Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-01-21; City Council; 21483; Annual Report Investment Portfolio June 30, 2013
CITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 1 AB# MTG. DEPT. 21,483 1/21/14 Treasury ANNUAL REPORT OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 DEPT.DIRECTOR CITY ATTY. CITY MGR. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept and file report. ITEM EXPLANATION: City Policy requires the City Treasurer to render an annual report ofthe city's investment portfolio. This report is forthe fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 (FY12-13). Assets in the investment portfolio totaled $638.5 million at the end of the fiscal year. The equity portion of the various funds at the amortized value of the total portfolio is summarized below: Fund Equity in Pooled Investments Cash Balance by Fund: General 93,673,257 Special Revenue 42,552,041 Capital Projects 291,412,906 Enterprise 155,035,841 Internal Service 35,172,248 Agency & Trust Funds 18,108,384 Reconciling Adjustments 2,576.749 Total Treasurer's Investment Portfolio at Amortized Cost 638,531,426 Fund equity balances are restricted for various purposes as listed above. This represents an increase of $13.2 million from the previous fiscal year. Cash and investments comprise an estimated 34 percent ofthe total assets reported by the city and its agencies. For the last month of the fiscal year, the portfolio had a return of 1.00 percent. For the entire fiscal year, however, the portfolio averaged 1.14 percent. Cash interest income totaled $9.57 million in FYI 2-13 of which approximately $0.77 million went to the General fund. For the next fiscal year (FYI 3-14), it is expected that the average return for the portfolio will approximate 1.04 percent. EXHIBITS: City Treasurer's Annual Report of Investment Portfolio for the fiscal year ended June 30. 2013. 1. FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED • WITHDRAWN • AMENDED • CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN RETURNED TO STAFF OTHER-SEE MINUTES • • • DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Nancy Sullivan (760) 602-2473 Nancv.Sullivan@carlsbadca.gov City Treasurer's Annual Report of Investments Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/13 (FY 12-13) ^%CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD City Treasurer's Annual Report of Investments For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal 1 Market Review FY 12-13 2 Portfolio Analysis 3 Preview FY 13-14 7 Appendices: A: Risk Management and Disclosure 10 B: Portfolio Activity for Year Ended June 30, 2013 13 1635 FaradayAvenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Website: www, carlsbadca. sov Prepared by the Treasury Department <l»|> CITY OF V CARLSBAD Office of the Treasurer www.carlsbadca.gov January 2014 Honorable Mayor, City Council, Residents of the City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 City Treasurer Letter of Transmittal 2012-2013 Annual Report of Investments I am pleased to present the Annual Report of Investments for the City of Carlsbad for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 (FY 12-13). The report is intended to provide reliable information as a basis for reviewing portfolio performance and making management decisions. It also provides an archival reference. The City Treasurer is charged with the design of an effective cash management and investment program for the City of Carlsbad and all of its agencies. Among other activities, this includes arranging for banking services; forecasting all cash receipts and expenditures; investing all inactive cash; managing investment risk exposures; and reporting all investment activities. This report summarizes and analyzes the activities of the investment portfolio for the fiscal year. Total portfolio assets, investment portfolio relative to total city assets, source of portfolio assets, asset allocations, yield achieved, unrealized gains and losses, and cash revenues are presented. To give perspectives to these measurements, a summary of movements in global and U.S. economic, as well as market interest rates are provided for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Comparisons are also made with the preceding fiscal years. Finally, a statement is offered regarding the prospects for the fiscal year 2013- 2014. Sincerely, Craig Lindholm City Treasurer 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-2473 F 760-602-8556 © CITY TREASURER ANNUAL REPORT OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 FY12-13 MARKET REVIEW Federal Funds Target Rate FY 12-13 3.00% 2.75% 2.50% - 2.25% 2.00% 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 0.75% 0.50% 0.25% -\ 0.00% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% Federal funds rate is a key money market rate that correlates with rates of other short term credit arrangements. It is the interest rate that banks charge each other for ovemight loans. In fiscal year 12-13, the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds rate at 0.25 percent. Changes in short-term market interest rates are usually affected by the actions of the Federal Reserve. Six-month and two year market rates remained relatively flat over the course of the fiscal year. The five year market rate increased to 1.40 percent. SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATES I Percent U.S. Treasury Instruments Fiscal Year 2012 - 2013 0.00 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN -•-Five Year —«i- Two Year -*-6 Month JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 0.58 0.59 0.63 0.72 0.62 0.72 0.88 0.76 0.77 0.68 1.02 1.40 .21 .22 .23 .28 .25 .25 .26 .24 .24 .21 .30 .36 .13 .13 .09 .11 .13 .11 .11 .12 .10 .08 .06 .09 YIELD CURVE 7/01/12,12/30/12, 6/30/13 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Market Rates The yield curve is a graphic presentation of the difference between short-term and longer-term interest rates of U.S. Treasury instruments on a given day. Financial analysts use it to assess the market's expectation of recession or inflation. The normal shape of the yield curve has a moderately upward slope, with short-term rates lower than longer- term rates. If the upward slope steepens, the financial markets believe inflation may occur. An inverted yield curve is when short- term market rates are greater than longer-term market rates. An inverted curve indicates that the financial markets expect a slower economy, if not a recession. At fiscal year end the yield curve showed a relatively moderate upward slope. 3 Mth -^07/01/2012 12/31/2012 —06/30/2013 10 Yr 0.582 0.724 1.395 1.469 1.758 2.487 PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS $650.0 $600.0 $550.0 $500.0 $450.0 $400.0 $350.0 $300.0 $250.0 $200.0 $150.0 $100.0 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO Dollar Amount of Assets (Fiscal Year End) $628.6 $641.9 FY06-07 FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11.12 FY12-13 Total assets in the investment portfolio, based on cost, stood at $641.9 million at the end of the fiscal year; a $13.3 million increase. This increase includes interest eamed, loan proceeds, and revenues in excess of expenses. CASH & INVESTMENTS RELATIVE TO TOTAL ASSETS OF CITY AND ITS AGENCIES* $2,400 $2,200 $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 $ Millions $1.712 $1.755 $1.777 $1.806 $1 ft14 $1.821 $573 $579 $599 $615 111 • • • ll FY08-09 FY09-10 FYlO-11 FYI 1-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 1 Cash/Investments • Total Assets Estimate •Source: Comprehensive Aimual Financial Report. The city publishes a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) at the end of each fiscal year. Among other information, the CAFR presents a balance sheet showing the total assets owned by the city and all its agencies. At the end of FY 12-13, cash and investments managed by the City Treasurer represent 34 percent of all assets reported by the city and its agencies. SOURCE OF POOL ASSETS (Dollar Amounts in Millions) 6/30/12 6/30/13 General Special & Other $80.0 $50.0 V Enterprise ^^^^^V $145.0^^___-^ General $94.0 Capital ^ Q 298.0 Agency & Inter Enterprise $155.0 Special & Other $ 43.0 apital $292 Total Investments - $625 IMillion Total Investments - $638 Million The portfolio is an intemal investment pool that uses the inactive cash from the various funds of all city agencies, including the city and the water district. The top three sources of portfolio assets calculated at amortized costs are the Capital Projects ftind 46 percent, the Enterprise fiind 24 percent, and the General fiind 15 percent. Together, these tliree fiinds account for 85 percent of total portfolio assets. 1 Investments are made in financial instmments authorized by the city's Investment Policy and the Califomia State Govemment Code. With the exception of bank deposits and deposits in the Califomia State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), all investments are in fixed-income instmments with known maturity dates. ASSET ALLOCATION (Dollar Amounts in Millions) 6/30/12 6/30/13 LAIF/CASH $140.1 CD $8.7 US TREASURY $2.1 ORPORATE 163.6 LAIF/CASH $156.1 FEDERAL AGENCY $314.1 CORPORATE $169.6 US TREASURYl On June 30, 2013, 46 percent of portfolio assets were invested in federal agencies, 26.5 percent in corporate notes, 0.3 percent in US Treasuries, 2.7 percent Certificates of Deposit and 24.5 percent in LAIF and cash. The allocation of assets to federal agencies and treasuries decreased while the allocation to CD's, LAIF and cash and corporate notes increased from the previous year. Within the asset category of federal treasuries and agencies, investments in Treasuries, Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation*, the Federal National Mortgage Association*, and the Federal Farm Credit Bank, constituted 0.3, 14, 7, 14, and 2 percent of the total portfolio, respectively. Federal agencies are creations of the U. S. Congress and include agencies and government-sponsored enterprises *(in conservatorship by Federal Housing Financing Agency). FEDERAL AGENCY $296.8 Total $628,587,917 Total $641,918,632 PORTFOLIO YIELDS With 6 Month T-Bill Yields FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FYI 0-11 FY11-12 FYI 2-13 -Portfolio r-T-Bill FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FYlO-11 4.45 3.72 2.52 2.06 2.86 .75 .20 .16 FYll-12 FY12-13 1.65 1.14 .09 .11 The average retum of the portfolio decreased to 1.14 percent from 1.656 percent the year before. The portfolio yield is heavily influenced by changes in short-term market interest rates since 21 percent of total investments were required to mature within one year. The average interest rate for six-month U.S. Treasury Bills increased slightly to 0.11 percent from 0.09 percent the previous year. This graph shows the percent change in value of the portfolio over the last several years. Investments gain and lose value subsequent to purchase because of changes in market interest rates. When market interest rates decrease, investments made earlier at higher rates will gain value. The reverse is tme when market interest rates increase. Accountants refer to these changes in value as unrealized gains and unrealized losses; commonly referred to as paper gains and paper losses. The gain/loss is not recognized until the investment is sold. Changes in value caused by changes in market interest rates are normal and are expected. 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% -0.50% -1.00% -1.50% -2.00% -2.50% Historical Unrealized Gains/Losses as Percent of Amortized Cost July 2005 - June 2013 With a buy and hold policy, an objective of the city's Investment Policy is to achieve an average market rate of retum over the economic cycle. The success in achieving this objective can be approximated with having unrealized gains and losses that are relatively equal over time. Tracking and measuring unrealized gains and losses could also reveal any presence of high-risk investments in the portfolio. The changes in asset values shown in the graph indicate that portfolio investments are within the acceptable interest rate risk identified in the city's Investment Policy. The total portfolio had a slight unrealized loss of 0.36 percent on June 30, 2013. If interest rates remain stable, unrealized gains and losses will remain near the 0.00 percent. However, a downward trend will continue if rates increase or when current investments with higher interest rates are called and reinvested at today's significantly lower market rates. 6 Cash income from portfolio investments represents an annuity stream of revenues from the Treasury. This annuity stream totaled $9.57 million, a decrease of $2.8 million from the previous fiscal year. Of the total cash interest revenues eamed by the portfolio, approximately $0.77 million was credited to the General fund. Cash income is a fiinction of assets in the portfolio, the market interest rates at the time of the investments, and the interest payment schedules of the issues. ANNUITY STREAM FROM TREASURY (Cash Interest Revenue) I Millions For Fiscal Years Indicated FY06-07 FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FYlO-11 FYll-12 FY12-13 FY 13-14 PREVIEW National and intemational economic forces and events have a direct influence on the United States equity and fixed income markets. Global Economy The global economy continues to be over-indebted. Stubbomly high unemployment combined with the austerity measures forced upon a number of European countries creates additional headwinds for the Eurozone. Elected officials stmggle to support their Euro currency but are limited in certain actions they may take as their primary mandate is controlling inflation through monetary policy. China's extended period of double digit gross domestic product (GDP) expansion is slowing down to what appears to be a mid to high single digit GDP growth rate. A growth rate still enviable by many measures but China stmggles to maintain a command and control economy overlaid with a modified form of capitalism. Japan is slowly recovering from the effects of the March 2012 tsunami. Prime Minister Abe launched a Japanese Quantitative Easing program and stepped up govemment expenditures. Japan also faces a serious demographic challenge with low birth rates and a rapidly aging population. In summary, global economic conditions are extremely fragile. The challenge facing foreign countries is the need to decrease debt while simultaneously stimulating growth. Giving up growth in the short-term for debt reduction and a better outlook for the future is critical. U.S. Economy Quantitative Easing initiated in 2008 and continues today. The primary effect of this extraordinary commitment to both issue and repurchase $85 billion monthly of these debt instmments has been to suppress interest rates to historical low levels. The 10 year Treasury Note, spiked from 1.62 percent to 2.80 percent in the month of May at the mere suggestion of tapering back on this program by Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bemanke. The Federal Reserve's determination, via Quantitative Easing (QE 3) creates an interesting paradox. Asset prices in the form of equities and fixed income have been driven up as result of this policy. So far the economic response to this strategy has been modest job growth and subpar GDP growth. Inflation has not begun to appear at this time with the headwinds of the broader economy and elevated unemployment. One extraordinary bright spot within the overall US economy is that of energy discovery and production. With large discoveries confirmed in a number of locations within the US, the US has reduced its dependency on imported oil by more than 20 percent over the past five years. New technologies and methodologies have recovered far more oil from formations previously thought to have been exhausted. New housing starts have begun to show up in the numbers after a five-year period of limping along. The environment is set for a housing recovery with favorable interest rates however, unemployed and under-employed households do not purchase homes. California Economy The State of Califomia is slowly improving from an economic perspective. Unemployment remains higher than previous levels as employers cautiously assess new regulations and their potential impact to their business. Recently enacted tax increases are strengthening current year budget results, however, defined benefit retirement plan unfiinded liabilities continue to be of concem. Year-over-year revenue results in the area of new auto sales, single-family and multifamily residential constmction are promising. The consumer price index for the prior trailing 12 month period is reported to be +1.0 percent. City of Carlsbad Carlsbad continues to be well positioned within the context of what has been described as one of the weakest recoveries on record. Our city enjoys a diversified revenue stream from its attractive location as a tourist destination and the resulting transient occupancy tax (TOT). New hotel properties and additional commitments to new constmction are in place. New automobile sales and expanded retail sales opportunities are very positive. Several projects will be going into their constmction phase and, when completed, will significantly increase sales tax revenues to our city. The long-awaited Poseidon desalinization plant is under constmction. This new facility will have the capacity to generate up to 50,000,000 gallons per day of freshwater from seawater. This production will be added into the regional water supply improving our access to this important resource. 8 At the end of FY 12-13, LAIF investments had a yield of 0.25 percent, and all other investments had a yield of 1.00 percent. Revenues on all investments will decrease due to the low interest rate environment. On June 30, 2013 the yield of the total portfolio averaged 1.14 percent. Total assets in the investment portfoHo stood at $642 million at the end of FY 12-13. 1-^ APPENDICES TO ANNUAL REPORT OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO APPENDIX A: RISK MANAGEMENT AND DISCLOSURE All investments are exposed to risk of some type. The objective of risk management is to identify the risks involved and establish acceptable levels of risks that are consistent with the city's investment objectives. Risk management includes managing, measuring, monitoring, and reporting the various risks to which portfolio investments are exposed. Portfolio investments are exposed to the following types of risks: A. Credit risk a. Custodial credit risk a) Investments b) Deposits b. Default credit risk c. Concentration credit risk B. Interest rate risk C. Event Risk As of June 30, 2013, the portfolio had the following investments and cash in its intemal investment pool. Market Value Investment Maturities Market Value Gain (Loss) U. S. agencies July 2013-June 2018 $295,128,000 $ 2,278,000 Corporate Notes Aug 2013-May 2018 168,248,000 565,000 Certif of Deposit Aug 2013-May 2018 17,281,000 15,000 LAIF 149,611,000 182,000 Sweep accounts 6,074,000 — Cash accounts 648,000 — Total $636,990,000 $3,040,000 10 Disclosures Custodial Credit Risk (Investments). The city uses a third party custody and safekeeping service for its investment securities. The Union Bank of Califomia (UBC) is under contract to provide these custodial services. Custodial credit risk is the risk that the city will not be able to recover the value of its investments in the event of a UBC failure. All city investments held in custody and safekeeping by UBC are held in the name of the city and are segregated from securities owned by the bank. This is the lowest level of custodial credit risk exposure. Custodial Credit Risk (Deposits). The city maintains cash accounts at Wells Fargo Bank (WFB) and UBC. At the conclusion of each business day, balances in these accounts are "swept" into ovemight investments. These ovemight investments are pooled and collateralized with either U.S. govemment securities or U.S. agency securities. The Califomia Code authorizes this type of investment. A small amount of cash is not swept from the WFB checking accounts to cover checks that may be presented for payment. Amounts up to $250,000 are FDIC insured. Default Credit Risk. Default credit risk is the risk that the issuer of the security does not pay either the interest or the principal when due. The debts of most U.S. agencies are not backed by the full faith and credit of the federal govemment; however, because the agencies are U.S. Government-sponsored, they carry AA credit ratings. The default credit risk of these investments is minimal. Unless otherwise exempted, Califomia state code limits investments to the top three credit ratings (AAA, AA, and A). It is the city's policy, however, to limit investments to the top two credit ratings (AAA and AA). As of June 30, 2013, eleven investments in corporate notes had a credit rating below the AA limit. These investments were made when the credit ratings were either AAA or AA. Califomia state code and the city's Investment Policy allow the City Treasurer to determine the course of action to correct exceptions to the policy. It is the intent of the City Treasurer to hold these investments in the portfolio until maturity unless events indicate a sale should be made. The default credit risk for corporate notes with a credit rating of single A is higher than U.S. Treasuries, federal agencies or LAIF, but is considered by the City Treasurer to be within acceptable limits for purposes of holding to maturity. The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is an investment pool managed by the Califomia State Treasurer. Its investments are short-term and follow the investment requirements of the state. As of June 30, 2013, the average maturity of the LAIF investments was 246 days. The State Treasurer is not required to contract for a credit rating to be assessed for LAIF. Califomia state code section 16429.3 excludes LAIF deposits from being transferred, loaned, impounded or seized by any state agency or official. 11 Concentration Credit Risk. Concentration credit risk is the heightened risk of potential loss when investments are concentrated in one issuer. The Califomia state code does not identify a specific percentage that indicates when concentration risk is present for any one issuer. The state code does, however, require that total investments in medium-term corporate notes of all issuers not exceed 30 percent of the portfolio. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 26 percent of the city's total portfolio investments were in medium-term corporate notes. For concentration of investments in any one issuer, the city's Investment Policy requires that no more than 5 percent of investments in corporate notes be in any one issuer. There is no similar requirement in either the state code or the City's Investment Policy for U.S. agencies. As of June 30, 2013, no investments in any one corporate issuer exceeded 5 percent of total portfolio investments. Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that investments will lose market value because of increases in market interest rates. A rise in market interest rates will cause the market value of investments made earlier at lower interest rates to lose value. The reverse will cause a gain in market value. As of June 30, 2013, the portfolio had a 0.48 percent gain in market value. The city's Investment Policy has adopted two means of limiting its exposure to market value losses caused by rising market interest rates: (1) Limiting total portfolio investments to a maximum modified duration of 2.2, and (2) requiring maturing investments within one year be equal to an amount that is not less than 2/3 of the current operating budget ($199,430,000). As of June 30, 2013, the modified duration of the portfolio was 2.136, within the required maximum of 2.2. Investments maturing within one year were $214,781,000, exceeding the required minimum of $133,000,000. The city's exposure to interest rate risk is within acceptable limits. Event Risk. Event risks include the chance that something unexpected will impede the ability of an issuer of a security to meet its obligations. These types of risks are usually short in duration, but can impair the city's ability to communicate with or use banking services. Such an event could cause a delay in collecting securities which have matured. Security risks are also within this category. 12 APPENDIX B: PORTFOLIO ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 The city's portfolio balance increased 2.1 percent from $628.6 million to $641.9 million in fiscal year 2012-13. The increase of $13.3 million does little to show the volume of cash that flows in and out of the portfolio in the course of one fiscal year. The following table illustrates that the City Treasurer managed over two billion dollars of cash inflows and cash outflows which prompted investment decisions during fiscal year 2012-13. Cash Flows: Bond Maturities $ 92,084,000 Bond Calls 154,405,000 LAIF Withdrawals 244,702,000 Sweep Withdrawals 867,770,000 Interest Income 9,567,000 Bond Purchases 240,818,000 LAIF Investments 255,374,000 Sweep Investments 868,604,000 Cash Investments (net) 140,000 Total $2.733.464.000 13 U.S. MARKET REVIEW Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/13 Federal Funds Target Rate FY 12-13 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.25% 0.00% 0.25% 0.50% 0.75% 1.00% 1.25% 1.50% 1.75% 2.00% 2.25% 2.50% 2.75% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATES U.S. Treasury Instruments Fiscal Year 2012 - 2013 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Five Year Two Year 6 Months Percent JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 0.58 0.59 0.63 0.72 0.62 0.72 0.88 0.76 0.77 0.68 1.02 1.40 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.30 0.36 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.09 YIELD CURVE 7/01/12, 12/31/12, 6/30/13 Market Rates 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 3 Mth 2 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr 07/01/2012 12/31/2012 06/30/2013 3 Mth 2 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr 0.099 0.213 0.582 1.469 0.043 0.249 0.724 1.758 0.033 0.357 1.395 2.487 PORTFOLIO REVIEW INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO Dollar Amount of Assets (Fiscal Year End) $556.5 $562.9 $570.2 $574.6 $601.4 $628.6 $641.9 $100.0 $150.0 $200.0 $250.0 $300.0 $350.0 $400.0 $450.0 $500.0 $550.0 $600.0 $650.0 $700.0 FY06-07 FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 Millions CASH & INVESTMENTS RELATIVE TO TOTAL ASSETS OF CITY AND ITS AGENCIES* $573 $579 $599 $615 $622 $620 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000 $2,200 $2,400 FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 Cash/Investments Total Assets $1,806 Estimate $1,814 *Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. $1,712 $1,755 $ Millions $1,821 $1,777 SOURCE OF POOL ASSETS (Dollar Amounts in Millions) $80.0 $52.0 $ 298 $50.0 6/30/12 General Special & Other Capital Projects Enterprise Agency/Internal Total Investments - $625 Million $94 $ 43.0 $292 $155 $ 54.0 6/30/13 Total Investments - $638 Million $132 General Special & Other Capital Enterprise Agency & Internal General Special & Other Capital Enterprise Agency & Internal ANNUITY STREAM FROM TREASURY (Cash Interest Revenue) For Fiscal Years Indicated $21.8 $26.0 $23.8 $18.3 $14.6 $12.4 $9.6 $- $3.0 $6.0 $9.0 $12.0 $15.0 $18.0 $21.0 $24.0 $27.0 FY06-07 FY07-08 FY08-09 FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 Millions FY 13-14 PREDICTIONS •Short-term interest rates will increase slightly •Yield curve will steepen •Average yield of portfolio for FY will remain in 1.00% to 1.08% range To Access Monthly and Annual Investment Reports •Go to: www.carlsbadca.gov • Click on: Government • Click On: City Treasurer Questions Craig Lindholm City Treasurer