Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-01-08; City Council; 21102; 2012 Public Opinion Survery Effectiveness ReportCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 25 AB# 21,102 2012 PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY AND STATE OF EFFECTIVENESS REPORT DEPT. DIRECTOR MTG. 1-8-13 2012 PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY AND STATE OF EFFECTIVENESS REPORT CITY ATTORNEY DEPT, CM 2012 PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY AND STATE OF EFFECTIVENESS REPORT CITY MANAGER //(^l RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the 2012 Resident Public Opinion Survey and State of Effectiveness reports. ITEM EXPLANATION: The City of Carlsbad prides itself on providing cost-effective, high-quality services to residents. For over 10 years, the city's Performance Measurement Team has coordinated the measurement of city performance through an annual public opinion survey and State of Effectiveness Report. In collaboration with BW Research Partnership, the team is proud to submit for City Council review and acceptance the 2012 Resident Public Opinion Survey and State of Effectiveness reports (on file with the City Clerk's Office). To gauge the satisfaction with city services from residents, the city contracted with BW Research Partnership to conduct a telephone survey of 1,000 residents. BW Research Partnership conducted the survey from September 12 through October 8, 2012 and surveys were an average of 20 minutes. The survey methodology ensures a statistically representative sample of Carlsbad residents. The State of Effectiveness Report documents key survey findings as well as other measures to track city performance. Both reports reflect the city's commitment to high-quality services that support an excellent quality of life for the community. The city will continue to measure performance throughout the year to advance the practices of continuous improvement and accountability as key parts of the organization's culture. FISCAL IMPACT: None. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Greg Hermann 760-434-2958 areq.hermann@carlsbadca.aov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED • DENIED • CONTINUED • WITHDRAWN • AMENDED • CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC • CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN • RETURNED TO STAFF • OTHER - SEE MINUTES ^ Council accepted the reports. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed action does not qualify as a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378, as it does not result in a direct or reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. EXHIBITS: 1. 2012 Public Opinion Survey 2. 2012 State of Effectiveness Report 1 <\? Cl T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD City of Carlsbad State of Effectiveness Report The City of Carlsbad prides itself on providing top quality services to residents and businesses. Over the past decade the city has measured its performance to gauge levels of success. The State of Effectiveness Report evaluates the city's progress towards achieving City Council Strategic Goals, provides feedback and information for continuous improvement, and helps to shape the culture of the organization. This is the 13th year the city has issued a report on its performance. Despite the difficult economic environment, most performance measurement outcomes continue to remain strong. In addition, this year's report is supplemented with several new performance measures to better reflect the changing needs ofthe community. The State of Effectiveness report is prepared using a variety of tools: the Carlsbad Resident Survey, internal operation performance measures and targets, professional associations and industry standards. Data from the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Center for Performance Measurement and from other professional associations, such as the American Water Works Association, are used to compare the city's performance to other local governments and organizations nationally. The measures help the city assess its progress towards achieving established strategic goals with both qualitative and quantitative data. The evaluation is based on a balanced approach which looks at the city's ability to meet the desired service delivery standard, customer satisfaction levels of key services or functions and cost objectives. • Service delivery: The efficiency with which the service is being delivered • Customer satisfaction: The degree to which customers are satisfied with the service provided • Cost: A measurement of costs related to providing the service This type of approach is outcome-oriented and provides a way to evaluate the effectiveness and value of the services the city provides. The report also includes key findings related to standards from the Growth Management Plan. The annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report provides a summary and analysis ofthe city's progress in meeting objectives to ensure that adequate public facilities are provided concurrent with growth and to ensure compliance with dwelling unit limitations. The Performance Measurement Team would like to thank the various departments and staff actively engaged in continuous improvement and commitment to the pursuit of excellence though the performance measurement process. 3 CARLSBAD CITY OF Table of Contents City Council Strategic Focus Areas 4 Community Vision Core Values 5 Growth Management Plan Key Findings 6 Performance Measures Administration: Finance 7 Administration: Risk Management 8 Communication 9 Community & Economic Development: Building Inspections 10 Community & Economic Development: Planning 11 Housing & Neighborhood Services: Code Compliance 12 Housing & Neighborhood Services 13 Housing & Neighborhood Services: Volunteer Program 14 Human Resources 15 Information Technology 16 Library & Cultural Arts: Cultural Arts Office 17 Library & Cultural Arts: Library 18 Parks & Recreation: Parks 19 Parks 8L Recreation: Recreation 20 Parks & Recreation: Trails 21 Property & Environmental Management: Facilities 22 Property 8i Environmental Management: Fleet 23 Property & Environmental Management: Storm Water 24 Safety Services: Fire 25 Safety Services: Police 26 Transportation: Street Maintenance 27 Transportation: Traffic Engineering 28 Utilities: Potable & Recycled Water 29 Utilities: Sewer 30 Utilities: Solid Waste 31 Resources 32 ^ CARLSBAD CITY OF City Council Strategic Focus Areas Background The City Council held its annual goal setting workshop Jan. 17, 2012. This workshop was the first step in creating the city's action plan and budget for the coming year. The day-long discussion focused on 12 key trends affecting the city in the areas ofthe economy, changing demographics and technology. From this discussion. Council identified the six most important strategic focus areas for 2012-13. Based on this direction, staff began to develop detailed and measureable action plans for each strategic focus area. This was accomplished through several workshops held with key staff from throughout the organization. Success was defined for each strategic focus area as well as various strategies that could be used to achieve that success. Staff then brainstormed and later refined a list of key projects that could be implemented this year to make the vision of each strategic focus area a reality. The projects are listed by strategic focus area. Key projects that are not directly associated with a strategic focus area are listed later in the report by strategic goal. Strategic Focus Areas • Create quality jobs in a new economy - The vision of this strategic focus area is to create quality jobs in the region. This will be accomplished by implementing strategies to retain businesses and help them grow, attracting talent and innovators to the city and partnering with universities and research institutions to become a hub for higher education. In addition, staff will focus on streamlining city processes for companies considering relocating to Carlsbad. • Sustainable organization - The vision of this strategic focus area is to be an adaptable, responsive and efficient city organization that delivers cost effective, high quality services. To accomplish this, the city will retain a motivated, flexible and responsive staff and incentivize high performance. • Balancing land use policies with a changing community - The vision of this strategic focus area is that, through the General Plan update process, the city adapts land use policies to address population and demographic trends. This will ensure that the city maintains its high standards and balances a thriving community with the need for tranquil, natural open spaces. • Changing parks and recreation needs - The vision of this strategic focus area is to meet the community's changing recreation needs, including more options for active seniors and young people. To accomplish this staff will consider accelerating the schedule for building new parks and community centers. In addition, we will look beyond parks to an expanded trails system and open spaces that encourage a healthy outdoor lifestyle. This will be facilitated by considering opportunities for public-private partnerships to expand offerings in a cost effective manner. • Livable streets - The vision of this strategic focus area is to begin adapting Carlsbad streets to accommodate and encourage all modes of transportation, not just cars. This will be accomplished by using street design to create a sense of place and community through green spaces, medians and signage. In addition, traffic signal technology upgrades will improve traffic flow. <^»r CITY OF CARLSBAD Next generation of community leaders - The vision of this strategic focus area is to find ways to encourage a broader demographic, which more accurately reflects the population of Carlsbad, to participate in city leadership and governance. <^ »X CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Community Vision Core Values Through an extensive outreach and involvement process, the Carlsbad community created a vision for the future that includes these core values, which serve as a guide for city leaders as they carry out their service: • Small town feel, beach community character and connectedness • Open space and the natural environment • Access to recreation and active, healthy lifestyles • The loca! economy, business diversity and tourism • Walking, biking, public transportation and connectivity • Sustainability History, the arts and cultural resources • High quality education and community services • Neighborhood revitalization, community design and livability 1 <<< ij; CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Growth Management Plan The Carlsbad Municipal Code requires the preparation of an annual monitoring report on the Cartsbad Growth Management Plan, which can be found in a separate report titled "City of Carisbad FY 2011-12 Growth Management Plan Monitoring Report". The FY 2011-12 report was transmitted to the City Council via memo in December 2012 and can be viewed at the following web link: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services select Planning then Growth Management. The purpose ofthe annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report is to provide information regarding the status of the Growth Management Plan and to verify that the plan is continuing to accomplish its stated objectives, which are to ensure that adequate public facilities are provided concurrent with growth and to ensure compliance with the dwelling unit limitations established by Proposition E in 1986. To ensure the provision of adequate public facilities, the City of CaHsbad adopted the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (Sept. 16,1986) which established performance standards for the following eleven public facilities: City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water Distribution System The annual Growth Management Plan monitoring report provides a summary and analysis of the city's progress in meeting the performance standards for the public facilities listed above. The major findings ofthe "City of Carisbad FY 2011-12 Growth Management Plan Monitoring Report" are as follows: • Building permits for 424 new dwellings and 218,884 square feet of non-residential space were issued during FY 2011-12. The total number of dwelling units in each quadrant continues to comply with the Growth Management Plan limitations. • All Local Facility Management Zones have adopted Local Facility Management Plans except Zone 25. • All public facilities are currently meeting their adopted Growth Management performance standard. <<j(^'f CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Administration: Finance Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 fy 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Py 2011-12 Balanced Long Term Fiscal Condition: 10-year financial forecast / Revenues will be equal to or exceed expenditures in each year Yes Yes Yes Yes Monthly Financial Status Report / Timely Distribution < 15 Average Working Days 10.7 average working days 10.2 average working days 10.6 average working days 11.5 average working days Business License Processing / Change in % of measures vear to vear Pending Licenses (decrease) 1.41% 1.42% 1.78% 1.43% Delinquent Renewals (decrease) 2.49% 2.39% 2.28% 2.41% On-line Processing (increase) 8.20% 10.04% 11.85% 21.20% Outgoing Payment Processing / Increase in % of payments year to year Successful Payments 99.71% 99.69% 99.41% 99.31% Electronic Payments 53.00% 54.93% 58.06% 63.47% The revised ten-year forecast for FY 2011-12 projected surpluses for the entire forecast horizon, an improvement over the previous forecast, which assumed that one-time funds would be needed to balance the FY 2011-12 budget. Surpluses were projected to be modest in the first five years of the forecast, or less than $1 million per year. After FY 2014-15, surpluses will continue to grow due to new revenues generated from development and increases in the tax base. The ten-year financial forecast also considers the Capital Improvement Program and the timing for the operation and maintenance of new facilities that will be opening over the next 10 years. The forecast assumed continued slow growth in the economy, which will slowly improve revenue growth over the forecast horizon. As the city reaches build-out, the emphasis will shift from new infrastructure construction to infrastructure maintenance and replacement. The ability to fund infrastructure maintenance and replacement is important to the sustainability of the city. Through fiscal discipline, the city continues its contribution to the Infrastructure Replacement Fund of 6.5 percent ofthe general fund revenues each year. The percentage of pending and delinquent business licenses for FY 2012-11 remained on par with the prior year percentages. There was a large increase in on-line processing of business licenses, up almost 10 percent over last year. The city upgraded its business license software in FY 2010-11, making it easier for businesses to renew their licenses on-line. This resulted In an increase in on-line processing. Electronic payment processing increases are due to more employees using direct deposit as a result ofthe new Human Capital Management system implementation. <X%. C I T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD Administration: Risk Management Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Claims Administrafion / 90% of claim determinations made within 45 days of receipt 94% 99% 99% 98% A key measure of Risk Management is the timeliness of processing claims. This measure reflects the efforts of all departments to coordinate on the collection of information, writing of reports, and on the evaluation of claims. This provides for an efficient and timely response to claimants which serves to reduce and mitigate liability exposure throughout the city. Claims Administration consistently reflects a processing time within the time frames established by law. Claims are consistently responded to within the statutory timeframe of 45 days; responses with claim determinations include acceptance, rejection and notice ofthe need for additional information. Loss control is part of the prudent management of fiscal resources. To this end. Risk Management administers the City's self-insured general liability and property damage insurance programs. Risk coordinates with departments citywide, legal counsel, consultants, third party administrators, and insurance companies to manage claims against the city and minimize losses. Risk Management works with all departments to implement measures that decrease and minimize loses and evaluate and revise insurance requirements in contracts and permits as necessary. <\^" CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Communication Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carlsbad Resident Survey - Satisfaction / 80% or areater 79% (*) 74% (*) 87% 85% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carlsbad Resident Survey - Level of Confidence / 90% or areater 74% 78% 84% 80% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per capita $ 8.50 $ 8.40 $ 9.80 $ 10.27 * Question change The goal ofthe city's communicafion efforts is to ensure mutually beneficial, two-way communication with the community about city issues and services, leading to a more responsive government and a high level of public confidence. Satisfaction with the city's communication efforts has been consistently positive over the years and reached a record high in FY 2010-11. This year's numbers are statistically equal to last, given the margin of error. (In FY 2008-09 and FY 2009-10, the survey question was changed to remove the examples of how the city communicates with residents. Subsequently, reported levels of satisfaction decreased.) Confidence in city government has also remained consistently positive for the past several years and also reached an all-time high in FY 2010-11. This year's rating is nearly equal to last, when factoring in the margin of error. Given the increased scrutiny of government by the public and the media, and recent nafionwide economic challenges, Carlsbad's ability to retain its high confidence ranking is notable. Per capita cost of communication programs is also tracked. Costs per capita increased in FY 2010-11 and again in FY 2011-12 because the Communications Department now manages a special revenue fund from cable providers. Money in this fund, which can only be spent on capital costs related to a new 24/7 city cable channel and associated video support, is housed in the overall Communications Department budget and fluctuates based on cable operator revenues. The personnel and M8tO costs (funded by the General Fund) for the Communications Department have remained relatively steady year over year. <\>!i CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development: Building Inspections Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Next Day Inspecfion / 95% or greater 98% 98% 97% 97% Average inspections per day per person / 18 to 22 or hiaher 16 15 21 23 Percent of inspecfions requiring corrections / 10% to 20% 14% 12% 12% 8% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Customer survey responses of "good" or "excellent" / 90% or areater 99% 99% 93% 97% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per approval or partial approval inspection $ 89.63 $ 85.67 $ 73.99 $66.54 Building Inspectors were able to meet 97 percent of all service requests the next working day. Work scheduling and coordination of next day inspecfions by clencal, building inspectors and supervisory staff is a priority and determined in daily department staff meetings. Coordination of inspections has been enhanced by the use of a GIS based inspection routing system. Increased construction activity has required a streamlined and efficient inspection process to respond to higher Inspection activity. During this period overall activity increased due to additional electrical, plumbing, mechanical and building inspection demand. Each Building Inspector performed an average of 23 of these combination type construction inspections per working day. The building division also monitors projects for storm water compliance. In addition to traditional building construction inspections, staff performed 2,481 construction site visits to insure proper Best Management Practice installations. The building division maintains a high level of compliance with Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Best Management Practices. The overall number of inspections requiring corrections decreased 4 percent from the previous year. This reduction may be attributed to the effectiveness of inspectors conveying code requirements to contractors and homeowners. The inspector's commitment to customer service is evident when they proactively anticipate potential problems. Helping customers identify issues early on ensures the progress of a project and avoids costly rework and missed or failed inspections. The customer satisfaction survey program has been very effective and has received an excellent response from the public with over 42 surveys returned out of a total number sent out of 265. A database of all responses is maintained and the building manager performs a follow-up call to allow the customer to expand on their experience with department counter staff and comment on the plan review and building inspection process. The 8.9 percent decrease in the cost per approved inspection is a result of the ratio between the increased number of inspecfions during the period and the overall reduction in building division staff. CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development: Planning Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Land use project reviews complete in 2 or less cvcles / 80% or areater (new) N/A N/A 91% 91% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Customer survey responses of "good" or "excellent" / 90% or areater 93% 94% 98% 87% Review cycles entail analysis ofthe minimum application submittal requirements and identifying the project design/standards for compliance issues. Once a project application is deemed complete it starts the clock on state mandated time periods for reaching a decision on an application. This performance measure was revised from being based on 3 or less review cycles to 2 or less review cycles in FY 2010-11. This change to the performance measure was made as a result of the high rate of success achieved at the previous level. The percentage of land use project reviews completed in 2 or less cycles remained constant at 91 percent and exceeding the 80 percent benchmark. By condensing the cycles, staff discovered more work efficiencies and provided a quicker turnaround time to the applicant. This year marks the sixth year the planning division has conducted an annual Customer Satisfaction Survey. This is a significant milestone as the survey has proven to be an important measure of the citizens, professionals, developers and other agencies that have direct interaction with the planning division through the discretionary review process. Through the survey, the planning division has been able to gauge and report on the satisfaction level with the discretionary review process and identify some key areas for improvement and efficiencies. This year's results shows a drop in the overall level of customer satisfaction from 98 percent to 87 percent, meaning 87 percent of the survey respondents rated customer service as either excellent (63 percent) or good (24 percent). The drop in satisfaction can generally be attributed to the higher number of respondents in this year's survey that Indicated they were an individual property owner or member of the owner's staff, rather than the traditional developer. These were also respondents that generally had only one interaction or only very limited interaction with the City of Cartsbad over the year penod and also had limited interaction with other planning departments in the County of San Diego with which to compare to Carisbad. The 87 percent falls just below the 90 percent benchmark. The customer service measure will continue to be a focus for staff. 13 ^ CARLSBAD CITY OF Housing and Neighborhood Services: Code Compliance Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchnnark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Calls for the nine most common code compliance issues / 90% or greater within closure standard of compliance 87% 92% 86% 92% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Customer survey responses of "good" or "excellent" / 90% or areater 98% 98% 100% 100% Cost ~ FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-U FY 2011-12 Average cost per "case closed" $ 268 $ 298 $ 268 $ 216 The nine most common code compliance issues are: building, business license, campaign signs, engineering nght-of-way, garbage and junk, health and safety, signs, vehicle zoning, and zoning. Case closure rates increased marginally in all nine categories. A continued proactive program of business license enforcement has maintained an excellent closure rate for these types of cases. The positive increase of closure compliance is attributed to fact that the code compliance officer continues to provide individual case management; this has resulted in a more effective tracking and resolution of open cases. Customer service surveys were sent out to 66 code compliance customers during this period and the city received 25 returned responses. This is an increase of 5 percent in customer service survey responses. Customer comments are tracked and a manager follow up occurred randomly in approximately 30 percent of the cases. Customer satisfaction ratings of good/excellent were reported in 100 percent of the returned surveys. While the code compliance case load has remained consistent, the average cost per "case closed" has decreased from $268 to $216 per case. This decrease can be attributed to a more streamlined process and work efficiencies. <A^*X CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Housing & Neighborhood Services Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Village area annual property tax assessed valuafion increase / > 5% 4% 1% 1% 1% Village area annual sales tax increase />5% -10% -6% -3% 9% Village area commercial vacancy rates /< 5% 7% 10% 10% 5% Number of Village review permits processed 56 56 41 42 Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carlsbad Resident Survey - Satisfacfion with Village experience "good" or "excellent" / 90% or areater 88% 88% 90% 90% Secfion 8 Program Assessment Rental Assistance / Standard Performer or better High Performer High Performer High Performer High Performer Cost/Benchnr!ark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Village area: Rafio public funding to private investment / 1:10 or greater 1:49 1:10 1:9 1:19 The Village is beginning to experience some relief as the national economy begins its recovery. Over the past year, the Village has experienced a minor increase of one percent in Property Tax assessed Values. Annual Sales Tax increased by nine percent over the prior year. Staff processed 42 permits over the past year, ranging from administrative permits to sign permits. Vacancy rates, reflecting both commercial and office space, for the Village have fluctuated over the past years. Commercial and retail businesses occupancy has remained consistent; much of the area's vacancy is leasable office space. Public survey responses continue to come back positive and convey excellent visitor experiences with regards to the Village. For each $1 of public expenditures, the goal is to demonstrate that there has been at least $10 of private investments made. In FY 2011-12, the public-to-private investment ratio was 1:19. Through the Storefront Improvement Grant Program, the Carlsbad Redevelopment Successor Agency reinvested $98,780 back into the community. Private investment has increased and new opportunities are beginning to emerge like the mixed use development at the corner of Lincoln and Oak as well as Harding and Cartsbad Village Drive. The Carlsbad Housing Agency has received the designation of "High Performer" by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Department. Performance data considered in the designation includes: expanding housing opportunities, quality control, timely annual reexaminations, and lease-up figures. CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Housing & Neighborhood Services: Volunteer Program Performance Measures Initial contact to response time / < 3 davs 95% of the time 100% 100% 99% 99% Offered orientations / at least one per month 30 23 17 18 Number of volunteers requested from staff New Measure 910 894 1,085 Number of volunteers found New Measure 924 918 1,116 Custonner Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Volunteer orientafion evaluation / A satisfaction ratina of 4 or above 4.23 4.85 4.85 4.80 Cmt ' FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-^11 FY 2011-12 Cost effectiveness / Ratio of value to cost 6.8:1 6.4:1 6.0:1 6.5:1 Total volunteers 2,360 2,015 2,604 2,453 Total volunteer hours 91,532 105,185 109,035 112,854 Net Benefit $ 1,849,187 $ 2,069,415 $ 2,426,867 $ 2,309,954 In FY 2011-12, the city's volunteer program continued to exceed expectations. The number of donated hours rose significantly, reaching a total of 112,854 hours. While the total number of volunteers has decreased, those who give their time are providing an average of 9.8 percent increase in hours and require less staff supervision. Throughout the year, 496 potential volunteers contacted the volunteer program or an average of 1.9 every working day. That represented a 32 percent increase over the previous year with twice as many referrals coming from Internet sources, city departments and walk-ins. Overall, the orientations received high satisfaction ratings as participants ranked them 4.8 out of 5 in terms of meeting their expectations. Whether it was a single request for a volunteer with a specific skill set or a group request for special events, staff requested a total of 1,085 volunteers. In FY 2011-12, staff requested a total of 1,085 volunteers. That is 21 percent Increase over the number of volunteers requested by staff last fiscal year. A total of 1,116 volunteers were found to meet their requests. That is an average 21.5 volunteers recruited every week to cover staff requests. The volunteers' contribution in terms of civic engagement is invaluable. With a 6:1 return on investment, the overall financial benefit to the city is clear. Human Resources Performance Measures <^ l^^.' . CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Employee turnover / 4.4% or less 2.8% 3.0% 3.3% 2.7% Cost/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Average number of lost work days per workers' compensation claim / 5.4 days or less 5.5 days 11.5 days 21.9 days 17.6 days The percentage of full-time employees who left the organization during the reporting period includes resignations and non-probationary terminations. Although not included in the benchmark data, in FY 2011- 12 the number of retirements was 12, which is consistent with the previous year, and is very much in line with the annual number of retirements prior to the spike of 34 retirements two years ago. Excluding the retirement data and comparing the City of Carlsbad's turnover rate to agencies of similar size, Carisbad's turnover rate is 2.9 percent less than the ICMA average. A certain amount of turnover is healthy in an organization. It indicates accountability and rigor in performance management. Over the next year, Human Resources will be focusing its attention on managing employee performance and retention of high performing employees. In order to better control and monitor workers' compensation claims, city staff recently contracted with a new third-party-administrator, Keenan & Associates. In addition to return-to-work programs, help to minimize lost days of work. There was a decrease in the number of lost work days in this reporfing period. Five large claims in public safety departments made up over neariy 40 percent of the lost work days. Last year, the Fire Department employees had 16 claims that were responsible for 24 percent ofthe city's lost work days. This year there were 25 workers' compensation claims in the Fire Department, responsible for 12 percent of the city's lost work days. The total number of lost work days due to all of these claims was 237 days, down from 412 In the previous reporting period. The Fire Department continues to promote an aggressive return-to-work program to try to decrease their lost work days. The Police Department accounted for 54 percent of the number of lost work days in the city. The department had 46 worker's compensation claims for a total of 1,036 lost work days. This is a decrease in total lost days from last year, when they had 35 claims and 1,048 lost work days. Last year the Police Department had four claims, each with over 100 lost work days. Although there was an increase in total claims In the Police Department, the number of claims with over 100 lost work days has remained the same at four. For both Police and Fire, the number of lost work days is partially attributed to the provisions of Labor Code Section 4850, which entitles Safety personnel, who are totally temporarily disabled and not at work, full salary up to one year. This "benefit" often works as a disincentive for employees to return to work or retire; however, an emphasis on encouraging employees to return to work in a light duty capacity has helped counteract this disincentive. 1 <XfSi • CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Information Technology Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Confidence in service % reporting satisfied or better / 80% or hiaher 75% 83% 89% 95% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Customer survey % of employees reporting "good" or "excellent" service / 80% or hiaher 93% 85% 89% 92% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Mean IT expenditures as a percent of expense 5.9% metric 2.0% citv 3.3% metric 2.0% citv 3.2% metric 2.0% citv 4.5% metric 3.0% citv In FY 2011-12, 95 percent of customers reported they had confidence in the service provided by the Information Technology Department. This exceeds the benchmark of 80 percent for the third consecutive year. This measurement combines city staff survey results on four different service delivery/confidence questions. The questions are centered in the areas of staff confidence in handling of technology requests, IT'S response to problems and the perceived skill levels of IT staff. The information technology customer satisfaction survey includes safety services, information technology and the geographic informafion services division. The benchmark was again achieved in FY 2011-12 with 92 percent of the customers reporting high levels of satisfaction. The survey was expanded to measure customer service topical areas including communication and customer expectations. According to Plante Moran's 2011 IT Spending and Staffing Report, local governments spend on average 4.5 percent of the total operating budget on IT. Carisbad, as compared nationally to its government peer group, spends approximately 3 percent of its total operating budget on IT services. This figure is about 40 percent less than other agencies. Typically, as organizations increase the level of IT investment, there is a corresponding Improvement in business performance and productivity levels. In FY 2012-13 IT will continue to implement new and enhanced technologies with a direct eye towards increasing electronic interactions with the public and streamlining internal business processes to speed delivery. This effort will build a more logical and delightful experience for the city's customers, both internally and externally. <4»i CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Library & Cultural Arts: Cultural Arts Office Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Projected attendance meets or exceeds actual attendance / over 90% ofthe time Yes Yes Yes Yes Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cannon Art Gallery visitor ratings of "good" or "excellent" / 90% ofthe time 92% 95% 96% 95% Three-Part-Art Educafion Program participant rafings of "good" or "excellent" / 90% or hiaher 100% 100% 100% 100% Carisbad Resident Survey - provide local arts and cultural opportunifies / 90% or hiaher 86.7% 87.4% 87.6% 79.8% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Expenditures per capita $ 9.37 $ 8.30 $ 8.44 $ 8.33 The service delivery measure helps the Cultural Arts Office gauge whether it is successful in reaching intended audiences for its specific programs. The figures are an important quantifiable element used during the yeariy budgeting and programming process to help determine whether a program should be continued. Customer satisfaction with the Cannon Art Gallery is gathered through a variety of user surveys. Visitors coming to the Gallery exhibitions continue to be highly satisfied, with service ratings at 95 percent. Teachers participating in the Three-Part-Art education program love the program and are enthusiastic repeat users - thus the 100 percent rating. For FY 13-14, Cultural Arts will identify and develop a new service area to track instead of the Three-Part-Art program. Even though the Gallery continues to receive high ratings, the Resident Survey shows a 7 percent drop in overall satisfaction with the "city's efforts to provide local arts and cultural opportunities" - a surprising development given that Cultural Arts Office offerings (and attendance at its offerings) have remained consistent both in quantity and quality over the past four years. In an effort to understand more about this drop, additional user surveying will be conducted on other programming areas not currently being evaluated in depth. The results of this more focused analysis should help to evaluate any potential shift in community interests or expectations and allow staff to make appropriate programming adjustments. Per capita expenditures for Cultural Arts continue to be lower today than five years ago. Cultural Arts will continue evaluating the programs and services offered to the community to ensure staff is providing the desired levels of service. In FY 2012-13, staff will do an RFP (Request for Proposals) for TGIF Jazz in the Parks' major expense - the producer (who delivers talent and sound production for the nine concerts) - to ensure these services are obtained at the best value to the city. Staff will also be part of a city-wide Corporate Marketing goal team looking to develop new revenue streams to support programs like TGIF Jazz and Three-Part-Art. <<C C C J T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD Library & Cultural Arts: Library Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Mystery shopper responses will indicate that the desired level of service was received related to facility conditions, core services, staff interactions, and computer and internet services / 95% or higher N/A 96% 96% 96% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - percent of customers who report being "very satisfied" or "somewhat safisfied" with library services / 90% or hiqher 97% 96% 96% 95% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Operafing cost per capita $ 91.63 $ 87.12 $ 90.61 $ 88.94 Value of volunteer hours 16,300 hours 23,712 hours 23,749 hours 25,561 hours Value of volunteer hours $ 385,000 $ 552,252 $ 556,202 $ 618,065 The Library desires to meet anticipated increases in demand for library services with the same or greater levels of efficiency and library user satisfaction. In FY 2009-10, the Library changed its service delivery measure to focus on its mystery shopper program. Mystery shopper surveys evaluate 50 specific service delivery indicators related to facility condition, core library services and computer/Internet services. The surveys capture whether or not library services were delivered to the mystery shopper as expected or desired. This is the third year mystery shopper service delivery questions were evaluated separately from questions that measure satisfaction with the service received. The Library's cost per capita dropped slightly from $90.61 to $88.94 due to reduction in part-time personnel expenditures, loss ofthe State Literacy Grant funds, and a slight increase in populafion. The cost per capita is in line with city expenditure controls as the Library's core operating expenditures remained flat in FY 2011-12. The value of volunteer hours Increased significantly as the Library continued to receive robust volunteer support for all programs in FY 2011-12. The public's contribution of time allows the Library to deliver enhanced services that otherwise would not be provided. Carisbad residents continue to rate satisfaction with Library services above all benchmarks. The level ofthe rating has been consistently over 95 percent for the past eleven years. 20 *X C I T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD Parks & Recreation: Parks Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11. FY 2011-12 Maintenance Assessment Program (MAP) / 90% or areater 93% 97% 95% N/A Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - "somewhat safisfied" to "very safisfied" / 90% or areater 94% 96% 96% 95% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Operating cost per acre $ 13,213 $ 13,667 $ 14,095 $ 12,859 The Maintenance Assessment Program (MAP) reflects the ratings of community representatives, outside professionals and city employees as to the overall quality of care a park is receiving. Areas of focus include irrigation, natural and synthetic turf, tot lots, parking lots, park furnishings and sports courts. The ratings have consistently exceeded the 90 percent benchmark over the last few years. Moving forward, in an attempt to further increase efficiencies, MAP will now be performed every two years. As a result no data is available for FY 2011-12. The parks system continued to exceed the 90 percent benchmark in customer satisfaction responses of very satisfied or somewhat satisfied for the tenth straight year in the Carisbad Resident Survey. Carisbad is continuing to deliver a high level of service, while keeping pace with the increasing population and the demand of citizens for access to open space. The parks division maintains, refurbishes and enhances 351 acres of developed land: approximately 260 acres of parks and special use areas, 41 acres of civic facilities landscapes, 32 acres of school athlefic fields, and 18 acres of other amenities including downtown village landscapes, community improvements, and beach accesses. The operating costs per acre were significantly reduced from $14,095 in FY 2010-11 to $12,859 in FY 2011- 12. Even though the cost of water and certain maintenance materials, including fertilizer and petroleum- derived items (gasoline, steel, plastic, etc.), has continued to increase, the overall maintenance costs per acre have been reduced. This reduction is attributed to operational efficiencies and controlled expenditures. 21 C I T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD Parks & Recreation: Recreation Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Adult Sports: T.R.U.S.T. Sportsmanship very good or excellent / 90% or higher 91% 91% 92% 90% Number of Technicals, Ejecfions, Suspensions / ot or below previous year 22 18 14 17 Youth Sports: T.R.U.S.T. Sportsmanship verv good or excel 1 ent / 90% or higher 96% 96% 96% 95% Number of Technicals, Ejections, Suspensions / at or below previous year 3 4 4 5 Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - "somewhat safisfied" to "very satisfied" / 90% or higher 88% 89% 87% 85% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 3011-12: Operafing cost per capita $ 60.61 $ 54.46 $ 54.43 $ 53.79 Net operating cost per capita $ 34.36 $ 28.36 $ 28.56 $ 29.68 Parks Sc Recreation offers a wide range of programs including youth and adult sports programs and leagues, special events, camps, preschool combined with a parental educafion component, instructional classes, teen programs, aquatics, senior activities and nutrition (home meal & congregate services through the senior center), and senior transportation programs. The division also operates three community centers, a senior center, an aquatic center, rentals and access associated with two historic sites (Magee Park &. Leo Carrillo Ranch Historic Park), six large community parks, and 15 medium to small parks which include a dog park and a skate park. The Teaching Respect Unity and Sportsmanship through Teamwork (T.R.U.S.T) performance measurement for both the youth and adult sports programs has exceeded the benchmark since FY 2008-09. The number of technicals/ejections/suspension violations is reflective of a typical year of sports and will continue to remain low due to the increase in repeat parficipants and coaches. The customer safisfaction rating, which measures how satisfied residents are with the city's efforts to provide recreation programs, is tracking a little bit lower. A Needs Assessment will be completed next fiscal year which will evaluate our facilities, programs and services. Action plans will be implemented based on community input and City Council goals. The department continues to identify efficiencies through a best value approach for services. Both the expenditures per capita and the net operating cost per capita are in line with staff expectations. 2.^ CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Parks & Recreation: Trails Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 New mileage per year / 4 miles or greater 3.30 miles 7.85 miles 0.25 miles 0 miles Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - percent of customer report being "somewhat" or "very satisfied" with provision of trails and walking paths / 90% or hiaher 88% 89% 88% 88% Cost .'"^ . ?• FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Trail maintenance cost per mile $ 5,545 $ 4,453 $ 4,801 $ 4,679 Carisbad residents continue to view open space and trails as an important quality of life issue. Based on the survey results, additional trails and walking paths are desired. The department will continue to require public trail easements and the construction of trails as part of ongoing private development for trails identified in the Citywide Trails Master Plan that fall within private development areas. This includes the process of increasing the number of Acceptance Agreements for Irrevocable Offers of Dedication for citywide public trail easements that were previously rejected as part of private development, and entering into a joint use agreement with SDGSiE to allow trail use on their utility easements that coincide with trails identified within the city's trails plan. The planning, development and construction of trails are identified within the Open Space 8t Conservation Element of the City's General Plan. Parks and Recreation is embarking on an update of the Trails Master Plan to bring the trail planning documents current and for use in future trail development.The Coastal Rail Trail is not included in the benchmark results due to the unique nature of this trail and its funding sources as provided through SANDAG. The number of new trail construction projects continues to decline due to the economic conditions as there were no new trails built as part of private development. The downturn in privately-built trails can be expected to continue until residential and commercial development picks up, making it unrealistic to reach the established benchmark. We do believe we will see an increase in development in 2013 which will result in new trail development. Total citywide trail mileage is currently at 46.70. A goal of 60 total miles of trails, at the city's build-out, is identified in the Citywide Trails Master Plan. The city's trail volunteer program continues to grow in both the number of volunteers as well as the number of projects completed by volunteers. Staff actively recruits volunteers to help reduce the trail maintenance cost per mile. The calculation for the trail maintenance cost per mile includes administrative costs. In 2011, trail volunteers conducted Carisbad's first trail count on five of the City's trails in an effort to gain a better understanding of trail use trends in addition to a website trails survey. 23 ^ CARLSBAD CITY OF Property & Environmental Management: Facilities Maintenance Performance Measures Maintenance Assesement Program (MAP) / areater than 90% 90% 90% 90% N/A Number of Corrective Maintenance work orders per 1000 sauare feet/ decrease vear N/A N/A 2.58 2.10 Cost/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Maintenance cost per square foot / less thon $8.68 $ 6.12 $ 6.38 $ 6.17 $ 5.48 The Facilities Maintenance division is responsible for maintenance and custodial activities at all city-owned buildings. Quality ratings from community representatives, outside professionals and city employees as part of the Maintenance Assessment Program (MAP) for city facilities have been consistent for the past several years. As a result the MAP is now performed every two years and no data is available for the current fiscal year. A new measure addresses the effectiveness of the preventative maintenance program by calculating the number of corrective maintenance work orders per 1000 square feet. The department goal is to reduce the need for corrective maintenance as a result of improved preventative and predictive maintenance programs. Preventative maintenance will become an increasing area of focus in the coming years, as staff has improved its maintenance forecasting, and is working with Finance to identify appropriate funding for major preventative maintenance activities. As the program matures, staff will gain a better understanding of an appropriate level of corrective maintenance necessary to maintain high quality facilities. The calculation of the maintenance cost per square foot includes square footage for all city-maintained facilities. Costs decreased by 11 percent this fiscal year due to an increase in square footage maintained (addition of Carlsbad Safety Training Center) and fewer unplanned maintenance events. Property and Environmental Management will continue to responsibly manage resources through regular business process review, and ongoing efforts to accurately relate time, resources and costs with performance measures to monitor efficiency and effectiveness in service delivery. 2.^ CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Property & Environmental Management: Fleet Maintenance Performance Measures Sen/Ice Detivery/BenchmaH< FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Percent of units available for use / 95% of the time or areater 98% 98% 93% 94% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Customer survey - rated as "good" or "excellent" / 90% or greater 97% 97% 94% 94% Cost/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per unit / decrease from previous vear $ 3,699 $ 4,081 $ 4,113 $ 3,979 The Fleet Maintenance division provides automotive services for the city's workforce, including preventative and breakdown maintenance. The "percent of units available for use" service delivery performance measure reflects the effectiveness of the preventive maintenance program as indicated by the availability of city vehicles. The measure of vehicle availability is considered an industry standard for both public and private sector fleet management. In FY 2010-11 the Fleet Maintenance department increased maintenance on vehicles to meet the scheduled maintenance intervals previously established. This resulted in an increase in vehicles being serviced, and a reduction in units available for use. The customer service metric is based on surveys provided to and returned by city staff that uses city Fleet vehicles. For FY 2011-12, overall customer satisfaction ratings remained above the benchmark. Fleet staff will continue to monitor and maintain these satisfaction ratings. Average Fleet Maintenance expenditures per unit were $3,979, a three percent decrease from the previous fiscal year. This value is derived by taking the total fleet maintenance expenditure divided by the total number of in-service vehicles (372 total vehicles for FY 2011-12). The cost per unit does not include fuel or miscellaneous interdepartmental charges. Fleet staff engages in regular cost control measures, such as renegotiation of pricing on parts and contract services, as well as identifying service efficiencies that work to stabilize maintenance costs despite external market conditions. Property and Environmental Management will continue to responsibly manage resources through regular business process review, and ongoing efforts to accurately relate time and resources with performance measures. 25 ^ CARLSBAD CITY OF Property & Environmental Management: Storm Water Protection Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Pf 2011-12 Number of Notices of Violation received from Regional Water Quality Control Board / none 0 r 0 r 0 0 Number of temporary beach postings due to urban runoff / none 0 0 r 0 r 0 High priority inlets cleaned / 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Complaint Response Tracking - percent of high priority reports of dumping to storm drain with inspector on scene within 45 100% 100% 100% 100% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - percent of residents reporting they have taken acfions to reduce water pollution based on messages received / 75% or greater 81% 74% 82% 76% FY 2008 09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per capita for Storm Water Protection Program $ 10.42 $ 9.07 $ 8.83 $ 10.02 These measures address the city's efforts to maintain the water quality of Carisbad's streams, lagoons and beaches. The measures also reflect the effectiveness of programs to reduce pollution in urban runoff. Service delivery measures are centered on compliance with the Municipal Storm Water Permit issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. All benchmarks have been met consistently over the past 4 years. Temporary beach postings, as used in this measure, notify the public of excess bacteria in ocean water resulting from urban runoff along Carlsbad beaches. Resampling within one business day of receipt of lab results that Identify unacceptable levels of bacteria allows for the timely identification of pollution sources. "High priority" reports of dumping to the storm drain are defined as activities which provide an immediate threat to storm drain pollution. The customer satisfaction goal is to ensure that 75 percent or more of the Carisbad residents who reported in the city's annual Resident Survey that they have seen or heard about ways to prevent water pollution each year have taken acfions to reduce water pollution, such as using a commercial car wash, or cleaning up trash in city parks and trails. These positive behavioral changes over time result in improved water quality. The cost per capita increased as a result increased State Water Resources Control Board fees, internal service costs, and personnel costs. 24 <X< CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Safety Services: Fire Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 All Emergency Responses first unit on the / in 6 minutes or less 75% 74% 72% 71% All Emergency Responses second unit on the / in 9 minutes or less 84% 80% 79% 75% Average number of minutes for first unit to arrive on scene 4:55 minutes 5:01 minutes 5:04 minutes 5:13 minutes Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - Fire Protecfion and Emergency Medical Service 94% 95% 94% 96% Overall Emergency Medical Service approval 98% 98% 99% 99% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Net operating cost per capita $ 142 $ 136 $ 126 $ 132 Per capita cost percent above / (below) ICMA data -12% -7% -16% -10% The Carisbad Fire Department continues its participation in a regional service delivery model, known as Boundary Drop, which assigns the closest available and appropriate resources to the emergency scene regardless of which city the unit belongs to. The utilization of the Boundary Drop is routinely being reviewed to create additional efficiencies in regard to training opportunities and overhead support that maximize the availability of resources for emergency response. In FY 2011-12, the Carisbad Fire Department responded to a total of 9,918 emergency incident responses, compared to 9,106 in FY 2010-11. Although in FY 2011-12 there was a slight increase in the average response time for the first unit to arrive on scene, the average remains below the established benchmark of six minutes or less. On average, the first unit dispatched to an emergency incident arrives on scene in 5:13 minutes. The increased response time can be attributed to several factors; increased populations within the City of Carlsbad and neighboring jurisdictions, along with an increased call volume, drive time, off-load delays at hospitals, and traffic delays. In FY 2011-12 the Carlsbad Fire Department responded to 812 more emergency incidents than the previous year. The Fire Department will continue to monitor response times to emergency incidents to determine any additional significant, contributing factors to an increased response fime. The department continues to maintain an exceptional level of customer satisfaction, as evidenced by the results of two separate customer surveys. The first survey focuses on the public's opinion of the Fire Department as a whole, were as the second survey focuses on those individuals who have experienced our EMS System first hand. Using ICMA for comparison, over the last three years, the Fire Department has consistently reported a lower per capita cost. Current FY 2011 data provided by ICMA shows the median cost per capita for all jurisdictions to be $146. As can be seen from the data In the table above, the Fire Department's cost per capita for FY 2011-12 is approximately 10 percent lower than ICMA. <Xi CITV Of ^ CARLSBAD Safety Services: Police Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - Cifizen sense of safety (day time) / 60% or greater 86% 87% 87% 89% Carisbad Resident Survey - Citizen sense of safety (night fime) / 31% or greater 52% 53% 56% 58% Crime Rate: Violent Crime / lowest third Property Crime / lowest third No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Clearances: Violent Crime / top third Property Crime / top third No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Response Time Average: Priority 1-6 minutes or less Priority 2-15 minutes or less Priority 3-30 minutes or less 6.0 minutes 11.8 minutes 22.6 minutes 5.5 minutes 11.2 minutes 21.3 minutes 5.9 minutes 11.9 minutes 22.8 minutes 5.8 minutes 12.2 minutes 24 minutes Response Time Distribution: Priority 1 - 90% less than 6 minutes Priority 2 - 90% less than 15 minutes Priority 3 - 90% less than 30 minutes 58% 78% 78% 60% 80% 81% 62% 78% 78% 57% 77% 76% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - "very safisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" / 90% or greater 90% 92% 92% 92% Sustained complaint / none 1 0 1 2 Cost/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per capita / $268 (FYll), $265 (FYIO) $ 255 $ 262 $ 265 $ 259 Violent and property crime rates are a calculation of crimes relative to the population. They are expressed as crimes per 1,000 population. The violent crime rate includes homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault, and the property crime rate includes burglary, larceny-theft and motor vehicle theft. While Carisbad's property crime rate did not meet the bottom one-third benchmark, at 18.5 crimes per 1,000 population, it is still lower than the county average of 20.2. Generally, a case is considered "cleared" when at least one person is arrested, charged and turned over to court for prosecution. Response time is measured from initial call to first officer on scene. Priority 1 calls Include life and death emergencies such as violent crimes in progress, armed robbery alarms, injury traffic collisions and burglaries in progress. Priority 2 calls include non-violent crimes in progress such as petty theft and burglary alarms. Priority 3 calls include "cold" reports - a report being taken after the crime has occurred. 23 S< C - CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Transportation: Street Maintenance Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Street light repairs completed within ten days / 90% or areater 97% 86% 79% 30% Recall percent of city traffic signals / 1% or less 0% 0% 0% 0% Percent of Prime and Major roadways refreshed /100% 100% 66% 88% 100% Percent of time desired response times for sidewalk repairs are met within 48 hours / 100% 80% 100% 85% 86% Custonner Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - Repair and maintenance of local street and roads / 90% or hiaher 87% 86% 87% 89% Customer survey - City's management of traffic congestion / 90% or areater 70% 74% 77% 81% Cost/Benchmark FY2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Annual maintenance cost per lane-mile / $6,178 $ 5,888 $ 5,662 $ 5,343 $ 5,583 In FY 2011-12, only 30 percent of city street light repairs were completed within 10 days. This is a direct result of manufacturer defects, with the induction light replacement program. It is expected that street light repair performance will be realigned with the benchmark next fiscal year. In FY 2011-12,100 percent of all prime and arterial roadways were inspected or refreshed to meet the city's Roadway Striping Plan standards. In FY 2011-12, 86 percent ofthe sidewalk repair calls received that were determined to be high priority were mitigated within 48 hours; two business days. In FY 2011-12, 91 percent of all permanent sidewalk repairs completed within 100 days. A total of 89 percent of the residents surveyed rated overall repair and maintenance of streets and roads and road conditions positively; consistent with prior years. A total of 81 percent of the residents surveyed rated overall management of traffic congestion on City streets positively. In FY 2011-12, the annual roadway costs are below benchmark. <<C C Cl T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD Transportation: Traffic Engineering Pprfnrmnnrp hApnaiir/yc Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Percent of road segments that meet Caltrans collision rates per million vehicles miles / 100% 86% 90% 94% 100% Pavement Condition Index (PCI): Average PCI above 80 77.9 80.3 80.1 80.5 Percent of roods with a PCI above 70 87% 90% 89% 88% Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Percent of routes with a Performance Index (PI) above 70/60%: AM Peak (6:30 AM - 8:30 AM): Off-Peak (10:00 AM - 2:00 PM): PM Peak (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM): N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40% 75% 50% 55% 75% 73% In FY 2011-12,100 percent ofthe roadway segments are within the statewide collision rate compared to 94 percent in 2010-11. The number of reported traffic collisions totaled 446 in 2012 which is exactly the same number of collisions compared to the prior year. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a value rating pavement condition: a PCI value greater than 70 indicates roads which are in good to excellent condition. The average city-wide pavement condition has remained constant; from 80.1 in 2010-11 to 80.5 in 2011-12, and the percentage of roadways with a PCI value greater than 70 has also remained relatively constant; from 89 percent to 88 percent. Phases l/ll of the Traffic Signal Program were completed this year. This work included linking 120 of the city's 171 traffic signals to the new Traffic Management Center, Over $1M was invested in traffic signal upgrades on the city's major corridors. The traffic signal timing plans were revised to improve traffic flow between the city's primary origins and destinations. The equipment upgrades and new signal timing plans are expected to improve the reliability of traffic signal operations so that drivers can expect consistent travel times each day. This year staff implemented a new performance measure for traffic signal operations. The new Performance Index (PI) is based on the system developed by Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The PI is calculated using average speed, stops per mile and a "green/red" ratio that is collected during a floating car study. Carisbad will use the OCTA standard that sets a PI score above 70 as acceptable signal coordination, and a PI score below 50 to indicate that congestion needs mitigation. The new PI benchmark has been established as: 60% of our routes will have a PI score above 70. In 2012, a total of 39 routes were measured in the AM Peak, Off-Peak, and PM Peak. Each of the three fime periods met their benchmarks except in the AM Peak where only 55% of the routes scored a PI above 70. Staff will continue to evaluate the signal operations to improve the PI particularly in the AM Peak to meet or exceed the benchmark. CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD utilities: Water (Potable and Recycled) Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Total leaks and breaks per 100 miles of water pipe in the potable system / less than 32.7 29.1 28.4 26.4 28.3 Total leaks and breaks per 100 miles of water pipe in the recycled system / less than 32.7 7.8 1.3 7.8 8.9 Percent of all water samples testing bacteria-free / 98% or areater 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% C ustomer Satisfactlon/Benchma rk FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - "very safisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" / 90% or greater 89% 90% 92% 91% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per acre-foot of water sold $1,440 $1,797 $1,987 $1,988 Percent of unaccounted for potable water / less than 6% 6.1% 6.1% 5.3% 5.1% Water service citywide is provided by three water agencies: the Carisbad Municipal Water District (CMWD), the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, and the Vallecitos Water District. The CMWD service area incorporates approximately 85 percent ofthe city, generally north of La Costa Avenue. The Carisbad Municipal Water District's (CMWD) Phase II Recycled Water Plant produces recycled water that is used within the CMWD service area. The District also purchases recycled water from the Leucadia Wastewater District and Vallecitos Water District via two inter-agency recycled water agreements. The ratios of water line leaks and breaks per 100 miles of pipelines in the system were below the Amercian Water Works Association benchmark of 32.7 breaks and leaks per 100 miles of pipelines in the system. This benchmark is the average rating for water systems in the western United States with service populafions of 50,001 to 100,000. The ratio is an indication of the integrity of the water distribution system. The lower ratios for the recycled portion ofthe water system are in part a result ofthe relative newness of a portion ofthe recycled system. The cost of water per acre foot is calculated by dividing the total operating cost by the number of acre-feet sold. The small increase In the cost per acre-foot of water sold is the result of the expenditures increasing by 5 percent and the total number of acre-feet sold also increasing by 5 percent. The percentage of unaccounted-for, or "lost" water is below the benchmark of less than 6 percent. Water can be "lost" as a result of leaks and breaks, inaccurate meter reads, flushing activities designed to maintain water quality, water used to clean water storage facilities and water used during new pipeline construction. CITY OF Utilities: Sewer Performance Measures ^ CARLSBAD Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Number of overflows per 100 miles of sewer main / none 1.39 2.08 1.05 0.35 Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark ¥Y 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survey - "very safisfied" or "somewhat safisfied" / 90% or areater 91% 93% 91% 89% Cost FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Cost per million gallons of sewage $4,429 $3,862 $3,440 $ 4,097 Sewer service citywide is provided by three agencies: the City of Carisbad, the Leucadia Wastewater District and the Vallecitos Water District. The benchmark for the number of sewer overflows per 100 miles of sewer main is zero. This benchmark is a result of state-mandated requirements to achieve a goal of zero spills. The city's ratio of 0.35 exceeds the benchmark but has improved significantly since FY 2009-10, and is the lowest rate since the metric began being used in FY 2003-04. Despite an aging infrastructure and the resultant challenges, staff is implementing new programs and activities that will ensure the city's infrastructure is adequately maintained into the future and replaced when necessary. Seven sewer overflows were prevented during FY 2011-12 by utilizing newer technology. The SmartCover™ is a device that is installed in a manhole and alerts staff automatically to changing conditions within the sewer system. This gives staff time to respond quickly to prevent sewer overflows. Staff is assessing additional locations for deployment of SmartCover™(s) as well as investigating possible implementation of other technologies to ensure sewer system reliability. Customer satisfaction was one percentage point below the benchmark of 90 percent, but continues to consistently be near the benchmark figure. The Sewer division continues Its active outreach program. During FY 2011-12 the division hosted a booth at the street fair and gave presentations about how to keep the sewer system clean at local schools. The cost measure results reflect ali of the operating costs including transfers to the replacement fund. In FY 2010-11 (the previous fiscal year) there was a one-time reduction in the replacement transfer, resulting in a lower than normal annual cost. The FY 2011-12 cost is more in line with what would be expected. 32- <^ (J' C I T Y O F ^ CARLSBAD utilities: Solid Waste Performance Measures Service Delivery/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Annual Disposal Rate / greater than 8.4 pounds 6.5 Ibs. 5.8 Ibs. 5.6 Ibs. 5.7 Ibs. Customer Satisfaction/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Carisbad Resident Survev: Trash/90% Recycling / 90% Household Hazardous Waste / 90% 89% 80% 66% N/A N/A N/A 93% 84% 72% 95% 94% 75% Cost/Benchmark FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Residenfial Rates / Lowest third Yes Yes Yes Yes Commercial Rates / Lowest third Yes Yes Yes Yes The Annual Disposal Rate is based on Senate Bill 1016, the Disposal Measurement System Act of 2008, effective January 1, 2007. This act requires Carisbad to not exceed a maximum amount of 8.4 pounds of solid waste per person per day. The Annual Disposal Rate benchmark is based on solid waste generation from 2003 through 2006. A new solid waste services hauling contract went into effect on July 1, 2012 and included the following significant upgrades: fully automated collection, single stream recycling, rolling carts for trash/recycling/green waste, enhanced bulky item collection, and curbside electronic waste collection. The decline in the annual disposal rate from the height of 7.0 Ibs. in 2007 may be related to the economy and residents purchasing fewer goods rather than changes to the solid waste program. It is anticipated that the new single stream recycling will have a positive impact on the annual disposal rate in the coming years; however, as the economy improves there may be an offsetting negative impact on the disposal rate. The annual Carlsbad Resident Survey for FY 2011-12 indicates that customer satisfaction has increased across the board for solid waste services (most notably for recycling). This may be a reflection of how residents perceive the new solid waste services. Carisbad's residential and commercial solid waste rates continue to be the lowest in San Diego County. CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Survey Repor Conducted for the City of Carlsbad December 2012 bw RESEAFJCH PARTNERSHIP 2725 JEFFERSON STREET, SUITE 13, CARLSBAD CA 92008 50 MILL POND DRIVE, WRENTHAM, MA 02093 T (760) 730-9325 F (888) 457-9598 b w r e s e arch, c oni \m\ iVf H icebook.com/bwresearch H.K^^ twitter.com/BW Research ^trj Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ii List of Tables ii Executive Summary 1 Key Findings 1 Conclusions 2 Satisfaction with City Services 4 Satisfaction - Comparison to Other Cities 6 Quality of Life 7 Perceived Direction 9 Number One Way to Improve Quality of Life 10 Quality of Life - Comparison to Other Cities 12 Sense of Community 14 Safety 17 Safety - Comparison to Other Cities 19 Confidence in City Government 21 Community Values 23 Satisfaction with Specific City Services 24 Satisfaction with City-Resident Communication 29 Recent Communication with the City of Carlsbad 31 Information Sources 32 Preventing Pollution of Creeks, Lagoons, and Ocean 33 Source of Information 34 Action Based on Information 35 Experience Visiting the Carlsbad Village 36 Appendix A: Methodology A-1 Appendix B: Survey Toplines B-1 [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 36 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Satisfaction with City Services 4 Figure 2: Satisfaction with City Services - Comparison to Other Cities 6 Figure 3: Quality of Life Rating 7 Figure 4: Quality of Life Direction 9 Figure 5: Number One Way to Improve Quality of Life 11 Figure 6: Quality of Life Rating - Comparison to Other Cities 12 Figure 7: Quality of Life Direction - Comparison to Other Cities 13 Figure 8: Sense of Community Index 14 Figure 9: Sense of Community Index Levels 15 Figure 11: Safety in Carlsbad 17 Figure 12: Safety Walking Alone During the Day - Comparison to Other Cities 19 Figure 13: Safety Walking Alone After Dark - Comparison to Other Cities 20 Figure 14: Confidence in City Government to Make Decisions 21 Figure 15: Agreement with Statements about Characteristics of Carlsbad 23 Figure 16: Satisfaction with Specific Services 24 Figure 17: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 1 26 Figure 18: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 2 27 Figure 19: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 3 28 Figure 20: Satisfaction with City-Resident Communication 29 Figure 21: Method of Communication with City Staff (n=288) 31 Figure 22: Frequency of Using Information Sources 32 Figure 23: Informed about Preventing Water Pollution 33 Figure 24: Source of Pollution Prevention Information (n=573) 34 Figure 25: Action Taken Based on Pollution Prevention Information (n=573) 35 Figure 26: Experience Visiting Carlsbad Village 36 LIST OF TABLES Table 2: Satisfaction with Specific Services 25 Table 3: Overview of Project Methodology A-1 [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 2^ Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the sixth consecutive year, the City of Carisbad and its performance measurement team partnered with BW Research Partnership, Inc., (BW Research) to conduct its public opinion survey of Carisbad residents. The main research objectives ofthe 2012 study were to assess residents' perceptions regarding city services, quality of life, sense of community, neighborhood safety, city government, community values, and city- resident communication in Carisbad. This report displays five years of survey results. The city-wide survey of residents was administered by telephone (both landline and mobile) from September 12 through October 8, 2012 and calls averaged 20 minutes in length. A statistically representative sample of 1,001 Carisbad residents 18 years and older completed the survey, resulting in a maximum margin of error +/- 3.08 percent (at the 95% level of confidence) for questions answered by all 1,001 respondents. KEY FINDINGS 100% 93_5% 94_4% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 91.6% 88.9% 90.9% 2011 2010 • Very satisfied Light 2009 2008 Somewhat satisfied Ninety-four percent of residents were satisfied with the job the City of Carisbad is doing to provide city services and 63 percent were very satisfied - the highest percentage reported in any survey year. When asked about specific services, residents who provided an opinion were most satisfied with the city's efforts to provide library services (97%), maintain city parks (95%), provide trash collection services (95%), provide recycling collection (94%), and provide fire protection and emergency medical services (93%). Among those who provided an opinion, satisfaction with the city's efforts to provide recycling services reached a new high in 2012. Although overall satisfaction remained unchanged, "very satisfied" increased for the city's efforts to provide library services, maintain city parks, provide trash collection services, provide water services, provide trails and walking paths, and maintain the business climate in Carisbad. Satisfaction among those who provided an opinion for the city's efforts to provide local arts and cultural opportunities and provide sewer services was statistically lower in 2012 than at least one other survey year, driven by increases in the percentage of residents who answered "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied." Quality of Life Ninety-seven percent of residents rated their quality of life in the City of Carisbad as excellent (65%) or good (32%) in 2012. Residents were more positive than in previous years regarding the direction ofthe quality of life. Twenty-three percent rated the quality of life as getting better, 62 percent viewed it as staying about the same, and only 11 percent felt it was getting worse. bv/ RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The overall safety percentages reported by residents in 2012 matched the overall highs from last year and reached new highs for those who felt very safe for both walking alone during the day and after dark in their neighborhoods. An overwhelming 99 percent of residents reported feeling safe walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day (89% very safe) and 90 percent of residents reported feeling safe walking alone in their neighborhoods after dark (56% very safe). 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 80.3% 83.5% 77.6% 73.7% 75.7% 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Dark = Very confident Light = Somewhat confident Confidence sn City Government Consistent with the levels reported in 2010 and 2011 and statistically higher than 2008 and 2009, 80 percent of residents indicated confidence in Carisbad city government to make decisions that positively affect the lives of community members. Sense of Community Based on a seven-question series, 45 percent of residents were classified as having a "high" sense of community. Within the series, Carisbad residents reported the highest level of agreement with items related to "community values." City-Resident Communication and Information Sources Eighty-five percent of residents were satisfied (51% very satisfied) with the city's efforts to provide information to residents through its website, newsletters, water bill inserts, and related sources of information. The most utilized sources for information about city issues, programs, and services were the city's website (72%), flyers that come in the water bill (69%), and the community services and recreation guide (68%). •Very satisfied •Somewhat satisfied 6%T OSo'^^w'^^t dissatisfied 7<J^y BVery dissatisfied • DK/NA CONCLUSIONS The City of Carisbad is evolving in terms ofthe issues and concerns that dominate residents' attention. In 2006, just over half of residents identified growth and development as a top concern, followed by almost a third of residents that indicated traffic and roads as their top concern. Six years ago respondents were six times as likely to identify growth and overcrowding as a top concern compared to the quality of schools or six times as likely to talk about traffic and roads as a top concern compared to the cost of living and housing in the city. Today, the landscape of issues that are top of mind to Carisbad residents has become considerably more diverse. This year's survey asked all respondents to identify the top issues related to improvement of the quality of life in Carisbad and not one single issue received over ten percent of responses. The 2006 question related to residents' top concern about the bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carlsbad City of Carisbad is not directly comparable to this year's question about the number one issue to improve quality of life in the city. However the two questions are indirectly comparable when evaluating the top issues that come to residents' minds when discussing what should be improved in the City of Carisbad. In 2012, while growth and development (10%) as well as traffic (9%) and infrastructure (7%) remain important to Carisbad residents, other issues such as improving schools (7%), preserving open space (6%), and increasing or improving police services (4%) are all becoming topics that residents are identifying and discussing as issues they believe the city should focus on in the immediate future. Community Values This year's survey tested a new series of questions based on Carisbad's core values and visions developed through the city's "Envision Carisbad" visioning process. The survey identified 12 discrete components ofthe nine core values and vision statements to describe the City of Carisbad. Each ofthe 12 discrete components describes qualities or attributes that reveal how Carisbad is, or what it is striving to be, and respondents were asked to provide their level of agreement with each statement. Of the items that were tested in this section ofthe survey, the highest level of agreement was found with: "Carisbad promotes active lifestyles by providing access to trails, parks, beaches, and other recreational opportunities" (95% total agreement among those who provided an opinion), "Carisbad maintains its beach community character" (90%), and "Carisbad supports a strong local economy by promoting business diversity and tourism" (87%). The lowest levels of agreement were reported for "Carisbad is improving access to public transportation" (47%) and "Carisbad celebrates the city's cultural heritage" (68%). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City ofCarlsbad SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES Ninety-four percent of residents surveyed in 2012 were satisfied with the job the City of Carisbad is doing to provide city services. The overall percentage satisfied was statistically consistent with the percentages reported over the last two years and higher than 2008 and 2009 (2012: 94%, 2011: 94%, 2010: 92%, 2009: 89%, 2008: 91%). The percentage of residents "Very satisfied" with the job the city is doing peaked in 2012, with the percentage statistically higher than 2008 and 2009 (2012: 63%, 2011: 61%, 2010: 60%, 2009: 56%, 2008: 58%) In 2012, 63 percent of residents were "Very satisfied," 30 percent "Somewhat satisfied," four percent were dissatisfied, and three percent did not know or declined to state their level of satisfaction. Figure 1: Satisfaction with City Services 80% ^ ^-^ ' - - ^ 60% 40% 20% 0% IB 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied DK/NA 63.5%^*^ 30.0% 1.3%° 2.8%* 6T.1%^ 33!3% i;8%°*" 1.0%'^ 2.8%*^ 59.9%° 31.7% 2.2% "i.6%° 4.7% 55.5% 33.4% 3.5% 4.1%* 3.4% 58.4% 32.5% 3^5% 2.4% 3.2% Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) * Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 [bw" RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Throughout this report, analyses of responses by resident sub-groups (i.e., cross tabulation data) will be presented in text boxes. The following is an examination of satisfaction with the city's provision of services among sub-groups. Residents who were satisfied with the job the city is doing to provide services were more likely to rate other aspects of life in Carisbad favorably. Resident satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services was positively correlated with a number of metrics within the survey, including: quality of life ratings, perceptions regarding the direction ofthe quality of life, safety in their neighborhoods (both walking alone during the day and night), sense of community, confidence in city government, satisfaction with city-resident communication, and experience visiting the Village. A regression analysis revealed the following as the top predictors of satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services (in order of influence): o Ratings for the quality of life in Carisbad; o Satisfaction with the city's efforts to maintain the business climate in Carisbad; and o Satisfaction with the city's efforts to provide law enforcement services. Satisfaction was close to 90 percent or higher for the vast majority of demographic sub-groups and the only statistically significant difference in overall satisfaction was found by zip code. Although still high at 89 percent, residents of zip code 92011 reported lower satisfaction than those in the other three zip codes (92008: 96%, 92009: 93%, 92010: 96%, 92011: 89%). Although no overall differences in satisfaction were found for the following sub-groups, their intensity of satisfaction differed. o Women were more likely to report being "Very satisfied" with the city's efforts to provide services than men (67% vs. 60%). o Residents with two children in the home were less likely to report being "Very satisfied" and more likely to report being "Somewhat satisfied" as compared to those without children, one child, or three or more (No children: 65%, 1 child: 66%, 2 children: 53%, 3 or more children: 73%). o Compared with other ethnic groups, Asian residents were more likely to report being "Somewhat satisfied" as compared to "Very satisfied." o A higher than average percentage of residents within the La Costa/ La Costa Canyon neighborhood reported being "Very satisfied" (72%), whereas a lower than average percentage in "Rancho La Costa/ La Costa Oaks/ La Costa Ridge" were "Very satisfied" (56%). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SATISFACTION - COMPARISON TO OTHER CITIES The City of Carisbad remained in the top tier with regard to residents' satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services. The figure below shows the range of satisfaction scores reported by cities throughout California that have conducted comparable studies within the past five years. Figure 2: Satisfaction with Citv Services - Comparison to Other Cities^ Small City, Riverside County Mid-sized City, Orange County City of Carlsbad, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, Ventura County Mid-Sized City, San Mateo County Small City, Orange County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Small City, Contra Costa County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, San Bernardino County Mid-Sized City, Sacramento County Large City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, Contra Costa County Small City, Riverside County Mid-Sized City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, Los Angeles County Large City, Fresno County 78% 77% 75% 74% 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ^ Small cities were defined as those with a total population up to 50,000. Mid-sized cities were those with a population between 50,001 and 150,000. Large cities were those with a population of 150,001 or more. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP ^7- Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QUALITY OF LIFE Ninety-seven percent of residents surveyed in 2012 rated their quality of life in the City of Carisbad as "Excellent" (65%) or "Good" (32%). Three percent rated it as "Fair" and zero percent provided a negative rating. The overall positive rating reported in 2012 was statically higher than 2008 and consistent with the percentages reported from 2009 to 2011. Figure 3: Quaiity of Life Ratinc| Excellent Good Fair 2.8%^ J.0%#a¥ 3.4% 3.6% 3.6% 0.0%^* ] 0.5%° Poor I 0.3%¥ 0.0% ¥ a 1.1% 0.2% 0.2% Very poor f 0.2% 0.0%^ 1 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% DK/NA i 0.2% 0.6% 0.4% 0% 65.0%^ 60.5% 63.9% I 61.9% 1 61.0% 31.8% 34.2°/o I 33.9% 33.5% 20% € 40% 60% Positive 2012 = 97%^ ! 2011 = 98%#°1 2010 = 96% j 2009 = 96% 2008 = 95% • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 80% Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 ° Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The following is an assessment of quality of life ratings by resident sub-groups. • Quality of life ratings were positively correlated with a number of other variables throughout the survey, including: perceptions regarding the direction of the quality of life, satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, satisfaction with city-resident communication, sense of community, confidence in city government, safety walking alone in their neighborhood (day and night), and experience visiting Carisbad's Downtown Village. • A regression analysis revealed the following as the top predictors of residents' quality of life ratings (in order of influence): o Satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services; o Agreement with the community values item "Carisbad has a small town, connected feel"; o Agreement with the sense of community item "If there is a problem in my neighborhood, people who live here can get it solved"; and o Agreement with the community values statement "Carisbad maintains its beach community character". • Residents who did not visit Carisbad's Downtown Village in a typical month were less likely than those who typically visited to rate their quality of life in Carisbad as "Excellent" or "Good" (88% vs. 97%). • Given the consistently high overall quality of life ratings among sub-groups, the assessment below focuses on differences in "Excellent" ratings. o Residents who have lived in Carlsbad for at least 15 years were more likely to rate their quality of life as "Excellent" as compared to those living in the city less than 15 years (71% vs. 62%). o Residents living in a single family home (69%) or apartment (65%) were more likely to rate the quality of life as "Excellent" compared with those in a condominium or townhome (53%). o A higher than average percentage of residents 18 to 24 years of age rated the quality of life in the city as "Excellent" (74% vs. 65%). o Residents in zip code 92008 were the most likely to rate the quality of life in Carisbad as "Excellent," whereas those in 92010 were more likely to rate it as "Good" (Excellent: 92008: 71%, 92009: 65%, 92010: 59%, 92011:62%,). o A lower than average percentage of Calavera Hills/ Tamarack Point residents rated the quality of life in Carisbad as "Excellent" (58% vs. 65%). [bw]l ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad PERCEIVED DiRECTION Residents were also asked whether they felt that the quality of life in Carisbad was getting better, getting worse, or staying about the same. Residents reported more favorable ratings m '^^^^^^^M in 2012 than previous years, with 23 percent rating the quality of life as "Getting better" (statistically higher than 2009-2011) and only 11 percent indicating that the quality of life was "Getting worse" (statistically lower than 2008-2010). Sixty-two percent of residents surveyed felt that the quality of life in the city was "Staying about the same." Figure 4: Quality of Life Direction 80% -f- - - - ^ -.-.^ ^ 60% 40% 20% 0% • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 Getting better Staying about the same Getting worse DK/NA • 2012 23.2%^*° 61.9%^* 11.4% 3.4% • 2011 17.1%* 68.1%°* 11.0%*°* 3.8% • 20101 16.5%* 64^7%° * 15.2%°^ 3.6% • 2009 59.8% 20.9% 4.2%^ • 2008 2ll% 56.5% 20.0% 2.4% Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Higher than average negative perceptions regarding the direction ofthe quality of life (11 % "Getting worse" across all 2012 respondents) were reported among residents that have lived in Carisbad for 15 or more years (17%), those who lived in zip code 92011 (18%), and those in the South Beach/ Terramar (20%) and Poinsettia/ Aviara (17%) areas. NUMBER ONE WAY TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE All respondents were next asked to identify the number one thing that the City of Carisbad could do to improve the quality of life within the community. Asked in an open-ended format, a third of residents did not identify anything^ and no single response was cited by more than ten percent of residents. Past surveys only asked this question among the sub-set of respondents who rated the quality of life in the city as "Poor" or "Very poor" or felt it was "Getting worse." When the data were filtered to only examine this sub-set of 115 respondents for 2012, the most frequently cited response among this group was to stop building and growth (29%), followed by "Improve schools" (15%), "Fix the traffic problems" (11%), and "Preserve more open space" (10%). Each year, the leading suggestion for the number one way to improve the quality of life among this sub-group has been that the city should stop building and growth. Although still in the top position, the percentage citing this response has fallen under 30 percent for the last two years (2012: 29%, 2011: 27%, 2010: 34% 2009" 37% 2008: 48%). Compared to previous years, the percentage of respondents in this sub-set that cited "Improve schools" (2012: 15%, 2011: 6%, 2010: 4%, 2009: 3%, 2008: 6%) and "Preserve more open space" (2012: 10%, 2011: 3%, 2010: 2%, 2009: 3%, 2008: 3%) have both more than doubled. Response categories of "Nothing needs improvement" and "DK/NA. [bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Figure 5: Number One Way to Improve Qualitv of Life^ Stop building/ stop growth Fix the traffic problems Improve the quality ofthe roads and other infrastructure Improve schools Preserve more open space Increase/ improve police services Be more business friendly/ provide more shops Increase recreation opportunities More community events/ programs Improve beach access Better economic plan/ lower taxes More affordable housing Listen to the residents/ care more about the people in the community 24.5% 0% 20% 40% Categories with less than one percent were combined into "Other" (see Appendix B for full breakdown). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP ^1 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QUALITY OF LIFE - COMPARISON TO OTHER CITIES This section displays examples of residents' quality of life ratings from cities that have conducted comparable studies within the past five years. The 97 percent overall quality of life rating provided by Carisbad residents places the city in the top tier. Figure 6: Qualitv of Life Rating - Comparison to Other Cities'* % of Residents that Rate the Quality of Life in their City as "Excellent" or "Good" Mid-Sized City, Orange County MId-Sized City, Orange County City of Carlsbad, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, Orange County Small City, San Mateo County Small City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, San Mateo County Mid-Sized City, Riverse County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, Orange County Mid-Sized City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, Alameda County Large City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, San Bernardino County Large City, Santa Clara County Large City, Riverside County Mid-Sized City, Contra Costa County Small City, El Dorado County Large City, Los Angeles County Small City, Riverside County Small City, Sacramento County 77% 75% 72% 70% 70% 62% 56% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Small cities were defined as those with a total population up to 50,000. Mid-sized cities were those with a population between 50,001 and 150,000. Large cities were those with a population of 150,001 or more. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 41) Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The figure below displays the percentage of residents that viewed the quality of life in their city as either "Getting better" or "Staying about the same." Among comparable research studies from cities throughout California, the combined 85 percent reported by Carisbad residents places the city at the top of the chart. Figure 7: Quality of Life Direction •- Comparison to Other Cities^ % of Residents that View the Quality of Life in their City as "Getting better" or "Staying about the same" City of Carlsbad, San Diego County Small City, Alameda County Small City, San Luis Obispo County Mid-Sized City, Sacramento County Large City, Santa Clara County Large City, Sacramento County Large City, San Bernardino County Small City, Los Angeles County Small City, Riverside County Large City, Riverside County Large City, Marin County Large City, Kern County Mid-Sized City, Contra Costa County Mid-Sized City, Riverside County 69% 66% 64% 60% 51% 47% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Small cities were defined as those with a total population up to 50,000. Mid-sized cities were those with a population between 50,001 and 150,000. Large cities were those with a population of 150,001 or more. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SENSE OF COMMUNITY To assess sense of community among residents, a seven-question series known as the "Brief Sense of Community Index"® was utilized. The series assesses the three underlying dimensions of sense of community: "Social connections," "Mutual concerns," and "Community values." The figure beiow displays the questions used to measure sense of community as well as overall agreement with each statement (disagreement for reverse-coded items). Carisbad residents reported the highest level of agreement with items related to "Community values" (76% average) and "Mutual concerns" (74% average). Figure 8: Sense of Community Index iStrongly agree OAgree w c o o o C c o o o o w 1 can recognize most of the people who live In my neighborhood 25% 50.4% 1 can recognize most of the people who live In my neighborhood Very few of my neighbors know me* Very few of my neighbors know me* 16% 46.1% I have almost no influence over what my neighborhood is like* Bj 45.6% (0 c 0) u c o o 3 3 If there is a problem in my neighborhood, people who live here can get it solved My neighbors and I want the same things from this community o It is very important for me to feel •| a sense of community with other > residents E E o o How strongly feel sense of community 18% 57.2% 20% 51.7% 27.8% 51.3% 32.8% 40.6% Total agree 75.1% 62.4% 53.3% 75.2% 72.2% 79.1% 73.3% Average 63.6% 73.7% 76.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% * Items reverse coded. Percentage shown is total disagreement. Disagreeing with these statements indicates a higher sense of community. ^ Long, D.A. and Perkins, D.D. (2003), "Confirmatory Factor Analysis ofthe Sense of Community Index and Development of a Brief SCI." Journal of Community Psychology 33(3): Pages 279 - 296. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP ^0 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad In 2012, 45 percent of residents were classified as having a "High" sense of community, meaning that they agreed with six of the seven items in the series. This percentage was statically higher than 2009, but otherwise consistent with 2008, 2010, and 2011. Forty-two percent of residents placed in the "Medium" sense of community group, having agreed with three, four, or five items in the series (consistent with 2010 and 2011 and lower than 2008 and 2009). Consistent with previous years, 13 percent of residents were classified in the "Low" sense of community group, identifying with fewer than three ofthe items. Figure 9: Sense of Community index Levels 100% 1 80% 1 60% 40% 20% 0% 13.3% 41.7% a ¥ 13.9% 43.0% 12.2% 43.9% 13.3% 48.3% 12.7% 46.4% 2012 43.0% 2011 44.0% iHigh 2010 • Medium 40.9% 2009 2008 • Low Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The following is an examination of sense of community levels by resident sub-groups. • Sense of community was positively correlated with a number of factors throughout the survey, including: satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, quality of life ratings, perceptions regarding the direction of the quality of life, satisfaction with city-resident communication, feeling safe walking alone in their neighborhoods (during the day and night), confidence in city government, and experience visiting the Carisbad Village. • A regression analysis revealed the following as the top predictors of residents' sense of community: o Agreement with the community values statement "Carisbad has a small town, connected feel" and o Use of the community services and recreation guide as a source for information on city issues, programs, and services. • Residents who visited the Carisbad Village in a typical month were much more likely to be classified as having a "High" sense of community than those who did not visit (46% vs. 25%). • Close to the majority of residents (49%) who have lived in Carisbad for at least ten years placed in the "High" sense of community group compared with 40 percent of those who have in the city less than ten years. • Among the different information sources available to find out about city issues, programs, and services, residents who frequently ("Regulariy" or "Sometimes") utilized Patch.com were the most likely to place in the "High" sense of community group. • Residents who owned their home as well as those living in a single family detached home were more likely to be classified in the "High" group than renters and those living in apartments, condominiums, or townhomes. • Residents with children in the home were more likely to be classified as having a "High" sense of community than those without children (52% vs. 41%). In addition, a higher percentage of residents with two or more children placed in the "High" group than those with one child (57% vs. 43%). • Fifty-four percent of residents 35 to 44 years of age placed in the "High" sense of community group compared with 41 percent of residents 18 to 34 years of age and 45 percent of residents 45 years and older. • Residents in zip code 92009 were more likely than those in other zip codes to be classified as having a "Low" sense of community (92008:11%, 92009: 18%, 92010: 9%, 92011: 10%). • A higher than average percentage of residents in the Rancho La Costa/ La Costa Oaks/ La Costa Ridge (20%), Rancho Carillo/ Bressi Ranch/ La Costa Greens (18%), and La Costa/ La Costa Canyon (17%) neighborhoods placed in the "Low" group. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 52- Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SAFETY Carisbad residents continue to feel very safe in their neighborhoods. An ovenA/helming 99 percent of residents felt safe walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day (89% "Very safe") and 90 percent of residents felt safe walking alone after dark (56% "Very safe"). One percent of residents reported feeling unsafe walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day and seven percent felt unsafe after dark. Driven by increases in the percentage who felt "Very safe" for both metrics, the combined safety percentage reported by residents for walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day was statistically higher in 2012 than 2009 (97%) and consistent with the levels reported in 2010 (98%) and 2011 (99%). The combined safety percentage reported by residents for walking alone in their neighborhoods after dark was statistically consistent with 2011 and higher than 2009 and 2010 (2012: 90%, 2011: 90%, 2010: 87%, 2009; 85%). Figure 10: Safety in Carlsbad' 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 9.3%^ 12.4% 10.9% 11.4% ^.4% • 86.2% • 86.8% • 85.5% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 33.7% Ai 35.8% 6.7% 36.6% 8.3% 33.0% ^ W 61.1% W 52.3% 0% 2012 2011 2010 2009 Walldng alone in neighborhood during the day 0% 2012 2011 2010 2009 Walldng alone in neighborhood after dark iVerysafe •Somewhat safe nSomewhat unsafe eVery unsafe nOK/NA ^ Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 ° Statistically significant change from 2009 ^ Question not asked in 2008. Due to space constraints, the following symbols were omitted from the chart for walking alone in neighborhood during the day: "Somewhat unsafe" was statistically lower in both 2012 and 2011 than 2009, "Very unsafe" was statistically lower in 2012 than 2011, and "DK/NA" was statistically lower in 2012 than 2009. [bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Safety walking alone in their neighborhoods (during both the day and night) was positively correlated with a number of other metrics within the survey, including: satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, quality of life ratings, sense of community, confidence in city government, satisfaction with city-resident communication, and experience visiting the Village. Given the very high percentage of residents that felt safe walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day (and thereby the limited amount of differentiation among sub-groups), the focus ofthe sub-group analysis below is on safety walking alone after dark. o Women were more likely than men to report feeling unsafe walking along in their neighborhoods after dark (10% vs. 3%). Further, 72 percent of men reported feeling "Very safe" compared with 41 percent of women. o A higher than average percentage of Asian residents reported feeling unsafe in their neighborhoods after dark (21% vs. 7%). o Residents who identified as living in a Carisbad neighborhood (91 %) or gave the name of their homeowners' association as their neighborhood (92%) were much more likely to report feeling safe in their neighborhood after dark than those who did not provide either (82%). o A higher than average percentage of residents in the Village/ North Beach/ Barrio area reported feeling unsafe in their neighborhood after dark (15% vs. 7%). bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SAFETY - COMPARISON TO OTHER CITIES The figure below shows examples of residents' feelings of safety walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day in cities throughout the state that have conducted comparable studies within the past five years. No city has reported higher than a 99 percent safety rating for this metric. Figure 11: Safety Wall<ing Alone During the Dav - Comparison to Other Cities City of Carlsbad, San Diego County Small City, Riverside County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Small City, El Dorado County Mid-Sized City, Los Angeles County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, San Bernardino County MId-Sized City, Riverside County Mid-Sized City, Sacramento County Large City, San Francisco County Small City, Riverside County Mid-Sized City, Contra Costa County 83% 81% 70% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% [bw]; ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 5"^ Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Carisbad remained in the top tier with regard to residents' safety ratings for walking alone in their neighborhoods after dark. Figure 12: Safety Walking Alone After Dark - Comparison to Other Cities Mid-Sized City, Orange County Mid-sized City, Orange County Small City, Orange County City ofCarlsbad, San Diego County Small City, Santa Clara County Small City, Riverside County Small City, El Dorado County MId-Sized City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, San Mateo County Mid-Sized City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, San Diego County Mid-Sized City, Sacramento County Large City, Santa Clara County Mid-Sized City, San Bernardino County Mid-Sized City, Sacramento County Small City, Riverside County Large City, San Francisco County Mid-Sized City, Contra Costa County 66% 55% 52% 50% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Consistent with the levels reported in 2010 and 2011 and statistically higher than 2008 and 2009, 80 percent of residents reported confidence in Carlsbad city government to make decisions that positively affect the lives of community members. Fourteen percent of residents reported a lack of confidence and five percent did not know or declined to state. Although overall confidence remained consistent with last year, the percentage "Very confident" increased (23% vs. 17%), with the 2012 level once again consistent with the levels reported from 2008 to 2010. 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 5.4% 10.8% 57.7% € a ¥ 2012 3i7% finM 10.3% £S 66.1% #a¥ 2011 4.9% 5.5% 12.0% 55.2% 2010 6.5% 15.7% 52.2% 2009 33^ 7.5% 12.9% 52.1% 2008 • Very confident DSomewhat confident DSomewhat unconfident OVery unconfident DDK/NA Statistically significant change from 2011 (p< 05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The following is an assessment of confidence in city government by sub-groups. • Confidence in city government was positively correlated with: residents' views regarding quality of life, direction of the quality of life, sense of community, how safe residents felt walking alone in their neighborhoods (day and night), satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, satisfaction with city-resident communication, and residents' experience visiting Carisbad's Downtown Village. • Residents who had communicated with city staff in the past 12 months regarding city business reported less confidence than those who had not contacted the city (Unconfident: 19% vs. 13%). • Residents who visited the Village in a typical month were more likely to report confidence in city government than those who did not visit (81% vs. 65%). • Although there was no difference in overall confidence by age group, residents 65 years and older were the most likely to report being "Very confident" in Carisbad city government to make decisions that positively affect the lives of its community members. • Similarly, Hispanic or Latino residents were more likely than those in other ethnic groups to report being "Very confident" (no difference in overall confidence). • Residents of zip codes 92008 (77%) and 92011 (77%) reported lower confidence than those in 92009 (83%) and 92010 (84%). • Although they represent a small sub-group, 25 percent of respondents in the South Beach/ Terramar area reported a lack of confidence. bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad CoMiviuNiTY VALUES New to the 2012 survey, a battery of questions were tested that asked residents their level of agreement with a variety of statements that describe Carisbad's vision for the city and specific characteristics or qualities of Carisbad. With the majority of residents who provided an opinion indicating they "Strongly agree" and between 87 percent and 95 percent total agreement, the top three characteristics were Carisbad's active lifestyles, beach community, and strong local economy. Figure 14; Agreement with Statements about Characteristics of Carlsbad^ Cartsbad... Promotes active lifestyles by providing access to trails, parks, beaches, & other rec. opportunities Maintains its beach community character Supports a strong local economy by promoting business diversity and tourism Promotes the arts Supports environmental sustainability Protects and enhances open space and the natural environment Is improving access to walking and biking trails Supports quality education Supports neighborhood revitalization and livable communities Has a small town, connected feel Celebrates the city's cultural heritage Is improving access to public transportation 68.7% 59.4% 52.1% 26.3% 30.8% 35.3% 5% 48.9% 36.7% 8% 35.9% 43.9% 41.7% 45.6% 34.9% 40.7% 47.2% 9% 37.1% 9% 37.7% 10% 8% 33.1% 10% 5% 42.8% 14% 5% 36.1% 6°/,12% 28.9% 39.2% 15.8% 12% 32.9% 24.3% 17.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% IStrongly agree • Somewhat agree DNeither • Somewhat disagree BStrongly disagree Due to higher than average percentages of "Don't know/ no answer" responses for many items, those responses were filtered out of the analysis for this series (see Appendix B for full breakdown of responses). bw RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SATISFACTION WITH SPECIFIC CITY SERVICES Over 90 percent of residents who provided an opinion were satisfied with the city's efforts to "Provide library services" (97%), "Maintain city parks" (95%)), "Provide trash collection services" (95%)), "Provide recycling collection" (94%)), "Provide fire protection and emergency medical services" (93%), "Provide water services" (91%), "Provide law enforcement services" (91%)), and "Provide trails and walking paths" (90%). Figure 15: Satisfaction with Specific Services Provide library services Maintain city parks Provide trash collection services Provide recycling collection services Provide fire protection and emergency medical services Provide water services Provide law enforcement services Provide trails and walking paths Provide sewer services Repair and maintain local streets and roads Provide recreation programs Provide street sweeping services Provide local arts and cultural opportunities Protect water quality in the city's creeks, lagoons, and the ocean Maintain the business climate In Carlsbad Provide hazardous waste disposal Manage traffic congestion on city streets Manage residential growth and development 80.7% 71.8% 75.7% 73.8% 72.4% 63.1% 64.1% 62.2% 62.0% 48.1% 58.3% 53.5% 45.5% 46.4% 46.2% 23.5% 27.9% 26.7% 28.0% 26.9% 38.7% 26.9% 31.0% 38.3% 37.0% 36.7% 42.8% 32.4% 1 40.6% 31.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% •Very satisfied • Somewhat satisfied 100% Due to higher than average percentages of "Don't know/ no answer" responses for many items, those responses were filtered out of the analysis for this series. The high percentages are likely due to residents' lack of direct experience with those specific services (refer to Appendix B for full breakdown of responses). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The table below shows the overall percentage of residents satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and dissatisfied with the city's efforts in each area. Table 1: Satisfaction with Specific Services Satisfaction with the city's efforts to... Satisfied Neither Dissatisfied Satisfaction Rank Provide library services 96.8% 2.6% 0.6% i Maintain city parks 95.3% 2 7% 2.0% 2 Provide trash collection services 94.7% 1.9% 3.4% 3 Provide recycling collection services 94.4% 2.1% 3.5% 4 Provide ffre protection and emergency medical services 92.6% 6.1% 1.3% Provide water services 91 0% 4.9% 4 0% 6 Provide law enforcement services 90.8% 3.7% 5.6% Provide trails and walking paths 90.2% 4.5% 5 2% 8 Provide sewer services 88.8% 8.9% 2 3% 9 Repair and maintain local streets and roads 86.9% 2.8% 10.3% 10 Provide recreation programs 85.2% 11.0% 3.9% 11 Provide street sweeping services 84.5% 9.3% 6.1% 12 Provide local arts and cultural opportunities 83.8% 10.4% 5.7% 13 Protect water quality in the city's creeks, lagoons, and the ocean 83.4% 9.7% 6.9% 14 Maintain the business climate In Carlsbad 82.8% 10.8% 6,4% 16 Provide hazardous waste disposal 75.2% 14.3% 10.6% 16 Manage traffic congestion on city streets 74.8% 5.7% 19.6% 17 Manage residential growth and development 71.4% 10.3% 18.2% 18 Average across Items 87.0% 6.7% 6.4% The three charts on the following pages display satisfaction with the city's efforts to provide each service over the past five years. Seven ofthe 18 services experienced a statistically significant change in total satisfaction in 2012 compared with at least one previous survey year (changes are marked and described in the text). ^° Only those services with data in 2012 and at least one other year are displayed in the charts. Due to rounding, the percentage "Total satisfied" displayed may not exactly equal the percentage "Very satisfied" plus "Somewhat satisfied." [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Driven by an increase in the percentage "Very satisfied" (74% vs. 56%), resident satisfaction with the city's efforts to "Provide recycling services" was up 11 percentage points from last year among those who provided an opinion. Although total satisfied remained unchanged, the proportion "Very satisfied" also increased for the city's efforts to "Provide library services," "Maintain city parks," "Provide trash collection services," and "Provide water services." Figure 16: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 1 Dark=Very satisfied Light=Somewhat satisfied Total Satisfied 0) > 2 5 n" = ^ LL (/) iS ^ C Q. > o ^ O S V) CL '12 '11 '12 80.7%** ^^^H 16.1%'' '11 76.6%* Pi 8.9%* '10 76.5%* HH| 19.6%* '09 77.4%* ^ 19.3%* '08 15.4% '12 71.8%***** Wmm 23.5%^''°* '11 66.5% "j 28.9% '10 66.5% • 29.3% •09 1 29.0% '08 1 30.5% 96.8% 95.5% 96.2% 96.8% 96.6% 95.3% 95.4% 95.9% 94.4% 95.5% i 75.7%* ^^^B 19.0%^ 94.7% 67.7% 25.5% 93.2% •> o o O >^ t. o = Q_ CU O '12 '11 ! 73.8%* •^^•i 20.6%* 94.4%^ 55.7% 28.0% 83.6% 0 -n CD ^ r- CD I ^ to E 0) •g > o CL '12 '11 '09 •12 '11 '10 '09 '08 72.4% ^^•H 20.2%'' , 73.8% 20.0% # 70.1%° PPP 24.6%° 74.2% 1 19.9% 63.1%**'* H 27.9%''" 60.9%'^° 1 30.9% 55.5% 1 34.7% 56.0% 32.8% 1 33.8% 1 Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 92.6% 93.8% 94.6% 94.1% 91.0% 91.9%° 90.1% 88.8% 90.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% bw' RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Among those who provided an opinion, resident satisfaction with the city's efforts to "Provide sewer services" was lower in 2012 than 2010 and 2008 (and consistent with 2011 and 2009), with an increased percentage of residents in the "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" category. Conversely, satisfaction with the city's efforts to "Provide recreation programs" was higher in 2012 than 2010 and 2008 (and consistent with 2011 and 2009). Although total satisfaction remained statistically unchanged, residents who provided an opinion were more likely to be "Very satisfied" with the city's effort to "Provide trails and walking paths" in 2012 as compared with 2008 to 2010. Figure 17: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 2 Dark=Very satisfied Light=Somewhat satisfied Total Satisfied 5 S CD CD (0 — cm '~ ^ ^ n\ O V- CL i= :^ to CD ro £ •o 5 ro CL ^ CD CD (/) (D •g > o £= o £= ro — ro </) .b .E CO ro ro -55 g I 00 '09 •08 '12 '11 '10 '09 •08 53.0% I I Illl m'l I ii,iijiii^niii.ji.,nii |iin,.ii.iii.ii<4Lii 34.8% 33.8% •12 64.1% 26.7% '11 65.1% 26.4% •10 64.5% • 28.2% '09 64.1% 1 25.9% '08 27.3% 12 62.2%*°* 28.0%''°* 11 59.4%°* 1^ 28.8%°* 10 56.5% 1 32.8% 90.8% 91.5% 92.7%° 90.0% 92.4% 90.2% 88.2% 89.3% 87.8% 87.5% 12 62.0% • 26.9%** 88.8%** 11 61.0% 30.1%* 91.1% 10 58.5% 34.5%° 93.0% 09 60.8% 30.0% 90.9% 08 33.5% 92.0% 48.1% • 38.7% 86.9% 45.6% T 41.8% 87.4%* 47.2% 1 38.7% 85.9% 47.6% 39.0% 86.6% i 39.6% 84.3% c CO CD O p ? I o a? o) o o P Q- CL '12 '11 '10 '09 '08 58.3% •• 26.9%*** 85.2%** 55.8% r 31.3% 87.1% 55.4% • 34.0%° 89.4% 5t«5^/-:, 29.1% 88.0% 34.3% 89.9% 0) 2^0)^ •Jo •- CD CD CD > T3 0 C- •> > CD O ^ <^ 12 WSBM ::V::^^'----;::,-'53.5%'•••••• • • 31.0% 84.5% 11 i 52.4% 33.1% 85.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% € # Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Q ¥ Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 [bw RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Driven by an increase in the percentage "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied," satisfaction among those who provided an opinion for the city's efforts to "Provide local arts and cultural opportunities" was statistically lower than 2008, 2010, and 2011. Consistent with previous years, satisfaction among those who provided an opinion for the city's efforts to "Protect water quality in the city's creeks, lagoons, and ocean" was statistically higher than 2008. Satisfaction with the city's efforts to "Manage traffic congestion on city streets" was statistically higher than 2008 and 2009 and "Manage residential growth and development" was higher than 2008 to 2010. Although overall satisfied remained unchanged, the percentage "Very satisfied" with the city's efforts to "Maintain the business climate in Carisbad" reached a new high in 2012. Figure 18: Satisfaction with Specific Services by Year: Part 3 Dark=Very satisfied Light=Somewhat satisfied Total Satisfied ro o ^ "t; - c ro CD CTJ ^ rs •O (O ±i t o ro o Q. Q. cp ro - ro ^ a? CO" ro Q_ cr o i5 CO .E "o "5 ro CD o ^ ,E ro w ^ E • — ^ _ ro ro j2 o O ro (0 w ^ ro"^ ^ N CD ro 5 CO CO CD 2 O) ^ ^ o o '12 '11 '10 '09 '08 '12 '11 '10 '09 '08 •12 •11 42.8% 40.1% 12 45.5%*° 38.3% 11 51.1% 36.5% 1 10 48.0% • 39.4% 1 09 50.0% 1 36.7% 08 1 38.7% 1 46.4%°* • 37.0% i 43.4%* 38.6% 42.3%* 1 40.8% 1 • '-41*8%*, ' 1 40.5% ! 39.5% 1 46.2%**'^* m 36.7%**°* ; 41.1% 41.8% 39.8% 1 43.8% 40.3% 43.4% f 45.1% 32.4% 32.2% '12 • 34.1%* 1 40.6% 'TT'1 33.0%* r 44.4%° •10 • 43.0%° '09 32.8%» 36.7%* '08 1 42.5% 83.8%*** 87.5% 87.4% 86.7% 88.3% 83.4%* 82.0%* 83.1%^ 82.3%^ 76.1% 82.8% 82.9% 83.7% 83.6% 83.2% 75.2% 72.3% 74.8%°^ 77.4%°* 74.1%°* 69.5% 68.1% <D .55 c or "5 ro :^ ^ (D CD E Q. _o CD > 5 o '12 '11 •10 '09 •08 31.7%*^* 1 39.8% 28.5%° 1 43.2%* 26.9%° 1 39.9% • • J^T»7,,L 41.2%* 36.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 71.4%*°* 71.7%*°^ 66.8%^ 63.8% 61.6% € # Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 ° Statistically significant change from 2009 * Statistically significant change from 2008 bw RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SATISFACTION WITH CITY-RESIDENT COMMUNICATION With the majority of residents "Very satisfied" (51%), 85 percent reported satisfaction with the city's efforts to provide information to residents through its website, newsletters, water bill inserts, and related sources of information. Overall satisfaction with city-resident communication remained statistically consistent with last year (85% vs. 87%). Figure 19: Satisfaction with City-Resident Communication^^ 1 Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied 50.9% 48.3% 34.4%^ 1 39.1% Hj 6.0% 1 5.3% Very dissatisfied I 2.0% 1.7% DK/NA 6.7% 5.7% Satisfied 2012 = 85% 2011 =87% • 2012 • 2011 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Wording of this question changed slightly in 2011. As such, previous years' data are not displayed. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad • Satisfaction with city-resident communication was positively correlated with a number of other metrics throughout the survey, including: residents' views on quality of life, perceptions regarding the direction ofthe quality of life, satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, sense of community, safety walking alone in their neighborhoods (day and night), confidence in city government, and experience visiting the Village. • Residents who referred to the city website, community services and recreation guide, Carisbad Currents newsletter, water bill flyers, and flyers at city building for information about city issues, programs, and services reported much higher satisfaction levels than those who never utilized those sources. • Residents living in single family homes reported higher satisfaction with city- resident communication (88%) than those in apartments (77%) or condominiums or townhomes (81%). • White/ Caucasian (87%) and Asian (85%) residents reported higher satisfaction with city-resident communication than Hispanic/ Latino respondents (75%)) and those identifying with a different ethnic group (78%). • Although there were no overall differences by zip code, residents of zip code 92008 were the most likely to report being "Very satisfied." Similarly, residents in the Village/ North Beach/ Barrio were the most likely to report being "Very satisfied." [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad RECENT COMMUNICATION WITH THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Up from the 21 percent reported in 2011, 29 percent of survey respondents in 2012 have communicated with City of Carisbad staff on issues related to city business over the past 12 months. Within that group - and consistent with last year - telephone was the most utilized method of contact (61%)), followed by in-person (38%) and email communications (25%). Figure 20: Method of Communication with Citv Staff (n=288) 1 Telephone 12 61.3% In-person Email 38.3% 24.5% Written letter • 5.3% Completing a web form H 4.0% DK/NA 0.3% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Residents 35 years and older and those who lived in Carisbad for five years or longer were much more likely than those 18 to 34 years and those who have been in the city less than five years to have communicated with Carisbad city staff on issues related to city business. Residents who owned their home as well as those living in a single family detached home were more likely to have communicated with city staff on issues related to city business than renters and those living in apartments, condominiums, or townhomes. The majority of residents (51%) who identified with an ethnic group other than White/ Caucasian, Hispanic/ Latino, or Asian indicated they had communicated with Carisbad city staff on issues related to city business in the past year. Multiple responses permitted; the percentages in the figure total more than 100 percent. [bw]: ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP (p1 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad iNFORMATION SOURCES Examining overall use of each source for information on city issues, programs, and services, the city's website (72%), flyers that come in the water bill (69% total use and also the highest percentage of regular use at 30%), and the community services and recreation guide (68%) were each utilized by more than two out of three residents. Compared with previous years, statistically more residents reported referring to the city's website (higher than 2008), water bill flyers (higher than 2009 and 2010), North County Times (higher than 2010), and social media websites (higher than 2009-2011), whereas fewer referred to the community services and recreation guide (lower than 2009-2011), San Diego Union Tribune (lower than 2009 and 2011), and the city cable channel (lower than 2011). Figure 21: Frequency of Using information Sources City of Carisbad website Flyers that come in water bill Community services and recreation guide Flyers at city buildings like the library, senior center, or community centers Carisbad Currents newsletter North County Times Coast News San Diego Union-Tribune or UT San Diego Social media websites such as Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube 17.4% 29.8% 19.7% 14^9% 20.7% 241% 35.6% 19.4% 26.9% 27.5% 12% 27.8% 32.0% 16.4% 30.9% 28.6% 20.8% 34.8% 22.8% 16.4% 37.7% 21.9% 13% 39.9% 28.9% 16.3% 41.8% 21.5% 17.3% 1 18.5% 15.7% 43.7% 14.7% 13% 55.0% City cable channel mi 13% 15% 65.4% Patch.com ^6%7% 77.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% iRegularly nSometimes nSeldom DNever nOK/NA Figure sorted by overall use. Patch.com and Coast News were new to the 2012 survey. bw RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad PREVENTING POLLUTION OF CREEKS, LAGOONS, AND OCEA! Consistent with 2008 but lower than percentages reported from 2009 to 2011, 57 percent of residents in 2012 had seen or heard information in the past year about how residents can prevent the pollution of local creeks, lagoons, and the ocean. Figure 22: Informed about^Preyentifig VVater Poltutipn 80% 1 • - • — — • - ' • • ^ 60% 4l a¥ 40% 20% 0% Yes No • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 pN** o\o <^** <>• DK/NA statistically significant change from 2011 (p<.05) Statistically significant change from 2010 Statistically significant change from 2009 Statistically significant change from 2008 bw]p E SEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City ofCarlsbad SOURCE OF INFORMATION Residents who recalled seeing or hearing information about how residents can prevent the pollution of local creeks, lagoons, and the ocean were asked to recall the source of the information in an open-ended format. The most frequently cited sources were television (20%), newspapers (17%)), and newsletters (17%)). Although television and newspaper have been the top two sources each year, the percentage of respondents citing television as the source ofthe information was much lower in 2012 than previous years (2012: 20%, 2011: 29%, 2010: 32%, 2009: 38%, 2008: 34%). Figure 23: Source of Pollution Prevention Information fn=573) Television 20.4% Newspaper Newsletters Curb Signs Brochures Radio Water/ utility bill Website Public events/ booth Family/ friends/ other word of mouth Flyers Posters Information in the mail Signs near lagoons/ beach/ trails School City building or library Magazine Internet Other Don't know/ not sure 17.2% 17.0% 13.2% 12.8% 6.3% +- 0% 20% 40% Multiple responses permitted; the percentages in the figure total more than 100 percent. For this figure, categories with less than one percent were combined into "Other." Please see Appendix B: Survey Toplines for a complete breakdown of responses. [bw]:. ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad ACTION BASED ON INFORMATION Residents who recalled seeing or hearing information about how to prevent water pollution were next asked to indicate what they had done - if anything - to reduce the amount of pollution in local creeks, lagoons, and the ocean. Consistent with the past two years, 24 percent of respondents to this follow-up question indicated that they had not done anything or declined to state. Twenty-two percent of those who recalled hearing or seeing information indicated that they properiy disposed of hazardous waste, 14 percent recycled, and 14 percent cleaned up trash at parks, beaches, or on the street. No longer placing in the top group, the percentage that reported using a commercial car wash as a way to reduce water pollution was lower in 2012 than previous years (9% vs. 15%) to 19%). Figure 24: Action Taken Based on Pollution Prevention Information (n=S73) Properiy disposed of hazardous waste IS 21.8% Recycled Cleaned up trash at parks and beaches/ on the street Used environmentally friendly soaps, pesticides, etc. , Used a commercial car wash H I do everything I can/1 don't pollute Careful of what goes down sewer/ no longer dump down storm drain Reduced usage/ used more efficiently Reduced run-off/ erosion control Cleaned up animal waste Don't litter Taught others/ reported violators Don't wash cars as much/ don't wash in driveway Reduce trash/ plastics Walk/ ride bike more often Other Have not done anything DK/NA 13.9% 13.7% 11.3% 7.0% 19.9% 4.3% 20% 40% Multiple responses permitted; the percentages in the figure total more than 100 percent. Categories with less than one percent were combined into "Other" (see Appendix B for full breakdown). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad EXPERIENCE VISITING THE CARLSBAD VILLAGE Consistent with last year, 95 percent of residents reported visiting Carisbad's Downtown Village in a typical month, with the majority (54%)) visiting at least once a week.^® Also in line with last year, nine out of ten residents who visited the Village rated their experience positively, with 45 percent reporting an "Excellent" experience and 45 percent rating it as "Good." Figure 25: Experience Visiting Carisbad Village 1 Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor DK/NA 8.7% 8.2% 1 0.8% 0.7% 0.2% I 0.5% 0.2% I 0.4% 45.3% 43.1% 44.8% Positive 2012 = 90% 2011 =90% 47 !o%| • 2012 • 2011 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Wording of this question changed slightly in 2011 to focus on a typical month. As such, previous years' data are not displayed. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP "1^ Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad The following section examines use and perceptions regarding Carisbad's Downtown Village by resident sub-groups. • In general, residents who had a positive experience visiting Carisbad's Downtown Village were more likely to rate other aspects of life in Carisbad favorably. Ratings were positively correlated with: residents' views regarding quality of life, direction ofthe quality of life, confidence in city government, sense of community, perception of safety walking alone in their neighborhoods during the day, satisfaction with the job the city is doing to provide services, and satisfaction with city-resident communication. • Residents who have lived in Carisbad at least 15 years were the most likely to regularly visit the Village (63%). • Seventy percent of residents living in apartments regularly visited the Village as compared to 52 percent of residents in single family detached homes or condominiums and townhomes. Renters were also more likely than owners to rate their experience as "Excellent" (51% vs. 43%). • Residents of zip code 92009 were the least likely to report visiting the Village in a typical month (92008: 99%, 92009: 90%, 92010: 99%, 92011: 98%). By neighborhood, frequency of not visiting the Village in a typical month was highest among residents living in the La Costa/ La Costa Canyon (11%) and Rancho La Costa/ La Costa Oaks/ La Costa Ridge (9%) communities. o Compared to visitors in Olde Carisbad zip codes (92008 and 92010), residents who lived in La Costa zip codes (92009 and 92010) and visited the Village in a typical month were less likely to rate their experience as "Excellent" and more likely to rate it as "Good" or "Fair." [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY The table below provides an overview of the methodology utilized for the project. Table 2: Overview of Proiect Methodology Method Telephone Survey (Mobile and Land Line) Universe 82,082 Residents 18 Years and Older within the City of Carisbad Number of Respondents 1,001 Residents Completed a Survey Average Length 20 minutes Field Dates September 12 - October 8, 2012 Margin of Error The maximum margin of error for questions answered by all 1,001 respondents was +/-3.08% (95% level of confidence) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Prior to beginning the project, BW Research met with the City of Carisbad's Performance Measurement Resource Team to determine the research objectives for the 2012 study. The main research objectives ofthe study were to assess residents' perceptions regarding city services, quality of life, sense of community, neighborhood safety, city government, community values, and city-resident communication. QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN Through an iterative process, BW Research worked closely with the city to develop a survey instrument that met all the research objectives ofthe study. In developing the instrument, BW Research utilized techniques to overcome known biases in survey research and minimize potential sources of measurement error within the survey. SAMPLING METHOD BW Research utilized a mixed-method sampling plan that incorporated a traditional random digit dial (RDD) methodology (listed and unlisted traditional land line numbers), an RDD cell phone sample, and a listed sample of residents (listed land line and cell phone numbers) known to live within the City of Carisbad or known to be a cell phone number. The RDD methodology is based on the concept that all residents with a traditional land line telephone in their home have an equal probability of being called and invited to participate in the survey. Both the cell phone RDD sample and the listed sample supplemented the traditional RDD methodology and allowed for targeted calling to demographic groups of residents typically under-represented in traditional telephone survey research. Screener questions were utilized at the beginning ofthe survey to ensure that the residents who participated in the survey lived within the City of Carisbad. [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP n^ Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad DATA COLLECTION Prior to beginning data collection, BW Research conducted interviewer training and also pre-tested the survey instrument to ensure that all the words and questions were easily understood by respondents. Interviews were generally conducted from 5:00 pm to 9:00 pm Monday through Thursday and 11:00 am to 5:00 pm on Saturday and Sunday to ensure that residents who commuted or were not at home during the week had an opportunity to participate. Throughout data collection, BW Research checked the data for accurateness and completeness and monitored the percentage of residents with language barriers to determine whether or not the survey should be translated into a language other than English. Since less than one percent of all numbers attempted were identified as having a language barrier, translating the survey into languages other than English was not necessary for representative results. DATA PROCESSING Prior to analysis, BW Research examined the demographic characteristics of the 1,001 respondents who completed a survey to the known universe of residents 18 years and older using the San Diego Association of Government's (SANDAG's) 2012 demographic estimates for the City of Carisbad. It is estimated that among Carisbad's 107,674 residents, 82,082 are 18 years and older. After examining the dimensions of zip code, gender, ethnicity, and age, the data were weighted to appropriately represent the universe of adult residents and ensure generalizability ofthe results. A NOTE ABOUT MARGIN OF ERROR AND ANALYSIS OF SUB-GROUPS The overall margin of error for the study, at the 95% level of confidence, is between +/-1.85 percent and +/- 3.08 percent (depending on the distribution of each question) for questions answered by all 1,001 respondents. It is important to note that questions asked of smaller groups of respondents (such as questions that were only asked of residents who visited the Village) or analysis of sub-groups (such as examining differences by length of residence or gender) will have a margin of error greater than +/-3.08 percent, with the exact margin of error dependent on the number of respondents in each sub-group. BW Research has utilized statistical testing to account for the margin of error within sub-groups and highlight statistically significant sub-group differences throughout this report. COMPARISONS OVER TIME Similar to the analysis of sub-groups, BW Research utilized statistical testing to assess whether the changes evidenced from previous survey years were due to actual changes in attitudes, perceptions, or behaviors or simply due to chance (i.e., margin of error). [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad APPENDIX B: SURVEY TOPLINES Hello, my name is and I'm calling on behalf ofthe City of Carisbad. The City has hired BW Research, an independent research agency, to conduct a survey concerning issues in your community and we would like to get your opinions. [IF RESPONDENT INDICATES THEY ARE A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER OR CITY STAFF- THANK THEM AND LET THEM KNOW THIS SURVEY IS MEANT FOR CARLSBAD RESIDENTS WHO ARE NOT CURRENTLY WORKING FOR THE CITY] (If needed): This should just take a few minutes of your time. (If needed): I assure you that we are an independent research agency and that all of your responses will remain strictly confidential. For statistical reasons, I would like to speak to the youngest adult male currently at home that is at least 18 years of age. (Or youngest female depending on statistics of previous completed interviews) (IF THERE IS NO MALE/FEMALE AT LEAST 18 AVAILABLE, THEN ASK:) Ok, then I'd like to speak to the youngest adult female/male currently at home that is at least 18 years of age. (IF THERE IS NO MALE/FEMALE AT LEAST 18 AVAILABLE, ASK FOR CALLBACK TIME) (If needed): This is a study about issues of importance in your community - it is a survey only and we are not selling anything. (If needed): This survey should only take a few minutes of your time. (If the individual mentions the national do not call list, respond according to American Marketing Association guidelines): "Most types of opinion and marketing research studies are exempt under the law that congress recently passed. That law was passed to regulate the activities ofthe telemarketing industry. This is a legitimate research call. Your opinions count!") [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad SCREENER Before we begin, I want to confirm that you live within our study area. Are you currently a A resident of the City of Carisbad? 100.0% Yes [Continue] 0.0% No [Thank and terminate] SCREENER B Are you a Carlsbad City Council member or do you currently work for the City of Carlsbad? 0.0% Yes [Thank and terminate] 100.0% No [Continue] SCREENER And what Is your home zip code? C (If respondent gives the PO Box zip codes 92013 or 92018, prompt them to give their home zip code for survey purposes). 27.3% 92008 [Continue] 38.8% 92009 [Continue] 13.7% 92010 [Continue] 20.3% 92011 [Continue] 0.0% Other [Thank and terminate] DK/NA [Thank and 0.0% terminate] [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carlsbad Ql To begin with, how long have you lived in the City of Carisbad? 3.5% Less than 1 year 22.3% 1 to 4 years 22.7% 5 to 9 years 19.3% 10 to 14 years 32.1%) 15 years or more 0.1% (Don't Read) DK/NA Generally speaking, are you satisfied pr dissatisfied with the job the City of Cartsbad is Q2 doing to provide city sen^ices? (GET ANSV\ER, THEN ASK:) Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 63.5% Very satisfied 30.0% Somewhat satisfied 2.4% Somewhat dissatisfied 1.3% Very dissatisfied 2.8% (Don't Read) DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=972) 65.4% Very satisfied 30.9% Somewhat satisfied 2.5% Somewhat dissatisfied 1.3% Very dissatisfied [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q3 How would you rate your quality of life in Carisbad? 65.0% Excellent 31.8% Good 2.8% Fair 0.0% Poor 0.2% Very poor 0.2% (Don't Read) DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=999) 65.2% Excellent 31.8% Good 2.8% Fair 0.0% Poor 0.2% Very poor Q4 Overall, do you feel the quality of life in Carisbad is getting better, getting worse, or staying about the same? 23.2% Getting better 11.4% Getting worse 61.9% Staying about the same 3.4% (Don't Read) DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT fn=966) 24.1% Getting better 11.8% Getting worse 64.1 % Staying about the same [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad 05 In your opinion, what is the number one thing that the City of Carisbad could do to improve the quality of life within the community? (DO NOT READ - ONE RESPONSE ONLY) 9.8% Stop building/ stop growth 9.1% Fix the traffic problems 8.4% Nothing needs improvement 7.4% Improve the quality ofthe roads and other infrastructure 6.8% Improve schools 6.4% Preserve more open space 4.1% Increase/ improve police services 3.5% Be more business friendly/ provide more shops 3.4% Increase recreation opportunities 1.9% More community events/ programs 1.8% Improve beach access 1.6% Better economic plan/ lower taxes 1.5% More affordable housing 1.1% Listen to the residents/ care more about the people in the community 1.1% More public transportation 1.0% Build Desalination Plant 0.7% Improve waste management/ City cleanliness 0.6% More jobs 0.5% Remove the illegal immigrants 0.5% Maintain public employees 0.4% More activities/ programs for children and young adults 0.4% Need new Mayor and/ or City Council 3.5% Other (Specify: ) 24.5% DK/NA [bw]^, ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP qp Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q6 Now I'd like to ask a couple questions about safety in the city. When you are ^ ^ would you say that you feel very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe, or very unsafe? Very safe Somewhat safe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe (Don't Read) DK/NA A. Walking alone in your neighborhood during the day 89.4% 9.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% B. Walking alone in your neighborhood after dark 56.3% 33.7% 5.1% 1.4% 3.5% QUESTION 6 WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT Very safe Somewhat safe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe A. Walking alone in your neighborhood during the day (n=997) 89.7% 9.3% 0.5% 0.4% B. Walking alone in your neighborhood after dark (n=966) 58.3% 34.9% 5.3% 1.4% Next, please think about the sense of community that you feei living in Carisbad. Would you say that you feel a strong sense of community, a weak sense of community, or no sense of Q7 community at all? (IF STRONG OR WEAK, THEN ASK:) Would that be very (strong/weak) or somewhat (strong/weak)? 32.8% Very strong 40.5% Somewhat strong 18.1 % Somewhat weak 2.4% Very weak 4.8% None at all 1.4% (Don't Read) DK/NA [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q8 Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about your neighborhood. .. (READ ITEM AND ASK:) Do you strongly agree. Here's the (first/next) one: agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement? RANDOMIZE A. 1 can recognize most the people who live in my strongly agree 24.7% Agree 50.4% Neither agree nor disagree 5.5% Disagree 16.9% strongly disagree 2.1% (Don't Read) DK/NA 0.3% neighborhood B. Very few of my neighbors know me 8.1% 25.7% 3.3% 46.1% 16.4% 0.5% C. 1 have almost no influence over what my neighbor is 9.2% 25.0% 10.9% 45.6% 7.7% 1.6% like D. My neighbors and 1 want the same things from this 20.5% 51.7% 11.5% 7.6% 1.9% 6.8% community E. If there is a problem in my neighborhood, people who live here can get it solved 18.1% 57.2% 9.6% 8.4% 3.0% 3.8% F. It is very important for me to feel a sense of community 26.1% 54.5% 8.2% 9.4% 1.4% 0.5% with other residents [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q9 Overall, how confident are you in the Carisbad city govemment to make decisions that positively affect the lives of its community members? 22.5% Very confident 57.7% Somewhat confident 10.8%o Somewhat unconfident 3.6%o Very unconfident 5.4% (Don't Read) DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=947) 23.8% Very confident 61.0% Somewhat confident 11.4% Somewhat unconfident 3.8% Very unconfident [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Now I'm going to read a list of statements that describe Carisbad's vision for the City. Please indicate whether you generally agree, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree with the following statements that describe characteristics or qualities of Carlsba. QtO Here is the (fist/next) one: Do you generally agree, disagree or neither agree nor disagree with the statement? (GET ANSWER IF AGREE OR DISAGREE ASK:) Would that be strongly (agree/disagree) or somewhat (agree/disagree)? RANDOMIZE A. Carlsbad has a small town, connected feel strongly agree 39.9% Agree 35.3% Neither agree nor disagree 5.7% Disagree 12.1% strongly disagree 5.0% (Don't Read) DK/NA 2.1% B. Carisbad maintains its beach community 59.0% 30.6% 3.7% 4.1% 2.0% 0.7% character C. Carisbad promotes active lifestyles by providing access to trails, parks. 68.0% 26.0% 2.1% 2.4% 0.5% 1.1% beaches and other recreational opportunities D. Carisbad supports a strong local economy by promoting business 50.3% 34.0% 5.8% 4.0% 2.2% 3.6% diversity and tourism E. Carisbad is improving access to walking and 39.4% 35.6% 9.6% 7.3% 2.6% 5.6% biking trails F. Carlsbad is improving access to public 11.9% 27.6% 20.4% 14.4% 9.4% 16.3% transportation G. Carisbad supports environmental 33.8% 44.5% 8.9% 5.0% 2.0% 5.9% sustainability H. Carisbad promotes the arts 47.2% 35.3% 7.8% 4.4% 1.7% 3.6% 1. Carisbad celebrates the City's cultural heritage 26.1% 35.5% 14.3% 10.7% 3.8% 9.6% J. Carisbad supports quality education 41.6% 30.2% 9.1% 5.5% 4.8% 8.8% K. Carisbad supports neighborhood revitalization 31.4% 38.5% 12.2% 5.3% 2.6% 10.1% and livable communities L. Carisbad protects and enhances open space and the natural environment 43.0% 36.3% 5.1% 8.4% 5.0% 2.1% [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QIC WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT A. Carisbad has a small town, connected feel (n=980) strongly agree 40.7% Agree 36.1% Neither agree nor disagree 5.9% Disagree 12.3% strongly disagree 5.1% B. Carisbad maintains its beach community character (n=994) 59.4% 30.8% 3.7% 4.2% 2.0% C. Carisbad promotes active lifestyles by providing access to trails, parks, beaches and other 68.7% 26.3% 2.1% 2.4% 0.5% recreational opportunities (n=990) D. Carisbad supports a strong local economy by promoting business diversity and tourism (n=964) 52.2% 35.3% 6.0% 4.2% 2.3% E. Carisbad is improving access to walking and biking trails (n=945) 41.7% 37.7% 10.1% 7.7% 2.7% F. Carisbad is improving access to public transportation (n=838) 14.2% 32.9% 24.3% 17.2% 11.3% G. Carisbad supports environmental sustainability (n=942) 35.9% 47.3% 9.5% 5.3% 2.1% H. Carisbad promotes the arts (n=965) 48.9% 36.7% 8.1% 4.5% 1.7% 1. Carisbad celebrates the City's cultural heritage (n=904) 28.9% 39.3% 15.8% 11.8% 4.2% J. Carisbad supports quality education (n=913) 45.6% 33.1% 9.9% 6.1% 5.3% K. Carisbad supports neighborhood revitalization and livable 34.9% 42.9% 13.6% 5.9% 2.8% communities (n=899) L. Carisbad protects and enhances open space and the natural 44.0% 37.1% 5.2% 8.6% 5.1% environment (n=980) [bw]: ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Now I'm going to read a list of services provided by the City of Carisbad. For each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with the job the City of Carisbad is doing to provide each service to residents. Q11 Would you say you are satisfied, dissatisfied or neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the city's efforts to: ? (GET ANSWER AND THEN ASK:) Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither sat nor dissat Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied (Don't Read) DK/NA A. Repair and maintain local streets & roads 47.7% 38.4% 2.8% 7.6% 2.6% 0.8% B. Manage traffic congestion on city streets 33.7% 40.1% 5.6% 12.7% 6.6% 1.3% C. Manage residential growth and 29.6% 37.2% 9.7% 10.8% 6.2% 6.5% development D. Maintain the business climate in Carisbad 43.2% 34.4% 10.1% 4.2% 1.8% 6.3% E. Provide fire protection and emergency medical services 68.8% 19.2% 5.8% 0.5% 0.7% 5.0% F. Provide law enforcement 62.2% 25.9% 3.6% 3.2% 2.1% 3.0% services G. Provide local arts and cultural opportunities 43.3% 36.5% 9.9% 4.3% 1.1% 4.8% H. Provide library services 79.3% 15.9% 2.6% 0.3% 0.3% 1.7% 1. Provide water services 61.1% 27.0% 4.8% 2.5% 1.4% 3.1% J. Provide sewer services 58.1% 25.1% 8.3% 1.4% 0.7% 6.4% K. Maintain city parks 71.1% 23.3% 2.7% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% L. Provide recreation programs 53.6% 24.7% 10.1% 2.4% 1.2% 8.0% M. Provide trails and walking paths 60.6% 27.3% 4.4% 4.4% 0.7% 2.6% N. Protect water quality in the city's creeks, 42.4% 33.8% 8.9% 4.6% 1.8% 8.6% lagoons, and ocean 0. Provide trash collection services 74.8% 18.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.4% 1.2% P. Provide street sweeping services 51.2% 29.7% 9.0% 3.9% 2.0% 4.2% Q. Provide hazardous waste disposal 36.9% 28.0% 12.3% 6.1% 3.0% 13.7% R. Provide recycling collection services 72.8% 20.3% 2.1% 2.3% 1.2% 1.3% [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q11 WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither sat nor dissat Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied A. Repair and maintain local streets and roads (n=992) 48.1% 38.7% 2.8% 7.7% 2.6% B. Manage traffic congestion on city streets (n=988) 34.1% 40.6% 5.7% 12.9% 6.7% C. Manage residential growth and development (n=936) 31.7% 39.8% 10.3% 11.6% 6.7% D. Maintain the business climate in Carisbad (n=937) 46.2% 36.7% 10.8% 4.4% 2.0% E. Provide fire protection and emergency medical services 72.4% 20.2% 6.1% 0.5% 0.8% (n=951) F. Provide law enforcement services (n=970) 64.1% 26.7% 3.7% 3.3% 2.2% G. Provide local arts and cultural opportunities (n=953) 45.5% 38.3% 10.4% 4.5% 1.2%) H. Provide library services (n=984) 80.7% 16.1% 2.6% 0.3% 0.3% 1. Provide water services (n=969) 63.1% 27.9% 4.9% 2.6% 1.5% J. Provide sewer services (n=937) 62.0% 26.9% 8.9% 1.5% 0.8% K. Maintain city parks (n=991) 71.8% 23.5% 2.7% 1.1% 0.9% L. Provide recreation programs (n=921) 58.3% 26.9% 11.0% 2.6% 1.3% M. Provide trails and walking paths (n=975) 62.2% 28.0% 4.5% 4.5% 0.8% N. Protect water quality in the city's creeks, lagoons, and ocean 46.4% 37.0% 9.7% 5.0% 1.9% (n=914) 0. Provide trash collection services (n=988) 75.7% 19.0% 1.9% 2.0% 1.4% P. Provide street sweeping services (n=958) 53.5% 31.0% 9.3% 4.0% 2.1% Q. Provide hazardous waste disposal (n=863) 42.8% 32.4% 14.3% 7.1% 3.4% R. Provide recycling collection services (n=988) 73.8% 20.6% 2.1% 2.3% 1.2% [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Switching gears a bit, now I would like to get your opinions about city-resident communication. Ql 2 Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the city's efforts to provide information to residents through its website, newsletters, water bill inserts and related sources of information? (GET ANSWER, THEN ASK:) Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 50.9% Very satisfied 34.4% Somewhat satisfied 6.0% Somewhat dissatisfied 2.0% Very dissatisfied 6.7% (Don't Read) DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=933) 54.5% Very satisfied 36.9%) Somewhat satisfied 6.4% Somewhat dissatisfied 2.2% Very dissatisfied [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carlsbad Q13 How often are you using the following sources of information when you want to find out about city issues, programs, and services? RANDOMIZE Reqularly Sometimes Seldom Never (Don't Read) DK/NA A. The City of Carisbad web site 17.4% 35.6% 19.4% 26.9% 0.7% B. The North County Times 24.1% 21.9% 13.4% 39.9% 0.7% C. The San Diego Union-Tribune or UT San Diego 21.5% 18.5% 15.7% 43.7% 0.5% D. The community services and recreation guide 19.7% 32.0% 16.4% 30.9% 0.9% E. Social media web sites such as Facebook, Twitter or YouTube 17.3% 14.7% 12.7% 55.0% 0.3% F. Carisbad Currents newsletter 20.7% 22.8% 16.4% 37.7% 2.4% G. Flyers that come in your water bill 29.8% 27.5% 11.8% 27.8% 3.1% H. Flyers at City buildings like the Library, Senior Center, or community centers 14.9% 28.6% 20.8% 34.8% 0.9% 1. City Cable Channel 5.5% 12.8% 14.9% 65.4% 1.4% J. Patch.com 5.4% 5.5% 6.9% 77.5% 4.7% K. Coast news 11.3% 28.9% 16.3% 41.8% 1.7% Q14 Have you communicated directly with the City of Carisbad staff on issues related to city business in the past 12 months? 28.7% Yes 71.2% No 0.1% (Don't Read) DK/NA [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad [ ASK Q15 IF Q14 = "YES", OTHERWISE SKIP TO Q16] Ql 5 How did you communicate with staff on the issues related to city business? [ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSES] (ns288) 61.3% Telephone 38.3% In-person 24.5% Email 5.3% Written letter 4.0% Completing a web form 0.3% (Don't Read) DK/NA Q16 Next I would like you to think about the water in Carlsbad's creeks, lagoons, and the ocean. Have you seen or heard anything during the past year about how residents can prevent the pollution of our creeks, lagoons, and ocean? 57.3% Yes [GO TO 017] 40.2% No [SKIP TO 019] 2.5% (Don't Read) DK/NA [SKIP TO 019] WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=976) 58.7% Yes 41.3% No [IF 016 = «N0» OR «DKft»IA» SKIP TO Q19, OTHERWISE ASK Q17 AND 018] [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP ^0 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q17 Where do you recall seeing or hearing about ways to prevent pollution? (Don't read list. Multiple Response) (n=573) 20.4% TV 17.2% Newspaper 17.0% Newsletters 13.2% Curb signs 12.8% Brochures 6.2% Radio 5.8% Water/ utility bill 5.5% Website 4.5% Public events/ booth 4.1% Family/ friends/ other word of mouth 3.7% Flyers 3.3% Posters 2.6% Information in the mail 2.1% Signs near lagoons/ beach/ trails 1.6% School 1.1% City building or library 1.1% Magazine 1.0% Internet 0.8% Movie theaters 0.6% Common sense/ it's all over the place 0.5% Calendar 0.4% Surfrider Foundation 0.4% Billboards 1.1% Other (Specify: ) 6.3% DK/NA [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carlsbad Q17 WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=537) 21.8% TV 18.4% Newspaper 18.1% Newsletters 14.1% Curb Signs 13.6% Brochures 6.6% Radio 6.2% Water/utility bill 5.8% Website 4.8% Public Events/ booth 4.3% Family/ friends/ other Word Of Mouth 3.9% Flyer 3.6% Posters 2.8% Information in the mail 2.2% Signs near lagoons/ beach/ trails 1.7% School 1.2% City building or library 1.2% Magazine 1.0% Internet 0.8% Movie Theaters 0.6% Common sense/ It's all over the place 0.5% Calendar 0.5% Surfrider Foundation 0.4% Billboards 1.2% Other (Specify: ) [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP 0{U Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Given what you have seen or heard, what have you done, if anything, to reduce the amount of Q18 pollution in our creeks, lagoons, and oceans? [DO NOT READ - ALLOW MULTIPLE RESPONSES] (n=573) 21.8% Properiy disposed of hazardous waste 13.9% Recycled 13.7% Cleaned up trash at parks and beaches/ on the street 11.3% Used environmentally friendly soaps, pesticides, etc. 9.3% Used a commercial car wash 7.0% 1 do everything 1 can/1 don't pollute 5.0% Careful of what goes down sewer/ no longer dump down storm drain 4.2% Reduced water usage/ used water more efficiently 3.2% Reduced run-off/ erosion control 2.9% Cleaned up animal waste 2.7% Don't litter 2.6% Taught others/ reported violators 2.0% Don't wash cars as much/ don't wash in driveway 1.9% Reduce trash/ plastics 1.3% Walk/ ride bike more often 0.7% Used different/ less pesticides 0.5% Changed landscaping 0.5% Stopped washing driveway 0.5% Composting 1.7% Other (Specify: ) 19.9% Have not done anything 4.3% DK/NA [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q18 WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=549) 22.8% Properiy disposed of hazardous waste 14.5% Recycled 14.3% Cleaned up trash at parks and beaches/ on the street 11.8% Used environmentally friendly soaps, pesticides, etc. 9.7% Used a commercial car wash 7.4% I do everything I can/1 don't pollute 5.2% Careful of what goes down sewer/ no longer dump down storm drain 4.4% Reduced water usage/ used water more efficiently 3.4% Reduced run-off/ erosion control 3.0% Cleaned up animal waste 2.9% Don't litter 2.7% Taught others/ reported violators 2.1 % Don't wash cars as much/ don't wash in driveway 2.0% Reduce trash/ plastics 1.4% Walk/ ride bike more often 0.8% Used different/ less pesticides 0.6% Changed landscaping 0.5% Stopped washing driveway 0.5% Composting 1.8% Other (Specify: ) 20.8% Have not done anything [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q19 [Ql 9 ASKED TO ALL RESPONDENTS] Next I am going to ask you a few questions about Carisbad Village, also referred to as downtown Carisbad in the northwestern part of the city. How often do you visit Carisbad's downtown village, in a typical month? [WAIT FOR RESPONSE, IF THEY SAY DO NOT KNOW, GIVE THREE CATEGORIES SHOWN IN OPTION 1,2AND3] 53.5% Regularly, once a week or more 30.9% Sometimes, once a month or more 10.9% Seldom, less than once a month 4.3% Never [SKIP TO OA] 0.4% (Don't Read) DK/NA [SKIP TO OA] PF Q19= "NEVER" OR "DK/NA" SKIP TO OA, OTHERWISE ASK Q20) [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP B-20 Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Q20 How would you rate your experience while visiting Carlsbad's downtown village? (n=954) 45.3% Excellent 44.8% Good 8.7% Fair 0.8% Poor 0.2% Very poor 0.2% DK/NA WITH DK/NA FACTORED OUT (n=952) 45.4% Excellent 44.9% Good 8.8% Fair 0.8% Poor 0.2% Very poor To wrap things up, 1 just have a fiew background questions for compartsoii purposes only. QA Do you own or rent the unit in which you live? 25.6% Rent 72.6% Own 1.8% (Don't Read) Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City OfCarlsbad QB Which of the following best describes your current home? 67.4% Single family detached home 9.0% Apartment 20.8% Condominium or Town Home 1.5% Mobile home 1.3% (Don't Read) Refused QC Please tell me how many children under 18 live In your house. 60.4% No children 14.7% 1 child 16.8% 2 children 7.0% 3 or more children 1.1% Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QD In what year were you born? 19_ (Receded Into age) 9.3% 18 to 24 years 14.2% 25 to 34 years 17.3% 35 to 44 years 18.0% 45 to 54 years 18.7% 55 to 64 years 17.8% 65 years or older 4.6% Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QE What neighborhood do you live in within Carlsbad? [DO NOT READ, RECORD FIRST RESPONSE] 16.4% La Costa / La Costa Canyon 7.1% Calavera Hills 6.1% Olde Carisbad 5.2% Aviara 4.4% Rancho Carrillo 3.8% None, 1 just live in Carisbad 3.4% Village or Downtown Carisbad 3.1% La Costa Greens 1.9% Bressi Ranch 1.8% Poinsettia 1.6% Tamarack Point 1.6% La Costa Oaks 1.4% Barrio 1.4% La Costa Ridge 0.7% Rancho La Costa 0.4% Carisbad Ranch 0.4% North Beach 0.4% Hedionda Point 0.3% Rancho Carisbad or Sunny Creek 0.3% Terramar 0.2% Ponto 0.1% South Beach 0.1% Kelly Ranch 26.1% Other (Specify: ) 11.9% DK/NA [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QE Breakdown of respondents' neighborhood identification 74.6% Identified with a Carisbad neighborhood 13.1 % Identified with an HOA 12.3% Did not identify with a neighborhood PF QE« "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "OK/NA" ASK QF THRU QL, OTHEI^SiE SKIP TO QM] QF [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92008 OR 92010 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR QE] Do you live North or South of Cartsbad Village Drive? (n=202) 21.4% North 68.5% South (Don't Read) 10.1% Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92008 OR 92010 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR QE] QG Do you live North or South of Tamarack Avenue? (n=202) 54.5% North 37.6% South (Don't Read) 7.9% Refused QH [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92010 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD,' "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR OE] Do you live East or West of College Boulevard? (n=60) 10.4% East 80.0% West 9.6% (Don't Read) Refused [bw]: ESEARCH PARTNERSHIP \0\ Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad Ql [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92008 or 92011 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR QE] Do you live East or West of Interstate 5? (n=265) 73.8% East 22.2% West 4.0% (Don't Read) Refused QJ [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92009 or 92011 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR QE] Do you live North or South of Poinsettia Lane? (n=216) 32.7% North 57.7% South 9.5% (Don't Read) Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92009 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD,' "OTHER," OR "DK/NA" FOR QE] QK Do you live North or South of La Costa Avenue? (n=93) 43.5% North 44.2% South 12.3% (Don't Read) Refused QL [ASK QF IF ZIPCODE IS 92009 AND ANSWERED "NONE, I JUST LIVE IN CARLSBAD," "OTHER," OR "OmA" FOR QE] Do you live North or South of Olivenhain Road? (n= 93) 65.2% North 10.4% South 24.4% (Don't Read) Refused [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP Resident Survey Report City of Carisbad QM What ethnic group do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to? (IF HESITATE, READ): 72.9% White or Caucasian 12.1% Hispanic or Latino 3.0% Asian 0.8% African American or Black 5.4% Other (Specify: ) 5.7% (Don't Read) DK/NA Those are all of the questions 1 have for you. Thank you very much for partlelpattngi QN Gender (Recorded firom voice, not asked): 48.4% Male 51.6% Female O. First Name of Respondent P. Phone Q. Date of Interview R. Name of Interviewer S. Time of Interview [bw] RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP