Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-04-10; City Council; 20862; Amendment to Policy No. 64 Regarding Wireless Communication FacilitiesCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# 20,862 AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 64 REGARDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES DEPT.DIRECT6I^ MTG. 4/10/12 AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 64 REGARDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES CITY ATTY. ^tS^. DEPT. CA AMENDMENT TO CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 64 REGARDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES CITY MGR. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2012-083 amending City Council Policy No. 64 to comply with H.R. 3630 which places restrictions on local government for the citing of wireless facilities on an existing wireless tower or base station. ITEM EXPLANATION: On February 15, 2012, President Obama signed into law a bill passed by Congress that includes among other provisions relevant to local government, restrictions on the siting of wireless facilities. The new law takes effect immediately. Therefore, staff is proposing that City Council Policy No. 64 regarding the siting of telecommunication facilities be amended to comply with current Federal law. The restriction being added to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 law states that: "Notwithstanding [47 USC section 332(c) (7)] or any other provision of law, a state or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station" (H.R. (House Rules) Sec 6409 (a) (1).) To comply with the new law, this restriction is being added to the "REVIEW RESTRICTIONS" imposed by City Council Policy No. 64. Likewise, A.4. ofthe "REVIEW AND APPROVAL GUIDELINES" of City Council Policy No.64, referencing collocation, is being revised to reflect that the City must approve collocation applications unless the expansion adds significantly to the height or width of a facility. City Council Policy No. 64 D., "APPLICATION AND REVIEW GUIDELINES," No.6 is also being revised to reflect that a Conditional Use Permit shall not be required ifthe modifications to the existing site are insubstantial. However, a Conditional Use Permit may still be required where the proposed wireless communication collocation facility is not consistent with requirements for the existing wireless telecommunications facility installation or substantially changes the physical dimensions ofthe existing tower or base station. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Ron Ball 760-434-2891 ron.ball(S)carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. X COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED X CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC • DENIED • CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN • WITHDRAWN • RETURNED TO STAFF • AMENDED • COUNCIL RECEIVED THE • REPORT/PRESENTATION OTHER-SEE MINUTES • Page 2 The new law does not prohibit a state or local government from imposing appropriate conditions on any requisite permit. Therefore even though the modification must be approved if there are no substantial changes in the physical dimensions of a tower or station, any permit may be conditional. The law does not address whether insubstantial modifications to existing facilities must be approved if the existing facilities are themselves nonconforming legal uses. Ordinance No. CS- 050 which amends Title 21, Chapter 21.48 addressing nonconforming uses is pending approval at the Coastal Commission. As amended, Chapter 21.48.060 allows a nonconforming non- residential structure to continue and to be altered or expanded if the alteration or expansion does not result in an additional structural nonconformity and increase the degree ofthe existing nonconformity of all or a part of such structure. Presumably, if the modification for a collocation facility results in an additional structural nonconformity by increasing the height or dimensions of a nonconforming structure and if the modification substantially increases the degree of the existing nonconformity of all or a part of such structure, then the City would not be obligated to approve such modification under the new law. Therefore the federal telecommunications law as revised and the pending Municipal Code provisions relating to legal nonconforming uses are harmonious since both recognize that a modification of a structure must be substantial to justify a denial a permit. It should be noted that the new law applies to cities as regulators, rather than as property owners, and therefore the new restriction would not obligate the City to allow collocation on property owned by the City. FISCAL IMPACT: Other than the expenditure of staff time, there are no costs associated with this amendment to City Council Policy No. 64. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Amendments to City Council Policy No. 64 authorize the operation, repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing structures or facilities and not expanding uses which are exempt under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15301 and 15303 exempting installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures. EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution No. 2012-083 2. Redline Version of City Council Policy 64 3. Amended Version of City Council Policy 64 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-083 28 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY ^ STATEMENT NO. 64 REGARDING WIRELESS 4 COMMUNICATION FACILITIES 5 WHEREAS, Council Policy 64 addresses Wireless Communication Facilities in 6 the City of Carlsbad; and 7 WHEREAS, On February 15, 2012, President Obama signed into law H.R. 3630 8 g which includes among other provisions relevant to local government, restrictions on the 10 siting of wireless facilities; 11 WHEREAS, H.R. 3630 adds the following provision to the Federal 12 Telecommunications Act of 1996: "Notwithstanding [47 USC section 332(c) (7)] or any other provision of law, a state or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does j5 not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station" (H.R. (House Rules) Sec 6409 (a) (1).) 16 " 17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad is amending City Council 1^ Policy No. 64 to comply with current Federal law; WHEREAS, the amended Policy includes revisions to the "REVIEW RESTRICTIONS" sections which are consistent with federal law; WHEREAS, the amended Policy includes revisions to section A.4. of the "REVIEW AND APPROVAL GUIDELINES" referencing collocation, to reflect that the City must approve collocation applications unless the expansion adds significantly to the 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 height or width of a facility; 26 WHEREAS, the amended Policy includes revisions to Section D., 27 "APPLICATION AND REVIEW GUIDELINES," No.6, to reflect that a Conditional Use 3 Permit shall not be required ifthe modifications to the existing site are insubstantial. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows that: 1. The above recitations are true and correct. 2. That City Council Policy No. 64 will be amended to read as set forth in Exhibit 2 to Agenda Bill No. 20,862. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Carlsbad on the 10*^ day of April, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: Council Members Hall, Kulchin, Blackburn, Douglas and Packard. None. ABSENT: None. MATTmALL, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAHslE M. WOOD, City Clerk (SEAL) CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Policy No. Date Issued Effective Date Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Page 1 of 11 64 Julv 1^. 2009 Julv1^. 2009 Juno 8. 200-1 General Subiect:Cateqorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File PURPOSE AND GOAL: Wireless communication facilities, or WCFs, refer to the many facilities with antennas and supporting equipment that receive and transmit signals and together enable mobile or other "wire-free" communication and information services. Unlike ground-wired telecommunications, such as the land- based telephone system, wireless communication technologies, by their operational nature, require a network of antennas mounted at various heights and attached typically to buildings, structures and poles. A common name for a WCF is "cell site." WCF proposals to the city became commonplace in the mid-1990s. Since then, Carlsbad has processed dozens of new WCF applications and numerous permit renewals for existing facilities, all without benefit of specific review criteria. As the City's population and the popularity and variety of wireless sen/ices grow, providers are expected to install more facilities to improve coverage and gain user capacity. This policy's purpose is to guide the public, applicants, boards and commissions, and staff in reviewing the placement, construction, and modification of WCFs. The goal is to assure WCFs in Carlsbad: • Are reviewed and provided within the parameters of law. • Are encouraged to locate away from residential and other sensitive areas, except as allowed by Section A. of this policy - Location Guidelines for the Placement of WCFs. • Represent the fewest possible facilities necessary to complete a network without discriminating against providers of functionally equivalent services or prohibiting the provision of wireless services. • Use, as much as possible, "stealth" techniques so they are not seen or easily noticed. • Operate consistent with Carlsbad's quality of life. This policy applies to all commercial providers of wireless communication services. It does not apply to amateur (HAM) radio antennas and dish and other antennas installed on a residence for an individual's private use. BACKGROUND: To secure the right to provide wireless services to a region, companies obtain ainwave licenses that are auctioned by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the federal agency that regulates the telecommunications industry. The FCC mandates the licensees establish their service networks as quickly as possible. In Carlsbad, there are three common types of wireless communication systems: Cellular, PCS (Personal Communications Services), and ESMR (Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio). The table below provides the relevant similarities and differences between the three. ,6 CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Page 2 of 11 Policy No. 64 Date Issued Julv 1^. 2000 Effective Date Julv I'l. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copios to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Hoads and Divicion Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Prose, Filo ATTRIBUTES SYSTEM Cellular ESMR PCS Technology Analog, converting to digital Digital Network Coverage Analog: Established Digital: Developing Developing Frequency 800 MHz 1900 MHz Features Telephone, call waiting, voice mail, caller ID, paging, e-mail, and Internet access (Notes: Analog cellular does not provide all of these features. ES/Wf? also offers dispatching and two-way radio. PCS also has video transmission ability.) Transmission A network of interconnected WCFs carries signals across a city and beyond. Each WCF contains antennas that transmit and receive signals over a small geographic area known as a "cell." As the user travels trom one cell to another, the signal is passed from one WCF to another in the next cell. Cell Size Radius Average 5 miles 0 -1 mile Antenna Types Dish, Panel (or sector), and Whip Antenna Support Lattice towers, Monopoles, Building or Structure-Attached Supporting Equipment In structures generally under 500 square feet In cabinets about the size of vending machines Provider Verizon, AT&T, Cingular Wireless Nextel Sprint PCS Table Notes More facilities may be needed to complete a PCS network since its higher operating frequency limits the range of its antennas and consequently the size of its cells. The antennas for all three systems function on a line of sight transmission. Antennas need to be placed at specific heights in relation to one another in order to transmit and receive signals. As a result, height is a determining factor in the design and location of WCFs. Monopole antenna supports may be installed on buildings or on the ground. A single wireless communication facility may consist of two or more antennas and antennas of different types. A facility may also include the antennas and supporting equipment of more than one provider. This is known as "collocation." Collocation also refers to a WCF placed together with utility structures such as water tanks, light standards, and transmission towers. WCFs are usually unmanned and require maintenance visits once or twice each month. This table is based on current information that is subject to change. CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 3 of 11 Poiicy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11 2000 DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv 1^. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 TCateqorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, Filo REVIEW RESTRICTIONS: The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA) preserves the City's ability to regulate the placement, construction, and modification of wireless communication facilities subject to the following restrictions, as contained in TCA Section 704. • The City may not favor any carrier. Regulations may not unreasonably discriminate among competitive providers. • Tlie City may not prevent completion of a network. Regulations may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless communication services. • Applications are to be processed in a reasonable time. A city must act on an application for WCFs within a "reasonable" amount of time, roughly the same time as for any similar application. • The City cannot deny an application because of perceived radio frequency health hazards. If federal standards are met, cities may not deny permits or leases on the grounds that radio frequency emissions are harmful to the environment or to the health of residents. However, local governments may require wireless carriers to prove compliance with the standards. The FCC has established procedures to enforce compliance with its rules. • The City cannot deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a* modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change .the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. • A decision to deny an appiication must be supported by substantial evidence. A decision to deny a WCF application must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.5", Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.75" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Font: Bold 1 ^ The Federal Communications Commission defines a "substantial change" as: • The mounting of a proposed antenna on the tower that would increase the existing height of the tower bv more than 10%, or bv the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna mav exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas: or • The mounting of a proposed antenna that would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the mounting ofthe proposed antenna mav exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessarv to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable. 7 CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT DATED: September 21, 2001 Page 4 of 11 Policy No. 64 Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 Effective Date Julv ^A, 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 vCateaorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Hoads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File HEALTH CONCERNS & SAFEGUARDS: Possible health risks from exposure to the radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields generated by WCFs are a significant community concern. Accordingly, the FCC requires facilities to comply with RF exposure guidelines published in the Code of Federal Regulations (see 47 CFR §1.1307 and 47 CFR §1.1310). The limits of exposure established by the guidelines are designed to protect the public health with a very large margin of safety as they are many times below the levels that generally are accepted as having the potential to cause adverse health effects. Both the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration have endorsed the FCCs exposure limits, and courts have upheld the FCC rules requiring compliance with the limits. Most WCFs create maximum exposures that are only a small fraction of the limits. Furthermore, because the antennas in a PCS, cellular, or other wireless network must be in a line of sight arrangement to effectively transmit, their power is focused on the horizon instead of toward the sky or ground. Generally, unless a person is physically next to and at the same height as an antenna, it is not possible to be exposed to the established limits for RF exposure. The FCC requires providers, upon license application, renewal, or modification, to demonstrate compliance with RF exposure guidelines. Where two or more wireless operators have located their antennas at a common location (called "collocation"), the total exposure from all antennas taken together must be within FCC guidelines. Many facilities are exempt from having to demonstrate compliance with FCC guidelines, however, because their low power generation or height above ground level is highly unlikely to cause exposures that exceed the guidelines. REVIEW AND APPROVAL GUIDEUNES: Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.42.010(16) allows WCFs in all zones with the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) and subject to this policy. These guidelines should be followed in the review of conditional use permits for new wireless facilities as well as extensions and amendments to CUPs for existing installations. A. Location Guideiines For Placement of WCFs 1. Preferred Locations - WCFs are encouraged to locate on existing buildings and structures. In addition, WCFs should locate in the following zones and areas, which are listed in order of descending preference: a. Industrial zones. b. Commercial zones. c. Other non-residential zones, except open space. CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 5 of 11 Policy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv I'l. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 vCateoorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File d. Public right-of-way of roads adjacent to industrial and commercial zones and identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element of the city's General Plan. e. Public property (e.g., city facilities) not in residential areas. f. Major power transmission towers in non-residential zones or areas. g. Public and private utility installations (not publicly accessible) in residential and open space zones (e.g., water tanks, reservoirs, or the existing communication towers near Maerkle Reservoir). h. Parks and community facilities (e.g., places of worship, community centers) in residential zones or areas. i. Public right-of-way of roads adjacent to residential zones and identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element of the city's General Plan. Discouraged Locations - WCFs should not locate in any of the following zones or areas unless the applicant demonstrates no feasible alternative exists as required by Application and Review Guideline D.2. a. Open space zones and lots (except as noted in Location Guideline A.I.). b. Residential zones or areas (except as noted in Location Guideline A.1). c. Major power transmission towers in corridors located in/or next to a residential zone or area. d. Environmentally sensitive habitat. e. Public right-of-way of roads not identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element of the city's General Plan. f. On vacant land. Visibility to the Public - In all areas, WCFs should locate where least visible to the public and where least disruptive to the appearance of the host property. Furthermore, no WCF should be installed on an exposed ridgeline or in a location readily visible from a public place, recreation area, scenic area or residential area unless it is satisfactorily located and/or screened so it is hidden or disguised. Collocation - Collocating with existing or other planned wireless communication facilities is recommended whenever feasible. Service providers are also encouraged to collocate with water tanks, major power transmission and distribution towers, and other utility structures when in compliance with these guidelines. The Citv must approve collocation applications unless the expansion adds significantly to the height or width of a facility. Monopoles - No new ground-mounted monopoles should be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates no existing monopole, building, or structure can CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 6 of 11 Policy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv 11. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8, 2001 ^Categorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna as required by Application and Review Guideline D.3. Design Guidelines Stealth Design - All aspects of a WCF, including the supports, antennas, screening methods, and equipment should exhibit "stealth" design techniques so they visually blend into the background or the surface on which they are mounted. Subject to City approval, developers should use false architectural elements (e.g., cupolas, bell towers, dormers, and chimneys), architectural treatments (e.g., colors and materials), elements replicating natural features (e.g., trees and rocks), landscaping, and other creative means to hide or disguise WCFs. Stealth can also refer to facilities completely hidden by existing improvements, such as parapet walls. Equipment- Equipment should be located within existing buildings to the extent feasible. If equipment must be located outside, it should be screened with walls and plants. If small outbuildings are constructed specifically to house equipment, they should be designed and treated to match nearby architecture or the surrounding landscape. Collocation - Whenever feasible and appropriate, WCF design and placement should promote and enable collocation. Height - WCFs should adhere to the existing height limitations of the zone in which they are located. Setbacks - WCFs, including all equipment, should adhere to the building setback requirements of the zone in which they are located, with the following clarifications: a. If on a site next to a residential zone, the WCF should be set back from the residential zone boundary a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antenna. b. If in a residential zone and in a public utility installation, park, or community facility, the WCF should be set back from the property boundaries of the utility installation, park, or community facility a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antenna. c. The Planning Commission may decrease or increase these setbacks if it finds such changes would improve the overall compatibility of the WCF based on the factors contained in Application and Review Guideline D.4. Building or Structure-Mounted WCFs: CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 7 of 11 Policy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv I'l, 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 fCateqorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attornoy, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, Filo a. Antennas and their associated mountings should generally not project outward more than 18 inches from the face of the building. b. Roof-mounted antennas should be located as far away as possible from the outer edge of a building or structure and should not be placed on roof peaks. c. If permitted, WCFs on residential buildings should only be allowed if disguised as a typical residential feature (e.g., a chimney, a dormer) and if all equipment is located inside, not outside, the building. 7. Ground-mounted Monopoles: a. All antennas should be mounted as close as possible to the monopole to improve facility appearance. b. The placement, screening, and disguise of the monopole should fit with the surrounding site design, architecture, and landscaping. Tree disguises, such as a "mono-palm," may be acceptable depending on their quality and compatibility with landscaping nearby. c. Landscaping should be provided as necessary to screen, complement, or add realism to a monopole. Landscaping should include mature shrubs and trees. Some of the trees should be tall enough to screen at least three-quarters of the height of the monopole at the time of planting. Sometimes, landscaping may not be needed because of the monopole's location or vegetation already nearby. d. When possible and in compliance with these guidelines, monopoles should be placed next to tall buildings, structures, or tall trees. 8. Lattice Towers a. New lattice towers should not be permitted in the City. b. On existing lattice towers, all antennas should be mounted as close as possible to the tower so they are less noticeable. 9. Undergrounding - AW utilities should be placed underground. 10. Regulatory Compliance - WCFs should comply with all FCC, FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), and local zoning and building code requirements. 11. WCFs in Public Right-of-Way a. Antennas for facilities shall be attached to existing poles (e.g. street lights), substantially similar replacement poles in the same location, or vertical structures already located in the right-of-way. The installation of new poles or vertical structures shall only be permitted if it can be demonstrated that a new pole or structure is essential to providing coverage. b. The antenna assembly may not exceed the height of the existing pole. CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Page 8 of 11 Policy No. 64 Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 Effective Date Julv 11. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 Gonoral Subioct:Categorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attornoy, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File c. The use of an existing pole, replacement pole or other existing vertical structure shall require the authorization of the owner of the pole or structure. If a city street light or other city-owned structure is used, compensation shall be paid to the city as the owner. If a private pole or structure is used, a right-of-way permit shall be obtained from the city. d. Panel antennas shall be vertically mounted to a pole or structure in compliance with any applicable separation requirements and shall not exceed eight-inches in distance from the pole to the front side of the panel. e. No more than four Panel Antennas or two omni-directional Antennas shall be mounted on any utility pole or structure by any one provider. f. Antennas shall be painted to match the color of the surface of the pole on which they are attached or shall othen/vise be screened to reduce their visibility. g. All other equipment associated with the facility shall be placed underground wherever possible. If it can be demonstrated that complete undergrounding of associated equipment is not possible, waiver requests involving landscaping or other screening techniques or visual mitigation will be considered. All equipment not placed underground shall be setback at least 2.5 feet from the back of the curb and within the parkway or greenway or 2.5 feet back from the edge of the sidewalk when it is contiguous to the curb. h. All equipment associated with the facility shall be located so as to minimize impacts to pedestrian access and vehicular site distance and safety. Performance Guidelines 1. Noise - All equipment, such as emergency generators and air conditioners, should be designed and operated consistent with the City noise standards. 2. Maintenance - All facilities, related equipment, and landscaping should be maintained in good condition and free from trash, debris, graffiti, and any form of vandalism. All required landscaping should be automatically irrigated. Damaged equipment and damaged, dead, or decaying landscaping should be replaced promptly. Replacement of landscaping that provides facility screening should be, as much as possible, of similar size (Including height), type, and screening capability at the time of planting as the plant(s) being replaced. 3. Maintenance Hours - Except in an emergency posing an immediate public health and safety threat, maintenance activities in or within 100 feet of a residential zone should only occur between 7 AM (8 AM on Saturdays) and sunset. Maintenance should not take place on Sundays or holidays. 7 CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 9 of 11 Policy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11. 2009 DATED: September 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv 11. 2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 t^Categorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copios to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, Filo 4. Lighting - Security lighting should be kept to a minimum and should only be triggered by a motion detector where practical. 5. Compliance with FCC RF Exposure Guidelines - Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, and with each time extension or amendment request, the developer/operator should submit to the Planning Director either verification that the WCF is categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1) or a project implementation report that provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report should quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with currently accepted ANSI/IEEE standards as specified by the FCC. The Planning Director should review the report for consistency with the project's preliminary proposal report submitted with the initial project application and the accepted ANSI/IEEE standards. If, on review, the Planning Director finds the project does not meet ANSI/IEEE standards, the City may revoke or modify the conditional use permit. 6. Abandonment - Any WCF that is not operated for a continuous period of 180 days will be considered abandoned. Within 90 days of receipt of notice from the City notifying the owner of such abandonment, the WCF owner must remove the facility and restore the site, as much as is reasonable and practical, to its prior condition. If such WCF is not removed within the 90 days, the WCF will be considered a nuisance and in addition to any other available remedy, will be subject to abatement under Chapter 6.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. If there are two or more users of a single WCF, then this provision will not become effective until all users stop using the WCF. The provider or owner must give notice to the City of the intent to discontinue use of any facility before discontinuing the use. Application and Review Guidelines 1. Besides the typical submittal requirements for a conditional use permit (including plans, landscape details, and color and material samples, as appropriate), all WCF applications should include the following items: a. A description of the site selection process undertaken for the WCF proposed. Coverage objectives and the reasons for selecting the proposed site and rejecting other sites should be provided. b. A description or map of the applicant's existing and other proposed sites. c. A description of the wireless system proposed (e.g., cellular, PCS, etc.) and its consumer features (e.g., voice, video, and data transmissions). d. Verification that the proposed WCF will either comply with the FCCs guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields or will be CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Page 10 of 11 Policy No. 64 Date Issued Julv 11. -2009 Effective Date Julv 11. -2009 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 vCateoorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department Heads and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the guidelines per 47 CFR §^ .1307(b)(1). If WCFs are proposed for collocation, the verification must show the total exposure from all facilities taken together meets the FCC guidelines e. Color photo-simulation exhibits, prepared to scale, of the proposed WCF to show what the project would look like at its proposed location and from surrounding viewpoints. The Planning Director may waive the requirement to provide the exhibits if he determines they are unnecessary. For WCFs proposed in a zone or area that is a discouraged WCF location as listed in Location Guideline A.2., the applicant should provide evidence that no location in a preferred zone or area as listed in Location Guideline A.l. can accommodate the applicant's proposed facility. Evidence should document that preferred zone or area locations do not meet engineering, coverage, location, or height requirements, or have other unsuitable limitations. For proposed new ground-mounted monopoles, the applicant should also provide evidence to the City's satisfaction that no existing monopole, building, structure, or WCF site ("existing facility") could accommodate the proposal. Evidence should demonstrate any of the following: a. No existing facility is located within the geographic area or provides the height or structural strength needed to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. b. The applicant's proposed WCF would cause electromagnetic interference with the existing antennae array or vice versa. c. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner to locate on an existing facility or to modify the same to enable location are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new monopole development are presumed to be unreasonable. d. The applicant demonstrates to the Planning Commission's satisfaction that there are other limiting factors that render an existing facility unsuitable. In considering a Conditional Use Permit for a WCF, the Planning Commission should consider the following factors: a. Compliance with these guidelines. b. ' Height and setbacks. c. Proximity to residential uses. d. The nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties. e. Surrounding topography and landscaping. f. Quality and compatibility of design and screening. g. Impacts on public views and the visual quality of the surrounding area. h. Availability of other facilities and buildings for collocation. CITY OF CARLSBAD Page 11 of 11 Policy No. 64 COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Date Issued Julv 11. 2000 DATED: Soptombor 21, 2001 Effective Date Julv 11, 2000 Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Juno 8. 2001 vCateqorv: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Specific Subject: Review and operation guidelines for wireless communication facilities Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attornoy, Dopartmont Heads and Division Hoads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File a.6. Conditional Use Permits for WCFs should be granted for a period not to exceed ten years unless public safety reasons and/or substantial land use reasons, including limitations on the term of use imposed by the owner of the property, justify a shorter term. Upon a request for either an extension or an amendment of a CUP, the WCF should be reevaluated to assess the impact of the facility on adjacent properties, the record of maintenance and performance with reference to the conditions of approval, and consistency with these guidelines. Additionally, the City should review the appropriateness of the existing facility's technology, and the applicant should be required to document that the WCF maintains the technology that is the smallest, most efficient, and least visible and that there are not now more appropriate and available locations for the facility, such as the opportunity to collocate or relocate to an existing building. -Collocation. Collocation of a proposed WCF on an existing WCF may be allowod undor limited circumstances. _For the purposes of collocation, the following definitions apply: (i) "Collocation facility" means the placement or installation of WCFs, including antennas, and related equipment, on or immediately adjacent to, a wireless telecommunications collocation facility. (ii) "Wireless telecommunications facility" means equipment and network emergency power systems that are integral to providing wireless telecommunications services. (iii) "Wireless telecommunications collocation facility" or "WTCF" means a wireless telecommunications facility that includes Collocation facilities. \^a. A conditional use permit shall not be required when thefor a proposed WCF Collocation facility which will be placed on a previously approved WTCF provided that: (i) The new WCF Collocation facility is consistent with requirements for the existing WTCF installation; and (ii) The modification of an existinq wireless tower or base station does not physically change the dimensions of such tower or base station. (4i) The existing WCF Collocation facility (including aesthetic and design critoria) was subject to a conditional use permit issued on or after January 1, 2007 and subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Crb-Approval of an application to construct or reconstruct a WCF wireless facility shall not require an escrow deposit for removal of the WCF Collocation facility or any component thereof. drC-Notwithstanding subsection (c) above, the City may require a performance bond or*- other surety or another form of security if the amount required is rationally related to the cost of removal. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.5" Tab stops: -0.81", List tab + Not at 0.75" "( Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", Hanging: 0.25" Policy No. 64 In Carlsbad, there are three common types of wireless communication systems: Cellular, PCS (Personal Communications Services), and ESMR (Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio). The table below provides the relevant similarities and differences between the three. ATTRIBUTES SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES Cellular ESMR PCS Technology Analog, converting to digital Digital Network Coverage Analog: Established Digital: Developing Developing Frequency 800 MHz 1900 MHz Features Telephone, call waiting, voice mail, caller ID, paging, e-mail, and Internet access (Notes: Analog cellular does not provide all of these features. ESMR also offers dispatching and two-way radio. PCS also has video transmission ability.) Transmission A network of interconnected WCFs carries signals across a city and beyond. Each WCF contains antennas that transmit and receive signals over a small geographic area known as a "cell." As the user travels from one cell to another, the signal is passed from one WCF to another in the next cell. Cell Size Radius Average 5 miles 0-1 mile Antenna Types Dish, Panel (or sector), and Whip Antenna Support Lattice towers, Monopoles, Building or Structure-Attached Supporting Equipment In structures generally under 500 square feet In cabinets about the size of vending machines Provider Verizon, AT&T, Cingular Wireless Nextel Sprint PCS Table Notes • More facilities may be needed to complete a PCS network since its higher operating frequency limits the range of its antennas and consequently the size of its cells. • The antennas for all three systems function on a line of sight transmission. Antennas need to be placed at specific heights in relation to one another in order to transmit and receive signals. As a result, height is a determining factor in the design and location of WCFs. • Monopole antenna supports may be installed on buildings or on the ground. • A single wireless communication facility may consist of two or more antennas and antennas of different types. A facility may also include the antennas and supporting equipment of more than one provider. This is known as "collocation." Collocation also refers to a WCF placed together with utility structures such as water tanks, light standards, and transmission towers. • WCFs are usually unmanned and require maintenance visits once or twice each month. • This table is based on current information that is subject to change. POLICY: REVIEW RESTRICTIONS: The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA) preserves the City's ability to regulate the placement, construction, and modification of wireless communication facilities subject to the following restrictions, as contained in TCA Section 704. Page 2 of9 17 Policy No. 64 • The City may not favor any carrier. Regulations may not unreasonably discriminate among competitive providers. • The City may not prevent completion of a network. Regulations may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless communication services. • Applications are to be processed in a reasonable time. A city must act on an application for WCFs within a "reasonable" amount of time, roughly the same time as for any similar application. • The City cannot deny an application because of perceived radio frequency health hazards. If federal standards are met, cities may not deny permits or leases on the grounds that radio frequency emissions are harmful to the environment or to the health of residents. However, local governments may require wireless carriers to prove compliance with the standards. The FCC has established procedures to enforce compliance with its rules. • The City cannot deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change^ the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. • A decision to deny an application must be supported by substantial evidence. A decision to deny a WCF application must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. HEALTH CONCERNS & SAFEGUARDS: Possible health risks from exposure to the radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields generated by WCFs are a significant community concern. Accordingly, the FCC requires facilities to comply with RF exposure guidelines published in the Code of Federal Regulations (see 47 CFR §1.1307 and 47 CFR §1.1310). The limits of exposure established by the guidelines are designed to protect the public health with a very large margin of safety as they are many times below the levels that generally are accepted as having the potential to cause adverse health effects. Both the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration have endorsed the FCCs exposure limits, and courts have upheld the FCC rules requiring compliance with the limits. Most WCFs create maximum exposures that are only a small fraction of the limits. Furthermore, because the antennas in a PCS, cellular, or other wireless network must be in a line of sight arrangement to effectively transmit, their power is focused on the horizon instead of toward the sky or ground. Generally, unless a person is physically next to and at the same height as an antenna, it is not possible to be exposed to the established limits for RF exposure. ^ The Federal Communications Commission defines a "substantial change" as: • The mounting of a proposed antenna on the tower that would increase the existing height of the tower by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas; or • The mounting of a proposed antenna that would involve adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this paragraph if necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable. Page 3 of9 I? Policy No. 64 The FCC requires providers, upon license application, renewal, or modification, to demonstrate compliance with RF exposure guidelines. Where two or more wireless operators have located their antennas at a common location (called "collocation"), the total exposure from all antennas taken together must be within FCC guidelines. Many facilities are exempt from having to demonstrate compliance with FCC guidelines, however, because their low power generation or height above ground level is highly unlikely to cause exposures that exceed the guidelines. REVIEW AND APPROVAL GUIDEUNES: Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.42.010(16) allows WCFs in all zones with the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) and subject to this policy. These guidelines should be followed in the review of conditional use permits for new wireless facilities as well as extensions and amendments to CUPs for existing installations. A. Location Guidelines For Placement of WCFs 1. Preferred Locations - WCFs are encouraged to locate on existing buildings and structures. In addition, WCFs should locate in the following zones and areas, which are listed in order of descending preference: a. Industrial zones. b. Commercial zones. c. Other non-residential zones, except open space. d. Public right-of-way of roads adjacent to industrial and commercial zones and identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element of the city's General Plan. e. Public property (e.g., city facilities) not in residential areas. f. Major power transmission towers in non-residential zones or areas. g. Public and private utility installations (not publicly accessible) in residential and open space zones (e.g., water tanks, reservoirs, or the existing communication towers near Maerkle Reservoir). h. Parks and community facilities (e.g., places of worship, community centers) in residential zones or areas. i. Public right-of-way of roads adjacent to residential zones and identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element ofthe city's General Plan. 2. Discouraged Locations - WCFs should not locate in any of the following zones or areas unless the applicant demonstrates no feasible alternative exists as required by Application and Review Guideline D.2. a. Open space zones and lots (except as noted in Location Guideline A.l.). b. Residential zones or areas (except as noted in Location Guideline A.l). c. Major power transmission towers in corridors located in/or next to a residential zone or area. d. Environmentally sensitive habitat. e. Public right-of-way of roads not identified on the Circulation Plan contained in the Circulation Element ofthe city's General Plan. f. On vacant land. 3. Visibility to the Public - In all areas, WCFs should locate where least visible to the public and where least disruptive to the appearance of the host property. Furthermore, no WCF Page 4 of 9 1^ Policy No. 64 should be installed on an exposed ridgeline or in a location readily visible from a public place, recreation area, scenic area or residential area unless it is satisfactorily located and/or screened so it is hidden or disguised. 4. Collocation - Collocating with existing or other planned wireless communication facilities is recommended whenever feasible. Service providers are also encouraged to collocate with water tanks, major power transmission and distribution towers, and other utility structures when in compliance with these guidelines. The City must approve collocation applications unless the expansion adds significantly to the height or width of a facility. 5. Monopoles - No new ground-mounted monopoles should be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates no existing monopole, building, or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna as required by Application and Review Guideline D.3. B. Design Guidelines 1. Stealth Design - All aspects of a WCF, including the supports, antennas, screening methods, and equipment should exhibit "stealth" design techniques so they visually blend into the background or the surface on which they are mounted. Subject to City approval, developers should use false architectural elements (e.g., cupolas, bell towers, dormers, and chimneys), architectural treatments (e.g., colors and materials), elements replicating natural features (e.g., trees and rocks), landscaping, and other creative means to hide or disguise WCFs. Stealth can also refer to facilities completely hidden by existing improvements, such as parapet walls. 2. Equipment - Equipment should be located within existing buildings to the extent feasible. If equipment must be located outside, it should be screened with walls and plants. If small outbuildings are constructed specifically to house equipment, they should be designed and treated to match nearby architecture or the surrounding landscape. 3. Collocation - Whenever feasible and appropriate, WCF design and placement should promote and enable collocation. 4. Height - WCFs should adhere to the existing height limitations of the zone in which they are located. 5. Setbacks - WCFs, including all equipment, should adhere to the building setback requirements ofthe zone in which they are located, with the following clarifications: a. If on a site next to a residential zone, the WCF should be set back from the residential zone boundary a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height ofthe antenna. b. If in a residential zone and in a public utility installation, park, or community facility, the WCF should be set back from the property boundaries ofthe utility installation, park, or community facility a minimum distance equal to the above-ground height of the antenna. c. The Planning Commission may decrease or increase these setbacks if it finds such changes would improve the overall compatibility of the WCF based on the factors contained in Application and Review Guideline D.4. Page 5 of9 Policy No. 64 Building or Structure-Mounted WCFs: a. Antennas and their associated mountings should generally not project outward more than 18 inches from the face ofthe building. b. Roof-mounted antennas should be located as far away as possible from the outer edge of a building or structure and should not be placed on roof peaks. c. If permitted, WCFs on residential buildings should only be allowed if disguised as a typical residential feature (e.g., a chimney, a dormer) and if all equipment is located inside, not outside, the building. 7. Ground-mounted Monopoles: a. All antennas should be mounted as close as possible to the monopole to improve facility appearance. b. The placement, screening, and disguise of the monopole should fit with the surrounding site design, architecture, and landscaping. Tree disguises, such as a "mono-palm," may be acceptable depending on their quality and compatibility with landscaping nearby. c. Landscaping should be provided as necessary to screen, complement, or add realism to a monopole. Landscaping should include mature shrubs and trees. Some of the trees should be tall enough to screen at least three-quarters of the height of the monopole at the time of planting. Sometimes, landscaping may not be needed because of the monopole's location or vegetation already nearby. d. When possible and in compliance with these guidelines, monopoles should be placed next to tall buildings, structures, or tall trees. 8. Lattice Towers a. New lattice towers should not be permitted in the City. b. On existing lattice towers, all antennas should be mounted as close as possible to the tower so they are less noticeable. 9. Undergrounding - All utilities should be placed underground. 10. Regulatory Compliance - WCFs should comply with all FCC, FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), and local zoning and building code requirements. 11. WCFs in Public Right-of-Way a. Antennas for facilities shall be attached to existing poles (e.g. street lights), substantially similar replacement poles in the same location, or vertical structures already located in the right-of-way. The installation of new poles or vertical structures shall only be permitted if it can be demonstrated that a new pole or structure is essential to providing coverage. b. The antenna assembly may not exceed the height of the existing pole. c. The use of an existing pole, replacement pole or other existing vertical structure shall require the authorization of the owner of the pole or structure. If a city street light or other city-owned structure is used, compensation shall be paid to the city as the owner. If a private pole or structure is used, a right-of-way permit shall be obtained from the city. d. Panel antennas shall be vertically mounted to a pole or structure in compliance with any applicable separation requirements and shall not exceed eight-inches in distance from Page 6 of 9 Policy No. 64 the pole to the front side of the panel. e. No more than four Panel Antennas or two omni-directional Antennas shall be mounted on any utility pole or structure by any one provider. f. Antennas shall be painted to match the color of the surface of the pole on which they are attached or shall otherwise be screened to reduce their visibility. g. All other equipment associated with the facility shall be placed underground wherever possible. If it can be demonstrated that complete undergrounding of associated equipment is not possible, waiver requests involving landscaping or other screening techniques or visual mitigation will be considered. All equipment not placed underground shall be setback at least 2.5 feet from the back of the curb and within the parkway or greenway or 2.5 feet back from the edge of the sidewalk when it is contiguous to the curb. h. All equipment associated with the facility shall be located so as to minimize impacts to pedestrian access and vehicular site distance and safety. C. Performance Guidelines 1. Noise - All equipment, such as emergency generators and air conditioners, should be designed and operated consistent with the City noise standards. 2. Maintenance - All facilities, related equipment, and landscaping should be maintained in good condition and free from trash, debris, graffiti, and any form of vandalism. All required landscaping should be automatically irrigated. Damaged equipment and damaged, dead, or decaying landscaping should be replaced promptly. Replacement of landscaping that provides facility screening should be, as much as possible, of similar size (including height), type, and screening capability at the time of planting as the plant(s) being replaced. 3. Maintenance Hours - Except in an emergency posing an immediate public health and safety threat, maintenance activities in or within 100 feet of a residential zone should only occur between 7 AM (8 AM on Saturdays) and sunset. Maintenance should not take place on Sundays or holidays. 4. Lighting - Security lighting should be kept to a minimum and should only be triggered by a motion detector where practical. 5. Compliance with FCC RF Exposure Guidelines - Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, and with each time extension or amendment request, the developer/operator should submit to the Planning Director either verification that the WCF is categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(l) or a project implementation report that provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report should quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with currently accepted ANSI/IEEE standards as specified by the FCC. The Planning Director should review the report for consistency with the project's preliminary proposal report submitted with the initial project application and the accepted ANSI/IEEE standards. If, on review, the Planning Director finds the project does not meet ANSI/IEEE standards, the City may revoke or modify the conditional use permit. Page 7 of9 Policy No. 64 6. Abandonment - Any WCF that is not operated for a continuous period of 180 days will be considered abandoned. Within 90 days of receipt of notice from the City notifying the owner of such abandonment, the WCF owner must remove the facility and restore the site, as much as is reasonable and practical, to its prior condition. If such WCF is not removed within the 90 days, the WCF will be considered a nuisance and in addition to any other available remedy, will be subject to abatement under Chapter 6.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. If there are two or more users of a single WCF, then this provision will not become effective until all users stop using the WCF. The provider or owner must give notice to the City of the intent to discontinue use of any facility before discontinuing the use. D. Application and Review Guidelines 1. Besides the typical submittal requirements for a conditional use permit (including plans, landscape details, and color and material samples, as appropriate), all WCF applications should include the following items: a. A description of the site selection process undertaken for the WCF proposed. Coverage objectives and the reasons for selecting the proposed site and rejecting other sites should be provided. b. A description or map of the applicant's existing and other proposed sites. c. A description of the wireless system proposed (e.g., cellular, PCS, etc.) and its consumer features (e.g., voice, video, and data transmissions). d. Verification that the proposed WCF will either comply with the FCCs guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields or will be categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1). If WCFs are proposed for collocation, the verification must show the total exposure from all facilities taken together meets the FCC guidelines e. Color photo-simulation exhibits, prepared to scale, of the proposed WCF to show what the project would look like at its proposed location and from surrounding viewpoints. The Planning Director may waive the requirement to provide the exhibits if he determines they are unnecessary. 2. For WCFs proposed in a zone or area that is a discouraged WCF location as listed in Location Guideline A.2., the applicant should provide evidence that no location in a preferred zone or area as listed in Location Guideline A.l. can accommodate the applicant's proposed facility. Evidence should document that preferred zone or area locations do not meet engineering, coverage, location, or height requirements, or have other unsuitable limitations. 3. For proposed new ground-mounted monopoles, the applicant should also provide evidence to the City's satisfaction that no existing monopole, building, structure, or WCF site ("existing facility") could accommodate the proposal. Evidence should demonstrate any of the following: a. No existing facility is located within the geographic area or provides the height or structural strength needed to meet the applicant's engineering requirements. b. The applicant's proposed WCF would cause electromagnetic interference with the existing antennae array or vice versa. c. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner to locate on an existing facility or to modify the same to enable location are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new monopole development are presumed to be unreasonable. Page 8 of9 9d Policy No. 64 d. The applicant demonstrates to the Planning Commission's satisfaction that there are other limiting factors that render an existing facility unsuitable. 4. In considering a Conditional Use Permit for a WCF, the Planning Commission should consider the following factors: a. Compliance with these guidelines. b. Height and setbacks. c. Proximity to residential uses. d. The nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties. e. Surrounding topography and landscaping. f. Quality and compatibility of design and screening. g. Impacts on public views and the visual quality of the surrounding area. h. Availability of other facilities and buildings for collocation. 5. Conditional Use Permits for WCFs should be granted for a period not to exceed ten years unless public safety reasons and/or substantial land use reasons, including limitations on the term of use imposed by the owner of the property, justify a shorter term. Upon a request for either an extension or an amendment of a CUP, the WCF should be reevaluated to assess the impact of the facility on adjacent properties, the record of maintenance and performance with reference to the conditions of approval, and consistency with these guidelines. Additionally, the City should review the appropriateness ofthe existing facility's technology, and the applicant should be required to document that the WCF maintains the technology that is the smallest, most efficient, and least visible and that there are not now more appropriate and available locations for the facility, such as the opportunity to collocate or relocate to an existing building. 6. Collocation. For the purposes of collocation, the following definitions apply: (i) "Collocation facility" means the placement or installation of WCFs, including antennas, and related equipment, on or imhiediately adjacent to, a wireless telecommunications collocation facility. (ii) "Wireless telecommunications facility" means equipment and network emergency power systems that are integral to providing wireless telecommunications services. (iii) "Wireless telecommunications collocation facility" or "WTCF" means a wireless telecommunications facility that includes Collocation facilities. a. A conditional use permit shall not be required for a proposed WCF Collocation facility which will be placed on a previously approved WTCF provided that: (i) The new WCF Collocation facility is consistent with requirements for the existing WTCF installation; and (ii) The modification of an existing wireless tower or base station does not physically change the dimensions of such tower or base station. b. Approval of an application to construct or reconstruct a WCF wireless facility shall not require an escrow deposit for removal of the WCF Collocation facility or any component thereof. c. Notwithstanding subsection (c) above, the City may require a performance bond or other surety or another form of security if the amount required is rationally related to the cost of removal. Page 9 of9