The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010-11-30; City Council; 20406; LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# MTG. DEPT. _2Qi406__ 11/30/10 CED LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13(A) DEPT. DIRECTORT CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council hold a public hearing and ADOPT Resolution No. 2010-260 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05-13(A) for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Application(s)Administrative Approvals Planning Commission City Council PUD 05-13(A)RA RA = Recommended Approval x = Final City decision-making authority •s = requires Coastal Commission approval On October 20, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval (4-0-3) of a Planned Development Permit Amendment application for the floor plans, plotting and architecture for 83 single family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map CT 05-16 and Planned Development Permit PUD 05-13, both of which were approved by the City Council on August 16, 2006. The project complies with all of the requirements of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the Planned Development Ordinance, and City Council Policy 66 for Livable Neighborhoods. The project is designed with four (4) floor plans (Plan 1,2,3 and 4) and three (3) different architectural styles for each floor plan including: Spanish Colonial, Tuscan and European Country. The total living area ranges in size from 1,914 to 2,889 square feet. No public comment was received at the Planning Commission hearing. A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions and a complete project description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the proposed discretionary action. FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Shelley Glennon (760) 602-4625 shellev.qlennon@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED WITHDRAWN AMENDED X U D D D CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER -SEE MINUTES D Dn D Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07. EIR 98-07 evaluates the potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed project reviewed here. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time, CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for EIR 98-07 which are applicable to the proposed project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2010-260 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6726 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 20, 2010 5. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 20, 2010. EXHIBIT 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-260 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED 3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE 4 DEVELOPMENT OF 83 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 5 NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND 6 NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. 7 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 CASE NO.: PUD 05-13(A) 8 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 9 follows: 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 11 Commission did, on October 20, 2010, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 12 to consider a Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 05-13 (A)); and 13 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 30tb day of November 2010, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Planned Development Permit Amendment and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, and comments of all persons interested in or opposed to PUD 05-13(A). 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 1 of Carlsbad as follows: 19 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 20 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of the Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 05-13(A)) is approved by the City Council and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning 22 Commission Resolution No. 6726 on file with the City Clerk and made a part hereof by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 3. The action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. 24 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 30th day of November, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Hall, Packard and Blackburn. NOES: ABSENT: None. None. , Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M. WOOD, CityfCle'rk / (SEAL) -2- EXHIBIT 2 WOT TO SCALE SITEMAP LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13 (A) S EXHIBIT 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6726 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 4 AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND PLOTTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 83 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES WITHIN THE 6 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF RANCHO 7 SANTA FE ROAD, SOUTH OF MELROSE DRIVE AND NORTH OF CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES ' ; 8 . MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. 9 CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 CASE NO.: PUD 05-13fA) 10 WHEREAS, Pulte Home Corporation, "Developer," has filed a verified ,.-, application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Real Estate Collateral 13 Management Company, "Owner," described as 14 Lot 1 through 83 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-16 La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15597, filed 15 in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007 17 ("the Property"); and 1 o i Q WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned 20 Development Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "MM" dated October 20, 2010, 21 on file in the Planning Department, LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5, as provided by 22 Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 23 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on October 20, 2010, hold a duly 24 noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 25 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 27 and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 78~° relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment; and 1 WHEREAS, on August 16, 2006, the City Council approved PUD 05-13, as 2 described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 2006-287. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 4 ,- Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 6 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 7 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 9 Findings: 10 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan, and complies with all applicable 11 provisions of Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in that the project is for the approval of architecture and plotting for 83 single-family detached units located on previously approved lots (CT 05-16) with a 13 minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet. In addition, the project achieves the General Plan's Residential Objectives through providing a variety of safe and attractive 14 housing that preserves the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of existing residential areas. The single-family residential development complies with all development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan as shown on 16 Attachments 6 through 9 (Tables 1-4). 17 2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to existing uses, or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely 18 impact the site, surroundings, or traffic, in that the project has been designated for single-family residential development with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. The single-family residential neighborhoods to the north and west of the site are also 2Q similar in character and density. Lands to the south of the project site will remain open-space as approved under the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Traffic has 21 been previously analyzed for compliance through the approval of Tentative Map No. CT 05-16 and Planned Development Permit No. PUD 05-13 (Planning 22 Commission Resolutions No. 6150 and 6151). i~\ -> 3. The project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, in that 24 the 83 single-family residential homes have been analyzed for consistency with all applicable city codes, policies and regulations. 25 4. The project's design, including architecture and plotting: 26 a. Contributes to the community's overall aesthetic quality, in that the project consists of a high quality residential design through the use of a variety of floor plans, exterior building planes, roof planes and color schemes, as well as a variety of PC RESO NO. 6726 -2- design elements distinctive to the 3 proposed architectural styles: Spanish 2 Colonial, European Country and Italian Tuscan. 3 b. Includes the use of harmonious materials and colors, and the appropriate use of landscaping, in that the project's distinctive architectural styles includes twelve different color schemes with a variety of design elements such as: accent colors, r window/door trims, roof tiling, decorative stucco, wood accents, stone veneer and wainscoting. The proposed materials and colors contribute to the distinctive 6 architectural styles while the previously approved landscaping will highlight all proposed architectural designs. 7 c. Achieves continuity among all elements of the project, in that the projec't'S high quality architectural design helps create interest and character for the entire 9 neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed homes have been carefully plotted to avoid any identical homes (including floor plans, color scheme and architectural 10 styles) from occurring side-by-side, thereby avoiding a monotonous residential street scene yet still providing a sense of continuity through design. , 2 5. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 and all City public facility policies and 13 ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection 14 and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 16 6. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will 17 be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that the project is being proposed and will be implemented consistent with the requirements of the ^9 Villages of La Costa Master Plan and Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. 20 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B). 21 8. The Planning Director has determined that:22 & ~ a. The project is a subsequent activity of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, a project for which a program EIR was prepared, and a notice for the activity has been 24 given, which includes statements that this activity is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and that the program EIR adequately describes the activity for the 25 purposes of CEQA; [15168(c)(2) and (e)]; and/or b. This project is consistent with the Master Plan cited above; and c. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07 was certified by the City Council 27 on October 23, 2001 in connection with the prior project or plan; and d. The project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in 28 the prior EIR; and PC RESO NO. 6726 -3- e. None of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR under 2 CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; and f. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures or project alternatives 3 identified in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR 98-07, which are appropriate to this Subsequent Project, have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for this Subsequent Project. 9. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 6 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 8 - Conditions: 9 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a 10 building permit. 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be 12 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 13 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the 1 - property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 16 or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Planned Development Permit Amendment. 17 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Planned Development Permit Amendment documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. 20 Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 21 ~~ 3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 23 4. If any conditions for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the 24 payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be 26 invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 27 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and PC RESO NO. 6726 -4- representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, 2 i claims, and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Planned 3 Development Permit Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use ^ contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the r facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 6 6. Developer shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of a Final Landscape and 7 Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved Final Plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving 9 condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 10 7. • The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the * 1 project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 12 8. Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar 13 copy of the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. 14 9. Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plancheck, a reduced legible version of all approving resolution(s) in a 24" x 36" blueline drawing 15 format. 17 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the San Dieguito Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 19 11. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required 20 as part of the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 21 22 12. The Developer shall comply with all the applicable conditions set forth by MP 98- 01(D) in Resolution No. 5837, CT 05-16 in Resolution No. 6150 and PUD 05-13 in 23 Resolution No. 6151, which are incorporated by reference herein. 24 13. The Developer shall implement and comply with all applicable mitigation measures required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program certified with the Final Program EIR for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan - EIR 98-07, contained in 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. 5010, including but not limited to Mitigation Measures regarding the adherence to the applicable foundation recommendations 27 contained in the geotechnical report and the fire protection plan for manufactured slopes.28 PC RESO NO. 6726 -5- 14. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this 2 project within 36 months from the date of project approval. 3 15. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. 4 c 16. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council 6 Policy No. 38, by allowing a pass-through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, then in addition to any other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer 7 shall disclose to future owners in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax or fee, and that the school district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing mechanism. The form of notice is subject to the approval of the Planning 9 Director and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales facility stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and where complete information 10 regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained. ^ 17. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to j2 the Planning Director, in the sales office at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and 13 existing schools, parks and streets. 14 18. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office in a prominent location that discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall remain posted until ALL of the units are sold. 19. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 17 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 18 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. ™ 20. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable 22 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 11, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 24 21. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice 25 of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of 9-7 Carlsbad has issued a Planned Development Permit Amendment by Resolution No. 6726 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, 28 location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as PC RESO NO. 6726 -6- well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 4 Fire: 22. No combustible patio covers, decks or similar structures to homes shall occur within 6 the first 20 feet (Zone 1) of the 60-foot Fire Protection Zone unless fire rated or heavy timber materials are utilized and approval of said materials shall be obtained 7 prior to installation from the Building Department and must be identified within the CC&Rs. 9 23. Unless the Fire Protection Zone begins at the property line, trees and shrubs shall be prohibited in the first 20 feet of the 60-foot zone and must be identified within the 10 CC&Rs. 24. All submittals including architectural submittals shall reference that all lots are to 12 include the installation of Automatic Residential Fire Sprinklers. It is expected that all submittals will reflect this requirement, so that this requirement is not lost 13 between submittals. 14 Engineering; Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. 17 General18 25. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer 20 for the proposed haul route. 21 26. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit 23 issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 24 Fees/Agreements Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for .-,/- recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. 27 28. Developer shall cause property owner to process, execute and submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best 28 Management Practice Maintenance Agreement for the perpetual maintenance of all treatment control, applicable site design and source control, post-construction permanent PC RESO NO. 6726 -7- Best Management Practices prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, 2 whichever occurs first for this project. 3 Grading 29. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable grading permi security per City Code requirements. , shall pay all applicable grading permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule and shall post 6 30. Supplemental grading plans are required for precise grading associated with this project. 7 Developer shall prepare, and submit for approval, grading plans for the precise grading as shown on the site plan, all subject to city engineer approval.8 a 31. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include 10 but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or 1 - devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to Stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify 13 prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 14 32. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, developer shall submit to the city engineer receipt of a Notice of Intent from the State Water Resources Control Board. 33. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit for city approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 17 (TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City ° of Carlsbad Requirements. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall identify and incorporate measures , g to reduce storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection 20 fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 21 34. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment 23 requirements per the city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the 24 SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 27 35. Developer acknowledges upcoming hydromodification (runoff reduction) requirements may impact how this project treats and/or retains storm runoff. Hydromodification 28 involves detailed site design and analysis to reduce the amount of post-development run- off by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site, preserving natural open- PC RESO NO. 6726 -8- spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing use of new impervious surfaces, and 2 promoting onsite infiltration and evaporation of run-off. During final design, developer shall demonstrate compliance with storm water requirements to the satisfaction of the city 3 engineer. 4 36. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement . plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc) incorporate all source control, site design, treatment control BMP, applicable hydromodification measures, and Low Impact Design 6 (LID) facilities. 7 Utilities / i 8 '37. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges 9 for connection to public facilities. 10 Code Reminders: 11 38. Developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to ,« prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 15.16 (the Grading Ordinance) to the satisfaction 13 of the City Engineer. 14 39. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Site Plan are jg for planning purposes only. 17 40. Developer shall pay a landscape plancheck and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 18 ,Q 41. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building 20 permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 21 42. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. 23 43. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning 24 Director to installation of such signs. 25 NOTICE 26 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, 27 reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as 00 "fees/exactions."Zo PC RESO NO. 6726 -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning V Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on October 20, 2010, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Acting Chairperson Baker, Commissioners Montgomery, Nygaard and Schumacher ABSENT: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioners Dominguez, and L'Heureux ABSTAIN: JULIE B CARLSB ATTEST: cting Chairperson BANNING COMMISSION DON NEU Planning Director PCRESONO. 6726 -10- The City of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: October 20, 2010 Application complete date: November 12, 2010 Project Planner: Shelley Glennon Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno SUBJECT: PUD 05-13(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes > the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6726 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05- 13(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized. Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-04 subdivided the area into open space areas and established the neighborhood development area boundaries. A Tentative Map (CT 99-04) and final map have been recorded for the Oaks; grading and improvement plans have been approved; and construction is presently ongoing. The proposed project is also located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of approval of CT 05-16 (La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Subdivision). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 83 single-family dwelling units located in the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through Tentative Map (CT 05-16) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05-13), approved by the City Council on August 16, 2006. A Planned Development Permit was required for Neighborhoods 3.4 and 3.5 because the minimum lot sizes are less than 7,500 square feet. Architecture for the units was not proposed at that time and PUD 05-13(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 October 20, 2010 PAGE 2 pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 05-13 Condition of Approval No. 7, could be processed at a later date through a Major Planned Development Permit Amendment. This PUD amendment application (PUD 05-13(A)) is for the architecture and plotting of Neighborhoods 3.4 and 3.5. At over 50 units, this project also requires City Council approval pursuant to the Planned Development Ordinance (Section 21.45.050(B)(1)). The proposed one and two-story homes consist of 4 separate and distinct floor plans (Plan 1, 2, 3 and 4) with living areas ranging in approximate size from 1,914 square feet to 2,889 square feet. Plan 1 is the only one-story plan. Plans 2, 3 and 4 are two-story plans. The project incorporates three distinct architectural styles including: Spanish Colonial, European Country and Tuscan, as well as 12 different color schemes to provide street scene variation throughout the project site. Plans 1-3 have a proposed two-car garage and Plan 4 proposes a two-car garage and a tandem parking space. The project complies with City standards including the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval being requested. The following table provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles: TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS PLAN NO. 1 2 3 4 1ST FLOOR SQ. FT. 2,341 1,632 1,845 2,036 2ND FLOOR SQ. FT. n/a 1,296 1,306 1,510 *LIVING AREA SQ. FT. 1,914 2,462 2,663 2,889 GARAGE SQ. FT. 427 2 car 466 2 car 488 2 car 657 3 car TOTAL BLDG. SQ. FT. 2,341 2,928 3,151 3,546 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Spanish Colonial Tuscan European Country Spanish Colonial Tuscan European Country Spanish Colonial Tuscan European Country Spanish Colonial Tuscan European Country * Living area excludes garage square footage IV. ANALYSIS Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(G)) The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented. An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the'three Master Plan Villages. As previously discussed, the subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 05-16 and PUD 05-13, and complies PUD 05-13(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 October 20, 2010 PAGE 3 with the Master Plan standards relating to the subdivision that was analyzed at that time. The proposed project meets all applicable development standards of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Please see Attachments 6 through 9 (Tables 1-4) for project compliance. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the f potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project reviewed herein. The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Oaks Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR 98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6726 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Table 1 - Residential Architectural Criteria Compliance 7. Table 2 - Front Yard Setbacks 8. Table 3 - Individual Lot Data 9. Table 4 - Building Elevation Design Elements 10. Reduced Exhibits 11. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "MM" dated October 20, 2010 NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13 (A) 19 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO:PUD05-13rA) CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 APPLICANT: Jack Henthorn & Associates REQUEST AND LOCATION: Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 through 83 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-16 La Cosia Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15597, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22. 2007. APN: 223-850-01-00 through 39; 223-851-01 through 27: 223-852-01 through 17. Acres: 24 Gross Acres Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 83 lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: RLM Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 4 du / acre Existing Zone: P-C Density Proposed: 3.5 du/ ac (CT 05-16) Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Site North South East West P-C P-C P-C P-C P-C RLM RLM OS RMH RLM LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Current Land Use Vacant graded lots Vacant graded lots / Recreational Facility Open Space / Fire Station No. 6 Existing Apartments Vacant graded lots Coastal Zone: [ | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A Within Appeal Jurisdiction: | | Yes [Xl No Coastal Development Permit: | [ Yes [> Local Coastal Program Amendment: | | Yes [X] No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A No Revised 01/06 Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: San Dieguito Unified Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 83 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption, N/A I | Negative Declaration, issued N/A I | Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated N/A [X] Other, Prior Compliance with EIR 98-07 ,0!Revised 01/06 ' CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 11_ GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: P-C DEVELOPER'S NAME: Pulte Home Corporation ADDRESS: 27101 Puerta Real. Suite 300 Mission Vieio, CA 92691 PHONE NO.: (858) 490-2300 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-850-01 through 223-850-39": 223-851-01 through 223-852-17 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 24 acres/3.62 acres of building coverage / 83 dwelling units ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 2012 A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 288.57 sq. ft. B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 153.90 sq. ft. C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 83 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.58 Acres E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 160.1 Identify Drainage Basin = Basin D F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 830 ADT G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 6 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 17.5 gross acres I. Schools (San Dieguito Union High/Elementary): 35 Students Encinitas Union Elementary School District: Middle School: 28 Students High School: 28 Students J. Sewer: Demands in EDU = 83 EDU K. Water Demand in GPD = 18.260 GPP L. The project density is 3.46 du/ac (CT 5-16), which is above the 3.2 du/ac Growth Management Control Point (GMCP). However, La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.3 (CT 05-15) and 3.1 (CT 05-14) were approved concurrently with a density of 2.5 du/ac and 2.9 du/ac. The average density of all neighborhoods throughout the La Costa Oaks North project is 2.8 du/ac. This is below the 3.2 du/ac GMCP. Additionally, the La Costa Oaks North project is also 22 units below the Villages of La Costa Master Plan dwelling unit allowance. DISCLOSURE Development Services STATEMENT Planning Department p <i /A\ 1635 Faraday Avenue (760)602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov TAR I <vRAD (760)602-4610V-./MM™ *JHJr\l~S Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. ' 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Richard Douglass Corp/Part Pulte H0me CorporationDivisionVicePres. Title Land (So. Calif. Div) Title Address 27101 PUerba Real *30(XddresS271Q1 Puerba Real, Sbe 300 Mission viejo, CA9TFgi Mission Viejo, CA 92691 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Fred M. Arbuckle Corp/PartReal Estate Collateral Agent for RECM: . Management CompanyTitle President Morrow Dev Title 1093 Wright Place 1903 Wright Place Address st.p IRQ Address Ste 180 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 P-1(A) Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/09 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust _____ Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes X No If yes,please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. sfthe above information is true and correct to the best of my knpwfeage.per ^ \ '-^ ~r -rj • <—~^£ Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent P-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 04/09 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1 - RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Front Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.a) 15' minimum, 20' neighborhood average (See VLCMP for instructions about calculating averages). Please refer to Attachment 7 - Table 2 "Front Yard Setbacks" for the 15' minimum setback compliance. Neighborhood Average Front Yard Setback = 22.26.' All units comply with the front yard setback requirements. Rear Yard Setback (4.6.2.B.2.e & 7.7.3.3.i) 15' minimum setback. Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15.' All units comply with 15' minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to Attachment 8 Table 3 "Individual Lot Data" for individual lot rear yard setbacks. All lots provide the required 15' x 15' usable rear yard area. Side Yards (4.6.2.B.2.C) Combined 25% of the minimum standard lot size width for lots less than 60' wide. • Minimum combined side yard setback; 12.5.' • Minimum of 5' per side. • Maximum setback does not need exceed 20' in aggregate. • Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs may reduce each side yard to 5'. At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7'. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Data" for side yard setbacks. All lots comply. Plan types 2, 3 and 4 incorporate side yard offsets. These plan types are plotted on 73 lots or 88.0% of the unit mix. Street Side Setback (4.6.2.B.2.d) 10' minimum.All units comply with the minimum 10' street side setback. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Slope Edge Building Setback (4.3.4) All main and accessory buildings that are developed on hilltops and/or pads created on downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in height shall be setback so that the building does not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from the edge of slope to the building. For all buildings, which are subject to this slope edge building setback standard, a profile of the diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other development application requirements. All proposed units will meet the required slope edge setbacks by maintaining the minimum rear yard setback. Please refer to the Slope Edge Building Setback Exhibit "C" of the enclosed site plans for further details. Lot Width (4.6.2.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.g) Minimum lot width shall be 50.'All lots were previously approved by CT 05-16 and have a minimum width of 50!' Building Coverage (4.6.3.B.2) 1-story units: 50% of net pad area. 2-story units: 40% of net pad area. Includes: « Garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes: Exterior structures: covered porches; Overhanging balconies that project < 8' from the building (or similar structure); Porte Cochere's not > 22' length and 8'width; • Roof eaves not extending 30" from the face of any building; « Awnings; « Open parking areas; . Structures under 30" in height; and • Masonry walls < 6' in height (wing- walls, planter walls, grade separation retaining walls). Lot Coverage: Plan 1:2,341 sq.ft. Plan 2: 1,632 sq.ft. Plan 3: 1,845 sq.ft. Plan 4: 2, 036 sq. ft. Plan 1 is a single-story structure and does not exceed the maximum 50% building coverage of net pad area as required. Plan types 2, 3 and 4 are two- story structures and do not exceed the maximum 40% building coverage of net pad area as required. Please refer to Attachment 8 - Table 3 "Individual Lot Date" for building coverage. All lots comply. Building Height (4.6.3.B.1 & 7.7.3.3.J) Maximum of 30' and 2 stories.Planl = 22'-0" max and 1 story Plan 2 =28'-9" max and 2 stories Plan 3 = 26' max and 2 stories Plan 4 = 29' max and 2 stories 2 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Front Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.e& 4.6.3.B.4.f) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 10' between front and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. 33% of the above 50% required, may reduce the limit from 4 separate planes to 2 if a fully landscaped front courtyard is substituted. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan* 1 2 3 4 SC 4 4 4 4 EC 3 4 4 4 IT 4 4 4 4 Plan types 1 (SC and IT only),'2,f 3 and 4 incorporate the minimum 4 front building planes. These plan types are plotted on 80 lots or 96% of the unit mix. Rear Building Planes (4.6.3.B.4.g) 50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18 inch offset planes with a minimum of 3' between face of the forward-most plane and rear planes. Each plane is 30 SF minimum. 3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of frontage or less. 4 separate building planes for lots with a frontage greater than 45'. Please refer to the architectural plans for the building plane exhibits. Plan* 1 '2 3 4 SC 4 4 3 3 EC 4 4 3 3 IT 4 4 3 3 Plan types 1, and 2 incorporate the minimum 4 rear building planes. These plan types are plotted on 42 lots or 51% of the unit mix. Front Building Elevations (4.6.3.B.6) Front building facades shall incorporate a minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to create character and interest to the home. These elements vary depending on the architectural style used. Please refer to Attachment 9 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each front elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. * SC - Spanish Colonial EC- European Country IT - Italian Tuscan ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Side & Rear Elevations (4.6.3.B.7) Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced architectural detailing incorporating good design is required for side & rear elevations adjacent to public/private roads. Please refer to Attachment 9 - Table 4 "Building Elevation Design Elements" and the architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated for each side and rear elevation type. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Elevations Fronting Circulation Element Roads (4.6.3.A.l.a) Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are required to receive special attention to detailing on the elevation fronting the roads. This will include window detailing equal to or better than that of the front elevation. The introduction of additional wall planes and balconies, where noise standards allow, is encouraged. Please refer to the enclosed ' •' architectural plans that detail the various design elements incorporated into the proposed elevations fronting Rancho Santa Fe Road. All plan types and elevation styles comply. Floor Plans (4.6.3.B.5.C & 4.6.3.B.5.d) Minimum of 3 per neighborhood. Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be provided for each floor plan. The proposed project includes four floor plans with three distinctive elevation types for each plan. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans. Single-story units (4.4&4.6.3.B.4.1) For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that are visible from a circulation element roadway, at least 20% of the units shall be single-story. • Single-story shall be defined as a plate-line maximum of 15', (10' preferred) This neighborhood is located on a ridgeline that is visible from a circulation element roadway (Rancho Santa Fe Road). There are 46 homes along the ridgeline and 10 of those homes are single- story units which is 22% of the total homes located along the ridgeline. Plan 1 single-story homes do not exceed the plate-line maximum of 15 feet. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Two Story Units (4.6.3.B.4.n& 4.6.3.B.5.b) Must include some single-story features. The second-story must not exceed 80% of the first-story square footage, including all garage area. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans that detail the single story features provided for the two-story units. All proposed plans comply. Plan 2: 79.4% Plan 3: 68.9% Plan 4: 73.6% Where three two- story units occur in a row situated less than 15 feet apart- (4.6.3.B.4.b) One of the three units must have a single- story building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan type 3 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 10' wide and runs the length of f the building. This plan type is plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with less than 15' between them. Where three two- story units occur in a row situated between 15 and 20 feet apart - (4.6.3.B.4.C) One of the three units must have a single- story building edge at least 5' deep and shall run the length of the building. Single-story shall be defined as a plateline maximum of 15'. Plan type 3 incorporates a single story building edge that is at least 5' wide and runs the length of the building. This plan type is plotted where there are three (3) 2-story homes in a row with 15' to 20' between them. Single-Story Elements (4.6.3.B.4.d) 33% of units within a Neighborhood must have a single-story element, with a minimum depth of 3' which is 40% or greater of the front elevation width. Porches and porte cochere elements qualify. All plan types incorporate a single story building element that is greater than 40% of the front elevation width and a minimum depth of 3 feet. % of the front elevation width that is a single-story element with a minimum depth of 3: Planl: 100% Plan 2: 55% Plan 3: 56% Plan 4: 100% ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1; RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Entries, Front Porches, Courtyards, & Balconies (4.6.3.B.9 & 4.6.2.B.f) 25% of the units must have either a porch at least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever is consistent with the architectural style. Porches require a minimum front yard setback of 10.' Porches shall have a minimum depth and length of 5'. A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.) shall be provided over porches. A balcony over a porch may also serve as this purpose. The front and sidewall of porches shall be open except for required and ornamental guardrails. These features shall qualify as a plane for the purposes of the architectural guidelines. Buildings on corner lots should consider having the porch wrap around the side of the building. Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8' respectively into the required front yard setback. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42 inches may encroach standard distances into the required yard areas. 59.0% of the elevations incorporate a porch (All elevation styles for Plans 2 and 3). Please refer to the enclosed site plan for setback compliance. All porches comply. Plan2:6'Dxl6'L ' ; Plan 3: 11'DxH'L All porches comply. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans for porch design compliance. All porches comply. Please refer to the enclosed architectural plans for porch design compliance. All highly visible corner lots have porches and/or porticos seen from the street side. Please refer to the enclosed site plan for setback compliance. All porches comply. No courtyard walls are proposed. No courtyard walls are proposed. 30 ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Octagonal or Round Entry Tower (4.6.2.B.3.a) May encroach into the required side yard setbacks a maximum of 2'. The total length of the encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be located within the larger side yard. The roof eave may encroach a maximum of an additional 12" into the required setback. A minimum 5' setback must be maintained. None are proposed within the side yard setback. Projections (4.6.2.B.3) Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other similar architectural features projecting from the building may intrude up to 2' into the required setbacks. No projections extend into the' side, rear or front yard setback. Recreation Parking (4.6.2.B.4.b) Common recreation areas: Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-street parking. "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide parking. Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for which they are required to serve shall include 1 space for every 20 units. More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of the units for which it is required to serve requires parking for those additional units at a rate of 1 space per 15 units. (See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking options) The common recreation area for the subject neighborhood is located within Neighborhood 3.1. Recreation parking will be provided in Neighborhood 3.1. Resident Parking (4.6.2.B.4.a) Minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' by 20'. Two one-car garages each having interior measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length may be provided as an alternative. All plan types meet the minimum 2-car garage with interior measurements of 20' x 20.' Plan 4 proposes a 3-car garage with a tandem space configuration. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Roofs (4.6.3.B.4.k& 4.6.3.B.8) Varied building roof heights and roof massing shall be incorporated into unit designs for each master plan neighborhood. • Changes in roof direction shall be provided to create diversity and interest. • Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes should attempt to parallel the slope. • A variety of roof colors shall be used within each neighborhood. • Minimum roof pitch of 3:12. A variety of roof forms and massing are proposed with changes in direction and pitches. See elevations and roof plans for compliance. All roofs provide change in roof direction, top of slope compliance, a variety of roofing tiles and colors, and have a minimum roof pitch of 3:12. ' ; Garage Criteria (4.6.2.B.2.b, 4.6.3.B.4.h, & 4.6.3.B.13) 20' minimum setback from the property line where garage doors face the street. Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback from property line. They also must be designed to appear as a livable portion of the home. For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units may have three-car in a row garages facing the street provided garages do not exceed more than 50% of unit's frontage. Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset two door garages (2 planes separated by at least 18 inches). A variety of garage configurations should be used within each neighborhood to improve the street scene. Roll-up garage doors are required. Architectural projections may encroach into the setback a maximum on 18" for garages. However, the projection shall not extend to the second story living space. All setbacks for garages that face the street are no less than 20 ft. Not Applicable No floor plan provides three-car in a row garages. Plan 4 has a three-car garage with a tandem space configuration, therefore, only one garage door is required. All garages and garage doors have been designed to fit the proposed elevation. All garage doors comply. All homes comply. ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Colors (4.6.3.B.12) Colors should be consistent with the architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones are preferred; however other color combinations are acceptable depending upon architectural style. Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3 different exterior color schemes shall be used for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units within the same architectural style shall not utilize the same color scheme. However, similar or same colors may occur within different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes units on either side of the subject unit as well as those directly across the street. Each plan type plotted on the site plan includes a color scheme designation to match the proposed architectural style. There are four color schemes for each floor plan within the same architectural styles. Please refer to the attached ' f plotting plan. All homes comply. Accessory Structures (4.6.3.B.3) Patio and accessory structures shall comply with development standards set forth in Section 21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All plan types comply. Architectural Styles Permitted (4.6.3.C&7.6) Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more of the following Architectural Styles: Santa Barbara Mediterranean Craftsman Bungalow Spanish Colonial Monterey Ranch . Italian/Tuscan « European Country The architectural styles included are as follows: Spanish Colonial European Country Italian/Tuscan ATTACHMENT 6 TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) GUIDELINE (VLCMP REFERENCE) STANDARD COMMENTS Design Standards (4.6.3.B.4.J & 4.6.3.B.5.e) 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored aluminum window frames shall be used (no mill finishes). "Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails, knee braces and columns shall be used when appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The windows and doors on the front elevations are recessed a minimum of 2" and are trimmed with either wood or raised stucco. Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. Chimneys (4.6.3.B.11) The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale with the size of the structure. 2- chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less than 7,500 SF. This standard does not apply because all proposed fireplaces are gas operated, therefore chimney flues are not required. Window Detailing (4.6.3.B.10) The design of the windows shall include one or more of the following features: . Deeply recessed windows Paned windows • Decorative window ledges Accent and varied shape windows • Window boxes and planters with architecturally evident supports Exterior wood trim surrounds Accent colors on shutters or other elements Arched elements . Shutters Raised stucco trim around windows • Window lintels Please refer to the enclosed elevations on the architectural plans for compliance. All plans comply. 10 PUD 05-13(A)ATTACHMENT 7 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 . 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Floor Plan 4 R 3 R 2 R iSiR "" " 4 R -ipp L2_ 4 R 3 R 2 R 1 R 2 R 4 R 1HE9 4 ; 2 1 4 2 I , .-3<4~ 2 1 4 IB 2 1 4 2 1 El ••V;-4. 2 3; 4~R 3;R 2;R 4 -•": 3' R 2 R 4R :-:.:;3iR 2 R 3 R YR 2 R 4 Individual Buildinq Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 15.90 21.40 20.50 39.50 33.70 20.70 20.10 39.70 21.50 20.00 20.00 28.90 37.00 24.00 18.50 29.50 20.00 48.50 36.60 21.80 18.60 20.00 36.60 22.40 16.60 20.70 16.10 23.70 20.00 38.90 15.40 20.90 33.10 20.60 15.00 20.30 15.80 21.40 33.90 20.80 20.20 39.50 15.60 20.90 35.30 22.20 15.20 20.00 15.00 20.30 20.50 39.50 35.90 22.90 16.20 21.00 16.30 21.80 35.70 22.70 15.00 20.00 21.60 40.60 15.80 21.30 35.00 22.00 20.00 40.20 18.80 24.80 22.80 41.40 34.80 21.20 19.40 24.10 21.00 40.70 35.80 22.80 17.50 23.00 21.90 41.70 36.10 22.60 20.70 40.40 20.00 25.70 36.00 22.00 17.70 21.80 Weighted Average 17.41 22.46 26.52 22.27 18.36 19.43 29.82 22.92 24.47 28.43 ' 1,6.57 28.76 17.22 17.92 22.00 16.96 26.20 15.69 17.38 26.67 22.28 17.02 28.07 15.58 16.49 22.46 28.72 16.43 17.77 28.52 15.53 23.40 17.32 27.82 22.34 20.29 24.33 27.29 20.08 23.07 28.62 18.84 23.86 28.65 22.81 21.19 28.27 18.21 Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Section B Table 3 7/15/2010 2:33 PM o c~Page 3 of 6 PUD05-13(A)ATTACHMENT 7 Front Yard Setbacks Lot# 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 Floor Plan 3 4 3; 2 4 i;z :.:.-: 3' "" 4 R wMR 2 Rli^R ' 1 R 2 R 4 R 1 R HR 2 R 4 R 1 R 2 R :v3JR 4 R 2 R -^R 1 R 4 R":"; :;a: 2 4z 3- 2 3^ 4 2 R 3:R Individual Buildina Plane Setbacks in Feet Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane #6 24.00 44.50 18.90 24.40 21.50 40.50 35.40 22.40 15.90 25.80 28.80 20.20 20.00 43.80 16.80 20.00 20.00 39.00 36.70 23.70 20.30 39.30 15.00 20.00 34.10 21.10 16.40 20.20 15.00 20.80 20.70 39.70 34.70 21.40 18.10 22.00 17.90 23.70 33.20 20.20 20.40 41.30 17.00 20.90 35.80 22.80 21.20 40.20 22.80 20.60 17.60 20.40 20.40 39.00 36.40 21.70 17.00 20.50 21.60 43.10 38.00 23.10 20.90 40.10 15.60 26.30 32.20 22.40 20.00 39.10 NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGE: Weighted Average 25.84 20.09 23.31 28.22 19.96 24.05 23.26 16.88 22.03 29.52 / 22.29 15.53 26.92 16.87 15.97 22.63 27.36 18.45 18.44 26.02 22.86 17.46 28.62 23.06 18.12 17.36 22.27 28.29 17.23 24.04 29.78 22.85 20.16 26.79 22.05 22.26 7/15/2010 2:33 PM Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Section B Table 3 Page 4 of 6 PUD 05-13(A) Individual Lot Data La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 ATTACHMENT 8 Lot* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Plan 4 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 4 R 3 2 4 R 3 R 2 R 1 R 2 R 4 R 1 3 4 2 1 4 2 3 4 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 2 1 3 4 2 3 4 R 3 R 2 R 4 3 R 2 R 4 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 4 R 2 R 4 3 4 3 2 4 2 3 4 R 3 R 2 R 3 R 1 R 2 R 4 R 1 R 3 R 2 R 4 R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 R Elevation A Bc A B ^B C B A Z B A B C B A A Z B A B A Z A Z B B A C A C B B A Z A C B 3 B C A Q B A C A B C A B B C A A B A C A C B C A B C B C B A Color 4 8 12 3 5 10 7 12 6 2 11 5 1 8 9 7 4 3 11 6 2 5 1 12 4 11 8 7 3 10 2 9 6 5 1 9 3 10 7 11 6 10 2 9 5 1 9 1 5 c 4 8 7 12 i 2 6 3 10 2 11 7 12 i 8 9 c 10 6 ' Average Front 17.41 22.46 26.52 22.27 18.36 19.43 29.82 22.92 24.47 28.43 16.57 28.76 17.22 17.92 22.00 16.96 26.20 15.69 17.38 26.67 22.28 17.02 28.07 15.58 16.49 22.46 28.72 16.43 17.77 28.52 15.53 23.40 17.32 27.82 22.34 20.29 24.33 27.29 20.08 23.07 28.62 18.84 23.86 28.65 22.81 21.19 28.27 18.21 25.84 20.09 23.31 28.22 19.96 24.05 23.26 16.88 22.03 29.52 22.29 15.53 26.92 16.87 15.97 22.63 27.36 18.45 18.44 26.02 22.86 17.46 Setbacks (ft) Side Yard Rear Left Right 21 22.9 31.7 29.5 55.1 38.2 41.8 44.6 25.7 32.2 18.7 29 30 17.2 20.8 19.8 30.8 16.1 17.6 27.1 18.7 17.9 27.7 16.8 22.6 24.6 33.6 22.4 27.6 38.5 27 28.5 25.4 34.2 25.7 41.2 41.9 35.9 19.4 18.3 25.2 24 20.5 31.4 17.8 18.1 36.9 36 38.4 35.3 38.3 46.3 34.7 37.4 25.8 21.4 25.6 35.6 29.1 22.1 31.9 20.4 20.2 23.9 31 22.6 23.2 32.1 22.8 23 23.5 8.3 6 7.8 6.5 10.4 7 8.2 14.6 5.9 7.8 9.5 10.2 6.9 7.5 7.2 6.8 7 7.7 7.2 7 7 6.5 6 8.4 8.5 7.7 8 8.4 7.4 8.1 8.5 8.6 7.6 8.1 20.4 10.6 5.7 10.3 8.8 5.5 7.8 10.3 7 9.6 7.8 8.4 6 42.3 17.4 16.8 15.8 10.4 12.2 8.8 17.1 7.5 5 7.5 5.5 5 13.9 6.2 10.3 7.6 22.7 6.1 6.2 9.9 10.3 7.2 6.7 6.5 7.9 9.9 6.1 5.5 10.1 6.2 6.6 6.4 5.3 7 5.6 7.5 7.8 5.7 6 7.7 5.7 8.6 8.8 6.5 8.8 8.6 8.1 6.4 6.6 8.2 6.7 6.5 8.1 8 6.5 8.5 6 6.2 6.8 16.4 17 12.5 18.3 17 17.2 17 18.4 21.9 26.3 7 7.9 7.6 5.2 7.9 5.1 9.4 7 10.2 8 15.2 16.6 16.4 15.2 16.8 13.6 15.6 10.1 6.4 8.2 7.5 8.4 Garage 21.4 20.5 20.7 20.1 20 20 24 29.5 20 21.8 20 22.4 20.7 23.7 20 20.9 20.6 20.3 21.4 20.8 20.2 20.9 22.2 20 20.3 20.5 22.9 21 21.8 22.7 20 21.6 21.3 22 20 24.8 22.8 21.2 24.1 21 22.8 23 21.9 22.6 20.7 25.7 22 21.8 24 24.4 21.5 22.4 25.8 20.2 20 20 20 23.7 20.3 20 21.1 20.2 20.8 20.7 21.4 22 23.7 20.2 20.4 20.9 Porch 17.9 28.5 27.7 28.7 24.6 19.1 31 17.1 36.5 30.6 30.7 20.1 28 17.4 27.1 17.9 27.9 28.4 17.8 29.3 17.2 28.5 29.9 18.3 29.7 29.6 17.8 29 28.8 20.6 30.4 28.6 21.7 29.5 29.8 19.5 30.5 30.1 29.3 22 29.9 21.1 33.5 20.9 29.5 29.4 15.4 22.8 31.7 22.4 28 30.7 28.3 28.1 19.7 28.7 28.7 21.7 27.2 29.8 20.5 Net Pad Area (SF) 5,555 5,050 5,163 7,055 8,306 6,450 5,561 7,672 5.917 5,250 5,544 6,001 6,307 6,426 5,118 5,135 5,158 5,134 5,122 5,105 5,096 5,138 5,193 5,450 5,471 5,506 5,587 5,668 5,615 5,831 5,834 5,759 5,684 5,609 5,593 6,398 6,084 5,098 5,561 4,866 4,502 5,233 5,052 5,187 4,892 5,578 6,047 7,756 5,393 5,183 4,843 4,973 5,230 5,075 5,944 5,521 5,525 4,900 4,886 4,699 4,657 5,368 5,568 5,343 5,526 7,579 6,367 5,841 5,760 6,034 Building Coverage " Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 2,051 1,896 1,632 1,896 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,341 1.632 2,051 2,341 1,896 2,051 1,632 2,341 2,051 1,632 1,896 2,051 1,632 2,341 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,341 2,051 1,632 2,341 1,896 2,051 1,632 1,896 2.051 1,896 1,632 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,051 1,896 1,632 1,896 2,051 1,632 2,051 1,896 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,051 1,632 1,896 2,051 1,895 1,632 1,896 2,341 1,632 2,051 2,341 1,896 1,632 2,051 2,341 1,632 1,896 2,051 36.9% 37.5% 31.6% 26.9% 24.7% 29.4% 29.3% 26.7% 32.0% 31.1% 42.2% 27.2% 32.5% 36.4% 37.0% 39.9J4 31.6,% 45.6% 40.0% 32.0% 37.2% 39.9% 31 .4% 43.0% 37.5% 34.4% 29.2% 41.3% 36.5% 28.0% 40.1% 32.9% 36.1% 29.1% 33.9% 32.1% 31.2% 32.0% 36.9% 39.0% 36.3% 39.2% 37.5% 31.5% 38.8% 36.8% 27.0% 26.4% 35.2% 39.6% 39.1% 32.8% 39.2% 32.2% 31.9% 37.1% 34.3% 33.3% 38.8% 49.8% 35.0% 38.2% 42.0% 35.5% 29.5% 27.1% 35.8% 27.9% 32.9% 34.0% 7/15/2010 2:33 PM Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Section B Table 4 Page 5 of 8 PUD 05-13(A) Individual Lot Data La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 ATTACHMENT 8 Lot# 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 Plan 2 R 3 R 1 R 4 R 3 2 4 3 2 3 4 2 R 3 R Elevation B C A C B C B A A C B A C Color 7 11 2 12 8 9 5 3 4 10 8 2 11 Average Neighborhood Setback: Setbacks (ft) Average Side Yard Front Rear Left Right Garage 28.62 23.06 18.12 17.36 22.27 28.29 17.23 24.04 29.78 22.85 20.16 26.79 22.05 22.26 31.6 29.2 34 24.5 44.1 44.4 36 36.7 50.9 44.7 22.3 58.5 43.4 6.7 7.5 5.5 8.2 7.3 7.2 7.5 6.9 8.5 9.2 13.7 8.9 7.5 92 9.4 8.4 10.5 10.3 5.3 7.5 8.1 5.3 8.1 40.7 7.5 21.4 , ,. 22.8 21.2 20.6 20.4 20.4 21.7 20.5 21.6 23.1 20.9 26.3 22.4 20 Porch 29.8 29.2 22.4 28.3 30.4 20.1 31.7 32.2 28.2 14.9 26.4 33.3 Net Pad Area (SF) 5,819 5,875 6,359 6,146 6,290 5,117 5,350 5,566 5,848 5,923 9,767 6,112 6,057 V *l'*. tWi S" f - ' Building Coverage 1/ Sq. Footage % of Net Pad 1,632 1,896 2,341 2,051 1,896 1,632 2,051 1,896 1,632 1,896 2,051 1,632 1,896 i s ^ -. •* 28.0% 32.3% 36.8% 33.4% 30.1% 31.9% 38.3% 34.1% 27.9% 32.0% 21.0% 26.7% 31.3% J , \ "1/ "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overtianging balconies that project less than 8 ft. from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any buikiing, awnings, open parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls. 7/15/20102:33PM Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Section B Table 4 Page 6 of 6 La Costa Oaks North Neighborhoods 3.4 3.5 BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS DESIGN ELEMENTS a. Variety of Roof Planes b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors c. Paned Windows and Doors d. Exposed Roof Beams or Rafter Tails e. Decorative Window Ledges Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood, Sidino and Stone g. Window and Door Lintels It. Dormers 1. Accent and Varied Shape Windows . Window Boxes and Planters with Architecturally Evident Supports k. Exterior Wood Elements Variations in Colors of Stucco and Other ElementsAccent Colors on Doors, Shutters or Other Element? n. Stucco Wainscoting o. Covered Balconies p. Arched Elements q. Shutters Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and Doors PLAN ONE Tuscan Fionl ! Side j •/ \ S / ^ | / j ' / — ' s •/ s s s ^ s\ s Rear ' / ^ ^ s s ' European Country Front ^ 's s s s s Side ' / ^ -f Ftear ^ ' <. ...... •/ \ s / — s ' •/ I s1 _ I ^^ Spanish Colonial Front Side ! Rear / Jl s — ^ v' / ^ s i s s s / 1 /• 1 s ' ' JL S s PLAN TWO Tuscan Fionl / ' / ' ' — s s s s Side 1 Real S ' ^ ^ / s / s •f \ s s s •f s i1 ^< European Country Front ^ / / ^ / ^ Side i Rear ^ / ^ v' ^ s\ / ' •/ s ^ ^ v- V S s ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ / ^ ^ ^ Spanish Colonial Fionl ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ / / _ ' /- Side Rear ^1 i ^ /I / V | v' / ! ^ 1 / [ / | ] | | / 1 ^L / | / ^^ ^ PLAN THREE ' Tuscan Fionl i Side i • ' ^ / ^ j / / i | ^ ^ ' v- ^ / V ^ ^ ' Keai ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ European Country Fionl ' 's s ' •f s s s s s s s s Side : to s '/ s s s s s s s s s . "7 ^ ^ ^ «'• s ^ Spanish Colonial Fionl i Side v- | v" 4|4i1 i^s^ . i , / | / ^ ^ s s s s Heai / ^ ^ ^ ' ^I • ^ ^ PLAN FOUR Tuscan Fionl ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ v- ^ ^ s V Side I Real ' ^ ~7 /] ^ x i 1 ' ^ ^ ^ / / ^ y' ^| V European Country Fiont \ Side ^ ^ V- ^ / ^ «< ^ ^ ^ ^ ' /. / / ^ v- ^ / _ v- / ^ ^ V- Heai ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Spanish Colonial Fionl '< ' s s s s ' s s s s Side Real ' ^ / y' ^ ^ '^ ^I y' ^ /• /• 1 ^ TJCo o01 o X ^mz Section A, Item #9 PUD 05-13 (A) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. NO. PUD 05-13 (A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH GENERAL NOTES NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 AND 3.5 EXISTING LANS USE: VACANT - ROUGH GRADED (PER DRAWING 446-6A) PROPOSED LAND USEi SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE TOTAL NUMBER Of DKLLING WITS: S3TOTAL NJMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: S3 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 22i-dSO-Oi-JS. 223-aS\-OI-27 t 113-8SI-OI-I7 LM (RESIDENTIAL LOf~tl£OHM DENSITY lo-4 dv/oel) SAL PLAN LAfO USE DESIGNATION:LM (RESIDENTIAL LOU-MEDIUM DENSITY IO-4 Ou/oct) I. EXISTING ZONING: PC10. MASTER PLAN WXRLYING ZONING; fl-1 (SINGLE FAMILY BCTAOfD)II. CROSS OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY-.).i OU/AC (S3 OU'S/34 AC) PER IM CT 12. LFMP 20NE: ZCtf IIIJ AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS: 030 (U WITS x 10 THIPS/DAtl 14 BUILDING COVERAGE: tVPROXIIHTELY 3.S ACRESIS. PERCENTAGE LANDSCAPING: APPROXIMATELY 94.01 GENERAL DESIGN NOTES-SITE PLAN ALL GRADING FOtt PROPOSED AND FUTURE STREETS SHALL CONFORM TO Tl£ CITY Of CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS REWIRED BY IHE CITY ENSHfER. ALL EASEIfNIS SHALL S£ PROVIDED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS A BY Ttf CITY ENGItfER. PUBLIC UTILITIES AMI tlfllt APPRCfftIA MANUFACTURED SLOPE Mr (OS SWll BE VARIABLE (I I MAX).FlHISrfD GRADES ARE PER ROUCH CHADINC PLANS 44S-6A SOILS ItfORMATIQN *AS OBTAINED FROM tlC UPDATED GEOTEOHIGAL INVESTIGATION PREPARED BY: GEOCON INC . Ml ED. 08-03-01 GRADED SIALES SHALL HAVE A MINIUM OF It FLO* LINE GRADE AM AS SHOm ONCXAD1HZ PLAN DUG 44S-6AALL STKET DESIGNS, STREET LIGHT. AND FIRE MOUNTS TO CONFORM TO CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS t£WIH£0 BY CITY ENGINEER UO PROVIDEDAS SHOM* ON llfHOVCtfHT PLANS OK 446-S t 42S-7. LANDSCAPING AtO TREE PLANTING SHALL 8E PER THi CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE MAMJAL AND Ttf VILLAGES OF LA COSfA MASTER PLAH (SEE Ttf UAStCH LAWSCAPE PLAN FOR Itf OAKS NOKIH) . AND PER LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY GILLESPIE DESIGN.CLL-OE-SAC CURB CRAOES SHALL BE A MINIUOI OF IX lit SueOIVIDEK/IXVELCfER SHALL PROVIDE AM INSTALL APPROVED STREET LIGHT STANDARDS ANO FIXTWES IN THE TYPE AND nufitt AfPXOVED BY Ttf CI1Y OFCARLSBAD. Tl£ PUBLIC KRKS DEPARTMENT - TRAFFIC SECTION AHS PER THE CITY'SSTREET LIGHT CONSTMXTIOH STANDARDS. STREET LIGHTS AS SHOW ON THIS MAP ARE TO BE USED AS A GUIDE ONLY. STREET LIGHTS AS SHOW ON THIS MAP ARE PER OK. 419-7 ANO 446-6. THIS KC ASSUUES CERTAIN BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTUK IS EXISTING OH APPROVED AND B0tt£0 FOR TO THE SATISFACTION Of THE CITY ENGINEER. THEY INCLUfSANTA FE noAD, SAN ELIJO ROM, AVENIDA SOLEDAO AND tt£ SOUTHERLY m£f£ HECESSARY IN ORDER TO MEET THE i' MINIUM POSITIVE OHAINAt£ OH SIDEYAfiDS. DEEPENED FOOTINGS MILL BE UTILIZED AS AUOtfO PER GEOCON, INC. LETKH DATED MAR-OS-IOALL IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING ARE EXISTING PER llfROVEMENT AM SHADING PLANS »4f-t Mt> 146-6A RESPECTIVELY.PRIOR TO Tl£ ISSUANCE OF A PRECISE GRADING PERMIT OR ANY BUILDING PERMITS. IfRQVEHEHT DRAWINGS SHALL t£ COtGIRUCtlON CHANCED TO SUM rt€ RELOCATION Of ANY ORIVE*AYS. SEMER AM *ATE# LATERALS WHICH MAY CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY STANDARDS OK PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNI IS/OH 1VEIAYS. RESIDENTIAL STRvCTUIES tILL HOT BE ALLOHED Ml THIN FIRt PROTECTION ZONES, FIRE RATED t IGNITION RESISTIVE GAZEOOS. DECKS AM PAtlOS CAN ENCROACH HI THIN TX PROPOSED PROTECTION ZONE LOTS 2t-15. 48-H. AND 6S-BO ARE REWIRED TO HAVE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS AS SH01NPER APPROVED CT OS-IS/PuD 15-JJ.NOTE: AU. BUILDING PLMCS CALLED OUT SMtLl BE CfTSET BY NO LESS DMW IS' «0 SWU KAD icss JUAN 30 SF IN AREA. APPLICANT 10 FREO AR8UCKLE - PRESIDENTOF UOHttO* DEVELOPMENT AS ACENT fOH REAL ESTAJECOLLATEfUL. MGUT. CO. HUNSAKER& ASSOCIATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.443.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA Cily Of Carlsbad, California i SHEET 1 OF 7 O PUD 05-13 (A) COfiTE PANORAMA (PUBLIC)^ EXISTING SITiq CORAZON (PUBLIC) TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS ItXAltONS Mi TifiCAL fMQ SHALL atM-VCA/WS ANO AS APPLICABLE. LLVCADIAOf/ 0*C «•)£-£. TYPICAL DRAINAGE SWAL£ DETAILS 10' , _ AVENIDA SOLED AD (PUBLIC) - RCCKHfi STMiOARD OHAt fRIHOfF FHOH lUPOtvtQuS MfAS (£.£ HOOF. UHCOv£S£O SLA3S) SHALL.fO JH£ UAXHHJU EttlHt HtACtXIA-f. B£ OO£Cf£0 MKOUGH ADJACENT LANOSCAPfO MiAS PRIOR SO KCACnlte AttA OttAIHS. ARCHITECTURAL PLANE DETAIL *>!E Ml ttMUHC PIMIS ULlfO Out &MU K affSfl SI HO IKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.4 & 3.5 PREPAflED BY: HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Ol Carlsbad, California PUD 05-13 (A) LOT 15 SE1BACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'A' • TYPICAL SCALC: 1' - iff NOTE: AS LOWS AS A 18.0' MIR DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK HEQUIREMENlb AHE MET. 19.8* ACTUALLOT 16 SETBAC TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "B" • TYPICAL SCALE: 1" - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.7' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE ME!. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "C* • TYPICAL SCALE: f - 10' NOlt: AS LONG AS A 0.2' MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK RETIREMENTS ARC MET. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "D" • TYPICAL SCALE: t" - Iff NOTE: AS LONG AS A 17.2' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "F - TYPICAL SCALE: T - 10" NOTE: AS LONG AS A 13.7 UIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED. THE TOP OT SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE M£T. LOT 32 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION T* • TYPICAL SCALE: 1* - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.7' MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AftE MET. SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX PREPARED BY: - TOP Of SLOPESETBACKLWE Of SIGHT LOT 24 \j'PLAN 1C T 24 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'G' - TYPICAL SCALE: 1' - 10' NOTE: AS LONG AS A I J.I' MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. LOT 56 SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "H" - TYPICAL TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "I* - TYPICAL SCALE: I' - 10' NOTE; AS LONG AS A 16.7' MKJ. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED, THE IOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. — TOP OF SLOPE LINE OF StOHI Lores M'LAN 3BR \ TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION 'J1 - TOPICAL HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City O( Carlsbad, California SHEET 3 PUD 05-13 (A NEIGHBORHOOD 3.4 & 3.5 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. OS-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California HUNSAKER& ASSOCIATES PUD 05-13 (A) NEIGHBORHOOD 3.443.5 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA HUNSAKER& ASSOCIATES City Of Carlsbad, CaliforniaFR - f/fff RATED/ICHITIOH RESISHVE CONSTRUCTION -C PUD 05-13 NEIGHBORHOOD 3.4 & 3.5 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California PUD 05-13 (A) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT NOTES NUMBER Cl C2 C3 DELTA 90 '00 '00" 05 '26 '58" 01 '50' 50" RADIUS 20.00 10 JO. 00 244.00 LCNGfH 31.12 97.96 7.87 NUUBEK LI L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 BEARING H22'29'18"E H28'06'5I"E N03'WOO"E N45'10'00"» N42'34 '00"W N46'24'00"» N51'57'00"» DISTANCE 60.00' 84.55' 108.35' 54 33' 59.99' 53.51' 94.45' inf fOLtOHNC ftSEueNK ARC fflOI DC QTT Of CMASM0 OUCl U ^B«M»S !I+^i^Vwwo HOHMMK MO A&xures. ®4 auttMf cts&CNr KOICAKO ro rrc citr of UHLSHO ffjsurae it HMIItH Cf THIS C^SftiM UfS tIThlH rtKWXO OtDIUHO Slfiffl. SCffliin, AW istar soot rCXfi s& citi if &>Astoe Ttucim *C «B IJ. 1006. 4S flLl HO XX&-OIOH xx Mt u&fkr cf nienr cf «r OWMO re ®«isr »' i/flKC na ii.THIS &St*y» Lftv it nor si^ xx * aiiLi'i toi& ^ AH flUJUKK ] 0© n cf atLivo IMC< no. w-0i-a>. 't*r it xu KLffrof caetm fix tixu&tt IOF <MLiw> ffx EXISTING EASEMENT EXHIBIT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.4 & 3.5 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA City Of Carlsbad, California SHEET 7 OF 7 i LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 f&m&Ls FLOOR PLAN Floor: 1914 sq.ft. Floor and Garage: 2341 sq. ft. Livable: 1914 sq.ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 Tuscan European Country ROOF PLANS Spanish Colonial LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 Spanish Colonial European Country Tuscan LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 o Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation SPANISH COLONIAL Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation EUROPEAN COUNTRY Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation TUSCAN Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: ONE SQUARE FEET: 1914 FIRST FLOOR PLAN First Floor: II66 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 1632 sq. ft. Second Floor: 1296 sq.ft. Livable: 2462 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 SECOND FLOOR PLAN First Floor: 1166 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 1632 sq.ft. Second Floor: 1296 sq.ft. Livable: 2462 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 4:12 IIP. U.HCX Tuscan European Country ROOF PLANS Spanish Colonial LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN l\lUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 Spanish Colonial European Country Tuscan LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 u\ Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation SPANISH COLONIAL Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 Left Elevation Right Elevation jgfjKi'iti'iliii'i'^ EUROPEAN COUNTRY Front Elevation Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 Left Elevation Right Elevation TUSCAN Front Elevation Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: Two SQUARE FEET: 2462 FIRST FLOOR PLAN First Floor: 1357 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 1845 sq. ft. Second Floor: 1306 sq.ft. Livable: 2663 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN 1M UMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 '•o SECOND FLOOR PLAN First Floor: 1357 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 1845 sq. ft. Second Floor: 1306 sq.ft. Livable: 2663 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 Tuscan European Country ROOF PLANS Spanish Colonial LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN IN UMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 Spanish Colonial European Country Tuscan LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN 1SI UMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation SPANISH COLONIAL Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 yiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi!^ 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I II I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I t M I I I 1 1 I I I II M 1 I M I I I I I M I I I M I I I M I I II ITTTT^iU I II I,ij it .u—x if .is ..a' u MJ \t \t u , u -if u.' ii ,;j. ,\i a. 'IJ.L u n.1, ,if,'.'i(-^x yd.u 'iij. 'u Left Elevation Right Elevation EUROPEAN COUNTRY Front Elevation Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN TslUMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 'JIi Left Elevation Right Elevation EUROPEAN 'COUNTRY (ENHANCED) LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: THREE SQUARE EEET: 2663 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation ' TUSCAM Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation TUSCAN (ENHANCED)Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: THREE SQUARE FEET: 2663 FIRST FLOOR PLAN First Floor: 1379 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 2036 sq. ft. Second Floor: 1510 sq.ft. Livable: 2889 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE "HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN 1M UMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 o SECOND FLOOR PLAN First Floor: 1379 sq.ft. First Floor and Garage: 2036 sq. ft. Second Floor: 1510 sq.ft. Livable: 2889 sq. ft. LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Tuscan European Country ROOF PLAINS Spanish Colonial LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Spanish Colonial European Country Tuscan LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation SPANISH COLONIAL Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN IN UMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Left Elevation Right Elevation EUROPEAN COUNTRY Front Elevation Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN MUMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Left Elevation Right Elevation TUSCAN Front Elevation Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN NUMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 Left Elevation Right Elevation Front Elevation TUSCAN (ENHANCED)Rear Elevation LA COSTA BY PULTE HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION JULY 06, 2010 PLAN IN UMBER: FOUR SQUARE FEET: 2889 EXHIBIT 5 Planning Commission Minutes October 20, 2010 Page 4 4. PUD 05-13(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 4 and stated Assistant Planner Shelley Glennon would make the Staff presentation. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if the applicant wished to continue with only 4 Commissioners present. The applicant stated yes. Acting Chairperson Baker opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 4. Ms. Glennon gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, PO Box 237, Carlsbad, representing Pulte Group, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Schumacher asked if there will be any LEED or energy efficiency features for the homes that the builder will be installing. Mr. Henthorn stated all of the architecture has LEED measures incorporated but the builder will not be pursuing LEED certification on the homes. Commissioner Nygaard asked if the division of the dual pane windows in the European country style homes will be interior or exterior. Mr. Henthorn stated he was not sure if the details have been worked out yet but he will pass the concern on to the architect. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if the master plan had any rules regarding solar installation and if the homes will be solar ready. Mr. Henthorn stated the master plan does not require solar installation. Dave Hutchins, representing Pulte Homes, 27101 Puerta Real, Mission Viejo, stated they are currently not planning solar electricity for the homes. Mr. Hutchins stated that solar roof tiles can be incorporated at a later date. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if the typical solar roof panels could be installed. Mr. Hutchins stated that would be a question of the CC&Rs. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Acting Chairperson Baker opened and closed public testimony. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further questions of Staff. Commissioner Schumacher asked about guidelines in the City for the LEED certifications. Mr. Neu stated there are City Council guidelines that address municipal buildings. For private developments, it only offers an expedited plan checking process if the project is pursuing LEED certification. Mr. Neu further stated that there are building code requirements for solar readiness that are in place. Commissioner Nygaard asked if the Planning Commission has any authority to ask that the CC&Rs require the placement of the solar panels on the roofs. Mr. Neu stated there is prohibition in state law about cities preventing the use and installation of solar equipment. Ms. Mobaldi stated the Solar Rights Act states that cities cannot totally prohibit solar equipment with CC&Rs; however there can reasonable restrictions on the placement of the equipment. Planning Commission Minutes October 20,2010 Page 5 Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she opened and closed public testimony. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Nygaard, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6726 recommending approval of Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 05-13(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 4-0 AYES: Acting Chairperson Baker, Commissioner Montgomery, Commissioner Nygaard, and Commissioner Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Chairperson Douglas, Commissioner Dominguez, and Commissioner L'Heureux ABSTAIN: None Acting Chairperson Baker closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 5. PUD 05-1KB1 - LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1 - Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a recommendation of approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 80 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 5 and stated Senior Planner Van Lynch would make the Staff presentation. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if the applicant wished to continue with only 4 Commissioners present. The applicant stated yes. Acting Chairperson Baker opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 5. Mr. Lynch gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Jack Henthorn and Associates, PO Box 237, Carlsbad, representing Standard Pacific Homes, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Commissioner Nygaard asked Mr. Henthorn to relate the same concern regarding the windows used in the European Country style homes. Acting Chairperson Baker asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, she opened and closed public testimony. This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: November 19th, 2010 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Escondido, California This 19th, of November 2010 Jane Allsnc>LTs6 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising GIVEN to you,because your interest may be affect- ed, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carls- bad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califor- nia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, No-vember 30, 2010, to consider ap- proval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family de-tached homes within the. Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighbor- hoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local FacilitiesManagement Zone 11 and more par- ticularly described as: Lot 1 through 83 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-16 La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5, inthe City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof NO. 15597, filed in the Office of the. County Recorder of San Diego County August 22,'2007. Df Whereas, on October 20, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commis- sion voted 4-0-3 to determine that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Pro- gram EIR adequately describes theactivity for the .purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans,elevations and plotting for the devel- opment of 83 single-family detachedhomes within the Villages of La Cos- ta Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Ran- cho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone Those persons wishing to speak onthis proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies ofthe agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Shelley Gfennon in the Planning Di- vision at,760-602-4625 or5hellev.alennon@carlsbadca.QOV. If you challengfe the Planned Devel- opment Permit Amendment in court, you may Be limited to raising onlythose issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing de- scribed in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attri: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carls- bad, CA 92008, at or prior to thepublic hearing. CASEFILE:PUD05-13(A)CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKSNORTH3.4&3.5 CITY OF CARLSBADCITY COUNCIL net 2275744 11/19/2010 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, to consider approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 through 83 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-16 La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15597, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007. Whereas, on October 20, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-0-3 to determine that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Shelley Glennon in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4625 or shelley.glennon@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL PUD 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 November 19, 2010 NOT TO SCALE LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13 (A) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, to consider approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11 and more particularly described as: Lot 1 through 83 inclusive, of City of Carlsbad Tract 05-16 La Costa Oaks North- Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15597, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 22, 2007. Whereas, on October 20, 2010 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-0-3 to determine that the project is within the scope of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and recommend approval of a Planned Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the development of 83 single-family detached homes within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5, generally located west of Rancho Santa Fe Road, south of Melrose Drive and north of Cadencia Street in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on or after November 24, 2010. If you have any questions, please contact Shelley Glennon in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4625 or shelley.glennon@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the Planned Development Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL PUD 05-13(A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 November 19, 2010 nor TO sctie LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13 (A) Easy Peel Labels Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®Paper See Instruction Sheet j for Easy Peel Feature ^IAVERY®5160« CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AVE SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 701 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966OLIVENHAINRD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 600 EUCALYPTUS AVE VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AV SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER STEVE MACIEJ - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®Sens de chargement Consultez la feuille d'instruction www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Impression antibourrage et a sechage rapide Utilisezlegabarit5160® CAMDEN USA, INC PO BOX 490O SCOTTSDALEAZ 85261 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY LA COSTA OAKS COMMUNTIY ASSN UNIT 2600 600 W BROADWAY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AVERY® 5160® SAN MARCOS MEDICAL CENTER LLC UNIT 255 11300 SORRENTO VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 HOFFINLILLC UNIT 800 3200 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA CA 92626 CIC LA COSTA LP UNIT 101 5993 AVENIDA ENCINAS, CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD PRESCHOOL LP UNIT 1100 100 W BROADWAY GLENDALECA 91210 EVERETT, ROBERT F / NEU, MARCO 7152SITIOCALIENTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 VANDERA.G M LIVING TRUST TUTINO, MICHAEL & DIANE K 7144 SITIO CALIENTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 LC OAKS 3 3 LLC UNIT 100 4747 MORENA BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92117 THIELE, JENS / HSIEH, SHERRY 7143 SITIO CALIENTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 PACHECO, JASON & JESSIE 7147 SITIO CALIENTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 HART, ARTIMUS & STEPHANIE 7159 SITIO CALIENTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 CLINE, CRAIG & N FAMILY TRUST 3388 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 CAMARATTA, JOSEPH G & KIM F 3384 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 WEBER,EDWARD J JR & SARA L 3380 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 DAVIS FAMILY TRUST 3376 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ANTHONY, ROBERT S & SUSAN PO BOX 236063 ENCINITAS CA 92023 PEDERSEN, BONNIE E TRUST 3368 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 HOKUNSON, TODD W & AUDRA N 3371 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 TINKER, MICHAEL & RENEE 3375 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 HALL, LEWIS & KIMBERLY 3379 CORTE PANORAMA CARLSBAD CA 92009 REAL ESTATE STE 180 ^ 1903WRIG|#m_ CA 92008 CNLM 215WASHST FALLBROOK CA 92028 Pulte Home Corporation 27101 Puerta Real, Ste 300 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 MORROW DEVELOPMENT STE 180 1903 WRIGHT PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOC PO Box 237 Carlsbad, CA 92018 REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT STE 300 2131 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 ®<ms ©AU3AV UlOD'AjaAB'MAAM ®<ms 6uji.uj.id aBpnws pue uier Villages of La Costa Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13(A) Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 La Costa Ridge Village La Costa Oaks Village Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 Villages of La Costa La Costa Oaks Village Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 83 Single-family Detached Homes 4 Floor Plans 3 Architectural Styles Tuscan Elevation Plan 1 European Country Elevation Plan 2 Spanish Elevation Plan 3 Tuscan Elevation Plan 4 Proposed Plan Types: Plan 1: 1,914 SF Plan 2:2,462 SF Plan 3: 2,663 SF Plan 4: 2,889 SF Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5Plan 1 –10 duPlan 2 –24 duPlan 3 –25 duPlan 4 –24 du Site Planning Spanish The Spanish Colonial architectural style is generally derived from the architecture of southern Spain and Colonial Mexico. European Country This eclectic style was derived from the English and French country houses which were popularized in the United States during the 1920’s and 1930’s. Tuscan In the Tuscan architectural style the massing is a more ornate adaptation of the Mediterranean vernacular, with details derived from the houses and villas of the Italian region of Tuscany. Architecture Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 1 Plan 3 Spanish Colonial The Spanish Colonial architectural style is characterized by the use of arches, courtyards, form as mass, plain wall surfaces and tile roofs. Design Elements include: Arched Elements Roof Treatments Iron Detailing Window Treatments Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 1 Plan 3 The European Country style is characterized by the use of steep roofs with multiple pitches, flat-tile roofs, and stucco walls with accents of brick, stone and wood. Design Elements include: Roof Treatments Stone and Brick Accents Window Treatments European Country Plan 2 Plan 4Plan 1 Plan 3 Tuscan In the Italian/Tuscan architectural style the massing is generally more simplified than the other Spanish influenced architectural styles. Design Elements include: Stone Accents Window Detailing Gable Roofs w/ Wood Detailing Villages of La Costa Neighborhoods 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13(A) La Costa Oaks North 3.4 & 3.5 PUD 05-13(A) Location Map SITIO CORAZONCORTE PANORAMA RANCHO SANTA FE RDSITIO CALIENTEAV E N I D A S O L E D A DCORTE FORTUNASITIO DESTINOSITIO COLINACO R T E ALTURACALLE PLATACALLE HIERROSITIO CORAZONPUD 05-13 (A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 SITE MAP EL C A MINO REA L LA COSTA AVCOLLEGE BLCARLSBAD B L AVI ARA PY MELRO SE DR 24 acres P-C Zone RLM SITIO C O R A Z O N RANC H O S A N T A F E R D CORTE PANORAMA AV E N I D A S O L E D A D SITIO CALIENTESAN ELIJO RD CO R T E F O R T U N A PASEO PLOMOSITIO COLINASITIO DESTINOCORT E A L T U R A CALLE PLATA FIRE STATION 6 DY CALL E HI E R R OSITIO CORAZON0 400200 Feet PUD 05-13 (A) LA COSTA OAKS NORTH 3.4 & 3.5 RLMOS OS RLM Apartments RLM Project Background •August 16, 2006-City Council approved the project site to be subdivided under Tentative Map (CT 05-16) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 05-13). •October 20, 2010 –Planning Commission recommended approval of PUD 05-13(A) Site Plan •Planned Development Permit Amendment for: •Building Floor Plans; •Elevations; and •Plotting •83 one-story and two-story single- family detached homes located within Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5 Project Design •4 Floor Plans (Plans 1, 2, 3 & 4)•3 Architectural Styles: •Spanish •Tuscan •European Country•12 Color Schemes•Building Plane and Roof Variation•Variety of Design Elements Including: •Window/door trims, roof tiling, decorative stucco, wood accents, stone veneer, wainscoting, etc.•2-Car & 3-Car Garages General Plan Consistency The project achieves the General Plan’s Residential Objectives through providing a variety of safe and attractive housing that preserves the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of the existing residential area. Project Consistency •Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98- 01(G)) –Master Plan Site Standards and Guidelines •Site Plan Standards •Architectural Controls –Neighborhood 3.4 & 3.5 Standards and Guidelines •Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 21 –Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45) •California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Recommendation •That the City Council ADOPT City Council Resolution No. CC 2010-260 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment No. PUD 05- 13(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.