 of
the project cost. When funds are received, they will be used to reimburse the Traffic Impact Fee Fund as
that is the funding source for the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project. FIA notices will be sent to the five
property owners listed above, indicating the Owner's obligations as stipulated in the agreements.
OPTIONS:
A memorandum was prepared by the Engineering Department dated January 21, 2009, which addresses
several options in handling the FIA's that were examined during the development of this project (see
Exhibit 3). As a result, staff has developed three (3) options for Council's consideration.
Option 1: Direct the City Attorney to Research Changing the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(Potentially Waive property owners' FIA obligations)
The five FIA's for this project collectively total approximately $75,000. Currently, under CMC Section
18.40.100 the Council can only waive or modify existing FIA's if they find either:
• the street has already been improved to the maximum feasible and desirable state or
• the granting of a waiver or modification will not perpetuate a hazardous or defective condition.
In order for the Council to waive the FIA's for this project, or any other project, the municipal code section
would have to be changed to provide the City Council with another alternative to waive FIA's. This option
would direct the City Attorney to research the legality of changing the Carlsbad Municipal Code to allow for
waiving the FIA obligations in this case. If the FIA's are not called, an additional $75,000 would be
appropriated from the TIF fund.
Option 2: Direct Staff to Postpone the Project
In February 1991, the Traffic Engineering Division of the Engineering Department published the "City of
Carlsbad Sidewalk Inventory Report". The report stems from City Council approval of the Pedestrian
Action Plan in 1988. The plan contains elements pertaining to safety and elimination of pedestrian facility
deficiencies throughout Carlsbad. The report outlines the Sidewalk Priority Rating Equation that was used
to establish the priority listing of deficient sidewalk locations.
Magnolia Avenue and Valley Street are identified on the list as priority numbers 13 and 25, respectively.
Because there are four schools in the vicinity of Valley Street and Magnolia Avenue, this project is being
proposed to reduce conflicts, increase pedestrian safety, enhance traffic circulation, and increase on-street
parking capacity.
By selecting Option 2, the City Council would postpone the project to a later date.
Option 3: Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement of Bids (Adopt Resolution)
(Call the FIA's)
Approving the plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement of bids will allow construction to
occur this summer. The project will not include undergrounding of the overhead utilities, but will ensure
that the pedestrian safety, traffic circulation, and on-street parking capacity will be addressed promptly.
City Council may want to consider offering a payment plan to the property owners with FIA's.
Example
A 10 year payment plan at 4% interest, the lowest monthly payment would be approximately $67
and the highest would be approximately $206.
If the City Council decides to offer a payment plan to residents, a reasonable payment plan can be
prepared by the Finance Department, and the property owners will be required to amend their FIA's.
Page 5
EXHIBITS:
1. Location Map.
2. Future Improvement Agreements Location Map.
3. City of Carlsbad Engineering Department Internal Memo dated January 21, 2009 regarding Valley
and Magnolia, Project No. 6019, Future Improvement Agreements.
4. City Council of the City of Carlsbad Adopt Resolution No. 2009-061 to approve
plans and specifications, and authorize advertisement of bids, for Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk
Improvements, Project No. 6019-1 and Water Line Replacement, Project No. 3904-1.
5. Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) Adopt Resolution No.
1349 approving the plans and specifications, and agreeing to reimburse the
City of Carlsbad the actual costs for the Water Line Replacement, Project No. 3904-1.
6
LOCATION MAP
CARLSBADVILLAGEACADEMY
NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY
MAP
NOT TO
SCALE
PROJECT NAME
VALLEY STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
AND WATER LINE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT
NUMBER
6019
EXHIBIT
1
DRAHN BY: SCOTT EVANS, CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT. 2/10/09 C:\CAPITAL\LOCA7ION UAPS\6019.DWG
LOCATION MAP
I CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL
CHESTNUTAVE.
46 VALJLEY
3556 VALLEY S
CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY
'ALLEY
MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CITY OF OCEANSDE
HIGHWAY j
Y MIDDLE SCHOOL VICINITY
MAP
LEGEND:
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT NAME
VALLEY STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE SIDEWALKS
PROJECT
NUMBER
60)9
EXHIBIT
DRAWN BY: SCOTT EVANS. CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT, 3/16/09 C:\CAPITAL\MOEDER\VAUJEY * UAGNOUA SDEWALKS\6019-2.DWG
3
January 21, 2009
TO: CITY ENGINEER
FROM: Associate Engineer, Moeder
VIA: Deputy City Engineer - Design
SUBJECT: VALLEY AND MAGNOLIA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 6019
FUTURE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS
BACKGROUND
A meeting was held on December 1, 2008, to discuss the five "Future Improvement
Agreements" (FIA) impacting the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements, Project No.
6019. At the meeting six options for handling FIA's were presented as follows:
1. Change the Carlsbad Municipal Code to give the City Council the ability to waive the
property owner's FIA obligation if it is in the City's best interest and if there is other
City funding available.
2. In lieu of the property owners paying the amount required by the FIA after the
improvements have been constructed, place a lien on the property.
3. Convert the "Compatible Design Street" to an "Alternative Design Street".
4. Change the project design so the five properties with FIA's are not included in the
improvements.
5. Postpone the project to future fiscal year.
6. Develop a payment plan for the five property owners with FIA's.
The purpose of this memorandum is to address the impacts from each of the six options,
followed by a recommend course of action.
Option 1:
Changing the City's Municipal Code Section 18.480.100 to provide the City Council with an
alternative to waive existing Future Improvement Agreement(s) in City funded projects can be
done. A clause similar to the following could be added to the Municipal Code:
"The City Council can direct staff to waive an existing "Future Improvement Agreement" if it is
in the best interest of the City to do so."
The major concern with adding such a provision is that the decision by Council could be
considered arbitrary. A number of property owners with an FIA could request that they be let
out of the requirement, shifting the financial burden to the City of Carlsbad. Upon approval of
this clause by the City Council, it will be difficult to enforce FIA's on other property owners.
Option 2:
The existing FIA's already allow the City to place a lien on the property if the property owner
fails to make the payment in accordance with the terms in each FIA.
Option 3:
In February 1991, the Traffic Engineering Division of the Engineering Department published the
"City of Carlsbad Sidewalk Inventory Report". The report stems from City Council approval of
CARLSBA
January 21, 2009 Page 2 of 3
Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements
Project No. 6019
Future Improvement Agreements
the Pedestrian Action Plan in 1988. The plan contains elements pertaining to safety and
elimination of pedestrian facility deficiencies throughout Carlsbad. The report outlines the
Sidewalk Priority Rating Equation that was used to establish the list of deficient sidewalks.
Magnolia Avenue and Valley Street are identified on the list as priority number 13 and 25,
respectively. Because there are four schools in the vicinity of Valley Street and Magnolia
Avenue, this project is needed to reduce conflicts, increase pedestrian safety, enhance traffic
circulation, and increase on-street parking capacity.
Converting the "Compatible Design Street" to an "Alternative Design Street" can not occur under
current safety and parking conditions. Undeveloped streets were categorized in a report as
"Compatible Design Street" by a citizen committee appointed by the City Council and the report was
approved by the City Council for the following reasons: "it was deemed that because of location,
pedestrian activity, demand for parking and other factors, the streets should be completed to City
Standards". The City has already categorized the project area as a priority due to its need for
safety, circulation, and capacity improvements.
Option 4:
Three of the five property owners with FIA's are located on Valley Street, and three are located
on Magnolia Avenue (one property owner is located on the corner of Valley Street and Magnolia
Avenue). Changing the project design so that it excludes the five property owners with FIA's is
not realistic. The purpose of the project is to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety,
circulation, and capacity. By not including improvements adjacent to the five properties, the
project will be disjointed and will have segments with missing sidewalk and street
improvements, creating a pattern of spot widening. It would not only have a negative affect
aesthetically, but will defeat the purpose of enhancing the pedestrian safety and circulation and
vehicular parking capacity.
Option 5:
Considering that the City has already identified the subject project area as an area of concern
due to its pedestrian safety, circulation, and parking capacity, as indicated above in "Option 3",
eliminating this project from the CIP or postponing it to a future fiscal year is not recommended.
An accident in the subject area could subject the City to legal issues.
Option 6:
Coordination with the City's Finance Director can be initiated to include a ten year or other term
payment plan. This payment plan could be presented to the City Council for approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon historical uses of FIA's by the City and considering the financial impact that calling
the FIA's may have on property owners, staff recommends that City Council approve the use of
FIA's as a project funding source and to direct staff to offer a payment plan. The payment plan
would require the five property owners to make payments based on the plan approved by
Council or a lien will be placed on the property.
January 21, 2009 Page 3 of 3
Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements
Project No. 6019
Future Improvement Agreements
UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITIES
An item that has been discussed with the property owners is undergrounding the overhead
utilities. Throughout the design phase of this project, meetings were held with all 19 of the
residents directly affected by this project. A common interest among all the residents was
undergrounding the overhead utilities. In fact, some of the residents were interested in forming
an assessment district to include this work in the project. However, due to the relatively high
expense to include this work (approximately $500,000), and because no funding is available in
the 20A account for undergrounding the utilities, the idea never gained sufficient momentum.
Options the City could consider would be to delay the project until sufficient funds are available
in the 20A account (about 6 years) to underground the overhead utilities in this area or fund the
undergrounding from the General Fund or possibly use Proposition 42 funds. This option would
satisfy the interests of all 19 residents directly affected by the project. It would provide some
relief to the property owners with FIA's because the owners will recognize that their FIA's are
contributing to a project that results in the undergrounding of the overhead utilities. The
undergrounding of utilities is a desire they have expressed strong interest in achieving from the
initial discussions of this project.
JAG^OB/iViOEDER, P.E.
Associate Engineer
c: Terry Smith, Senior Civil Engineer - Design Division
Ronald Kemp, Deputy City Attorney
Aaron Beanan, Accountant
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO.2009-061
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF VALLEY AND MAGNOLIA SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 6019-1 AND WATER LINE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 3904-1.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, has determined it necessary,
desirable, and in the public interest to construct sidewalk, curb, gutter and widen portions of Valley
Street and Magnolia Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of CaTkbad, CalifShija, has determined it necessary,
desirable, and in the public interest to incorporate a waterVie replacemerXproject, Project No. 3904-1
into the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Implement project, IVpject No. 60J9-1; and
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad Municipal ^ater District (CMWD) w\\\foree to reimbj^Tse the City of
Carlsbad for the actual costs of constructing the \ater Line ReplacaBrtent project, §roject No. 3904-1;
and
WHEREAS, tfof^pran^^fld specifications^or furnishing of jrfT labor, materials, tools,
equipment, trans%ortation,|and other expanses necessaryWpr incidenttn of said projects have been
prepared and are %n file in^he Public Works S^gineering Departme^u of the City of Carlsbad and are
incorporated by reference \
WHEREAS,\the Val\y and Magnoliaf SidewalkyTmprovement project is exempt from
enviromental review p^r CEQA Sction 15303(df and
REAS, theVater Line^pjaceXent prefect is exempt from environmental review per
^ ^ ^"^CEQA Section T5^Q2(c); ar
WHEREAS, tnb^nglbeer's estimate foj^the construction portion of the Valley and Magnolia
Sidewalk Improvement projecn»763,000 an)B the Engineer's estimate for the construction portion of
the Water Line Replacement project is $304^000; and
WHEREAS, based on the Eng/eer's estimate additional funds in the amount of $186,265 are
required to complete the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvement project, approximately $75,000 of
which will be collected by "calling" five existing Future Improvement Agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project, Project No. 6019, falls within the
guidelines of the Sidewalk/Street Construction Program; and »>
1 WHEREAS, sufficient funds exist in the Sidewalk/Street Construction Program, Project No.
2 6002 to accommodate the anticipated Valley and Magnolia project increase.
3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
California, as follows:4
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.5
. 2. The Finance Department can prepare a reasonable payment plan for the five
D
property owners with FIA's.
3. City Attorney is directed to prepare an amendment to the subject FIA's to include a
8
reasonable payment plan of up to 10 years.
9
4. That the plans, specifications and contract documents on file in the Engineering
10
Department of the City of Carlsbad are hereby approved.
11 5- The City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad is hereby authorized and directed to publish, in
12 accordance with State law, a Notice to Contractors Inviting Bids for the construction
13 of the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 6019-1, in
14 accordance with the plans, specifications, and contract documents referred to herein.
15 6. That the Finance Director is authorized to transfer $186,265 from the Sidewalk/Street
16 Construction (Project No. 6002) program to the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk project
17 (Project No. 6019).
18 '"
19 I"
20 I"
21 /"
22 "/
23 /"
24 ///
25 HI
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Joint Special Meeting of the
2 Carlsbad City Council and Carlsbad Municipal Water District Board of Directors, held
3 on the day of , 2009, by the following vote:
4
5 AYES:
6
NOES:
7
ABSENT:8
9
10
11
CLAUDE A LEWIS, Mayor
12
ATTEST:
13
14
15 LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk
16 (SEAL)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO.1349
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (CMWD), APPROVING THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETERMINING TO REIMBURSE THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD FOR THE ACTUAL COSTS FOR THE WATER LINE
REPLACEMENT. PROJECT NO. 3904-1.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD),
California, has determined it necessary, desirable, and in the public interest to replace an old 8"
asbestos cement pipe (ACP) and install a new SLpolyvinyl chloride (PVC) water line; and
* y ^^WHEREAS, the plans and specifications foriurnishing of all laborTmS^rials, tools, equipment,
transportation, and other expenses necessary or incident^ to the Water Line Replacement, Project No.
3904-1, have been prepared and are on file«n the Public WcN^s-Engineering Departn|pnt of the City of
Carlsbad and are incorporated herein by refere
WHEREAS, the CMWD agrees to reimbSjse the City of Ca^sbad for the jfct/il costs for the
Water Line Replacement project part of the Valley anoVlagnolia SidewalK Impra^rn^ht project, Project
No. 6019-1; and
WHEREAS, thelEngineer's esllh^te for the construction portij^i of the Water Line
Replacement projecVis $30i[,000; and
WHEREAS, Vis project is exempt from environmental review pejj
NOW, THEREVpRE\BE IT RESOLVED by tte Board of Directors
Water District (CMWD) ofVhe cV of Carlsbad, CaliforniaXas follows:j
1. That the a^ve reojtations are true and ctrrect.
2. That the pl\ps, specifications, and/contract documents for the Water Line
t, Project No. 3904-\are on fiTSjaJhe^fblic Wo/s-Engineering Department of the City of
Carlsbad and>^hereby approved^
3. ThaTN»e Finance Direfctor is authorized t/release $304,000 to the City of Carlsbad to
reimburse the City of CarlsbafcKqrJhe Wa^er Line Replajfement, Project No. 3904-1.
EQA Section 15302(c).
of the Carlsbad Municipal
\ 4
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Joint Special Meeting of the
2 Carlsbad Municipal Water District Board of Directors and the Carlsbad City Council,
3 held on the day of , 2009, by the following vote:
4
5
AYES:
6
NOES:
7
ABSENT:8
9
10
11
CLAUDE A LEWIS, President
12
ATTEST:
13
14
15 LORRAINE M. WOOD, Secretary
16 (SEAL)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
le-
Sheila Cobian
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jacob Moeder
Monday, March 23, 2009 2:15 PM
Sherry Freisinger
Bill Plummer; Bob Johnson
FW: Letter
Sherry - below is an email I received re: the Valley and Magnolia Sidewalk Improvements agenda bill.
Jacob Moeder
From: Kekoa Ede [mailto:kekoaede@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Jacob Moeder
Subject: RE: Letter
3/23/09
Hi Jacob,
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. To summarize this rather long e-mail, both my wife
and I have decided that we do not want to have the Magnolia sidewalk improvement project done.
We received your letter dated 3/17/09 regarding the sidewalk improvements on Valley Street and
Magnolia Avenue.
I know that the bolded section said that the letter doesn't serve as a demand to the property owner to
install or pay for the improvements at this time.
However, my wife and I would like to inform you that we no longer want to have the sidewalk constuction
project done for the following reasons:
1. You stated to me about a year ago directly that the sidewalk improvement portion (without the
driveway resurfacing) would be done entirely at the cost of the city and not at our cost.
2. I let you know initially both verbally and in a letter and e-mail that overall I was not in favor of the
project because it involves destroying trees that in my mind are beautiful and have been growing probably
for over 50 years. Had I realized from the outset that I'd have to possibly pay the city $20,000 to help
pay for the project, I would have been strongly opposed to the project. My wife and I do not feel that it is
fair or forthright on the part of the city to be told about a year after initially hearing about the project,
after being asked to give consent to allow city workers on our property, that we might have to pay into
the project.
3. Although there was a lien on the property from a contract signed in 1991- about 2 previous owners
ago, both my wife and I were completely unaware of this lien or its implications.
4. With the current housing crisis with high rates of home foreclosures, we are uncomfortable with the
city notifying us of the potential of paying $20,000 for a project that we did not initially agree with.
5. Since signing the letter allowing the city to be on our property to do the work, we have found out that
public improvement projects are not necessarily a "done deal" (would happen even if community members
do not want the project done)- and are sometimes preventable if the community does not wish to have
the project completed.
Thus, for all these reasons, my wife and I do not want the sidewalk improvement project to be done. We
do, however, sincerely appreciate you listening to us and all the time you have spent in analyzing and
preparing this neighborhood improvement project.
Sincerely,
Kekoa C. Ede
Get quick access to your favorite MSN content with Internet Explorer 8. Download FREE now!
March 24, 2009
To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Subject: Undergrounding of Utilities
In reference to Agenda Item #8, attached is a priority chart from the Undergrounding
Utilities Advisory Committee Report from 2001. This chart shows the priority rankings
from the last evaluation. Please note on the last page of the report, there is an explanation
of how the points are distributed.
If you need any additional information, please let me know.
Lisa Hildabrand
City Manager
LH:ad
Attachment
£0'.
APPENDIX "D"
Priority Chart
uuptable12 J1ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
119
117
92
91
243
39
118
148
151
221
150
210
235
257
258
63
64
140
141
142
143
144
149
160
209
244
2
STREET
HARDING ST
HARDING ST
EL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD BLVD
HARDING ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
JEFFERSON ST
OAK AVE
PINE AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST
LAS FLORES DR
OAK AVE
ROOSEVELT ST
3
LIMITS
PINE AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE
S/O CHESTNUT AVE 2010'
HOSP WY TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE
CITY LIMIT TO STATE ST
OAK AVE TO PINE AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE TO ANCHOR WY
ANCHOR WY TO CAROL PL
PALOMAR OAKS TO COLLEGE BLVD.
CAROL PL TO TAMARACK AVE
OCEAN ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
HIGHLAND DR TO JAMES DR
JAMES DR TO VALLEY ST
CAMEO RD TO CELINDA DR
CELINDA DR TO EL CAMINO REAL
LAS FLORES TO BUENA VISTA WY
BUENA VISTA WY TO BUENA PL
BUENA PL TO KNOWLES PL
KNOWLES PL TO LAGUNA DR
LAGUNADR TO ARBUCKLE PL
TAMARACK AVE TO CITRUS PL
JEFFERSON ST TO TUTTLE ST
HARDING ST TO I-5
WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
4
LENGTH
860:0
400.0
2090.0
1500.0
385.0
1325.0
390.0
300.0
475.0
5100.0
300.0
350.0
260.0
320.0
815.0
635.0
355.0
660.0
370.0
300.0
670.0
625.0
235.0
280.0
655.0
400.0
5
ADT
5583
7049
26869
33226
4000
22389
5716
6800
7200
40800
7488
1720
2500
10215
10413
6293
6293
13873
13873
13873
13873
9800
3891
10175
2900
0
\ * A. «
6
CIP
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
*•
7
A
3
3
1
3
3
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
8
B
3
3
5.
5
3
5
3
3
3
5
3
2
2
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
5
3
2
5
2
0
9
C
2
2
5
5
0
5
0
2
2
5
.2
3
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
10
D
8
7
3
0
7
0
5
3
3
0
3
2
2
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
2
5
11
Total
Points
16
15
14
13
13
12
11
11
11
11
9
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
12
COST [$]
172,000
80,000
418,000
300,000
77,000
265,000
78,000
60,000
95,000
1,020,000
60,000
70,000
52,000
64,000
163,000
127,000
71,000
132,000
74,000
60,000
134,000
125,000
47,000
56,000
131,000
80,000
'* ^
13
OTHER
FACTORS
A
A
A
A
A
A
w«w
£>'£'
Page 1 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptable12 j1ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
245
255
256
7
53
145
162
174
176
177
178
2
6
52
192
204
259
262
274
276
1
45
46
54
58
60
120
124
146
2
STREET
ROOSEVELT ST
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
ADAMS AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
JEFFERSON ST
LAS FLORES DR
MADISON ST
MADISON ST
MADISON ST
MADISON ST
ACACIA AV
ADAMS AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
OAK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
VALLEY ST
VALLEY ST
ACACIA AV
CHERRY AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
HARDING ST
HEMLOCK AVE
JEFFERSON ST
3
LIMITS
CHESTNUT AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
JEFFERSON ST TO 1-5
PIO PICO DR RO ADAMS ST
HIGHLAND DR TO PARK DR
HARDING ST TO PIO PICO DR
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE
PIO PICO DR TO CHUPAROSA WY
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO OAK AVE
PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE
WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE
W/O GARFIELDST
HOOVER ST TO HIGHLAND DR
JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST
VALLEY ST TO MONROE ST
RAILROAD TO STATE ST
VALLEY ST TO PARK DR
POLLY LN TO HIGHLAND DR
BASSWOOD AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE TO ANDREA AVE
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST
HIGHLAND DR TO VALLEY ST
DONNA DR TO WESTHAVEN DR
CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
OAK AVE TO PINE AVE
4
LENGTH
690.0
245.0
420.0
1775.0
365.0
420.0
300.0
385.0
390.0
400.0
450.0
730.0
1235.0
370.0
1020.0
160.0
250.0
335.0
660.0
745.0
395.0
425.0
405.0
560.0
1130.0
225.0
630.0
475.0
400.0
5
ADT
0
15540
16091
826
6698
2434
2967
2032
2400
2800
2000
745
1147
3184
1970
400
10141
12733
2323
1935
745
546
793
5335
5100
6293
3282
423
1169
6
CIP
/
A
3
3
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
8
B
0
5
5
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
5
5
2
2
0
0
0
3
3
3
2
0
0
y
c
0
0
2
5
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
3
5
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
3
2
10
D
5
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Total
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
tej
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
12
COST [$]
138,000
49,600
84,000
355,000
73,000
84,000
60,000
77,000
78,000 .
80,000
90,000
146,000
247,000
74,000
204,000
32,000
50,000
67,000
132,000
149,000
79,000
85,000
81,000
112,000
226,000
45,000
126,000
95,000
. 80,000
13
OTHER
A
;
i
1
J
i
.-ii
:
';
Page 2 of 11
COPY
APPENDIX D
uuptable12 JlByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
161
191
206
207
279
10
111
51
59
61
62
67
77
78
108
113
129
132
152
184
188
193
198
203
205
208
211
216
m
2
STREET
LAS FLORES DR
MAGNOLIA AVE
OAK AVE
OAK AVE
WALNUT AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
. CHESTNUT AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHRISTIANSEN WY
CHRISTIANSEN WY
GARFIELD ST
GRAND AVE
HOME AVE
HOPE AVE
JUNIPER AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
MAPLE AVE
MONROE ST
OAK AVE
OAK AVE
OAK AVE
OAK AVE
PACIFIC;AVE
PARKDR
3
LIMITS
I-5 TO PIO PICO DR
HIGHLAND DR TO VALLEY ST
ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST
MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
TAMARACK AV TO CAM I NO DEL SOL
CAMINO DEL SOL TO CHINQUAPIN AV
MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST
' MONROE ST TO DONNA DR
WESTHAVEN DR TO SEAVIEW WY
SEAVIEWWY TO CAMEO RD
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO RAILROAD
RAILROAD TO STATE ST
REDWOOD AVE TO TAMARACK AVE
HOPE AVE TO CUL DE SAC
JEFFERSON ST TO HOPE AVE
HOME AVE TO GRAND AVE
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST
ADAMS ST TO GRECOURT WY
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
KAREN LN TO PARK DR
LINCOLN ST TO RAILROAD
STATE ST TO ROOSEVELT ST
JEFFERSON TO HARDING ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO LINCOLN ST
: OCEAN'STJO MdUNTAl^^B)8jfDBip:,'^;
MAY CT TO TAMARACK AVE
4
LENGTH
290.0
1210.0
390.0
375.0
375.0
285.0
465.0
380.0
345.0
220.0
315.0
440.0
400.0
100.0
240.0
450.0
480.0
400.0
470.0
500.0
580.0
410.0
725.0
515.0
390.0
395.0
205.0
SJ625&S:
650.0
5
ADT
5930
2026
2611
2349
1165
3151
3151
0
6293
6293
6293
0
0
0
3829
0
0
0
778
4841
1882
347
1728
0
0
0
0
S.-.-S5C-,
2557
6
CIP
7
A
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
;.-2;:.
2
8
B
3
2
2
2
0
2
2
0
3
3
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
9
C
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
'..2.
0
10
D
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
0
0
11
Total
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
12
COST [$]
58,000
242,000
78,000
75,000
75,000
57,000
93,000
76,000
69,000
44,000
63,000
88,000
80,000
20,000
48,000
90,000
96,000
80,000
94,000
100,000
116,000
82,000
145,000
103,000
78,000
79,000
41 ,000
125,000
130,000
13
OTHER
B
Page 3 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptableU )1 ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
228
230
231
254
275
277
283
8
9
14
-• -• '23; :
48
65
66
73
74
99
104
109
121
122
147
175
179
183
185
; 214 .
215
222
2
STREET
PINE AVE
PINEAVE
PINE AVE
SYCAMORE AVE
VALLEY ST
VALLEY ST
WALNUT AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
-. :.-. :•; .:BASSW0:pD,AVE '•' ;: ;
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
HARDING ST
HARDING ST
JEFFERSON ST
MADISON ST
MADISON ST
MAGNOLIA AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
V; OCEAN ?ST ..,;......:.
'OCEAN;ST
PARKDR
3
LIMITS
TYLER ST TO ROOSEVELT ST
MADISON ST TO JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO GARFIELD ST
CHESTNUT AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
ANDREA AVE TO TAMARACK AVE
E/0 MADISON ST TO THE ALLEY
MAGNOLIA AV TO LARKSPUR WY
LARKSPUR WY TO TAMARACK AV
HARRISON ST TO HOOVER ST
•• ^:^&i^m^mmv^m^^&^iK^
LINCOLN ST TO RAILROAD
EL CAMINO REAL TO CATALINA DR
CATALINA DR TO TREISTE OR
HARRISON ST TO ADAMS ST
ADAMS ST TO SYME DR
PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE
ACACIA AVE TO CHERRY AVE
TAMARACK AVE TO SEQUOIA AVE
PALM AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE TO CAROL PL
CHESTNUT AVE TO PALM AVE
OAK AVE TO PINE AVE
PALM AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST
JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST
. , . . -.f/Ai;GASHEta-^Tsi0»SffieHSS^ft-?SsBi:
•-'. •••^ ^^CHRISTIANSENsWYS|®MK»E«t4?*f^
MONROE TO MAY CT
4
LENGTH
175.0
385.0
375.0
380.0
890.0
430.0
180.0
670.0
395.0
600.0
jg#8J®fi£i
520.0
160.0
160.0
535.0 .
520.0
410.0
315.0
270.0
580.0
745.0
400.0
390.0
475.0
445.0
285.0
SiBSOjOS:
§«»
400.0
5
ADT
0
0
0
333
1789
2642
0
0
0
1083
0
4073
0
2536
3034
1733
2882
1907
0
0
0
0
0
0
2892
Stt8*6j&:
^:SJ£v
2557
6
CIP
;-<W-:
•>;x--
.':'X-
7
A
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
V-.0--
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
,0
0
1
8
B
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
50;
0
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0.
2
9
C
0
2
2
3
0
0
2
2
2
0
,0.,!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
<o
0
0
10
D
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.3
.3
0
.11-'"
' Total
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
•-.'•••3:'- ..
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
"••• '3
3 :'
3
12
COST [$]
35,000
77,000
75,000
76,000
178,000
86,000
36,000
134,000
79,000
120,000
280,000
104,000
32,000
32,000
107,000
104,000
82,000
63,000
54,000
116,000
149,000
80,000
78,000
95,000
89,000
57,000
366,000
228,000
80,000
13
OTHER
C
B
B
Page 4 of 11 • APPENDIX D
uuptablelL 01ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
229
240
268
282
4
5
12
13
15
25
28
29
41
42
49
50
55
56
57
69
70
71
75
84
98
100
102
103
106
2
STREET
PINEAVE
ROOSEVELT ST
VALLEY ST
WALNUT AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
ADAMS AVE
BASSWOOD AVE
BEECH AVE
BEECH AVE
CEREZODR
CEREZO DR
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CYPRESS AVE
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
3
LIMITS
ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST
LAGUNA DR TO BEECH AVE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO JAMES DR
ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST
CHESTNUT AV TO PALM AV
ADAMS ST TO MAGNOLIA AV
CHINQUAPIN AV TO HARBORVIEW LN
HARBORVIEW LN TO LOCUST ST
LOCUST ST TO HARRISON ST
JAMES DR TO VALLEY ST
GARFIELD ST TO CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD BLVD TO WASHINGTON ST
CARLSBAD BLVD TO LOS ROBLES DR
LOS ROBLES DR TO EL ARBOL DR
RAILROAD TO ROOSEVELT ST
ROOSEVELT ST TO MADISON ST
ADAMS ST TO WOODLAND WY
WOODLAND WY TO SPANISH WY
SPANISH WY TO HIGHLAND DR
RAILROAD ST TO HARBOR DR
HARBOR DR TO BALDWIN LN
BALDWIN LN TO JEFFERSON ST
SYME DR TO STELLA MARIS LN
OGEAWfiTTO CARl!SmD&Wl> ^ " ^f
N;OGARCSBAOW&ASeDfR> - *
WALNUT AVE TO SYCAMORE AVE
CHESTNUT AVE TO MAPLE AVE
MAPLE AVE TO ACACIA AVE
JUNIPER AVE TO HEMLOCK AVE
4
LENGTH
380.0
970.0
145.0
375.0
270.0
605.0
345.0
125.0
200.0
470.0
280.0
400.0
245.0
285.0
550.0
390.0
575.0
275.0
360.0
575.0
290.0
235.0
310.0
^eoDtf i
i* 945^
200.0
335.0
325.0
230.0
5
ADT
0
0
2019
519
0
0
1083
1083
1083
0
1218
477
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1265
0
J&ST
* 8&-
0
0
0
.0
6
CIP
7
A
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
8
B
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ov
0
0
0
0
0
9
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
10
D
2
2
0
2
0
.0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Total
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
12
COST [$]
76,000
194,000
29,000
75,000
54,000
121,000
69,000
25,000
40,000
94,000
56,000
80,000
49,000
. 57,000
110,000
78,000
115,000
55,000
72,000
115,000
58,000
47,000
62,000
120,000
189,000
40,000
67,000
65,000
46,000
13
OTHER
. . B
B
Page 5 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablelk. -01ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
107
126
127
133
134
156
165
166
187
189
190
199
200
225
226
232
234
236
237. .
250
260
269
271
273
280
281
24
31
40
2
STREET
GARFIELD ST
HIBISCUS CR
HIGHLAND DR
JAMES DR
JAMES DR
KNOWLES AVE
LINCOLN ST
LINCOLN ST
MAGNOLIA AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
MONROE ST
MONROE ST
PARK DR
PARK DR
PINE AVE
PINE AVE
PIO^ICO:DR
PIOPIGODR
SP.RUCE ST
TAMARACK AVE
VALLEY ST
VALLEY ST
VALLEY ST
WALNUT AVE
WALNUT AVE
BASSWOOD AVE
BLENKARNE DR
CATALINADR
3
LIMITS
HEMLOCK AVE TO REDWOOD AVE
ANCHOR W&TO 600' S/OSJ^MAMCfK ''-*$
-> k RATC!lFFflD^ADAMSlSf'4.r ? * "
TAMARACK AVE TO JEANNE PL
MOWMEJSTTO*eeiLOF^SAC * v -,
DAVIS AVE TO CUL DE SAC
OAK AVE TO PINE AVE
PINE AVE TO WALNUT AVE
PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST
GRECOURT WY TO YVETTE WY
YVETTE WY TO HIGHLAND DR
MAGNOLIA AVE TO KAREN PL
CHESTNUT AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
WESTHAVEN DR TO WOODVALE DR
WOODVALE DR TO MONROE ST
HARDING ST TO I-5
GARFIELD ST TO LINCOLN ST
350' N/0 YOORELU AVE TOtftGUNA'DR- -
OAKAVETOCHESTNPTJAVF-* ., '
YOURELL AVE TO FOREST AVE
ADAMS ST TO MARGARET WY
JAMES DR TO OAK AVE
EVERGREEN DR TO BONITA LN
VALLEY PL TO BASSWOOD AVE
GARFIELD ST TO LINCOLN ST
LINCOLN ST TO WASHINGTON ST
HIGHLAND DR TO JAMES DR
ESTWOOD DR TO 590' W/O WESTWOOD DR S/EN'
CHESTNUT AVE TO TRIESTE DR
4
LENGTH
245.0
iMWbO-Jff
J28Q&& ;
240.0
, "3WMP-'
565.0
390.0
395.0
620.0
260.0
410.0
130.0
360.0
855.0
855.0
580.0
255.0
* 3500.0-
'I'SS&O-
490.0
660.0
320.0
280.0
370.0
260.0
475.0
500.0
590.0
1540.0
5
ADT
0
1 0
*804Q
0
^ 'O'te
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1002
0
0
2507
2507
0
0
0
0
1398
0
0
0
0
0
6
CIP
« r
,.
1
7
A
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
8
B
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
C
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Total
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
' ',2: '
.2"
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
12
COST [$]
49,000
280,0~00
2,500',000
48,000
; '60.000
113,000
78.000
79,000
124,000
52,000
82,000
26,000
72,000
171,000
171,000
116,000
51,000
700,000 '
.. 310,000
98,000
132,000
64,000
56,000
74,000
52,000
95,000
100,000
118,000
JP8.000
13
OTHER
B
B .
C
B
B ..
Page 6 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptableli 31ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
47
68
72
76
89
90
95
101
105
110
125
153
167
171
172
186
213
217
218
219
227
261
270
272
285
. -3"
.:16
:W-;ir
2
STREET
CHESTNUT AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
CHINQUAPIN AVE
ELARBOLDR
ELARBOLDR
FALCON DR
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
GARFIELD ST
HEMLOCK AVE
JUNIPER AVE
LINCOLN ST
LOS ROBLES DR (E & W)
LOS ROBLES DR (E & W)
MAGNOLIA AVE
OAK AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
PALM AVE
PINE AVE
TAMARACK AVE
VALLEY ST
VALLEY ST
WESTWOOD DR
ABAMS'AVE ./
-.-. .;• ALDER:AVE ..
;ALTHEA':LN^^mmmiB:
3
LIMITS
GARFIELD ST TO LINCOLN ST
GARFIELD ST TO RAILROAD
JEFFERSON ST TO HARRISON ST
STELLA MARIS LN TO HIGHLAND DR
CEREZO DR TO MANZANO DR
CANNON RD TO CEREZO DR
WESTWOOD DR TO DONNA DR
SYCAMORE AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
CHERRY AVE TO JUNIPER AVE
SEQUOIA AVE TO CHINQUAPIN AVE
E/O GARFIELD ST
E/OGARFIELDST
WALNUT AVE TO CHESTNUT AVE
CANNON RD TO CEREZO DR (ALLEY)
CEREZO DR TO MANZANO DR (ALLEY)
HARDING ST TO CUL DE SAC
VALLEY ST TO CANYON ST
MADISON STTO JEFFERSON ST
JEFFERSON ST TO HARDING ST
HARDING ST TO CUL DE SAC
LINCOLN ST TO WASHINGTON ST
MARGARET WY TO POLLY LN
OAK AVE TO EVERGREEN DR
BONITA LN TO VALLEY PL
NE/O MONROE ST TO 70' S/O BLENKARNE DR N/E
' :t..sUiS-BASSW,OQD'AV';TOffiH:ES¥NUT:AWJ '^ ft!
•; :.W^:-^M0N:ROE;:S1^0;0I^
•'•••'•: ^ :V^:^^BRE^^E^D':eDSfi^ci:^^., | '••^^^^ff^^^Q^^^^^
4
LENGTH
260.0
820.0
505.0
375.0
910.0
1515.0
245.0
205.0
300.0
275.0
765.0
765.0
405.0
1530.0
890.0
190.0
740.0
345.0
340.0
205.0
485.0
215.0
160.0
435.0
1180.0
^^'tOBOlO*1
-ICttOiCK;
//r;25&&Jl*
5
ADT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S540&&
ikfOli':-:
mMf?&w;
6
CIP
7
A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
••:&-.-
>-Q.
: 0
•:-&•
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•0-
vO;
•o.
iO
9
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i.--a,-
iff-
: 0
0
10
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
' - 0
xO
0
;;0
11
Total
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
: £ • ..OK-
. o
; 0. .
, 0
12
COST [$]
52,000
164,000
101,000
75,000
182,000
303,000
49,000
41,000
60,000
55,000
153,000
153,000
81,000
306,000
178,000
38,000
148,000
69,000
68,000
41,000
97,000
43,000
32,000
87,000
236,000
21 0,000
: 202,000
50,000
138,000
13
OTHER
B
B
C
. C
Page 7 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablell 01E3yPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrouriding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
19
20
21
22
26
27
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
43
44
79
80
81
82
83
85
86
87
88
93
94
96
97
2
STREET
ANNDR
ARBUCKLE PL
ARLAND RD
AVOCADO LN
BASSWOOD AVE
BEECH AVE
BELLE LN
BUENA PL
BUENA VISTA CR
BUENAVISTAWY
CAMDEN CR
CAMELLIA PL
CAMINO DEL SOL CR
CANYON ST
CHARLEEN CR
CHARTER OAK DR
CIPRIANO LN
CITRUS PL
CLEARVIEW DR
CREST DR
CYNTHIA LN
DATE AVE
DAVIS AVE
DAVIS PL
DONNA DR
ELMWOOD ST
EUREKA PL
FALCON DR
FOREST AVE
3
LIMITS
. -GAYLEWY-.TOJANISWW £.r ' >«t"
i. MADISON STTO UEFFERSON -SI*?. >-' I"
HIGHLAND!DR'TOBUENAMSTAWYv*Tt?V
* HARDlN&ST-'ro CDS -^ f&J * - i -
VALLEY^STTO RIDGECREST«Rn®v * f *
- ' OCEAN StTOGARFIELDST.,"1' »V 'i
BASSWOOD AVETO CDS' <^! - i '
1 JEFFERSON ST TO CDS -/;,,; ~t <
'„ ' N/OUGUNADR^j^AY^'-j
JEFFERSON ST TC?DAVIS>AVEV;SV , •
RIDGECRESTDR TO CDS" >;">'!• ,'"
"XHARDfNG'STTCTGDS ^ - il ,
1 * ADAMS STTO CDS *-'•/"-,'«"
OAK AVE TO BASSWOOaAVB -
DONNA DR TO CDS *.' ' r „ u, , > ,
SEACREST DR TO RIDGECREST DR
FOREST AVE TO CDS 4v : i ^
JEFFERSON St TO CDS W> ^
S/0 MACARTHUR AVE TB401, ' ,* -* I -- r
FOREST AVE TO BUENAJVISTX WY v'.% ' '
270'-W/0J& 130' E/0 GRB?ORYt)fti *
GARFIELD STTO RAILROAD-. "
BUENA VISTA WY TOJLAGt)NA DHA
wyo DAVIS AVE iso1' r;Vnr '. -
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR TO CHESTNUT AVE
BUENA VISTA WY TO LAGUNA DR
BASSWOOD AVE TO CHESTNUTiAVE
DONNA DB TO CUL! DE SAC , '
HIGHLAND DR TO CREST DR '
4
LENGTH
-•* 530.0?*
n;3oo:o:i
^ 320.0 1
*f 400;0'-:
• 260CJ.O
;.210Q-*
; 190.0^1 570.0 ;
,,15gO.Oi!
^780.0 '1 . 170:0
£80.0 "
260.0 '
• 900.0>
< ,600.0--,'
500.0.
260.0 '
'260.0
<h 640.0-
- -1620,0
400.0 »
640,0, 1250:0
!,r15Q.O
* 4000.0
1190.0
1190.0
, 900.0
1980.0
5
ADT
/ 0.
L 0^< '
» >--a.',
j 0«,
? 0
,t)-
•o
* 0-
*Q\,
591
0
0
0
0 ,
0 •
0
" 0
0 ,
'0
v D
• ,0
0
0
0
879
485^
0
0
0
6
CIP
*
r
i
*
V
7
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
COST [$]
106,000
6o;ooo
' 64.0.00 •
80,000
520V000 .
42;.000 .-
38,000
114,000
31:0,000 .
156,000
34;000
76,000
52,000.
180,000
120,000
100,000
52,000
52,000
128,000
324,000
80,000
128,000
250,000
30,000
800,000
238,000
238,000
180,000
.396,000
13
OTHER
B
C
B
C
B
. • . B .
C
C
B
. • c
C
c
c
B
C
B
C
C
B
B.
C
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
Page 8 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptablel. -01ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
111
112
114
115
116
123
128
130
131
135
136
137
138
139
154
155
157
158
159
163
164
168
169
170
173
.T80
181
182
1QV
2
STREET
GAYLE WAY
GLORIA LN
GREGORY DR
HARBOR DR
HARBORVIEW LN
HARRISON ST
HILLCRESTCR
HOMEAVE
HOOVER ST
JAMES DR
JANIS WAY
JAN IS WAY
JEANNE PL
JEFFERSON ST
KARREN LN
KNOWLES AVE
KNOWLES AVE
LAGUNA DR
LARKSPUR LN
LAS FLO RES DR
LAURIE CR
LINDA LN
LOCUST AVE
LONG PL
MACARTHUR AVE
MADISON ST
MADISON ST
MAEZEL LN
-MGARETWY
3
LIMITS
MONROE ST-TO DONNA'DR « -j ,
- ''vJEANNElPLTOCDSJSU,^
, CYNJHIASCN TO KNOWLES 'XVE&*^ , ' <
> ' , ^S/0*CHlNQUAPIN.AVe ifl.%>i ** <<
ADAMS-STTO CDS*l"^'> *>j t, , ' ?
CHINQUAPIN AVE TO ADAMS ST>, *• i >,
^.SEACRESTDRTO.CDS L» -(* ,„ ,
E/0 MOPE AVE TO CUL DE SAO . » ;
HIGHLAND DR TO 570' SW/O ADAMS ST
JEANNE PL TO NO NAME ST
BEDFORD CR TO CUL DESACV?
ANN DR TO DONNA DR , "
JAMES DR TO CDS
. N/OLASFLORES / «\
< MONROE ST TO CDS ,^, ^
JEFFERSON ST TO DAVIS AVE '
PIO PICO DR TO ELMWOOD ST ' ^'
JEFFERSON ST TO ELMWOQD'ST j
ADAMS ST TO CDS- , '
MORNING GLORY LN TO HIGHLAND DR
ANN DR TO CDS , '
- MONROE ST TO CDS's "
HARRISON ST TO ADAMS ST» v,
CHINQUAPIN AVE TO CDS ! ',
SUNNYHILli DR TO SKYLINE RD
GRANT AVE TO ARBUcktE'PLi ""•,' -
ARBUCKLE PL TO LAGUNA DR
BASSWOOD AVE TO CDS
TAMARACK AVE TO CDS ~»
4
LENGTH
66tfO -
,-*150,0 >
^280.0 s
700.0 -
> 350.0*
; 131 o.o .
f 150.0
< 355.0
' 1420.0
740.0
620.0 >
310,0
6300
580.0
170.0
610.0
,1050.0
* 2250.0
^ -460.0
340.0
, 160X1
800.0 ,
490.0,'
375.0
570.0
5806
800.0
3900
450.0
5
ADT
0
y 0 "
0
'0
: P>O
. O^i
> 0
< 0
. 0'
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
605
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
* 0
0
0
0
0
6
CIP
*
7
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,-o
0
0
0
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o •••o
9
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
;-0
:0
10
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
:0
0
• 0
:.Q-
11
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.
0
0
. 0 ,
0
•0 ,
::0
12
COST [$]
132,000
30,000:
56,000
140,000:
70,000:
262,000 .
30,.000
71,000
-284,000
148,000
f24,000
62,000
126,000 -
116,000
34,000
122,000
210,000
.450,000
92,000
68,000
32,000
160,000
98,:000
75,000
1 14,000
116,000
160,000
78,000
90,000
13
OTHER
C
C
B
B
.C
B
C
B
B
C
B
- C
: - B
C
B
B
B
C
B
C
. B
C
B
B
C
__C_-J
Page 9 of 11 APPENDIX D
r "
uuptablelL J1EiyPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
195
196
197
201
202
212
220
224
233
238
239
246
247
248
249
251
252
253
263
264
265
266
267
278
284
2.86
287
288
m
2
STREET
MCKINLEY ST
MEADOWLARK LN
MONROE ST
MOUNTAIN VIEW DR
NORMANDIE LN
OAKAVE
PALM AVE
PARK DR
PINE AVE
REDWOOD AVE
RIDGECREST DR
SANDY PL
SEACREST DR
SEQUOIA AVE
SKYLINE RD
SPRUCE ST
STRATFORD LN
SUNNYHILLDR
TRIESTE DR
TRUESDELL LN
TUTTLE ST
TYLER ST
VALLEY ST
VALLEY PL
WESTHAVEN DR
WILSON ST
WOODLAND WY
WOODVALE DR
YOURELL AVE
3
LIMITS j
PINEAVETO BASSWOODAVE^ftY-^
• f vRlDGECREST>'DRTOCDS*4iti'.«- Y< k
» ;PARKDRVTOSUNNYH)LUDRJ!< >V '
' OCEAN STTO CARLSBADBLA/D ' !</
QARF-IELD'STTO MOUNTAIN VIEW DR & , 1"
PIO PICO DP TO VALLEY ST |Nhl --«•
PIO PICO DR TO ADAMS ST^t*'i < '
, TAMARACK'AVE TO KELLY DR^ '
PIO PICO DR TO HIGHLAND DFf- -
. <-„ E/0 GARFIELD'ST : ^ ,Y ,* V '\ >
BASSWQOD* AVE TO CHARTER Q"AK»DR „
>. " "CANYON STTO CDS" . '* >V; * O '
RIDGECREST DR N/ENTRms/ENW* n
CARLSBAD BLVDTO GARFIELD SF
WESTHAVEN DR TO TELESCOPE'AVE . ' '
-YOURELL AVETO CUL DE SAC
PIO PICO DR TO CDS
MONROE STTO HILLSIDE DR ' ' ^
SIERRA MORENA AVE TO GRANADA WY
BLENKARNE DR TCTCDS * /
LAS FLORESDR TO BUENA VISTA WY
OAK AVE TO CHESTNUTJWE ^ ^ '
BUENA VISTA'WY TO CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
'VALLEY STTO CUL'DE SAC" i - ; '
CHESTNUT AVE TO WOODVALE DR t-
FOREST AVE TO BUENA VISTA WY' ^ >
CH ESTN UT AVE TO CDS ^ ^
PARK DR TO WESTHAVEN DR ' i
PIO PICO DR TO HIGHLAND DR
4
LENGTH
V . 650!0r;>
>2so:o ,
*' 650.0" .v
J. 450.0
360.0ft
" 2400,0 ,\
(' 535.0 l
, 2070.0
_J 670.0'
i ^635:0>
-2700,0^
j- 170.0 „
1630.6
- 440.01
" 4665.0, k
s< 120,0
" 7500
. 2700.0
' 120.0
300.0 '
,760.0*
1380.0
^ -eod.o
1 260.0 f
" t-\300,0
1570.0
1 770.0
280.0
1250.0
5
ADT
«0
* '0» ,
? o
1282
v ,iO' '
f -0* ,
^ o
'0(,
' 0"
0. 0
,-,0.
'•0
' 0
« 0
0
0
0
sga
0
T 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
CIP
.
7
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0 ;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
COST [$]
130,000 .
. . 50,000;
,130,000
90,000
72,000
- 480,000
107,000
414;000
334,000 '
: 127,000
.540,000
34,000
326,000
; 88;ooo
:. 933,000
. 24,000
150,000
540,000
24,000
60,000
152,000.
276,000
120;,000
52,000 ..
220,000
314,000
.154,000
.56,000
250,000
13
OTHER
B
C
B
B
C
B
. . B
. B
: B
B :
B
. C
B
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
B
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
B
Page 10 of 11 APPENDIX D
uuptable12 1ByPoints.xls
City of Carlsbad
Eng.Dept.-Utility Undergrounding Qualification List
July 2001
1
ID
290
2
STREET
-YVETTE WY
3
LIMITS
MAG NOLI A AVE TO CDS ' „
• 4
LENGTH
^500.0 -
5
ADT
0
6
CIP
7
A
0
8
B
0
9
C
0
10
D
0
11
Total
0
12
COST [$]
100,000
13
OTHER
G
Column 6 - CIP:
if in the next 5 years = x
Column 7 - A Points=Concentration of overhead
1=one crossarm
2=two crossarm
3=two crossarm and separate telephone
3=three crossarms
Column 8 - B Points= Traffic Volumes:
0=less than 1500 ADT
2=1500 to 5000 ADT
3=5000 to 10,000 ADT
5=more than 10,000 ADT
Column 9 - C Points=Civic,recreation,scenic:
0=none
2=adjacent to school
2=adjacent to civic area
2=adjacent to park and recreation
3=adjacent to ocean with view
5=in scenic corridor
Column 10 - D Points=Other Factors:
2=in business district
3=CIP project scheduled in 5 years
5=2001 UUAC judgement of high priority
Column 11 - Total Points =A+B+C+D
Column 12 - Cost = Length x $200/ft
Column 13 - Other Factors:
A = Judgment Factor of high priority
B = Alternative Design Street in NW Quadrant
C = Dead End Street
D = Judgment Factor of low priority
Note:
Streets with Factors B and C have been
shaded since they are unlikely to have the
utilities undergrounded in the near future.
Page 11 of 11 APPENDIX D
3/23/09
Valley Sidewalk Improvement CIP 6019 Petition
By signing this petition, I indicate that I do not want to have the City of Carlsbad
complete the sidewalk improvement project for Valley.
Name of Home Owner Address
3 /3.^/0 f
3/23/09
Magnolia Sidewalk Improvement CIP 6019 Petition
By signing this petition, I indicate that I do not want to have the City of Carlsbad
complete the sidewalk improvement project for Magnolia.
Name of Home Owner Address
i*
c at
2
Install
Waterline
Construct
Sidewalk &
Widen Street
Carlsbad High School
Carlsbad
Village
Academy
Valley
Middle School
Magnolia
Elementary
SchoolIn City’s R/W
Undergrounding of Utilities not included
3
Increase parking
capacity
Enhance pedestrian
and vehicle circulation
Pedestrian
4
Enhance Pedestrian
Safety
Northbound
Car
Southbound
Car
Total 19 parcels
18 residential lots and Carlsbad Village
Academy
Public Improvements in City’s R/W
Regrade/Pave Driveways
5
Street Improvements $763,000 -TIF funds
and Future Improvement Agreements
(FIA’s)
Water Line Replacement $304,000-Water
Replacement funds
6
FIA’s result from
›Parcel split
›Lot line
adjustment
›Building permit
FIA’s cost share
$75,000
7
Schools
Carlsbad High School
Carlsbad
Village
Academy
Valley
Middle School
Magnolia
Elementary
SchoolFIA’s
CMC Section 18.40.100 prevents Council
from waiving the obligations of the FIA’s
in this case.
Direct the City Attorney to Research CMC to
possibly waive the FIA obligation
8
Concerns –pedestrian safety, traffic
circulation and parking capacity
Priority 13 & 25 in the “City of Carlsbad
Sidewalk Inventory Report” prepared by
the Traffic Division in 1991
Priority Project Area in Pedestrian Master
Plan approved by Council on March 17,
2009
9
Improve Streets and Install Waterline
›Addresses pedestrian safety, traffic
circulation, and on-street parking capacity
Undergrounding of utilities not included
Prevailing Wages not required
Call FIA’s with option for Finance Dept. to
prepare a payment plan for FIA’s
10
Advertise -April 2009
Open Bids -May 2009
Award –June 2009
Construction –August to November 2009
11
Delays project a min. of 1 year
Cost ~ $500,000
Street Lighting ~ $30,000
Funding Options
1.20A SDG&E funds
2.Prop 42 funds
3.General Fund
4.Assessment District
12
1.20A SDG&E funds
›Borrow up to 5 years ~(-$920,000)
›Currently borrowed 2 years~(-$405,000)
›Prevailing Wages required
2.Prop 42 funds
›Prevailing Wages required
›Funds could be used on other projects
(e.g., PAR Widening, ECR Widening, etc)
3.Assessment District –Property Owners Pay
›Low ~ $17,000 / High ~ $85,000
13
14
2006 -Faraday Avenue/El Camino Real
Intersection Improvements, CIP 3920
›No action from Council
›City saved ~ $63,000
1987 -Tamarack Avenue Improvements
from Adams to Highland, CIP 3144
›FIA’s discovered after public improvements
were made and Council approved
collection of FIA’s
›City saved ~ $30,300
15
›Example
A 10 year payment plan at 4% interest
$67/month (low) & $206/month (high)
16
No formal process for conversion
Future Improvement Agreement (FIA)
›Used for Compatible Improvement Street or
Alternative Design Street
›Lien on Property
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement
(NIA)
›Used for Alternative Design Street only
›Waives owner’s right to vote on Assessment
District
17
Compatible Improvement Street (CIS)
›Pedestrian Safety
›Location near 4 local schools
Alternative Design Street (ADS)
›Reconvene Sidewalk Policy Committee and
re-evaluate findings
›Council Adopt new findings (if any)
›Priority 13 & 25 in1991 Sidewalk Inventory
Report
›Priority Project Area in Pedestrian Master Plan
18
19