Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-05-19; City Council; 19826; Authorize energy efficient street light retrofitsCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 17 #• 19,826 MTG.5/19/09 PW-GS AUTHORIZE ENERGY EFFICIENT STREET LIGHT RETROFITS DEPT. HEAD CITY ATTY CITY MGR. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2009-119 _, which authorizes staff to 1) submit to the Federal Government for the Energy Efficient Block Grant, 2) apply to the California Energy Commission for a low interest loan to be put towards lighting retrofits, and 3) solicit proposals for the retrofitting of the City's street lights. ITEM EXPLANATION: For the past decade, the City of Carlsbad has engaged in a comprehensive effort to reduce electrical consumption and to promote energy efficiency. These efforts include the development of Council Policy #71: Energy Conservation and Management, Council adoption of Quality of Life and Environmental Guiding Principles, improvements to the City's vehicle fleet fuel efficiency, extensive energy efficiency improvements to City facilities, quantifying the municipal corporation's greenhouse gas emissions or "carbon footprint", and most recently, pursuing a design for a hydroelectric facility at Maerkle Reservoir. In 2006, the State of California approved Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32). This legislation, and other subsequent State directives, has established aggressive short and long term goals regarding the use of energy and the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) through the year 2050 (Exhibit 2). The State has developed a scoping plan to assist in the implementation of Air Resources Board programs and the provisions of AB 32. Project Description This project proposes to replace or modify all 7,040 high pressure sodium (HPS) street lights owned and maintained by the City of Carlsbad with high efficiency induction street lights. Thirty years ago, the City undertook a similar project and converted its mercury vapor street lights to HPS. Until recently, HPS was considered the best technology available. Over the past several years, technology has progressed with regards to the energy efficiency of street lighting. Staff's proposal is to adopt induction street lighting as the City standard and replace the existing fixtures with induction fixtures. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Tom Moore 760 434-2980 or Thomas.Moore@carlsbadca.gov FOR STAFF USE ONLY. ACTION: APPROVED S DENIED D CONTINUED D WITHDRAWN D AMENDED D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D RETURNED TO STAFF D OTHER-SEE MINUTES D Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The City currently pays approximately $600,000 per year in electrical costs for street lighting (this represents nearly 25% of the total annual electrical expense for the municipality). Staff estimates this cost will be reduced by approximately $290,000 annually by switching to induction street lights. Additionally, maintenance costs are projected to decrease due to an increase in the warranty period for the new induction lighting modules. As a result, staff anticipates an additional $100,000 in maintenance savings annually to the street lighting budget. Furthermore, induction lamps are projected to last longer and have a rated life span of 100,000 hours (24 years) versus a 25,000 hour rated lifespan (6 years) for the current HPS lamps. If approved, the proposed project is expected to take 14 to 16 months to complete. Energy savings will accrue as lamps are replaced, with San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) adjusting the City's rate per fixture after each installation. SDG&E has, and continues to adopt new rates which reflect induction fixtures reduced energy usage. For example, a typical HPS fixture costs the City approximately $7.54/month, while an induction fixture would cost approximately $3.32/month. The estimated cost for retrofitting the HPS street lights owned by the City, which includes all lights in both Street Lighting and Landscaping Districts No. 1 (LLD #1) and No. 2 (LLD #2), is $3.03 million. Staff has identified a number of funding sources (as outlined in the table below) to help offset the capital expense of the proposed project, including: a portion of the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) annual allocation, incentives from SDG&E, full allocation of the Federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant, and a loan from either the California Energy Commission or the City's General Capital Construction (GCC) fund. Funding Source CDBG Allocation SDG&E Incentives Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Anticipated Loan Amount Total Amount $265,000 $285,000 $939,000 $1,543,000 $3,032,000 The City Council could consider three loan options: 1. Apply for a low interest (3.9%), ten-year loan from the California Energy Commission. 2. Have the GCC fund loan LLD #1 the necessary funds, bearing interest at an annual rate equal to the average yield on the Treasurer's portfolio for each fiscal year, payable over ten years. 3. Have the GCC fund loan LLD #1 the necessary funds, bearing no interest, payable over ten years. PageS The savings in LLD #1 are estimated to be the most significant, and range between $2.1 million and $2.6 million citywide over the next ten years, depending on which loan option is chosen. This is due to the fact that the majority of street lights are located in LLD #1. Staff proposes to fund loan payments from the annual savings (both electrical and maintenance) achieved from the retrofitting. Without retrofitting the street lights, staff currently projects that the fund balance in LLD #1 will be depleted in Fiscal Year 2012-13, as assessments cannot be increased in that district without voter approval. If approved, the savings projected through the retrofitting of the lights will allow LLD #1 to operate over the next ten years without requiring any additional funding from the City's General Fund for operational purposes. Efficiency savings in LLD #2 are estimated at $126,000 over the next ten years, and may result in lower annual assessments to property owners within LLD #2. In LLD #2, assessments for street lights are adjusted on an annual basis in order to fully cover the operational costs of the lights. Based on an analysis of projected portfolio yields, staff recommends Option 1, a loan from the California Energy Commission, to provide the remainder of the funding necessary for this project. The interest rate is lower than the anticipated interest rate for option #2, and this option does not impact the GCC as would option #3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Staff estimates that the change in technology will reduce the City's current power consumption for street lighting from 5,118,967 kwh/year to 2,040,898 kwh/year. This is a reduction of 3,078,049 kwh annually. In terms of greenhouse gas reduction, this project will result in the reduction of 1,240 tons annually, the equivalent of taking 170 cars off the road for a year, or planting 124,046 trees. Additionally, the technology used in induction lamps greatly reduces the amount of mercury used, resulting in diminished need for hazardous waste disposal, and reduces both costs to the City and impacts to the environment. Approximately one-tenth the amount of mercury used in high pressure sodium lighting is used in induction fixtures. The form of mercury used in induction lamps is a solid versus a liquid or gaseous form in high pressure sodium lamps, which makes it much easier to recover and recycle at the end of the lamps useful life. This project is a Class 1 categorical exemption (minor alteration of existing structure or facilities) and is, therefore, exempt from the environmental review process under provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(c). EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution No. 2009-119 authorizing the retrofit of the City's streetlight inventory with more efficient induction lighting, authorizing staff to apply for Federal Grants to help pay for the project, and authorizing staff to apply for a low interest loan from the California Energy Commission to assist with financing for this project. 1 2 3 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT. 4 5 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has engaged in a comprehensive effort to reduce 6 energy consumption; and 7 WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted AB 32, the Global Warming 8 Solutions Act of 2006; and 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET LIGHT RETROFIT PROJECT AND APPLICATION FOR STATE AND g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 25 Carlsbad, California, as follows: 26 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. WHEREAS, AB 32 calls for dramatic reductions in the production of green house gases; and WHEREAS, the Council believes that the development of energy conservation measures represents an effective way to help achieve the goals identified in AB 32; and WHEREAS, new technology in street lighting substantially reduces energy consumption; and WHEREAS, the federal government has made available funds to help offset the capital cost of replacing street lights; and WHEREAS, the State of California provides low interest loans to help facilitate energy efficiency projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed street lighting retrofit will save more than three million kilowatt hours annually. 2. City Council authorizes staff to proceed with developing specifications and soliciting bids for to procure and install induction street lighting. f 1 2 3. Staff is authorized to seek federal grants to assist with the financing of a street light retrofit project. 3 4. Staff is authorized to seek a low interest loan from the California Energy 4 Commission to assist in the financing of a street light retrofit project. 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 // 12 // 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 // 22 23 24 25 26 " 27 // 28 // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 19th day of May, 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Hall, Packard and Blackburn. NOES: None. ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin. ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, City Clerk' (SEAL) ENERGY EFFICIENT SUSTAINABLELIGHTINGSUSTAINABLE LIGHTING STREET LIGHTINGENERGY CONSUMPTION•Energy consumption of the  existing system is    5illiKWHover 5 million KWH•$600,000 annual energy costs$,gy•20% to 25% of City of Carlsbad  greenhouse gas emissions GUIDINGPRINCIPLESGUIDING PRINCIPLES•COUNCILPOLICY71•COUNCIL POLICY 71•CARLSBAD QUALITY OF LIFE AND ENVIROMENTAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES•STATEASSEMBLYBILL32STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 32•STATE DIRECTIVES TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTIONANDGREENHOUSEGASCONSUMPTION AND GREENHOUSE GAS•FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY CARLSBAD STREET LIGHTING228 5,350928928480 Benefits of Induction LightingLESS THAN ONE HALF ENERGY USEPROVEN SINCE 1990A100 000HOURLIFEA 100,000 HOUR LIFEPRODUCESWHITELIGHTPRODUCES WHITE LIGHTLESS GLARETEN YEARWARRANTY ADVANTAGES OF INDUCTION  LIGHTINGRENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSITITUTE LIGHTING RESEARCH CENTER·QUICKER REACTION TIME UNDER WHITE LIGHT QUICKER REACTION TIME UNDER WHITE LIGHT∙ STREET APPEARS BRIGHTER AND MORE COMFORTABLE COMFORTABLE ∙ TRAFFIC SIGNS APPEAR MORE CLEAR∙∙ GREATERSENSE OF SECURITY∙∙ GREATERSENSE OF SECURITY∙ BETTER COLOR RECOGNITION AND FACIAL RECOGNITIONRECOGNITION LIGHTPOLLUTIONLIGHT POLLUTION •InternationalDarkSky•International Dark Sky Association compliant cutoff fi tfixtures•Less than one half of the existing wattagegg•ProduceslessreflectiveglareProduces less reflective glare ENVIROMENTALIMPACTENVIROMENTAL IMPACTRdCitfClbdh•Reduce City of Carlsbad  greenhouse gas emissions by 1,200 tons per year, the equivalent of taking 170 cars off the road or planting 124,000 treestrees•Reducing  our hazardous mercury waste by 90% FISCALIMPACTFISCAL IMPACT•Cost of project  $3,032,000•40% incentives and grants make simple payback 4 yearsyears•Projected yearly savings of $ 400,000 per year•Continued savings over the 20 year lifespan of new systemsystem•HPS $7.54 per month vs. Induction $3.32 per month LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL SAVINGS•10 year savings to LLD#1 of 2.1 million to 2.6 million, a direct savings to the General Fund•10 year savings to LLD#2 of $126,000 , may result in  lower annual assessments WHAT OTHERS ARE DOING PROJECTSCHEDULEPROJECT SCHEDULE•Summer 2009 apply for grants incentives and loans•Fall 2009 solicit bids for equipment and installation•Fall2009Councilapprovalforsuccessfulproposals•Fall 2009 Council approval for successful proposals•Winter 2009 delivery of equipment and start of                   installations•Fall 2010 project completion and closeout.pjp RESOLUTIONNO.2009‐119RESOLUTION NO. 2009119StaffrecommendsadoptingresolutionNo.2009‐119Staff recommends adopting resolution No. 2009119 authorizing the following actions :1SubmittothefederalgovernmentforanEnergyEfficiency1.Submit to the federal government for an Energy Efficiency  Block Grant2. Apply to the California Energy Commission for a low interest loan to assist in financing the lighting retrofit project3. Develop specifications and solicit bids  to procure and  pppinstall  induction street lighting  Questions or Comments? ORIGIN OF INDUCTION LIGHTING•The Principle of Induction wasintroducedtotheworldwas introduced to the world by the scientist Nicola TESLA in the 1800’s.•TESLApredictedthat•TESLA predicted that incandescent lighting  “will soon be superseded by the electrodelessvacuumtubeelectrodelessvacuum tube which I brought out thirty‐eight years ago, a lamp muchmoreeconomicalandmuch more economical and yielding a light of indescribable beauty and softness"softness." Communities Going Greeng•Princeton Il. Replaces current street lights with energy efficient Induction lighting•Islip NY going green with Induction Street lighting•City of St. Petersburg purchases $640,000 Induction fixtures•North Bay Ontario lights the way with 5,500 Induction Bulbs•City of Tempe completes pilot program requests 2 million for induction•Arizona Public Service Agency approves Induction Cobra head Street lights•Evanston Il Council approves one million dollars for Induction Street Lights•Evanston Il. Council approves one million dollars for Induction Street Lights•City of Los Angeles converts 4,800 street lights to Induction Lamps•City of Compton improves public safety with induction street lightsyppp y g•Cobourg Ontario to make total conversion to Induction Lights, 2,395 in total•Ponca City Okla. improves services ,reduces costs with Induction Lights•Henderson Nev. Green upgrades : 26,000 street lights to be replaced with Induction FixturesHenderson Nev. Green upgrades : 26,000 street lights to be replaced with Induction Fixtures•Caltrans replacing 175 –205 watts with 85 watts induction lamps ABETTERWAYTOLOOKATLIGHTA BETTER WAY TO LOOK AT LIGHT WHATISINDUCTIONLIGHTING?WHAT IS INDUCTION LIGHTING ?HOW DOES IT WORK ?•. PSE&G Goes Green In a BIG WAYThtilitilld$50illif•The utility will spend $50 million for efficient induction fluorescent lighting.•PSE&G will replace 96,000 street lights in two years, resulting in immediate titi i liticost savings to municipalities.