Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-26; City Council; 21142; Housing Element Program 2.1 BarrioCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 8 AB# 21,142 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 BARRIO DEPT. DIRECTOR MTG. 2/26/13 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 BARRIO CITY ATTORNEY Iff DEPT. CED HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 BARRIO CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council: 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2013-048 . APPROVING: a. an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program forthe 2005-2010 Carlsbad Housing Element, b. an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element to create the Residential R-30 Land Use Designation, c. an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and Official Open Space & Conservation Map, and d. an amendment to the Local Coastal Program Land Use Map and Zoning Map 2. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. CS-205 and Ordinance No. CS-206. APPROVING amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zonlrrg Map. ITEM EXPLANATION: The proposal consists of a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Zone Change (ZC), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZCA), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA), and an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element to change the land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio area, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. No development is proposed as part ofthe land use designation and zoning amendments (amendments). A portion of the Barrio is located within the Coastal Zone and a portion is located outside the Coastal Zone. The amendments are proposed as separate amendments - inside vs. outside the Coastal Zone. Upon City Council approval of the proposed amendments, the amendments applicable outside the Coastal Zone will become effective within 30 days; and the amendments applicable within the Coastal Zone, which are subject to California Coastal Commission approval, will not become effective until LCPA 12-03 is approved by the Coastal Commission. As described in the Report to the Planning Commission dated December 5, 2012 (Exhibit 8), the proposed amendments are necessary to implement Program 2.1 of the current Housing Element. Program 2.1 identifies amendments to the land use designations and zoning throughout the Barrio in order to increase allowed residential densities. Pursuant to state law, by April 30, 2013, the city must complete all necessary land use designation and zoning changes identified in the Housing Element in DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Jennifer Jesser 760-602-4637 iennifer.iesser@carlsbadca.gov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC • DENIED CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN • CONTINUED • RETURNED TO STAFF • WITHDRAWN • OTHER-SEE MINUTES • AMENDED • Page 2 order to demonstrate to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that the city accommodated its share of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the 2005-2010 housing cycle. The proposed amendments were reviewed as part of the Envision Carlsbad/General Plan update process and are consistent with the Preferred Plan that was accepted by the City Council on September 11, 2012, a portion of which included land use changes for the Barrio area. Due to the need to implement Housing Element Program 2.1 prior to April 30, 2013, it is necessary to implement the Barrio land use designation and zoning changes ahead of the overall General Plan update, which is anticipated to be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council later this year. In addition to implementing Housing Element Program 2.1, the proposed amendments also achieve the following project objectives: • Protect the neighborhood character of the center of the Barrio, which consists primarily of single- family and duplex dwellings on small lots; • Bring existing uses into conformity with density limits. Existing residential development on many lots within the Barrio exceed the density currently allowed by the existing General Plan. Increasing allowed density on these sites will bring most of them into conformance with the allowed density. • Encourage revitalization and redevelopment around the perimeter of the Barrio by increasing the allowed residential densities. On December 5, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments; the commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the amendments. Minutes from the December 5, 2012 commission meeting are attached as Exhibit 7. Following the Planning Commission meeting, staff received correspondence (Exhibit 9) from a resident who lives near the Barrio area; staff's reply is attached (Exhibit 10). FISCAL IMPACT: The only anticipated fiscal impact would be from staff time required to complete the amendment process. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The proposed amendments are substantially within the scope of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2005-2010 Housing Element (GPA 03-02), dated December 22, 2009. Staff has determined that the project will have no significant effects beyond those analyzed in the MND and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require adoption of a subsequent environmental document have occurred. Staff prepared an Addendum to describe the minor changes to the Barrio portion of Housing Element Program 2.1 on which the MND was based. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council Resolution No. 2013-048 2. City Council Ordinance No. CS-205 including: a. Exhibit ZC 12-02, amending the Zoning Map outside the Coastal Zone 3. City Council Ordinance No. CS-206 . including: a. Exhibit ZC 12-03, amending the Zoning Map inside the Coastal Zone 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931, including: Page 3 a. Exhibit A - Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Carlsbad 2005- 2010 Housing Element, including a copy of said Mitigated Negative Declaration 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6932, including: a. Exhibit GPA 12-03A, amending the text of the General Plan Land Use Element; b. Exhibit GPA 12-03B, amending the General Plan Land Use Map outside the Coastal Zone 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933, including: a. Exhibit GPA 12-04, amending the General Plan Land Use Map inside the Coastal Zone; and b. Exhibit LCPA 12-03 (Land Use), amending LCP Land Use Map c. Exhibit LCPA 12-03 (Zoning), amending the LCP Zoning Map 7. Minutes from the Dec. 5, 2012 Planning Commission meeting 8. Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated December 5, 2012 9. Correspondence from Renee Houston 10. Staff's reply to Ms. Houston. 5 EXHIBIT 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-048 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING: 1) AN ADDENDUM TO 3 THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE 2005- 4 2010 CARLSBAD HOUSING ELEMENT, 2) AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO CREATE THE 5 RESIDENTIAL R-30 LAND USE DESIGNATION, 3) AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AND 6 OFFICIAL OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION MAP, AND 4) AN AMENDMENT TO THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LAND 7 USE MAP AND ZONING MAP; SAID MAP AMENDMENTS IMPLEMENT HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 WITHIN THE 8 BARRIO AREA, WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE 9 RAILROAD, AND WEST OF INTERSTATE 5. CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO 10 CASE NO.: GPA 12-03/GPA 12-04/ZC 12-02/ZC 12-03/ ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 11 12 follows: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 13 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning 14 Commission did, on December 5, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 1^ to consider: an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and 1^ Reporting Program for the 2005-2010 Carlsbad Housing Element, according to "Exhibit A," attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931; General Plan Amendment 12-03, according to Exhibits "GPA 12-03A" and "GPA 12-03B," attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6932; General Plan Amendment 12-04, according to Exhibit "GPA 12-04," attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933; and Local Coastal Program Amendment 12-03, according to Exhibit "LCPA 12-03," attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of: the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2005-2010 Carlsbad Housing Element, according Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931; General Plan Amendment 12-03, according to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6932; and General Plan Amendment 12-04 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 12-03, according to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933; and 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 26th day of 2 February , 2013, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Addendum, 3 General Plan Amendments and Local Coastal Program Amendment; and 4 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 5 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors 6 relating to the Addendum, General Plan Amendments and Local Coastal Program Amendment. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 8 of Carlsbad as follows: 9 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 10 11 2. That the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2005-2010 Carlsbad Housing Element, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931, is approved and the findings and conditions of the . Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931 are incorporated herein by reference, and are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 13 3. That General Plan Amendment 12-03, as shown in Planning Commission 14 Resolution No. 6932 on file with the City Clerk, is approved and the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6932 are 15 incorporated herein by reference, and are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 16 4. That General Plan Amendment 12-03 shall be effective thirty days after City Council adoption of this resolution. 17 5. That General Plan Amendment 12-04, as shown in Planning Commission 18 Resolution No. 6933 on file with the City Clerk, is approved and the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933 are 19 incorporated herein by reference, and are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 2^ 6. That Local Coastal Program Amendment 12-03, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933 on file with the City Clerk, is approved and the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933 22 are incorporated herein by reference, and are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 23 7. That General Plan Amendment 12-04 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 12-03 shall not become effective until Local Coastal Program Amendment 12-03 is 24 approved by the California Coastal Commission. 8. This action is final on the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. 25 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: 26 " 27 ifl 28 1 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 2 The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of 3 Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which 4 this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost 5 or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either 6 personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, 7 City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. 8 /// 9 /// 10 /// 11 /// 12 /// 13 /// 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 26*^ day of February 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: Council Members Hall, Packard, Wood, Blackburn, Douglas. None. ABSENT: None. MATK HALL, Maydr ATTEST: BARBARA ENGLESON, Ci (SEAL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. CS-205 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING MAP) BY CHANGING THE ZONING ON VARIOUS PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE BARRIO, WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE RAILROAD AND WEST OF INTERSTATE-5. CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1- BARRIO CASE NO: ZC 12-02 WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 26*^ day of February 2013 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said City Council considered all factors relating to ZC 12-02 - Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That section 21.50.030 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code, being the zoning map, is amended as shown on the map marked "ZC 12-02 - Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio," dated December 5, 2012, attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6932 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption; and the city clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the full text of the ordinance or a summary of the ordinance prepared by the City Attorney to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption. // // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 26th day of February 2013, and thereafter. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day of ,2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CELIA BREWER, City Attorney MATT HALL, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA ENGLESON, City Clerk (SEAL) ZC 12-02 Exhibit "ZC 12-02" Decennber 5, 2012 Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio Exhibit ZC 12-02 Related Case File No(s): GPA 12-03 Zone Changes APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone 2040310100 R-3 RD-M 2040930800 R-3 OS 2041720300 R-2 RD-M 2040310200 R-3 RD-M 2040930900 R-3 OS 2041720400 R-2 RD-M 2040310300 R-3 RD-M 2041100100 R-3 RD-M 2041720500 R-2 RD-M 2040310400 R-3 RD-M 2041100200 R-3 RD-M 2041720600 R-2 RD-M 2040310500 R-3 RD-M 2041100300 R-3 RD-M 2041720700 R-2 RD-M 2040310600 R-3 RD-M 2041100900 R-3 RD-M 2041720800 R-2 RD-M 2040310900 R-3 RD-M 2041101000 R-3 P-U 2041720900 R-2 RD-M 2040311000 R-3 RD-M 2041101200 R-3 RD-M 2041721000 R-2 RD-M 2040311100 R-3 RD-M 2041101900 R-3 RD-M 2041721100 R-2 RD-M 2040311400 R-3 RD-M 2041103000 R-3 RD-M 2041721200 R-2 RD-M 2040311700 R-3 RD-M 2041103100 R-3 RD-M 2041721300 R-2 RD-M 2040311800 R-3 RD-M 2041103200 R-3 RD-M 2041721400 R-2 RD-M 2040311900 R-3 RD-M 2041103300 R-3 RD-M 2041721500 R-2 RD-M 2040312000 R-3 RD-M 2041103500 R-3 RD-M 2041721800 R-2 RD-M 2040312100 R-3 RD-M 2041103600 R-3 RD-M 2041721900 R-2 RD-M 2040320100 R-3 RD-M 2041103700 R-3 RD-M 2041722000 R-2 RD-M 2040321000 R-3 RD-M 2041110100 R-3 RD-M 2041722100 R-2 RD-M 2040321200 R-3 RD-M 2041110200 R-3 RD-M 2041722200 R-2 RD-M 2040700900 RD-M RD-M 2041110300 R-3 RD-M 2041722300 R-2 RD-M 2040701000 RD-M RD-M 2041110400 R-3 RD-M 2041722400 R-2 RD-M 2040701100 RD-M RD-M 2041110500 R-3 RD-M 2041722500 R-2 RD-M 2040701500 RD-M RD-M 2041110600 R-3 RD-M 2041722600 R-2 RD-M 2040701600 RD-M RD-M 2041110900 R-3 RD-M 2041722700 R-2 RD-M 2040701700 RD-M RD-M 2041111000 R-3 RD-M 2041722800 R-2 RD-M 2040701800 RD-M RD-M 2041111100 R-3 RD-M 2041722900 R-2 RD-M 2040701900 RD-M RD-M 2041111200 R-3 RD-M 2041723000 R-2 RD-M 2040702700 RD-M RD-M 2041111300 R-3 RD-M 2041723100 R-2 RD-M 2040840100 R-3 RD-M 2041111400 R-3 RD-M 2041723200 R-2 RD-M 2040840200 R-3 RD-M 2041111500 R-3 RD-M 2041723300 R-2 RD-M 2040840300 R-3 RD-M 2041111600 R-3 RD-M 2041723400 R-2 RD-M 2040840400 R-3 RD-M 2041111700 R-3 RD-M 2041730100 R-2 RD-M 2040840500 R-3 RD-M 2041111800 R-3 RD-M 2041730200 R-2 RD-M 2040840600 R-3 RD-M 2041111900 R-3 RD-M 2041730300 R-2 RD-M 2040840700 R-3 RD-M 2041112000 RD-M/R-3 RD-M 2041730400 R-2 RD-M 2040840800 R-3 RD-M 2041600100 R-P RD-M 2041730500 R-2 RD-M 2040910100 C-2 RD-M 2041600200 R-P RD-M 2041730600 R-2 RD-M 2040910200 C-2 RD-M 2041600300 R-P RD-M 2041730700 R-2 RD-M 2040910300 R-P RD-M 2041600400 R-P RD-M 2041730800 R-2 RD-M 2040910400 R-P RD-M 2041600800 R-P RD-M 2041730900 R-2 RD-M 2040910500 R-P RD-M 2041600900 R-P RD-M 2041910100 R-3 RD-M 2040910600 R-P RD-M 2041601600 RD-M RD-M 2041910200 R-3 RD-M 2040910700 R-P RD-M 2041601800 R-P RD-M 2041910300 R-3 RD-M 2040910800 R-P RD-M 2041710100 R-3 RD-M 2041910400 R-3 RD-M 2040910900 R-P RD-M 2041710200 R-3 RD-M 2041910500 R-3 RD-M 2040911000 R-P RD-M 2041710300 R-3 RD-M 2041910700 R-3 RD-M 2040911100 R-P RD-M 2041710400 R-3 RD-M 2041910800 R-3 RD-M 2040911200 R-P RD-M 2041710900 R-3 RD-M 2041910900 R-3 RD-M 2040911300 R-P RD-M 2041711000 R-3 RD-M 2041912000 R-3 RD-M 2040920100 C-2 C-2 2041711100 R-3 RD-M 2041912100 R-3 RD-M 2040920200 C-2 C-2 2041711400 R-3 RD-M 2041912200 R-3 RD-M 2040920300 R-P RD-M 2041711500 R-3 RD-M 2041920500 R-3 RD-M 2040920400 R-P RD-M 2041711600 R-3 RD-M 2041920600 R-3 RD-M 2040920500 R-P RD-M 2041711700 R-3 RD-M 2041920700 R-3 RD-M 2040920600 R-P RD-M 2041711800 R-3 RD-M 2041920800 R-3 RD-M 2040922400 R-P RD-M 2041711900 R-3 RD-M 2041920900 R-3 RD-M 2040922500 R-P RD-M 2041712000 R-3 RD-M 2041921000 R-3 RD-M 2040922600 R-P RD-M 2041712100 R-3 RD-M 2041921100 R-2 RD-M 2040930200 R-3 OS 2041712300 R-3 RD-M 2041921200 R-3 RD-M 2040930300 R-3 OS 2041712600 R-3 RD-M 2042100300 R-3 RD-M 2040930400 R-3 OS 2041720100 R-2 RD-M 2042100400 R-2 RD-M 2040930500 R-3 OS 2041720200 R-2 RD-M 2042100500 R-2 RD-M Exhibit ZC 12-02 | Related Case File No(s): GPA 12-03 |Zone Changes Page 2 of 2 APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone 2042100600 R-2 RD-M 2042100700 R-2 RD-M 2042100800 R-2 RD-M 2042100900 R-2 RD-M 2042101000 R-2 RD-M 2042101100 R-2 RD-M 2042101200 R-2 RD-M 2042101300 R-2 RD-M 2042101400 R-2 RD-M 2042101500 R-2 RD-M 2042102200 R-2 RD-M 2042102301 R-2 RD-M 2042102302 R-2 RD-M 2042102401 R-2 RD-M 2042102402 R-2 RD-M 2042102501 R-2 RD-M 2042102502 R-2 RD-M 2042102601 R-2 RD-M 2042102602 R-2 RD-M 2042102701 R-2 RD-M 2042102702 R-2 RD-M 2042102801 R-2 RD-M 2042102802 R-2 RD-M 2042102901 R-2 RD-M 2042102902 R-2 RD-M 2042103001 R-2 RD-M 2042103002 R-2 RD-M 2042103101 R-2 RD-M 2042103102 R-2 RD-M 2042103201 R-2 RD-M 2042103202 R-2 RD-M 2042103301 R-2 RD-M 2042103302 R-2 RD-M 2042103400 R-2 RD-M 2042103500 R-2 RD-M 2042103601 R-2 RD-M 2042103602 R-2 RD-M 2042103701 R-2 RD-M 2042103702 R-2 RD-M 2042103801 R-2 RD-M 2042103802 R-2 RD-M 2042103901 R-2 RD-M 2042103902 R-2 RD-M 2042104101 R-2 RD-M 2042104102 R-2 RD-M 2042104200 R-3 RD-M 2042104300 R-3 RD-M 2042104400 R-3 RD-M 2042104501 R-2 RD-M 2042104502 R-2 RD-M 2042104700 R-2 RD-M 2042105001 R-2 RD-M 2042105002 R-2 RD-M 2042105003 R-2 RD-M 2042105004 R-2 RD-M APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone APN Existing Zone Proposed Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. CS-206 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21.90.045 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A REFERENCE TO THE DENSITY RANGE FOR THE R-30 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION AND AMENDING SECTION 21.05.030 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING MAP) BY CHANGING THE ZONING ON VARIOUS PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE BARRIO, WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE RAILROAD AND WEST OF INTERSTATE-5. CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO CASE NO.: ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02 WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 26*^ day of February 2013, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said City Council considered all factors relating to ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02 - Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad does ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 21.50.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, being the zoning map, is amended as shown on the Exhibit "ZC 12-02 - Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio," dated December 5, 2012, attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II: That Section 21.90.045 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 21.90.045 Growth management residential control point established. In order to ensure that residential development does not exceed those limits established in the general plan, the following growth management control points are established for the residential density ranges of the land use element. /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Allowed Dwelling Units Per Acre General Plan Density Ranges Growth Management Control Point RLO-1.5 1.0 RLM 0-4.0 3.2 RM 4.0-8.0 6.0 RMH 8.0-15.0 11.5 RH 15.0-23.0 19.0 R-30 23.0 - 30.0 25.0 No residential development permit shall be approved which density exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range unless the following findings are made: 1 The project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted; and 2. There have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so that approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit; and 3. All necessary public facilities required by this chapter will be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this development and in compliance with the adopted City standards. For the purposes of this paragraph the term "quadrant" means those quadrants established by the intersections of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road as set forth in the map amending the General Plan and as required by Proposition E adopted November 4, 1986. SECTION III: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6933 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption; and the city clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the full text of the ordinance or a summary of the ordinance prepared by the City Attomey to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Carlsbad within [fifteen days after its adoption. {Notwithstanding the preceding, this ordinance shall not be effective within the Coastal Zone until LCPA 12-02 is approved by the California Coastal Commission.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the 26th day of February 2013, and thereafter. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the day of ,2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CELIA BREWER, City Attorney MATT HALL, Mayor ATTEST: BARBARA ENGLESON, City Clerk (SEAL) CQ I Csi E (U O) o c E UJ D) C '(/) o I CO 5!S N o : n *i E £ 8 X Q LU CO o Csl O N Exhibit ZC 12-03 Related Case File No(s): GPA 12-04/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 Zone Changes APN Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning 2041601200 RD-M RD-M 2041601700 RD-M RD-M 2042800100 R-3 RD-M 2042800200 R-3 RD-M 2042800400 RD-M RD-M 2042800500 RD-M RD-M 2042800700 RD-M RD-M 2042800800 RD-M RD-M 2042802600 RD-JVI RD-M 2042802700 RD-M RD-M 2042802900 R-3 RD-M 2042803000 R-3 RD-M 2042803100 RD-M-Q RD-M-Q 2042910100 R-2 RD-M 2042910200 R-2 RD-M 2042910300 R-2 RD-M 2042910400 R-2 RD-M 2042910500 R-2 RD-M 2042910600 R-2 RD-M 2042910700 R-2 RD-M 2042910800 R-2 RD-M 2042910900 R-2 RD-M 2042911400 R-2 RD-M 2042911500 R-2 RD-M 2042911600 R-2 RD-M 2042911700 R-2 RD-M 2042911900 R-2 RD-M 2042912000 R-2 RD-M 2042912100 R-2 RD-M 2042912200 R-2 RD-M 2042912300 R-2 RD-M 2042912400 R-2 RD-M 2042912500 R-2 RD-M 2042912600 R-2 RD-M 2042912700 R-2 RD-M 2042912800 R-2 RD-M 2042912900 R-2 RD-M 2042920100 R-2 RD-M 2042920200 R-2 RD-M 2042921000 R-2 RD-M 2042921100 R-2 RD-M 2042921200 R-2 RD-M 2042921300 R-2 RD-M 2042921400 R-2 RD-M 2042921600 R-2 RD-M 2042921700 R-2 RD-M 2042921800 R-2 RD-M 2042921900 R-2 RD-M 2042922000 R-2 RD-M 2042922100 R-2 RD-M 2042922200 R-2 RD-M n 5 EXHIBIT 4 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6931 ^ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY 4 ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EFFECTUATING PROGRAM 2.1 OF THE HOUSING 6 ELEMENT BY AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN, ZONING ORDINANCE AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO 7 CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING ON VARIOUS PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE BARRIO, WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE RAILROAD AND WEST OF INTERSTATE-5. 10 CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO 11 CASE NO.: GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ ZCA 12-Q2/LCPA 12-03 12 j3 WHEREAS, on December 22, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution 2009- 14 322, which adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Mitigated Negative Declaration") and approved the 2005-2010 Housing Element (GPA 03-02); and WHEREAS, shortly after adoption of Resolution 2009-322, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the validity of the 2005- 9 16 17 18 19 20 2010 Housing Element; and 21 WHEREAS, on May 18, 2011, the Superior Court entered a judgment which 22 found that the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration complied with the 23 requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 24 WHEREAS, Program 2.1 ofthe 2005-2010 Housing Element identifies parcels 25 throughout the Barrio that, with an amendment to the General Plan to increase allowed 26 2j residential densities, can accommodate a portion of the city's 2005-2010 Regional Housing 28 Needs Assessment (RHNA); and WHEREAS, to implement Program 2.1, the City Planner has filed a verified application for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to amend the land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of Interstate-5 in Carlsbad, Califomia; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 y WHEREAS, to reflect the input received during the Envision Carlsbad community outreach process, the proposed amendments differ in comparison to Program 2.1 and 9 result in the potential for 165 more dwelling units than the amendments specified in Program 2.1; 10 and 11 WHEREAS, in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed amendments and 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration were evaluated, based on the conditions described in Section 15162 ofthe CEQA Guidelines, to determine if the preparation of a subsequent negative declaration was required for HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments constitute a change to the project on which the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2j Declaration was prepared; and 22 WHEREAS, said Addendum, dated December 5, 2012, is attached hereto as 23 Exhibit "A," and includes as attachments the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative 24 Declaration; and 25 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on December 5, 2012, hold a duly 26 noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Addendum; and 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6931 -2- WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the Addendum, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: g A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 9 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 10 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL ofthe Addendum to the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated 11 Negative Declaration, based on the following findings: 19 Findings; ^ ^ 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: a. it has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Addendum to the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio - GPA 16 12-03/ZC 12-02 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03, and said recommendation reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of 17 the City of Carlsbad; and 18 b. the Addendum has been prepared in accordance with requirements ofthe Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection 19 Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and 21 22 20 c. that RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of an Addendum to the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate because, although the proposed land use changes differ slightly and could result in 165 more dwelling units than what is specified by Program 2.1 of the 2005-2010 Housing Element, the differences and additional number of units are not substantial (fewer than 10% 23 additional units compared to the 1,760 units possible pursuant to Housing Element Program 2.1); and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 ofthe CEQA 24 Guidelines calling for preparation of a subsequent negative declaration have occurred, speciflcally 25 The proposed amendments will not result in any significant new environmental 26 effects or any substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant effect. The analysis and mitigation contained in the 2005-2010 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6931 -3 ^ Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration remain adequate to address the 2 proposed amendments. 3 ii. There has been no substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments are being undertaken that would require major revisions to 4 the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration. ^ iii. There is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time ^ the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration was certified, y which shows: g iv. The proposed amendments will not have any significant effects that were not discussed in the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration. 9 v. There are no mitigation measures that were previously found not to be feasible 10 that are now found to be feasible and which would substantially reduce one or more significant effects. 11 12 13 vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Black, L'Heureux, 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on December 5, 2012, by the following Nygaard and Siekmann NOES: Commissioner Arnold ABSENT: Commissioner Scully ABSTAIN: ^ ^ MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 26 DON NEU City Plamier 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6931 -4- Exhibit "A" December 5, 2012 ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH # 2006051076) FOR THE CITY OF CARLSBAD 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT A. Introduction On December 22, 2009, the City Council ofthe City of Carlsbad (City) adopted Resolution No. 2009-322, which adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the 2005-2010 Housing Element. Shortly thereafter, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the validity of the 2005-2010 Housing Element (Housing Element). On May 18, 2011, the Superior Court entered a judgment which found that the Mitigated Negative Declaration complied with the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Housing Element Program 2.1, which was part of the project evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, identifies amendments to General Plan land use designations to increase allowed residential densities on various parcels throughout the Barrio, which is an existing developed (infill) residential neighborhood generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of Interstate 5. Program 2.1 identifies increased density in the Barrio in order to provide sites that can accommodate a portion of Carlsbad's 2005-2010 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for housing affordable to lower and moderate income households. Program 2.1 identifies each parcel in the Barrio and what residential density is to be allowed on each parcel. The city is now effectuating the density increases pursuant to Program 2.1 by amending the land use designations and zoning on parcels throughout the Barrio (Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03)). B. Background Between 2004 and 2009, the city engaged in an extensive, multi-year public process to update the Housing Element of the Carlsbad General Plan in compliance with state law. The result of this process was embodied in the 2005-2010 Housing Element, which provided the goals, policies and programs that will enable the city to accommodate its share of the region's need for low and moderate income housing. In compliance with CEQA, the city prepared a project description/initial study to determine whether the 2005-2010 Housing Element may result in any significant impacts on the environment. The initial study found the 2005-2010 Housing Element would facilitate the construction of housing that may have significant impacts on a number of environmental resources unless mitigation was required. The initial study thus recommended mitigation measures to reduce or avoid the potential significant impacts and incorporated those measures into a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Because there were no unmitigated significant impacts, the city prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental document required by CEQA. On February 12, 2009, the Housing Commission adopted Resolution No. 2009-001, which recommended approval of the 2005-2010 Housing Element. On November 18,2009, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6547, which recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the MMRP, and Resolution No. 6548, which recommended approval of the 2005- 2010 Housing Element. On December 22,2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2009-322, which adopted and approved the findings and recommendations of the Housing Commission and the 1 Exhibit "A" December 5, 2012 Planning Commission, adopted the Mifigated Negative Declarafion, and approved the 2005-2010 Housing Element. Pursuant to Govemment Code secfion 65585(h), the Califomia Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) reviewed the 2005-2010 Housing Element to determine whether it addressed the statutory requirements of housing element law. On March 30,2010, HCD notified the city that the 2005-2010 Housing Element was in fiall compliance with housing element law. On January 22, 2010, a lawsuit entitied Friends of Aviara v. City of Carlsbad was filed in the San Diego Superior Court as Case No. 37-2010-00050553 (lawsuit), challenging the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the validity of the 2005-2010 Housing Element. On March 28, 2011, the Superior Court issued an order finding that the Mitigated Negative Declaration complied with the requirements of CEQA. C. Minor Changes to Barrio Portion of Program 2.1 of the 2005-2010 Housing Element The city has prepared this Addendum to describe minor changes proposed to the Barrio portion of Program 2.1 ofthe 2005-2010 Housing Element on which the Mitigated Negative Declaration is based. Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12- 03/ZCA 12-02/LCP A 12-03) proposes to effectuate the residential density increases identified for the Barrio area by Program 2.1 in order to accommodate a portion of Carlsbad's share ofthe 2005-2010 RHNA. The proposed amendments achieve the RHNA objectives of Program 2.1 relative to the Barrio; however, in order to reflect the input received during the Envision Carlsbad community outreach process, the proposed amendments differ from what is specified in Program 2.1. There are minor differences in the proposed residential densities from parcel to parcel in comparison to Program 2.1; the proposed amendments do not include designating parcels for "mixed-use" as specified in Program 2.1; and the proposed amendments result in the potential for 165 more dwelling units than Program 2.1. There are 1,164 existing dwelling units in the Barrio and Program 2.1 specifies land use designation changes that result in a potential net increase of 596 dwelling units (i.e. a potential for 1,760 total dwellings). Although the proposed amendments differ slightly and could result in 165 more units than what is specified by Program 2.1, the differences and additional number of units are not substantial (fewer than 10% additional units compared to the 1,760 units possible pursuant to Program 2.1); and said differences will not increase the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, no new information of substantial importance shows that the project will have significant effects not discussed in the 2005-1010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration. The number of dwelling units that may result from the proposed amendments is within the city's Growth Management dwelling unit limitations. All mitigation measures identified in the 2005-2010 Housing Element MND remain sufficient and are applicable to the proposed amendments. The Deputy Director ofthe City of Carlsbad Transportation Department has reviewed the proposed amendments and determined they will not result in a significant impact to transportation/traffic. The additional 165 potential dwelling units that may result from the proposed amendments, as compared to Program 2.1, could generate approximately 100 peak hour trips, which would be dispersed over the 10 ingress/egress points that provide access to the Barrio. The area has a very connective grid roadway network that allows all trips (pedestrian, bicyclists, and motorists) to be spread throughout 2 ^ Exhibit "A" December 5, 2012 the community. Most of the access points are signalized and have sufficient capacity to accommodate existing and future growth. The Barrio is also within walkable proximity to the Coaster train station, jobs, retail, services, schools and parks. Frequent transit bus service is also provided in close proximity. This area is a "smart growth" area for the City of Carlsbad and San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG); both organizations are investing fimds to promote and encourage altemative transportation choices in the area. The proposed density increase fiirther supports the ability to create a smart growth and transit oriented development area. D. CEQA Guidelines Provision for Addendum. CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b) provides that an addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration has occurred. CEQA Guidelines section 15162 provides that, when a negative declaration has been adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines that: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the proj ect which will require maj or revisions of the previous negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; 2. Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the surrounding circumstances which will require major revisions of the previous negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not and could not have been knovm at the time the previous negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous mitigated negative declaration; c. Mitigation measures or altematives previously found infeasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponent declines to adopt them; d. Mitigation measures or altematives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous mitigated negative declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the project proponent declines to adopt them. The city has considered whether any of the events described in Section C above would satisfy the requirements for preparation of a subsequent mitigated negative declaration pursuant to CEQA 3 cD^ Exhibit "A" December 5, 2012 Guidelines Section 15162. The proposed amendments do not constitute a substantial change in the proposed project or in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken; and no new information of substantial importance is known. The proposed amendments do not make any substantial change in the nature or scope ofthe 2005-2010 Housing Element or in the analysis of environmental effects contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. E. Conclusion. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), the city has prepared this Addendum to the previously approved 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration to serve as the environmental review required by CEQA for the proposed amendments. The Addendum complies with the requirements of CEQA because: 1. The Superior Court mled that the previously adopted 2005-2010 Housing Element Mitigated Negative Declaration complied with CEQA; and 2. Although the amendments proposed by Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03) constitute a change to Program 2.1 ofthe 2005-2010 Housing Element, the changes are not substantial and none ofthe conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. Accordingly, this Addendum and the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration comply with the requirements of CEQA for environmental review of the proposed amendments. A copy of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is attached. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c), this Addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City Council will consider the Addendum prior to making a decision on Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03). Attachments: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Proj ect Description & Initial Study for City of Carlsbad 2005-2010 Housing Element (General Plan Amendment 03-02) rP3 EXHIBIT 1 1 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-322 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED 3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND APPROVING A GENERAL 4 PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADOPT THE UPDATE OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE 2005-2010 HOUSING CYCLE 5 AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE AND WHICH AFFECTS PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE 6 CITY. CASE NAME: 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT 7 CASE NO: GPA 03-02 8 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as 9 10 U 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 J recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 22nd day of 23 Ppcember , 2009, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Mitigated 24 Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and General Plan 25 Amendment; and 2^ WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 27 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Housing Commission did, on February 12, 2009, hold a noticed public meeting to consider General Plan Amendment GPA 03-02, as referenced in Housing Commission Resolution No. 2009-001, and the Housing Commission adopted Housing Commission Resolution No. 2009-001, recommending to the Planning Commission and City Council that GPA 03-02 be approved; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on November 18, 2009, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program, as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6547, and General Plan Amendment GPA 03-02, as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6548, and the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6547 and 6548 1 relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 2 and General Plan Amendment. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 4 of Carlsbad as follows: 5 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. ^ 2. That the recommendation of the Housing Commission for the approval of General Plan Amendment GPA 03-02 is adopted and approved, and that the findings of the Housing Commission contained in Housing Commission Resolution No 2009-001 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference are the findings of the City Council. 23 24 25 26 27 28 "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" 9 3. That the recommendations of the Planning Commission for the (1) adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, 10 and (2) approval of General Plan Amendment GPA 03-02 are adopted and approved, and that the findings of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 11 6547 and 6548 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings ofthe City Council. 12 4. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council, 13 The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review", shall apply: 14 15 .. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is 16 governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code 17 Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date 18 on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an 19 amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court Is 20 extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney 21 of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of 22 Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008." /// /// /// /// /// -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 22nd day of December. 2009, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Hall, and Blackburn. NOES: None. ABSENT: Council Member Packard. I, Mayor ATTEST: EXHIBIT 2 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6547 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4 FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADOPT THE UPDATE OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE 2005-2010 5 HOUSING CYCLE AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. 6 CASE NAME: 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT CASE NO.: GPA 03-02 7 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, "Applicant," has filed a verified application g with the City of Carlsbad to adopt a General Plan Amendment for the Draft 2005-2010 Housing 10 Element ("Draft Housing Element"), a document that affects properties throughout Carlsbad; and 11 WHEREAS, the Draft Housing Element is an update to the Housing Element 12 adopted in 2000 for the 1999-2005 Housing Cycle; and WjHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public circulation of the MND from May 29, 2009 to June 28, 2009, staff prepared minor revisions to the Draft Housing Element and the MND, as necessary, to (1) delete text and figures regarding the La Costa Town Square 14 15 16 17 18 j9 project, which was approved by City Council in August 2009 without the residential and 20 mixed use high density components indentified in the Draft Housing Element; (2) add 21 additional shopping center sites with high density, mixed use potential to Table 3-7 and 22 related text; (3) revise text, tables and figures as necessary to reflect the above revisions; (4) ^•^ update the MND's Initial Study (Environmental Impact Assessment Form) Sections 15 and 17 on Transportation/Traffic and Mandatory Findings of Significance to match the findings ofthe San Diego Association of Governments' Final 2008 Congestion Management Program Update and amend the MND's list of supporting information sources to include this document; and (5) amend Draft Housing Element Section 4 to clarify the ability of 24 25 26 27 28 1 water and sewer providers to serve the City's remaining Regional Housing Needs ^ Assessment and to add to the Quarry Creek environmental constraints discussion that remediation of groundwater is occurring; and WHEREAS, the minor changes to the MND and Draft Housing Element do not require recirculation of the MND since they are consistent with the description of "new information" in CEQA Section 15073.5(c) (4), which states recirculation is not required if "new information is added to the negative declaration which merely clarifies, amplifies, or 9 makes insignificant modifications to the negative declaration;" and 10 WHEREAS, the minor revisions to the MND affect specifically the "Project 11 Description" and "Initial Study (lEnvironmental Impact Assessment Form)"portions of the 12 environmental document, which are attached, and are shown as either strikeouts or bolded and underlined text; arid WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on November 18, 2009, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors 20 relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 22 Commission as follows: 23 z^) xhat the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning 25 Commission hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program according to 26 Exhibits "NOI," "MND," "Project Description" and "Initial Study (Environmental Impact Assessment Form)," and "MMRP" attached hereto and made a part 27 hereof, based on the following findings: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 28 PC RESO NO. 6547 -2-30 Findings; 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: ^ a. It has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Negative Declaration for the 5 DRAFT 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT (dated December 2008) - GPA 03- 02, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and said 5 comments thereon, and the Program, on file in the Pianning Department, prior to RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ofthe project; 7 b. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance with requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental ^ Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting 11 Program reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission ofthe City of Carlsbad, and; 12 d. Based on the "Project Description" and "Initial; Study (Environmental Impact 13 Assessment Form)," the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and comments thereon, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial 1 ^ evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6547 -3- 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on November 18, 2009, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Baker, L'Heureux, Nygaard, Schumacher, and Chairperson Montgomery Commissioners Dominguez and Douglas MARTEWB. CARLSBAD PLANN erson ON ATTEST: DON NEU Planning Director PC RESO NO. 6547 -4- NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATrVHE DECLARATION CASE NAME: Draft 2005-2010 Housing Element CASE NO: GPA 03-02 PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is the adoption of tiie City of Carlsbad Draft 2005-. 2010 Housing Element, which requires a General Plan Amendment. Califomia Housing Element law requires that local jurisdictions update their housing elements every five years. The Housing Element represents a chapter of the City's General Plan, a planning document that identifies the community's long-term goals for development. The Housing Element chapter provides guidance and direction for City policymakers to address the specific housing needs of the community. PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study '(EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (i) mitigation measures developed before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad City Council. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Pursuant to Section 15204 ofthe CEQA Guidelines, in reviewing Mitigated Negative Declarations, persons and public agencies should focus on the proposed finding that the project wall not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and public agencies believe that the project may have a significant effect, they should: (1) identify the specific effect;' (2) explain why they believe the effect would occur; and (3) explain why they believe the effect would be significant. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of the date ofthis notice. The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Scott Donnell in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4618. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD Mav 29.2009-June 28. 2009 PUBLISH DATE Mav 29.2009 33 City of Carlsbad 2005-2010 Housing Element (General Plan Amendment GPA 03-02) Project Description & Initial Study City of Carisbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Contact: Scott Donnell, Senior Planner (760) 602-4618 Scott.Donnell(g),carlsbadca.gov 3M I- Project Descripuon Update This environmental document, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, supersedes the Negative Declaration circulated by the City in January and Febmary 2009. The Draft 2005-2010 Housing Element programs analyzed in both environmental documents remain the same. Please see the Environmental Review section below. Project Summary The project is die adoption ofthe City of Carlsbad Draft 2005-2010 Housing Element ("Draft Housing Elemenf). Califomia Housing Element law requires that local jurisdictions update their Housing Elements every five years. The Housing Element represents a chapter, or element, of the City's General Plan, a planning document that identifies the community's long-term goals for development. Adoption of the Draft Housing Element requires an amendment to the General Plan. The Draft Housing Element provides guidance and direction for City-policymakers to address the specific housing needs of the community. For this Initial Study, the project is the adoption of the Draft Housing Element pursuant to Section 65302 of the California Govemment Code. California law provides guidance to communities in the preparation of the Housing Element. Per State law, the Housing Element has two main purposes: (1) To provide an assessment of both current and fiiture housing needs and constraints in meeting these needs; and (2) To provide a strategy that establishes housing goals, policies, and programs. The Draft Housing Element is a plan for the 2005-2010 period. This differs fi'om the City's other General Plan elements, which cover a much longer period. The Draft Housing Element serves as an integrated part of the General Plan but is updated more frequently to ensure its relevancy and accuracy. The Draft Housing Element identifies strategies and programs that focus on: (1) Conserving and improving existing affordable housing; (2) Maximizing housing opportunities throughout the community; (3) Assisting in the provision of affordable housing; (4) Removing governmental and other constraints to housing investment; and (5) Promoting fair and equal housing opportunities. State law requires Housing Elements to be updated every five years to reflect a community's changing housing needs, unless otherwise extended by State legislation. These five year periods, or housing cycles, are staggered throughout the state so all Califomia cities and counties update their elements at different times. For San Diego County jurisdictions, the current housing cycle began July 1,2005, and ends June :^0, 2010. The state Department of Housing and Community Development, Division of Housing Policy Development (HCD) reviews Housing Elements for compliance with state law. With revisions made since its initial release in April 2007, HCD has found Carlsbad's Draft Housing Element V California Government Code, §65588 et. seq. ^ California Government Code, §65583 et. seq. 33 GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 2 for the current housing cycle will comply with state law. This compliance is stated in a November 21, 2008, letter from HCD to the City. The compliant version of the Draft Housing Element is dated December 2008 and is the subject ofthis Project Description and Initial Study. The preparation of the Draft Housing Element has taken several years and has involved several public meetings before the City's Housing Commission and City Council. Now that the draft has been completed and found compliant by HCD, the Draft Housing Element and its related General Plan Amendment (GPA) will undergo the formal approval process. After receiving a recommendation of approval from the Housing Commission in Febmary 2009, the GPA also will- be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at public hearings. These hearing are expected to take place in summer 2009. If the City Council approves the Draft Housing Element, it will be sent to HCD for certification. Readers may view the HCD compliance letter and the City's Draft Housing Element, dated December 2008, at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/pdfdoc.html?pid=528 Project Location The City of Carlsbad is located along the Pacific coast in northem San Piego County. Carlsbad is bounded by the city of Oceanside to the north; the city of Encinitas to the south; the cities of San Marcos and Vista, and unincorporated San Diego County areas to the east; and the Pacific Ocean to the west. The Draft Housing Element applies to the areas within the City limits, which encompass approximately 42 square miles. The City contains three lagoons, extensive agricultural lands, and several large tracts of open space. Project Objectives The Draft Housing Element uses the residential goals and objectives of the City's adopted Land Use Element as a policy framework for developing more specific goals and policies in the Housing Element. The residential goals and objectives of the Land Use Element encompass four main themes: 1. Preservation: The City should preserve the neighborhood character, retain the identity of existing neighborhoods, maximize open space, and ensure slope preservation. 2. Choice: The City should ensure a variety of housing types (single-family detached or attached, multifamily apartments and condominiums) with different styles and price levels in a variety of locations for all economic segments and throughout the City. 3. Medium and High Density Uses in Appropriate, Compatible Locations: Medium and higher density uses should be located where compatible with adjacent land uses and where adequately and conveniently served by commercial and employment centers, transportation and other infi-astmcture, and amenities. Further, the City should encourage a variety of residential uses in commercial areas to increase the advantages of "close-in" living and convenient shopping, 4. Housing Needs: The City should utilize programs to revitalize deteriorating areas or those with high potential for deterioration and seek to provide low and moderate income housing. 3(£L GPA 03-02-2005-2010 HO flSlG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 3 Furthermore, affecting all development in Carlsbad is the Growth Management Program, the provisions of which are incorporated into the General Plan. Developed in 1986, the Growth Management Program ensures the timely provision of adequate pubic facilities and services to preserve the quality of life of Carlsbad residents. Accordingly, a purpose and intent ofthe Growth Management Program is to provide quality housing opportunities for all economic segments ofthe community and to balance the housing needs of the region against the public service needs of Carlsbad's residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. The Draft Housing Element was reviewed with regard to the Growth Management Program. As demonstrated herein, the City can meet its obligations under the law with respect to the Regional - Housing Needs Allocation under the Growth Management Program. Project Characteristics Each community in Califomia has a responsibility to provide affordable housing and help address statewide housing needs. A process commonly known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), mandated by State law, was developed to allocate the regional housing needs to individual jurisdictions. The San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG) is responsible for developing the RHNA for the county and the 18 citie§ in San Diego County. RHNA figures are developed based on statewide housing needs; regional growth pattems; local growth potentials; housing market characteristics such as construction, demolition, and vacancy rates; and household characteristics such as average household size. Furthermore, the RHNA is divided into four income groups based on the county Median Family Income (MFI): • Very Low Income (up to 50 percent MFI) " Low Income (between 51 and 80 percent MFI) • Moderate Income (between 81 and 120 percent MFI) • Above Moderate Income (above 120 percent MFI) For the 2005-2010 Housing Element cycle, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) projected a need for 107,301 new housing units in the San Diego region. The San Diego Association bf Govemments (SANDAG) is responsible for allocating this future housing need to the 19 jurisdictions within the County. In this capacity, SANDAG developed a RHNA that determines each jurisdiction's "fair share" of the forecasted growth through 2010. Carlsbad's share ofthe regional housing need for the 2005-2010 period is allocated by SANDAG based on factors such as recent growth trends, income distribution, and capacity for future growth. The City of Carisbad was assigned a ftiture housing need of 8,376 units for the 2005-2010 planning period, or 7.8 percent of the overall regional housing need. The City must make available residential sites at? appropriate densities and development standards to accommodate these 8,376 units according to the following income distribution: 31 GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 4 • Very Low Income: 1,922 units (23.0 percent) • Low Income: U460 units (17.4 percent) • Moderate Income: ^583 units (18.9 percent) . Above Moderate Income: 3,411 units (40.7-percent) For San Diego County, the regional growth projected by the State was for the period between January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2010. Therefore, while tiie Draft Housing Element is a five-year document covering July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2010, the City has seven and one-half years (January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2010) to fijifill die RHNA. Therefore, housing units constmcted or' issued Certificates of Occupancy during this period can be credited toward the RHNA for this housing cycle. As part of the City Inclusionary Housing program, a significant number of affordable units have been constmcted (or are under constmction) since January 1, 2003. Overall, based on the number of units constmcted or under constmction since January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2006, tiie City has already met 60 percent of its RHNA, with a remaining RHNA of 3,566 units (2,395 lower and 1,171 moderate income units). Approximately 25 percent ofthe units constmcted or under constmction during the 2003 to 2006 period are affordable to persons in the very low, low, and moderate income categories. Pursuant to State law, the City must demonstrate that it has adequate vacant and undemtilized residential sites at appropriate densities and development standards to accommodate the City's RHNA. Overall, tiie City has the capacity to accommodate 5,280 additional units on residentially designated land and in mixed-use and redevelopment areas. This capacity includes the ability to accommodate 3,028 lower income, 577 moderate income, and 1,675 above moderate income units. Combined, the City has land resources to meet the remaining RHNA of 3,566 units for lower and moderate income households using properties designated for Residential High and Residential Medium High densities. As the RHNA for above moderate income housing has already been satisfied by residences constmcted through 2006, there is no remaining need to address for this income group. In 1986, Carlsbad voters passed Proposition E, which ratified the City's Growth Management Plan. This program lowered the City's residential buildout capacity and imposed very specific facility improvement and/or fee requirements for all new development. The program divided the City into four quadrants and established a dwelling unit cap per quadrant. The cap for the entire City is 54,600 units, although the individual quadrant caps cannot be exceeded without approval from Carlsbad voters. The accommodation of the City's RHNA can be accomplished within the City's Growth management dwelling unit cap. While the Draft Housing Element does include programs (e.g., 2.1 and 2.2) to increase or allow residential density on several residential and non-residential properties for purposes of meeting the City's RHNA for lower and moderate income housing, the Draft Housing Element does not propose housing development beyond the total dwelling units anticipafed in the City's existing General Plan. The Draft Housing Element includes goals, policies, and programs to fiirther facilitate increasing the supply of affordable housing; however, it does not directiy provide for approval or construction of any housing, nor directly change any land use designations, use, or development standards. Individual development projects and proposed land use and code changes pursuant to adoption and implementation of the Draft Housing Element will be subject to separate environmental review as necessary by the City. 5€ GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HO xNG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 5 : Environmental Review A Negative Declaration (SCH nOQ605l076) for the Draft Housing Element, dated December 2008, was circulated for public review from January 29 to Febmary 28, 2009. (An earlier Negative Declaration, circulated in 2006, was prepared for a now superseded version of the Housing Element and is no longer valid.) In response to conunents received on the 2009 circulation, this Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. No changes have been made to the Draft Housing Element programs analyzed in either document. Information on the environmental documents referenced in this document is listed below and at the end of Part II of this document, the Initial Study. Because of its age, the General Plan Final Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR), adopted in 1994, is used primarily for background information. Document Status Approving Resolution State Clearinghouse Identification # General Plan Master EIR Certified in 1994 City Council Resolution 94-246 93091080 Final EIR, Robertson Ranch Master Plan Certified in 2006 City Council Resolution 2006-324 2004051039 Final EIR, Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Certified in-2007 City Council Resolution 2007-303 2007031141 Negative Declaration, Village Master Plan and Design Manual Changes Adopted in 2007 City Council Resolution 2007-274, Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution 446 2007071132 Draft EIR, La Costa Town Square Draft released for public review XT/A i—7 7 V 2003011159 Draft Subsequent EIR, Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan Public review of Draft EIR completed N/A (City of Oceanside) 2005021119 Draft EIR, Bridges at Aviara Notice of Preparation released February 3, 2009 N/A 2009021030 EIR for Regional Comprehensive Plan Certified in 2004 San Diego Association of Govemments Resolution 2005-01 20040111411 As mentioned, the Draft Housing Element includes programs that propose city-initiated actions to increase or allow residential density on several properties. These actions are needed to enable the City of Carlsbad to meet its RHNA obligation for lower and moderate income housing. The GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 6 City has also counted privately-proposed residential projects toward fiilfilling its RHNA obligation. Draft Housing Element Section 4 discusses environmental constraints and information for all sites, whether counted because of city or private proposals. City Proposals Proposed programs 2.1 and 2.3 identify the need for General Plan Amendments and other land use regulation changes for several properties, or sites. Some of these sites are already undergoing or have completed environmental review that is relevant to Program 2.1. For example, the properties- identified as "Ponto" and "Commercial Mixed Use Ponto" are part of the adopted Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan, for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified. This EIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts of high density and mixed use residential projects at densities and unit numbers consistent with those identified in Program 2.1. Therefore, additional environmental review is not anticipated to be necessary to adopt the required land use changes identified in the Draft Housing Element for the Ponto properties. In October 2007, the City Council adopted changes to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and other applicable documents that, among other things, established density ranges with minimum and maximum densities in the Village Redevelopment Area. As part pf this action, the City Council also adopted a Negative Declaration, which considered the environmental impacts of 937 additional residences that could be-built in the Village area as a result of the changes. Under Program 2.1, the increased minimum densities proposed in the Village area, which are within the adopted density ranges, would allow up to 875 of the 937 units. Therefore, additional environmental review is not required to implement Program 2.1 changes to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and other appUcable regulations. Another site identified in Program 2.1 is Quarry Creek. Quarry Creek is an approximately 100 acre property in Carlsbad. Hard rock mining was undertaken over several decades on portions of the property. Mining also took place on adjacent property in the City of Oceanside, all but about four acres of which has been already reclaimed and developed as a shopping center. For the 100 acre Quarry Creek property in Carlsbad, the City's General Plan currently designates about 76 acres of the site for residential development and 24 acres as open space. The program proposes two new residential land use designations to replace the property's current residential designation that would increase the density currently allowed and in tum increase the housing unit yield. The program does not propose any particular site design as part of the.density increase. The City of Oceanside, as lead agency per agreement with the City of Carlsbad, has circulated a Draft EIR for the reclamation of past mining activities at Quarry Creek (listed above as "Draft Subsequent EIR, Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan"). Although in draft form, the environmental document provides relevant information to consideration of the Quarry Creek site. If certified by Oceanside, the mitigation measures identified in the Quarry Creek EIR can be implemented by Carlsbad, the agency responsible to review, approve, and issue all discretionary and grading permits for all work necessary to complete the reclamation for the majority of the Quarry Creek property that is located in the City of Carlsbad. The permits filed with Carlsbad include Special Use Permit (floodplain) SUP 07-03, Habitat Management Plan Pennit HMP 07-06, and Hillside Development Permit HDP 07-01. However, it is recognized that implementation of land use changes identified for the Quarry Creek site per Program 2.1 will require its own environmental review. GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HQ. .ING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 7 . Program 2.1 proposes other changes to land use designations and standards as follows: • Increase the minimum densities of the residential RMH and RH General Plan land use designations as follows. Existing density information is provided for perspective: Densities* Designation Existing Minimum density Existing Growth Management Control Point Proposed Minimum Density Existing maximum density RMH 8.5 11.5 12 15 RH 15 19 20 23 M// densities in housing units per acre. The proposed minimum density increases affect underutilized and vacant, unentitled properties in the RMH and RH designations. These properties are generally small and scattered throughout Carlsbad. When compared to existing minimum densities, the increased minimum densities potentially enable approximately 160 more units to be built. This increase in units would not cause Growth Management dwelling unit caps to be exceeded nor exceed residential buildout figures as estimated by the General Plan. However, Govemment Code Section 65863, provisions of which were incorporated into the Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning Ordinance in 2004, restricts a city's ability to approve densities below those utilized to determine compliance with housing element law. For the previous housing element, which was in effect in 2004, densities utilized to determine compliance were those at the Growth Management Control Point (GMCP). For the Draft Housing Element, the GMCP is also used to determine housing law compliance, except where densities increases are proposed as described in this paragraph. Program 2,1, and as part of the private proposal discussed below and in the Draft Housing Element, In keeping with Section 65863, residential projects approved by the City have densities generally at or near the GMCP. Densities are permitted below the GMCP only if specific findings are made. As evidenced in the table above, the proposed minimum densities of 12 and 20 units per acre represent only slight increases over the Growth Management Control Points for the RMH and RH designations. These minor density changes potentially increase the yield by 25 additional units on properties designated RMH and RH when compared to existing Growth Management Control Points. Because the density increase is slight and affected parcels are scattered throughout Carlsbad, the City does not anticipate implementation of this component of Program 2.1 will require additional environmental review. The proposed minimum densities will apply to other projects discussed herein as well, such as Quarry Creek and La Costa TOWTI Square, and the proposed densities have been or will be considered in the environmental documents for those other projects. GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Pages , • Allow housing, in the form of mixed use residential and commercial projects, in Carlsbad's commercial zones. Such uses are already conditionally permitted in the City's commercial districts. Program 2.1 would allow mixed use residential by right, rather than by conditional use permit. The City does not anticipate this program will require additional environmental review. • Amend land use designations in the Barrio Area to permit higher density residential than currentiy exists and mixed-use (commercial and residential) development. Preparation of development standards and land use changes will require environmental review. Private Proposals Additionally, the Draft Housing Element relies on private projects, identified in many of the tables of Draft Housing Element Section 3, which have been approved or are undergoing the review process. Since these are private projects and not proposed city actions, they are not included in any Draft Housing Element programs. For the approved projects, including Robertson Ranch (see Table 3-4) and others (see Table 3-11), all environmental analysis has been completed to enable the projects to be built as reported in the Draft Housing Element. Further, Table 3-12 identifies the constmction of 80 second dwelling units toward meeting the City's lower income housing need. As accessory uses to single-family dwellings, second dwelling units are exempt from environmental review. • Table 3-4 also identifies the Bridges at Aviara and La Costa Town Square as twe-a proposed project with units, to help meet the City's RHNA. As indicated in the table above, an EIR cuirently is being prepared for eaeh-the Bridges at Aviara project. In addition, this both project proposes amendments to the General Plan and other regulatory documents as needed to provide the land use designations, densities, and housing unit numbers as identified in Table 3-4. Accordingly, no subsequent environmental review will be necessary. SANDAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Smart Growth In 2004, the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG) adopted the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) for the San Diego region. The RCP provides a vision for the region based on smart growth and sustainability. The RCP is the long-range planning document that addresses the region's housing, economic, transportation, environmental and overall quality of life needs. A key implementation action of the RCP has been the development of a "Smart Growth Concept Map" illustrating the location of existing, planned, and potential smart growth areas. The SANDAG Board accepted an initial Smart Growth Concept Map in 2006 and an updated Concept Map in 2008. The RCP defines smart growth as a compact, efficient, and environmentally-sensitive pattem of development that provides people with additional travel, housing, and employment choices by focusing fiiture growth away from rural areas and closer to existing and planned job centers and public facilities, while preserving open space and natural resources and making more efficient use of existing urban infrastmcture. The updated Concept Map identifies four smart growth areas in Carlsbad, all of which are proposed in the Draft Housing Element as sites for high density residential and/or mixed use development. These sites fit the smart growth definition because they are in or near developed GPA 03-02-2005-2010 Hd. .ING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 9 areas and are proximate to major transportation corridors, transit facilities, job centers, and public facilities and amenities. They also comply with the City's General Plan policies guiding the location of high density housing and mixed use projects. As identified in the Draft Housing Element, these sites are the Barrio Area, Village Redevelopment Area, Quarry Creek, Ponto, and Plaza Camino Real. The Barrio and Village Redevelopment areas are counted as one smart growth area in the RCP. As part of its 2004 adoption ofthe RCP, SANDAG certified a Program EIR. As a program level document, the certified EIR analyzes potential environmental impacts at a broad, rather than project-specific, level. In addition, since it was prepared before the concept maps, the EIR did - not analyze any of the maps' smart growth areas, including those in Carlsbad. The Program EIR mitigation measures apply to projects in general and recognize that proposed smart growth projects, for example, will be subject to subsequent environmental review to address potential individual environmental impacts. As discussed below, mitigation measures are proposed to ensure potential impacts associated with implementation of Draft Housing Element programs, including that which feature smart growth sites as identified in the RCP, are adequately analyzed and addressed. Conclusion In the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)^ mitigation measures are included to reduce identified potential significant impacts to a less than significant level for housing facilitated by the Draft Housing Element. However, these mitigation measures will not be applied to the approved city and private proposal projects discussed above that have already undergone environmental review. At a minimum, projects still pending completion of environmental review will comply with all applicable mitigation measures identified in the MMRP and/or they will comply with equal or better mitigation measures specifically developed as each project progresses. Housing Plan The Housing Plan section of the Draft Housing Element establishes a policy framework to guide City decision-making to meet identified goals and objectives and is implemented through a series of housing policies and programs offered by the City. The housing programs outiined below represent actions the City of Carlsbad will undertake to promote housing opportunities for all segments of the community. Because of theu" continued success and relevancy, many ofthe goals, objectives, policies, and programs contained in the Housing Plan have been .carried forward from the City's previous Housing Element, adopted in 2000. These programs outlined below are from the Draft Housing Element dated December 2008. Since only programs are identified below, the reader is referred to Section 6 of the Draft Housing Element for all goals, objectives, policies and other information contained in the Housing Plan. Draft Housing Element Programs Preservation Preserving the existing housing stock and avoiding deterioration that often leads to the need for substantial rehabilitation is one of the City's goals. In addition, it is important to preserve GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 10 , affordable housing units in the community to maintain adequate housing opportunities for all residents. Program 1.1: Condominium Conversion The City will continue to discourage and/or restrict condominium conversions when such conversions would reduce the number of low or moderate income housing units available throughout the City. All condominium conversions are subject to the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance; the in-lieu fees or actual affordable units required by the ordinance would be used to mitigate the loss of affordable rental units from the City's housing stock. Program 1.2: Mobile Home Park Preservation The City will continue to implement the City's Residential Mobile Home Park zoning ordinance (Municipal Code 21.37) that sets conditions on changes of use or conversions of Mobile Home Parks. The City will also assist lower income tenants to research the financial feasibility of purchasing their mobile home parks so as to maintain the rents at levels affordable to its tenants. Program 1.3: Acquisition/Rehabilitation of Rental Housing The City will continue to provide assistance to preserve the existing stock of low and moderate income rental housing, including: - Provide loans, grants, and/or rebates to owners of rental properties to make needed repairs and rehabilitation. • Acquire and rehabilitate rental housing that is substandard, deteriorating or in danger of being demolished. Set-aside at least 20 percent of the rehabilitated units for very low income households. • Provide deferral or subsidy of planning and building fees, and priority processing. Priority will be given to housing identified by the Building Department as being substandard or deteriorating, and which houses lower income and in some cases moderate income households. Program 1.4: Rehabilitation of Owner-Occupied Housing As the housing stock ages, the need for rehabilitation assistance may increase. The City will provide assistance to homeowners to rehabilitate deteriorating housing. Energy conservation improvements are eligible activities under the City's rehabilitation assistance. Assistance will include financial incentives in the form of low interest and deferred payment loans, and rebates. Households targeted for assistance include lower-income and special needs (disabled, large, and senior) households. Program 1.5: Preservation of At-Risk Housing One project ~ Seascape Village - within the City may be considered as at risk. This project has deed restrictions on 42 units that are set to expire January 1, 2009. The City will monitor the status of projects such as Seascape Village that may be at-risk, ensure tenants receive proper 4M GPA 03-02-2005-2010 HO^ xNG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 11 . . notification of any changes and are aware of available special Section 8 vouchers, and contact nonprofit housing developers tb solicit interest in acquiring and managing at risk projects. Housing Opportunities A healthy, sustainable community relies on its diversity and its ability to maintain balance among different groups. The City encourages the production of new housing units that offer a wide range of housing types to meet the varied needs of its diverse population. A balanced inventory of housing in terms of unit type (e.g., single-family, apartment, condominium, etc.), cost, and architectural style will allow the City to fulfill a variety of housing needs. Program 2.1: Adequate Sites The City will continue to monitor the absorption of residential acreage in all densities and, if needed, recommend the creation of additional residential acreage at densities sufficient to meet the City's housing need for current and fiiture residents. Any such actions shall be undertaken only where consistent with the Growth Management Plan. • In order to ensure that adequate residential acreage at appropriate densities is available to meet the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) the City will implement the following objectives: • The City shall process a general plan amendment(s) to redesignate a minimum net acreage of each site in Table 6-1 to RH and require that the redesignated sites be developed, at a minimum density of 20 units per acre. As part of this program, the City shall also process all necessary amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and other planning documents, such as master or specific plans. Table 6-1 General Plan Amendment (RH): Ponto and Quarry Creek Approximate Minimum Acres to be Density Property APN Redesignated to RH Yield Ponto 216-140-17 6.4 128 Quarry Creek Portions of 167-040- 21 .15.0 300 Commercial Mixed Use Portion of 216-140- 18 2.8 28 Ponto Portion of 216-140- 18 The City shall process a general plan amendment(s) to redesignate a minimum net acreage of each site' in Table 6-2 to RMH and require that the redesignated site be developed at a minimum density of 12 units per acre. As part of this program, the City shall also process all necessary amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and other planning documents, such as master or specific plans. GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSflSfG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 12 Table 6-2 General Plan Amendment (RMH): Quarry Creek Property APN Approximate Minimum Acres to be Re-designated to RMH Density Yield Quarry Creek Portions of 167-040- 21 17 • 200 The City shall process general plan amendments to establish minimum densities of 12 units per acre and 20 units per acre for the RMH and RH land use designations, respectively, except for those RH designated properties in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. Residential projects and mixed use projects with residential components within the Village Redevelopment Area shall be developed at minimum densities equal to 80% of the maximum of the density range. For land use districts 1 - 4 (density range of 15 - 35 units per acre), as specified in the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual, 80% shall be 28 units per acre. For land use districts 5-9 (density range of 15 - 23 units per acre), 80%o shall be 18 units per acre. Furthermore, the City shall approve modifications to development standards of the Carisbad .Village Redevelopment Master Plan and-Design Manual if a project satisfactorily demonstrates as determined by the City that such modifications are necessary to achieve the minimum densities. The City shall process amendments to the general plan and zoning ordinance and process other planning documents as necessary to establish and permit the minimum densities, areas, and land uses as described in Section 3 and specified in Tables 3-4, 3-6 and 3-9 for the Barrio Area. The City shall amend its zoning ordinance, general plan, and other land use documents as necessary to permit residential in a mixed use format on shopping center sites and commercial areas with a General Plan designations of "CL" and "R" and zoning designations of "C-L," "C-1" and "C-2," and/or other general plan and zoning designations as appropriate. Mixed use residential on shopping center and commercial sites shall be at a minimum density of 20 units per acre. The City will encourage the consolidation of small parcels in order to facilitate larger- scale developments. Specifically, the City will make available an inventory of vacant and undemtilized properties to interested developers, market infill and redevelopment opportunities throughout the City, particularly in the Village Redevelopment Area and proposed Barrio Area, and meet with developers to identify and discuss potential project sites. For the Barrio Area, incentives shall be developed to encourage the consolidation of parcels and thus the feasibility of affordable housing. These incentives shall include increased density and other standards modifications. Incentives are not necessary for the Village Redevelopment Area as standards modifications (including increased density) are already permitted for affordable housing, "green" buildings, and projects which meet the GPA 03-02-2005-2010 HOu xNG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 13 goals and objectives of the Village (which include residential and mixed use developments). Program 2.2: Flexibility in Development Standards The Planning Department, in its review of development applications, may recommend waiving or modifying certain development standards, or propose changes to the Municipal Code to encourage the development of low and moderate income housing. Pro-am 2.3: Mixed Use The City will encourage mixed-use developments that include a residential component. Major- commercial centers should incorporate, "where appropriate, mixed commercial/residential uses. Major industrial/office centers, where not precluded by environmental and safety considerations, should incorporate mixed industrial/office/residential uses. • As described in Program 2.1, the City shall amend the zoning ordinance and other necessary land use documents to permit residential mixed use at 20 units per acre on shopping center sites and commercial areas. Program 2.4: Energy Conservation The City of Carlsbad has established requirements, programs, and actions to improve household energy efficiency, promote sustainability, and lower utility costs. • Enforce Califomia building and subdivision requirements by requiring compliance with state energy efficiency standards (including adoption of the Califomia Energy Code, 2007 Edition) and state Subdivision Map Act energy conservation provisions (Govemment Code section 66473.1). This latter code section requires subdivision design to provide future homes with passive or natural heating opportunities to the extent feasible through, for example, lot orientation. • Encourage solar water heating by requiring new residential constmction (ownership dwelling units only) to pre-plumb to accommodate solar hot water systems. This requirement has been in effect since 1981. • Promote and participate ih regional water conservation programs that allow Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) residents to receive rebates for water efficient clothes washing machines and toilets, free on-site water use surveys, and vouchers for weather- based irrigation controllers. The City publicizes these programs on its website at www,carlsbadca.gov/water/ wdtips,html, CMWD serves approximately 75 percent of the City, CMWD is also a signatory t6 the Califomia Urban Water Conservation Council Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU"). Signatories to the MOU implement 14 Best Management Practices that have received a consensus among water agencies and conservation advocates as the best and most realistic methods to produce significant water savings from conservation. In 1991, Carlsbad adopted a five-phase Recycled Water Master Plan designed to save potable water. The result is that CMWD has the most aggressive water recycling program in the region Ml GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 14 when measured in terms of percent of supply derived from recycled water. In its 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, CMWD estimates that in 2020 seven percent of the water needs ofthe area it serves will be met by conservation, 21 percent by recycled water usage, and 72 percent by desalinated water. • In the Village Redevelopment Area, encourage energy conservation and higher density development by the modification of development standards as necessary to: o Enable developments to qualify for silver level or higher LEED (Leadership in"" Energy & Environmental Design) Certification, or a comparable green building rating, and to maintain the financial feasibility of the development with such certification. o Achieve densities at or above the minimum required if the applicant can provide acceptable evidence that application of the development standards precludes development at such densities. Modifications may include but are not limited to changes to density, parking standards, building setbacks and height, and open space. • Facilitate resource conservation for all households by making available through a competitive process Community Development Block Grants to non-profit organizations that could use such funds to replace windows, plumbing fixtures, and other physical improvements in lower-income neighborhoods, shelters, and transitional housing. • Per General Plan policy, reduce fossil fuel consumption and pollution and improve residents' health by requiring: o New development to provide pedestrian and bike linkages, when feasible, which connect with nearby community centers, parks, school, and other points of interest and major transportation corridors, o Multi-family uses to locate near commercial centers, employment centers, and major transportation corridors. • Designate "smart growth" areas in the City to help implement the San Diego Association of Govemments Regional Comprehensive Plan vision for compact, sustainable growth. • Per the City's Growth Management Program: o Facilitate development of higher density, affordable, and compact development by allowing withdrawals from the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank (see Section 4 for further'details) only for certain qualifying projects; these projects include transit-oriented/smart growth developments, senior and affordable housing, and density bonus requests. o Encourage infill development in urbanized areas before allowing extensions of pubic facilities and improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized. Program 3.1: Inclusionary Housing Ordinance The City will continue to implement its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that requires 15 percent of all residential units within any Master Plan/Specific Plan community or other qualified GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOL . .NG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 15 subdivision (currently seven units or more) be restricted and affordable to lower income households. This program requires an agreement between all residential developers subject to this inclusionary requirement and tiie City which stipulates: • the number of required lower income inclusionary units; • the designated sites for the location ofthe units; • a phasing schedule for production ofthe units; and • the term of affordability for the units. For all subdivisions of fewer than seven units, payment of a fee in lieu of inclusionary units is permitted. The fee is based on a detailed study that calculated the difference in cost to produce a market rate rental unit versus a lower-income affordable unit. As of September 1,2006, the in-lieu fee per market- rate dwelling unit was $4,515. The fee amount may be modified by the City Council from time-to-time and is collected at the time of building permit issuance for the market rate units. The City will continue to utilize inclusionary in-lieu fees collected to assist in the development of affordable units. The City will also continue to consider other in-lieu contributions allowed by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, such as an irrevocable offer to dedicate developable land. Program 3.2: Excess Dwelling Unit Bank The City will continue to maintain, monitor and manage the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank, composed of "excess units" anticipated under the City's Growth Management Plan, but not utilized by developers in approved projects. The City will continue to make excess units available for inclusion in other projects using such tools as density transfers, density bonuses and changes to the General Plan land use designations per Council Policy Statement 43. Based on analysis conducted in Section 4, Constraints and Mitigating Opportunities, the City has adequate excess dwelling units to accommodate the remaining RHNA of 2,395 units for lower and 1,171 units for moderate income households, which would require the withdrawal of 2,830 units from the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. Program 3.3: Density Bonus In 2004, the State adopted new density bonus provisions (SB 1818) that went into effect on January 1, 2005, Consistent with the new State law (Government Code sections 65913,4 and 65915), the City will continue to offer residential density bonuses as a means of encouraging affordable housing development. In exchange for setting aside a portion of the development as units affordable to lower and moderate income households, the City will grant a bonus over the otherwise allowed density, and up to three financial incentives or regulatory concessions. These units must remain affordable for a period of 30 years and each project must enter into an agreement with the City to be monitored by the Housing and Redevelopment Department for compliance. The density bonus increases with the proportion of affordable units set aside and the depth of affordability (e.g. very low income versus low income, or moderate income). The maximum density bonus a developer can receive is 35 percent when a project provides 11 percent of the units for very low income households, 20 percent for low income households, or 40 percent for moderate income households. GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSn^G ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 16 Financial incentives and regulatory concessions may include but are not limited to: fee waivers, reduction or waiver of development standards, in-kind infrastmcture improvements, an additional density bonus above the requirement, mixed use development, or other fmancial contributions. Progi'am 3.4: City-Initiated Development The City, through the Housing and Redevelopment Department, will continue to work with private developers (both for-profit and non-profit) to create housing opportunities for low, very low and extremely low income households. Program 3.5: Affordable Housing Incentives The City uses Redevelopment Housing Set-Aside Funds and Housing Tmst Funds to offer a number of incentives to facilitate affordable housing development. Incentives may include: • Payment of public facility fees; • In-kind infrastmcture improvements, including but not limited to street improvements, sewer improvements, other infrastmcture improvements as needed; • Priority processing, including accelerated plan-check process, for projects that do not require extensive engineering or environmental review; and • Discretionary consideration of density increases above the maximum permitted by the General Plan through review and approval ofa Site Development Pjan (SDP). Program 3.6: Land Banking The City will continue to implement a land banking program to acquire land suitable for development of housing affordable to lower and moderate income households. The Land Bank may accept contributions of land in-lieu of housing production required under an inclusionary requirement, surplus land from the City or other public entities, and land otherwise acquired by the City for its housing programs. This land would be used to reduce the land costs of producing lower and moderate income housing by the City or other parties. The City has already identified a list of nonprofit developers active in the region. When a City- owned or acquired property is available, the City will solicit the participation of these nonprofits to develop affordable housing. Affordable Housing Funds will be made available to facilitate development and the City will assist in the entitiement process. Program 3.7: Housing Trust Fund The City will continue to maintain the various monies reserved for affordable housing, and constituting the Housing Tmst Fund, for the fiduciary administration of monies dedicated to the development, preservation and rehabilitation of housing in Carlsbad. The Tmst Fund will be the repository of all collected in-lieu fees, impact fees, housing credits and related revenues targeted for proposed housing as weir as other local, state and federal fiinds. Program 3.8: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers The Carlsbad Housing Authority will continue to operate the City's Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program to provide rental assistance to very low income households. 30 GPA 03-02-2005-2010 HOI .NG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 17 Program 3.9: Mortgage Credit Certificates The City participates in the San Diego Regional Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program. By obtaining a MCC during escrow, a qualified homebuyer can qualify for an increased loan amount. The MCC entities the homebuyer to take a federal income tax credit of 20 percent of the annual interest paid on the mortgage. This credit reduces the federal income taxes ofthe buyer, resulting in an increase in the buyer's net earnings. Program 3.10: Senior Housing The City will continue to encourage a wide variety of senior housing opportunities, especially for lower-income seniors with special needs, through the provision of financial assistance and regulatory incentives as specified in the City's Senior Housing Overiay zone. Projects assisted with these incentives will be subjected to the monitoring and reporting requirements to assure compliance with approved project conditions. In addition, the City has sought and been granted Article 34 authority by its voters to produce 200 senior-only affordable housing units. The City would need to access'its Article 34 authority only when it fimctions as the owner of the project, where the City owns more than 51 percent ofthe development. Program 3.11: Housing for Persons with Disabilities The City will adopt an ordinance to establish a 'formal policy on offering reasonable accommodations to persons with disabilities with regard to the constmction, rehabilitation, and improvement of housing. The ordinance will specify the types of requests that may be considered reasonable, accommodation, the procedure and reviewing/approval bodies for the requests, and waivers that the City may offer to facilitate the development and rehabilitation of housing for persons with disabilities. Program 3.12: Housing for Large Families In those developments that are required to include 10 or more units affordable to lower-income households, at least 10 percent of the lower income units should have three or more bedrooms. This requirement does not pertain to lower-income senior housing projects. Program 3.13: Farm Labor Housing Pursuant to the State Employee Housing Act, the City permits by right employee housing for six or fewer in all residential zones where a single-family residence is permitted. Farm labor housing for 12 persons in a group quarters or 12 units intended for families is permitted by right on properties where agricultural uses are permitted. In 2004, the City amended the Zoning Code to conditionally permit farm labor housing for more than 12 persons in a group quarters or 12 units/spaces for households in the E-A, 0, C-1, C-2, C-T, C-M, M, P-M, P-U, 0-S, C-F and C-L zones. Program 3.14: Housing for the Homeless Carlsbad will continue to facilitate the acquisition, for lease or sale, of suitable sites for emergency shelters and transitional housing for the homeless population. This facilitation will include: • Participating in a regional or sub-regional summit(s) including decision-makers from North County jurisdictions and SANDAG for the purposes of coordinating efforts and resources to address homelessness; 5\ GPA 03-02 - 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 18 • Assisting local non-profits and charitable organizations in securing state and federal funding for the acquisition, constmction and management of shelters; • Continuing to provide funding for local and sub-regional homeless service providers that operate temporary and emergency shelters; and • Identifying a specific zoning district in the City where emergency shelters will be permitted by right, with the following criteria: o The appropriate zoning district will offer easy access to public transportation and supportive services. o The zoning district should also contain adequate vacant and undemtilized sites or building that can be converted to accommodate emergency shelters. o Besides being subject to the same development standards applied to other development in the specified zoning district, the City will establish objective development standards to regulate the following: 1) the maximum number of beds/persons,, permitted to be served nightly; 2) off-street parking based on demonstrated need, but not to exceed parking requirements for other residential or commercial uses in the same zone; 3) The size/location of exterior and interior onsite waiting and client intake areas; 4) The provision of onsite management; 5) The proximity of other emergency shelters, provided that emergency shelters are not required to be more than 300 feet apart; 6) The length; pf stay; 7) Lighting; and 8) Security during hours that the emergency shelter is in operation. Program 3.15: Transitional and Supportive Housing Currentiy, the City's Zoning Ordinance does not address the provision of transitional housing and supportive housing. The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to clearly define transitional housing and supportive housing. When such housing is developed as group quarters, they should be permitted as residential care facilities. When operated as regular multi-family rental housing, transitional and supportive housing should be permitted by right as a multi-family residential use in multi-family zones. Program 3.16: Supportive Services for Homeless and Special Needs Groups The City will continue to provide CDBG funds to community, social welfare, non-profit and other charitable groups that provide services for those with special needs in the North County area. Furthermore, the City will work with agencies and organizations that receive CDBG funds to offer a City Referral Service for homeless shelter and other supportive services. Program 3.17: Alternative Housing The City will continue to implement its Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance (Section 21,10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) ^nd will continue to consider ahemative types of housing, such as hotels and managed living units. Program 3.18: Military and Student Referrals The City will assure that information on the availability of assisted or below-market housing is provided to all lower-income and special needs groups. The Housing and Redevelopment Agency will provide information to local military and student housing offices of the availability of low- income housing in Carisbad. 55 GPA 03-02-2005-2010 HO. xNG ELEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR INITIAL STUDY Page 19 Program 3.19: Coastal Housing Monitoring As a function of the building process, the City will monitor and record Coastal Zone housing data including, but not limited to, the following: 1) The number of new housing units approved for constmction within the coastal zone after January 1,1982. 2) The number of housing units for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, required to be provided in new housing developments witiiin the coastal zone. 3) The number of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income that are authorized to be demolished or converted in the coastal zone pursuant to Section 65590 of the Govemment Code, 4) The number of residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code tiiat are required for replacement or authorized to be converted or demolished as identified above. The location of the replacement units, either onsite, elsewhere ^yithin the City's coastal zone, or within three miles of the coastal zone in the City, shall be designated in the review. Program 3.20: Housing Element Annual Report To retain the Housing Element as a viable policy document, the Planning Department will undertake an annual review of the Housing Element and schedule an amendment if required. As required, staff also monitors the City's progress in implementing the Housing Element and prepares corresponding reports to the City Council, SANDAG, and Califomia Department of Housing and Community Development aimually. Fair Housing Equal access to housing is a fundamental right protected by both State and Federal laws. The City of Carisbad is committed to fostering a housing environment in which housing opportunities are available and open to all. Program 4.1: Fair Housing Services With assistance from outside fair housing agencies, the City will continue to offer fair housing services to its residents and property owners. Services include: • Distributing educational materials to property owners, apartment managers, and tenants; • Making public announcements via different media (e.g, newspaper ads and public service announcements at local radio and television channels); • Conducting public presentations with different community groups; • Monitoring and responding to complaints of discrimination (i.e. intaking, investigation of complaints, and resolution); and • Referring services to appropriate agencies. S3 II. Initial Study (Environpaental Impact Assessment Form) (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: GPA 03-02 DATE: Mav 29. 2009 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: DRAFT 2005-2010 HOUSING ELEMENT , 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv of Carisbad - 1635 Faradav Avenue. Carisbad, CA 92008-7314 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NTJMBER: Scott Donnell. Senior Planner - (760) 602- 4618 . . ^ 4. PROJECT LOCATION: CitVN\'ide 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Same as Lead Agencv. above 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A-Citvwide ^ • . 7. ZONING: N/A-Citvm^ide 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): Once adopted by the Citv. certification ofthe Draft Housing Element from the State Department of Housing and Communitv Development. Division of Housing Policv Development is required. \ 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: See Proiect Description GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics ^ Agricultural Resources ^ Air Quality X Biological Resources X Cultural Resources 3 Geology/Soils ^ Noise El Hazards/Hazardous Materials • Population and Housing 1^ Hydrology/Water Quality ^ Public Sei-vices I I Land Use and Planning I I Mineral Resources Mandatoiy Findings of Significance I I Recreation jEi Transportation/Circulation E Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 11/17/08 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) I I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I I I find that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attache'd sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. Planner Signature^ Date Planning Director's Signature Date 3 - Rev. 11/17/08 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the foiiowing pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved, A "No Impact" answer should be explained when tliere is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe tfie mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level, • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Initial S.tudy",-if a proposed project cauld have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 11/17/08 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an eariier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) tiu-ough the EIA-Initial Study analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears af^er each related set of questions. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 11/17/08 ^^^^^^^ f GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality ofthe site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which wouid adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a - c) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. . The City of Carisbad is a coastal city comprised of a diverse scenic landscape with coastal bluffs, several lagoons, and various valleys and canyons surrounded by rolling foothills. Much of the City is in open space, with scenic resources prevalent tliroughout the City. The Draft Housing Element will not result directly in the construction of any housing. However, all future development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element policies and programs will be'reviewed and constructed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Local Coastal Program.'.Many of the scenic resources in Carisbad are areas precluded fi-em development by existing City regulations. Housing development will be subject to development standards such as Title 21, which precludes development on beaches, bodies of water, natural slopes over 40%, significant wetlands, or significant riparian or woodland habitats. In addition, Carlsbad's Growth Management policies require 15% of the developable land in the City to be preserved as open space. The Local Coastal Program includes policies that preserve sensitive natural resources, significant slopes and public views. The City is not located near a State Scenic highway (Califomia Department of Transportation). The City has adopted Scenic Corridor Guidelines for several major Carlsbad streets and the railroad. Currently, only the El Camino Real corridor features an overiay zone with specific development standards to recognize its scenic designation, although the adopted Scenic Corridor Guidelines contain general criteria for landscaping, site design and architecture, and signs. All projects adjacent to El Camino Real and other streets designated as scenic corridors, including housing developments, are reviewed for consistency with these standards and guidelines. All future development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element policies and programs will be reviewed and constructed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Local Coastal Program. However, as the City develops, scenic resources could be negatively affected, which is considered a significant impact. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures • A-1 As applicable, all future development projects in the City shall comply with the following requirements: 0 Carisbad Municipal Code Title 21.53 and Califomia Environmental Quality Act - Preservation of steep slopes (40% or greater) and other environmentally constrained areas (i.e., wetlands and floodways). o The open space and sensitive habitat preservation requirements of the City of Carisbad Habitat Management Plan. Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element o El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards. o Hillside Development Ordinance (contour/landform grading, screening graded slopes, landscape buffers, reduction of slope heights and gradipg, sensitive hillside architecture). o Planned Development Ordinance and Design Guidelines Manual. o Landscape Guidelines Manual o City Council Policy No. 44 - Architectural Guidelines for the Development of Livable Communities. o City Council Policy No. 66 ~ Principles for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods o Growth Management Ordinance - Requirement for 15% performance standards open space o Zoning Regulations (i.e., setback, coverage, signage, and height, etc.) o City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program • A-2 As applicable, all future development projects in the City shall comply with the following General Plan policies: o Arrange land use so that they preserve community identity and are orderly, functionally efficient, healthful, convenient to the public and aesthetically pleasing. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattern, C.I) o Ensure that the review of future projects places a high priority' on the compatibility of adjacent land uses. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattem, C.2) o Review the architecture of buildings with a focus on ensuring the quality and integrity of design and enhancement of the. character of each neigiiborhood. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattern, C.€) o Ensure that grading for building pads and roadways is accomplished in a manner that maintains the appearance of natural hillsides (Land Use Element, Environmental, C.3) d.) Potentially Significant impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Future housing facilitated by the Draft Housing Element could introduce new sources oflight (street lights, security lighting, etc.), and substantial light and glare affecting nighttime views is an aesthetic concem. New sources of light due to urban development could also have a negative affect when adjacent to open space and sensitive natural resource areas. These impacts are considered significant without mitigation; however, implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. • A-3 As applicable, developers shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of an exterior lighting plan, including parking areas, recreation areas and other applicable components of residential projects. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. For any lighting adjacent to or within 100 feet of open space and sensitive habitat areas, the lighting plan shall demonstrate compliance with the Adjacency Standards of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan. • A-4 Consfruction lighting shall be shielded or directed away from adjacent residences and sensitive receptors to light, including sensitive habitats. • A-5 All projects adjacent to open space and sensitive habitat areas shall comply with the lighting recommendations found in the Adjacency Standards of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, including the following: o Eliminate lighting in or adjacent to the preserve areas except where essential for roadway, facility use and safety and security purposes. Rev. 12/13/07 ( GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Use low pressure sodium illumination sources. Do not use low voltage outdoor or trail lighting, spot lights, or bug lights. Shield light sources adjacent to the preserve so that the lighting is focused downward. Avoid excessive lighting in developments adjacent to linkages through appropriate placement and shielding of light sources. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the Califomia Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Fafrnland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agriculmral use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Familand to non-agricultural use? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • S • • • • S ^ • • a, c) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. According to the San Diego County Important Farmland 2006 map, published by the Califomia Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the City of Carisbad contains a limited number of areas considered Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance. The Draft Housing Element will not alter existing General Plan policies and designations or Zoning Ordinance standards regarding agricultural resources. Additionally, the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP) policies address the issue of premature conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses by establishing programs which require mitigation, including impact fees, for agricultural conversion. The existing General Plan and goals and policies regarding agricultural uses provide for the preservation of agricultural lands and prevention of their premature conversion to urban uses. While the City supports agriculture, it also recognizes its possible transition to urban uses. Where important farmlands exist, this could result in significant impacts if these lands are converted to Urban uses. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. • AR-1 Within the Coastal Zone, projects that would convert farmland must comply vvith the agricultural conversion requirements of the Local Coastal Program. • AR-2 For any project that would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, a Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model Analysis must be prepared to identity potential impacts to important agricultural lands. Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element b. No Impact) There are no Williamson Act contracts in effect in Carlsbad and the Draft Housing Element does not propose to convert any properties currently zoned for agriculture to residential uses; therefore, no impact is assessed. IH. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution cojitrol district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • • • S • • • • K • • • • K • • • a) No Impact. The Draft Housing Element does not include any proposal for the physical development of any site. Policies are intended to facilitate housing development with the adopted General Plan land use policies, the City's Growth Management Program, and regional growth assumptions. The project site (citywide) is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a state non-attainment area for ozone (O3) and for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PMjo). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particulariy for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed joinfly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG). A Plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans fi-om all other Califomia non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create the Califomia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARBy after public hearings on November 9* through 10* in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particulariy regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumpfions are based on each city's and the County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project Rev. 12/13/07 (9^ (' GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. Implementation ofthe policies and programs of the Draft Housing Element will not increase the number of dwelling units in Carisbad beyond that already anticipated by the General Plan and Growth Management Plan, therefore the Draft Housing Element is consistent with the growth assumptions utilized in the air quality planning document. Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS, The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The Califomia Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the groMh assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. As discussed above, the Draft Housing Element is a policy document and does not include any proposal for physical development of any property. The Element plans for housing consistent with the General Plan land use policies and regional growth policy, as expressed tlirough SANDAG's RHNA allocation. Thus, given that the RAQS are developed based on jurisdictions' long-range plans, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obsfruct implementation of the regional plan. Furthermore, the Draft Housing Element encourages infill and mixed-use development, which will assist in achieving regional air quality goals. No significant impact is identified. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The closest air quality monitoring stafion to the project site is at Camp Pendleton. Data available for this monitoring site from 2000 through December 2004 indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were fbr the state one hour standard for ozone (a total of 10 days during the 5-year period). No other violations of any air quality standards have been recorded during the 5- year time period. The Draft Housing Element is a policy level document that analyzes adopted land use policies and does not include a proposal for physical development of any site. Any development facilitated by tlie Draft Housing Element would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized tiu-ough standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with housing projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would be consistent with those emissions already anticipated by the General Plan build out assumptions. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with these projects, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Furthermore, the General Plan EIR included air quality mitigation measures to which any future project would be subject, which will reduce air quality impacts. Future environmental assessments will be conducted to ascertain potential project-specific air quality impacts and compliance with appropriate regulatory authorities. Adherence to applicable standards related to the generation and control of air quality will reduce potential impacts. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. Any development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would involve short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Impacts, which include tailpipe emissions from construcfion equipment and dust, are considered a significant impact. Implementation of the following mitigation measure will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. • AQ-1 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Water or dust control agents shall be applied to active grading areas, unpaved surfaces, and dirt stockpiles as necessary to prevent or suppress particulate matter from becoming airbome. All soil 10 Rev, 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element to be stockpiled over 30 days shall be protected with a secure tarp or tackifiers to prevent windblown dust. o Spoil or demolition material in each truckload shall be kept low enough to prevent spillage and shall be sufficiently wetted down or covered with a secure tarp to prevent dust generation during transport. o Grading and other soil handling operafions shall be suspended when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour. The construction supervisor shall have a hand-held anemometer for evaluating wind speed. o Dirt and debris spilled onto paved surfaces at the project site and on the adjacent roadway shall be swept or vacuumed and disposed of at the end of each workday to reduce resuspension of particulate matter caused by vehicle movement, o Vegetation disturbed by construction or maintenance activity shall be re vegetated upon complefion of work in the area, where appropriate. o Electrical power shall be provided from commercial power supply wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. o Air filters on construction equipment engines shall be maintained in clean condifion according to manufacturers' specifications. o The construction contractor shall comply with the approved traffic control plan to reduce non- project traffic congestion impacts. Methods to reduce construction interference with existing traffic and the prevention of truck queuing around local sensitive receptors shall be incorporated into this plan. o Trucks and equipment shall, not idle for more than 15 minutes when not in service. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The air basin is currently in a state non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. The Draft Housing Element is a policy level document that analyzes adopted land use policies and does not include a proposal for physical development of any site. Any development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with potential future housing projects would be consistent with those already anticipated by the General Plan build out assumpfions. Given that the Draft Housing Element is within the limits ofthe General Plan, air quality would be essentially the same whether oi- not the Draft Housing Element is implemented, as build out ofthe General Plan could still occur. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Future environmental assessments will be conducted to ascertain potential project-specific air quality impacts and compliance with appropriate regulatory authorities. Adherence to applicable standards related to the generation and control of air quality will reduce potential impacts. The Draft Housing Element includes programs to encourage mixed use and higher-density residential development. Mixed-use development in Carlsbad has the benefit of potentially reducing both work and non-work related trips by future residents in the area, which could reduce air quality impacts as compared to typical single use development pattems. Furthermore, Carisbad requires higher density housing to be near transit services, commercial and employment centers, which could also reduce auto emissions. Along these lines, all four areas of Carisbad that the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG) has designated as existing/planned or potential smart growth areas are specified in the Draft Housing Element as proposed locations for enhanced existing or future mixed use and higher density residential development. Smart grovsth areas must meet certain housing and employment target densities and transit service thresholds. In Carlsbad, proposed smart grovrth areas are Plaza Camino Real, Ponto, Quarry Creek and the Village RWevelopment area/Proposed Barrio Area. Any impact in this area is assessed as less than significant. Global Warmins/Climate Change "Global warming" is the term used to describe very widespread climate change characterized by a rise in the Earth's ambient average temperatures with associated disturbances in weather pattems and resulting alteration of oceanic 11 Rev. 12/13/07 (3H GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element and terrestrial environs and biology. The predominant opinion within the scientific community is that global warming is currently occurring, and that it is being caused and/or accelerated by human activities, primarily the generation of "greenhouse gases" (GHG). The types of GHG include those related to land use, such as carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, which are generated by various activities that include the burning of fossil fuels. California State Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) established a state goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, and California State Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) amends CEQA to establish GHG emissions and their effects as appropriate for CEQA analysis. SB 97 also directs the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to prepare guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions by July 1,2009 and transmit those draft regulations to the California Air Resources Board, which must certify and adopt these guidelines by January 1,2010. The Draft Housing Element is a policy level document that analyzes adopted land use policies and does not include a proposal for physical development of any site. Without specific project details for future projects, and furthermore, in tlie absence of regulatory guidance to assist any lead agencies in determining whether a particular- project will have a significant impact on global warming, it is not possible to detennine impacts to air quality in relation to global warming. Any future development proposal that is facilitated by Draft Housing Element policies and progi-ams will be subject to further environmental review pursuant to CEQA on a site-specific basis. d) Less than Significant Impact. The Draft Housing Element does not include a proposal for physical development of any site, however, implementation of the Draft Housing Element could facilitate new housing construction. The Draft Housing Element applies citywide and new housing' could be built next to sensitive receptors, such as schools and hospitals. However, residential land uses and mixed use that allows residential uses generally would be considered compatible with sensitive receptor sites as they do not generate the types of pollutants typically considered harmful to these sites, or excessive concentrations of pollutants. Impacts will be less than significant. e) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Although the Draft Holising Element will not result directly in the construction of any housing, housing development could be facilitated by the implementation ofthe Housing Element. Objectionable odors are generally created by nonresidential uses, such as industrial and manufacturing businesses. Development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would be exclusively residential units on residentially designated land and mixed-use developments in commercial areas; these uses typically are not associated with the creation of objectionable odors. However, the construction of any projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element could generate fumes fi-om the operation of construction equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. While such exposure would be short-term or transient, it may be considered significant. Implementation of the above Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 12 Rev. 12/13/07 6i GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • • • • • .• • a-d) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated.. The Draft HousingElement is a policy document and will not result directiy in the approval or construction of any hoiising. However, adoption ofthe Draft Housing Element will facilitate hous'ing production, which could have an impact on sensitive species and wildlife, habitat, wetlands and other resources. The San Diego Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP) includes a subregional plan for the northwestern portion of the County, including Carisbad, and was approved by the San Diego Asso'ciation of Govemments on March 23, 2003, The subregional plan provides for the conservation of 77 sensitive species. On November 15, 2004, the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carisbad (HMP) was approved, and provides for the conservation of 43 sensitive species. In addition, the HMP has identified and mapped a preserve system for the City. Any housing development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will be subject to, and required to comply with, the requirements of these documents. Portions ofthe City identified by the General Plan for residential development have been identified by the HMP as including potentially sensitive habitat resources. For any future project that may impact sensitive habitat or species, a detailed biological resource study is required, as well as any applicable state and federal agency permhs, as outiined in the HMP. Without the filing of a proposed development application with studies and plans, it is not possible to analyze and determine all the specific biological impacts a project may have. However, construction, of housing pursuant to the proposed Draft Housing Element could result in the following potentially significant i;npacts: • Per the City's HMP, housing construction could result in long-term impacts if sensitive species or habitats are permanently destroyed or degraded. This would also result in a cumulative impact to biological resources, ^ • Long-term or permanent impacts could result from loss of sensitive habitats within the Coastal Zone. This would contribute to the regional loss of sensitive habitats, resulting in a cumulative impact. The loss of state and/or federally listed plant species is considered a significant impact, sensitive plant species at a regional level would contribute to a cumulative impact. The loss of 13 Rev. 12/13/07 (' GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element • Development that results in substantial vegetation clearing or impede wildlife movement within Core Areas and linkages would result in a significant impact. • Construction and occupancy of housing adjacent to sensitive species or habitats may have permanent or temporary direct and indirect negative impacts, such as from invasive species, runoff, and construction noise. Staff has prepared a list of mitigation measures that would be applicable to projects with the potential to impact sensitive habitats and species. These mitigation measures could be made conditions of a project approval, or the measures may be refmed or found unnecessary as detailed planning and study specific to the project occurs. In any case, adherence to these measures and City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. • BR-1 Projects with the potential to impact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, shall comply with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Coastal Act, the- Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP), the HMP and other applicable documents including but not limited to those identified in subsection 5.1, Regulatory Context, of the City's "Guidelines for Biological Studies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time • BR-2 For projects with the potential to unpact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, a biology resources technical report (BTR) shall be prepared. The BTR shall provide the necessary information to establisK the current status of biological resources within- a project footprint, an analysis of potential project impacts, and mitigation measures that should be implemented to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance. The format and content of the BTR shall be similar to report standards outiined in the City's "Guidelines for Biological SUJdies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time. Future project level environmental review that would impact biological resources would be provided to the Wildlife Agencies for review to verify consistency with the City's HMP. • BR-3 Implementation ofthe mitigation measures BR-3a through BR-3d would be required for projects that would impact sensitive HMP habitats and would reduce direct and cumulative impacts to belgw a level of significance. Note that the descriptions of Type A through F habitats are per Table 11 ofthe HMP. Avoidance and on-site mitigation are the priority. o BR-3 a For impacts to Type A habitats (coastal salt marsh, alkali marsh, freshwater marsh, estuarine, salt pan/mudflats, riparian forest, riparian woodland, riparian scrub, disturbed wetiands, flood channel, fresh water, Engelmann oak woodland, coast live oak woodland) a goal of no net loss of habitat value or function shall be met. Habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation lands shall be determined in consultation with the USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance with the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the Califomia Fish and Game Code, All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetland habitats shall be in the City or MHCP plan area, at a ratio to be determined by the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o Bio-3b Impacts to Type B habitats (beach, southem coastal bluff scrub, maritime succulent scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grass) shall be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o Bio-3c Impacts to Type C habitats (Califomia gnatcatcher-occupied coastal sage scrub) shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o BR-3d Impacts to Type D (unoccupied coastal sage scrub, coastal sage/chaparral mix, chaparral), Type E (annual, nonnative grassland), and Type F (disturbed lands, eucalyptus, agricultural lands) habitats are subject to the fee payment if not conserved or mitigated onsite. • BR-4 Consn-uction activities, including clearing and grubbing, in or adjacent to habitat occupied associated with sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors, shall be generally prohibited during the bird 14 Rev. 12/13/07 &7 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element breeding season (February 15 - September 15). If construction activities cannot be avoided during this time the following measures shall be taken: o BR-4a A qualified biologist shall conduct a focused species gnatcatcher survey in appropriate habitat within and surrounding the project areas. The surveys will consist of tlu-ee visits, one week apart; the last of these shall be conducted no more than tliree days prior to construction. o BR-4b Surveys shall also be conducted by a qualified biologist in appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and migratory birds (including, but not limited to, the least Bell's vireo) within three days of construction. o BR-4c If nests of sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors are located, the project applicant shall receive confirmation fi*om the biologist that construction may proceed or continue and implement any necessary mitigation measures. o BR-4d During the breeding season, construction noise shall be measured regulariy to maintain a threshold at or below 60 dBA hourly Leq within 300 feet of breeding habitat occupied by listed species. If noise levels superseded the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented. BR-5 Where required, protocol-level surveys will be conducted for sensitive plant or wildlife species prior to construction, as determined by the Wildlife Agencies. BR-6 For projects that would result in the loss of sensitive habitats within the Coastal Zone, mitigation shall be required at ratios consistent with requirements of the HMP, including Standards 7-1 through 7-14 of Section D, and the policies and provisions of the LCP. BR-7 Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the provisions of the HMP and Local Coastal Program. For all projects affecting riparian and wetland habitat, habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation lands shall be determined in consultation with the USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance with the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the Califomia Fish and Game Code. For projects with unavoidable impacts, the City shall demonstrate that viable wetiands can either be: I) created at a minimum ratio of 1:1 within close proximity ofthe impact area to replace the wildlife function affected by the project; or, 2) provide proof that wefiand creation credits at a minimum ratio of 1:1 have been purchased at a Wildlife Agency approved bank. Consistent with the City's HMP, higher ratios will be required for impacts to high quality wetiands (e.g., occupied by listed or otherwise sensitive species) and for wetlands within the Coastal Zone. For projects where wetland creation will be necessary, construction shall not be initiated until a viable wetland creation mhigation site with long-term value is identified and the wetland mitigation plan is approved by the appropriate Resource Agencies. The wetiand creation shall not require impacts to sensitive wildlife or vegetation communities. All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetland habitats shall be in the City or MHCP plan area as deemed appropriate by the Wildlife Agencies. BR-8 As needed, surveys for state and federally listed sensitive plant species shall be conducted to complete a determination of suitable habitat presence prior to issuance of any discretionary permits by the City. Surveys shall be conducted at a time when sensitive plant species would be most observable. BR-9 At the project design stage for projects located within key Core Areas and linkages, design measures and restoration efforts shall be required to maintain the viability of the wildlife corridors throughout Carisbad. BR-10 Projects shall comply with the Adjacency Standards outiined in Section F., pp. 4-16 to F-24 ofthe HMP. BR-11 During clearing, grading, and other constmction activities, ensure that proper irrigation and stormwater mnoff mitigation measures are employed to reduce sediment loads and to prevent contamination from pesticides, fertilizers, petroleum products, and other toxic substances. Fugitive dust shall also be avoided and minimized through watering and other appropriate measures. 15 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element e - 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. General Plan policies, the Habitat Management Plan and its implementing ordinance (Chapter 21.210 ofthe Zoning Ordinance), and the Open Space Management Plan are the City's policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. The Housing Element does not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan, including the Carlsbad HMP. However, construction of housing facilitated by adoption of the Draft Housing Element could conflict with these requirements. Compliance with the biological resources mitigation measures identified above will ensure consistency with local requirements. Additionally, Draft Housing Element programs do not propose housing in any areas designated by the General Plan as Open Space. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the.project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial'adverse change in the signifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064,5? c) Directiy or indirectly destroy a unique pale ontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any hun-tan remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation . Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact • • • • • S • • • • • • • • a-d) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. According to the Carisbad General Plan Master EIR (1994), Carisbad contains many areas of significant paleontological and cultural resources; this has been reinforced by numerous studies prepared for the many master plan and development projects processed by the City since the General Plan's adoption in 1994, Recognizing the value of Carlsbad's prehistoric, historic, and paleontological heritage, the General Plan includes policies to address potential impacts on cultural and paleontological resources resulting from development projects. The City of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory has identified all historic structures throughout the City for the purpose of preserving historic resources. In 2009, the City completed consultation with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians on the Draft Housing Element pursuant to Califomia Government Code 65352.3. The Band identified the potential for significant impacts to Native American cultural resources due to housing constructed pursuant to the Draft Housing Element. While the Draft Housing Element will not result directiy in the approval or construction of any housing, its adoption and implementation will facilitate housing production, which could impact cultural resources. Pursuant to standard City practice and mitigation measures, future housing developments proposed in whole or in part that implement the programs contained in the Draft Housing Element will require a site-specific assessment of potential impacts to paleontological and archeological resources pursuant to CEQA and associated local, state and federal regulations. It is standard City practice to consult the City of Carisbad Historic Resources Inventory to ensure that no historic structures will be demolished. If a site has the potential of containing paleontological and archeological senshive resources, a cultural or paleontological resources survey report is required. Staff has prepared a list of mitigation measures that would be applicable to projects with the potential to impact cultural resources when avoidance is not feasible. Such projects would be those that, for example, encroach into areas with intact native soils or areas not adequately surveyed or undisturbed, including projects requiring surface disturbance in undeveloped areas. These mitigation measures could be made conditions of a project approval, or the measures may be refined or found unnecessary as detailed planning and study specific to the project occurs. In any case, adherence to these measures and City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 16 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element CR-1 The following mitigation measures will be required if a project is located in an undeveloped area that could potentially impact significant cultural deposits, o CR-1 a Preconstruction Requirements - Prior to the start of construction, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted under the supervision of a qualified archaeologist for previously undisturbed areas that have not been surveyed or adequately surveyed (e.g., the area was surveyed with outdated or non-protocol methods). The survey shall be conducted in parallel linear transects spaced no farther than 10 meters apart in undeveloped areas. • CR-la(l) Cultural resources, if found during the survey, shall be photographed, mapped using a global positioning system (GPS), and recorded on the appropriate Califomia Department of Parks and Recreation fomis (DPR Form 523A/B). The forms shall be submitted to the SCIC for the assignment of Primary numbers within 1 week of the survey. • CR-Ia(2) Witiiin 1 month of completion ofthe field survey, a draft letter report or technical report shall be submitted to the City for review, whether the survey is negative or positive. A final report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of receipt of the City's comments, with a copy submitted to the SCIC for their files. o CR-lb If the pedestrian survey is positive, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct an updated archival search, if needed, as well as additional detailed field testing. Local Native American groups shall be contacted for testing of prehistoric cultural resources regarding the project. Where applicable, the City will execute a Pre-Excavation Agreement with tiie appropriate Native American groups. • CR-Ib(I) Prior to the start of field testing, surface artifacts and/or feamres shall be marked and mapped using a GPS. Testing shall be required if surface artifacts are discovered, and shall include a program of 30-cni-diameter shovel test pits (STPs) to define site boundaries and identify the potential for a substantial subsurface deposit. • CR-Tb(2). - Based on tiie results'of tiie STPs, additional measures such as Test Excavation Units or mechanical frenching (for substantial historic sites) would be placed in areas witii the potential for a substantial subsurface deposit, as determined by the qualified archeologist. • CR-lb(3) All excavated soils shall be screened through 1/8-inch mesh hardware cloth. On completion of the project the artifact collection, along with copies ofthe catalogs and the technical report, shall be permanently curated at the San Diego Archaeological Center. An updated site record shall be prepared and submitted to the SCIC. • CR-Ib(4) Within 3 months of completion ofthe fieldwork, a draft technical report including evaluations and recommendations shall be prepared and submitted. The final technical report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of receipt of the City's comments. CR-2 Monitoring Requirements •- Construction monitoring will be required for projects that involve excavation or grading within undisturbed native soils and could potentially impact subsurface cultural deposits. o CR-2a Prior to the first preconstruction meeting for the project, the Planning Director (PD) shall verify that the requirements for archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring, if applicable, have been noted on the appropriate consttuction documents. The applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to verify that a records search has been completed and updated, as necessary, and to implement the monitoring program. At the preconstmction meeting, the archaeologist shall submit to the PD a copy of the site/grading plan that identifies areas to be monitored. o CR-2b The qualified archaeologist shall be present full-time during grading/ excavation of native soils with the potential to contain buried cultural features or deposits and shall document activity via the Consultant Monitor Record. Monitoring of trenches shall include mainline, laterals, services and all other appurtenances that impact native soils 1 foot deeper than existing as detailed on the plans or in the contract documents. It is the construction manager's responsibility to keep the archaeological monitors up-to-date with current plans. 17 Rev. 12/13/07 •7Q f GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element 0 CR-2c In the event ofa discovery, the archaeologist, or the Principal Investigator (PI) if the monitor is not qualified as a PI, shall divert, direct, or temporarily halt ground-disturbing activities in tiie area of the discovery to allow for preliminary evaluation of potentially significant archaeological resources. The PI shall also immediately notify the construction manager and the PD of such findmgs at the time of discovery. • CR-2c(l) The significance of the discovered resources shall be assessed by die PI. For significant archaeological resources, a Research Design and Data Recoveiy Program shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist. The results of the Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be approved by the City before ground-disturbing activities in the area of discoveiy shall be allowed to resume. o CR-2d If human remains are discovered, work shall halt in that area and procedures set forth in tiie Califomia Public Resources Code (Sec. 5097.98) and State Health and Safety Code (Sec. 7050.5) shall be implemented. Constinction in that area shall not resume until-the remains have been-- evaluated and conveyed to appropriate descendants or reinterred to the satisfaction ofthe PI, o CR-2e The archaeologist shall notify the PD, in writing, of the end date of monitoring. The archaeologist shall be responsible for ensuring that all cultural remains collected are cleaned, catalogued, and permanently curated witii an appropriate institution; tiiat a letter of acceptance from, the curation institution has been submitted to the Planning Department; tiiat all artifacts are analyzed to identity function and chronology as they relate to the history .of the area; that faunal material is identified as to species; and that specialty studies are completed, as appropriate. o CR-2f: Witiiin 3 months following the completion of monitoring, the Draft Results Report (even if negative) and/or evaluation report, if applicable, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the Archaeological Monitoring Program (with appropriate graphics) shall be submitted to the PD for approval. For significant archaeological resources encountered during monitoring, the Research Design and Data Recovery- Program shall be included as part of the Draft Results Report The qualified archaeologist shall be responsible for recording (on the appropriate State of Califomia Department of Park and Recreation forms-DPR 523 A/B) any significant or potentially significant resources encountered during the Archaeological Monitoring Program, and submitting such fonns to the SCIC with the Final Results Report. CR-3 The following paleontological mitigation measures shall be implemented: , o CR-3a: Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. o CR-3b A copy of the paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director before construction. If the paleontologist's report finds the project will not significantiy impact fossil resources, this mitigation measure shall be considered fiilfilled and no further effort to comply with this measure shall be required. o CR-3c A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens, o CR-3d The paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process. o CR-3e The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts. o CR-3f All fossils collected may be donated to a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. o CR-3g Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. Rev. 12/13/07 71 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or. based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related "ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-she landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Section 1802.3.2 of the Califomia Building Code (2007), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • • K • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • • a.i) No Impact. According to the maps published by the Califomia Geological Survey, the City of Carisbad is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No known active faults, fault traces, or suspected faults traverse the City. The nearest known active fault is the Rose Canyon fauh zone, located approximately three to four miles offshore. No impact is assessed as no known earthquake faults will be affected by future housing projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element. a.ii - a.iv. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The City is not subject to any unique earthquake hazards; however, there are several active faults throughout Southern California, and these potential earthquakes could affect Carisbad. Landslides are also a potential threat in parts ofthe City. Potential for seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, and landslides are considered a significant impact. Implementation ofthe following mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures 19 Rev. 12/13/07 t GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element • GS-1 A site-specific geotechnical investigation shall be prepared to address geotechnical considerations related to future housing development facilitated by tiie Draft Housing Element, specifically project components that would involve excavation, grading, or constmction of new structures. The report shall contain all necessary requirements to address any adverse soils conditions that may be encountered in final design of a project. The applicant- shall be required to adhere to all such requirements. The report shall include a discussion of site-specific geology, soils, and foundational issues; a seismic hazards analysis to determine the potential for strong ground acceleration and ground shaking; potential groundwater issues; and structural design recommendations. The soil engineer and engineering geologist shall review the grading plans for adequate incorporation of recommended measures prior to finalization. • GS-2 All future projects shall be designed and constructed in conformance to the Uniform Building Code, current seismic design specifications of the Structural Engineering Association of California, and other regulatory requirements. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A variety of soil types, including tiiose that are considered very erosive, are found throughout Carisbad. Due to the sensitive habhats at the lagoons and creeks located in Carlsbad, erosion as a result of development can significantiy impact water quality. Erosive soils may be located on future project sites facilitated by the Draft Housing Element, and as such, the potential for erosion is considered significant. Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures • GS-3 Prior to issuance of a grading perniit, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval ofthe Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stprmwater Permit, 'and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. • GS-4 All applicable federal, state and local permits regarding drainage shall be obtained. Such permits include the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. • GS-5 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Erosion control measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code § 15.16 et.seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on plans included in the SWPPP. o All grading permits issued authorizing grading during the rainy season (October I of any year to April 30* of the following year), shall require the installation of all erosion and sedimentation control protective measures in accordance with city standards. Erosion and runoff control measures shall be designed and bonded prior to approval of grading permits by the City. o All permanent slopes shall be planted with erosion control vegetation, drained and properly maintained to reduce erosion within 30 days of completion of grading. Erosion control and drainage devices shall be installed in compliance with the requirements ofthe City. o All erosion and sedimentation control protective measures shall be maintained in good working order through out the duration of the rainy season unless it can be demonsn*ated to the City Engineer that their removal at an eariier date will not result in any unnecessary erosion of or sedimentation on public or private properties. c - e) Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. According to the Carisbad General Plan EIR (1994), generally the soil types present throughout the City can support development. However, geotechnical characteristics of soils vary by soil type, and all new development applications require an analysis of site-specific soils. The Carisbad General Plan EIR (1994) identifies various areas in the City where soil types exist that are 20 Rev. 12/13/07 73 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element potentially unstable or expansive, and where liquefaction, lateral spreading, subsidence, and landslides could potentially result. All development proposals in Carlsbad are subject to the requirements such as the Uniform Building Code earthquake constmction standards and soil remediation requirements that, when necessary and applied, guard against potential adverse effects. Locating potential projects on soils that cannot support development is considered a significant impact. For any future housing projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element, implementation ofthe above Mitigation Measures GS-1 and GS-2 will reduce this impact to a less than significant level. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section 65962,5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact • • • • s • • • • • • • s • • • • • K • ^ M • h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Q Q ^ Q loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? a, c) Less than Significant Impact. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document and will not result directiy in the construction of any housing. Adoption of the Draft Housing Element will facilitate housing production, and 21 Rev. 12/13/07 -7^ ' ' GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element future residences could be exposed to hazards associated with residential, and in the case of mixed use development, commercial uses. Incidental amounts of hazardous materials may be utilized during the constmction and/or occupation of new residential units and nearby commercial uses in mixed use projects. It is anticipated that the nature and quantity of hazardous materials utilized will be typical of those of residential and commercial uses and therefore would not be significant. In addition, the nature and quantity of such materials would not likely create a significant impact on any existing or proposed school located within one-quarter mile of a residential site. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Large areas ofthe City that currentiy or previously have been in agricultural use are designated for residential development by the General Plan. Agricultural chemicals and pesticides may have been used and stored on these properties, which could impact future residential development. Likewise, other areas of the Carlsbad, such as the Quarry Creek site discussed in d) below or commercial areas, may have contaminated soils or groundwater due to the presence of former or existing non- agricultural uses, such as gas stations, above or below ground storage tanks, dumps, or industrial operations. _ Furthemiore, redevelopment in older parts of Carisbad, such as in the dowmtown Village or Barrio Areas, may expose construction workers to hazardous materials during demolition activities. Development of sites witii such contamination may expose people to release of hazardous materials, a potentially significant impact. In response, for any future housing project facilitated by the implementation of the Draft Housing Element, if a site has the potential of containing agricultural chemicals and pesticides or other soil contaminants, a soils testing and analysis report is required. Monitoring and sampling of groundwater may also be necessary along with groundwater and soil remediation to ensure all contaminants are removed. As identified below and as may be further refined during project review, any recommended mitigation measures would be made conditions of any project approval. Adherence to these measures and existing federal, state, and local regulations will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. A proposed Draft Housing Element program would permit emergency shelters in the,City's industrial zones. These zones may contain uses tiiat routinely use, transport or dispose of hazardous materials. As with all uses locating in the P-M or M zones, siting Sn emergency shelter will require consideration be given to the presence of surrounding industrial uses that may employ chemicals or hazardous materials or procedures that could pose a,threat. Such surrounding uses may render a potential emergency shelter location as unsuitable or may require additional building requirements. While it is not possible to determine if such conditions exist until a specific site is identified, mitigation measures can be developed to ensure due consideration is given to potential hazards associated with industrial areas. Any emergency shelter proposed pursuant to the Draft Housing Element will be subject to site- specific environmental review to ensure compliance with all applicable city land use policies and regulations, including fire and building codes. Staff has prepared a list of mitigation measures that would be applicable to projects with the potential to be significantiy impacted by the routine use or accidental release of hazardous materials. These mitigation measures could be made conditions of a project approval, or the measures may be refined or found unnecessary as detailed planning and study specific to the project occurs. In any case, adherence to these measures and City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. • HM-1 Prior to approval of discretionary permits for projects within (1) an existing or former agricultural area, or (2) an area believed to have contaminated soils due to historic use, handling, or storage of hazardous materials, a detailed soils testing and analysis report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City and the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) for approval. This report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination due to historic use, handling, or storage of chemicals and materials restricted by the DEH. The report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at concentrations in the soil which would have a significantiy adverse effect on human health. • HM-2 If use of agricultural chemicals within an existing agricultural operation has tiie potential to adversely impact a proposed residential development on an adjacent parcel, mitigation measures including but not limited to physical barriers and/or separation between the uses shall be considered. • HM-3 Prior to approval of any permits for uses such as emergency shelters and farm worker housing within the City's industrial zones, the applicant shall obtain clearances from federal, state, and local 22 Rev. 12/13/07 75 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element agencies as necessary to ensure such uses are not exposed to significant hazards due to the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials or tlirough reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, • HM-4 All trash and debris within project sites shall be disposed of off-site in accordance with current, local, state, and federal disposal regulations. Any buried trash/debris encountered shall be evaluated by an experienced environmental consultant prior to removal. • HM-5 Before beginning demolition or renovation activities, the interior of individual onsite structures shall be visually inspected. Should hazardous materials be encountered, the materials shall be tested and properiy disposed of offsite in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Any stained soils or surfaces underneath the removed materials shall be sampled. Results of the sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required, • HM-6 Before beginning any remedial or demolition work, building owners shall contract with a certified professional to conduct an asbestos survey, consistent with National Emission Standards for hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standards to determine the presence of asbestos containing materials. Demolition of or within existing buildings on individual parcels onsite must comply with State law, which requires a certified contractor where there is asbestos-related work involving 100 square feet or more or such materials to ensure that certain procedures regarding the removal of asbestos are followed. • HM-7 Before the issuance of a grading permit, all miscellaneous debris (i.e., wood, concrete, storage drums, and automobiles) shall be removed offsite and properiy disposed of at an approved landfill facility. Once removed, a visual inspection of the areas beneath the removed materials shall be performed. Any stained soils observed undemeath the removed materials shall be sampled. Results of the sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required. ; • HM-8 If unkno\^^^ wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction on individual properties that are believed to involve hazardous waste/materials, the contractor shall: o Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, removing workers and the public from the area; o Notify the project engineer ofthe City of Carlsbad; o Secure the areas as directed by the project engineer, and; o Notify the City's hazardous waste/materials coordinator. d) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. . The State of Califomia Environmental Protection Agency on its website maintains the Cortese List, which is the name commonly given to the requirements referenced by Government Code Section 65962.5. According to the website's Cortese List data resources, Carisbad has many sites where cleanup of hazardous materials is underway or has been completed. Most of these sites are located in the City's commercial and industrial areas. Quarry Creek, proposed in Draft Housing Element Program 2.1 as a site to be redesignated from lower density to medium and high density residential housing, is identified as a location where two active cleanup efforts are underway - one due to a leaking underground tank. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan, the CEQA document prepared for the reclamation ofthe Quarry Creek site, describes soil and groundwater remediation efforts underway. The Draft EIR notes that cleanup is anticipated to occur prior to or during site reclamation; this means that remediation would be complete before residential development of the site. Because remediation is underway according to all applicable requirements, the Draft EIR includes no mitigation measures with regards to hazardous materials. Further, the Draft EIR concludes that all remediated soils would remain on site and there would be no hazards associated with their redistribution on the site. The Draft Housing Element may facilitate residential constmction, including mixed use development and emergency shelters, on sites known to be on the Cortese List. Properties on the list are more likely to be those in commercial and industrial areas and are also more likely to be developed rather than vacant. When applications are 23 Rev. 12/13/07 f GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element submitted to redesignate the land use of a property or propose development or redevelopment, disclosure of inclusion on the Cortese List is required". Because development of such sites could create a significant hazard to the public or environment if their cleanup was not conducted consistent witii all federal, state, and local regulations, a mitigation measure requires compliance with applicable regulations for any site identified on the Cortese List. These regulations would also dictate whether property, such as Quarry Creek, could be developed safely while any remediation was underway or if cieanup needed to occur prior to any development and occupancy of a site. Any recommended mitigation measures developed consistent with the regulations would be made conditions of any project approval. Adherence to these measures would reduce potential impacts, to a less than significant level. Resides the Cortese list. City staff also reviewed the federal Environmental Protection Agency website to determine if any active sites in Carlsbad are identified on the federal Environmental Protection Agency's CERCLIS Database and Superfund Site Infonnation list. No sites were identified as active. Six sites in Carisbad are designated "archived sites" on the Superfund list, which means the site has no furtiier interest under the Federal Superfund program. The locations of all six sites cannot be determined based on the website data; however, one archived site is identified as South Coast Asphalt Products with an address of 3701 Haymar Drive, This may be the Quarry Creek- site. • HM-9 When applications are submitted to the City of Carlsbad Planning Department to redesignate the land use of a property or propose development or redevelopment, disclosure of inclusion on the Cortese List (Government Code Section 65962.5) shall be required. If an application is for property included on the Cortese List, the applicant shall provide evidence that describes the required remediation process, through text and graphics, and (1) demonstrates compliance is occurring or has occurred with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations; (2) describes all necessary actions and approvals to remediate the property and includes evidence of any approvals so far obtained; (3) describes the estimated remediation timeframe, current status, and any monitoring required during and following remediation; (4) discusses any restrictions on use ofthe property upon reclamation completion; (5) includes all other required information as deemed necessary by the City, DEH, and other agencies having regulatory authority with regards to remediation of the site, . - • e - f) No Impact. The McClellan-Palomar Airport is located west of El Camino Real and north of Palomar Airport Road inside the boundaries of Carisbad. The airport is a County owned and operated general aviation facility. The Airport Land Use Commission is responsible for preparing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the area surrounding the airport, and most recentiy amended the CLUP in 2004. The City's General Plan conforms to the CLUP and prohibits residential uses in the nearby vicinity around the airport, including in Runway Protection Zones and Flight Activity Zones. The Draft Housing Element is consistent with the CLUP and General Plan as no land use changes are proposed in the airport vicinity. A proposed Draft Housing Element program would permit emergency shelters in the City's industrial (M and P-M) zones. These land use zones surround the airport. However, uses involving large gatherings of people (more than 100), which may include shelters, are not permitted in Flight Activity or Runway Protection Zones per the CLUP. As demonstrated in Section 4 of the Draft Housing Element, sufficient properties exist outside the Flight Activity Zones to accommodate such shelters. Any emergency sheher proposed pursuant to the Draft Housing Element will be subject to site-specific environmental review to ensure compliance with all applicable city land use policies and regulations, including the CLUP. No private airstrips exist in Carisbad or in the adjacent areas of bordering cities. No significant impact will result. g) Less than Significant Impact. Adoption and implementation of the Draft Housing Element will not impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan. According to the Carisbad General Plan, the City has adopted the "City of Carlsbad Emergency Plan"; however, this plan does not apply to day-to-day or routine emergencies, and as such, will not be impacted by the implementation of the Draft Housing Element. Through the development review process, projects are reviewed by the Carlsbad Fire Department to verify that adequate access for fu-e safety equipment is maintained and that individual sites can be evacuated in an emergency situation. Adherence to such requirements and existing City standards will reduce the potential impacts to a less than significant level. No mitigation measures are required. 24 Rev, 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element h) Less than Significant Impact. The City is considered a medium fire hazard area for wildland fires that could threaten urban and undeveloped areas. This condition arises from a large area of natural vegetation along the City's eastem boarder and within City limits. The Draft Housing Element will not directly result in the constmction of any housing. Development facilitated by the implementation ofthe Draft Housing Element and consistent with, adopted land use policy could place additional homes in or near areas with wildland fire hazards. The City's Landscape Manual implements prevention techniques for wildland fires. Also, through the development review process, projects are reviewed by the Carlsbad Fire Department which imposes conditions to minimize fire hazards, including conditions such as requiring interior sprinklers and fire-safe roofing materials, and ensuring adequate fire safety equipment access. All future housing development must comply with the Landscape Manual and other conditions imposed by the Carlsbad Fire Department to minimize fire hazards. Adherence to such requirements and existing City standards vvill reduce the potential impacts to a less than significant level. No mitigation measures are required. VIIL HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering ofthe local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which pemihs have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? d) Substantially alter tiie existing drainage pattem ofthe' site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantiafly degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact S • • • S • • • S • • n • • • • • m • Rev, 12/13/07 Potentially Significant Impact • ( GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact • Kl • h) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? k) Increase erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. 1) Increase pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? m) Change receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following construction? n) Increase any pollutant to an-already impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list? : o) Increase impervious surfaces and associated runoff? p) Impact aquatic, wetiand, or riparian habitat? q) Result in the exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? a), c-f). Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document that does not recommend or approve any particular development project. However, implementation of Draft Housing Element policies and programs will facilitate housing construction, which in turn could generate additional urban stormwater runoff and affect water quality. Development typically results in increased impervious areas resulting in more rapid runoff of stormwater, with increased flow rates and volumes downstream. These increased flows can cause streambed erosion. The 2007 Regional Water Quality Conti-ol Board permit includes a requirement to implement Low Impact Development (LID) features into new development. LID techniques help to mimic more closely the pre-development runoff characteristics. The quality of stormwater runoff is regulated under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The NPDES stormwater permit provides a mechanism for monitoring the discharge of pollutants and for establishing appropriate controls to minimize the entrance of such pollutants into stormwater runoff. As part of the NPDES permit, each jurisdiction must prepare programmatic guidance documents, including the Watershed Urban Runoff Management Plan (WURMP), a Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Plan (JURMP), and a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). The SUSMP and Municipal Storm Water Permit require the City to prevent stormwater pollution and improve the quality of water flowing into the' stormwater system for all new and existing development through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). Through the development review process, the Cit>' applies Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs to all new development projects. Any project facilitated by the Draft • X • • • • s • • E • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • 26 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Housing Element would be subject to tiie BMP requirements, as well as all federal. State, regional and local stormwater requiirements. Furthermore, future projects are subject to requirements for a hydrology report to assess impacts relating to drainage and stormwater runoff. Projects must demonstrate adequate capacity in downstream drainage systems or show that the development does not increase runoff. Runoff from residences pursuant to the Draft Housing Element can potentially generate non-stormwater discharges. Specific development plans wiil be required to include best management practices (BMPs) specifically targeted to the anticipated pollutants. The below mitigation measures ensure a project's compliance with all standards promulgated to ensure water quality. Projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will comply with these measures; fuithermore, once project details are known, these mitigation measures may be refined, supplemented or replaced by more appropriate, specific measures, • WQ-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit (Order No, 99-08, NPDES CAS000002), and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit (Order R9-2007- OOOI, NPD£S CASO108758). The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the BMP erosion control measures identified below on a weekly basis in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code Section 15.16. et seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on the grading plans, BMPs that shall be installed include, but are not limited to, the following: o Silt fence, fiber rolls, or grave] bag berms o Check dams o Street sweeping and vacuuming '„ . o Storm drain inlet protectfon o Stabilized construction entrance/exit o Hydroseed, soil binders, or straw mulch o Containment of material delivery and storage areas o Stockpile management o Spill prevention and control o Waste management for solid, liquid, hazardous, and sanitary waste, and contaminated soil o Concrete waste management • WQ-2a. Prior to issuance of grading permits or approvals for any public or private right-of-way improvements or site development plans, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval by the City of Carlsbad City Engineer, a stormwater management plan that demonstrate that pollutants will be conft-olled through compliance with the City of Carlsbad SUSMP and Stormwater Management Program (SWMP). Approval of such plans shall be subject to a determination by the Carisbad City Engineer that the proposed project has incorporated post-development water quality pollution control site design BMPs, source control BMPs, and numerically-sized treatment control BMPs such as those identified below into the project design to the maximum extent practicable: o street sweeping o inlet basin labeling o Filtering bioretention units o Pervious pavement o Vegetated swales o Detention/infiltration basins o Covered trash enclosures • WQ-2b. Projects shall be required to show compliance with the applicable hydromodification provisions of Order R9-2007-000] and to show they are designed so that postproject runoff flow rates and directions do not exceed pre-project runoff flow rates and directions for applicable design storms. Projects shall incorporate LID design techniques to reduce the amount of runoff by mimicking the natural hydrologic 27 Rev. 12/13/07 •go f GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element function of the site by preserving natural open spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, and promoting infiltration and evapotranspiration of runoff before runoff leaves the site. LID techniques include, but are not limited to: o Vegetated buffer strips 0 Vegetated bio swales 0 Rain gardens 0 Porous pavements o Bioretention areas o Vegetated roofs o Stormwater planter boxes o Infiltration trenches 0 Dry wells • WQ-3 In conjunction with the sale, rental or lease of a residence or business property, all prospective owners and tenants shall be notified in writing tlirough Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that they shall: 0 Establish or work with established disposal programs for the removal and proper disposal of toxic and hazardous waste products, o Not discharge-or cause to be discharged any toxic chemicals or. hydrocarbon compounds, such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives and other such fluids, into any public or private street or into any storm drain or storm drain conveyance. o Use and/or dispose of all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, and other such chemical treatments in accordance with federal. State, County, and City requirements as prescribed on their respective containers, o Employ BMPs to- eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and/or surface improvements. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding CC&Rs. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. o Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Califomia Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. • WQ-4 As required by the City Engineer, a hydrology report to assess impacts relating to drainage and stormwater runoff shall be prepared. The report shall demonstrate compliance with current applicable hydromodification standards and demonstrate adequate capacity in downstream storm drain facilities, or shall demonstrate no increase in runoff peak flows through onsite detention. b) Less than Significant Impact. It is not anticipated that any development facilitated by adoption of the Draft Housing Element would interfere substantially with the recharge of groundwater or groundwater supplies. The City of Carlsbad is not reliant upon groundwater for its domestic water supply. Neither the Final Master Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 1994 General Plan Update nor the Carisbad Municipal Water District Water Master Plan Update identify groundwater as a significant supply source to the City or development as a potential threat to groundwater supplies or recharge. g -h, j) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document that does not recommend or approve any particular development project. However, implementation of Draft Housing Element policies and programs will facilitate housing construction. Based on the policies and standards of the City, and as required by mitigation measures below, it is not anticipated that housing constructed as a result of a Draft Housing Element program will expose people or property to flooding risk or impede or redirect flood flows. The Flood Hazard goal ofthe General Plan Public Safety Element is "a City which minimizes injury, loss of life, and damage to property resulting from the occurrence of flooding." Further, an objective of the Element is "to restrict or prohibit uses which are dangerous to the health and safety of people or 28 Rev. 12/13/07 SI GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element adversely affect property due to water and erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increased in erosion or flood height or velocities." Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.110, Floodplain Management Regulations, implements the Public Safety Element policies regarding floodplain development. It establish restrictive provisions regarding construction of structures within a 100-year floodplain and requires the installation of protective structures or other design measures to protect proposed buildings and development sites from the effects flooding or wave action. It also recognizes that controlling tiie alteration of namral floodplains and stream channels and controlling the filling, dredging, and grading of these features helps reduce flooding potential. Furthermore, the Floodplain Management Regulations require specific development and construction standards to avoid damage due to inundation by tsunami within established coastal high hazard areas and by niudflows in mudslide prone areas. Based on the Floodplain Management Regulations, all new construction and substantiar improvements must be" elevated to or above the base flood elevation. All new construction must be located on the landward side of the reach of mean high tide. As specified in the mitigation measures below, all future housing developments will be subject to compliance with these required standards, including reports and studies as detennined by the City Engineer. Furthermore, projects that incorporate changes to established floodplains are required to document these changes through the FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process. Adherence to these measures and existing City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. • WQ-5 Proposed development shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 21.110, Floodplain Management Regulations, of the Zoning Ordinance. This shall include preparation of all applicable studies and reports, including those required by other agencies, such as FEMA, as directed by the City Engineer. • WQ-6 Proposed development shall be subject to compliance with mitigation measures GS-1 and GS-2, which require preparation of site-specific geotechnical investigations and compliance with Uniform Building Code and other structural regulations. i) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Specific areas of Carlsbad may be subject to inundation due to failure of a dam, such as a breach of the Stanley A. Mahr Reservoir in the La Costa area. Failure of the dam, an unlikely event, has the potential to flood areas downstream, which may necessitate evacuation. Inundation is a possibility even if the area downstream of a dam is not within a flood zone. The following mitigation measure will reduce the possibility of flooding due to dam failure to a less than significant level. • WQ-7 As directed by the City Engineer, a dam breach analysis and inundation study shall be prepared for any area potentially subject to flooding due to a dam breach or failure. Based on the study as approved by the City Engineer, appropriate mitigation measures shall be developed to ensure adequate safety of individuals and, as feasible, protection of property in downstream areas. k - q) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document that does not recommend nor approve any particular development project. However, implementation of Draft Housing Element policies and programs will facilitate housing construction, which in turn could generate additional erosion, pollutant discharges, impervious surfaces, urban stormwater mnoff and affect water quality, including that of lagoons, wetiands and riparian areas. According to the Carisbad Drainage Master Plan (2008), Clean Water Act Section 303(d) listed waters in the Carisbad watershed include the following: The Pacific Ocean shoreline at the mouth of Buena Vista Creek and Moonlight State Beach (located in Encinitas, CA), Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and the Agua Hedionda Creek. These waters currently do not meet established water quality standards. Implementation of Draft Housing Element programs may result in significant impacts associated with the listed impaired water bodies. However, compliance with the water quality mitigation measures WQ-l to WQ-4 listed above would cause any impacts to be less than significant. 29 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 HousingElement Through the development review process, the Cit}' requires Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs to be incorporated into all new development projects. As required by mitigation measures WQ-1 to WQ-4 above, any project facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would be subject to the BMP requirements, all federal. State, regional and local stormwater requirements as well as a hydrology report to assess impacts relating to drainage and stormwater runoff IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • X • • • X • • • s • a - c) Less than Significant Impact. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document that does not recommend or approve any particular development project.- The Draft Housing Element plans for the City's fiiture housing needs within the level anticipated by the General Plan. The Draft Housing Element does not propose nor affect any policy, program or regulation that would result in the division of an established community; instead, Draft Housing Element programs strengthen developed residential and some commercial areas by encouraging infill residential or mixed use development. Therefore, impacts are assessed as less than significant. The Draft Housing Element will not conflict with nor amend any General Plan policies or provisions of the Growth Management Plan, Zoning Ordinance, or Local Coastal Program or any other policy or standard adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. No land zoned for open space or designated by the General Plan for open space will be converted to urban uses by the Draft Housing Element. The Draft Housing Element does not affect preserve areas identified in the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Through the environmental review process, future projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would be evaluated for potential environmental impacts and compliance with the provisions and policies of the documents identified above. Any new mitigation measures identified would be required as conditions of approval. Adherence to these measures and existing City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. The Draft Housing Element does not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan, including the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) for Namral Communities in the City of Carlsbad (2004), All future housing development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will be subject to, and required to comply with, the requirements of the HMP. No significant impact will result. Rev. 12/13/07 S3 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • • S • • • ^ X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? a - b) No Impact. No mineral resources are currently being extracted within Carlsbad. Although mineral resources were previously extracted throughout the City via gravel pits, oil wells, and salt evaporation ponds, as the City has become more developed, these activities have decreased through time. All mining operations ceased in 1995 and are now complete at the South Coast Materials Quarry in northem Carisbad (Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan Draft Subsequent EIR, Sept. 2008), According to tiie Carisbad General Plan EIR (1994), all resources at this quarry have been depleted. There are remaining mineral resources present in the northeastem part of the City, but this area was designated by the 1994 General Plan for urban development and is not planned for extraction activities. Therefore, no impact on mineral resources will resuU. XL NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundboume vibration or groundbourne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working * in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • S • • • • • • • • • • • K Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 HousingElement a) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Carisbad experiences typical urban noise from sources such as automobile, train, and air traffic, operation of mechanical equipment and construction equipment, vocalizations, and related sources. Primary sources of noise include highways and other roadways (especially Interstate 5, State Highway 78, El Camino Real, Palomar Airport Road, and Rancho Santa Fe Road), and North County Transit District railroad, and planes using McClellan-Palomar Airport. Draft Housing Element policies will fiacilitate housing construction throughout Carlsbad in areas where noise may be of concem. Development of properties along Interstate 5, State Highway 78, El Camino Real, Palomar Airport Road, and Rancho Santa Fe Road and the railroad could expose future residents to excessive noise in the absence of barriers, berms, or other noise-attenuating features. Development of residential property in or next to commercial areas may expose future residents to truck noise and other urban sources of noise. The City's General Plan Noise Element contains several policies that require noise attenuation and/or prohibit residential development in noisy areas. The maximum permitted noise level for residential interiors is a CNEL of 45"' dBA (pursuant to Titie 24 of the California Administrative Code), and the maximum for residential exteriors is a CNEL of 60 dBA or 65 dBA if subject to noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport. Future development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element may expose residents to high levels of roadway, rail, or airport noise, which is considered a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measures N-1 through N-3 would reduce the impact to a less than significant level. • N-1 A noise study shall be submitted with all discretionary applications for residential projects of five or more dwelling units located within or 500-feet beyond the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour lines as shown on Map 2: Future Noise Contour Map in the Noise Element ofthe General Plan. This noise study shall identify design features such as noise attenuation walls and mechanical building ventilation necessary to enforce the City policy that 60 dBA CNEL is the exterior noise level (65 dBA if subject to noise fi-om McClellan-Palomar Airport) and 45-dBA CNEL is the interior noise level to which ail residential units shall be mitigated. - •• ' ' • N-2 To minimize noise impacts, project design techniques shall be used during any discretionary review of a residential or other noise sensitive project to shield noise sensitive areas from a noise source. This can be done, for example, by increasing the distance between the noise source and the receiver; placing non-noise sensitive uses such as parking areas, maintenance facilities, and utility areas between the source and the receiver; using non-sensitive structures, such as a garage, to shield noise sensitive areas; and, orienting buildings to shield outdoor spaces from a noise source. • N-3 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the policies of the City of Carlsbad General Plan Noise Element and City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. b, d) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Infill development involves construction or redevelopment in close proximity to existing developed areas, and as such, new development on infill properties may expose people to temporary groundboume noise and vibration due to construction activities compared to development of previously undeveloped areas. Construction of projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will generate short-term noise from construction equipment, such as water trucks, scrapers, bulldozers, and other vehicles, which may be considered significant impacts. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-4 would reduce the impacts level to a less than significant level, • N-4 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the following requirements: o Heavy equipment shall be repaired at sites as far as practical from nearby residences and occupied sensitive habitats. o Construction equipment, including vehicles, generators, and compressors, shall be maintained in proper operating condition and shall be equipped with manufacturers' standard noise conti-ol devices or better (e.g., mufflers, acoustical lagging, and/or engine enclosures). o The City's noise ordinance (Municipal Code Section 8.48.010) limits the hours of construction to between 7 a.m. and sunset on weekdays and 8 a.m. to sunset on Saturdays. Construction is 32 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element prohibited on Sundays, and holidays. The Cit>' Manager may grant an exception for night work during the night, Sundays, and holidays if the construction is in a nonresidential zone and there are no inhabited dwellings within 1,000 feet ofthe construction site. o Electrical power shall be provided from commercial power supply, wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. o Staging areas for construction equipment shall be located as far as practicable from residences and sensitive habitats. o Operating equipment shall be designed to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal noise regulations. o Noise attenuation wallSf'buffers shall be used to shield sensitive noise receptors fi-om construction-. generated noise greater than 75 dBA within 50 feet of sensitive receptors. o If lighted traffic control devices, are to be located within 500 feet of residences, the devices shall be powered by batteries, solar power, or similar sources, and not by an internal combustion engine. With regard to the constt-uction of future projects adjacent to open space and sensitive habitat areas, construction noise is considered a significant impact to the least Bell's vireo, Califomia gnatcatcher, and other sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors during their breeding seasons (ie., February 15 through September 15). Implementation of Mhigation Measure N-5 would reduce this impact to less than significant level.. • N-5 Refer to Mitigation Measure Biological Resources BR-4, which will reduce potential construction noise impacts to sensitive bird species, migratory birds, or raptors to below a level of significance, c) Less than Significant Impact. Fumre housing development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element policies will result in additional population, potentially increasing existingmoise levels. Carlsbad and the surrounding cities constitute an urbanized environment where existing noise levels are higher than other less developed areas, and implementation of the Draft Housing Element would not result in a substantial increase to the existing noise level. Impacts will be less than significant e) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The McCellan-Palomar Airport is located west of El Camino Real and north of Palomar Airport Road inside the boundaries of Carlsbad, The airport is a County owned and operated general aviation facility. The Airport Land Use Commission is responsible for preparing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the area surrounding the airport, and adopted the CLUP in 2004, The City's General Plan conforms to the CLUP and prohibits residential uses in the nearby vicinity around the airport. According to the General Plan Noise Element, land within the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour, which extends from the runway of Palomar Airport and is generated by aircraft operations, is not planned for residential uses. The Draft Housing Element will not modify the existing land use plan inside the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour boundaries. The majority of the City is located in the airport Noise Impact Notification Area (NINA), where aircraft overflight typically occurs on an irregular basis. Though not considered a health or safety impact, aircraft noise may be a nuisance. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N- 6 would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. • N-6 Future residential development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Prior to the recordation of the first final (tract/parcel) map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval ofthe Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). o Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated whh the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning Department). Rev. 12/13/07 i GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element f) No Impact. No private airstrips exist in Carlsbad or in the adjacent areas of bordering cities. No significant impact will result. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIL POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly F"! |~j r~j ^ (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectiy (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, F"! fH necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating f"! P"! ^ the constmction of replacement housing elsewhere? a - c) No Impact, The Draft Housing Element considers additional housing opportunities within the limits of the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element and Growth Management Plan. In 1986, Carlsbad voters passed Proposition E, which ratified the City's Growtii Management Plan, This program lowered the residential build out capacity and imposed very specific facility improvement and/or fee requirements for all new development. The program established a dwelling unit cap of 54,600 dwelling units. The accommodation of the City's RHNA can be accomplished within the City's Growth Management dwelling iinit cap (See City of Carisbad Draft 2005-2010 Housing Element Section 4), Though tiie Draft Housing Element includes programs proposing residential density increases and residential mixed-use in commercial areas for purposes of meeting the RHNA for lower and moderate income housing, the Draft Housing Element does not propose policies to facilitate housing beyond the total dwelling units anticipated by the City's existing General Plan and Growth Management Plan, Moreover, the Draft Housing Element will not induce substantial population growth by the extension of roads and other infrastrucmre, since the project does not provide for such. The Draft Housing Element contains policies that encourage infill development in existing areas and a diversity of housing types and price. Development of the Quarry Creek site, as would be facilitated by Draft Housing Element Program 2,1, may result in the extension of Marron Road. The Quarry Creek site is largely dismrbed and bordered on three sides by development; due to its proximity to commercial areas and transportation, it is also a potentiaTsmart growth area per SANDAG. Quarry Creek is already served by two roads (the present terminus of Marron Road to the east and Haymar Drive to the north) and its development may not warrant extension of the road to the west. It is likely that a traffic smdy, submitted with a development proposal at Quarry Creek, will determine the need for the extension. None of tiie programs or policies in the Draft Housing Element would displace either substantial numbers of existing housing or persons. Draft Housing Element proposed programs that propose and encourage increased densities for residential and mixed use projects, such as in the proposed Barrio Area and the Village Redevelopment Area, may result in demolition of housing units. However, these units would be replaced by new housing, either as a stand- alone residential product or, as permitted by applicable regulations and policies, in combination with commercial uses. Furthermore, sites identified in Program 2.1, such as Quarry Creek and the proposed Barrio Area, are consistent with the SANDAG Regional Comprehensive Plan's objectives of developing smart growth areas as a way to accommodate additional housing in an efficient, compact, and resourceful manner. Finally, the Draft Housing Element contains programs designed to preserve existing affordable housing and rehabilitate deteriorated housing. No significant impacts will result. Rev. 12/13/07 ^7 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 HousingElement Xin. PUBLIC SERVICES Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public faciUties? • X • • • X • • • • X • • • X • • • X • • a.i - a.v) Potentially Significant- Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element considers additional housing opportunities within the limits of the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element and Growth Management Plan. In 1986, Carisbad voters passed Proposition E, which ratified the City's Growth Management Plan. This prograrh lowered the residential build out capacity and imposed very specific facility improvement and/or fee requirements for all new development. The program established a dwelling unit cap of 54,600 dwelling units. The accommodation of the City's RHNA can be accomplished within the City's Growth Management dwelling unit cap, as explained in Section 4 of the City of Carlsbad Draft Housing Element. The Growth Management Plan requires planning for public facility needs through build out and for public facilities to be provided concurrent with development. The Draft Housing Element does not affect the Growth Management Plan, and does not propose policies to facilitate housing beyond the total dwelling units anticipated by the City's existing General Plan and Growth Management Plan. Implementation of the Draft Housing Element will not require additional public services beyond those already anticipated. Developers of every new development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will be required to pay all applicable impact fees, including required school impact fees, to support additional public services as the demand for those services increases with population growth. Implementation of the Draft Housing Element will not require additional public services beyond those already anticipated, with the exception of Local Facility Management Zone 25. Zone 25 is undeveloped and not all public service needs are known at this time. This is considered a significant impact; however, the City's General Plan and Habitat Management Plan do anticipate future development within Zone 25. Moreover, the San Diego Association of Governments has identified the Quarry Creek portion of zone 25 as a potential smart growth area, or an area suitable for a compact, efficient, and environmentally-sensitive urban development pattem. Implementation of the mitigation measure below will reduce public service impacts to a less than significant level. • PS-1 Prior to approval ofthe fu-st tract map or building permit in Zone 25, a Local Facility Management Plan shall be prepared and adopted by the City Council for Zone 25. Consistent with the Carisbad Growth Management Plan and its performance standards for public facilities, this plan shall show how and when the following facilities will be provided: Sewer systems, water, drainage, circulation, fire facilities, schools, libraries, city administrative facilities, parks and open space. This plan shall also include an 35 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housins Element inventory of present and future requirements for each public facility, a phasing schedule establishing the timing for provision of each facility, and a financing plan for funding the necessary facilities. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational faciUties or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • K • • S a) Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Draft Housing Element has the potential to increase the number of housing units and residential population. This could accelerate the deterioration of existing park and recreational facilities. Developers of future housing projects will be required to pay all applicable fees (including park in-lieu fees and development impact fees) to address any potential impacts on park and recreational facilities and services. The Grov^h Management Performance Standard for Parks requires 3 acres of park space for every 1,000 people in the city. As population (and corresponding demand for parks) is increased. Growth Management policies require park acreage to be concurrently increased, thereby ensuring that existing park facilities are not overburdened. No significant impacts will result. b) No Impact. The Growth Management Plan requires planning for public facility needs through build out, and requires public facilities to be provided concurrent with development. This includes the build out need for parks and recreational facilities. The Draft Housing Element does not affect these plans or require additional facilities beyond those already anticipated. No significant impacts will result. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity ofthe street system (i.e., resuh in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard* established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • • • • • Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element Potentially Significant Potentially Unless LessTlian Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including Q |^ ^ • X • • • X • • • • • E • • either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn- outs, bicycle racks)? a) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document that does not recommend or approve any particular development project. Implementation of Draft Housing Element policies and programs will facilitate housing construction, which in turn could generate new vehicle trips. However, the policies in the Draft Housing Element do not include project specific conditions and approval. The project specific impacts to the transportation system will be addressed as part of the permitting'process. The Draft Housing Element includes programs that encourage infill, higher density and mixed-use development, which are located in close proximity to public transportation and services. These programs are consistent with SANDAG Regional Comprehensive Plan objectives for smarter, more efficient growth patterns because they are expected to reduce the number of vehicle trips as compared to standard single family development. Citywide, the circulation system has been designed to accommodate the number of housing units at buildout of the General Plan, and the Draft Housing Element does not propose to increase or significantiy redistribute the number of housing units designated in the General Plan. However, there may be local traffic impacts from individual future projects which may be potentially significant prior to mitigation. Implementation of the following mitigation measures, consistent with the Growth Management Plan, will reduce any such impacts to a less than significant level. • T-1 Require new development to provide a traffic analysis report, as applicable, according to City standards and as may be requu-ed by the City Engineer. This report shall evaluate project specific traffic impacts and identify mitigation for impacts. • T-2 Require new development to comply with the adopted (September 23, 1986) Growth Management perfoi-mance standards for circulation facilities, which ensures future development will not exceed the traffic load and capacity ofthe City's street system and intersections. • T-3 Developers shall make applicable fair share contributions through the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program toward traffic improvements, to the satisfaction of the Carlsbad Engineering Department. • T-4 For projects that may potentially impact the circulation networks of adjacent jurisdictions, the City shall coordinate the pr^ect's environmental review with these jurisdictions to determine the need for any mitigation ofthe potential impacts. • T-5 Require new development to provide pedestrian and bicycle linkages, when feasible, which connect to nearby community centers, commercial developments, parks, schools, points of interest, major transportation corridors and the Carlsbad Trail System. 37 Rev. 12/13/07 90 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. SANDAG, acting as the County Congestion Management Agency, has designated tiiree-four.roads (Qijvenhain, Rd^.Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and tvvcione highway segments in Carlsbad as part of the regional circulation system. Accordi.natQ the SANJ)AG Final. 2aQ.8,.ConuestiQn Manauemen; Prograju ypdjue^ apj?ro^ t^he efisw-Levels Of Service on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad as of20Q7tsare: LOS OUvejihain .Road _. ''D'' Rancho Santa Fe Road~ "A-©C:B" El Camino Real "A4^r.-P' Palomar Airport Road "A-D" . ... Inierstaic 5 ... /*E" SR78 ~ W The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E". or LQS "F" if tfeat-wa&-th8 LOS in the IQQO-basc year (^rg^rSR 78 in Cn LOS ^'F" in 1990). Accordingly, all designated roads aMJl!ah>Y.^yA.whh thg.ex^epti. ofa portjop of El Camino fleal, and high-\¥£ty-7^-are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS, Thx.CMF^3g|imii^.;T'LtQ-ilii^ Q§m'aQj^gal. JiaokPia;^?^ Priv*?. iiL&irLsbadjft^jyjsta .Wiiv-iLi ingchaaism -fk, -i;.valuiatinjL-CMP--jdgiitifijgd.jieft£ieil^seg.aigQt§^and j-ecQinmgadingJniprQ,vgtiieiit$.„The- CMP idemjfigi.this deficient segment of El Camino Real .will have acceptable levels of service rB"-"C") in the near-term and at .bui.ld out.with.improvementsIdentified in the 2030. RIP, Implementation of the Draft Housing Eletnent will not result in dwelling units above that already anticipated by the Carlsbad General Plan and Growth Management Plan. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacities of the designated roads and highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable levels of service in the short-term and at buildout. Citywide, the circulation system has been designed to accommodate the number of housing units at buildout ofthe General Plan, and the Draft Housing Element does not propose to increase the number of housing units beyond the General Pian. However, there may be local traffic impacts from individual future projects which may be significant. Implementation ofthe above mitigation measures T-1, T-2. T-3, T-4 and T-5 will reduce this impact to a less than significant level. c) No Impact. The Draft Housing Element does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air traffic pattems or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed. d - f) Less than Significant Impact. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document and does not provide any project entitlements and will not result directly in the constmction of any housing. Adoption of the Draft Housing Element will facilitate housing production, which could increase the use of existing roads and require new road improvements. Through the environmental review process, future projects facilitated by the Draft Housing Element would be evaluated for potential traffic impacts and would be required to comply with the City's roadway safety standards, emergency access requirements and parking standards. Any future project circulation improvements wil! be designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards. All projects will be evaluated by the Fire and Police Departments and required lo satisfy existing requirements for emergency access. Parking standards set forth in the Zoning Code will be applied to each new housing development. If a project could have potential traffic impacts, a traffic analysis report will be required. Any mitigation measures identified would be required as conditions of approval. Adherence to these measures and existing City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. No mitigation measures are required. Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element g) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document and will not result directly in the constriiction of any housing. The Draft Housing Element includes programs that encourage infill, higher density and mixed-use development, which per the General Plan are to be located in close proximity to public transportation, including rail. Draft Housing Element programs support, rather tiian conflict with currently adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative tt-ansportation. The General Plan contains goals and policies related to pedesti-ian ti-avel, bicycle support facilities, commuter facilities and public transit facilities and services. Implementatioft of the Draft Housing Element is expected to increase the use of altemative ti-ansportation. Furthermore, any project facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will be required to comply with existing City standards regarding the installation of bicycle racks and bus turnouts. New housing facilitated by Draft Housing Element programs may include homes adjacent to or near the North County Transit Disti-ict railroad right of way, particularly in the Village Redevelopment Area, Barrio Area, and Beach Area Overlay Zone. New development may increase traffic volumes, including pedestrian traffic, at at-grade highway-rail crossings. These traffic increases may impact safety within the rail corridor. However, the mitigation measure below requires the preparation of studies to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. • T-6 For development proposed adjacent to or near the North County Transit District railroad right of way, ti-affic analysis reports required by mitigation measure T-1 shall address any traffic increase impacts over affected rail crossings and associated mitigation measures, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, XVL UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS project: Would the a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of tiie applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact S • • K • • • Kl • • • • • • • • • K 39 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? • • • ^ a) Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Wastewater generated within Carisbad is treated at the Encina Wastewater Authority (EWA). EWA's treatment facility is designed to treat wastewater to the secondary level and meets current State and Federal requirements. As such, EWA's facility is designed to adequately treat sewer flows from uses such as residential development. With regard to water quality impacts for wastewater treatment facilities resulting from pollutants generated by general runoff, new development of currently vacant areas could cause significant impacts. Implementation of the following mitigation measure will reduce this impact to a less than significant level. • USS-I Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit, and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. b - e) Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element considers additional housing opportunities within the limits of the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element and Growth Management Plan. In 1986, Carlsbad voters passed Proposition E, which ratified the City's Growth Management Plan. This program lowered the residential build out capacity and imposed very specific facility improvement and/or fee requirements for all new development. The program established a build out dwelling unit cap of 54,600 dwelling units. The accommodation of the City's RHNA can be accomplished 'within the City's Growth Management dwelling unit cap. The Growth .Management Plan reguires planning for public facility needs through build out and for public facilities to be provrded concurrent with development. The Carlsbad Municipal Water District Master Plan (2003) and Carisbad Sewer District Master Plan (2003) planned for the capacity and conveyance facilities necessary to serve the City with water distribution and wastewater treatment services to the Growth Management build out dwelling unit cap of 54,600 dwelling units. Though the Draft Housing Element will facilitate housing construction which could increase water and sewer demand, the Draft Housing Element does not affect these master plans and will not exceed the number of dwelling units anticipated by these master plans and allowed under Growth Management. The City is also served by the following: Leucadia Wastewater District, Olivenhain Municipal Water District and Vallecitos Water District. Each district has prepared master plans or studies which evaluate the adequacy and determine improvements necessary to provide adequate service for future developments. Carlsbad has structured its development impact fees to provide for adequate public infrastructure, services and utilities in developing areas of the City, which are generally well served, to meet existing and approved developments. Future development proposals will be reviewed to address any potential impacts on water supply and wastewater collection and treatment. Development will not be permitted unless adequate service is available or can be provided. Future development proposals will also be required to pay all applicable fees (including development impact fees) to address any potential impacts to facilities or service delivery. With respect to Local Facility Management Zone 25, Zone 25 is currentiy undeveloped and not all public service needs are known at this time. This is considered a significant impact; however, implementation of Mitigation Measure PS-1 from the Public Services section will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. f- g) No Impact. All development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will comply with existing City, State and federal statutes regarding solid waste disposal, including source reduction programs pursuant to the Califomia Integrated Waste Management Act. Each housing development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element will participate in the City's recycling program and comply with all other regulations related to waste management. No significant impact will result. 40 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which wili cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directiy or indirectiy? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • • • • • • • • a) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element is a policy document and does not provide any project entitiements and will not result directly in the construction of any housing. However, adoption of the Draft Housing Element will facilitate future housing projects, which could negatively affect environmental quality. As evidenced in the Biological Resources category, the project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment and reduce the number and restrict the range of a rare animal and plant. However, the project's compliance with mitigation measures, which requires compliance with the HMP, ensures these impacts would be reduced to a level of insignificance. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project does not have cumulatively considerable impacts as this environmental document demonstrates. SANDAG projects regional growth for the greater San Diego area and local general plan land use policies are incorporated into SANDAG projections. Based on these projections, region-wide standards, including but not limited to, storm water quality control, air quality standards, habitat conservation, and congestion management standards are established to reduce the cumulative impacts of development in the region. All of the City's development standards and regulations are consistent with the region- wide standards. The City's standards and regulations, including grading standards, water quality and drainage standards, traffic standards, habitat and cultural resources protection regulations, and public facility standards, ensure that future development within the City will not result in a significant cumulatively considerable impact. Mitigation measures are included herein to ensure projects comply with all applicable standards. Two regional issues of concem with regard to cumulative impacts are air quality and regional circulation. Development of future residential projects facilitated by Draft Housing Element policies and programs may represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. 41 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element As discussed above in the Air Quality section. Draft Housing Element policies will not provide for housing beyond that accounted for in SANDAG's regional plans and thus, is within the scope of regional air quality management plans. While fiimre projects will contribute to regional emissions, those emissions have been accounted for in regional planning efforts. Additionally, mitigation measures are included herein to reduce to less than significant the short term air quality impacts that occur during constiiiction. With regard to circulation, SANDA.CL.the County CQnggstLon_ManMeme]it Agency iCMA) has designated tiwee four,roads CQliygnh.a.irL,Rd.-Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real, and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad as part of die regional circulation system. The CMA has determined, based on the City's growth projections in the General Plan,aBdi|&B!§MMi»4l that these designated roadways will function at acceptable levels of service in the short term and at build out. Draft Housing Element programs are consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan growth projections. Mitigation measures are included in this environmental document to ensure localized traffic impacts, compliance vvith the City's Growth Management and Traffic Impact Fee programs, coordination with other cities, and improvements to Carlsbad's pedesti-ian and bicycle circulation network occur. Regarding biological impacts, the MHCP was designed to compensate for the loss of biological resources throughout the program's region; therefore, projects that conform to the MHCP, as specified by the City's HMP, would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact for those biological resources adequately covered by the program. As discussed in the Biological Resources category herein, the direct and indirect biological impacts resulting from development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element should not be cumulatively considerable if the mitigation measm-es as contained herein are implemented to ensure conformance to the MHCP and the City's HMP. c) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Draft Housing Element policies and programs seek to (1) provide a plan for meeting the City's share of the regional housing need, (2) focus on providing safe and affordable housing or shelter for all Carlsbad residents, (3) encourage the rehabilitation 6f deteriorated housing units and (4) provide shelter for homeless individuals. Further, implementation of Draft -'Housing Element programs would encourage the developjnent of compact," efficient smart growth, which would efficiently locate housing near transportation, services, and employment. Adoption and eventually implementation of the Draft Housing Element will have an overall beneficial impact. Construction of housing pursuant to the Draft Housing Element, if not according to applicable standards and requirements, could potentially have significant adverse effects on human beings. Therefore, mitigation measures as contained herein ensure any future housing facilitated by the Draft Housing Element, including emergency shelters and temporary farm worker housing, will be constructed consistent with all adopted building codes and other applicable standards, such as those regarding noise and air quality and hazards and hazardous materials. XVIII EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation mealures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project, 42 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, California, 92008. 1. City of Carlsbad. Carlsbad General Plan. 2. City of Carlsbad. Carlsbad Municipal VVater District Water Master Plan Update. March 2003. 3. City of Carlsbad, City of Carlsbad Draft 2005-2010 HousingElement. December 2008. 4. City of Carisbad. City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan. July 2008. 5. City of Carl sbad. City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan Update. March 2003. 6. City of Carisbad. El Camino Real Corridor Study. February 8, 1984. 7. City of Carlsbad. Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan Update. SCH# 2006041066, December 2007, 8. City of Carlsbad. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update. SCH #93091080. March 1994. 9. City of Carlsbad. Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad. November 2004. 10. City of Carlsbad, Landscape Manual. Adopted November 13, 1990. 11. City of Carisbad. Local Coastal Program with Kelly Ranch Amendments. Amended 2006. 12. City of Carisbad. Minutes of City of Carlsbad City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Joint Special Meeting)'. November 6,2007. 13. City of Carlsbad, Municipal Code, Title 21: Zoning Ordinance. 14. City of Carisbad, Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report. EIR 06-01, Bridges at Aviara. February 3,2009. 15. C'xty QiQdxh\}zdi. Scenic Corridor Guidelines. i\i\y \,\9Z%. 16. City of Carlsbad. Negative Declaration for Village Master Plan and Design Manual - Amendments. (SCH #2007071132). Adopted November"6,2007. 17. CERCLIS Database and Superfund Site Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites/index.htm. accessed January 22, 2009. 18. Cortese - List Data Resources, California Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/default.htm. accessed January 22.2009. 19. Eligible and Officially Designated Routes, California Department of Transportation, www.dot.ca.gov/liq/LandArch/scenic/cahisvs.htm. 20. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Regional Comprehensive Plan for the San Diego Region. (SCH # 2004011141). Prepared by P & D Environmental. July 2004. 21. Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan Draft Subsequent EIR fSCH# 2005021119;. Prepared by HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc, September 2008, 22. La Costa Town Square Draft Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2003041159). Prepared by EDAW, Inc. March 19,2009. 23. Officially Designated State Scenic Highways, Califomia Department of Transportation, www.dot.ca.gQv/liq/LandArch/scenic/schwv.htm. 24. Ponto Beachfront Village Vision Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2007031141), Prepared by RBF Consuhing. August 2007. 25. Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2007031141), Prepared by BRG consulting, Inc, April 2006. 26. San Diego Association of Governments. Regional Comprehensive Plan for the San Diego Region. July 2004. 27. San Diego County Important Farmland 2006 map, published August 2008. Access from the State Department of Conservation website at ftp://ftD.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2006/$dg06 west.pdf 28. San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, McClellan-Palomar Airport Carlsbad, California. Amended October 4,2004. 43 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) Aesthetics • A-1 As applicable, all future development projects in the City shall comply with the following requirements: o Carisbad Municipal Code Title 21,53 and California Environmental Quality Act - Preservation of steep slopes (40% or greater) and other environmentally constrained areas (i.e., wetlands and floodways). o The open space and sensitive habitat preservation requirements of the City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, o El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards. o Hillside Development Ordinance (contour/landform grading, screening graded slopes, landscape buffers, reduction of slope heights and gradmg, sensitive hillside architecmre), . o Planned Development Ordinance and Design Guidelines Manual, o Landscape Guidelines Manual o City Council- Policy No. 44 - Architectural Guidelines for the Development of Livable Communities. o City Council Policy No. 66 - Principles for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods o Growth Management Ordinance - Requirement for 15% performance standards open space o Zoning Regulations (i.e., setback, coverage, signage, and height, etc.) o City of Carlsbad Local Coastal Program • • A-2 As applicable, all future development projects in the City shall comply with the following General Plan policies: o Arrange land use so that they preserve community identity and are orderly, functionally efficient, healthful, convenient to the public and aesthetically pleasing. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Partem, C.I) o Ensure that the review of future projects places a high priority on the compatibility of adjacent land uses. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattem, C.2) o Review the architecture of buildings with a focus on ensuring the quality and integrity of design and enhancement of the character of each neighborhood. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattem, C.6) o Ensure that grading for building pads and roadways is accomplished in a manner that maintains the appearance of natural hillsides (Land Use Element, Environmental, C.3) • A-3 As applicable, developers shall submh and obtain Planning Director approval of an exterior lighting plan, including parking areas, recreation areas and other applicable components of residential projects. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. For any lighting adjacent to or within 100 feet of open space and sensitive habitat areas, the lighting plan shall demonstrate compliance with the Adjacency Standards of the Carisbad Habitat Management Plan. • A-4 Construction lighting shall be shielded or directed away from adjacent residences and sensitive receptors to light, including sensitive habitats. • A-5 All projects adjacent to open space and sensitive habitat areas shall comply with the lighting recommendations found in the Adjacency Standards of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, including the following: 44 Rev. 12/13/07 97 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element o Eliminate lighting in or adjacent to the preserve areas except where essential for roadway, facility use and safety and security purposes. o Use low pressure sodium illumination sources. Do not use low voltage outdoor or trail lighting, spot lights, or bug lights. Shield light sources adjacent to the preserve so that the lighting is focused downward, o Avoid excessive lighting in developments adjacent to linkages through appropriate placement and shielding oflight sources. Agricultural Resources • AR-1 Within the Coastal Zone, projects that would convert farmland must comply with the agricultural conversion requirements of the Local Coastal Program. • AR-2 For any project that would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, a California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model Analysis must be prepared to identify potential impacts to important agricultural lands. Air Quality • AQ-1 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Water or dust control agents shall be applied to active grading areas, unpaved surfaces, and dirt stockpiles as necessary to prevent or suppress particulate matter from becoming airborne. All soil to be stockpiled over 30 days shall be protected with a secure tarp or tackifiers to prevent windblown dust. o Spoil or demoUtion material in each truckload 5hall be kept low enough to prevent spillage and shall be sufficiently .wetted down or covered with a secure tarp to prevent dust generation during transport, - o Grading and other soil handling operations shall be suspended when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour. The constmction supervisor shall have a hand-held anemometer for evaluating wind speed. o Dirt and debris spilled onto paved surfaces at the project site and on the adjacent roadway shall be swept or vacuumed and disposed of at the end of each workday to reduce resuspension of particulate matter caused by vehicle movement. o Vegetation disturbed by constmction or maintenance activity shall be revegetated upon completion of work in the area, where appropriate. o Electt-ical power shall be provided from commercial power supply wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. o Air filters on construction equipment engines shall be maintained in clean condhion according to manufacturers' specifications. o • The construction contractor shall comply with the approved traffic control plan to reduce non- project traffic congestion impacts. Methods to reduce construction interference with existing traffic and the prevention of truck queuing around local sensitive receptors shall be incorporated into this plan. o Trucks and equipment shall not idle for more than 15 minutes when not in service. Biological Resources BR-1 Projects with the potential to impact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Califomia Coastal Act, the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP), the HMP and other applicable documents including but 45 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element not limited to those identified in subsection 5.1, Reguiatoiy Context, of the City's "Guidelines for Biological Studies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time BR-2 For projects with the potential to impact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, a biology resources technical report (BTR) shall be prepared. The BTR shall provide the necessaiy infomiation to establish the current stattis of biological resources witiiin a project footprint, an analysis of potential project impacts, and mitigation measures that should be implemented to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance. The format and content of the BTR shall be similar to report standards outiined in the City's "Guidelines for Biological Sttidies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time. Future project level environmental review that would impact biological resources would be provided to the WildUfe Agencies for review to verify consistency with the City's HMP. BR-3 Implementation of the mitigation measures BR-3a through BR-3d would be required for projects that would impact sensitive HMP habitats and would reduce direct and cumulative impacts to below a level of significance. Note that the descriptions of Type A through F habitats are per Table 11 ofthe HMP, Avoidance" and on-site mitigation are the priority. o BR-3a For impacts to Type A habitats (coastal salt marsh, alkali marsh, freshwater marsh, estuarine, salt pan/mudflats, riparian forest, riparian woodland, riparian scrub, disturbed wetlands, flood channel, fresh water, Engelmann oak woodland, coast live oak woodland) a goal of no net loss of habitat value or function shall be met. Habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation ^ands shall be determined in consultation with the USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance whh the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the California Fish and Game Code, All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetland habitats shall be in tiie City or MHCP plan area, at a ratio to be determined by the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting, o Bio-3b Impacts to Type B habitats (beach, southem coastal bluff scrub, maritime succulent scmb, southem niaritime chaparral, native grass) shall be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o Bio-3c Impacts to Type C habitats (Califomia gnatcatcher-occupied coastal sage scrub) shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource agencies at the time of project pemiitting. o BR-3d Impacts to Type D (unoccupied coastal sage scrub, coastal sage/chaparral mix, chaparral), Type E (annual, nonnative grassland), and Type F (disturbed lands, eucalyptus, agricultural lands) habitats are subject to the fee payment if not conserved or mitigated onsite. BR-4 Construction activities, including clearing and gmbbing, in or adjacent to habitat occupied associated with sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors, shall be generally prohibited during the bird breeding season (February 15 - September 15), If construction activities cannot be avoided during this time the following measures shall be taken: o BR-4a A qualified biologist shaU conduct a focused species gnatcatcher survey in appropriate habitat within and surrounding the project areas. The surveys will consist of three visits, one week apart; the last of these shall be conducted no more than three days prior to construction. o BR-4b Surveys shall also be conducted by a qualified biologist in appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and migratory birds (including, but not limited to, the least Bell's vireo) within three days of construction. o BR-4C If nests of sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors are located, the project applicant shall receive confirmation from the biologist that construction may proceed or continue and implement any necessary mitigation measures. o BR-4d During the breeding season, construction noise shall be measured regulariy to maintain a threshold at or below 60 dBA hourly Leq within 300 feet of breeding habitat occupied by listed species. If noise levels superseded the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented. 46 Rev, 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element BR-5 Where required, protocol-level surveys will be conducted for sensitive plant or wildlife species prior to construction, as determined by the Wildlife Agencies. BR-6 For projects that would result in the loss of sensitive habitats within the Coastal Zone, mitigation shall be required at ratios consistent with requirements of the HMP, including Standards 7-1 through 7-14 of Section D, and the policies and provisions of the LCP. BR-7 Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the provisions of the HMP and Local Coastal Program. For all projects affecting riparian and wetland habhat, habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation lands shall be determined in consultation with tiie USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance with the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the Califomia Fish and Game Code. For projects with unavoidable impacts, the City shall demonstrate tiiat viable wetlands can either be: 1) created at a minimum ratio of 1:1 within close proximity of the impact area to replace the wildlife function affected by the project; or, 2) provide proof that wetland creation credits at a minimum ratio of 1:1 have been purchased at a Wildlife Agency approved bank. Consistent with the City's HMP, higher ratios will be required for impacts to high quality wetiands (e.g., occupied by Usted or otherwise sensitive species) and for wetiands within the Coastal Zone, For DMP Update components where wetland creation will be necessary, construction shall not be initiated until a viable wetland creation mitigation site with long-term value is identified (and if necessary purchased by the City) and the wetland mitigation plan is approved by the appropriate Resource Agencies. The wetland creation shall not require impacts to sensitive wildlife or vegetation communities. All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetiand habitats shall be in the City or MHCP plan area as deemed appropriate by the WildUfe Agencies. BR-8 As needed, surveys for state and federally listed sensitive plant species shall be conducted to complete a determination of suitable habitat presence prior to issuance of any discretionary permits by the City, Surveys shall be conducted at a time wlien sensitive plant species would be most observable. BR-9 At the project design stage fbr projects located within key Core Areas and linkages, design measures and restoration efforts shall be required to maintain the viability ofthe wildlife corridors throughout Carisbad. BR-10 Projects shall comply with the Adjacency Standards outiined in Section F., pp. 4-16 to F-24 ofthe HMP. BR-Il During clearing, grading, and otiier construction activities, ensure that proper irrigation and stormwater mnoff mitigation measures are employed to reduce sediment loads and to prevent contamination from pesticides, fertilizers, petroleum products, and other toxic substances. Fugitive dust shall also be avoided and minimized through watering and other appropriate measures. Cultural Resources CR-1 The following mitigation measures will be required if a project is located in an undeveloped area that could potentially impact significant cultural deposits. o CR-1 a Preconstruction Requirements - Prior to the start of construction, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted under the supervision of a qualified archaeologist for previously undisturbed areas that have not been surveyed or adequately surveyed (e.g., the area was surveyed with outdated or non-protocol methods). The survey shall be conducted in parallel linear transects spaced no farther than 10 meters apart in undeveloped areas. • CR-la(l) Cultural resources, if found during the survey, shall be photographed, mapped using a global positioning system (GPS), and recorded on the appropriate Califomia Department of Parks and Recreation forms (DPR Form 523A/B). The forms shall be submitted to the SCIC for the assignment of Primary numbers witiiin 1 week of the survey. • CR-la(2) Within 1 month of completion of the field survey, a draft letter report or technical report shall be submitted to the City for review, whether the survey is negative or positive, A final report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of receipt of tiie City's comments, with a copy submitted to the SCIC for their files. 47 Rev. 12/13/07 ' ' GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element o CR-lb If the pedestrian survey is positive, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct an updated archival search, if needed, as well as additional detailed field testing. Local Native American groups shall be contacted for testing of prehistoric cultural resources regarding the project. Where applicable, the City will execute a Pre-Excavation Agreement with the appropriate Native American groups. " CR-lb(l) Prior to the start of field testing, surface artifacts and/or features shall be marked and mapped using a GPS. Testing shall be required if surface artifacts are discovered, and shall include a program of 30-cm-diameter shovel test pits (STPs) to define site boundaries and identify the potential for a substantial subsurface deposit. • CR-lb(2) Based on the results of the STPs, additional measures such as Test Excavation Units or mechanical trenching (for substantial historic sites) would be placed in areas with tiie potential for a substantial subsurface deposit, as determined by the qualified archeologist. • CR-lb(3) All excavated soils shall be screened through 1/8-inch mesh hardware cloth. On completion of the project the artifact collection, along with copies of the catalogs and the technical report, shall be permanenfiy curated at tiie San Diego Archaeological Center. An updated site record shall be prepared and submitted to the SCIC, • CR-lb(4) Within 3 months of completion ofthe fieldwork, a draft teclinical report including evaluations and recommendations shall be prepared and submitted. The final technical report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of rece'ipt of the City's comments, CR-2 Monitoring Requirements - Construction monitoring will be required for projects that involve excavation or grading within undisturbed native soils and could potentially impact subsurface cultural deposits, o CR-2a Prior to the first preconsttnction meeting for the project, the Planning Director (PD) shall verify that the requirements for archaeologicaf monitoring and Native American monitoring, if applicable, have been noted on the appropriate constmction documents. The applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to verify that a records search has been completed and updated, as necessaty, and to implement the monitoring program. At the preconstmction meeting, the archaeologist shall submit to the PD a copy ofthe site/grading plan that identifies areas to be monitored. o CR-2b The qualified archaeologist shall be present full-time during grading/ excavation of native soils with the potential to contain buried cultural feauires or deposits and shall document activity via the Consultant Monitor Record. Monitoring of trenches shall include mamline, laterals, services and all other appurtenances that impact native soils 1 foot deeper than existing as detailed on the plans or in the contract documents. It is tiie constmction manager's responsibility to keep the archaeological monitors up-to-date with current plans. o CR-2c In the event of a discovery, the archaeologist, or the Principal Investigator (PI) if the monitor is not qualified as a PI, shall divert, direct, or temporarily halt ground-disturbing activities in the area ofthe discovery to allow for preliminary evaluation of potentially significant archaeological resources. The PI shall also immediately notify the constmction manager and the PD of such findings at tiie time of discovery. • CR-2c(l) The significance of the discovered resources shall be assessed by tiie PL For significant archaeological resources, a Research Design and Data Recovety Program shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist. The results of the Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be approved by the City before ground-dismrbing activities in the area of discovety shall be allowed to resume. o CR-2d If human remains are discovered, work shall halt in tiiat area and procedures set forth in the Califomia Public Resources Code (Sec. 5097.98) and State Health and Safety Code (Sec, 7050,5) shall be implemented. Construction in that area shall not resume until the remains have-been evaluated and conveyed to appropriate descendants or reinterred to the satisfaction of the PI. o CR-2e The archaeologist shall notify the PD, in writing, of the end date of monitoring. The archaeologist shall be responsible for ensuring that all cultural remains collected are cleaned. 48 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element catalogued, and pei-manently curated with an appropriate institution; that a letter of acceptance from the curation institution has been submitted to the Planning Department; that all artifacts are analyzed to identify function and chronology as they relate to the history of the area; tiiat faunal material is identified as to species; and tliat specialty studies are completed, as appropriate. o CR-2f: Within 3 montiis following the completion of monitoring, the Draft Results Report (even if negative) and/or evaluation report, if applicable, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the Archaeological Monitoring Program (witii appropriate graphics) shall be submitted to the PD for approval. For significant archaeological resources encountered during monitoring, the Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be included as part of the Draft Results Report. The qualified archaeologist shall be responsible for recording (on the appropriate State of Califomia Depaitment of Park and Recreation forms-DPR 523 A/B) any significant or potentially significant resources encountered during tiie Archaeological Monitoring Progi-am, and submitting such fonns to-- the SCIC with the Final Results Report, CR-3 The following paleontological mitigation measures shall be implemented: o CR-3a: Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to perform a walkover survey of tiie site and to review the grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. o CR-3b A copy of the paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director before construction. If the paleontologist's report finds the project will not significantly impact fossil resources, this mitigation measure shall be considered fulfilled and no further effort to comply with this measure shall be required. o CR-3c A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the sniall nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix-samples for laboratory processing through fine screens, - o CR-3d The paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process, o CR-3e The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts. o CR-3f All fossils collected may be donated to a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. o CR-3g Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. Geology and Soils GS-1 A site-specific geotechnical investigation shall be prepared to address geotechnical considerations related to future housing development faciUtated by the Draft Housing Element, specifically project components that would involve excavation, grading, or construction of new structures. The report shall contain all necessary requirements to address any adverse soils conditions that may be encountered in final design of a project. The applicant shall be required to adhere to all such requirements. The report shall include a discussion of site-specific geology, soils, and foundational issues; a seismic hazards analysis to determine the potential for strong ground acceleration and ground shaking; potential groundwater issues; and stmctural design recommendations. The soil engineer and engineering geologist shall revievs' the grading plans for adequate incorporation of recommended measures prior to finalization. GS-2 All future projects shall be designed and constructed in conformance to the Uniform Building Code, current seismic design specifications of the Structural Engineering Association of California, and other regulatory requirements. GS-3 Prior to issuance of a grading permh, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to demonstrate 49 Rev. 12/13/07 !C9 ( GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit, and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control, measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. • GS-4 All applicable federal, state and local permits regarding drainage shall be obtained. Such permits include the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Regional Water QuaUty Control Board. • GS-5 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Erosion control measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code § 15.16 et.seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on plans included in the SWPPP. 0 All grading permits issued authorizing grading during the rainy season (October 1 of any year to ' April 30* of the following year), shall require the installation of all erosion and sedimentation control protective measures in accordance with city standards. Erosion and runoff control measures shall be designed and bonded prior to approval of grading permits by the City. o All permanent slopes shall be planted with erosion control vegetation, drained and properiy maintained to reduce erosion within 30 days of completion of grading. Erosion control and drainage devices shall be installed in compliance with tiie requirements ofthe City. o All erosion and sedimentation control protective measures shall be maintained in good working order through out the duration of the rainy season unless it can be demonstrated to the City Engineer that their removal at an earlier date will not result in any unnecessary erosion of or sedimentation on public or private properties. Hazards and Hazardo.us Materials • HM-1 Prior to approval of discretionary permits for projects within (1) an existing or former agricultural area, or (2) an area believed to have contaminated soils due to historic use, handling, or storage of hazardous materials, a detailed soils testing and analysis report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City and the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) for approval. This report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination due to historic use, handling, or storage of chemicals and materials resuricted by the DEH, The report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at concentrations in the soil which would have a significantly adverse effect on human health, • HM-2 If use of agricultural chemicals within an existing agricultural operation has the potential to adversely impact a proposed residential development on an adjacent parcel, mitigation measures including but not limited to physical barriers and/or separation between the uses shall be considered. • HM-3 Prior to approval of any permits for uses such as emergency shelters and farm worker housing within the City's industrial zones, the applicant shall obtain clearances from federal, state, and local agencies as necessary to ensure such uses are not exposed to significant hazards due to the routine transport, use or'disposal of hazardous materials or through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident condhions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. • HM-4 All trash and debris within project sites shall be disposed of off-site in accordance with current, local, state, and federal disposal regulations. Any buried trash/debris encountered shall be evaluated by an experienced environmental consultant prior to removal. • HM-5 Before beginning demolition or renovation activities, the interior of individual onsite structures shall be visually inspected. Should hazardous materials be encountered, the materials shall be tested and properly disposed of offsite in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Any stained soils or surfaces underneath the removed materials shall be sampled. Results of the sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required. 50 Rev. 12/13/07 /Q3 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element • HM-6 Before beginning any remedial or demolition work, building owners shall contract with a certified professional to conduct an asbestos survey, consistent whh National Emission Standards for hazardous Air PoUutants (NESHAP) standards to determine the presence of asbestos containing materials. Demolition of or within existing buildings on individual parcels onsite must comply witii State law, which requires a certified contractor where there is asbestos-related work involving 100 square feet or more or such materials to ensure that certain procedures regarding the removal of asbestos are followed. • HM-7 Before the issuance of a grading permit, all miscellaneous debris (i.e., wood, concrete, storage drums, and automobiles) shall be removed offsite and properly disposed of at an approved landfill facility. Once removed, a visual inspection of the areas beneath the removed materials shall be performed. Any stained soils observed undemeatii the removed materials shall be sampled. Results ofthe sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required. • HM-8 If unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during constmction on individual properties that are believed to involve hazardous waste/materials, the contractor shall: o Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, removing workers and the public from the area; o Notify the project engineer of the City of Carlsbad; o Secure the areas as directed by the project engineer, and; o Notify the City's hazardous waste/materials coordinator. • HM-9 When applications are submitted to the City of Carisbad Planning Department to redesignate the land use of a property or propose development or redevelopment, disclosure of inclusion on the Cortese List (Government Code Section 65962.5) shall be requu-ed. If an application i^ for property included on the Cortese List, the applicant shaU provide evidence that describes the required remediation process, through text and graphics, and (1) demon§tt-ates compliance is occurring or has occurred with aU appUcable federal, state, and local regulations; (2) describes all necessary actions and approvals to remediate the property and includes evidence of any approvals so far obtained; (3) describes the estimated remediation timeframe, current status, and any monitoring required during and following remediation; (4) discusses any restrictions on use ofthe property upon reclamation completion; (5) includes all other required information as deemed necessary by the City, DEH, and otiier agencies having regulatory authority vvith regards to remediation of the site. Hydrology and Water Quality • WQ-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carisbad City Engineer, a Storm' Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit (Order No. 99-08, NPDES CAS000002), and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit (Order R9-2007- OOOI, NPDES CASO 108758). The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the BMP erosion control measures identified below on a weekly basis in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code Section 15.16. et seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on the grading plans, BMPs that shall be installed include, but are not limited to, the following: o Silt fence, fiber rolls, or gravel bag berms o Check dams o Street sweeping and vacuuming o Storm drain inlet protection o Stabilized construction entrance/exit o Hydroseed, soil binders, or straw mulch o Containment of material delivery and storage areas o Stockpile management o Spill prevention and confrol o Waste management for solid, Uquid, hazardous, and sanitary waste, and contaminated soil o Concrete waste management 51 Rev. 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element WQ-2a. Prior to issuance of grading permits or approvals for any public or private right-of-way improvements or site development plans, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval by the City of Carlsbad City Engineer, a stormwater management plan that demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad SUSMP and Stormwater Management Program (SWMP). Approval of such plans shall be subject to a detennination by the Carisbad City Engineer that the proposed project has incorporated post-development water quality pollution control site design BMPs, source control BMPs, and numerically-sized treatment control BMPs such as those identified below into the project design to the maximum extent practicable: o street sweeping o inlet basin labeling o Filtering bioretention units o Pervious pavement o Vegetated swales o Detention/infiltration basins o Covered trash enclosures WQ-2b. Projects shall be required to show compliance with the applicable hydromodification provisions of Order R9-2007-0001 and to show they are designed so that postproject runoff flow rates and directions do not exceed pre-project runoff flow rates and directions for applicable design storms. Projects shall incorporate LID design techniques to reduce the amount of runoff by .mimicking the namral hydrologic function of the she by preserving namral open spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, and promoting infiltration and evapotranspiration of runoff before mnoff leaves the site. LID techniques include, but are not Umited to: o Vegetated buffer strips o Vegetated bio swales - o Rain gardens , - • • ". ' '• o Porous pavements o Bioretention areas o Vegetated roofs o Stormwater planter boxes o Infilfration trenches o Dry wells WQ-3 In conjunction with the sale, rental or lease of a residence or business property, all prospective owners and tenants shall be notified .in writing through Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that they shall: o Establish or work with established disposal programs for the removal and proper disposal of toxic and hazardous waste products, o Not discharge or cause to be discharged any toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds, such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives and other such fluids,- into any public or private street or into any storm drain or storm drain conveyance, o Use and/or dispose of all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, and other such chemical freatments in accordance with federal. State, County, and City requirements as prescribed on their respective containers, o Employ BMPs to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and/or surface improvements. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding CC&Rs. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval, o Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Califomia Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. WQ-4 As required by the City Engineer, a hydrology report to assess impacts relating to drainage and stormwater runoff shall be prepared. The report shall demonstrate compliance with current applicable 52 Rev. 12/13/07 /05 Noise GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element hydromodification standards and demonstrate adequate capacity in downstream storm drain facilities, or shall demonstrate no increase in runoff peak flows through onsite detention. WQ-5 Proposed development shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 21.110, Floodplain Management Regulations, of the Zoning Ordinance. This shall include preparation of all appUcable studies and reports, including those required by other agencies, such as FEMA, as directed by the City Engineer. , WQ-6 Proposed development shall be subject to compliance with mitigation measures GS-1 and GS-2, which require preparation of site-specific geotechnical investigations and compliance with Uniform Building Code and otiier structural regulations. N-1 A noise study shall be submitted with all discretionary applications for residential projects of five or more dwelling units located within or 500-feet beyond the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour lines as shown on Map 2: Future Noise Contour Map in the Noise Element of the General Plan, This noise smdy shall identify design features such as noise attenuation walls and mechanical building ventilation necessary to enforce the City policy that 60 dBA CNEL is the exterior noise level (65 dBA if subject to noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport) and 45 dBA CNEL is the interior noise level to which all residential units shall be mitigated, N-2 To minimize noise impacts, project design techniques shall be used during any discretionary review of a residential or other noise sensitive project to shield noise sensitive areas from a noise source. This can be done, for example, by increasing the distance between the noise source and the receiver; placing non-noise sensitive uses such as parking areas, maintenance facilities,'.and utility areas between the source and the receiver; using non-sensitive structures, such as a garage, to shield noise sensitive areas; and, orienting buildings lo shieldcbutdoor spaces from a noise source. N-3 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the policies of the City of Carlsbad General Plan Noise Element and City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. N-4 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the following requirements: o Heavy equipment shall be repaired at sites as far as practical from nearby residences and occupied sensitive habitats. o Construction equipment, including vehicles, generators, and compressors, shall be maintained in proper operating condition and shall be equipped with manufacturers' standard noise confrol devices or better (e.g., mufflers, acoustical lagging, and/or engine enclosures). o The City's noise ordinance (Municipal Code Section 8.48.010) limits the hours of construction to between 7 a.m. and sunset on weekdays and 8 a.m. to sunset on Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and holidays. The City Manager may grant an exception for night work during the night, Sundays, and holidays if the construction is in a nonresidential zone and there are no inhabited dwellings within 1,000 feet ofthe construction site. o Electrical power shall be provided from commercial power supply, wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. o Staging areas for construction equipment shall be located as far as practicable from residences and sensitive habitats. o Operating equipment shall be designed to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal noise regulations. o Noise attenuation walls/buffers shall be used to shield senshive noise receptors from constmction- generated noise greater than 75 dBA within 50 feet of sensitive receptors. o If lighted traffic control devices are to be located within 500 feet of residences, the devices shall be powered by batteries, solar power, or similar sources, and not by an internal combustion engine. 53 Rev, 12/13/07 /Oil GPA 03-02 2005-2010 HousingElement • N-5 Refer to Mitigation Measure Biological Resources BR-4, which will reduce potential construction noise impacts to sensitive bird species, migratory birds, or raptors to below a level of significance. • N-6 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Prior to the recordation of the first final (tract/parcel) map or the issuance of building pennits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department), o Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning Department). Public Semces • PS-1 Prior to approval of the first tract map or building pennit in Zone 25, a Local Facility Management Plan shall be prepared and adopted by the City Council for Zone 25. Consistent with the Carisbad Growth Management Plan and its performance standards for public facilities, this plan shall show how and when the following facilities wil! be provided: Sewer systems, water, drainage, circulation, fire facilities, schools, libraries, city-administi^tive facilities, parks and open space.. This plan shall also include an inventory of present and fumre requirements for each public facility, a phasing schedule establishing the timing for provision of each facility, and a financing plan for funding the necessary facilities. Transportation/Traffic • T-1 Require new development to provide a traffic analysis report, as'applicable, according to City standards and as may be required by the City Enginieer. Tills report shall evaluate project specific fraffic impacts and identify mitigation for impacts, • T-2 Require new development to comply with the adopted (September 23, 1986) Growth Management performance standards for circulation facilities, which ensures fhture development will not exceed the traffic load and capacity of the City's sfreet system and intersections. • T-3 Developers shall make applicable fair share contributions through the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program toward fraffic improvements, to the satisfaction of the Carisbad Engineering Department. • T-4 For projects that may potentially impact the circulation networks of adjacent jurisdictions, the City shall coordinate the project's envu-onmental review with these jurisdictions to determine the need for any mhigation ofthe potential impacts. • T-5 Require new development to provide pedestrian and bicycle linkages, when feasible, which connect to nearby community centers, commercial developments, parks, schools, points of interest, major transportation corridors and the Carlsbad Trail System. • T-6 For development proposed adjacent to or near the North County Transit District railroad right of way, traffic analysis reports required by mitigation measure T-1 shall address any fraffic increase impacts over affected rail crossings and associated mitigation measures, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Utilities and Service Systems • USS-l Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit, and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. 54 Rev, 12/13/07 GPA 03-02 2005-2010 Housing Element APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. (Not applicable) Date Signature 55 Rev. 12/13/07 |0% Page 1 of 23 PROJECT NAME: Draft 2005-2010 Housing Element FILE NUMBERS: GPA 03-02 APPROVAL DATE: Mav 26. 2009 The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate identified environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Mitigation Measure, Monitoring; - Type' Monitoring r Department Shown on . 'Plans' ' ... ..Verified 'implementation ' Remarks A-1 As applicable, all future developnnent projects in the City shall comply with the following requirements: o Carisbad Municipal Code Titie 21.53 and California Environmental Quality Act - Preservation of steep slopes (40% or greater) and other environmentally constrained areas (i.e,, wetlands and fioodways). o The open space and sensitive habitat preservation requirements of the City of Carisbad Habitat Management Plan. o El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards. o Hillside Development Ordinance (contour/landform grading, screening graded slopes, landscape buffers, reduction of slope heights and grading, sensitive hillside architecture), o Planned Development Ordinance and Design Guidelines Manual. o Landscape Guidelines Manual o City Council Policy No. 44 - Architectural Guidelines for the Development of Livable Communities. o City Council Policy No. 66 - Principles for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods o Growth Management Ordinance - Requirement for 15% performance standards open space o Zoning Regulations (i.e., setback, coverage, signage, and height, etc.) o City of Carisbad Local Coastal Program Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has Iseen implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 2 of 23 Mitigation Measure^ I ^.^- f^-' ^C . , . Monitoring ~ 'Type ^ ' Monitoring ^ .'Department' Shov^n on ^ • Plans '- ^ . Verified. Implementation Rerfiarks • A-2 As applicable, all future development projects in the City shall comply with the following General Plan policies: o Arrange land use so that they preserve community identity and are orderly, functionally efficient, healthful, convenient to the public and aesthetically pleasing. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattern, C,1) o Ensure that the review of future projects places a high priority on the compatibility of adjacent land uses. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattern, C.2) o Review the architecture of buildings with a focus on ensuring the quality and integrity of design and enhancement of the character of each neighborhood. (Land Use Element, Overall Land Use Pattern, 0.6) o Ensure that grading for building pads and roadways is accomplished in a manner that maintains the appearance of natural hillsides (Land Use Element, Environmental, C.3) Project Planning, Engineering • A-3 As applicable, developers shall submit and obtain Planning Director approval of an exterior lighting plan, including parking areas, recreation areas and other applicable components of residential projects. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. For any lighting adjacent to or within 100 feet of open space and sensitive habitat areas, the lighting plan shall demonstrate compliance with the Adjacency Standards of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan. Project Planning - • A-4 Construction lighting shall be shielded or directed away from adjacent residences and sensitive receptors to light, including sensitive habitats. Project Planning, Building, Engineering/P ublic Works • A-5 All projects adjacent to open space and sensitive habitat areas shall comply with the lighting recommendations found in the Adjacency Standards of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, including the following: Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measiire. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dalted. yerified implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 3 of 23 " Mitigation Measure * ' " Monitoring ' Type ;i Monitoring 1 Department ' Shown on •\ Plans Verified Implementation Remarks o Eliminate lighting in or adjacent to the preserve areas except where essential for roadway, facility use and safety and security purposes. o Use low pressure sodium illumination sources. Do not use low voltage outdoor or trail lighting, spot lights, or bug lights. Shield light sources adjacent to the preserve so that the lighting is focused downward. o Avoid excessive lighting in developments adjacent to linkages through appropriate placement and shielding of light sources. • AR-1 Withiathe Coastal Zone, projects that wouid convert farmland must comply with the agricultural conversion requirements of the Local Coastal Program. Project Planning • AR-2 For any project that would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, a California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model Analysis must be prepared to identify potential impacts to important agricultural lands Project Planning • AQ-1 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Water or dust control agents shall be applied to active grading areas, unpaved surfaces, and dirt stockpiles as necessary to prevent or suppress particulate matter from becoming airborne. All soil to be stockpiled over 30 days shall be protected with a secure tarp or tackifiers to prevent windblown dust. o Spoil or demolition material in each truckload shall be kept low enough to prevent spillage and shall be sufficiently wetted down or covered with a secure tarp to prevent dust generation during transport. o Grading and other soil handling operations shall be suspended when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour. The construction supervisor shall have a hand-held anemometer for evaluating wind speed. o Dirt and debris spilled onto paved surfaces at the project site Project Planning, Building, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initiated and dated. Verified implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 4 of 23 Mitigation Measure- and on the adjacent roadway shall be swept or vacuumed and disposed of at the end of each workday to reduce resuspension of particulate matter caused by vehicle movement. Vegetation disturbed by construction or maintenance activity shall be revegetated upon completion of work in the area, where appropriate. Electrical power shall be provided from commercial power supply wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. Air filters on construction equipment engines shall be maintained in clean condition according to manufacturers' specifications. The construction contractor shall comply with the approved traffic control plan to reduce non-project traffic congestion impacts. Methods to reduce construction interference with existing traffic and the prevention of truck queuing around local sensitive receptors shall be incorporated into this plan. Trucks and equipment shall not idle for more than 15 minutes when not in service. Monitoring^ ' Type Monitoring Department Shovvn on . Plans Verified Implementation Remarks BR-1 Projects with the potential to impact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Coastal Act, the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP), the HMP and other applicable documents including but not limited to those identified in subsection 5,1, Regulatory Context, of the City's "Guidelines for Biological Studies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time Project. Planning BR-2 For projects with the potential to impact sensitive biological species and habitats, as determined by the City, a biology resources technical report (BTR) shall be' prepared. The BTR shall provide the necessary information to establish the current status of biological resources within a project footprint, an analysis of potential project impacts, and mitigation measures that should be implemented to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance. The format and content of the BTR shall be similar to report Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure, >Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and da'ted. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column v«ll be initialed and dated. ( Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 5 of 23 ^1 Mitigation Measure: Monitoring Type •. Monitoring Department- •Shovyn on Plans • Verified Implementation Remarks standards outlined in the City's "Guidelines for Biological Studies," dated May 29, 2008, and as may be amended from time to time. Future project level environmental review that would impact biological resources would be provided to the Wildlife Agencies for review to verify consistency with the City's HMP. BR-3 Implementation of the mitigation measures BR-3a through BR-3d would be required for projects that would impact sensitive HMP habitats and would reduce direct and cumulative impacts to below a level of significance. Note that the descriptions of Type A through F habitats are per Table 11 of the HMP. Avoidance and on-site mitigation are the priority. o BR-3a For impacts to Type A habitats (coastal salt marsh, alkali marsh, freshwater marsh, estuarine, salt pan/mudflats, riparian forest, riparian woodland, riparian scrub, disturbed wetlands, flood channel, fresh water, Engelmann oak woodland, coast live oak woodland) a goal of no net loss of habitat value or function shall be met. Habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation lands shall be determined in consultation with the USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance with the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the California Fish and Game Code. All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetland habitats shall be in the City or MHCP plan area, at a ratio to be determined by the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o Bio-3b Impacts to Type B habitats (beach, southern coastal bluff scrub, maritime succulent scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grass) shall be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource agencies at the time of project permitting. o Bio-3c Impacts to Type C habitats (California gnatcatcher- occupied coastal sage scrub) shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio, or at an appropriate ratio based on habitat quality and quantity as determined in coordination with the applicable resource Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other Information. Page 6 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring '•Type Monitoring' Department- Shown on Plans - . ' Verified • Implementation Remarks agencies at the time of project permitting. BR-3d Impacts to Type D (unoccupied coastal sage scrub, coastal sage/chaparral mix, chaparral), Type E (annual, nonnative grassland), and Type F (disturbed lands, eucalyptus, agricultural lands) habitats are subject to the fee payment if not conserved or mitigated onsite. BR-4 Construction activities, including clearing and grubbing, in or adjacent to habitat occupied associated with sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors, shall be generally prohibited during the bird breeding season (February 15 - September 15). If construction activities cannot be avoided during this time the following measures shall be taken: o BR-4a A qualified biologist shall conduct a focused species gnatcatcher survey in appropriate habitat within and surrounding the project areas. The surveys will consist of three visits, one week apart; the last of these shall be conducted no more than three days prior to construction. o BR-4b Surveys shall also be conducted by a qualified biologist in appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and migratory birds (including, but not limited to, the least Bell's vireo) within three days of construction. o BR-4c If nests of sensitive species, migratory birds, or raptors are located, the project applicant shall receive confirmation from the biologist that construction may proceed or continue and implement any necessary mitigation measures. o BR-4d During the breeding season, construction noise shall be measured regulariy to mairitain a threshold at or below 60 dBA hourly Leq within 300 feet of breeding habitat occupied by listed species. If noise levels superseded the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented. Project Planning BR-5 Where required, protocol-level surveys will be conducted for sensitive plant or wildlife species prior to construction, as determined by the Wildlife Agencies. Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. . Shown on Plans = When mitigatran measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initiated and dated. —f-^ flemarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other infonnation. Page 7 of 23 Mitigation Measure. ^Monitoring -•--•Type'-' Monitoring -1 Departmient ...Shown on" ''^ Plans": Verified - Implementation Remarks BR-6 For projects that would result in the loss of sensitive habitats within the Coastal Zone, mitigation shall be required at ratios consistent with requirements of the HMP, including Standards 7-1 through 7-14 of Section D, and the policies and provisions of the LCP. Project Planning BR-7 Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with the provisions of the HMP and Local Coastal Program. For all projects affecting riparian and wetland habitat, habitat replacement ratios and the specific location of mitigation lands shall be determined in consultation with \he USFWS, USAGE, and CDFG as appropriate in accordance with the requirements of the federal CWA, federal wetland policies, and the California Fish and Game Code. For projects with unavoidable impacts, the City shall demonstrate that viable wetlands can either be: 1) created at a minimum ratio of 1:1 within close proximity of the impact area to replace the wildlife function affected by the project; or, 2) provide proof that wetland creation credits at a minimum ratio of 1:1 have been purchased at a Wildlife Agency approved bank. Consistent with the City's HMP, higher ratios will be required for impacts to high quality wetlands (e.g., occupied by listed or otherwise sensitive species) and for wetlands within the Coastal Zone. For projects where wetland creation will be necessary, construction shal! not be initiated until a viable wetland creation mitigation site with long-term value is identified and the wetland mitigation plan is approved by the appropriate Resource Agencies. The wetland creation shall not require impacts to sensitive wildlife or vegetation communities. All mitigation lands for impacts to riparian and wetland habitats shall be in the City or MHCP plan area as deemed appropriate by the Wildlife Agencies. Project Planning BR-8 As needed, surveys for state and federally listed sensitive plant species shall be conducted to complete a determination of suitable habitat presence prior to issuance of any discretionary permits by the City. Surveys shall be conducted at a time when sensitive plant species would be most observable. Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initiated and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other infomiation. Page 8 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring Typfe'^ ' Monitoring ' Department Shown on Plans"! Verified / Implementation Remarks BR-9 At the project design stage for projects located within key Core Areas and linkages, design measures and restoration efforts shall be required to maintain the viability of the wildlife corridors throughout Carisbad, Project Planning BR-10 Projects shall comply with the Adjacency Standards outlined in Section F., pp. 4-16 to F-24 ofthe HMP. Project Planning, Engineering BR-11 During clearing, grading, and other construction activities, ensure that proper irrigation and stormwater runoff mitigation measures are employed to reduce sediment loads and to prevent contamination from Vesticides, fertilizers, petroleum products, and other toxic substances. Fugitive dust shall also be avoided and minimized through watering and other appropriate measures. Project Planning, Engineering CR-1 The following mitigation measures will be required if a project is located in an undeveloped area that could potentially impact significant cultural deposits, o CR-1 a Preconstruction Requirements - Prior to the start of construction, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted under the supervision of a qualified archaeologist for previously undisturbed areas that have not been surveyed or adequately surveyed (e.g., the area was surveyed with outdated or non- protocol methods). The survey shall be conducted in parallel linear transects spaced no farther than 10 meters apart in undeveloped areas. • CR-1a(1) Cultural resources, if found during the survey, shall be photographed, mapped using a global positioning system (GPS), and recorded on the appropriate Califomia Department of Parks and Recreation forms (DPR Form 523A/B). The forms shall be submitted to the SCIC for the assignment of Primary numbers within 1 week of the survey. • CR-1a(2) Within 1 month of completion ofthe field survey, a draft letter report or technical report shall be submitted to the City for review, whether the survey is negative or positive. A final report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of receipt of the City's comments, with a copy submitted to the SCIC for their Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept, = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. .^Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initiated and dated, iRemarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other infomiation. Page 9 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring Type' ' Monitoring Department Shown on ' Plans ' Venfied Implementation Remarks' files. o CR-lb If the pedestrian survey is positive, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct an updated archival search, if needed, as well as additional detailed field testing. Local Native American groups shal! be contacted for testing of prehistoric cultural resources regarding the project. Where applicable, the City will execute a Pre-Excavation Agreement with the appropriate Native American groups. • CR-lb(l) Prior to the start of field testing, surface artifacts and/or features shall be marked and mapped using a GPS. Testing shall be required if surface artifacts are discovered, and shall include a program of 30-cm-diameter shovel test pits (STPs) to define site boundaries and identify the potential for a substantial subsurface deposit. • CR-1b(2) Based on the results of the STPs, additional measures such as Test Excavation Units or mechanical trenching (for substantial historic sites) would be placed in areas with the potential for a substantial subsurface deposit, as determined by the qualified archeologist. • CR-1b(3) All excavated soils shall be screened through 1/8- inch mesh hardware cloth. On completion of the project the artifact collection, along with copies of the catalogs and the technical report, shall be permanently curated at the San Diego Archaeological Center. An updated site record shall be prepared and submitted to the SCIC. • CR-1b(4) Within 3 months of completion of the fieldwork, a draft technical report including evaluations and recommendations shall be prepared and submitted. The final technical report shall be submitted within 6 weeks of receipt of the City's comments. CR-2 Monitoring Requirements - Construction monitoring will Project be required for projects that involve excavation or grading within undisturbed native soils and could potentially impact subsurface cultural deposits. Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partcular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, fhis column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. » Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for olher information. Planning, Engineering Page 10 of 23 Mitigation Measure ^Monitoring: Type Monitoring, Department ^Shown on^ '' Plans - Verified Implementation Remarks^ CR-2a Prior to the first preconstruction meeting for the project, the Planning Director (PD) shall verify that the requirements for archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring, if applicable, have been noted on the appropriate construction documents. The applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to verify that a records search has been completed and updated, as necessary, and to implement the monitoring program. At the preconstruction meeting, the archaeologist shall submit to the PD a copy of the site/grading plan that identifies areas to be monitored. CR-2b The qualified archaeologist shall be present full-time during grading/ excavation of native soils with the potential to contain buried cultural features or deposits and shall document activity via the Consultant Monitor Record. Monitoring of trenches shall include mainline, laterals, services and all other appurtenances that impact native soils 1 foot deeper than existing as detailed on the plans or in the contract documents. It is the construction manager's responsibility to keep the archaeological monitors up- to-date with current plans. CR-2c In the event of a discovery, the archaeologist, or the Principal Investigator (PI) if the monitor is not qualified as a PI,, shall divert, direct, or temporarily halt ground-disturbing activities in the area of the discovery to allow for preliminary evaluation of potentially significant archaeological resources. The PI shall also immediately notify the construction manager and the PD of such findings at the time of discovery, • CR-2c(1)The significance of the discovered resources shall be assessed by the PI. For significant archaeological resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist. The results of the Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be approved by the City before ground-disturbing activities in the area of discovery shall be allowed to resume. o CR-2d If human remains are discovered, work shall halt Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. I^erified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other infomnation. Page 11 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring Tyf3e' Monitoring Depirtrrient Shown on Plans' Verified Implementation Remarks in that area and procedures set forth in the California Public Resources Code (Sec. 5097.98) and State Health- and Safety Code (Sec. 7050.5) shall be implemented. Construction in that area shall not resume until the remains have been evaluated and conveyed to appropriate descendants or reinterred to the satisfaction of the PI. CR-2e The archaeologist shall notify the PD, in writing, of the end date of monitoring. The archaeologist shall be responsible for ensuring that all cultural remains collected are cleaned, catalogued, and permanently curated with an appropriate institution; that a letter of acceptance from the curation institution has been submitted to the Planning Department; that all artifacts are analyzed to identify function and chronology as they relate to the history of the area; that faunal material is identified as to species; and that specialty studies are completed, as appropriate. CR-2f: Within 3 months following the completion of monitoring, the Draft Results Report (even if negative) and/or evaluation report, if applicable, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the Archaeological Monitoring Program (with appropriate graphics) shall be submitted to the PD for approval. For significant archaeological resources encountered during monitoring, the Research Design and Data Recovery Program shall be included as part of the Draft Results Report, The qualified archaeologist shall be responsible for recording (on the appropriate State of California Department of Park and Recreation forms-DPR 523 A/B) any significant or potentially significant resources encountered during the Archaeological Monitoring Program, and submitting such forms to the SCIC with the Final Results Report. Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. . Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. ^ Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, Ihis column will be initialed and dated. ' Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other infonnation. Page 12 of 23 Mitigation Measure ;Monitoring Monitoring Department- Shown on .-Plans' •-; Verified , - Implementation Remarks CR-3 The following paleontological mitigation measures shall be implemented: o CR-3a: Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall- be retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. o CR-3b A copy of the paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director before construction. If the paleontologist's ^report finds the project will not significantly impact fossil resources, this mitigation measure shall be considered fulfilled and no further effort to comply with this measure shall be required. o CR-3c A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens. o CR-3d The paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process. o CR-3e The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading In the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts. o CR-3f All fossils collected may be donated to a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. o CR-3g Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer. Project Planning, Engineering GS-1 A site-specific geotechnical investigation shall be prepared to address geotechnical considerations related to future housing development facilitated by the Draft Housing Element, specifically project components that would involve excavation, grading, or construction of new structures. The report shall contain all necessary requirements to address any adverse soils conditions Project Planning, Building, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column vwll be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented. Ihis column wiil be initiated and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 13 of 23 : ' Mitigation Measui:e ' / ',7 Monitoring ; ' -'-Type - :i Monitoring " ^Department Shown on ; '-''Plans- ' ' •> Verified Implementation:-' Remarks ., that may be encountered in final design of a project. The applicant shall be required to adhere to all such requirements. The report shal! include a discussion of site-specific geology, soils, and foundational issues; a seismic hazards analysis to determine the potential for strong ground acceleration and ground shaking; potential groundwater issues; and structural design recommendations. The soil engineer and engineering geologist shall review the grading plans for adequate incorporation of recommended measures prior to finalization. • GS-2 All future projects shall be designed and constructed in conformance to the Uniform Building Code, current seismic design specifications of the Structural Engineering Association of California, and other regulatory requirements. Project Planning, Buifding, Engineering • GS-3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit, and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. Project Planning, Engineering, Public Works • GS-4 All applicable federal, state and local permits regarding drainage shall be obtained. Such permits include the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Project Engineering • GS-5 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Erosion control measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code § 15.16 et.seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on plans included in the SWPPP, Project Planning, Engineering, Public Works Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. qj ' Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. — Verified implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. } Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 14 of 23 Mitigation Measure^ Monitoring ' ' - Type Monitoring Department i Shown on -, Plans' <• ^: Verified , Implementation : Remarks: All grading permits issued authorizing grading during the rainy season (October 1 of any year to April 30'^ of the following year), shall require the installation of all erosion and sedimentation control protective measures in accordance with city standards. Erosion and runoff control measures shall be designed and bonded prior to approval of grading permits by the City. All permanent slopes shall be planted with erosion control vegetation, drained and properly maintained to reduce erosion within 30 days of completion of grading. Erosion control and drainage devices shall be installed in compliance with the requirements of the City. All erosion and sedimentation control protective measures shall be maintained in good working order through out the duration of the rainy season unless it can be demonstrated to the City Engineer that their removal at an eariier date will not result in any unnecessary erosion of or sedimentation on public or private properties. HM-1 Prior to approval of discretionary permits for projects within (1) an existing or former agricultural area, or (2) an area believed to have contaminated soils due to historic use, handling, or storage of hazardous materials, a detailed soils testing and analysis report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer, and submitted to the City and the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) for approval. This report shall evaluate the potential for soil contamination due to historic use, handling, or storage of chemicals and materials restricted by the DEH. The report shall also identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any significant public health impacts if hazardous chemicals are detected at concentrations in the soil which would have a significantly adverse effect on human health. Project Planning, Engineering HM-2 If use of agricultural chemicals within an existing agricultural operation has the potential to adversely impact a proposed residential development on an adjacent parcel, mitigation measures including but not limited to physical barriers and/or Project Planning, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mifigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. /erified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column wiil be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 15 of 23 Mitigation Measure,. ' \% - Monitoring./ -Type - Monitoring . Department Shown on Plans ' Verified Implementation Remarks separation between the uses shall be considered. • HM-3 Prior to approval of any permits for uses such as emergency shelters and farm worker housing within the City's industrial zones, the applicant shall obtain clearances from federal, state, and local agencies as necessary to ensure such uses are not exposed to significant hazards due to the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials or through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Project Planning, Building • HM-4 All trash and debris within project sites shall be disposed of off-site in accordance with current, local, state, and federal disposal regulations. Any buried trash/debris encountered shall be evaluated by an experienced environmental consultant prior to removal. Project Planning, Building, Engineering • HM-5 Before beginning demolition or renovation activities, the interior of individual onsite structures shall be visually inspected. Should hazardous materials be encountered, the materials shall be tested and properiy disposed of offsite in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Any stained soils or surfaces underneath the removed materials shall be sampled. Results of the sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required. Project Planning, Building • HM-6 Before beginning any remedial or demolition work, building owners shall contract with a certified professional to conduct an asbestos survey, consistent with National Emission Standards for hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standards to determine the presence of asbestos containing materials. Demolition of or within existing buildings on individual parcels onsite must comply with State law, which requires a certified contractor where there is asbestos-related work involving 100 square feet or more or such materials to ensure that certain procedures regarding the removal of asbestos are followed. Project Planning, Building • HM-7 Before the issuance of a grading permit, all miscellaneous debris (i.e,, wood, concrete, storage drums, and Project Planning, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. \j - Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. (jJ > Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. •• Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for olher information. Page 16 of 23 • Mitigation Measure-^'-.- ' , \ 7 ^ Monitoring ' ' •^Type . Monitoring ' Department . Shown on • Plans ' • Verified;-, , Implementations; Remarks automobiles) shall be removed offsite and properiy disposed of at an approved landfill facility. Once removed, a visual inspection of the areas beneath the removed materials shall be performed. Any stained soils observed underneath the removed materials shall be sampled. Results of the sampling would indicate the appropriate level of remediation efforts that may be required. • HM-8 If unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction on individual properties that are believed to involve hazardous waste/materials, the contractor shall: o Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, removing workers and the public from the area; o Notify the project-engineer of the City of Carisbad; o Secure the areas as directed by the project engineer, and; o Notify the City's hazardous waste/materials coordinator. Project Planning, Building, Engineering, Public Works • HM-9 When applications are submitted to the City of Carisbad Planning Department to redesignate the land use of a property or propose development or redevelopment, disclosure of inclusion on the Cortese List (Government Code Section 65962.5) shall be required. If an application is for property included on the Cortese List, the applicant shall provide evidence that describes the required remediation process, through text and graphics, and (1) demonstrates compliance is occurring or has occurred with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations; (2) describes all necessary actions and approvals to remediate the property and includes evidence of any approvals so far obtained; (3) describes the estimated remediation timeframe, current status, and any monitoring required during and following remediation; (4) discusses any restrictions on use of the property upon reclamation completion; (5) includes all other required information as deemed necessary by fhe City, DEH, and other agencies having regulatory authority with regards to remediation of the site. Project i Planning • WQ-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carisbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Project Engineering, Public Works Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure, ^hown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has t>een implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. 17 of 23 Mitigation Measure ' ~, Monitoring ' ' Type • - Monitoring - DepartiTient Shown on . Plans' Verified' Implementation Remarks (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants wilt be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit (Order No. 99-08, NPDES CAS000002), and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit (Order R9-2007- 0001, NPDES CAS0108758). The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the BMP erosion control measures identified below on a weekly basis in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements (Municipal Code Section 15,16. et seq.). The locations of all erosion control devices shall be noted on the grading^plans. BMPs that shall be installed include, but are not limited to, the following: o Silt fence, fiber rolls, or gravel bag berms o Check dams o Street sweeping and vacuuming o Storm drain inlet protection o Stabilized construction entrance/exit o Hydroseed, soil binders, or straw mulch o Containment of material delivery and storage areas o Stockpile management o Spill prevention and control o Waste management for solid, liquid, hazardous, and sanitary waste, and contaminated soil o Concrete waste management WQ-2a. Prior to issuance of grading permits or approvals for any public or private right-of-way improvements or site development plans, the developer shall prepare and submit for review and approval by the City of Carisbad City Engineer, a stormwater management plan that demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad SUSMP and Stormwater Management Program (SWMP). Approval of such plans shall be subject to a determination by the Carlsbad City Engineer that the proposed project has incorporated post- development water quality pollution control site design BMPs, source control BMPs, and numerically-sized treatment control BMPs such as those identified below into the project design to the Project, ongoing Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. ^ Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partteular mitigation measure. J Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will tse initialed and dated. ^Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been imptemented, this column will be initiated and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 18 of 23 Mitigation Measure iMonitoring ^ Type Monitoring* Department^ Shown on ' Plans ' ~ Verified \ Implementation Remarks maximum extent practicable: o street sweeping o inlet basin labeling o Filtering bioretention units o Pervious pavement o Vegetated swales o Detention/infiltration basins o Covered trash enclosures WQ-2b. Projects shall be required to show compliance with the applicable hydromodification provisions of Order R9-2007-0001 and to show they are designed so that postproject runoff flow rates and directions do not exceed pre-project runoff flow rates and directions for applicable design storms. Projects shall incorporate LID design techniques to reduce the amount of runoff by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site by preserving natural open spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, and promoting infiltration and evapotranspiration of runoff before runoff leaves the site. LID techniques include, but are not limited to: o Vegetated buffer strips o Vegetated bio swales o Rain gardens o Porous pavements o Bioretention areas o Vegetated roofs o Stormwater planter boxes o Infiltration trenches o Dry wells Project, ongoing Engineering WQ-3 In conjunction with the sale, rental or lease of a residence or business property, all prospective owners and tenants shall be notified in writing through Ciovenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that they shall: o Establish or work with established disposal programs for the removal and proper disposal of toxic and hazardous waste Project, ongoing Planning, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been imptemented. this column will be initiated and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 19 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring - Type Monitoring - Departmerit: Shown on Plans Verified Implementation Remarks products. Not discharge or cause to be discharged any toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds, such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives and other such fluids, into any public or private street or into any storm drain or storm drain conveyance. Use and/or dispose of all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, and other such chemical treatments in accordance with federal. State, County, and City requirements as prescribed on their respective containers. Employ BMPs to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and/or surface improvements. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding CC&Rs. Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the California Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. WQ-4 As required by the City Engineer, a hydrology report to assess impacts relating to drainage and stormwater runoff shall be prepared. The report shall demonstrate compliance with current applicable hydromodification standards and demonstrate adequate capacity in downstream storm drain facilities, or shall demonstrate no increase in runoff peak flows through onsite detention. Project Engineering WQ-5 Proposed development shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 21.110, Floodplain Management Regulations, ofthe Zoning Ordinance. This shall include preparation of all applicable studies and reports, including those required by other agencies, such as FEMA,as directed by the City Engineer. Project Planning, Engineering WQ-6 Proposed development shall be subject to compliance with mitigation measures GS-1 and GS-2, which require Project Planning, Engineering, Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. _ Monitoring Dept = Department or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partteular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. > Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other informalion. Page 20 of 23 Mitigation Measure ' - - ^ - Monitoring Type ' ' . Monitoring /. Department, Shown on ^ Plans - ••" Verified Implementation ' - Remarks preparation of site-specific geotechnical investigations and compliance with Uniform Building Code and other structural regulations. Building • N-1 A noise study shall be submitted with all discretionary applications for residential projects of five or more dwelling units located within or 500-feet beyond the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour lines as shown on Map 2: Future Noise Contour Map in the Noise Element of the General Plan. This noise study shall identify design features such as noise attenuation walls and mechanical building ventilation necessary to enforce the City policy that 60 dBA CNEL is the exterior noise level (65 dBA if subject to noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport) and 45 dBA CNEL is the interior noise level to which all residential units shall be mitigated. Project Planning • N-2 To minimize noise impacts, project design techniques shall be used during any discretionary review of a residential or other noise sensitive project to shield noise sensitive areas from a noise source. This can be done, for example, by increasing the distance between the noise source and the receiver; placing non-noise sensitive uses such as parking areas, maintenance facilities, and utility areas between the source and the receiver; using non- sensitive structures, such as a garage, to shield noise sensitive areas; and, orienting buildings to shield outdoor spaces from a noise source. Project Planning • N-3 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the policies of the City of Carisbad General Plan Noise Element and City of Cadsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. Projisct ~ Planning • N-4 As applicable, future residential development shall comply with the following requirements: o Heavy equipment shall be repaired at sites as far as practical from nearby residences and occupied sensitive habitats. Project Planning, Building, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. !Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. ;J'erified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been imptemented, this column will be initialed and dated, ^marks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 21 of 23 Mitigation Measure Monitoring; • Type' •Monitoring Department- Shown on • Plans ^ Verified Implementation-Remarks Construction equipment, including vehicles, generators, and compressors, shall be maintained in proper operating condition and shall be equipped with manufacturers* standard noise control devices or better (e.g., mufflers, acoustical lagging, and/or engine enclosures). The City's noise ordinance (Municipal Code Section 8,48,010) limits the hours of construction to between 7 a.m. and sunset on weekdays and 8 a.m. to sunset on Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and holidays. The City Manager may grant an exception for night work during the night, Sundays, and holidays if the construction is in a nonresidential zone and there are no inhabited dwellings within 1,000 feet of the construction site. Electrical power shall be provided from commercial power supply, wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators. Staging areas for construction equipment shall be located as far as practicable from residences and sensitive habitats. Operating equipment shall be designed to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal noise regulations. Noise attenuation walls/buffers shall be used to shield sensitive noise receptors from construction-generated noise greater than 75 dBA within 50 feet of sensitive receptors. If lighted traffic control devices are to be located within 500 feet of residences, the devices shall be powered by batteries, solar power, or similar sources, and not by an internal combustion engine. N-5 Refer to Mitigation Measure Biological Resources BR-4, which will reduce potential construction noise impacts to sensitive bird species, migratory birds, or raptors to below a level of significance. Project Planning N-6 Future development shall comply with the following requirements as applicable: o Prior to the recordation of the first final (tract/parcei) map or Project Planning, Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dited. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initiated and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 22 of 23 , Mitigation Measure , 1; ''' Monitoring , ' Type Monitoring .Department Shown on .Plans • Verified.. Implementation Remarks the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this property Is subject to overflight, sight and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Palomar Airport, In a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director anci the City Attorney (see Noise Form #2 on file in the Planning Department). o Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Planning Department), 1 • PS-1 Prior to approval of the first tract map or building permit in Zone 25, a Local Facility Management Plan shall be prepared and adopted by the City Council for Zone 25. Consistent with the Carisbad Growth Management Plan and its performance standards for public facilities, this plan shall show how and when the foiiowing facilities wiil be provided: Sewer systems, water, drainage, circulation, fire facilities, schools, libraries, city administrative facilities, parks and open space. This plan shall also include an inventory of present and future requirements for each public facility; a phasing schedule establishing the timing for provision of each facility, and a financing plan for funding the necessary facilities. Project Planning • T-1 Require new development to provide a traffic analysis report, as applicable, according to City standards and as may be required by the City Engineer. This report shall evaluate project specific traffic impacts and identify mitigation for impacts. Project Planning, Engineering • T-2 Require new development to comply with the adopted (September 23, 1986) Growth Management performance standards for circulation facilities, which ensures future development will not exceed the traffic load and capacity of the City's street system and intersections. Project Planning, Engineering • T-3 Developers shall make applicable fair share Project Planning, Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept, = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partteular mitigation measure. •Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. "Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been imptemented. this column will be initiated and dated. "Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. Page 23 of 23 . Mitigation Measure - • . . " r , . Monitoring - Type Monitoring Departrfient - Shown on . ' Plans Verified Ihiplementation Remarks contributions through the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program toward traffic improvements, to the satisfaction of the Carisbad Engineering Department, Engineering • T-4 For projects that may potentially impact the circulation networks of adjacent jurisdictions, the City shall coordinate the project's environmental review with these jurisdictions to determine the need for any mitigation of the potential impacts. Project Planning, Engineering • T-5 Require new development to provide pedestrian and bicycle linkages, when feasible, which connect to nearby community centers, commercial developments, parks, schools, points of interest, major transportation corridors and the Cadsbad Trail System. Project Planning, Engirieering, Recreation • T-6 For development proposed adjacent to or near the North County Transit District railroad right of way, traffic analysis reports required by mitigation measure T-1 shall address any traffic increase impacts over affected rail crossings and associated mitigation measures, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Project Planning, Engineering • USS-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carisbad City Engineer, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), General Construction Stormwater Permit, and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit. The applicant shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the Best Management Plan (BMP) erosion control measures in accordance with the City's grading and erosion control requirements. Project Engineering Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a partteular mitigation measure. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and d^ted. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has laeen implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information. i?9 0 3 73 Notice of Determination To: S , Office ofPlanning and Research From: CITY OF CARLSBAD P.O. Box 3044 Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 rs" n fl ^ 1635 Faraday Avenue D.vlfBut.i.ReLrLrCleS^r^ ^^^^^ 3 SD County Clerk ^ ''^ (760)602-4600 Attn: Linda Kesina DEC 24 2009 Mail Stop A-33 ay Keslao 1600 Pacific Highway DEPUTY San Diego, CA 92101 Project No: GPA 03-02 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public- Resources Code. 2005 - 2010 Housing Element Project Title City of Carlsbad, Scott Donnell (760)602-4618 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number All areas within the city limits of Carlsbad in San Diego County Project Locations (include County) Name of Applicant: City of Carlsbad Applicant's Address: 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Applicant's Telephone Number: (760) 602-4618 Project Description: Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approval of a General Plan Amendment to adopt the update of the Housing Element for the 2005-2010 housing cycle as required by the Califomia Goyemment Code and which affects properties throughout the city. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on December 22,2009, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project, 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan ^as adopted for this project. 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to th&JGeneral Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ^ f0(^AiR) m TMR OFFICE or J'J^ 'v- \t\^^io'i ^ONWPiSJi^ ^ Date Date received for filing at OPR: ^'°sted J?.KJJJte_j^g^'^^^^^^ •"^eiurned to agency on , ' Deputy LrKgerr—— Revised December 2004 EXHIBIT 5 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6932 ^ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN 4 LAND USE ELEMENT TO CREATE A NEW RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION AND RECOMMENDING 5 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION 6 ELEMENT, AND ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING ON VARIOUS 7 PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE BARRIO, WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE RAILROAD AND WEST OF INTERSTATE-5 IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO 11 CASE NO: GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 9 10 12 WHEREAS, the City Planner , has filed a verified application for a General Plan 13 Amendment and Zone Change regarding various properties throughout the Barrio, which are 14 owned by various individuals and generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak 15 Ave,, east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5 in Carlsbad, Califomia; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan Amendment as shown on Exhibits "GPA 12-03A" dated December 5, 2012, and "GPA 12- 03B" dated December 5, 2012, attached hereto and on file in the Carlsbad Planning Division, HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02, as provided in Govemment Code Section 65350 et, seq, and Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as set forth in the draft City Council Ordinance, EXHIBIT "X" dated December 5, 2012, and attached hereto HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02; and 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 33 9 10 12 13 14 16 17 18 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on December 5, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - 11 BARRIO - GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02., based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings; California Environmental Quality Act 1. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are substantially consistent with the 1^ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element, which was previously adopted on December 22, 2009. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not result in any new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element. 19 3. None of the circumstances requiring a subsequent EIR/Mitigated Negative Declaration/Negative Declaration or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines 20 Sections 15162 or 15163 exist. 21 General Plan Amendment 22 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated December 5, 2^ 2012 including, but not limited to the following: 24 a. That the proposed General Plan Land Use designation changes are substantially 2^ consistent with and achieve the objectives of Housing Element Program 2.1 for the Barrio, which identifies increases to allowed residential densities throughout 2^ the Barrio in order to accommodate a portion of the city's share of the 2005- 2010 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). 27 PC RESO NO. 6932 -2- ^ The proposed R-30 (Residential 23-30 du/ac) land use designation does not 2 conflict with any provision of the General Plan because application of said designation to any property will only occur when it will not result in a conflict 2 with Growth Management or any other policy of the General Plan. 4 c. The proposed land use designations in the Barrio, which include R-30 (23-30 du/ac), RMH (8-15 du/ac), GC (General Commercial), OS (Open Space) and U 5 (Public Utilities) are consistent with the Land Use Element because they are compatible with existing uses and densities in the Barrio and surrounding areas, 6 will bring existing non-conforming residential uses into conformity with density limits, and are compatible with the Growth Management dwelling unit 7 limitations. ^ Zone Change 9 5. That the proposed Zone Changes are consistent with the goals and policies of the various YQ elements ofthe General Plan and will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as mandated by Califomia state law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land 11 Use Element, in that the proposed zone classifications implement the proposed land use designations and said land use designations are consistent with the various 12 elements of the General Plan, as found above. 13 6. That the Zone Change is consistent with the public convenience, necessity, and general welfare, and is consistent with sound planning principles in that the proposed land use 14 designations and implementing zone classifications are compatible with existing uses and densities in the Barrio and surrounding areas, will bring existing non- ^ ^ conforming residential uses into conformity with density limits, are compatible with the Growth Management dwelling unit limitations, and provide more opportunities for housing affordable to lower and moderate income households. Conditions: 17 18 1. The City of Carlsbad shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the 2005-2010 19 Housing Element (GPA 03-02) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PC RESO NO. 6932 28 1^ 1 2 3 4 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Black, L'Heureux, Nygaard, and 5 Siekmann 13 14 15 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califomia, held on December 5, 2012, by the following vote, to wit: 6 NOES: Commissioners Arnold 7 ABSENT: Commissioner Scully 8 ABSTAIN: 9 10 ^ ^ MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson 12 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ^6 DON NEU City Planner 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESONO, 6932 I3CP Land Use Element EXHIBIT GPA12-03A mi performance standards, provide a detailed financing mechanism to ensure public facilities can be provided, are reviewed by City staff for accuracy, and are approved by the City Council after a public hearing. Individual Projects - must comply with the provisions of the Local Facilities Management Plans, as well as implement provisions of the Citywide plan. The third phase of the program includes the review of individual projects to ensure compliance with all performance standards prior to the approval of any development permits. The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, adopted in 1986, made an ESTIMATE of the number of dwelling units that could be built as a result of the application of the density ranges in the Land Use Element to individual projects. For the entire City at buildout, the ESTIMATE was 54,600 dwelling units or an ESTIMATED population of 135,000. The purpose of this estimate was to provide an approximate ultimate number of future dwelling units and population citywide and for each quadrant for facility planning purposes. The City's Capital Improvement Plan, Growth Management Plan, and public facilities plans are all based on this estimate. To ensure that all necessary public facilities will be available concurrent with the need to serve new development, it was necessary to set a limit on the number of future residential dwelling units which can be constructed in the City based on the estimate. The City determined the maximum number of future dwelling units which could be constructed in the four quadrants along El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. The maximum number of future dwelling units which may be constructed or approved in each quadrant after November 4, 1986, is as follows: Northwest Quadrant 5,844; Northeast Quadrant 6,166; Southwest Quadrant 10,667; Southwest Quadrant 10,801. (Map 1: Maximum Future Dwelling Units by Quadrant). When the Growth Management Program was ratified by Carlsbad citizens through an initiative, the voters mandated that the City not approve any General Plan amendment, zone change, tentative subdivision map or other discretionary approval which could result in future residential development above the limit in any quadrant. This mandate will remain in effect unless changed by a majority vote of the Carlsbad electorate. 0. LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS The land use classifications described herein and shown graphically on the Land Use Map (Map 2: General Plan Land Use Map) represent existing and expected land uses in the City at some future period of time, at total buildout of the City. The purpose of the Land Use Map is to serve as a diagram to graphically display the type, arrangement and relation of land uses planned in the City. It is not intended to be used to legally define or measure parcels of land. Table 1: Quantitative Breakdown of Land Use Map is a quantitative breakdown of the Land Use Map in approximate gross acres. Charts 1 and 2 provide a more visual representation of the number of acres designated for each land use category. The following are the land use classifications represented on the Land Use Map: RESIDENTIAL Low Density (RL) (0-1.5 dwelling units per acre) Low-Medium Density (RLM) (0-4 dwelling units per acre) Medium Density (RM) (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Medium-High Density (RMH) (8-15 dwelling units per acre) High Density (RH) (15-23 dwelling units per acre) R-30 (Residential 23-30 dwelling units per acre) COMMUNITY FACILITIES (CF) COMMERCIAL Local Shopping Center (L) General Commercial (GC) Regional Commercial (R) Tourist/Recreation Commercial (TR) The Village (V) Office and Related Commercial (O) PLANNED INDUSTRIAL (PI) GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES (G) PUBLIC UTILITIES (U) Amended January 24, 2012 Page 5 131 Land Use Element Mi SCHOOLS Elementary Junior High High School Continuation Private OPEN SPACE & COMMUNITY PARKS (OS) TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (TC) UNPLANNED AREAS (UA) COMBINATION DISTRICT Within each land use designation, there exists the potential for certain unique land uses for which there are no specific designations. Such uses may include, but are not limited to churches, or hospitals. These and other unique types of uses cannot be automatically placed within any "A City which provides for a variety of housing types and density ranges to meet the diverse economic and social requirements of residents..." particular land use classification and must be reviewed on an individual site basis through the conditional use permit process (Title 21, Chapter 21.42, Carlsbad Municipal Code). Discussed below are descriptions of the land use classifications including population density and building intensity permitted within each classification. 1. RESIDENTIAL Density is the unit of measure used to compare and describe the intensity of residential land use. Different categories of density constitute policy statements used in establishing the public facility requirements for each area. Density allocations are not intended to specifically identify building types but rather intensity of use. The City's goals regarding the need for specific types of residential housing are contained in the Housing Element. That element should be referred to for more detailed infonnation regarding the housing needs of the community and an integrated set of goals, policies and programs to assist the community in meeting those needs. ^ive-Six ranges of residential density, as shown below, have been incorporated into the General Plan. Each of these categories is implemented by one or more zone classifications that contains specific site development standards. The City also has a specific mobilehome park zoning classification although individual mobilehomes are permitted in any residential land use classification. Notwithstanding the density provisions and intent of each residential land use designation, as specified below, a one-family dwelling shall be permitted on any legal lot that existed as of October 28, 2004, and which is designated and zoned for residential use. Any proposal to subdivide land or construct more than one dwelling shall be subject to the density and intent of the underlying residential land use designation. a. Low Density IRL): Low density residential areas intended to be developed with one- family dwellings on parcels one-half acre or larger at a density between 0 to 1.5 units per acre. On sites containing sensitive biological resource, as identified in the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, development other than one-family dwellings may be approved with a planned development permit, subject to the density range of this designation. b. Low-Medium Densitv (RLM^: Low-medium density residential areas intended to be developed with one-family dwellings at a density between 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre. On sites containing sensitive biological resources, as identified in the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan, development other than one-family dwellings may be approved with a planned development permit, subject to the density range of this designation. 0. Medium-Densitv (RM): Medium density residential areas intended to be developed with one-family dwellings, two-family dwellings and multiple-family dwellings at a density between 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. Amended January 24, 2012 Page 9 Land Use Element Hi d. Medium-High Densitv (RMH): Medium- high density residential areas intended to be developed with two-family dwellings and multiple- family dwellings, as well as one-family dwellings (developed as two or more detached units on one lot) at a density between 8 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Development of one-family dwellings on individual lots may be approved with a planned development permit, subject to the density range of this designation. e. High Densitv (RH): High-density residential areas intended to be developed with two- family and multiple-family dwellings, as well as one-family dwellings (developed as two or more detached units on one lot) at a density between 15 to 23 dwelling units per acre. f. R-30 (Residential 23-30 dwelling units per acre): High-density residential areas intended to be developed with two-familv and multiple- family dwellings, as well as one-family dwellings (developed as two or more detached units on one lot) at a densitv between 23 to 30 dwelling units per acre. Certain areas of the City designated for planned communities may have several residential desig- nations or combinations of residential designa- tions. To accommodate good design and plan- ning, as well as environmental and topographical factors, planned communities shall be controlled by a master plan. As part of the City's Growth Management Plan, a dwelling unit limitation was established for each quadrant of the City. The City shall not approve any general plan amendment, zone change, tentatiye subdivision map or other discretionary approval for a development that could result in the development above the limit in any quadrant. To ensure that development does not exceed the limit, the following growth management control points (GMCP) in Table 2 are established for the Land Use Element density ranges. The City shall not approve any residential development at a density that exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range without making the following findings: a. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted. b. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit. c. All necessary public facilities required by the City's Growth Management Program will be constructed, or are guaranteed to be constructed, concurrently with the need for them created by this development and in compliance with the adopted City standards. Table 2: ALLOWED DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE General Plan Land Use Designation Minimum GMCP RHNA Base* Maximum RL 0 1.0 1.0 1.5 RLIVI 0 3.2 3.2 4.0 RM 4 6.0 6.0 8.0 RIVIH 8 12.0 12.0 15.0 RH 15 19.0 20.0 23.0 R-30 23 25.0 25.0 30.0 RHNA Base, discussed below, does not apply to RH designated properties in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. In the Beach Area Overlay Zone, the minimum and GMCP densities shall apply. The residential land use designations indicate MAXIMUM development unit yields. To meet the General Plan goals and objectives, including, but not limited to population goals and environmental considerations, the ACTUAL yield may be less than maximum potentials, but not less than the minimum density of the underlying land use designation; except, density may be approved below the minimum of the density range in the following circumstances: a. When a single, one-family dwelling is constructed on a legal lot that existed as of October 28, 2004. b. When a single, one-family dwelling is constructed on a lot that was created by consolidating two legal nonconforming lots into one lot (this only applies to lots that are nonconforming in lot area). 0. When a legal lot is developed with one or more residential units that existed as of October 28, 2004; provided, the existing units are to remain and it is not feasible to construct the number of additional units Page 14 Amended January 24, 2012 t2n (0 CD I CM E CO o c 0) £ 0 LU O) c o X S: ^ = E jQ 0 •£Q X Lil CO cp CM t |40 Exhibit GPA 12-03B Related Case File No(s): ZC 12-02 General Plan Land Use Designation Changes APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation 2040310100 RMH R-30 2040930800 RMH OS 2041720300 RM RMH 2040310200 RMH R-30 2040930900 RMH OS 2041720400 RM RMH 2040310300 RMH R-30 2041100100 RMH R-30 2041720500 RM RMH 2040310400 RMH R-30 2041100200 RMH R-30 2041720600 RM RMH 2040310500 RMH R-30 2041100300 RMH R-30 2041720700 RM RMH 2040310600 RMH R-30 2041100900 RMH R-30 2041720800 RM RMH 2040310900 RMH R-30 2041101000 RMH U 2041720900 RM RMH 2040311000 RMH R-30 2041101200 RMH R-30 2041721000 RM RMH 2040311100 RMH R-30 2041101900 RMH R-30 2041721100 RM RMH 2040311400 RMH R-30 2041103000 RMH R-30 2041721200 RM RMH 2040311700 RMH R-30 2041103100 RH R-30 2041721300 RM RMH 2040311800 RMH R-30 2041103200 RMH R-30 2041721400 RM RMH 2040311900 RMH R-30 2041103300 RMH R-30 2041721500 RM RMH 2040312000 RMH R-30 2041103500 RMH R-30 2041721800 RM RMH 2040312100 RMH R-30 2041103600 RMH R-30 2041721900 RM RMH 2040320100 RMH R-30 2041103700 RMH R-30 2041722000 RM RMH 2040321000 RMH R-30 2041110100 RMH R-30 2041722100 RM RMH 2040321200 RMH R-30 2041110200 RMH R-30 2041722200 RM RMH 2040700900 RMH/0 R-30 2041110300 RMH R-30 2041722300 RM RMH 2040701000 RMH/0 R-30 2041110400 RMH R-30 2041722400 RM RMH 2040701100 RMH/0 R-30 2041110500 RMH R-30 2041722500 RM RMH 2040701500 RMH/0 R-30 2041110600 RMH R-30 2041722600 RM RMH 2040701600 RMH/0 R-30 2041110900 RMH R-30 2041722700 RM RMH 2040701700 RMH/0 R-30 2041111000 RMH R-30 2041722800 RM RMH 2040701800 RMH/0 R-30 2041111100 RMH R-30 2041722900 RM RMH 2040701900 RMH/0 R-30 2041111200 RMH R-30 2041723000 RM RMH 2040702700 RMH/0 R-30 2041111300 RMH R-30 2041723100 RM RMH 2040840100 RMH R-30 2041111400 RMH R-30 2041723200 RM RMH 2040840200 RMH R-30 2041111500 RMH R-30 2041723300 RM RMH 2040840300 RMH R-30 2041111600 RMH R-30 2041723400 RM RMH 2040840400 RMH R-30 2041111700 RMH R-30 2041730100 RM RMH 2040840500 RMH R-30 2041111800 RMH R-30 2041730200 RM RMH 2040840600 RMH R-30 2041111900 RMH R-30 2041730300 RM RMH 2040840700 RMH R-30 2041112000 RH R-30 2041730400 RM RMH 2040840800 RMH R-30 2041600100 RMH/0 R-30 2041730500 RM RMH 2040910100 C RMH 2041600200 RMH/0 R-30 2041730600 RM RMH 2040910200 C RMH 2041600300 RMH/0 R-30 2041730700 RM RMH 2040910300 RMH/0 RMH 2041600400 RMH/0 R-30 2041730800 RM RMH 2040910400 RMH/0 RMH 2041600800 RMH/0 R-30 2041730900 RM RMH 2040910500 RMH/0 RMH 2041600900 RMH/0 R-30 2041910100 RMH R-30 2040910600 RMH/0 RMH 2041601600 RMH R-30 2041910200 RMH R-30 2040910700 RMH/0 RMH 2041601800 RMH/0 R-30 2041910300 RMH R-30 2040910800 RMH/0 RMH 2041710100 RM RMH 2041910400 RMH R-30 2040910900 RMH/0 RMH 2041710200 RM RMH 2041910500 RMH R-30 2040911000 RMH/0 RMH 2041710300 RM RMH 2041910700 RMH R-30 2040911100 RMH/0 RMH 2041710400 RM RMH 2041910800 RMH R-30 2040911200 RMH/0 RMH 2041710900 RM RMH 2041910900 RMH R-30 2040911300 RMH/0 RMH 2041711000 RM RMH 2041912000 RMH R-30 2040920100 C GC 2041711100 RM RMH 2041912100 RMH R-30 2040920200 C GC 2041711400 RM RMH 2041912200 RMH R-30 2040920300 RMH/0 RMH 2041711500 RM RMH 2041920500 RM R-30 2040920400 RMH/0 RMH 2041711600 RM RMH 2041920600 RM R-30 2040920500 RMH/0 RMH 2041711700 RM RMH 2041920700 RM R-30 2040920600 RMH/0 RMH 2041711800 RM RMH 2041920800 RM R-30 2040922400 RMH/0 RMH 2041711900 RM RMH 2041920900 RM R-30 2040922500 RMH/0 RMH 2041712000 RM RMH 2041921000 RM R-30 2040922600 RMH/0 RMH 2041712100 RM RMH 2041921100 RM R-30 2040930200 RMH OS 2041712300 RM RMH 2041921200 RM R-30 2040930300 OS OS 2041712600 RM RMH 2042100300 RM RMH 2040930400 OS OS 2041720100 RM RMH 2042100400 RM RMH 2040930500 OS OS 2041720200 RM RMH 2042100500 RM RMH Exhibit GPA 12-03B [Related Case File No(s): ZC 12-02 |General Plan Land Use Designation Changes Page 2 of 2 APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation 2042100600 RM RMH 2042100700 RM RMH 2042100800 RM RMH 2042100900 RM RMH 2042101000 RM RMH 2042101100 RM RMH 2042101200 RM RMH 2042101300 RM RMH 2042101400 RM RMH 2042101500 RM RMH 2042102200 RM RMH 2042102301 RM RMH 2042102302 RM RMH 2042102401 RM RMH 2042102402 RM RMH 2042102501 RM RMH 2042102502 RM RMH 2042102601 RM RMH 2042102602 RM RMH 2042102701 RM ' RMH 2042102702 RM RMH 2042102801 RM RMH 2042102802 RM RMH 2042102901 RM RMH 2042102902 RM RMH 2042103001 RM RMH 2042103002 RM RMH 2042103101 RM RMH 2042103102 RM RMH 2042103201 RM RMH 2042103202 RM RMH 2042103301 RM RMH 2042103302 RM RMH 2042103400 RM RMH 2042103500 RM RMH 2042103601 RM RMH 2042103602 RM RMH 2042103701 RM RMH 2042103702 RM RMH 2042103801 RM RMH 2042103802 RM RMH 2042103901 RM RMH 2042103902 RM RMH 2042104101 RM RMH 2042104102 RM RMH 2042104200 RM RMH 2042104300 RM RMH 2042104400 RM RMH 2042104501 RM RMH 2042104502 RM RMH 2042104700 RM RMH 2042105001 RM RMH 2042105002 RM RMH 2042105003 RM RMH 2042105004 RM RMH APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation 16 17 18 19 EXHIBIT 6 ^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6933 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN 4 LAND USE ELEMENT, THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM . AND ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING ON VARIOUS PROPERTIES 6 GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF TAMARACK AVE., SOUTH OF OAK AVE., EAST OF THE RAILROAD AND 7 WEST OF INTERSTATE-5 IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. ^ CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - 9 BARRIO CASE NO: GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 10 WHEREAS, Califomia State law requires that the Local Coastal Program, j2 General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in conformance; and 13 WHEREAS, the City Planner, has filed a verified application for a General Plan 14 Amendment, Zone Change, Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Local Coastal Program 1^ Amendment regarding various properties throughout the Barrio, which are owned by various individuals and generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5 in Carlsbad, Califomia; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a General Plan 20 Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibits GPA 12-04 dated 21 December 5, 2012, LCPA 12-03 (Land Use) dated December 5, 2012 and LCPA 12-03 22 (Zoning) dated December 5, 2012, attached hereto and on file in the Carlsbad Planning Division, HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 24 12-02/LCPA 12-03, as provided in Govemment Code Section 65350 et. seq.. Chapter 21.52 of 25 the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and Public Resources Code Section 30514 and Section 13551 of 26 2y Califomia Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 5.5; and 28 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment as set forth in the draft City Council Ordinance, Exhibit "X" 143 dated December 5, 2012, attached hereto and on file in the Carlsbad Planning Division, HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12- 02/LCPA 12-03; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on December 5, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Zoning Ordinance Amendment and 10 Local Coastal Program Amendment; and 11 WHEREAS, the Califomia Coastal Act requires a six-week public review period 12 for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 14 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: ^ ^ A) That the above recitations are tme and correct. 16 B) At the end of the state-mandated six-week review period, starting on November 17 9,2012, and ending on December 21,2012, staff shall present to the City Council a summary of the comments received. 18 C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 19 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03., based on the 20 following findings and subject to the following conditions: 21 Findings; California Environmental Quality Act 23 1. The amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal 24 Program are substantially consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element, which was previously adopted on December 22, 2009. 25 The amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal 26 Program will not result in any new significant environmental effect not analyzed as significant in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing 27 Element. 28 PC RESO NO. 6933 1 None of the circumstances requiring a subsequent EIR/Mitigated Negative 2 Declaration/Negative Declaration or a Supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist. 3 " 4 5 6 7 21 22 General Plan Amendment 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is in conformance with the Elements of the City's General Plan based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated December 5, 2012 including, but not limited to the following: a. That the proposed General Plan Land Use designation changes are substantially consistent with and achieve the objectives of Housing Element Program 2.1 for the Barrio, which identifies increases to allowed residential densities throughout the Barrio in order to accommodate a portion of the city's share of the 2005- 9 2010 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). 10 b. The proposed R-30 (Residential 23-30 du/ac) land use designation does not conflict with any provision of the General Plan because application of said 11 designation to any property will only occur when it will not result in a conflict with Growth Management or any other policy of the General Plan. c. The proposed land use designations in the Barrio, which include R-30 (23-30 du/ac), RMH (8-15 du/ac), GC (General Commercial), OS (Open Space) and U (Public Utilities) are consistent with the Land Use Element because they are compatible with existing uses and densities in the Barrio and surrounding areas, 15 will bring existing non-conforming residential uses into conformity with density limits, and are compatible with the Growth Management dwelling unit limitations. 17 Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 18 5. That the proposed Zone Changes and Zoning Ordinance Amendment are consistent with the goals and policies of the various elements of the General Plan and will provide 19 consistency between the General Plan and Zoning as mandated by Califomia state law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element, in that the proposed zone 20 classifications and Zoning Ordinance Amendment ensure compliance with the city's Growth Management Ordinance and implement the proposed land use designations; and said land use designations are consistent with the various elements of the General Plan, as found above. 23 6. That the Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment are consistent with the public convenience, necessity, and general welfare, and are consistent with sound planning 24 principles in that the proposed land use designations and implementing zone classifications are compatible with existing uses and densities in the Barrio and 25 surrounding areas, will bring existing non-conforming residential uses into conformity with density limits, are compatible with the Growth Management 26 dwelling unit limitations, and provide more opportunities for housing affordable to lower and moderate income households. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 6933 MS Local Coastal Program Amendment That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment meets the requirements of, and is 3 in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 ofthe Coastal Act and all applicable policies of the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program not being amended by 4 this amendment, in that that the amendments ensure consistency with the Carlsbad General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and do not conflict with any coastal zone 5 regulations or policies with which future development must comply. 6 8. That the proposed amendment to the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program is required to bring it into consistency with Carlsbad General Plan and ^ Zoning Ordinance. o Conditions; 9 1. The City of Carlsbad shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the 2005-2010 1Q Housing Element (GPA 03-02) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 11 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 12 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on December 5, 2012, by the following 13 vote, to wit: 14 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Black, L'Heureux, Nygaard, and Siekmann 15 16 I y ABSENT: Commissioner Scully ABSTAIN: NOES: Commissioners Amold 19 20 21 MICHAEL SCHUMACHER, Chairperson 22 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 23 24 25 26 DON NEU 27 City Planner 28 PC RESO NO. 6933 cu CQ I E CO i_ D) O c £ 0 LU D) c •(/) o X O CM T- CN < to" .t: 0 ••S 8 UJ o i Exhibit GPA 12-04 Related Case File No(s): ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 General Plan Land Use Designation Changes APN Existing General Plan Designation Proposed General Plan Designation 2041601200 RMH R-30 2041601700 RMH R-30 2042800100 RMH R-30 2042800200 RMH R-30 2042800400 RMH R-30 2042800500 RMH R-30 2042800700 RMH R-30 2042800800 RMH R-30 2042802600 RMH R-30 2042802700 RMH R-30 2042802900 RMH R-30 2042803000 RMH R-30 2042803100 RMH R-30 2042910100 RM R-30 2042910200 RM R-30 2042910300 RM R-30 2042910400 RM R-30 2042910500 RM R-30 2042910600 RM R-30 2042910700 RM R-30 2042910800 RM R-30 2042910900 RM R-30 204291140.0 RM R-30 2042911500 RM R-30 2042911600 RM R-30 2042911700 RM R-30 2042911900 RM R-30 2042912000 RM R-30 2042912100 RM R-30 2042912200 RM R-30 2042912300 RM R-30 2042912400 RM R-30 2042912500 RM R-30 2042912600 RM R-30 2042912700 RM R-30 2042912800 RM R-30 2042912900 RM R-30 2042920100 RM R-30 2042920200 RM R-30 2042921000 RM R-30 2042921100 RM R-30 2042921200 RM R-30 2042921300 RM R-30 2042921400 RM R-30 2042921600 RM R-30 2042921700 RM R-30 2042921800 RM R-30 2042921900 RM R-30 2042922000 RM R-30 2042922100 RM R-30 2042922200 RM R-30 CO CQ I CN E CO O) o DL •*-> c E 0) LU D) c '(/) Z3 o X 0) D c (0 <M o u> CNI o < S O <D -J o sz m 0) (0 "D c (0 CO o d u Exhibit LCPA 12-03 (Land Use) Related Case File No(s): GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/ Land Use Designation Changes Existing Proposed APN Land Use Land Use Designation Designation 2041601200 RMH R-30 2041601700 RMH R-30 2042800100 RMH R-30 2042800200 RMH R-30 2042800400 RMH R-30 2042800500 RMH R-30 2042800700 RMH R-30 2042800800 RMH R-30 2042802600 RMH R-30 2042802700 RMH R-30 2042802900 RMH R-30 2042803000 RMH R-30 2042803100 RMH R-30 2042910100 RM R-30 2042910200 RM R-30 2042910300 RM R-30 2042910400 RM R-30 2042910500 RM R-30 2042910600 RM R-30 2042910700 RM R-30 2042910800 RM R-30 2042910900 RM R-30 2042911400 RM R-30 2042911500 RM R-30 2042911600 RM R-30 2042911700 RM R-30 2042911900 RM R-30 2042912000 RM R-30 2042912100 RM R-30 2042912200 RM R-30 2042912300 RM R-30 2042912400 RM R-30 2042912500 RM R-30 2042912600 RM R-30 2042912700 RM R-30 2042912800 RM R-30 2042912900 RM R-30 2042920100 RM R-30 2042920200 RM R-30 2042921000 RM R-30 2042921100 RM R-30 2042921200 RM R-30 2042921300 RM R-30 2042921400 RM R-30 2042921600 RM R-30 2042921700 RM R-30 2042921800 RM R-30 2042921900 RM R-30 2042922000 RM R-30 2042922100 RM R-30 2042922200 RM R-30 150 CO GQ CM E CD O) O E 0) LU O) •(0 o X "E o N «^ o S2 o „ IO k. Q> n E o 0 Q O X LU Ui c "E o N CO o CNI u 151 Exhibit LCPA 12-03 (Zoning) Related Case File No(s): GPA 12-04/ ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02 Zone Changes APN Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning 2041601200 RD-M RD-M 2041601700 RD-M RD-M 2042800100 R-3 RD-M 2042800200 R-3 RD-M 2042800400 RD-M RD-M 2042800500 RD-M RD-M 2042800700 RD-M RD-M 2042800800 RD-M RD-M 2042802600 RD-M RD-M 2042802700 RD-M RD-M 2042802900 R-3 RD-M 2042803000 R-3 RD-M 2042803100 RD-M-Q RD-M-Q 2042910100 R-2 RD-M 2042910200 R-2 RD-M 2042910300 R-2 RD-M 2042910400 R-2 RD-M 2042910500 R-2 RD-M 2042910600 R-2 RD-M 2042910700 R-2 RD-M 2042910800 R-2 RD-M 2042910900 R-2 RD-M 2042911400 R-2 RD-M 2042911500 R-2 RD-M 2042911600 R-2 RD-M 2042911700 R-2 RD-M 2042911900 R-2 RD-M 2042912000 R-2 RD-M 2042912100 R-2 RD-M 2042912200 R-2 RD-M 2042912300 R-2 RD-M 2042912400 R-2 RD-M 2042912500 R-2 RD-M 2042912600 R-2 RD-M 2042912700 R-2 RD-M 2042912800 R-2 RD-M 2042912900 R-2 RD-M 2042920100 R-2 RD-M 2042920200 R-2 RD-M 2042921000 R-2 RD-M 2042921100 R-2 RD-M 2042921200 R-2 RD-M 2042921300 R-2 RD-M 2042921400 R-2 RD-M 2042921600 R-2 RD-M 2042921700 R-2 RD-M 2042921800 R-2 RD-M 2042921900 R-2 RD-M 2042922000 R-2 RD-M 2042922100 R-2 RD-M 2042922200 R-2 RD-M (5? EXHIBIT 7 Planning Commission Minutes December 5,2012 Page 5 MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Siekmann, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6935 recommending approval of ZCA 12-01 to amend the Zoning Ordinance by adding Sections 21.85.195 and 21.90.195 based on the findings contained therein. VOTE: 6-0 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioner Arnold, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Nygaard, and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Scully ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Schumacher closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 2 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 4. GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - Request for 1) a recommendation of approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005- 2010 Housing Element; 2) a recommendation of approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residential land use designation; and 3) a recommendation of approval of amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program to change land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 4 and stated Senior Planner Jennifer Jesser would make the staff presentation. Chairperson Schumacher opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 4. Ms. Jesser gave a detailed presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Schumacher acknowledged receipt of a letter from Lola's Market dated November 29, 2012. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Arnold asked how many more dwelling units could be built in the Barrio with this new proposal. Ms. Jesser stated that in addition to what is currently built today, at the proposed growth control points, there could potentially be an additional 759 units built. Commissioner Arnold asked how many units currently exist. Mr. Jesser stated there are 1,272 units existing. Mr. Barberio clarified that the 759 potential units would be considered the worst case scenario and would happen if every property owner moved forward to maximize development on their property. Commissioner Nygaard asked if this item was bringing into conformance what has already been approved by Council and Commission. Ms. Jesser stated the amendments reflect what the Commission previously considered when reviewing the Envision Carlsbad preferred plan. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, he asked if there were any members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Ofie Escobedo, 1611 James Drive, Carlsbad, commended the Envision Carlsbad group for their work and efforts towards the Barrio. She would like to see the completion of Pine Park, an overpass at Chestnut over the train tracks, and a traffic circle at Roosevelt and Walnut. She does not support the name change as proposed by others in the community. Planning Commission Minutes December 5,2012 Page 6 Lucinda Vigne, Hibiscus Circle, Carlsbad, requested that the zoning for her property be changed so that it and the adjacent properties are zoned as R-1 which would make it consistent with the other surrounding properties. She asked for clarification regarding the new zoning proposal and if all proposed housing needs to be considered low income housing. Stan Katz, 7721 Segovia Way, Carlsbad, who owns a couple properties in the Barrio area, asked if there Is a prototype of the densities so that the citizens can see what it would look like. Christine Bevilaqua, 235 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, asked if the density could be more spread out throughout the Village Area. Matt Kappuccilli, 823 Camelia Place, Carlsbad, stated one ofthe issues is traffic as there is only Jefferson Street and Carlsbad Village Drive as the main streets through the area. He stated that Jefferson Street, in front of the school, needs to be widened. He further commented that Chestnut needs to go through to the beach, that landscaping can help improve the look of the area, that low income housing should be east of El Camino Real, and that there should be a bike lane on Carlsbad Village Drive. Victor Carajuana, 3605 Harding Street, Carlsbad, asked about eminent domain. He stated he agrees with the increased density proposals however he is concerned with the traffic impacts and access for police and emergency medical personnel. Bill Dominguez, 4378 Adams Street, Carlsbad, commented that the points already raised are very valid points. He feels that traffic will be the main issue with the increased density. He stated that any concentration of low income housing will be a mistake, it has been done before and it was mess. Mr. Dominguez stated that low income housing should be spread out throughout the city. Stan Katz, 7721 Segovia Way, Carlsbad, stated he is concerned that the city will lose its reputation as a high end community because of the concentration of low income housing. He asked why the City is complying with the State regulations. Chairperson Schumacher asked if there were any other members of the audience who wished to speak on the item. Seeing none, he closed public testimony on the item and asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Nygaard asked staff if the new R-30 zoning would always be considered affordable housing. Ms. Jesser stated the State identifies 30 units or higher per acre as having the ability to accommodate housing that is more affordable but it is not required to be affordable. The city's only requirement that housing be affordable is through the city's inclusionary housing ordinance which is applicable throughout the city regardless of the density it is built at; however the R-30 designation does not mandate that housing be affordable to any income group. Commissioner Nygaard asked if it does satisfy the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement as mandated by the state. Ms. Jesser stated that was correct. Commissioner Nygaard asked what the inclusionary housing ordinance requires. Mr. Neu stated that the ordinance requires that 15% of all new projects of 7 units or greater to provide affordable housing units. Often that is done onsite but there are cases where projects are allowed to provide the affordable housing off-site. Sometimes developers purchase credits within the existing affordable housing projects which then generates funds to go into future projects. Chairperson Schumacher asked if because most of the lots in the Barrio will not see projects over 7 units then in theory there will not be as much affordable housing units. Mr. Neu stated that on projects with fewer than 7 units, the developer pays an impact fee and the affordable unit/units are placed in the housing trust fund which are then used for other projects. Commissioner Siekmann asked for staff to explain density versus growth management. Ms. Jesser provided a detailed explanation to the Commission regarding density and the growth control point. Commissioner Siekmann commented that based on the information then the most likely scenario in the Barrio is that it is very unlikely that the city will see densities of 30 units per acre. Ms. Jesser stated that was correct. Ms. Mobaldi added that the State is requiring that the city provide capacity for a certain Planning Commission Minutes December 5,2012 Page 7 amount of housing because the state has a goal to provide housing to people in California. To reach the City's RHNA numbers, staff shows that the city is zoning sites to accommodate those RHNA numbers. However those units do not need to be built. The other consideration is that the State has certain goals with reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reducing air pollution, and making communities more walkable. In that regard, both the State and SANDAG, the regional entity, indicate that there needs to be more density along transportation corridors and near commercial amenities, which is also beneficial to people of lower incomes who may not have vehicles. These are all policies and goals of the State and of the region of San Diego County in general, that the City of Carlsbad is trying to comply with and which is one of the reasons why the Barrio was chosen by the City Council and recommended by the Planning Commission as an area to accommodate higher densities. Ms. Mobaldi stated that is also why higher densities were just approved by the city council for the Village proper, rather than in more rural parts of the City. Ms. Mobaldi commented that in regard to the legal issues, the housing element that the city prepares every four years has to be submitted to the State Department of Housing and Community Development and it is certified as meeting the requirements of the State. She stated that if the city does not meet the requirements there may not be any funding from SANDAG for things such as improved transportation. If the city is challenged in court and there is not an approved, certified housing element, a court can declare a moratorium on building or development proposals can be approved that the City may not want and perhaps at an even higher density than allowed by the General Plan. Ms. Mobaldi stated that in regard to the question pertaining to eminent domain, the Planning Commission does not have eminent domain power, only the City Council. If there is a public purpose, and the Council goes through certain procedures, the City can acquire property by eminent domain which is very infrequently. Finally, Ms. Mobaldi reminded the Commission and audience that the Planning Commission and City Council have already reviewed in great depth the recommendations for implementation of the City's housing element, and this is the implementation phase. Mr. Barberio directed the Commission's attention to Attachment 4 in the Staff Report Packet to discuss and clarify the proposed changes. Chairperson Schumacher asked Staff to answer the questions raised during public testimony. Ms. Jesser stated that in regard to Ms. Vigne's question about zoning for her property and the surrounding properties. Staff is not recommending Ms. Vigne's property be re-zoned as it is not part of Housing Element Program 2.1. However as part of the General Plan update. Staff will be proposing some zone changes on sites where the zoning does not match up with the existing General Plan and to provide better consistency. These specific properties have been identified to be rezoned to R-1 with the General Plan update. Regarding the issue of traffic, Ms. Jesser stated the amendments were reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer who determined the existing street system would accommodate the development that could result from these proposals. Ms. Jesser noted that when future development proposals are submitted, they will be evaluated by the appropriate city departments. If a development triggers a need for traffic improvements, those would be addressed at that time. Mr. Barberio commented that the City is currently looking into a type of pedestrian crossing at Chestnut Avenue which could be an underground crossing, an overpass or at at-grade crossing. The City is also looking at grants for traffic calming and street light improvements in the Barrio area. Mr. Barberio further commented that the Pine Avenue Park improvements are currently included in the City's Capital Improvement Program budget. Chairperson Schumacher asked Staff to discuss the traffic Levels of Service and if there is a plan to handle traffic. Ms. Jesser stated the plan is the current Circulation Element and through the Mitigated Negative Declaration done with the Housing Element and the analysis recently completed by the City Engineer for the minor changes proposed with these amendments to the Housing Element, it was determined that the City's current system is adequate to accommodate the changes. 1£6 Planning Commission Minutes December 5,2012 Page 8 DISCUSSION Commissioner Nygaard stated it is really important to remember that both the Council and Commission have already reviewed these proposals in great detail. She feels the issues have been addressed and this is the implementation phase. Commissioner Nygaard supports the project. Commissioner Arnold stated it is never too late to change course and he feels that it is too much. The prospect of that many more units is too frightening, and he will not support the project. Commissioner L'Heureux feels the basic concept of preserving and protecting the core of the Barrio makes sense. Most of the areas are built already. It creates an opportunity to increase values in the area. He stated that one of the benefits of these changes will be to bring most of the existing non- conforming uses into compliance. Commissioner L'Heureux stated he can support the item. Commissioner Black stated his agreement with Commissioner Nygaard and Commissioner L'Heureux. He stated he can support the project. Commissioner Siekmann stated this is a great plan and framework for the future. This is the first step to helping the environment. She commended staff for their work and stated she can support the project. Chairperson Schumacher stated he does not have any issues with the item and he can support the project. MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Siekmann, and duly seconded, that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931, recommending approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; and adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6932 and 6933, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA 12- 03), Zone Change (ZC 12-02), and General Plan Amendment (GPA 12-04), Zone Change (ZC 12-03), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZCA 12-02), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 12-03) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. VOTE: 5-1 AYES: Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Nygaard, and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: Commissioner Arnold ABSENT: Commissioner Scully ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Schumacher closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 4 and asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item. 5- ELECTION OF OFFICERS Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 5 and asked the Commission to consider nominations for the positions of Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year. Chairperson Schumacher asked for nominations for the position of Chairperson. Commissioner Arnold nominated Commissioner Siekmann for Chairperson. By unanimous vote. Commissioner Siekmann was elected Chairperson for 2013. Chairperson Schumacher asked for nominations for the position of Vice Chairperson. EXHIBIT 8 The Gity of Carlsbad Plaiming Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: December 5, 2012 Application complete date: N/A Project Planner: Jennifer Jesser Project Engineer: N/A SUBJECT: GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO - Request for 1) a recommendation of approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; 2) a recommendation of approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residential land use designation; and 3) a recommendation of approval of amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program to change land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east ofthe railroad and west of lnterstate-5. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6932 and 6933, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment (GPA 12-03), Zone Change (ZC 12-02), and General Plan Amendment (GPA 12- 04), Zone Change (ZC 12-03), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZCA 12-02), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 12-03) based on the fmdings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposal consists of a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Zone Change (ZC), Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZCA), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA), and an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element to change the land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio area, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. The GPA, ZC, and LCPA require approval of the City Council and the LCPA requires approval by the Califomia Coastal Commission. No development is proposed as part of the land use designation and zoning amendments (amendments). The amendments are proposed as two separate amendments; one amendment applies to parcels outside the Coastal Zone (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02) and the second amendment applies to parcels within the Coastal Zone (GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03). Upon City Council approval of the proposed amendments, the amendment applicable outside the Coastal Zone will 5 / GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 2 become effective within 30 days; and the amendment effective within the Coastal Zone will not become effective until LCPA 12-03 is approved by the Califomia Coastal Commission. III. BACKGROUND On June 20, 2012, as part of the Envision Carlsbad draft Preferred Plan review process, the Planning Commission discussed and provided direction to staff regarding land use designation changes within the Barrio. On Sept. 11, 2012, the City Council accepted the draft Preferred Plan, which included the land use plan for the Barrio area. The proposed amendments are consistent with the information previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. As described in Section IV, below, the amendments are proposed to implement Program 2.1 of the current Housing Element. Program 2.1 identifies amendments to the land use designations and zoning throughout the Barrio in order to increase allowed residential densities. Pursuant to state law, by April 30, 2013, the city must complete all necessary land use designation and zoning changes identified in the Housing Element in order to demonstrate to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that the city accommodated its share of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the 2005-2010 housing cycle. Although the Barrio land use designation changes have thus far been considered as part of the Envision Carlsbad/General Plan update process, due to the need to implement Housing Element Program 2.1 prior to April 30, 2013, it is necessary to implement the Barrio land use designation and zoning changes ahead of the overall General Plan update, which is anticipated to be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in summer 2013. IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The objectives of the proposed land use changes for the Barrio include: Implement Program 2.1 of the 2005-2010 Housing Element regarding housing needs in the Barrio. Protect the neighborhood character of the center of the Barrio, which consists primarily of single-family and duplex dwellings on small lots. Bring existing uses into conformity with density limits. Existing residential development on many lots within the Barrio exceed the density currently allowed by the existing General Plan. Increasing allowed density on these sites will bring most of them into conformance with the density allowed by the General Plan. Encourage revitalization and redevelopment around the perimeter of the Barrio by increasing the allowed residential densities. GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 3 A. Housing Element Program 2.1 In addition to being part of the Preferred Plan for the General Plan update, as mentioned above, the amendments are proposed to implement Program 2.1 ofthe 2005-2010 Housing Element. Program 2.1 identifies necessary amendments to General Plan land use designations on specific properties in order to allow higher residential densities throughout the Barrio to satisfy a portion ofthe city's share ofthe 2005-2010 RHNA. The proposed amendments differ slightly, but still implement the objectives of Housing Element Program 2.1 for the Barrio. To reflect the input received during the Envision Carlsbad community outreach process, the location of the proposed residential land use designations varies slightly from parcel to parcel compared to Program 2.1.; also, the proposed amendments do not include designating properties for "mixed use" as Program 2.1 specifies. The land use designation changes specified by Program 2.1 would result in the potential for an overall net increase of approximately 596 dwelling units. The proposed amendments will result in the potential for an overall net increase of approximately 759 dwelling units, which will assist in satisfying the city's 2005-2010 RHNA and the 2010-2020 RHNA. The potential overall net increase of 759 dwelling units assumes that every lot in the Barrio will develop to the full potential density (based on the proposed growth control point density); however, that is not likely to occur and the actual net increase in dwelling units will likely be less than the maximum that the proposed densities could allow. B. Proposed Land Use Changes Overview As shovm in the exhibits attached to Attachments 2 and 3, the lots along the perimeter of the Barrio are proposed to be designated with a General Plan land use designation of R-30 - (Residential 23-30 dwelling units per acre (du/ac)) and RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) Zone. "R-30" is a new proposed land use designation (see Section IV.E, below). Within the center ofthe Barrio staff recommends applying a General Plan land use designation of RMH (Residential Medium High Density - 8-15 du/ac) and RD-M Zone, which would protect the existing single-family/duplex character. Existing non-residential land uses (i.e. the Barrio Museum and adjacent vacant stmctures, the Pac Bell facility and city-ovmed lots for future park area) are proposed to be designated consistent with the existing land uses - GC (General Conmiercial) land use/C-2 (Community Commercial) Zone, U (Public Utilities) land use/P-U (Public Utilities) Zone, and OS (Open Space) land use and zoning. Much of the residential development within the Barrio was built prior to the 1980's, when the city approved a General Plan amendment that reduced allowed densities below the density of existing development. As a result, approximately 45 percent of the residential lots within the Barrio are currently built at a density that exceeds the density allowed by the existing General Plan (see Attachments 5 and 7). This limits the ability/desire of property ovmers to remodel, revitalize or redevelop their land. As residential stmctures age, property ovmers are less inclined to redevelop if they are unable to retain or increase the number of units on their property. The proposed land use designation changes will allow residential densities that are consistent with most of the existing densities. GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 4 C. Barrio Center The center ofthe Barrio (the area generally between Pine Ave. and Magnolia Ave., and Harding St. and Roosevelt St.) is comprised of the city's Senior Center, Pine Avenue Park and Chase Field, as well as small residential lots generally developed with individual single-family homes, two single-family homes, or duplex dwellings. Within this area are several historic stmctures, including the Barrio Museum (3304 Roosevelt St.), Ramirez House (3309 Rooseveh St.), Gaus House (3442 Roosevelt St.) and Mission Santiago (3329 Roosevelt St.). The majority of lots within the Barrio center are 3,500 square feet in area (25 feet wide by 140 feet in depth); however, the majority of dwellings (small scale single-family and two-family homes) are constmcted on sites that are a combination of two lots resulting in 7,000 square foot parcels. Approximately one-half of the lots in the Barrio center are currently developed within the RMH density range of 8-15 du/ac (see Attachment 7); however, these lots are currently designated RM, which allows 4-8 du/ac (see Attachment 5). A few of the lots in the center are developed with multi-family stmctures (3+ units). Staff recommends the following for the Barrio center: 1. The lots currently designated RM are proposed to be re-designated as RMH (implemented by the RD-M Zone), which will ensure most of the existing non- conforming residential densities will become consistent with the General Plan, and the vacant lots or the lots with only one house may develop at a density consistent with much ofthe existing development in the Barrio center (approximately 49 percent ofthe existing RM designated lots in the center are currently developed with 2 or more units). 2. Lots within the Barrio center that are currently designated RMH are proposed to remain RMH. One concem expressed by some Barrio community members is that applying a land use designation that would allow a higher density would change the single-family/duplex character of the center of the Barrio. Staff agrees the single-family/duplex character of the Barrio center should be protected. Designating the Barrio center as RMH will enable most lots to be developed with no more than one to two units, which is consistent with the existing neighborhood character. In addition, the RMH designation will enable a property ovmer to build the same number of units on their lot as a typical neighbor who currently has two units (exceeding today's allowed density). Approximately 50 percent ofthe lots in the Barrio center, which are currently designated RM or RMH, have two or more units constructed on them today. Attachment 4 illustrates the proposed land use designation changes and indicates how many units could be built on each parcel in addition to the existing units if the proposed amendments are approved. For example. Attachment 4 indicates that several parcels within the Barrio center can accommodate one additional unit; the majority of these parcels currently have one existing dwelling (see Attachment 7); therefore, the addition of one unit, pursuant to the proposed RMH designation, will result in the potential for a total of two dwellings on those parcels. /(iD GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 5 As mentioned above, the proposed amendments will allow for a potential net increase of 759 dwelling units throughout the Barrio. However, in the Barrio center, the potential net increase is only 75 dwelling units; the remaining potential net increase of 684 dwelling units applies to the Barrio perimeter. D. Barrio Perimeter The lots located along the Barrio perimeter (generally, between Oak Ave. and Pine Ave., adjacent to Interstate 5, west of Rooseveh St., and south of Magnolia Ave.) consist primarily of multi-family developments, most of which exceed today's allowed densities, as well as a limited number of duplex and single-family dwellings (see Attachments 6 and 7). Within this perimeter area are a few non-residential uses, such as a church and a Pac Bell facility. The lots in the Barrio perimeter are also generally much larger than those within the Barrio center. Based on the existing multi-family character and larger lot sizes, staff recommends that this area be designated for high density residential uses at 23-30 du/ac (R-30) and zoned RD-M; with the exception ofthe Pac Bell site, which staff recommends be designated/zoned as Public Utilities (U/P-U) to reflect the existing land use. Most of the sites within the Barrio perimeter that currently exceed today's allowed density will become consistent with the density allowed by the proposed R-30 land use designation. E. Proposed R-3Q Land Use Designation The proposed R-30 land use designation would allow 23 to 30 du/ac with a Growth Management Control Point density of 25 du/ac, which is five more units per acre (at 25 du/ac GMCP density) than the city's current highest density outside the Village (RH; 15-23 du/ac, 20 du/ac GMCP density). Within the Village, density up to 35 du/ac is allowed. As described above, the R-30 designation is proposed to be applied to areas within the Barrio; and as discussed in previous reports to the Planning Commission regarding the Envision Carlsbad/General Plan update, the R-30 designation will also be proposed as part of the General Plan update to be applied to a limited number of new residential sites in other areas of the city. The primary reasons to create this new residential land use designation at this time is to demonstrate to HCD that the city can accommodate its share ofthe 2005-2010 and 2010-2020 Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA). To accommodate its share of the RHNA, the city must demonstrate to HCD that it has the capacity to accommodate a specified number of housing units that are affordable to very low, low, moderate and above-moderate income households. Historically, Carlsbad has had no difficulty in accommodating above-moderate income households, due to the high real estate values of a coastal community and the large amount of land designated for low density single family residences. However, the city has had great difficulty demonstrating that it can accommodate housing affordable to very low, low and moderate income households; to do so, HCD generally requires a jurisdicfion to have a sufficient inventory of land available to be developed at a density of 30 du/ac or higher (30 du/ac is HCD's defauh density for housing affordable to lower income GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 6 households). Carlsbad's current highest residenfial density (outside the Village Master Plan area) is 15-23 du/ac and only 1.3% of the city is designated at this density. Historically, the city has been successful in demonstrating to HCD that, although the city does not currently have land designated at 30 du/ac (except for the Village Master Plan area), the city can and has effecfively utilized the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank to ensure development of housing affordable to lower income households. As the city gets closer to build-out, however, there is less land where the city can accommodate residential development (at any density) and, as the city experienced with the last housing element update, HCD expects a greater guarantee that there is land available that could be developed at high enough densifies to accommodate housing affordable to lower and moderate income households. With the last housing element update (2005-2010), HCD required the city to establish a density in the medium-high and high density ranges, which is higher than the GMCP density in those two density ranges, and required the city to increase allowed densities on certain lands, such as the Barrio and Quarry Creek. As part ofthe General Plan update, the housing element is also being updated for the 2010-2020 housing element cycle; and due to the limited land available and the confinual push from HCD to accommodate densifies of 30 du/ac, staff proposes to create a new residenfial density range that would allow up to 30 du/ac (R-30). The GMCP density for the R-30 density range is proposed at 25 du/ac, which ensures that development above 25 du/ac up to 30 du/ac must meet the city's criteria for an allocation from the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank, which includes housing affordable to lower income households that exceeds the requirements of the city's inclusionary housing ordinance. F- Addendum to the 2005-2010 Housing Element Mifigated Negafive Declarafion (MND) Housing Element Program 2.1 idenfifies specific land use designafion changes on each parcel within the Barrio; Program 2.1 was analyzed as part ofthe MND for the 2005-2010 Housing Element, which was adopted by the City Council on December 22, 2009. The proposed amendments are substantially consistent with the changes specified in Program 2.1; however, there are minor differences between the proposed land use designation changes and those specified in Program 2.1. Therefore, an addendum to the MND is proposed. The differences include: Program 2.1 identifies "mixed use" as a land use designation on some properties; however, the proposed amendments do not include "mixed use." In place of "mixed use" the RMH or new R-30 land use designafions are proposed. To reflect the input received during the Envision Carlsbad community outreach process, the location of the proposed residential designations varies slighfiy from parcel to parcel compared to Program 2.1. As menfioned above in Secfion IV.A, the land use changes specified in Program 2.1 result in a potenfial net increase of 596 dwelling units and the proposed land use changes GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 7 ^ result in a net potenfial increase of 759 dwelling units (165 more units than Program 2.1 specifies). Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Secfion 15152 states that when a negafive declarafion has been adopted for a project, no subsequent CEQA analysis shall be prepared unless substanfial changes are proposed or have occurred that involve new significant environmental effects that increase the severity of previously idenfified significant effects, or new information of substantial importance shows the project will have significant effects not discussed in the previous negative declaration. There are 1,164 exisfing dwelling units in the Barrio and Housing Element Program 2.1 specifies residential density increases that result in a potential net increase of 596 dwelling units (i.e. a potential for 1,760 total dwellings). As menfioned above. Program 2.1 was analyzed as part of the previously adopted MND for the 2005-2010 Housing Element. Although the amendments differ slighfiy and could resuh in 165 more units than what is specified by Program 2.1, the differences and additional number of units are not substantial (fewer than 10% additional units compared to the 1,760 units possible pursuant to Program 2.1); and said differences will not increase the severity of previously idenfified significant effects. In addifion, no new information of substanfial importance shows that the project will have significant effects not discussed in the 2005-1010 Housing Element MND. The Deputy Director of the city's Transportafion Department reviewed the proposed amendments and determined they will not resuh in a significant impact to transportafion/traffic. The addifional 165 potential dwelling units that may result from the proposed changes, as compared to Program 2.1, could generate approximately 100 peak hour trips, which would be dispersed over the 10 ingress/egress points that provide access to the Barrio. The area has a well-connected grid roadway network that allows all trips (pedestrian, bicyclists, and motorists) to be spread throughout the community. Most of the access points are signalized and have sufficient capacity to accommodate existing and future growth. The Barrio is also within walkable proximity to the coaster train stafion, jobs, retail, services, schools and parks. Frequent transit bus service is also provided in close proximity. This area is a "smart growth" area for the City of Carlsbad and San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG); both organizafions are invesfing funds to promote and encourage altemative transportafion choices in the area. The proposed density increase further supports the ability to create a smart growth and transit oriented development area. The number of dwelling units that may resuh from the proposed amendments is within the city's Growth Management dwelling unit limitations and all mitigation measures identified in the 2005-2010 Housing Element MND remain sufficient and are applicable to the proposed amendments. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project is substanfially within the scope of the previously adopted Mifigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mifigafion Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2005- 2010 Housing Element (GPA 03-02), dated December 22, 2009. Staff has determined that the l(p3 GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 - HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO DECEMBER 5, 2012 PAGE 8 project will have no significant effects beyond those analyzed in the MND and none of the condifions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require adopfion of a subsequent environmental document have occurred. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6931 (Addendum to MND) 2. Planning Commission Resolufion No. 6932 (GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02) 3. Planning Commission Resolufion No. 6933 (GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03) 4. Proposed General Plan Land Use Designafions and Net Capacity 5. Exisfing General Plan Land Use Designations 6. Exisfing Built Land Uses 7. Exisfing Built Residenfial Densities 8. ZCA 12-02 Strike-Out/Underline ATTACHMENT 4 Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations and Net Capacity Medium High Density Residential (8-15 du/ac) High Density Residential (23-30 du/ac) Commercial Public/Semi-Public Open Space # New Net Capacity (Allowable Units minus Existing Units) Attachment 4 Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio GPA 12-03/ZC 12-03 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03 Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Nji^' and Net Capacity ' 061512 (s5 ATTACHMENT 5 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations CARLSBAD COMMUNITY CHURCH VILLAGE Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) Medium High Density Residential (8-15 du/ac) High Density Residential (15-23 du/ac) Combination District (RMH/O) Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio GPA 12-03/ZC 12-03 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations 060612 ATTACHMENT 6 VILLAGE 1^ ^ Existing Built Land Use Residential Single Family Two Family Multi-Family (3+units) Atuchment 6 Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio GPA 12-03/ZC 12-03 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03 Existing Built Land Use 060612 (£f? ATTACHMENT 7 CARLSBAD COMMUNITY CHURCH VILLAGE Existing Built Densities 0-4 units/acre 4-8 units/acre 8-15 units/acre 15 - 23 units/acre 23 - 30 units/acre 30+ units/acre Attachment 7 Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio GPA 12-03/ZC 12-03 and GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03 Existing Built Densities 060612 ATTACHMENT 8 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO ZCA 12-02 STRIKE-OUT/UNDERLINE 21.90.045 Growth management residential control point established. In order to ensure that residential development does not exceed those limits established in the general plan, the following growth management control points are established for the residential density ranges of the land use element. Allowed Dwelling Units Per Acre General Plan Density Ranges Growth Management Control Point RL 0—1.5 1.0 RLM 0—4.0 3.2 RM 4.0—8.0 6.0 RMH 8.0—15.0 11.5 RH 15.0—23.0 19.0 R-30 23.0 - 30.0 25.0 No residential development permit shall be approved which density exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range unless the following findings are made: 1. The project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted; and 2. There have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so that approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit; and 3. All necessary public facilities required by this chapter will be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by this development and in compliance with the adopted City standards. Forthe purposes ofthis paragraph the term "quadrant" means those quadrants established by the intersections of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road as set forth in the map amending the General Plan and as required by Proposition E adopted November 4, 1986. /(st EXHIBIT 9 [Copy of email from Renee Houston] TO: City of Carlsbad, Planning FROM: Renee Huston, 540 Anchor Way, Carlsbad RE: General Plan Housing Update, Barrio There are several issues of concern in the Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio as described in the Notice of Public Hearing. First of which is the traffic and safety impacts to Jefferson Street as it appears to be ttie only southbound egress ingress to the barrio boundary as described in the notice of public hearing. Currently this is a two lane road through a residential neighborhood, and is extremely busy and regularly comes to a stop as parents drop of their children and pick them up in the morning and afternoon. The additional population of students to Jefferson is also a concern. Additionally Anchor Way which runs west from Jefferson and bends into Hibiscus, is currently a thoroughfare for drivers who wish to avoid the traffic signal at Tamarack and Jefferson. This has created a traffic hazard for an otherwise quiet family neighborhood. The intensity of housing density proposed for the barrio will greatly aggravate both of these roadways. I am not sure how a single egress/ingress out of an area with a heavy increase in population is viable or meets the requirements of the Carlsbad Growth Management. Another concern is that of design review, so that all new developments meet a standard of architecture that lends itself to the Village character and enhanced property values. I was unable to attend the planning commission meeting tonight and answers and details ofthe above concerns I was unable to locate. I look forward to viewing the video tomorrow morning Dec 6^*^. Renee Huston po EXHIBIT 10 <CW CTY OF V(CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov January 28, 2013 Renee Huston 540 Anchor Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio Dear Ms. Huston, Thank you for your email regarding the project titled "Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio," which is a proposal to change the General Plan land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Barrio area. The following provides information In response to your questions and concerns. Question/Concern 1: Traffic and safety impacts to Jefferson St., as it appears to be the only southbound egress/ingress to the Barrio boundary. Currently this is a two lane road through a residential neighborhood, and is extremely busy and regularly comes to a stop as parents drop off their children and pick them up in the morning and afternoon. The additional population of students to Jefferson is also a concern. Response: There are 10 roadways that provide ingress and egress to the Barrio area: 1. Jefferson St. (from Tamarack Ave.) 2. Jefferson St. (from Oak Ave.) 3. Harding St. (from Oak Ave.) 4. Madison St. (from Oak Ave.) 5. Roosevelt St. (from Walnut Ave.) 6. Tyler St. (from Walnut Ave.) 7. Oak Ave. (from Roosevelt St.) 8. Pine Ave. (from Roosevelt St.) 9. Walnut Ave. (from Roosevelt St.) 10. Chestnut (from 1-5 underpass) Jefferson St., as most streets adjacent to a school, can become congested before and after school for pick-up and drop-off. These are usually short timeframe durations of approximately 20-30 minutes. During these time frames there are multiple other ingress and egress roadways into the Barrio area, as noted above. The area has a well-connected grid roadway network that allows all trips (pedestrian, bicyclists, and motorists) to be spread throughout the neighborhood. The roadways and access points have sufficient capacity to accommodate existing and future growth. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio January 28, 2013 Page2 The Carlsbad Unified School District was notified of the proposed general plan amendment; the district has not expressed concern regarding student capacity at Jefferson Elementary, in fact, last year the school district considered closing a nearby elementary school (Buena Vista) due to low student enrollment. Question/Concern 2: Anchor Way, which runs west from Jefferson and bends into Hibiscus, is currently a thoroughfare for drivers who wish to avoid the traffic signal at Tamarack and Jefferson. This has created a traffic hazard for an otherwise quiet family neighborhood. The intensity of housing density proposed for the Barrio will greatly aggravate both of these roadways. I am not sure how a single egress/ingress out of an area with a heavy increase in population is viable or meets the requirements of the Carlsbad Growth Management. Response: The city has a program ~ the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program (CRMTP) - that outlines a process and methods to address excessive speed and cut-through traffic on neighborhood streets. The CRMTP is a three-phase program that specifies criteria that must be met for a street to become part of the program and be eligible for potential traffic calming improvements. At this time, Anchor Way and Hibiscus Circle do not meet the Phase II criteria of the program. However, the cit/s Transportation Department continues to observe, evaluate, and enforce Anchor Way and Hibiscus as part of a suggested roadway for the CRMTP. information about the CRMTP can be found on the city's website www.carlsbadca.gov (enter "CRMTP" in the website's "search" box). As mentioned above, there are 10 roadways providing ingress and egress to the Barrio neighborhood; the neighborhood's roadways have sufficient capacity to accommodate existing and future growth consistent with the city's Growth Management Plan. Question/Concern 3: Another concern Is that of design review, so that all new developments meet a standard of architecture that lends itself to the Village character and enhanced property values. Response: New residential development of two to four dwellings must comply with the cit/s architectural design guidelines. Multifamily residential projects of four or more dwellings must comply with all zoning standards and receive Planning Commission approval of a site development plan, which must demonstrate that the project is properly related to the site and surroundings. Housing Element Program 2,1 - Barrio January 28, 2013 PageJ If you would like additional information regarding traffic, please contact Bryan Jones, Deputy Director of the Transportation Department. Mr. Jones can be reached at 760-602-2431 or Brvan.Jones@carlsbadca.gov. Please contact me regarding other aspects of the project; I can be reached at 760-602-4637 or Jennlfer.Jesser@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, JENNIFER JESSER Senior Planner c: David de Cordova, Principal Planner Bryan Jones, Deputy Director Transportation Department File Copy T3 NOTICE QF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 26, 2013, to consider. 1) approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; 2) approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residential land use designation; and 3) approval of amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program to change land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Banio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. Whereas, on December 5, 2012 the City of Carisbad Planning Commission voted 6-1 (Amold) to recommend approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; recommend approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residential land use designation; and recommend approval of amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements, Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program to change land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Banio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies ofthe agenda bill will be available on and after February 22, 2013. If you have any questbns, please contact Jennifer Jesser in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4637 or iennifer.iesser@carlsbadca.gov. If you challenge the General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Zone Code Amendment and/or Local Coastal Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written con-espondence delivered to the City of Carisbad, Attn: City Cleric's Office, 1200 Carisbad Village Drive, Carisbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: GPA 12-03/GPA 12-04/ZC 12-02/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 CASE NAME: HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO PUBLISH: February 16, 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL A>i3AV-O9*008-|. :ARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 5225 EL CAMINO REAL :ARLSBAD CA 92011 ap suas • SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AV SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRia 710 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DISTRICT TIMJOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AV CARLSBAD CA 92009 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 :iTY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 :iTY OF VISTA ZOO CIVIC CENTER DR yiSTA CA 92084 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH AND GAME 3883 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE 310 5510 OVERLAND AV SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239 SAN DIEGO LAFCO STE 200 9335 HAZARD WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92123 J.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 5010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD :ARLSBAD CA 92011 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 CA COASTAL COMMISSION ATTN KANANI BROWN STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 SANDAG STE 800 401 B ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 :ARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE i934 PRIESTLEY DR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 :iTY OF CARLSBAD >UBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT- >ROJECT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER MICHAEL MCSWEENEY - BIASD STE 110 9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407 f Hid'^Pi dn-dod asodxa iaded pa9i ®09tS 9iB|dujei @AjaAV ssR I AMaAV-OEH)08-l BARONA GROUP OF THE CAPITAN GRANDE EDWIN ROMERO, CHAIRPERSON 1095 BARONA RD LAKESIDE CA 92040 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108 [ Mxdn-dod pjoqaj a| jaf^A^j I ap lujB ajni{3ei| ef f zaiidatj BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS 2800 COTTAGE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 CA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 11-DIVISION OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 4050 TAYLOR STREET, MS-240 SAN DIEGO CA 92110 ].U3UiaDJeLl3 ap suas W \ ®09iS ®AM3AV *UBqe6 3| zasin^n BUSINESS, TRANS & HSG AGENCY STE 2450 980 NINTH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 CANNEL ISLANDS NATL PARK SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 1901 SPINNAKER DR SAN GUENA VENTURA CA 93001 CITYOF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 COASTAL CONSERVANCY STE1100 1330 BROADWAY OAKLAND CA 94612 COUNTY OF SD SUPERVISOR RM 335 1600 PACIFIC SAN DEGO CA 92101 DEPT OF DEFENSE LOS ANGELES DIST ENG POBOX 2711 LOS ANGELES CA 90053 DEPT OF ENERGY STE 400 611 RYAN PLZDR ARLINGTON TX 760114005 DEPT OF FISH & GAME ENVSERV DIV POBOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 942442460 DEPT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES RM100 1220N ST SACRAMENTO CA 95814 DEPT OF JUSTICE DEPT OF ATTY GEN RM700 110 WEST A ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 MARINE RESOURCES REG DR & G ENV SERVICES SPR STEJ 4665 LAMPSON AVE LOS ALAMITOS CA 907205139 SANDAG EXEC DIRECTOR STE 800 1ST INTLPLZ401 BST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 STATE LANDS COMMISSION STE 1005 100 HOWE AV SACRAMENTO CA 958258202 DEPT OF FORESTRY ENVCOORD POBOX 944246 SACRAMENTO CA 942442460 FED AVIATION ADMIN WESTERN REG POBOX 92007 LOS ANGELES CA OFF OF PLANNING & RESEARCH OFF OF LOCAL GOV AFFAIRS POBOX 3044 SACRAMENTO CA 958123044 SD COUNTY PLANNING & LAND USE DEPT STE 310 5510 OVERLAND AVE SAN DIEGO CA 921231239 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER 1455 MARKET ST FL17 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103 DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEV REGION IX ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER 611 WEST SIXTH ST, STE. 811 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 1001ST ST., STE 2300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941053084 SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERV & DEV COM STE 2600 50 CALIFORNIA ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 941114704 SDGE 8315 CENTURY PARK CT SAN DIEGO CA 92123 US BUREAU OF LAND MGMT STE RM W 2800 COTTAGE WY SACRAMENTO CA 95825 US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 27708 JEFFERSON AVE, STE 202 TEMECULA CA 92590 US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES 2800 COTTAGE WAY STE W-2605 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4169 430 G ST DAVIS CA 95606 J iiM.a6pa dn-dod asodxa iaded padi ®09I.S ajeidiuai @AjaAV esfi AMaAV-OE)-008-l. tiio:}''Ai3Ae'MA/vM I widn-dod pjoqai af jaj^A^j j ap uijB ajni|3eq e| ^ zailda^ ap suas T ®091.S ®AH3AV l-ueqeB a| zasinjn ja|ad e sa|i3ej. sausnbi^p WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POBOX 100 SACRAMENTO CA 95801 I .f f Hi86p3 df>-dod asodxa idded pa9d ®09I.S 9JB|dujai @AjaAV asp Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® HALL MATTHEW REVOCABLE TRUST 2604 EL CAMINO REAL #334 CARLSBAD CA 92008 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY 1RA.HS\1 DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC AGENCY 00000 AVERY® 5160® WALTERS JOHN C & PATRICE N TRUST 6856 WIGEON PL CARLSBADCA 92009 ARREOLA-QUINONES ENRIQUE & ANGEL- ARREOLA LURE REVO 878 GRANADA DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056 SOOADDIEY 2361 VIA SUBRIA VISTA CA 92084 MAUGA FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 3347 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 WOOLEN JOHNNY L 33820 SUMMIT VIEW PL TEMECULA CA 92592 HARDING STREET APARTMENTS LLC C/O ALBERT A FROST III 4255 OCEAN BLVD SAN DIEGO CA 92109 KATZ STANLEY S&SANDRA L HORIZON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT POBOX 235481 ENCINITAS CA 92023 SERETTI FAMILY TRUST 327 SANTA ISABEL AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 PACIFIC BELL CALIFORNIA STATE ASSESSED 00000 MORENO FRANCES 3383 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RICARDEZ ROBERTO & MACIAS VERONICA 422 SAN DIEGO ST OCEANSIDE CA 92058 ANDERSON MARY G LIVING TRUST 3121 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BOCHINSKI JONATHAN D & DESTINY L 3386 TYLER ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARROLL GLENN S & E GLORIA TRUST C/O E W DAWSON CORP, LTD POBOX 555 INGLEWOOD CA 90307 KHALONA RAMON A 3267 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MUNOZ M GUADALUPE F 3250 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 GALINDO JAMES P 3230 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF S D P 0 BOX 85728 SAN DIEGO CA 92186 KELLEY FAMILY TRUST 3208 VIA RIBERA ESCONDIDO CA 92029 SANDWELL FAMILY TRUST 3390 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 3MALLEY SCOTT )06 PINE AVE :ARLSBADCA 92008 CHILDS THERESA J LIVING TRUST 3331 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MONTALBANOANNET AL 1151 WILD CANARY LN ENCINITAS CA 92024 :iMMERMAN ROBERT D 1880 MAVERICK ST AS VEGAS NV 89108 VALDEZ FRANCES L TRUST 810 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 REAMER GARY R BOSS SANDRA E 615 SAN DIEGUITO DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 •tiauettes faciles a peier Repllez a ta hachure afin de www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® SCHERER SHERYN A 10606 FALCON RIM POINT SAN DIEGO CA 92131 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ ROOSEVELT PLAZA LP C/O CHAMBERLAIN PROPERTY MNGMT 2653 ROOSEVELT ST #D CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® ! HENKINS FAMILY TRUST 438 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CAPPUCCILLI DEO M & MELISSA A 823 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 HOLMES EVELYN K 756 MORSE ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 MATA PHYLLIS T 450 CHINQUAPIN AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CASTILLO MICHEAL R 3419 BRIGHTON ST ROSEMEAD CA 91770 ATAYEE FAMILY TRUST 12762 SALMON RIVER RD SAN DIEGO CA 92129 JOHNSTON JESS LIVING TRUST 1025 1/2 IRVING RD EUGENE OR 97404 NORMAN PATRICK M & DEBORAH L 865 GRAND AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 OROZCO DANIEL D 786 PALM AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MIER MONICA P POBOX 4301 CARLSBAD CA 92018 HERSKOWITZ DAVID S & JOAN M 1175 KILDEER CT ENCINITAS CA 92024 MERKLE MARSAL 3405 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BONA ANTHONY P 3434 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 DINWIDDIE ALAN & JOVITA 144GARDENSIDE CT FALLBROOK CA 92028 CURRY TRUST 2036 LINDA LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARTINEZ DAVID L EST OF 7707 WLAYTON WAY LimETON CO 80123 REZNICHEK RYAN P 3575 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 SERNA JUAN J 3535 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 ANTONACCI MORENO & KATHRYN L 825 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 KOYL REAL ESTATE VENTURES L P 752WLAJOLLA ST PLACENTIA CA 92870 GIRDNER WILLIAM L 370 REDWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BULES CHARLES & LAVONN TRUST 360 REDWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JEFFERSON STREET APARTMENTS L L C 3147 JEFFERSON ST #2 :ARLSBAD CA 92008 LYNCH JEFF M REVOCABLE TRUST 330 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 THOMPSON DAVID B & KAREN R TRUST POBOX 130758 CARLSBAD CA 92013 "HOMAS FAMILY TRUST 1173 GRAFTON ST :1 CAJON CA 92020 BENNETT RUSSELL L P 0 BOX 356 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 BOUTELLE DAVID C & BARBARA J 4939 RANCHO VIEJO DR DEL MAR CA 92014 Itiquettes faciles a peler Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® CARLSBAD CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY 825 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ T&JLP 1909 COLORADO AVE SANTA MONICA CA 90404 AVERY® 5160® JACK IN THE BOX INC C/O PACIFIC COAST INC POBOX 7099 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 BALIAN ZAVEN N & ANAHID H ET AL C/0 SILVA ISAGOLIAN 1424 SAPPHIRE DR CARLSBAD CA 92011 DALZIEL LIVING TRUST 3918 SHERIDAN PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 DERRICK CHARLES N TRUST 1050 PALM AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 SISSON CRAIG & ROSITA 407 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 JEFFERSON HARDING LLC 1120 SILVERADO ST LA JOLLACA 92037 PETERSEN HARRY E & SONDRA S POBOX 635 BISHOP CA 93515 DOKKEN DIANA 1022 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MCCHESNEY DAVID & MARTHA N TRUST 825 CAPE BRETON VISTA CA 92084 DOROTHY LOSA 3145 ROADRUNNER RD SAN MARCOS CA 92078 SHAKIBAPOUR FARZANEH F 3977 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 EKBLAD PHILLIP M 813 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 HERNANDEZ GLORIA ETAL 790 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 GRANT JOHNHTRUST TAX DEPT POBOX 117508 CARROLLTON TX 75011 SINGH JANE M C/O JANE SONNEMON 52 EL SERENO CT SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127 NORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC 150VALPREDA RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 KERR FAMILY TRUST 1252 VIA PORTOVECCHIO SAN MARCOS CA 92078 MCALLISTER TRUST 440SGRANADOSAVE SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 STASZEWSKI RICHARD 1055 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 COFFINO CHRISTOPHER & AUTUMN 1059 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 COWELL STEPHEN & MARYELLEN 1047 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MAGALLANES LIVING TRUST 600 SOWELL RD MCDONOUGH GA 30252 LOPEZ LIVING TRUST C/O RAYMOND LOPEZ 308 CHINQUAPIN AVE 3ARLSBAD CA 92008 JAUREGUIFRANCES 525 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 NAVARRO RITAM 3463 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 3ATTEN BRYAN J 3461 MADISON ST :ARLSBAD CA 92008 HAMMER BONNIE M 765 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 DAVIS NS TRUST 3920 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 hiquettes faciles a peier • Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com 4 onn^/=rv_A\#CDV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® SANTAYANA FERNANDO&CECILIA 3914 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge^** ^ MCGERVEY SCOTT A 830 CITRUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® CARLSBAD VILLAGE PARTNERS LLC 3303 LILAC SMT ENCINITAS CA 92024 GONZALEZ EMILIO & MARTHA C 3725 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 VALDIVIA FRANCISCO & JOVITA 3901 LINMAR LN CARLSBADCA 92008 OQUITA MATT & ADELE 3930 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 MUSSER FAMILY LIVING TRUST 511 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MONAREZ JOHN & EILEEN M 3919 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MERCERJOHNF 1016 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHRISTMAN ADRIENNE M 1040 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD VILLAGE APARTMENTS LLC GABLES RESIDENRIALS 777 YAMATO RD #510 BOCA RATON FL 33431 MAY APRIL C POBOX 675695 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 GOLDMAN GLENN L FAMILY TRUST 2653 ROOSEVELT ST#D CARLSBAD CA 92008 JEFFRESS PATRICIA A REVOCABLE TRUST 546 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 HEYWORTH FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 539 BROOKS ST LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 REZA ALEX A 25024 HIGHSPRING AVE NEWHALL CA 91321 HERNANDEZ DAVID F I 1213 S FREEMAN ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 J & J REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 2 ESTATE ST REDLANDSCA 92373 NEWTON JOHN W & JANET C POBOX 99 SOUTH CHATHAM MA 02659 CROWE DANIEL J 382 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MILNE CAROL FAMILY TRUST 555 EATON ST#I OCEANSIDE CA 92054 ACAA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O AHD HADDAD 29848 LIVE OAK CANYON RD REDLANDS CA 92373 GERICOS 2858 CARLSBAD BLVD CARLSBAD CA 92008 RABII MAX LIVING TRUST 2210 MONTGOMERY AVE #7 CARDIFF CA 92007 ROAHE FAMILY TRUST 73 S PEAK J\GUNANIGUELCA 92677 EDWARDS FAMILY TRUST 320 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 RUBALCABA LORETTA J TRUST 3960 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 IS ENTERPRISES LLC 3700 PIO PICO DR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 ST JOHN FAMILY TRUST 3657 MONROE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SIMS DECEDENTS TRUST 2820 WILSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 kiquettes faciles a peler A ^«>n« de Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com 4 Qnn_/=rk_A\#CDV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® ATKIN FAMILY TRUST 3565 TRIESTE DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ j PUBLIC STORAGE OF CARLSBAD INC 701 WESTERN AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 AVERY® 5160® DENNISON JOHN E 300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR #108A CARLSBAD CA 92008 WELLS FAMILY LIVING TRUST 1350 E FLAMINGO RD #36 LAS VEGAS NV 89119 BOOTH RICHARD & BARBARA 1022 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 GREENE JIM 3143 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 NUNEZ JOSEFINA LIVING TRUST 3924 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 GOMEZ FAMILY TRUST 765 PALM AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 RAMOS FAMILY TRUST 1052 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 VIGNE THOMAS D & LUCINDA 3880 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 A J M PREFERRED PROPERTIES LLC POBOX 1634 VISTA CA 92085 ACUNA FAMILY LIVING TRUST 91 MAYNARD AVE NEWBURY PARK CA 91320 VITALIE JAMES D 3037 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 HERRERA LUPEC TRUST 371 REDWOOD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 TASSONI PAUL D TRUST 811 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 LUJAN JESUS & MANUELA B 3545 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 PINAMONTI MARY J TRUST 2244 S SANTA FE AVE #B02 VISTA CA 92084 SMERUD FAMILY TRUST 3667 CAMINO MARGLESA ESCONDIDO CA 92025 BLAIR GILES & DEBRA 3935 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 WALLACE CLICK B & AUTUMN D 3378 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CLAY ANDREW JR REVOCABLE TRUST 860 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ZAMORA VICTORIANO & ROSA 827 CITRUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 GASTELUM FAMILY SURVIVORS TRUST 323 HILL DR VISTA CA 92083 AJDOUR MICHAEL&JULIE 3537 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCUDERIPAUL 4081 THOMAS ST OCEANSIDE CA 92056 MCCONNELL CAROLE K TRUST 3975 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SNODGRASS JUNE L TRUST 3980 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 3ASTELUM RUBEN I & MARGE 1975 MAGNOLIA AVE :ARLSBAD CA 92008 BRADLEY FAMILY RENTALS L L C C/O HILLTOP GROUP INC 807 E MISSION RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 CIPRIANI DANIEL J III & JACALYN 384 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 hiquettes faciles a peler • Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de j n ..—Mr i www.avery.com 1 -ann-/^rk. AV/i: DV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® KINSER LARRY R LIVING TRUST 2192 S COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge'' DUKE PAMELA A 3967 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® TERHUNE GENTRY G TRUST 645 FRONT ST #1312 SAN DIEGO CA 92101 RODRIGUEZ FRANK L & JOSEPHINE 2914 HILL VALLEY DR ESCONDIDO CA 92029 TALLEY TERRY & JANISE TRUST 1875 BUSINESS CENTER DR SAN BERNARDINO CA 92408 SHEEHY TIMOTHY D & LAUREN E 850 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBADCA 92008. MCGILVRAY DUNCAN D 1833 QUEENS WAY VISTA CA 92084 SANCHEZ ROY R&ESTELA V FAMILY TRUST 3482 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBADCA 92008 ALLAHYARI FAMILY TRUST 19 TIERRA VISTA LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 CURRY TRUST 2036 LINDA LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 MEIKLE MALCOLM 860 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 AMMON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 4070 SUNNYHILL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 3068 STATE STREET L L C C/0 L JOHN SIMONS 300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR #108A CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANTANA FAMILY TRUST 3183 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 MORENO SALVADOR R 3468 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CARLSBAD CA 3780 PIO PICO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHALFANT THERESA E 1611 JAMES DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 KOYL REAL ESTATE VENTURES C/O RENTAL OFFICE 752WLAJOLLA ST PLACENTIA CA 92870 SALATKA JAMES & NORA 457ARDEN DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 RODRIGUEZ PATRICIA J 661 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ALVARADO FAMILY TRUST 3337 TYLER ST #R CARLSBADCA 92008 STOLL CAROL A TR 2607 LEVANTE ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 GOREN CAROL F C/O PATRICIA A FISTER TR 119 NEL CAMINO REAL#E154 ENCINITAS CA 92024 JOIN HANDS-SAVE A LIFE 3528 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 <RAMERMARCE 13032 CAMINITO POINTE DEL MAR DEL MAR CA 92014 SOUGIAS NIKOLAOS & MARIA TRS 2433 MANCHESTER AVE CARDIFF CA 92007 GUSTAFSON TODD B & TIFFNEY 811 CITRUS PL CARLSBADCA 92008 DIAS PETER & SARAWAR SALLY 1956 LINMAR LN :ARLSBAD CA 92008 ROSS MARTIN 580 LOS VALLECITOS BLVD #208 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 BULLOCK SHERYL F TR C/O CALB&T 300 LAKESIDE DR #8 OAKLAND CA 94612 •tiquettes faciles a peler • . Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de | www.avery.com 1-ft00.6O.A\/FRY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA NC1-001-03-81 101 N TRYON ST CHARLOTTE NC 28255 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ DU SHAUNE JESSICA 3150 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® APODACA MARIA L TRUST 13596 TRADITION ST SAN DIEGO CA92128 SENTENO ALFONSO S & CRESPINA TRUST 3323 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 COOPER ROBERT J 3240 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BANK OF CALIFORNIA C/0 GORDON A LARSEN POBOX 1101 RCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 FLETCHER LIVING TRUST P 0 BOX 986 POWAY CA 92074 MCDONALD JOHNMJR 466 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CAVALEA TRUST 3640 FELIZ CREEK RD HOPLANDCA 95449 ' MARTIN MERRIEKEST OF 3750 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARRUTH ADAM POBOX 1966 CARLSBAD CA 92018 WILLIS GEORGE R & JACKYE E TRS 2050 LAURIE CIR' CARLSBADCA 92008 DOYLE TIMOTHY M & DONNA D 1046 HERON DR VISTA CA 92081 DEWHURST DAVID R TRUST POBOX 2510 CARLSBAD CA 92018 JOHNSON BYRON J 861 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANE DONNA E 5120 EMERSON AVE ROLLING MDWS IL 60008 WORSTER JOHN A & MULLINS-WORSTER PAULA A FAMILY TR 3997 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 STIMPSON RALPH & LILLIAN TRUST 3482 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 WINDER WILLIAM & MICHELLE TRUST 3411 CORTE ACIANO CARLSBAD CA 92009 CLARK KATHLEEN M 3060 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 E H S ENTERPRISES LLC 5553 TRINITY WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92120 SCHULTE FAMILY TRUST 7386 ESCALLONIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 LUCKHAM FAMILY TRUST P 0 BOX 27449 SAN DIEGO CA 92198 GRACE DANA K 335 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 -ERENCZ FRANK A & SUSAN C 1620 ALDER AVE /ORBA LINDA CA 92886 BOYER DENNIS E & STACEY L 14149 HILLDALE RD VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 CROWLEY MARY A TRUST 333 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ^ETZ BRUCE D & CAROLE 3956 LONG PL :ARLSBAD CA 92008 HAUCK TIM & KATHY FAMILY TRUST 302 HEMLOCK AVE #A CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARKS FAMILY TRUST 3166 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 Itiquettes faciles a peler • Repliez a la hachure afin de \ www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® KIANIPUR AMETHYST B 3 GOLETA POINT DR CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ j CARLSBAD COMMUNITY CHURCH 3175 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® ! A BERUKOFF FAMILY TRUST 2460 W BLAKE ST LA HABRA CA 90631 ACCARDI LEONARD A & M ELIZABETH 5158 STEINBECK CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARSHALL MICHAEL T & UNGERMANN- MARSHALL MARY S 5256 PIZZO RANCH RD LA CANADA CA 91 Oil AGUILO RAFAEL D POBOX 518 CARLSBAD CA 92018 ROSS DAVID M REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 2715 ASCOT AVE CARLSBADCA 92009 SCHWARTZER LENARD E & GERALDINE H 2880 S MILLER LN LAS VEGAS NV 89117 SOLLIE ELIZABETH A POBOX 6008 SAN RAMON CA 94583 FINK ERIC L&DARLENEL 347 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 KOYL DAVID & BILLIE FAMILY TRUST 7230 BABILONIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 MELIDEO LAWRENCE 6845 WISH AVE LAKE BALBOA CA 91406 TREJO FAMILY TRUST 3383 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 OVERGAAG RICHARD H & NANCY G 213 E SOUTH AVE REDLANDS CA 92373 BENTON BRADLEY K 290 HEMLOCK AVE #B CARLSBAD CA 92008 HENSHALL RUSSELL A & MICKIE Y 302 HEMLOCK AVE #B CARLSBAD CA 92008 KNOLL ADRIENNE TAX DEPT 5230 LAS VIRGENES RD #200 CALABASAS CA 91302 GARCIA LOUIS & CAMILLE V 3920 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MARIPOSA LLC 4411 30TH ST #200 SAN DIEGO CA 92116 SACA TRUST 345 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CUNNINGHAM COASTAL LLC POBOX 3634 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 KREKORIAN QUINN A 6521 ARTEMIS LN WEST LINN OR 97068 OGARA LUKE T POBOX 1633 CARLSBAD CA 92018 KORBONSKI LIVING TRUST 33731 GLOCAMORA LN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675 ANDERSON ROBERT G & LAURA J 2278 PLAZUELA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009 REDENDULICEATRUST 87-3197 JAPONICA RD CAPTAIN COOK HI 96704 PAWLOWSKI FAMILY TRUST 19309 ITASCA ST NORTHRIDGE CA91324 ^OPER FRANK R JR & PATRICIA A TRUST ^79 SHARON RD ^\RCADIACA 91007 NASSIF GEORGE F 3835 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PERFITO RITA FAMILY TRUST 3875 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 Etiquettes faciles a peier • Cone Ae Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com M nnn AI #r-r>v/ Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® RUGGLES STEPHEN J TRUST 3149 FAIRVIEW DR VISTA CA 92084 Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ j NAJAR JOSEPHS TRUST 2248W230THPL TORRANCE CA 90501 AVERY® 5160® j A INDRIERi RICHARD L FAMILY TRUST 4992 VIA MARTA CARLSBADCA 92008 WALTERS SUSAN 3840 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROBB PATRICIA S POBOX 4564 OCEANSIDE CA 92052 COLLINS CHARLES W & JEANNIE 615 S NEVADA ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 KOLDEN MARY L LIVING TRUST 10 BLUE JAY DR ALISO VIEJO CA 92656 RETZER MARKLYN J & WENDY D 3845 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 MAUS ROLAND TRUST 3825 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 QUIJADA FAMILY TRUST 3805 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 REISER MARK & NANCY 3815 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 BLAIR LESLIE R & DOROTHY C TRUST 3830 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBADCA 92008 PRIETTO JOHN G TRUST 3071 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 TSAI CHIN LUNG & YU 0 2918 MANAGUA PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 FISHER FOREST F R TR 1417 ANTIGUA WAY NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 CALDWELL DAVID J & SORANA 3850 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PATTEN ROBERT F TRUST 3537 N TWIN OAKS VALLEY RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 COOKE RENE & DOREEN 3865 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WIEDERKEHR LIVING TRUST 3820 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PARKER FAMILY PROPERTIES L L C C/O KATHRYN M VENEZIA 560 HIGHLAND OR DANVILLE CA 94526 COLES ROBERT J TRUST 3111 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 LO CHERYL S 331 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 VALDIBIESO ALEX J & SARAH C TRUST 3450 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MEEHAN JEANNE M 3647 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 KULLMANN JASON & LORI M 3860 NAUTICAL DR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 HARROLD GARY J & MARY A TRUST 3810 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 KAESBAUER RAYMOND F JR & JAIME L 13862 TORREY BELLA CT SAN DIEGO CA 92129 JONES MARLENE )402 BAKER AVE NW SEAHLEWA 98107 AGUILERA MARTHA P 1347 BROKEN HITCH RD OCEANSIDE CA 92056 KANE RYAN R & KERRY C 3830 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 ;tiauettes faciles a oeler Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® A Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge^'*' AVERY® 5160® I i BATTLES LEISHA M 3835 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 SHAS MANAGEMENT INC 3666 PIO PICO DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 KORNBERG FAMILY TRUST 509 N MAPLE DR BEVERLY HILLS CA90210 MELLANO HARRY M & SHARON E TRS C/0 MELLANO & COMPANY POBOX 100 SAN LUIS REY CA 92068 THOMPSON W & K LIVING TRUST 600 KALORAMA DR VENTURA CA 93001 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK BULLOCK SHER C/OCREF 300 LAKESIDE DR OAKLAND CA94612 TORREY PACIFIC CORP 171 SAXONY RD#109 ENCINITAS CA 92024 HERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST 3820 POLLY LN CARLSBADCA 92008 RODRIGUEZ STEVE F 3207 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 GARCIA SUSAN L 1050 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 RAMIREZ FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 735 PINE AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 HODGKINSON BRIAN P 840 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCHNEIDER WILLIAM & ELLEN P 0 BOX 891 CARLSBADCA 92018 MASUE TRUST C/0 RITE AID #5621 POBOX 3165 HARRISBURG PA 17105 BURECKCAPITALLLC 1923 DENTRO DE LOMAS BONSALL CA 92003 BELL FAMILY TRUST 737 ORANGE AVE BEAUMONT CA 92223 SCOTT JEFFREY G&KRISTYH 5375 PINTAIL ST LA VERNE CA 91750 HEDRICK MICHAEL P 3557 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 TAVARUA SENIOR APARTMENTS L P 1641 S SEPULVEDA BLVD #425 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 FONTANA FAMILY TRUST 3287 ALTA LAGUNA BLVD LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 COURY DANIEL L SR& JOYCE L 9602 W BUCKEYE RD TOLLESONAZ 85353 JERROMES STEVEN J & CYNTHIA L POBOX 1240 VISTA CA 92085 RIDINGS DANIEL R &CHRISTINE A 755 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 SHELLEN II LTD PARTNERSHIP 4522 TRIAS ST SAN DIEGO CA 92103 3TANDER FAMILY TRUST 10905 GLENCREEKCIR SAN DIEGO CA 92131 NGUYEN SUZANNE H 3369 MIDDLEBROOK WAY SAN RAMON CA 94582 SHEA STEPHEN D 3443 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 ^OCHA FAMILY TRUST 1209 CIELO AVE XEANSIDE CA 92056 JAMES JOYCE ATR 3380 TYLER ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ASBILL FAMILY TRUST 3530 RIDGECREST DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 Itiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de | www.avery.com i.Rnn.r:(^.A\/FRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® 1 A DAVIES RAE ATR 1067 SANDALWOOD DR EL CENTRO CA 92243 HALL MATTHEW REVOCABLE TRUST 2604B EL CAMINO REAL #334 CARLSBAD CA 92008 PGP CARLSBAD SENIORS LTD CAPITAL GROWTH PROP 1120 SILVERADO ST LA JOLLA CA 92037 CASTRO JOE A (DCSD) TR 3715 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 KINMAN ANTHONY P 1812 N BRIGHTON ST BURBANKCA 91506 LOPEZRACHELGH 931 OAK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 TRUEBLOOD DONALD MARK & ANH POBOX 274 DUCOR CA 93218 MELLING BERNARDINO & M LOURDES 863 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 STANDERFER JOHN L & BARBARA M 861 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 GILLROY ANTHONY & DIANE TRUST 3928 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHANEY 2004 TRUST 333 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BRAVENDER JOANNA B REVOCABLE TRUST 3952 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 STEWART FAMILY TRUST 3975 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 PALMER KATHLEEN M Y 3905 DAISY PL OCEANSIDE CA 92056 CARRENO DAGOBERTO P & MERCED B 910 PALM AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO POBOX 85728 SAN DIEGO CA 92186 ROSE THOMAS C & JENNIFER N 33741 HOLTZHILL RD DANA POINT CA 92629 MACGURN RICHARD & ELIZABETH TR 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #E3 CARLSBAD CA 92008 SONN DONALD & CARDIN JULIE 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #F2 3ARLSBADCA 92008 HOULDIN ROBERT F II POBOX 232493 ENCINITAS CA 92023 MOORE STEPHEN J & DEVITO ROBIN A 1015 CHESTNUT AVE C2 CARLSBAD CA 92008 3UCK SIGNE M TR 1966 PRIMROSE AVE 5 PASADENA CA 91030 BETANCOURT FELIPE & MARIA URLYOICHE 3903 JAMES DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 SERAFINLLC 4525 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 50NZALEZ HUMBERTO & BEATRIZ 1912 JEFFERSON ST ;ARLSBAD CA 92008 KOTAS PAUL M & SANDRA D 1055 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ARO PARTNERS 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #A3 CARLSBAD CA 92008 lUEVARA RICHARD G & MARILYN S TRS 124 SUN VALLEY RD AN MARCOS CA 92078 CARRANZA FAMILY TRUST 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #B3 CARLSBAD CA 92008 VOULGARIS MARKOS & MELPO TRUST 4769 NIAGARA AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92107 hiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez a ia hachure afin de j www.dvery.com 1 .ftnn.r:n. AVFRv Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to i expose Pop-up Edge'" AVERY® 5160® I A TOVAR FAMILY TRUST 2315 BIRDIE ST OCEANSIDE CA 92056 COX RUSSELL J & TAMARA 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #A2 CARLSBAD CA 92008 MCCOMAS FAMILY TRUST 850 E STANLEY BLVD #63 LIVERMORE CA 94550 PIO PICO 3050LLC C/0 HARVEY LIONS POBOX 3000 LA JOLLACA 92038 QUETIVES RICKEY D & GAVUZZI DONNA TR 816 MORSE ST OCEANiSIDE CA 92054 GAGNON TERRY & MARIAN 24244 NOTTINGHAM CT VALENCIA CA 91355 SONN DONALD A & CARDIN JULIE A 1015 CHESTNUT AVE #G2 CARLSBAD CA 92008 KNISLEY GEORGE R 3955 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 ERB CARL & BILLIE LIVING TRUST 13875 PHILADELPHIA ST WHiniERCA 90601 YOAKUM ELVIN E & SUZANNE M 1400 W FRANCIS ST ONTARIO CA 91762 COUNSELLOR ALLEN & LAWSON DEBORAH 318 JUNIPER AVE #10 CARLSBADCA 92008 DORE JOHN & JANE REVOCABLE TRUST 959 PASSIFLORA AVE LEUCADIA CA 92024 RHODES T L&EDITH M 1993 TRUST 1840 AVOCADO RD OCEANSIDE CA 92054 SANCHEZ NOE & ADELA 270 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 BAILEY JOHN L& JANE 23429 BRISTOL WAY MURRIETA CA 92562 JARRARD LIONEL T & SUSANA L 788 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 3470 MADISON STREET LL C 1478 SCHOOLHOUSE WAY SAN MARCOS CA 92078 HARRINGTON ROBERT F JR & SABRINA 3919 LINMAR LN CARLSBADCA 92008 TEMPLETON WILLIAM & JENNY 3936 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 HAMSAYEH GOSHTAB M & BAGHEGOLESTANI PARIZAD A A FA POBOX 2167 DEL MAR CA 92014 LEEKA FAMILY TRUST 4368 HAYMAN AVE LA CANADA CA 91011 WEINGART ROBERT J 318 JUNIPER AVE #13 CARLSBAD CA 92008 MOHAMMEDIZIAT 838 LINCOLN BLVD #2 SANTA MONICA CA 90403 TRAM LIEN TRANG 3147 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCHNEIDER WILLIAM C & ELLEN S 3448 CAMDEN CIR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 MCNALLY JEAN M REVOCABLE TRUST 4012 LAYANGLAYANG CIR #B CARLSBADCA 92008 FORBESS KEVIN 1732 ROGUE ISLE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 ^MOS CHRISTINA G !594 ROOSEVELT ST :ARLSBAD CA 92008 BARNHART LANA 755 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 KANE EDWARD J& CAROL D 3166 SEABURY ST CARLSBAD CA 92010 Itiquettes faciles a peler • Sens de Repliez a (a hachure afin de i r&w\f>r ie rebord PoD-UD*"^ ! www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Ubeis Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge'" ^ AVERY® 5160® I i TAYLOR DONALD L & MARY E TRUST 4030 KAIKIO EWA PL PRINCEVILLE HI 96722 KNICKERBOCKER SHAWN F 318 JUNIPER AVE #7 CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANSDALE WILLIAM 318 JUNIPER AVE #8 CARLSBAD CA 92008 SANDELL JEANNE F REVOCABLE TRUST 350 REDWOOD AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 BADGER ALFRED H & SUSAN C TRUST 207 RAINBOW DR #10795 LIVINGSTON TX 77399 SMITH RONALD E & LINDA L 812 CITRUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ZETTNER WILLIAM 944 PALM AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 CAMPA JESUS & MAGDALENA TRUST 770 AVOCADO LN CARLSBADCA 92008 MAGANA BERTHA TRUST 910WOODLAKE DR CARDIFF CA 92007 FARQUHAR ELLEN E TR 6128 YEARLING ST LAKEWOOD CA 90713 CVETKOVIC FAMILY 1996 TRUST 3017 QUAIL RD ESCONDIDO CA 92026 PENDLETON FAMILY TRUST 1312 NEPTUNE AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 PETERSON FAMILY TRUST 3315 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ANSON ANDY H 982 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 RUGAR GARY & JEANETTE FAMILY TRUST 921 DAVIS ST RAMONA CA 92065 OREY CLAY F & SIMPSON CHELEEN K 860 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 GILLINGHAM KURT ESTATE C/O MR & MRS ROBERT S GILLINGHAM 2628 WILSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BREGG VERA M LIVING TRUST 3950 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WALTERS JOHN C & PATRICE NAB TRUST 6856 WIGEON PL CARLSBAD CA 92009 CURRY JAMESW 2036 LINDA LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 \^URPHY STEVEN 3369 ROOSEVELT ST :ARLSBAD CA 92008 ISRAEL FORTUNA LIVING TRUST 3535 HARDING ST CARLSBADCA 92008 SAVAGE BRETT 3255 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBADCA 92008 (OHNE CONNELLC i845 TARANTELLA LN 5AN DIEGO CA 92130 DORANTES ALBERTO J & TINA 4602 OAK TER OCEANSIDE CA 92056 KAHAHAWAI ELIZABETH 771 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 ALKE FRANK E & KATHRYN A TRUST '0 BOX 675514 lANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 GILLINGHAM ROBERT S TRUST 2628 WILSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 JAIME TRUST 600 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Itiquettes faciles a peler • Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de { www.avery.com 1 .finn.r;n. A\/PRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to • expose Pop-up Edge'** | AVERY® 5160® ! A LARSEN SHIRLEY A TRUST 3605 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 VIGNE THOMAS D & LUCINDA S 3880 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 PREMIER GLOBAL VENTURES LLC 140 BREAKWATER RD CARLSBADCA 92011 MCGEE DAVID J & JACQUELINE M TRS 6499 FAIRWATER PL CARLSBADCA 92011 CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC AGENCY 00000 JACINTO PAUL & ELIZABETH 3430 HARDING ST CARLSBADCA 92008 SISSON CRAIG 407 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 LASKEY JOHN L III & BARBARA R 3966 LINMAR LN CARLSBADCA 92008 ZAMORA ESPERANZA 6151 PASEO JAQUITA CARLSBAD CA 92009 ENRIQUEZ RODNEY M 790 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 FORD/SCHUMACHER FAMILY TRUST 350 CHESTNUT AVE #1 CARLSBADCA 92008 SMITH SUSAN M 3320 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 NOBEL FAMILY TRUST 6435 CAMINITO BLYTHEFIELD #C LA JOLLA CA 92037 TERANSARAC 305 DATE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 WOOD JUNE POBOX 2134 LEUCADIA CA 92023 BANK OF COMMERCE ATTN: R/E TAX DEPT 2800 E LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 PRIETO GABRIEL J 3957 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 WONG ERIC & GRACE FAMILY TRUST 5318 VALLEY VIEW RD ' RANCHO PALOS VERDES CA 90275 PEI DANIEL K& VIRGINIA YU 810 COLDSTREAM CT DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 CASTILLO AMADOR & IRMA FAMILY TRUST 4765 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBADCA 92010 MATHEWS JOHN L &.CHERYLE L TRUST' 3376 ADAMS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 /VALKER-GILBERT TRUST ^350 HIGHLAND DR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 CANALES ISABEL 0 TRUST C/0 EDDIE R CANALES 721 MOSAIC CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057 CARDENAS JOEU 3676 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 yiOORE KENNETH T & DARLENE B 18452 CERVEZA CT iSCONDIDOCA 92026 SMITH TRUST 591 MT HUNTER WAY BOULDER CITY NV 89005 MILLER DAVID & JOHANNA 365 HEMLOCK AVE #D CARLSBADCA 92008 ANZL JUSTIN 65 HEMLOCK AVE #E ;ARLSBAD CA 92008 365 HEMLOCK B TRUST C/0 TAX SERVICE 25612 BARTON RD#348 LOMA LINDA CA 92354 POST SUE E TRUST 363 HEMLOCK AVE#A CARLSBADCA 92008 Etiquettes faciles a peier • Sens de Repliez a ia hachure afin de | www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ ^ AVERY® 5160® I A MUNOZ KELLEY K 367 HEMLOCK AVE #B CARLSBADCA 92008 DAVIS JOHN A & DENA M TRUST POBOX 949 CAMP VERDE AZ 86322 MOHR PATRICK W & HEATHER S 3432 ADAMS ST CARLSBADCA 92008 REID SEAN P 3915 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SOTELO FAMILY TRUST 154CREGAR ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 FIELDS LONDON 363 HEMLOCK AVE #C CARLSBAD CA 92008 VOGEL JENNIFER J 1 BELLA VITA SAN MARCOS CA 92078 HOHMAN FAMILY TRUST OF COSTA MESA 2450 ORANGE AVE COSTA MESA CA 92627 ETCHELLSJOHNR 367 HEMLOCK AVE #A CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSON DONALD 0 & SHIRLEY J T TRS 14527 WRAVENSWOOD DR SUN CITY WEST AZ 85375 LOCHER BRIAN K & SABRINA N 3710 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 GONZALEZ FAMILY TRUST 3925 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 STATESCU PENNY POBOX 686 SAN LUIS REY CA 92068 VALDIVIA FAMILY LIVING TRUST 740 TAYLOR DR MONTEREY PARK CA 91755 BRUNN DARRELL G JR LIVING TRUST 330 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 MONTAGUE LUKE & MARSHA M 3750 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 EISER GEORGE H JR & IMELDA H TRS 16356 TULSA ST GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 UBER THEODORE R & LOUELLA G TRUST C/O JOANN SKARE 23602 ST ELENA MISSION VIEJO CA 92691 MARTINEZ VIRGINIA H 3367 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCHICK LUAN TRUST 938 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 CHAFEY REVOCABLE TRUST 3740 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 ESKAM ERNEST F & DOROTHY N 180908 EXPERIMENT FARM RD \/IITCHELL NE 69357 MAST POKEY FAMILY TRUST 1166 LARKSPUR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 VOORHEES JOHN F 12132 SKY LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 30RIN0 DOMINICK J & NORMA J TRUST 351 SUNSET GROVE RD •ALLBROOKCA 92028 DOUGHTY DOROTHY 3745 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 FERRY DANEL P 8812E5THST TUCSON AZ 85710 lAYOC FAMILY TRUST 25 ANCHOR WAY :ARLSBAD CA 92008 HEMINGWAY KAREN £ 2005 TRUST POBOX 1425 CARLSBADCA 92018 SANDCASTLE SHORES APTS L P 1322 SCOTT ST #204 SAN DIEGO CA 92106 Etiquettes faciles a peler A® A Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de { rowdier le rehnrri Pon-UD**^ ! www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to < expose Pop-up Edge^^" ^ AVEIW® 5160® ! A GAMMON JOYCE TRUST 3258 PEARL LN OCEANSIDE CA 92056 BECKER CURTIS ALBERT & ELIDA 808 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 LEIGH ZACHARY 0& LINDA C 3720 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 NIEDRICK FREDERICK W & KAY F AB TRUST 3750 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 BREMSETH MARIANNE REVOCABLE TRUST 520 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCHWARTZ JONATHAN F TRUST 3955 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 VOORHEES GARRY T POBOX 892497 TEMECULA CA 92589 GONZALES JANICE C TRUST 6423LAVANCOCT CARLSBADCA 92009 SIGALL DUSTIN L 440 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 TEPPER TINA TRUST 3745 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 TAYLOR BRIAN 819 CITRUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 YEANEY SHEILA H LIVING TRUST 3725 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBADCA 92008 HENDRIX LOREN L & VIRDEL M 3720 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HADLEY RICHARD C & DONNA J 1627E83RD ST INDIANAPOLIS IN 46240 MIONE STEFANO& JOSEPH INE 12381 DARKWOOD RD SAN DIEGO CA 92129 TAYLOR DAVID & SCHRAM NEIL TRUST 6200 VIA SUBIDA PALOS VERDES PENINSULA CA 90275 MACLEAN FAMILY LIVING TRUST 2152 FALLS CITY CT HENDERSON NV 89044 PARTRIDGE FAMILY TRUST 3725 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 BUTCHER NEAL H & MELISSA L 460 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 GARCIA ANTONIO &DIONICIA 3590 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SIMIKICH FAMILY TRUST 1029 HONEYSUCKLE DR SAN MARCOS CA 92078 SHINTO DEBRA 3925 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008 K&K PETROLEUM INC 422 SAN LUCAS DR SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 GUIDO JOHN TRUST 3730 NAUTICAL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 MATSUBARA COLLEEN Y 983 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANYI ANDY & CAROLYN 1629 CALLE LAS CASAS OCEANSIDE CA 92056 REBUILDING TOGETHER LONG BEACH 3847 E WILTON ST LONG BEACH CA 90804 ADAMS BRIAN F 342 CAMELLIA PL :ARLSBAD CA 92008 MADRID ROSANNA LIVING TRUST 3417 SANTA CLARA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92010 DEWHURST DAVID R TRUST 154 LANCER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 Etiquettes faciles a peler ./B> iffi A Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de ! www.avery.com i.Rnn.r:n.AVPRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® MCNULTY FAMILY TRUST 4240 SUNNYHILL DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 WILSON LESTER & MARJORIE 391 REDWOOD AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 HENKINS ANTHONY R LIVING TRUST 148 SYCAMORE AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 TANGUMA PAULINE TR 3495 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARTER LANCE D & LAINE 3910 SHERIDAN PL CARLSBADCA 92008 URBINO ARTHUR S & HEMINA B 421 TAMARACKAVE CARLSBADCA 92008 ENTEZARI PAT & JUDY H 4377 TOULUMNE PL CARLSBAD CA 92010 FLORES RUTH A FAMILY TRUST 2010KARRENLN CARLSBADCA 92008 BASILA DAVID & PAMELA 3950 NHILLWOOD CIR TUCSON AZ 85750 CHILINGIRIAN KEAN R 219FLORITAST ENCINITAS CA 92024 CYR GARY 640 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 DUNN ROBERT P& SHELLEY 740 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBADCA 92008 SWEETLAND FAMILY TRUST 4107 PARK DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 HEREDIA RUDOLF A POBOX 2210 CARLSBAD CA 92018 STERNBERGTANYA 1998 TRUST 3156 HARDING ST CARLSBADCA 92008 HELMUTH FAMILY 1996 TRUST 507 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 HARRINGTON JEFFREY J LIVING TRUST 2471 PRESIDIO DR SAN DIEGO CA 92103 MORET RICHARD M & CRANE ROBETTE L 6114 E MIRAMAR DR TUCSON AZ 85715 MCDONALD FABIOLA M 804 CITRUS PL CARLSBADCA 92008 BERNAL RALPH R & PENELOPE R 1956 CIRCLE PARK LN ENCINITAS CA 92024 FRIEDRICHS JOSEPH S & ROSIE 3160 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 DIAZROSARIOV 735 ANCHOR WAY :ARLSBADCA 92008 MISIOWIEC CATHERINE 0 710 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 KNOLL ADRIENNE POBOX 222 NACOAZ 85620 DOOM FAMILY TRUST 330 REDWOOD AVE :ARLSBAD CA 92008 LALONDE FAMILY TRUST 565 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 HARTMANN LORRAINE F 630 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBADCA 92008 3ULL OWENM&TERRIL i17HILLCRESTDR ONGVIEWWA 98632 JUNCAL RAYMOND W & HELEN J 550 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANDAVAZORENEE A FAMILY TRUST POBOX 4426 CARLSBAD CA 92018 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez a ia hachure afin de | rou^lor ie rohAiri Pon-UD^^ ! www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to | expose Pop-up Edge™ ^ AVERY® 5160® ! A RECTOR JOHN L& CATHY E 545 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CASSITY JANEH 645 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 MUZZARELLI DIANA W 1997 TRUST 2201 N BROADWAY ST #169 NEW ULM MN 56073 SCARPELLI ANTHONY & CECILIA 92-116 KOHI PL KAPOLEI HI 96707 MA HARRY HSIANGPO FAMILY TRUST 252 HAMPDEN TER ALHAMBRA CA 91801 ZICKAFOOSE DAVID W 745 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 RORABACH KARINA 560 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 JAWOR SCOTT S & PATRICIA L 610 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 PIERCE BRIAN E & GINA M 625 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 MCMILLAN CHARMION B TRUST 1065 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ODONNELL FAMILY 1991 TRUST 3976 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 CORBIN DALE & DEBRA 431 TAMARACKAVE CARLSBADCA 92008 MAHIN REVOCABLE TRUST 1745 KIRK PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 FLEMING LINDA L 555 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 MATTHEWS PETER F & PATRICIA J TRUST 3032 UNION ST SAN DIEGO CA 92103 KONONCHUK FAMILY TRUST 3305 TYLER ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 WEST JACKH JRTR 790 VALE VIEW DR VISTA CA 92081 GEORGE &LEROY TRUST 790 VALE VIEW DR VISTA CA 92081 RAMIREZ JULIO H 1298 BUENA VISTA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 H F L P-DOLPHIN BEACH LLC ATTN: MATT PETCOFF 1430 LARIMER ST #200 DENVER CO 80202 OROZCO DANIEL D POBOX 607 CARLSBAD CA 92018 3ARCELLA KATHERINE I 1081 CHESTNUT AVE :ARLSBAD CA 92008 GARDNER JEFFREY L & ANGELA C 772 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 PRUITT MICHAEL N & THERESA L 770 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBADCA 92008 .AMARCA JAMES A & BEYER MARCY L 3965 HIBISCUS CIR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 BALING KATHERINE EST OF 511 WALNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROOSEVELT VILLAGE LLC 3957 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ^NEWALT ANTHONY TRUST VOJOHNAANEWALT 1835 SPRINGSIDE RD AN DIEGO CA92128 JAEGER CHESTER E & EILEEN D TRS 636 ALAMOSA DRIVE CLAREMONT CA 91711 CARLSBAD VILLAGE PROFESSIONAL CENTER LLC 2945 HARDING ST #105 CARLSBAD CA 92008 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez a ia hachure afin de i www.avery.com i.fion.f;n.AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge^"" AVERY® 5160® I A HIGHTOWER CLOTILDE A TR (DCSD) C/0 CLAUDIA GAY 3675 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 RVNINC 727 S BREA BLVD BREA CA 92821 MARTINSON CHARLES S BYPASS TRUST 1370 BELHAVENRD SAN MARINO CA 91108 LOPEZ RICHARD V & CARMEN A 815 AVOCADO LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 CRUZ MICHAEL W & CRUZ JOHN M 19230 NEARBROOK ST CANYON COUNTRY CA91351 MALTINSKY ROBERT P TRUST 210 W AVENIDA SAN ANTON ID SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARLSBAD POBOX 913 CARLSBADCA 92018 CINNAMON APARTMENT PARTNERSHIP C/O JAMES F WEBER 580 BEECH AVE #A CARLSBADCA 92008 GLORIOSO ANGELA TRUST 364 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 STAVISKI FAMILY TRUST 366 HEMLOCK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 DIAZ RAUL F & LAFFERTY ALICIA M 3936 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 STOUT FAMILY INTERVIVOS TRUST 2914 LUAN ADR OCEANSIDE CA 92056 ANGEL FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 3329 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SALDANA ROLANDO A LIVING TRUST 7424 CIRCULO SEQUOIA CARLSBADCA 92009 HASSELL CARL & JOYCE FAMILY TRUST 3935 LINMAR LN CARLSBADCA 92008 FLEMING ROBERTS DONNA 2645 BRIGHTON RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 VALADEZ JOSEA& SYLVIA M 3234 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCANLON FAMILY TRUST 7306BORLAPL CARLSBAD CA 92009 MCCARTHY MILES D DECEDENTS TRUST 2545 HANSEN AVE FULLERTON CA 92831 WAHLRAB FAMILY TRUST. 3228 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 DELOACH RALPH K TRUST C/0 NANCY DELOACH 12141 AVENIDA CONSENTIDO SAN DIEGO CA 92128 DIGIACOMO JOHN A 3471 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 HERNANDEZ MARIANO 1325 HIGGINS ST OCEANSIDE CA 92058 CARLSBAD M AC PROPERTIES LLC 2152 FALLS CITY CT HENDERSON NV 89044 30NZALEZ MIGUEL & FRANCISCA TRUST 3119 MADISON ST #B :ARLSBAD CA 92008 ALVARADO GILBERT J & SHERRY L 10112 CIRCLE PLN ESCONDIDO CA 92026 RUIZGERARDO&ELISA 770 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 :OBIAN ALBERTO TRUST '68 MAGNOLIA AVE :ARLSBAD CA 92008 GUERRA MAGDALENA M 3445 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MISSION FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 5785 OBERLIN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 Etiquettes faciles a peier A Sensde Repliez a la hachure afin de I raxtalar ta rakrtrri Dnn.iinMC ! www.avery.com i^nn.r;n.AVPRv Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® I A BARRERA REYNALDO & REGINA 3221 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 GOMEZ FAMILY TRUST 4765 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 STROBEN FAMILY 2006 TRUST 1724 CALAVO CT CARLSBADCA 92008 JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST 2308EAMERIGE AVE FULLERTON CA 92831 ANDERSON MICHAEL A & ORALIA C TRUST 1060 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 CARRENO DAGOBERTO P 1030 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 NOVAK KATHLEEN 822 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBADCA 92008 GAY ELIZABETH C TRUST 2272 SOLEDAD RANCHO RD SAN DIEGO CA 92109 PATTERSON FAMILY TRUST 3995 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBADCA 92008 SLAWSON GRANT & MCCAFFERY VICTORIA 12710 HERITAGE GLEN CT SAN DIEGO CA 92130 JAMES JOYCE ATR 3931 GARFIELD ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 GOMEZ CONSUELO M 3306 MADISON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 HATTER LARRY W & CATHLEEN E TRUST 2344 LITTLER LN OCEANSIDE CA 92056 HARTZELL FAMILY TRUST 4009 CRESCENT POINT RD CARLSBADCA 92008 MARR RUSSELL T 434LAVETAAVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 NORMAN PATRICK M 893 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 MUKAILLC C/O ROBERT & OLIVIA LECHNER 2939 AUSTIN TER CARLSBADCA 92008 SALAZAR LINDA A REVOCABLE TRUST POBOX 102 CARLSBADCA 92018 WILBER SABINA BTR POBOX94 CARLSBADCA 92018 HAHN DANIEL J& MELISSA D 3914 SHERIDAN PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 KOYL REAL ESTATE VENTURES LP 7230 BABILONIA ST , CARLSBADCA 92009 VIONROY MARIO R & MARJORIE A TRS 749 MAGNOLIA AVE #B :ARLSBADCA 92008 MATA ROMALDA M LIVING TRUST 3450 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 MONEDA CORP 1900E25TH ST VERNON CA 90058 :EL0NA JOSEPH A & YOUNG TERESA T 5095 NAPOOKALA CIR 'RINCEVILLE HI 96722 MONTION DOLORES A 6897 HARDING RD VALLEY SPGS CA 95252 GOMBAR JOHN & BARBARA LIVING TRUST 07-22-99 POBOX 1667 CARLSBAD CA 92018 RICARDEZ ROBERTO 22 SAN DIEGO ST )CEANSIDE CA 92058 CALVERT SUSAN K 16315 BERNARDO OAKS DR SAN DIEGO CA 92128 NEW POINTE INVESTMENT 15 L L C 16880 W BERNARDO DR #230 SAN DIEGO CA 92127 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de | www.avery.com 1 -snn-r: rk- A\/C D V Ea^ Peel® Labels Use Aveiy® Template 5160® EUREKA LLC POBOX 1131 CARDIFF CA 92007 Bend along line to expose Pop-Up Edge™ BUSH FAMILY 2008 TRUST 2591 ALAMO COUNTRY CIR ALAMO CA 94507 AVERY® 5160® LAVENUTA FAMILY TRUST 1045 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 BROWN LARRY & ELIZABETH TRUST 3965 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 KELLENBERGER FRED & PEGGY 3266 EUREKA PL CARLSBADCA 92008 HOPPE CASA DEL SOL L L C C/OCONCEPCION HOPPE 6530 EL CAMINO DEL TEATRO LA JOLLACA 92037 OROURKE SHEILA 244 CHINQUAPIN AVE#A CARLSBADCA 92008 LEM DOONG W & SUMIKO E FAMILY TRUST 3925 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 HARVEY GLORIA D LIVING TRUST 795 AVOCADO LN CARLSBADCA 92008 CARLSBAD SHORES APARTMENT HOMES 1322 SCOTT ST #204 SAN DIEGO CA 92106 HAMILTON CHRIS J & JUDITH W 407 PACIFIC AVE SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 3095 HARDING LLC 1120 SILVERADO ST LA JOLLACA 92037 UBER FAMILY TRUST 31130 HILLTOP DR VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 PRATTJEFFERY 2470 SUNRISE DR BISHOP CA 93514 ORTIZ J JESUS & ESTHER 840 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 MANNO ILARIO & MARIE 1309 VISTA COLINA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92078 BOGARD SUSAN M 841 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 DIRTADIAN ARA & LAURA 631 HARROW AVE SAN MATEO CA 94402 GAOIRAN MANUEL P TRUST 3520 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ZIRCON HOLDINGS LLC 807 E MISSION RD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 VAGENAS PETER & JANET T 88 N BERKELEY AVE PASADENA CA 91107 3ILVESTRI FAMILY TRUST 3926 HIBISCUS CIR :ARLSBAD CA 92008 CLARK REVOCABLE TRUST 3914 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBADCA 92008 LOPEZ JANICE B 1620 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 3AMADILLC 494 UNION ST #601 )AN DIEGO CA 92101 FRANCIS STEPHEN W & NANCY A POBOX 655 RAMONA CA 92065 VENSTROM FAMILY TRUST 2933 LANCASTER RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 lEIDERMAN BRIAN & JOYCE TRUST 415 FOREST AVE ARLSBADCA 92008 URETAJOELA 3280 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 PACHECO FAMILY SURVIVORS TRUST 3357 MADISON ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 :ttquettes facHes h peler • Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de j www.avery.eofn i^nrw;rk-A\/FRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® ACOSTA FAMILY TRUST 3945 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 Bend along Hne to | expose Pop-Up Edge™ J SANTARCANGELO MICHAEL & MELISSA 843 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBADCA 92008 AVERY® 5160® I i KEITH CYNTHIA L REVOCABLE TRUST 3945 JEFFERSON ST CARLSBADCA 92008 FITZPATRICK FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 31338 LAKE VISTA CIR BONSALL CA 92003 URETAJAVERA 3280 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBADCA 92008 RAMOS JOSE J&NANCY A 2358 PIO PICO DR CARLSBADCA 92008 CAVENY CHRIS 3946 LINMAR LN CARLSBAD CA 92008 HENDERSON TERRY & SARAH 1044 PALM AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 NAYUDU TRUST 320 WALNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 POTTER MARGARET I 856 SEABRIGHT LN SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 WILLIAMS GW CO 3190 CLEARVIEWWAY#200 SAN MATEO CA 94402 WILLSON ELLIS M REVOCABLE TRUST 1120 SILVERADO ST LA JOLLACA 92037 CYPRESS COVE APTS LP 1322 SCOTT ST #204 SAN DIEGO CA 92106 CIRCLE K STORES INC C/0 TOSCO MKTC0#DC17 POBOX 52085 PHOENIX AZ 85072 J&A DEBS FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 240 TRAFALGAR LN SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 PIELLI CHRISTOPHER & BOL CAROLINE E 26913 SANTA YNEZ WAY VALENCIA CA 91355 GONZALES ADAM M 4887 FOXCREEK TRL RENO NV 89519 MARTINEZ GUADALUPE 3274 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 ROSE ALVIN & MARIE TRUST 1060 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBADCA 92008 HYDE JOHN R & MARTUS CAROLYN 4276 MANCHESTER AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 RODRIGUEZ FLORENCIO FAMILY TRUST 2106 CROWN VIEW WAY OCEANSIDE CA 92056 RYAN FAMILY LIVING TRUST 42-175 KANSAS ST ^ALM DESERT CA 92211 CHAVEZ ROSA M TRUST 3484 ROOSEVELT ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 LANDIS CELIA R 3423 SOUTHWOOD DR OCEANSIDE CA 92058 -lERROS ROBERT &OLGA 320 CITRUS PL :ARLSBAD CA 92008 M BAKER MANAGEMENT INC POBOX340 GAPITOLA CA 95010 DOANLARRYG 2873 HIGHLAND DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 /lAYNES WILLIAM TJR& LISA E 250 TAMARACK AVE :ARLSBADCA 92008 KOUMA MARTIN TRUST 3630 HARDING ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 HARRISON DAVID C 620 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 :tiquettes faciles a peler A Sens de Repliez k la hachure afin de | www.avery.com Easy Peel® Labels ttee Avery® Template 5160® CERDA DANIEL J & ERNESTINE C 1915 ANDREWS CT OCEANSIDE CA 92054 Bend along line to expose Pop-Up Edge™ SOTO VERA A TRUST 985 OAK AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY® 5160® I BALSER MERRILL E & JANE FAMILY TRUST 3419HOLLYBERRY DR VISTA CA 92084 MARTINEZ VERA M TRUST 1041 MADISON PL LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 NEELY REVOCABLE TRUST 3935 HIBISCUS CIR CARLSBADCA 92008 CHRISTO CRAIG M& AIMEE M 720 ANCHOR WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008 JIMENEZ ERICA C 821 CAMELLIA PL CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5934 PRIESTLEY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92011 ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT 101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT STE 250 255 PICO AV SAN MARCOS CA 92069 SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT 710 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS CA 92024 OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT 1966 OLIVENHAIN RD ENCINITAS CA 92024 LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DISTRICT TIMJOCHEN 1960 LA COSTA AV CARLSBAD CA 92009 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AV ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF VISTA 200 CIVIC CENTER DR VISTA CA 92084 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT 201 VALLECITOS DE ORO SAN MARCOS CA 92069 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT Of FISH AND GAME 3883 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SD COUNTY PLANNING STE 310 5510 OVERLAND AV SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STE 100 9174 SKY PARKCT SAN DIEGO CA 92123-4340 SAN DIEGO LAFCO STE 200 9335 HAZARD WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SANDAG STE 800 401 B ST SAN DIE( :A 92101 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 10124 OLD GROVE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92131 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 5010 HIDDEN VALLEY RD :ARLSBAD CA 92011 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION SAN DIEGO CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776 CA COASTAL COMMISSION ATTN KANANI BROWN STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 itiquettes U(Mes d peler A Sens de Repliez k la hachure afm de I.TM I i-Rnn.^n.A\/PRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to i expose Pop-up Edge™ j AVERY® 5160® John Bonanno 17190 Bernardo Center Dr. San Diego, CA 92128 Robert C. Little 3611 Valley Centre Dr., Ste. 550 San Diego, CA 92130 Allen M. Jones 7577 Mission Valley Rd., Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92108 Heather C. Turner Aviara Resort Associates Limited Partnership 11828 La Grange Ave. Los Angeles, CA90025 Todd Galarneau The Corky McMillin Companies PO Box 85104 San Diego, CA 92186-5104 Mark Gordey 7783 Palenque St. Carlsbad, CA 92009-8026 Gail Carrol 1254 Mariposa Rd. Carlsbad, CA 92011-4206 Geoffrey Sherman Excel Trust 17140 Bernardo Center Dr. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92128 Jerry Dimolios 3982 Garfield SL Carlsbad, CA 92008 William Stone Excel Trust 17140 Bernardo Center Dr. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92128 David K. Landes Land Advisors Organization 9707 Waples St. San Diego, CA 92121 Adrian McKibbin, President 7529 Draper Ave., Ste. D La Jolla, CA 92037 Carrie M. Timko 10200 Willow Creek Rd. Ste. 100 San Diego, CA 92131 Jon H. Epsten 10200 Willow Creek Rd. Ste. 100 San Diego, CA 92131 Dolores Welty 2076 Sheridan Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Jan Kennard 7251 Spoonbill Lane Carlsbad, CA 92011 Jan Fretwill 7279 Spoonbill Lane Carlsbad, CA 92011 Thomas Krouse 6637 Curlew Terrace Carlsbad, CA 92011 Steve Lincoln 6638 Towhee Lane Carlsbad, CA 92011 Craig Beam 2815 Townsgate Road, Ste. 200 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Todd Galarneau 2750 Womble Rd. San Diego, OA 92106 Fred C. Sandquist 6408 Crossbill Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92011 Cynthia Eppeldauer 3 MacArthur Place Santa Ana, CA 92707 Katherine McHenry 3210 Via de Canto Carlsbad, CA 92010 Barbara Hamilton 2335 Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Rob Ladwig 2234 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Bill Arnold 3432 Don Ortega Drive Carlsbad, CA 92010 Margie Caruso 6624 Brookite Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Sherry & Gil Alvarado 3327 Tyler St Carlsbad, CA 92008 John Chavez 2405 Granada Way Carlsbad, CA 92010 itiquettes faciles a peler • Sensde Repliez a la hachure afin de \ www.avery.com 4 onn_/=/> A%#CD\x William Stone 17140 Bernardo Center Drive San Diego, CA 92128 Geoff Reeslund Hughes Investments 23 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, CA 92660 Gil Miltenberger Integral Communities 2235 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 David Landes 1035 Loretta Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 Kasey Cinciarelli 2727 Lyons Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92010 Mel Vennon 1044 N. Ivy St Escondido, CA 92026 Bruce Bandemer 6341 Allston St. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Teri Chalfant 450 Marylynn Ct. Escondido, CA 92025 Karen Merrill 3681 Seaflower Lane Oceanside, CA 92056 Lucinda Vigne 3880 Hibiscus Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008 Michael Hedrick 3557 Madison St.; Apt. B Carlsbad, CA 92008 Theresa J. Childs 3331 Madison St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ofelia E. Escobedo 1611 James Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mario Monroy 749 Magnolia Avenue, #B Carlsbad, CA Jacques Romatier 7283 Spoonbill Lane Carlsbad, CA 92011 Shelley Hayes Caron PO Box 1502 Carlsbad, CA 92018 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the prin^ of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen Times-Advocate and which newspapers f adjudicated newspapers of general circi the Superior Court of the County of S;| State of California, for the City of Ocea the City of Escondido, Court Decree 171349, for the County of San Diego, notice of which the annexed is a printed in type not smaller than nonpariel), published in each regular and entire issi newspaper and not in any supplement t the following dates, to-wit: February 16*^ 2013 Proof of Publication of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r°l K K^^f.^^ ^^'^^'''^ '"^^''^"^ that the City Council of the City of nlf ^B^in n m on ? H TK' '''' ^^^'^^^^ ^'"^9^ ^Le, Carlsbad Ca I or- .H^nln M t^ ; °"J"^f l^^bruary 26, 2013, to consider: 1) approval of an addendum to the p eviously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element; 2) approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residenSTand use designation; and 3 approval of amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program to change land use designations and zoning on various prop- erties hroughout the Barrio, which is generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak A™ east of the railroad and west of lnterstate-5. ' Whereas, on December 5, 2012 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 6-1 (Arnold) to recom- mend approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005 20 0 Housing Elemen ; recommend approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zon ing Ordinance Chapter 21.90 to create a new residential land use designation- and recommend aoDrovtlnf amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements, Zoning olance and L^^^^^ Pmgram to change land use designations and zoning on various properties throughout the Bar whl T generally located north of Tamarack Ave., south of Oak Ave., east of the railroad and west of Interstate Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing Copies of the agenda bill wiil be available on and after February 22, 2013. If you have any questions please conSc Jennifer Jesser in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4637 or iennifer.iesser@n.ri.h.Hn. If you challenge the General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Zone Code Amendment and/or Local Coast- a Program Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public heanng descnbed in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Citv of CarlsTad Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or p^^3r to the public h^^^^^^^^ CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: GPA 12-03/GPA 12-04/ZC 12-02/ZC 12-03/ZCA 12-02/LCPA 12-03 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 - BARRIO February 16, 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at E On This 1"^^^ dido, California , day February 2013 Jane AUshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Housing Element Program 2.1 - Barrio GPA 12-03/ZC 12-02 & GPA 12-04/ZC 12-03/LCPA 12-03 Proposal Summary •Modify land use & zoning designations in the Barrio •New residential land use designation (R-30) •Addendum to the 2005- 2010 Housing Element MND •No development proposed Background •Sept. 11, 2012 –CC reviewed the Barrio land use changes as part of the Envision Carlsbad Draft Preferred Plan –Proposal consistent with the Draft Preferred Plan accepted by CC •Dec. 5, 2012 –PC recommended approval of Barrio land use changes Amendment Objectives •Implement Housing Element Program 2.1 •Encourage revitalization and reinvestment in the Barrio •Bring existing uses into conformance with allowed densities •Protect existing character of Barrio core Housing Element Program 2.1 •HE Program 2.1 identifies land use changes throughout the Barrio to provide additional housing opportunities •Program 2.1 implementation deadline April 30, 2013 Land Use Change Summary •Barrio Core: –RMH (8-15 du/ac); consistent with existing built densities •Barrio Perimeter: –R-30; consistent with existing multifamily character •Create R-30 –(23-30 du/ac) Revitalize & Reinvest •Public Investment in the Barrio –$28M in public improvements completed since year 2000 –$17.5M in future improvements (next 5 years) Barrio Core •148 lots (3,500-7,000 sf) •231 total du’s •Majority (84%) w/1-2 du’s –65 lots w/1 du –60 lots w/2 du’s –10 lots w/3+ du’s •96 lots (65%) currently designated RM (4-8 du/ac) Barrio Core •59 lots (40%) exceed allowed density •RMH = 138 lots (93%) will be consistent with density Barrio Core •Potential Capacity –Existing = 20 du’s –Proposed = 62 du’s Barrio Core Potential Increase in Dwelling Units Per Lot (Core) 0 Dwelling 1 Dwelling 2 Dwellings 3 Dwellings 4 Dwellings 85 Lots 56 Lots 5 Lots 1 Lot 1 Lot Barrio Perimeter •145 total lots •962 total du’s •816 du’s (85%)part of multifamily housing •134 lots (94%) currently designated RMH (8-15 du/ac) Barrio Perimeter •72 lots (50%) exceed allowed density •R-30 = 129 lots (89%) consistent with density Barrio Perimeter •Potential Capacity –Existing = 137 du’s –Proposed = 669 du’s New R-30 Land Use Designation •New R-30 designation –Density range 23-30 du/ac –25 du/ac GMCP New R-30 Land Use Designation •Reason for new R-30 designation: –Assist in accommodating the city’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA); and –Assist in satisfying the State’s expectation for land at 30 du/ac Inside & Outside Coastal Zone •Outside Coastal Zone –Effective 30 days after CC approval •Inside Coastal Zone –Not effective until Coastal Commission approval Growth Management Units Needed From Excess Dwelling Unit Bank Core 42 Excess Units Perimeter 532 Excess Units Total Barrio Area 574 Excess Units Excess Units Available 3,138 Excess Units •Land Use changes will not exceed NW quadrant dwelling unit cap Summary •Proposal will: –Implement HE Program 2.1 –Encourage revitalization & reinvestment –Bring existing uses into conformance with allowed densities –Protect character of Barrio core Recommendation •That the City Council: –ADOPT Resolution No. 2013-048, APPROVING: 1) an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2005-2010 Housing Element, 2) an amendment to the General Plan to create the R-30 designation, 3) amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Open Space & Conservation Map, and 4) an amendment to the LCP land use map and zoning map; and –INTRODUCE Ordinance Nos. CS-205 & CS-206, APPROVING amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. City Council Discussion Examples of Density Carlsbad – Pine Ave & Roosevelt 14.8 dwellings/acre Carlsbad – Roosevelt Gardens 19.5 dwellings/acre Examples of Density Carlsbad – Village by the Sea 22.9 dwellings/acre Escondido – City Square 28 dwellings/acre Examples of Density Chula Vista - Pinnacle 30 dwellings/acre Carlsbad - Tavarua 54 dwellings/acre Barrio Photos Typical Dwellings in the Core Examples of Density Typical Existing Multi-Family Dwellings in the Perimeter Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Recent Construction – 2 Dwellings Barrio Photos Recent Construction – 1 Dwelling + granny flat Barrio Photos Recent Construction – 1 Dwelling Barrio Photos Recent Construction – 4 Dwellings Barrio Photos Barrio Museum Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Gaus House Barrio Photos Ramirez House Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Barrio Photos Demographics Census Data for Barrio (all) (includes a some areas outside the Barrio that are within the Census block) Total Housing Units Occupied Units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 1272 1198 (94%) 169 (14%) 1029 (86%) Age of Household Occupant (all) 15-24 years old 25-44 years old 45-64 years old 65+ years old Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 0 79 (3%) 35 (3%) 521 (43%) 73 (6%) 281 (24%) 61 (5%) 148 (12%) Total 79 (7%) Total 556 (46%) Total 354 (30%) Total 209 (17%) Demographics Census Data for Core (area proposed to be redesignated from RM to RMH) Total Housing Units Occupied Units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 151 144 (95%) 60 (42%) 84 (58%) Age of Household Occupant (Core – RM to RMH area) 15-24 years old 25-44 years old 45-64 years old 65+ years old Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 0 2 (1%) 16 (11%) 44 (31%) 25 (17%) 28 (20%) 19 (13%) 10 (7%) Total 2 (1%) Total 60 (42%) Total 354 (37%) Total (20%)