Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-26; City Council; 21145 Part A; Approve Disabilities Act Transition PlanCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 21.145 2/26/13 DEPT. TRANS APPROVE THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY DEPT. HEAD CITY ATTY. CITY MGR. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt City of Carlsbad Resolution No. 2013-049 approving the City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public RIghts-of-Way. ITEM EXPLANATION: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way provides the basis for the systematic construction of improvements that will create accessible pathways to public facilities. In addition to identifying and prioritizing improvements the plan estimates the cost of the improvements and identifies a schedule for appropriation of funds to be expended via the City's Capital Improvement Program. The impetus for the development and approval of the plan is a set of Federal, State and Local laws, codes and policies. At the federal level the Architectural Barrier Act of 1968, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and finally the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 address universal access, protection from discrimination based on disabilities and the extension of civil rights protections to all people with disabilities. Title II, Subtitle A, of the ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all services, programs and activities provided to the public by state and local governments whether they are federally funded or not. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) regulations implementing Title II requires local governments to evaluate and identify barriers that may limit accessibility for people with disabilities and to develop transition plans which describe how they will address the barriers. In accordance with DOJ guidelines. Transition Plans must: 1) Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities. 2) Describe the methods that will be implemented to make the facilities accessible. 3) Provide a timeline to bring facilities into compliance; and 4) Designate a person who is responsible for implementation of the plan. DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Marshall Plantz, 760-602-2766 Marshall.Plantz@.Carlsbadca.aov FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY COUNCIUBOARD ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC • DENIED CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN • CONTINUED • RETURNED TO STAFF • WITHDRAWN • OTHER-SEE MINUTES • AMENDED • Page 2 At the state level the State of California enacted its own version of the federal legislation which is incorporated within Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and is known as the California Building Standards Code. At the local level the Carlsbad City Council adopted Resolution 92-240, on July 28, 1992, which established an ADA Grievance Procedure Policy and approved an ADA Compliance Action Plan. The Action Plan included an inventory of non-compliant issues associated with city buildings and other public facilities throughout the city, costs associated with implementation, and a projected schedule for resolution of the issues. Building on the prior efforts, which focused on city buildings and adjacent facilities, this Transition Plan is focused on the public rights-of-way. The amount of public right-of-way area is very large and therefore to prepare a plan that can be reasonably implemented the Transition Plan analysis is focused on areas where the greatest amount of pedestrian activity can be expected to be found. To find and prioritize these areas, a GIS based ADA priority model was developed. The ADA priority model utilized demographic information, land use maps, zoning, activity centers, destinations, transit stops, street layout, collision data, street classification, and others to predict heavy pedestrian use area to determine the study areas. The public destinations in these areas include places such as city hall, community centers, recreation centers, post offices, parks, senior centers, libraries, police stations and fire stations. As a result of the priority modeling the City of Carlsbad was divided into three tier areas: Tier One (high priority). Tier Two (moderate priority) and Tier Three (low priority) areas. Tiers One and Two were designated as areas where fieldwork would be conducted to assess accessibility in the public right-of-way. Tier Three which is the remainder of the City could be the focus of future ADA planning efforts. After completing the fieldwork, the data was classified for the purposes of prioritizing the recommended improvements. After analyzing the data. Focus Study Areas A, B and C were identified to facilitate a more systematic implementation of the improvements. To further refine the prioritization and to identify the program of improvements Focus Study Area A was divided into three priority levels: 1) Priority Level One: The immediate block adjacent to a building identified as a public facility. 2) Priority Level Two: The area within one quarter mile of Priority Level One along existing roadways. 3) Priority Level Three: The remaining area within the highest ranking Focus Study Area. Once this prioritization was completed the location, type and estimated costs to implement the improvements were identified. As summarized in the Transition Plan the estimated costs for improvements in Focus Study Areas A and B are: 1) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level One - $950,000 2) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level Two - $720,000 3) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level Three - $2,030,000 4) Focus Study Areas B $1,610,000 Page 3 Given the scope and cost ofthe improvements identified a prioritized, phased and transitional approach is an appropriate strategy for the city to implement. In accordance with this strategy the improvements would be programmed based on the following timelines: 1) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level One - Near Term (1 -5 Years) 2) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level Two - Short Term (5-10 Years) 3) Focus Study Area A - Priority Level Three - Mid Term (10-20 Years) 4) Focus Study Areas B Long Term (20+ Years) In accordance with the applicable requirements the public input process for this plan was comprised of multiple meetings with local representational and advocacy groups for the disabled community and the pedestrian community at large. These groups consisted of the North County Transit District, Walk San Diego, Access to Independence, and the San Diego Center for the Blind. In addition the plan was presented to the City of Carlsbad Traffic Safety Commission on November 5, 2012, see attached meeting minutes. The Traffic Safety Commission received a presentation and unanimously approved staff's recommendation that the commission recommend City Council approval of the plan. In addition this item is being presented for City Council approval in conjunction with a noticed public hearing which included making the plan available for public review. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Approval of the Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights of Way is exempt from CEQA per to Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies. Future construction projects will be subject to review pursuant to CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: The programming of funds for these improvements will be implemented via adoption of the Capital Improvement Program Budget which occurs on an annual basis. As recommended, $950,000 would be programmed over the next five years, $720,000 over the five to 10 year time frame and another $2,030,000 over the 10 to 20 year time frame. The appropriation of the funds, which occurs one year at a time, would be approved starting with the adoption ofthe 2013-14 Capital Improvement Program. EXHIBITS: 1. City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Resolution No. 2013-049 approving the City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way. 2. City of Carlsbad Traffic Safety Commission, November 5, 2012 meeting minutes. 3. City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights of Way. (Appendix C in 11 x 17 size is on file in the City Clerk's office). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CITY OF CARLSBAD AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has an adopted Circulation Element of the General Plan which establishes a goal to promote, encourage, and accommodate a variety of transportation modes as alternatives to the automobile; and WHEREAS, an objective of the Circulation Element is to provide infrastructure and facilities necessary to accommodate pedestrians, bicycles, and other non-automobile modes of transportation; and WHEREAS, at their November 5, 2012 meeting the City of Carlsbad Traffic Safety Commission Council received a presentation from staff and unanimously approved staff recommendation that the Commission recommend that the City Council approve the City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the best interest of the citizens of Carlsbad to establish a City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way to guide the future planning, development and enhancement of pedestrian facilities and programs within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council did on February 26, 2013 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Plan; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the Plan, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering all comments received, the City Council considered all factors relating to the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council hereby APPROVES the City of Carlsbad Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way. 4 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AYES: Council Members Hall, Packard, Wood, Blackburn, Douglas. NOES: None. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council 2 of the City of Carlsbad on the 26*^ day of February 2013, by the foiiowing vote to wit: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MATT HALL, Mayor 12 ATTEST: 13 ABSENT: None. BARBARA ENGLESON, (SEAL) ^^S^ 18 =0:^^^:0 = 19 ^o•»^•J^/ MINUTES MEETING OF: DATE OF MEETING: TIME OF MEETING: PLACE OF MEETING: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION November 5, 2012 5:00 p.m. City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER Chair Jairo Valderrama called the Meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff Members Present: Chair Jairo Valderrama Vice-Chair Hope Wrisley Commissioner Fred Muir Commissioner Chris Chauncey Commissioner Kathryn Fox John Kim, Associate Engineer, Transportation Department Bryan Jones, Deputy Director, City Traffic Engineer Marshall Plantz, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 1, 2012 ACTION: VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: Motion by Vice-Chair Wrisley, and duly seconded by Commissioner Muir, to approve the minutes of the meeting held on October 1, 2012, as presented with a revision on page 7, paragraph 4 where it reads, "...asked for their opinion if it was not going to work" to be replaced with "asked for their vote if the final action differed from what was originally proposed". 4-0-0 Valderrama, Wrisley, Muir, Chauncey None None November 5,2012 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 2 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None PREVIOUS BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: ITEM 6A: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan was presented by Marshall Plantz. Mr. Plantz introduced Mike Singleton from KTU&A, the consultant that is currently working on the project with the city. Mr. Plantz explained that the object ofthe plan is to create accessible paths throughout the city for disabled persons. The plan was developed in accordance with legal responsibilities, access to Federal funding, and to implement City Council policy. The first step of the plan was to identify existing conditions. This was done by taking a look at the highest use areas for pedestrians. KTU&A collected data and identified areas of need. In addition, the city performed some public outreach by meeting with NCTD staff. Access to Independence, Walk SD, and SD Center for the Blind to get some insights into what works well. Next, the scope of Improvements was determined. This was done by focusing on the highest demand areas and access to public buildings and services. Priority levels were identified to determine the most logical method to create accessible paths. Based on the formation ofthe study areas and the assignment of priority levels within each study area, cost estimates and preliminary work plans were established as shown in the following table. STUDY AREA A Projected Costs Estimated Time Frame Priority Level 1 $950,000 0-5 years Priority Level 2 $720,000 5-10 years Priority Level 3 $2,030,000 10-20 years Study Area B was estimated to cost approximately $1,610,000 but no time frame was established for Study Area B. 7 November 5,2012 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 3 Staff is now seeking recommendation from TSC so that City Council can ultimately approve the plan and include funding in the Capital Improvement Program so that design and construction can begin. Thomas Castillo with NCTD asked if any ofthe El Camino Real would be looked into. Mr. Plantz replied that yes it is going to be part of Area B, so it will be looked at in the future. Vice Chair Wrisley asked if this plan includes streets without sidewalks? Mr. Plantz replied that the concept will consider streets without sidewalks. Commissioner Muir asked if future estimated dollars are in today's dollars. Mr. Plantz stated that yes it is and staff will revisit changes in dollars due to inflation and can ask for adjustments for costs in the future. Commissioner Chauncey asked what established the timeline and can it be accelerated, is it based solely on cost? Mr. Plantz answered that the timeline and cost is based on past history of yearly concrete work and other comparable projects. Mr. Plantz continued by saying that the pedestrian curb ramp inventory took 4-5 years and $500,000 to $1,000,000. Mr. Singleton added that there is not a required timeframe to complete this project by law but we do need to identify our needs. ACTION: Motion by Chair Valderrama, and duly seconded by Vice-Chair Wrisley, to approve the ADA Transition Plan. VOTE: 4-0-0 AYES: Valderrama, Wrisley, Muir, Chauncey NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ITEM 7: REPORT FROM TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS Vice Chair Wrisley asked why the city does not provide handicap parking on streets? 9 November 5,2012 Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Page 4 Mr. Singleton explained that there is not an obligation to have handicap parking for parallel parking but there is an obligation for angled parking. The laws have just recently been defined and clarified. ITEM 8: REPORT FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEER John Kim informed the Commissioners that the agenda bills for the Traffic Calming Plans on Esfera Street, Magnolia Avenue, and Levante Street would tentatively be going to Council at the last meeting ofthe year on December 11,2012. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion, Chair Valderrama adjourned the Meeting of November 5, 2012 at 5:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted. Rose Williams Secretary r July 2012 Prepared for: City of Ctrlsbad Prepared by: Plannins + Landscape Architecture JEFF KATZ ARCHITECTURE /o CityofCarlsbod This report was created for the City of Carlsbad by KTU+A Planning and Landscape Architecture and Jeff Katz Architecture, July 2012. II Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction 1 1.1. Project Purpose ^ 1.2. Project Limits ^ 1.3. Primary Project Goal ^ 1.4. Project Supporting Objectives 2 Section 2: Requirements 5 2.1. Federal Requirements • ^ 2.1 .I.ADA of 1990 • ^ 2.1.2. Title II and Transition Plans ^ 2.1.3. Guidelines for ADA in the Public Right-of-way (Department of Transportation) 6 2.2. State of California Requirements ^ 2.2.1. Title 24 ^ 2.3. City of Carlsbad Requirements 7 2.3.1. Council Policies Affecting ADA ^ 2.3.2. Departmental Standards Affecting ADA 7 2.3.3. General Plan Circulation and Land Use Element 7 2.3.4. Relationship with Pedestrian Master Plan ^ Section 3: Existing Conditions 9 3.1. Current Conditions ^ 3.1.1. Land Use ^ 3.1.2. Street Classification ^ 3.1.3. Volume of Traffic ^ 3.1.4. Observed Speeds ^ 3.1.5. Freeway Barriers ^ 3.1.6. Rail Line Barriers 3.1.7. Landform Barriers ^ ^ 3.2. Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right of Ways 25 3.3. Public Input Process 25 Section 4: Analysis 27 4.1. ADA Priority Area Computer Modeling 27 4.1.1. Attractors 4.1.2. Generators 4.1.3. Barriers 4.1.4. Detractors : 4.1.5. Composite 4.1.6. Differences Between the ADA and Pedestrian Master Plan Model 30 4.2. Site Survey Limits 4.2.1. Tier One Inventory Area 4.2.2. Tier Two Inventory Area 4.2.3. Tier Three Area • 4.3. Site Survey Methodology ^5 4.3.1. Priority Items for Field Check 4.3.2. standards and Guidelines for Checklist Items 35 4.4 Site Evaluation Forms • 4.5. Inventory Area Fieldwork Results 4.5.1. Overview of Area ^ 4.5.2. Existing Facilities ^ 4.5.3. Missing Facilities ^ 4.5.4. Major Deficiencies 4.5.5. Screening Criteria ADA Transition Plan Section 5: Project Prioritization 51 5.1. Criteria for Project Prioritization 51 5.2. List of Projects by Priority 51 5.2.1. Overview of Prioritized Projects , 5T 5.2.2. Proposed Improvements 51 5.3. Potential Funding Sources 51 5.3.1. Local Funds 51 5.3.2. Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) 52 5.3.3. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds 52 5.4. Implementation 55 5.4.1. Near-Term Projects , 55 5.4.2. Short-Term Projects 55 5.4.3. Mid-Term Projects 56 5.4.4. Long-Term Projects , 56 Section 6: Implementation & Guidelines 57 6.1. Typical Issues and Countermeasure Treatments 57 6.2. Walkway Surfaces 57 6.2.1. Minimum Widths 57 6.2.2. width Goals ....~IIIZ~~ZI"Z'. 57 6.2.3. Trip Hazards 57 6.2.4. Potential Barriers and Hazards 57 6.2.5. street Furnishings 57 6.2.6. Utility Element Locations 57 6.3. Transitional Surfaces 59 6.3.1. Pedestrian Curb Ramps- New 59 6.3.2. Pedestrian Curb Ramps- Modifications 59 6.3.3. When to Use Truncated Domes 59 6.3.4. When to Use Tactile Strips 59 6.3.5. Maximum Slopes 59 6.3.6. Minimum Widths 59 6.3.7. When to Use Apex or Directional Ramps 61 6.4. On-street Parking ADA Requirements 62 6.4.1. Minimum ADA Spaces per Block of On Street Facilities 62 6.4.2. Perpendicular ADA Space Guidelines 62 6.4.3. Parallel ADA Space Guidelines 62 6.4.4. Angled ADA Space Guidelines 63 6.4.5. Access Aisles 63 6.4.6. signage and Pavement Markings 63 6.5. Intersection Crossing 63 6.5.1. stop sign Crossings 63 6.5.2. signalized Crossings 63 6.5.3. Advance Stop Bars ...63 6.5.4. Median and Pedestrian Refuge Islands 64 6.5.6. Mid-block Crossings 64 6.5.7. Pedestrian Control Devices/Accessible Pedestrian Signals 66 Appendices 67 A: Glossary of Terms 68 B: Meeting Notes - Stakeholder and Advocacy Meetings 70 C: Prioritized Projects - Inventory and Analysis 77 D: General Grievance Form 236 E: References 237 <aft=#,.- -X. ./ « ADA Transition Plan ADA Transition Plan 1A. Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to address Federal leg- islation known as the Annericans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and subsequent legislation in the State of Cali- fornia, known as Title 24. The project assessed compli- ance ofthe publicly accessible portions ofthe public right-of-ways within the City of Carlsbad, California. The development of this'Transition Plan" is also intended to improve walking conditions for all users ofthe public right-of-ways, thereby increasing the City of Carlsbad's reputation as a pedestrian friendly community for people of all abilities. Universal access is a planning and design philosophy that serves to not only meet the strict minimums of ADA and Title 24, but to emphasize that these improvements benefit all users of public facilities, includ- ing those with no physical challenges to those where mobility is very difficult. Persons that are aging are finding that current minor ailments are evolving into major mobility problems. Given aging demographic trends, senior populations are becoming a much larger percent ofthe population, thereby making the improvement of walking environments even more important. 1.2. Project Limits This project focuses on public right-of-ways in Carlsbad (see Figure 1.1). The study includes only those areas that are outside ofthe travel lanes of roadways, to the outer limits of existing public right-of-ways. They do not include off-street public lands, facilities, nor do they include any private areas, all of which are subject to varying degrees of regulation under California Title 24 and Federal ADA. The total number of publicly accessible areas within the City of Carlsbad is very large and beyond the capabilities of current inventory budgets and future capital improvement budgets to address the full city. To prioritize the focus ofthis study (and future capital improvements), a GIS-based ADA priority model was developed to determine areas where the greatest percent ofthe walking public can be expected to be found. A secondary purpose ofthe priority model was to focus the efforts ofthe facility inventory and to base future project priorities on those areas of most concern for public right-of-way access to public programs and facilities.These public destinations include places such as city hall, com- munity centers, recreation centers, post offices, parks, public trails, transit stops, senior centers, libraries, performance centers, police stations and fire stations. All public right-of-ways are priorities for barrier removal. However, not all areas receive the same level ofd emand or use as others.The ADA priority model utilized demographic information, land use maps, zoning, activity centers, destinations, transit stops, street layout, collision data, street classifications (in- cluding levels of service, average daily traffic, posted speed limit, etc.) and other GIS data that predict heavy pedestrian use areas that were used to determine the study areas. The results ofthe priority model divided the City into three tier areas:Tier One (high priority), TierTwo (moderate priority) and Tier Three (low priority) areas. Tier One and Tier Two were designated as the facility inventory area where fieldwork was conducted to assess barriers within right-of-ways forthis study, TierThree is comprised of the remainder ofthe City and could be the focus of future ADA transition planning efforts. Upon completion ofthe inventory area fieldwork, the fieldwork data was reclassified for the purposes of prioritizing recommended improvements. As a result ofthis reclassification, the City was divided into three study focus areas: "A, B and C". Focus Study Area "A" is comprised of most of Tier One and a small portion of Tier Two; Focus Study Area "B" includes the southern portion of Tier One and the remainder of TierTwo; and Focus Study Area "C" is comprised of Tier Three, which is the remainder ofthe City. To further direct the prioritization of facility improvements, Focus Study Area "A" was divided into three priority levels: Priority Level One: The immediate block adjacent to the entry of a building identified as a public facility. Priority Level Two: The area within one quarter mile of Priority Level One along existing roadways. Priority Level Three:The remaining area within Focus Study Area "A". Figure 1.2 provides a summary ofthe process described above for establishing the study area limits and facility improvement prioritization. 13. Primary Project Goal The primary goal ofthe project is to provide a complete and accurate survey of walking facilities within the public right-of-way in the designated tier areas that can then be addressed as part ofa broader strategic "Transition Plan". The Plan outlines a comprehensive approach to removing public barriers to walking by mapping out a program that wili transition the City from its current levels of non-attainment of ADA and Title 24 requirements, to compliance. Given the enormity of the project and the limitations on public funds, a prioritized, phased and transitional approach is the appropriate method for the City. Transition plans allow a municipality to dedicate a reasonable amount of public funds to remove these barriers on a recurring basis instead of all at once. Federal ADA and Title 24 requirements allow this type of transitional planning and phased implementation to address non-compliant public barriers. 1.4. Project Supporting Objectives The supporting objectives are to: • Assure that public funds are allotted to public use areas where the greatest number of persons can take advantage of these improvements. • Prioritize the types of destinations and origins where a higher than normal level of physically challenged or aging persons may exist. • Understand that higher levels of pedestrian activity are typically located near tourist destina- tions, public facilities, parks, beaches and other major employment, school or shopping desti- nations. Areas with higher levels of walking activity, need to be considered high priorities for the removal of barriers to public travel. • identify the specific improvements needed at intersections, ramps and walkways, to provide better connectivity, increase public safety and to remove obstacles that impede those with and without physical challenges. • Recognize opportunities where Federal ADA and California Title 24 corrective actions would benefit walkability and urban design quality. • Recommend a phased approach that will allow for a logical and economically viable method to implement a broad range of Tier One and TierTwo projects. • Suggest guidelines to be used by the City of Carlsbad in the future for retrofitting or replacing public right-of-ways barriers to travel. • Deliver a computer database and GIS mapping products that will allow the City to modify and update the work products ofthis transition plan. ADA Transition Plan 0.75 15 Figure 1.1: City of Carlsbad Regional Map City of Carlsbad A model was created to help rank where efforts should be taken to improve the public right of way Areas of tiigher priority were red and lower priority were blue. Focus Study Areas The priority levels were limited to three categories and the model was clipped to the public right of way. Next, the fieldwork data from Tiers 1& 2 was reclassified for the purposes of prioritizing recommended Improvements. The three categories were modified to form contiguous areas Identified as Tiers 1,2 & 3. ReldworkMap i ocus Study Area A Carlsbad was divided Into three Focus Study Areas. Focus study Area A (green) Is comprised of most of Tier 1 and part of Tier 2. Focus Study Area B (yellow) includes the southern portion of Tier 1 and the remainder of Tier 2. Focus study Area C (blue) is Tier 3. Tiers 1 & 2 were designated as inventory areas. Fieldwork was conducted for Tiers 1 & 2. Focus study Area A was further divided Into three priority levels. Priority Level 1 (yellow) Is the Immediate block adjacent to a building Identified as a public facility (orange). Priority Level 2 (gray) Is the area within a quarter mile of Priority Level 1 alor^g existing roadways. Priority Level 3 (green) Is the remaining area within Focus Study Area A. Figure 1.2: Process Chart ADA Transition Plan A variety of regulations apply to public use areas with- in the City of Carlsbad. The following requirements specifically relate to creating a barrier-free walking environment within the public right-of-way. Where requirements conflict, the more restrictive or demand- ing ofthe two regulations will apply. This Transition Plan was created specifically for docu- menting the accessibility compliance of pedestrian facilities within the public rights-of-way. The following information provides the basis for the require- ments for these types of facilities. 2.1. Federal Requirements Sweeping civil rights legislation took place in 1968,1973 and 1990 regarding the requirement for public agencies and privately owned businesses to remove barriers that prevented equitable access to facili- ties, services and employment. Below is a summary ofthe most recent legislation as it applies to this transition plan. 2.1.1. ADA of 1990 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted in 1990, extends comprehensive civil rights pro- tections to all people with disabilities. Title II of the ADA addresses the law's requirements of local governments in their interactions with people with disabilities. This legislation mandates that qualified disabled individuals shall not be excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of, or be subjected to discrimination under any public program or activity. In the ADA, the term disability means, with respect to an individual having: (1) A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more ofthe major life activities of such individual; (2) A record of such an impairment; or (3) Being regarded as having such impairment. If an individual meets any one of these three tests, that person is considered to be an individual with a disability for purposes of coverage under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Revisions to the ADA were adopted in 2011 and become mandatory requirements in 2012. For information and a summary ofthe revisions to the ADA, please visit: www.ada.gov. 2.1.2. Title II and Transition Plans Title II ofthe ADA is companion legislation to two previous federal statutes and regulations; the Ar- chitectural Barriers Acts of 1968 and Section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Architectural Barriers Act requires universal access to facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds. Section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a federal law that protects qualified individuals from discrimination based on their disability. The nondiscrimination requirements ofthe law apply to em- ployers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. City of Carlsbad Title II, Subtitle A, ofthe Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of dis- ability in all services, programs, and activities provided to the public by State and local governments, except public transportation services, whether or not they are Federally funded. Title II has broad ap- plications to local governments'interactions with people with disabilities, and mandates that qualified disabled individuals not be excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of, or be subjected to discrimination under any local government program or activity. The United States Department of Jus- tice's (DOJ) regulations implementing Title II dictate that local governments must evaluate and identify barriers that may limit accessibility for people with disabilities and develop a transition plan describing how they will address identified barriers. The United States DOJ developed guidelines for the develop- ment of Transition Plans, which can be found in the Federal Register (28 CFR 35.105-35.107; 35.150(c) and(d))-7/26/91). ATransition Plan must at a minimum: 1. Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities; 2. Describe the methods that will be implemented to make the facilities accessible; 3. Provide a timeline to bring facilities into compliance; and 4. Designate a specific person who is responsible for implementation ofthe plan. If a public entity has previously complied with the transition plan, requirements ofa Federal agency regulation implementing section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the requirements above shall apply only to those policies and practices that were not included in the previous transition plan. 2.1.3. Guidelines for ADA in the Public Right-of-way (Departnnent of Transporta- tion) In addition to Title II of the ADA, the Department of Transportation (DOT) has adopted the Ameri- cans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) as its standard for accessible facility design. ADAAG provides scoping and technical requirements for all new construction and alterations to public and private facilities. Key elements of these guidelines that apply to this plan include: Provision of accessible routes within public rights-of-way and to public transportation Accessible parking requirements Ramp and curb ramp standards ADA Signage requirements Types and requirements for detectable warnings 2.2. State of California Requirements The state is required to meet the minimum requirements of all public projects under the Federal ADA. However, to provide for clarification ofthe implementation ofthe ADA at a state and local level, the State of California enacted its own version ofthe Federal legislation and incorporated it within the building standards code. m.,.. „. ADA Transition Plan 2.2.1. Title 24 Title 24, the California Building Standards Code, serves as the basis for the design and construction of buildings in California. The Division ofthe State Architect (DSA) serves as California's policy leader for building design and construction, and is in charge of developing and maintaining accessibility stan- dards and codes utilized in public and private buildings throughout the state. Accessibility standards are found in the DSA Access Compliance Reference Manual and are designed to comply with the re- quirements ofthe Federal ADA and state statutes. 23. City of Carlsbad Requirements 2.3.1. Council Policies Affecting ADA On July 28,1992 the Carlsbad City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-240 which established an Ameri- cans with Disabilities Act Grievance Procedure Policy and a task force to develop a Compliance Action Plan. The details ofthe current Grievance Procedure can be found online at: http://www.carlsbadca. gov/Pages/ADA-compliance.aspx. The preparation ofthe Action Plan included an evaluation of City facilities, services, programs and activities. The public was surveyed to provide input on how the City can better serve the disabled community. The Action Plan included an inventory of non-compliant is- sues associated with public facilities throughout the City, costs associated with implementation, and a timeline for resolution. It was publicized in January, 1993. 2.3.2. Departmental Standards Affecting ADA City departments must comply with local, state and Federal regulations with regards to ADA. For pe- destrian facilities within the public rights-of-way, the City of Carlsbad utilizes the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings (SDRSD), as modified by the City of Carlsbad, as standard details for construction. The SDRSD can be found online at: http://www.regional-stds.com. The City of Carlsbad modifications can be found online at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/business/building/codes-standards/Pages/engi- neering-standards.aspx 2.3.3. General Plan Circulation and Land Use Element The State of California requires all cities to create and maintain a Circulation Element document per Government Code Section 65032(b). This document must consist ofthe general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the Land Use Element ofthe General Plan".The City of Carlsbad Circulation Element provides for the safe movement of people and goods within the City, access to public facilities and services and identifies how transportation systems link elements both locally and regionally. The Circulation Element provides information about existing and future pedestrian circulation and can aid in the establishment of future accessible paths of travel throughout the City and routes for public transportation. City of Carlsbad 23A. Relationship with Pedestrian Master Plan A Pedestrian Master Plan was prepared by Alta Planning + Design forthe City of Carlsbad in 2008. The focus ofthis study was to provide a guide for future development and enhancement ofthe pedestrian experience throughout the City. Although there is some overlapping information between the Pedes- trian Master Plan and this ADA Transition Plan, the ADA Transition Plan provides a more in-depth analy- sis of ADA related issues as they apply to public facilities within the City rights-of-way. The Pedestrian Master Plan provides recommendations for improving pedestrian safety and overall walkability ofthe City, whereas the Transition Plan provides a detailed plan to bring pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way (curb ramps, path-of-travel, pedestrian signal actuators, etc.) into conformance with cur- rent state and federal ADA codes and regulations. ADA Transition Plan ^ect Existing Conlfftioils 3.1. Current Conditions A review of maps and other available data was conduct- ed and summarized in Figures 3.1 through 3.8. Much of this information is incorporated into the GIS model for ADA priority areas discussed in the following chapter. 3.1.1. Land Use Current land uses in the City of Carlsbad can be seen on Figure 3.1. The three Tiers are shown as an overlay on the land use map, Figure 3.2. The enlarged land use maps for Tier 1 are shown on Figures 3.3 and 3.4. The enlarged land use maps for Tier Two are shown on Figures 3.5 through 3.8. The land use information was utilized in the development ofthe initial field work study areas since land uses often determine trip origins and trip destinations. Depending on the mixture of land uses present, higher levels of pedestrian activity can be predicted and if the types of land uses are public or have a high level of public visitation, those areas should receive priority over lower pedestrian land use areas. 3.1.2. Street Classification Information on street classifications help to deter- mine appropriate pedestrian treatments of inter- sections and walkways (Figure 3.9: Street Classifi- cation). Wide streets may be barriers for safe and convenient pedestrian crossings. 3.1.3. Volume of Traffic Information on traffic volumes help to determine appropriate pedestrian treatments of intersec- tions and walkways (Figure 3.10: Street Volumes). They help to indicate if the width and volume of traffic represent barriers for safe and convenient crossings. 3.1.4. Observed Speeds Speeds of vehicles on roads helps to determine the proper level of pedestrian protection and treat- ments of intersections (Figure 3.11: Street Speeds). Higher observed speed roads represent greater bar- riers to the physically challenged as well as those with- out physical challenges. 3.1.5. Freeway Barriers Interstate 5 bisects the City toward the western edge. Adequate pedestrian access is needed to facilitate safe passage to and from either side of the freeway (Figure 3.12: Barriers and Crossings). City of Corlsbod 3.1.6. Rail Line Barriers Rail line crossings must be carefully evaluated for safety of all users. Detectable warnings must be pro- vided as visual and tacflle indicators ofa transit plat- form edges or rail crossings (Figure 3.13: Barriers and Crossings). Lateral movement along the rail lines may be available, but crossings are tighfly controlled and those not at legal crossings are unsafe in any area. 3.1.7. Landform Barriers Steep slopes throughout Carlsbad present chal- lenges for compliance with ADA (Figure 3.14: Land- form & Steep Slopes). Though the grade of walk- ways attached to streets are allowed to follow the grade ofthe road, steep slopes present barriers to those with disabilities. Existing pedestrian facilities in Carlsbad in need of improvement. 70 pi'W«l»>l|||WilJiiliJIIIII!lia)jB!!l ADA Transition Pla V: Oceanside San Marcos Miles C ^ City Of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use"^^ Residential Single Family ^mP^ Mobile Homes ^tj^ Multiple Family Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers ^mH^ Commercial and Office Industrial Industrial ^tttj^ Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities Agriculture Education ^jjjjjjjjj^ Institutions Parks and Recreation ^11^ Recreation Open Space Parks Undeveloped Undeveloped Figure 3.1: Existing Land Use * City ot Carlsbad City of Carlsbad Oceanside V IWiles Encinitas 0.75 1.5 J) City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use Residential Single Family Mobile Homes 4|^H| Multiple Family Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial ^///f^ Industrial Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities ^mUl^ Transportation & Utilities 4m^b Education Institutions Parks and Recreation ^UPl^ Recreation Open Space Parks Agriculture Agriculture Undeveloped Undeveloped Tier 1 Study Area Tier 2 Study Area Figure 3.2; Land Use and Tier Boundary Overlay 12 ^5 C^,) City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential t Single Family Mobile Homes Multiple Family 4^ Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial industrial Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities -^^3 Agriculture 4^ Education Undeveloped 4^ Institutions Undeveloped Parks and Recreation Recreation r Open Space Parks o A Miles 025 0.5 Figure 3.3: Existing Land Use for Tier 1 Study Area City of Carlsbad C,^> City of Carlsbad \Afeiter Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential Single Family Mobile Homes ^11^ Multiple Family Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial 4^ Industrial mUll Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture 4^ Transportation & Utilities -f^Sii: Agriculture 4^ Education Institutions Parks and Recreation Recreation Open Space Parks Undeveloped Undeveloped A J Miles 0.2$ a5 Figure 3.4: Existing Land Use for Tier 1 Study Area C. .> City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential Single Family Mobile Homes Multiple Family ^9 Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers ^/l^ Commercial and Office Industrial Industrial 4Bl^ Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities -^iM:^-- Agriculture Education Undeveloped iHH Institutions Undeveloped Parks and Recreation Recreation Open Space Parks 0 A Miles 0.25 Figure 3.5: Existing Land Use for Tier 2 Study Area 0.5 2© City of Carlsbad CZJ City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential Single Family Mobile Homes Multiple Family Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial Industrial Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities :vi^y|r^: Agriculture ^9 Education Ifl^ Institutions Parks and Recreation Recreation Open Space Parks Undeveloped Undeveloped -^^iles 0.25 Figure 3.6: Existing Land Use for Tier 2 Study Area 16 0.5 ADA Transition Plan Encinitas Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial Industrial Extractive Industry (, City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential 1 Single Family Mobile Homes 0^ Multiple Family Figure 3.7: Existing Land Use for Tier 2 Study Area Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities Agriculture 0^ Education Undeveloped Institutions Undeveloped Parks and Recreation Recreation l~ Open Space Parks o A Miles 0.25 0.5 3o City of Carlsbad C J City of Carlsbad Water Bodies Existing Land Use * Residential Single Family 0^ Mobile Homes Multiple Family Mixed Use Commercial and Office Shopping Centers Commercial and Office Industrial Industrial Extractive Industry Public Facilities and Utilities Agriculture Transportation & Utilities ^^Mrj, Agriculture Education Undeveloped Institutions Parks and Recreation Recreation Open Space Parks Undeveloped A 0.25 0.5 Figure 3.8: Existing Land Use for Tier 2 Study Area iles 3\ ^ ADA Transition Plan Marcos J Miles Encinitas 0.75 1.5 (^^^ City of Cartebad Street Classirication* FREEWAY & ON/OFF RAMPS Wbter Bodies PRIME ARTERIAL MAJOR ARTERIAL SECONDARY ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET LOCAL STREET ALLEY PRIVATE STREET ODO?' Figure 3.9: Street Classification * City of Carlsbad City of Carlsbad San Marcos Miles C3 Qty of Carlsbad Average Daily Trips (ADTs)* W^ter Bodies 0-5,000 A • /""^ 5,001-15,000 Agriculture ^ Golf Course Open Space Parks 15,001 -20.000 > 20.000 'Cityof Carlsbad Figure 3.10: Street Volumes 33 ADA Transition Plan Oceanside ^ ^ / 1 i. Vista San Marcos J Miles c City of Carlsbad W^ter Bodies Agriculture Golf Course Open Space Parks Speed Limits* 25 MPH 25 - 45 MPH > 45 MPH City of Carlsbad Figure 3.11: Street Speeds 5^ City of Carlsbad San Marcos "T_ 0.75 Q ^ City Of Carlsbad Water Bodies Agriculture Golf Course Open Space II^B^ Parks Freeway Barrier Figure 3.12: Freeway Barriers 35 ADA Transition Plan City of Carlsbad Wfeiter Bodies Agriculture Golf Course Open Space Parks Railroad Barriers Figure 3.13: Rail Line Barriers 3c. City of Carlsbad Vista Miles 0.75 1,5 C^^J) City of Carlsbad Steep Slopes W^ter Bodies ^ ^ ^''^'^ 0 10-25% > 25% Figure 3.14: Landform Barriers & Steep Slopes 37 Ml ^^^^^^^mmmmmw- ADA Transition Pla 3.2. Pedestrian Facilities In the Public Right of Ways Figure 3.15 shows the extent of walkways in the City of Carlsbad. Also included are missing walkways and Alter- native Design Streets, which are streets designated by the community and City of Carlsbad to remain without walkways. The missing walkways which fell within the inventoried areas ofthe City were cataloged as part ofthis project. Recommendations for improvements are included in this report. The Pedestrian Master Plan provides rec- ommendations for walkway improvement outside the scope of inventoried areas. 3.3. Public Input Process California Title II and Federal ADA require a public entity to make information regarding the ADA Transition Plan and its applicability to the services, programs or activities ofthe public entity available to applicants, participants, residents and other interested parties, and to apprise the public ofthe protections against discrimination afforded to them by the ADA. The public entity also is required to provide an opportunity for interested persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities, to participate in the devel- opment ofthe ADA Transition Plan. The ADA requires that a copy ofthe draft ADA Transition Plan shall be made available for public inspection during a formal public review period. ' The public input process for this Transition Report was comprised of multiple meetings with local representational and advocacy groups for the disabled community and pedestrian community at large. These groups consisted ofthe North County Transit District (NCTD), Walk San Diego, Access to Independence and The San Diego Center for the Blind. Notes from these meetings can be found in Appendix B. Review ofthe plan by City departments in- cluded Traffic and Safety Development Services, Engineering, Planning and Risk IVIanagement. The stakeholders and advocacy groups were selected because of their wide range of direct experience with the communities in which they serve and their ability to provide insight into the mobility issues faced by their clients on a daily basis. The main objective of these meetings was to solicit input, direction and feedback on the issues facing all pedestrians, with emphasis on the disabled community, with regards to safety and universal accessibil- ity of facilities within the public right-of-ways. The input received was used to help formulate solutions for barrier removal and accessibility issues. 39 City of Carlsbad Vista Marcos J Miles Encinitas 0.75 15 Contiguous Meandering Non-Contiguous Unimproved Streets without sidewalks Alternative Design Streets City of Carlsbad V\fater Rivers Figure 3.15: Existing Walkways 1\DA Transitioh Plan Section 4^g|^««il^ Analysis 4.1 • ADA Priority Area Computer Modeling As described in Chapter 3, fieldwork for the Carlsbad ADA Transition Plan was divided into Tiers, or geo- graphic regions of the City. The goal of this study was to provide detailed inventory of approximately 25% of the entire city. The total area of the City of Carlsbad is 25,010 acres. The total area within the right-of-way is 2,916 acres. Breakdown of each tier is based on area within the right-of-way. Field work was limited to facilities within the public right-of-way in Tiers One and Two. The percent of land area per tier are: Tier One at 10% is 302 acres TierTwo at 16% is 465 acres TierThree at 74% is 2,149 acres The three tiers were based on the Carlsbad ADA Priority Model, which takes into account numerous GIS data layers to create a priority ADA model.The model was broken down into three distinct sub-models; Attractors, Generators, and Barriers.The Detractor and Generator maps utilize a color scheme where red represents a positive feature that may result in higher levels of pedestrian activity. In the case of barriers, red indicates a negative feature that is counted as a highly important element since fixing these issues will help to increase pedestrian use levels. 4.1.1. Attractors The Attractors Model (Figure 4.1: Attractors) identified activity areas by utilizing pedestrian-related geo- graphic features that are likely to attract pedestrians. The features used are: 1. Schools 2. Transit stops 3. Civic facilities (post offices, libraries, etc) 4. Beaches 5. Parks 6. Commercial centers 7. Polling places 4.1.2. Generators The Generator Model utilized demographic data as indicators ofthe potential volume of pedestrians based on how many people live or work in the City. Existing and projected total population and em- ployment were used as well as other demographic data such as age, income and disabilities. Pedestrian activity areas that contain a greater number of people living or working within them were more likely to have more people walking as a mode of transportation. Disability density was also taken into account for this model (Figure 4.2: Generators). T^Vf Carlsba J 1 fl^^, I Miles 0.75 1.5 J> City of Carisbad Attractors Water Bodies High Attractor Areas Low Attractor Areas Figure 4.1: Attractors ^D>\ Transition Plan Miles Encinitas 0.75 1.5 C^^l^ City of Carlsbad Generators m—iiw High Generator Activity Water Bodies Low Generator Activity Figure 4.2: Generators CityofCarlsbod 4.1.3. Barriers Barriers are features likely to discourage or detract people from walking and are especially trouble- some for those with limited mobility These barriers are physical limitations of topography roadway lane width, missing sidewalks, missing curb ramps and railroad crossings that prevent pedestrians from getting from their origin to their intended destination. 4.1.4. Detractors Detractor issues coincide with the barriers in that they discourage or detract people from walking and usually pose ADA issues. Detractor issues are more related to the vehicular intensity and perceived safety ofthe walking environment. Streets with high volumes of traffic and high speeds tend to de- tract people from walking due to the amount of traffic adjacent to their route. Known areas of high pedestrian collisions are also a deterrence as people may reroute their trip to avoid certain streets and intersections where safety is a concern (Figure 4.3: Barriers). 4.1.5. Composite These four sub-models were combined to create an ADA Composite Model (Figure 4.4: Composite) which highlights areas within the City of Carlsbad where efl'orts should be taken to improve the pe- destrian and ADA environments. In the ADA Composite Model, areas that have high point values are shown in red and orange. The lower point values are in blue and in some cases do not have a walking environment. The Tiers that generated three distinct levels of points were delineated based on the ADA Composite Model and the high point areas. The high point values, or congruent large areas in red and dark orange values, make up Tier 1 and measure roughly 10% ofthe City's total area. Tier 1 was the focus area for identifying specific improvements. Tier 2 makes up another 16% of the City's area and primarily follows smaller patches of orange and yellow or median point values. Tier 3 makes up the remaining areas of the City The delineation ofthe tiers was determined by their composite scores derived from the ADA Compos- ite Model as follows: Tier 1: 30+ total points Tier 2: 20-30 total points Tier 3: <20 total points Areas that meet these points criteria were then grouped into geographic areas as simplified polygons. Though some areas within the polygons may drop below the tier thresholds, the average of the area was used to designate the tiers. 4.1.6. Differences Between the ADA and Pedestrian Master Plan Model The pedestrian model developed under the Pedestrian Master Plan has similar distribution of priority areas since similar input of land use, density intensity and generators were used. However, the ADA model gives a higher weighted scores to public destinations and to generators where either young families live or where aging populations may be concentrated. The two ends ofthe human age spec- trum are where limited mobility skills and agility are found, so a concentration ofthe very young and the old were incorporated into the ADA model. H3 ADA Transition Plan | Encinitas 0.75 1.5 > City of Carlsbad Barriers Water Bodies High Barrier Areas Low Barrier Areas Figure 4.3: Barriers City of Carlsbad Vista San Marcos , A , 1 I Miles 0.75 1,5 C J City of Carisbad Composite Model ^'-"^ High Activity Area Water Bodies Low Activity Area Figure 4.4: Composite HS ADA Transition Plan 4.2. Site Survey Limits The ADA model and the initial mapping ofTiers were adjusted based on initial field work and based on input from City of Carlsbad staff. The final tiered areas are shown on Figure 4.5. Adjustments to the ADA model and initial tiering are discussed below. 4.2.1. Tier One Inventory Area Tier One is bounded on the west by Carlsbad Blvd, to the east by Interstate 5, to the north and south by the City limits. Tier One includes areas of high pedestrian activity such as "The Village" and the coastal corridor. 4.2.2. Tier Two Inventory Area TierTwo begins directly east of Interstate 5 and includes mostly residential neighborhoods. El Camino Real corridor, Palomar Airport Road west of El Camino Real and portions of arteri- als throughout the City This area was adjusted slightly to cover additional transit access as well as areas where paratransit services are being requested because the lack of pedestrian access to exist- ing transit locations. 4.2.3. Tier Three Area TierThree encompasses the remainder ofthe City not included in Tiers One and Two. This area was not inventoried. However, future inventory work could utilize the ranking ofthe ADA model to determine the next priority areas for future surveys. HQ CityofCarlsbod Marcos Miles Encinitas 0.75 1.5 J) City Of Carlsbad Composite Model mmmmmr Higli Activity Area Water Bodies Tier 1 Study Area Tier 2 Study Area Low Activity Area Figure 4.5: Inventory Areas over ADA Model ^7 ADA Transition Plan 4.3. Site Survey Methodology Extensive field work was conducted between August 2010 and December 2010 on at least 17 days of field inventory The field work was then entered into a database and spreadsheet, and analyzed based on the criteria screening in Tables B-D, Section 4.4. The analyzed data for Focus Study Area A can be found in Appendix C for each type of facility inventoried. 4.3.1. Priority Items for Field Check Field survey work was conducted in the Tier One and TierTwo study areas. Public facilities within the City right-of-way were inventoried, measured, photographed, and cataloged. Public facilities surveyed were curb ramps, pedestrian signal actuators and crossings, exterior accessible routes, and parking. 4.3.2. Standards and Guidelines for Checklist Items A compliance checklist was developed for each type of facility to be inven- toried. Checklists and forms, Figures 4.5 to 4.10, were used in determining compliance of each type of public facility The evaluation criteria was taken from State and Federal standards of compliance. 4.4 Site Evaluation Forms Site evaluation forms were created to collect field work data, and to compile an inventory ofthe pe- destrian facilities within the public right-of-way.The data collected corresponds with current State and Federal guidelines for accessibility compliance. The facilities cataloged were: • Dual Curb Ramps, Figure 4.6 • Single Curb Ramps, Figure 4.7 • Pedestrian Signals and street crossings. Figure 4.8 • Sidewalks within the public right-of-way, Figure 4.9 • Accessible Parking within the public right-of-way, Figure 4.10 35 City of Carlsbad DUAL CURB RAMP INSPECTION FORM Curb Ramp Location: N/S Street 0 N/E 0 NAA/ 0 S/E EAA/Street XA' Coordinate 1 _ Carlsbad Asset ID 1 X/Y Coordinate 2 Carlsbad Asset ID 2 oSAA/ Curb Ramp Type per SDRSD: o A o B 0 Vertical Curb Ramp data: A: % B: % C: % D: % Right side length: ft. in. Pan width: ft. in. Left side length: ^ft. in. oC 0 Rolled Curb oD 0 Apex 0 Directional E: % F: % G: Right side length: ft. __ Pan width: ^ft. in. Left side length: ^ft. _ % H:. in. in. See following page for applicable standards. © DO 8888808888888 ooaoooaooseo e«eoeeee»eee »e«eoeeao»»e« ^ft ft 4 ft min. EA/V Street: North Arrow Inspected/measured by:. Figure 4.6: Dual Curb Ramp Inspection Form Date: 4^ ADA Transition Plan SINGLE CURB RAMP INSPECTION FORM Curb Ramp Location: N/S Street X Coordinate oN/E 0 N/W 0 S/E E/W Street Y Coordinate Carlsbad Asset ID oSiW Curb Ramp Type per SDRSD: oA oB oC oD 0 Vertical Curb o Rolled Curb o Apex o Dtrectionaf Ramp data: A: % B: % C: Right side length: ft. Pan width: ft, in. Left side length: ft. _ Landing Depth: ^tt— % D:. in. % E: % F: % Uplifts: in. jn. Curb @landing: Y/N Ht: Landing Cross Slope: % Landing Running Slope: See following page for applicable standards. yo Distance from crosswalk striping to apex ramp: E/W Street: InspectedAneasured by: North Arrow Date: So Figure 4.7: Single Curb Ramp Inspection Form City of Carlsbad Curb Ramp Standards: • Curb ramps shall be located at each corner of street intersections and where a pedestrian way crosses a curb • Built-up curb ramps are located so they do not project into vehicular traffic lanes • Pan of ramp must be48"minimum width • Surface slope does not exceed 8.33% • Cross slope does not exceed 2.0% • Slope of side flares does not exceed 10% • Finished surface of curb ramp contrasts visually from adjacent sidewalk (in color or texture) • Curb ramp is stable, firm, and slip resistant • Surface of curb ramp and side flares (if provided) do not contain any vertical edges greater than 0.25"in height • A level landing a minimum of 48"deep that extends the full width ofthe ramp is provided at the top landing of curb ramp, or the slope ofthe side flares does not exceed 8.33% • Slope of top landing does not exceed 2.0% in any direction • Transitions from curb ramp to walks, gutters, or streets are flush and free of abrupt changes • A 12" grooved border is provided along the top and sides ofthe ramp atthe level surface ofthe sidewalk (grooves approximately 0.75"on center) • The slopes ofthe road, gutter, or accessible route adjoining the curb ramp do not exceed 5.0% within 48" of the top and bottom ofthe curb ramp • Curb ramps shall be located to prevent obstruction by parked vehicles • Curb ramp has detectable warnings that extends the full width and depth ofthe curb ramp, ex- cluding the side flares, inside the grooved border Detectable warnings contrast visually with adjoining surfaces, either light on dark or dark on light Material used to provide visual contrast is an integral part ofthe walking surface Detectable warnings consist of raised truncated domes with a diameter of nominal 0.9" at the base tapering to 0.45 inch at the top, a height of nominal 0.2"and center-to-center spacing of nominal 2.35 inches Pedestrian Signal Standards: Push buttons located within 60"of extended crosswalk line and 120"from other buttons. Each push button located 120" maximum and 30" minimum from curb line. Push button parallel to direction of crossing. Clear surface space of 30"x48"at push button. Height to center line of push button from 42"to 46" maximum. IVlaximum 5 lbs. pressure to operate. Locator tone from 2 dB to 5 dB above ambient. ADA Transition Plan PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL INSPECTION FORM Pedestrian Signal Location: o N/E N/S Street X/YCoordinateA Carlsbad Asset IDA 0 NAA/ 0 S/E EAA/Street X/Y Coordinate B Carlsbad Asset ID B oSAA/ Pedestrian Signals per SDRSD: o Vertical Curb o Rolled Curb o One Ramp o Two Ramps Document signal locatlon(s) on plan. A: If one push button is present: Height of push button: in. Diameter of push button: in. Accessible signal operational: Locator tone operational: Push button parallel to direction of travel: B: If two push buttons are present Height of push button: in. Diameter of push button: in. Accessible signal operational: Locator tone operational Push button parallel to direction of travel: (D 03 0 EA/V Street: North Arrow Inspected/measured by:. Date: PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL STANDARDS: Document any conditions not in compliance with these standards. • Push buttons located within 60" of extended crosswalk line and 120" from other buttons. • Each push button located 120" maximum and 30" minimum from curb line. • Push button parallel to direction of crossing. • Clear surface space of 30" x 48" at push button. • Height to CL of push button from 42" to 46" maximum. • Maximum 5 lbs. pressure to operate. • Locator tone from 2dB to 5 dB and above ambient. Figure 4.8: Pedestrian Signal Inspection Form City of Carlsbad SIDEWALK INSPECTION FORM Street Sides of Street: o North 0 East 0 South Sidewalks per SDRSD: o Vertical Curb o Rolled Curb 0 Planter strip entire length o Planter strip partiallength See following page for applicable standards. 0 West 0 No Curb North or west side of street: (Show measurement locations) Sidewalk clear width: Planter strip width: Running slope: Cross-slope: Other specific conditions:. Al: ft. in. A2: ft. in. A3: ft. in. B: ft. in. CI: C2: C3 D1: D2: D3 South or east side of street: (Show measurement locations) Sidewalk clear width: Planter strip width: Running slope: Cross-slope: Other specific conditions: E1: ft. in. E2: ft. in. E3: ft. in. F: ft. in. GI: G2: G3 H1: H2: H3 Draw all obstructions or hazards on plan. North or West Cross Street: D. B. H South or East Cross Street North Arrow Inspected/measured by:. Figure 4.9: Sidewalk Inspection Form Date: 5 ADA Transition Plan Exterior Accessible Route Standards: • IVlust be a continuous common surface not interrupted by steps or abrupt changes in level (abrupt changes in level are those that exceed 0.25") • Level changes between 0.25"- 0.5"are beveled with a maximum gradient of 1:2 (50% slope) • Slope in the direction of travel does not exceed 5.0% unless within the public right-of-way. Slope then may be equal to gradient of adjacent road. • Cross slope does not exceed 2.0% • Walkways maintain a minimum width of 48" • Walks, sidewalks, and pedestrian ways shall be free of gratings whenever possible • If gratings are necessary, grid openings are a maximum of 0.5" in direction of traffic flow • Walks with continuous gradients have level areas at least 5'in length at intervals of 400'maximum • Accessible routes with less than 60" of clear width have passing spaces a minimum of 60" x 60" at least every 200' • Doors that encroach into walkways have a minimum 60"x 60" level landing area with slope less than 2.0% in any direction • Level landing area extends a minimum of 24" beyond strike edge of door • Doors that swing away from walks have a level landing area a minimum of 48" wide x 44" deep with slope less than 2.0% in any directions • Surface is slip resistant • Abrupt changes in level exceeding 4" along a path of travel are protected by either a curb (mini- mum of 6"in height above the walkway surface) or a guardrail or handrail is provided and a guide- rail centered 3" plus or minus 1 "above the surface ofthe walk • Any vertical obstruction is a minimum of 80"above the walking surface (measured from the bot- tom ofthe obstruction) • If vertical clearance of an area adjoining an accessible route is reduced to less than 80", a barrier to warn blind or visually impaired persons is provided • Walks are clear of hazards 54 City of Carlsbad ACCESSIBLE PARKING CHECKLIST Parking Location: o N/E o NAA/ o S/E o SAA/ N/S Street EAA/ Street • Lot or Parking Structure w/iere parking is provided for the public, the City shall provide the re- quired number of accessible parking stalls 0 One in every eight required accessible spaces, but not less than one, shall be served by an ac- cess aisle 96" wide minimum and shall be designated as "Van Accessible" 0 Parking space(s) are located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to the accessible entrance(s) 0 Accessible parking space access aisle(s) are part of an accessible route of travel to the building or facility 0 Accessible parking spaces are located such that they do not compel users to travel behind parked cars other than their own 0 When necessary, a parking bumper or curb is provided to prevent encroachment of cars over the required width of walkways 0 Ramps do not encroach into accessible parking space(s) or access aisle(s) 0 Surface ofthe parking space(s) and access aisle(s) does not exceed 2.0% in any direction • Single Parking Space Design 0 18' minimum length of parking space 0 9' minimum width of each parking space 0 Minimum 18' x 5' access aisle (passenger side) 0 Surface ofthe parking space(s) and access aisle(s) does not exceed 2.0% in any direction • Double Parking Space Design 0 18' minimum length of parking space 0 9' minimum width of each parking space o 23' minimum total width of both spaces and access aisle o Minimum 18' x 5' access aisle (between spaces) 0 Surface ofthe parking space(s) and access aisle(s) does not exceed 2.0% in any direction • Van Accessible Parking Space Design 0 18' minimum length ofthe parking space 0 9' minimum width ofthe parking space 0 9' minimum width ofthe access aisle 0 The access aisle is placed on the side opposite the driver's side when the vehicle is going for- ward into the parking space (i.e. the passenger side ofthe vehicle) 0 Surface ofthe parking space(s) and access aisle(s) does not exceed 2.0% in any direction 0 98" minimum vertical clearance is provided at the parking space and along at least one vehicle access route to such spaces from site entrance(s) and exit(s) • Parking Space Signage 0 Each parking space reserved for persons with disabilities shall be identified by a reflectorized sign permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space, consisting ofa profile view ofthe International Symbol of Accessibility in white on a dark blue background. Such signs may also be centered on the wall at the interior end ofthe parking space 0 Signage is installed at each space 0 Area ofthe sign(s) is not smaller than 70 square inches 0 When posted in a path of travel, the bottom ofthe sign is 80" minimum from the parking space finished grade Figure 4.10: Accessible Parking Checklist ADA Transition Plan 0 The sign is located where there is an unobstructed view ofthe sign from the parking space 0 Van accessible parking spaces have an additional sign or additional language stating "Van Ac- cessible" mounted below Symbol of Accessibility 0 An additional sign or addition language below the symbol of accessibility shall state "Minimum Fine $250" • Parking Space Striping 0 The surface of each accessible parking stall or space must have a surface identification duplicat- ing either ofthe following schemes: 1. By outlining or painting the stall of space in blue and outlining on the ground in the stall or space in white or suitable contrasting color a profile view depicting a wheelchair with occupant 2. By outlining a profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on blue background. The profile view shall be located so that it is visible to a traffic enforcement office when a vehicle is properly parked in the space and shall be 36" high x 36" wide 0 Surface identification of accessible parking stalls complies with one ofthe above noted striping configurations 0 The loading and unloading access aisle is marked by a border that is painted blue 0 Within the blue border, hatched lines that are a maximum of 36" on center are painted with a color that contrasts with the parking surface, preferably blue or white 0 The words "NO PARKING" are painted in white on the ground within each access aisle 0 "NO PARKING" letters are a minimum of 12" high and visible to traffic enforcement officials • 12- Foot/15- to 20- Foot Curb To Right-of-Way Line Parallel Parking Design 0 Located in most level area of block (recommended practice) to maximize usability 0 Provide 9' of space with 5' minimum obstruction-free access aisle adjacent to space for parallel parking 0 Curb line shifts toward right-of-way to accommodate access aisle 0 Space and access aisle should have smooth surface for lift deployment, minimize cross slope for lift operation • 8- to 9- Foot Curb To Right-of-Way Line Parallel Parking Design 0 Located in most level area of block (recommended practice) to maximize usability 0 Provide 9' of space with 5' minimum obstruction-free access aisle adjacent to space for parallel parking 0 Sidewalk width narrows toward right-of-way to accommodate access aisle 0 Space and access aisle should have smooth surface for lift deployment, minimize cross slope for lift operation • 4- to 5- Foot Curb To Right-of-Way Line Parallel Parking Design 0 Located in most level area of block (recommended practice) to maximize usability 0 Provide 9' of space with 5' minimum obstmction-free access aisle adjacent to space for parallel parking 0 Pedestrian access route ramps down to parking level in order to provide sufficient width for space 0 Space and access aisle should have smooth surface for lift deployment, minimize cross slope for lift operation Sketch of parking layout: 41 • City of Carlsbad 4.5. Inventory Area Fieldwork Results 4.5.1. Overview of Area As was discussed in Section 1.2, the project inventory area was determined with the assistance ofa GIS- based ADA pnority model that analyzed various factors affecting pedestrian activity and determined areas where the greatest percent ofthe walking public can be expected to be found. In addition, the inventory area is comprised only of areas within the public right-of-way outside of the travel lanes of roadways, to the outer limits of existing public nght-of-ways. The inventory includes Tier One and Tier Two areas as described in Section 1.2 and shown on Figure 4.5. 4.5.2. Existing Facilities The existing facilities surveyed during fieldwork include curb ramps, pedestrian signals and existing walkways within the right-of-way study limits. A variety of compliance issues were inventoried for each facility type. Many ofthe facilities within the study area were found to have one to several compliance issues that ranged from relatively inexpensive, minor safety hazards to issues that require a complete reconstruction of the facility. Table "A" below summarizes the number of facilities surveyed, and the number of those surveyed with compliance issues. Compliant Compliance Issues Total Ramps (includes missing ramps) 46 1,320 1,366 Pedestrian Signals 0 933 933 ROW Obstructions 0 379 379 Table A: Inventory Area Facility Summary 4.5.3. Missing Facilities Missing facilities were identified as part ofthe inventory process. These included missing curb ramps and missing walks. Of the 1,366 curb ramp field data entries, 151 are for missing ramps. 44 ADA Transition Plan 4.5.4. Major Deficiencies The major facility deficiencies found during the inventory process are listed below by facility type. Curb Ramps Horizontal and vertical obstructions Uplifts Horizontal spacing or pavement divots Non-compliant or missing detectable warning strips Non-compliant or missing truncated domes Non-compliant pan width Excessively sloped side flares Non-compliant ramp running and cross slopes Non-compliant landing depth Non-compliant ramp and path of travel. Non-compliant curb ramp Non-compliant curb ramp. Vegetation causing obstruction of path of travel. Vertical uplift in path of travel (greater than 1/4"). 45 City of Carlsbad Pedestrian Signals Non-compliant actuator distance from curb and/or crosswalk Non-compliant actuator distance from other actuator buttons Non-compliant actuator height Non-compliant level clear floor space around signal pole/push button Obstruction in clear floor space Non-compliant actuator push button Missing countdown timer and/or audible signal Uplifts at required clear floor space Right-of-Way Walkways Vertical and horizontal obstructions Non-compliant vertical clearance Uplifts Excessive running and cross slopes Non-compliant walkway width Missing truncated domes at major vehicular crossing Lack of curb definition Utility poles in the path of travel. Non-accessible pedestrian signal actuator. 46 ADA Transition Plan 4.5.5. Screening Criteria To determine the overall level of non-conformance and improvements needed for the designated priority areas, fieldwork data was filtered through a set of screening criteria. Categories for compliance based on State and Fed- eral accessibility requirements were assigned a numerical value based on the level of deficiency. The total value of each facility determined the level of deficiency from Fully Conforming to Major Access Barrier. Tables "B-D" are the screening criteria by which each type of facility was evaluated. Tables "E-G" (Section 5.4) provide summaries for the pedestrian facilities within Focus Study Area "A", Priority Levels One, Two and Three. As discussed in Section 1.2 and shown on Figure 5.1, Priority Level One is the immediate block adjacent to the entry ofa building identified as a public facility, Priority Level Two is the area within one quarter mile of Priority Level One along existing roadways and Priority Level Three is the remaining area within Focus Study Area "A". Example of obstacles faced by wheelchair users. Non-compliant clear floor space at actuator. Vegetation overhanging the path of travel creates a barrier for pedestrians. 47 CD in n rD n rD T) fD Q. fD (/> 0)' 3 30 3 LEVEL ONE SCREENING CRITERIA - PEDESTRIAN RAMPS CARLSBAD ADA TRANSITION PLAN Existing Curb Ramp Fea*ures in the Pubfc Right of Way are: Fully ConforiDing Facility- No Safety Risks Minor Access Barrier-Within minor tolerance limits witti only minor safely risk Moderate Access Barrier- Beyond conformance limits with moderate safety risk Major Access Barrier- htoo conforming and high safety risk Composite Score Needed to Place in Each Category 0 points <.5 .5-1.9 >2 Obstructions Found in on or Near the Ramp None Exist ObitiiKfion limits a clear patti of travel between 36"-43" Obstruction li"N R _ e-i , travel < 36' Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Dwots 1" dianjeter widi <0 25' depth 1-2" diameter w/0.25-0.5" depth '•'2" diameter wrth "-•0 5' depth Lip/Upiifts {NC or Concrete) --.25" lip/uplift 0 25-0 5" Hp/uplift 6"-r lip/uplift >1' Hp/uplift Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) 12" Width 6* Width hJo Detectable Wammg Stop but Tmncated Domes Exist Nefttier detectable warning or truncated domes exi^ Truncated Dome 48" wide by 36" deep truncated dome Partial pan wdft OR <36" wide and/or <24* depth No Truncated Domes but Detectable Stnps Exist No detectable warning or truncated domes Pedestrian Ramp Existence Exists Does not Exist Field Work Identified Ramp as Non-Conforming Info other than "Non-Compliant" provided in existing condition notes Field Work "Existing Conditions" = Non-Compliant Pan Width >48" (State Compliance) 47* to 36" (Federal Compiiance) <36" Side Flares (Motto exceed 10%) £ 10% 11-15% <15% Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) <8.33% 8.34% 12% >12% Ranp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) <2% 2-5% >5% Landing Running or Doss Slope <2% 2-5% >5% Ramp Used in High Speed / High Volume Ajterial Directional lamp (two per comer) >48" from ranp bottom to crosswalk stripe or traffic lane Existing Bike Lane or Pailcing Lanes No martted crosswalks witti high speed, large radius, right turns Crosswalk striping In relation fo ramp Full cross walk stiiping, stop bar and offset from ramp Four way stop sign with stop bars but no crosswalk Missing stnping at signafized intersection or not offset from ramp Gutter slopes adjoining ramp (within 48* from top & bottom of curt) namp) S5% 5-8% 8-12% Approach Apron Sopes (within 48" from top & bottom of curb ramp) £5% 5-8% 8-12% Landing DepBi Past the Top of the Pan 48" X 48* or side flare slopes do not exceed 8.33% 30"-47" <30"deep o —^ Q; fD n n fD fD 3^ 3* in n fD Qi* •D fD Q. fD tn r+ 0)' 3 {/) IQ* 3 LEVEL ONE SCREENING CRITERIA - PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS CARLSBAD ADA TRANSITION PLAN Exiting Pedestrian Signals in the Putrfic K^t ot 1«ay are: FulJy Confomiing Facility- No Safety Risks Mirtor Access Barrier-Within minor tolerance limits with only minor safety risk Moderate Access Barrier- Beyond conformance limits with moderate safety risk Major Access Barrier-Non- conforming and high safety risk Composite Score Needed to Place in Each Category 0 points <.5 ^-1.9 >2 0.1 0.29 1 Actuator Height Height 42"-48" 36"-41"or 49'-60' <36* or >60" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Actuator Distance from Crosswalk Line 60" maximum 61 "-84" >84" Actuator Distance from Curb Line 30"-120" 20'-29" <20*or>120' Actuator Distance from other Buttons 120' maximum >120" Push Button Parallel to Direction of Crossing Push button parallel to direction of crossing Not Parallel Perpendicular to direction of crossing Clear Floor Spacc at Push Button Gear floor space of 30' x 48" at push button No clear floor space Obstruction in Clear Floor Space None Vegetative obstnjcbon in clear floor space Hard obstruction in clear floor space Level Clear Floor Spacc max 2% grade Slope >2-5% Slope > 5% Ped Head Signal Countdown timer with visual and audible notifications No countdown timer or audible options Button Actuator Typo An-QW with broad flat panel button with audible finding signals Mushroom actuator with no audible Small button actuators with no audible or visual options Uplift m Clear Fioor Spacc <.25" lip/uplift 0.25-0.5" lip/uplifl .6"-1"lip/uplifl Color Pole Banding Exists Does not exist Field Work Identified Ramp Non-Conforming Info other than "Non-Compliant" provided in existing condition notes Field Worti 'Easting Conditions" = Non-Corr^jSait indif ,ites (ietmilt ossiimplion in absence ot ci.it.i S O 3 g; fD p n —? fD fD 3^ 3* n n o fD I •D fD Q. fD (/» r-h —i £U' 3 b Existing Curt) Ramp Features in the Public Ri^t ot Way are: Fully Conforming Facility- No Safety Risks Minor Access Barrier-Within minor tolerance limits with only minor safety risk Moderate Access Barrier- Beyond conformance limits wHJi moderate safely risk Major Access Barrier- Non- conforming and high safety risk Composite Score Needed to Place in Each Category. 0 points <.5 .5-1.9 >2 .rfiilwi Obstmctions Found in the ROW None Exist Obstnjction limits a clear path of travel between 38"-48" Obstruction limits a clear patti of travel < 36" Horizontal Gaps (-'1". •-•12" or Pavement Kvots <r diameter with <0.25' depth 1-4" diameter w/0.25-0,5" depth >4" diameter with >0.5" depth Lip/U^)lifts (/VC.Concrete 0( Utilit/ Cover) <.25' lip/uplift 0,25 0.5' lip/uplift ,6'-1" lip/uplift Detectable Warning/Tmncated Domes at Vehicular Crossing DetectableWarning/Truncated Domes Exist Detectable Waming / Truncated Denies Oo Not Exist, but Pathway Soiface Material/Elevation are continuous DetectableWarning/Truncated Domes Needed for Major Dnveway with Zero Curb Cross Slope <2% 2-5% >5% Width >48" (State Conpliance) 47" to 36" (Federal Compliance) <36" Vertical Clearance 80" Clear <80" Clear w/vegetative obstruction <72' Cleanirth hard obstruction Bock has missing walkways Not missing full block missing but in alt street design area or one side rmssing in on a neighborhood street internittent start and stop of walkways, requiring use of road edge or both sides nissing on a collector or minor street internrittert start and stop of wMkways, recpjiring use of road edge on a busy ^eri^ i^ttt no buffer Edge Definition <6" but >4" Vertical change at edge of walk < 4" but > 2"Veffical change at edge of walkway < 2" or >6" ADA Transition Plan 5: Prioritiz 5.1. Criteria for Project Prioritization As discussed in Section 1.2 Project Linnits, the original Tier One, Tier Two and Tier Three areas were reclassi- fied into Focus Study Areas "A, B and C", then each fur- ther divided into Priority Levels One, Two and Three for project prioritization. See Figure 5.1: Phased Map for Priority Projects and Figure 5.2: Focus Study Areas "B" and "C". Focus Study Area "A", Priority Level One - pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way immediately adjacent to City/public facilities (intersection to intersection), were determined to be the highest prior- ity for bringing deficient facilities into compliance. These areas have the highest density of attractors per the GIS model, the greatest percent of where the walking public can be expected to be found, and the most immediate need for full compliance due to the proximity to City/public facilities. 5.2. List of Projects by Priority 5.2.1. Overview of Prioritized Projects Projects within Priority Level One, of Focus Study Area "A", are the first priority in bringing into compli- ance with ADA. (Figure 5.1: Phased Map for Priority Projects) 5.2.2. Proposed Improvements Proposed improvements include repair, replacement or installation of curb ramps and walkways, elimi- nation of uplifts, resetting of utility boxes, evaluation and possible relocation of utilities, and the repair, replacement or installation of Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS). See Appendix 7.3. Prioritized Projects - Inventory and Analysis for analysis ofthe proposed improvements in Focus Study Areas "A" and "B". 5.3. Potential Funding Sources 5.3.1. Local Funds The City of Carlsbad has two programs in place to aid in the repair and replacement of facilities within the public right-of-way. Sidewalk/Street Construction Program The Sidewalk/Street Construction Program is an annual program designed to complete missing links of sidewalk throughout the City. In most cases, construction ofthe sidewalk improvements involve con- struction of adjacent street improvements to bring them into conformance with City Standards. Each year, sidewalk/street projects are selected from the City's missing sidewalk priority list for inclusion into that year's sidewalk/street construction project. 57 City of Carlsbad Concrete Repair Program Ongoing miscellaneous concrete repairs to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, driveways and cross gutters are funded by the City on an annual basis. 5.3.2. Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) The City of Carlsbad's annual budget includes funding for Capital Improvement Projects throughout the City. The Transition Plan will assist in the identification of improvements to be undertaken in up- coming years to minimize costs and for the provision of an accessible public right-of-way. 5.3.3. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a flexible program that provides com- munities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. Beginning in 1974, the CDBG program is one ofthe longest continuously run programs at the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).The CDBG program provides annual grants on a formula basis to 1209 general units of local government and States. Concrete repairs occur annually in the City of Carlsbad. ADA Tramm&nPfan Focus Study Area A Priority Level 1 - ROW Adjacent to Public Facilities Priority Level 2 -1/4 ml from Public Facilities Priority Level 3 Public Facilities Figure 5.1: Phased Map for Priority Projects A Miles 0 1.252.5 7.5 City of Carlsbad Miles 0.75 1 5 San Marcos k^^j City of Carlsbad Study Improvement Priority AfCd Water Bodies B City of Carlsbad Figure 5.2: Focus Study Areas "B" and "C" 5.4. Implementation Refer to Figure 5.1: Phased Map for Priority Projects, for recommended phasing of Focus Study Area "A" projects. 5.4.1. Near-Term Projects The near-term projects proposed for the City of Carlsbad consist ofthe deficient facilities found within Focus Study Area "A," Priority Level One. Priority Level One includes pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way immedi- ately adjacent to City/public facilities (intersection to intersection). Table "E" provides a facility inventory summary for Priority Level One. The projected costs to implement the projects in this category is $946,310.00. 5.4.2. Short-Term Projects The short-term projects proposed for the City of Carlsbad consist of the deficient facilities found within Focus Study Area "A", Priority Level Two. Table "F" provides a facility inventory summary for Priority Level Two.The projected costs to implement the projects in this category is $720,348.00. Priority Level 1 Summary Curb Ramps Count % of Total Conforming 5 1.68% Minor 48 15.77% Moderate 226 75.17% Major 23 7.38% Total 302 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 647,510 Pedestrian Signals Count % of Total Conforming 0 0.00% Minor 85 92.39% Moderate 7 7.61% Major 0 0.00% Total 92 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 74.150 Right of Way - Walking Segments Count % of Total Conforming 6 1.56% Minor 298 77.60% Moderate 80 20.83% Major 0 0.00% Total 384 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 224.650 Table E: Priority Level 1 Inventory Summary Priority Level 2 Summary Curb Ramps Count % of Total Conforming 5 1.74% Minor 28 9.72% Moderate 251 87.15% Major 4 1.39% Total 288 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 664,648 Pedestrian Signals Count % Of Total Conforming 0 0.00% Minor 63 87.50% Moderate 9 12.50% Major 0 0.00% Total 72 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 55.700 Table F: Priority Level 2 Inventory Summary 5.4.3. Mid-Term Projects Mid -term projects are those in Focus Study Area "A", Priority Level Three. Table "G" provides a facility inventory summary for Priority Level Three. The projected costs to implement the projects in this cat- egory is $2,031,397.50. 5.4.4. Long-Term Projects Long -term projects are those in Priority Level Three, Focus Study Area B and Focus Study Area C. Table "H" provides a facility inventory summary for Focus Study Area "B". The projected costs to implement the projects in Focus Study Area "B" is $ 1,608,828.00. Priority Level 3 Summary Curb Ramps Count % of Total Conforming 37 5.06% Minor 111 15.18% Moderate 546 74.69% Major 37 5.06% Total 731 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 1.385.697.50 Pedestrian Signals Count % of Total Conforming 0 0.00% Minor 559 76.79% Moderate 168 23.08% Major 1 0.14% Total 728 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 645.700.00 Table G: Priority Level 3 Inventory Summary Focus Study Area "B" Curb Ramps Count % of Total Conforming 40 6.51% Minor 149 24.27% Moderate 387 63.03% Major 38 6.19% Total 614 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 997,328 Pedestrian Signals Count % of Total Conforming 0 0.00% Minor 489 73.31% Moderate 178 26.69% Major 0 0.00% Total 667 100.00% Total Estimated Costs: $ 611,500 Table H: Focus Study Area "B" Inventory Summary ADA Transition Plan 6.1. Typical Issues and Coun- termeasure Treatments The following sections describe Federal ADA and California Title 24 requirements for pedestrian facili- ties within the public right-of-way. The City of Carls- bad utilizes the San Diego Regional Standard Draw- ings (SDRSD) for implementation of these facilities. 6.2. Walkway Surfaces Walkway surfaces shall be constructed ofa firm, stable and slip-resistent material. Where pedestrian walkways/access routes are within a street or highway right-of-way, the running slope shall not exceed the general grade established for the adjacent street. Where pedestrian walkways/access routes are not within a street right-of-way, the grade of pedestrian access routes shall be 5% maximum or 8.3% with handrails. The cross slope shall not exceed 2%, unless otherwise noted. See Section 4.3 for additional exterior accessible routes standards. See Figure 6.1: Walkway Treatment Plan. 6.2.1. Minimum Widths The minimum required walkway width perTitle 24 (State of California) is 48", ADA (Federal) is 36". 6.2.2. Width Goals Walkways in the City of Carlsbad shall be 10' wide minimum in "The Village", 5' wide minimum every- where else, unless it is within areas of high pedestrian activity as designated by the City. 6.2.3. Trip Hazards Any vertical separation greater than 1/4" without beveled edges or 1/2" with beveled edges along a walkway is considered a potential trip hazard. This may be caused by uplifts in the walkway, or utility boxes which have separated from the adjacent walking surface. Repair, slice or patch lifts and re-set utility boxes flush with the adjacent walking surface. 6.2.4. Potential Barriers and Hazards Potential barriers or hazards within the accessible path of travel in the public right-of-way are gaps in walks, utility facilities, mailboxes, driveways, overhanging vegetation, and overhead elements which have less than an 80"vertical clearance. 6.2.5. Street Furnishings Street furnishings shall be located outside path of travel, with a minimum 36" clear space to pass. No part shall protrude more than 4" horizontally into the accessible path of travel between the heights of 27"-80"above the walk surface. 6.2.6. Utility Element Locations Utilities shall be located outside path of travel, with a minimum 36" clear space to pass. No part shall protrude more than four (4) inches horizontally into the accessible path of travel between the heights of 27"-80" above the walk surface. Utilities should be grouped together where possible to reduce the impact as obstacles for pedestrians. 57 CityofCarlsbod An inaccessible environment...made accessible Issues Potential Solutions (See legend*) W1 - Minimum sidewalk widths. Sidewalks less than 48° wide or inadequate passing space. When clear space is less than 60", a passing space 60"x60" must be provided every 200 feet. IW W2 - Walkway obstructions. Gaps in walkway, overhead obstructions (less than 80° clear), vegetation overhang in path of travel, site furnishings, utility boxes and poles. IW, 2W, 3W, also see 3A, 4A W3 - Trip hazards. Walkway uplift greater than VA or Vz with beveled edge, utility boxes which have separated from adjacent walking surface. see 3A, 7A W4 - Slope requirements. Path of travel exceeding 5% slope in the direction of travel or 2% in cross slope. Where path of travel is within public right-of-way, running slope may be the same as, but not exceed, the slope of adjacent road, even if it exceeds 5%. see SA, SA W5 - Limited street crossing options. Accessibility can be impaired when it takes a lonq time to pet from oriqin to destination. 4W, SW, 6W Walkability Solutions 1W) Provide greater than minimum walkway widths (>48"sidewalk width, 60"dear space) 2W) Provide and maintain trees, awnings or building overhangs (80" clear overhead) 3W) Provide street furnishings for comfort and enjoyment (outside of the 48" unobstructed walkway) 4W) Provide countdown display crosswalk signals 5W) Provide traffic control for crossings such as traffic signals or "all way stops" 6W) Provide "pedestrian scrambles" (simultaneous crossing allowed in any direction, including diagonally) * These tables and graphics are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be used fbr engineering analysis or design. The potential solutions are a possible list of methods to address the problem. Implemented solutions will be determined by actual site conditions, interpretation of policies and engineering evaluation. Figure 6.1: Walkway Treatment Plan tmsmsmBamismiiitfimwi ADA Transition Plan 6.3. Transitional Surfaces Transitional surfaces are those elements within the public right-of-way that allow for transition from one ground plane surface to another. See Section 4.3 for additional curb ramp standards and Figure 6.2: Transitional Surface Treatment Plan. 6.3.1. Pedestrian Curb Ramps- New New pedestrian curb ramps shall be installed in new construction, replacement of non-compliant ramps and in areas where ramps do not currently exist. Ramp design and installation shall be per SDRSD G-27, G-28and G-29. 6.3.2. Pedestrian Curb Ramps- Modifications Modify curb ramps when minor deficiencies are indicated, such as missing truncated domes or when the lip ofa ramp is not flush with adjacent surface. Install truncated domes panels as shown in SDRSD G-30. Grind the lip ofa ramp down until it is flush with the adjacent surface. 6.3.3. When to Use Truncated Domes Truncated domes shall be installed at all new and replacement curb ramps, hazardous vehicular ways, pedestrian refuge islands, at-grade rail crossings and reflecting pools. Truncated domes shall be de- signed and installed per SDRSD G-30. 6.3.4. When to Use Tactile Strips Tactile strips, consisting ofa series of panels of truncated domes, are to be used along the entire edge of all transit platforms and extend 24" in width from the edge ofthe platform. 6.3.5. Maximum Slopes ADA provides standards for the configuration of pedestrian ramps.Table"r'demonstrates the maximum allowable slopes for elements ofa pedestrian ramp. 6.3.6. Minimum Widths The pan (middle) ofthe ramp shall be minimum 48"wide.The top landing shall be minimum 48"wide x 48"deep. Element Slope (%) Surface Slope of Pan 8.33% Cross Slope of Pan 2% Side Flare 10% Top Landing 2% in any direction Adjoining surface (within 48" of top and bottom of ramp) 5% Table I: Maximum Allowable Slopes for Ramps Ramp in need of truncated domes Example of proper installation of truncated domes 59 Issues R>tentid Solutions (See legend*) Al - Missing pedestrian ramps. Pectestrians requiring the use of ramps for manaiver£A)iiity may not be to cross the street, or may be forced to travel in the street, increasing the mk of vehicuiar^estrian colfision. 1A,2A A2 - Pedestrian ramps do not meet standards. Ramps that lack tactile Indicators, or ramps that are constructed with steep running slopes, la^e gutter transitions or exces^ve cross sliypes, decrease aoces^Nlify. 2A, 3A, 4A. 6A. 7A A3 - Missing pedestrian signals. Missing or non-accessible (height or location) pedestrian signals or signal actuators diminish maneuverability. 2A A4- Sidewalk obstacles. Site Mshnigs, above-grade utilities and temporary construcdon f^icing can create verticai dearance and protruding barriers. 3A.4A AS - Sidewalk gaps. Missing sidewalk segments can make an entire route inaccessible for some pedestrians. 4A, also see 20S A6 - Inconsistent sidevraik design. Meandering walkways or abrupt changes in the travel path can be difficult for the visually impaired to navigate. 4A A7 - Cross slopes. Excessive aoss i^pes, often at driveways, can decrease acces^blKty. 5A A8 - Steep grades. Exces^ve grades, often at intersections with alleys, can make maneuverability difficult. 6A A9 - Substandard walking surfaces. Sik;k or uneven walking surfaces, or trip hazards, can make maneuverability difficult. 7A Accessibility Solutions IA) F^estrian ramps 2A) Audible/visuai crosswalk sign^ 3A) W^ki^ys and mmps free of damage or tr^ hazards 4A} Pedestrian paths free of gaps, obstiuctions and barriers 5A) Sidewalks wHh limited driveways and mmi mai cro8s-sk}pe 6A) Remade slope of walkway to meet ADAAitie 24 standards 7A} Repair, slice or patch lifts on walking surfaces and re-set utilities boxes to fkish * These tables and gap/hks am for Wustrafive puposes only aid ae not to ise used for engneering analy^s or (tesi^ The potential sofcitions are a posstt^e list of metiiods to address the problem. inr^Frfemented solutions will be d^etmii^ by actual site condi^s, interpretation of policies and engineering evaluation. Figure 6.2: Transitional Surface Treatment Pian 1"? IDA Transition Plam 63 J. When to Use Apex or Directional Ramps Visually impaired pedestrians use a variety of auditory and tactile cues in locating the crosswalk, align- ing to cross and maintaining alignment while crossing. Traffic noise serves as audible cues about the direction of traffic. Directional ramps provide tactile information to align a visually impaired user with the crosswalk. Directional ramps are preferred in circumstances where the curbline is continuous to the lane of traffic, due to roll-out potential in the travel lane. See Figure 6.3 for design variations for direc- tional ramps. Actual ramp designs are dependent on site conditions. Apex, or parallel, ramps are used when there is a bicycle lane, parking or a shoulder provided. Apex ramps can be misleading to the visually impaired since they do not help to align the pedestrian with the flow of traffic. Crosswalk striping must include a minimum of 48"clear within the designated cross- walk to accommodate maneuverability for wheelchair users. See Figure 6.3 for design variations for apex ramps and striping. Actual ramp designs are dependent on site conditions. Apex/Parallel Ramps Figure 6.3: Design variations for Pedestrian Ramps 1^ 6.4. On-street Parking ADA Requirements 6.4.1. Minimum ADA Spaces per Block of On Street Facilities There is not a specific requirement for the number of ADA spaces for on-street parking. Incorporating a policy of providing one accessible space per developed block face, in commercial areas where parking is controlled by meters, time limits, or similar regulation, is preferred. In residential areas, citizen requests may establish need and should be coordinated with the provision of curb ramps. Existing accessible on- and off-street public spaces and site opportunities and constraints may also be factors in determin- ing location and quantity of accessible spaces. Proper signage and curb striping shall be provided at each space. Accessible spaces shall not be smaller in width or length than that specified by the local jurisdictions for other spaces and in no case less than 8 feet wide and 18 feet long. The slope ofthe accessible space, van accessible space, access aisle for the accessible space, and access aisle for the van accessible space shall not exceed 1:48 slope in any direction. 6.4.2. Perpendicular ADA Space Guidelines Where perpendicular parking is provided, a parallel access aisle at least 60 inches wide shall be pro- vided at street level the full length ofthe accessible parking space. At van accessible parking spaces, a parallel access aisle at least 96 inches wide shall be provided at street level the full length ofthe van ac- cessible parking space. Two perpendicular parking spaces may share an access aisle. One in every eight accessible parking spaces, but not less than one, shall be a van parking space with an access aisle that is not less than 96 inches wide. Refer to SDRSD M-27A for dimension and layout information. 6.4.3. Parallel ADA Space Guidelines The US Access Board recommends that a parallel parking space shall be a minimum of 13'wide to ac- commodate an 8'vehicle and 5'access aisle. A curb ramp may be located at the head or rear ofthe park- ing space for access to the walkway. If the parking space is located adjacent to the street corner, the corner curb ramp may serve as access. Where the width ofthe public pedestrian right-of-way between the curb and edge ofthe public right-of-way is less than 12 feet, a parallel access aisle is not required at parallel parking spaces. See Figure 6.4 for graphics depicting variations on parallel parking layout. Any walkway adjacent to accessible parallel parking space should be free of signs, street furniture, and other obstructions the full length ofthe parking space and provide room to deploy a van side-lift or ramp or the vehicle occupant to transfer to a wheelchair or scooter. Accessible parallel parking spaces located at the end ofthe block face are preferable for vans that have rear lifts and cars that have scooter platforms. ////////////////////// PERPENDICULAR ACCESS AISLE 12' OR MORE W///////A ROW LINE s 13' MIN. !! 1-UNDER 12 t n 1 II II 0 It 1 " " 0 I 11 II !_ j 8' f-5' MIN. T MIN JL PARALLEL ACCESS AISLE 60" MIN Figure 6.4: On-Street Accessible Parallel Parking. Graphics courtesy of US Access Board 7f ADA Transition Plan 6.4.4. Angled ADA Space Guidelines ADA guidelines recommend that a person requiring use of an accessible parking space should be able to pull in forward or backward. This option allows the greatest flexibility for people who need to assist others in unloading from the vehicle. One in every eight angled accessible spaces shall be van accessible with an 8'wide access aisle located on the passenger side ofthe space. Refer to SDRSD M-27B for dimension and layout information. 6.4.5. Access Aisles Where perpendicular or angled parking is provided, an access aisle 8.0 ft wide minimum shall be provided at street level the full length ofthe parking space and shall connect to a pedestrian access route. The access aisle shall be marked so as to discourage parking in the access aisle. Two parking spaces are permitted to share a common access aisle. An access aisle is not required where the width ofthe adjacent side- walk or the available right-of-way is less than or equal to 14.0 ft. When an access aisle is not provided, the parking spaces shall be located at the end ofthe block face. 6.4.6. Signage and Pavement Markings Proper signage, striping, curb and pavement markings must be provided at designated accessible parking spaces. Refer to SDRSD M-28A, M-28B and M-29 for ADA signage and pavement markings requirements and layout. 6.5. Intersection Crossing Crossing an intersection is one ofthe most difficult movements for those that are physically challenged. Crossings can represent real safety concerns, so attention to standards is essential. See Figure 6.5 Inter- section Typical Plan. 6.5.1. Stop Sign Crossings Stop sign crossings shall be signed and marked per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards. Pedestrian ramps shall be installed at each connection to the public right-of-way. The running slope may not be greater than 5%, and cross slope may not be greater than 2%. 6.5.2. Signalized Crossings Signalized crossings shall be signed and marked per MUTCD standards. Pedestrian ramps shall be in- stalled at each connection to the public right-of-way. Pedestrian actuators shall be installed at each designated crossing.The running slope ofthe street crossing may not be greater than 5%, and the cross slope may not be greater than 2%. 6.5.3. Advance Stop Bars Blind pedestrians listen for the sound of an idling car engine as a guide to safely cross a street. For this reason, drivers are advised in the California Driver's Handbook to stop no further than 5 feet from the blind pedestrian unless there is an advance stop bar. 63 The primary purpose of an advance stop bar is to increase the visibility between pedestrians and mo- torists in the crosswalk. The standard distance for a stop bar is four feet from the crosswalk. An advance stop bar can be moved back 15-30 feet from the crosswalk. For the blind pedestrian, too much distance is a safety concern. Placement of an advance stop bar should ideally fall within a range of 5 - 10 feet for crosswalk joining to a directional ramp. The stop bar should be placed where sight lines between pedestrian and motorist are optimized. 6.5.4. Median and Pedestrian Refuge Islands Median and pedestrian refuge islands offer protection for users crossing wide streets, and allow for more time to cross a busy intersection. A median refuge shall be a minimum of 6'in length in the di- rection of pedestrian travel. If there is a cut-through, detectable warning (truncated domes) shall be located at the curb-line, in line with the face of curb, or at the road edge if there is no curb. Detectable warning panels shall be 24"deepand separated by a minimum of 24" of walk without detectable warn- ing. Detectable warning (truncated domes) shall comply with typical ramp and blended transitions, where occurs. 6.5.5. Non-Controlled Crossings Non-controlled crossings are those pedestrian crossings at intersections that are not marked. They are held to the same standards for pedestrian safety and accessibility as those marked. The running slope may not be greater than 5%, and cross slope may not be greater than 5%. 6.5.6. Mid-block Crossings A mid-block crossing is a legally established crosswalk that is not at an intersection. Mid-block cross- ings shall be signed and marked per MUTCD standards. Pedestrian ramps shall be installed.The running slope may not be greater than 5%, and cross slope may match the grade ofthe road. 11 issues Pdential Solutions (See legend*) S1 - wide streets. Age. ability and street crossing distance may make it difliciJt for some pedestrians to cross wide streets in one cyde. Pectestrians may enter the crossing signal phase fliegally without time to cross. 1S,2S»3S»4S,8S| 10S,11S,12S,13S S2 • Multiple lane crosswalk collisions. Pedestrian collisions with vehicles can occir in crosswalks at stop signs with multiple lanes in eacfi direction. Larger vetiides can shield views of pedestrians and drivers from each other. Drivers may also encroach on the crosswalk in an attempt to see onconwng traffic. 2S,3S,4S,SS,11S, 12S, 138 S3 - Controlled intersection collisions. Pedestrian collisions with vetucles nrtay occur at intersections with signals or stop signs. Collisions may occur due lo high speeds, signal running, or either a driver or pedestrian violating the other's right-of-way. 1S,2S,3S^4S,6S^9S, 10S,11S,12S,13S S4 - Uncontrolled intersection collisions. Cdlisions may occur at intersections with no stop signs or traffic signals. Multiple lanes in each direction intensify this prot)lem dramatically, as well as poor visibility and lack of medan refuges. Drivers may not understand that pedestrians have the right-of-way at intersections, regardess of crosswalk markings. 1S^2S,3S^4S,SS^7S, 11S,12S,13S,alsosee Safety Solutions 1S) Medan refuges (a safe place to stand in the street) 2S} Pedestrian pop-outs (curt)/sidewalk extensions into street) 3S) f^gh-visibili^ crossw^k striping 4Sj Qevated and/or specially paved crosswalks with detectable warnings 5S} Advance stop bars 6S) Radar speed monitoring and dsplay 7S} Reduced curb radii 8Sj Early pedestrian start at crossing signal 9S) No nght turn on red at intersection lOS) Automatic pedestrian detection and signal contrd 11S Ad^uate pedestrian lighting levels 12S) Traffic calming measures 13S Enforcement and education sdutions See Section 6 implementation and Guidelines for specific ADA compliance standards for these safety solutions. * These tables and graphics are for BlustratlvB purposes only and are not to be used for engneerRig analysis or design. The potential solutions are a possible list of m^hods to address the problem. Implemented solutions will be determined by actual site concfitions, interpretation of policies and engineering evaluation. Figure 6.5: Intersection Typical Plan CityofCarlsbod 6.5.7. Pedestrian Control Devices/Accessible Pedestrian Signals Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) shall meet the requirements of MUTCD Section 4E. Pedestrian Con- trol Features. Signal timing and distance used in calculating timing shall be the entire length ofthe crosswalk. Pedestrian signal actuators shall be located per the standards described in Section 4.3. if an intersections is signalized, pedestrian actuators shall be installed at each designated crossing. Existing facilities not in compliance shall be relocated or replaced as necessary. The location ofthis pedestrian actuator provides the required clear floor space, but is not parallel with the direction of travel. Inaccessible pedestrian actuator. Relocate actuator within distance standards described in Section 4.3. The actuator may be placed on a pole by itself to meet the standards. 66 ADA Transition Plan A. Glossary of Terms B. Meeting Notes - Stakeholder and Advocacy Meetings C. Prioritized Projects - Inventory and Analysis D. General Grievance Form E. References 67 CityofCarlsbod A: Glossary of Terms Accessible - Accessible facilities are those that can be reached, used and traversed by people of all ages and abilities without difficulty Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS)/Pedestrian Signal - enhancements to the traffic signal system to provide signal phase information in audio, tactile, and/or vibrotactile formats for the pedestrian. APS devices available today are of four general types: pedhead mounted, pushbutton integrated, vibrotac- tile only, and receiver-base. Actuator - a mechanism used to control traffic signal phase information Attractors - geographic features that are likely to attract pedestrians Barriers - geographic features that are likely to discourage or detract people from walking Cross slope - the transverse slope ofa surface perpendicular to the direction of travel Crosswalk/Pedestrian Crossing - a point on a roadway that employs some means of assisting pedestri- ans or other non-motorized transportation modes to safely cross the road. Crosswalks usually consist of some combination ofon-road paint, a crossing signal for pedestrians and signage warning motorists ofthe presence of pedestrians. Crosswalks are most commonly located at signalized intersections but can be located anywhere along a roadway Curb - the intersection at which a raised surface, such as a sidewalk, meets an adjacent unraised sur- face, such as a street Curb Ramp - a solid ramp graded down from the top surface of a sidewalk to the surface of an adjoin- ing street Detectable Warning - a system of textured ground surface indicators, such as truncated domes, used to alert pedestrians, specifically the visually impaired, ofa hazard in the path of travel Facility - all or any portion of buildings, structures, improvements, elements, and pedestrian or vehicu- lar routes located in the public right-of-way Flare - the sloped side panels of a curb ramp Generators - factors which help to indicate the volume of people in a given area, such as population, age, and income GIS - Geographic Information System, which is a system that integrates hardware, software, and data for capturing, managing, analyzing, and displaying all forms of geographically referenced information. Landing - a level area at the top and bottom of a ramp Model - spatial data used to identify sites most suitable for a specific use ADA Transition Plan Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - a manual specifying signage, signals and other traffic control devices. There is also a California version that takes precedence within the state. Pan - the middle panel ofa curb ramp Path of Travel (POT) - a corridor of accessible travel through the public right-of-way that has, among other properties, a specified minimum width and cross slope Pedestrian - a person walking or traveling by means of a wheelchair, electric scooter, crutches or other walking devices or mobility aids. Use ofthe term pedestrian is meant to include all disabled individuals regardless of which equipment they may use to assist their self-directed locomotion (unless they are using a bicycle). It also includes runners, joggers, those pulling or pushing strollers, carriages, carts and wagons and those walking bicycles. Public Facility - a building or service open to and utilized by the public, usually owned &/or operated by a city or government agency Ramp - a portion of a walkway with a running slope in excess of 5% Right-of-Way (R.O.W.) - a general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for or devoted to transportation purposes Running Slope - the slope ofa surface in the direction of travel Slope - the measured incline ofa ground plane surface Street Furnishings - elements used to enhance a pedestrian environment, such as benches, trash re- ceptacles, bicycle racks Tactile Strip - a series of truncated dome panels which serve as warning ofa hazard in the pedestrian path of travel, usually found at transit platforms Walkway/Sidewalk - the portion ofthe public right-of-way between the curb line or edge of road and the adjacent property line, improved for use by pedestrians 3^ CityofCarlsbod B: Meeting Notes - Stakeholder and Advocacy Meetings During the process of compiling this report, meetings were held with several advocacy groups representing the disabled and general pedestrian communities to gather information about the most relevant issues facing pedes- trians of all abilities within the public right-of way. Information from these meetings was used in evaluating and prioritizing projects for implementation. ADA Transition Plan mitfl Plaining + Landscape Architecture 3916 Normal Street San Dieso, CA 92103 619.294.4477 fax • 619.294,9965 www.ktua.conn RIA 1481 •2342*2386 ADA TRANSITION PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD MEETING MINUTES - Staiceholder meeting with Walk San Diego Meeting Date: 12/6/11 Time: 3:30-5:30 pm Diego CA Location: Walk San Diego, 740 13th St # 502, San Attendees: Marshall Plantz Mike Singleton Catrine Madii Emily Henning Jim Stone Kathleen Fen-ier Helen Elias Carlsbad KTU+A KTU+A KTU+A Walk San Diego Walk San Diego Community Advocate Agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introductions. Overviaft/ of project. Significant issues facing the community relative to access in the public right-of-way. Solutions to issues per priority level area. Additional insight for cities like Carlsbad. Notes • Wien preparing this plan, were demographics taken into consideration? Did you project out age to future? Reply: Yes, young children and older adults were taken into account. • Investigate overlap with high use facilities, such as grocery stores, pharmacies, etc., not just public buildings. Reply: The full pedestrian/ADA priority model did take these into account, even though the Tier 1 and Tier 2 analysis and ajbsequent Priority Level 1 recommendations did not. • Look at transit stops. If stops are accessible, can you get to a destination from the stop? Are facilities adjacent to transit stop also accessible? • Items to considw for prioritization would be m syor intersections especially those with adjacent transit stops or that are near public facilities. • Make sure to incorporate the idea of universal access, not just access for the disabled community. • At major intersections make sure there is an indication ofthe signal cycle such as countdown timers or audible pedestrian signals, and make sure it Is appropriate and long enough of a cycle for slower pedestrians. • Provide a median refuge for intersections with more than two lanes (total) of traffic if possible. If more than a total of 4 lanes exists, then the median refuge is essential. Make sure there is room for two wheelchairs at a time in the median refuge and provide an accessible actuator in the reHige for those that can't get all the way across in one cycle and may be stuck there. This is essential for agnals that do not automatically insert a pedestrian crossing phase on each cycle. A person can get stuck half way for a long period of time if there is no actuator in the median to trip the cycle. • Walkways: o Meandering walkways are problematic for the visually impaired, although a gradual m eander is ok since this is detectable with the typical pacing ofa sweep of cane, o Straight walks work best, parallel to traffic. Page 1 of 2 Should fhe contend of this report differ from the recoffecf «n of any attendee, he/she will notify the author in wriing of the discr^rtcy v^hin five days of rec&ving the r^rt, orsA the next meeting, flhseri this notiTication, this report diaff stand as an accurate represeritation of events. Additions or corrections to the report will be noted in the report of fhe r»xf meefing. CityofCarlsbod o If street trees exist, use flush tree grates if possible or completely flush open trees wells are okay, but very minor drops are worse than those that are several inches since the later can be detected more easily. Use discretion when determining when to install truncated domes at driveways, consider volume of use and conflict with pedestrians. At train crossings, make sure crossing arms are as low as possible to the ground for canes to detect. Apexvs directional ramps: o Directional is preferred since the truncated domes are supposed to indicate direction of travel o For streets with higher speeds, volumes, no right turn only lanes, no on-street parking or bike lanes, directional ramps are needed to avoid having a wheel chair run out into the active travel lanes. Intersections with stop signs, low volume residential streets, low speed neighborhood an collector streets or streets with a bike lane or parking lane that push the immediate travel lane away from the ramp, apex ramps are acceptable. Streets without sidewalks (Alternative Design Streets): o For safety, the City can add a shoulder stripe or bike path to create safe walking path nearest the edge of the road. Make sure to indicate where there are connectivity issues throughout the focus study area, not just fcjy public facilities. Cross Slopes: o Driveways are especially challenging, more so for motorized wheelchairs than non-motorized. Keys Items to include in report: o Major intersections o Public transit crossings o Entrances to public facilities not just in the ROW. Though this study includes only the ROW, indications of where the primary path of travel to an entrance as it touches the ROW, is important to include. Good resource for senior population information is Dan Burden and AARP. Prepared by: KTU+A Page 2 of 2 Should the content of this report differ from the recollection of any attendee, he/she wiil notify the author in writing of the discrepancy within five days of receiving the repori, or at the next meeting. Absent this notification, this repai shall stand as an accurate representation of events. Additions or corrections to the report will be noted in the report of the next meeting. S ADA Transition Plan mm Planning + Landscape Architecture 3916 Normal Street San Dieso, CA 92103 619.294.4477 fax • 619.294.9965 www.ktua.com RLA 1481 •2342 * 2386 ADA TRANSITION PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD MEETING MINUTES - Stalcehiolder meeting with Access to Independence Meeting Date: 1/31/12 Time: 1:00 p.m. Location: Access to Independence, 8885 Rio San Diego Dr., San Diego, CA Attendees: Marshall Plantz Amy Kalivas Ruben Ceballos Emily Henning Carisbad Access to Independence Access to Independence KTU+A Agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introductions. OverView of project. Significant issues facing the community relative to access in the public right-of-way. Solutions to issues per priority level area. Additional insight for cities like Carlsbad. Notes • Wiat are typical barriers for the disabled community within the public right-of-way? o Reply: • Curbs and street crossings not properiy marked for visually impaired • Uplifts in path of travel, which are especially difficult for people with walkers • Reduction of services due to budget cuts • Obstacles within the path of travel or ramp, such as bollards used for preventing vehicles from driving on the walk • Lack of audible signals in non-urban areas • Non-contiguous paths to destinations, make sure path to destination is consistent and easy to navigate • Deficient space for loading and unloading zones for buses and para-transit, not enough room for more than one vehicle to drop off at a time, including private vehicles at pedestrian loading/unloading areas • Example is the loading/unloading zone at a mall for LIFT (North San Diego County paratransit provided by NCTD) • Railroad crossings are very difficult to navigate. • There is a fear from users of walkers of losing balance and falling over. • Canes get caught in rails • Anti-tip wheels on wheelchairs get caught in rails • Are audible signals helpful? o Reply: Yes, very, especially in areas with less traffic noise and for the newly visually impaired. • Audible cues, such as traffic noise and design elements such as fountains, help a visually impaired person to navigate paths and amve at destinations • Familiarity with routes and audible cues associated are the best situations for those with visual impairments Page 1 of 2 Should the content of this report differ from the rec<^ledion of any attendee, he/she will notify the a(Ahor in writing of the dixrepancy virithin five days of rec&ving the r^porf, or the next meeting. Absent this notification, tNs report shall stand as an accurate refyesentation of events. Addiions or conedions to fhe report will be ndted in fhe report of ttie next meefing. CityofCarlsbod • Do you have any safety ideas to improve the ocean front boardwalk? Are there any particular issues for the disabled community? o Ensure there is clear visibility of pedestrians by drivers o Provide safety for pedestrians from (distracted) drivers • How are wide streets viewed by disabled community? Are median refuges acceptable? o Reply: • Wide streets are intimidating and not user friendly. • Median refuge is better than nothing, but do not provide feeling of safety and protection from traffic, especially high speed traffic • Are there any trends or new legislation you anticipate or hear about coming up? o Reply: Louis Frick would be the best person to ask. Email: Ifrick@a2isd.org • Final thoughts: o Education is the key to many of these issues, for people of all abilities, o "Complete Streets" keep all users in mind when designing, which is helpful for disabled community. Prepared by: KTU+A Page 2 of 2 Should the content of this report differ from ihe recollection of any attendee, he/she will notify the author in writing of the discrepancy within five days of receiving ihe report, or at the next meeting. Absent this notification, this report shall stand as an accurate representation of events. Additions or corrections fo the report will be noted in the report of the next meeting. '7 ADA Transition Plan ma Planning + Landscape Architecture 3916 Normal Street San Dieso, CA 92103 619.294.4477 fax • 619.294.9965 www.ktua.com RIA 1481 • 2342 • 2386 ADA TRANSITION PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD MEETING MINUTES - Stalceholder meeting vynth San Diego Center ofthe Blind Meeting Date: 2/7/12 Time: 10:00 a.m. Rd, Vista, CA Location: San Diego Center for the Blind, 1385 Bonair Attendees: Marshall Plantz Kim Gibbens Lindsay Haas Mike Singleton Catrine Machi Emily Henning Carisbad San Diego Center for the Blind San Diego Center for the Blind KTU+A KTU+A KTU+A Agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introductions. Oven*iewofproject. Significant issues facing the community relative to access in the public right-of way. Solutions to issues per priority level area. Additional insight for cities like Carisbad. Notes • VWiat are some general concerns for the visual impaired community within the public right-of-way? o Reply: • Gaps in sidewalks, where a sidewalk will stop and start along the same block • Lack of sidewalks, forcing the user to walk in the road • incomplete walkway systems • Drivers not seeing pedestrians, difficult to make your presence known as a pede^rian • Audible cues can be misleading if they are not conastent or regular, such as trash tmcks, loud music, gardeners equipment, any noises competing with the noise from adjacent traffic • Visually impaired community is taught to reti^in from crossing a street until you can cleariy hear the flow of traffic; this takes extensive auditory training. • 85% ofthe SDCB clients have partial viaon o A large portion use a cane for detection • Is tiie bright yellow the best color for truncated domes for visually impaired? o Reply: Yes, sometimes the contrast of two grays (light and dark) or other colors is not enough of a distinction to someone with visual impairment • Are tactile grooves sufficient waming? o Reply: No, not really. They can get filled with sand or wom down over time. They are difficult to detect with a cane. Truncated domes have a distinctive sound and feel, which helps in detection. • Is there a preference between directional and apex ramps? o Reply: • Ramps in general are difficult for the visually impaired. A 6" curb is better for detection and indication of potential vehicular conflict. Page lof 2 ShoukI the content of this report differ from the recoiledion of any attwidee, he/she wiff notify the author in writing of the discr^ncy wiNn five days of rec&ving the r^rt, orstthe next meeting. Absent this natificetion, this report shaS starid as an accurate representation of events. /Editions or conedions to ffie report will be noted in the report of the ne}d meeting. CityofCarlsbod ' Clients are taught to align themselves parallel to traffic. This is difficult when apex ramps are used. Apex ramps conflict with audible cues. Landmarks can also help with direction. Most people will only follow routes they are familiar with, especially when crossing large streets. • Are audible signals helpful? o Reply: Audible signals are very helpful. They are actually best for intersection where it is difficult to hear the traffic, like at T' intersections or intersections with less traffic. • Constant t)eeping of APS is helpful in locating the device. • Are painted crosswalks helpful at all? Are they detectable for a visually impaired user? o Reply: Any indication of a tract is helpful, but the paint is not necessarily detectable with a cane. Someone with partial vision may use the painted crosswalk as a guide, so in that respect they are helpful in guiding someone across an intersection. • Are there any general issues with walking surfaces or environments? o Reply: • Meandering walkways are difficult to navigate • Outdoor dining poses problems, especially when there is no physical separation between the furniture and walkway, like a railing • In urban environments, a constant edge is good. • Tree grates can cause problems with canes getting caught in the openings or on the edges • Guide Animals: o Approximately 3% of visually impaired use a guide animal o Animals are trained to navigate both obstacles telow and above o Animals are trained to stop at major elevation changes • Use of a cane and detection is based on training technique and tip type, such as a rolling tip. • Are there any issues within Focus Study Area A that would be helpful for us to pay attention to? o Reply: • The grid system is good, easier to navigate • Wide corners that are flush with the road are problematic, there is limited detection of conflict with cars and the truncated domes do not aid in providing direction. • Round-abouts are especially problematic. Traffic slows but does not stop, yielding is not good enough to make a visually impaired person feel comfortable crossing a street. • Are there any trends or new legislation you anticipate or hear aboiA coming up? o Reply: There is a lot of legislation about APS in the works They will be required at all new signalized intersections. • Final thoughts: o A constant, static edge is best o Drivers need to be more aware of pedestrians o Curbs are good Prepared by: KTU+A Page 2 of 2 Should the content of this report differ from the recollection of any attendee, he/she will notify the author in writing of the discrepancy within five days of receiving the report, or at the next meeting. Absent this notification, this reporf shall stand as an accurate representation of events. Additions or corrections to the report will be noted in the report of the next meeting. ADA Transition Plan C: Prioritized Projects - Inventory and Analysis The following spreadsheets are an inventory ofthe issues found within Focus Study Areas "A" and "B", separated by Priority Level and type of facility. Refer to Figure 5.1: Phased Map for Priority Projects, for a graphic delineation of each Priority Level and Figure 5.2 for delineation of Focus Study Areas"B"and "C". 77 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv Removal Patching Grinding g 8 i t Scoring ,E S Si i & Install 1 1 1 Strtpt D«mo & Construct Nsw Apex Ramp Used-Protection from ai Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL f-Dual Directional Needed • Repair j Expand Composite all Items Comoosite all Itenis FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots Grinding g 8 i t Scoring ,E S Si i & Install 1 1 1 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehicular Traffic Lane Pedestnan Ramp Non-existent Field Worit Identified Ranp Hon-Conforming Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) | Ramp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb tamp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from ai Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL f-Dual Directional Needed • II lii ffi 5 1 III Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan [4'X 4'requited) :>)niposite Scores or Costs Ikxnposile Fiating Category jToss Costs (some double counting tet Costs (with Maximum for ramp epiacement ^ 1 Km Location Facililv ID Uan Page Tier Exlsliia Condilion Notes Cost $1,133 S200 (250 S200 1300 $800 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 RMP 160 RHP160 Mm No detectable wamiiigs provKted at curb ramp: Curti ramp does not contrast witti w^cent sidewalk; Transifion at bottom landing has is I'tvgti; Curb temp elopes It 6% Bottom landing slopes 11.8% Top landing slopes 2.4%; Side flare slopes 17.3% 0.25 0,25 01 01 025 1.95 Mo<t&rate $6,050 $2,750 ?MP1SS RMPtee ADOS No deteclaWe warnings provided; Curb ranp slt^s 10 Z% Cross slope of curb ramp is 5.9%, Transibon at bottom landing is I" high; Side flares slope 19 B%Bnd 6.B^^ Tt^ landing cross slope ts 7.0% Curb ramp projects mto traffic lanes and Is not parallel to the pedestrian flow 0,25 025 026 01 025 2.1 Major $9,050 $3,000 <MP3629 RMP3629 ADOS No detectat^ warnings provided at curb ramp; Curb ran^ does not connect b south side of Laguna Dr and there is no crosswalk or safe access across Laguna Dt to Buena Vista Circle; Side flares slope 14.9% and 9.5% 0,25 026 1.5 Moderate $3,000 AI05 Two accesEit^ spaces provided, no access aisle provided Neither accessible space is designated as van accessible No $250 fine waming sign provided at either space Pavement signage is not located at rear of space Accessible route connected to crosswalk is ptovided between ttie two accessible spaces 01 025 026 0.6 Wo^lerate $2,750 ^MP672 AD02 1 Curb does not contrast witti nJjacent sidewalk; 25' deep detectable mmings are not located at bottom of curb rar^ and are iC Irom curb face; Side flares stapes 17 1%and 13.7% Transibon at bottom landK^ is 11/4* high, Curb lamp cross slope is 2 6% Top landing cross slope m 2.6% Bottom landing slopes 66% 0,25 025 01 01 01 1.8 Moderate $2,750 IMP 670 RMP670 AD02 Noncompliant cub remp does not conned to an accessible route in any direcOon Curb tamp should be removed wiOi reptecement 1 1 Uoderale $2,750 W349 RMP349 AE06-AEO7 No detecteble watnings provided, side flares slope 12.0% and 11.0% vertical of^ at bottom Imding is 1/3" high Diagonal cut tamp is not taceted wittvn ttie narked crosskig. 01 025 01 0.45 0.55 $550 RMP348 RMP34S AEI)6-AE07 No detectable warnings provided, side Hares sbpe 11 5%and 10 7% verbcal olfset at bottom landing is 1/2" high, curb ramp stapes 110% 0,1 026 01 01 0.45 0.55 Moderate $550 W185 RMP185 AE04 Curb tamp surface does not contrast witli adjacent sidewalk 0 Conformieg $0 RMP208 RM»08 AE03 1 Noncompkant curb ramp Coordinate witti path across diveway 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 ;HP2<» RMP2I)9 AEOS Noncompliert cwb remp Coordinate with patti across driveway 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 \UP2n RMPjro AEIX No detectable wammgs provided at ctvb ramp 025 0J25 Mleor $300 RMPZ80 RHP280 AP« l4o detectable wttning) prmided It ciib ramp 025 0.25 Minor $300 $300 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction CateqofY: £a£ii!i3dD Ma££afl£ Tier Exisllna Condition II Demo H. Construct New Ramp 11 g i fl II 15 i I I i Expand Composite all Items 11 ^hwest comer of Garfield and Christiansen NonccmplBnt curb tamp MoncompHant curl) ramp HoncompliBnl curb ramp Noncompliant curb ramp Noncon^mt curb remp Noncompliant curb rmy Noncompliartcurbranpisnot tocated within marted crossing Noncortyteit cuib ramp Noneatnirtwnt art tamp S2.750 $2,750 $2.750 $2,750 $2,750 _12,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found In on or Near the | Ramp 1 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots 5 Up/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) |! Detectable Warning (Tactile Grooves) |. Truncated Dome ! | Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from \ g ivehicular Traffic Lane 1^ Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Slopes ot the concrete gutter adioining ^ curb ramp (within 48' from top and f Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan f (4' X 4' requited) = Composite al Items ° Composite ali Item* FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item Obstructions Found In on or Near the | Ramp 1 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots 5 Up/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) |! Detectable Warning (Tactile Grooves) |. Truncated Dome ! | Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from \ g ivehicular Traffic Lane 1^ 1 1 1 1 o. Field Work Identified Ftanp Non-'conforming Pan Width Side Flares (Not to mcnnrilOIQ Ramp Skjpes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) Lanrfing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within AS' from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traftic Movement InsufficienL iDual Directional Needed Slopes ot the concrete gutter adioining ^ curb ramp (within 48' from top and f Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan f (4' X 4' requited) = Composite Scores or Costs Items ° Gross CXs\s (some double counting occuis) Net Costs (iMth Maximum for ramp replacement 1 Item Localion Facililv ID MacPaQe Tier Exislina Condition Noles | '^'^ SI.133 $200 S260 S200 (300 $800 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 S350 $600 RMP m\ RMP3621 AE03 1 Noncompliant curb ren^ 1 1 Moderate 12,760 $2,750 RMP3S20 RMP362(I AE03 Noncixi^ant curb ran^ is not located within marked crossing Fire tiydrant and traftic si^al pole are located m me lop landing 1 3 Maior $4,383 $3,883 RMP 3619 RMP3619 AE03 • Noncompliant curb ramp is not located wlhin msked crossing 2 Maior $3,250 $2,750 RMP361S RMP3618 AE03 NoncQn4>lieiit curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 3617 RMP3617 AE03 1 Ftoncompliant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 3616 RMP3616 AE03 1 tttaicompliant curb ramp 1 Moderate $2 760 $2,750 RMP 282 RMP282 AEM 1 Noncompliant curb ramp Coordirate with at^cent accessfele route 1 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 RMP 196 RMP198 AE04 Noncompliant curb remp 1 1 2 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 276 RMP276 AE04 Noncon^iltant curb rsn^ is not located witMn merited crossing 1 1 2 Major $3,250 $2,750 RMP 277 RMP277 AEM NoncompltBnt curb rsmp oimects b> pwk whicti does mA connect to an accessibie route 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 226 RMP226 AEIM 1 Noncompliant curb rsnp Large verbcal offset at traffic signal cover is located in the top landing • 1 2 M^or $3,000 $1,100 $2,750 $1,100 RMP 285 RMP285 AE04 1 No detectable warnings provided, m> grooved border provided, 1' high vertical oRset at bottom landing, bottom landing slope is noncompkant 0,25 1 1 0,1 2,35 Maior $3,000 $1,100 $2,750 $1,100 RMP 223 RMP223 AE04 1 1 Moderat* I2,7S0 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Facilit;^ MMSlm. Tiet Existing Condition Noncompliant curb ramp Detectable warning do not span entire wdth of curb te Noncompliant curb ramp NonccmpMata curb ramp Construction Ca^eggry: Patching 8S i5 ^emo ^Construct New Samp 11 g , ll ill |1- $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 NoncompiantcurtirBmp NoncompBant curb ran^ Diagonal curb tamp does not have 24' long segment of sttatgK cwb located on each le ofthe curb ramp and Mrittni ttie irked crossing $2,750 NoncompBant curb ramp Noncompliant curb ramp Noncomplianl curb ronp Noncompfat< curb ramp NonconyltBnl curb tamp NonconyliBnt curb tamp FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateoonf: FaeiWyJD Mm£m Tja Exlstno condition Snnding Jcoring lnstal[ Demo t Construct New Ramp it ft to £ Composlle »tl Items l-i g .|_3J West side of State St AHey between Christiansm and Grand West side of State St Alley between Christiansen and Grand Noncompliant curb ramp Nonconytiant cirti reny Conpliart cuilj ramp does not connect to an accesaible route on Ihe opposing side of the Curb ramp does mrf conneclto ibie route and projects in street parking space NoncQmpBaa curb ramp NoncomirtMnt curii ramp There is a noncompliant curb ramp located on each side of the south station driveway ThereBanooMi^^ Noncomplianl curb ramp Noncompteit curb ramp NoncompBant curb tan^ Confomi ng $2.750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2.750 $2,750 1 I Moikrate I t2,750 | $2.750 J5 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Hotizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots S Up/UpHfIs (A/C or Concrete) : 3. CO Detect^le Warning (Tactile Grooves) |. Trancated Dome [ a Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from e Vehicular Traffic Lfflie ? Demo i Construct New Ramp Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL if-Dual Directional Needed 8 Slopes ot the oVicrete gutter adjoining \^ curb ramp (within 48' from top and f Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan § (4'X 4'required) | Composite all Items ComDOSile all tteim FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliante Itm Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Hotizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots S Up/UpHfIs (A/C or Concrete) : 3. CO Detect^le Warning (Tactile Grooves) |. Trancated Dome [ a Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from e Vehicular Traffic Lfflie ? Pedestrian Ramp Non«istent Field Wori( Identified Ranp Non-IDonfonnng Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48* from top and tiottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL if-Dual Directional Needed 8 Slopes ot the oVicrete gutter adjoining \^ curb ramp (within 48' from top and f Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan § (4'X 4'required) | (kimposite Scores or Costs Gross Costs (some double counting occurs] Net Costs (with Maximum for ramp Location Facilitv ID Man Page Tiei Existina Condition Noles | Cost $1,133 $200 S250 S200 S30(l S800 J2,750 t2,760 t2,7S0 S2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2750 $2,760 $3,0(X) $360 S500 RMP292 AE05 Top landHig slopes 3.0% bottom landing atopes 73% 0,1 0,1 0.2 Minor $360 $350 RMP 227 RMP227 AE06 1 Top lending slopes 5.5%and cross slopes 3 3% bottom landing slopes 7 3% 0,1 0 1 0.2 Minor $350 $350 W 16S RMP165 AE04 rJoncomplianl curb ramp Reptace curb remp with concrete rather than paws 1 Moderate $2,760 52,750 $2,750 RMP1S9 RMP159 AE06 Noncompfiani cixb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,760 52,750 $2,750 l!MP229 RMP223 HBSS Noncompliant turb ramp 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 £2 750 $2,750 RMP 281 RMP281 .04 Noncompliant cub ramp 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 £2 750 $2,750 RMP 234 RMP234 .04 Noncompliant cuib ramp 1 1 1 1 Moderate 12,750 $2,750 RMP 279 RMP278 AF»4 1 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 235 RHP23S AF04 1 rjoncon^liant curb ramp 1 1 Uoderete $2750 $2,750 RMP 278 RMP278 AF04 ' Noncomfriiant cub ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 247 RMP247 AE05 1 Noneomptiant curb t«i^ is not Iwated within nwked crossing 2 Major $3,250 $2,750 RMP 267 RMP267 AEOS Nonccn^liatrt cub ran^ is not located within marked crossing 2 Major $3,250 $2,750 RMP 268 RMP26B AEOe Noncompliint curb nmp Coordinate with cross slope requrements 1 Moderalt . $2,750 $2,750 (5^ FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaon Conqriianeeltvt Obstracbons Found in on or Near the ! | Ramp ll Horizontal Spadngs Of Pavement Divots ,1 U(VUplifts (A/C or Concreie) g. Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) 1. Instal 1 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from i S Vehicular Traffic Lane f Pedestrian Ramp Non-existent Field WorIt Identified Ramp Non-Conforming Pan Width o Side Flaies (Not to exceed tO%) \S a ^?amp Slopes (Running up the Pan) i | ^amp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) [-3 .anding Running or Cross Slope ?amp Slopes of Approach Apron (within -18" from lop and bottom of curb ramp) 1 \pex Ramp Used-Protection from a, /ehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL f-)ual Directional Needed S >lopesot the Concrete gutter adioining ;urb ramp (within 48" from top and | anding Depth Past the Top of the Pan § t-x4-|iaquifed) | tomposite Scores or Costs o t»slte all Items o •f Iross Costs (some double counting S ccurs) || et Costs (with Maximum for ramp g iplacement j« Location Facililv ID Mao Paoe T». 1 Item Exisfina Condition Notes j Cost $1,133 $200 $250 $200 t300 ssoo S2J60 t2,750 12,750 S2,750 S2,760 J2.750 J2,7bO !2,750 $3,000 RMP 269 RMP269 AE06 Noncompliant curb rarr^ Coordinate with cross slope retprements RMP 173 RMP173 AE06 Noncompliant curb ramp is not located wWim marVed crossing 2 RMP 172 RMP172 AE06 Noncompliant curb remp is not locked within marked crossmg 1 2 J RMP 182 RMP182 AE06 1 Noncompliant curb rsmp Coordinate wifli cross stope reqmrements 1 2 J RMP 181 RMP181 .06 Noncon^ant curb rsnip Coordinate with cross slope requirements 1 1 J RMP 263 RMP263 AE06 NoncompKart curb ramp 1 J RMP 264 RMP264 AE06 1 Nonconpliant curb ramp Coortfinote with cross slope requirements RMP 265 RMP265 AE06 1 Noncomplisnt curb ramp Coordinate twitb cross slope requirements S2,750 $2,750 RMP 266 RMP266 AE05 Noncon^ent curb ramp is not located within marked crossing 2 Moderate S2,750 $2,750 RMP 248 RMP248 AE06 Noncomplianl curt) ramp is not located within marked crossing 2 RMP 261 RMP261 AF04 i^oncompliBnt curb ramp ll^or $2,750 RMP 262 RMP262 AF04 ^Joncomfifiant curt) ramp Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 343 RMP343 AF06 1 oncompHant curt) ramp 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 -0 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots E Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) 1 L r Scoring i £ Si 1 Install 5 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from S Vehicular Traftic Lane Demo & Construct Now Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Itenis Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Corrq)liance Ittn Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots E Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) 1 L r Scoring i £ Si 1 Install 5 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from S Vehicular Traftic Lane 1 1 a. Field WorIt Idenfified Ramp Non-Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10K,) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ran^) Slope (Slope AciDSS the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protecfion from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL Dual Direcfional Needed Slopes ol the concrete gutter adjoining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4'x4'iaquitBd) Composite Scores or Costs Ckxnposile Rafing Category Gross Costs (some double counfing DCCUIS) Costs (iMlh Maximum for ramp j Item Localion Facilitv ID Mao Pa°e Tiei Exislmo Condilion Notes | Cost $1,133 S200 S250 (200 S300 S800 $2,760 $2750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 $360 $600 RMP 344 RMP344 NoncompHairt curb ramp 1 Moderate 13,750 $2,750 ^MP345 RMP346 »E06 1 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 RMP340 AE06 AE06 Nontonqisnt cud) ranp 1 Moderate S? 750 $2,750 W341 RMP341 AE06 AE06 Noncomplignt curt) ramp 1 Moderate 12,750 $2,750 RMP 342 RMP342 AF06 No detectable warnings provided, nancompliBnt top lamfing, 1/2* verticsl offset at bottom landing 0,26 01 025 1.6 1 Moderate $2,133 $2,183 RMP 9 RMP9 AE06 1 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 1.6 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMPS RMPS AE06 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 W7 RMP7 AF06 Noncomplimt curb remp Coordinate witti marlted crossing 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 374 RMP374 AG06 NoneompliarAcufb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 RMP 370 RMP370 AF06 NonctmpKant curb remp Coordinate wiUi accessible route requirements across street Curb ramp does not connect witti accessible route into < 1 Moderate $2750 $2,750 RMP 367 RMP367 AF06 1 NoncompliBnteurb rvip Coordirate witti accessible route requirements across stie^ Curb ran^ does not connect witti accessible route into 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 360 RMP360 AF06 Noncompgant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 365 RMP365 AF06 1 Noncompliant curb ramp Coordmate with accessible route requirements across street 1 1 Moderela $2,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv; Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots g Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) it Detectable Waming (TacfileGnxjves) :3 Install 1 Stiiping in Crosswalk or Buffer from i ^ Vehiculv Traffic Lane \j Demo & Con$trui:t New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots g Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) it Detectable Waming (TacfileGnxjves) :3 Install 1 Stiiping in Crosswalk or Buffer from i ^ Vehiculv Traffic Lane \j 1 1 Field Work Idenfified Ramp Non-Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Stapes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stape (Slope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cnjss Stope Ramp Stapes of Approach Apron (within 48" from lop and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protecfion from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL Dual Direcfional Needed E ll If Iff ll i Landsig Depth Past Ihe Top of the Pan (4'x4'requiied) Composite Scores or C^ts f : Sross Costs (some doubte counfing xcurs) ^1 Costs (with Maximum for lamp 1 lUm Localion rarM„\n Mao Page tiei Exislina Condilion Notes | Cost J1,133 $200 $250 $200 $300 $800 $2,750 52,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 W37II RMP378 AF07 • Noncm^iant curti ran^ 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP3S5 RMP365 AF07 1 Two noncompliant curb ran^is are provided here Coordlnele witli accessD^le route requirenwits across street and nwked crossing retirements 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 yVeel side of Harding between Chestnut and Pine ..633 Af 07, AE06 Curb ronps leading into Pine Ave Park are (loncompliant 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 West side of Hatding between Chesbiut and Pine laUASM AF(17,AE06 Curb ranps leading into Pine Ave, Pork are norKomphant • 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 West side of Harding between Cheslntit and Pne KTUA5e6 AF07, AE06 Curb ramps lesdms Into Pine Ave. Parti are noncomptant 1 1 2 Moderate Moderate $2,750 $2,750 Wast tide of Hanling betNeen Chestnut and Pine KTUA586 AF07, AE06 1 Curb ran^ leaifng into Pine Ave. Park ere norKompliant 1 1 2 Moderate Moderate $2,750 $2,750 W360 RlilP36ll AF(I7 1 NoncompNanl curb ramp is not positioned correctly or located within the marking crossing 1 1 2 $3,250 t2 7S0 W>»3 RMP363 AF07 htaiccnpHant curb ranip it not IOCBM wINn mailtod crossly 1 2 1 Major $2,75 D_ 0 (MP 364 RMP364 AF07 1 Two nmKompliant curti ran^s are provided here Cooidhete with accessible route equiremerris across street ' 2 1 Moderate $2,750 $2.75 D_ 0 RMP 371 RMP371 AF07 1 NoncompKant curb ramp 1 1 Mo^terate $2 750 $2,750 RMP 372 RMP37! AF07 Noncamfriiant curb rsmp 1 1 p,v,llodefate $2,750 $2,750 (MP 373 RMP373 km 1 4oncon^lianl curb rEfnp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP706 AG07 Noncompliant curb ramp Is not positioned correctfy 1 1 $2,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS CoitEtruction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near the ! | Ramp IS Horizontal Spadngs or Pavement Divols ^ Grinding 1 o i t Scoring Install SMpe Demo & Construct Netw Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite ail Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Cam;riiance Item Obstructions Found in on or Near the ! | Ramp IS Horizontal Spadngs or Pavement Divols ^ Grinding 1 o i t Detectable Waming (Tacfile Grooves) 1 1 E Sfiiping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehicular Traffic Lane 1 1 1 •B 1 Field Wof1( Idenfified Ranp Non-(^onforming Pan Width I Side Flares (Not to exceed 10'XO Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Stope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes Of Approach Apron (within 1 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protecfion from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsulficienL Dual Direcfional Needed Slopes ol the concrete gutter Adjoining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pat (4'X 4'required) Composite Scores or CosIs Composite fifing Category Gross Costs (some doubta counfing occurs) Met Costs (v»th Maximum for ramp replacement 1 lUm Localion Facililv ID Mao Pane Tja Existino Condilion Notes | $1,133 S200 J260 1200 (300 ssoo $2,750 J2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 ssoo RMP 706 RMP705 AG07 Noncon^iant curt) ramp is not positioned corectly 1 Moderate 12,750 $2,750 RMP 705 RMP708 AG07 Noncompliant curb renp Is not positioned correctly 1 Moderate S2,750 $2,750 RMP 707 RMP707 AG07 NoncompliBnt curb ramp 1 1 2 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 709 RMP70. AF07 Noncomplisnl curb ranp is not located wilhin marked crossing 1 2 Major $3 250 $2,750 RMP 710 RMP710 AF07 Noncon^liant curb ramp 1 0.25 Moderate S2,750 $1,133 $2,750 $1,133 RMP 724 RMP724 A™ Noncompkant curb ramfi has vertical olftels to surouncing sidewaHis 025 1 0.25 Minor S2,750 $1,133 $2,750 $1,133 RMP 730 RMP730 AHOe No detectattle mmings provided, crose slope is 3.2% vertical offset Is 1/4' hi^ at top lending 01 025 01 0.45 Minor SI ,433 $1,433 RMP 731 RMP731 AH08 AH08 No detectable warnings provided, curb im^ is not 4' wide 025 01 0.35 2 Minor S300 $300 RMP 728 RMP728 AH08 AH08 1 Noncompliant curb ranp is not located wiOiin merited crossing 1 0.35 2 Major $3,250 $2,750 RMP 727 RMP727 AG08 Noncomplianl curb ramp is not located wihin marked crossing 1 2 Major $3,250 $2,750 RMP 726 RHP725 A™ 1 I4oneompliantcurb rvnp 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 RMP 726 RMP726 AH08 'JoncDR^IIant curb remp 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 RMP 734 RMP734 AH08 1 «oden«< $2,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaory; Obstructions Found in on or Near the 11 Ramp is Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots % UpMpm (A/C Of Concrete) 11 Detectable Warning (Tactile Grooves) 11 InsUII Stnpe Demo & Construct New Ramp Replact Repair ll i ^ l| iij o < III Landing Depth Past the Top Of the Pan § (4'X 4'required) | Composite all Items Composite all Item; 1 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Itan Obstructions Found in on or Near the 11 Ramp is Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots % UpMpm (A/C Of Concrete) 11 Detectable Warning (Tactile Grooves) 11 Truncated Dome [striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vetiicular Traffic Lane 1 1 1 CL. Field Work Identified Ramp Non-Confomiing Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed fO%) Ramp Stopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Stope Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within 48' from top and bottom of curb ran^) Apex Ramp Used^'rotection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsuflicienL Dual Direction^ Needed Repair ll i ^ l| iij o < III Landing Depth Past the Top Of the Pan § (4'X 4'required) | Composite Scores or Costs Composite Rating Category Gross Costs (some double counting occurs) ^ Net Costs (with Maximum for ramp 1 1 Hem tocalion Facilitv ip Mao Paoe Tier Existino Condilion Notes | <^'* $1,133 $200 S2&0 S200 «300 $800 $2,750 S2,760 $2,750 S2,750 $2,760 $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $600 IWTX Rl*736 AHOB Noncon^iant curb remp 1 Moderate J2,750 $2,750 BMP 737 RIUP737 AH08 1 Uncompliant curb ranp 1 1 Moderate 12,760 $2,750 UP 736 RMP736 AH08 NoncompltuM curb ronp 1 1 Moderate S2,760 S2.750 $2,750 WIP671 RMP67I AD02 NonccmpSant curb rsmp 1 1 1 Moderate S2,760 S2.750 $2,750 WP3627 RMP3627 AD02 1 Noncon^)lant curb rvr^ 1 1 Moderate $3,750 $2,750 Uedian vwst curt) ramp on Carlsl>ad BM RMP3626 AtXK I^OTcomplwit curb ran^ 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 Median east ciHb ronp on Carlsbail Blvd RUP3626 AO02 NoncomptiBnt curb ran^ 1 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 RMP3624 AD02 • Noncon^snt axb lanp 1 0.25 Medaiita $2,760 $2,750 W3629 RMP362S ADOS 1 No detoctoble wamlngs provided at curb ramp 025 1 0.25 Mtmr $300 $300 RW112 RMP112 AB04 No detectaUe wamtngs provided at curb ramp. Transition at bottom landing Is notflusti; Side nares sh^ ^2 S%af)fl 8.3% Noncompliant side fine connects to Buena Vista Viof where there is no rtproved walking tacHibes wtthrn public right of way 0,1 0 25 01 0.4S Minor $550 $550 RMP 113 RMP113 AB04 No dBtecMiemfnings provided at curb rsnp; TrBrration at bcdtomlandHig is not flush 01 0 25 0.35 $550 $5» 0 SO RMP 114 RMP114 AC04 No detectable warnings provided at curb ramp; Transition at bottom landing is not flush; Side flares slope 11 3% and 16.9% 0.1 025 025 0.6 Moderate $3,300 $2,7 0 SO RMP Its RHP115 AC04 No detflCtaUe warnings provided at curt) rtrrip: Translion at bottom landhg is not Rush 01 0,2. 025 0.6 Moderate $750 $750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near the : | Rantp ,| Horizontal SpacRigs or Pavement Divots Gnnding g 5 o i t Detectable Wanting (Tactile Grooves) |. Truncated Dome j g-Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from S Vetiicular Traftic Lane Demo & Construct New Ramp Apex Ramp Used-Protection from ^ Vehicular Traffic Movement InsulficienL f Dual Directional Needed |8 Repair ll If B " 1 » 1 1 = •£! |€ 1 0 S i Landng Depth Past the Top Of the Pan § (4' X 4' requited) S Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Ittm Obstructions Found in on or Near the : | Rantp ,| Horizontal SpacRigs or Pavement Divots Gnnding g 5 o i t Detectable Wanting (Tactile Grooves) |. Truncated Dome j g-Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from S Vetiicular Traftic Lane Pedestrian Ramp Non-existent Field Work Identified Ramp Non-Conforming PanWidtti Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) •L S 1 1 S2. 1 Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curt) ran^i) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from ^ Vehicular Traffic Movement InsulficienL f Dual Directional Needed |8 Repair ll If B " 1 » 1 1 = •£! |€ 1 0 S i Landng Depth Past the Top Of the Pan § (4' X 4' requited) S Composite Scoies or CosIs j Composite Rating Category Gross Coste (some double counting OCCUIS) Net Costs (vtith Maximum for ramp replacement 1 Item Location Facilitv Ip Map Page Tier Exislina Condition Notgs [ Co* $1,133 S200 $250 $200 $300 $soo $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $3,000 $360 $500 RMP 359 RUP3&9 Noncon^riiant curb remp 1 Medtrste $2,750 $2,750 RMP 4739 RMP4739 AFOJIM 0 Conlbriiitng SO $0 ^MP 2m RMP28S AE04 • Compliant 0 Confonning s; to $0 RW 180 RNiPIBO AE06 fJonctmplnnt curb nmp rhis location applies to the curb ranps on both sides of the alley Coordinaie with cross slope requirements scross 1 Moderate s; 750 $2,750 * Rmp At S AHey Approx SOYite From Com Cwd @ Hardmg RW179 (kiveway ran^; no truncated dome, 0.5* uplift where pan meets sidewaHt; cracked pan; crsclted grooves; ch^s in concrete along edge oS curb; ramp cross slope 6% .1 025 0,25 0.6 Moderate S3 $2 S6 300__ 750 $2,750 $2,750 South Mie of Beech between Washingtm and Carisbad Bh/d KTUA5O0 AE03 MoncompNant curb ramp located et 209 Beech 1 1 Moderate S3 $2 S6 300__ 750 $2,750 $2,750 Ne Rmp At Pine @ Basswood RMP544 0.5* lip; no truncated dome; utility box with 0 2S'-0 5' uplifts located at pan/landing transition side Rare A: 48 6% 34* landing; landing running slope 7 3% 01 0,2S 0.25 026 01 0.95 Moderate S3 $2 S6 550 $2,750 Soult) side of Beech between WsGtMngton and Carisbad BM. KTUA501 AE03 NoncompliBr^ curb ran^ locked at 209 Beech 1 1 Moderate $2 $2 750 $2,750 *tortl)east comet oF Grand and Washington KTUA502 AE04 Noncompltant curb ramp 1 1 HPderste $2 $2 $2,750 Mwth side of Chestnut twtween Harding and JefTerson KTUA504 AF07 Moncomi^ant curb tamp located at pedestnan crosswalk 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 South side of Chestnut between Jefferson and Hardng KTUA505 AF07 Monecmpliwit ctrb ramp located Ht pedestrian crosswafli 1 1 1 Moderate $2 $2,750 Crosswak across Garfield St, et Pacific Ave KTUA522 AD02 No curb ramps provided where accessible route crosses curt) 1 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 Cmswili across GarMd SI st Pacilic Ave KTUA523 AD02 No cud) ramps provided where accessible route crosses curti 1 1 Moderate S2 750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Rnnoval Patching Up/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) IL Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) | Truncated Dome \ | Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from SI Vehicul^ Traffic Lane f Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Coinposite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Comfdiancelten' Obstmctions Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots Up/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) IL Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) | Truncated Dome \ | Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from SI Vehicul^ Traffic Lane f Pedestrian Rair^i Mon-existent Field Work Identified Ranp Non-conforming Pan Width Side Flaies (Not to exceed 10%) (^mp Skipes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Stope Across fhe Pan) Landing Running or Cioss Stope Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within 48' from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection fiom Vehicular Traffic Movement Insufficient Dual Directional Needed blopes ol the concreie gutter ad|oining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Lading Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4' X 4' required) S S 1 Composite Rating Category f3ross CosIs (some double counting occurs) Net CosIs (\Mth Maximum for ramp replacement 1 llcm Localion Facililv ID Map Page Tier Exislina Condition Noles | Co* $1,133 $200 J250 J200 S300 ssoo $2,760 12,760 J2,760 S2,760 52,760 J2,760 12,760 $2,760 $3,000 $360 $500 SW RMP at Oak and Jeflefson St AHey iaUA645 AE06 No curb ran^ prowted on either side of nrtersection at aHey 1 tttoderate S2750 $2,750 SE RMP al 0*1 and JetHtson SI Aley lauAsae AE06 1 Mo curt) ramf) provided on either side of ir^ersectfon at alley 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 ^RMPatPineand Madi^ St Aney KTUA557 AF06 No curt) ramp provided oo either side of intersection at ^y 1 1 1 Moderate $2,/50 $2,750 IE RMP al Pine and Madison SI AHey KTUA55S AF06 1 No curb ramp provided on either side of intersection at alley 1 1 Moderate $3,750 $2,750 SW RMP at Pine end Madison 51 Aley KTUA561 AF06 No cult) rar^ provided on other side of irrtersection at aHey 1 1 1 1 Moderate Moderate $2750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 SW RMP at Pine and MadiDon SI Aley iaUA562 AF06 1 Ho curb rmp provided on either side oF intersection at aHey 1 1 1 Moderate Moderate $2750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 SW RMP at Jefferson St and Chestnut Ave, Noith Facmg KTUA565 AF07 Curt) rar^ connecting to RW 378 is noncomplianl 1 1 1 Moderate $2750 $2,750 NE RMP al Madison St Aley and Clieahul iaUA666 AF07.AF06 No curt) rannps provided on eHier wie oTMadiwn St Aley 1 1 Moderat* , $2,760 $2,750 NE RMP at Madison St Alley and Clieslnut ICTUA567 AF07, AF06 1 No curt ramps provided on either side of Madison St. Alley 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 SE RlulP on Ocean lietween Cypress and Pacilic Ave iaUA649 Missing remp at crosswalli 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 SW RMP on Ocean lietween Cypress and Pacific Ave KnjA650 Ussing ramp et crosswali 1 1 1 Moderati ' $2,750 $2,750 ^ RMP on Ocean between Cypress and Pacific Ave iaUA661 Missing ramp at crosswaft 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 W RMP on Ocean between Cypress and Pacilic Ave iaUA662 1 riisEing rsmp at crosswaft 1 1 Modern $2,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near ttie | Horizontal Spadngs or Pavement Oirots |f Grinding Oetect^to Waming (Tactile Grooves) §. Install StiIpe Denw & Constract New Ramp Replace Repair ll iiJ ill III Expand Composite all Items Composite all Iterm FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Conptence Item Obstructions Found in on or Near ttie | Horizontal Spadngs or Pavement Oirots |f 1 o t i t Oetect^to Waming (Tactile Grooves) §. Truncated Dome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from i Vetiicular Traffic Lane Pedestrian Ramp Itat existent Field Work Identified Ranp Non-£ i O-Side nares (Not to exceed tO'iy Ramp Stopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Stope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Stope Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL Dual Direcltond Needed Repair ll iiJ ill III Landing Depth Past the Top of Ihe Pan (4'x4'ia<)uifBd) Composite Scores or Costs Composits Rating Category Sross Costs (some doubte counting xcurs) *lel Costs (with Maximum for ramp leplacement , Location 1 Item Facililv ID MapPaflf Tier Exislina Coniiition Noles | Cost St,i33 $200 S250 J200 {300 {800 $2,750 S2,750 12,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 SE RMP at Cypress and Gerlielil KrUA653 Misstng ranp at crosswaHi 1 1 Modendt $2,750 $2,750 SW RMP at Carol PI and Jefferson RMP732 no tmncated dome; 6* detectable waming, excessive cross slope at bottom landii^ 0,1 0 25 0, 0.45 Minor S500 $500 NW RMP al Carol PI and Jefferson RMP733 t no truncated dame:tel^>hDne pole obstructs pot et bottom of rar^ to less Itian 36", slope exceeds 2%8l bottom landing 0,2S 026 0.1 0.6 Moderate $1 433 $1,433 ME RMP al Hope Av AWey and OaK KTUA664 1 No curb ramp provided on eiltier side of Ir^ersection at alley 1 Moderate /so $2,750 NW RMP al Hope Av AHey end Oek KTUA6S5 No curb ronp provided on rther side of interwc&on A aHey 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 >C RMP et Jelfeiesni SI Aley and Oek KTUA666 No curb remp provided on either side oT kiterBettion at alley 1 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 rW RMP at Jeffereson St Alley and Oak KTUA667 No curb ramp provided on either side of intersection at alley 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 SE RMP at Madison St Alley and Cheslmil Ave KTUA853 1 No curb ramp prouded on either skfe of intersection at aley 1 1 Moderate $2,750 SW RMP at Madison St Aley and Chestnut Ave KTUA669 No curb ramp provided on eittier side of intersectian at alley 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 SE RMP at Madison SI Aley and Pakn Av KTUA660 1 No curb ramp provided on either side of intersection A alley ' 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 SW RMP at Madison SI Aley and Patn Av KTUA661 < No curb ranq) provided on either of Mitersection at aHey 1 1 IMerale $2,750 $2,750 RMP 161 RMP161 AD03 No detectrtle warnings pruvided at curb remp, Curti ramp slopes 12 0%, Bottom larxling slopes 105% Transition at bottom lartding IS 1' Ngti: Offset from curb ramp to grooved border is 3/4* hi(|li; Side ftares slope 16.7% and 15.0% 0,25 0.25 01 0,25 0.85 Moderate $5,750 $2,750 East side or HoMay Park along EunAa PI (Hareicaf) ramp) ICTUA603 77w66 2 compliant 0 Coflformlnq $0 $0 Construction Cateaorv; Retnoval Patctiing Gnnding Scoring Install Stdpe Demo & Construct Netw Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite alt Itenis FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS CanpUance Iter jObstiuclions Foisid in on or Near the Ramp Hotizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots LipfUplifts(A«; or Concrete) Detectabte Waming (Tactite Grooves) |Truncated Dome Striping in Crossviralk or Buffer from Vehicular Traffic Lane Pedestrian Fiamp Non-existent Field Work Idenlilied Ramp Non-(Donfotming i CL Side Flares (Not to exceed lOQ Ramp Stopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Stope Across the Pan) Landing Runiang or Cross Stope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (wilhin 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ran^) Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Moi/ement InsufficienL Dual Directional Needed Slopes ot the concrete gutter ad|oining curb ramp (wthin 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4'X 4'required) Composite Scores or C^ts Gross Costs (some doubte counting occuis) Itet Costs (Mth Maximum for lamp replacement Location Facilitv ID ^ap Page Tier Existina Condition 1 Item Noles 1 '^»* $1,133 $200 $260 $200 $300 $800 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 iauA605 29 2 0.1 0.26 f*E RMP at CtHiparosa and Las Flores Df No tnincated dome; wom leidun;; 0 5' tip 0.35 Minor $660 $550 RMP121 29 2 0.1 025 S/E RMP at Pio Pk:o and Las Flofes Dr No trnnciHed dome; 0,5' Iq) 0.35 Mnor $660 $550 RMP123 39 2 0.25 SfE RMP at Pie Pi<» and Buena ViSta No InjnciKed dome; wom teidura 0.25 Minor $300 $300 RMP129 2 01 0 25 SE RIMP at Pio Pico I> and Laguna Or no tmncaled dome; 0,25* tip 0.35 Minor $660 $550 RMP133 29 2 01 025 SIW RMP al Pio Pico and Las Flotes Dt, No tmncated dome; OS' lip; wom teidure 0J5 Minor $660 $550 RMP14S 42 2 026 NIE RMP al Valley SI and Carlsbad VHaje Dr No tnarcated dome 0.25 Minor $300 $300 RMP26 43 2 rmncated dc«ne not fijll pan 0.1 01 N/W RMP at Monroe SL and Cartsbad Vrilage Drive Landing runtring slope; 9,4% 0.2 Minor $300 $300 RMP607 56 2 025 0,1 NE RMP i< Volley St and Bassiiirooe No tmncated dome; 0,25' lip, textaite; tamp nmning slope 6 7% 0J5 Minor $300 $300 RHP510 56 2 01 026 NW RMP at Vanoy St and Basswood no tmncated dome, 0 5' lip, texlure 0.35 Minor $560 $550 RMPseo 0.1 026 SE RIP at Magnaia Av ent Adams St no tmncated dome, 0,5' lip 0.35 Minor $650 $550 RMP5e2 2 0.1 026 tW RMP at Megnote Av md Adam; SI no tmncated done; 025" lip 0.35 Minor $660 $550 RMPSS9 2 0.1 026 01 SW RMP ot Volley St and Brady C» no tmncated dome. 0.25'lip; 37* landing 0.45 Minor $1,050 $1,050 RMP606 70 2 0,25 0-25 01 E RMP at EM Of Ua^ioie Av Into MoKoe St no Inmcated dome; 0.7 lip; 37 tendkig 0.6 HsdenK $1,000 $1,000 C3 ConEtrui:tton Cateaorv: Removal Patctdng Grinding Scoring Install Stdpe Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Comooslte all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compltance Iten Obstnicttons Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots LipWplifIs (A/C or Concrete) Detectabte Waming (TacSe GnDoves) Tmncated Dome j Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehicula Traffic Lane Pedestrian Ran^D Mon-existent Field Work Identified Ranp Non-Conforming Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Stepes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Stope (Stope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Stope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) I Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL Dual Directional Needed btopes ot the conaete gutter adjoining curb ramp (within 48" from top and LaniSng Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4'x4'rei]uiiied) ,,, J Composite Scores or Costs 1 Composite Rating Category Sross Costs (some doubte counting ^1 Costs (\uth Maximum for ramp -epiacement < Location Facilitv ID liffi Existina Condifior 1 Item Noles 1 Cost 51,133 S200 $260 J200 J300 1800 $2,760 J2,75C $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 1281 1299 Certsbad Viltege Dr (S/E RMP) 53 2 iion-campliant 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 KrUA626 53 2 1281-1299 Cailsbad Village Dr. (S/W RW) iwn-CDmpliaiit 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 KTUA630 53 2 1 S/E RMP at Pico Pico and Carlsbad VHIage Or notvciHTipliBnt 1 Moderate 12,760 $2,750 S/W RMP st Pico Pico and Carlsbad ViHege Dr KrUA631 53 2 Path ortraini across the street A leiiir upHtsandbfoltenAA: 1 Moderate 12,750 $2,750 KrUA633 29 2 0,25 0,25 mi RMP al Chuparosa and Las Flores Dr No tmncated dome; 1* lip, no texture 0.5 Moderate S650 $550 =asl side of Holiday PEVII along Eureka PI st Horsestwe House [Handicap ramp) KTUA835 « 2 iioi-canpliaiit; slopes 90<xl; no IrUKtfed dome; no texture; no ^eiwes at pan 1 2 Ml^or 1500 $500 KTUM36 77 2 1 N/E RMP at Eureka and Chestnut non-compliant 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 KIUA638 77 2 , r«W RMP « Eureka and Cttestnut non-conipNant 1 Moderate $2/50 $2,750 RMP122 29 2 1 f*E RMP at Pro Pico and Buena Vista Way non-complianl 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP at Pio Pico Dr and Laguna Dr RMP12B 2 no tmncated dome; 0 5' lip: famp mnning slope 10.7% cross slope 35% poiwer pole otistrndion in side flare/landing; landins mnnxig slope 3 4% cross slope 3% WiH require complete ramp replacement 01 0.1 025 0, 01 01 0.75 Moderate £1,683 $1,683 RMP130 53 2 1 SVE RMP at Pico Pico and Carlsbad Village Dr non-compli.nl 1 Moderate ; $2,760 $2,750 WWIUllPatPico Pico and Carlsbad \M8ge Or. RMP131 53 2 non-compHatt Patti of travel chipped, liroiten, tiplifted in 1 1 Moderate s:,75o $2,750 Rl«>132 29 2 0,1 026 0,25 *W RHP M Pio Pico and Buena Veta Way no tmncated dome: no landing; 0 5* ip 0.6 Moderate $1,060 $1,050 C5 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaory: Removal Horizontal Spadngs Of Pavement Divots | Up/Uplifls (A/C or Concrete) g. Scoring Install Stripe Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Coinposite all tems > i Composite alt Itenis FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item Obstructions Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spadngs Of Pavement Divots | Up/Uplifls (A/C or Concrete) g. OetnctahM Wanting (Tactile Grooves) Tmncated Dome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from VeliicularTraflicLane J 1 1 a. Field Work IdenSlied Ranp Non-Confotming Pan Widtii Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ranip Slopes (Running up the Pan) fiamp Slope (Slope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement Insufficient Dual Directional Needed Slopes ol me coiU3(t6 gutter adjoining curb ramp (wthin 48" from top and hnttnm nf nirt\ nmi\\ Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4'X 4-required) Composite Scoies or CosIs t I tems > i (Sross Coste (some double counting Net Costs (Mth Maximum for ramp replacement Location FaalilvID Map Paoe Tier Existino Coniirtiijn Notes | C"* SI.133 J200 $250 $200 $300 $800 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 12,750 $2,760 $2,760 $3,000 $350 $500 NiW RHP at Higliland Dr and Foreel Ave RHP134 19 No truncated dome, 0 5' lip; 3 2%crosG slope 0,1 025 0,1 0.45 Minor $550 $550 St RMP at Monroe St and Cartstied ViBage Dr RMP143 43 2 no lantbig, 6* grooves 01 It Moderate $700 $700 SIW RMP at Monroe St and Ceilsbed Vlege Drive RHPI« RMP145 « 2 1 1 1.25 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 S/E RMP at Valley SI and Carisbad Village Dr RHPI« RMP145 42 2 No tnincBted dome; no landing 02S 1 1.25 Moderate SSOO $800 WE RMP at Monroe St and Canined Vlage Dnve RMP27 43 2 large ctttriks missing in curb 1 1 Moderate S2,750 $2,750 S/E RMP at Valley St and McCauley RMP3546 42 2 No truncated dome; ff* grooves; (US' Path of travel should be replaced, crack in 0,1 01 025 0.45 Minor $760 $750 1/E RMP at Highland and Buena Vista RMP3727 30 2 No truncated dome; grooved pan, Landing rutming slope. 6% 0,25 0.28 0.5 Moderate S3050 $2,750 >«W RttP at HIgliland and Buena Vista RMP3728 30 2 No landing; no tnincalBd donw; no taidun 0,25 1.25 Moderate , . $800 $800 S/W RMP at Moming Gkiry and Ies Flores Dr RMP3734 30 2 No truncated dome, cracked pan; 0 5' 1^ 01 025 0.35 Minor J650 $550 sm RMP et Vane/ St and Carlsbad Vrilsge Di RMP4435 42 2 non-compliant 1 1 -,.:ili»<M(lt„',:.i $2,750 $2,750 *W RMP al Voley St and Carlsbad Village Dt RMP4436 42 2 rmp not deep enough; no tnincated dome 025 0.25 $300 $300 SE RMP al Palomar/Upon Rd and Melrose Rd. RMP4437 57 2 no tmncated dome, O.Zfi'Np: remp nffinmg slope 12 3% landing cross sk^ 4.6% 01 0,26 0-26 01 0.7 Moderate $3300 $2,750 SE RMP al Monroe and Gayle RMP443J 57 2 no IriKicated dome; 0 5' lip; ramp tunning slope 9 7% landing cross slope 41%; no SidewaHt on oiw side of ramp 01 0.25 01 01 0.55 Moderate S550 $550 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Category: Removal Pstcbing Grinding Scoring Install Strtp9 Demo t Construct N«w Ran^ Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compyance Iterr Obstructions Found in on or Near ttie Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots Up/UpNfts{/VC or Concrete) Detects*le Waming (Tactile Grooves) Truncated Oome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehicular Traffic Lane Pedestrian Ramp Non-e»slent Field Work Identified (Ramp Non-conforming Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Skipes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Skipe Acioss the Pan) iLanding Running or Cross Sfope Ramp Skipes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protectkm from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsuHicienl, Dual Directkxial Needed bkipes ot me concrete gutter adjoining curb ramp (wlhin 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4' X 4' required) Composite Scoies or Costs Composite Rating Category Gross Costs (some double counting occurs) Net Coste (vMth Maximum for ramp replacement { Rem Localion Facilitv ID Vap Paqg Tier Exislina Condition Notes | Cost $1,133 S200 $250 $200 $300 $800 S2.750 $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $3,000 $360 $500 ^£ MUP d Monroe and Linda U RUP4439 44 2 no tnmcated dome; 05' tip, ramp nmning slope 9%, landing mnning slope A.9% p o t has 01 0 25 01 0,1 0.55 lloderate $550 SE at Monroe and Linda Ln RMP4440 44 2 no truncated dome; 05' lip; inaufficient landing; pot needs to lie r^aced 01 0,25 1.35 Moderate $1,050 $1,050 hVE RMP a( Canyon and Basswood RHPWl 44 2 No tmncated dome; 0 25' lip; texture; ramp mnning slope 11% cross slope 6 6<Ki 35 5' landing; siitewallt separated at pint; landing running ^pe 55% 0.1 0.25 01 0.25 025 01 1.05 1 Moderate $6,550 $2,750 WE RMP on Cartsbad Viage Dr. (Library Entrance) RMP494 54 2 0.25 1.05 1 Moderate 12,750 $2,750 WW RMP on Carisbad Dr (Lit)rary Entrance) 54 non-compliant 1 ItSoderate 52,750 $2,750 N/E RMP on Carlsbad Viliage DT (UlirBry main drive) 63 non-compli«it Path of travel should be replaced; slope on each side with dip m noddle 1 1 1 tloderatc $2,750 $2,750 NM RMP on Canst>ad Village Dr (Library main dnw) RMP487 53 2 non-compliant 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 S/E RMP at Highland and Cartsbad VHIage Dr 4, 2 cracked pan; 2" 1^ 1 1 Moderate $250 $250 aw RMP at Highland and Carislwd Village Dr RMP493 41 2 non-compliant 1 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 WE RMP at Highland and Carisbad Viflage Dr. RMP494 41 2 No tmncated dome; no twKfing 0,26 1.25 Moderate $800 $800 WW RM> It Hl^riand ml CvliM VMaoe Dr RMP4» 41 2 No tmncated dome; no texture; 1* Rp 025 0 26 0.5 Moderate S550 $550 SW RMP at Valley St and Jvnes Dr. RMP496 42 2 non-compliant 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 W FUiiP it VaMy St and Jam es Dr RUP497 42 2 non-compSant 1 Moderate $2,760 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateoorv: Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Pitching Grinding Scoring InsUII Stripe Demo & Construct New Remp Replace Repair Expand Coniposlte all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots n Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) Tnincated Oome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer trom Vehicular Traffic Lane 1 1 1 1 1 Field Work Idenlilied Ramp Nott-Confomwig Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) ftemp Skjpes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Skipe (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Skipe Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within W from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement Insufficient, Dual Directional Needed bkipes ot the concrete gutter ad|oining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4' X 4' required) Oxnposite Scores or Coslte Composite FiaUng Calegoiy Gross Costs (some double counbng OCCUIS) Net Costs (Mth Maximum for ramp replacement 1 Item Localion Facililv ID Mac Paoe Tj^i Exislina Condition Noles | Cost $1,133 5200 $250 S200 $300 ssoo $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $360 $500 SE RMP al VHey St and Oak Ave RMP49e .2 2 pan cross slope S% landing running slope 6% new ramp, everything else comphant 0.1 01 0.2 so $0 NE RMP at VaRey SL and Oak Ave RMP499 2 landing running slope 3.6% cross slope 5.7% ramp running slope 9% non-compliant 1 0,1 026 1.35 Moderate $5,500 $2,750 NW RMP al Valley SI and Oek Ave, RMP500 2 non-complient; 6* grooves; no truncated dome; T ip 01 0,25 1 2.35 1 Maior $3,500 $2,750 SJB RMP at Jffnas Dr, and Basswood RMP608 2 non-cotnpliant ' 2.35 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 SfW RMP at vmey and Basswood RMP50. 56 2 0.5* Np. no tniTKirted dome; texture; ramp running slope:10% landing running slope: 5% 2* |0in1 in patti of travel 01 0,25 01 0,1 0.55 1 Moderate £550 $550 3/E RkIP It Vanoy and Cheslnid RbK>514 69 2 major upHt of a/c in patti of travel 1 0.55 1 Moderate S2 750 $2,750 SW RMP at Valley and Cheanut RUP515 69 2 non-compliBnt 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 IW RMP at Valay end ChesM RMP516 69 2 No trurKatpd dome; no texture; 05* Hp; ramp cross slope 3% 2* separation in path of travel 0,1 0,25 01 0.45 Minor £650 $2,750 $550 M/E RMP al Valley and Chostnut RMP517 69 2 non-compNarrt 1 1 Moderate £650 $2,750 $2,750 SW MP at Basswood and Montee RUP520 44 2 no truncated dome; ^ooved pan. ronp ruraiing slope 10% cross slope 56% ^ndmg running slope 5,7% 025 01 025 025 0.85 Modtfate £5800 $2,750 VW RMP al Basswood and Monoe RMP521 44 2 nottuncateddome; grooved pan; O S' beveled lip; rwnp running stope 102% landing uming ^ope 3.7% 01 025 01 01 0.55 Moderate $550 $550 NE RMP at Basswood and Monroe RMP522 44 2 no truncated done; 0.5' lip; ramp running slope 12.5% cross slope 6 4% landing running slope 6.4% cross ^ope 3% 31' landing; 40* pan 0,1 026 0.1 025 0.25 0,25 01 1.3 Moderate £9,300 $2,750 SE RMP at ktonroe and Basswood RtJP523 44 2 no tmncated dome, 0.5" lip; wom tejtture, 32" tending; ran^ cross slope 2.7% 01 026 0-1 01 0.55 Moderate £1,050 $1,050 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Removal Patctiing Grinding Scoring InsUII Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from IS Vehicular Traffic Lane f D9mo 1, Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Cooipaitteallltmw Composite alt Items FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Hem Obstiuctions Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) Detectable Waming (Tactile Giooves) Truncated Dome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from IS Vehicular Traffic Lane f Field Work Identified l^p Hon-Confomiing Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed WK) Ramp Stopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Skipe (Stope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Stope Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from i/ehiculaf Traffic Movement InsuflicienL Dual Directtonal Needed bk)pes ot the concrete gutter adjoining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4' X 4' lequiied) Composite Scores or Coste Ctomposite Rating Category 3ross Costs (some doubto coundno «let Coste (with Maximum for tamp epiacement 1 Item Location Facilitv iD Mac Paae Tigf Existina Condition Notes | Cost SI,133 $200 $250 S200 $300 $800 $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 MW RMP at Ittonroe St /Lancer and Ctwstntit Av RMP528 2 no tnjnc^d dome; 0.25'Hp; landing running slope 3.8% cross slope 4.5% sign post hole and 0.5" uplift lo rigtit of ramp 0 1 61 0 25 0,1 0.55 Woderste $1,683 $1,683 SW RMP at Monroe Stfl_ancet Way omt CHestnut Av RMP526 70 2 v-ditch in p o t; no truncated dome;0 5' lip; no landing; noncompliant 0,1 026 • 1.35 Moderate $1,050 $1,050 sJE RMP at Monroe St / Lancof Way amf Chestnut Av RKiP530 2 no truncated dome; 0 25'lip; ramp running slope 96% no landing 0 25 01 1.35 Moderate $1 050 $800 $1,050 RMP at Monroe Sl/Lancer Way and Chestnt^ Av RMP531 70 2 no tmncated dome: 0 S' lip, no landing, non compliant 0,1 025 1.35 Moderate $1 050 $800 $1,050 S/W RMP eA Basswood and Pine RMP542 65 2 No tnincated dome; wom texture; 34" landing, side Flare a:13% 026 01 01 0.45 0.95 1 Minor $800 S3,800 $800 $2,750 S/E RMP at Sasswoott and Rne RHiPM3 55 2 No trunceted dome; no lextive; tiroken curb; 0 5* Hp; 1' upwt at storm drain manhole, 34' landing; ronp cross slope 6 6% landing running slope 7% utilty box in middle of transition to lanifing 0,25 026 01 0,25 0,1 0.45 0.95 1 Moderate $800 S3,800 $800 $2,750 S/W RMP eA. Eureka PI «id Basswood RMP545 ee 2 non-compliant 0.45 0.95 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 S/E RMP at Eureka R- and Basnwood RMPS46 ss 2 No tmncated dome, no texture; no landing; 0.5* 1^; ren^ running sbpe: 156% non- compliBnt 01 0 25 025 0.6 Moderate $3,300 $2,750 East side of Holiday Parli across street from 3215 Eureka RMP550 ss 2 no tnmcated dome; no texture; insulficient landing 025 0-25 0.5 Moderate $800 $800 « RMP at Magnotte Av and Adams St RMP559 2 no truncated dome, 0.5' lip; ramp running slope 10.2% cross stope 4.7% lending running stope 7.8% cross slope 3 6% .1 0,26 0.1 01 0,25 0.8 Moderate $3,300 $2,750 SW Rl#3 at MagnolH Av and Adams St Rhff>S61 2 no tnmcated dome; 0.5'lip; rampnjrniing stope 8% cross slope 2 7% landing runrwig slope 6% cross slope 4% 01 026 01 025 0.7 liodeiate $3,300 $2,750 SW RMP at CFiestnut Av Br>d Matjorie Ln RUP576 2 no truncated dome. 0 25'l?i; no texture, 16" deep pan 01 0,26 0.35 Minor $550 $550 SE RMP at Chestnut Av ar>d Marjorie Ln RMP577 no trura^d dome; 0.5' lip; 36' landmg; landing running slope 3% SNiewalk ends to om side 01 026 01 0,1 0.55 Moderate $1,050 $1,050 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateqory: Removal Hotizontal Spacings Of Pavement Divots t Up/Uplifls (A/C or Concrete) | Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) §. Install 1 1 5 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from g Vetiicular Traffic Lane I'S Demo & Construct New Ramp Apex Ramp Used-Proleclton from ^ Vehicular Traffic Movement InsuflicienL f-Dual Directional Needed ^ Repair h || 3 " 1 ill § s i Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan § (4' X 4' required) = Composite all Items Composite ail Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance Item t Hotizontal Spacings Of Pavement Divots t Up/Uplifls (A/C or Concrete) | Detectable Waming (Tactile Grooves) §. Install 1 1 5 Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from g Vetiicular Traffic Lane I'S Pedestrian Ramp Non -existent Field Work Identified Ranp Non-Conforming Pan Width Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Skipes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Skipe (Skipe Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Skipe Ramp Stopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Proleclton from ^ Vehicular Traffic Movement InsuflicienL f-Dual Directional Needed ^ Repair h || 3 " 1 ill § s i Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan § (4' X 4' required) = Composite Scores or Costs Composite f?abng Category (3ross Costs (some double counting occurs) Net Costs (Mth Maximum for ramp replacement 1 Item Localion Facilitv ID Map P^qi! Tiei Exislina pondition Noles | Cost $1,133 S200 J250 S200 $300 ssoo $2,750 S2,760 t2,760 S2.750 t2.750 S2.750 S2.750 12.750 uooo J350 ssoo NE RMP at chestnut Av and Donna DI N/Cl S RMP578 no Ifuncoted dome. 0.25"lip; ramp cross slope 5.2% broken al curb; landing cross slope 3% running slope 3 S% 3r landing gutter Itirougti pot 01 026 0. 01 01 0.65 Moderate t1,050 $1,050 NW RMP at Chestnut Au and Donna Dr N/a S RMP579 2 no tmncated dome, 0 25*1^; ramp cross slope 134% landing cross siope4.4%, running slope 15.9% 37.5' landing; steeps slopes on erther side of ranp 01 026 0.25 025 01 0,26 01 1.3 Moderate J9300 $2,750 tc RW at Magnolia Av and Brady Cir RMP6S4 2 no truncated dome; 0.5" lip; remp running slope 8 9% landing runmng slope 3% ZT landing; one side of roup leads to a/c 01 025 01 01 0.55 Moderate $1,050 $1,050 NW RMP at Magnona Av end Brady Cir RMP595 ' no tnincated dome: 0.5' lip; ramp cross slope 27% 37* landing 01 026 01 0 1 0.55 Moderate $1,050 $1,050 SE RMP at MegnoKa Av and Valley St RMP596 2 notruKBted dome; 05' lip; remp running slope 13% cross slope 2.5% 37* landing 0.1 0.25 0.25 01 01 0.8 Moderate $3,800 $2,750 5W RMP at Magnoia Av and Valey St RMP5. 2 no tmncated dome; 0 5' lip; ramp running slope 10 8% cross slope 3 6% landing running slope 6% 35' iHKling 01 028 0.1 .1 025 01 0.9 Moderate S3 800 $2,750 NW RMP at Magnolia Av and Valley st RMP59S 2 no truncated dome; 0 5" lip; ramp mnning slope 11.6% cross slope B 9% landing running slope 10% 39* landing; 1 l%slope ot p.o.l towest of ran^; a/c to east of ramp 01 026 01 0.25 0.26 026 0 1 1.3 Moderate $6 900 $2,750 NW RMP al Vallsy St and Brady C» RMP600 2 no truncated dome; ramp mnning sk^ 9.4% crass slope 3% 3r tending sidetwalk ends to norlh of tamp, ale begins 025 01 01 01 0.55 Moderate $800 $800 SW RMP at Monroe St and Magnolia Av RMP604 70 2 no toncBted dome; 0 5' lip; landing cross ^ope 2.6% runrang slope S 1% 0.5* upNfl to loll of ramp 01 025 026 0.6 Moderate $3,300 $2,750 tW RMP at Monroe St and Magnolia Av RMP605 70 2 no truncBtetJ dome; 0 5* lip, grooved landing; lending cross sk^e 9% 3ff landing; ramp cross slope 7.4% 01 026 025 026 01 0.95 Moderate $6,550 $2,750 *W RMP et Pie Pico and Laa Horet Oc. RMPe6 29 2 No tnincated dome; no textUTB; 0-5" Iqi 0, 0.26 0.35 Minor $660 $550 NIE RMP at Pm Pieo and Las Floras Dt RMP68 29 2 No tmncated dome; 0 5' lip; land cross slope. 3.1% 01 0.25 01 0.4S Minor $560 $550 «W RMP at Siauce St and Forest Ave. RMP 69 „ No truncated dome; cradted pan 025 0.25 Minor $300 $300 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction CateQ<^; Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots S-UpWplifts(A«; Of Concrete) | (Detectable Waming (Tactile Gmoves) Instill 9t & 1 1 Striping in Crosswalk or Sufter from ^ Vehicular Traliic Lane i^' Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite alt Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Compliance ItcfT Obstructions Found in on or Near the | Ramp 1 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots S-UpWplifts(A«; Of Concrete) | (Detectable Waming (Tactile Gmoves) Instill 9t & 1 1 Striping in Crosswalk or Sufter from ^ Vehicular Traliic Lane i^' 1 1 1 1 1 Field Worii Identiried Ramp Non-Conforming S i i Q-Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Fiamp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Appioach Apron (within 48' from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsuflicienL Dual Directional Needed Stopes ot the concrete gutter 3d|0ining curb ramp (within 48' from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan (4'X 4'required) ! 5 S f 2 s Gross Coste (some double counting OCCUIS) Nel Costs (wth Maximum for ramp replacement j Item Localion Facilitv ID Mao Paoe Tier Existinc Condition Notes | Cost S1,I33 $200 S250 (200 S300 $800 12.750 $2,760 $2760 $2,760 $2,750 $2750 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $500 SE RMP at Pio Pico Dr and MBfpotia Av RMP748 2 no truncated dome. O.S' lip; grooved pan; landmg mnning slope 3.5% cross slope 2^% ramp runrung slope 10 2% cross slope 2.7% 01 0.25 0.1 01 01 0.65 Mwitrafa 1550 $550 RMP at Pio Pico Dr and MagnoNa Av RMP74fi 2 no truncated dome; 0 5* lip; cracked and broken concrete; nofl-compHant 01 0.25 0.35 Minor $560 $550 S RMP at Tamarack Av and Pto Pico Dr RMP750 93 2 no bunc^ dome; 0.5* lip; ramp running slope 135% landing running slope 2.9% cnwa sk>pfl4.2% 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.6 0.55 Moderate $3,050 SI,050 $2,750 $1,050 ^ RMP at Temerach Av and Pico Dr RKIP751 » 2 no truncated (feme; 05* lip; ramp nmning sk^ 11.8% tomfing cross slope 29% 01 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.55 Moderate $3,050 SI,050 $2,750 $1,050 N| RMP B( Tamarack Av artd Pio Pico Dr RMP752 93 2 no tmncated dome; 05" lip; ramp running slope 121% landing cross slope 3 4% 29" landing 0.1 026 025 0.1 0.26 0.95 IHodarate S3.SOO $2,750 RMP at Tamarack and Aderm Ave RMP754 98 2 ramp rutHiing slope 8% cross slope 7.8% landing runnir^ slope 12.4% cross slope 5% landing 35* wide 0.25 0,25 0.5 $6,500 $2,750 SE RW at Tamarack Av and Adarm St RMP755 9S 2 no tnmcated dome; 0.5' lip, msufRciert landing lip and holes in aft 0-1 0.25 0-1 0.45 Minor $1,050 $1,050 SW RMP at Tamaraclt Av and Adams St RMP756 es 2 no tiunctfed dome, 0.5' lip, non-compliant 0.1 0.28 0.35 Minor $650 $550 NW RMP at Tamarack Av and Adams RMP757 93 2 46" pan; ramp ruming slope 7.3% landing running sl(^ 9.4% cross slope 41 % 0.1 0.1 0.2 Minor SO $0 SW RMP at Dorma Ct and Chestnut Z Ho rav^ provided along accessible route 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 5E RMP at Doma Ct and Chestnut KTUA598 2 No ramp prowded along access9>le route 1 1 2 Moderate 12.750 $2,750 Handicap RMP on Eureka PI alortg east side of l-Miday Park RMP549 66 2 No tmncated dome, no detectable waming grooves 1 • 1 2 Maior $500 $500 t RMP Pio Pico WHi Pm RMP637 No tmncated dome; 0.25' lip 01 0.25 0.35 Minor $450 $450 N FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv: Obslmctions Found in on or ^4ear the 11 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots % UtVUpfifts(AA: or Concrete) | Scoring .S 1 & Tmncated Oome g Striping in Cnosswaik or Bufler from % VehioilarTtaflicLane ;l Demo & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair l-l 5I ^1 3 " 1 8B; ill % !S E \ B i Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan ^ (4'x4're<iuirBd) :| Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS CompUanee Iter Obslmctions Found in on or ^4ear the 11 Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots % UtVUpfifts(AA: or Concrete) | Scoring .S 1 & Tmncated Oome g Striping in Cnosswaik or Bufler from % VehioilarTtaflicLane ;l 1 1 1 1 a. Field Woi1( Idenlilied Ranp Non-Confofming PanWidlh Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ran^) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement Insufficient Dual Directional Needed | Repair l-l 5I ^1 3 " 1 8B; ill % !S E \ B i Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan ^ (4'x4're<iuirBd) :| Composite Scoies or Costs Composite Rating Category (jiDSs CkBts (some double counfing occurs) Net CosIs (viiith Maximum for ramp leplacemenl 1 Item Location Facilitv ID Man Page Tier Existina Condition Noles | Cost $1,133 S200 S250 t200 S3IX) S800 52,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $3,000 $350 $600 SE RMP at Pm PKO and Pine RIIP636 2 No truncated done; 0.25' lip 0.1 0.25 0.35 Minor $460 $450 IW RMP el Pk) PH:O and Temarack RMP;53 2 No truncated dome; 0.5' 1^; ineirflicient landing less than 36* Google maps 0,1 025 0,1 0.49 Minor $1,050 $1,050 SWRMPatTamarackanilHIsMandDr Ri«>6eo 2 Side flare A: 11.5% rsmp cross slope 3% pan width t/f . 41' larKting abut^ Hnl; landing running slope 451% 0.1 0.1 .1 0,1 0.4 Minor $500 $500 SE RMP gl Tanarack and Hgliland Dr RMP593 2 no truncated dome: ramp running slope 12 5% side flare c 14 9% 21' landing abutting waN: cross elope of ramp 2.4% landing running slope 3% 025 0,1 0.25 0,1 01 025 1.05 Moderate $3,550 $2,750 NE RMP atTanarack and HighM Dr RMP692 89 2 Ramp amnng slope 11% side flare A 17 6% side flare C 13 7% landing cross slope 2.7% running slope 3.7% 27" landing witfi vegetative ot)strucSon leaving\7 ctearatKB 0,25 0.26 0, 0,1 0.7 Moderate $3,883 $3,883 m RMP al Temarack and mgliland Dr RMP591 89 2 Ramp cross ^ope 3% landing running slope 4 2% 42" lamfing Mutbng wal 0,1 01 01 0.3 $500 $500 SE RMP at Itmerack and Junes Dt RMP765 2 No truncated dome: pan widlti less ttian 36"; insufficient landing less tfian 36" 0.2&' lip Google maps 0.1 0,25 025 01 0.7 Moderate $3,800 $2,750 SW RMP al Tinarack and Jamea Dr RMP7&4 2 No truncated dome; pan width less than 36"; insufficient landng less ttian 36*. landirtg slopes exceed 5% 0 25' 10 Google m^is 0, 025 0.25 0,25 0 1 0.95 0.95 Moderate $6,550 $2,750 NE RMP at Tanarack and vmey £1 RMP612 2 No tnmcated dome, pan wdlh less than 36"; insufficient lending less than 36": landing ^pes exceed 5% landing abutting wall; 0 25' Google maps 01 0.25 0.26 0,25 0,1 0.95 0.95 Moderate S6 550 $2,750 NW RMP at Tanarack and Vallay st RMP611 2 No tnmcated dome; pan WKfth less than 36", insufficient lending less than 36': landing slopes exceed &% 0.25* Google maps 01 025 026 0,25 0 1 0.95 Moderate $6,550 $2,750 SW RMP at Tanarack and Valey St RMP613 2 No InHKBted dome; pan width less than 36*: side nares lead to pailtway; 0.25" Ip Google maps 01 0.25 0.25 0.6 Moderit«.;,.vi $3,300 $2,750 NE RMP at Vatey St and Andrea RMPtor 2 no truncated dome; 0 25' Hp Googterrups 01 0.26 0.35 Minor $650 $550 SE RMP at Valey St and Andria RMP605 2 no tnmcated dome; 0 29* fip; iraiAclent imding Oipgimnii 01 025 01 0.45 Minor $1,050 $1,050 FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateqory: Removal Patching Griitding Scoring Install Stripe Demo & Conetruct New Ramp Reptece Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite alt Items FOCUS AREA'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Complnnceltem Obstructions Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots U(iWplite(/VCorCoiicfete) Detectable Warning (Tactile Giooves) Truncated Dome Striping in Ciosswallt or Buffer from Vehicular Traffic Lane Pedestrian Ramp Mon-existent Field Work Identified l^p Non-PanWidlh Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Acioss the Pan) Landing Running of Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ranni Used-Protection fiom Vehicular Traffic Movement InsufficienL Dual Directional Iteded Slopes ot me conaete gutter adjoining curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top ofthe Pan (4' X 4' required) Composite Scores or Costs Composite Rating Categoiy CBfoss C^ts (some double counbng occuis) Net Costs (Mth Maximum for ramp [ Localion Facililv ID MacPaqe Tier Existino Condition Noles | '^'^ S1,133 $200 S250 S200 S300 ssoo $2,760 $2,760 S2.760 J2.750 J2.750 S2.750 J2,750 SZ760 Uooo S360 tsoo SW RMP al Pfo Pico Dr and Chestnut Av RMP361 2 No truncated ikmes, sidetmlk approach F 15.3% Landing running slope 6 2% Pan width s 36*, Ramp tuns into 69* waR after landing 026 0-1 026 0.6 Hoderatt $3,050 $2,750 NW RMP at PIO Pico Dr and ChCBtmjl Av, RMP362 2 No tmncated domes, gutter slope 2.5% SidewaHt approach E 17 2% Landing is 30*, Pan width 36", Landing cross slope 3.6% Landing nmning slope 5.0% Ramp runs into 69* wall after landing 026 01 0, 0.45 Minor J800 $800 SE RMP al Pio Pico am Chealnul RMP540 2 No truncated domes, ramp slope B 12 6% gutter slope: 4 1% Pan vwdth is 30*; No jnwves. Landing cross stope is 11.9% 1 0-25 01 025 2.6 Meter S6 000 $2,750 NE RMP at Pio Pico Dr and Chectnut Ave RMP541 2 No truncated domes: ramp slope B 11% Slope flare C 9 3% Landing deptt) 1', PanWidtti AT. Landing cross slope 3 7% No curb 0 26 0.1 01 0, 0 26 0.8 Moderate 1800 $800 RMP 440 RMP440 AJ06 Ntxioorr^iant curb ramp 1 ModerMa $2,750 $2,750 RMP 402 RMP402 AG04 Noneompllant curb ramp 1 1 1 ModtraM $2 750 ^ $2,750 RMP 403 RMP403 AG04 Noncompliant curb ramp Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" long segment of strai{^t curb ramp and within the marked crossing. 1 1 Modarato $2,750 $2,750 RMP 404 RMP404 AI304 Noncompliant curb ramp Crosswalk striping Fias feded Curb ramp does not put path of travel in Wieproper direction 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 405 RMP405 AG04 Noncompliant curb ramp NSaefecfafife wafnings provSaedT" 0 75" high vertical offset at bottom landing, top tenting is 32" deep, no contrasting finish, side flares slope 10 9% and 3.8% Curb ramp does not put path of travel In the proper 1 Moderat* $2 750 $2,750 RMP 406 RMP406 AG04 1 Noncompliant curb ramp crosswalk noi prcMoeo across Chestnut Crosswalk leacfing across Carlsbad Blvd is not within the marked crossing Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" long segment of straight curb located on 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 407 RMP407 AG04 1 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb 1 1 Moderate $2,750 1 $2,750 RMP 408 RMP408 AH04 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 RMP 409 RMP409 AH04 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided al crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work. Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 Moilanite $2,750 $2,750 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS Construction Cateaorv. Removal Patctiing Grinding Scoring Instill SWpe Demo & Construct New Ramp R«ptac« Repiir Expand Composila all Itam Compotite all Itenis FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS GorqiSonceltmi Obstructions Found In on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots LipAJplifte(M; or Concrete) Delectable Waming {Tactile Grooves) Truncated Dome Striping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehiculaf Traffic Lane i i Field Worii Idenlilied Ranp Non-Conforming PanWidlh Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Slopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Across the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb ramp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehicular Traffic Movement InsulficienL Dual Directional Needed Slopes ot the concrete gutter aipmmg curb ramp (within 48" from top and Landing Depth Past the Top of the Pan e ! 5 3 I 3ross Costs (some double counting xcurs) ^t Costs (iMth Maximum for ramp epiacement 1 IKm IjOf ation FntBvin Mac Paoe Tier Existino Conditign Notes | Co* 51,133 S200 $250 $200 S300 $800 $2,750 S2,750 12.760 t2,750 12.750 J2.760 S2.760 $2,750 $3,000 $360 $500 RMP 410 RMP410 AH04 Noncomplient curb ramp Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" segment of straight curb located on each side of the ramp & within marked crossing Accessible ped. signal is not prcMded. 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP413 RMP413 AH04 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope end cross slope requirements 1 Moderata $2,750 $2,750 RMP 413 RMP412 AH04 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided at aoeswalk. Incorporate into curb ramp work. Coordinate with slope and cross sicpe requirements 1 1 1 Moderate $2 750 $2,750 RMP 411 RMP4„ AH04 1 Noncompliant curb ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work. Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 1 $2,750 $2,750 RMP 414 RMP414 AH06 Noncompliant curt ramp No marKea crossing provioea at crosswalk. Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements across street Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" long segment of 1 ModtraA* $2,750 RMP 416 RMP416 AH05 1 Nonconfljiiant curb ramp NO marked crossing pro/ideo at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work. Coorrtnate with slope and cross slope requirements across street. SDG&E cover is located within curb ramp. Moderate S2.750 $2,750 $2,750 RMP 421 RMP431 AI05 Noncompliant curb ramp NO markea crossing provioeo at CTosswalk. Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with stope and cross sicpe requirements across street Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" long segment of htodcratt S2.750 $2,750 $2,750 RMP 423 RMP433 AJ05 NoncompltBnt curb ramp NO marKea crossing prcMoea at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements across street. Diagonal curb ramp does not have 24" long segment of 1 1 Moderate $2,750 RMP 434 RMP434 AI06 Nonconpliant curb ramp Mo marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 1 MederiKte $2,750 $2,750 RMP 426 RMP426 AI06 1 NoncomFrfianl curb ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk Incorporate into curb ramp work. CoortJnate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 Moderate $2,750 $2,750 RMP 433 RMP432 AI06 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 RMP 437 RMP437 AI06 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 1 Moderate $2,750 RMP 438 RMP438 AIDS 1 Noncompliant curb ramp does not connect to an accessible route No pedestrian access is provided to bus stop Island 1 $2,750 $2,750 Construction CatcQOry: Removal Patching Grinding Scoring Install Stripe D«nw & Construct New Ramp Replace Repair Expand Composite all Items Composite alt Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 CURB RAMPS CompliatKe Itsrr Ot)structions Found in on or Near the Ramp Horizontal Spacings or Pavement Divots LipAJplifts(A«: or Concrete) Oetect^le Waming (TacBle Grooves) Truncated Dome Stiiping in Crosswalk or Buffer from Vehiculaf Tnaflic Lane Pedestrian Ramp Non-existent Field Worit Identified Ramp Non-Conforming PanWidlh Side Flares (Not to exceed 10%) Ramp Stopes (Running up the Pan) Ramp Slope (Slope Actoss the Pan) Landing Running or Cross Slope Ramp Slopes of Approach Apron (within 48" from top and bottom of curb tamp) Apex Ramp Used-Protection from Vehiculaf Traftic Movement InsufficienL Dual Directional Needed ll If iii ill n B 1 Landing Depth Past the Top ol the Pan (4' X 4' required) Composite Scores or Costs Composite Rating Category Gross Costs (some double counting occurs) Net Costs (iMth Maximum for ramp replacement Location Facililv ID Map Paoe Tier Existina Condition 1 Item HQI^S 1 Cost J1,133 S200 (250 S300 ssoo $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,760 $2,750 $2,750 $2,760 $3,000 $350 $500 RMP 439 RMP439 AI05 Noncompliant curb ramp pfojects into traffic lanes No pedestrian access or crosswalk provtded- Bus slop is nol accessible from public right of way Sidewalh ends leading to access parking lot. 1 1 Modirata S2,750 $2,750 RMP441 AJ06 1 RlltP M1 Noncompliant curb ramp 1 Moderat* $2,750 $2,750 RMP 48e9 RMP4869 AI06 NoncoTT^Iiant curt) ramp No marked crossing provided at crosswalk. Incorporate into curb ramp work Coordinate with slope and cross slope requirements 1 Moderate $2750 $2,750 tt ol Ramps with this problem 8 1 79 11 107 0 25 178 12 ie 33 30 40 7 9 4 57 $814,950 $719,010 Count % of Total Confonning Minor Moderate Major 5 1.52% 48 ; 14.63% 252 1 76.83% 23 7,01% 328 100.00% FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS titiction Cateaorv: Band Relocate / Replace Adjust Construct Update Install Trim Remove Grind Composite all Items Composite all items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Compliance Item Color PdeBamfng Achiator Distance from Crosswalk Une ^ Actuator Distance fiom Curt) " [Actuator Distance fixim 1 lotherButtons Field Work Identified Signal Non-Cknlomiing Push Button Parallel to OliectKxi of Crossing Actuator Height Level Clear Fkxir Space Clear Floor Space at Push Button Buttons ate okj style actuators Instead of dome or anow actuator Ped signal and actuator does not support countdown timer or au<fble countdown Vegetative Obstiuction in Clear Floor Space Hard Obstniction in Clear RoorSpace UpSfl in aearFtoor Space Composite Scores or CosIs Composite Fating Category Sross Costs (some doiiile xiunSng occurs) Mel Costs (with Maximum or ramp replacement Location MSE. Item Facilitv ID EaflS Tier Existina Condition Notes Cost $50 $1,000 ^ Actuator Distance fiom Curt) " [Actuator Distance fixim 1 lotherButtons $1,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $600 $600 $100 $1,133 $250 PDSGNL A RMP143 43 2 46" Height; 50" to curb line and 68" to crosswalk 0.1 01 01 0.3 Minor SI .650 $1,000 PDSGNLB RMP143 43 2 46" Height; 48" to curb line and crosswalk 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL A RIVIP144 43 2 45.5" Heigtit; 36" to curb line; 36" to crosswalk 0.1 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL A RMP 145 42 2 45.5" Heigtit; 5' to curb line and crosawalk; no clearance around base 01 01 025 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PDSGNLB RMP 145 42 2 46" Heigtit; exceeds 60" to crosswalk and curb line; no clearance at base 01 01 025 0.1 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP 146 42 2 46.5" Heigtit; exceeds 60" to crosswalk and curb 01 01 0.1 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP146 42 2 46.5" Heigtit; exceeds 60' to crosawalk and curb 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP26 43 2 45.5" Height; exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL A RMP27 43 2 46.5" Height; 55" to crosswalk and curb line 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL 8 RMP27 43 2 46" Height; 66" to crosswalk; 40" to curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL A RMP4435 42 2 46" Height; no clearance at base; exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb line 01 0.1 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL B RMP4435 42 2 4i3.t)" Height; no clearance at base; exceeds b' to crosswalk and curb line; audible signal 01 0 0.1 Minor $50 $60 PDSGNL A RMP4436 42 2 46" Height; exceeds 5' to curb line and CTOsswalk; exceeds 120" between signals; no clearance at base 01 0.25 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNLB RMP4436 42 2 exceeds 60" to crosswalk; exceeds 10 between signals; no clearance at base 01 025 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNL A RMP492 41 2 45.5" Height; 55" to crosswalk and curb line 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL B RMP492 41 2 45.5" Height; 37" to curb line; 40" to crosswalk 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL A RMP493 41 2 47" Height; 34" to crosswalk and curb line 0.1 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL B RMP493 41 2 45.5" Height; 35" to crosswalk 01 01 0.2 Minor $550 $660 PD SGNL A RMP494 41 2 48" Height; 64" to crosswalk; 60" to curb line; no clearance around any side 01 01 025 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP494 41 2 45" Height; no clearance at base; 70" to crosswalk and curb line. 01 01 0.25 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PD SGNL A RMP495 41 2 46" Height; exceeds 5' to crosswalk; 38" to curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP495 41 2 47.5" Height; 48" to curb line and crosswalk 01 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL A and B (Same Pole) RMP528 70 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk 01 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNLB RMP528 70 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PO SGNL A RMP529 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP529 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb None 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP530 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb line; no access to signal 01 01 025 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 :ruction Cateaorv: Band Relocate / Replace Adjust Construct Update InsUII Trim Remove Grind Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Compliance Item Cotor Pole Banding Actuator Distance ftom iCnosswalk Line p\ctuatof Distance fnom Cutb Line Actuator Distance fnom lotherButtons Field Wori< Identified Signal Non-Confomiing Push Button Parallel to Oinectkxi of Crossing Actuator Height Level Clear Roor Space Clear Floor Space at Push iBulton Buttons are oW style actuators instead of dome or iarrow actuator Ped signal and actuator does not support countdown timer or audible countdown Vegetative Obstroctkm in Clear Floor Space Hand Obstruction in Clear Floor Space S a to s o "S. 3 Composite Scores or Costs Connposite Fiating Categoty Gross t3osts (some doubte counting occurs) Net Costs (with Maximum for tamp replacement Location Map Facilitv ID Page T[ef Existina Condition Notes Item Cost; $50 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $600 $600 $100 $1,133 $250 PDSGNLB RMP530 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb line None 0.1 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,550 $1,000 PD SGNL A RMP531 70 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,550 $1,000 PD SGNL 8 RMP531 70 2 exceeds 5' to crosswalk and curb 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,550 $1,000 PD SGNL A RMP750 98 2 47.5" Height; 19" to crosswalk and curb line 01 0.25 01 0.46 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP752 98 2 46.5" Height; greater than 5' from crosswalk and curb line 01 01 0.1 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP752 98 2 46.5" Height; greater than 5' from crosswalk and curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP754 98 2 no access; 44.5" Height; greater than 5' to crosswalk and curb line 01 01 025 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP754 98 2 45.5" Height; 60' to crosswalk, 52" to curb line 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL A RMP755 98 2 47,5" Height; 74" to crosswalk and 25" to curb line 01 01 01 01 0.4 Minor $2,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP755 98 2 47,5" Height 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL A RMP756 89 2 46.5" Height: 6' to crosswalk and curb line signal located in p.o.t. 01 01 025 01 0.66 Moderate $1,850 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP756 89 2 47" Height; 68" to crosswalk and 47" to curb tine 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP757 98 2 46.5" Height; 32" to crosswalk and 27" to curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PDSGNLB RMP757 98 2 45.5" Height; 38" to CTOsswalk and 26" to curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL RMP 735 RMP735 AH08 1 Traffic- control device does not have reguired color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 736 RMP736 AH08 1 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 736 RMP736 AH08 1 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 737 RMP737 AH08 1 Traftic- control device does not have required color coding; Required clear floor space at traffic- control signal has slopes greater than 2.0% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNL A RMP130 53 2 47.5" Height; 36" clear path of travel; 55" to crosswalk; 24" to curb line 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $1,650 $1,000 PD SGNL B RMP130 53 2 46.5" Height; 36" clear path of travel; exceeds 5' to crosswalk; 24" to curb 01 01 01 01 0.4 Minor $2,650 $1,000 PDSGNL A RMP131 53 2 not parallel; 45.5" Height; 48" clear path of travel; exceeds 5' to crosswalk; 36" to curb 01 01 01 01 0.4 Minor $1,850 $1,000 PDSGNL RMP 162 RMP162 AE04 East traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required dear floor space slopes 7,2% 01 025 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 162 RMP162 AE04 South traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD^GfJL'RHP^ 165 RMP165 AE04 1 West traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space cross slopes 3.0% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNL RI^P 165 RMP165 AE04 South traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space slopes 4.4% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 172 RMP172 AE06 1 East Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL RMP 172 RMP172 AE06 1 1 rattle- control device does not have required color coding, ttiere are large offsets located at west signal 0.1 01 025 0.46 Minor $900 $900 FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS ;ruction Cateaorv: Band Relocate / Replace Adiust Construct Update Install Trim Remove Grind Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Compliance Item Cotor Pole Banding Actuator Distance fnom iCnosswalk Line Actuator Distance from Ctab Line Actuator Distance from other Buttons Field Work Identified Signal Non-Confonning Push Button Parallel to Directkm of Crossing Actuator Height Level Qear Ftoor Space Clear Floor Space at Push Button Buttons ane oW styte actuators instead of dome or arrow actuator Ped signal and actuator does not support counWown timer or audtJe countdown Vegetative Obstmclkm in Clear Hoor Space Hard Obstmction in Ctear Roor Space Uplift in Clear Ftoor Space Composite Scones or CosIs < c c 1 I Gross Costs (some double counting occurs) Net Costs (with Maximum for ramp replacement Map Item Location Facilitv in Paae Tier Existina Condition Notes Cost: $50 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $600 $600 $100 $1,133 $250 PDSGNL RMP 173 RMP173 AE06 North traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 0.1 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 173 RMP173 AE06 Sout traffic- control device does not have required cotor coding, south signal is mounted 52 3/4" above finished grade 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD5G1\ILT5IStP^ 183 RMP183 AE04 South traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required dear floor space cross slopes 3.8% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 183 RMP183 AE04 East traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNClWtP 188 RMP188 AE04 South traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space slopes 6.2% 01 025 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNL RMP 188 RMP188 AE04 West traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGrorRMP~ 223 RMP223 AE04 f^orth traftic- control device does not have required color coding, requifed'cliearHoor space slopes 16,5% 01 025 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PUSCiNL RMP 223 PDSGNtTRKflP" 226 RMP223 AE04 East traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 $860 PUSCiNL RMP 223 PDSGNtTRKflP" 226 RMP226 AE04 1 North traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space cross slopes 2.5% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $660 $860 PDSGNL RMP 226 RMP226 AE04 bast traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required dear floor space cross slopes 7.0% 01 0.25 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 247 RMP247 AE05 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $550 $660 PUBCiNL RMP 247 RMP247 AE05 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD^SGfJLRMP^ 248 RMP248 AE05 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 248 RMP248 AE05 1 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 263 RMP263 AE06 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL RMP 263 RMP263 AE06 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 266 RMP266 AE05 West traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space cross slopes 3.8% 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 266 RMP266 AE05 North traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 267 RMP267 AE05 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 267 RMP267 AE05 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL KMP 270 RMP270 AE06 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 270 RMP270 AE06 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PU SGNL KMP 285 RMP285 AE04 West tratfic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space slopes 3.6% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 285 RMP285 AE04 North traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PU SGNL KMP 288 RMP288 AE04 North tratfic- control device do not have required color coding, required dear floor space cross slopes 2.4% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 288 RMP288 AE04 1 South traffic- control device do not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 f U SONL KMP 291 RMP291 AE04 North traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required dear floor space cross slopes 2.7% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 truction Cateaorv: Band Relocate / Replace Adjust Construct Update Install Trim Remove Grind Composite all Items Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS Complian :e Item Cotor Pole Banding Actuator Distance fiom Cnosswaik Line Actuator Distance from Cuib Line Actuator Distance from other Buttons Field Work Identified Signal Non-Confonning i Push Button Parallel to i Directkm of Crossing ; Actuator Height Level Clear Roor Space Clear Floor Space at Push Button Buttons ane okJ styte actuators instead of dome or anow actuator Ped signal and actuator does not support countdown timer or audibte countdown Vegetative Obstnicfion in Clear Floor Space Haid Obstniction in Clear Floor Space Uplift in Clear Ftoor .Spa<« Composite Scores or Costs Composite Fiating Categoiy Gross Costs (some double counting occurs) Net CosIs (with Maximum for ramp replacement Location Map Facilitv ID gage Tier Existina Condition Notes Item Cost: $50 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $200 $200 $200 $200 $600 $600 $100 $1,133 $2S0 291 RMP291 AE04 East traffic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space cross slopes 7.9% 01 025 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 HD SGNL RMP 3618 RMP3618 AE03 North traftic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space of north device slopes 2.4% 01 0.1 0.1 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PDSGNL RMP 3618 RMP3618 AE03 West traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 FU SGNL KMP 3619 RMP3619 AE03 1 raffle- control device does not have required color coding; accessible route does not lead all the way up to the device Coordinate with level landing requirements 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $750 $760 PD SGNL RMP 3619 RMP3619 AE03 1 raffle- control device does not have required color coding; accessible route does not lead all the way up to the device Coordinate with level landing requirements 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $750 $760 PL) SGNL KMP 3620 RMP3620 AE03 South traffic- control device does not tiave required color coding; required clear floor space of south device slopes 3.4% 01 0.1 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD^SGNL RMP~ 3620 RMP3620 AE03 East traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 3621 RMP3621 AE03 1 raftic- control device does not have required color coding, required clear floor space cross slopes 4.7% 01 01 01 0.3 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 734 RMP734 AH08 Traffic- confrol device does not have required color coding 0.1 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 734 RMP734 AH08 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PDSGNL RMP 403 RMP403 AG04 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 PD SGNL RMP 437 RMP437 AI06 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding. Required clear fioor space slopes up to 9.2%. 01 0.25 01 0.46 Minor $850 $860 PD SGNL RMP 735 RMP735 AH08 Traffic- control device does not have required color coding 01 01 0.2 Minor $650 $660 # of signals with this problem 94 26 S 0 0 1 2 17 » 0 94 2 0 1 $98,750 $75,650 Count % of Total Conforming 0 0,00% Minor 87 92.55% Moderate 7 7.45% Major 0 0.00% Total 94 100.00% 5o FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Construction Category: Removal Patchin; Grinding Rebuild Install Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Compliance Item Vegetative Obstructions Found in ttie ROW (Property Owner Responsibility) Vertical Clearance Obstnjctions Obstructions Found in the ROW (Oty Responsibility) Obstructions Found in ttie ROW (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Utility Box Cover Uplift (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Horizontal Gaps (>1", <12' or Pavement Divots Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concfete) Cross Slope > 2% along walkways Cross Slope > 5% at driveways NaiTOW Width Detectable Warning/Truncated Domes at g Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in iWalkwav Exists Btock has missing walkways (Altemative Design Street) Block has missing walkways Lack of Curb Edge Definitkin Composite Score C^posite Rating Category Composite Costs Location Tier Mao Pac Notes Individual Item Cost: $75 $200 $500 ^ $0 $0 $100 $250 $750 $1,500 $1,000 Detectable Warning/Truncated Domes at g Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in iWalkwav Exists $0 $6,000 $500 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. and State St. AB01. AB02, AC02 No improved v^lking facilities within pub^c right of way abng east side of street Bike lane only provided 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 West side of Carlsbad Blvd. and Stale St AB01, Ae02, AC02 No improved vralking facilites within pubic right of way along west side of street Bike lane only provided 0.1 0.1 lyiinor $0 West side of State St. AC02 Cross stope across driveway exceeds 2,0% and stopes exceed 5.0% at Viltege Gateway building 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 West side of State St. AC02 Asphalt sidewalk surface is not smooth, cross sto|)e exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 West side of state St. AC02 SDG&E cover creates vertical offsets greater than 1/4" high 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 $1,600 North side of Laguna Or. between Buena Vista Qrcle and State St. AD03 Cross slope across driveways exceeds 2.0% and slopes exceed 5.0% Ho detectable warnings provided at eitier side of driveway 0.5 0.5 .lyiojMraie $0 $1,600 North side of Laguna Dr. between Buena Vista Qrcle and State St. AD03 1/2* verttoal offset in sidewak 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 South side of Laguna Dr. between Stale St. and Buena Vista Oncle AD03 Bushes reduce sideviralk clear width to less than 4' wide in front of 539 - 597 Laguna Dr. Califomia Building Code requires 48' wide, Americans with Disabiites Act Accessibility Guidelines requires 38' wide. 0.1 0.1 Minor $76 East side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 No pedestrian access provided between Laguna Dr and 2558 Roosevelt 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 $1,600 East side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Cross stope across driveways exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% Cross stope and stopes at 2572 Roosevelt drivevray are compliant 0.5 0.5 Moderate $0 $1,600 East side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 SOG&E cover creates vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.25 0.25 Minor $0 East side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Water meter covercreates vertical offsets greater than 1'higli (x3) 0.25 0.25 Minor $260 East side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Trees overhang sidewalk at tess than SO' above finished grade 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 East side of RooseveH between Beech and Laguna AD03-AD04 Gaps in directkxi of tievel are greater than 1/2' wide 0.1 0.1 Minor $100 West side of Roosevelt between Beecti and Laguna AD03- AD04 Water meter cover creates vertical offsets greater than 1' high 0.25 0.25 Minor $260 West side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Palm trees overhang walkway at less than 80' above finished grade 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 West side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Storm drain cover causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high and gaps in path of travel greater than 1/2' wide 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AO04 Gaps in directton of travel are greater than 1/2' wide 0.1 0.1 Minor $100 West side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AO04 SDG&E pole between 2571 and 2621 Roosevelt reduces sidewalk to 211/2' wde California Building Code requires 48' wide, Americans with Disabiites Act Accessibility Guidelines requires 36' wide. 0.5 0.5 Moderate $0 West side of Roosevelt between Beech and Laguna AD03- AD04 Damaged sidewalk causes gaps greater than tIT wide in direction of travel 0.5 0.5 Moderate $100 Construction Category: Retnoval Patchinc Grinding Rebuild Install Composite all Itsms FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Compliance Item Vegetative Obstructions Found in the ROW (Property Owner Responsibility) Vertical Clearance Obstnjctions Obstructions Found in the ROW (City Responsibility) Obstructions Found in the ROW (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Utility Box Cover Uplift (Franchise UUIity Responsibility) Horizontal Gaps (>1', <12" or Pavement Divots Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Conaete) Cross Stope > 2% along walkways Cross Skjpe > 5% at driveways Narrow Width Detectable Warning/Truncated Domes at Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in Walkway Exists Block has missing walkways (Altemative Design Street) Btock has missing walkways Lack of Curb Edge Definition Composite Score Composite Rating Categoiy Composite Costs Location Tier Mao Pae Ifot^s Individual Item Cost; $76 $200 $600 $0 $0 $100 $250 $750 $1,500 $1,000 $300 $0 $5,000 $500 Accessible route between RMP 672 and RMP 671 AD02 storm drain creates cross sto|5es ranging from 12,1%-23.3% 0.25 0.25 Minor $760 Accessible route between RMP 672 and RMP 671 casraccBssiuieTOaie^eciaas^tansoeuTjivu between RMP 3624 and median east curb ramp on Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 storm drain openings create gaps 5 1/2' wide in direction of travel and 11/2' wide perpendicular to direction of travel 0.5 0.5 Moderate $100 Accessible route between RMP 672 and RMP 671 casraccBssiuieTOaie^eciaas^tansoeuTjivu between RMP 3624 and median east curb ramp on Carlsbad Blvd. ADC2 Accessible route stopes 7.4% - 8.3% along Carlsbad Blvd. at crosswalk 0.5 0.5 Moderate $100 between RMP 3624 and median east curb ramp on Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Damaged asptialt at cmsswak causes 3' deep gaps 0.5 0.5 Moderate $100 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Trees overhang walkway at less than SO* above fnistied ^de 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Numerous vertical offsets in concrete are greater ttian 1/4' tiigh 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 No edge protecton provided at 8' drop-off at chain ink fence 0.25 0.25 Minor $600 East side of Carisbad Blvd. AD02 Sidevralk is 47 1/4' wide at bridge to train tracks Califomia Building Code requires 48' wide, Americans wth Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines requires 36' wide. 0.1 0.1 Minor $1,000 East skle of Carisbad Blvd AD02 Water meter cover creates vertical offsets greater than 1/4" hi^ 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Carisbad Blvd. AD02 Cross slope across driveway exceeds 2.0% and slopes exceed 5.0% at 2550 Carlsbad Blvd. 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Cross slope exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Cross stope across driveway exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% at private property south of 2584 Carlsbad Blvd 0.25 0.5 0.75 Moderate $2,260 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Trees overhang walkway at tess than 80' above f nished grade 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 East side of Carisbad Blvd. between RMP 670 and 671 AD02 Electrical cover and water meter cover create vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 East side of Carlsbad Blvd. between RMP 670 and 671 AD02 Cross slope exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 East side of Ocean St. AO02 Cross slope across Meways exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 Nortti side of Mountain View Dr. AD02 No improved wanting facilities within pubic right of way atong north side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 Norih side of Pacife Ave. AD02 No i mproved walking facilities within pubic right of way along north side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 Soutfi side ot lAxintain View Dr. AD02 No improved vralking facilities within pubfc right of way along south side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 South side of Pacific Ave. AD02 No i mproved walking facilrties within pub fc right of way along south side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 West accessible route across Carlsbad Blvd. between RMP 3627 and median west curb ramp on Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Accessible route stopes 10.3% -12.8% along Carlsbad Blvd. at crosswalk 0 Conforming $0 1^ FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Construction Category: Remtwai Patcliins Grinding Rebuild Install Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Compliance Item Vegetative Obstructions Found in the ROW (Property Owner Responsibility) Vertical Clearance Obstnjctions Obstnjctions Found in the ROW (City Responsibility) Obstructions Found in the ROW (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Utility Box Cover Uplift (Franchise Utility Responsibility) •• Horizontal Gaps (>r, <12' or Pavement § Divots 1 o O o Q. z> •a. '_j $250 Cross Stope > 2% atong walkways Cross Stope > 5% at driveways Narrow Width ^ Detectable Waming/Truncated Domes at S Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in ° Walkway Exists „ Btock has missing walkways (Altemative ° Design Street) "cB s cn 1 E $6,000 Lack of Cutb Edge Definition i Composite Score Composite Rating Category Composite Ctosts Location Tier Mao Pac Notes Individual Item Cost: $76 $200 $600 $0 $0 •• Horizontal Gaps (>r, <12' or Pavement § Divots 1 o O o Q. z> •a. '_j $250 $750 $1,500 $1,000 ^ Detectable Waming/Truncated Domes at S Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in ° Walkway Exists „ Btock has missing walkways (Altemative ° Design Street) "cB s cn 1 E $6,000 $500 West side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Vertical offset in sidewalk is 1' high 0.25 0.25 Minor $260 UVest side of Carlsbad Blvd. AD02 Tree grate covers create vertcal offsets up to 2* high 4' of sidewat< provided aiound tree grates; NO ISSUE 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Cartebad Blvd. AD02 Trees ovettiang walkway at tess than 80' above finished grade 01 0.1 Minor $200 West side of Cartebad BKid AD02 Cioss slope exceeds 2,0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 West side of Cartebad Blvd. 1 AD02 Signal pole pad creates vertical offsete up to 21/4" high 4' of sidawal< provided around signal pole pad 0.25 0.25 Minor $260 East side of Ocean St, AD01 Cross sbpe across driveways exceeds 2,0% and skipes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 $0 North side of Pacifk; Ave. between Garfeld and Ocean AD01 No improved walking facilities within public right of way along north side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $1,600 $0 Soutti side of Pacifk; Ave. between Garfield and Ocean AD01 No improved walking facilities within pubfc right of way along south side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 West side of Ocean St AD01 No improved walking facilities within pubfc of way akxig west side of street Pedestrian access begins at pubic beach access point 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 West side of Ocean St AD01 Cross slope across driveways exceeds 2,0% and sbpes exceed 5,0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $1,600 East side of Cartebad Blvd. between Beecti and RMP 3264 AD02, AE02, AE03 Cross slope exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 East side of Cartebad Blvd. between Beecti and RMP 3264 AD02, AE02. AE03 Tree grates cause vertfcal offsets greater than 1/4" high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Cartebad Blvd. between Beecti and RMP 3264 AO 02, AE02. AE03 Cross slope across dnveways exceeds 2.0% and stepes exceed 5.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $1,600 East side of Carlsbad Blvd, between Beech and RMP 3264 AD 02, AE02, AE03 %Joint between curb and sidewalk causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 02S 0.25 Minor $260 East side of Cartebad Blvd. between Beech and RMP 3264 AD 02, AE02, AE03 Meter covers cause verteal offsete greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Cartebad Blvd. between Beech and RMP 3264 AD 02, AE02, AE03 Numerous verlreal offsets are greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Cartebad Blvd between Cypnis and RMP 3267 AD02, AE02, AE03 Trees overtiang wel<way at less than 80" above finished yade 0.1 0.1 Minor $200 West side of Cartebad Blvd. between Cypnjs and RMP 3267 AD 02, AE02, AE03 Numerous vertcal offsets are greater than 1/4" high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 1^ FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Construction Cateaorv: Removal Patching Grinding Rebuild Install Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Compliance Item Vegetative Obstructions Found in the ROW (Property Owner Responsibility) Verbcal Clearance Obstmctions Obstnjctions Found in the ROW (City Responsibility) Obstructions Found in the ROW (Franchise UHIily Responsibaity) Utility Box Cover Uplift (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Horizontal Gaps (>1', <12" qr Pavement Divots Lip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) Cross Slope > 2% atong walkways "g Cross Stope > 5% at driveways s •C3 i <13 z $1,000 jDeteclabte Waming/Truncated Domes at ' g Major Vehtoular Xing Where Break in 'Walkwav Exists „ Block has missing walkways (Altemative ° Design Street) Block has missing walkways Lack of Curb Edge Definition Composite Score Composite Rating Category Composite i3osts Loeation Tier Mao Pac Notes Individual Hem Cost: $75 $200 $600 $0 $0 $100 $250 $760 "g Cross Stope > 5% at driveways s •C3 i <13 z $1,000 jDeteclabte Waming/Truncated Domes at ' g Major Vehtoular Xing Where Break in 'Walkwav Exists „ Block has missing walkways (Altemative ° Design Street) $5,000 $500 Composite i3osts West side of Carlsbad Blvd. between Cypnjs and RMP 3267 AD02. AE02, AE03 Tree grates cause vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Carlsbad Blvd, between Cypnis and RMP 3267 ADC2, AEC2, AE03 Cress slope exceeds 2,0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 $0 $0 Cypnis Ave, Alley AE02 No pedestrian access provided along either side of street 01 0.1 Minor $760 $0 $0 East side of Garfiekl between Beech and Cypress AE02 No pedestrian access provided north of 2650 GarfieW 01 0.1 Minor $760 $0 $0 East side of Gaifield between Beech and Cypress AE02 Cross stope across driveways exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 East side of Gatfiekf between Beech and Cypress AE02 Numerous vertical offsets are greater than 1/4" high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Garfiekl between Beech and Cypress AE02 Joint between curb and sidewalk causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Garfiekl between Beech and Cypress AE02 Cross slope exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 East side of Ocean between Christiansen and Beech AE02 No pedestrian access provided south of 2746 Ocean Ave. 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 East side of Ocean between Christiansen end Beech AE02 Cross slope across driveways exceeds 2.0% and sbpes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 East side of Ocean between Christiansen and Beech AE02 Meter cover causes verteal offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 East side of Ocean between Cyprus and Pacific AE02 No pedestrian access provided aking east side of street Segments of sidewalk provided connecting stairwells on school campus 01 0.1 Minor $0 North side of Christiansen between Garfield and Ocean AE02 No pedestrian access provided atong north side of street NO ISSUE 0 Conforming $0 North side of Cypnis between Carlsbad Blvd. and Garfiekj AED2 No pedestrian access provided atong north side of street 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 North side of Cyprus between Garfield and Ocean AE02 No pedestrian access provided along north side of street 01 0.1 Minor $0 South side of Cypais between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02 No pedestrian access provided west of the Ebb Tide Inn 01 0.1 0.5 Minor $0 South side of Cypnis between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02 Cross slope acioss driveways exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.1 0.5 Moderate $1,600 South side of Cypnis between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02 Cross sbpe exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 South side of Cypnis between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02 Stop sign reduces required ctear width of sidewalk to 351/4' wide 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,000 South side of Cypnis between Ocean and Garfield AE02 No pedestrian access provided atong south side of street 01 0.1 Minor $0 West side of Garfeki between Cypress and Beech AE02 Trees overhang wakway at tess than 80" above finished grade 01 0.1 Minor $200 Construction Category: Removal Patdiins Grinding Rebuild Install Composite all Items FOCUS AREA 'A' PRIORITY LEVEL 1 ROW OBSTRUCTIONS Compliance Item Vegetative Obstmctions Found in the ROW (Property Owner Responsibility) Vertical Clearance Obstmctions Obstnjctions Found in the ROW (City Re^nsibility) iObstoictions Found in the ROW (Franchise Utility Responsibility) lUtility Box Cover Uplift (Franchise Utility Responsibility) Horizontal Gaps (>1', <12' or Pavement Divots iLip/Uplifts (A/C or Concrete) Cross Stope > 2% along walkways Cross Stope > 5% at driveways Narrow Width Detectabte Waming/Truncated Domes at Major Vehicular Xing Where Break in iWalkway Exists ; Block has missing wdkways (Altemative Design Street) Block has missing walkways Lack of Curb Edge (Definition Composite Score Composite Rating Categoiy Composite Costs Location Tier Mao Pac Notes individual Item Cost: $75 $200 $600 $0 $0 $100 $250 $760 $1,500 $1,000 $300 $0 $5,000 $500 West side of GarfieW between Cypress and Beech AE02 Numerous vertical offsets are greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Garfieto betvwen Cypress and Beech AE02 No pedestrian access provided norih of 2685 Garfiekl 1 1 Moderate $6,000 West side of Ocean tietween Pacific and Beecti AE02 No pedestrian access provided atong wast side of stieet 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 East side of Gaifiekj tietween Christiansen and Beech AE02, AE03 No pedestrian access provkled atong east side of stieet 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 North side of Beech tietween Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02, AE03 Traffic signal covercauses vertfcal offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 North side of Beech between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02, AE03 Cross slope exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 North side of Beech between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd AE02, AE03 Numerous vertical offsets are greater than 1/4'high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 ftorth side of Beech between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd. AE02. AE03 Water meter covers cause vertbal offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 South side of Beech betvraen Carlsbad Blvd. And Garfiekt AE02, AE03 Cross sbpe exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 South side of Beech between Carlsbad Blvd. And Garfeld AE02, AE03 Cross sbpe across driveways exceeds 2.0% and slopes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 ^Motlwete $1,600 South side of Beech between Carlsbad Blvd. And Gerfeto AE02, AE03 Numerous vertfcal offsets are greater than 1/4' high 0.1 6.1 Minor $260 South side of Beech between Cerlsbad Blvd. And Garfiekl AE02. AE03 Damaged concrete causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' Ngh and gaps greater than 1/2' wide in the direction of travel 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 South side of Beech between Carlsbad Blvd. And Garfieto AE02, AE03 SDG&E cover causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $0 South side of Beech between Carlsbad Blvd. And GartieW AE02, AE03 Traffic signal covws cause verfcal offsets greater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 South side of Beech between Carlsbad Blvd. And Garfield AE02, AE03 Former pote holes cause vertfcal ottsets greater than 1/4' deep and greater than 1/2' viide 0.1 0.1 Minor $100 West side of Carlsbad Blvd. between Cypms and Beech AE02, AE03 Damaged concrete at electrical meter cover causes vertfcal offsets greater than 1/2' high and gaps greater than 1/2' wide in the drectfcn of travel 0.25 0.25 Minor $0 West side of Carisbad Blvd. between Cyprus and Beech AE02, AE03 Numerous vertfcal offsets are lyeater than 1/4' high 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Carisbad Blvd. between Cypnis end Beech AED2. AE03 Cross sbpe actoss driveways exceeds 2.0% and stopes exceed 5.0% 0.5 0.5 Moderate $1,600 West side of Carlsbad Blvd. between Cypnis and Beech AE02. AE03 Damaged concrete causes vertical offsets greater than 1/4' high and gaps greater than 1/2' wide in the direction of travel 0.1 0.1 Minor $260 West side of Cartsbad Blvd. between Cypnis and Beech AE02. AE03 Cross sbpe exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 Minor $760 West side of GarfieM between Beech and Christiansen AE02, AE03 Cross sbpe exceeds 2.0% 0.1 0.1 M^or $760