Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-14; City Council; 20358; LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 11 AB# 20,358 MTG. 9/14/2010 DEPT. CED LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 PUD 05-12(6) DEPT. DIRECTORIES CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council hold a public hearing and ADOPT Resolution No. 2010-222 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05-12(6) for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Application(s)Administrative Approvals Planning Commission City Council PUD 05-12(6)RA RA = Recommended Approval * = Final City decision-making authority / = requires Coastal Commission approval On July 7, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval (7-0-0) of a Planned Development Permit Amendment application for the floor plans, plotting and architecture for 67 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street. The lots for this neighborhood were created through Tentative Map CT 05-15 and Planned Development Permit PUD 05-12, both of which were approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. The project complies with all of the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the Planned Development Ordinance, and City Council Policy 66 for Livable Neighborhoods. The project is designed with three (3) floor plans (Plan 1, 2 and 3), one (1) variation to Floor Plan 1 (Plan 1X), and three (3) different architectural styles for each floor plan including: Spanish, Tuscan and Santa Barbara. The total living area ranges in size from 3,162 to 3,688 square feet. No public comment was received at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions and a complete project description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the proposed discretionary action. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Shelley Glennon (760) 602-4625 shellev.glennon@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION:APPROVED DENIED D CONTINUED D WITHDRAWN D AMENDED D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC D CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN D RETURNED TO STAFF D OTHER - SEE MINUTES D Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98- 07. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time, CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation, measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for EIR 98-07 which are applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2010-222 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6711 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated July 7, 2010 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 7, 2010. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 14tb day of sppt-pmhpr 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Member? Lewis, Kulcbin, Hall, Packard and Blackburn NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: l/ORRA\NE M.<tfV0)6D, City Clerk (J '(SEAL) -2- 4 EXHIBIT 2 \ NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP La Costa Oaks North 3.3 PUD 05-12(8) EXHIBIT 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6711 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 4 AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 67 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE 6 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE 7 ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 8 . ZONE 11. 9 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS, NORTH 3.3 CASE NO.: PUD 05-12(6) 10 WHEREAS, LC Oaks 3-3, LLC, "Developer," has filed a verified application 12 with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral Management 13 Company, "Owner," described as 14 Lots 1 through 18 inclusive, Lots 36 through 79 inclusive, and Lots 116 through 120, of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 05-15, La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3, in City of Carlsbad, 16 County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of 17 San Diego County, August 22,2007 18 ("the Property"); and 19 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned 20 Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" — "UUU" dated July 7, 2010, on 21 22 file in the Planning Department, LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3, as provided by Chapter 23 21.45/21.47 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 24 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on July 7, 2010, hold a duly noticed 25 public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 26 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 27 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 28 relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment; and 1 WHEREAS, on September 26, 2006, the City Council approved PUD 05-12, as 2 described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 2006-287. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 4 r Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 6 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 7 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 9 Findings: 10 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan, and complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Villages of La Costa . Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for 67 single-family detached units located on previously approved lots (CT 05-15) with a 13 minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet. In addition, the project achieves the General Plan's Residential Objectives through providing a variety of safe and attractive 14 housing that preserves the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of existing residential areas. The single-family residential development complies with all development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan as shown on 16 Attachments 6 through 9 (Tables 1 - 4). 2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to existing uses, or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely 18 impact the site, surroundings, or traffic, in that the project has been designated for single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. The single-family residential neighborhoods to the north, south and east of the site 2Q are also similar in character and density. Lands to the west of the project site will remain open-space as approved under the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Traffic 21 has been previously analyzed for compliance through the approval of Tentative Map No. CT 05-15 and Planned Development Permit No. PUD 05-12 (Planning 22 Commission Resolutions No. 6148 and 6149). 23 3. The project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, in that 24 the 67 single-family residential homes have been analyzed for consistency with all applicable city codes, policies and regulations. 25 The project's design, including architecture and plotting: 26 a. Contributes to the community's overall aesthetic quality, in that the project consists of a high quality residential design through the use of a variety of floor plans, 28 exterior building planes, roof planes and color schemes, as well as a variety of PCRESONO. 6711 -2- design elements distinctive to the 3 proposed architectural styles: Spanish, 2 Tuscan and Santa Barbara. 3 b. Includes the use of harmonious materials and colors, and the appropriate use of landscaping, in that the project's distinctive architectural styles includes nine 4 different color schemes with a variety of design elements such as: accent colors, ,- window/door trims, roof tiling, decorative stucco, wood accents, stone veneer and wainscoting. The proposed materials and colors contribute to the distinctive 6 architectural styles while the previously approved landscaping will highlight all proposed architectural designs. 7 c. Achieves continuity among all elements of the project, in that the project's high quality architectural design helps create interest and character to the entire 9 neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed homes have been carefully plotted to avoid any identical homes (including floor plans, color scheme and architectural 10 styles) from occurring side-by-side, thereby avoiding a monotonous residential street scene yet still providing a sense of continuity through design. , ^ 5. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and 13 ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection 14 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 16 6. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 17 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the in Villages of La Costa Master Plan arid Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. 20 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B). 21 8. The Planning Director has determined that:22 5 _, a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been 24 given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the 25 purposes of CEQA; [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified by the City Council 27 on October 23, 2001 in connection with the prior project or plan; and d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in 28 the prior EIR; and PCRESONO. 6711 -j- e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under 2 CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and f. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives 3 identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the 4 project design or are required as conditions of approval for this Subsequent Project. 9. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 6 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 7 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 9 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a 10 building permit. 1., If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be j2 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 13 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 14 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the ,, property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 16 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Planned Development Permit Amendment. 17 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Planned Development Permit Amendment documents, as 19 necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. 20 Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.21 22 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 23 4. If any conditions for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the 24 payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be 26 invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 27 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and PCRESONO. 6711 -4- representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, 2 claims, and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, .directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Planned 3 Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use ^ contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the - facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 6 6. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 7 Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving 9 condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 10 7. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the * * project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 12 8. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar 13 copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. 14 9. Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plancheck, a reduced legible version of all approving resolution(s) in a 24" x 36" blueline drawing I g format. 17 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the San Dieguito Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 19 11. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required 20 as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 21 ~~ 12. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by MP 98- 01(D) in Resolution No. 5837, CT 05-15 in Resolution No. 6148 and PUD 05-12 in 23 Resolution No. 6149, which are incorporated by reference herein. 24 13. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final 25 Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations 27 contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured slopes. 28 PCRESONO. 6711 -5- 14. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this 2 project within 36 months from the date of project approval. 3 15. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. 4 - 16. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council 6 Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer 7 shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information 10 regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. 17. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to 12 the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and 13 existing schools, parks and streets. 14 18. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. 19. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 17 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 20. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable 22 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 24 21. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice 25 of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of 27 Carlsbad has issued a Planned Development Permit Amendment by Resolution No. 6711 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, 28 location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as PCRESONO. 6711 -6- well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. 2 The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer 3 or successor in interest. 4 Fire; 22. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur within 6 the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall be obtained 7 prior to installation from the Building Department and must be identified within the CC&Rs. o 9 23. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone and must be identified within the 10 CC&Rs. 1* 24. All submittals including architectural submittals shall reference that all lots are to 12 include the installation of Automatic Residential Fire Sprinklers. It is expected that all submittals will reflect this requirement, so that this requirement is not lost 13 between submittals. 14 Engineering: Fees/Agreements 16 25. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for 17 recordation the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. 18 Grading 19 26. Developer shall apply for separate.grading permits for the precise grading associated with 20 the single family lot development, all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 21 27. Developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the City's current Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). Developer shall provide improvements constructed pursuant 23 to best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level 24 prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: 26 A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established 27 disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products. 28 PCRESONO. 6711 -7- B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, 2 solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water 3 conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, 4 County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants 6 when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. 7 28. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions 9 established by the San Diego Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The SWPPP shall address measures to reduce 10 to the maximum extent practicable storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project. ,~ 29. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)." 13 The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order R9-2007-0001 issued by the San Diego 14 Region of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water, to the maximum extent practicable, for the post-construction 16 stage of the project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall: 17 a. Identify existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern. b. Identify the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water bodies that * could be impacted by this project. I n c. Recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants from storm water to the maximum 20 extent practicable before discharging offsite; d. Establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine cleanup. Special 21 . considerations and effort shall be applied to (RESIDENT/EMPLOYEE) education on the proper procedures for handling cleanup and disposal of pollutants. e. Ensure long-term maintenance of all post-construction BMPs in perpetuity. 23 f. Identify how post-construction runoff rates and velocities from the site will not exceed the pre-construction runoff rates and velocities to the maximum extent 24 practicable. oc 30. Developer shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) standards into the design of 2/r this project per City Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version, including applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board Orders, all to the 27 satisfaction of the City Engineer. 28 ... PCRESONO. 6711 -8- 31. Developer shall cause property owner to process, execute and submit an executed copy to 2 the City Engineer for recordation a City standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement for the perpetual maintenance of all 3 treatment control, applicable site design and source control, post-construction permanent Best Management Practices prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, 4 or the recordation of a final map, whichever occurs first for this Project. Code Reminders: 6 32. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to 7 prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9 33. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and 10 Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Site Plan are * 1 for planning purposes only. 12 34. Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section 13 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 14 35. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. !6 36. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 17 Code Section 18.04.320. * ° 37. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance jo with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director to installation of such signs. 20 21 NOTICE 22 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as 23 "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If 25 you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for 26 processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or 27 annul their imposition. 28 PCRESONO. 6711 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection planning, with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, expired. PASSED, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the otherwise planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on July 7, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN _^— =»^^^ , •• — FARR^cH^DOUGLAS Chairperson Douglas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, L'Heureux, Montgomery, Nygaard and Schumacher : -^CN^"ysJet^ , ^fitirperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: dx. DON NEU Planning Director PCRESONO. 6711 -10-15 The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: July 7, 2010 Application complete date: March 15, 2010 Project Planner: Shelley Glennon Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno SUBJECT: PUD 05-12(8) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6711 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05- 12(B) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. A Tentative Map (CT 99-04) and final map have been recorded for the Oaks; grading and improvement plans have been approved; and construction is presently ongoing. The proposed project is also located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 05-15 (La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 Subdivision). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 67 single-family dwelling units located in the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 05-15) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05-12), approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. A Planned Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 3.3 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and pursuant to O II* PUD 05-12(B) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 JULY 7, 2010 PAGE 2 Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 05-12 Condition of Approval No. 7, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. This is the second PUD Amendment to be processed for La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3. The first amendment was for the architecture and plotting of the southern portion of Neighborhood 3.3 - Lots 19-35 and 80-115 (PUD 05-12(A)). This second PUD amendment application (PUD 05- 12(B)) is for the architecture and plotting of the northern portion of Neighborhood 3.3 - Lots 1- 18, 36-79 and 116-120. At over 50 units, this project also requires City Council approval pursuant to the Planned Development Ordinance (Section 21.45.050(B)(1)). The proposed two-story homes consist of four separate and distinct floor plans (Plan 1, IX, 2 and 3) with living areas ranging in approximate size from 3,118 square feet to 3,684 square feet. Plan IX is a variation of the Plan 1 and incorporates a slightly larger building footprint. The project incorporates three distinct architectural styles including: Spanish, Tuscan and Santa Barbara, as well as nine different color schemes to provide street scene variation throughout the project site. Each two-story home has either an attached three-car garage or two-car garage with an additional tandem parking space. Additionally, each floor plan has an option to change the third tandem parking space into livable area (see Attachment 10 for all the floor plans). The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS PLAN NO. 1 IX 2 3 1ST FLOOR SQ. FT. 2,114 2,312 1,676 1,727 2ND FLOOR SQ. FT. 1,004 1,004 1,887 1,957 LIVING AREA SQ. FT. 3,118 3,316 3,563 3,684 GARAGE SQ. FT. 595 3 car 595 3 car 703 3 car 735 3 car TOTAL BLDG. SQ. FT. 3,713 3,911 4,266 4,419 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Spanish, Tuscan, Santa Barbara Spanish, Tuscan, Santa Barbara Spanish, Tuscan, Santa Barbara Spanish, Tuscan, Santa Barbara IV. ANALYSIS Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(G)) The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. An overall goal of the Master Plan is P PUD 05-12(8) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 JULY 7, 2010 PAGE 3 to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan Villages. As previously discussed, the subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 05-15 and PUD 05-12, and complies with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision that was analyzed at that time. The proposed project meets all applicable development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Please see Attachments 6 through 9 (Tables 1-4) for project compliance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed herein. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Oaks Neighborhood 3.3 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6711 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Table 1 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance 7. Table 2 - Front Yard Setbacks 8. Table 3 - Individual Lot Data 9. Table 4 - Building Elevation Design Elements 10. Reduced Exhibits 11. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "UUU" dated July 7, 2010 NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP La Costa Oaks North 3.3 PUD05-12(B) BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: PUD Q5-12(B) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 APPLICANT: Jack Henthorn & Associates REQUEST AND LOCATION: Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 1L LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 18 inclusive. Lots 36 through 79 inclusive, and Lots 116 through 120, of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 05-15. La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3. in City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. August 22. 2007. APN: 223-840-01-00 through 223-840-23-00: 223-841-18-00 through 223-841-24-00 and 223- 842-01 through 223-842-37-00 Acres: 18 Acres Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 67 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: RLM Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 4 du / acre Density Proposed: 2.5 du / ac Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Current Land Use Site P-C RLM Vacant graded lots North P-C OS/RLM Open Space / Vacant lots South P-C RLM Vacant graded lots East P-C RLM Vacant graded lots West P-C OS Open Space LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes 1X1 No Coastal Development Permit: I I Yes IXI No Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes [Xl No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A Revised 01/06 2-0 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Dieguito Unified Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 67 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption, N/A I I Negative Declaration, issued N/A I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated N/A [X] Other, Prior Compliance with EIR 98-07 Revised 01/06 2-1 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 1 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: P-C DEVELOPER'S NAME: LC Oaks 3-3, LLC ADDRESS: 4747 Morena Boulevard, Suite 100, San Dieeo, CA 921 17 PHONE NO.: (858) 490-2300 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-840-01-00 through 223-840- 23-00: 223-841-18-00 through 223-841-24-00 and 223-842-01 through 223-842-37-00 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC.. SO. FT., DU): 18 acres/3.6 building coverage / 67 dwelling units acres of ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 2012 A. B. C. D. E. City Administrative Facilities: Library: Demand in Square Footage = 232.94 sq. ft. Demand in Square Footage = 124.23 sq. ft. 67EDU .47 Acres 160.1 Basin D F. G. H. I. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 6 Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools (San Dieguito Union High/Elementary): Encinitas Union Elementary School District: 670 ADT 17.5 gross acres 28 Students J. K. L. Sewer: Water: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin Demand in GPD = Middle School: 22 Students High School: 22 Students 67 EDU N/A 14,740 GPD The gross overall neighborhood density is 2.5 du/ac (per CT 5-15), which is 0.7 du/ac below the 3.2 du/ac Growth Management Control Point of the RLM Land Use Designation. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint''venture, association, $gcjal club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver^ syndicate, in this andean other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or assy other group or combination acting as a unit" t*» ? *'••*, "\ v *,. , ,4 <Agent* may siga.tfaJj dopnnent; fiowever, the legal same and entjty'qf the appllean^and property owner must be provided below.' ! -* > ** 1.APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MOKE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part IQJalts 3,3, Ljj? Title Title Address.Address 4747 frfarena Blvd. Ste 100 San Dieno.CA 92117 2.OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, "LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEAS E INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned fcorooratipn. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate Corp/Part Title peal Estate Collateral Management Company Address 1903 Wrloht Place. Suils 180 Carlsbad. CA 92008 1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760} 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.oarteDad.ca.U8 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organisation or a trust, list the names and addresses of AN% person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of (be. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title.Thle. Address.Address. 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? QYes No If yes, please indicate pcrson(s):, NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. rmation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of applicant/date /gent lor RECM; Fred M.Arbuckie F -esldent of Morrow Development F tint or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant*s agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H*OMIN\COUNTER\DISCIOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1 - RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) 15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages). All proposed porte cochere or arbor structures are allowed within the front yard setback to accommodate applicable alternate garage configurations. The cover cannot exceed 200 square feet in size and must have a 5' minimum setback from property line. Please refer to Attachment 7 - Table 2 "Front Yard Setbacks" for the 15' minimum setback compliance. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 21.63'. The proposed porte cochere on Plan 2A is in compliance. All units comply with the front yard setback requirements. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.6 & 7.7.3.3.i) 15' minimum setback. Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15.' All units comply with 15' minimum rear yard setback. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C) Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60' wide. • Minimum combined side yard setback: 12.5.' • Minimum of 5' per side. • Maximum setback does not need exceed 20' in aggregate. • Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5'. At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Data" for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. Plan types 2 and 3 incorporate side yard offsets. These plan types are plotted on 45 lots or 67.1% of the ^ plotted on 45 lots or unit mix. Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum.All units comply with the minimum 10' street side setback. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback Exhibit "C-D" of the enclosed site plans for further details. Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.g) Minimum lot width shall be 50.'All lots were previously approved by CT 05-15 and have a minimum width of 50' Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 2-story units: 40% of net pad area. Includes: . Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: « Exterior structures: covered porches; . Overhanging balconies that project < 8' from the building (or similar structure); . Porte Cochere's not > 22' length and 8'width; • Roof eaves not extending 30" from the face of any building; • Awnings; Open parking areas; • Structures under 30" in height; and . Masonry walls < 6' in height (wing- walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). All plan types are two-story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% of net pad area as required. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Date" for building coverage. All lots comply. Building Height (4.6.3.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.J) Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Planl= 28'-2" max and 2 stories PlanlX=28'-2" max and 2 stories Plan2= 27'-10" max and 2 stories Plan3 = 26'-8" max and 2 stories ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.6& 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan* 1 IX 2 3 SC 4 4 4 5 IT 5 5 5 6 SB 5 5 5 5 All units comply. Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan* 1 IX 2 3 SC 4 4 4 4 IT 4 4 4 4 SB 4 4 4 4 All units comply Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to Attachment 9 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. SC - Spanish Colonial SB - Santa Barbara IT - Italian Tuscan ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to Attachment 9 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads (4.6.3.A.l.a) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each of the proposed elevations. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.C& 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood. Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes four floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Single-story units (4.4&4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. • Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15', (10' preferred) Not Applicable within this Neighborhood. Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n& 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided. All proposed plans comply. Planl: 37.1% Plan IX: 34.5% Plan 2: 79.3% Plan 3: 79.5% ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Where three two- story units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan types 1, Ix and 2 incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of the building. These plan types are plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with less than 15' between them. Where three two- story units occur in a row with less than 15 ft between homes- (4.6.3.B.4.C) One of the units must have a single-story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan types 1, Ix, and 2 incorporate a single story building edge that is at least 5' wide and runs the length of the building. These plan types are plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with less than 15' to 20' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3' which is 40% or greater of the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. Plan types IX and 3 incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the front elevation width and a minimum of 3' deep. Plan IX: 62% Plan 3: 40.2% Plan types IX and 3 are plotted on 33 lots, or 49.2% of the unit mix, meeting this requirement. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9& 4.6.2.B.f) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may encroach standard distances into the required yard areas. 34.3% of the elevations incorporate a courtyard with a porte cochere entrance (All elevation styles for Plan 2). All courtyard walls comply and do not encroach into the front yard setback. Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side yard setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the side, rear or front yard setback more than 2' nor are wider than 8 feet. Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: • Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking. "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking. • Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. • More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) The common recreation area for the subject neighborhood is located within Neighborhood 3.1. Recreation parking will be provided in Neighborhood 3.1. 30 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'. Two one-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. All plan types meet the minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' x 20.' Plan 1 and Plan Ix have a two-car garage with a one-car tandem space. Plan 2 and 3 have a two- car garage and 1 side loaded- garage. Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k & 4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. • Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. • Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. • A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. • Minimum roof pitch of 3:12. A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. All roofs provide change in roof direction, top of slopes compliance, a variety of roofing tiles and colors, and have a minimum roof pitch of 3:12. 3 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.H, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. All setbacks for garages that face the street are no less than 20 ft. All side-loaded garages comply with the minimum 15' setback from property line and are designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. No floor plan provides three-car in a row garages. Plans 1 and Ix have a two-car garage with 1 tandem car space and Plans 2 and 3 have 2-car garages with 1 side loaded garage. All garages are designed to fit the proposed elevation. All garage doors comply. All homes comply. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Colors (4.6.3.B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred; however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to match the proposed architectural style. There are a minimum of three color schemes for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. Please refer to the attached plotting plan. All homes comply. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All plan types comply. Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C & 7.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: • Santa Barbara Mediterranean • Craftsman Bungalow Spanish Colonial . Monterey Ranch . Italian/Tuscan • European Country The architectural styles included are as follows: Spanish Colonial Santa Barbara Mediterranean Italian/Tuscan ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.I & 4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes). "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure. 2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All chimneys and their caps comply with proper scale and proportion. Each home has only one chimney. Window Detailing (4.6.3.B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: • Deeply recessed windows • Paned windows • Decorative window ledges • Accent and varied shape windows • Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports Exterior wood trim surrounds • Accent colors on shutters or other elements • Arched elements • Shutters • Raised stucco trim around windows • Window lintels Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. ATTACHMENT 7 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Floor Plan 1 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 1 R 1x 2 3 2 3 2 1X; 3 2 1x 2 R 3 R 1x R 1 R 2 R 3 R 2 1 R 2 R 3 R 1x R 2 3 R 2 R 1 R 3 3 R 2 1x 3 2 R 1x R 3 R 1 2 2 R 3 1 2 R 3 1 R 3 1x R Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 20.00 27.90 24.20 34.50 15.00 26.40 15.40 46.00 33.10 15.00 20.00 29.90 27.20 23.20 30.40 15.00 27.00 15.80 46.30 33.70 15.00 26.50 15.30 46.10 34.00 15.30 26.70 15.70 46.30 21.10 30.10 16.10 38.00 19.30 29.40 18.40 49.00 21.50 30.00 16.20 28.50 17.40 50.10 35.50 15.10 20.70 28.80 15.00 20.00 28.20 25.10 26.20 15.00 45.80 36.60 17.90 32.50 21.50 52.10 20.00 27.90 24.00 27.00 15.00 45.60 34.30 15.60 24.70 32.80 18.80 26.00 15.00 45.60 34.30 15.50 25.80 15.70 47.80 20.00 28.00 24.70 36.00 15.00 38.60 22.00 34.50 15.20 39.70 25.50 32.50 15.40 35.00 16.30 32.30 15.00 42.70 21.30 29.20 15.00 33.70 15.00 20.00 27.70 22.00 25.90 15.00 45.80 26.00 15.00 45.60 33.70 15.00 20.00 27.40 21.90 26.70 15.70 46.30 33.90 15.00 20.00 28.00 24.60 52.70 38.40 20.80 33.60 23.90 Weighted Average 22.79 15.00 24.51 15.00 24.24 15.00 24.98 15.00 24.52 21.47 24.81 20.56 25.14 27.51 20.77 26.87 21.96 15.00 23.18 15.00 23.85 30.61 22.72 15.00 21.75 23.68 15.00 21.69 24.68 23.00 15.00 26.78 26.71 22.71 22.39 15.00 15.00 15.00 21.92 15.00 15.00 15.00 21.84 24.81 15.00 22.96 . 40.90 23.91 4/19/2010 2:37 PM Neighborhood 3.3 North Section B Table 3 Page 3 of 5 3-S ATTACHMENT 7 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 116 117 118 119 120 Floor Plan 2 1x R 3 3R 2 1 2 3 1 R 3 2 2. 1 3 3R 2 R 1x R 2 R 1x R Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 28.80 15.70 47.00 22.60 35.50 24.20 43.20 21.90 33.70 16.70 29.70 15.20 44.90 21.00 29.00 25.60 26.20 15.00 45.80 29.50 15.00 20.00 31.60 30.70 31.70 22.20 30.90 16.70 46.20 31.20 15.70 46.10 21.80 29.50 25.50 28.60 15.00 29.60 15.00 30.40 15.00 43.00 28.20 34.10 15.90 33.20 17.30 46.50 23.60 31.60 17.20 NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE: Weighted Average 25.76 25.16 28.56 22.08 25.58 23.96 15.00 15.00 25.83 24.14 26.93 26.59 24.37 15.00 15.00 15.00 24.41 28.17 22.37 21.63 4/19/2010 2:37 PM Neighborhood 3.3 North Section B Table 3 Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT 8 Individual Lot Data . La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 North Lot* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 116 117 118 119 120 Plan 1 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 1 R 1x 2 3 2 3 2 1x 3 2 1x 2 R 3 R 1x R 1 R 2 R 3 R 2 1 R 2 R 3 R 1x R 2 3 R 2 R 1 R 3 3 R 2 1x 3 2 R 1x R 3 R 1 2 2 R 3 1 2 R 3 1 R 3 1x R 2 1x R 3 3 R 2 1 2 3 1 R 3 2 2 1 3 3 R 2 R 1x R 2 R 1x R Elevation B C A B A C B A C B A B C B A C A C B C B A C B A B A C B A B A A C A C B C A C B B C A C B C B A C B A B C C B A C A B A A B A 3 C A Color 4 7 2 5 1 9 6 3 8 6 1 5 9 4 2 9 1 7 5 8 6 1 7 5 2 6 1 8 6 3 4 1 2 7 3 9 4 7 2 8 6 4 9 3 8 4 9 6 1 8 4 2 5 8 7 5 2 9 2 4 3 1 5 3 6 7 3 Average Neighborhood Setback: Setbacks (ftl Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 22.79 15.00 24.51 15.00 24.24 15.00 24.98 15.00 24.52 21.47 24.81 20.56 25.14 27.51 20.77 26.87 21.96 15.00 23.18 15.00 23.85 30.61 22.72 15.00 21.75 23.68 15.00 21.69 24.68 23.00 15.00 26.78 26.71 22.71 22.39 15.00 15.00 15.00 21.92 15.00 15.00 15.00 21.84 24.81 15.00 22.96 40.90 23.91 25.76 25.16 28.56 22.08 25.58 23.96 15.00 15.00 25.83 24.14 26.93 26.59 24.37 15.00 15.00 15.00 24.41 28.17 22.37 21.63 15 15 15.4 15 17.6 62.1 73.4 69.1 63.1 58.1 54.5 54.1 57.9 57.5 44.3 37 30.6 18.6 15.5 15 56.6 53.2 60.2 73.5 73.8 92.6 22.7 28.3 40 100.3 26.2 31.9 15 36.2 20.5 16.3 61.4 24.2 19.8 15.6 16.2 17.1 16.6 15.6 15.7 15 17.6 28.2 15.1 52.9 75.9 43.8 16 19.4 15 19.6 15 15.6 40.2 46.2 34.8 25.1 57.7 66.4 45.6 25.6 22.4 7 5.3 5.3 5.5 5.7 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 9.8 7.5 8.4 7.7 7.2 6.7 13.4 6.7 7.9 9.3 42 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 7.4 5.8 9.7 5.6 8.3 15.8 8.5 8.4 7.2 5.3 5 15 11.8 8.6 6.8 10.2 9 9 9.4 22.4 5.3 17.8 21.9 5.6 5.5 5.3 22.4 11.2 10.8 7.8 19.2 7.3 10.1 11.2 10.2 7 8.7 7.2 6 5.8 6 24.7 10.8 10.8 10.6 10.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.5 7 5.3 5.8 8.4 5.4 9.9 8.4 6.5 17.8 21.4 7.5 11.5 9.2 9.2 9 16.9 8.2 8 8.1 7.8 7.8 51.8 5.7 16.4 11.4 10.5 20 5.3 5.5 5.9 5.5 5.8 5.5 5.3 5.3 15.5 7.3 11.1 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.2 21.4 5.9 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.5 5.3 5.7 5.4 7.5 7 7.2 7.7 20 34.5 26.4 33.1 20 23.2 27 33.7 26.5 34 26.7 21.1 38 29.4 21.5 28.5 35.5 20.7 20 26.2 36.6 32.5 20 27 34.3 24.7 26 34.3 25.6 20 36 38.6 34.5 25.5 35 32.3 21.3 47.9 20 25.9 26 33.7 20 26.7 33.9 20 52.7 20.8 28.8 22.6 43.2 33.7 29.7 21 26.2 29.5 20 31.7 30.9 31.2 21.8 28.6 29.6 30.4 28.2 33.2 23.6 Porch Net Pad Area (SF) 7,266 6,478 6,481 6,539 6,801 7,330 6,267 6,292 6,363 6,365 6,203 7,745 7,033 7,163 8,904 8,626 8,676 7,520 7,201 7,272 6,224 6,245 7,150 6,266 6,651 8,601 6,530 6,600 7,244 6,817 6,602 7,151 10,022 7,761 6,779 6,839 8,584 10,080 6,812 6,248 6,171 6,717 6,905 6,314 6,311 7,038 10,189 13,248 11,181 9,553 10,728 9,262 9,458 7.093 6,636 6,444 8,600 9,427 8,810 9j541 8,218 7,678 10,028 9,343 8,494 7,309 7,568 Building Coverage1' Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,709 2,462 2,379 2.462 2,709 2,907 2,379 2,462 2.379 2,462 2,379 2,907 2,462 2,379 2.907 2,379 2,462 2,907 2,709 2.379 2,462 , 2,379 2,709 2,379 2,462 2,907 2.379 2,462 2,379 2,709 2,462 2.462 2,379 2.907 2.462 2,379 2,907 2,462 2,709 2.379 2,379 2.462 2,709 2,379 2,462 2,709 2.462 2,907 2,379 2,907 2,462 2.462 2,379 2.709 2.379 2,462 2,709 2,462 2,379 2,379 2,709 2,462 2,462 2,379 2,907 2,379 2,907 37.3% 38.0% 36.7% 37.7% 39.8% 39.7% 38.0% 39.1% 37.4% 38.7% 38.4% 37.5% 35.0% 33.2% 32.6% 27.6% 28.4% 38.7% 37.6% 32.7% 39.6% 38.1% 37.9% 38.0% 37.0% 33.8% 36.4% 37.3% 32.8% 39.7% 37.3% 34.4% 23.7% 37.5% 36.3% 34.8% 33.9% 24.4% 39.8% 38.1% 38.6% 36.7% 39.2% 37.7% 39.0% 38.5% 24.2% 21.9% 21.3% 30.4% 22.9% 26.6% 25.2% 38.2% 35.8% 38.2% 31.5% 26.1% 27.0% 24.9% 33.0% 32.1% 24.6% 25.5% 34.2% 32.5% 38.4% 1/ "Building Coverage' = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitat* area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding eternal walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the building, and poite cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 6 feet. Abo excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry waBs not greater than 6 feel in height such as wing-walls, planter wafe or grade-separation retaining waits. 4/19/2010 2:37 PM Neighborhood 3.3 North Section B Table 4 Page 5 of 5 La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3 North BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS DESIGN ELEMENTS a. Variety of Roof Planes b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors c. Paned Windows and Doors d. Exposed Roof Beams or Rafter Tails e. Decorative Window Ledges ( Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood, Sidina and Stone g. Window and Door Lintels h. Dormers 1. Accent and Varied Shape Windows . Window Boxes and Planters with Architecturally Evident Supports k. Exterior Wood Elements . Variations in Colors of Stucco and Other Elements Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or Other m' Elements n. Stucco Wainscoting o. Covered Balconies p. Arched Elements q. Shutters Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and Doors PLAN ONE/ONE X Spanish Front ! Side Rear i ! 'i ' <\< < ' 1 'iI ' ^ ^ V v' s s •/ S S V I 0 ' ' ' ^ Tuscan Front ' Side Rear S / v' ' / ' S ' j s ' S S ^ V ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ \ 0 j / ^ j ^ Santa Barbara Front 'v' ' / ^ ^ ^ Side ^ ^ ^ ^ i 1 . 1 i / I ^ 0 ' Rear ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' V PLAN TWO Spanish Front ' ' ' Side ! Rear _lj ^^' i / S \ S -/ j S ' s ' ' s ' V ^ v' ^ ___ X sisTs s s s Tuscan Front ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^L ' ' Side ' ^ Rear '^ 1 ^ ^ ^ _ j/ ! ^ ^V X j i Santa Barbara Front ^ ^ ' ^ Side Rear ^ ^ ^ v^ ^ ' ^ ! x ^ ^ V1 ^ T v^ X ^.X i ./ PLAN THREE Spanish Front ^ ^> ' ^ S ' s ' s Side v' ^ ' ^ ^ ^ 0 ^ Rear ^ v' ' ^ ^ ^ v^ X ^ ^ Tuscan Front v' ^ ^ ' /• ^ Side ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ i V ^ v' / ^ ^ ^ 0 ^ Rear ' ^ ^ ^ ^ X ^ v' ^ X ' Santa Barbara Front v' V v' Side ./ ^ ^ ^ i ' ^ ^ • ^ ^ Rear • '^ ^ s ^ ^ 1 / i ^ ^ 0 X ^ I I o: OPTIONAL : AT SELECTED LOTS mz (O 6/8/2010 Section A, Item #9 PUD 05-12 (B) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND.i A rnsTALr\ U/LA3//1 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH -12 (B) LEGEND LA COSTA VICINITYMAP . !CTHCE ffiOW HA1&. STKR. ABBREVIATIONS RECLAIIfD *AT£R PAP ELEVACROSS SO IfT SO F LEGAL DESCRIPTION ! NORTH '/6-I20 OF nf CITY OF CA&SBAD TRACT A COSTA - LA COSTA OWCS NORTH - I Tlf CITY OF CMtLSBAD. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ACCORDING TO HAP NO THEffCfI5S96 FILED IN rtf OFFICE OF nf COW STOKER OF SAN D OtMTY ON AUGUST 22. 2007 AS FILE HO. X07-05S04X PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DISTRICTS YALLCCITOS WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAO VALLEClTOS «IER DISTRICT ENCINITAS UNION ELEU. SCHOOL DIST. SAN DIECUI TO LHION HICH SCHOOL DtS' COX. Tilt »A»CR . CARLSBAO MUNICIPAL *ATER DIST SCKWLS SCHOOLSCABLE .KEQ-AllfD *ATEX REFERENCE DRAWINGS 446-5 446-5A 446-1B 44E-SC 446-SE446-sr429-7 CJOSWG tOf •KMBCH tasTiNG LOT HUUKK*ITH PAD ZLEVAnON AND NT PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH BUILDER it«?ovoo/r$ NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 DINC AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 DINC AND EmSlON CONTROL PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH NT PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH BUILDER IHPROVEIfNTS NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 NORTH DINC *SO EKOSION CONTROL PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 SOUTHNT PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NCKTH BUILDER itfRovEtftfrs NEIGHBORHOOD 3 3 SOUTHNT PLANS FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH DEVELOPER iifRovEuEnTs NEIGHBORHOOD 3 t. 3 3-3 : FOR LA COSTA OAKS NORTH HE I J 3 CARLSBAD TCT OS-IS EXISTING EASEUEHT UHE CXISHHC maifBLL SLOPE (2:i UAX) EXISTING * OF GHAOE ft- eve UNLF.SS ontKmsE NOTED} WATER HUH *TH n« HYDRANT RECLAMED WATEK STREET CENTERUHE ELEVATIONS PROPOSED HtTAVUHG WALL nnsrwc RETAINING WALL BOUNDARY ANNOTATION CAILOUT PLAN TYPE ELEVA TION ANO COLOR SCHEME BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY PIAM 3 *OF UNITS «« 32 3! «* »Q. Ft.' 248J TOTAL BUXJ. COVERAGE- S' IW PARKING SUMMARY SNGIE FAU1.V VffinWPARKWG TOT>LS M,L STMDMtD SPAC *PEB If. COSTA DfiKS V PROVOED PARKIN SiNGLE PAMIY FULL-SQED 'HG»B«G& TOTALS sr % LAGEO , D^W 2 : IM S SPACES : s KW«S**HHGUNpr3] : " '"' SLBTOTHL . 19 ?s 153 EV BLANMV STAIOAIW)S 4 « 2 C •* D * SPACESJDU TOTAL SPACE3 MS ^CEPEHUMT REPRESENTATIVES, PROCESSED BY: JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES GENERAL NOTES I WTAL SITE AREA; APPROXIMATELY IB 0 ACRES ! EXISTING LAND USE. VACANT - ROUGH GRADED (PER DRAWING 446-X) J PROPOSED LAND USE. SINGLE FAUILY RESIDENTIAL tfC OPEN SPACE 4 TOTAL W*«R OF DUELLING UNITS: 67 5 TOTAL HJ*S£P OT RESICCNTIAL LOTS 676 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL HUHGERS 221-840-01-23. 223-841-18-24 t 223-942-01-37 7 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAIC USE DESIGNATION OLU (RESIDENTIAL LOf-tfDilM DENSITY 10-4 Ou/ocl) a PROPOSE! GOffUL PLAN LAIC USE DESIGNATIONRLU (RESIDENTIAL LOn-lfDIlM DENSITY fO-4 Ou/oci) 9 EXISTING ZONING: PC10. MASTER PLAN UNDERLYING ZONING: R-l (SINGLE FA¥ILt DETACHED)!l GROSS OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY: 2 5 DU/AC (I2O OU'S/48.9 AC) PER Tu CT 05 12 LFHP ZONE: 20NE nIJ AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS: 670 (67 UNI TS * 10 TRIPS/DAY) 14 BUILDING COVERAGE: APPROXIMATELY J 9 ACRES15 PERCENTAGE LANDSCAPING: APPROXIMATELY 5J.W GENERAL DESIGN NOTES-SITE PLAN I ALL GRADING FOR PROPOSED AND Fl/OfiF STREETS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 2 AU, EASCUEMTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. REMOVES OR RELOCATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. PUBLIC UTILITIES AH) THEIR APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS 3 ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL 8E INSTALLED LftDETORIXM).4 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: SAH-LO AERIAL SURVEYS FLOtH OJ-JO-97 R J LUNG FLOfN 05-11-04 AND THE MUNSAKER t ASSOCIATES ROUGH GRADING PLAN (DRAWING NO 446-56) 5 CONTOURED INTERVALS l'/S' FEET6 UANLfACTuKED SLOPE RATIOS SHALL BE VARIABLE (2: I MAX).7 FINIStfD GRADES ARE PER ROUGH GRADING PLANS 44S-SB S SOILS INFORMATION *AS OBTAINED FROU THE UPDATED CfOTECHNICAl INVESTIGATIONPREPARED BY: CEOCON INC. . DATED- Ofl-OJ-OT 9 GRADED StALES SHALL HAVE A HIHtltM OF IX FLOf LINE GRADE AND 'S 9-OKHOH GRADING PLAH OIK 446-58 10 ALL STREET DESIGNS. STREET LIGHT AND FIRE HYDRANTS TO CONFOHti TO CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AfO AS REOUlRED BY CITY ENGINEERVC PROVIDED AS SHOWY ON IHPROVEtfNT PLANS OK 446-SC t 429-7.J i LAtcscAFiNC AND TREE PIANTINC SHALL BE PCR THE CARLSBAD LAfOSCAff UANUAL Aft) Tff VILLAGES OF LA COSTA VASTER PLAH. (SET. Tff MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAH FO> Ttf OAKS NORTH) . AH) PER LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY GILLISPIE DESlCH12 CLL-CE-SAC CURB GRADES SHALL BE" A UINIUUH OF it II Ttf SUBDIVIDEK/KVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL APPROVED STREE' L IGHT STANDARDS AND FIXTURES IN Ttf TYPE AHS MMER APPROVED BY Ttf CITY OF CARLSBAD THE PUBLIC HORKS CEPARnfNT - TRHTIC SECTION AND PER Ttf CITY'S STREET LIGHT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. STREET LIGHTS AS SHOHN OH THIS IMP ARE TO BE USED AS A GUIDE ONLY. STREET LIGHTS AS SHOK* ON THIS UAP AOE PER DK 429-7 AND 446-SC M THIS PIC ASS(MES CERTAIN BACKB&C INFHASTmjCTUSl IS EXISTING OR APPROVED AHD BONDED FOR TO T/C SATISFACTION OF Tff CITY ENGINEER TtfY INCLUDE fttWCHO SANTA F£ ROAD. SAN EL I JO ROAD. AVffJIM SOLEDAD ORDER TO tfTT 7W 5 '15 »CFfT ifCESSARY I PER Itff/OVEUfNT AND GRADING BUILDING 'POSITIVE DRAINAGE 0- S AU_0»O! PER CEOCON.LETTER DATED FEB-OJ-tO. ALL llfROVEIfNTS AH) GRADING ARE EXISTPLANS 446-5C AHD 446-5B RESPECTIVELY. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PRECISE GRADING PERU! PERMITS. THE EXISTING IHfROVEUENT DRAKINCS SHALL BE COHSTK CHANGED TO SHO* THE RELOCATION OF ANY DRIVEWAYS SEKR AfCLATERALS HHICH IMY CONFLICT HIT, RESIDENTIAL UNITS/DRIVEWAYSRESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED *ITHIN FIRE PROTECTION ZONES FIRE RATED * IGNITION RESISTIVE GAZEBOS. DECKS AHD PATIOS Cf FiHE SPRINKLERS »ILL BE HEOUIRED FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES BUION OR ffTER JANUARY I. 2011. OWNER L ESTATE COLLATERAL UCUT CO . APPLICANT 7 UOffNA BOLLEVARD Jr- - OF UORROH DEVELOPMENT AS AGENT FOR REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MCUT CO PREPARED BY: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(8) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 1 OF 7 PUD 05-12 (B) AHD SHALL BE PLACFD 9V ACCOKDANCt AND AS APPLICABLE. LEUCADIA MSTiMl AS SWDHW PC* OH- DiHC 446-5 atMOff ntou nupfwvfoe/s w»s rf.C ffOCF. WCO»E»a> 5L*flSfSHlUL. TO /Nf MfUOMCM £XfNTfWACiwwit er WRCCITDMfOUCW *OJ»CEWf LAHOSCAPfD 48EAS PRIOR TO WAOHHC MfDRAINS. PER SDfiSD 0-2?. DRIVEWAY SHALL INCLUDE CROSS-FA TO Sffl£ OF LOT MTU D-2? ORMN •XtiOHfD PER CEOCON iHC SOUS l£Tl£R DATED FEB-03-10 SEf SHEEI ! (XHEML flESKW-S/E PLAN NO!E / /5. SO)£W*LK UNDEDDfiAIN PER Rf&OHAi SFAHtMRD DKAmGS mt_L BE PROVI1XO OH EifRY LOI PER DETAIL 0-2?. SECTION B-B TVPOi DRAINAGE SWALE DETAILS SHIP CALJENTE (PUBLIC) CORTEFORTUNA (PUBLIC) i-4- ^4- « (um.)HOT ftJ SC«f -4' «:/»• M <UN.JHOT to swtE „,\cr-rsy SITJO CALIENTE (PUBLIC) COUNA CERRO (PUBLIC) EXISTING " T O COfl-IZO J (" g EXISTING STREET SECTIONS PREPARED BY: ATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(B) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 2 Xo PUD 05-12 (B) 1 HI I l in \ ,— TOP DF SLOPE \ / SETBACKV* LINE OF 90HT in TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION W - TYPICAL SCALE- 1" - 10' NOTE; AS LONG AS A 16-8' MM DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OT SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. ...i TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'B' • TYPICAL SCALE; T - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.6' UN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE M£T LOT" 53 SETBACK TOP Of SLOPE - SETBACK LINE OT SCHT I I i • LOT 56 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION V • TYPICAL SCALE: 1' - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A fl.r MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET TOP Of SLOPE- SEIBACKUNE OF SIGHT i • ,'Jfls • I m m LOT 57 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "D" - TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10' NOTE: AS LONC AS A 14.fi* MN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET TOP Of SLOPE - SETBACKUNE Of SIGHT 111 11 • = II! «"« LOT 58 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *£' - TYPICAL NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.8' MIN DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK LOT 59 SETBACKTOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "F - TYPICAL SCALE: 1" « 10' MOTE: AS LONG AS A 16 8' Mm. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. ">- 1 • i • TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'G' - TYPICAL NOTE: AS LONG AS A 7.5' UjN. DISTANCE IS MAWTAWED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP Of SLOPE- SETBACK UNE OF SKHT III Ill • t LOT 61 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'H' • TYPICAL SCALE: 1" « TO' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.0' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE -SETBACK LINE Of SKHT LOT 62 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION T - TYPICAL SCALE: l" • 1O' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.0' MIN. DISTANCE rS MAIN TAWED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. rf""™-«.,, I I ! i TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION -J • TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 9.7* MIN DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX ARCHITECTURAL PLANE DETAIL SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120) PLANTYP 1A 1B 1C 1XA 1XB 1XC 2A 2B 2C 3A 38 3C ELEVATION STYLESPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SCWE I" . JO1 MO&; fit BUUMCtuwts CMUD our VMM no uss PREPARED BY:PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(B) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carfabad, California SHEET 3 OF 7 X. PUD 05-12(6) TOP OF SLOPESET8ACK LINE QT SIGHT H-2Q.fj, „.*'•" LOT 64 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION TO - TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.6' UN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. H-24.Q"> .. TOP OF SLOPE-SETBACKLINE OT aotl I I ' 1 LOT 66 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION V • TYPICAL SCALE: f " 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.8' MIN. ft STANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET 1 • * • I * i 1 TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "M1 • TYPICAL SCALE: I" - 10' NOTCx AS LONG AS A 10.3* MIN. DISTANCE IS MAIN TAWED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE - SETBACK LINE OF SCHT i i ^"^ laV-ACTUAL / LOT 71 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'N' • TYPICAL SCALE; 1* - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 7.4' MM. DISTANCE IS MAMTAMED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF 5LOPE- SCTBACK UNE OF 9GHT J, _ I U. I I LOT 72 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "O1 - TYPICAL SCALE: 1" - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.5' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.1>C TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARC MET. LOT 73 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION V • TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.6' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK LINE OF SIGHT TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *Q' • TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 9.7' WIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAMED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPESETBACKUNE OF SIGHT LOT 75 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION TV - TYPICAL SCALE: \~ . 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.fi' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE VET. SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX ARCHITECTURAL PLANE DETA L NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18.36-79 & 116-120) PLAN TYP 1A 1B 1C 1JW 1XB UU 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C ELEVATION STYLE SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCANSANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCANSANTA BAR6AHA If MO iff MO LESS PREPARED BY:PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(B) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 4 OF 7 PUD 05-12 ( NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120) PLANTYP 1A 1B 1C 1XA 1XB 1XC 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C ELEVATION STYLE SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA SPANISHTUSCAN SANTA BARBARASPANISH TUSCAN SANTA BARBARA PREPARED BY: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(B) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 5 OF 7 PUD 05-12(6) NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(B) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH(LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Xr PUD 05-12 (B) PREPARED BY: Mf ftmomrK fASfifa ms HO srfonc loautat SET « xcows Af«s; jo' *er CASfufHi txmiCD H3 muforos Ufittt orsnacT Pfit DOC KCus 13. xo«. •$ ru no. 2006-0104^70, or O.K. A PORTION or THS OSfUfHT UCS IHJHft ffOfVSCD DCDICttn} SJWfFT. StttO CHJDrtt. ttC $ HOISTOUT* ffafOH. iff on of ovtts&P met no. 99-04-01. m? HO t$3it A * f* f DOKxai m of on OF aaseno P& i EXISTING EASEMENT EXHIBIT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-12(8) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.3 NORTH (LOTS 1-18, 36-79 & 116-120 OF C.T. 05-15) VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 7 OF S1 PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS BRICK VENEER SIDING DETAIL IN RECESS frontELEVATION 'A'SPANISH S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS STONE VENEER 6X WOODOUTLOOKERS frontELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRiM 2X FASCIA STONE VENEER RECESSED ARCHED WINDOWS frontELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA SCALE- 1/4"- I1 0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarcmtecturalgroup,inc planONE 04 . 05 « 2010 leftELEVATION 'A'SPANISH rearELEVATION 'A'SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A' SCALE: 1/4"' V-0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc SPANISH planONE leftELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN rearELEVATION 'B1 TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B1 SCALE: 1/4"= V-0" TUSCAN LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/R/ch planONE woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc leftELEVATION 'C santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C1 santaBARBARA SCALE: 1/4"= 1 XT LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarcnitecturalgroupjnc planONE S1 PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS BRICK VENEER SIDING DETAILiN RECESS frontELEVATION 'A'SPANISH S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS STONE VENEER 6X WOOD OUTLOOKERS frontELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM 2X FASCIA STONE VENEER RECESSED ARCHED WINDOWS frontELEVATION 'C1 LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarcmtecturalgroupjnc santaBARBARA planONEx 05 «2010 leftELEVATION 'A'SPANISH rearELEVATION 'A'SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A1 SCALE: 1/4"= V-0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroup,inc SPANISH planONEx leftELEVATION 'B1 TUSCAN rearELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B1 SCALE: 1/-41 - V-CT TUSCAN LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/Rich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc planONEx 04 • 05 .2010 leftELEVATION 'C santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C' 4' $'LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc santaBARBARA planONEx S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS BRICK VENEER AIDING DETAIL IN RECESS frontELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS STONC VENEER 6XWOODOUTLOOKERS frontELEVATION 'B1 TUSCAN S' PROFILE CONCRETt ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM 2X FASCIA [STONE VENEER IRECESSED ARCHED WINDOWS frontELEVATION 'C1 SCALE: 1/4"= l'-0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc santaBARBARA planTWO 05 .2010 leftELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH rearELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A' 4' 8' SCALE: !/<"= V-0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/Rich woodleyarchitecturalgroup,inc SPANISH planTWO leftELEVATION 'A1 (with optional balcony)SPANISH rearELEVATION 'A1 (with optional balcony)SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A' (with optional balcony) LA COSTA 3.3 NORTHSCALE: \!f -TO" ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc SPANISH planTWO 02 • 05 • 2010 leftELEVATlON 'B1 TUSCAN rearELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B' a 7 4'LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc TUSCAN planTWO 04 « 05 • 2010 leftELEVATION 'B1 (with optional balcony)TUSCAN rearELEVATION 'B' (with optional balcony)TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B' (with optional balcony) LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/R/ch woodleyarchitecturalgroup,inc TUSCAN planTWO 04 • 05 • 2010 leftELEVATION 'C santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C1 santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C1 santaBARBARA SCALE. 1/4' - 1 -0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich planTWO woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc leftELEVATION 'C' (with optional balcony)santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C' (with optional balcony)santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C' (with optional balcony)santaBARBARA LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc planTWO 04 • 05 V PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS 8RICK VENEER SHAPED STUCCO DETAILING frontELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE PANEL SHUTTERS RAFTER TAILS STONE VENEER GX WOOD OUTLOOKERS .,!».** «U£i.«Jf • "*»v»» '•» U< i«'i->. • ',. » (fii.^.i i'k .&.**,« .W 'if. frontELEVATION 'B1 TUSCAN S1 PROriLE CONCRETE ROOP TILE STUCCO TRIM 2X FASCIA STONE VENEER RECESSED ARCHED WINDOWS frontELEVATION 'C1 santaBARBARA LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc planTHREE 34 • 05 » 2010 S' PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM RAFTER TAILS BRICK VENEER SHAPED STUCCO DETAILING frontELEVATION 'A'SPANISH S1 PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE PANEL SHUTTERS RAfTtR [AILS STONE VENEER 6X WOODOUTLQOKERS frontELEVATION 'TUSCAN S' PROflLE CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO TRIM 2X FASCIA STONE VENEER RECtSSED ARCHED WINDOWS frontELEVATION 'C1 SCALE' 1/4' - V 0"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/R/ch woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc santoBARBARA planTHREE w/ OPT. OFFICE 04 • 05 • 2010 icole: 1/4"5 leftELEVATION 'A'SPANISH rearELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A1 SCALF: V4" = rff LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc SPANISH planTHREE 04 • 05 • 2010 leftELEVATION 'A' (with optional balcony)SPANISH l/f rearELEVATION 'A' (with optional balcony)SPANISH rightELEVATION 'A' (with optional balcony) SCALE. I/* - I'CT LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc SPANISH planTHREE 04 • 05 »2010 leftELEVATION 'B'TUSCAN reorELEVATION 'B1 TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B' LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc TUSCAN planTHREE leftELEVATION 'B' (with optional balcony)TUSCAN rearELEVATION 'B' (with optional balcony)TUSCAN rightELEVATION 'B' (with optional balcony) LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc TUSCAN planTHREE leftELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C'santaBARBARA 0 •£_ 4' SCALE: 1/4' - I'-O"LA COSTA 3.3 NORTH Co/Rich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc planTHREE leftELEVATION 'C1 (with optional balcony)santaBARBARA rearELEVATION 'C' (with optional balcony)santaBARBARA rightELEVATION 'C' (with optional balcony) LA COSTA 3.3 NORTHSCALE; !/*"= t'-O" ColRich woodleyarchitecturalgroupjnc santaBARBARA pfriaMRBEE EXHIBIT 5 Planning Commission Minutes July 7,2010 Page 4 MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L'Heureux, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6710 recommending approval of the Envision Carlsbad Phase 2 Draft Work Program. VOTE: 7-0 AYES: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioner Baker, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Nygaard and Commissioner Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Douglas asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 2. PUD 05-12(6) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Assistant Planner Shelley Glennon would make the Staff presentation. Chairperson Douglas opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 2. Ms. Glennon gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Douglas asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant would like to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, 1902 Wright Place, Suite 200, Carlsbad, representing Colrich Communities, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Douglas asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Baker asked which neighborhoods in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan have single story homes. Ms. Glennon stated there are single story homes as required by the Master Plan located north of this proposal along Rancho Santa Fe Road; however there were no single story requirements for this proposal. Commissioner Dominguez complimented Mr. Henthorn on the rear elevations for this project. Chairperson Douglas asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Chairperson Douglas opened and closed public testimony. DISCUSSION Commissioner Montgomery stated he liked the project. Commissioner Schumacher concurred with Commissioner Montgomery. Commissioner Nygaard stated this project will be a nice addition to the city. 7O Planning Commission Minutes July 7,2010 Page 5 Commissioner L'Heureux stated he is in favor of the project and complimented the applicant on the colored map depicting the placement of the various plans within the neighborhood. Chairperson Douglas commented that this development will not look like a cookie-cutter development and complimented the applicant on the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L'Heureux, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6711 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-12(6) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 7-0 AYES: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioner Baker, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Nygaard and Commissioner Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Douglas asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 3. GPA 04-03/GPA 09-07/ZC 09-08/SDP 09-05/SUP 09-08/CUP 03-21(A)/CUP 09-07/CUP 10-05/V 10-01 - PALOMAR COMMONS - Request for the recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and a recommendation of approval of a General Plan Amendment to establish a new General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (GC), a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change and approval of a Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit, two Conditional Use Permits, one Conditional Use Permit Amendment, and 'a Variance for the development of a 16.65 acre site with a 185,244 square foot commercial center located at the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real in Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 3 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the Staff presentation. Chairperson Douglas opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 3. Mr. Lynch gave a detailed presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Douglas asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Baker stated that some of the buildings do not seem to be related as they are currently placed. She commented that it might be a more walkable project if the buildings were placed closer together. Mr. Lynch stated much of the design for the project is dictated by the intensity of uses that is allowed by the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Commissioner Baker stated that if the further you are away from the airport the more intense the use can be, it would then make more sense to have the more intense uses further from the airport. Mr. Lynch stated the applicant can address the issues regarding the design of the project. Mr. Lynch stated the project did go through quite a few revisions during the review of the Airport Plan. Commissioner Baker commented that she is concerned because of the shared uses of the parking and the reduction of parking. Mr. Neu stated that when Staff reviews the distribution of parking, Staff is looking at the distribution of parking relative to the uses of the buildings. Mr. Neu stated that if all of the buildings end up on the southern side of the access road there is the potential for pedestrians crossing the road from a sea of parking. The building placement along the road also helps break up the parking lot. Mr. Neu further commented that at one point there were utility lines that affected the site in terms of the placement of buildings. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, to consider approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lots 1 through 18 inclusive, Lots 36 through 79 inclusive, and Lots 116 through 120, of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 05-15, La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.3, in City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, August 22, 2007 Whereas, on July 7, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 67 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.3, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after September 3, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Shelley Glennon in the Planning Department at (760) 602- 4625 or shelley.glennon@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad. Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: PUD 05-12(B) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.3 PUBLISH: August 28, 2010 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP La Costa Oaks North 3.3 PUD 05-12(6) AM3AV-OD-008-1 UlCO'AjaAB'MMM B| za;|nsuco ap suas ®091S ®AM3AV »ueqe6 a| ja|ad e sajpej sananbiig CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AVE SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949VIEWRIDGEAV SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 ATTN TEDANASIS SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER STEVE MACIEJ - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER •09is®Afcl3AV Yajrueaj |aaj Aseg ! iaau<; uoiurmsui aa<; jaded W I ®091S Asea AM3AV-O9-008H uojpn.ijsui.p e| CIC LA COSTA L P 5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS 101 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4459 LA COSTA OAKS COMMUNITY ASSN 1903 WRIGHT PL 180 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-6584 REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGI 1903 WRIGHT PL 180 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-6584 LA COSTA OAKS ASSN 1903 jSBAD IHT PL 180 , CA 92008-6584 REAL ESTATE COLL.L MANAGI 1903WRiGHT PL 180 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-6584 CLINE CRAIG & N 3388 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 JOSEPH G & KIM CAMARATTA 3384 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 EDWARD & SARA WEBER 3380 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 DAVIS 3376 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD', CA 92009 BONNIE E PEDERSEN TODD W & AUDRA HOKUNSON MICHAEL & RENEE TINKER 3368 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 3371 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 3375 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LEWIS & KIMBERLY HALL 3379 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD, CA 92009 LC OAKS 3 3 LLC 4747 MORENA BLVD 100 SAN DIEGO, CA 92117-6584 *** 18 Printed *** ROBERT S Sc SUSAN ANTHONY PO BOX 236063 ENCINITAS, CA 92023 L C OAKS 3 3 4747XMORENA BLVD 100 DIEGO, CA 92117-3466 A notice has been mailed to yll property owners/occupants listed herein. Dale: 3-3-JO CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS MANJ 215 W ASH ST FALLBROOK, CA 92028-2904 LC OAKS 3 3 LLC 4747 DIEGO [A BLVD 100 , CA 92117-3466 rTejn;eaj laaj Aseg joj jadej