Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-12-04; City Council; 21064; Palomar Place Retail Center CUP 12-08 CDP 12-14CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL AB# MTG. DEPT 21,064 12/4/12 CED PALOIVIAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 DEPT DIRECTOR^ CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council hold a public hearing and ADOPT Resolution No. 2012-265 APPROVING Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit No. CDP 12-14 to allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the construction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commercial building on a 1.75- acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello II Segment ofthe Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. ITEM EXPLANATION: Project Application(s) Administrative Approvals Planning Commission City Council SDP 90-05(G) X CUP 12-08 RA X CDP 12-14 RA X RA = Recommended Approval X = Final City decision-making authority ^ = requires Coastal Commission approval On November 7, 2012, the Planning Commission recommended approval (4-2-1, L'Heureux and Scully opposed; Nygaard absent) of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit No. CDP 12-14 to allow for an expansion and remodel to an existing commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the construction of a new freestanding commercial building on a property located within the Costco shopping center. The Planning Commission also approved a Site Development Plan Amendment to accept the site plan for the proposed Palomar Place Retail Center. At the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant and co-owner, Mr. Nick Foussianes, provided a brief presentation on his professional background in development and provided examples of prior development projects he had worked on. No testimony was received in opposition to the project. A significant portion of the Planning Commission discussion focused on the proposed alternative architectural design which requires City Council approval pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Chapter 21.208, the CommercialA/isitor-Serving Overlay Zone. The Planning Commission generally had concerns about the quality of the architecture. In addition. Commissioner Scully had concerns regarding traffic generated by the project as well as traffic circulation within the Costco shopping center. Ultimately, the project was approved with the addition of a condition to the CUP to enhance the architectural design through a number of material upgrades and/or color changes prior to issuance of the building permit. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Shannon Werneke 760-602-4621; Shannon.Werneke@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. % COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC • DENIED • CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN • CONTINUED • RETURNED TO STAFF • WITHDRAWN • OTHER-SEE MINUTES • AMENDED • Page 2 A full disclosure of the Planning Commission's actions, including the additional CUP condition, and a complete project description and staff analysis of the proposed project are included in the attached minutes and Planning Commission staff report. The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit. FISCAL IMPACT: All public infrastructure required for this project will be funded and/or constructed by the developer. No fiscal impacts to the City have been identified. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the Zoning Ordinance, the project site is within the city limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2012-265 2. Location Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6921, 6922, and 6923 4. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated November 7, 2012 5. Excerpts of Draft Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 7, 2012. 6. Correspondence from Citizens EXHIBIT 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-265 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE 3 PERMIT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A 2,816 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 4 5,263 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING FORMERLY OCCUPIED BY PAT & OSCARS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF 5 A 7,261 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A 1.75-ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE 6 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND ARMADA DRIVE, WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE 7 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. 8 CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER CASE NO: CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 9 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 10 follows: 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 12 Commission did, on November 7, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 13 to consider Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14 14 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6922 and 6923, recommending approval of 1^ Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14; and 16 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the ^th day of 1'7 December , 2012, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider adoption of a Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors relating to the adoption of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 23 of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 24 25 „ 2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of 26 a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 12-08) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 12-14) is adopted and approved, and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission 27 contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6922 and 6923 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions ofthe City Council. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 4*^ day of December, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Hall, Kulchin, Blackburn, Douglas and Packard. None. None. MATT HALL, Mayor ATTEST: LORRAINE M (SEAL) D, City Clerk 0 EXHIBIT 2 SITE MAP N NOT TO SCALE Palomar Place Retail Center CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 5 EXHIBIT 3 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6921 3 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT SDP 90-05 (G) TO 4 ALLOW FOR A 2,816 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 5,263 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING 5 FORMERLY OCCUPIED BY PAT & OSCAR'S AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,621 SQUARE FOOT 6 FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A 1.75- ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE 7 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND ARMADA DRIVE WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT ^ OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER 10 CASE NO.: SDP 90-05(G) 9 23 24 25 26 27 28 ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Development 11 WHEREAS, MERI Palomar Place, LLC, "Developer," has filed a verified 12 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Oscar's Carlsbad, LLC, 13 "Owner," described as 14 Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 17542 in the City of Carlsbad, County 15 of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 27,1995 16 17 18 1^ Plan Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "I" dated November 7, 2012, on file in the 20 Planning Division, PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - SDP 90-05(G) as provided by 21 Chapter 21.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on November 7, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Site Development Plan Amendment. 6 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 3 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 4 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 5 Commission APPROVES PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - SDP 90-05(G) based on the following findings and subject to the following 6 conditions: 7 Findings: ^ 1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental ^ settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, will not be detrimentail to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which 10 the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that: 11 a. The request use is necessary and desirable for the development of the 12 community in that the retail and restaurants will provide a service for the residential, tourist and business communities; 13 b. The project is in harmony with various elements and objectives of the General ^4 Plan in that the Regional Commercial (R) land use designation encourages convenient services that may be associated with a regional commercial center such as the existing Costco shopping center; ^ ^ c. The project is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in 17 the zone in that the proposal does not produce any on-site parking or circulation impacts to the Costco center and the project is consistent with the development 18 standards of the General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zones which ensures the project's 19 compatibility with the community; and 20 d. The project will not adversely impact the traffic circulation in that the parking 21 lot has been designed to align with the circulation pattern of the Costco center. In addition, the proposed project will generate less traffic (1,056 ADT) than the 22 previous restaurant use (1,128 ADT) and will not impact the levels of service of the surrounding roadways and key intersections to an unacceptable leveL 23 That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, 24 in that the 1.75-acre site can accommodate the proposed retail center without disrupting the existing internal circulation of the shopping center, encroaching into 25 the required setbacks, or reducing the parking below that which is required by the Zoning Ordinance. 26 ^ 3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be 2g provided and maintained, in that the project complies with all development standards PC RESO NO. 6921 -2- H 1 required by the General Commercial, Qualified Development (C-2-Q) and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zones, the roof equipment has been 2 adequately screened from public view, and adequate landscape buffers have been ^ provided around the building and parking lot. ^ 4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the traffic impacts of the proposed retail center, 5 1,056 ADT, are less than the previous restaurant use which generated 1,128 ADT, and will not impact the levels of service of the surrounding roadways and key 6 intersections to an unacceptable level. 7 5. The project is consistent with the adopted McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP adopted January 25, 2010, amended March 4, 2010) in that: 8 ^ a. The project site is located within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise exposure range per Exhibit III-l - Compatibility Policy Map: Noise. Pursuant to Table III-l, the 10 proposed retail and restaurant uses are considered to be compatible uses within this range; 11 b. The project site is not located within a Safety Zone per Exhibit III-2 12 Compatibility Policy Map: Safety; therefore, there are no restrictions with respect to the use or floor area; 13 j4 c. The project site is located within the 481' MSL horizontal surface elevation contour of Exhibit III-3 - Compatibility Policy Map: Part 77 Airspace 15 Protection. The proposed finished floor elevation of each of the buildings, 78.5' and 79.98' above MSL, will not penetrate the 481' MSL horizontal surface 16 elevation contour of the Part 77 Airspace Protection Map; 17 d. The project site is located within the Overflight Notiflcation Area per Exhibit III-4 - Compatibility Policy Map. However, as the proposed land use is nonresidential, the recordation of an overflight notification document is not 18 required; 20 ^- The project site is located outside of the Avigation Easement Area but within the Overflight Notiflcation Area per Exhibit III-6 - Compatibility Policy Map. 21 However, as indicated in 5(d) above, as the proposed land use is nonresidential, the recordation of an overflight notification document is not required; 22 f. The project site is located within Review Area #1 of the Airport Influence Area per Exhibit III-5 - Compatibility Policy Map: Airport Influence Area. Review 24 Area 1 of the Airport Influence Area consists of locations where noise and/or safety concerns may necessitate limitations on the types of allowable land uses. 25 In addition, Review Area 1 encompasses locations exposed to aircraft noise levels of 60 dB CNEL or greater. As discussed above in subsections a-d, the proposed 26 indoor and outdoor uses are considered compatible and no restrictions or special requirements are required; and 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 -3- 1 g. As the proposed project does not involve a change in land use designation or zoning, no additional review for consistency with the ALUCP is required. 2 6. That the City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the 4 environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt fi'om the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332, Infill Development 5 Projects, of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do 6 not apply to this project. 7 7. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 and all City public policies and ordinances. The ^ project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; 10 govemment administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, 11 The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be 12 collected prior to the issuance of building permit. ^3 b. The Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 5 is required by Carlsbad Municipal 9 14 22 26 Code Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit. c. A growth management fee of $0.40 per square foot of non-residential development will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will be used to 15 construct recreational facilities to offset demand created by employees within Local Facilities Management Zone 5. 17 8. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient 18 Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50). 19 9. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed 20 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 2 J degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 23 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. 24 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be 25 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all 27 future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the 28 property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said PC RESO NO. 6921 -4- Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 1 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Site Development Plan 2 Amendment. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections 4 and modifications to the Site Development Plan Amendment documents, as necessary to make them intemally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. 5 Development shall occur substantially as shown on tiie approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 6 3. 7 4. If any condition for constmction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment ^ of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Govemment Code 10 Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies 11 with all requirements of law. ^2 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims j4 and costs, including court costs and attomey's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectiy, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Site Development Plan 15 Amendment, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and 16 (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the ^7 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 19 6. Developer shall submit to the Planning Division a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of 20 the Site Plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. 21 7. Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plancheck, a reduced legible version of all approving resolution(s) in a 24" x 36" blueline drawing 22 format (including any applicable Coastal Commission approvals). 23 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, tiie Developer shall provide proof to the City 24 Planner from the School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 25 9. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required 26 as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including, but not limited to the 27 following: 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 10 26 13. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 1 a. A growth management park fee of 40 cents per square foot of non-residential development required by Local Facilities Management Plan 5 will be collected 2 at the time of building permit issuance. This fee will be used to construct recreational facilities to offset demand created by employees within Local Facilities Management Zone 5. 4 10. Approval of SDP 90-05(G) supplements the approvals of SDP 90-05, SDP 90-05(A), 5 SDP 90-05(B), SDP 90-05(C), SDP 90-05(D), SDP 90-05(E), and SDP 90-05(F). All conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3209, 3913, 4065, 6 4143, 4454, 4792, and 4781, dated April 3, 1991; April 3, 1996; March 19, 1997; August 6,1997; January 20,1999; July 19,2000 and June 7,2000, respectively, shall 7 remain in effect except as modifled herein. g 11. Any internal or external illumination of the tower shall be on a timer such that the g lighting is turned off at 10:00 p.m. 10 12. This approval is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14 and is subject to all conditions contained 11 in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6922 and 6923 for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. 12 I 13 14 I 14. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing 15 water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 16 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 17 15. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy 18 #17, the License Tax on new constmction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable 2Q Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 5, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this 21 approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 22 16. Prior to the issuance of the building permit. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is 23 to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad 24 has issued a Site Development Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit by Resolutions No. 6921,6922, and 6923 on the property. 25 Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City 27 Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or 28 successor in interest. PC RESO NO. 6921 -6- jj 3 1 17. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and 2 the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall constmct and install all landscaping and irrigation as shown on the approved Final Plans. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All irrigation systems 4 shall be maintained to provide the optimum amount of water to the landscape for plant growth without causing soil erosion and mnoff. 5 18. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the 6 landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 7 19. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in g substance as provided in Building Department Policy No, 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the City Planner. 10 20. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief 11 When so required, the Developer shall submit and obtain approval of the Fire Chief and the City Planner of an Outdoor Storage Plan, and thereafter comply with the approved plan. Engineering: 12 13 14 Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the 15 approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. 16 17 18 General 21. Prior to hauling dirt or constmction materials to or from any proposed constmction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer 2 g for the proposed haul route. 20 22. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has 21 determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 22 2^ 23. Developer shall submit to the city planner, a reproducible 24" x 36" mylar copy of the site plan and conceptual grading/drainage plan, reflecting the conditions approved by the 24 final decision making body. The reproducible shall be submitted to the city planner, reviewed and, if acceptable, signed by the city's project engineer and project planner 25 prior to submittal of the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever occurs first. 26 " 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 1 Fees/Agreements 2 24. Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement. Grading 3 4 5 25. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the 6 site plan, a minor grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall process grading plans via the building permit process. Technical studies/reports may be required subject to the city engineer's review. Developer shall pay all applicable grading plan check and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule. g 26. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include 10 but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during constmction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and 11 educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or 12 stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall J ^ notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. j4 27. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, 15 developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by 16 the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 17 28. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), 20 latest version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to 21 ensure that mnoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc.) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable 22 SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 23 29. Developer is responsible to ensure that all fmal design plans (grading plans, improvement 24 plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design, treatment control BMP, applicable hydromodification measures, and Low Impact Design 25 (LID) facilities. 26 30. Developer shall submit documentation, subject to city engineer approval, demonstrating how this project complies with hydromodification requirements per the city's SUSMP, 27 latest version. Documentation shall be included within the Storm Water Management . _ Plan (SWMP). 2o PC RESO NO. 6921 -8-5 1 Utilities 3 33. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public facilities. 2 31. Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by 4 public water mains to the satisfaction of the district engineer. 5 32. Developer shall design and constmct public facilities within public right-of-way or within minimum 20-foot wide easements granted to the district or the City of Carlsbad. 6 At the discretion of the district or city engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes. 8 9 34. The developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a 10 source and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the district engineer. 11 35. Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at ^2 locations approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be J ^ reflected on public improvement plans. 24 36. The developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 15 " 16 17 18 Fire: 37. Automatic fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system are required. Code Reminders: 2^ The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 20 38. Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 21 20.08.050 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code. 22 39. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the 2^ Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 24 40. The project shall comply with the latest nonresidential disabled access requirements 25 pursuant to Title 24 of the Califomia Building Code. 26 41. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 If 12 1 42. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily 2 Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the site plan are for ^ planning purposes only. 4 NOTICE 5 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as ^ "fees/exactions.' 7 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If g you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Govemment Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for 9 processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or 10 annul their imposition. ^ ^ You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this 13 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise 14 expired. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 -10-15 1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on November 7, 2012, by the following 3 vote, to wit: 4 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Amold, Black and 5 Siekmann 6 NOES: Commissioners L'Heureux and Scully 7 ABSENT: Commissioner Nygaard 8 9 10 ABSTAIN: 11 MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 12 13 14 15 ATTEST: QL/t DON NEU 16 City Planner 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6921 -11- . 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6922 3 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 12-08 TO 4 ALLOW FOR A 2,816 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 5,263 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING 5 FORMERLY OCCUPIED BY PAT & OSCAR'S AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,621 SQUARE FOOT 6 FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A 1.75- ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE 7 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND ARMADA DRIVE WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER 10 CASE NO.: CUP 12-08 11 WHEREAS, MERI Palomar Place, LLC, "Developer," has filed a verified 12 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Oscar's Carlsbad, LLC, 13 "Owner," described as 14 Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 17542 in the City of Carlsbad, County 15 of San Diego, State of California, flled in the Offlce of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 27,1995 23 24 25 26 27 28 ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use 16 17 18 29 Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - "I" (project plans) and Exhibit "AA" - "QQ" (amended 20 comprehensive sign program) dated November 7, 2012, on file in the Planning Division, 21 PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER- CUP 12-08, as provided by Chapter 21.42 and 22 21.208 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on November 7, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the CUP. 17 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 3 A) That the foregoing recitations are tme and correct. 4 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Conimission 5 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - CUP 12-08, based on the following findings and subject to the following 6 conditions: 22 27 28 Findings: 7 g 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, g and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan and the certified Local Coastal Program, in that the proposed commercial retail center with up 10 to two restaurants is a permitted use within the General Commercial- Qualifled Development Overlay (C-2-Q) and the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zones 11 and will provide goods or services for tourists, residents, and employees of the surrounding businesses and industrial centers. 12 2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the project site has been 24 designed to accommodate all parking, which includes the provision to use a total of 16 parking spaces within the adjacent Costco parking lot. In addition, no additional 15 trafflc is generated, and the project provides for adequate trafflc circulation and is appropriately aligned with existing circulation patterns within the Costco parking 16 lot. Furthermore, to ensure compatibility of the project with the surrounding community, all of the required development standards of the C-2-Q and ^7 Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay zones have been incorporated into the project design. 29 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, 20 landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner, planning commission or city council, in order to integrate the use with other 21 uses in the neighborhood, in that in that the project flts within the 1.75-acre parcel without the need for any development standard modiflcations. Furthermore, the project complies with all of the required development standards and parking 2^ requirements of the C-2-Q Zone and the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CVSOZ) in that, adequate building and landscape setbacks have been provided; 24 the trash enclosure is screened with landscaping and walls; the roof-mounted mechanical equipment is screened from public view; project access points for 25 ingress and egress of the site are aligned with other surrounding driveways to integrate the proposed uses with other uses in the adjacent Costco shopping center; 26 and the proposed comprehensive sign program is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, including the speciflc standards of the CVSOZ. PC RESO NO. 6922 |2 1 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the proposed project generates less traffic than 2 the previous restaurant use. Pursuant to the previous traffic study prepared for Pat & Oscar's, the project did not reduce the level of service of the surrounding roadways and key intersections to an unacceptable level In addition, it was 4 determined that the existing street system was adequate to handle the 1,128 ADTs generated by the Pat & Oscar's restaurant. As the proposed retail center will 5 generate 1,056 ADTs, which is less than the prior restaurant use, the existing street system is adequate to handle the traffic generated by the proposed use. 3 18 22 23 28 Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone Findings: 5. That the proposed project is adequately designed to accommodate the high percentage of ^ visitor, tourist, and shuttle/bus altemative transportation users anticipated given the 9 proposed use and site location within the overlay zone in that the onsite circulation system has been adequately designed to accommodate the flow of trafflc without 10 creating conflicts between uses. The project, in conjunction with a recorded agreement between the subject property and the Costco property, provides the 11 required number of parking spaces to accommodate the proposed uses. Pedestrian circulation will be provided between the existing vacant building (formerly Pat <& 12 Oscars) and the proposed retail commercial building within the project area and connects with an existing sidewalk which ties in with Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive to the north. 14 6. That the building form, building colors, and building materials combine to provide an 15 architectural style of development that will add to the objective of high quality architecture and building design within the overlay zone in that the buildings have been 16 designed with an alternative contemporary architectural design. The proposed buildings represent a high quality of architectural design through their use of varied 17 building forms, high quality building materials, and decorative architectural elements. This combination of architectural elements creates a project that is complementary to the surrounding development, and adds to the objective of high 29 quality architecture and building design within the overlay zone. 20 7. That the project complies with all development and design criteria of the overlay zone, in that the project meets or exceeds all of the development and design criteria of the 21 overlay zone including, but not limited to parking, screening, building height, building setbacks, building design, and landscaping. That the amended comprehensive sign program is consistent with the overlay zone and CMC Chapter 21.41 in that the wall and monument signage does not exceed the area 24 allocations, maximum height and locational requirements. 25 9. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50). 26 10. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer 27 contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed PC RESO NO. 6922 -3- | C| 9 Conditions; Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 2 3 4 5 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be 6 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 7 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy ^ issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer 2Q or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 11 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Conditional Use Permit documents, as necessary to make them 12 intemally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, 1 ^ different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 14 Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and 2 5 regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 16 4. If any condition for constmction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project 17 are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Govemment Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be 1 ^ invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies Q with all requirements of law. 1 y 20 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and 21 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attomey's fees incurred by the City arising, directly 22 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Conditional Use Permit, CUP 12-08, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether 2^ discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and 2^ (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 25 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's 26 approval is not validated. 27 28 .. PC RESO NO. 6922 -4- g^O 1 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to 2 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. ^ 7. This approval is granted subject to the approval of SDP 90-05 (G) and CDP 12-14 and is 4 subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6921 and 6923 for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. 5 8. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this 6 project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 8 13 7 9. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the 9 time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 10 10. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council PoHcy 11 #17, the License Tax on new constmction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by 12 Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 5, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this 24 approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 15 11. Prior to the issuance of the CUP 12-08, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to 16 be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad 17 has issued a Conditional Use Permit by Resolution No. 6922 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or 29 restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates 20 said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. 21 12. CUP 12-08 shall be reviewed by the City Planner annually to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect 22 on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general welfare. If the City Planner determines that: 1) the Conditional Use Permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval was granted is not being 24 exercised; or 3) the Conditional Use Permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval or the conditions of approval have 25 not been met; or 4) the use for which such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 5) the use is in violation of any statute, 26 ordinance, law or regulation; or 6) the use permitted by the Conditional Use Permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare 27 or so as to constitute a nuisance, the City Planner shall recommend that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing and after providing the permittee the opportunity to be 18 23 28 PC RESO NO. 6922 3^1 1 heard, the Planning Commission may revoke and terminate the Conditional Use Permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the Conditional Use Permit, modify the conditions or impose 2 new conditions. 3 13. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of 10 years from November 7, 2012 4 through November 6, 2022. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land 5 uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 10 years 6 upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it finds 7 that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses Or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with 9 conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. 10 14. The amendment to the comprehensive sign program, PS 99-46(A), is approved 11 pursuant to Exhibits "AA" - "QQ". 12 15. The building architecture and the materials shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Planner to incorporate the following prior to the issuance of a building permit: 8 13 24 a. Utilize a warmer tone for exterior wood surfaces similar to the Westfield UTC project "Newsstand" tenant space; 15 b. The color of window muUions/storefront metal surfaces shall be revised to a lighter color; and 16 c. Travertine shall be utilized above storefront columns. 26 NOTICE 17 18 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, 19 dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." 20 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Govemment Code Section 22 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely 23 follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. 24 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions 25 DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a 27 NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 28 PC RESO NO. 6922 -6- 1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on November 7, 2012 by the following 3 vote, to wit: 4 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Amold, Black and 5 Siekmann 6 NOES: Commissioners L'Heureux and Scully 7 ABSENT: Commissioner Nygaard ABSTAIN: 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson 12 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 0^ 13 14 15 16 DON NEU 17 City Planner 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6922 -7- ^3 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6923 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 12- 4 14 TO ALLOW FOR A 2,816 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO . AN EXISTING 5,263 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCL\L BUILDING FORMERLY OCCUPIED BY PAT & OSCAR'S 6 AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,621 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A 1.75- 7 ACRE PARCEL GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD ^ AND ARMADA DRIVE WITHIN THE MELLO ll SEGMENT 9 OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5. 10 CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER CASE NO.: CDP 12-14 11 22 WHEREAS, MERI Palomar Place, LLC, "Developer," has filed a verified 13 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Oscar's Carlsbad, LLC, 14 "Owner," described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 17542 in the City of Carlsbad, County 16 of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 27,1995 17 ("the Property"); and 2 9 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal 20 Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - "I" dated November 7, 2012, on file in the 21 Planning Department, PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - CDP 12-14 as provided by 22 Chapter 21.201.040 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 23 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on November 7, 2012, hold a duly 24 2^ noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 25 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 27 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 28 relating to the CDP. 12 15 23 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are tme and correct. - B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER- 6 CDP 12-14, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 7 " 8 Findings: 9 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) and all applicable policies in that the proposed 10 retail shopping center is consistent with the LCP Land Use Plan which designates the site Regional Commercial (R) and encourages convenient services that may be 11 associated with a regional commercial center such as the existing Costco shopping center. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding commercial and offices uses in the neighborhood. Furthermore, no agricultural activities, sensitive 13 resources, geological instability, flood hazard, or coastal access opportunities exist onsite, and the retail center does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from 14 public lands or public right-of-way nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone as the project site is located at an elevation which is substantially lower than Palomar Airport Road (i.e. 12 feet); therefore, the coastline is not visible from 25 the adjacent right-of-way. 17 2. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the property is not located adjacent to the shoreline. 18 Therefore, the project will not interfere with the public's right to physical access to the ocean and the site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. 19 3. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21,203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the 21 City's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), and Jurisdictional Urban 22 Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil erosion. Furthermore, no steep slopes will be affected by the project, and no native vegetation is located in the development envelope for the 24 proposed retail center. In addition, the project site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction. 25 4. The project is not located in the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, according to Map X 26 of the Land Use Plan, certified September 1990 and Agricultural Mitigation Fees are not required in accordance with the provisions of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zoning Ordinance). PC RESO NO, 6923 9sS " The project is not located between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and 2 therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204 of the Zoning Ordinance). 3 6. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient 4 Landscape Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50). ^ 7. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer ^ contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 7 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 8 Conditions: 9 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a 10 building permit. 11 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so ^2 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to 22 revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy 14 issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said 15 conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer . , or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Coastal Development Permit. 16 17 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make 18 them intemally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 20 Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and 21 regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 22 4. If any conditions for constmction of any public improvements or facilities, or the 23 payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Govemment Code 24 Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies 25 with all requirements of law. 5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold 27 harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims 28 and costs, including court costs and attomey's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Coastal Development Permit, PC RESO NO. 6923 -3- (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or 2 nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, 3 including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation 4 survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's ^ approval is not validated. 6 6. This approval is granted subject to the approval of SDP 90-05(G) and CUP 12-08 and is subject to all conditions contained in Resolutions No. 6921 and 6922 for those other 7 approvals incorporated herein by reference. g The applicant shall apply for and be issued building permits for the addition within 24 9 months of approval or this coastal development permit will expire unless extended pursuant to Section 21.201.210 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 10 11 NOTICE 12 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions. 14 You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If 15 you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Govemment Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for 16 processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely J ^ follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. 18 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions 19 DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this 20 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a 22 NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 22 " 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6923 -4-^7 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on November 7, 2012, by the following vote, to wit: ^ AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Amold, Black, and Siekmann NOES: Commissioners L'Heureux and Scully ABSENT: Commissioner Nygaard ABSTAIN: 6 7 8 9 10 11 ^ ^ MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson 13 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 14 15 16 17 DON NEU City Planner 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6923 -5- ^ The Gity of Carlsbad Planning Department EXHIBIT 4 A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: November 7, 2012 Application complete date: Project Planner; Project Engineer: September 28, 2012 Shannon Wemeke Frank Jimeno SUBJECT: SDP 90-05(GVCUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - Request for approval of a Site Development Plan Amendment and a recommendation of approval for a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the constmction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commercial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located on the southwest comer of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6921 APPROVING Site Development Plan Amendment SDP 90-05(G) and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6922 and 6923 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the constmction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commercial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located within the Costco shopping center in the General Commercial and Qualified Development Overlay Zone (C-2-Q) as well as the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CVSOZ). Because a Site Development Plan (SDP) and a number of subsequent amendments were approved in conjunction with the development of the Costco shopping center and the subject parcel, an additional amendment to the SDP is required. The SDP amendment requires approval by the Planning Commission. In addition, as the property is located within the CVSOZ, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for the proposed restaurant and retail uses. Finally, the project's location within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program requires the processing and approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). Both the CUP and CDP require approval by the City Council. Findings required to approve the Site Development Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit can be made and the project is consistent with the General Plan, relevant Local Coastal Program (LCP) policies, as well as the applicable zoning regulations of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The staff recommendation for approval with conditions is supported by the following analysis. SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7,2012 PAGE 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The subject parcel is located within the northeast portion of the Costco shopping center at the southwest comer of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive. The site is bounded on tiie north by a 50-foot-wide section of the Costco property which abuts Palomar Airport Road, on the south by the Costco gas station, on the east by the entrance driveway for the shopping center and open space beyond, and on the west by the Costco building and associated parking lot. The subject property has a General Plan Land Use designation of Regional Commercial (R) and a zoning designation of General Commercial (C-2). In addition, the project site is also located within the Qualified Development and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay zones. On May 7, 1991, the City Council approved several discretionary permits, including a Site Development Plan, for the development of the Costco center (SDP 90-05), At the time that SDP 90-05 was approved for the center, it was envisioned that the subject 1.75-acre site located at the northeast comer of the shopping center would be developed with a 5,000 square foot retail building. A number of amendments to the SDP for the Costco center (i.e., SDP 90-05(A) through SDP 90-05(F)) have been approved since 1991, including an amendment for the constmction of the gas station. In June, 2000, the Planning Commission approved SDP 90-05(F) for the constmction of the Pat & Oscar's restaurant as well as outdoor dining at the site. The restaurant building is currently vacant and has been unoccupied for approximately one year. The proposed Site Development Plan Amendment (SDP 90-05(G)), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 12-08) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP 12-14) will allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to the existing 5,263 square foot building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's. In addition, a new 7,621 square foot, single-story commercial building is proposed to be constmcted adjacent to and west of the existing building and parallel to Palomar Airport Road. Combined, these two buildings will encompass the Palomar Place retail center. Approximately six to nine tenants are anticipated to occupy various suites proposed within the center. Potential uses include up to two restaurants, a deli or a coffee shop, retail uses and/or a financial institution. In addition, up to three different outdoor dining areas, each approximately 400 square feet in size, are proposed to accommodate the restaurant, deli or coffee shop uses. Since the tenants are unknown at this time, the approximate area and location are shown on the floor and site plans. A separate administrative permit will be required for the outdoor dining areas subsequent to the discretionary actions. As discussed above, the former Pat & Oscars restaurant is vacant and the site is currently fenced off from the Costco shopping center. The site is topographically level; however, the existing building has a pad elevation which is approximately 12 feet lower than the elevation of Palomar Airport Road. The existing single-story building has a height which ranges from 24.5 feet for the main stmcture up to 35 feet for the four accent towers located on each elevation of the building. In order to achieve the proposed contemporary architectural design which will provide retail tenants with a standard storefront with increased visibility, a major facade remodel is proposed to the vacant building. The height of the main shell of the building will remain at 25 feet. The existing architectural tower located on the south elevation will be removed to accommodate the 2,816 square foot addition. The remaining three towers will be retained and are proposed to be reduced in height from 35 to 32 feet. 2o SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 3 A second commercial retail building is proposed to be constmcted along the northem property line of the subject lot, approximately 55 feet from Palomar Airport Road. The 7,621 square foot, single-story building is proposed to be 25 feet tall with architectural projections ranging from 32 feet to 39 feet. The tallest projection, at 39 feet in height, is an architectural tower located at the northeast comer of the building. Due to the 12-foot difference in elevation between the building pad and Palomar Airport Road, the lower half of the building will not be readily visible along Palomar Airport Road. In order to create a commercial center which is conducive for a variety of retail tenants, the applicant is proposing a contemporary architectural style. Design elements such as towers, linear building forms, flat roofs with parapets at varying heights, a trellis, sustainably-landscaped planters and a courtyard central to the anticipated restaurants are proposed. The design of the center is further enhanced by a palette of high quality materials and finishes. The stucco features a "Santa Barbara" smooth finish with an earth tone color scheme in both a light cream and contrasting dark colors which are characteristic to local traditional southwestem design. The tower element features travertine stone and frosted glazing. Sustainable wood is utilized as a unifying element throughout the project. Enhanced paving in the drive aisle and native vegetation in large bio-swales provides a natural/native well landscaped exterior with palm tree accents. To accommodate the new building, the existing parking lot will be slightly reconfigured, but will retain the same general circulation pattem. Overall, the number of existing parking stalls will be reduced from 89 to 80 parking spaces. In addition, pursuant to the CC&R's agreement recorded in 1995 between the subject parcel and the Costco parcel, a total of 16 parking spaces will be provided by Costco offsite. Therefore, a total of 96 parking spaces will be provided for the proposed project. Access to the lot will continue to be provided by one of three driveways that tie in with the Costco parcel. As part of the Conditional Use Permit and as required pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.208 (Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone), the comprehensive sign program for Costco is proposed to be amended (PS 99-46(A)) to include the Palomar Place wall signage and expand the existing Costco monument sign on the southwest comer of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive to add reference to the Palomar Place tenants. Please see Table 2 of this report as well as Exhibits "AA" - "QQ" for additional information. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, and standards: A. Regional Commercial (R) General Plan Land Use designation; B. General Commercial (C-2) and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapters 21.28 and 21.208 of tiie Zoning Ordinance); C. Site Development Plan, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Ordinance); D. Conditional Use Permits and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapters 21.42 and 21.208 of the Zoning Ordinance); 3/ SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE4 E. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, Coastal Development Permit Procedures and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapters 21.201 and 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance); F. McClellan Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP); and G. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90) and Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan. Staffs recommendation of approval for the SDP Amendment, CUP, and CDP was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies listed above. The following analysis discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. Regional Commercial (R) General Plan Land Use Designation The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site is Regional Commercial (R). The proposed commercial retail center is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan as demonstrated in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Land Use Site is designated as Regional Commercial (R) The proposed project provides a regional shopping center (i.e., Costco) and provides a range of specialty retail uses and restaurants which are compatible with Regional Commercial (R) General Plan Land Use designation. Yes 2X SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 5 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Circulation Require new development to provide safe, adequate, and attractively-landscaped parking areas. The modifications proposed to the parking lot are consistent with the Land Development Engineering division and Fire Department circulation standards as well as the Landscape Manual. In addition, the ingress and egress driveways are appropriately aligned with the existing circulation pattem of the Costco center and enhanced paving is proposed in the parking lot front of the buildings. Yes Public Safety Design all stmctures in accordance with the seismic design standards of the UBC and State building requirements. Provision of emergency water systems and all-weather access roads. All buildings will meet UBC and State seismic requirements. All necessary water mains, fire hydrants, fire sprinklers, and appurtenances are existing or must be installed prior to occupancy. In addition, the existing paved access driveways will be maintained throughout constmction. Yes Open Space & Conservation Utilize Best Management Practices for control of stormwater and to protect water quality. The project will conform to all National Pollution Discharge Elimination Standards (NPDES) and has been designed to include Low Impact Design (LID) elements. Yes 33 SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 6 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Noise Non-Residential exterior noise standard of 65 CNEL and interior noise standard of 55 CNEL. Utilize noise standards contained in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for McClellan Palomar Airport. As the buildings are located 12 feet below the elevation of Palomar Airport Road, the project site is not impacted by traffic noise and the proposed use does not cause any significant noise impacts to the adjacent commercial uses. In addition, as the outdoor dining area is not a required component of the project, compliance with the exterior noise thresholds is not required. The project is located within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contour of the ALUCP. Pursuantto Table III-l ofthe ALUCP, the proposed retail and restaurant uses are considered compatible land uses within this noise range. Yes B. General Commercial (C-2) and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CVSOZ) The project site is located in the General Commercial (C-2) and the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay (CVSOZ) Zone. The project, a new retail center with a variety of retail and restaurant uses, is considered a commercial use and is required to comply with the Commercial/Visitor- Serving Overlay Zone. The Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone contains design and development standards for projects within the overlay and supersedes some of the standards of the underlying C-2 zone. The project complies with all requirements in the C-2 and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Zones as demonstrated in Table 2 below. 34 SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 7 TABLE 2 C-2-Q ZONE/COMMERCIAL/VISITOR-SERVING OVERLAY ZONE COMPLIANCE STANDARD-REQUIRED PROPOSED Permitted use (CVSOZ) Commercial/visitor-serving uses, including retail, restaurants with or without outdoor dining, delis, hotel/motels, and gas stations. Retail stores, coffee shop or deli and restaurants with outdoor dining. Building Height (C-2 Zone) Maximum 35 feet with allowed height protmsions up to 45 feet. 22 to 32 feet with permissible architectural projections up to 39 feet. Building Setbacks (CVSOZ) Front: 50 foot setback from Palomar Airport Road (PAR) Side and Rear: 10 foot setback Minimum 55 feet from PAR. Minimum 10 feet for retail buildings; trash enclosure located within setback. Due to the unique location of the subject lot within the Costco parking lot and at an elevation 12 feet below PAR, the location ofthe trash enclosure in the northwest comer property setback has been determined to be acceptable as part of the Conditional Use Permit; however, a minimum setback of 50 feet from Palomar Airport Road is maintained. Parking (CVSOZ) Shopping Center Retail: 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area Restaurant: 1 space per 100 square feet of gross floor area up to 2,000 square feet Retail: 12,200 SF-200 = 61 spaces Restaurant: A: 2,000 SF - 100 = 20 spaces B: 1,500 SF-100 =15 spaces Total required: 96 spaces 96 spaces (80 on-site and 16 on the Costco site pursuant to recorded agreement) 3S SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 8 TABLE 2 C-2-Q ZONE/COMMERCIAL/VISITOR-SERVING OVERLAY ZONE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED STANDARD-REQUIRED PROPOSED Alternative Architectural Style, Building Materials/Colors (CVSOZ) • High-quality materials such as brick, stone, marble or wood • Primary colors cannot dominate the building • Use of colors should be balanced and in context of the architectural style The altemative contemporary architectural style includes a mixture of high quality materials including travertine stone, frosted glazing for the architectural tower and sustainable wood throughout the buildings as well as earth tone- colored stucco with a smooth finish. The proposed earth tone color scheme does not include the use of any primary colors. Landscaping (CVSOZ) Parking lot trees: One tree per 6 parking spaces 15-gallon minimum, 50% required to be 24-inch box 80 spaces on-site -^6 = 14 trees 30 trees are proposed in the parking lot which equates to one tree per 2.6 parking spaces. 24-inch box provided Decorative Paving (CVSOZ) Decorative paving of at least 900 square feet covering, at a minimum, the width of the driveway shall be provided at the primary approach. The decorative paving shall be depicted on the landscape plans and located adjacent to, but not on, city right-of-way adjacent to the project entrance. Approximately 1,300 square feet (50' X 26') of enhanced paving is proposed in front of the primary entrance to the buildings. The decorative pavement is depicted on the landscape and site plan and is not located within city right-of-way. 34 SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 9 TABLE 2 C-2-Q ZONE/COMMERCIAL/VISITOR-SERVING OVERLAY ZONE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED STANDARD-REQUIRED PROPOSED Screening of Parking Areas and Trash Enclosure (CVSOZ) All areas used for loading activities, receiving deliveries and trash enclosure locations shall be located onsite so as to be screened from public points of view. Landscaping may assist this objective but is secondary to locating these areas onsite and/or using solid masonry walls, to minimize visibility. The trash enclosure is proposed to be located towards the rear of the lot (i.e. northem property line), at the base of the 12-foot cut slope which separates the project from Palomar Airport Road. In addition to the walls around the enclosure, which will be textured and painted to match the project, a roof as well as landscaping is proposed on all sides. In addition, the parking spaces facing the shared driveway will include landscaping which will screen the undercarriages of the cars as viewed from the shared driveway with Costco. Screening of Rooftop Equipment (CVSOZ) Rooftop equipment and/or other stmctui-al features shall be screened from public view. Rooftop mechanical equipment for the retail center will be screened from public view behind a parapet of approximately 6-7 feet in height. 37 SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 10 TABLE 2 C-2-Q ZONE/COMMERCIAL/VISITOR-SERVING OVERLAY ZONE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED STANDARD-REQUIRED PROPOSED Signage (CVSOZ and CMC Chapter 21.41) Wall Signs in Commercial Centers: • One (1) square foot of signage per lineal foot of building frontage = 150 square feet of wall signage for each building; • Each sign shall not exceed 75% of the width ofthe lease space frontage; • Maximum of one wall sign facing Palomar Airport Road (i.e. north elevation) for the existing building (former Pat & Oscar's) and two wall signs facing Palomar Airport Road and spaced 150' apart on the new building; • 24-inch letter height for tenant suites less than 3,000 square feet; 30 inches for tenant suites above 3,000 square feet. • No signage permitted on architectural tower. Monument: 125 square feet between the two existing Costco monument signs, maximum height of 10 feet (two monument signs permitted pursuant to CUP 98- 12i A comprehensive sign program (Exhibits "AA" -"QQ") is proposed which details the layout and area of the signage. The Costco monument sign at the comer of Armada Drive and Palomar Airport Road is proposed to be modified to add signage for Palomar Place and will not exceed 125 square feet in area and 10 feet in height. The proposed wall signage does not exceed the maximum 150 square footage allocation per building. In addition, wall signage is not proposed on the architectural tower. The signage does not exceed the maximum pemiissible allocation and meets each of the applicable requirements. C. Site Development Plan, Qualifled Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.06 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) A Site Development Plan is required to be processed pursuant to Chapter 21.06, Qualified Development Overlay Zone, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. On May 7, 1991, the City Council approved a Site Development Plan for the development ofthe Costco center (SDP 90-05). 3B SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7,2012 PAGE 11 The proposed Site Development Plan Amendment, SDP 90-05(G), represents the 7th amendment to the Site Development Plan for the Costco shopping center. The proposed project will allow for a 2,816 square foot addition to the existing 5,263 square foot building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's. In addition, a new 7,621 square foot, single-story commercial building is proposed to be constmcted. As demonstrated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6921, all ofthe required SDP Amendment findings can be made. In summary, the use is properly related to the surrounding land uses which include the Costco shopping center, is consistent with the various elements of the General Plan, will not adversely impact traffic, and the site is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed retail center. D. Conditional Use Permit and Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone (CMC Chapters 21.42 and 21.208 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) Commercial projects located within the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the City Council. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6922, the findings for a Conditional Use Permit, along with the additional required findings for the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone can be made. In summary, the requested commercial retail center is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, is desirable for the community, is not detrimental to existing uses, the site is adequate in size in shape to accommodate the use, and the street system can handle the traffic generated by the proposed use. In addition, the project has been designed to be consistent with the development standards of the Commercial/Visitor-Serving Overlay Zone in that it has been designed to accommodate a high level of visitors and incorporates a high quality contemporary architectural design with a mixture of materials and earth tone colors. E. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, Coastal Development Permit Procedures and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapters 21.201 and 21.203 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of tiie Local Coastal Program (LCP). The site is also located within and subject to the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6922, the findings for a Coastal Development Permit can be made. The project's compliance with each of the above- referenced programs and ordinances is summarized below. 1. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program The project site has an LCP Land Use designation of Regional Commercial (R). The project's consistency with the R Land Use designation is analyzed in Section A above. The proposed project entails a request to develop a 15,700 square foot commercial retail shopping center. The site is topographically level and is currentiy developed with a vacant restaurant and parking lot. The project would be consistent with the surrounding development which consists of the Costco shopping center and an associated gas station. The proposed retail center will not obstmct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-of-way nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone as the building pad is located approximately 12 feet below the elevation of Palomar Airport Road; 3'^ SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 November 7, 2012 PAGE 12 PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER therefore, the coastiine is not visible from the project site. No agricultural uses currentiy exist on the developed site, nor are there any sensitive resources located in the area of the proposed addition. In addition, the proposed addition is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazards. Since the site does not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access are available from the subject site. Furthermore, the commercially-designated site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. 2. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to tiie City's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban run-off, pollutants and soil erosion. No development is proposed in areas of steep slopes (coastal bluff) and no native vegetation will be removed. In addition, the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction, F. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) The project site is located approximately 1.5 miles soutiiwest of the McClellan-Palomar Airport and is subject to the policies and standards outiined in the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). Specifically, the project site is located within Review Area 1 of the Airport Influence Area, which consists of locations where noise and/or safety concems may necessitate limitations on the types of allowable land uses. More specifically, the project site is located outside of the Safety Zones but is located within the Airport Overflight Notification Area, However, because the proposed use is nonresidential, an overflight notice is not required to be recorded. In addition, pursuant fo Exhibit III-l of the ALUCP, the project is located within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contour. Pursuant to Table III-l ofthe ALUCP, the proposed retail and restaurant uses are considered compatible land uses within this noise range. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the ALUCP. G. Growth Management Regulations The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the southwest quadrant ofthe City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 3 below, TABLE 3 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration N/A N/A Library N/A N/A Waste Water Treatment 8.7 EDUs Yes Parks $ 0.40/square foot Yes Drainage 8.16 CFS, Basin D Yes Circulation 1,056 ADT (does not exceed ADT for previous restaurant use) Yes SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER November 7, 2012 PAGE 13 TABLE 3 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE CONTINUED STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE Fire Station No. 4 Yes Open Space N/A N/A Schools N/A N/A Sewer Collection System 8.7 EDUs Yes Water 3,611 GPD Yes V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the Zoning Ordinance, the project site is within the City limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval, ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6921 (SDP) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6922 (CUP) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No, 6923 (CDP) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet 6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 7. Disclosure Statement 8. Reduced Exhibits 9. Exhibits "A" - "I", Project Plans, dated November 7, 2012 10. Exhibit"AA" - "QQ", Comprehensive Sign Program, dated November 7,2012 SITEMAP N NOT TO SCALE Palomar Place Retail Center SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SDP 90-05(GVCUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER APPLICANT: MERI Palomar Place, LLC REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Site Development Plan Amendment and a recommendation of approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formeriv occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the constmction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commercial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located on the southwest comer of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 17542 in the Citv ofCarlsbad, Countv of San Diego, State of Califomia, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego Countv, June 27, 1995. APN: 211-040-34-00 Acres: 1.75 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Regional Commercial (R) Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A Existing Zone: General Commercial, Qualified Development Overlay, and Commercial/Visitor- Serving Overlay Zone (C-2-Q, CVSOZ) Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site C-2-Q, CVSOZ R Vacant restaurant North C-2-Q CVSOZ R 50-foot-wide section of Costco property/Palomar Airport Road South C-2-Q, 0-S R/OS Costco gas station and native open space East O-S OS Native open space West C-2-Q R Costco Revised 01/06 ^43 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: ^ Yes Q No Local Coastal Program Segment: Mello II Within Appeal Jurisdiction: OYes No Coastal Development Permit: ^ Yes Fl No Local Coastal Program Amendment: Q Yes No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: R Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: C-2-0, CVSOZ Proposed LCP Zone: N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 8,7 EDU ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ^ Categorical Exemption, CEQA Section 15332, In-fill Development Proiects I I Negative Declaration, I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ • Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Palomar Place Retail Center - SDP 90-05(GVCUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 5 GENERAL PLAN: R ZONING: C-2-0, CVSOZ DEVELOPER'S NAME: MERI Palomar Place, LLC ADDRESS: 2081 Faradav Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE NO.: 858-367-3160 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO,: 211-040-34-00 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 10,437 SO. FT. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 6/2013 A, City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = N/A_ B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = N/A C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 8.7 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.40 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 8.16 Identify Drainage Basin = D (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 1,056 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 8.7 Identify Sub Basin = D (Identify tmnk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD = 3,611 V5 cms e. em 16^ or piy i^pDintdcf Boards Cdmii^^^^ ' " ' .III lV,l,jl1u Tl ,1 II li carnal be reviewed thte ik^miatfOH is compteled: f%a®e priii. Pardon deHfied as "Any fn^h«^, frm, c«;h|^^^^ier8fo|), }plnt vaijbjre, associafion, 90(sm ts^dd^T ofganizaBori, cofpsia^, estate. WJ^ w*5^, ^^ec^, io &^ ^^^mm^, ^ midmjijf^, w^^^t^iiQcm&ttt;lm0^mt.m siT^. r NO NOiv«5uAt0 mm ^mm m OP rm mmm, Pii^Ass INDICATE MOJN*APr^UCAa.E (NiA) TJ^ ^ACE ^OW. If a iXsM^-Dlfrnfed conaora^n. Inclifde Ihe nmm, m&s, md &di^4s&^ of the CG^fporate ^se^rate may be dtta^c^^dif n^e^sary,) 2^ Olift^fj^ ow^^ ^@e^' ^^tde tlie IgOiffiHJETlB. tMJ&A% names and adidrtt^ies of Mi. p^r^tm ^nf QM^e^ip irdesfest In tie picp^ imfo^/ed Al«o, providte t% rvakffB of me' legi^l ownefBhlp ^.a, paatpersN|>, len^ri^ Ip coitwion, non-pro^ cofporsiim, ele,). tf^e o)Am^ip fo^ckid^ ^ -^^tfiiaomSaf^itar ^ja^ersWrp. inelude t!i# riame^, ^j^i^ ^r^^e!s all IncSvlduafe owning mtm ©f st«ares. NO fNCWftXIALS OVVW MORE THAN 10% OF THE SW^, rHJEASE mOlCATE NON-APPUC/ypif (m> 11^ Tf^ SPACE E^LOW. if ai piAmst-^aaismi cdr^«Migiten. j^jlud^ ^fe nanti^, ilHi^ anci addresses of mfecorpota^cj^Ecers, (A^^e#af^l^a#g may fee^tfedie^i if Recje$s TfaeJohfK 3QrVlt->K>^. rV^F.^^b'^r* Tftfe.i^M^^^^^^^M lib 3. • fi»Gii4*^eWi;- If ii^|(^il?»ii idas^ (1) or ^) above is a oofipn^ immes and ad(Sress^ of fiMt pmmt Irving a& m officer or Non Profit/Tfyst Ttfte monijs? No If yes. A wiify that 3(B ti^fe atsdve fnformafioff is Inte &Mi borr^et to ¥ my knowiesdge. nafOre of ovwiet/date PHriittlr rtaN*6 of 01^^ Print or lype nam^ tJl^g^pfeaitt *^ A^toi^-gv^ S /C^yjr^ A-t^rS^ '-v^^4as>- ^ /g^fS^jg^ Print or type name of ew!Reiy^&f)pffcant'-s-a§ef* ^7 Palomar Place Project Data Project Oescrtption: Renovation of an existing restaurant Into a retail shopping center with various future tenants. Demolition of existing patio structure and addhbR of new attached structure. Additim of a new freestanding retail structure with new conrwnon patio. Building 'A' max. height to be lowered to 32 feet. Building 'B' max. height to be 26 feel, and Building 'C max. height to be 32 feet. The central tower shall be 39 feet max. in height. Owrter: Landscape Architect: Assessors Parcel«: Legal Description: Project Addres Zoning; Occupancy: Construction Type: Land Use: Permit applications: Parking provided: UlilitY Companies: Oscar's Carisbad, LLC PO Box 45S Carlsbad, CaHFornla 92018 Phone: (858) 205-92S6, misty$)delmarherit^e MERI Palomar Place, LLC 2081 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Ni<* Foustianes, (658) 231-1691, nk|ifgimisslonequitiesj»m Mission Equities Real Estate, Inc, 13838 Stebtcit Court San Diego, California 92130 Contact: Nicic Foussianes, (8S8) 231-1691, niclrf#mIssionequlttes.com Lusardi Construction Company 1570 Unda Vista Drive San Marcos, California 92069 Contact: CHnt Fowler, (760J 744-3130, cfowler©lusardi.com Studio I.e. 6568 Bluebonnet Drive Carisbad, CaHfornia 92011 Contact: Jeff Causey, (760) 869-4918, jbce>jbcstudK>le.com K8iS Engineering 7801 Mission Center a. suite 100 San Oiego, California 92108 Contact: Kama! Sweis, (619) 296-5565, las@>ks-engr.com Wiles landscape Architecture 2410 Manchester Avenue Rancho Santa Fe, California 92091 Contact: Steve Ahles, (858) 756-8963, ahlesiand^isbcglobaljiet 211-O40-34-00 PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 17542 IN THE OTY OF CARUBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILEDIN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, June 27,1995. General Plan: Regional Commercial Zoning: General tommercial - Qudlfied Development Overlay (C-2-Q1 Coastal Zone: subject to Mello II Segment of Local Coastal Program LCP Land Use: Regional Commercial (R) IXP Zoning: General Commercial - Qualifled Overlay (C-2-Q) 1.75 acres or 76,230 square feet Building coverage: 15,700 square feet = 21% site coverage Landscape cover^e: 9,465 square feet = 12.4% she coverage Sldg'A' BIdg'B' (new) BIdg-Cfnew) Suildlng area 5,263 sf 2,816 sf 7,621 sf General Commercial - existing/proposed (commercial serving overlay district) Conditional Use Permit Site Development Plan Amendment Coastal Development Permit Sign Program Amendment Restaurant 3,500 sf g) 1/100 > 35 spaces required Dell 1,500 sf ©1/200 = 7 spaces requked detail 10,700 sf g 1/200 » 54 spaces required Total 15,700 sf 96 spaces required (including 4 ADA) 96 spaces (75 Standard • 17 Compact (18*) + 4 ADA « 96 Total) Water: Gas and Electric: Telephone: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Qty OfCarlsbad San Diego Gas and Electric ATM School District: Carlsbad Unified School District Estimated Water & Sev«r: Water • 3,611 GPD * SEE SHEET PDIOO FOR POTENTIAL LAYOUTS AND PARKING CALCULATIONS. Carlsbad, Galif mar Airpor cilifornia PROJECT DATA SHEST INDEX *c*» KIC PTAonwr pi>N HAI9 ecmm^ATKM n>N AVERAGE DAILY TRAPFIC Undun 0^ Trip OWN in 1Z.400 sq.ft. 496 ' EnWlniPltaOsar't I-7U mi 90 HI yiciMiTr MAP W ^ m-—^ ^ SITE WAP c/: phone 760.994.1800 fax 760.994.1820 |bc@ibcstud ioie.com .jbcstudiole.com Ul O E 0- IK < h I. < £ 0 COVER SHEET < PROJECT PATA • • -Si KEYMOTES © a3 SP a». DAM» LM MDICA'Te* CAN WeWW. » PMIKM LOT t-MHfTM* TO BE ntOCMW A* ftH0l4i TYF. PROJECT DATA PARKING COUNT EXISTING SITE PLAN -HI phOM 760.994.1800 fax 750.994.1820 jbc@}bcstudioie .com v.)bcstudloifl.com KEYNOTES ® PROJECT DATA > HD1E. TTMANTi AKE omCMIXr COHTKACTB? AT TW» Tl = 61 phone 760.994.1800 fax 760.994.1820 Jbc@jbcstudiole.coni www.Jbcstudtotfl.com ^^^^^ o i fi" -I q bl -I Q_ O E O o a. PDIOO SOUTH ELEVATION 0 SOUTI- (J) UUEST ELEVATION (4) BAST ELEVATION KEYNOTES ® i) PARTIAL BLDG "A" UDEST ELEVATION (fe) PARTIAL BLDG "C" EAST ELEVATION •Pi 'HI phone 760.994.1800 fax 760.994.1820 jbc@jbcatudlole.com www.ibcstudioje.com PD200 TOT NH// m» "6' t v ^- 1 - \- phorw 780.994.1800 fax 780.994.1820 jbel9)bcitudfole.cotfi www.jbcitudjole.com Q 0 IU E O E < <. BL «l Of s ^ !S On" Q- ^ 1. c E 0 I SDP 90-05G / CDP 12-14 / CUP 12-08 LEGEND DESCRIPTION LEGEND STANDARD DRAWING SYMBOL oosnw HOOF oMNs New ana NEW CUB t ounat NCWFRE SERVICE New miB) uiEXAi NEW SCW! LATOW. HEW 24W CATCH BASIN NEW 4" PVC srani DRAM m NEW f ROUNO Mils -© -® VICINITY MAP CITV OF OCCANSIOE cm OF ENCINITAS A.C PAWUEHT msiLAr- nisr-w KKicinni AC PAVOBIT OVEDUr CM.TKWS sue HQBHMDQfLCDrQ somp maa numr PMOHmr PWMICT (so«f»ce ro amiee) rm (m ru; PMP. FUMMOIT mmi -ii^ , ^MUS <ia> FU) FW. MUM scenM__=acLjaiac wms <WK Fll} cm. PMOCHT mnnM Ma YAMS NOSl NoiQ SEC aou icrair PM weimwi omMMiiK 11^^ SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPI^V K * S ENSMEERWO HC OMOkJWMRr 17. 2011 J"" "^iiNcnictjioo K«S ENGINEERING, INC. |*='|tCITY Ol-' CARLS6AD|I"K« L__JI EWawEERINO DEPARTMEWT |[ [oitiplHC blUBliai tijii Mfe PALOMAR RETAIL CENTER CITY SLOPE STANDARDS ALTHcusu VO HtaiaiKsi acFES. Ma cs EXSIHS, OE AMTICIPAIED OR sitm CN PRXECT CML Bctem R/WS. ne imcw stMMaM IU BE <pna> wou; SL(7^ CM FMAL FKOECT CnCM) »PROye«(t PlJWi SLores. Al 3FEElCRLESeMvfRIIC4LIClanW«M»niOFieUCIULI30RSnseTSIie^ rwiih siAFOARD vc^vER CROP CR B»sicN coniuL HArne;. Bl aiEAIER1IW3imT0SISTM\CiaiC4.IElaiiaaMSTAIC/ISI}i1fSW9l^ mTTKi StUU. BE MST/UEO M LBI CF A COVER CROPt 1. AO •}. a II EXCESS OF sFSTNvfRncAiEiiMriiEaiseeTJNMWiiERoeiaiccNnanAnw sua BE WTALIED N LSI CF A COVER CRCPJ. •>, 9 «C M. ne KUW PL«mS6, OR 5HAR MIL 8E PROVCED. AIST/KMfiPl- OMR CRT WAU BE ALTMW CARPET CF SNOW (ElVSICNCCNIRILmTniG SH4LL BE K6TAILED N LEI CF A COVER OKP FOR SLOPE npCS B ac C). 8.1 oRow COVER sm BE woponnFRosTRAniiniAmDiiAiERW. ATV toes (» CBHERI a LOB swes ewLi BE ACACIA sERXse TROSIRAIA'- A NON-NVASIVE VARETT- n-w men LIIBS.»FBICNC8IIBa D> LARX SlflBS ML BE ^ELALIICA leOSBniU (I OALCW AT A imw RATE OF C^ noHtcisonmisF. -SKWT Lie PER CAinUN; STAICAO^N:; UlCecAPE 0>ER !0 H HISH » PROPOSED inuid VIBU CORRPOR APFROXmiElOCAIIOICM.r6910m ws AREAS NOT A PARI CF ms PRMEC) AC HA3N0T «BI RE-E»BlffiiEP. PALOMAR PLACE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREA - PARKNIS LOT AREA OF B, 6SS SF. INCLUDES PB SF. CF LAICSCAFE FKVCED LANDSCAPE EXCaS isanEonimiicFmmsF, { CONCEPT STATEMENT TIC LAICeCAPE FRCMCiee AESnctlC AlO WCTENAL nSiVSITS OF A I^AIL BlU^ COmx ACimiTT0U|(WLAW^(^CU«AC1ERAICI«A1IJai;iCARTlCie«eil^^ lUEEXISTWParEIERICARIieiKOPPItiCSlim ACCESS CMvE IS MANTAieD. ISIPUMH3S •eUCESEvmLOWKTERANPIUMIBUHZSPecetl U.LMiSCAFM«U.eEPROv«aN coFomMx mu nc cirrs LAicscApE nAMUL MAINTENANCE NOTE AFTER COTUTICX OF All ESIABUeHCIIT FEiICO BT nc HSIAILATBN ccNiRACTo^ MAsneiANx Ml BE FROvcEP BT nc FRUEa oeet LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN 0 20 40 FT. ITuJ NORTW SCALE BIO RETENTION AREAS TO EE UttXafB) (AS SHCtNl K ACCCRDAICE HIH CASCIA STAIOARD K-X. Sd AIC BUXaL PRE CML BtiKSn PLANS. naSANCSHaJBSTOBE FROVBEC. nelE ARE REIM® TO BE 11 lOL «I*IC»« C«>ER PRBR10 OCapAN^^ PLANnMiS nur IMTIB) N AND COVGRHl imUTY SCREENING lOm. ALLWimESARETOBESCREEICD. LAND9CAFE CCNSmUCnON DnWGS Wi BE icaJK TO eingAw LABa Aa mnes AIC PROVIDE APFRDPRIA1E SCR©W5 -MIERSECTICNSIWILK SEE W7IES EEICU (STAtOARD B, ATnCSEBflRlE6> INTERSECTION SIGHT UNES PLANTS, afX m/USl AND AT lUnHTT, SU. BE TOSTICI© ID AVOID OeSIWCncN ItJIORBTSl VBB CF PSIESTRMN CRDSSMGS, DRIVEIMTS, ROmiTS AND onCR VEHCIILAR 1R«E HATS A) CNCOUiCIORSlISETS/WLABSER LANDSCAPE HBBITSCVERJe IOCS SllCICmitlCll^ AT MAnlTO) AS ItASII® FR»1 ADJACai SniET aUDE ARE NOI PEB1TIED AT STRBT COBCSS Mn»l A TRIANatAR DIW IK« TUD FOMS,» FHI OUniiSD FB31BEMI80 CF OS^ il ATICDmT0lll»l«DRIVE0AT5,Iie»ll3IICl9ITLWAII£HAmCS4T0RIVEIl»TS»iaifROincm2 AFiacN cmw Atot) nc oiB, ncH« cEiiira ToiURDS ne miFBilT. a L»C«CAPEIEAlllWISlBe6,TI«6,IBe«5.ETcySimBEiaECIEDTOBISiraTlUTNO^ oesnicTioe ARE LOCATED mm ne CALTRANS SCUT DISTANCE lies. D.' CAL nWNSSilWT DISTANCE Lies IttvE A ItOSnONTAL A* ^R«CALC<mi«T(PWF^ SWT LICS ARE DEIEfJIMEP BT nc FRCUeCt CM. ENOICER EXISTING TREE LEGEND iRSitmtia>aimicBiraF^miK*SA/tmaiBi ® ARECASTRUIROWNCFFKn ® ] ormorm Eirm«M @ ! oecusLEx : ALIUS ExaiW IRS TO BE tSWGD MEM CTICR •SE WIS u K lucruoa: n oral PUCIOR mai M lUCE nCB) WH «I OEBIPALH CARROT IKXC CCKALKEE McaroAic ALMR BXSFI-SHCAl SKWFT.SKCAL BkUFI.ISMCAL. exJFI-MMCAl. ISXSFT-BHCAL AHLES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE «: P.0, Bos 1503 Randn SanU Fe, CA 92007 8S8-766-8963 CM SBM I An FAHLIAR MTH TIE REOIIREieiTS FOR LAICSCAPE AIC IRRIGATION PLANS OCNTArCD IN THE Cirr CF CARLSeADS LAICSCAFt MAMIAL AND HATER ERWENI LANDSCAPE RSaiATICNS. I HAVE PREPARED THS PLW IN COMPUANCE mm THOSE RSalLATICNS AND TUE LAICSCAPE MANUAL AND AfiREE TOCOMPLI' UW AIL RECURBWTS (MEN SllBmilN& COenSCTICN DOCUMENTS. ICERIFT THAT ne PIAN maeffs THOSE REOULAIICNS TO PRMDE BFCIBtT USECFIIUTER LLI O < CL < o < CL ^3 Eo ^ L.1 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET HYDRO ZONE INFORMATION TABLE coRRotia' uroRcaoE* OOCRPRCH axm' EXISim AIC IWCUKi BIO REIENIIOI AREAS lelDRP MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE CALCULATIONS Auama Eia FTPACKK LAICSCAPEAREAirolAU CWfBtPACKK Aoomam.cT.iPeaALAREA, vwMmtta>UMiA>eiiL3Li.\ • 2«S3 lUaoNSrrEAR sjie arrsjR e.» AF/rcAS ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE SSTFUJEP rarJi uisRise Emi.(rOTa«) | . SLAj • »33J«SAlKINSfltAR PERCENTAGE ALLOWANCE USED WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT wiBiccNS^ATioiis PROMOTED nmisMne vrDRozDie'iiRaps»iiLARi<RimnoN IBUraCHIS A eSPARAiav VAVED USE DSP DAIERNS SrSIEH tU. BE PISvCED. NO lemusFispRcpoEED, AN«T(nuicsrsiBiiiim >UEain«(iuiT«LEFORneiieECF RECTCLEO WIER AND DEK REOIRBnTS RELATIVE 10 RECrCLED USE Wi BE FROvlCED. IIATS CCNSBA'ATUN DESISN FEAWES NauDEi tOl. ANUTilS AND FREPARATKM tFECIFIUTIOH APPKWA1E PLANT SELECnCN, NOUEECFURlKtSS, uiECFEmcsitRRiaAnol USECFMULOIES. APPRCFRMIE MAWIENANCE SfKBCAnCK Cily Log \mt OR SieSWACE KRIjAncM IU ee USED TO RRIIMIE ANT VESETAIIC^ Hn»i 14 IOCS CF AN mmABlE ill9=ACE UNLESS ne ADWCan nFERCABLE UiFACES ARE DESCNB3 iW CONSnillOIED TO CAUSE WIER TO DRW BinRB.r WO A LAICSCAFE AFEAS. EXISTMSnaGAnCNIASFREVICUSLYAFFROyEDFORISCrCLEDVAIERIIEEIIUrBE FETAICD WERE UOSWRBED BT ICll CONSTRU^TICK RECYCLED WATER USE OITDOOR EAttG AREAS AND OnCR PIBIIC USE SPACES MJ. EE PRDIECIED FROM OVER SPRAT AIC B«OFF AS l5a*ED IWOUSII nc USE CF DRP IWAnCN AND COI«^^ um CITT m; AND PEN RECMF&tNTS. AHLES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE «: PX>. Box 1503 Randw SanU Fc, CA 92007 856-766-8963 CA< 2S3a I AM FAMUARIIITH TUE REOIIREHBITS FOf! UlCS&APE 4ND IRRtUTION aANS CCNTANED N THE CITT OF CAR1.8BADS USICSCAPE MANUAL AND MTEREmclENT LANDSCAPE ISalATIOB. I HAVE PREPARED THIS FIAN N CCrniANCE WTH THOSE RSaOLATIONS AND WE LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND A(5PEE TO CCrt=LT MIH AU. ^cuREiefTS iMEN suemnc COftTRUCnONDOOmiTS. ICERTFT TMAT THE PIAN m0«I> THOSE ReauuTic»» TO PROVIDE msm use CF OUTER LU o < i -J ^ a. ^ cr < o < Q_ s; L.2 PEFEflBCe CT99-2S WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 0 20 401=1 RECYCLED WATER USE AREAS PALOMAR PLACE 8 OCTOBER 2012 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE I N. ^^^^^^^^^ COMPREHENSIVS SI(5N PROc^RAM, PS 9S'460A), Palomar A.\rporf Road $ Armada Drive Costco APN# 211-040-3<S00 Palomar Place APN» 211-040-3400 I Inn ll I'TTL ^ HllillllliGliidllffllllllilllD IJllilllllilBllllillilfflHiW pimiiiiiimiBHHitiiiimtlllO IMUgiglS tyiiiiuiiiililliiiiiiuiitiiiiiiiia iimiiiiaitiinaiiiiiitiiiio iP^ tiHiBiHiiiiianiiiiaiiiiiP. TTT PROJECT INFORMATION: PROPERTY OWNER: MISSION EQUITIES CONTACT: NICK FOUSSIANES 2081 FARADAY CARLSBAD. CA 92008 PH: 858.367.3160 COSTCO WHOLESALE: CONTACT: MR. DAVID CARATTINI 951 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD CARLSBAD. CA 93009 PH: 760.929.0963 CARLSBAD PLANNING CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION CONTACT: SHANNON WERNEKE 1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD. CA 92008 PH: 760.602.4600 PROGRAM DESIGNER: CLEAR SIGN I DESIGN. INC. CONTACT: STEVE WEDDELL 170 NAVAJO STREET SAN MARCOS. CA 92078 PH: 760.736.8111 WWW.CLEARSieNS.COM INDEX: PURPOSE S. INTENT 1 SUBMITTALS f APPROVALS 1 AMENDMENT 1 DESIGN GUIDELINES 2 FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS. 3 ALLOWABLE SIGN TYPES 3 PROHIBITED SIGNS 3 MAINTENANCE 3 EXCEPTIONS 3 SITE PLA.N / SIGN TYPES 4 SITE PLAN / BUILDINGS 5 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 1 6 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 2 7 SIGN EXHIBITS: WALL SIGN TYPE 1 a WALL SIGN TYPE 2 9 MULTI-TENANT WALL SIGNS ^o CORNER MONUMENT n ENTRY MONUMENT 13 COSTCO SIGNAGE I3_i6 <3 COMPRSHSNSiVE SI3N PaOGKAM PURPOSE & INTENT: The following criterion has been established for the purpose of amending the Costco Sign Program PS 99-46. PS 99-46(A) is an amendment to the Costco Sign Program to incorporate signage for Palomar Place. As part of this Amendment, the monument signage for Costco will be modified to accommodate signage for Palomar Place and new wall signage will be proposed. In addition, the Costco wall signage will be included as part of the amended sign program as it was approved as part of the original sign program, but will have a legal nonconforming status. This criterion also has the purpose of assuring a consis- tent sign design program and to establish standards for the design and fabrication of Identification signage for Palomar Place. Creativity of design is encouraged and at the same time overall visual harmony is maintained. The Property Owner and the City of Carlsbad will enforce conformity with these criteria. Any nonconforming or unapproved sign will be brought in to conformity at the expense of the Occupant's. SUBMITTALS & APPROVALS: The Building Occupants must provide sign design drawings to Property Owner for prior review and approval in the manner, form and procedure set forth herein and further subject to the applicable design review procedures. The design drawings must be drawn to scale and shall indicate copy/logo, colors, materials and fabrication details. A. SUBMriTAL TO PROPERTY OWNER: Occupants shall submit four (4) copies of detailed shop drawings to Property Owner for approval prior to City submittal or sign fabrication. Sign drawings are to be prepared by a Califomia licensed sign contractor. All signage will conform to this criteria, specifically and in detail, and will be subject to the applicable review and approval of the Property Owner and comply with the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Planning & Building Departments. FRONT ELEVATIONS: Scaled elevation of Occupant's sign depicting the proposed sign design and all the dimensions as they relate to the Occupants' sign. SHOP DRAWINGS: Fully dimensioned and scaled shop drawings specifying exact dimensions, copy layout, type styles, materials, colors, and means of attachment, illumination, electrical specifications, and all other details of construction. B. SUBMITTAL TO CITY OF CARLSBAD: Occupants to have his or her sign contractor submit three (3) full sets (1 full color signed by the Property Owner) of plans to include site plan. Occupants' business name and address, individual sign detail, store front elevations with conceptual sign location, fabrication and method of installation plans. All elevation plans must identify the height, width and square footage of each sign and store front elevation. Occupant's sign contractor will be responsible for all pertinent applications, & permit fees to the Planning and Building Departments at the time of submission. Building Permit Application can be downloaded from the Building and Safety section of The City of Carisbad website: (www.carisbadca.org) C OCCUPANTS' RESPONSIBILITY: Occupant's sign contractor shall carry workman's compensa- tion and public liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence against all damage suffered or done by any and all persons and/or property while engaged in the construction or erection of signs. Evidence of this insurance, naming Palomar Place as additional insured, must be provided to Property Owner prior to installation. The Property Owner may, at their discretion and at the Occupant's expense, correct, replace, or remove any sign that is installed without written approval, necessary permits, does not<:onform to the submitted design drawings or these criteria. Occupant's shall be responsible for the following expenses relating to the signage at his or her leased space: • 100% of approval and permit processing costs and application fees. • 100% of costs for sign fabrication and installation. • Upon vacancy the occupants shall remove sign and restore fascia to original condition at Occupant's sole cost and expense within fifteen (15) days of expiration of term or earlier termination of Occupant's lease. • When existing signs are removed or replaced all brackets, poles and other supports that are no longer required shall be removed; holes will be properly repaired and patched to the satisfaction of the Property Owner. The vacated sign area will be painted to cover all "ghosting" of old sign and to match the adjacent portion of the building or sign support structure. • Occupant's to provide wiring, power and final hook up from Property Owner's house panel to J-box to the sign location. D. APPROVED SIGN COMPANY: The Property Owner has approved the Company below to design, fabricate and install signs in Palomar Place. Clear Sign and Design 170 Navajo Street San Marcos, CA 92078 Ph: 760.736.8111 Fax: 760.736.8121 www.clearsl2ns.com Occupants are free to use another sign company; however the company must: • Be a licensed sign contractor in good standing with the California Contractor State License Board. www.cslb.ca.eov E. AMENDMENT: Any amendments to PS 9946(A) will require review and approval by city planner. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. N PRO(5?<A DESIGN GUIDELINES: The purpose of establishing these design guidelines is to ensure that each Occupant's sign contributes to the center's success. High quality signage, which reflects the integrity of the architecture, is encouraged. Occupants' individual signs should incorporate a diversity of sign styles, icons, and materials. Creative and innovative designs are encouraged. A. MATERIALS AND GENERAL CRITERIA: • All sign fabrication work will be of excellent quality. All logo images and type styles will be accurately reproduced. Lettering that approximates type styles will not be accepted. Property Owner, in its sole discretion, reserves the right to reject any fabrication work judged to be sub-standard. • Finish surfaces of metal or aluminum will be free from canning and warping. All sign finishes will be free of dust, orange peel, drips and runs and will have a uniform surface conforming to the highest standards of Ifie industry. ; Penetrations into walls will be made waterproof. Damage to existing finishes or the interior or exterior of a Building caused by sign installation or removal will be repaired at the Occupants' expense. • Occupant's signage should incorporate the following acceptable materials subject to Property Owner and City approvals. B. ILLUMINATION Occupant's signage should incorporate the following acceptable lighting method subject to Property Owner and City approval. • All occupant's signs are to be front lit or reverse halo illuminated channel letters. Or a combination of both. • Illumination to be LED. LED to be enclosed and not exposed. C. SIGN COLORS AND FINISHES All Occupant's sign colors must be approved by the Proper^ Owner and City prior to fabrication. To assist in achieving a harmonious blend of color throughout the center, the following guidelines are to be adhered to: • All trademark logo styles will be permitted to use corporate colors. • Color of letter retums and to match building color, black, or chrome. D. TYPE STYLES AND LOGOS The sign copy (text) of permanent signs shall relate only to the name and/or nature of the business. Permanent ''comeK)ns'' signs that advertise continuous sales, special prices, etc. are not allowed. Sign copy shall include minimal information only. The use of subordinate information (e.g., telephone numbers, list of products, pictures of products, etc.) is prohibited. The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign. Sign copy in non-Latin/Roman symbols, numerals, or alphabet charac- ters shall contain a generic description in English of the nature of the business or use (e.g., Dentist, Flower Shop). E. OCCUPANTS SIGN ALLOCATION • Sign quantities and areas as set forth in this sign criteria are deemed fair and appropriate for the current Occupant's leased space. In the event that Occupant's leasehold spaces are divided or combined in the future; sign locations, areas, and quantities may change. If such changes occur a new sign program with said amendments will be produced and approved by the City of Carlsbad. • Changes to the approved sign program will be submitted in writing and reviewed by the City of Carisbad planning department. Additional fees may be required. F. SIZE AND QUANTITIES Sizes and quantities for Occupants signs shall be outlined in this criteria for each sign type. G. SIGN ACCEPTABILITY Only those sign types and sign locations specifically described herein are acceptable. There will be no exceptions without a sign program amendment approval by The City of Carisbad and Property Owner. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. COerCO i RALOMAR PLACE FABRICATION REQUIREMENTS: All signage will conform to these criteria, specifically and in detail, and will be subject to the applicable review and approval of the Property Owner and comply with the City of Carlsbad Sign Standards, Sign Regulations. • All signs shall be fabricated and installed with UL approved components and be in compliance with all building and electrical codes. • All signs shall be fabricated and installed with no visible screws, seams, rivets, or fastening devices. • Signs shall be made of durable rust inhibited materials that are appropriate and complementary to the building. • Sign manufacture shall supply a UL label in an incon- spicuous location. • Paint colors and finishes must be reviewed and approved by the Property Ovmer and City of Carlsbad. • Letter faces shall be attached in such a way that there is no light leaks. Light leaks between face and returns will not be permitted. • Spacers shall be noncorrosive, and painted to match building color. All bolts and mounting devices shall consist of porcelain finished iron, stainless steel, aluminum or carbon-bearing steel with painted finish. Angle clips attached to letter sides will not be permitted. • All sign finishes shall be free of dust, orange peel, drips, and runs. Finishes should have uniform coverage and be of the highest quality. ALLOWABLE SIGN TYPES: PROHIBITED SIGNS: TENANT WALL SIGNS • The overall sign area of all wall signs shall not exceed 1 sq. ft. of signage to every 1 linear foot of store frontage. • The overall sign area allowed for street frontage is 150 sq. ft. per building. • Maximum letter height shall not exceed 24". Except for tenants with lease space of 3,500 to 10,000 sq.ft. can have a maximum letter height of 30" (Section 21.41.095.b) No part of any sign vinll be allowed to extend past fascia above or below. • Sign length shall not exceed 75 percent of width of leased frontage. Example of 75%: If the allotted frontage is 30' wide, then sign can not exceed 22.5' in width. SIGN TYPE 1 • TENAIMT WALL SIGNS • Tenant Wall Signs shall be installed as shown on the attached exhibits for each occupants. LED intemally illuminated channel letters. Signs faces and returns will be painted per approved colors. Nationally recognized corpo- rate translucent vinyl colors may be used if approved by landlord for the channel plaque. Sign shall have a stroke width of no less then 2". SIGN TYPE 2 - TENANT WALL SIGNS • This type sign follows all the same requirements of sign type 1. • This type sign is must be used whenever wood occurs for sign placement. This will maintain legibility of sign. • Behind channel letters will be a .25" thick Aluminum painted brushed silver. The cloud will be shaped around tenants signage. The outline around letters/logo will depend on size of letters/logo. • All sign style's must be approved by owner, must be clear and legible from a distance, have a minimum of 2" stroke and comply with the Property Owner and City guidelines. Should the City of Carisbad or Property Owner deem a typeface to be non^egible, occupants shall change said typeface to satisty City of Carisbad Planning Depart- ment, and Property Owner. • All signs must be mounted permanently to building face, and 24" down from top of wall. • All signs must be mounted • All signs must be permitted by the City of Carisbad MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT Two double-sided Multi-Tenant Monument sign, as shown on the attached Exhibits. This sign will use existing up lights for illurtiination. Combined sign not to exceed 125 sq ft of sign area. Not to exceed 10 ft in height MAINTENANCE: It is the Occupant's responsibility to maintain their signs in proper working and clean conditions at all times. Other- wise Property Owner reserves the right to hire his own contractor, make the necessary corrections, and bill the Occupant's, should it be deemed necessary. Arrange- ments must be made within 48 hours to repair any broken or damaged sign. Any sign or section of a sign not illuminated correctly shall be turned off entirely until all lighting is completely repaired. The following signs are prohibited by Property Owner and City of Cartsbad. • All prohibited signs outlined in the City of Carisbad sign standards. • Any sign that does not conform or meet the intent of this sign program as determined by the Property Owner or the City of Carisbad. • Animated, moving, flashing, blinlting, reflecting, revolv- ing, or other similar signs. • Dilapidated or unsightly signs. • Cabinet signs with acrylic faces. • Exposed tubing or lamps to include but not limited to, neon, LED, Florescent, or luminescent. • Coated Styrofoam, acrylic foam, or any type of foam letters. • Inflated signs, balloons, and figures.. EXCEPTIONS: Exceptions must be submitted to Property Owner in advance for consideration. Property Owner reserves the right to make specific exceptions that it deems will enhace the quality of the project and that are in keeping with the purpose and intent of this document. Requests for exceptions that are denied approval by the Property Owner may be resubmitted for consideration after a period of 6 months from the date of notification of denial. All requests for exceptions shall be submitted to the City of Carisbad Planning Department for approval. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. 5|i5N PRO(3<AM iTei-i HI ENTRY I-1C3NUI-1ENT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD '••^ITEMIta. • •. euloplNS'i. • \M<^LL.$t€NS AS ITEM » 2 CORNER MONUMENT It II nnn 111.1*« •COSTCO WALL SISNASE 15 COxSiDERED TO BS _=S.A^ NON-COXFORvilNS AS it WAS AP=>!20VED :=URSUANT N!0 CH.ANSES .ASS PROPOSED TO TH= COSTCO VvAL- SiC5N.ASS, UHiilijii liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifiaii fl iiiinii|iiiiiiiiiiiiiiimn iBmiamil tilliliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.iiiiitl tiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiii iniiiimiiiiiiiiwa liWiiililiE ITEM «4 &UILDINS 3 WALI. &&tiS> H-N SITE PLAN/SION TYPES SIGN TYPE SCHEDULE /TEM S;(SN TYPE BIGNARBA 1 COSTCO ENTRY MONUMENT 20.0 S.F. 2 CORNER MONUMENT 1 -TENANT PANEL COPY A 56.2 S.F. -TENANT PANEL COPY B 27.5 S.F 1 -COSTCO PANEL COPY 20.5 S.F. TOTAL = TOTAL ALLOWED = 124.2 S.F. 125.0 S.F. SLVLC 3-A W0 i WALL MOUNTED SlGNS 2-PANEL MULTI-TENANT SIGN 30.0 S.F. 3-B 3-PANEL MULTI-TENANT SIGN 60.0 S.F. 3-C TENANT SIGN i 12.0 S.F 3-D TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F. 3-E TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F. 3-F TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F 3-G TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F rCTAL = rOWL ALLOWED = 150.0 S.F. 150.0 S.F. BUILC 4-H 2-PANEL MULTI-TENANT SIGN 30.0 S.F 4- 1 3-PANEL MULTI-TENANT SIGN 60.0 S.F. 4-J TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F 4-K TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F 4-L TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F 4-M TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F 4-N TENANT SIGN 12.0 S.F TOTAL = TOTAL ALLOWED = 150.0 S.F 150.0 S.F 5 •SOUTH ELEVATION I.D. 6 •TIRE CENTER I.D. (WALL SIGN) | 36.0 S.F. 7 •MENU BOARD | 20.0 S.F. 6 •GAS STATION CA«efSl«W."»« i 20.0 S.F •^TAL = 309.0 S.F. r. fW-MftirONCeiTEIt THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. -WW ^/»»Si ^ ^BW*' Wl*'' . Vxx^ SfMf* PALOMAR PLACE BUILDIhlO 2 ^ 2 PANEL MULTI-TENANT WALL 5ISN • TENAMT5 ON THIS $IS!J ARE DECIDED BY THE PR0PE8TY OWNER. - SISN IS ALLOTTED: 30 S.F. ^ 3 PANEL MULTI-TENANT WALL SIGN - TENANTS OH THIS SISN ASE DECIDED 9Y THE P80PESTY OWNEB. - SISN IS ALLOTTED: SO S.F. ^ TENANT 5ISN • S-g« lici to exceed /SS of -tcnoRT fro-irogc. - Moximjm sign height of single li-ie copy Is 2ft. siccked copy is Afl. • TENANT SiSN 15 ALLOTTED: 12 S.F. ^ TEN.ANT SISN - S^gfl pet to exceed 75* of tenant frontage. - Hoxunyin sign height of single line copy is 2ft. srccfced copy is 4ft. • TENANT SISN IS ALLOHED: 12 S.F. ^ TEN.ANT SISN • Sign not to exceed 75% of tenoRT fronroge. • Maximu.Ti sign height of single line copy is 2ft. stcci:eri copv is Afr, - TENANT SISN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F. TENANT SISN - Sign fiCT to exceed 75fti of tenont frontage. * l-laximym sign height of single line copy is 2ft, stcciicd copy Is 4ft. • TENANT SI(3N IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F. TENANT SISN * S-gn nct to exceed 75% of tenon? frontage. • Maximum sign height of single line copy is 2fi. stccited copv is 4ft. • TENANT SiSN 15 ALLOTTED: 12 S.F TOTAL COMBINED SIGN AREA: 150 S.F. TOTAL .ALLOWED SISN AREA: 150 S.F. SITE PLAN/BUILDINGS 3UILDINC5 2 ^ 2 PANEL MULTI-TENANT SISN • TENANTS ON THIS SISN ARE DECIDED SY THE ?ROP£i!TY OWNER. . SISN 15 ALLOTTED: 30 S.F <D i PANEL MULTI-TEN.ANT SISN TENANTS ON THIS SISN ARE DECIDED BY THE OROPESTY OWNER. SISN IS ALLOTTED: SO S.F. TENANT SISN • Sign no? to exceed 75ftS of tenant frentoge. • Mcximum sign height of single line copy is 2ft. stacled copy is 4ft, • TENANT SISN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F ^ TENANT SISN ' Sign not to exceed 75* ef tena.nt frontage. - Maximum sign heigiit of single line copy is 2ft, stacked copy ^s 4ft. • TENANT SiSN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F # TENANTSISN - Sign not TO exceed ?5S£ of tenosT frontage. . Maximum sign height ef single line copv is Sft. stacked copy is 4ft. - TENANT SIGN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F. ^ TENANT SIGN • Sign not TO exceed 75% of tenanT frontage. . Maximum sign height of single line copv is 2fr. stacked copy is 4ft. - TENANT SISN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F. ^ TENANT SISN • Sign not TO exceed 75SS of tenant frontage. - Maximum sign height of single line copy is 2ft, stacked copy Is 4ft. • TENANT SISN IS ALLOTTED: 12 S.F TOTAL COMBINED SISN AREA: ISO S.F TOTAL ALLOWED SIGN AREA: ISO S.F THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. w*' ^^w^' . W^' BUILDIN<3 1 ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 'lTCii*)fr«iciil.; ... HI *^ni;iln miiiKiili ... HI *^ni;iln miiiKiili ... HI *^ni;iln miiiKiili ... HI *^ni;iln miiiKiili o- 4' e>' Ife' EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION (jo THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. \^ i*.:.**-^ U:S* ,^MAR PLAC BUILDING 2 ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION O' 4' 6' 16' O' 4' £>' 16' 32' . . . EAST ELEVATION O- 4' ft' 16' 32' NORTH ELEVATION q; 4' e; i6' 32' THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. COMpaHHENSIVE Si(5N PROGRAM TENANT SION TYPE 1 A - SINOLE LINE OF COPY B - STACKED COPY 8'-0" (75% STORE FRONTAGE MAX) COFFEE INDIVIDUAl CHANNfi LETTERS/PLAQUE TYPE 1 - WALL SI<5N FACE LIT CHANNEL LETTERS/PLAQUE • LED ILLUMINATED • 3/lS- WHITE ACRYLIC FACES WITH VINYL OVERLAY • .OAO- ALUr-IINUM BACKS AND RETURNS . 3/4.- TRIM CAP AND RETURNS PAINTED BLACK • MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL FASCIA. 24" BELOW TOP OF WALL. TENANTS ALLOWED THIS SIGN: • 1.0 S.F. FOR EVERY 1 LINEAR FOOT OF STORE FRONTASE • SISN LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED 75* OF STORE FRONTASE < CHARACTER STROKE WIDTH NO LESS THAN 2' • MAXIMUM HEISHT FOR SINGLE LINE COPY IS 24- ; EXCEPT FOR TENANTS WITH LEASE SPACE DF 3,500 TO 10,000 S.F. CAN HAVE A MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 30" (SECTION 21.41.025 (B)). • MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR STACKED COPY IS 4fl- MTERIOR MWTEO WHITE L «10MM. FASTENERS MH 3 PERU L 0RMNHai.e.MIN.2PERGRAmK L POWERTDSIGNB THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTFIACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. TENANT SJON TYPE 2 A - SINGLE LINE OF COPY B - STACKED COPY 6'-0" (76% STORE FRONTAGE MAX) ^ INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS/PLAQUE TYPE 2 - WALL SIGN W/ CLOUD FACE LIT CHANNEL LETTERS/PLAQUE WHENEVER WOOD OCCURS FOR SIGN PLACEMENT TENANT MUST HAVE AN ALUMINUM "CLOUD" PLACED BEHIND LETTERS • LED ILLUMINATED • 3/l<S' WHITE ACRYLIC FACES WITH VINYL OVERLAY • .040' ALUMINUM BACKS AND RETURNS • 3/4- TRIMCAP AND RETURNS PAINT MATTHEWS BRUSHED SILVER • .125" ALUMINUM CLOUD PAINTED MATTHEWS BRUSHED SILVER (OUTLINE AROUND LETTERS WILL DEPEND ON SIZE OF LETTERS) • MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL FASCIA. 24" BELOW TOP OF WALL TENANTS ALLOWED THIS SIGN: • l.O S.F. FOR EVERY 1 LINEAR FOOT OF STORE FRONTAGE • SIGN LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED 7596 OF STORE FRONTAGE • CHARACTER STROKE-WIDTH NO LESS THAN 2' . MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR SINGLE LINE COPY IS 24" ; EXCEPT FOR TENANTS WITH LEASE SPACE OF 3.500 TO 10,000 S.F. CAN HAVE A MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 30' (SECTION 21.41.095 (B)). • MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR STACKED COPY IS 4S' DISCONNECT SWITCH lED POVStR SUPPLY I. CLASS 2 WIRE L «10 MW. FASTENERS MIN. 3 PER LETTER THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. y^*sa ^^*^ ^=*^ MULTI-TENANT WALL SIONS 2-PANEL MULTI-TENANT WALL SI<5N FLOURECENT ILLUMINATED .125" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE WITH 3/1S" ACRYLIC BACKER PANEL AND VINYL OR PAINTED GRAPHICS 1/a- ALUMINUM CABINET WITH 1" DIVIDER BAR MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL FASCIA. 24" BELOW TOP OF WALL TENANTS ALLOWED THIS SIGN; • THE PROPERTY MANAGER WILL DECIDE WHICH TENANTS NAME WILL BE PLACED ON THIS SIGN. SIGN = 30 S.F. 8' • " 10' " hi TENANT SIGN I TENANT SIGN , E CN (D d CM JL TENANT SIGN « t c 3 CM CM 1 1>- •tENiM4t-SIGW-^' .v! L:-\TEN/CNT'$IGN••••j 3-PANEL MULTI-TENANT WALL SIGN FLOURECENT ILLUMINATED .125" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE WITH 3/1S" ACRYLIC BACKER PANEL AND VINYL OR PAINTED GRAPHICS VS' ALUMINUM CABINET WITH 1" DIVIDER BAR MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL FASCIA. 24" BELOW TOP OF WALL. TENANTS ALLOWED THIS SIGN: • THE PROPERTY MANAGER WILL DECIDE WHICH TENANTS NAME WILL BE PLACED ON THIS SIGN. SIGN = (SO S.F THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. • • : ; M AX?* AM MULTI-TENANT D/F MONUMENT SION - CORNER • 20'-<S" (A) 113.S75" TENANT,A-jENANTB (^^^f^^^^^KKit^^A^^^^3^lilii^^KfV^Kf^^'il^^ffltKtii^\ TENANT D TENANT F '"7j''-:l-'* JrvV'r.V-.' "• i '- - TENANT C ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ TENANT E : TENANT D TENANT F '"7j''-:l-'* JrvV'r.V-.' "• i '- - TENANT G TENANTH FRONT ELEVATION VIEW (B) IIS" PROFILE VIEW CCRNER MONUMENT - P/F MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGN • EXISTING DOUBLE FACED MONUMENT TO HAVE NEW FABRICATED PAN INSTALLED OVER EXISTING STRUCTURE, ADDITIONAL WOOD PANELS MATCHING SHOPPING CENTER BACKGROUND. • UP LIGHTS FOR ILLUMINATION . CHANGEABLE TENANT PANELS BUILT OUT OF PAINTED ALUMINUM WITH FLAT CUT OUT ACRYLIC LETTERS/LOGO ATTACHED WITH VHB TAPE. • OVERALL SIGN HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED lO FEET • COMBINED MONUMENT SIGN AREA TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED 125 S.F (I.E. TOTAL FOR BOTH MONUMENT SIGNS, PER CMC SECTION 21.20e.lOOB) • (A) TENANT A,B,D,F PANEL SIGN AREA r SiS.IS S.F. • (B) TENANT C,E,G,H PANEL SIGN AREA = 27.54 S.F • COSTCO PANEL TO MAINTAIN ITS CURRENT SIZE OF = 20.5 S.F. (PS 2S-4S) TOT^ SIGN AREA = 104.22 S.F EXISTING SIGN THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. COSTCO $ RALOMAR PLACE 0^ FRONT ELEVATION VIEW ENTRY MONUMENT - COSTCO MONUMENT Double-faced monument s(gn to be fabricated with 1/2" iftick Sintra on a 2" metal angle frame Utttihed with a integral fine nsgrejate stucco to tiraulate formed concrete. "COSTCO" graphics to be pre-ftnished In red *fltf blue to macch logo graphic stan<lards and ipray-mwked prior to stmcco applkation. Sign w> be mounted to «tructuril pipe In a concrete pole footing. Sign to be fteodllt wth lv»o (2) 480 v 0.7amp 28w {one per side) floodM^bt focttirea (to match comar morniment flocKi%htfixture»). »1 PROFILE VIEW ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN 20 sq. ft. sign area JHESHORAWI^OSARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY.THEY ARE NOTFOHACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE COMPRSHENSiVE Si0N PROGRAM DESCRiPTtON Exittiag painted wail sign with niiorescMiit iloodllghttikg. 233.0 sq. ft. sign area COSTCO - SOUTH ELEVATION WALL S\GN I.D. TTr X I»AJITCA1 SOUrrH ELEVATION (#5 fntvwmy OrhnmOi •COSTCO WALL Sli3N.A©5 IS CONSOESgC- TO SE LEGAL N-ON-CONFOSMINS .AS ^"^ VS-A5 .APP?50vSD "LRSJANT TC -5 SS-s-S. NC CH.ANiG££ A5£ PROPOSED TO TH£ CCS''CO WA-- 51 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. COYPRSHENSIVE PROGRAM COSTOO - WALL SIGN TIRE CENTER I.D. DESCRIPTION EKilfttns 2* deep dimensioRa! letters ptinted Xo»:o Bltte* in helveikal tj^pest)4e» m<M{t»ad to fluted «oncf«te wiM 3^ sq. ft sign »reft fASmAL iAST iLEVATION (Tire Center) 'CCS'CO WAL_ Si£N.A(5E IS CONS ~0 BS L=GAL NCJN-CONFO^MING .AS i~ VVAS .•^^PPROVSD 'LRSJAxT TO P5 NO CH.'^NGES .A<S PROPOSED TO "Hg COS''CO VVAL.. 51G\* THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. r-ric-^-^rj & OA] OMA12 pi A<"s: COSTCO - OAS CANOPY IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION EXISTING - WEST CAI^iOPY ELEVATION SIGN TO BE REMOVED Gas statiofi camopy graphic iit standaixi 'Go«tco*c<ibr$'SafetyRed#SW-4081 and UplsUzuli#SW.t8&S. <R«viMKi f iz« €7^5% »n»i(«r to comply v*ltli City of Carlstiad reqjukements) 20 sq. fbeadi I •-$1/2" •CCS"rCO W.ALi- SISN.AGE iS CONSiDE^gD TO BB LEGAL. KON-CONFO*^iN-3 .-^S '~ \KA~ APPROVED PLRSJANT TO =>5 32-i6, NO CH.ANC5SS .ASS Pi50PC'5£D TO 'rt£ COS'CC WA__ 3<S\ASB. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. wL^iP : C K**KUO! i,AK KL-..*^WS ENStVE SIGN PROGRAM COSTCO - MENU BOARD DESCfUPTIOISI Floodlit meeii board fi^coted ^vith white board, vinjrl copf and fuS^eolOf prodyctpietare$. I I ^ 1LZ3 F [2 z T V w. z 'COSTCO WALL SISN.A-SH IS CONSiDSSSO =•£ L=5AL NON-CONFOSMIN-S .AS \\A~ .A.PPROVED PLiSSJAx"'' Tc =5 Z2'^&. NO CH.ANSSS A<5 PSOPOSEE: -IF COS'CO \VAL_ 5IGSAGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY THEY ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION PURPOSES. THE SIGN CONTRACTOR CHOSEN BY THE OCCUPANTS ACCEPTS TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SELECTION. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION. EXHIBIT 5 Planning Commission IVIinutes November 7,2012 Page 6 Commissioner Siekmann asl^ed if the applicant would be agreeable to placing a sign on their property. Mr. Eilford stated that he is agreeable to simple "Caution When Exiting" sign. The Commission discussed the need for a sign regarding left turns from the site and possible wording to include on a sign. The Commission agreed on a sign reading "Caution When Exiting." MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Siekmann, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6925 approving CUP 10- 12(A) based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein with an added condition for a cautionary sign to be placed at the exit. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioner Arnold, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Scully, and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Nygaard ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Schumacher closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 3 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next agenda item. 5- SDP 90-05(G)/CUP 12-08/CDP 12-14 - PALOIVIAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER - Request for approval of a Site Development Plan Amendment and a recommendation of approval for a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the construction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commercial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 5 and stated Associate Planner Shannon Werneke would make the staff presentation. Chairperson Schumacher opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 5. Ms. Werneke gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Arnold asked if the store logos will be on the signs. Ms. Werneke stated she has not seen the details for the logos on the monument sign and deferred the question to the applicant. Commissioner Arnold asked if the sidewalk along Palomar Airport Road will be enhanced to be a landscaped parkway. Ms. Werneke stated no. Chairperson Schumacher asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Nick Foussianes, 12838 Stebick Court, San Diego, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Arnold asked if the monument sign will have store logos. Mr. Foussianes stated that would be the preference of the tenants. Commissioner Siekmann commented that the project seems to be a very dark project. She asked if the applicant would consider a warmer color palette for the buildings and if the mullions or window class 7^ Planning Commission Minutes November 7,2012 Page 7 could be different colors. Mr. Foussianes stated the window panes and mullions are proposed to be anodized bronze which has wood feeling to it. He stated they are flexible with the color choices and would be open to considering a lighter color. Commissioner Black asked for the purpose of the tower. Mr. Foussianes stated it is a means for visibility to the center from Palomar Airport Road. Commissioner Black asked if the market study shows that there will be enough traffic for the project. Mr. Foussianes stated yes. Commissioner Scully asked about the circulation of traffic. Mr. Foussianes stated the calculus in the code addresses and provides for that. He stated that because this is a less intense use than the previous use with less ADT, they were able to add another building on the site. The traffic study prepared for the previous use was updated with this application. The project is proposing less daily trips than the previous project. Ms. Werneke confirmed that there will be a net decrease in 72 ADT with this new project based on the difference in uses. Ms. Werneke further stated that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Armada currently operates at a Level of Service A during the peak a.m. hours and a Level of Service of C during the peak p.m. hours which are acceptable levels of service. She also stated that over the course of four years there have only been 4 traffic accidents at that intersection. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, he asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, Chairperson Schumacher opened and closed public testimony. Commissioner Siekmann commented that because the applicant is agreeable to working on the proposed colors. Ms. Werneke stated staff could work with the applicant and have it as an added condition. DISCUSSION Commissioner Arnold commended the applicant for coming up with a more innovative design. Commissioner L'Heureux stated he has real problems with this project. It is not something he would be proud of to have in the city. With the kinds of proposed businesses and the type of traffic it will generate, it will only create a nightmare for traffic. He feels it is a much too intense use for the site and he cannot support the project. Commissioner Scully stated she cannot the project. She stated most of the time it takes several cycles of lights just to enter the site. To add nine more businesses will only add to the congestion. Commissioner Scully stated that the building is awful and is not appropriate for the area. She stated she cannot support the project. Commissioner Black stated he can support the project with consideration to changing the colors. Commissioner Siekmann can also support the project and would like to suggest a condition regarding a warmer more appealing combination of colors for the buildings, more travertine and less wood. Chairperson Schumacher applauded the applicant for not coming forward with a stucco building. He supports Commissioner Siekmann's request for a warmer look for the colors. He feels that what the applicant is proposing, while it will bring more traffic, it will be a nice addition to the center. Ms. Mobaldi suggested that if the Commission is going to change the project design or colors, the Commission needs to provide specific direction to staff and the applicant as to where they would like to see changes. Commissioner Siekmann suggested the color of wood to be like the color used on the Newsstand Store at Westfield UTC. She further suggested that the stucco above the columns to be travertine tile. Mr. Foussianes stated he was agreeable to that. Commissioner Siekmann further suggested that the color of mullions blend more with the windows. Mr. Neu stated that a new Condition No. 15 would be added to Resolution No. 6922 to read "The building architecture and the materials shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Planner to incorporate the 7^ Planning Commission Minutes November 7,2012 Page 8 following prior to the issuance of a building permit: utilize a warmer tone for exterior wood surfaces similar to the Westfield UTC project "Newsstand" tenant space; the color of window mullions/storefront metal surfaces shall be revised to a lighter color; and Travertine shall be utilized above storefront columns. Chairperson Schumacher asked for a show of support for the added condition regarding the design changes. The Commission supported it 4-2. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Siekmann, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6921 approving Site Development Plan Amendment SDP 90-05(G) and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6922 and 6923 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including additional Condition No. 15 to Resolution No. 6922. VOTE: 4-2 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioner Arnold, Commissioner Black, and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: Commissioner L'Heureux and Commissioner Scully ABSENT: Commissioner Nygaard ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Schumacher closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 5 and thanked Staff for their presentations. COMMISSION COMMENTS None. CITY PLANNER COMMENTS Mr. Neu informed the Commission of upcoming additional briefing times due to the Quarry Creek project and the Westfield Carlsbad project. Commissioner L'Heureux stated that it would be helpful to arrange a tour of the Quarry Creek site. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS Ms. Mobaldi stated the Council denied the Gunther appeal 3-2. Ms. Mobaldi also updated the Commission on the Appellate Court decision regarding the lawsuit filed by Friends of Aviara challenging approval of the Housing Element. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Regular Meeting ofthe Planning Commission of November 7, 2012, was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. DON NEU City Planner Bridget Desmarals Minutes Clerk November 15, 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD NOV 19 2012 PLANNING DEPARTMENT City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Proposed Palomar Place Retail Center Dear Sir/Madam: I read in the Union Tribune on November 12,2012 about the proposed commercial center proposed for the Costco shopping center on Palomar Airport Road. The article mentioned there was strong opposition voiced by several of the commissioners, however, several other commissioners felt it was a good idea to go forward with the development. It would seem to me those who are in favor of the development should take the time to visit that area at various times ofthe day. The traffic into and out ofthe Costco parking area is now almost impossible at times. If you add another nine tenants to the area and the traffic that will bring (if it is more successful than Pat & Oscar's), getting into and out of the area would be a major triumph. Please reconsider this development at least with the traffic situation as it is now. Carlsbad has made some very good decisions with regard to development, and it has made a few not so good. This would be a "not so good." Thank you for your consideration. Sipjcerely, C^^^__/;^^55H^ ^^^^ JeinMilam 5163 Don Ricardo Drive Carlsbad, CA 92010 V PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: November 25^^ 2012 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at^^scondido, California On This ^6*^ d^y November, 2012 Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Proof of Publication of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING faNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your in- Fterest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Coun- cil Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 4,.2012, to consid- er approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Develop-ment Permit to allow for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an ex- isting 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the construction of a 7,621 square foot free- standing commercial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Pro-gram and Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and more partic-ularly described as: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 17542 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 27,1995 Whereas, on' November 7,2012 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-2 (L'Heureux and Scully) to approve a Site Development Plan Amendment and recommend approval of a ' Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to al-low for a 2,816 square foot expansion to an existing 5,263 square foot commercial building formerly occupied by Pat & Oscar's and the construction of a 7,621 square foot freestanding commer- cial building on a 1.75-acre parcel located on the southwest cor-ner of Palomar Airport Road and Armada Drive, within the Mello 11 Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Fa-cilities Management Zone 5. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially in- vited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after November 30, 2012. If you have any questions, please contact Shannon Werneke in the Planning Di- vision at (760) 602-4621 or shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov . If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit and/or Coastal De- velopment Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing de-scribed in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hear- ing. CASE FILE: CUP 12-Oa/CDP 12-14 CASE NAME: PALOMAR PLACE RETAIL CENTER CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 1068983011/25/2012 AU3AV-O9-008-I. UJ0>'Ai3Ae'MMM CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 ap suas SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AVE SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ®091S <3)AU3AV iueqe5 d| zasjij^i ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 710 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DIST TIM JOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF VISTA 200 CIVIC CENTER DR VISTA CA 92084 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH AND GAME 3883 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE 310 5510 OVERLAND AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239 SAN DIEGO LAFCO STE 200 9335 HAZARD WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92123 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 CA COASTAL COMMISSION ATTN KANANI BROWN STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- PROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER MICHAEL MCSWEENEY - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 Hu.a6p3 dn-dod asodxa • ®091S aiB|duiai @ytiaAV asn siaaei xKiaa«t Xses Aa3AV-O9-008-l Uj03'AjaAe-MMVM { :„dn.dod pJoqaj a| jajBAaj *"aps^a|^^ T <S,Q91S ®Ad3AV :iueqe6 a| zasjn^f jaiad 1^ saipe^ sauanbii; LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA L L C LF PO BOX 543185 DALLAS, TX 75354-3185 JOHNS 843 DUNE ST EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-2021 C B RANCH ENTERPRISES 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS 100 CARLSBAD, CA 920O8-4452 ROBERT & DEBORAH STREET 102 9 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 HORRELL 2004 1025 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 DAVIES 1021 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 JAMES & GARRIE RHODES *M* 1013 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 ROSS-MACNEEL 1009 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 HOTTO 1007 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 GROSS 1001 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 MARCIA BIGLAISER 1004 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1222 EDWARDSARNELL 1007 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1218 HENRY Sc FERN MARLING 1003 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1218 JOSEPH G COREY 995 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1216 OLGA RESTA *M* 991 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1216 DUANE T Sc JENNIFER OCONNELL 987 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1216 RUBEN P Sc LESLIE LAZO 983 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1216 STEVEN S Sc TAMARA OGG 979 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1216 STEVEN J RUDE 986 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1215 CHUNG CHO 994 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1215 JEFFREY T Sc REBECCA VOGEL 998 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1215 AIDAN Sc JANET NUTTALL 1006 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1217 RICHARD J SCHROEDER 1014 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1217 LOUGEAY 1047 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 PAUL Sc KATHLEEN ZOMBOLAS 1043 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 SCHWAEBE 103 9 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 ROBERT D Sc KIM CANTERBURY 103 5 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 ELLEN L NAKAMURA 1031 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 SHAW 1027 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 HUGH G Sc CHERYL GERHARDT 1023 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 ®09is ©AtlBAV f nx^SpB dn-dod asodxa I 0} au|| 6uo|e puaa jadej paaj • @09I.S aiB|diuai @AjaAv asn siaqei ^gviaad Aseg Aa3AV-09-008-l. ul03'AJaAe'/^AA^M [ ;,ndn-dOc| pjoqaj a| ja|^Aaj ap suas • I ®091S (DAMHAV iueqeB a| zasjnir ! jajad e sa|pe^ sananbj:^; ABRAMS FAMILY 1019 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 EHRLICH 1015 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1219 TY Sc KATHRYN COX 1037 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 CHARLES PARKER 103 3 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1223 JAMES J Sc DONNA KOZAK 1011 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1218 MOORE *B* 1048 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1224 COLCLASER 1049 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1225 FIGGAT 1045 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1225 CHRISTOPHER HAJNIK 1041 GOLDENEYE VW CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1225 SUZANNE L HARMATZ 103 0 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1220 JONATHAN M Sc PAMELA TUCKER 1034 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1220 BILLIE D CASTILLO 103 8 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1220 FLORENTINO Sc CAROL CALIP 1042 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1220 MARTY JOYCE 1046 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1220 KREMERS 1018 TURNSTONE RD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1217 OSCARS CARLSBAD LLC 1959 PALOMAR OAKS WAY 300 CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1310 ANGEL M Sc KATHLEEN TORRES PO BOX 130275 CARLSBAD, CA 92013-0275 DONALD F ARMENTO PO BOX 131511 CARLSBAD, CA 92013-1511 BRIAN Sc LAURA BODENSTEINER PO BOX 235020 ENCINITAS, CA 92023-5020 HANNAWATER HOLDINGS LLC 1758 KENNINGTON RD ENCINITAS, CA 92024-1027 FAIRWEATHER 3417 LONE HILL LN ENCINITAS, CA 92024-7264 CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS MANi 215 W ASH ST FALLBROOK, CA 92028-2904 YOUNGBLOOD PO BOX 13 08 RANCHO SANTA , CA 92067-1301 SEABRIGHT CARLSBAD HOMEOWNERJ 438 CAMINO DEL RIO 112B SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3546 FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4432 JCM TOM CO L L C II 1524 DORCAS ST SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-1515 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 999 LAKE DR ISSAQUAH, WA 98027-8990 *** 57 Printed *** I ®09\PS ®AU3AV f wia6p3 dn-dod asodxa I 0% au!| 6uo|e puag J3ded paaj [ • ! ®09I.S eiB|duiai ®AjaAV asf Easy PeeP Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Por; i-n Edge^" AVERY® 5160® CURRENT PALOM^^^IRPORT RD CARLyg^AD, CA 92 011 CURRENT RESIDi PALOMAR _^K^ORT RD CARLTSB'XD, CA 92011 CURRENT RESIDENT 965 PALOMAR AIRPQRTRD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1110 CURRENT RESIDENT 951 PALOMAR AIRPORTRD CARLSBAD, CA 92011-1110 *** 4 Printed *** Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® • Sens de Repliez k la hachure afin de | r&vMt^r IP rebord Pon-tinMC ! www.avery.com i.Rnn.rin.AvcRV PALOMAR PLACE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA COMPANY OVERVIEW (KEY PERSONNEL) John Sarkisian Nick Foussianes •Seasoned Investor/Developer •$100MM+ Developed Value •20+ years Commercial Real Estate Experience •Trusted Advisor (5 MM+ SQUARE FEET) •Microsoft •BP America •Aon Corporation •Willis •PWC •Wilson Sporting Goods •Principal Financial •Sears •Canary Wharf •Licensed/Registered Architect/Broker •Community and Business Leader •$250MM+ Developed Value •25+ years Commercial Real Estate and Executive Business Experience •SKLZ CEO •Founding Owner •Semtek (now a division of Verifone) •Pat & Oscars •Board Member •Brightscope •YMCA •San Diego Sports Commission •San Diego Sports Innovators •CAF Million Dollar Challenge Co-chair COMPANY OVERVIEW Past and Current Projects COMPANY OVERVIEW Past and Current Projects Project Size Value Poinsettia Ridge – Mixed Use, Encinitas 120 units/127,0 00sf $37MM Pat & Oscar’s, Retail (Multiple Sites) 21 Stores $20MM UCSD Medical Center Building, Medical Office, Hillcrest 30,000sf $9MM Mesa Ridge, Flex Office, Sorrento Mesa 33,000sf $5.7MM Plaza Linda Paseo, Mixed Use, SDSU Campus Entitlement Project 47 Units + 4,000 sf Ret NA Pala Gateway, Mixed Use Land Development, Fallbrook 300 Units +50ksf Ret. $12MM Heritage Villas at Evening Creek, MF Residential, Sabre Springs 60 Units $30MM 3200 6th Avenue, MF Residential, Hillcrest 31 Units $21MM Heritage on First, MF Residential, Hillcrest 25 Units $18MM Heritage on Diamond, MF Residential, Pacific Beach 20 Units $9.5MM INSPIRATION INSPIRATION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING – INTERIOR COURTYARD ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING – SITE PERSPECTIVE TENANT MIX Tenants (Lease Negotiation) Tenants (Letter of Intent Negotiation) THANK YOU Palomar Place Retail Center December 4, 2012 Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner PALOMAR AIRPORT RDARMADA DRCUP 12-08 / CDP 12-14 Palomar Place Retail Center 0 90 18045Feet Site Plan Costco parking 50’ Proposed Existing Proposed Elevations North- facing Palomar Airport Road South 39’ 32’ 32’ Existing/Renovated Proposed Building Proposed Addition to (E) 25’ Elevations East- facing driveway off Armada Drive Palomar Airport Rd Palomar Airport Rd West 12’ Comprehensive Sign Program Wall Signs- West Building Comprehensive Sign Program Monument Sign 20 ½ ’ 7’ Existing height: 5 ½ feet Existing width: 18 ½ feet Planning Commission Action November 7, 2012: •Approved SDP Amendment (4-2-1, L’Heureux Scully opposed) •Recommended approval of CUP and CDP SANDAG TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES Land Use Trip Rate Restaurant, Sit-down, high turnover 160/1,000 square feet Specialty Retail/Strip Commercial 40/1,000 square feet Project Comparison- ADTs PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADTs) Pat & Oscars (7,050 SF restaurant) 1,128 ADTs Palomar Place (3,500 SF restaurant & 12,400 SF of retail) 560 + 496= 1,056 ADTs NET DIFFERENCE (-72) Analysis •General Plan •Local Coastal Program •Zoning Ordinance •CEQA Recommendation City Council ADOPT Resolution 2012- 265 approving Conditional Use Permit CUP 12-08 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 12-14